WEBVTT - July Q&A

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm that for me. I'm a man, I'm forty. I've

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>heard so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for dake ado steak? Is

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>that whoo whoom?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And then and tie, Welcome back to the solid verbal,

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>boys and girls. My name is Ty Hildenbrandt, joining me

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as always over there in sweltering New York City. My

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>man Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how goes it?

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It goes really well, Tie, And I'm gonna tell you why.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, tell me.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I was pretty sure I was out of coffee this morning,

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 2>and I went for a run. Gave me a good

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 2>amount of energy, and I remembered I had some cold

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>brew in the fridge. Oh, I can't do that, which

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>is even more powerful because it's a sort of reduced

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>version of coffee. And I may have overdone it because

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I was worried about not being caffeinated enough. And when

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you overdo.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Cold brew not not good.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>It's cold cane.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Tie, Yeah, it is not good. Wegman's damn near killed

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>me with their cold brew about a year ago, and

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then I haven't heard it since.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>So the lesson is be careful, because we've got a

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 2>really fun show tonight in which we've asked for a

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>bunch of questions about revenge. Revenge would be one way

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of looking at it. My more optimistic way is turning

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 2>things around in the new year optimism.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But revenge is more controversial, Dan, But revenge, Uh yeah,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's sort of what's going on.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>So we asked for questions about which twenty seventeen l

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 2>you most felt your team could turn into a twenty

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 2>eighteen W. Yeah, w your dream next coach, because it's

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>never too early to start imaginarily firing people, right. I

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>feel bad. It's a holiday week and we should all

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>be celebrating with family and loved ones and not thinking

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>about loss of jobs. And in that vein tie, celebrating

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>with loved ones and family and friends and whoever else

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>wants to hang around grilling meats or vegetables. We want

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk side dishes, specifically for cookouts, barbecues, cookouts. Dan. Yes,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is that people in your region of the

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>country or world call cooking things over open fire, we

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>want to go to the side of that. Compliments, Ty,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what we want, all.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, don't forget you can always follow us out on

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the social media's where all the kids are. We're on Facebook,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We're on Twitter, we're on Instagram. Please follow us if

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already, sign up for the newsletter because we've

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of exciting stuff that we're going to

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be sending out. I've been checking daily. The notifications I've

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>joked with you are popping up on the screen left

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and right from new people who want to sign up,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>want to be part of the action, want to get

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>early access to not only our merch which we're going

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to be putting on sale in very short order, but

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>also the tickets to the live show. Tickets the live show.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We are still in the process of firming up the venue.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>We think we've got a good one picked out.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 2>When's the live show? When is it? When is it? Though?

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Live show in Chicago? August eleventh, Oh my god, can't

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>wait is the official date. But as soon as we've

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got that venue and as soon as we can put

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>tickets up for sale, we're going to do that. But

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we will give everyone notice again. Sign up for the newsletter,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which you can find out on our Facebook page or

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on our website soliverble dot com. The people who subscribe

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to the newsletter. Are going to be the ones who

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>get first DIBs on tickets.

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, get that will be the twenty eighteen Fantasy Things

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Draft live show in Chicago. Ty will be crowdsurfing to

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the stage, as he has promised many times. That's right,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think we should get into that. We got

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of good cues and some mediocre, as.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Mediocre as Daniel. Yes, I found my soundboard one of

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the boxes. Do you remember when we used to play

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this sound talking about James Winston?

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I do I, Dodd remember this?

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I shouldn't go there on this show.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>But America's quarterback.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Nonetheless, Happy Fourth of July. Perhaps you're listening on the

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>way to a barbecue or grilling adventure of some kind,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what you call it, in what part of

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the country you might be. We've got questions in front

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of us, Dan, where do we want to go?

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's start here with a state in which I will

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>be in a few days, The beautiful state of Michigan.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>The state I don't have. What is the nickname of

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the state of Michigan? Do you know, Dan?

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the Wolverine State?

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Is it? You should have known?

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That?

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Should have known Michigan's. So it's of Michigan's big ten

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 2>losses from last year. This is the likelihood that Jordan

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>thinks the flipping happens basically from an L to a W.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Michigan State. Okaynstin Penn State, Ohio State. We've talked about

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>this in the past. I don't know where your opinion

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>stands right now. So we're ignoring the Notre Dame game,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>ignoring Western Michigan SMU. So of those four losses, I

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>go to Michigan State the week after big body blow Wisconsin,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>right on the road after playing Wisconsin at home, I

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>think is going to be a bit too tough.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say the most likely and I we've

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 2>probably answered this question the last three weeks, but coming

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>off of that bye week and playing at home and

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>playing against a Penn State team that has lost a

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>number of key pieces that including Joe moorehead, I would

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>say that is the most likely flip. How do you

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 2>feel about that?

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, coming off the buy is definitely a little

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more advantageous. But if memory serves that game isn't

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>till a little bit later on in the year.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 2>It's correct November three, So.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd be inclined to go with Jordan here

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and go Michigan State because as I look at Ohio State,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as I look at Penn State, and as I look

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at Wisconsin, I still don't feel as confident in Michigan

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>State as I do those other three teams on a

0:05:58.160 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>week to week.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Basis a direct thumb in the face to Bruce Feldman

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and his body blow theory, though.

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This would it is a thumb in the face. Sorry.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>And also I believe this would classify as early Michigan

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>State disrespect.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's true, right, I am disrespecting Michigan State saying

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>they're not even worth talking about because Penn State.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Is the more likely lost, right, that is true.

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>And you are disrespecting Michigan State because you don't believe

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be good enough at home again after

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin on Michigan's schedule to beat the Wolverines.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>A blatant show of disrespect here, But I'm gonna go.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna agree with Jordan's assessment and go Michigan State.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Early disagree. Colin wants to know first laces over under

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>on D'Antonio era seems like four years, I'm going to

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 2>go under. I'm gonna say to be fewer than four

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>years left, just because why do you feel that way?

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Health issues coupled with the upheaval in East Lansing in

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that the athletic department that there needs to be a

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>cleaning of house. And that doesn't necessarily mean you fire

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the football coach. But sometimes there comes a time where

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>a football coach in school just decide it's the best.

