WEBVTT - Trump Is Derailing, Perverting the Mission of the USPS: O'Brien

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day,

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. We says over for Congress,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi has called back the House because of growing

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>controversy surrounding the USPS, the United States Postal Service. Writing

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on this subject today in Bloomberg Opinion, Timothy O'Brien, senior

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>columnist for Bloomberg, And in fact it wasn't today, Tim,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but it has been recently, and it's not the first

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>time you've written on this subject. What can Congress do

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to throw light on what the president is doing and

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>rain in anything that's illegal? Um? Well, Van, yeah, I

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think I think I should do a lot to throw

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>light on the problem. I'm not sure how much they

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can do to stop it. What's going on is mail

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>carriers hours has been reduced, Post office hours have been reduced.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>UM large mail sorting machines are being taken out of

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>commission in post office hubs and all of this is

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>slowing down mail delivery that matters in an election year.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, because uh, there's there's a strong chance we're

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have a huge surgeon mail in voting uh

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>this year because of the pandemic. And um, it's it's

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear that um, this is is in is an

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>effort to weaponize the Postal Service to slow down mail

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in balloting, and the President is behind that. He's done

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>very little uh to try to stop it. He's been

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>questioned about it, he said he has no interest in

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>changing what's going on in the Postal Service. In fact,

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he said he won't even release funds of the Postal

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Service that would allow to speed up its operations. Um Uh.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress is holding hearings. Congress has asked the Inspector General

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Post Office to examine this. A number of

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>state attorneys general are are coalescing around this and planning

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to sue the Trump administration of the Post Office to

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>stop these practices, but that has to wend its way

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>through the court. So the issue here is, um, how

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>much can really be done in real time to course

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>correct here so voters of both parties don't get their

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>votes um taken away from them because the post Office

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>can't deliver their balance. I didn't even know this was

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a thing until it happened him. Um, it just seems

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like every day there's something new here, is there? This

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes to the bigger question. I guess that

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>some people are raising that if the president were to

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>lose this election, that perhaps he would not be willing

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to really admit that, or or he would can can

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>contest it? Is that a material risk in your perspective,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a very material risk, And he said as much.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he said in recent press appearances that we

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>will know the results on election night. We may not

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>know it for weeks after election night, perhaps even months.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that we certainly may not know an election night,

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and we may not know shortly after election night. But

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but we will find out in relatively short order, and

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>voters will just have to get used to the facts.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Will take a little longer this year, but the President

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>has already ceded the ground with the idea that the

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>vote can't be trusted. He said that mail in balloting

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is riddled with fraud. That's just factually untrue. A majority

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of states have used it quite well for quite a

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>long time, including Red states Republican states who stand by

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it as a process. So yeah, it's a material risk,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think, like everything in the Trump era, he's

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he's pressing the limits of what we accept as norms

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>around executive authority and presidential behavior and public institutions that

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are really challenging people to kind of wrestle these things

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to the ground with him. It's really interesting because it

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of puts paid to the idea that the president

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>may not run now, or may pull out of the

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>race if he thinks he's not going to win, or

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or or or this rhetoric that's going around that maybe

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really want it, that he had his one

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>term and he'll be finding something else. It seems like

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he really, really, really does want to win a second term.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that's been pointed out to people in

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>his campaign and to himself is that last time around

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Mielan balloting actually benefited him, and so even that isn't enough,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to change his mind on what's going

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on here with the postal service. Now. His argument is

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's a money loser, and of course that's a

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>winning argument for a capitalist who cares about money. How

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how do those who don't like what's going on defend

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the USPS. So it's the United States Postal Service, it's

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not the United States Postal business. It was mentioned in

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the in the Constitution as an organization that was meant

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to knit the country together and to make sure that

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Americans who lived in far fun places would always have

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a means of communication. Uh. And that's still true today.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The Post Office loses a lot of money on traditional

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>mail delivery because they have to deliver to remote rural communities.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>Seniors really rely on the service, and the post Office

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>itself is not allowed to raise the price of stamps.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>That's that's set by a commission that decides what the

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>affordable rate should be. But we also don't expect the

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Department of Defense to make a profit. In fact, the

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Department of Defense loses by that standard. The Department of

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Defense loses far more money annually than the post Office,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>roads and bridges, fire departments, police departments. Uh. The Intelligence

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>services and the Diplomatic Corps and the White House itself

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>are not for profit businesses their public services. Uh. That said,

