WEBVTT - Zero Dollars is No Money

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I have had sex with a guy who like he came,

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't even know he came because he was

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so dead silent, where you silent silent. There's been so

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>much happening recently, and I've been consuming so much media

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like we should slow the brakes today

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and just talk about what we've been watching, reading,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to, you know, really get into like a little

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a little key um what we're vibing. Yeah, and you know,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, next time we'll we'll do another

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into a more nostalgic cultural object. But today

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, talking about what's going on at the moment,

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because this is like a virgin the show where we

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>give yesterday's pop culture, and I do mean the pop

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>culture from literally yesterday today's takes. I'm Rose, damn you,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fran Toronto. How are you doing? Would you

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>do this weekend? Um? Well, the weekend was great. I

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just like kind of spent the weekend indoors. I had

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>people over for brunch. We watched ever After, I had people, well,

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I watched ever After recently too. Did you have fun?

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>It was? It was great? Angelica Huston it's Oh. I

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>thought I thought that she was one of those girls

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that like she's like, no, it's huston, okay, thank you?

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Um should we do and have our after episode? I

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>don't maybe a Drew, a Drew Barrymore episode. I honestly

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's a Drew. It's a Drew episode for sure,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because ever after it's amazing. But to me, it would

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>have to be a larger discussion about like Cinderella adapt

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>weights or something. You know what would be good though,

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is a fairy Dale adaptation episode? Yes, because I think

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot because then we could do like into

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Woods, we could do like I don't know, I

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think that opens up a lot of things. Actually, even

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just Cinderella adaptations gives us like Brandy gives us the

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Cape Blanchet, Cinderella give Okay, well we're gonna work. Well

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll chop it, we'll ChRI it. But anyways, ever

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>after it was great. Angelica Houston was I mean, she

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was the whole movie. She I forgot how could anyone

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>love a pebble in their shoe? Or when she was like,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>do not contribute to the silence unless you can improve it,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like damn amazing actress. I think I really

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>forgot how clever the whole movie is, how good the

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>dialogue is. Um, how Drew really wear some ugly, ugly

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>dresses in that movie? Also some gorgeous dresses. My favorite

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lasters is My favorite look of hers is when she

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>goes to meet him in the abandoned castle and she's

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>wearing like a like a red velvet number. I did

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not like all of her dress, says except for the

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>last one. We will agree to degree. Yeah, I was.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I was isolated. People disagreed with me. That people that

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I was viewing with also disagreed with me. But I

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was just so maybe that means you have bad taste.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I actually have great taste. As I've said

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, I've always had a great taste with

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>some with some exceptions. But I was going to tell

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you just a few So Rose, what have you been

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like listening to consuming this weekend? Like? Have you just

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>were you? I saw you were in Malibu? Question mark? Yes, Um,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I went to the beach yesterday. We went to zooma

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>beach and Malibu. You know, I'm like not really a

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>beach girl. I'm a pool girl like you know, being

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>from Florida. Um, but it was perfect beach day. We

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>drove up there in the morning, We're there for a

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours and then like left by three pm,

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, perfect for me. I cannot I

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot go to the beach with people who want to

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be there literally all day. Yeah, I know, but you

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are you are a Caucasian and you do need allies

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in that in that situation. But you know, we had

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we had a an umbrella, so I was able to

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the shade um an umbrella ella an umbrella

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>la la a a. But I did get some son,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>do you have more freckles? Now? I do have a

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more freckles. But I also did use some of

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>my weekend to catch up on some you know, cultural things.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The big thing is f Y Island ended, and the

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>twists were twisting. The twists were twisting, so spoilers for

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone watching. But f Boy Island ended, and the final

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>twist was that Nikki Glazer revealed to the girls that

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of just either choosing a nice guy and getting

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to split the money with him, or choosing an f

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>boy and the f boy having the ability to either

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>split the money or take all of it. There was

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a third option where the women could choose themselves and

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>keep all of them money, which I was gagged. I

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>was screaming, shooting and hollering at a really good twist.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping that they were all going to do it.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that was. Like, I mean, obviously it's

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>reality TV that's been produced to the instagrae like This

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Girl is scripted during some parts, But like I I

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't understand anybody that would not choose a hundred

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, like even after taxes, that so much money, Like,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>come on us, after taxes is considerably less money, and

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>zero dollars is no money. There's no money. Um so

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>my I've already sent you a voice memo with all

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of my takes. But like, I think it's infuriating that

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Ms Mercedes did not take the hundred thousand dollars in dash.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>That would have been way more satisfying. It would have

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>been up to our predictions. He is such a piece

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>of ship and they're clearly not even going to last

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>very long, so like why even a week? It's a charade,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>like Mercedes is putting on a charade of being a

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nice guy, and I hate him. I feel like he

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>realized how bad he looked over over the course of

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the show and wanted to try to rehabilitate his image

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end. That's the worst part if you are

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on a reality TV show, Do not do not self analyze,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>do not self perceive, Like it just makes the whole

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>thing worse. Like no self awareness, you should be a

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>black mirror upon which, um, you know. I wished Louise

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>was my favorite character from beginning to end, and I

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of thinking she was going to turn out

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the f girl who took the money, but

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert, it was Tamaris was the only one who

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>picked herself and revealed herself to be an F girl,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and I honestly, the clues were there all season. Obviously

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of showed she had said many times that she

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>cheated before, she'd lied, before she was a player, that

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>she dumps guys with no emotion like, so I was like,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, good for her, and I kind of I

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>loved actually the moment where they showed the guy crying

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and then as soon as he left, she was like,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can I get makeup in here? That was so fucking

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>funny because it was like the immediate switch, um from

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the I mean Tommy Boy, Poor Tommy Boy. Um the

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like FARTI trombone sounds that put underneath him. Tommy Boy

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>will be fine. But another another incredible season of reality television. Truly,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are you a Louise Tamaris or where are we both?

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>To Maris's I'm definitely Tamaris. I think you're more of

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a Louise. Am I more of Louise Louise. The thing is,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I will say at the I I really do cut

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and run like you're an f girl. I'm not saying

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not a girl, but you also are legitimately Louise.

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You are looking for love. Also on a trio Max,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Harley Quinn came back. You know, friend and I have

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>talked before about how Harley Quinn was one of our

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows of last year. It's back in its third

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>season the Pandemic find. Yeah, we have both only watched

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the first episode, I think. Um. We talked about how

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we're both kind of saving it for like a Saturday

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>morning cartoon SNAr um, So I just haven't gotten around

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to watching more of it. But in the first episode

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is great. It was Harley and Poison Ivy are together.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Now they're on like they're going on like an international

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>honeymoon funck fest. It's beautiful. It's the show remains so funny.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I laugh out loud all the time it's starting, and

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's starting with a kind of more emotional honest, the

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>emotionally honest kind of plot points of like what's not

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>going right in their relationship, the little clues about where

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>their disconnects are, where their miscommunications are, which, like I

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of wish it would start with like the fun stuff,

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, the show is very layered, and

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I really I'm excited to see where it goes. Yeah,

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. I have to go in a little

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>rant about another HBO show that is not good? Um,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>do you watch Westworld? Have you ever watched Westworld? No?

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I probably you know, as I always say, the next

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>time I have the flu, I will definitely watch the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>first season, but just the first season. I would never

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>watch more than watch only the first season, because the

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>first season of Westworld was great, It was amazing. Even

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the second season of West World was had moments of

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>brilliance and was otherwise, like the third season of rest

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>World was rotted. Should have never happened. The fourth season,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which is airing now, lured me back in somehow, making

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>me think it would be good again. People were talking

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about it, and just every week has gotten worse and worse,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I'm losing my mind triasically. It's

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>basically just like the Matrix now. And the thing that

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring up is like, obviously I don't

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about like the particulars of the show,

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's very it's all very hetty and stupid, and

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's it's exactly as yes, it is exactly

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as dumb as it thinks it's smart, which is infuriating.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things I've noticed is that, especially

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this season, there is so much suicide depicted on the show.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Like the robots are constantly killing themselves. Um, you know,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>death doesn't death doesn't mean the same thing on the

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>show because people are robots that can be brought back,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but also the human characters are killing themselves, and it's

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at a point where it has become almost like fetishistic,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that people are constantly killing themselves. And it's

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just something about it to me, and I'm not usually

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>like the morality Police with with media, Like I'm like,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>go off, I want to see funked up should happen.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's just it's just really weird and it actually

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is making me on comfortable what you yeah, because it's

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just so indulgent, like it doesn't really it's like for

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the sake of it, there's no asition to the violence.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah there. It really feels like there could have been

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a better storytelling choice to get kind of the same

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>point across. That's such a bummer. I mean, I honestly

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>getting sucked into a show is the worst. And I

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate when people are like just watched the first

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>season because that's the only thing I would do with

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>West World. Honestly, That's what I'm doing with Damages right now,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which like I can't discuss well like well for another podcast,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just the reason you need. The main reason

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still watching West World is like a I do

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>still kind of want to know how it how it ends,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure it will get canceled after this season.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no way with all the HBO stuff happening, like

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with the business things, that this show, which like literally

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>four people are watching, will get renewed. But Also another

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>reason why I watch it is because who weekly do

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>recaps on their on their weekly Patreon episodes and they're

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>really funny, and so I literally watched the episodes just

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so I have the context to listen to that fun

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at least, Yes, but funck Westworld. Um So, I have

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a movie recommendation for you that I really think you

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>should watch. Um so we can discuss a little bit

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>more at length in the future. There's this new movie

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out called Not Okay. It's on Hulu. It's stars Zoe Deutsch,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>who's like just one of those girlies, one of the girls. Yeah,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's I think she's an nepotism baby. And

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's about this like a loser photo editor who works

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at sort of like a vice magazine analog and she

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really wants to be a writer, and like everyone in

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>her office hates her in sort of a way that's

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>almost like a caricature, Like they're like, you're a fucking loser,

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>even though she's like hot and like is like almost

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like disgustingly on trend, like she has those like streaks

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that every girl had less year, the chunky rings, and

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like so she decides that to seem cool.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>She's going to fake going on a trip to Paris

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to a writer's workshop, and while she's supposed to be

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in Paris, a terrorist attack happens there, so everyone in

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>her life thinks that she was part of the attack,

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, she starts getting attention for it,

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and she realizes that she can use her victimhood as

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>a way to become an influencer, and in doing so,

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>she meets this young high school girl who is a

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>school shooting survivor and becomes friends with her. And it

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously gets very messy and dramatic, but it's really funny.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It's really smartly written. I think it has some very

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting things to say about influence our culture. I don't

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a perfect movie by any means, but what

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I loved is that she, the protagonist, is a horrible person,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and she is it does the movie does have some

0:13:55.400 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe not sympathy, but empathy for her, and she does not,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, get any sort of like Redemption arc Um.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was a really good movie. Um. I think

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a first time filmmaker who wrote and directed it

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>very excited to see what she does next. And I

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think you would really enjoy it. I'm honestly surprised that

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that you liked it, because I feel like it's so hard,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>especially for consumers like us, to to make a good

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>movie that is also a commentary on social media and

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>or influencers. Like that stuff gets really cringe really fast.

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I did not really like Ingrid Goes West all

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that much, Like I've never seen it. You you know,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of really redeeming elements to it. Um.

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that, like, you know, more often than not,

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the people writing about social media or writing about you know,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>influence or culture whatever that means, are either people that

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are do not participate in it, and so they're creating

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>these weird caricatures that are like not funny, or they're

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>two inside of it and they think it's way more

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting than it actually is. And I think that, you know,

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff is like best when it's the punchline, right,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a really good segue to Bodies, Bodies, Bodies.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you you watched that, right, Yeah,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw an early screening of it in June. I

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>finally saw it last week, and I felt, what did

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you think? Well, you know, I felt like the commentary

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on just like us as you know, gen Z millennial

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like influencer types were at times the movie's

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>strongest points and also some of the biggest joke flops.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And obviously Rachel Senate was the moment for that, and

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>she she was kind of the movie for me, was

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I actually don't think the movie would have

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>worked without her. I totally agree. I thought every I

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>loved everything about the movie. I thought it was actually

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really thrilling. I thought the twist at the end was

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>somehow I didn't I didn't even I mean like it

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>felt very obvious towards the end, but like at the

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>same time, I didn't predict it, did not see it coming,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>did not see it coming, and um, but the I

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think the reason I get to that is like, despite

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Rachel, I mean, Rachel was the best

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, the most fun to watch on screen, but

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all the other performances obviously great, But like Rachel's character

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically is like a kind of meta commentary on a

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very specific person you'll meet at a party or at

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a on a group vacation. Like I felt like I

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>knew her. I felt like I knew a lot of

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the characters, um, and I felt felt like some of

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of you know jokes that make fun of

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>girls like her were very funny, and then some of

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>them were two on the nose. I also watched, speaking

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of slashers, I finally watched that They Slash Them movie?

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you have you heard it? For the Virgins? If

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, there's this Peacock original that you know.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>The title is they Them, but it's supposed to be

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>pronounced they slash them, or as Thomas Muster said it

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>should speaking. I was at the at the screening with

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Patos and they pronounced it they slash them, and

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>which I think is much better. Um. Here's the thing again,

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>when movies really want to go in on like making

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>commentary about something, sometimes they forget to be a good movie.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, to compare something like Bodies,

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Bodies Bodies, which is extremely queer, to something like They

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Slash Them, which is also extremely queer, but like also

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>very very trans like it's a much more trans story. Um,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, they Slash Them suffered under

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the weight of the things that was trying to say

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about gender discrimination justice. Um, but ultimately, you know, had

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some thrills, had some chills, was not really scary unfortunately,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>but um good jokes are really great. Um singing montage

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>moment that I won't spoil. Do you think I should

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>watch it? Would I like it? I think that if

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be something that you're watching with people

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or if you have absolutely nothing to do, it is

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>something that you would have a lot of thoughts on. Actually,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and THEO Germaine, the lead, who's a friend of mine,

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is so hot and his THEO is really hot, so hot,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and his scene partner is Kevin Bacon pretty much the

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>whole movie. And I heard that the movie was originally

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be more specifically about gay conversion therapy, and

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>then they were like, no, no, no, two, we got

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to make a trans So is the trans stuff done well?

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Like is it interesting? Does it like add to what

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the movie is trying to say? And like the horror

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, it adds and it also detracts. And this

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is I'm really glad you asked that question because it's

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of crystallizing everything that we're talking about, Like you

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>telling me that that like they made they were decided

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to make it more trans is abundantly obvious to me.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>It is very clearly. I think the trans issues in

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the in the movie are really wedged in, and there

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are moments of discrimination against trans people that are inconsistent.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin Bacon is really transphobic to one trans character

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and then not transphobic to this other trans character, and

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the logic of that doesn't really make sense. And then

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>also the experiences of gay and lesbian people on the

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at the camp and trans people at the camp are

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of conflated, and there's no nuance in discussing how

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of oppressions are different, and yet it's trying

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to say something about it. So like for me, it's like,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>either you need to clarify what you're trying to say,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>or just like don't even go into it, Like we

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>can just figure it out and you don't have to

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really give us this ham fisted like commentary on trans

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>identity spoiler alert. At the end, when we find out

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who the murderer is, there's this moment where you're kind

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of like the murderer is kind of like on the

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>side of the queer people, and you're like, oh, this

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>murderer is dope, and like is like doing great things

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for people, but then the cops come and arrest them,

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and I was like this, how could this be like

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a queer movie? And yet the climax is resolved with cops,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's I know, that's like how all slashers end.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But like you couldnot like fabricate any sort of other

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>cinematic invention that would give us a resolution that does

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not involve cops, Like, it's just a failure of the

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>imagination to me, um for that to be the ending.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Another movie I kind of frayed into this weekend was

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>good luck to you, Leo Grant. Have you have you

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>watched this or heard about it at all. I've heard

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the premise of it, which is it's it's about like

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an older woman who's never come and hires a sex worker.

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>That's literally the log line. And it's and it's like

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a COVID movie. So it's just like the two of

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>them in a hotel room the whole time, exactly, And

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is hard. You know, that's a very specific

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>movie to watch. It's like one set. It's basically a play.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna lie and that's fine. Um. Emma Thompson

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>does incredible incredible work, like she actually an interview has

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>described that, like the nudity scene that she does, and

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it is the hardest thing she's ever had to do

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>as an actress, which is saying something because Emma Tompson,

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because let's talk about let's talk about her listening to

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Joni Mitchell and love actually, oh my god, the performance

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of a life. Um, But it was really what was

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating is I've been really excited about this movie.

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd heard a lot of things, a lot of really

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>good things about it, and the movie did not really

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>deliver to me on a lot of what it was

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to say about sex workers, because it was really

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>really trying to say something about sex workers. And what

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was very interesting to me was that I watched it

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the day after I rewatched Pretty Woman with a bunch

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of my friends, one of my favorite movies, one of

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest movies ever written, and yet one of the

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>most offensive depictions of like sex work like we've ever seen,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>but also that it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, and also,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like you have to think it was the late eighties

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and just the fact that that movie was made where

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the main character was a sex worker and like gets

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>a happy ending, and it's just I think it's a

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty radical movie for its time, and it is one

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite movies. And the first time I ever did,

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, quote unquote drag publicly was on Halloween.

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I was Julia robertson Pretty Woman my freshm my freshman

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>year of college. You have the wigs, you have that

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bob nasty? Is that nasty bob? They made her wear

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that bob for so long, like way more of the

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>movie than she needed to wear that bob, and like

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you forget, like the sex scenes in that movie are

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>actually so The scene on the reno, oh my god,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on the piano is so sexy, so well blocked, so

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>well written. Yeah, it's a great movie. Actually, I truly

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think this. We need to do a Julia Roberts episode.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We absolutely do. We'll bring Caleb here and specifically Julia

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Roberts rom com Queen Earra like nodding Hill. I've never

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>seen Pretty Woman, my best friend's wedding runaway Bride. I've

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>never seen Mr Pizza. I've never seen Mr Pizza either, So, Virgins,

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if you would like a Julia Roberts episode, let us

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>know um in the comments. Yeah, and to put a

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>pin on like kind of this the pretty woman of

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it all. It's like, it's so funny, it's an amazing movie,

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and yet like the conceit of the movie is like

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire treats a woman basically like a like a

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>into puppy kind of like you know, weekend toy thing

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a week a week only three grant for a week

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>air all the money and even with inflation, it still

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense, like financial, it makes no financial And

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the movie was originally called three thousand. That's

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so fucking stupid. I hate that. Um. Anyways, Richard Gere,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>who is so sexy and it's the only movie where

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he's sexy, he you know, treats her like says really

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive things to her face frequently, like is honestly a

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>scum of a human being, and like also has like

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>an entire body of work and life that is like

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>gouging people and like like tricking people, which like you know,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he gets his little redemption arc at the end, but

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>he becomes class conscious, right, he becomes class conscious whatever.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But I just thought it was so funny that we

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can have this really kind of like this depiction of

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a sex worker where the sex worker kind of has

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a superhuman ability to deal with their clients bullshit because

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>they're just grateful, and that that was unfortunately replicated in

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this Emma Thompson movie Um. Emma Thompson plays a really erratic,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>uh dysfunctional woman who is so she is really really

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bad at boundaries with the with um Darryl McCormick. So

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I gotta give it out to Darryl McCormick, who was

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so amazing this movie. They both were so good. But

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>like Emma Thompson plays, plays this woman who just repeatedly

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>treats him like an object and treats him like ship

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and asks him really offensive questions and says really insulting

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>things to his face and he has to just kind

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of deal with it through the whole movie like he does.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But does the like does the lens of the film

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>show that that stuff is bad? Yes, And that's kind

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of the difference. Well, to some extent, the difference is that,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like and Pretty Woman, they never tell you why any

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of this is like not how to treat a sex worker.

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Right in Um Good Luck to You, Leo Grand the

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>movie is trying to demonstrate what to not do with

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sex workers, and also um just has there's a very

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>long p s A in the middle about um just

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 1>like why sex worker is ballad and should be like

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a public service and all this different stuff, Like it

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to say about the validity of sex work,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>which is like, fine, if that's what you're trying to

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do with the movie. I don't really enjoy like pedantic

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>moments like that. I think it creates limitations around what

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can be a really good story. But it's still had.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it checked all the right boxes of what

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it was trying to say. It's just the um I

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>want a story about sex work where we don't have

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this transformative like look at this upstanding hooker and how

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, well behaved they are now, and how

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like nice and saint like they are. It's like, actually,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like sex workers don't have to be saints, and they

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be these like like healing like fixers

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that come in and like make you better and they

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>have like nothing better to do with their lives. Like

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I felt with both movies they were very disinterested in

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like the inner life of the sex worker, though it's

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>much more explored in the Emma Thompson movie because the

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>acting is so good, but it's just like, you know, yes,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>like sex workers have to do tons of emotional labor.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>A lot of sex workers have to be therapists for

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>their clients sometimes, but just like I want their life too,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, I do think that we have almost

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>never had a truly good depiction of sex work in

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a piece of mainstream media. And they're both The thing is,

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they're both great movies. Like, Okay, here's the thing. Pretty

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Woman at the end of the day is a male

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>fantasy marketed to women, right, Like it is a I

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>get to rent a woman for because I'm a billionaire,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and I take our around on my day. It's in

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>my nice car, and she's so obsessed with me, and

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I get to buy all these nice clothes and like

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever and like but at the end of the day,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like she chooses me and because like you know, because

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I fixed her, like she it's a it's a Cinderella story.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not it's a rare rom com where I

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's like it's not kind of aspirational in

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a way because I think the women who it's being

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>marketed to at the time or not being like, oh,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to grow up and be a prostitute, and

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like how this happened to me, which is like pumped

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up because like you know, like being sex work is

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not something that you know, should have stigma around it. Yeah,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to watch that movie. Yeah yeah, I

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think I don't think you would like it. Um.

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really slow and it's very just like dialogue the

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>whole time. That's it. Speaking of movies, I don't think

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you would like I finally watched the Netflix Persuasion adaptation. Oh,

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>which girls are mad about this. The girls are really

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>mad about it. I honestly, I don't think it's okay.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing it maybe if I had finished the book,

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I would feel differently. I started the book um when

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we were when we were on vacation, I was um

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of dropped it. I got a little bored.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And maybe if I had read the book and like

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the story was important to me, Um, I would have

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>hated it because even just from what I read, it's

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>very different. Um. But I you know, like I enjoyed myself.

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I I had it on while I was taking a bath,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was like very It's like you know, it's

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like a cozy, romantic period piece and like, yes, it's

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to be fleabag so hard and it's literally

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like have you ever bought anything from from Reformation or

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like gotten their emails their emails that you know their

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>emails are like your ex boyfriend called or like, um,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen enough. I've seen enough Hunter Harris tweets to

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>know that I cannot let myself be ensnared by a refreation.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like if the person who wrote the copy

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for those Reformation emails wrote an adaptation of Treason, that's

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's this one. Um. So it's it's stupid and bad,

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and I still enjoyed myself and Dakota Johnson. Dakota Johnson

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like shouldn't have been in it, but like was great

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>because she's Dacote Johnson. She has zero chemistry with the

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with the lead, even though he's super sexy. Um, there's

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>no kind of like outstanding side characters, which is what

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you want in a Jane Austin adaptation. And it's it's

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not good, but I don't think it's quite as evil

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, like bad for the culture as

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone is making it out to be. I've heard that

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the fandom is very pissed about this adaptation. Why why

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>are why are Jane Austen stands mad because of the

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of like flea bagification of Persuasion, Like it has

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>contemporary dialogue, right, it has, it has contemporary dialogue and sensibility.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>There's but I think that's honestly the the part that

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone's getting caught up on and is not the real problem. Like, so,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Persuasion is the story of a woman who was supposed

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to marry a m a naval officer when she was young,

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but her family persuaded her not to because he had

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>no money, and so she has regretted it ever since.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And eight years later he comes back into her life

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and he has like risen in the ranks and has money.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Now she's still a spinster. And it's the last book

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Jane Austin completed before her death, and it's very sort

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of like melancholic, and it's about a much different kind

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of love than you see in her earlier works. It's

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about a mature love. It's like a bit sadder and

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and Elliott, in what I read of the book is

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like a very you know, like introspective character. She's very quiet,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and Dakota Johnson in the movie is like it is

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like speaks directly to the camera and says things like

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we were worse than friends were x is, and like

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>there's little jokes like she she's like opening a box

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of letters from Wentworth and she's like he made me

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a playlist and it's like literally like a bunch of

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>sheet music tied together. So it's stuff like that that

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>people are like making a big deal out of when

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually the real problem is that the an Elliott of

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the film is just not the same character as in

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the book and like does a lot of things that

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the an Elliott in the book would never do. The

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>reason that they're brought together back in the book is

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>like the the like mishaps and like conventions of the

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>genre that put them back together that Jane Austen was

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>so good at and not that like you know, and

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Ellie it was this like manic pixie dream girl, um,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. And also it's like the movie is not pretty.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The costumes are not lush. It's not that it's giving budget,

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's giving like they try to make it look contemporary,

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it wears a lot of like button down shirts

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>over a long dress and it's like, no, give me

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sense and sensibility like glamour. That's their family. Their family

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>has to move from the country to Bath because they're poor.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And someone says, like I've heard that if you're a

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ten in London, you're a five in Bath and like

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>things like that are like stupid, but they're just they're

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>distracting from the problem with it, which is that I

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think this movie just fundamentally doesn't understand what is beloved

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>about its source material and like the kind of love

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to portray. But that being said, I I

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 1>am always looking for that sort of printing period peace

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like cozy Day movie. And it still is that despite

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not being perfect, So you know, watch it for yourself,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like make up your own mind. It's not the evil,

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>evil thing that people are making it out to be. Okay, great,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>even though you didn't finish Persuasion, whether any other goodness.

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He's got into this weekend. Yeah, I'm reading two books

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um. One I started earlier in the summer

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and just got back into yesterday when I was at

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the beach. It's called book Lovers by Emily Henry, who's

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like a huge romance author. Um it's her latest book.

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a It's a book about a literary agent and

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a literary editor who find themselves in the same small

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>town and I suppose are going to have a romance.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's really good. Um so far. It just it

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>just took me a while to get into it because

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really that interested. But the other book that

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading that I'm very excited about and I'm trying

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to pace myself on because I don't want to get

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>through too quickly is Husband's Material by Alexis Hall, who

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is like kind of one of my instant by authors.

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like anything. They I've talked about a couple of their

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>books this year already. Um. They this is a sequel

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to their book Boyfriend Material, which is Boyfriend Material was

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>very much like a gay send up of like Bridget

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Jones Diary. Okay, I'm googling right now. Oh, you absolutely

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>need to read it. It's super funny. Um. I also

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I listened to the audiobook of it the second time.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The cover is in mely promising. Yeah, when you see

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a cover like this, it's it's a by hunt, It's

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about it's about this guy who's like sort of like, um,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's the child of some celebrities, and like

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of always winding up in the tabloids and

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he has to have a fake boyfriend to like rehabilitate

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>his image. But obviously him and the and the boyfriend

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like actually fall in love and wind up together. And

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>so in the sequel, everyone around them is getting married,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I think they might get I would assume that,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 1>since it's called husband material, they get married. It looks

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it looks very British. It is very British, and like

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the British isms are a big part of the humor

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and what I like about it, And yeah, it's really

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>good in Alexis Hall. The books of theirs that I've

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>talked about this year were, Um, A Lady for a Duke, Yeah,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which was which is a historical romance with a trans lead,

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and you like them. I did really like it. I

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it was perfect, um, but I liked it.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of goes back to what we were

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about with them with they slash them, which is

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that even though Alexis Hall has said that they wanted

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to write a book about a trans character, where like

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>their Transnis was not the main thing with the plot.

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true of the work that they

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>actually wrote, and but but to its like, I mean

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that in a positive way, because I want to see

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 1>more stories where people's queerness and like more specifically, their

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>trans nous are the plot couldn't happen without them, because

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>those are the interesting stories that we haven't seen yet,

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the new stories that we should be telling. I think

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. Yeah, I agree, I mean that's the

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thing is like this this tension between like do I

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>tell people how I really feel about a certain issue

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or do I just tell a good story? Or like

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do I have to pick? And like when do I?

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>How do? How do I do both? It's like it's

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>about the issue I think, like I think identity, and

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and like there's so much inherent in transness that can

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>create a really interesting narrative. Like in In a Lady

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for a Duke, the whole plot of the story is

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that this trans woman has this best friend. They went

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to war together, she was injured in action and presumed dead,

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and she used that as as her chance to transition

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and like go away for a couple of years. I

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>remember this very Alexis Mead allah ugly and come back

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as a woman, and like, that's what I mean when

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I say it's a plot point that could not happen

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>without transness, and it's what creates the whole narrative. And

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that is really interesting that that story wouldn't exist if

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for her identity, and so that is I'm

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in seeing more queer stories like that and in

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>creating um but you know more, Stay tuned. But a

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>boy from Material definitely recommend Book Lovers is good. I mean,

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure like everyone's reading it, because like everyone reads

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily Henry's books anyway, So I'm not telling anyone anything

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't know. And I do now that I've watched

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the movie, I do want to finish Persuasion. I'll get

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>around to it eventually. Honestly. Something that's kind of giving

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a little like kind of persuasion made well um Girl

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic is the new Maggie Rogers album, which for some

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 1>reason drop the same day as Beyonce's I don't know. Well,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing I know that they have as a

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>music artists. They have nothing to do with each other.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Their music has no overlap. I get it. I just

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like that can't be like, why would you? I would

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>never in a million years drop something that weekend, especially

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>if one of your songs is called honey. Oh well,

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what did you did you listen to thee? Yeah? Can

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I admit something to you. I don't love it. I'm

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:10.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of having I'm kind of having a hard time

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with it. And at first I thought it was just

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that every time I put it on, I found myself

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking I could just be listening to Beyonce right now,

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was the initial problem with it. And the

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>few times that I did listen to it, it was

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always background music while I was writing, or background music

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>while I was reading or whatever. And then I said, no, no, no, no,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I need to sit down and actually listen to it

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with headphones on and really give this album it's chance.

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And it made me realize that I wasn't reaching for

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it because I don't love it. I don't. It's very

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.959
<v Speaker 1>hard to you know, I think with a sophomore album

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>when your first album was received, um, you know so

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like so Universe, the Universe slee Positive, Um, that's really

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>hard to follow up. I just, um, I don't I

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like some of it. I like a lot of the

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>singles that she released I think are good, but it's

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just like not a lot of the songs are really

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of grading, and I know that that's a big

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>part of what she does. I was I was listening

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to something, oh and a recent episode of Lost Cultures

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>does they were talking about her and how you know,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>she originally started off as a folk artist and then

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like once she moved to New York for school, like

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that's when she started like hearing a lot of club

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>music and like got really into production and that's why

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>her music kind of is the way that it is now.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>And I liked a lot of what she did with

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that on her last album, But on this album, I

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's just too it's overproduced and it's really I

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>never would have thought about that. Yeah, it's a lot

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of like pots and pants happening, and it's just, um,

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it's challenging to listen to, but not in a way

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that makes me want to kind of rise to the occasion.

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>It's challenging to listen to in a way where I

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>find myself just like I can only make it through

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like half a song and then I skipped to the

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>next one. I just don't really I'm not enjoying it,

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's sad because I love her and her last

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>album I was obsessed with and still am. I listened

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to it all the time. I have a slightly different

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship to Maggie Rogers, but a lot of similar experiences

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of this new album because I so I did not,

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was. I love Maggie, I love her art.

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like a Maggie stand per se. I did

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not listen to her first album over and over again

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the way I know a lot of Maggie Rogers heads do,

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, Joel Can Boosters listening right now, like

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>screaming at us being so mad that we're um, you know,

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>making critique of his queen. But like, but like she,

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I I think that thing about you know, heard it

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in a past life her last album is that it

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>did have a lot more pop orientation, and these songs

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>have really amazing hooks, and because Surrender doesn't have, it's

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>much more introspective and much more thoughtful. It doesn't have

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the hooks that her last album had, and therefore for

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>me was background music. And I think really great background music,

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like music still has that function and like that sounds

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like an insult, but like, I think it's really gorgeous,

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't even work from it doesn't even work

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for me is background music because it becomes distracting and

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I don't want to skip. Well, listen to

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the song. For me, the song that goes hardest. Shatter

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>is the best song. I love Shatter. I love how

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Maggie screams on it. I think it's so cathartic and

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and one of my favorite songs she's ever written

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or done. Um, But I just like I thought it

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was you know, I've consumed the kind of the media, uh,

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff around her enrollment in the Harvard Divinity

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 1>School and how her Coachella performance was a project for

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>her Harvard Divinity School, her Harvard Divinity School, like thesis

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And I was like, like she says in

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this interview that Coachella, like her Coacheller performance fulfilled a

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>requirement on public presonation. She literally filed this performance as

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of her the completion of her school. That's

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>really that's really cool that I don't see. I mean, okay, cool, yes,

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But also just like I just feel like school is

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>like for you, Like it's for your education, not for

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like entertainment value, like when I'm in school, I'm actually

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm being a little too hard on her. I

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just feel like I to be that experimental and to

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 1>be so I don't know, I just like don't want

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to read your thesis. That's the thing.

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm being like kind of an asshole about it,

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>because like I at the end of the day don't

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>want to read all everything behind it. I just want

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to know if it's a good album or not, and

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if every and honestly, maybe I'm projecting because this is

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>something I'm extremely guilty of. I will do tons of research,

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>tons of background work, have huge like stories and rationale

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>behind projects that I put out or things that I do,

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and like all of that is worth nothing at the

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the day if people don't get it, you

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, And it doesn't matter how many

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>degrees you have or how much um intellect or pedagogy

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you've put into the thing, if it's at the end

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 1>of the day, not something that's good for consumption, even

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>something that's experimental and fun to consume. Like I don't know,

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's then to me just a project and surrender feels

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like a project, not an album, and I'm okay with that,

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to see Maggie explore, and so I'm

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>excited to see what else she does. And she does

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not need to be the artist she was on Harden

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Past Life Forever, but that is the art that I

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>would like from her, and I hope maybe with her

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>next project she finds her way a little, a little

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>further back, not territory, because for the moment, I'm just

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still only listening for Nissance Rose. Other things that

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we listened to this weekend the Queen's remix of Break

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>My Soul Girl. I was gagged when when I was

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sent that link before, like before it came out on

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and then sent it to you, I was like,

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is this a Joe? It felt not real. And then

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I listened to it. I think it's so good. I

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's great. I think it's so good. I like

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's you know, the cultural context of Madonna's Vogue

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>is that, like, as much as we love it and

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as much as it you know, brought vogue to the

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>forefront of mainstream culture, it is also extremely appropriative. As

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Madonna has been throughout her career, and I

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 1>do like that in reworking and sampling the song, and

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a project where she's doing so much

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sampling and you know, reinterpretating of Vogue and House. I

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like that Beyonce places ballroom culture back in its original

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>context while using the very thing that was I don't

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say weaponized against it, but like the very

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.839
<v Speaker 1>thing that kind of helped break it from that in

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Um And the way she does that

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 1>is through like I think most specifically at the end,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>when she's doing what Madonna did the original song and

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like naming all these legends, like and when Madonna did it,

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>she was like naming all these white women who were

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on the cover of Vogue. When Beyonce does it, she's

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>naming all these black female artists and literal Vogue houses

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like and some of them were deep cuts to Like

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>when she mentioned House of Ladosia, I was gaming. I

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was gagged. I was gagged for people that don't know

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>House of Ladosia is. And they're like an iconic underground

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>New York house, very much a part of the Westgate

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>scene the early years of bush Wig. It's Julianna Hustable,

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Joanna Huxtable collective predominantly, So it's like very it's

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just different. It's so it's such Julianna Hugstable, Michael Magnan,

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Dosha Bailey styles, Neon Christina like true underground New York legends,

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>very much involved in like Spectrum used to throw a

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of really cool parties and so to hear them

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 1>placed in that context with other legendary houses like House

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of Extravaganza, House of Aubiance. Also my like my girl

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Nita Auvance, who's one half of the Carrie Nation, did

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the break My Soul remixes that Beyonce put out.

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just like the best remix. It's so it's so

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>incredible to see Babarin culture at large be celebrated in

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this way by the biggest artists in the world, in

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a way that is actually like honoring the reality of

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what it is rather than you know, like appropriating it's

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's style or sound um and doing something entirely different

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>with it. It's it's as we said in our our

0:49:56.840 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce episode last week, like she's citing her sources and

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and even more than that, she is like she's trying

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as in any way she can to give the girls

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>their flowers. You said it all like I I, and

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I honestly didn't even think about it in that way,

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and then thinking about it as a full circle moment

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of rectify the ways that Madonna's Vogue was

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely exploitative. Right, Like Madonna did a lot for a

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ballroom culture. Um our friend of the pod, like mikel

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Street has like a lot of work and reporting on

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this if you ever want to check out his stuff,

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But like he um, there's nuance in all of it, right,

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Like Madonna was appropriative and exploitative and like stole culture

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 1>from the most marginalized in the New York scene. But

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, she brought the House of Ninja

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and other dancers with her on tour. Right she put

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 1>them in the music video. Right, she got an entire

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, group of people listening to Vogue to say,

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what's Vogue, what's vogueing, what's ballroom? And that is you

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>know big, that's huge, right, Um for Beyonce to put

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly in context, I think you said it perfectly,

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Like that's so amazing. And also in addition to ladosha

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>um a kiki house like House of tell Far a

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>very new house, a house that's like fresh on the scene,

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like again another really deep cut. And the list of

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>names where it's just like a list of powerful black women.

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And she says Grace Jones twice, like Grace, Grace Jones,

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Grace Jones. Um, she should have said. I mean, maybe

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this is like totally totally fan service, wishful thinking, but

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like Calice should have been in the

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>list of names. Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen,

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>but if she removed, I mean, it's just me being

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a fan fan, but like, come on, that would have

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>been so iconic because Calice is in that list, you

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? She is she is, you know,

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>she's I've been listening to so much Calie, to this

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce stuff is happening. All just made me Acapella is

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 1>it's all of the millennium, um, and that's one good

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to come of all this is thought. It reminded

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>me how much I love Chalice and I hope that

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>my streams are making her money. Similarly, I've been revisiting Chalice,

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but I also have been revisiting Donna Summers Bad Girls,

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think I've given a through listened through

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>since like college, and like the transitions I mean Beyonce,

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's like one of the strongest influences for renaissances,

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Like the transitions on Bad Girls are sublime, like they

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are so next level, and um I I honestly it

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>gave me a whole new appreciation for the album as

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole, as one of the greatest dance albums to

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have ever been released, and I um I honestly, it

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 1>just made me crave like real disco music right like

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know in You and I saw tons of like

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>disco inspired music, right do I release the album Chromatica

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be disco influenced. I thought it was

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just a kylie um see where, which is like an

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.840
<v Speaker 1>amazing album, But like Honey Again, it's more than disco yeah,

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's like it's for me. It's like, no, I

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>want like if you're going to do a disco album,

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is part of why I love A lot

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of the songs are renaissance, Like if you're gonna do

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a disco album, I want a farty ass base, I

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>want a gospel choir, I want some clapping sounds like

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I want like the things that make disco disco, Like

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I want full wind and trumpet ensemble, right, okay, Like

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like, you know, when we get I

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 1>want native new Yorker, yes, native New Yorker, and when

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I get reformed Williams, and like when I get the

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>dual leap of stuff, which is like fine, it's just

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, it's not disco. It's not disco. It's not

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>even really house. I think if anyone like Kylie is

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe the girl who really was giving up has always

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:53.720
<v Speaker 1>given us true disco but like the disco inspired ship.

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like I think Renaissance is what I was waiting for,

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the diet. I don't think Renaissance is

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>even disco, Like ren Renaissance is house. Yeah, I think

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that there are three songs that are pretty pretty like

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty disco funk disco. Um, but I agree, it's like

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted the full fantasy, the bad girl's fantasy. So

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>um wait. So we got a d m at like

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a virgine and that said one of our theories from

0:54:21.520 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>last week, and this person does not want us to

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>blow out their spots, so we will keep them anonymous.

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But they said that one of our theories is true

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and that the next two projects are a country album

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and an R and B album. So crowded for that

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>country album and do you think they're gonna do you

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>think she's going to tap the Chicks again? But the

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>other rumors that it's going to be maybe don R

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and B album, but a rock album, and that the

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 1>whole thread of these three albums is that Beyonce is

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>taking back music that was traditionally kind of stolen from

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>from Black Bowl. So she did it with house, Um,

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>she'll do with country and then with rock and roll,

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and like a Beyonce rock album would be major, like

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking like rock, like you know, give me

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like a little Richard sample Tina Turner. It's all about

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Tina Like, um, I mean like like I'm talking, we're

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>talking like classic rock and blues, like you know, the

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:28.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of rock that Elvis appropriated. Yeah eggs, oh gag.

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll get into that maybe in our VAS episode.

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But like I girl, I really like I saw I

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think I saw that theory on Twitter and I had

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 1>goose bumps, like the idea of giving it back to

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like what like you know, something that was stolen like,

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but I totally agree. I'm much more compelled by Beyonce

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:49.919
<v Speaker 1>rock album than another R and B album, which would

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>also be amazing obviously because it's Beyonce, but like damn,

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the Tina Turner samples would be off the chain. And

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 1>when we think about, you know, Beyonce is a frequent

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>collaborator with like Jack White, with like kind of cold

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Play ed Sheer in like pop rock types that she

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of influence from, Like I mean, I

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think Beyonce once said that cold Play is like her

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite band or something like that, Like I mean, I

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, But again, it kind of flexes onto the

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote basicness of Beyonce that I alluded to last week,

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which is not an insult, it's it's just makes her

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really clean canvas um. But I I feel like just

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>looping back to the Madonna of it all, appropriation at large,

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like cultural exploitation at large, is like a massive sin

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of this country that, like to this day is still

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>something that we just never reckoned with, Like we are

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>constantly stealing from black and brown culture without even realizing it.

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't even have to say that. It's

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like so you know, rudimentary and obvious to say, but like,

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so grateful for what Renaissance is and whatever

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 1>she does next, because you know, last week when we

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were saying, like Beyonce watched Post and then made this album,

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we were joking, but like, but Beyonce

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>literally does love Post. Like she's on the record saying

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that she loves that show, and um for me when

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we're sorting out because the you know, since in the

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>week that this album has released, there have been a

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversations around Renaissance talking about like what is

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the role of appropriation? Is Beyonce appropriating quote unquote queer culture,

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>trans culture ballroom? You know, like is this her her

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>um territory to trod on? And for me and this

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is just my personal belief. So if people don't believe,

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but people disagree with me, that's totally cute. But like,

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes down to the question of telling a

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>story that isn't yours, is the basic way of putting it.

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to tell a story that isn't yours,

0:57:47.080 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's about one clocking the hours on the

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>story you want to tell, Right, what are the research

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is what's the research you've done? Who are the sources

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're citing? And, as we've already laid out in our

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>album review, like Beyonce has done all of that. The

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>second question is like reckoning with your conviction, Right? Do

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to make this because you care about this

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>community and you have an investment in it? Or do

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to make this because you want to collect

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the cloud of highlighting a marginalized community? Right? And I

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think that Beyonce was very smart to release all this

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Johnny stuff to show that she has a personal

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stake in this, that this is her life, that you know,

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 1>she grew up with house music and with queer culture

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>by way of her uncle. Right. And then the last

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>thing is do you stick the landing? Like? Is it

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>just good? Is it good art? And it's good art,

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's good fucking art. And like for me, it's like

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that tree out of Things is like a really great

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rubric for to figure out whether or not your art

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is you know, gonna exploit some people. And I think

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that for her to say all these iconic houses, all

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 1>these iconic women's names, to give credit where credit is due,

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just like exactly how you do it? Know what

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, UM, and I'm so grateful for that. Wow,

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we really have UM consumed a lot. That was a

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 1>lot over the past week. Is there anything Is there

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 1>anything that you're really looking forward to that's coming out

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>or happening in the next couple of weeks that, like

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the listeners, the Virgins can um consume as well so

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that they are on the same track as us. There

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>literally is something that I can't think of what it

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is right now. Do you have an answer to that question? Um? Okay,

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things that I'm like, you know, I

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 1>named the books that I'm reading at the moment. I

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>still think I want to figure out this book club scenar.

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Like all of our d M s are about people

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>saying they want to do the book club. We've had

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like multiple people say they want to be our intern.

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So we will be making it happen. Oh, The Sandman,

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what we want to talk about. Okay, okay, so

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>will I watch it? I'll watch it. I started watching

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the new Netflix series The Sandman, which is an adaptation

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of Neil Gaiman's comic book series, which was turned into

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a series of graphic novels. Um, I'm really trying to

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>take my time on it because I don't want to

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>go through it too quickly. Um, Fran, if you watch it,

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>if you'll watch it, like, I'll save my thoughts about it.

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think Fran and I did talk about this,

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but maybe we should do a Neil Gaiman episode because

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Neil Gaiman is really important to me. I've like read

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>everything he's ever written, and Fran is like a true virgin,

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it would be fun to have

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>them like try out a couple of things and have

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about it. Um. But yeah, we can definitely

1:00:43.600 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>do maybe for our next new segment. Um, once Fran

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>has watched a little bit of The Sandman and I've

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>watched a little bit more, we can talk about it.

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's really good. Um, if anyone out there wants

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to start watching it, definitely do that. I'm gonna see

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bullet Train. That's so excited. I'm gonna see bullet Train.

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually might maybe see it later today or like, maybe

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be really hot in Nelly this week, so

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe one day when it's really hot, I'll go to

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the movies maybe. Um, So we'll probably talk about that

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>next week. I'm definitely excited for Bad Bunny in Bullet Train,

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm going to be like wet and that like

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sucking the r C. It's gonna be gross. Uh yeah.

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week, um and back to our

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>usual format with a discussion on all things Basilerman, but

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for real this time, because I know we said that

1:01:40.440 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. It's just you know, sometimes take a little turn.

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So now you have an extra week to catch up on,

1:01:47.400 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Basilerman's. You can leave us a review on

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It actually helps us a lot.

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It cannot be overstated that if you leave us a review,

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it is the number one thing or maybe the number

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>two things, aside from sharing with your friends, um, to

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>help our podcasts become so famous. You can find me

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on social media at friends, squish co anywhere you want,

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can find me at Rose Damn You. You

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe to Like a Vision anywhere you listen. This

1:02:12.280 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart production. Our producer is the Phoebe Unter,

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with support from Lindsay Hoffman, Julian Weller, Chess Crane Chitch

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and Nicky Etour. Until next week, See you later, Virgins