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 2>Even Mark d Antonio arguably arguably as like the best

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>football coach in the history of the modern program, I

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>could see a time to move on there. So his

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>question is Dave Randa Alex Grinch being his two names

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously big and huge name defensive coordinators lately Alex Grinch

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 2>at Washington State Dave Randa most recently at LSU but

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>also success in the Midwest at Wisconsin recently. Do you

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>think either of them make it that long? So around

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>four years before landing a bigger gig, Tyler.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Randa probably has his site set on no

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>disrespect again to Michigan State, god time twice in a row.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm doing this, Dan, but I think that Randa

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>could probably get what I would consider a top ten job.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>If my only two options here are Alex Grinch or

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Dave Random Inclina, go Alex Grinch.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I would go Alex Grinch as well, though there are

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>complicating factors to both of these names. The Alex Grinch

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>complicating factor is a lot of people think, given his

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I believe he's an associate head coach, he has a

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>big title at Ohio State as he slides into that

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>tenth spot, that tenth assistant spot, that perhaps he is

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 2>next in line when Greg Chiano probably moves on somewhere

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>after his time at Ohio State and Alex Grinch makes

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>for a natural successor there. And then the Dave Randa thing,

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:40.239
<v Speaker 2>And this is one of my favorite words. Tie the scuttle, ooh, scuttle.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 2>The scuttle butt is that his eyes, at least within

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the last year, his eyes long term are probably pointed

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>in the direction of the NFL. I could see that too. Yeah,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't necessarily want to be long for college football.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't necessarily have the This is a according to

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>people who would definitely know better than you and I,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>that his temperament is best suited to be just that

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>magician defensive coordinator in the NFL, and that he wants

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>to be like Dick Lebaux kind of thing.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you a question. Then, Yeah, hypothetically speaking,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that sound cued up, but I'm going

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to reframe Collins's question. Yeah, is an NFL defensive coordinatorship, Yes,

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>better than a top ten job in college football.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Depends what you're looking for. If you are looking for

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>a football intensive lifestyle where you worry about x's and o's,

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 2>where you perhaps plan with the head coach and plan

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>with some sort of team president about personnel to run

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>your defense, and coaching more than teaching, because you remember,

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 2>you're bringing in high school kids, certainly with a ton

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>of raw talent, but there's a lot of teaching of technique.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of teaching of how you go game

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>game play to play, how you keep temperament, and just

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of molding you into an NFL player. Well, whereas

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, yes, you really have to worry about

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>installing systems, making sure people know their assignments, but not

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>necessarily teaching them footwork in the way that you would

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>have to teach a nineteen year old.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, we're obviously singing to a very biased

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>choir here asking that question. However, if a random falls

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>into that category of liking the scheme maybe more than

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the apparatus around college football and everything that goes along

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>with it, I think you're right in that there's probably

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a spot for him somewhere in the NFL before long.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to go with Alex Grinch there as

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>my more likely answer. If we're talking about D'Antonio out

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>within the next four years. You also bring up to

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>good points as to why he might leave. He's sixty

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>two years old. They're clearly complicating factors around that Michigan

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>State program that might facilitate and exit within that timeframe.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So we shall wait and see.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm so fascinated We'll get to the next question in

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a matter of seconds. I'm fascinated by the situational happiness

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>of coordinators, either college pros, whatever, where a lot of

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>people not in football can just be very happy with

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>their Lawton life. They're happy with the money they make,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 2>they're happy with their coach. They say, Lawton life. They're

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot in oh life. Okay, their situational happiness, and

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people ask that question about Brent Vennables.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Is he waiting for Kansas State? I know we have

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a Kansas State question, but or is he just super

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>pumped to be making a ton of money coaching the

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>best assembly of defensive linemen in college football. I'm fascinated

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to talk to people about that, about how real that

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 2>has become.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Scott Lawton, current flyer, used to live

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>above me. Really apartment complex. True story, no good, good

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to know.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Moving on, Jonathan wants to know does Florida State get

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:58.239
<v Speaker 2>revenge against colin Boston College, Clemson, Louisville, Miami, North Carolina,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>all of them? I mean BC is the most likely. Sure,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's fair. That's in Tallahassee this year. It

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 2>was the big emotional game last year. And it was

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>also a game last year in which Florida State was

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>pure concentrated trash.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, really bad. But in that game. But Boston College.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We've answered this Boston College question before in this show.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>There seems to be some amount of trepidation about Boston

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>College the Florida State in twenty eighteen. I just don't

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>see it. I don't know. I understand that they sort

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of caught lightning in a bottle last year Boston College

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>in beating Florida State, but there was a lot working

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>against FSU a year ago. I'm not seeing it in

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Tallahassee this year, dan So, I feel pretty good about

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that game. Clemson's going to be loaded again. I don't

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>see it. Quarterback questions, questions, but the right kind of questions.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And there are those same questions with Florida State Louisville.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I do what to expect out of Louisville this year.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>B v G B Miami, n C State again big

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>questions for me.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that the revenge spot is BC first and foremost.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, coming to tallasse But I really do

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>like Boston College. I like what they have in the backfields. Defensively.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I think there are a couple pieces that will will

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>cause trouble for a lot of teams. Florida State. I

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 2>think that game is later on in the season, right

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>later in the state bac So, you would imagine Florida

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 2>State will be in a bit of rhythm that you

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>know quarterbacks should be sorted out by then. I like

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Willie Tagger play calling on offense. I got to see

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>that with issues last year, and I don't think Florida

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>State will have those issues with injury again. It's just

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 2>hard to believe there'll be snake bitting once again. So

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that that's probably my answer here.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, where are we going?

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 2>Matthew wants to know is it all hype or can

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia actually beat for the very first time? A

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>baker lists sooner squad h I know your answer. Your

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>answer is no. My answer is, well, here's I think

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a complicated answer. I as you know, if you

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 2>listened to last week's episode, I'm pretty down on what

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia has returning, and we'll put on the field

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>on defense.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I am detecting a very very serious hedge coming here

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>from what happened last week on this show.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not a hedge. I believe Oklahoma is going to

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 2>win this game. Okay, but here's my butt. I've always

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>wanted to say that onto a microphone. Here's my butt.

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those sneaky Oklahoma is the final

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>game of the season for West Virginia. Correct.

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe so it is.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>It's November twenty third, the week before they play Oklahoma State.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>The week before that, they played TCU the week before that.

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>They are at Texas Oklahoma before the West Virginia game.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you know who they play? Kansas? Yeah, Kansas, so situationally,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's after Bedlam too, obviously, you remember they've moved

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Bedlam up to more of the beginning of November, so

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't always come down to that game at the

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>end of the year. I imagine if there is a situation,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 2>if they're playing Oklahoma State the week before West Virginia,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that to me has such an enormous letdown potential that

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a not as good West Virginia at home against Oklahoma

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in the letdown spot has a better shot. But because

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>there's that Kansas buffer, which let's hope we don't have

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to say that all your Kansas Kansas, right. I do

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>like Oklahoma a little bit more, but it's a Mike

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Stoops defense late in the season, and West Virginia has probably,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 2>as we speak now, the most dependable quarterback in the conference.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>At home in an emotional spot, perhaps I don't think

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma blows them out, but I think I'm just going

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to go with Lincoln Riley in the Sooner.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Matthew, I am with you, dog lock

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it up, Ty, No, We're not locking it's about to

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be July fourth. Then we're not locking it up this

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>far in advance, but lock it up. I we've been

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>talking so much about this Kyler Murray situation. I'm fascinated

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>by it. Yeah, I can't read enough about it. It

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is such a unique spot where you've basically got a

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kid signed on for five million dollars, a top ten

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>baseball pick signed already for five million dollars, has one shot.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for the Oklahoma fan video set to lose

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>yourself by eminem you know, mom spaghetti, Yeah exactly. I

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>am not convinced he's playing the whole year.

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>You think that he gets injured and shuts it down.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if he's injured at.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>All, rolls an ankle, anything.

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>He shuts it down.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Oklahoma has other quarterbacks they could probably win with.

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not convinced that Kyler Murray is going to

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be the answer for a full twelve game slate in

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve. And so this game being at the

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the year on the road at West Virginia,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who knows what Oklahoma is playing for at that point,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what the hell, let's do it. I think it can happen.

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Our friend Jess Mattana, of course, of New York City

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame graduate, lists her Notre Dame el to w

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>as Stanford. How do you feel about, said el to

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>w Stanford with I know you've gotten some flak on

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the subreddit ur slash solid verbal people saying you weren't

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 2>doing your homework about Stanford's offense. I actually think, I

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>actually think you were pretty right on other than neglecting

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bryce Love fact.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>What I haven't seen this, so what were they saying?

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 2>They said that you were selling too vigorously on Notre

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Dame being an offensive threat this year and being more

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 2>about defense when they had some big losses on defense,

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and this year they return a lot on offense, including

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Love, although kJ Costello has been pretty beat up

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and they get hip surgery early on in the off season.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they have like a guy at either

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>tight end or receiver in the way that they've had

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>in years past, where they've been able to count on

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of efficient scun offense. But last year they

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>still were because of those Bryce Love home runs. They

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>were one of probably the ten or twelve most purely

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 2>efficient touchdown scoring teams in the country. Okay, now I

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 2>feel free factor.

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel fine about flipping that Stanford game. The games

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's first off, it's in Notre Dame, which is always helpful.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they go out to Stanford, I feel like they'd lose.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no data to back that up. It's purely

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>reactionary as a skeptical Notre Dame fan. But yeah, games

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in South Bend, that's one, and I'm going to stand

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>by what I said. I think Notre Dame defense keeps

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a minute, low scoring game, slug it out in the mud,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>end up winning. So I always feel I think okay

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>about Stanford in Notre Dame. The one that really gets

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>me is when they go out to USC end of

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the year. Oh yeah, that's like always a loss. I

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>don't even want to talk about Notre Dame.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame going west where like as they fly, like

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>they lose parts of their football souls. Midayre it's not great.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I am going to tag your opinion with I agree.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Stanford the week before goes to Oregon, which I think

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>will be more a more physical team in the trenches

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 2>than in years past with but they return along both lines.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Even if Stanford's able to pull out that game in

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Autsen going to Eugene and then going to South Bend

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in consecutive weeks after having already played San Diego State

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 2>and USC earlier in the month. I think it's going

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a lot. So I think that's a good

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>spot for Notre Dame to get Stanford. Jess also adds

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that her dream next Notre Dame coach, which it seems

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Brian Kelly is pretty entrenched, like he's in that zone

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>where the NFL's probably not calling his name, probably is

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>already at such a big school that it would be

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>a lateral move to go somewhere else unless he's miserable

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>in South Bend. Do you get that sense?

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense, yes, that he's entrenched and also misery.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps he may be growing more miserable.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>What would make a Notre Dame coach miserable given the

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, definite advantages.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You mean other than coaching at Notre Dame.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Other than coaching at Notre Dame, what specifically do you

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 2>think where is on a coach more than anything else

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 2>with that, you know, a really good or if not

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>excellent job.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Brian Kelly has always fashioned himself as a

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>career man in the sense he's looking for another gig.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He wanted that Notre Dame job more than anybody else.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And I do feel like there was part of him,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>again just opinion, that one to go to the NFL

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that has not materialized, because the stock has sort of

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>remained neutral or dropped a little bit since that run

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to the National Championship Game back in twenty twelve. His

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>stock hasn't risen a whole lot, if anything, has gone

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit. So I feel like that part

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to him is probably a little bit frustrating, and it

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>just seems like he's unable to get things firing on

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>all cylinders delay many fans had hoped. There are a

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of fans that are really down on BK. They

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think he mismanages so much of that team. So I

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think just a confluence of events here perhaps has worn

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on him over the course of time. Again just my opinion,

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but if I were venturing a guest, I think BKA

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>has gotten a little bit more frustrated with that situation.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>As for Jess's dream coach here, once he talks about

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Urban Meyer, Am I seeing this correctly.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 2>That you are singing it correctly. Yeah, member Notre Dame

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers coach. I believe, And I'm with Jess. You know,

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I love yes right with her. Everybody loves Jess.

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm with her on urban Meyer. However, is there any

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>team out there outside of Ohio State and Alabama whose

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>dream coach isn't also Urban Meyer.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. I would probably say Clemson's dream

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>coach is not Urban Meyer.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, three teams, Yeah, three teams. So I think you

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>almost assume urban Meyer as the answer here. A more

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>realistic answer has eluded me for years. I was talking

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to a friend a couple of weeks ago about all

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>things Notre Dame, and the same question came up. If

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>BK were to leave, who would be your dream coach?

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have it was not mom age. I don't

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have an answer for it. And I know I'm supposed

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to being the resident Notre Dame fan here and sure

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>our brand of college football whatever on the solid verbal,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to have an answer for that question. I don't.

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's somebody, there's somebody in state who has received

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of buzz. Okay, Tom Allen, Tom, I like

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Tom Allen. I like Tom Allen. I'm rooting Jeff Brom

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay maybe, Okay, so that's in state and he will

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>have proved he will have head coaching experience in a

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 2>major conference, has a lot of buzz, would be creative,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>did a good job bringing with him Nick Holt and

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 2>succeeding on defense in year one.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me just let me say this. Let me say

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this before we go on much more about this.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Any enthusiasm I have about a young, up and coming

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>coach is blunted by this skepticism I have, maybe from

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>being a Notre Dame fan for too long that oh,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to want to go to Notre Dame.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Why would they want to go to Notre Dame when

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there might be an opening at LSU in two years,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>or there might be an opening here or there.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Early bird dinners, hard candys, shut up, let's go. Let's

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>stick with Purdue. Our old friend Danny Klobacar I added

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the n Y Last season, Purdue beat Iowa and lost

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to Northwestern and Nebraska. To have a bowl season, they

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 2>may have to flip the Nebraska game in Lincoln. So

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>heading to Lincoln with a different looking defense up front

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Nebraska game, excuse me, the Northwestern game at home,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 2>which is more likely, so going on the road and

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>beating Nebraska or beating Northwestern at home for Purdue. All right,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 2>so let's look up the produce schedule in front of me.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 2>So they have they have Iowa at ross Aid, like

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you said, a week after they travel to Michigan State,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's a week after Ohio State. So that's a

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>that's the end of a pretty rough string. They have

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 2>BC and Missouri both in ross Aid before they travel

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to Nebraska. They travel to Lincoln. So certainly going to

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Michigan State a week before coming home is probably more

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>difficult than having Boston College at home the week before Nebraska.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 2>If we're going to focus on body blow stuff, I'm

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>going to say it's more likely that Purdue is able

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to gosh, probably at home.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>That Nebraska spot is intriguing to me because it's at

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of September, right, you know, I'm pretty high

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>on Scott Frost, but there's a pretty good chance that

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>team is still going to be trying to find its way.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 2>He also mentioned Northwestern. That's the opening night game in

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>West Lafayette, right on a Thursday night, it's like the opening,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>like August thirtieth.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>That was the other game I was looking at. That's

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good spot too for them.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty good to be at home to open the

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>season when you are going to look rusty in certain aspects,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>especially with some new players around the field for both teams,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>really and Northwestern with Clayton Thorsen coming off of injury

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and his first spot back after getting hurt in the

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 2>bowl game, I think it's pretty safe to say that

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a nice spot for Purdue. So I will say

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>that's probably my most likely flip.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, where are we going next?

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Can Ucla is from Bradley surprise anyone on its schedule?

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I had this schedule. This sort of feels like can

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>I get a date to the prom? If I really like?

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I learn how to dress better real quickly?

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this a Yahoo Answers question?

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>This is a Yah can Ucla surprise? So here's the

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>full list of So if by surprise Bradley means beat

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 2>somebody unexpected who is not taking Ucla perhaps as seriously

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>as they should be, even though I think teams would

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 2>take UCLA pretty seriously. Ship Kelly sure, so that would

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 2>be at Oklahoma, that would be Washington, that would be

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>at Oregon. That would be USC and Stanford, teams that

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason believe UCLA is far away and are

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>more talented than UCLA is currently constructed. Can they surprise

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>any of those teams? Sure? I would say the most

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 2>likely of those is probably Stanford. At the end of

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the year. Okay, they get them in the Rose Bowl,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a week after Stanford is on the road in

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's the big game. But I think Cal's

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be improved. So a week after a rivalry

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>game going staying on the road feels sort of let

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>downy to me, and I know you are, you're not

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>fully convinced of kJ Costello. I think that's fair to say.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>That's fair so him going on the road, UCLA will

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 2>be more fully formed. Clearly by the end of the season.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 2>I would say that's the spot that UCLA if you

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>remember this happened a couple of years ago, that UCLA

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 2>looked really good, you know, had the let down against USC,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and then just got trucked by Stanford at home a

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>week after a rivalry game. I think I think UCLA

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>is not trucking Stanford, but it's a good spot to

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>get somebody more talented.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm doing at the current moment, Dan is

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going through and I'm looking at all of the

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>games between Chip Kelly at Oregon and Stanford.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Does Chip Kelly have a Stanford problem?

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, You're right. You'll remember we've talked about this.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It does go with him now as he moves over

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to UCLA.

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>So I want to say Oregon murdered the best Stanford

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>team ever in twenty ten.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>So Oregon won that game by a fifty two to

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty one margin.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, but I think they were down like twenty one

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to three and rolled then at that point it was

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 2>like forty nine to ten, so it was a pretty

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 2>comfortable win.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>The following year they won again handily, fifty three to thirty.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I was there now after that came a very very

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>close Stanford win in twenty twelve. I guess i'd be

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Chip Kelly's final season.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>But that's too painful to talk about, even to this,

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 2>too painful to talk about. Granted, these are different just

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, defensive coordinators and Derek Mace and everything like that,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>but there's certain you know, David Shaw's been there a

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 2>very long time. Yeah, so all right, I'll agree. Let's

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>go to the SEC. We have a couple more questions

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>before we get into food. Does that work for you?

0:28:59.280 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>A couple more?

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it couple more. This is from Tyler. I

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>think the twenty eighteen version of Florida, which Tyler is

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>very confident he knows what the twenty eighteen version of

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Florida is going.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>To look like.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>But I appreciate that sure would beat LSU, who they

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 2>lost to by one, or Texas A and M, who

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>they lost to by two this time around.

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so he is he is taking the twenty eighteen

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Florida Gators on the Magic school Bus back a year

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in playing LSU in Texas A and M. Is that

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is that my underside?

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I think? I think he means twenty eighteen LSU and

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>A and M. Oh oh, well, Florida doesn't even play

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>A and M this year, so he must mean last year's. Okay,

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>so let's go with l Let's just stick with LSU.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 2>How would you rank Florida's ability to flip that LSU loss?

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I am pretty bullish on Florida this year. Okay, I'm

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty bullish. I think because Dan Mullen is there. The

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>offense has to be better. I also am very aware

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that I said the exact same thing

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with their lasting football coach, The offense has to be better,

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta be better.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>He's an all cosive mind.

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but this time, eventually, I've got to be right

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with that, and I think Dan Mullin's probably the guy

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to get that done. So provided provided that their defense

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>remains on point. I don't have any reason to believe otherwise.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the offense improves enough to the point that, yeah,

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a one point loss is surmountable in twenty eighteen, so yeah,

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll agree with that.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's so LSU has a better immediate schedule

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>coming into that Florida game. They host Louisiana Tech and

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>they host Ole Miss, which defensively two good places to

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 2>get some momentum with the new offensive coordinator, a new

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>new new quarterback, going into an extremely tough place to play,

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>having already played Miami and going to Auburn that's probably

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>nice to have. Whereas Florida goes to Tennessee, which I

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>think will be fine but nothing. They're nowhere near their ceiling,

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and they go to Mississippi State, which is a complete

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>unknown under Joe moorehead, but a pretty talented team, so

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Florida will be happy to come back home. I think

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>LSU was probably in a pretty good spot there. I

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 2>am giving the slight edge, even at a tough place

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to play. I think I'm giving it a slight edge

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to LSU.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wow, Okay, I don't know.

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm feeling confident. I'm feeling a little above

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>average confidence wise in Joe Burrow right now. Why talking

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>myself into him?

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>You're talking yourself into Joe Dirt.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking myself into Joe Dirts. That's completely correct. I

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know. The more I think about it, you know,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>LSU just had a at a sort of starcross poor

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 2>time last year, and I think it's going to take

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit for Florida to fully get in rhythm,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>whereas there is at least a little bit more continuity

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>with LSU, even with going back to an interim offensive coordinator.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I like the day of a Randa with a more

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in place LSU defense against a first year Florida offense,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>even on the road. I reserve the right to change

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>my mind.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Where are we going next? Let's go like

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>one more football.

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, one more football? This is cross conference? How

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>about that? Yeah, Jonathan says, Ohio State don't blow the

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>big twelve out of conference game like they did to

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma at home last year. This year they're going to

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>TCU in September.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So now is this a question or is this just

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like a statement don't blow it?

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of both. So TCU hosts that game

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>early on against Ohio State. That's in Arlington. It looks

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 2>like Week three. So TCU opens the season with Southern

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>they go to SMU Sunny Dyke, and then in the

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>somewhat neutral not fully neutral game in their own area

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of Texas. I suppose in North Texas against Ohio States.

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Both teams, new quarterbacks, both teams with certainly talent on defense.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State is going to be a little bit more

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 2>dangerous there, but it's going to be an easier time

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>travel wise for TCU. Does Ohio State blow that game

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>early like they've done a couple of times? Really good

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State teams have had that one trip up early

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>on a couple time, you know, going back to that

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Virginia Tech game a few years ago on their national

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>championship team, and then last year against Oklahoma even though

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>they really looked good the rest of the year. Where

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>is your early lean?

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So an early draw against TCU, knowing full well that

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State is going to be in a position with

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a new quarterback is intriguing to me. However, Ohio State

0:33:54.400 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is so well rounded offensively beyond the quarterback position, particularly

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in that running game that can get you places. So

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see that being a close game, especially since

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>its neutral site. But I my leaning is still Ohio

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>State in that game. They usually play well in that spot,

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>usually right, So far be it from me to go

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>against Urban Meyer in a in a big spot early

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>You'll also remember that Ohio State went to Oklahoma a

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 2>couple of years drilled really looked good on the road,

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 2>drilledom So there's something to be said. And we talked

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 2>about the Kansas buffer, the Kansas pillow. Right, do you

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 2>know who Ohio State opens the season with one and

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 2>eleven Oregon States and Rutgers.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that Rutgers pillow is pretty soft too.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 2>The Rutgers Oregon State too, So it's almost it's a

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 2>bed with just extra pillows. There's so much throw pillow

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on that bed. You have to it's Ohio State tearing away.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 2>I have to throw pillows to get to where they're

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>actually sleeping. Rutgers went four to eight last year, so

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll combined. If my math serves five and nineteen to

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>open the season, right, pretty good for Ohio State. So

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Ohio State wins that game by double digits.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, let's go to a non football question here.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Close it out again. Soliverbotgmail dot com, email in, find

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>us out on all the social media's, subscribe to our newsletter. Continue.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:31.439
<v Speaker 2>So I specifically asked for cookout, grilling, barbecue, whatever your

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>preferred term is, side dishes because I was tasked with

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>making one of these for one tomorrow, and I settled on,

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna charge some corn up and then toss it.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I sent you this recipe with avocado. I might even

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>add some black beans, some hot peppers. It's in like

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.919
<v Speaker 2>a spicy honey lime vinagrette, maybe some cilantro. It looked

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 2>real good, refreshing, and I think, as you know, we

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 2>got a ton of these emails about people making brisket

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 2>or ribs or what goes with you sausage whatever. I

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to run a good counter. I think

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>we're grilling up some sausages, so I think with like

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the salt factor, it's going to be like a good

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>burst of freshness. And you know, zest tip, what do

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you think about a charred corn salad?

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You showed me the picture of it earlier, right, it

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>looks delightful. If you can pull it off, I think

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I can. I already know the avocados separate. Yeah, so

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't get all all browned. So you have a

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>native working knowledge of the avocado. That's true, I do,

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so I feel pretty confident that you can pull this off. Yeah,

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>h okay.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 2>So this goes right into Robbie asking which is better

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 2>with ribs, baked mac and cheese, or roasted corn on

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the cob.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a ribs guy.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I do like ribs.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a ribs guy, but I'm definitely more of

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a corn on the cob guy. Here.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say this depends basically if you are if

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.040
<v Speaker 2>you're a lacquering sauce on the ribs, which I like

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 2>a dry rube, I like a wet sauce. Whatever. If

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going with that sweeter sauce, I think The answer

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 2>is like a salty, limey roasted corn to counter the

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 2>sweetness and the meatiness. I think if you were going

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>dryer with like the saltiness, I think you go mac

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 2>and cheese for richness and starchiness to counter that. Sound right?

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It sounds right? Yeah?

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Okay. A lot of people asking questions about Cole

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.439
<v Speaker 2>slaw tie. Are you a slow guy?

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you like a mayo based or a vinegar or neither?

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a slow guy. I'm just not in general,

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a slog guy.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Whatever reason, people, I'd like mayo, I like vinegar, I'll

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 2>like this is my move for slaw and it's it's

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>what comes on my favorite fried chicken sandwich that exists

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 2>in Son of a Gun in La. If you like vinegar,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>if you like that tang tie, maybe a little bit

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>of spice I would go with the dressing. You maybe

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 2>have some slight you know, some some sliced onions, some

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Holopano's if you're into that spice, A little bit of

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 2>pickle juice.

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Huh?

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>That was what Douce Staley used to use to get

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of the cramps.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that one hundred percent confirmed?

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Percent. I don't know if the science behind it is confirmed, but.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 2>He actually did go yeah juice, Yeah yeah, I would

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>go with a little bit of pickle juice for your

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 2>slow dressing. You can put it on sandwiches, you can

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 2>have it on the side with your richer meats. That's

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 2>my recommendation for slaught eart your meats. Look at you,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 2>your richer meats. This was a great life question, ty Yeah.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Another one from our friend Danny Kay for attending cookout

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 2>grow whatever. If you follow a lifestyle such as paleo

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>or vegan paleo, as far as I know, it's you

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>have to eat very basic foods prepared and very basic,

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 2>like you can cook them, but nothing. You're not makeing enchiladas.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Altas are not paleo? Should you a only eat when

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you can at the risk of offending hosts or having

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to explain yourself or be bring a few dishes of

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 2>your own at the risk of being seen as forcing

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 2>your way of life onto others. So say you're going to.

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>A cookout, right, I see what he's doing with this here.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And like, if you're eating paleo, you could have like

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you could have a hot dog

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 2>that's a process meat. But well, you could have a burger.

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 2>I assume it's just ground beef over fire with some

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>salt or something like that again, or a steak or

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 2>a piece of chicken. I don't know. I listen. I'm

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to pretend like I know what paleo is.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 2>But I'm gonna answer this question like I do. I

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 2>would say, eat your sides beforehand, come a little bit hungry,

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and have some meat. I do think it's a little

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 2>bit strange to come with your tupperware and say like

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a ah, hey, Mike's here and he brought I brought

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>my own roast broccoli.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a little weird.

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a tough thing to pull off with

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 2>the asterisk. If people already know you're a weirdo and

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 2>confident about that, like I imagine people think of me,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 2>then go for it. But if it's a bunch of

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 2>people you don't know and you don't want to explain

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>yourself over and over again, eat your side dishes first,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 2>and come eat some meat or whatever is paleo there.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I stand by what I said a couple of weeks ago,

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which is just don't make a production, right, don't make

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a production, don't cause a scene. You know, do your

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>best to sort of blend in. But the world does

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily care that you are adhering to a specific cuisine,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>specific dietary choice.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 2>That's that's right. I think I just it'd be it'd

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 2>be very strange to ding dong door opens. I'm there

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 2>holding my tupperware for my food only it's a strange,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>strange thing to put onto somebody. Also, our friend Jess says,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 2>skip the sides meat only. I can't do that, love is.

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I know she's gluten free because she has seliac disease.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But there are plenty of grapes. You can eat beans,

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>you can eat potato salad, you can eat that slow.

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you're okay. I think you gotta eat some

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 2>sides to balance.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So now I need to I need to talk to

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you about this question from David.

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I know you're not a beer guy, how much

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of aut not, But I will talk beer, all right.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So he says, some are shandy or servesa with a lime.

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what summer shandy is. Are you familiar with

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the line of Google's summer Shandy?

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I believe that is it beer mixed with like a

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:29.439
<v Speaker 2>tart lemonade. It's uh something like that. Yeah, I feel

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like it's a lemony michelada.

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so some are shandy. Or when he says servesa

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with a lime, he's really just ignoring the obvious reference

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>here to bud light lime.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.479
<v Speaker 2>You know it's I think it's probably bud light mixed

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 2>with lime powder. But okay, do you like bud light lime.

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I am a proponent of bud light lime dan Okay.

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it deserves a five out of five

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>on your untapped social network. I'm just saying that bud

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>light lime in summertime should not be frowned upon and

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>can be rather refreshing. I'm okay with it.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Do they make non light beer lime beers.

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Non light beer?

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure? Like, can you get like a bud heavy line

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>or could you get like a like a Cores regular

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Cores lime.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. I think it's being sort of sold as

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a light refreshing option, kind of like

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they do with the mic Ultra stuff, which never I

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>never really understood as a marketing pitch. But you know,

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to come in from mowing the lawn

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in a one hundred degree heat and be like, Wow,

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm thirsty for a Mick Ultra like no one, No

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>one does that. But he may also be referring to

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>a corona with the lime, which is a much more

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a much more standard practice. That's definitely a higher end

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>version of the bud light lime fad that we find

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in here in twenty eighteen. I think both are acceptable,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and both are preferable over summer shandy. If I'm selecting.

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 2>One, there is something that it's summer shandy can be

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 2>very acidic. I'm gonna go with like a takaate with

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>lime being my ideal cold summer beer. It's cheap, it's

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 2>available everywhere, it's great cold, it mixes well with a lime.

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 2>That's probably my.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Move there at our at our live show, if someone

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>comes up and wants to buy me a bud Light lime,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I will not at all scoff at that.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's probably gonna be pretty warm in Chicago.

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Scoff at a bud Light lime, A nice cold bud

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Light lime.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, blah blah blah blah. Here we go. JD wants

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to know the best side dishes that also make for

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 2>good toppings on hot dogs. Oh boy, so you're not

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a slaw person. Now, hot dogs are good tie.

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in LA where there's it's a pretty

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 2>experimental hot dog town. Tie. It just is. Hey, did

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I ever take you to any of like the weird

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 2>hot dog places in La?

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Experimental hot dog town? Oh my god?

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Tie. Okay, So there's a famous place called Pinks. Do

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you know about Pinks hot dogs?

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Pinks?

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 2>They have Pinks, Yes, Pink's hot dogs. I want to

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 2>say it's on Melrose, and it is. They they're very creative.

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe these hot dogs named after famous people that come

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 2>create it. And some of them have a slow some

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>be a mac and cheese dog, like a bacon potato salad,

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, like there'll be a Seth Rogan dog and

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 2>a Martha Stewart dog and they really go for it.

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't really do like the crazy hot dogs. They're

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 2>chili cheese dog is outstanding. So I would say side

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 2>dishes that make for good toppings for hot dogs, ranch beans,

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 2>sort of a chili stand in. I think that's fine.

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 2>You want to put some cheese on there as well,

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Mustard onions great, so ranch baked beans type things, that's great.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I will say a spicy slaw and a hot dog

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 2>really good. Maybe a spicy mustard as the dressing for

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the slaw. Okay, I think that can be great. Beyond

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.240
<v Speaker 2>slaw and beans as a side dish on a dog,

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is chili.

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Is chili a side dish? Though, sure you will go

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to a cookout and they will be making like chicken

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and steaks with a side of chili. I don't know.

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Chili chili Chili's versatile enough that it could be a

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>side if someone to make it as a side.

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more likely you're gonna get like ranch beans,

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 2>which are chili esque.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, chili, I think is the answer.

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>But what is how would you most rigorously load.

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Up a hot dog?

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Tie? What do you mean? I just wanted to say rigorously,

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Like what is your standard hot dog topping wise? And

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're really going for it, if you're making like

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 2>a super dog super dog, Like if you are, you

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 2>know you're you're doing it not just for flavor, but

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 2>also for show that you want, like the a loaded

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 2>hot dog.

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, the loaded hot dog would come if I went

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>to Yako's.

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 2>So what's the loaded Yako's dog?

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The loaded Yako's dog is the Yacko's secret sauce, which

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of a kind closest to It's like a

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>chili okay, a chili sauce rather than a chili. Let's

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>do that's right. They'll put some onions on it, but

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>usually just a chili sauce and maybe some onions here

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and there. If I were loading it up, though, if

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I had my pick of the proverbial hot dog condiment

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 1>add on litter mm mmm hm would I would commit

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the cardinal sin and go ketchup.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 2>That's fine.

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I would probably also put some yellow mustard on there.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. I would probably go some onions as well,

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe try to simulate the yaco's experience with

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort of chili, although you're always sort of taking

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your life in your hands when you use a foreign

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>chili as a topping on the hot dog, so you

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mix. You don't know how that's gonna go over.

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Can you taste the ketchup with chili on there as

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>well or the chili sauce? I feel like that's pretty close.

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I probably wouldn't overdo it with the ketchup, Okay,

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>something like that I think.

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 2>The only real So I obviously feel strongly about ketchup.

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I know somebody on our subreddit I want to say

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it's it's either Striker or Peter that their handle sort

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 2>of says ketchup equals garbage and fine. I smile every

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 2>time I see it, but I've softened on the like. Listen,

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 2>if you like ketchup, we'll ketch um on your hot dog.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gross, but you know, to each their own.

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 2>If i'm loading up, I'm going chili love a place

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 2>called Tommy's, a fast food place. I'll get a like

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 2>a pint of chili from there. Yellow mustard, not talking

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 2>about brown, not talking about some sort of spicy or

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 2>honey like the Grays must like New York mustard is

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 2>just trash yellow like frenches. Whatever mustard Frenches get at

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 2>us for a sponsorship. We're open some diced onions, mustard. Oh,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and I might melt some American cheese under the dog tie.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 2>So I like melt a little bit of cheese, dog mustard, onions,

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and then ChIL encapsulating everything. Okay, Wow, that's it's aggressive.

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm not gonna tell you it's not.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Two more non football, Dan, before we.

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Go, let's go to a lot of people just have

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 2>questions about coleslaw. Who knew Matt Werner grilled veggies underrated

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 2>as a side dish. I don't know they're underrated. I

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 2>think everybody I know likes grilled veggies.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, underrated in general.

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, what what are your go to specifics? The

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>grilled zucchini, probably the champ yeah, oh man, I go onions,

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe some poblano peppers, well, spiceing there. I love grilled onions.

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 2>I can eat a mountain of onions any and you

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 2>wake me up in the middle of the night with

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.439
<v Speaker 2>a plate of grilled onions, Tie, I'm rearing.

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>If you. If you literally and figuratively, Daniel.

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm real if you. If you've knocked down my front

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 2>door with a just a mound of sauteed or grilled

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 2>onions and you had a bullhorn and you said it's

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 2>an emergency and I had to jump out of bed,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, the emergency is these onions are delicious.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I would I would say, what the hell, Tie, and

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you for the onions, because I do love them.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Last question, we got a couple questions about potato salad.

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So my question to you is have you made potato salads?

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you have stances on potato salads? Do you have

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 2>secret ingredients that go into potato salads? And Nathan specifically

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to know if there's anything more variant than good

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to bad potato salad.

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I have very strong thoughts on potato salad.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I'm ready.

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta be cold. First off? Oh, yes, of course

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I like a cold potato salad.

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, was say? The German ones are like, is that

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 2>what's warm?

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean they're just warm in general if you

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>leave them out of the fridge.

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:47.760
<v Speaker 2>For me, Well, no, I know. I think German potato

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 2>salads supposed to be warm.

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The Germans like everything warm. They like their Vierau room temperature. Yeah,

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very strange, but I prefer a colder potato salad

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to start. I also prefer a potato salad of the

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit more your variety.

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm so in there with you.

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Like the potato salad be a little bit crunchier. Sometimes

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you get mushy and that's fine.

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 2>M m.

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, for sure, needs to be crunchy, needs

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to be cold. Also, there's nothing worse than a potato

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 1>salad that has been poorly mixed and it just tastes awful.

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that we have been more simpatico on

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a food topic than we are with potato salad. I

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 2>want a crunch factor. I don't want it over creamed.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I want it well seasoned. Crunch factor can be anything

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:35.919
<v Speaker 2>you want, salt crunch. You want some bacon in there,

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you want some scallions, some Julianne carrots. Really go for it.

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:44.760
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, I just need texture variation. Tie, it sounds

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>funny when I say it out loud, and it's.

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Gotta be cold. It's gotta gotta be cold. Some people

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>really just go heavy on the mayo.

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you like a mustard potato salad?

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they've ever had one of those.

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh delicious, Tie, you were.

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The one who turned me on initially to brown mustard,

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's changed my life.

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I do like brown mustard, just not on my hot dogs.

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I would yeah, I would definitely say keep it cold,

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 2>but yellow mustard or yeah, yellow mustard and potato salad

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 2>more found in the South, I would say than anywhere else. Delicious.

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You get that tang factor. You're not as relying on mayo.

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 2>You get something maybe sweet with the carrots and salty

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 2>with bacon or scallions or something like that. I love

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a potato salad because it counteracts barbecue meats so well,

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 2>the sort of chilled starchiness against that the hot saltiness.

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 2>I am. I'm just fully enthusiastic and on board with

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 2>excellent potato salads.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we leave it there?

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Daniel? Can I peel? Can I peel some couple layers

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:41.800
<v Speaker 2>back on this show?

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 2>You? Initially, because I'm traveling this week and you've been

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 2>running around, you said to to me, you said, should

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 2>we just take this week off?

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I did? I did say that, Yeah.

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Perfectly reasonable question. Right, we're in the we're in the

0:51:57.000 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 2>midst of somewhere. We're right before we're gonna fully load

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 2>up for the season. We've got season previews coming up,

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>We've got media days coming up, we have actual news.

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be ramping up and doing more shows. I said,

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 2>you know what, Tye, it's it's the holiday week. Why

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 2>don't we give you know, people are traveling, why don't

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 2>we give them something? And you said, all right, let's

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 2>record at four thirty and let's bang out a half hour. Yep.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And here we are at five thirty seven, and I

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 2>just I bow down. Ty you are a warrior. Other

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 2>other shows take weeks off, and they're great shows, but

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 2>they'll take a week off. They don't dedicate themselves to

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 2>editing and production value like you do. Ty Here you are.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 2>This is your MJ flu game.

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit of.

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 2>A flu game, the dead of the off season.

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>One hundred degree heat. Yeah, yep. If it sounds like

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a wind tunnel, it's because I've got the

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fan in this room on. That's fine turbo at the moment.

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I just.

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm just sitting here that when you are listening to

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 2>this show, please know that Tye is giving you every

0:52:59.160 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 2>last bit of him.

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to collapse in a puddle after this. Yeah,

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that's all I got. I just wanted to let it

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be known that you are You're digging deep, and I

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thank you, Daniel. I appreciate you, yes, as

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I always do. And I appreciate all the verballers yep,

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>who so kindly sent us a Gosh, we have pages

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of questions here.

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 2>We do we have about eight pages. We asked for

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 2>questions about an hour before recording.

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>On like an hour's notice. So thank you to everyone,

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as always for your support and enthusiasm we do have.

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 1>We've been saying it. Trust us when we say that,

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we mean it. A whole bunch of exciting things coming

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.359
<v Speaker 1>up here. Really, we're on the precipice of what's going

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a very exciting next couple months here in

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Solid Verbalville, not the least of which is of course,

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the live show The Fantasy Things Draft somewhere in Chicago

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on August the eleventh. We're working out to that. Please

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>do subscribe to the newsletter if you want to get

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>first DIBs on those tickets. That's where you're going to

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:01.279
<v Speaker 1>get the link first and foremost. Also, we've got merch

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>coming out. We've seen proofs. The store is about to launch.

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 1>We're very excited about how that looks. Yep, a lot

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of exciting stuff. I was stunned by the way at

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the reaction we got to the dad hat.

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>People want to be lazy on game day. They don't

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 2>want to be doing their hair, they just want to

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:20.479
<v Speaker 2>throw a hat on. I've worn the new Solid Verbal

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 2>hat and I can tell you not only does it

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 2>have looks, but it has personality. Yeah, so I'm a

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 2>big fan. So yeah, the hat's coming out. We're told

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:31.720
<v Speaker 2>that the merch Star opens this week. Hopefully that's the case.

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.720
<v Speaker 2>We've got three shirts, We've got a hat. We posted

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the shirts both on Twitter and Instagram. Follow

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're not yet, We'll post a couple more pictures

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of the other stuff soon. And yeah, sign up for

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 2>the newsletter. We can't wait to see everybody, whether you're

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago or coming from elsewhere in the Midwest or

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else in the country, for the Fantasy Things Draft

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 2>on August eleventh in Chicago. We are I really wish

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 2>we would have had this venue situation taken care of,

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 2>but we assure you it is within the city limits

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 2>of Chicago. And sign up for that dang newsletter for

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that first link to make sure you get your tickets.

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:10.839
<v Speaker 1>On that note for that gentleman over there, my good

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>friend Dan Rubinstein or myself, Ty hilden Brand over here

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in Allentown, PA. By all means, enjoy your fourth Please

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stay safe, enjoy your cookouts, Enjoy any road trips you

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 1>might be on here. Yeah, we'll catch you all in

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a week. In the meantime, stay solid, peace,