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that the post offices operations could be

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>streamlined and and and new thought and fresh thinking about

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>how can do its job better is welcome. But it's

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a complete strong man to say this is about just

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>making the post office a better business. It's very clear

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>now that that this is about the post office mission

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>being perverted and derailed in the service of a trench

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>warfare approach to politics. Well, it's extraordinary. Tim O'Brien, thanks

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us and providing some color on

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what is a developing story. One that's getting the interest

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the of Congress right now is Speaker Pelos, who

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>brings the house back. Timothy O'Brian, Senior Columns for Bloomberg

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Opinion joining us. Just a fascinating story. There's something new

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>every day, it seems like. And it's uh the good

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>folks of Bloomberg News and UH and Bloomberg Opinion keeping

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up on all of it, so we appreciate their help. Well,

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this market has been described as one that's being quote

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>unquote backstopped by the US Federal Reservant for that matter,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of central banks around the world. To get a sense

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of whether that is enough for this market going forward

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to welcome Nicholas, co founder Data Trek Research, Nick, thanks

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so much. For joining us here. So again i'd love

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to get your thirty foot view on what's kind of

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing this market higher. We obviously had that terrible pullback

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>March April when the coronavirus hit, but since then with

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve stepping in with fiscal stimulus and all

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the markets come roaring back, and love to get your

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughts right here right now as it relates to some

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of these riskier assets. Sure, the way we think about

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it at Data Trek is the market is discounting a

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>very definite the bottom, not necessarily in the economy, but

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in corporate profits. So if you think about a forty

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>two dollar a share earnings power number for the SMP

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in the back half of last year per quarter, two dollars,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>markets expecting we're going to get back to those levels

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the next four quarters. So even though the economy

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be sluggish, we are going to get

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>very high levels of corporate profitability because of fiscal stimulus,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because of monetary stimulus, and because of costing, we're going

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to get back to those numbers. And that's why the

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>markets back to its old highs, because it doesn't care

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>how we get that earnings number. It just cares that

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we do get it, and it has a very highly

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>read confidence that we will. But Nick, it doesn't matter

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>how much stimulus you give corporations or how lenient do

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you make the rules for them to get money to

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tie them over. If there isn't demand for their products

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>from from customers who themselves are dropped, those earnings can't

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be there. Come they no very good point and that's

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>why they change in the composition of the SMP is

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so important. We're actually looking at this for clients last night.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in two thousand sixteen, technology was the SMP.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>The comp number now apples to Apples thirty three. And

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as we saw the second quarter earnings, you have a

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>whole range of tychnical companies that are really hurting, but

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>technology is doing extremely well. So the SMP five hundred

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a unique measure of corporate profitability because

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it is waiting those companies that have very high that

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was a profitability even to um showing high levels of

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. It values them very highly. So the F

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and P is not perhaps the best measure, but it's

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the one most folks follow, and the earnings are there

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for the technology sector and others that aren't as affected.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So Nick, it appears that this next next round of

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, you know, we didn't get it, you know,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>before the recess. Now there's some talk about perhaps will

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>get something in September. How critical is it for the

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>market to get a meaningful piece of fiscal stimulus? Uh,

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>in the relatively near term. I mean on a scale

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of one to ten, it's probably a fifteen or sixteen.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Um it's super super critical, you know, And to Bonny's

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>point earlier, it's it underpins that ability for aggregate earnings

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to improve. You know, without that, you don't get that

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>part of the story. Look, I mean, you know, looking

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at past cycles, you know, every cycle bottom is a

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit different, and the biggest difference is exactly what's

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>going to make us come off the bottom this time around?

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It the whole is so deep that the market saying

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>politicians have to provide the stimulus, they have no choice

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>as an election year, and so our uncertainty about future

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>earnings is actually lower than traditional bottom cycle moments when

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>there isn't that level of support. So Nick, you know,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the biggest risk here to this to this market rally?

