1
00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520
Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

3
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120
Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

5
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720
Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

6
00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,559
Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Right now, though,

7
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,880
Speaker 1: let's turn our attention to North Korea and the issues

8
00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,800
Speaker 1: facing the Korean Peninsula. J Leftwitz is a former U

9
00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:41,640
Speaker 1: S Special Envoy for Human Rights in North Korea and

10
00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:45,120
Speaker 1: currently a leading partner at Kirkland and Ellis. J. Leftwitz,

11
00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:47,320
Speaker 1: thank you very much for being with us. Good morning,

12
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:50,120
Speaker 1: How are you good. Maybe you could just begin by

13
00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:54,880
Speaker 1: stating what many people do not know myself. Included, perhaps,

14
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,720
Speaker 1: is the current position of the United States government when

15
00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:02,760
Speaker 1: it comes to a uni fied Korean Peninsula. Well, it

16
00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,479
Speaker 1: has been basically the policy of the United States going

17
00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:09,760
Speaker 1: all the way back to the Korean War, uh that

18
00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:13,520
Speaker 1: we believe that there really should be one government on

19
00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,880
Speaker 1: the peninsula of Korea. It should be a government led

20
00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:19,840
Speaker 1: by what is really the the Republic of Korea, the

21
00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:25,759
Speaker 1: democratic government that is currently based in Seoul, and the

22
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:29,080
Speaker 1: Korean War when it actually ended, didn't formally end there.

23
00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:32,880
Speaker 1: There there's never really been a cessation of hostilities, and

24
00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:36,920
Speaker 1: of course that's because the the Chinese have always insisted

25
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:41,720
Speaker 1: that everything above the thirty parallel be outside of the

26
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,640
Speaker 1: scope of influence of of what is South Korea, and

27
00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:47,920
Speaker 1: so we've kind of been at a stalemate. But our

28
00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:52,240
Speaker 1: official policy has always been that we support unification of

29
00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:55,720
Speaker 1: the peninsula, and that's actually been the formal policy of

30
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:58,920
Speaker 1: of of South Korea as well. You know, Jay, I

31
00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 1: was listening reading through the recent oup ed piece that

32
00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:05,720
Speaker 1: you published in the New York Times, were you were

33
00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:07,840
Speaker 1: saying that as long as the US, this is my

34
00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:10,840
Speaker 1: interpretation anyway, as long as the US continues with this

35
00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:15,400
Speaker 1: policy and remains hard fixated on it, uh, it's going

36
00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,200
Speaker 1: to be very difficult to get some kind of uh,

37
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:22,840
Speaker 1: meaningful concession from China that could actually make a difference

38
00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:25,440
Speaker 1: in this whole situation and end it without a catastrophic

39
00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:29,239
Speaker 1: type of event on the Korean Peninsula. I think that's

40
00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:31,960
Speaker 1: the very accurate reading of of of my take here.

41
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:34,040
Speaker 1: I mean, look, there there are two there are two

42
00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,200
Speaker 1: parties that were focused on here. We're focused principally on

43
00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:40,880
Speaker 1: North Korea. And actually, to his credit, President Trump just

44
00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:45,000
Speaker 1: signed into law in August second the uh bill called

45
00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:49,960
Speaker 1: Countering America's Adversary through Sanctions, and that imposes new sanctions

46
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:53,240
Speaker 1: on Russia, North Korea, and Iran. And I think there's

47
00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:55,600
Speaker 1: certainly a lot that we can do in terms of

48
00:02:55,760 --> 00:03:00,080
Speaker 1: dealing with North Korea from a sanctioned perspective. But the

49
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,840
Speaker 1: fact is we've been dealing with this North Korean issue

50
00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:07,400
Speaker 1: for decades. The Sixth Party took started in in two

51
00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:11,519
Speaker 1: thousand and three, were now about fourteen years later, and

52
00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:15,720
Speaker 1: they are marching inexorably towards not only having the nuclear

53
00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:19,160
Speaker 1: weapons that they already have, but developing a delivery system

54
00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:23,480
Speaker 1: that will have the ability to have ballistic missiles that

55
00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:26,680
Speaker 1: are nuclear tipped hit the coast of the United States.

56
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,600
Speaker 1: And so what President Trump has said, which is corrected,

57
00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:33,639
Speaker 1: we have to get China to engage here. But it's

58
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:38,200
Speaker 1: simple negotiation tactics that you need both carrots and sticks,

59
00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:41,080
Speaker 1: and I think the most important carrot here is to

60
00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:45,280
Speaker 1: let China know that we actually are not seeking to

61
00:03:45,440 --> 00:03:49,960
Speaker 1: exert our influence or South Korea's influence over the northern

62
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:54,320
Speaker 1: part of that peninsula. It's not actually something that anybody

63
00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:57,720
Speaker 1: believes is realistic at this stage. And yet as long

64
00:03:57,760 --> 00:04:01,680
Speaker 1: as it remains our official stated policy, I think China

65
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:06,640
Speaker 1: believes that it is more to fear from a unified

66
00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,000
Speaker 1: pen and flow with US influence in South Korea right

67
00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,400
Speaker 1: on its weakest border then it has from this current

68
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,880
Speaker 1: unstable nuclear regime in North Korea. And if we could

69
00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:20,960
Speaker 1: just allay those concerns that I think China would be

70
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:25,320
Speaker 1: incentivized to help solve the problem of North Korea. Jay,

71
00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:28,599
Speaker 1: I'm sure that you have discussions with some people currently

72
00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:31,520
Speaker 1: in government or I imagine that you have a sense

73
00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:34,599
Speaker 1: of the dynamic there. Do you have a sense that

74
00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:40,000
Speaker 1: anyone is seriously considering what you're talking about? And if so,

75
00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:43,839
Speaker 1: what would they hope that China would give a sort

76
00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:47,440
Speaker 1: of a reciprocation and that could possibly ameliorate the whole situation.

77
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:52,080
Speaker 1: So look, I have had quite a number of follow

78
00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:54,520
Speaker 1: ups just in the last week from folks who are

79
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:58,680
Speaker 1: involved in in policy issues in the government. Uh, I

80
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,480
Speaker 1: don't want to reveal they are directly, and I also

81
00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:04,400
Speaker 1: don't want to in any way suggest that the Trump

82
00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:09,080
Speaker 1: administration is accepting my suggestions. But I think the Trump

83
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:13,320
Speaker 1: administration certainly recognizes that the path to a North Korea

84
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:18,159
Speaker 1: solution lies through China, and the challenges how to really

85
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:20,440
Speaker 1: get the Chinese to the table. And when you say,

86
00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:23,080
Speaker 1: what would we be looking for, you know, it seems

87
00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:26,240
Speaker 1: to me that the message to China is, look, if

88
00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:31,520
Speaker 1: we allay your concerns about too much US influence up

89
00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:36,000
Speaker 1: north of the Parallel, in return, we want you to

90
00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:40,600
Speaker 1: deal with this regime. Now, China has enormous economic clout.

91
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:44,159
Speaker 1: They could literally shut all of the remaining lights in

92
00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:47,599
Speaker 1: Pianyang out in forty eight hours if they wanted to,

93
00:05:47,920 --> 00:05:53,360
Speaker 1: and they could presumably also uh change the regime um

94
00:05:53,400 --> 00:05:55,640
Speaker 1: if they wanted to. And I think what we have

95
00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:57,600
Speaker 1: to tell the Chinese is We're going to give you

96
00:05:57,800 --> 00:06:01,800
Speaker 1: some time to do this, but if not, then here

97
00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:04,000
Speaker 1: are the sticks. The sticks are we are going to

98
00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:06,440
Speaker 1: have to protect U s citizens. We are going to

99
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:10,359
Speaker 1: have to think about putting short range missiles in the region,

100
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:13,359
Speaker 1: whether in Japan or South Korea. We're going to have

101
00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,560
Speaker 1: to start building a missile defense system that is there

102
00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:20,880
Speaker 1: to protect the United States of interest, and it has

103
00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,799
Speaker 1: to be in the region to deal with North Korea,

104
00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,760
Speaker 1: and of course China certainly doesn't want the United States

105
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:28,800
Speaker 1: to do that. So I think we need a set

106
00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:34,240
Speaker 1: of carrots and sticks to have a productive negotiation. J Lefkowitz.

107
00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:37,400
Speaker 1: Do we know what it is that North Korea wants?

108
00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:42,279
Speaker 1: Has anyone asked them? I don't know that anybody knows

109
00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:45,400
Speaker 1: what they want. You know, the problem with North Korea

110
00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:49,359
Speaker 1: is it is really a cult of personality. It's probably

111
00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:56,799
Speaker 1: the last true remaining stalinist authoritarian regime. They have concentration camps,

112
00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:01,719
Speaker 1: they torture their own citizens, they routinely starve their own citizens.

113
00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:04,880
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a cult of personality. It's not

114
00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:08,320
Speaker 1: really a nation state. And the problem is when you're

115
00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:12,560
Speaker 1: not dealing with true nation states that are functioning nation states, Uh,

116
00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:15,800
Speaker 1: there isn't the same sense of responsibility to a citizen

117
00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:20,240
Speaker 1: rate accountability. Um. And so I don't know that anybody

118
00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:24,960
Speaker 1: knows what what what the Kim family really wants here, Jay,

119
00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:27,320
Speaker 1: real quick, what do you think the chances are at

120
00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:31,600
Speaker 1: this point of a violent resolution to the situation. I

121
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:35,960
Speaker 1: don't think we're likely to have a violent resolution in

122
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:40,560
Speaker 1: the short term. I think China certainly has has has

123
00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,680
Speaker 1: made it clear to North Korea that at least short term,

124
00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:47,680
Speaker 1: a true violent reaction would not be acceptable, and of

125
00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:50,680
Speaker 1: course the United States would have to react with violence.

126
00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:54,280
Speaker 1: If there were one South Korea, it would be in jeopardy.

127
00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:56,920
Speaker 1: But I do think over the next year the United

128
00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:00,440
Speaker 1: States of shores are going to be genuinely threatened, and

129
00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:02,880
Speaker 1: so we can't leave it for a year from now

130
00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,720
Speaker 1: to try to solve this problem. Jay Leftwitz, thank you

131
00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:08,800
Speaker 1: so much for joining us. Truly a pleasure speaking with you.

132
00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:12,360
Speaker 1: Jay Leftwitz was a former U S Special Envoy for

133
00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:15,640
Speaker 1: Human Rights in North Korea under President Bush from two

134
00:08:16,040 --> 00:08:19,080
Speaker 1: five to two thousand and nine. He is currently a

135
00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:22,720
Speaker 1: leading partner at Kirkland and Ellis in New York, and

136
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,320
Speaker 1: we will continue to bring you coverage in this issue

137
00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:27,800
Speaker 1: because it is one of the main concerns that a

138
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:30,559
Speaker 1: lot of policymakers have, at least at Brown with Pimp Fox.

139
00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:45,080
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg right now. We want to get more

140
00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:48,839
Speaker 1: on this from Chris Strom, Justice Department reporter for Bloomberg,

141
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:53,040
Speaker 1: and Chris, you're listening. What was your biggest takeaway from this? Well,

142
00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:58,360
Speaker 1: the biggest takeaway is that they aren't actually announcing anything

143
00:08:58,920 --> 00:09:03,680
Speaker 1: new so much as they're saying that they're putting more

144
00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:10,319
Speaker 1: emphasis on activities to identify leaguers and men prosecute them. Uh.

145
00:09:10,400 --> 00:09:14,560
Speaker 1: They Session said that they've now had more referrals that

146
00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,520
Speaker 1: they're going to investigate, and he said that the number

147
00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:22,400
Speaker 1: of active investigations is higher now than it was at

148
00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:24,800
Speaker 1: the end of the end of last year. Uh. The

149
00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:27,480
Speaker 1: abomb administration was known for for being for having an

150
00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:32,800
Speaker 1: aggressive posture towards towards leaguers. And uh, it seems that

151
00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:37,120
Speaker 1: Sessions wants to try to even outdo the Obama administration.

152
00:09:37,240 --> 00:09:40,080
Speaker 1: But you know, we'll still have to see how it

153
00:09:40,120 --> 00:09:43,280
Speaker 1: plays out in the coming months. I mean, obviously Sessions

154
00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:44,840
Speaker 1: has been under a lot of pressure to talk about

155
00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:47,960
Speaker 1: leagues and that's what he's doing. Chris, just a question

156
00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,439
Speaker 1: to you, because some Republican senators, I'm thinking, for example,

157
00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:55,439
Speaker 1: of the Judiciary Chairman Chuck grass Lee back in July,

158
00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:58,640
Speaker 1: he urged the leaker who had the information about the

159
00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:01,800
Speaker 1: talks between Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions in a Russian diplomat.

160
00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:04,960
Speaker 1: He urged the leaker to actually leak the entire conversation.

161
00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:10,240
Speaker 1: Is there any confusion amongst the Republican senators about what

162
00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:13,839
Speaker 1: leaks are allowed and what aren't. Well, I mean, certainly

163
00:10:13,880 --> 00:10:17,679
Speaker 1: there's hypocrisy in in in this world, and so uh

164
00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:22,360
Speaker 1: you know, uh, one person's leaker is another person's patriot.

165
00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:25,840
Speaker 1: You know. So it just depends on your your your

166
00:10:25,880 --> 00:10:28,720
Speaker 1: politics and in your point of view. I mean even

167
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:31,640
Speaker 1: going back to um, you know, uh Trump when he

168
00:10:31,679 --> 00:10:36,280
Speaker 1: was campaigning talking about uh, you know Russian, you know Russian, Uh,

169
00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,079
Speaker 1: you know, hackers should should find Hillary Clinton's emails and

170
00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:42,640
Speaker 1: leak them. I mean, you know, um, the idea that

171
00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:47,280
Speaker 1: uh you know, some people support some leagues while they

172
00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:52,240
Speaker 1: oppose other leagues. Um, you know, is you know frequently happens. Chris,

173
00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:55,080
Speaker 1: you know, I'm struck by this coming just as we

174
00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:59,840
Speaker 1: find out about the assembling of a grand jury for

175
00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:04,240
Speaker 1: or Bob Mueller's team. He is the special prosecutor that

176
00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:08,080
Speaker 1: was appointed to look into any connection with Russia and

177
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:11,360
Speaker 1: possible collusion with respect to the U. S. Election. And

178
00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:14,800
Speaker 1: I'm wondering, you know, this raises the specter of even

179
00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:18,560
Speaker 1: more leaks. And do you expect that the conversation will

180
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:22,720
Speaker 1: shift to what is classified? How how to determine these things?

181
00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:24,880
Speaker 1: And do you expect the leaks to actually stop or

182
00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:28,760
Speaker 1: just simply accelerate from here. Well, it's hard to know

183
00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:32,680
Speaker 1: exactly how this is going to play out. Um Uh, certainly, Uh,

184
00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:34,960
Speaker 1: there have been leaks that have been damaging to the

185
00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:39,480
Speaker 1: to the Trump administration. Um that you know, appear to

186
00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:42,200
Speaker 1: come from people who are who are who who feel

187
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:44,719
Speaker 1: that what Trump is doing is wrong and that they

188
00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:46,400
Speaker 1: need to stand up. And the and the way that

189
00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:49,280
Speaker 1: they are choosing to stand up is being uh, you know,

190
00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:54,640
Speaker 1: whistleblowers by by leaking information. Um. Uh you know, with

191
00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:58,160
Speaker 1: with Moller. You know, I think that the Trump administration

192
00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:01,320
Speaker 1: seems to be trying to build a case to discredit

193
00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:04,920
Speaker 1: what uh you know, what Maller is is finding, um

194
00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:08,439
Speaker 1: by saying he has conflicts of interest and so um

195
00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:11,079
Speaker 1: you know, to the degree that you've got you know,

196
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,080
Speaker 1: these competing these competing forces, I think that you're going

197
00:12:14,120 --> 00:12:17,559
Speaker 1: to continue to see people, um, you know, leaking information

198
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:20,480
Speaker 1: to the media uh for what they see you know,

199
00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:25,920
Speaker 1: is in there in their best interest and so. UM.

