WEBVTT - Tesla Stems the Bleeding, SpaceX Set to Destroy

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jlon Muski is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled by one man.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's a legitimate super genius. I mean legitimate.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He says he's always voted for Democrats, but this year

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it will be different.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 4>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>on him. Alon Musk is a scam artist and he's

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>done nothing.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 5>Anything he does, he's fascinating people. Welcome to the elan Ink,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's July second. I'm

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 5>your host, David Papadopolis. Today is a big day for Tesla.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 5>The company reported its quarterly sales numbers. Than they are

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 5>not too bad. We'll dig into Tesla's potentially changing fortunes

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 5>after a terrible start of the year. First, though, we'll

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 5>do a lightning round of odds and ends, starting with

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 5>some low Earth orbit news, where SpaceX has scored a

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 5>NASA contract to blast a space station into the ocean,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 5>just as the company's valuation soared above two hundred billion dollars.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 5>And in Washington, the Supreme court rendered some opinions that

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 5>could have an impact on X in a very consequential

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 5>election year. And to wrap up, we'll examine somewhat seriously

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Elon's bid to turn X into Pinterest. So for our roundup,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 5>we have Ace Elon Musk, reporter Dana Hull, Allow Dana Hey,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 5>and Max Chapkin, BusinessWeek senior writer in Max. Good Day, David, Max, Now,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 5>I noticed that last week while you're on there were

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 5>an awful lot of F bombs. I want you to

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.559
<v Speaker 5>keep it clean. This week I got some listener mail.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Did you really No?

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So Dan, we're going to start with you in

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 5>our news roundup. SpaceX gets to create something called the

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Space Station deorbit Vehicle. What the heck is that?

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So the International Space Station, which has been like

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 4>this home away from home for astronauts, is going to

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>be retired. It is expected to be retired in twenty

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 4>thirty and NASA needs help getting this station like out

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>of space. And so SpaceX won this contract, which is

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>worth up to eight hundred and forty three million dollars

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>to sort of deorbit the space station.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>And so my.

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Understanding is that SpaceX is going to create some kind

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>of vehicle that's going to help guide the space station

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 4>back through the Earth's atmosphere, at which point it will

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>blow up and then like fall into the ocean.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 5>So Max, how cool is this? Not only do you

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 5>get to blow this thing up, you get had to blow.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Up objectively probably the coolest government contract you could possibly win.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>But I will say this is like a weird It's

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of weird.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Like SpaceX's whole deal is like they are a commercial provider.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>They just sell these launches, and this is obviously a

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 2>custom project. You know, this is kind of like an

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>old school What it feels like is like an old

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>school defense contract, the kind of thing that SpaceX would

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have criticized maybe in the past. On the other hand,

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>objectively cool contract, I don't see how you turn it

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 2>down create stuff.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, then press release from NASA. I got a

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>kick out of NASAU selects International Space Station US de

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 5>orbit vehicle. Now here's the thing, though, Dan, about this

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 5>deorbit vehicle. My sense is that SpaceX Elon and the

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>crew they get to create it, and they have a

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 5>large budget now to do so, but they do they

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 5>actually get to do the blowing up themselves, So they

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 5>have to turn this baby over to the end up

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 5>NASAU crew to handle that part of it.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I understanding is that SpaceX develops the de orbit spacecraft

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>and then turns.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>That over to NASA.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of a down and.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX are like long term partners. I mean, NASA was

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 4>key to like SpaceX even becoming company. And so I mean,

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the contract could be modified going forward.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it will how much in the it's a robot.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 5>I just say, I'm just saying this. You know, one

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 5>of the in addition, in addition to being a great industrialist,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Elon apparently is quite the gamer. You could see him

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 5>just like gaming out on this thing, controlling it as

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 5>it's gonna blow this thing up.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean reading stories about this, you know they're going

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 2>to drop it in some part, some part of the

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>ocean that's like Asteros, not a lot of I guess

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>marine life or whatever, but this is like the area

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of the ocean where they.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Dump old spaceships.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 2>So it'll it's the whole thing is fascinating, and you know,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>hopefully by the time they do this, we'll have you know,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 2>a station on the Moon or something.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 5>One would hope. Okay, Max, in other SpaceX news its

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 5>valuation is up, up and up.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>So SpaceX, as we've said on this podcast many times,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 2>is a privately held company. It's a little bit unusual

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>because it's been around for a long time, and you

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 2>have employees and investors who've been who've held stock in

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the company for many years, if not more than a decade,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>and private companies essentially like this will make tender offers. Well,

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>they'll essentially offer to buy shares of longtime shareholders using

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 2>external capital. The reporting suggests that the valuation is two

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten billion dollars, substantially up from before. I

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>will just say, you know, these tender offers, these valuations

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>are not public markets valuations. Anytime we're talking about private

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>market valuations. It's not like the definitive value of this thing.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just sort of like what the company is telling

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>investors that it thinks it is worth.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Well. But if it is the latest transaction that's happening,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 5>so at sub level, that does set a price. I mean,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 5>I guess the fact that SpaceX is willing to pay

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 5>that price for the shares indicates that it thinks it's

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 5>worth that much. I mean, but yeah, as you were

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 5>saying it's climbed quite a bit. I think towards the

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 5>end of last year was at one hundred and eighty billion,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and then two hundred billion, and now two hundred and ten.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 5>It is a very very, very very large private company. Remember,

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 5>the vast bulk of Elon's companies are privately held companies, ie,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 5>not companies that trade in public stock markets, Tesla being

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 5>the loan exception. But it is SpaceX that is by

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 5>far the most valuable, and at this point I would

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 5>say on the cuspmax of being the most valuable private

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 5>company in the world right now, the only larger one

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 5>is Byte after bite after Byte Dance, right, owner of TikTok.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 5>But if SpaceX's valuations up up and up, Byte Dances

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 5>valuation is going in the exact opposite direction, right But Dan,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 5>I got to say on that does SpaceX and Star

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 5>do they stay private or go public? Given how worked

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 5>up Elon is getting about the Delaware court as it

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 5>relates to Tesla and all the hassles of having to

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 5>be a publicly traded company, man, I got to think

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 5>that these companies stay private.

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't think Elon likes being a public company.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 4>CEO I mean it opens you up to just far

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 4>more scrutiny. You've got to deal with earnings every quarter.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think he you know, he tried to

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 4>take Tesla private back in twenty eighteen and then had

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 4>to back out of that when when it was clear

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>that that was going to be way harder to do.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>That he realized.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 4>And the whole thing with the funding secured at four

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty and the saudis so. But yeah, I mean, why

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 4>go The only the reason to go public, it's it's

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 4>really a fundraising event. Like you go public because you

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 4>need to raise money. If SpaceX can continue to raise

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 4>money from private investors and venture capitalists and private equity

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 4>and get these lucrative government contracts, like, I don't think

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 4>he would want to go. But yeah, I mean Gwen

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 4>shotwell All, the president of SpaceX, you know, at an

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 4>investor conference a couple of years ago, said that she

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 4>could see spinning Starlink out at some point when Starlink

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 4>had positive revenue. I don't think they're there yet. But

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>if you're elon, like, what upside is there to going public?

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a serial case for going public is that you know,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>his his like ability to raise capital from the public

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>markets is much greater.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Because you get to tap into all that.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we just saw like the retail investors of

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Tesla gave him just just you know, wrote him a

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>fifty billion dollar check after declining. Like you know, you

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>can like Elon Musk as as persuasive as he is

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>with you know, major private.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Market investor retail crowd.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 3>It's the retail crowd that really, you know, will will

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 3>go for this.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 5>That's fair. Here's my prediction. He neither IPO's SpaceX or starlink,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 5>but does an IPO spin off of his de orbit

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 5>vehicle unit. Okay, well, we'll see how this first one does,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 5>uh in a few years when they try to blow

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 5>this thing up up. Okay. In other news, down in Washington, Max,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court had a couple of big rulings on

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 5>social media that could affect Elon Musk's X. Tell us

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 5>all about.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Them, all right, So the top line here is that

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the status quo for social media stays the same. But

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 2>just going a little bit deeper on that, you had

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a case about a week ago where a couple of

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>states had sued the Biden administration over essentially accusations that

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>came up during the Twitter Files. This was the idea

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that the government was, you know, improperly influencing social media companies.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court said, now, this is a bit of a