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's it's a great question, um. You know,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>to us, the biggest risk is is a hybrid of

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the policy political issue and the earnings issue. You know,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we think back to two thousand eight, for example, really

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>horrible quarter for UM, for the for the market, and

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it came in part because there was a huge change

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of government in Washington during the eight elections and we

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>had a real power vacuum for several months during a

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>period of you know, in the middle of the financial crisis.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>My biggest concern is we just get that's a similar

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of power vacuum around the election. It's not necessarily

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because of anything untoward that happens in the election, but

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>just millions in charge in DC for a few months,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just when we get into perhaps a second wave and

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>real concerns about the state of the economy in the

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>first half of next year. So my biggest concern is

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we get a power vacuum in Washington in the matter

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>month of the year and you end up with not

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so much confidence around those corporations. As we discussed. Alright,

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So Nick, if where do you think where do you

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>think investors should be looking in this market? Given the

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>move we've had given that it's been. You know, the

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>breath of this market isn't what most technicians or even

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental analysts would like to see. Where do you see

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunities here? You know, do you take a look across

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the risk assets. You know, right now we

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are favoring cyclicals um selectively. So I'm talking about industrials

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and energy first and Foremost industrials have the most ardens

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>leverage going into meaning they generate the most out of

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>incremental profits from upside surprise and revenues, and energy has

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest potential upside. On the revenue side, you have

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a profitability to be kind of shaky just because of

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>commodity pricing improved of it. So circle goals to the

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>place we're recommending people to put in current on money.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a hard way to make money, though.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>We think circle goals will outperform over the back half

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year, but it'll probably happen over ten random

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>days where they're up two percents in the markets. Flat

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and a tough way to make money, but that's the

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>way to outperform. We don't like the financials though. The

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>financials are just stuck in their own private health. Yeah,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a great way to put it, right. I mean,

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>even Warren Buffett Is is deciding that he doesn't care

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>about the financials anymore. It's really really interesting. Did you

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>learn anything for the thirteen F filings? Nick, No? No

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>from Buffets No. I mean it's it is. It's always

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to watch him because he's just so good at

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what he does. But no, not really, you it's and

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just more broadly from the hedge funds and what they

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>were doing or how hedge funds made money. So, for example,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I was dropped by Chris Rockell spying just a whole

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>heap of Ali Baba and like literally that's all he did.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>He just made that one, if I can say, ballsy trade,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know obviously it's paying off. Yeah. No, I

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>mean Baba's boba is an interesting one. Evaluation is so

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>cheap relative and China tech generally is so cheap relative

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to US tech that you kind of want to think

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a catch up trade. And we're certainly seeing some

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of the catch up trade in the broader Chinese market

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>today with the stimulus last night. Are you seeing Nick

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so t extent? You're looking at more cyclical names is

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that suggests you're going to fund that with some of

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the tech names that have a performed Yes. I mean

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the way the way we think about it is if

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you if you want to underweight one sector, it's got

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>to be financials. There's just nothing going on there, and

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>then you can dumbell it out between the industrial's energy

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and the tech and have a reasonable shot of that

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>performing that. The banks are just just in a horrible space. Nick.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We will catch up with you again very soon and

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>take the temperature of the banks and the cyclicals and

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lots lots of more. This market is going nowhere as

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 1>as it seems anyway, it's going to just continue to

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go and hire Nichols as co founder of data Check Research.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic notes every day, really and get in touch with

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick if if you want to subscribe to the our

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>research once again, our thanks to Nick Cholas. I don't

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>want to bring you a headline across the Bloomberg. Just

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a few moments ago, New York City gyms can open

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>August twenty four, which is one week from today, with

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent capacity, so third capacity. Yeah, and in

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>fact it's more than New York City. It's it's it's

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>New York State Gym's, so gym's all over the state

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>can open August as long as people wear masks and

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they are not full beyond thirty three percent capacity, which

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was so beginners or people who haven't come to the

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>gym in a long time quite happy for fewer people

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in the gym. Yeah. Absolutely, that's not to

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>suggest that I myself will be going back. That might

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>not be for coronavirus reasons, that might be for other reasons.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>New research suggests glaring divergences between a m D and Intel,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>something that maybe didn't seems so obvious before. Let's bring

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in a strus and senior semiconductor and harder analyst for

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence to tell us about this new research. And

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know there were are rivals. But what does

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this new research tell us about A m D and

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>intell how they do their business and their products. Good

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>morning morning, Paul, Thank you for having me. So we've

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>done some work. That study that suggests that there's a

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>structural landscape shift going on in the microposter industry across

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>PCs and across servers between mb and Intel. M D

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>appears to be on the front foot and will continue

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to gain share in our view through twenty and one,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and in the data center their share could as much

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as triple from sort of the five percent range to

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the fi percent range. UM and Intel, on the other hand,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>will continue to lose share. Um Intel has a wider

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>variety of products and certainly is larger, but that may