200
00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:29,080
Speaker 1: But I wouldn't be surprised if if you do see uh,

201
00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:34,199
Speaker 1: the administration come forward with some you know, new active cases. Um.

202
00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:38,000
Speaker 1: But these cases take a while, they're they're hard to uh,

203
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,040
Speaker 1: they're they're they're hard to prosecute. That's why you don't

204
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:46,520
Speaker 1: have many examples of actually successful prosecutions. And so you know,

205
00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:49,760
Speaker 1: any case that that the uh you know Sessions is

206
00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:51,319
Speaker 1: working on is going to take a while to come

207
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:55,480
Speaker 1: to fruition. Is is there a way to I don't

208
00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:57,079
Speaker 1: even know if it's relevant, but I mean, is there

209
00:12:57,080 --> 00:12:59,120
Speaker 1: a way to to find what is a leaker? What

210
00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:03,640
Speaker 1: is a whistle blow or and what is a confidential source? Well,

211
00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:08,600
Speaker 1: there are there in the law. There there is definitions

212
00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:12,079
Speaker 1: that um that you know apply when you're actually doing

213
00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:17,439
Speaker 1: a leak investigation. And so um, if you're if you're

214
00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:21,000
Speaker 1: somebody who's working inside government and you're not if you

215
00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:24,280
Speaker 1: if you're working for the civilian side of government, the

216
00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:27,960
Speaker 1: non national security side of government. There are specific steps

217
00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:30,480
Speaker 1: that you can go through in order to be a

218
00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:33,360
Speaker 1: whistle in order to be designated as a whistleblower and

219
00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:37,240
Speaker 1: have a job protection. UM. Now, people have said that

220
00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:40,600
Speaker 1: those uh steps are very difficult to follow and that

221
00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:43,240
Speaker 1: you know, they're cumbersome, and that oftentimes when people come

222
00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:46,760
Speaker 1: forward and they follow those steps, they get retaliated against

223
00:13:46,800 --> 00:13:49,400
Speaker 1: in in their own agency. And so there's a disincentive

224
00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:53,240
Speaker 1: to actually do that. So, um, but when you get

225
00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:55,600
Speaker 1: into a leak investigation, you need to you know, look

226
00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:57,280
Speaker 1: at the look at the facts that that are that

227
00:13:57,320 --> 00:14:00,760
Speaker 1: are relevant to that investigation in order to find out

228
00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:04,680
Speaker 1: you know what specifically, uh, you know what, what specific

229
00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:07,679
Speaker 1: laws somebody violated and whether criminal charges can be can

230
00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:09,760
Speaker 1: be brought against them. Chris, you know, I was really

231
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:14,440
Speaker 1: struck by the comments about media subpoenas. Did that ring

232
00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:19,560
Speaker 1: something for you as being I don't know, something new? Yeah,

233
00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:22,320
Speaker 1: that that caught me. Um. The idea that you know,

234
00:14:22,360 --> 00:14:24,560
Speaker 1: he said that they are going to be reviewing the

235
00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:28,680
Speaker 1: idea of subpoenaing news outlets is uh, it's something that

236
00:14:28,720 --> 00:14:31,440
Speaker 1: I think, you know, we need to watch for. Um.

237
00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:34,720
Speaker 1: You know, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Trump

238
00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:38,440
Speaker 1: administration to try to, um, you know, go after some

239
00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:43,080
Speaker 1: news outlets for uh publishing uh, you know, classified or

240
00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:46,360
Speaker 1: or sensitive information. I want to thank you very much

241
00:14:46,400 --> 00:14:50,160
Speaker 1: for joining us. Chris Strom is our Justice Department reporter

242
00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:54,720
Speaker 1: for Bloomberg, giving us his thoughts and reaction to the

243
00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:58,480
Speaker 1: comments from Attorney General Jeff A. Sessions today coming from

244
00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:12,920
Speaker 1: the Justice Department. Thanks for every much well, today's non

245
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:16,240
Speaker 1: farm paywork report was better than estimated by a variety

246
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:19,960
Speaker 1: of economists. Joining us now is the former Deputy Secretary

247
00:15:19,960 --> 00:15:23,280
Speaker 1: of Labor under President Obama, Chris Lou. He is currently

248
00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:27,000
Speaker 1: a Senior Fellow at the University of Virginia Miller Center,

249
00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,160
Speaker 1: and he can be followed on Twitter at Chris Lou

250
00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:34,280
Speaker 1: forty four. Chris Lou forty four, tell us if you

251
00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:38,560
Speaker 1: now have a new perspective after leaving the administration. Obviously,

252
00:15:38,760 --> 00:15:40,960
Speaker 1: I'm wondering if you could explain to us what you

253
00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:44,480
Speaker 1: have learned now that you are out of government about

254
00:15:44,520 --> 00:15:49,200
Speaker 1: the politicization of these reports, because you know you did

255
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,920
Speaker 1: it when you were in when you were in the administration,

256
00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:54,080
Speaker 1: that you know we take that, and of course the

257
00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:56,440
Speaker 1: current administrat every administration does it. But is there a

258
00:15:56,440 --> 00:15:58,080
Speaker 1: way to step back and say, all right, let's not

259
00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,400
Speaker 1: play politics with the numbers. Let's not describe blame or

260
00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:04,840
Speaker 1: or credit, just describe what's going on. I think that's

261
00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:09,479
Speaker 1: a fantastic point number that we touted back in Republicans

262
00:16:09,560 --> 00:16:12,720
Speaker 1: love saying or uh, I love poo pooing them, and

263
00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:14,520
Speaker 1: and and the flip right now as you see it,

264
00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:17,920
Speaker 1: going the other way, where numbers that President Trump is touting,

265
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:21,480
Speaker 1: Democrats often sort of say, uh, this is really glass

266
00:16:21,560 --> 00:16:24,440
Speaker 1: half empty. I think what's fair to say about these

267
00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:28,040
Speaker 1: numbers is that it's a solid growth two nine anything.

268
00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:31,400
Speaker 1: Anytime you have a two before the number, that's a

269
00:16:31,560 --> 00:16:36,880
Speaker 1: good sign. The constant here, and this runs across both administrations,

270
00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:39,520
Speaker 1: is wage growth at two and a half percent. And

271
00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:42,680
Speaker 1: while obviously any positive wage growth is a good thing,

272
00:16:42,960 --> 00:16:45,240
Speaker 1: it's really not enough to make a meaningful difference in

273
00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:47,480
Speaker 1: most people's lives. And this is one of the reasons

274
00:16:47,520 --> 00:16:51,680
Speaker 1: why in the Obama administration we push for increases in

275
00:16:51,720 --> 00:16:55,120
Speaker 1: the minimum wage, raising the overtime threshold, up skilling, which

276
00:16:55,120 --> 00:16:58,800
Speaker 1: are good, sensible, I would argue, nonpartisan policies. So I

277
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:01,080
Speaker 1: think that's the constant rate. I'm are go ahead, well, no, Chris,

278
00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:03,880
Speaker 1: because I was going to say that actually, in the

279
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:08,240
Speaker 1: lower salary jobs there actually has been more growth with

280
00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:12,080
Speaker 1: respect to salaries as well as jobs being filled. It

281
00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:14,959
Speaker 1: seems to be uh, you know, clearly there could be

282
00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:17,280
Speaker 1: more growth there as well, but you know, there has

283
00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:20,240
Speaker 1: been also very little growth at the high end, in fact,

284
00:17:20,359 --> 00:17:23,119
Speaker 1: less growth at the higher ends, which is uh, it

285
00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:26,880
Speaker 1: which suggests that there's something larger at play here. Well,

286
00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:29,480
Speaker 1: it is something larger play. It reflects kind of the

287
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:32,800
Speaker 1: shifting of the economy right now, when you've got kind

288
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:37,119
Speaker 1: of um an outflux of manufacturing jobs in the United States,

289
00:17:37,160 --> 00:17:39,280
Speaker 1: a lot of the folks that would have those jobs

290
00:17:39,359 --> 00:17:42,159
Speaker 1: in rural areas have now moved to retail jobs, and

291
00:17:42,200 --> 00:17:44,840
Speaker 1: so those salaries have been basically flat during this period

292
00:17:44,880 --> 00:17:46,959
Speaker 1: of time. And again, looking a little bit more at

293
00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:50,639
Speaker 1: these numbers. While again over all these were positive numbers,

294
00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:53,879
Speaker 1: I look at construction manufacturing, which had gains, but they

295
00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:56,400
Speaker 1: weren't big gains. I looked at retail, which was essentially

296
00:17:56,400 --> 00:17:59,399
Speaker 1: flat and has lost about eighty thousand jobs over the

297
00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:02,119
Speaker 1: last six and that's kind of a longer term trend

298
00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:04,679
Speaker 1: that is going to continue with automation. And so again

299
00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:07,679
Speaker 1: this is a positive job report, but as with anything,

300
00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:11,000
Speaker 1: there are some issues in here. Chris, is there any

301
00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:13,720
Speaker 1: data that you've been able to look at that describes

302
00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:17,720
Speaker 1: the relationship between actually getting a job, holding a job,

303
00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:20,960
Speaker 1: and the benefits such as healthcare, health insurance that would

304
00:18:20,960 --> 00:18:24,560
Speaker 1: come with the job. Many people taking a position for

305
00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:27,760
Speaker 1: those reasons as opposed to let's say, making money or

306
00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:31,600
Speaker 1: or doing the particular work. Well, you're right, it's not

307
00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:35,600
Speaker 1: just the that's a minimum wage. It's whether people have

308
00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:39,159
Speaker 1: health care, how robust that healthcare is. Obviously, um the

309
00:18:39,240 --> 00:18:42,960
Speaker 1: affordable character has played an important role in helping to

310
00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:45,680
Speaker 1: lift up people. But more broadly, it's what are the

311
00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:49,560
Speaker 1: retirement benefits. As larger companies have moved away from the

312
00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:53,560
Speaker 1: traditional pension plans, the longer term security of employees is

313
00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:56,440
Speaker 1: really at risk. And as you move more to a

314
00:18:56,440 --> 00:19:00,000
Speaker 1: gig economy where people don't work for one employer, uh

315
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:02,600
Speaker 1: for the course of their lifetime or even at one time,

316
00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:06,920
Speaker 1: it creates greater economic instability. And that's just not something

317
00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:09,040
Speaker 1: we've really figured out a way to address quite yet

318
00:19:09,040 --> 00:19:11,800
Speaker 1: in this country. You know, Chris, we had our own

319
00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:15,000
Speaker 1: Carl Ricadona, chief US economist from Bloomberg Intelligence on earlier

320
00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:18,159
Speaker 1: and he was saying that he does expect that wage

321
00:19:18,200 --> 00:19:21,280
Speaker 1: growth will start to accelerate more later in the year

322
00:19:21,520 --> 00:19:25,800
Speaker 1: if we still keep getting these two plus prints. Do

323
00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:29,720
Speaker 1: you agree? Well, I hope so. And that's something that frankly,

324
00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:33,840
Speaker 1: we thought would happen um years ago and during this recovery. Mean,

325
00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:37,040
Speaker 1: when we got down in the five percent unemployment, and

326
00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:39,960
Speaker 1: people kept saying, well, we're close to full full employment,

327
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:42,320
Speaker 1: we should start to see wage growth. That just doesn't happen,

328
00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,119
Speaker 1: and it starts to suggest there may be broader issues

329
00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:47,560
Speaker 1: going on in the economy, whether it's with automation, whether

330
00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:51,560
Speaker 1: is globalization that may be having a powerful downward impact

331
00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:55,000
Speaker 1: on wages. It also speaks more broadly as to whether

332
00:19:55,080 --> 00:19:57,960
Speaker 1: the fet is being premature in raising interest rates and

333
00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:00,040
Speaker 1: whether they ought to let this recovery go on a

334
00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:03,200
Speaker 1: little bit longer. Of course, one of the big topics

335
00:20:03,320 --> 00:20:07,399
Speaker 1: is immigration and the jobs that immigrate immigrants to the

336
00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:11,280
Speaker 1: United States get when they arrive. Can you give us

337
00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:14,960
Speaker 1: your thoughts about the trends that currently exist, what kinds

338
00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:19,040
Speaker 1: of jobs they get, and whether these new policies will benefit,

339
00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:22,439
Speaker 1: as the President has said, the American workers. Well, I

340
00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:24,440
Speaker 1: think the bill that the President out of the other

341
00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:27,320
Speaker 1: day is the wrong approach. And that's not just me

342
00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:29,639
Speaker 1: saying that. That's the US Chamber of Commerce, that's the

343
00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:33,359
Speaker 1: I T industry, it's Senators McCain and Graham. Uh. You know,

344
00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:35,320
Speaker 1: we are in a period right now in the United

345
00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:38,640
Speaker 1: States where population growth really is at its lowest since

346
00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:41,280
Speaker 1: the Great depression. And that's not only because of low

347
00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:45,000
Speaker 1: birth rates, it's because of more people retiring. And so

348
00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:47,560
Speaker 1: we need more labor in this country. And yes, we

349
00:20:47,600 --> 00:20:50,679
Speaker 1: need more high skilled labor. We need to replenish and

350
00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:54,159
Speaker 1: revitalize the igh T industry in this country, but we

351
00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:57,200
Speaker 1: need low skilled labored as well. And uh. Senator Lindsay

352
00:20:57,200 --> 00:20:59,680
Speaker 1: Graham said it, well, in a state like South Carolina,

353
00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:03,000
Speaker 1: you not only have high tech healthcare jobs, but you

354
00:21:03,040 --> 00:21:06,480
Speaker 1: also have a retail, your food service, you have agriculture

355
00:21:06,520 --> 00:21:10,280
Speaker 1: that all needs more people. And so artificially cutting in

356
00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:13,040
Speaker 1: half legal immigration is not the right answer to creating

357
00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:16,159
Speaker 1: economic growth. Chris lou thank you so much for joining us.

358
00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:18,800
Speaker 1: Chris Leu is a senior fellow at the University of

359
00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:22,560
Speaker 1: Virginia Miller Center. He was the Deputy Secretary of Labor

360
00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:25,760
Speaker 1: under former President Barack Obama, and he comes to us

361
00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:42,800
Speaker 1: from Virginia. Well, it is another day and another billionaire

362
00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:46,440
Speaker 1: hedge fund manager is coming out to trash the E

363
00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:50,159
Speaker 1: T F industry. Paul Singer, who's the billionaire founder of

364
00:21:50,200 --> 00:21:54,600
Speaker 1: Elliott Management Corps, warned that quote passive investing is in

365
00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:58,639
Speaker 1: danger of devouring capitalism, which may have been a clever

366
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:01,640
Speaker 1: idea and its infancy has grown into a blob which

367
00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:05,680
Speaker 1: is destructive to the growth creating and consensus building prospects

368
00:22:06,240 --> 00:22:09,840
Speaker 1: a free market capitalism. We'll here to defend the blob

369
00:22:09,920 --> 00:22:12,400
Speaker 1: that is the E t F industry. Is our own

370
00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:15,120
Speaker 1: Eric baltun As he is our senior et F analyst

371
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:20,560
Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Intelligence and Eric Um. First, I just want

372
00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:22,280
Speaker 1: to I want to ask you, you know, I have

373
00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:24,280
Speaker 1: a feeling that you do not think that E t

374
00:22:24,440 --> 00:22:28,200
Speaker 1: F s are devouring capitalism. Is there anything about Paul

375
00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:32,520
Speaker 1: Singer's argument that rang true with you? Yes, So there's

376
00:22:33,000 --> 00:22:35,119
Speaker 1: there's a one hand in the other. So on one hand,

377
00:22:35,640 --> 00:22:38,840
Speaker 1: Vanguard and black Rock, which are ultimately passive, that's they

378
00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:41,919
Speaker 1: own almost all the passive assets, are the top in

379
00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:46,520
Speaker 1: the top three holders of the sp companies. So they

380
00:22:46,520 --> 00:22:48,119
Speaker 1: are becoming a bigger and bigger deal. And if we

381
00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:51,000
Speaker 1: extrapolate the assets ten twenty years down the road, you

382
00:22:51,000 --> 00:22:53,919
Speaker 1: could see a world where Vanguard alone owns thirty of

383
00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:56,280
Speaker 1: the stock market. At that point, I think we would

384
00:22:56,840 --> 00:22:59,120
Speaker 1: the government might step in at that point. But right now,

385
00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:01,280
Speaker 1: let me give you some other context, which is to

386
00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:03,080
Speaker 1: say that even though they're the top three in the

387
00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:06,080
Speaker 1: top three holders of almost all the companies, they collectively

388
00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:09,439
Speaker 1: only own about thirteen point five of the stock market.

389
00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:12,800
Speaker 1: Because here's why people forget this. Mutual funds which e

390
00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:15,119
Speaker 1: t f s are included in, are a minority owner

391
00:23:15,119 --> 00:23:18,760
Speaker 1: of the stock market. The rest is households, institutions, pensions,

392
00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:22,920
Speaker 1: all people who are active essentially. So you are definitely

393
00:23:22,960 --> 00:23:26,320
Speaker 1: looking at a rise of passive within mutual funds, where

394
00:23:26,320 --> 00:23:29,280
Speaker 1: you're having more and more people put their money passively

395
00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:31,880
Speaker 1: um and I think that speaks to a bigger issue,

396
00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:34,880
Speaker 1: which is that active has lost the hearts and minds

397
00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:37,000
Speaker 1: of investors. And I think that's part of what you're seeing.

398
00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:40,280
Speaker 1: You're seeing they feel threatened, they're they're losing. I'm sure

399
00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:42,240
Speaker 1: he's getting calls from people saying, why don't I just

400
00:23:42,280 --> 00:23:44,080
Speaker 1: put my money in the n sp y or or

401
00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:47,040
Speaker 1: a separately managed account that's passive And it's tough to

402
00:23:47,080 --> 00:23:51,360
Speaker 1: defend uh in this market going with free exposure, essentially,

403
00:23:51,440 --> 00:23:54,680
Speaker 1: it's just hard to combat that. And I think active

404
00:23:54,960 --> 00:23:58,200
Speaker 1: in the eighties and nineties got potentially a little too

405
00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:01,360
Speaker 1: greedy and did not pass on some of the economy's

406
00:24:01,359 --> 00:24:03,960
Speaker 1: of scale in the form of lower fees. Meanwhile, Vanguard

407
00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:06,440
Speaker 1: is then you have the world turning and now everybody

408
00:24:06,440 --> 00:24:09,240
Speaker 1: wants everything cheap, and you could argue it's overshooting a

409
00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:12,680
Speaker 1: little bit, but it's active creation. Well, okay, so let's

410
00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,040
Speaker 1: talk about Paul saying, all right, his main hedge fund

411
00:24:15,119 --> 00:24:17,600
Speaker 1: oversaw thirty three billion dollars. He's not exactly hurting. He

412
00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:20,680
Speaker 1: is a billionaire. Uh that fund gained three and a

413
00:24:20,680 --> 00:24:23,680
Speaker 1: half percent in the first half of the year. Fine

414
00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:28,119
Speaker 1: me underperformed the stock market for sure. But I I

415
00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:30,280
Speaker 1: want to just talk to the one point that you

416
00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,439
Speaker 1: made about Vanguard and black Rock owning such a substantial

417
00:24:33,440 --> 00:24:37,680
Speaker 1: proportion of the biggest companies. Have they shown an inclination

418
00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:42,160
Speaker 1: to be active with their ownership of these shares? I mean,

419
00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:48,959
Speaker 1: could they potentially affect great changes at companies without necessarily Yes,

420
00:24:49,280 --> 00:24:51,880
Speaker 1: you know, the investors setting off on that and active

421
00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:55,560
Speaker 1: maybe owning this whole their value for capitalism a little

422
00:24:55,560 --> 00:24:58,480
Speaker 1: too much. I mean, arguably Elon Musk and Steve Jobs

423
00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:00,480
Speaker 1: aren't waiting for active managers to do what they have

424
00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:04,080
Speaker 1: to do. Um making profits is for their real motivation. Second,

425
00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:07,600
Speaker 1: active is definitely focused on short termism. They are definitely

426
00:25:07,640 --> 00:25:11,360
Speaker 1: guilty of making everything about the quarterly earnings now passive.

427
00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:14,560
Speaker 1: They have corporate governance groups. Now they're not is in

428
00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:16,399
Speaker 1: the face of the c e o s, but they

429
00:25:16,440 --> 00:25:20,760
Speaker 1: are definitely prickly and they vote with activists, sometimes against

430
00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:23,399
Speaker 1: them sometimes but really what their game is is to

431
00:25:23,440 --> 00:25:26,920
Speaker 1: create the environment to have good uh independent board corporate

432
00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:30,159
Speaker 1: government's e s G policies so that long term value

433
00:25:30,200 --> 00:25:33,160
Speaker 1: can exist. But they're not gonna basically needle them on

434
00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:35,240
Speaker 1: one product or another. That's not their thing. But they're

435
00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:38,640
Speaker 1: not passive. They have teams that do this and both

436
00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,919
Speaker 1: Larry Fink and Bill mcnabbel, now it's Tim Buckley have

437
00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:44,199
Speaker 1: come out and said exactly what they hope to do.

438
00:25:44,240 --> 00:25:46,920
Speaker 1: And that's where you got this dual class listing issue

439
00:25:46,920 --> 00:25:49,119
Speaker 1: with the SMP. I think it was pushed by Vanguard

440
00:25:49,160 --> 00:25:52,480
Speaker 1: and Blackrock. Eric, is anybody ever gonna be let go

441
00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:55,240
Speaker 1: from their job if they recommend to their client that

442
00:25:55,280 --> 00:25:56,879
Speaker 1: they buy an e T F let's say, of the

443
00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:01,000
Speaker 1: SMP five and it goes down, Well, if it goes

444
00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:04,480
Speaker 1: down because the market goes down, or right, that's the spid.

445
00:26:04,640 --> 00:26:07,359
Speaker 1: You buy the spider, right, you buy an index fund

446
00:26:07,880 --> 00:26:10,360
Speaker 1: and you make it plain to the investor here, this

447
00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:13,280
Speaker 1: is what it's connected to. Yeah, so you're bringing something

448
00:26:13,280 --> 00:26:17,680
Speaker 1: that's even bigger, which is UM this fiduciary UH standard

449
00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:20,240
Speaker 1: and now it's a rule. So what we're finding is

450
00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:23,720
Speaker 1: the reason you see this flood. The passive flows have

451
00:26:23,760 --> 00:26:26,919
Speaker 1: doubled this year. They're doubling their intensity. And the fiduciary

452
00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:29,560
Speaker 1: rules is not Trump trade. It's the fiduciary rule, correct,

453
00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:31,960
Speaker 1: Because all of the money is going to the absolute

454
00:26:32,040 --> 00:26:34,560
Speaker 1: cheapest products from Schwab, black Rock and Vanguard. They're taking

455
00:26:34,600 --> 00:26:37,119
Speaker 1: like ninety of the assets. And the reason is because

456
00:26:37,400 --> 00:26:39,200
Speaker 1: if you don't go to the absolutely cheapest fund, a

457
00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:41,119
Speaker 1: lot of advisors are worried their clients are gonna come

458
00:26:41,160 --> 00:26:43,040
Speaker 1: back and say, hey, there was a cheaper fund on

459
00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:44,560
Speaker 1: the market. You put me in this one, even though

460
00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:47,000
Speaker 1: it was three basis points more, I'm gonna sue you.

461
00:26:47,359 --> 00:26:49,879
Speaker 1: And so they're this fear of the fiduciary rule is

462
00:26:49,920 --> 00:26:52,480
Speaker 1: sending money to basically as low as you can go,

463
00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:56,120
Speaker 1: and that's why that has exacerbated the fee war. UM.

464
00:26:56,280 --> 00:26:57,960
Speaker 1: Now you can see the few were in print of

465
00:26:58,160 --> 00:27:00,800
Speaker 1: Vanguard free zones like cybersecurity ETFs are now in a

466
00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:02,520
Speaker 1: fee war there's two of them and they're like going

467
00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:05,040
Speaker 1: down to six each now, and the fiduciary rule has

468
00:27:05,080 --> 00:27:08,360
Speaker 1: everybody um that you're exactly right, so no one, Yeah,

469
00:27:08,359 --> 00:27:10,600
Speaker 1: it depends. I will say that if somebody recommend sp

470
00:27:10,800 --> 00:27:14,800
Speaker 1: Y over i VV, you know, that's six basis points more,

471
00:27:14,880 --> 00:27:17,040
Speaker 1: it's possible they get in trouble. And that's why spies

472
00:27:17,119 --> 00:27:20,600
Speaker 1: losing money this year partially is because now there's cheaper

473
00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:24,240
Speaker 1: san P five products. That's how one basis point is

474
00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:27,440
Speaker 1: enough to double your flows. It's like the law of

475
00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,760
Speaker 1: unintended consequences. Well done, Thanks very much for being with us.

476
00:27:30,840 --> 00:27:33,400
Speaker 1: Eric balchun Is always a pleasure, Senior et F analyst

477
00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:36,920
Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Intelligence. You can follow him on Twitter at

478
00:27:37,240 --> 00:27:40,360
Speaker 1: Eric Balchunis. Go ahead, Well, the one thing that does

479
00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:42,520
Speaker 1: scare me, I will just add a sort of an

480
00:27:42,520 --> 00:27:45,719
Speaker 1: epithet and they get three seconds. If if the market

481
00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:48,920
Speaker 1: tanks and everybody pulls their money out, who's going to

482
00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:51,520
Speaker 1: be on the other side if active managers are washed

483
00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:53,920
Speaker 1: out of the market. Well, that's why we've got Erik Balchunis.

484
00:27:53,920 --> 00:27:58,439
Speaker 1: He's going to be telling us. Thanks for listening to

485
00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:01,320
Speaker 1: the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

486
00:28:01,400 --> 00:28:05,400
Speaker 1: listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

487
00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:08,880
Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at

488
00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:12,440
Speaker 1: pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one.

489
00:28:12,640 --> 00:28:15,359
Speaker 1: Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide on

490
00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:16,240
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio