WEBVTT - How Nanotechnology Works

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff Works dot com. Hi there, everybody,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Pollett. I'm

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an editor here at how Stuff Works, and with me

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>as usual is senior writer Jonathan Strickland. Hey there, So

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a little topic I want to talk about today,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>very little, tiny. In fact, you might call it nano. Yes,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>in fact, we would, because that's the topic technology. Everybody.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's doing nano. Yeah, everyone is, and depending on who

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you talked to, it's either gonna destroy the world or

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>rescue it. Yeah. So, um, what's the big deal? So

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>to speak? The big deal is that it's a very

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very little deal. In fact, one billionth of a deal,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or a nanometer is one billionth of a meter. And uh,

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to give you an idea of how tiny this is,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the average human hair is one hundred micrometers in diameter. Now,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a micrometer is a thousand nanometers, so that means that

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the average human hair is one hundred thousand nanometers in diameter.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I should point out that that's average. I've seen a

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>number of numbers. Yeah, it is usually between sixty and one.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's normally that's the average I normally see, but one hundred,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fair enough to say. So, yeah, some people have

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>very fine hair. But we're kind of splitting hairs now,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't we. You've walked right into that one. So we're

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about things on this tiny, tiny scale. Now, we're

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the atomic scale, because that's actually smaller

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>than the nano scale. Yeah, because an atom is about

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>an atom. When you take the entire atom into account,

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the average atom is about point one nanometers in diameter.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty teeny. So it's one tenth of a of

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a nanometer. That's the atomic scale. We're getting pretty close

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to the atomic scale. Yeah. Yeah, Now if you want

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the nucleus of an atom, do you

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>want to how big that is? I mean, yes, how many?

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course you want to know how big it is?

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>It Tollett Cheese, I thought I had you. It is

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>point zero zero zero zero one nanometers wide. That's just

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus. So when you when you strip away the

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:21.119
<v Speaker 1>electron shell, it's tiny indeed, But anyway, nanoscale, we're talking

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>about things on this really tiny scale. Building machines that

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are on this scale. Usually people say between one and

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one d nanometers is kind of within the nanoscale range.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Um building not just machines, but but really specific machines

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that can actually potentially change the world. And um, it's

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty phenomenal to think of building anything on that

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller scale. You can't even look at these things with

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a light microscope because they're so tiny because the the

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>wavelength for visible light on the small scale of it

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>over on the violet spectrum, that's about four hundred nanometers

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>for a wave length. So we're talking about having to

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>use things like scanning telling microscopes to look at the

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>nano scale. Now, these are special microscopes that emit a

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>small charge electric charge, and then it interprets the data,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sends it to a computer, and you look at an

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>image on a computer screen. So you're not even really

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at the physical thing. You're looking at a computer

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>image representation of that thing. Right, if if nanotechnology is

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that small, how do you make it? Because you know,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who talk about things

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on the nano scale, like, uh, you know, computer processor

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>chips using nanotechnology, Uh, nano robots, which I'm told you

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>might know something about a little bit. You know, you

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>know all kinds of things. How are you building these tiny,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tiny things if you can't even really see them, if

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you're depending on a machine to do it for you

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to look at them, that's a tricky question.

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll there are two different ways, right. There's the top

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>down approach, which is where you actually drop stuff on

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it from above, not quite, but you you build each

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>component and you then put everything together. It's it's kind

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the classic way you build anything, right, Like

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you would use a top down approach to build say

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a car. You know, you build the frame and then

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you attach various things to the frame. I'm talking like

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I know anything about cars. Um. So it's a different

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and Scott is way better at it than I am.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So the other way is the bottom up approach. This

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. This is where you're actually building things kind

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of um like you're growing them almost like you're growing machines. Um.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>And you're doing it adam by adam, molecule by molecule,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'm not really sure which way it's gonna go.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This is an early early silent science, even though it's

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>been around for a couple of decades. We're still, you know,

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just barely in the beginning of it. So we'll see

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>which method ends up being the the prevalent one. Um,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but there are people working on it on either end,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, and to give you an idea of

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>how possible this is. In so we're talking about almost

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago. Uh, there was an IBM scientist named

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Don Eidler who led a team who demonstrated that they

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can manipulate individual atoms and they used a scanning tunneling

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>microscope to move atoms to spell I B M, I

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>AM so not shock. Yeah. So you can actually there

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are pictures of this on the internet if you google

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know IBM scanning tunneling microscope. Uh, you can find

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>pictures of this where you see the image where each

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>dot represents a separate atom. So they actually use the

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>atoms to spell the word. Well. And in two thousand four,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>again IBM scientists are kind of leading the research in this. Uh.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They were in Zurich and they they show that they

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>were able to change the charge state of individual atoms

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>by adding or removing electrons from an individual atom. Yeah.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So again they used a scanning telling microscope, and they

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>had a charged point on the tip of that microscope

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>which comes to such an incredibly fine point that it

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>can do these things that can remove an electron from

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>one atom and and put it onto another. So we

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have the technology to manipulate individual atoms. Now we have

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to get to the point where we can build molecular

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>structures that work as tiny machines, all right, and there

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>are a couple different ways we can look into that.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the really popular things that people have been

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about recently are carbon nanotubes. Have you heard of these? Yeah,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the stuff that's supposed to, you know, do everything

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>everything you've ever heard of. Essentially, carbon danotubes can apparently

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>do well. There there's such a versatile structure, yeah, and

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, very resilient yep. Yeah. It actually all depends

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on how you how you roll the yeah, how you

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>roll the tube. So carbon nanotubes, the way you create

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a carbon nanotube in general them I'm way oversimplifying here,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but you take a sheet of carbon atoms, all right,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they form molecular structure where it looks very like it

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like a series of hexagons, and what you then

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>do is you roll this into a tube. You roll

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the sheet into a tube, and depending on the angle

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you use when you roll it into a tube, that

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>dictates the the the properties the carbon nanotube will have.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know that. Of course graphite is composed of carbon,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as are diamonds, but these two materials are have very

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>different properties. Graphites very soft, it's opaque, uh, diamonds not

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so soft, usually pretty clear. But the reason why they're

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>different is because of the way these molecules are arranged.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with carbon nanotubes. So if you arrange

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>them as specific way by rolling the sheet in a

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>specific direction, you can create a material that's hundreds of

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>times stronger than steel and six times is light. Well

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 1>what could what could possibly be a problem with Well, yeah,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem, as you pointed out, is it's very expensive.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It's there's no easy way to do it. It's no easy,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>efficient way right now that we can do it on

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a mass scale. So we can be done. It's just

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be done in very small amounts, like on the

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>nano scale amounts, and it's being done in laboratories and

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take several years for that to move from

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory to the production room. And um, when it does,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna start seeing lots and lots of stuff

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with carbon nanotubes and it we we see some already.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>There's some products that use carbon nanotube technology already, but

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not on the scale that the you know, the

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>future of nanotechnology kind of promises us. But I've seen

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>things like everything from a Spider Man type suit made

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out of carbon nanotubes because if you roll them a

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>certain way, they work very like a Gecks skin. You

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>could climb walls and things with this stuff, which pretty neat. Yeah. Yeah,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got one on back order. So anyway, Um, so

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of giving you the lowdown on on where

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we are now and and you can find technology that

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>does incorporate things on the nano scale. In fact, you're

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>probably using one right now to listen to us. Yeah,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you're using any sort of device that has

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a microchip, chances are you've got a transistors on that

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>microchip that are on somewhere in the nanoscale. I mean,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have a recent computer, then it's definite, you know,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's not I guess a netbook. You know,

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>if you have one that has a powerful microprocessor. You're

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about transistors that are only a few dozen nanometers wide.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So for example, Intel's uh I CORPS seven I believe,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are what forty wide? I think, yes, except it's Core

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I seven. Just remember, yeah, I show have said nehalem.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about it as the nehalem. But yes, uh,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>those are um, those are like like forty five nanometers wide.

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking about stuff that's already out on

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the market that's at this scale. I was looking at

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>applications of nanotechnology and I found an article on on

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>c net that in which they were talking about using

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>your voice to charge your cell phone. And uh, apparently

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to do this they use they would they

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>would use they should say, would they would use barry

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Um Tighten eight crystals, which are twenty three nanometers wide,

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And to do that, it actually creates piezo electricity. It

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>transfers transfers, it transfers of physical energy into electrical energy. Yes, exactly, Karma. Yeah,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know, that's that's pretty neat to imagine that.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, these crystals that are are you know, in

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the teens are not teens, but in the dual digit

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>nanometers size. You know that's wow, so um so piazzo

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>electric that that essentially means that you're converting kinetic energy

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>into electricity or vice versa. And then oh no, I

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna say, this is the same sort of

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff you you've have in things like microphones and speakers,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing where it's converting uh, one form

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of energy into another. And crystal there's certain crystals that

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can do this, like quartz that that have this property

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>innately di lithium, tillium anyway. Um. And then they're the

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>nano robots, which are great for you know everything. Read

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>this article written by you know this Jonathan Strickling guy

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and vaguely remember writing that it's been it's been more

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>than a year now. Yeah, but yeah, so nano robots

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>um all kinds of metal cool applications for those. Yeah,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the here's the interesting thing about nano robots. UM,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't exist. Well, yeah, we're pretty much in the

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>micro stage right now to be to be really fair,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>but assuming that we ever get down to the nano

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>size and are able to build nano sized robots, the

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>applications are pretty amazing from the medical standpoint. Um. For example,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you have a disease that's affecting a

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>very specific part of your body. And let's say the

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>normal way to treat this disease would be that you

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would have you would take you know, medication. Well I'm

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking medication really, but we can get the surgery to

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. Um, So let's say that it would

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>normally be that you would either get a shot or

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>take some medicine orally or whatever. You would have to

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>wait for that medicine to make its way through your system,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and to eventually affect the infected area. Right, Okay,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so the medicine is already getting diluted through bloodstream, it's

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>taking time for it to reach the infected area, takes

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>time for it to to uh take effect at the area,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and so the whole recovery rate is slower than it

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>would ideally be. Now with a nano robot, theoretically you

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>could direct it, or if you could find a way

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of making it autonomous, it can direct itself to the

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>infected area and deliver a much smaller payload of medication

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>directly to the infected area. So, for one thing, you're

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have the side effects that you might have

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>experienced through a larger dose of medication because the dose

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is much much smaller. For another, the application is immediate

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to the infected area, so you're talking about it being

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>much more efficient and having a smaller impact on the

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>patient's overall health. So that's that's an ideal situation now

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for surgery. As you were pointing out, that's also a

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>possibility you could create nano robots that would have things

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like laser cutters that would essentially act like a little scalpel,

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but they would be the incredibly precise, far more precise

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>than any human would be with a scalpel, because they're

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on the nano scale. You're talking about something so small

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's you know, blood cells are dwarfing it. So

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but it could be an incredibly precise tool. And granted,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think, well, with a device that's small, how

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>could it really be useful? A lot of these future

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>projections suggests that you would not have just one of

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>these little nano robots working. They would there would be thousands,

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps millions of them working together at the same time,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, then you don't have to find a way

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of getting them out, or potentially you would have nano

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>robots in you all the time, and they could even

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>act as a preventive measure and keep you healthy and

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>head off any problems before they could really start even

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>uh bringing up symptoms. Yeah, you were saying in the

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>article that they could be used to do things like

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>breakup blood clots or you know, kidney stones. Oh man,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And they say breaking up is hard to do. You

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know someone who has suffered from kidney stones. I gotta

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I would love to have had some robots. Yeah,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else, then just to start have someone specific

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I could scream at UM instead of just the the

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the directionless screaming that I did while I actually had

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>them UM. But yeah, yeah, there are lots of different

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>cool applications. Now, there's some big problems that we have

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. First, we have to be able to create

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>UM power systems on that scale something to power these robots.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about batteries and capacitors that are have

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to be incredibly tiny UM and that's that's a big challenge. Now,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some doctors have engineers have got around that by creating

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>robots that that propelled themselves, or actually they don't really

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>propel themselves. They are propelled externally. UM. There's one that

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>used m r I machine and you would use the

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>magnets in the m R I really to direct the robot,

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>so you could actually you know, you're kind of the

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>robot really was more passive, but you could direct it

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to specific spot within an artery system. Now I should

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>point out that the scientists who did this did it

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>with a pig. Um. They were not doing human testing,

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but it worked, went through the pig's arteries, so you know,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a it's nothing to sneeze at. Actually, I was

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>reading about a completely different application of nanotechnology. There was

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of fascinating. UM. Jennifer Lowell was blogging about it

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for for Seen It and she was talking about the

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>possibility that you could use nanotech to alter food on

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the microscopic scale. UM. She actually was quoting Steve Bogan

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Guardian. UM. They were talking about essentially how

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you could if you had a food that to which

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you were allergic, Uh, you could maybe make alterations to

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it so that it would pass from your body without

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>being a problem. Trick is you know you could uh

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you could have problems with people who don't particularly genetically

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>modified food, you know, so a lot of people that

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are kind of creeped out by the frank and food. Um,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about messing with things down again on

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a very very tiny level. Uh So that's pretty that's

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant. Um. But Bogan also mentioned the possibility that

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>packaging could be made um to where the nanotechnology inside

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the food packaging could sniff out when you know, the

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 1>food started to give off gassing as it was decomposing,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>it would change color to go, oh, well, you know

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>this thing, it's started to turn brown. We need to

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>toss it out without even you know, sniffing it or

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sticking your finger on it and going, I know,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it feels kind of weird. Yeah, that would have prevented

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>many many memorable nights that I've had in my past. Yeah,

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure anyway, So uh and and to talk a

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about building these robots, one of the

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that scientists are working on is

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and create specific kinds of nano robots called assemblers. Yeah. Now,

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>assemblers do what you would think they do. They assemble

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>other nano machines. So they could assemble other assemblers, so

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>then you have a self replicating nano robot. Do you

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>see where there might be a problem with this? I

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>feel its edging gradually towards the singularity. Right, So we're

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about the potential for nano robots to replicate themselves

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>at such an incredible rate. And remember as soon as

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>one gets replicated, it can start replicating, and then the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>ones that replicates can start replicating. So it's exponential growth. Right. Um,

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a scenario called gray Goo. Gray Goo is this

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this doomsday scenario where nano robots in order to build

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>more nano robots, they have to create it out of something.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're not building it out of nothing. So

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is they're they're in this scenario anyway,

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>it's taking carbon out of the environment and then building

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>robots with them that were of carbon. Right, Well, everything

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff is made out of carbon on

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on our planet, turns out, So the idea here would

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>be that the robots would start to consume all the

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>carbon in an effort to build more robots. And of course,

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>since it's exponential, it gets faster and faster every passing second.

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So this Tudnsday scenario has the entire world just turning

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>into this writhing mass of gray goo as nano robots

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>take over everything. I'm totally singing The Sorcerer's Apprentice in

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>my head. Sleep well tonight. Yeah, I'm glad that we

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to take such a rosy idea and go

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>there with it. Well, I mean, it's it's obviously a

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenario, but there are a lot of First

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, we're decades away from getting there. Second of all,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no guarantee that that's what would happen if we

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>even were able to create the nanotech simblars. So I

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think we don't have to worry just yet. When the

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>singularity comes, then we'll start worrying. All right, So we

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>got about twenty years. You got anything to add to nanotechnology? No,

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just get your living in while it's good? Okay, well

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what do you know what's also good? Yeah?

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>This is not good. It's listener mail. Seriously, where's the

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>volume that element? So anyway, Rory writes in, Hi, Rory,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Rory writes in and says, have either of you guys

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>ever used Linux or bs D? Os ten does not

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>count as BSD in this case, then does a little

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>uh smiley emoticon that has its tongue sticking out at you. Also,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>do either of you program, even on just a hobby level.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Excuse the questions. I'm just curious that we fit exercise

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>room sounds awesome. Thank you, It is awesome. So let's

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>let's tackle these questions. Have you ever used Linux or

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>BSD and remember O S ten doesn't count. Yes, actually have, UM,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>although admittedly on sort of a as you know, you

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>might put it hobby scale. UM, I've dabbled with trying

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to install UM. I'm build of a bunch of on

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>my old beat up PC at home and uh, probably

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>should not have because it did not like it very much.

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Although I have a spare hard drive and um I'm

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about trying it again, so maybe I can report

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>back on that later. But UM, I've I've used a

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>boot disc and uh, you know, just dabbled with it

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that way, and I really like it. I've used it

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>on friends machines. I do not have a Linux machine

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>other than my HTCG one which runs on Android, which

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>has a Linux kernel that it's very core. Well, I

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do have a t VO, so technically yes, we have

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>used it, though not as a chief operating system um uh.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like we have a bias against Linux

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at all, or BSD for that matter. It's really part

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of it's just the fact that all of our computers here,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much most of our computers here, I should say,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>run on Windows, so it's just easier to stay on

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the same operating system. And in case you want to

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>work on anything, that's true. Now, I do have an

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Intel powered Mac at home, and you know, I could

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>partition the hard drive and install Linux on it, but

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I really haven't. I'd really rather try

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it on something else first, especially since the problem I

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>did have on it was partitioning the hard drive. Yeah,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let me get a little bit more comfortable with

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that before I started. Sounds good. And uh so the

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>question do you program? Do you program? Um? Not anymore? Yeah,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I used to program using a Mega Basic. Yeah, I

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>used to program. So, yeah, we programmed back when, uh

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>back when personal computers were pretty new. We were not

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>now granted we were not. Uh we're not going to

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>give you any of the harder stories of programming for

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a computer using punch cards. That's a little before our time. Um,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>although I, uh my older brother went to a punch

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>card class. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, And you know, I realized

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that h GML is not technically programming, but you know

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a little coding. Yeah. I used to do

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's us, you know, just to mess with the back end,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:20.239
<v Speaker 1>not even you know, no wisywig editors end. Okay, I

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think I'm done now. Okay, So anyway, yeah, I've done

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some h MIL coding as well. Back when the web

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was was pretty much new, I did. I built websites.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And that was back in the day when you would

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you would code in HTML, save it, open up a browser.

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Look at what you did. Say, Oh my god, that

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>looks terrible. Close the browser, open up the editor, makes

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some changes. Close it, you know, save it, close it,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, rents and repeat. It's so much easier now.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>The blink tag yeah, and the marquee tag and they

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and the the looping uh midi file in the background. Anyway,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So well, thank you very much, Rory. I hope we

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>answer your question. Roy's laughing at us right now, and well,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right well we should. If any of you have any questions, comments, suggestions, corrections,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>please right in to tech stuff at how stuff works

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And remember we have a brand new blog

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>up l at blogs dot How Stuff Works dot Com.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not just tech stuff either. You can find stuff

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about from history, stuff you should know, auto science. It's

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>all there and check it out. You know, there's a

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>good way to UH to get another kind of UH

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>insight into the way our minds work, as scary as

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that is. And we'll talk to you again really soon

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it how Stuff Works dot Com? Brought to you by

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you