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not help it at all over the next couple of years,

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly as the cloud becomes a bigger piece of the

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>pie and more powerful piece of the pie. So, you know,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the evaluations, and you look at how

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the stocks have performed here to date. And while it

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>might suggest, you know, getting a lot of calls from

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>clients about okay, is this you know, another set up

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for long Intel shorty m D for example, but fundamentals

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are suggesting exactly exactly the opposite. So on, you know,

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to this tech lay person, when I think chips, I

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think Intel. What's happened to Intel in terms of you know,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>losing share here? They seem to have lost kind of

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>their you know there, I guess their new product Mojo,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>their technology Mojo. What's what do you think is at

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the route there? You know, you can attribute it to

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different factors. For I mean, if you

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>look at their technology transitions transitions from our transistor shrinkage perspective,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they were late to full key n animeter, they're late

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to ten animeter and now seven animeters delayed. Now considered that,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the technology shrinkage isn't the be all. Lend

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>All and More's law is in fact slowing. But smaller

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the transistors, more the transistors on the chip, more the

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>transistors on the chip, chip is more powerful, uh, quite simplistically,

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and at the at the same time, more transistors on

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the chip produces the cost for transistion purely because of scaling.

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And if you keep prices same or you reduce it

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>at a lower rate, you gross margins also can expand.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But m D has certainly taken the upper hand in

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this and is as much as a node or node

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half ahead of Intel, and Intel's sort of

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>slow in its transitions. It has a wider ice cream shop,

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>if you may, you know it has a wider variety

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of flavors, wider variety of toppings and sauces and stuff

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that go with it. But at the end of the day,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you still have to have a quality venilla, strawberry,

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and chocolate in order to build a more fitting ices

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Sunday for your clients. I'm loving these analogies. And so

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>what do customers want? Do they want the maybe a

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more old fashioned flavor is you know, at

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a good price point that are very very reliable, you know,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or do they want the new stuff? I mean, people

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 1>were quite happy to wait for Apple to catch up

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>with other people on on their software and so on.

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>They didn't demand that app will be first on everything. Yeah,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great point. So one of the

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a fantastic question because the cloud has upended,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>upended the demand for the ice cream, if you may.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the variety of computing workloads that

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the cloud has brought to bear, everything has become large.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything has now has scale. So you want the specialized

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ice cream Sunday um and the demand for that is

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>high relative to you know, corporate I demand scale, if

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you may, and they vanillas, strawberry and chocolate. So if

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at what the m D has to offer,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it doesn't have all the flavors um in the

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the ice cream shop, and maybe it's applicability to cloun.

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The workloads, if you may, is predominantly in the Minila

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>chocolate and strawberry at a better place. No one listening

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to this segment is going to have any idea what

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about at this point. What about the cones?

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the cones on? But the but the ice cream

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>machine at Intel is broken, right, So that's the that's

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the that's the key part. At the end of the day,

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>three years from now, five years from now, you have

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to turn these out upun intended UM

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at a better UM, with better quality, and at a

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>better price point UM. As a result, when you build

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these massive servers and you know Facebook and Amazon, Microsoft

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are buying the servers ten thousand at a clip or

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty at a clip, you have to have better performance

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and better pricing. And I think the applicability of m

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>D is in ceasing, and the applicability of Intel products

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is right over the next couple of years is decreasing.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>On INTRONI Boston, thanks so much for joining us on

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Introney Boston, senior semi conductor and harder analysts, part time

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>ice cream analyst from Blueberg Intelligence joining us here talking

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to us about the ostensibly the semi conductor, you know,

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the chip business. But I kind of, uh, kind of went.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I took a different little route there with his analogy,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>but that works. So we got h A M D

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of hitting on all cylinders. Intel from our product perspective,

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>some concern that's per on its research. Sally Bakewell of

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News had a story several days ago, really fascinating.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Basically the gist does stimulus has helped Amazon and Visa

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>borrow at record low rates, yet small companies faced tighter

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>conditions threatening the recovery to dig deep on that store

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and the phenomena. Were welcome to have Ted Kaneig, President

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Monroe Capital, UH nine point three billion

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars under under management. Ted, thanks for joining us here,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so give us a sense of kind of the the

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>mid market company out there. Is it easy or difficult

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for them to access capital here to try to make

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it through the pandemic, much less to find growth capital?