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>rebuke to the for people who really thought the Twitter

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 2>files were a big game changer. Essentially said that there

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>was no reason to think that this had actually happened

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in any kind of sustained way. There was a second

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of set two cases that the Supreme Court kicked

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>back to lower courts earlier this week, and these were

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>over laws in Texas and Florida that we would essentially

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>prevent social media companies from doing the kind of moderation

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>that they do previous that they do currently. So it

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>was saying, like, you know, you're not allowed to like

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>throw somebody off a platform. You have to give people

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>like an absolute right to free speech on social media.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of Elon Musk's position.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 2>The Court effectively is saying that for now, social media

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>companies have free speech rights as well, which means that

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>they can sort of do whatever they want with their platforms.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's the stat This is a status quo stays

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the same. Now, does this affect Elon Muskin anyway?

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Probably not. I mean, like.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>His his sort of maximalist view of the First Amendment

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>could be seen as being rebuffed. But for now, you know,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>X will just continue operating as as it's operated.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Actually, And as a result, the effect on the twenty

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 5>twenty four campaign and use of social media in the

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four campaign and disinformation campaigns, any impact there?

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 3>No? Well, like I said, status Quo is going to

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>say the same.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that there are that probably like

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>public pressure on social media companies matters, because these companies

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>have constituencies that include like investors and users and so on,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>and if and if a social media in the same

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>way that you can kind of like work the refs

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>like in a game and sort of push them towards

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>making decisions that are close to.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 5>What you like. I gotcha. So we are now joined

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 5>by Bloomberg's Global autos Are Craig Trudel to talk about

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 5>tesla second quarter sales. Craig, welcome, Thanks for having me. Okay, so, Dana,

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 5>we will start with you though here tell us what

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 5>exactly were the numbers and how should we interpret them?

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, Tesla delivered four hundred and forty three thousand

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 4>nine hundred and fifty six vehicles in the second quarter.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Those are global figures. It was still a five percent

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 4>year of year decline, but the numbers that were released

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 4>this morning were better than what analysts were expecting, and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing the shares move higher as a result.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 6>This is a matter of a few thousand vehicles more

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 6>than analysts we're expecting. I think, you know, the consensus

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 6>that we had was about a five point eight percent decline,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 6>So all of one percentage point has meant you know,

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 6>a roughly ten percent move just this morning, which is

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 6>really remarkable but also kind of par for the course

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 6>with this this stock. You guys have had Esha Day

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 6>on here before to kind of talk about Tesla as

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 6>a stock and how much that's a big aspect of

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 6>the story for this company. When this name gets momentum,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 6>it really moves in dramatic ways, and we've seen that,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, just in the last few weeks. You know,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 6>even as everybody was anticipating these numbers weren't going to

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 6>be that great, there's been so much emphasis and focus

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 6>on the future, in no small part thanks to Elon

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 6>and his comments at the annual meeting recently.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so on the stock. We spent a fair amount

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 5>of time in the first half of the year talking

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 5>about its cratering it had at its nadir back in April,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 5>it was down almost fifty percent. It was quite the plunge.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 5>It has roared back since, as you guys are alluding to,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 5>It's gained more than fifty percent since then, and really

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 5>isn't down much year to date at all. Now, So, Craig,

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 5>how do I square that rebound with these sales numbers

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 5>that just came out again? I get that the sales

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 5>numbers weren't quite as bad as expected, but they were

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 5>still down.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 6>I suppose. I mean, I guess this has always been,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, a story stocked to some degree, right, I mean,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 6>it's always been the case that, you know, if you

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 6>talk with a sort of more traditional automotive analyst, that

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 6>they've generally, you know, and very consistently said that this valuation,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, doesn't make a sense in their universe. But

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 6>as long as you're looking at this as a tech

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 6>company and putting that serious amounts of value on businesses

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 6>that don't exist in in the case of robotaxis or

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 6>optimist robots, you can sort of put whatever number you

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 6>like on this and Elon you may call you something

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 6>other than boneheaded.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 4>The other thing I was just going to point out

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 4>about the release today is that they flagged their energy

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 4>storage numbers. You know, so Tesla has two divisions, automotive

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and energy storage. Energy storage is when they sell these

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 4>big batteries known as megapas to utilities like pgene and

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 4>the power wall to consumers, and like, the energy division

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>has always played this big back seat to automotive in

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 4>terms of revenue, but now with the automotive sales obviously

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 4>no longer showing robust growth, they're like really flagging energy

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 4>is like this big growth thing. So it was just

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 4>funny to see in a quarterly release that's all about

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 4>vehicle deliveries that they flag how awesome the energy sales

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>are going. And I think you're going to see Elon

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>talk a lot more about energy on the earnings call

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 4>later this month.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a little bit of the active diversion and confuscation.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 5>That is the second time recent week, Stana, that you

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 5>brought interview storage up. I feel an entire segment or

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 5>episode coming up on that topic soon. Max, though, how

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 5>did you take the number?

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I just like Craig is saying, We've been talking for

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>months about what I think, in retrospect was a really

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of audacious move by Elon Musk. We have a

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 2>car company that is priced like a growth stock that

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>has stopped growing, and we've been talking for a long

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>time about how that's a pretty big problem.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>We're a growth stock and you're not growing. That's problem.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>And what we've seen is Elon Musk, over the course

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of several months, essentially reframe the story. And now it's

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>been reframed. It's no longer a car company. He's said

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that a million times, despite the fact that as we

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>see from these delivery numbers, they sure saw a lot

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>of cars, seems to be the bulk of their revenue.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But nonetheless, you know, what the investors are clearly focused on,

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen this now in the stock reaction today,

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>in the payvote, you know, over the last several months,

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>is is this autonomy story. And what's interesting here is

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>getting lost. So they sold almost all of these sales

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 2>are Model three, Model Y that's the kind of lower

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>end car. Tesla also sells, of course models Model X

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and a Sign.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 5>They basically sell almost none.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Of those and remember we talked about at this at

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the end of last year, like wow, you know the

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>cyber truck, this, this could really, you know, change the

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 2>game for Tesla. You know, pickup trucks are are the

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>best selling category.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 4>You don't even break it out separately, it's under it.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a very very small number twenty thousand

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>total other models. So I mean you're talking about, you know,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>number of cyber trucks that you know, would be insignificant

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>to like a Toyota, Ford or whatever. So it's just

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty staggering first of all that that the company has

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>gone in this direction, and then also that investors are

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>are up for it, they like it.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so, Craig, I actually I've been thinking about this

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 5>for a while now. At this point on the model

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 5>S IS and X IS, and you know, these are

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 5>older models that are selling at this point negligible amounts.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 5>As Max is saying, it's all about the why, It's

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 5>all about the three. The cyber truck is just ramping up.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 5>If it even goes anywhere, why not put a bullet

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 5>in the s in the ax. Aren't they just a distraction? No?

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 6>I think they do still sell for for fairly significant

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 6>amounts of money, and so perhaps you can kind of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 6>make the argument that you know, continuing to amortize, you know,

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 6>the investment in those vehicles makes some sense. But as

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 6>as we do look ahead to you know, where this

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 6>company is going, and you know, sort of pay close

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 6>attention to the fact that you know, Musk is very

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 6>much you know, focused on autonomy and on robotaxis to

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 6>the extent that he is able to actually stand up

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 6>that business and does want to sort of, you know,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 6>put more emphasis on that going forward. Would it make

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 6>sense to potentially, you know, switch up the existing factory

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 6>capacity that you have to make those vehicles over you know,

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 6>ones that now are quite long in the tooth that

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Musk has said, we probably shouldn't keep making them anymore

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 6>and are really just sort of doing so for posterity reasons.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 5>On the fleet point in general, and this has come

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 5>up a fair amount in the past, but I suppose

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 5>it's going to keep coming up, not just the S

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 5>and the X, but the totality of the fleet, with

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 5>the exception of the cyber truck, Dana. As I drive

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 5>around the streets of the Tri State area, Man, these

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 5>teslas they do it? Should they just look old and tired.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 5>I mean you drive around, you bump into you know,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 5>you see Rivians in the wild and some of the

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 5>new Fords, and the key is in the VW's It

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 5>just seems like these are just yesterday's cars.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 4>I think the calculation that Elon Musk made is that

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 4>look like they were the first company to really bring

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 4>electric cars into the mainstream full stop. But now electric

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 4>cars are quite common and here in California, same thing.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I see Rivians, I see a lot of Hyundaies,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 4>and like being an electric car maker is no longer

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 4>enough to set you apart from the pack. What sets

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 4>you apart from the pack is that you are electric

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>and fully autonomous, and that is what Elon is going for.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 4>And Craig and I have had long debates back and

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.479
<v Speaker 4>forth about whether this is like real or vaporware, and like,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 4>at what point does Tesla actually get you know, level

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 4>five regulatory approval. I mean, that's all very still very

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 4>high in the sky. But Musk believes in his heart

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 4>that they are on the cusp of full autonomy and

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 4>he just wants to be like he wants to be

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 4>valued as a tech company. He sees Nvidia and all

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 4>these other players getting these crazy valuations, and he wants

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 4>Tesla to be thought of in that vein, and so

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 4>he is all about like Tesla doesn't really just make cars,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 4>they are making autonomous.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 5>So then your point is he's not up for playing

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 5>this game that the traditional car makers play, which is, hey,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 5>we're going to refresh our fleet every shing.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 4>I think that Elon is just bored of making cars.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 4>It's like very capital intensive and like he's always been about.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 5>And he's board making cars, but he wants them to

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 5>pay him some odd billion dollars when car making is

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 5>your main job.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, But he's been at this for a very long time.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 4>It is capital intensive, it is grueling, you're fighting for

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>market share. He's got byd coming out like after him,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Like he's just like he like just constantly refreshing models

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 4>and constantly coming out with new models is just it's

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 4>boring for him.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean you could see it Nickel Dimes stuff.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 4>It wants to be, you know, he wants to be

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 4>like cutting edge, mister future, and that's.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Our time as you as you've often said, I do think,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 5>you know.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>For Elon Musk and for the people who sort of

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>buy this it's the the comparison is a tech company,

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 2>not not a car company, you know. And I think

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>all along the reason they are not refreshing the Model

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>three or whatever, and the reason this is happening is

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 2>because Musk has long seen like the model as Apple, Right,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone form factor is has been essentially unchanged for

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>almost the entire time that the iPhone has you know, existed.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Every other company's you know, iPhone like device looks exactly

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 2>like it.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 3>The differentiator is the software and that's what Musk sees.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Right, and those he would argue, those are where the

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 5>refreshes come.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Think there are real questions about whether that is how

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>consumers feel. And even when we're talking about atimomy, Dana

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>is saying, like, you know, talking about oh, well, you know,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>maybe they'll get the level five approval or whatever. I

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously, like, there are so many questions there,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's going to take way longer.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Than Elon Musk assumes.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>But then the on the other side, there's a question

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 2>of do consumers care like is like it is the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>assumption that this is a game changer going to be

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>true for a regular person who drives a regular car.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 2>And we don't know answer that question yet, but we

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>have seen some signs and like one of which is

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem like there have been that successful in

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>selling full self driving or whatever you want to call it,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>this aid ass system to customers. Customers, they've drive the

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>price like, it doesn't look like how much does it cost?

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was what two.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Hundred dollars a month. Now they're down to one hundred

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month. They're sort of getting it away.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 4>It is not thought to be very high.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, And I think that and when you talk to

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>like normal people, you know, and every time I'm sure

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Dan and Craig do this as well, but like you know,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you're in an uber you ask them about full self driving,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's pretty rare. When I ask the question

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that someone is like, yeah, it's the best. Most people

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>are like I don't use it, or yeah it's okay.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And I just don't think they've managed to convince regular

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>normal drivers that this thing is worth paying for yet.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 5>Craig on the Robotaxi, you guys have referred to it.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 5>It's coming soon, right, the big reveal. They're gonna they're

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 5>gonna put bring it out on stage. They're gonna bring

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 5>something out on stage, you know, covered in a blanket

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 5>or you know, and then they're gonna Elon's gonna, you know,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 5>with great pomp and circumstance, you know, pull the blanket away.

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 5>We're gonna see something when it exactly is that coming?

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'd like a BINGO card for that event. You know,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 6>is he wearing the Texas hat.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Working on the beginning?

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Craig, we are doing it.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 6>So that's August eighth. And to Max's point, I do

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 6>think the fact that this company has been taking people's

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 6>money for years now and deferring revenue that it that

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 6>it collects related to full self driving. And actually, when

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 6>you when you sort of look closely at their quarterly

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 6>filings and compare the deferred revenue that they're actually recognizing

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 6>versus what they thought they would recognize, you know, the

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 6>prior year, those numbers have have never matched up. They've

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 6>always overestimated how much revenue they're going to generate from

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 6>or or recognize from that sort of you know, piggybank

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 6>that they've you know, kind of set aside in acknowledgment

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 6>of the fact that Full self driving is not actually

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 6>self driving. So you know, this is a company that,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 6>for years, if you're sort of a close partser of

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 6>regulatory filings, has acknowledged the fact that they've over sold

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 6>this stuff. And not only do we not know to

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 6>what extent consumers are ready to take this on, I

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 6>think we have some real questions about just how ready

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 6>regulators are because if you look at what the National

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 6>Highway Traffic Safety Administration has to say about Tesla's lower

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 6>level systems autopilot I'm referring to here, they have real

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 6>concerns about the safety gap between you know, how the

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 6>company is marketing this and how they're deploying it versus

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 6>what it's actually capable of.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Robotaxi. Of course, the level of angst among regulators and

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 5>scrutiny's going to be that much greater. I will just say, though, Max,

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 5>that between you got to say here that between robotaxi

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 5>talk and all by doing whatever he was that he

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 5>had to do, stabilizing sales to some extent, slashing payrolls

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 5>by the way, during in recent months he's cut payrolls

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 5>almost twenty percent. Okay, you take all those things together,

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 5>and he's done it again. He has turned the tied

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 5>on a stock that seemed to be in free fall.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I totally agree.

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Listen, there there are some real questions about whether this

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 2>strategy is real. And I mean you're talking about like

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>our robotos tax is going to happen. I think some

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 2>elon probably thinks that's a problem for the Trump administration

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to solve. I think it's going to be a problem

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>for like the Eric Trump administration or the Donald Junior

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump ad like this is a this is a decades

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 2>long regulation problem, not not something that's going.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 3>To happen soon, but and and so.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 5>But in the near term.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's done it. He really has.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he he completely managed to change the narrative

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to turn what should be a real problem for a

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>company that makes cars, which is that it's not selling

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>them as much as it wants to, into like almost

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 2>an asset.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>It's you know, sorry, we're not a car company anymore.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 3>We're software.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Don't worry about that. But he has Craig push sales

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 5>volume at any price, cutting prices repeatedly that presumably has

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 5>come and will continue to calm at the cost of margin.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean, is that is that something that's we're going

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 5>to see playing out in coming quarters.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Dana mentioned the energy storage deployments, and it is

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 6>a very dramatic increase, but I think we've also watched

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 6>very closely how that has actually translated in terms of revenue,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 6>and we've not really seen evidence that that is really

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 6>moving the needle. I think the fundamentals of this company's

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 6>business are sort of continuing to deteriorate and sort of

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, matching, you know, maybe what the stock was

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 6>doing months ago. And it's been fascinating to see the

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 6>shares you know, really sort of come roaring back just

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 6>these last few weeks.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 4>I just looked at the Bloomberg terminal and shares are

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 4>only down like seven point six percent for the year now.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that is a big difference from where we.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 5>Were basically flat. I mean, it's true, Dana that the

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 5>market overall is up like fifteen percent or so, So

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 5>seven percent down is still seven percent down at a

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 5>time when everything else is up. But you're absolutely right.

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, to have gone from almost fifty percent down

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 5>to down just seven percent year to date is quite

0:26:59.160 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 5>a thing.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I just want to make one more point, which we've

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 4>pounded on quite a bit on this show and elsewhere,

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 4>which is that, like you know, Elon is fundamentally just

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 4>this like master Marketer, master of the narrative. It's like

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 4>the Man behind the Curtain, Wizard of Oz kind of

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 4>stuff where he really does like drop these clues. It's

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 4>almost like a QAnon drop and the fans go bananas.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 4>So the other thing that happened this week was he

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 4>started following Travis Kalanik, which everyone saw as this clue

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 4>that like the Robotaxi is gonna partner with Uber or

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 4>like that, you know, and he's called it the cyber Cab.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 4>And so like just when he does stuff like that,

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 4>like the fans go go ballistic and they are all

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 4>in on like this future vision. And it is like

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 4>a cult in a lot of ways in terms of

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 4>the way that the stock moves and the way that

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, everyone rallies around the leader. And there have

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 4>been these real pivot points where you're like, oh my god,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 4>is he going to be able to pull this out?

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 4>Is he going to be able to pull the rabbit

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 4>out of the hat, And like he does it over

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 4>and over again to the point where like we're all

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 4>very cynical about it, but obviously investors are not. And

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 4>that's like, that's the disconnect that I think some of

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 4>us feel. It's like, Wow, they're really going for this

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 4>yet again. But we've seen this play over and over again.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Craig, great to have you on. Don't be a stranger.

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Come back soon.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Okay, to wrap this up. Now, we're gonna do a

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 5>segment that I'm gonna be honest, I know absolutely nothing

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 5>about Max. Tell us all about it. Something about Elon

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 5>trying to make X a kinder, gentler place.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've talked about this in past episodes. Elon. You

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 3>may think of him as a trolling, you know.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Poster who loves to just stir the pot, but he

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>has a softer side, and that softer side wants to

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>see content that isn't divisive, that doesn't you know, rile

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>people up.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>That's just beautiful.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Such a and and so yesterday there this is i'd

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>say one of my favorite all time Elon Musks posts.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>He he posted a tweet by an account called l Lookbook.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It's basically like a a bunch of pictures essentially beautiful interiors,

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like something out of Brides magazine it's

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 2>like an all white interior with a bed kind of

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 2>in the in the background, and an arch and some plants.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>It's just a gorgeous It looks like your ideal Airbnb

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in Newport or something. And Elon wrote, would be lovely

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to see more accounts on x simply posting beautiful content. Okay,

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and I say, Elon here here, let's all come back.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 5>But I'm seeing he wants.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 4>To become Pinterest or something.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, I feel like I'm seeing a direction of travel

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 5>because just the previous week, right he said, when I

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 5>told everyone to go all the you know, advertisers to

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 5>go f themselves, I didn't mean go f yourself. And

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 5>now like again he's just right just continuing on that line,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 5>and man, can we just post beautiful.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 7>And a dyne non You know, it's weird because like

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 7>the jk Rowling one was sort of felt like a

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 7>specific comment about jk Rowling where he was saying, hey,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 7>what was that?

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 5>Remind me?

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he had he.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Had suggested that, you know, essentially I'm paraphrasing, probably badly,

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>but essentially that she had been posting all this controversial stuff.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it better if she was just posting stuff about

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>wizards or Harry Potter or something here.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like Danna says.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, it wouldn't it be great if we

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>just had some nice interiors on this on this site

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>instead of all this divisive content. And I thought, Okay, maybe,

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe this maybe is turning overleaf. But you

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>really don't have to go too too far before he's

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, down in the timeline, before he's back in

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the mix politically, So just.

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Back in the in the in the in the scrum

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 5>and just and just fighting and scrap it. So, Dana, though,

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 5>you see that post and it says, pinteresting, Well.

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 4>It's a summer bedroom. I mean I see flowers, I

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 4>see white sheets, white walls. The person who posted is

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Eva loves Design and yeah, look it's like a Pinterest

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 4>board like my favorite interior for my summer cottage or

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 4>something like that.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 5>So now, Max, is that the totality though? The kinder

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 5>gentler X from elanor were there other things that put

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 5>you in that direction? That was it?

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the totality.

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 5>That's the totality, Max, Dana, thanks for joining.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Always a pleasure, great to be here.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 5>This episode was produced by Stacy Woan Naomi Shaven and

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Rayhan Harmanci are our senior editors. The idea for this

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 5>very show also came from Rayhan. Blake Maples handles engineering,

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 5>and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott, Antonia

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Muffarech and Arafat Jalasho Perry. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 5>The elin ing theme is written and performed by Taka

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Yasuzawa and Alex sugi Era. Brendan Francis Newnham is our

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 5>executive producer, and Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 5>A big thanks as always to our supporter Joel Weber.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm Dave bit Papadopolis. If you have a minute, rate

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 5>and review our show, it'll help other listeners find us.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 5>See you next week.