1
00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:04,720
Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal.

2
00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:05,600
Speaker 2: Ill that for me.

3
00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:09,680
Speaker 1: I'm a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

4
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:11,640
Speaker 1: I want to be happy. You want to be happy

5
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:13,640
Speaker 1: for day? Edith state is that?

6
00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:14,440
Speaker 3: Whoo whoom?

7
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:19,120
Speaker 1: And Dan and Tye.

8
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,239
Speaker 2: Welcome back to the solid verbe of boys and girls.

9
00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:25,599
Speaker 2: My name is ty That guy over there is Dan Rubinstein. Yeah,

10
00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:28,600
Speaker 2: this is a bonus verbal that you got tonight.

11
00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:29,600
Speaker 1: It's a Thursday.

12
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:33,479
Speaker 2: We normally put a show out on a Wednesday. But

13
00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:36,000
Speaker 2: Dan Rubinstein, let's talk about this.

14
00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:38,360
Speaker 1: Why are we doing this? Q and A show? What's up?

15
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:43,120
Speaker 3: We take our cues from the great Edward James Olomos,

16
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:47,000
Speaker 3: who familiar with his filmography, Edward James Almos.

17
00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:51,640
Speaker 2: I'm familiar with Edward Norton, but ed you know Edward

18
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:52,559
Speaker 2: James Almos.

19
00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:54,000
Speaker 1: I have no idea who that is.

20
00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,160
Speaker 3: Okay, So he starred in which I haven't seen. But

21
00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,920
Speaker 3: he was the star of Battlestar Galactica, which I'm sure

22
00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:00,440
Speaker 3: you've heard of.

23
00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:00,920
Speaker 1: I've heard of.

24
00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,680
Speaker 3: Yes, he was this, well, not the star but a

25
00:01:04,680 --> 00:01:07,920
Speaker 3: co star in La Bamba, the Richie Valens story.

26
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:09,319
Speaker 1: Okay, yep, you.

27
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:12,199
Speaker 3: Know Pada bay la La Bamba yep, yep, he is.

28
00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:14,959
Speaker 3: He is an esteemed actor I think, probably into his

29
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:19,520
Speaker 3: seventies now, and he had a role which I would

30
00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:23,080
Speaker 3: I would venture to guess seventy one percent of kids

31
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,319
Speaker 3: that grew up in southern California at some point we're

32
00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:30,640
Speaker 3: forced to watch this movie in school, probably in seventh

33
00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:34,560
Speaker 3: eighth grade, and the name of that film was Stand

34
00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:39,480
Speaker 3: and Deliver. And it's about an inner city teacher who tutors,

35
00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:42,679
Speaker 3: or not tutors, but teaches a bunch of kids who

36
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:45,680
Speaker 3: nobody thought would amount to anything academically leads them to

37
00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:49,800
Speaker 3: big ap calculus. I want to say, scores, very inspiring,

38
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:53,160
Speaker 3: deep plot right there. I want it's a deep plot.

39
00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:56,680
Speaker 3: It's great, it's inspiring. And we take our cues because

40
00:01:56,720 --> 00:02:00,760
Speaker 3: we now both of us stand and deliver. Okay, we're

41
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,720
Speaker 3: both standing and we're delivering a bonus show.

42
00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:03,160
Speaker 1: Right here.

43
00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:07,800
Speaker 2: I am standing, I'm hopefully delivering. I mentioned this to

44
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:10,880
Speaker 2: you before we hit record, but normally now I don't

45
00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,519
Speaker 2: know about you. Actually I do know about you because

46
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,920
Speaker 2: we've been doing this for ten plus or you're feeling

47
00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:20,960
Speaker 2: twenty two. Yeah no, no, not going tailor swift with this, Okay,

48
00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:23,639
Speaker 2: I don't feel like you have much of a radio voice.

49
00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:27,079
Speaker 1: Per se. I feel I have the radio voice. Well

50
00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:28,200
Speaker 1: you have the radio voice.

51
00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,680
Speaker 2: But just in general, if you meet you, if you

52
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:35,160
Speaker 2: interact with you outside of our podcasting setting, the way

53
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,600
Speaker 2: that you talk, your cadence, all that stuff, it's kind

54
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:43,040
Speaker 2: of one to one. There's not much, not much. There's

55
00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:45,679
Speaker 2: not an additional layer if you will.

56
00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:46,359
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

57
00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:46,400
Speaker 3: No.

58
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:48,680
Speaker 1: I'm what you see is what you get.

59
00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,120
Speaker 2: And I'm kind of like that for the most part.

60
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:55,600
Speaker 2: I'm the same human and my sensibilities are the same.

61
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:58,680
Speaker 2: But I do tend to project in a way when

62
00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:02,440
Speaker 2: I'm recording that I wouldn't normally project. Like if CYB

63
00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:05,839
Speaker 2: broadcast that's right, a solid wife Kate were here, she'd

64
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:08,040
Speaker 2: be downstairs and she would hear me yelling.

65
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:10,400
Speaker 1: I don't do that in real life. I'm not. I'm

66
00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,000
Speaker 1: not that loud, that boisterous of a person in real life.

67
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:14,240
Speaker 1: So where I'm.

68
00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:18,600
Speaker 3: Gonna sit down for turkey sausages and say welcome to dinner, exactly,

69
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:19,160
Speaker 3: don't do that.

70
00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:21,040
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't project in that manner.

71
00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:24,000
Speaker 2: So what I was thinking about in the way over here,

72
00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:26,120
Speaker 2: because it was a long day at the office, as

73
00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:29,040
Speaker 2: I'm sure so many of our listeners have experienced for

74
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:34,079
Speaker 2: themselves long day at the office, a little, a little,

75
00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:38,280
Speaker 2: just worn down from the week. I am going to

76
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:42,200
Speaker 2: do my best to go sans radio voice tonight, So

77
00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:46,880
Speaker 2: you're gonna get raw, unfiltered, unfettered tie right from the

78
00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:50,640
Speaker 2: cane plant tonight. I'm going to do my best to

79
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:55,040
Speaker 2: not project and just give you as authentic inexperience as possible.

80
00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:58,120
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna edit anything out. This is gonna be

81
00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:01,040
Speaker 2: raw and unedited. Yeah, this is time I unplugged. Tie

82
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:04,800
Speaker 2: after dark, verbal after dark. That's what you're gonna get

83
00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:07,560
Speaker 2: here this evening. And furthermore, we haven't done a Q

84
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:09,200
Speaker 2: and A show in a while. We were doing these

85
00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,680
Speaker 2: once a month in the off season. Yeah, if only

86
00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:14,600
Speaker 2: because we had nothing else to talk about, and now

87
00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:16,400
Speaker 2: we had to grow up and mature and all that

88
00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:19,360
Speaker 2: and talk about real life college football stuff. But we

89
00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,840
Speaker 2: still do get the questions, and we just wanted to

90
00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:24,400
Speaker 2: get people a bonus show. Actually, they're going to be

91
00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:27,960
Speaker 2: multiple bonus shows coming at you, not just last week,

92
00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:30,440
Speaker 2: but in the weeks to come, and which we can

93
00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:33,760
Speaker 2: get into here in a little bit. But you were

94
00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:37,160
Speaker 2: kind enough to solicit questions from I saw a variety

95
00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:38,240
Speaker 2: of different platforms today.

96
00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:43,200
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, And this is like the asterisk to today's

97
00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:45,640
Speaker 3: and the rest of the season's bonus Q and A shows,

98
00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:47,800
Speaker 3: which I don't know how bonus they are for announcing them,

99
00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:51,040
Speaker 3: but I'm glad we are announcing them because people can

100
00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:54,279
Speaker 3: expect them and it holds us accountable. The questions that

101
00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:57,200
Speaker 3: we are answering are questions that have to do with

102
00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:00,799
Speaker 3: this season itself. It's a mid season Q which will

103
00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:05,159
Speaker 3: devolve into latter season Q and a's whatever. But we

104
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:08,599
Speaker 3: got a lot of really excellent questions. But like, hey,

105
00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:12,000
Speaker 3: if you could be any kind of popcorn and you

106
00:05:12,320 --> 00:05:16,200
Speaker 3: and you had to be a popcorn eaten by SEC coaches,

107
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:18,919
Speaker 3: we will save those.

108
00:05:19,279 --> 00:05:20,839
Speaker 1: The coach questions are the ones.

109
00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,720
Speaker 2: Those are the ones that we kind of strike I

110
00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,480
Speaker 2: think almost instinctively at this point.

111
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,880
Speaker 3: Yeah, your hypothetical coach questions, We've we've gone a lot

112
00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:32,279
Speaker 3: of directions with those, but we've gotten a lot of

113
00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:34,200
Speaker 3: like I'm moving to a new city, what should I

114
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:37,279
Speaker 3: do for dating and a new job and apartment. We're

115
00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,440
Speaker 3: happy to talk about those type of hypotheticals for us

116
00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:42,839
Speaker 3: and for the but we're going to save those, yeah,

117
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:47,159
Speaker 3: like February or June. So we're going to attack the

118
00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:51,800
Speaker 3: most relevant to the middle of the season questions that

119
00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:55,600
Speaker 3: have been asked of us today and then also at

120
00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:58,479
Speaker 3: least this week and next week. Do you remember the

121
00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:01,320
Speaker 3: episode is a flashback episode The Simpsons where Homer was

122
00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:05,400
Speaker 3: climbing up to a clubhouse in a treehouse and they

123
00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:09,240
Speaker 3: said it's the No Homers Club. Yeah, yeah, ye, and

124
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:12,040
Speaker 3: then there was already a Homer and it was no Homers.

125
00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,320
Speaker 3: We're doing an only Homer's Club segment at the end

126
00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:18,360
Speaker 3: of these episodes. Today we are going to be joined well,

127
00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:21,200
Speaker 3: I will be joined by Jeff Schwartz, and we are

128
00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:23,200
Speaker 3: going to nerd out about the organ season thus far.

129
00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,640
Speaker 3: If you don't want to listen to that, that's cool,

130
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:29,680
Speaker 3: Just stop the episode and move on with your life.

131
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:31,880
Speaker 3: Next week we'll be doing some Notre Dame with the

132
00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:35,800
Speaker 3: Notre Dame guests, and you're going to flex those muscles,

133
00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:39,680
Speaker 3: Tye that you've been yearning to stretch so many musya

134
00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:43,800
Speaker 3: and you know it is squat sober Tye. As you know,

135
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,800
Speaker 3: sure coaches with the Scroolers skip leg day, yep, never

136
00:06:47,880 --> 00:06:50,400
Speaker 3: skip leg day, I have real sore standing and delivering

137
00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:52,159
Speaker 3: as we speak. So that's what we're going to do.

138
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,240
Speaker 3: And I'm ready to dive in with some q's and

139
00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:55,000
Speaker 3: a's if you are.

140
00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely the one thing that I would ask though.

141
00:06:57,960 --> 00:06:59,919
Speaker 2: But I'm really going to try to hold true on

142
00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:01,839
Speaker 2: this no radio voice thing.

143
00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:03,080
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.

144
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:07,000
Speaker 2: And you've known me for a long time again, independent

145
00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:10,040
Speaker 2: of the whole podcast thing. If ever, I, if ever

146
00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:12,800
Speaker 2: I slip into radio mode, I want you to just

147
00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:16,080
Speaker 2: go buzz or make some sort of noise, okay, so

148
00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:18,960
Speaker 2: then I can try get level set and kind of

149
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:21,200
Speaker 2: come back into just normal time mode.

150
00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:21,640
Speaker 1: Okay.

151
00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:25,239
Speaker 3: I think the low point of your radio voice, neess

152
00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:27,640
Speaker 3: was when you told Mama h to follow you on

153
00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,480
Speaker 3: Facebook fancred Twitter. That was weird and she didn't know

154
00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:35,400
Speaker 3: what you were talking about. And we want the real tie.

155
00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:37,080
Speaker 3: You're gonna get the real tie tonight, all right. Just

156
00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,080
Speaker 3: make sure that I make sure that I stay true

157
00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:42,760
Speaker 3: to myself. Do you have our our Dave Letterman sound? Uh?

158
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:47,320
Speaker 1: Hold on talk a little bit while I find it. Oh, okay, cool,

159
00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:48,920
Speaker 1: We've got a lot of good questions here.

160
00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:53,680
Speaker 3: We asked four questions from Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, and Soliverbaltgmail

161
00:07:53,720 --> 00:07:55,760
Speaker 3: dot com to which any of those you can always

162
00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:57,200
Speaker 3: send questions.

163
00:07:57,240 --> 00:07:58,920
Speaker 1: But we got a lot of good ones.

164
00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:03,320
Speaker 3: There's a couple of slightly off topic sub questions, but

165
00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:05,320
Speaker 3: I feel like we are we are really going to

166
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:08,520
Speaker 3: hone in on stuff that is relevant to this season. Also,

167
00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,400
Speaker 3: Ty is drinking I believe sparkling water and tonight I

168
00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:15,760
Speaker 3: am drinking a ginger turmeric tea with a little bit

169
00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:17,640
Speaker 3: of honey. Okay, I got it. That is I found

170
00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:18,440
Speaker 3: my instrument.

171
00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:19,600
Speaker 1: Sorry, it took me so long.

172
00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:22,200
Speaker 3: I had to rebuild my sound welcome back. I was

173
00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:24,080
Speaker 3: talking about my tea. Here we go, Here we go.

174
00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,640
Speaker 2: Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail, You've got mail on the

175
00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:32,680
Speaker 2: solid rubal. That took a lot longer than expected because

176
00:08:32,760 --> 00:08:38,120
Speaker 2: my soundboard app crashed on Sunday morning. When everything else

177
00:08:38,160 --> 00:08:41,440
Speaker 2: crashed for us, so did the soundboard and I've had

178
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:42,000
Speaker 2: to rebuild it.

179
00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:43,280
Speaker 1: So all the buttons aren't place yet.

180
00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:45,800
Speaker 2: But as often as we can here on the program,

181
00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:49,840
Speaker 2: we try to pay homage, homage.

182
00:08:49,320 --> 00:08:54,400
Speaker 1: To Harver Ballers and whatever questions come in. So here

183
00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:54,600
Speaker 1: we go.

184
00:08:54,679 --> 00:08:56,280
Speaker 3: That was a little radio voice. It was little radio

185
00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:57,960
Speaker 3: was it right there? I'm sorry, Yeah, a little bit,

186
00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,520
Speaker 3: It's okay. First question from Shoeless Sean. This is a

187
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:04,520
Speaker 3: good entry point. How are you two doing? How are

188
00:09:04,520 --> 00:09:04,920
Speaker 3: we doing?

189
00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:06,920
Speaker 1: Yeah?

190
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,800
Speaker 2: Like life as as a as an item or just independent?

191
00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:13,200
Speaker 1: What is this question? When someone says, how are interpret it?

192
00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:13,840
Speaker 1: Interpret it?

193
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:14,120
Speaker 2: How you?

194
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:15,760
Speaker 1: How you like? How are we doing?

195
00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:18,960
Speaker 3: Let's say how are we doing together? In conjunction, the

196
00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:21,319
Speaker 3: show is doing well? The show is doing well, the

197
00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:22,520
Speaker 3: show continues to grow.

198
00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:26,920
Speaker 2: I feel like, and maybe I can only speak for

199
00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:30,880
Speaker 2: me with this, but I feel like me personally and

200
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:34,520
Speaker 2: us collectively, we've really been able to dial up our

201
00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:38,000
Speaker 2: personality and bring out more of who you and I

202
00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:39,800
Speaker 2: are just as college football fans. So I think we're

203
00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:42,280
Speaker 2: doing well, and the numbers would seemingly indicate that too.

204
00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:44,880
Speaker 3: Yeah. I think we're pinning our ears back and really

205
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:52,320
Speaker 3: getting after it. I think we are. Shoeless Sean also says,

206
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:56,640
Speaker 3: do you have any annual autumnal outings away from college

207
00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:58,760
Speaker 3: football season? As we enter into autumn and then we're

208
00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:01,600
Speaker 3: gonna I promise we're getting into colleg football topics. I

209
00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:06,200
Speaker 3: really don't. I'll take this one first. I outings. I

210
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:09,520
Speaker 3: don't have any kids. I live across the country from

211
00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:13,800
Speaker 3: most of my family. So outings wise, it's just generally

212
00:10:13,880 --> 00:10:16,720
Speaker 3: with Jody with an eye and we keep it pretty simple.

213
00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:19,720
Speaker 3: We will go for walks. You know, we have Central

214
00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:22,319
Speaker 3: Park and Prospect Park obviously, so only a slim amount

215
00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:24,480
Speaker 3: of people can relate to that that are listening. But

216
00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:28,360
Speaker 3: I'm a big outdoors person walking running, you know, I'll

217
00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:30,680
Speaker 3: listen to a podcast while going for a walk. That's

218
00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:33,959
Speaker 3: I'll like a good crisp baar walk. So that's that's

219
00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:35,040
Speaker 3: all I can really offer.

220
00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:37,800
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, I have an outing coming up this weekend.

221
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:40,400
Speaker 2: I talked about the five k that I'm going to

222
00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:44,240
Speaker 2: run right that I haven't trained for at all, and

223
00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:46,560
Speaker 2: some folks were asking, like, is it a costume five

224
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:49,959
Speaker 2: k where you get to run as Captain America or No,

225
00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:52,840
Speaker 2: it's not. It's just a normal race over here in

226
00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:56,000
Speaker 2: Bethlehem that I do every year with my family.

227
00:10:55,720 --> 00:10:56,520
Speaker 1: Which would be cool.

228
00:10:57,760 --> 00:11:04,160
Speaker 2: It's also going to be ti Vember next month, my birthday. Yeah,

229
00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:07,160
Speaker 2: so that's sort of a yearly thing. But no, beyond

230
00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:09,880
Speaker 2: beyond the usual stuff, we got Trick or Treat Night

231
00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:11,439
Speaker 2: coming up. Do you guys do Trick or Treat Night?

232
00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:14,760
Speaker 3: Yeah? We actually just got an email in our building

233
00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:16,679
Speaker 3: to sign up because there are some kids in our

234
00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:20,200
Speaker 3: building to sign up so that they can knock on

235
00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:21,199
Speaker 3: the door and get some candy.

236
00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,120
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna go big with the candy. Yeah,

237
00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:24,760
Speaker 1: I was gonna ask you about that because.

238
00:11:24,520 --> 00:11:26,680
Speaker 3: I want to develop that reputation. I want to develop

239
00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:27,840
Speaker 3: the full size reputation.

240
00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:31,320
Speaker 2: I pulled an all time old man move a couple

241
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,640
Speaker 2: months ago. Now, as it relates to Halloween.

242
00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:36,280
Speaker 3: Would you give away some walnuts?

243
00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:40,720
Speaker 2: No? I thought I probably told you about this, but

244
00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:41,480
Speaker 2: I guess they didn't.

245
00:11:41,559 --> 00:11:41,640
Speaker 1: What.

246
00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:44,720
Speaker 2: I was up at Wegman's and I saw and that

247
00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:49,560
Speaker 2: they were offering the big bags of kit Kats, and

248
00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:53,760
Speaker 2: I think the mini Snickers bars. They're offering some kind

249
00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:58,360
Speaker 2: of sale. And I saw this and I was thinking

250
00:11:58,400 --> 00:12:00,360
Speaker 2: back to last year where I didn't have any and

251
00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:01,640
Speaker 2: and I was just caught off guard and had to

252
00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:03,280
Speaker 2: run out and buy a bunch of stuff. And they

253
00:12:03,280 --> 00:12:04,880
Speaker 2: get you through the nose if you buy it late.

254
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:05,960
Speaker 2: It's like Valentine's Day.

255
00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:07,160
Speaker 1: So I went.

256
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:11,000
Speaker 2: I came home with like ten bags, ten deluxe bags

257
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:14,719
Speaker 2: of candy because they were three dollars apiece. And I'm

258
00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:16,920
Speaker 2: not kidding. I did this at the end of like July,

259
00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:20,160
Speaker 2: and I came home and Kate said, what the hell

260
00:12:20,240 --> 00:12:20,440
Speaker 2: is that?

261
00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:21,679
Speaker 1: Why did you do this?

262
00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:24,000
Speaker 2: Oh? I guess for Halloween, just so we want to

263
00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:27,000
Speaker 2: be ready, And she's like, you do realize Halloween is

264
00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,199
Speaker 2: three and a half months away. And that kind of

265
00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:32,160
Speaker 2: dawned on me that maybe I was I was turning

266
00:12:32,160 --> 00:12:32,920
Speaker 2: into an old man.

267
00:12:32,840 --> 00:12:34,160
Speaker 1: At that point. But I am ready to go.

268
00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:37,120
Speaker 2: Yeah, we've got kit kats and we've got I believe

269
00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:39,079
Speaker 2: it's those Hershey's miniatures.

270
00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:40,800
Speaker 1: So we got a bunch of that ready to go.

271
00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:43,880
Speaker 3: Oh great call, all right, Derek wants to know. And

272
00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:45,880
Speaker 3: I'm going to give you some contenders here for you

273
00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:49,320
Speaker 3: to choose from. Okay, biggest surprise so far this year,

274
00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:53,120
Speaker 3: good and bad, and I'm going to I'm going to

275
00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:54,040
Speaker 3: weld this.

276
00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:55,160
Speaker 1: I'm going to bend it.

277
00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:58,440
Speaker 3: Hopefully it's a malleable enough interpretation, not just good and

278
00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:02,520
Speaker 3: bad but sort of disappointing bummers, really cool things. I'm

279
00:13:02,520 --> 00:13:05,080
Speaker 3: gonna give you some options here, all right, yep. So

280
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:08,320
Speaker 3: these are the good, positive things that have been a

281
00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:13,320
Speaker 3: little bit unexpected. Hawaii six and one Cole McDonald's for

282
00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,840
Speaker 3: a ton of yards being already Bowl eligible after our

283
00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:20,720
Speaker 3: really low expectations, Colorado with a down couple of years,

284
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:23,720
Speaker 3: but certainly surging even after the loss of the loss

285
00:13:23,760 --> 00:13:29,800
Speaker 3: to USC the magnitude of Tua's season, we figured he'd

286
00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:34,680
Speaker 3: be good, not world destroying. What Iowa has looked like

287
00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:37,800
Speaker 3: on offense recently, because we obviously have an immense amount

288
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:39,040
Speaker 3: of loyalty to Nate Stanley.

289
00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:41,480
Speaker 2: I was told we're in at Iowa show now because

290
00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:43,280
Speaker 2: we haven't provided them two weeks running.

291
00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:45,920
Speaker 3: Is that still that's on you? You set up our

292
00:13:45,960 --> 00:13:46,480
Speaker 3: preview doc.

293
00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,480
Speaker 1: I did set up there. I'm you know what it is.

294
00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:51,520
Speaker 2: When we veered strong in the direction of NC State,

295
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:53,520
Speaker 2: we veered away from Iowa.

296
00:13:53,559 --> 00:13:56,640
Speaker 1: We became pro anti Iowa on this program.

297
00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:59,160
Speaker 3: What's the It's there's some sort of law. Is in

298
00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:02,000
Speaker 3: Newton's law for every reaction, there's an equal and opposite.

299
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:04,480
Speaker 1: I don't know that would be those two programs.

300
00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:09,040
Speaker 3: Yeah, Buffalo and how good their offense has looked in

301
00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:11,160
Speaker 3: a down year for the MAC Buffalo has looked strong.

302
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:14,440
Speaker 3: And I would say Utah State, Utah State and the

303
00:14:14,440 --> 00:14:20,600
Speaker 3: Mountain West. There are other smaller situations within teams, within programs,

304
00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:23,600
Speaker 3: within conferences, whatever that are interesting in a positive way,

305
00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:25,840
Speaker 3: but those are the ones that I have in a

306
00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:26,600
Speaker 3: positive direction.

307
00:14:26,720 --> 00:14:29,920
Speaker 2: Well, so I would I would push back on the

308
00:14:29,960 --> 00:14:34,560
Speaker 2: to A thing because it might be a surprise the

309
00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:37,840
Speaker 2: heights to which Alabama's gone, but it's still to A

310
00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:41,880
Speaker 2: and it's still an incredible safety net for him playing

311
00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:43,960
Speaker 2: in that system, having all that talent around him, so

312
00:14:44,400 --> 00:14:47,040
Speaker 2: he could he could be even better than he is now,

313
00:14:47,040 --> 00:14:48,960
Speaker 2: and I'm not sure it would truly be a surprise,

314
00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:53,520
Speaker 2: not for me. And also on the Colorado front, I'm

315
00:14:53,560 --> 00:14:56,840
Speaker 2: afraid to say that we didn't expect great things from

316
00:14:56,840 --> 00:15:00,000
Speaker 2: Colorado because the angry free range Colorado hate that way

317
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:04,480
Speaker 2: come away. That's true, as you know from reading the emails. Yeah,

318
00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:08,320
Speaker 2: I compostable. The answer for me is LSU because oh

319
00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:11,600
Speaker 2: good answer. When we did our ama on the subreddit

320
00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:14,600
Speaker 2: reddit dot com slash our slash solid verbal if you're

321
00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:17,720
Speaker 2: playing along at home, I think I said back then

322
00:15:17,800 --> 00:15:21,160
Speaker 2: that LSU is going to go seven and five and

323
00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:24,840
Speaker 2: Coacho was going to get fired. It's it's apparent to

324
00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:26,640
Speaker 2: me that that's not going to happen at this point.

325
00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:30,080
Speaker 2: LSU clearly having a really good year up to I

326
00:15:30,080 --> 00:15:33,720
Speaker 2: think fifth in the latest Top twenty five. Even if

327
00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,080
Speaker 2: they fall off from this point four, which I don't

328
00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:38,480
Speaker 2: think is going to happen, it's still is far going

329
00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:41,440
Speaker 2: to exceed those expectations. So for me, for me, I

330
00:15:41,480 --> 00:15:45,040
Speaker 2: think LSU is definitely the good surprise. The bad surprise

331
00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:47,320
Speaker 2: on the flip side. Also in the SEC would be Auburn.

332
00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:50,080
Speaker 2: And I'm not going to say I was the highest

333
00:15:50,080 --> 00:15:52,520
Speaker 2: in the world on Auburn, but for Auburn to be

334
00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:54,800
Speaker 2: at this breaking point now, it feels like they're at

335
00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:57,320
Speaker 2: a breaking point with this game this week again, so

336
00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:01,400
Speaker 2: old Miss I picked Old Miss outright, and I think

337
00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:04,560
Speaker 2: you went Auburn if memory served. I should know this

338
00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:06,080
Speaker 2: because we just did the show yesterday.

339
00:16:06,160 --> 00:16:07,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I have Auburn winning.

340
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:09,760
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, But it just it feels like they're at

341
00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:12,960
Speaker 2: a breaking point. They have not gotten that rushing game

342
00:16:13,080 --> 00:16:16,280
Speaker 2: on track. Jared Stidham has definitely fallen short of at

343
00:16:16,360 --> 00:16:19,360
Speaker 2: least my expectations. So for me, they would be the

344
00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:21,840
Speaker 2: surprise on the bad side.

345
00:16:22,680 --> 00:16:25,760
Speaker 3: Yeah, losing to Tennessee will warp, will warp some minds,

346
00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:29,080
Speaker 3: this iteration of Tennessee, which I think Tennessee will be

347
00:16:29,280 --> 00:16:31,920
Speaker 3: a pretty good program with Jeremy Pruitt, but at this point,

348
00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:34,640
Speaker 3: losing that comfortably at home to Tennessee that gets people's

349
00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,880
Speaker 3: eyes popping open like saucers. The other contenders I have

350
00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:41,760
Speaker 3: here because I do obviously have Auburn there, and I

351
00:16:41,800 --> 00:16:43,480
Speaker 3: don't know if I'm fully bought in as Auburn. As

352
00:16:43,520 --> 00:16:47,040
Speaker 3: the disappointment, They're definitely disappointing, but their defense has you know,

353
00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:49,240
Speaker 3: when the offense hasn't totally let them down, They've looked

354
00:16:49,280 --> 00:16:51,880
Speaker 3: good for long stretches of this season. I would say

355
00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:56,480
Speaker 3: Wisconsin just with what their defenses look like Stanford and

356
00:16:56,520 --> 00:17:00,880
Speaker 3: that is, you know, a multi pronged explanation with losses

357
00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:04,119
Speaker 3: and Bryce Love just simply not being healthy enough to

358
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:06,480
Speaker 3: really get there, the offensive line taking a step down.

359
00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:09,960
Speaker 3: Khalil Tate's health, I don't think anybody questions his ability,

360
00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:14,720
Speaker 3: but what Arizona has looked like with Khalil Tate sort

361
00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:18,040
Speaker 3: of just struggling to maintain health, what a pretty.

362
00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:22,439
Speaker 2: What about Kevin someone at Arizona? Yeah, I expected a

363
00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:25,800
Speaker 2: lot more on that front. I would also bolt on

364
00:17:26,040 --> 00:17:30,200
Speaker 2: Michigan State too. Michigan State of course beat Penn State.

365
00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:33,000
Speaker 2: They just went to Penn State, and I know, I know,

366
00:17:33,160 --> 00:17:36,359
Speaker 2: and maybe they're turning a corner. But wow, let's say

367
00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:39,520
Speaker 2: the first five games for Michigan State got me a

368
00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:40,240
Speaker 2: bit underwhelmed.

369
00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:43,159
Speaker 3: Yeah, and then they've worked through their own injury and

370
00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:45,960
Speaker 3: continue to work through their own injury issues. TCU's offense,

371
00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:48,960
Speaker 3: I think is pretty surprising that they haven't been able

372
00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:52,760
Speaker 3: to not even maintain but look somewhere in the neighborhood

373
00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:56,760
Speaker 3: of where they've been offensively with a new quarterback. Everything

374
00:17:56,760 --> 00:17:58,240
Speaker 3: about Louisville is my answer.

375
00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:03,240
Speaker 1: Or I mean, think about the perception of the ACC.

376
00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:07,560
Speaker 3: Right now, it's Clemson and some of Miami, and now

377
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,639
Speaker 3: Miami is losing to Virginia, so it's basically Clemson and

378
00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:13,400
Speaker 3: hopefully they continue to look good with the true freshman quarterback.

379
00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:17,480
Speaker 3: That's not a great reputation. It's okay to have a

380
00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:20,280
Speaker 3: one great team and the rest if you're the Pac twelve.

381
00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:23,399
Speaker 3: But the ACC, and especially where the ACC has been

382
00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:25,840
Speaker 3: these past few years, really looking like one of the

383
00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:28,520
Speaker 3: deeper conferences, a really good slate of quarterbacks as recently

384
00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:30,640
Speaker 3: as a couple of years ago. I mean, the ACC

385
00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:33,920
Speaker 3: made Nate Peterman look good. That was fun, and now

386
00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:36,960
Speaker 3: he's a disaster. But think about our perception of the

387
00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:38,040
Speaker 3: ACC right now.

388
00:18:38,119 --> 00:18:40,520
Speaker 1: If Louisville were pretty good, if.

389
00:18:40,440 --> 00:18:42,919
Speaker 3: The defense definitely took a step back, but if Puma

390
00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:46,399
Speaker 3: pass had worked out and they were competitive and fun,

391
00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:49,920
Speaker 3: even if not a hugely winning team, you'd have Clemson, Louisville,

392
00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,320
Speaker 3: and maybe to a lesser extent, Virginia Tech and Miami.

393
00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:54,880
Speaker 2: I assume that you're not mentioning NC State because we're

394
00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:57,520
Speaker 2: just assumed to be an NC State podcast this point.

395
00:18:57,560 --> 00:18:59,040
Speaker 3: We are in NC State Park. How could you be

396
00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:00,240
Speaker 3: disappointed with NCACT eight?

397
00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:02,320
Speaker 1: All right, let's do another one.

398
00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:07,119
Speaker 3: So Louisville, Louisville cratering BBG. Can you rank the twenty

399
00:19:07,160 --> 00:19:08,879
Speaker 3: eighteen We've got a lot of people asking a similar

400
00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:13,200
Speaker 3: question the twenty eighteen coaching hires, coaching carousel hires.

401
00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:15,840
Speaker 1: Okay, so what's that. Well, we're not gonna want to

402
00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:16,920
Speaker 1: give you some names.

403
00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:18,760
Speaker 3: No, I'm just gonna give you some names, and I'm

404
00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:20,960
Speaker 3: gonna give you a head to head who you've been

405
00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:24,520
Speaker 3: more impressed with within the context of what they have

406
00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:28,240
Speaker 3: and what they've done and where they appear to be going. Okay, Okay,

407
00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:32,920
Speaker 3: Joe moorehead and Dan Mullen. You know those two programs

408
00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:33,800
Speaker 3: are related to.

409
00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:36,400
Speaker 2: Of course, you would put those two against each other,

410
00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:38,920
Speaker 2: of course, and they played each other.

411
00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:41,960
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, Dan Mullen for me, is the answer.

412
00:19:42,359 --> 00:19:46,080
Speaker 2: And maybe maybe he's starting from a place where he

413
00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:51,000
Speaker 2: had more higher level talent, but there was definitely more

414
00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:54,200
Speaker 2: of a veteran presence for Joe Moorehead and it's taken

415
00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:55,960
Speaker 2: him a little bit to figure it out. I think

416
00:19:55,960 --> 00:19:57,800
Speaker 2: Mississippi State's going to be fine. They've got a big

417
00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:00,520
Speaker 2: game this weekend which we should find out obviously a

418
00:20:00,560 --> 00:20:03,800
Speaker 2: little bit more about the Bulldogs. But for me, I

419
00:20:03,880 --> 00:20:08,359
Speaker 2: just I feel like Dan Mullen has reinstated a sense

420
00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:11,560
Speaker 2: of hope at Florida and that's really what they were missing.

421
00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:15,960
Speaker 2: Felipe Franks has gotten better at quarterback. Yeah, I would

422
00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:18,879
Speaker 2: go Mullen, but Joe Morehead's doing a good job in

423
00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:19,880
Speaker 2: his own right too.

424
00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:22,359
Speaker 3: And that I mean this is, you know, potentially one

425
00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:24,200
Speaker 3: of the most important hires when you're a head coach

426
00:20:24,200 --> 00:20:27,119
Speaker 3: in the SEC. The Todd Grantham higher defensive coordinator has

427
00:20:27,200 --> 00:20:30,640
Speaker 3: looked very good earlier. So yes, I think Dan Mullen

428
00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:32,960
Speaker 3: has done a strong early job for the Gators. Chip

429
00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:34,639
Speaker 3: Kelly against Scott Frost.

430
00:20:35,280 --> 00:20:42,479
Speaker 2: Ooh, I guess I go Chip Kelly. Okay, at this point,

431
00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:43,800
Speaker 2: is it fair to go chip Kelly?

432
00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:46,120
Speaker 1: Uh?

433
00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:49,840
Speaker 3: Yeah, I would say the battle that he has is

434
00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:53,400
Speaker 3: probably a little more uphill because of the division he's

435
00:20:53,480 --> 00:20:57,720
Speaker 3: coaching in at the moment and just the the open

436
00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:02,800
Speaker 3: nature of it. But I like the high I like

437
00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:04,320
Speaker 3: the fit, I like the higher little bit more. The

438
00:21:04,320 --> 00:21:07,600
Speaker 3: thing I'd be worried about a little is recruiting seems

439
00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:09,800
Speaker 3: to be trending in a better direction for Scott Frost

440
00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:13,320
Speaker 3: and Nebraska then for Chip at UCLA. They have not

441
00:21:13,440 --> 00:21:15,960
Speaker 3: really brought in any big, big names. It's been a

442
00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:18,600
Speaker 3: sort of slow role for them. If you're looking into

443
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:21,040
Speaker 3: the future. So I actually may go Frost here, I

444
00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:24,480
Speaker 3: may go really Frost. Well, yes, I think, I think

445
00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:27,840
Speaker 3: because he is on an ascension, whereas Chip Kelly isn't.

446
00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:31,439
Speaker 3: Necessarily I think I like that the idea of Scott

447
00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:33,080
Speaker 3: Frost shooting star a little bit better.

448
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:35,240
Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, I mean, I think you can make a

449
00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:37,280
Speaker 2: good case for both of them. I probably go Chip Kelly.

450
00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:40,840
Speaker 2: It just seems like they're figuring out the system and

451
00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:45,879
Speaker 2: UCLA within the context of a season. This season is

452
00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:49,000
Speaker 2: playing better, and if they do start to win, if

453
00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:51,119
Speaker 2: he can get more of his guy here at all

454
00:21:51,119 --> 00:21:53,439
Speaker 2: the time, right his guys, if you can get if

455
00:21:53,480 --> 00:21:55,679
Speaker 2: you can get his guys in there, I think we

456
00:21:55,720 --> 00:21:58,680
Speaker 2: could be in a position where, you know, Chip Kelly

457
00:21:59,280 --> 00:22:01,879
Speaker 2: wins a little sooner than expected at you Ceiling.

458
00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:04,400
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the good news for both of those

459
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,280
Speaker 3: that they have in common is incredibly promising true freshman

460
00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:10,400
Speaker 3: quarterbacks I've thrown into the fire. Yeah, and and there's

461
00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:13,560
Speaker 3: an encouraging situation with both. Finally, we'll end with this

462
00:22:13,720 --> 00:22:19,680
Speaker 3: had to head Jimbo Fisher yep, I'll indulge you. Mario

463
00:22:20,200 --> 00:22:23,400
Speaker 3: crystal Ball, how would you rank their performances?

464
00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:29,840
Speaker 2: I like, I like what Mario crystal Ball is doing

465
00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:34,480
Speaker 2: at Oregon. I like that he is trying to build

466
00:22:36,080 --> 00:22:39,840
Speaker 2: a physical presence up front, something that we talked about

467
00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:43,280
Speaker 2: on the show yesterday, how he's trying to get more physical.

468
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:47,880
Speaker 3: And trust me, Jeff and I will momentarily okay.

469
00:22:48,640 --> 00:22:51,399
Speaker 2: So I think that I think that's an important step

470
00:22:51,480 --> 00:22:57,280
Speaker 2: that we knew was in crystal Ball's background, but maybe

471
00:22:57,280 --> 00:23:00,199
Speaker 2: didn't expect to see so soon at Oregon. So that

472
00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:04,679
Speaker 2: to me has had an outsided impact on how I

473
00:23:04,720 --> 00:23:08,120
Speaker 2: feel about this comparison. A and M scares me to death.

474
00:23:08,800 --> 00:23:13,240
Speaker 2: They scared me to death. But I think my answer

475
00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:18,960
Speaker 2: here would probably be crystaball by a hair because I'm

476
00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:24,080
Speaker 2: seeing things I didn't quite expect at Oregon. And on

477
00:23:24,160 --> 00:23:26,040
Speaker 2: the A and M side, it just A and M's

478
00:23:26,160 --> 00:23:29,280
Speaker 2: very good, really soon under Jimbo. It's clear that he's

479
00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:30,120
Speaker 2: having an impact.

480
00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:33,720
Speaker 3: Yeah, both inherited a good amount of talent on both sides.

481
00:23:33,840 --> 00:23:37,040
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just I feel like we should have seen

482
00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:39,720
Speaker 2: this all along at A and M. And it's just

483
00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:43,680
Speaker 2: taken Jimbo half a season here to assemble the parts

484
00:23:43,720 --> 00:23:45,879
Speaker 2: and get them playing the way that they should have

485
00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:48,240
Speaker 2: all along. Whereas Oregon, I didn't expect to see them

486
00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:49,360
Speaker 2: playing physical football.

487
00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:55,040
Speaker 3: Yeah, and I would I measured about crystal ball because

488
00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:59,800
Speaker 3: that Washington game was a probable Washington win. And so

489
00:24:00,960 --> 00:24:03,920
Speaker 3: I'm not fully ready to fully hop on board with

490
00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:07,240
Speaker 3: Oregon playoff contender, even though we got some questions about

491
00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:09,960
Speaker 3: that they're not a playoff contender. They're just not. I

492
00:24:10,080 --> 00:24:14,160
Speaker 3: watched every play of this team. They're not the case.

493
00:24:14,200 --> 00:24:17,280
Speaker 3: For Mario Cristabal, though, is both with what he's done early,

494
00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:22,520
Speaker 3: the level of competition that Oregon has beaten or almost beaten,

495
00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:26,080
Speaker 3: and the same kind of goes for Texts A and M.

496
00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:29,360
Speaker 3: With how competitive they were against Clemson, certainly not competitive

497
00:24:29,359 --> 00:24:32,720
Speaker 3: against Alabama. I'm a little higher on crystaball I think

498
00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:35,880
Speaker 3: right now, just because he doesn't have Alabama in his division,

499
00:24:36,160 --> 00:24:38,760
Speaker 3: just because he has already beaten the class of the division.

500
00:24:38,920 --> 00:24:41,719
Speaker 3: So within that context, I'm going crystal ball. But I

501
00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:44,600
Speaker 3: think Jimbo Fisher should have texts A and M threatening

502
00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:46,080
Speaker 3: double digits pretty consistently.

503
00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:48,359
Speaker 1: My only caveat if I could.

504
00:24:49,080 --> 00:24:52,160
Speaker 2: If Moregan loses this week against Wazoo, I'm gonna switch

505
00:24:52,240 --> 00:24:55,360
Speaker 2: my answer over to Okay, Jimbo Fisher.

506
00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:56,359
Speaker 1: You're upfront about it.

507
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:00,359
Speaker 3: I respect that, all right, Tom f wants to say,

508
00:25:00,440 --> 00:25:03,119
Speaker 3: And no, LSU beats Alabama, so that'd be in a

509
00:25:03,200 --> 00:25:07,439
Speaker 3: couple of weeks and wins the SEC Championship, so presumably

510
00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:11,520
Speaker 3: over Florida or Georgia, Notre Dame in Clemson remain undefeated,

511
00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:15,520
Speaker 3: Clemson wins the ACC Championship, what scenario keeps BAMA out

512
00:25:15,840 --> 00:25:19,520
Speaker 3: of the playoff from there? So repeating the mode the

513
00:25:19,560 --> 00:25:22,600
Speaker 3: method by which they got into the playoff last year,

514
00:25:23,119 --> 00:25:24,800
Speaker 3: not winning division, getting into.

515
00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:29,359
Speaker 1: The final four. What would keep them out if they so?

516
00:25:29,600 --> 00:25:31,880
Speaker 3: Okay, so, in this scenario, I'm gonna give you, I'm

517
00:25:31,880 --> 00:25:34,639
Speaker 3: Sorry'm gonna give you a further baseline. LSU is in,

518
00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:38,760
Speaker 3: LSU is in the playoff, they win the s LSU, Right,

519
00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:43,399
Speaker 3: So LSU Notre Dame Clemson, LSU in with presumably one loss,

520
00:25:43,480 --> 00:25:47,120
Speaker 3: Notre Dame Clemson undefeated. Who is that fourth team that

521
00:25:47,280 --> 00:25:48,800
Speaker 3: keeps Alabama out?

522
00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:52,920
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, first off, I don't think there is one,

523
00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:54,600
Speaker 2: because I don't think the Big Twelve is getting a

524
00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:57,359
Speaker 2: team in. I don't think the Pac Twelves getting a

525
00:25:57,400 --> 00:26:00,720
Speaker 2: team in. I don't think the ACC is getting a

526
00:26:00,760 --> 00:26:02,879
Speaker 2: second team in there. I wouldn't even know who that

527
00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:07,880
Speaker 2: team would be. I think the only scenario that would

528
00:26:07,920 --> 00:26:12,720
Speaker 2: keep Alabama out would be another loss somewhere on the

529
00:26:12,760 --> 00:26:15,399
Speaker 2: schedule for Alabama. And I don't know if it's going

530
00:26:15,480 --> 00:26:20,600
Speaker 2: to be the week after against Mississippi State, if it's

531
00:26:20,600 --> 00:26:22,600
Speaker 2: gonna be the Iron Bowl the last week of the year.

532
00:26:22,680 --> 00:26:26,320
Speaker 2: But I think in a scenario where they've only got one,

533
00:26:26,320 --> 00:26:28,520
Speaker 2: you don't think an undefeated Ohio State would get in.

534
00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:32,680
Speaker 2: Forgetting Ohio State never mind, yeah, never mind, No Ohio

535
00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:33,880
Speaker 2: State would get in for sure.

536
00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:38,840
Speaker 3: Yeah, I would say undefeated Ohio State. I would say

537
00:26:38,960 --> 00:26:42,000
Speaker 3: if Michigan runs the table from here and potentially beats

538
00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:45,360
Speaker 3: Oklahoma twice, I totally forgot the Big Ten. That's that's

539
00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:47,600
Speaker 3: how long I know it's been. I know it's been

540
00:26:47,640 --> 00:26:48,080
Speaker 3: a long day.

541
00:26:48,160 --> 00:26:52,159
Speaker 2: I apologize, just redact strike everything from the record that

542
00:26:52,200 --> 00:26:52,640
Speaker 2: I just said.

543
00:26:52,680 --> 00:26:53,520
Speaker 1: I'm not editing it out.

544
00:26:53,520 --> 00:26:58,280
Speaker 3: Send Jim Delaney a telegram. I apologize. Best so undefeated

545
00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:01,440
Speaker 3: Ohio State. Yes, I don't think that's a question. I

546
00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:04,720
Speaker 3: don't think that's a serious question. If Ohio State runs

547
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:08,800
Speaker 3: the table and beats Wisconsin or Iowa, I guess in

548
00:27:08,840 --> 00:27:11,560
Speaker 3: the Big Ten championship game, although not the most impressive,

549
00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:16,719
Speaker 3: they're taking care of business and they scheduled well. Texas

550
00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:19,680
Speaker 3: running the table, I don't think they will, but if

551
00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:23,600
Speaker 3: they do, it's a bad loss, but probably not. You

552
00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:26,560
Speaker 3: know what's worse. I guess getting murdered by Iowa like

553
00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:29,600
Speaker 3: Ohio State did last year, not getting in or losing

554
00:27:29,640 --> 00:27:31,920
Speaker 3: relatively close to a probably.

555
00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:34,399
Speaker 1: Average Maryland team. I don't know.

556
00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:39,600
Speaker 3: Beating Oklahoma twice is a pretty sizable feather. And then

557
00:27:39,640 --> 00:27:43,200
Speaker 3: I would say Michigan with as if Notre Name runs

558
00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:47,120
Speaker 3: a table and that's Michigan's only loss. That's as good

559
00:27:47,240 --> 00:27:51,360
Speaker 3: a loss as losing to LSU away from home, both

560
00:27:51,359 --> 00:27:54,760
Speaker 3: away from home, and that would then mean Michigan beats

561
00:27:54,760 --> 00:28:00,480
Speaker 3: Ohio State in Columbus, they've already beaten Wisconsin. They would

562
00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:04,200
Speaker 3: then have Michigan State wins and a Penn State win

563
00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:09,120
Speaker 3: and then you know again potentially over Wisconsin again and Iowa.

564
00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:13,360
Speaker 3: I would put Michigan in over Alabama not winning their division.

565
00:28:13,359 --> 00:28:15,880
Speaker 3: If Michigan were to win the Big Ten championship at

566
00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:16,720
Speaker 3: twelve and one.

567
00:28:16,720 --> 00:28:19,560
Speaker 2: If Alabama has one loss and doesn't win the SEC,

568
00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:21,760
Speaker 2: would you put them in over Notre Dame.

569
00:28:24,600 --> 00:28:27,840
Speaker 3: It to me at this point Notre Dame has a

570
00:28:27,880 --> 00:28:31,720
Speaker 3: style point responsibility to me. To my eyes, that mean

571
00:28:31,840 --> 00:28:36,720
Speaker 3: nothing to this process because Notre Dame has what Florida State,

572
00:28:36,800 --> 00:28:42,000
Speaker 3: Northwestern Navy, Syracuse and Yankee Stadium USC I might be

573
00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:46,680
Speaker 3: forgetting somebody, but especially after struggling with Pitt, who by

574
00:28:46,680 --> 00:28:51,240
Speaker 3: the way, is like fully in the ACC Coastal race

575
00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:55,400
Speaker 3: right at two and one, Notre Dame is they now

576
00:28:55,440 --> 00:28:58,400
Speaker 3: have a style point responsibility to me, and if they

577
00:28:58,800 --> 00:29:02,600
Speaker 3: play down consistently, I think pretty hard about it.

578
00:29:02,600 --> 00:29:04,960
Speaker 2: It's an interesting dilemma. I think that's the road the

579
00:29:05,440 --> 00:29:09,320
Speaker 2: conference champions. Yeah, I think that's the real dilemma here.

580
00:29:09,320 --> 00:29:11,640
Speaker 2: And I apologize to everyone for screwing that up. Believe me,

581
00:29:11,680 --> 00:29:15,200
Speaker 2: it has been a failure. Okay, you're good, But a

582
00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:18,040
Speaker 2: one lost Alabama against an undefeated Notre Dame, I think

583
00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:19,280
Speaker 2: is an interesting proposition.

584
00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:23,440
Speaker 1: I'm a Notre Dame fan. Everyone knows that Alabama. It's

585
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:24,240
Speaker 1: a style point thing.

586
00:29:24,480 --> 00:29:26,200
Speaker 2: I don't know what it's a thing of. I think

587
00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:28,600
Speaker 2: Alabama is a better team. I think there's any denying

588
00:29:28,600 --> 00:29:31,160
Speaker 2: that Alabama's best team in the country. To leave them

589
00:29:31,280 --> 00:29:34,720
Speaker 2: out in favor of really any team, to me is

590
00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:38,240
Speaker 2: doing them a disservice because Alabama is so damn good.

591
00:29:38,680 --> 00:29:40,440
Speaker 2: You got to win the games in the schedule. That

592
00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:42,160
Speaker 2: is a system that we set up here. So if

593
00:29:42,200 --> 00:29:46,120
Speaker 2: they lose, and depending how badly they lose, is all hypothetical.

594
00:29:46,680 --> 00:29:48,480
Speaker 2: Of course, you can make a case for leaving them out,

595
00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:50,520
Speaker 2: but for me, that's a hard sell because I just

596
00:29:50,520 --> 00:29:52,120
Speaker 2: think they're the best team in the country. They're blowing

597
00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:55,120
Speaker 2: everyone out. These games have not even been competitive so far, but.

598
00:29:55,440 --> 00:29:57,560
Speaker 3: We got My favorite question is one we're not going

599
00:29:57,640 --> 00:29:59,800
Speaker 3: to answer, but it's related to that, to what you

600
00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:02,240
Speaker 3: and we just were talking about. And somebody asked about

601
00:30:02,240 --> 00:30:05,320
Speaker 3: Ian books NFL chances and that was my favorite thing.

602
00:30:05,840 --> 00:30:10,560
Speaker 1: Next topic. All right, here we go.

603
00:30:10,560 --> 00:30:13,480
Speaker 3: Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah bah. How

604
00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:15,320
Speaker 3: are we doing? We've already answered that question.

605
00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:16,280
Speaker 1: Okay, here we go.

606
00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:21,040
Speaker 3: This is from either copper Nick or maybe Copernicuss. It's

607
00:30:21,040 --> 00:30:23,400
Speaker 3: short for but Copper Nick.

608
00:30:23,520 --> 00:30:23,680
Speaker 1: Ten.

609
00:30:24,080 --> 00:30:25,880
Speaker 3: You must build a team that can beat Alabama. You

610
00:30:25,880 --> 00:30:28,360
Speaker 3: can use any player coach from any other team. Who

611
00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:31,840
Speaker 3: do you pick? And I will I will adjust this

612
00:30:31,920 --> 00:30:35,400
Speaker 3: question a little bit too. Last year, our power Richard

613
00:30:35,520 --> 00:30:38,640
Speaker 3: Johnson and I did this with specific units. If we're

614
00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:42,880
Speaker 3: going to build a super team to beat Alabama, where

615
00:30:42,920 --> 00:30:46,840
Speaker 3: would we go with said super team? I would go

616
00:30:47,040 --> 00:30:48,680
Speaker 3: this is me and I'll give you some time to

617
00:30:48,680 --> 00:30:49,960
Speaker 3: think about this tie.

618
00:30:50,320 --> 00:30:52,680
Speaker 1: I would go probably with Justin Herbert at quarterback.

619
00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:57,160
Speaker 3: I would go with the Wisconsin offensive line, and I'm

620
00:30:57,160 --> 00:30:59,640
Speaker 3: only I can't repeat any of these any of the

621
00:30:59,640 --> 00:31:03,000
Speaker 3: school I'd probably look at Ohio State at running back,

622
00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:06,480
Speaker 3: if not running back, receiver. And if I were to

623
00:31:06,480 --> 00:31:08,680
Speaker 3: go Ohio State at running back, I'll probably go Oklahoma

624
00:31:08,760 --> 00:31:12,120
Speaker 3: at receiver. Defensive line is Clemson. It's a pretty easy

625
00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:17,040
Speaker 3: call for me. Linebacker, I like Auburn's guys, I like

626
00:31:17,320 --> 00:31:22,640
Speaker 3: Washington's guys. I will probably go Auburn there. Defensive backs,

627
00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:25,120
Speaker 3: I'll I think I'm just gonna lock in LSU there

628
00:31:25,320 --> 00:31:28,320
Speaker 3: with Grant Delpit and Greedy Williams. I think that's my

629
00:31:28,440 --> 00:31:30,920
Speaker 3: answer if I'm gonna if I'm gonna go across the

630
00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:33,560
Speaker 3: major position groups, and it did hurt not to take

631
00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:36,040
Speaker 3: special teams with LSU and Cole Tracy, but I'm going

632
00:31:36,080 --> 00:31:37,680
Speaker 3: to leave that too open to interpretation.

633
00:31:38,160 --> 00:31:40,800
Speaker 1: I would go Trace McSorley and coach who would you

634
00:31:40,800 --> 00:31:41,640
Speaker 1: go with? Coach wise?

635
00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:47,320
Speaker 2: Uh, coach, can we bring Hugh Freeze out of retirement?

636
00:31:47,360 --> 00:31:50,440
Speaker 2: You seemed to have a lot of success against against Alabama.

637
00:31:50,440 --> 00:31:54,080
Speaker 1: It's a good answer. Trace McSorley is my answer. At quarterback.

638
00:31:54,720 --> 00:31:58,720
Speaker 2: He does enough okay with his legs and with his arm.

639
00:31:59,200 --> 00:32:01,160
Speaker 2: I think to cause it's you need a dual threat guy.

640
00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:05,120
Speaker 2: I would take Old Missus wide receivers because they're big

641
00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:08,000
Speaker 2: and very talented.

642
00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:09,440
Speaker 1: Mm hmmm.

643
00:32:09,840 --> 00:32:13,520
Speaker 3: Probably we've seen them against Alabama's defense backs well, we have.

644
00:32:13,720 --> 00:32:15,600
Speaker 3: But that's why I went away from Old Miss.

645
00:32:15,840 --> 00:32:21,160
Speaker 1: That's a good point. Who did you go with? Oklahoma's? Oklahoma?

646
00:32:21,680 --> 00:32:24,120
Speaker 1: I'm still gonna go, like Hollywood, give Old Miss another chance,

647
00:32:24,160 --> 00:32:27,440
Speaker 1: all right, okay go I agree with you running backs,

648
00:32:27,440 --> 00:32:28,080
Speaker 1: Ohio State.

649
00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:34,200
Speaker 2: We'll take Wisconsin offensive line sure, Clemson defensive line sure,

650
00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:35,160
Speaker 2: Auburn linebacker.

651
00:32:35,160 --> 00:32:35,880
Speaker 1: I agree with that.

652
00:32:36,240 --> 00:32:39,920
Speaker 2: I might go Michigan defensive backfield, very good on the

653
00:32:39,920 --> 00:32:43,200
Speaker 2: defensive backfield, very good defensive You could take Michigan's entire

654
00:32:43,240 --> 00:32:44,040
Speaker 2: defense if you want it.

655
00:32:44,200 --> 00:32:46,120
Speaker 3: I would take Yeah, I would take Michigan at linebacker

656
00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:47,400
Speaker 3: as well. I kind of forgot about that.

657
00:32:47,600 --> 00:32:50,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, but you can make you can make a case for.

658
00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:54,760
Speaker 2: A variety of different answers there on the defensive side.

659
00:32:55,040 --> 00:32:55,880
Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay.

660
00:32:56,240 --> 00:32:58,880
Speaker 3: Uh And so you coach wise, I hate your Trace

661
00:32:58,920 --> 00:33:00,840
Speaker 3: McSorley pick, by the way, I know alough you didn't.

662
00:33:00,840 --> 00:33:02,360
Speaker 1: You hate Trace McSorley just in general.

663
00:33:02,400 --> 00:33:04,280
Speaker 3: So I don't need Trace McSorley. I watched him play

664
00:33:04,280 --> 00:33:06,720
Speaker 3: against Michigan State last week and I was inking, Alabama

665
00:33:06,800 --> 00:33:10,240
Speaker 3: big game quarterback. Okay, big game quarterback. It was pretty

666
00:33:10,280 --> 00:33:18,320
Speaker 3: big game big game quarterback. Next question, we got a

667
00:33:18,360 --> 00:33:25,160
Speaker 3: couple of Iowa State questions. Let's go to how embarrassed

668
00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:27,520
Speaker 3: are all involved parties going to be when no one

669
00:33:27,560 --> 00:33:30,280
Speaker 3: sees Iowa State Texas because the game got exiled to

670
00:33:30,320 --> 00:33:33,760
Speaker 3: the Longhorn Network. I totally disagree with the premise of

671
00:33:33,800 --> 00:33:39,240
Speaker 3: this question. That's from Jacob. I loved watching Army Oklahoma

672
00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:43,400
Speaker 3: on an illegal stream. There was something, There's something very

673
00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:47,280
Speaker 3: bonding about everybody being in this same weird position and

674
00:33:47,320 --> 00:33:52,280
Speaker 3: having to go to Twitch or periscope or a weird

675
00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:56,040
Speaker 3: stream that's installing malware as you speak, as you watch

676
00:33:56,600 --> 00:34:01,080
Speaker 3: on your computer, that's tracking your every movement. And that's

677
00:34:01,120 --> 00:34:03,280
Speaker 3: how many of us. If this game is close, if

678
00:34:03,280 --> 00:34:05,560
Speaker 3: this game is interesting, if this game has stakes, are

679
00:34:05,600 --> 00:34:06,320
Speaker 3: going to watch.

680
00:34:06,520 --> 00:34:10,680
Speaker 1: It does give a feeling of mystery to it, doesn't it. Yeah?

681
00:34:11,239 --> 00:34:13,960
Speaker 3: Yeah, if a tree falls in a forest kind of element, Yeah,

682
00:34:14,120 --> 00:34:16,400
Speaker 3: it really happened. And this, by the way, was one

683
00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:18,640
Speaker 3: of the more interesting games last year. It was what

684
00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:22,880
Speaker 3: I think seventeen ten, seventeen seven Texas wins in ames.

685
00:34:22,920 --> 00:34:25,239
Speaker 3: That was the Jacob Park maybe the last Jacob Park

686
00:34:25,239 --> 00:34:29,440
Speaker 3: game for Iowa State. Wow and cut, thank you, Thank you,

687
00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:34,960
Speaker 3: and Iowa State's defense became weirdly influential. Everybody started running

688
00:34:35,000 --> 00:34:36,919
Speaker 3: a crazy dime in the Big twelve.

689
00:34:37,000 --> 00:34:39,319
Speaker 1: I like that. Jesse wants to know.

690
00:34:39,400 --> 00:34:43,120
Speaker 3: Has the fourteen playoff devalued the New Year six? It

691
00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:45,080
Speaker 3: used to be that making a New Year six game

692
00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:48,400
Speaker 3: was a huge accomplishment. Now it seems like a consolation prize.

693
00:34:49,080 --> 00:34:52,480
Speaker 1: I well, yes and no.

694
00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:57,680
Speaker 2: I think the BCS devalued, to be honest, I think

695
00:34:57,719 --> 00:35:00,000
Speaker 2: the BCS de valued the balls the second they moved

696
00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:05,680
Speaker 2: moved away from the old system where everyone would play

697
00:35:05,719 --> 00:35:09,279
Speaker 2: whatever Bowl matchups they ended up with, and then the

698
00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:12,520
Speaker 2: voters would decide who the champion was whenever they moved

699
00:35:12,520 --> 00:35:16,239
Speaker 2: away from that system, in which essentially.

700
00:35:15,880 --> 00:35:17,920
Speaker 1: Bowl games weren't.

701
00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:20,239
Speaker 2: Fully exhibition games the way they are now when they

702
00:35:20,280 --> 00:35:23,640
Speaker 2: moved away from that, and now to the current model.

703
00:35:23,360 --> 00:35:28,799
Speaker 1: Where we have a quote unquote true national championship game.

704
00:35:28,840 --> 00:35:31,960
Speaker 2: We did previously or tried to with the BCS, and

705
00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:35,080
Speaker 2: we do now obviously with the playoff system. Yeah, I

706
00:35:35,080 --> 00:35:38,200
Speaker 2: think by default the values those other games. I don't

707
00:35:38,200 --> 00:35:39,239
Speaker 2: think there's any way around it.

708
00:35:40,520 --> 00:35:44,319
Speaker 3: I remember loving New Year's Day so much more a

709
00:35:44,360 --> 00:35:48,720
Speaker 3: while ago, and it's hard to say more. Multiple things

710
00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:52,200
Speaker 3: aren't true. It's hard to say that. That was so

711
00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:54,920
Speaker 3: much more fun when that was all we knew and

712
00:35:54,960 --> 00:35:55,640
Speaker 3: all we had.

713
00:35:55,719 --> 00:35:56,279
Speaker 1: When you were.

714
00:35:56,200 --> 00:35:59,840
Speaker 3: Watching you know, Wisconsin, Stanford or you know whoever in

715
00:35:59,880 --> 00:36:02,200
Speaker 3: the Rose Bowl and you have a fun Sugar Bowl

716
00:36:02,320 --> 00:36:04,880
Speaker 3: and an Orange Bowl would be Florida State and somebody

717
00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:09,400
Speaker 3: Florida State Nebraska. There was that element of we're the

718
00:36:09,440 --> 00:36:14,120
Speaker 3: only sport that weirdly has five kind of four championship games,

719
00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:17,759
Speaker 3: six championship games. There was something that was cool about that.

720
00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:21,279
Speaker 3: Well in a very misleading way. Well yeah, no, So

721
00:36:21,400 --> 00:36:24,319
Speaker 3: I think there's two questions here. The question that Jesse

722
00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:28,279
Speaker 3: asked us is are those bowl games devalued? And I

723
00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:30,680
Speaker 3: think the answer is yes, if you're asking me if

724
00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:34,840
Speaker 3: New Year's Day as a football holiday has been devalued,

725
00:36:34,840 --> 00:36:37,319
Speaker 3: And that's a resounding guess. And I'm with you on

726
00:36:37,400 --> 00:36:37,960
Speaker 3: that front.

727
00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:40,560
Speaker 2: Whenever they got away from that old bottle where we

728
00:36:40,680 --> 00:36:42,719
Speaker 2: just had more games and it was more higher level

729
00:36:42,760 --> 00:36:46,040
Speaker 2: matchups that we could watch on New Year's Day, that

730
00:36:46,200 --> 00:36:48,600
Speaker 2: was the best. I love that as a kid. You

731
00:36:48,600 --> 00:36:50,520
Speaker 2: don't get that anymore. You have a couple hand you

732
00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:53,439
Speaker 2: have a handful of games that are spaced out. But yeah,

733
00:36:53,600 --> 00:36:55,799
Speaker 2: there used to be more games on New Year's Day,

734
00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:57,600
Speaker 2: and it was just a football palooza, kind of like

735
00:36:57,640 --> 00:37:01,120
Speaker 2: a college football Saturday, with really matchups that we wouldn't

736
00:37:01,120 --> 00:37:03,799
Speaker 2: have otherwise. That was fun And if there were any

737
00:37:03,800 --> 00:37:05,440
Speaker 2: way to get back to that, I'd be all for it.

738
00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:10,560
Speaker 3: There was something, I swear, I'm going to try my

739
00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:12,960
Speaker 3: best not to get gross here. Tie not gross, but

740
00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:17,879
Speaker 3: you know, deeply sexual. There was something when spreading all

741
00:37:17,920 --> 00:37:21,000
Speaker 3: of those games around like that and knowing that was it,

742
00:37:21,040 --> 00:37:25,759
Speaker 3: that's all we had. There was something about it just

743
00:37:26,000 --> 00:37:30,160
Speaker 3: being I'm really trying hard not to be gross, so

744
00:37:30,480 --> 00:37:33,040
Speaker 3: I'm not going to be. All I'm gonna say is

745
00:37:33,680 --> 00:37:35,719
Speaker 3: as it relates to the playoff, I think the fore

746
00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:38,759
Speaker 3: play may be better than the main event. Okay, I

747
00:37:38,800 --> 00:37:43,239
Speaker 3: don't look forward to the playoff like I do trying to.

748
00:37:43,400 --> 00:37:46,920
Speaker 3: I don't look forward to the actual playoff itself as

749
00:37:47,000 --> 00:37:49,719
Speaker 3: much as I like seeing it all sort out in

750
00:37:49,760 --> 00:37:52,680
Speaker 3: the coming in the weeks leading up to it. Yeah,

751
00:37:53,239 --> 00:37:56,560
Speaker 3: the playoff is not a fun experience right now. No, Well,

752
00:37:56,600 --> 00:37:58,360
Speaker 3: I mean, and part of that is the inevitability of

753
00:37:58,400 --> 00:38:01,200
Speaker 3: Alabama and teams like Ohio and Clemson being there more

754
00:38:01,239 --> 00:38:03,959
Speaker 3: often than not, So there is there's nothing really fun,

755
00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:06,200
Speaker 3: whereas like the Rose Bull you have like Washington Purdue

756
00:38:06,200 --> 00:38:08,799
Speaker 3: one year, I really love the Rose Bowl. So okay,

757
00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:10,439
Speaker 3: that's where I stand right now.

758
00:38:10,520 --> 00:38:12,359
Speaker 1: All right, we'll go where are we going next? Here?

759
00:38:14,080 --> 00:38:20,080
Speaker 3: Let's go to Jason Horvath wants to know what must

760
00:38:20,080 --> 00:38:25,920
Speaker 3: Michigan do to beat Ohio State? Well, so what is

761
00:38:25,920 --> 00:38:28,760
Speaker 3: our state of the mid season with Ohio State and Michigan.

762
00:38:29,400 --> 00:38:33,360
Speaker 2: We talked about Ohio State's defense a little bit on

763
00:38:33,400 --> 00:38:38,800
Speaker 2: the show yesterday, and even on Sunday they're given up points.

764
00:38:38,920 --> 00:38:44,360
Speaker 2: They're not as impenetrable as we've seen in recent years,

765
00:38:44,400 --> 00:38:47,000
Speaker 2: probably as they could be this year. It seems like

766
00:38:47,040 --> 00:38:48,760
Speaker 2: that's a real tendency and that's part of the reason

767
00:38:48,760 --> 00:38:51,799
Speaker 2: why Purdue is only like a two touchdown dog at

768
00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:54,560
Speaker 2: home because they score points, and you can put up

769
00:38:54,600 --> 00:38:57,319
Speaker 2: points against Ohio States. So I think what Michigan has

770
00:38:57,360 --> 00:39:00,360
Speaker 2: to do is, first off, they need to control clock

771
00:39:00,520 --> 00:39:03,640
Speaker 2: because Ohio State, with Dwayne Haskins and all of their

772
00:39:03,680 --> 00:39:06,040
Speaker 2: weapons on offense, they can strike you pretty darn quick.

773
00:39:08,160 --> 00:39:10,439
Speaker 1: Michigan needs to control the clock. With their rushing game.

774
00:39:11,120 --> 00:39:13,279
Speaker 2: We know they like to run the ball and at

775
00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:17,000
Speaker 2: Shaye Patterson needs to avoid turnovers. Quite frankly, I think

776
00:39:17,000 --> 00:39:19,360
Speaker 2: there is that streak in him where he tries to

777
00:39:19,360 --> 00:39:22,040
Speaker 2: make something out of nothing. He needs to not do that,

778
00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:23,960
Speaker 2: and the defense needs to find a way to distrup

779
00:39:24,040 --> 00:39:26,680
Speaker 2: Dwayne Haskins. I don't know if the formula to beat

780
00:39:26,680 --> 00:39:29,360
Speaker 2: Ohio State is as complex as it has been in

781
00:39:29,400 --> 00:39:32,560
Speaker 2: previous years. Lord knows, they still have the talent, but

782
00:39:32,800 --> 00:39:34,920
Speaker 2: I think whatever, you've got such a high level defense

783
00:39:34,960 --> 00:39:37,880
Speaker 2: the way Michigan does this year and an offense that

784
00:39:37,920 --> 00:39:41,279
Speaker 2: does seem to be improving, the calculus isn't quite as

785
00:39:42,040 --> 00:39:44,320
Speaker 2: isn't quite as complicated now. They just need to play

786
00:39:44,560 --> 00:39:46,600
Speaker 2: their best game of the year, which is no small task,

787
00:39:47,239 --> 00:39:49,839
Speaker 2: and they need to shut down certain assets, and they

788
00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:52,000
Speaker 2: need to shut down certain aspects of that Ohio State

789
00:39:52,040 --> 00:39:53,959
Speaker 2: offense to really give themselves a puncher's chance.

790
00:39:55,239 --> 00:39:57,879
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think Michigan can play them pretty much head

791
00:39:57,960 --> 00:39:59,719
Speaker 3: up on defense. I don't think they need to do

792
00:39:59,719 --> 00:40:01,600
Speaker 3: any thing. I don't think it's that complex.

793
00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:03,560
Speaker 1: I just they need to play really solidly.

794
00:40:04,520 --> 00:40:06,279
Speaker 3: Yes, I think they have the talent on all three

795
00:40:06,360 --> 00:40:08,640
Speaker 3: levels that they just play their own game and they're

796
00:40:08,640 --> 00:40:10,160
Speaker 3: in a good place. The game is in Columbus, which

797
00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:14,000
Speaker 3: will post an incredible challenge Offensively, I think that's where

798
00:40:14,000 --> 00:40:19,240
Speaker 3: everything is for Michigan because keeping this defense well rested

799
00:40:19,320 --> 00:40:22,600
Speaker 3: is huge, and if they're able to generate some bigger

800
00:40:22,600 --> 00:40:25,600
Speaker 3: plays on the ground with Chris Evans and Karan Higdon

801
00:40:26,040 --> 00:40:30,160
Speaker 3: and Shaye Patterson continues to sort of evolve within the

802
00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:33,560
Speaker 3: Jim Harbaugh Pep Hamilton offense, if they're able to get

803
00:40:33,600 --> 00:40:36,279
Speaker 3: more consistent performances from their pass catchers, I know Nico

804
00:40:36,360 --> 00:40:38,960
Speaker 3: Collins is the latest to sort of step up. I

805
00:40:38,960 --> 00:40:41,960
Speaker 3: think that's enormous because I think you're right. Ohio State

806
00:40:42,800 --> 00:40:46,160
Speaker 3: has a good defense, but not a great great defense

807
00:40:46,280 --> 00:40:47,920
Speaker 3: right now. And maybe by the end of the season,

808
00:40:47,920 --> 00:40:49,719
Speaker 3: maybe they're more of a grower, maybe they'll come into

809
00:40:49,800 --> 00:40:52,640
Speaker 3: their own, But right now, I think Michigan has a like,

810
00:40:52,680 --> 00:40:54,160
Speaker 3: if you had to give me a zero out a

811
00:40:54,200 --> 00:40:57,840
Speaker 3: one hundred percent chance of Michigan going to Columbus and

812
00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:01,400
Speaker 3: winning this game outright probably as I don't know, two

813
00:41:01,480 --> 00:41:03,240
Speaker 3: and a half, three and a half point dogs, whatever

814
00:41:03,320 --> 00:41:06,480
Speaker 3: somewhere around there, what percent chance.

815
00:41:06,239 --> 00:41:12,440
Speaker 1: Would you give it? What percent would I give.

816
00:41:14,120 --> 00:41:16,879
Speaker 3: Michigan going to Columbus and just win winning the game

817
00:41:16,920 --> 00:41:23,680
Speaker 3: out right, correct, man, I I got I'd probably give

818
00:41:23,719 --> 00:41:29,640
Speaker 3: him like a thirty to forty percent chance.

819
00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:33,200
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's where my head is. My head had.

820
00:41:33,040 --> 00:41:35,360
Speaker 2: Thirty eight Yeah, yeah, I mean I think they have

821
00:41:35,440 --> 00:41:37,600
Speaker 2: eight percent. They have a pretty good chance of doing it.

822
00:41:39,120 --> 00:41:41,480
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, So that's where we're at right now.

823
00:41:41,480 --> 00:41:43,480
Speaker 3: With that, that'll change this weekend. We'll go a long

824
00:41:43,520 --> 00:41:45,080
Speaker 3: way with Michigan playing Michigan State.

825
00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:45,439
Speaker 1: Yeah.

826
00:41:46,480 --> 00:41:48,719
Speaker 3: With the success Notre Dame has had thus far since

827
00:41:48,719 --> 00:41:51,040
Speaker 3: Brian Kelly, Gosh, we are steering into Notre Dame, aren't

828
00:41:51,040 --> 00:41:55,440
Speaker 3: we all? Homer episode? Yeah, with his success the Irish

829
00:41:55,480 --> 00:41:57,600
Speaker 3: have had thus far since Brian Kelly made the switch

830
00:41:57,800 --> 00:42:00,680
Speaker 3: from Brandon Wimbush to Ian book. That's right pit by

831
00:42:00,680 --> 00:42:07,560
Speaker 3: not one, not two, not three. Do you envision more

832
00:42:07,600 --> 00:42:10,040
Speaker 3: coaches in the future being proactive when it comes to

833
00:42:10,120 --> 00:42:13,279
Speaker 3: switching quarterbacks prior to have it being forced upon them

834
00:42:13,400 --> 00:42:16,000
Speaker 3: via losses. I think this is one of the more

835
00:42:16,160 --> 00:42:21,360
Speaker 3: intriguing questions of the season overall, is managing quarterback play

836
00:42:21,400 --> 00:42:23,600
Speaker 3: in general. With what we've seen at I mean Nebraska

837
00:42:23,640 --> 00:42:27,440
Speaker 3: losing a quarterback before the season, starting with what's happening

838
00:42:27,480 --> 00:42:31,920
Speaker 3: at Georgia and Clemson, it's fascinating. Alabama, well, it's okay.

839
00:42:31,960 --> 00:42:37,439
Speaker 2: So not all situations are created equally, and I bring

840
00:42:37,520 --> 00:42:42,960
Speaker 2: that up. So we've had a couple instances of quarterback changes,

841
00:42:43,000 --> 00:42:47,040
Speaker 2: all of which were under different circumstances. Do we count

842
00:42:47,080 --> 00:42:51,680
Speaker 2: the Tua move in the National Championship last year as

843
00:42:53,000 --> 00:42:55,880
Speaker 2: falling under this cant making a change before losing? Yeah,

844
00:42:56,080 --> 00:42:59,440
Speaker 2: making a change before losing. So that's a very recent,

845
00:42:59,560 --> 00:43:02,600
Speaker 2: very note example of it working out. And then we've

846
00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:04,440
Speaker 2: had another one this year. Of course, with the move

847
00:43:04,480 --> 00:43:09,439
Speaker 2: to Trevor Lawrence away from Kelly Bryant. We've had it

848
00:43:09,560 --> 00:43:13,160
Speaker 2: to happen obviously at Notre Dame. Not every school has

849
00:43:13,440 --> 00:43:17,520
Speaker 2: the same embarrassment of riches that Alabama and Clemson have.

850
00:43:18,600 --> 00:43:20,320
Speaker 2: Who knows, we might see it at Georgia before the

851
00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:26,640
Speaker 2: end of the year two. But like I hesitate to

852
00:43:26,640 --> 00:43:29,440
Speaker 2: say that we're gonna see more of this, I just

853
00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:34,359
Speaker 2: think we're in a really extraordinary season where we knew

854
00:43:34,440 --> 00:43:36,280
Speaker 2: headed in there were gonna be a ton of quarterback

855
00:43:36,360 --> 00:43:39,600
Speaker 2: questions around college football, and we knew that this was

856
00:43:40,160 --> 00:43:43,759
Speaker 2: a possibility we would see some quarterback changes. I just

857
00:43:43,800 --> 00:43:45,880
Speaker 2: don't think we expected to see as many as we

858
00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:47,560
Speaker 2: have and to see, oh, by the way, so many

859
00:43:47,600 --> 00:43:49,880
Speaker 2: of them work out. I think these are kind of

860
00:43:49,920 --> 00:43:52,799
Speaker 2: extraordinary circumstances that you wouldn't see otherwise in a normal

861
00:43:52,840 --> 00:43:55,759
Speaker 2: college football season. So I don't necessarily think it's a

862
00:43:55,800 --> 00:43:58,719
Speaker 2: harbinger for anything to come down the line. I just

863
00:43:58,760 --> 00:44:02,200
Speaker 2: think it's just sort of one of those blips on

864
00:44:02,239 --> 00:44:05,480
Speaker 2: the radar where we had many situations in a very

865
00:44:05,480 --> 00:44:07,200
Speaker 2: short period of time all kind of work out.

866
00:44:08,960 --> 00:44:12,600
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I think it's this specific situation with Notre

867
00:44:12,680 --> 00:44:16,640
Speaker 3: Dame was because Notre Dame, with the talent on both

868
00:44:16,680 --> 00:44:21,840
Speaker 3: sides of the ball, wasn't separating itself from average to

869
00:44:21,960 --> 00:44:25,359
Speaker 3: below average teams. Yeah, and we also not meant to

870
00:44:25,360 --> 00:44:28,920
Speaker 3: insult those teams, but we had signs that Brandon Wimbush

871
00:44:29,040 --> 00:44:32,359
Speaker 3: was not leading touchdown drives where he should have been.

872
00:44:32,600 --> 00:44:35,239
Speaker 2: Yeah, And in that sense, it's very normal the way

873
00:44:35,280 --> 00:44:37,319
Speaker 2: that they moved away from him. It's dramatic because it's

874
00:44:37,360 --> 00:44:40,640
Speaker 2: Notre Dame, but we saw it all last season with Wimbush.

875
00:44:40,680 --> 00:44:42,279
Speaker 2: We did see a little bit of book come in

876
00:44:42,280 --> 00:44:44,960
Speaker 2: in big situations and perform. And though it was a

877
00:44:44,960 --> 00:44:47,040
Speaker 2: little bit unexpected to bring him in and start him

878
00:44:47,040 --> 00:44:50,080
Speaker 2: against wake Forest. I feel like that's a lot less

879
00:44:50,120 --> 00:44:55,320
Speaker 2: expected than the balls that Nick Saban had quite frankly

880
00:44:55,400 --> 00:44:58,960
Speaker 2: to bring in Yeah Tua in the National Championship, or

881
00:44:58,960 --> 00:45:02,040
Speaker 2: even the balls that Dabo Sweeney had to bring in

882
00:45:02,080 --> 00:45:05,920
Speaker 2: Trevor Lawrence over Kelly Bryant really.

883
00:45:05,600 --> 00:45:09,959
Speaker 1: With no body of work. That those, to me are.

884
00:45:10,239 --> 00:45:13,120
Speaker 2: Are really extraordinary that they would have the confidence to

885
00:45:13,160 --> 00:45:16,719
Speaker 2: go to those guys. Granted two had a little bit

886
00:45:16,760 --> 00:45:20,000
Speaker 2: of work last year beforehand, but still those to me

887
00:45:20,120 --> 00:45:23,880
Speaker 2: are incredible that the coaches would go to guys with

888
00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:27,520
Speaker 2: virtually no experience in key situations, and even this year

889
00:45:27,520 --> 00:45:32,120
Speaker 2: obviously with Clemsons. So the book move, though dramatic, is

890
00:45:32,120 --> 00:45:33,919
Speaker 2: is far more normal than some of the other ones

891
00:45:33,920 --> 00:45:34,359
Speaker 2: we've seen.

892
00:45:35,440 --> 00:45:38,319
Speaker 3: Yeah, the Clemson one is interesting because Kelly Bryant had

893
00:45:38,360 --> 00:45:40,880
Speaker 3: been good this year. I mean, obviously he hit a

894
00:45:40,920 --> 00:45:43,959
Speaker 3: wall against Alabama last year and most most teams did,

895
00:45:44,600 --> 00:45:48,440
Speaker 3: so we had a concept that Kelly Bryant may struggle

896
00:45:48,480 --> 00:45:53,080
Speaker 3: against the very best of competition. But this wasn't you know,

897
00:45:53,120 --> 00:45:57,160
Speaker 3: the Kelly Bryant situation. Wasn't Brandon Wimbush barely beating Ball

898
00:45:57,239 --> 00:46:01,640
Speaker 3: State or Vanderbilt or something like that. So that was

899
00:46:01,719 --> 00:46:03,960
Speaker 3: that's more surprising to me. But yeah, I think you're right.

900
00:46:03,960 --> 00:46:06,480
Speaker 3: I think most teams should have the luxury of switching

901
00:46:06,560 --> 00:46:11,360
Speaker 3: quarterbacks undefeated and only beating teams by by narrow margins.

902
00:46:11,719 --> 00:46:13,640
Speaker 3: That that's I think the unique quality of it.

903
00:46:13,719 --> 00:46:16,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, where are we going next?

904
00:46:16,440 --> 00:46:20,160
Speaker 3: Maybe final question? We'll see this because it was worded

905
00:46:20,200 --> 00:46:22,600
Speaker 3: so magnificently. Chris wants to know which team has the

906
00:46:22,640 --> 00:46:26,759
Speaker 3: biggest second half turnaround because every now and then they

907
00:46:26,760 --> 00:46:30,360
Speaker 3: fall apart, or because they're forever is going to start tonight?

908
00:46:33,320 --> 00:46:37,080
Speaker 3: Good job, Chris, great, That question is ti even I

909
00:46:37,120 --> 00:46:40,239
Speaker 3: tried to read it as dryly as possible to see

910
00:46:40,239 --> 00:46:43,560
Speaker 3: if you would pick up what I was throwing down. Okay,

911
00:46:43,680 --> 00:46:46,359
Speaker 3: so what the second half turnarounds? What is the question here?

912
00:46:47,280 --> 00:46:50,239
Speaker 3: So presumably a team that has been disappointing in the

913
00:46:50,239 --> 00:46:54,680
Speaker 3: first half of the season will come on strong. Okay

914
00:46:54,840 --> 00:46:57,960
Speaker 3: from this point on recording this October eighteenth, So there

915
00:46:57,960 --> 00:47:01,600
Speaker 3: are games tonight actually, so if like Stanford for example, yeah,

916
00:47:01,600 --> 00:47:04,760
Speaker 3: could be one of those teams. They are playing Arizona

917
00:47:04,760 --> 00:47:06,759
Speaker 3: State tonight. We'll see what happens. We may sound like

918
00:47:07,120 --> 00:47:09,480
Speaker 3: idiots by the time people listen to this. If they

919
00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:12,120
Speaker 3: get killed by ASU. But who, in your mind is

920
00:47:12,160 --> 00:47:15,800
Speaker 3: a prime turnaround candidate who, let's say has a losing

921
00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:16,840
Speaker 3: record right now.

922
00:47:16,800 --> 00:47:20,080
Speaker 2: Has a losing record. Okay, well, yeah, I'll give you

923
00:47:20,080 --> 00:47:24,320
Speaker 2: some candidates of TEA. Give me some options here, so from.

924
00:47:24,239 --> 00:47:29,640
Speaker 3: The ACC and I'll be realistic here. So I guess Louisville.

925
00:47:29,920 --> 00:47:31,680
Speaker 3: You know, they have pieces, They've had a really nice

926
00:47:31,719 --> 00:47:35,760
Speaker 3: receiving corps. They have a losing record. North Carolina, Georgia

927
00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:38,800
Speaker 3: Tech a top maybe twenty five to thirty offense in

928
00:47:38,840 --> 00:47:41,000
Speaker 3: Georgia Tech, but the defense has been kind of disappointing.

929
00:47:42,080 --> 00:47:46,120
Speaker 3: Kansas Kansas State both have losing records in the Big

930
00:47:46,160 --> 00:47:48,680
Speaker 3: twelve and the Big Ten. I think we can scratch

931
00:47:48,760 --> 00:47:53,360
Speaker 3: Rutgers off losing records. From the other side is just Nebraska.

932
00:47:53,360 --> 00:47:57,160
Speaker 3: Maybe Nebraska has a turnaround. You haven't stopped me yet,

933
00:47:57,200 --> 00:47:59,520
Speaker 3: so I'm not sensing you're feeling great about anybody.

934
00:47:59,760 --> 00:48:02,279
Speaker 1: I think, well, I'm going to go to one that

935
00:48:02,320 --> 00:48:04,600
Speaker 1: you haven't gotten to and one that you did. Yeah.

936
00:48:04,640 --> 00:48:09,799
Speaker 2: I'm intrigued by k State because, like we said on Barnes, Yeah,

937
00:48:09,840 --> 00:48:12,680
Speaker 2: like we said on the show, I think last Wednesday

938
00:48:13,000 --> 00:48:16,120
Speaker 2: and again on Sunday. If k State just decides if

939
00:48:16,120 --> 00:48:19,040
Speaker 2: it we're running every play, that might be more what

940
00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:22,480
Speaker 2: they're equipped to do at this point. So kse State

941
00:48:22,520 --> 00:48:24,800
Speaker 2: to me is one that I can see them turning around.

942
00:48:25,440 --> 00:48:27,840
Speaker 2: And I'm real curious to see what happens with UCLA

943
00:48:27,920 --> 00:48:28,919
Speaker 2: now because they're one in five.

944
00:48:29,239 --> 00:48:31,360
Speaker 1: That was gonna be my answer, Yeah, one in five.

945
00:48:31,560 --> 00:48:33,720
Speaker 2: It does seem like they're kind of making a shift

946
00:48:33,760 --> 00:48:38,920
Speaker 2: offensively as well. So if that system takes and they

947
00:48:39,040 --> 00:48:42,759
Speaker 2: keep having success, I think I think UCLA is a

948
00:48:43,760 --> 00:48:46,520
Speaker 2: is a pretty good answer. One answer that probably won't

949
00:48:46,520 --> 00:48:50,719
Speaker 2: translate to wins and losses, but just a team that

950
00:48:50,760 --> 00:48:53,080
Speaker 2: I think has had a turnaround this season. In many

951
00:48:53,120 --> 00:48:56,040
Speaker 2: regards Oregon State. We didn't talk about John Smith at all,

952
00:48:56,400 --> 00:48:58,560
Speaker 2: the job he's I think it'll translate into some losses,

953
00:48:58,600 --> 00:49:02,720
Speaker 2: but it'll translate into but there's definitely been a market

954
00:49:02,719 --> 00:49:06,600
Speaker 2: improvement in the revers this year, and that if you're

955
00:49:06,640 --> 00:49:09,960
Speaker 2: an Oregon State fan, if you're listening now, I don't

956
00:49:09,960 --> 00:49:12,000
Speaker 2: know how many we have, but I do think they

957
00:49:12,040 --> 00:49:14,719
Speaker 2: are better and I hope they continue down the path

958
00:49:14,719 --> 00:49:17,160
Speaker 2: that they've been going down so far this year because

959
00:49:18,120 --> 00:49:19,160
Speaker 2: there's been improvement.

960
00:49:20,000 --> 00:49:23,879
Speaker 3: It's a year zero situation. Yeah, and absolutely you can

961
00:49:24,000 --> 00:49:27,000
Speaker 3: tell that there is belief in Jonathan Smith, both among

962
00:49:27,080 --> 00:49:29,279
Speaker 3: the players on that team, guys transferring in. They have

963
00:49:29,320 --> 00:49:34,400
Speaker 3: some big name transfers coming in Addison Gums, Tristan Jebia, Gabbio, whatever,

964
00:49:35,200 --> 00:49:38,200
Speaker 3: Tijon Lindsay also from Nebraska, big names, big time recruits

965
00:49:38,239 --> 00:49:41,799
Speaker 3: from a past couple of years. UCLA is interesting to

966
00:49:41,840 --> 00:49:44,640
Speaker 3: me just because we've seen the momentum start with how

967
00:49:44,680 --> 00:49:47,200
Speaker 3: they played against Washington, you know, beating Cal.

968
00:49:47,280 --> 00:49:49,120
Speaker 1: They have Arizona this week. The back half of.

969
00:49:49,120 --> 00:49:54,440
Speaker 3: Their schedule is not great, but what they look like

970
00:49:54,560 --> 00:50:00,319
Speaker 3: against Utah, Oregon, USC Stanford should be an indicator and

971
00:50:01,120 --> 00:50:03,080
Speaker 3: it should perhaps pick up their.

972
00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:05,920
Speaker 1: Recruiting momentum a little bit, which is I think in need.

973
00:50:06,480 --> 00:50:08,879
Speaker 3: So definitely, I think those are my answers right now

974
00:50:08,960 --> 00:50:11,239
Speaker 3: that you know, you might not translate to wins. But

975
00:50:11,440 --> 00:50:14,400
Speaker 3: and even like Arkansas has looked pretty, they have some

976
00:50:14,520 --> 00:50:17,120
Speaker 3: fight to them. Yeah, even though it hasn't hasn't sort

977
00:50:17,160 --> 00:50:20,000
Speaker 3: of caught in the winds, call some plot, a little

978
00:50:20,000 --> 00:50:22,680
Speaker 3: bit of pluck, some pluck, he says. I'll tell you

979
00:50:22,680 --> 00:50:25,319
Speaker 3: one team I'm not in on, Yukon. I am not

980
00:50:25,480 --> 00:50:28,720
Speaker 3: in on sexy Randy eds huls Now Yukon.

981
00:50:28,880 --> 00:50:31,160
Speaker 2: We haven't played I think we haven't played sexier than

982
00:50:31,200 --> 00:50:31,799
Speaker 2: edsseel in a while.

983
00:50:31,800 --> 00:50:32,960
Speaker 1: Maybe on Wednesday we'll do it.

984
00:50:34,239 --> 00:50:35,560
Speaker 3: Can I give you a couple right now?

985
00:50:36,320 --> 00:50:40,080
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, it's a free show, free country.

986
00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:42,000
Speaker 3: It's a free show, all right, before we get on

987
00:50:42,239 --> 00:50:43,360
Speaker 3: with Jeff Schwartz.

988
00:50:43,400 --> 00:50:45,960
Speaker 1: So here, hold on, here's what I wanted to like.

989
00:50:46,200 --> 00:50:48,680
Speaker 2: We're not editing any of the stuff out now because

990
00:50:48,800 --> 00:50:51,360
Speaker 2: we're enjoying ourselves here with the Q and A, and

991
00:50:51,400 --> 00:50:54,160
Speaker 2: we're already running close to an hour. We'll put out

992
00:50:54,320 --> 00:50:57,640
Speaker 2: your Oregon chat with Jeff is like a separate thing altogether. Okay,

993
00:50:57,760 --> 00:50:59,200
Speaker 2: all right, so we don't have to try and bolt

994
00:50:59,200 --> 00:51:01,600
Speaker 2: those two together. We'll just we'll make that a whole

995
00:51:01,640 --> 00:51:04,120
Speaker 2: separate thing and we'll close out strong here with the

996
00:51:04,160 --> 00:51:04,480
Speaker 2: Q and A.

997
00:51:05,320 --> 00:51:09,960
Speaker 3: Yeah, okay, are the following people sexier than Randy Edzel?

998
00:51:10,040 --> 00:51:12,759
Speaker 3: This comes to us as a game that I don't

999
00:51:12,760 --> 00:51:15,279
Speaker 3: know we started for no good reason a long time ago.

1000
00:51:15,440 --> 00:51:18,880
Speaker 3: Definitely no good reason. This is all science, ty. You

1001
00:51:19,040 --> 00:51:22,799
Speaker 3: just tell me if objectively these coaches are sexier than

1002
00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:26,399
Speaker 3: Randy Edzel, and by all means you can have every

1003
00:51:26,440 --> 00:51:29,000
Speaker 3: advantage and pull up a picture of Randy Etzel right now, yep,

1004
00:51:29,239 --> 00:51:31,680
Speaker 3: to just get a sense for him his topography.

1005
00:51:32,160 --> 00:51:36,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, if you're listing at home or at the office,

1006
00:51:36,840 --> 00:51:39,640
Speaker 2: just pull up go to Google image search and pull

1007
00:51:39,719 --> 00:51:43,200
Speaker 2: up the biggest you can filter by large images, get

1008
00:51:43,200 --> 00:51:46,040
Speaker 2: the biggest, highest res image you can of Randy Edzel.

1009
00:51:46,440 --> 00:51:47,960
Speaker 2: And if you're driving in a car, we can't. We

1010
00:51:47,960 --> 00:51:51,080
Speaker 2: wouldn't advise you to do this while you're driving the car.

1011
00:51:51,160 --> 00:51:54,120
Speaker 2: But maybe if you want to pull over somewhere and

1012
00:51:54,160 --> 00:51:55,520
Speaker 2: just pull it up on your phone just so that

1013
00:51:55,560 --> 00:51:57,920
Speaker 2: you can play along, play the home game with us here.

1014
00:51:59,280 --> 00:52:04,920
Speaker 3: All right, Uh, let's start here with Charlie Strong.

1015
00:52:05,960 --> 00:52:11,120
Speaker 2: Wow, that's a good I say. I think so, Charlie Strong,

1016
00:52:11,160 --> 00:52:12,320
Speaker 2: looks like you could still play.

1017
00:52:13,239 --> 00:52:19,600
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, this one's the tough one. Dabo Sweeney, No,

1018
00:52:20,800 --> 00:52:22,279
Speaker 3: I don't think that's I don't think that's right.

1019
00:52:22,480 --> 00:52:23,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know.

1020
00:52:23,440 --> 00:52:26,319
Speaker 2: I've got I've got a split screen thing going on

1021
00:52:26,400 --> 00:52:27,200
Speaker 2: right here, right now.

1022
00:52:28,080 --> 00:52:31,239
Speaker 1: And uh no, it's it's no contest.

1023
00:52:31,480 --> 00:52:33,680
Speaker 2: It's Dabo or excuse me, it's a It's not Dabo,

1024
00:52:33,800 --> 00:52:37,279
Speaker 2: it's Randy Etzel, Okay.

1025
00:52:37,320 --> 00:52:43,680
Speaker 3: Paul Christ No, Paul Christ. Wow, emphatic out of here,

1026
00:52:44,000 --> 00:52:54,279
Speaker 3: Randy Etzel. Scott Frost mm hmmm, still Randy Etzel. Frost is, Yes,

1027
00:52:54,640 --> 00:52:58,880
Speaker 3: it's it's Randy Etzel, Chris Peterson, Randy Edzel.

1028
00:53:00,520 --> 00:53:03,480
Speaker 1: Wow, Randy Etzel. He seems like.

1029
00:53:03,480 --> 00:53:05,319
Speaker 3: Chris Peterson, seems like he's a pretty good shave. I'm

1030
00:53:05,360 --> 00:53:08,759
Speaker 3: learning all sorts of things about you, Justin Wilcox.

1031
00:53:09,640 --> 00:53:13,320
Speaker 2: I'm not even sure I know what Justin Wilcox looks like. Really, Yeah, hold.

1032
00:53:13,160 --> 00:53:16,280
Speaker 3: On, okay, pull up a picture Justin Wilcox.

1033
00:53:16,440 --> 00:53:18,560
Speaker 1: Oh, okay, yeah, I know what you mean now.

1034
00:53:18,760 --> 00:53:21,720
Speaker 2: I probably Okay, he says, well, you know, let's be honest.

1035
00:53:21,760 --> 00:53:23,920
Speaker 2: I got to go Justin Wilcox here.

1036
00:53:25,400 --> 00:53:27,560
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think I agree with you. Will must champ.

1037
00:53:31,520 --> 00:53:34,200
Speaker 1: Randy Edzel. I think Randy Edzel is the answer.

1038
00:53:34,320 --> 00:53:42,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, final Gus smells on Randy Edzel. Yeah, the sweater

1039
00:53:42,719 --> 00:53:43,919
Speaker 3: vest thing is not working out.

1040
00:53:44,000 --> 00:53:46,480
Speaker 2: There's a reason that we call this game sexier than Edsel.

1041
00:53:46,520 --> 00:53:48,480
Speaker 2: It's not easy to be sexier than Randy Etzel.

1042
00:53:49,440 --> 00:53:51,799
Speaker 3: This is what I'm learning. Who knew, ty?

1043
00:53:51,960 --> 00:53:54,000
Speaker 2: This is why we played the high bar of Randy Edseel.

1044
00:53:54,040 --> 00:53:57,280
Speaker 2: You play to win the game here, Okay, good.

1045
00:53:57,040 --> 00:54:00,000
Speaker 3: To know well, we'll finish with somebody that has I'm

1046
00:54:00,239 --> 00:54:02,960
Speaker 3: that didn't have anything to do with college football, but somebody

1047
00:54:03,000 --> 00:54:03,640
Speaker 3: wanted to know.

1048
00:54:04,560 --> 00:54:07,080
Speaker 1: Here's our final question. Where did it go? This was

1049
00:54:07,680 --> 00:54:10,000
Speaker 1: Shiva doc Shiva doach.

1050
00:54:10,719 --> 00:54:12,760
Speaker 3: Actually is a good we'll do college and non college

1051
00:54:12,760 --> 00:54:15,400
Speaker 3: in this. If Georgia Tech decides to move from Paul Johnson,

1052
00:54:15,440 --> 00:54:17,760
Speaker 3: move on, move forward from Paul Johnson after this season,

1053
00:54:17,800 --> 00:54:20,480
Speaker 3: who do you think are prime candidates for the Georgia

1054
00:54:20,480 --> 00:54:23,520
Speaker 3: Tech job A very good job, I would say, at least.

1055
00:54:23,400 --> 00:54:25,759
Speaker 1: Potentially, Yeah, I think so.

1056
00:54:26,120 --> 00:54:30,359
Speaker 3: Okay, So it's academics come into it with Georgia Tech. Right,

1057
00:54:31,239 --> 00:54:33,800
Speaker 3: being the number two in your state is It's tricky,

1058
00:54:33,840 --> 00:54:36,040
Speaker 3: But a state that's filled with talent, and in a

1059
00:54:36,040 --> 00:54:39,560
Speaker 3: region that's filled with talent, and in a conference where

1060
00:54:39,560 --> 00:54:43,760
Speaker 3: you can win a good chunk of games. Right, desirable city,

1061
00:54:44,360 --> 00:54:53,200
Speaker 3: right man Ie lane lane train. I don't think it's

1062
00:54:53,200 --> 00:54:55,080
Speaker 3: probably gonna happen with the lane train. That's a pretty

1063
00:54:55,080 --> 00:54:55,640
Speaker 3: big jump.

1064
00:54:55,960 --> 00:54:59,200
Speaker 2: Yeah, I as long as it's not the option for me,

1065
00:54:59,360 --> 00:55:01,439
Speaker 2: you'd have to move away from the option. Don't don't

1066
00:55:01,440 --> 00:55:04,359
Speaker 2: stick with that option system. The option, I know you

1067
00:55:04,400 --> 00:55:06,319
Speaker 2: love it. I think it shades the way you look

1068
00:55:06,360 --> 00:55:09,759
Speaker 2: at that job. But I don't think the answer here

1069
00:55:09,840 --> 00:55:11,560
Speaker 2: is ken Neo Mantalolo.

1070
00:55:12,680 --> 00:55:17,640
Speaker 1: Okay, disagree? So who do you have?

1071
00:55:17,640 --> 00:55:21,440
Speaker 3: Give me some names? Neil Brown at Troy. A lot

1072
00:55:21,480 --> 00:55:23,719
Speaker 3: of people thought he was going to be a growing name.

1073
00:55:24,640 --> 00:55:25,600
Speaker 1: He's a decent name.

1074
00:55:25,800 --> 00:55:28,640
Speaker 3: Scott Saderfield app State. I don't know what more you

1075
00:55:28,680 --> 00:55:31,160
Speaker 3: want from him. Blake Anderson at Arkansas State.

1076
00:55:31,280 --> 00:55:33,239
Speaker 1: This is me googling feverishly.

1077
00:55:33,560 --> 00:55:35,040
Speaker 3: Jason Kandall, Toledo.

1078
00:55:36,960 --> 00:55:40,560
Speaker 2: I would want a guy from the South, Okay, I

1079
00:55:40,600 --> 00:55:41,920
Speaker 2: would want someone from down south.

1080
00:55:42,520 --> 00:55:43,680
Speaker 1: How about this?

1081
00:55:43,680 --> 00:55:46,560
Speaker 3: This was somebody whose name we mentioned not two and

1082
00:55:46,560 --> 00:55:49,000
Speaker 3: a half minutes ago, but Charlie Strong.

1083
00:55:51,480 --> 00:55:53,040
Speaker 1: Interesting, it's an interesting name.

1084
00:55:53,080 --> 00:55:56,400
Speaker 3: Their defense would be instantly approved, improved.

1085
00:55:56,600 --> 00:56:01,600
Speaker 1: He's got good familiarity with the South. Correct. Would he

1086
00:56:01,640 --> 00:56:03,960
Speaker 1: want to leave South? Is Georgia Tech a better job

1087
00:56:04,000 --> 00:56:04,680
Speaker 1: than South Florida?

1088
00:56:05,280 --> 00:56:08,920
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, oh for sure is. Yes, It's an

1089
00:56:08,920 --> 00:56:11,520
Speaker 3: a sec job and it's a quality acc Charlie Strong

1090
00:56:11,600 --> 00:56:14,759
Speaker 3: loves he loves the state of Florida. I know you're

1091
00:56:14,760 --> 00:56:20,200
Speaker 3: not that far away. Okay, you could convince people from

1092
00:56:20,200 --> 00:56:22,640
Speaker 3: Florida to move to Atlanta. Atlanta is a great city.

1093
00:56:22,920 --> 00:56:24,640
Speaker 1: Yeah, It's just true.

1094
00:56:25,320 --> 00:56:26,799
Speaker 3: You don't have to sit in traffic that much if

1095
00:56:26,800 --> 00:56:30,799
Speaker 3: you're a college student. I think Charlie Strong is It's

1096
00:56:30,840 --> 00:56:31,279
Speaker 3: a good I.

1097
00:56:32,160 --> 00:56:34,239
Speaker 1: Need time to think about this. I was unprepared for

1098
00:56:34,280 --> 00:56:34,800
Speaker 1: this question.

1099
00:56:35,280 --> 00:56:37,840
Speaker 3: That's okay, you are prepared for the second part of

1100
00:56:38,320 --> 00:56:41,160
Speaker 3: Shiva Docs. Questions from Reddit. By the way, best national

1101
00:56:41,200 --> 00:56:45,360
Speaker 3: fast food chain tie a first, Let's let's okay.

1102
00:56:46,080 --> 00:56:47,719
Speaker 1: Good answer. Chick fil A is the answer I would

1103
00:56:47,760 --> 00:56:48,560
Speaker 1: only answer.

1104
00:56:48,280 --> 00:56:51,480
Speaker 3: How do you how do you define? And Chick fil

1105
00:56:51,480 --> 00:56:53,240
Speaker 3: A fits this? How do you define fast food?

1106
00:56:53,239 --> 00:56:54,840
Speaker 1: What is like? Is Chipotle fast food?

1107
00:56:54,960 --> 00:56:58,759
Speaker 2: Some No, that would be casual dining or casual fast Yeah.

1108
00:56:59,000 --> 00:57:02,560
Speaker 2: I think something with a through mm hmm is what

1109
00:57:02,560 --> 00:57:05,920
Speaker 2: I would classify as best fast food or a fast

1110
00:57:05,960 --> 00:57:07,520
Speaker 2: food traditional fast food.

1111
00:57:07,520 --> 00:57:08,759
Speaker 1: For me, the answer is Chick fil A.

1112
00:57:10,160 --> 00:57:13,000
Speaker 2: Do you have a favorite fast food burger? I like

1113
00:57:13,080 --> 00:57:16,040
Speaker 2: the Wendy's classic single with cheese.

1114
00:57:16,320 --> 00:57:18,480
Speaker 1: Oh wow. Didn't even have to think about it.

1115
00:57:18,560 --> 00:57:21,760
Speaker 3: No, you didn't have to shuffle through your whopper experiences

1116
00:57:22,040 --> 00:57:23,280
Speaker 3: big mac experiences.

1117
00:57:23,560 --> 00:57:25,680
Speaker 2: The problem with the whopper is that there's too much

1118
00:57:25,680 --> 00:57:28,840
Speaker 2: going on, and there's so much burger that the bun

1119
00:57:28,920 --> 00:57:32,360
Speaker 2: falls apart and I read something a long time ago

1120
00:57:32,440 --> 00:57:35,320
Speaker 2: on the McDonald's front that if you take the burger

1121
00:57:35,400 --> 00:57:39,080
Speaker 2: out of the bun and throw it out on your

1122
00:57:39,080 --> 00:57:42,920
Speaker 2: back deck, that the bacteria won't even attack it.

1123
00:57:43,080 --> 00:57:45,040
Speaker 1: That it's not it's not real.

1124
00:57:45,280 --> 00:57:48,160
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's enough preservatives to fight off nature.

1125
00:57:48,520 --> 00:57:53,080
Speaker 2: And though though I've probably had a quarter pounder here

1126
00:57:53,120 --> 00:57:56,200
Speaker 2: and there since reading that, I gotta be honest, it

1127
00:57:56,280 --> 00:57:59,280
Speaker 2: scares the hell out of me. So okay, the answer

1128
00:57:59,320 --> 00:58:02,400
Speaker 2: would definitely not be them.

1129
00:58:02,440 --> 00:58:05,840
Speaker 1: What percent of the Chick fil A menu do you explore?

1130
00:58:08,080 --> 00:58:12,600
Speaker 2: I'll usually go if I'm feeling dangerous, by the way,

1131
00:58:12,720 --> 00:58:14,560
Speaker 2: Chick fil A not a sponsor.

1132
00:58:14,120 --> 00:58:14,960
Speaker 1: No, not a sponsor.

1133
00:58:15,000 --> 00:58:17,720
Speaker 2: I'll go if i'm a feeling If I'm feeling dangerous,

1134
00:58:17,720 --> 00:58:21,400
Speaker 2: I'll go spicy chicken sandwich. But I've experimented with the

1135
00:58:21,720 --> 00:58:24,600
Speaker 2: just Chick fil A sandwich, the regular Chick fil A sandwich.

1136
00:58:25,120 --> 00:58:27,720
Speaker 2: I've done the cool Wrap combo, which I think is

1137
00:58:27,760 --> 00:58:31,440
Speaker 2: the number six. I've done the nugs. Everyone's done the

1138
00:58:31,480 --> 00:58:33,600
Speaker 2: nugs or the chicken tendos.

1139
00:58:34,920 --> 00:58:37,000
Speaker 3: Do they currently have spicy nugs?

1140
00:58:37,960 --> 00:58:41,120
Speaker 1: I don't know. They probably have sauce that could satisfy that.

1141
00:58:41,200 --> 00:58:45,520
Speaker 3: Yeah, but I'm talking for you nug itself being that's

1142
00:58:45,520 --> 00:58:48,360
Speaker 3: where Wendy's has an advantage. They have strong spicy nugs.

1143
00:58:49,000 --> 00:58:52,440
Speaker 2: Right, No, I don't. I don't think so. I've done salads,

1144
00:58:52,440 --> 00:58:56,080
Speaker 2: I've done the soup. I think I've done I've done

1145
00:58:56,120 --> 00:58:58,800
Speaker 2: like the milkshake, some of the ice cream.

1146
00:58:58,520 --> 00:59:01,600
Speaker 1: That they offer you. I've had a good swath of

1147
00:59:01,640 --> 00:59:05,800
Speaker 1: the menu. My answer may be Jack in the Box?

1148
00:59:06,840 --> 00:59:08,720
Speaker 3: Does Jack in the Box? I don't drive fast food?

1149
00:59:09,400 --> 00:59:10,600
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.

1150
00:59:10,680 --> 00:59:13,400
Speaker 2: Okay, you could tell that I'm not versed in the

1151
00:59:13,400 --> 00:59:14,400
Speaker 2: ways of Jack in the Box.

1152
00:59:14,440 --> 00:59:15,040
Speaker 1: Jack in the Box.

1153
00:59:15,080 --> 00:59:20,120
Speaker 3: I honestly I will eat McDonald's for breakfast in an airport.

1154
00:59:20,280 --> 00:59:22,080
Speaker 3: And this isn't for any real reason. I just like cooking.

1155
00:59:22,240 --> 00:59:24,680
Speaker 3: I think fast food is delicious. It's just terrible for you.

1156
00:59:25,920 --> 00:59:29,080
Speaker 3: I like Taco Bell, McDonald's is fine. I like a

1157
00:59:29,160 --> 00:59:31,000
Speaker 3: McDonald's cheeseburger dipped in sweet and sour.

1158
00:59:31,000 --> 00:59:31,200
Speaker 1: Fine.

1159
00:59:31,240 --> 00:59:34,440
Speaker 3: Chick fil A is good. Jack in the Box is

1160
00:59:35,200 --> 00:59:37,480
Speaker 3: way out in the forefront in terms of all day

1161
00:59:37,520 --> 00:59:39,920
Speaker 3: breakfast or a breakfast jacket one in the morning if

1162
00:59:39,960 --> 00:59:43,560
Speaker 3: you want it five pm. And everybody started copying them.

1163
00:59:43,600 --> 00:59:49,680
Speaker 3: Their tacos are disgustingly wonderful. It's like a mystery meat situation.

1164
00:59:49,800 --> 00:59:51,200
Speaker 3: The whole thing is fried together.

1165
00:59:51,320 --> 00:59:51,600
Speaker 1: It's not.

1166
00:59:51,640 --> 00:59:53,120
Speaker 3: They don't just fry the shell and then put in

1167
00:59:53,160 --> 00:59:55,000
Speaker 3: some meat and lettuce. They fry the whole damn thing.

1168
00:59:55,960 --> 00:59:59,080
Speaker 3: There's spicy chicken sandwiches, good good shakes. Jack in the Box.

1169
00:59:59,120 --> 01:00:01,640
Speaker 3: My answer, does does In and Out have a drive through?

1170
01:00:03,280 --> 01:00:03,480
Speaker 1: Yeah?

1171
01:00:03,520 --> 01:00:07,680
Speaker 3: I mean it's by default, yeah, Oh, by default in

1172
01:00:07,800 --> 01:00:11,120
Speaker 3: and Out it's a drive through. But I think In

1173
01:00:11,160 --> 01:00:13,080
Speaker 3: and Out is delicious. Their fries aren't that good, and

1174
01:00:13,120 --> 01:00:15,200
Speaker 3: it's not a national fast food chain. I don't think

1175
01:00:15,200 --> 01:00:17,560
Speaker 3: they go past Utah, Texas or we.

1176
01:00:17,560 --> 01:00:19,120
Speaker 1: Don't have any. We don't have any Jack in the

1177
01:00:19,160 --> 01:00:23,959
Speaker 1: Box franchises over here in PA. Have you had Jack

1178
01:00:23,960 --> 01:00:28,760
Speaker 1: in the Box? I don't think so. It's it's a weird,

1179
01:00:28,960 --> 01:00:30,240
Speaker 1: terrific experience. Tie.

1180
01:00:30,400 --> 01:00:32,640
Speaker 3: You can look into a bag and get some mazzarella sticks,

1181
01:00:32,640 --> 01:00:34,560
Speaker 3: some egg rolls, okay, breakfast sandwich.

1182
01:00:34,640 --> 01:00:36,640
Speaker 2: But if you take if you take the burger out

1183
01:00:36,680 --> 01:00:38,480
Speaker 2: of the bun and throw it out on your back patio,

1184
01:00:38,840 --> 01:00:42,720
Speaker 2: well the flies will the bacteria go after it?

1185
01:00:42,800 --> 01:00:43,600
Speaker 1: Almost assuredly?

1186
01:00:43,680 --> 01:00:43,760
Speaker 2: Not?

1187
01:00:44,040 --> 01:00:46,360
Speaker 3: No, I'm sure it's in the same class. Oh, and

1188
01:00:46,360 --> 01:00:48,880
Speaker 3: they also they have the sourdough option. Ty, okay, you

1189
01:00:48,920 --> 01:00:50,200
Speaker 3: got a burger on some sourdough.

1190
01:00:50,440 --> 01:00:50,920
Speaker 1: It's great.

1191
01:00:51,440 --> 01:00:53,600
Speaker 2: All right, this has been This has been fun. I

1192
01:00:53,600 --> 01:00:56,400
Speaker 2: don't think we've got time for any more questions. Here

1193
01:00:56,480 --> 01:00:58,840
Speaker 2: is the deal. We'll do more of these as the

1194
01:00:58,880 --> 01:01:01,640
Speaker 2: year progresses. We promise there's always demand for a Q

1195
01:01:01,720 --> 01:01:04,560
Speaker 2: and a show. If you've got questions, If you want

1196
01:01:05,040 --> 01:01:07,560
Speaker 2: questions answered, maybe you sent them in today, we didn't

1197
01:01:07,600 --> 01:01:09,840
Speaker 2: get to them. We will get to them at some

1198
01:01:09,920 --> 01:01:13,240
Speaker 2: point this season, whether it's a separate podcast, whether it's

1199
01:01:13,240 --> 01:01:15,240
Speaker 2: just something we post on one of the social channels,

1200
01:01:15,560 --> 01:01:17,840
Speaker 2: keep your eyes and ears peeled for when we might

1201
01:01:18,280 --> 01:01:20,760
Speaker 2: do something like that. We'll do it again soon, we promise.

1202
01:01:21,280 --> 01:01:23,600
Speaker 2: The other thing that we'll add. If you're looking at

1203
01:01:23,640 --> 01:01:26,760
Speaker 2: your podcast feed and you see an Oregon show come

1204
01:01:26,880 --> 01:01:30,280
Speaker 2: up after this one, it's because this is a thing

1205
01:01:30,280 --> 01:01:32,160
Speaker 2: that we're going to try to do more of. So

1206
01:01:32,240 --> 01:01:34,120
Speaker 2: Dan's going to talk to Josh Schwartz, our good friend

1207
01:01:34,160 --> 01:01:37,920
Speaker 2: Josh Schwartz about Oregon football. Next week, We're going to

1208
01:01:37,960 --> 01:01:41,280
Speaker 2: try and talk Notre Dame. We'll start off with two

1209
01:01:41,280 --> 01:01:44,040
Speaker 2: of our homer pods, but then we really do truly

1210
01:01:44,080 --> 01:01:47,160
Speaker 2: want to migrate into talking about some other teams with

1211
01:01:47,200 --> 01:01:49,320
Speaker 2: other beat writers, just to try and get the lay

1212
01:01:49,320 --> 01:01:52,000
Speaker 2: of the land. Whether it's a team of prominence, whether

1213
01:01:52,040 --> 01:01:53,800
Speaker 2: it's not a team of prominence, just someone with an

1214
01:01:53,840 --> 01:01:56,440
Speaker 2: interesting storyline. Feel free to reach out let us know

1215
01:01:57,040 --> 01:01:59,080
Speaker 2: which teams you might be interested in hearing more about

1216
01:01:59,280 --> 01:02:01,120
Speaker 2: if we talk a little bit more detail, because we

1217
01:02:01,120 --> 01:02:02,560
Speaker 2: think it'd be a cool thing to do this time

1218
01:02:02,600 --> 01:02:02,880
Speaker 2: of year.

1219
01:02:03,320 --> 01:02:06,080
Speaker 1: Sound good? Yeah, yeah, yeah, only Homer is allowed.

1220
01:02:06,200 --> 01:02:08,280
Speaker 2: All right, Well, for that guy over there, Dan Rubinstein,

1221
01:02:08,360 --> 01:02:11,200
Speaker 2: thank you, sir for collecting all these questions, for putting

1222
01:02:11,200 --> 01:02:13,600
Speaker 2: them in a document, and for not buzzing me the

1223
01:02:13,640 --> 01:02:14,120
Speaker 2: whole show.

1224
01:02:14,800 --> 01:02:15,680
Speaker 1: I didn't do the radio that.

1225
01:02:16,440 --> 01:02:17,760
Speaker 3: I just I didn't want to throw you off your

1226
01:02:17,760 --> 01:02:18,360
Speaker 3: game time.

1227
01:02:18,640 --> 01:02:21,680
Speaker 1: I'm considerate. All right, Well, I tie he's Dan.

1228
01:02:22,080 --> 01:02:25,360
Speaker 2: We're gonna catch you all momentarily, actually, if you're listening

1229
01:02:25,440 --> 01:02:29,000
Speaker 2: to us in binge mode. But in the meantime, if

1230
01:02:29,040 --> 01:02:30,600
Speaker 2: you don't listen to any of these shows, or at

1231
01:02:30,640 --> 01:02:31,680
Speaker 2: least the next show that.

1232
01:02:31,680 --> 01:02:33,960
Speaker 1: We're doing, we'll catch you all on Sunday. In the meantime,

1233
01:02:34,000 --> 01:02:35,800
Speaker 1: stay STI