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for asking. It's tough. Um. You know, we we specialize.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We have five hundred and eight middle market companies in

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio that we lend money to, everything from million

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or revenue up to about five million revenue. These companies

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>are not viewed as investment grade, so they don't have

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability to go into the marketplace and issue bonds

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>or high yield debt that the government has been backing.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So these companies have really been on their own and

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>uh left to their own devices. They rely on the

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>asset value or the enterprise value of of their own

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>companies in order to borrow money. And once they've borrowed

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>capital that the banks believe, you know, as an amount

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sufficient to cover their assets, whether it's accounts, receivable, inventory, equipment,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or real estate, they don't really have any other options.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The government has not allowed these companies to have any

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>any good options at their disposal to generate liquidity. And

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's really what's causing main street America. Well, so explain

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit, because A, isn't that what you're for?

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And B should the government be funding these companies? Well,

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the government has put up the p p P program

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and what the government has done is they've injected liquidity

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to buy bonds of the very large investment

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>grade companies. Um Woral Lender. We focus on buyouts and

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>transactions from mid market companies. We do it based upon

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>collateral value. We lend up to what you know these

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>companies as a private lender, we lend up to what

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>these companies can can can rightfully borrow, and we do

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it through institutional LPs. Right but still I'm still not

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sure about what the complaint is or arding the government.

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So they can apply for p p P if they

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>meet the criteria, and they can borrow from banks if

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they meet the criteria, and if they don't, they also

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have the option of getting extra cash from you guys.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So well, I'm just lost. Just explained the problem of

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the government. What's what's happening is that the government has

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>been buying in order to provide liquidity into the market.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>They've been buying um corporate bonds. They've been on a

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate bond buying program for quite a while, and that's

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the U. S. Treasury and UH that provides

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>capital to the company. Lenders like us need the same liquidity.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I need that liquidity to make loans to a lot

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of the companies, and in times like this, many LPs,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>whether they're pension funds or endowments or foundations, don't have

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the ability to fund um into the investments. So have

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 1>there been many are you saying that many of your

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies are at risk all or have gone bankrupt.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That is us a fact, not bankrupt because of business interruptions.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of middle market companies UM, particularly those in

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the areas of leisure, hotel, airlines, restaurants, UM, have had

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>significant challenges. That's due to closure. It's not due to

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>bad businesses, not due to bad management. It's just due

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to the economy being closed to them. When the economy

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>opens up, you know, those companies that are still around,

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll turn it around, but it's getting its covering

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the bridge from here to there. Where the commercial banks

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and all of this they're they're the primary lender to

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>these types of companies. How are they performing? Are they

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>making their balance? It's available. Uh, it's hard, you know.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>And in times of stress, banks tend to look inward

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and they don't tend to put money to work. UM.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>This is no different than the last crisis. Right now,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>banks are very concerned about their portfolios. They look at

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the bank stocks across the board are down, losses are up.

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>The market believes that there's more losses to come in

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>banks portfolios, So banks do not tend to be very aggressive.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>If you look at what's happening in the government right now.

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The government's trying to push the main street lending program,

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and the way that program works is banks are required

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to underwrite a portion of those loans, call it five percent.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Banks have not embraced the government's main street lending program

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want to take the exposure right now

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of lending to these companies. Yeah, I mean, it's a

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a horrible situation. But for some of the companies,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>would you blame them? I mean, what percentage of the

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies you deal with do you think will be

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>around any year's time. That's a great question. You know,

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't blame the lenders. I mean, I'm in the

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>same position. You know, We've got to make sure we

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>don't lose money for our shareholders in our investors. So

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a fine balance between you know, making

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>uh good loans and being responsible to your shareholders and

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>your investors and then providing relief. You know, right now

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a liquidity need. A lot of these companies don't

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have places to go to get the liquidity need. You know,

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the p p P programs were basically um payroll protection

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for employees, and you know, those were ninety day programs

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to cover payroll. Many of those programs now that that

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>program came out in May, many of those programs in

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, August, September and hour we're going to come

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to an end. And there's a lot of outcry on

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these smaller companies that took the p p P program

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that now we're in trouble. Yeah, And I mean some

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>restaurant ours were saying this even before they took p

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>PP loans. Some of them didn't even take it because

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of this, you know, I mean, there was no guarantee

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that business is going to be back to normal three

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>months later. And if there wasn't, why would you rehire

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>people that were then going to have to go again.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Ted kind of get President and CEO of Monroe Acompatal,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio,