1 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul swing you, 2 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day 3 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for 4 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or 5 00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple 6 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as 7 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,360 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. The big news of the day 8 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: certainly China and the US. The other big news is 9 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 1: Argentina at the pace so continuing to sell off versus 10 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:33,199 Speaker 1: the dollar currently at its lowest weakest level on record, 11 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:38,880 Speaker 1: after the surprise defeat of Mauricio mccli the current president, yesterday, 12 00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:42,480 Speaker 1: and questions about who will take his place, the fact 13 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:46,160 Speaker 1: that Christina Kirshner could be coming back to power. Joining 14 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:48,279 Speaker 1: us how to talk about how investors have to view 15 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,159 Speaker 1: all this is Paul Greer. He's a portfolio manager focusing 16 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:54,639 Speaker 1: on emerging markets, debt and fax at Fidelity International. He's 17 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 1: joining us from our London studios. Paul, thank you so 18 00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:01,200 Speaker 1: much for being with me today. The main question is 19 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:04,959 Speaker 1: how much is Argentina a specific story about a country 20 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 1: that has defaulted many times on its debt and how 21 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 1: much does this reflect true risk and emerging markets that 22 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 1: is currently mispriced by debt investors A Lisa and yeah, 23 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 1: I guess with Argentina, you know, clearly it's been that 24 00:01:18,920 --> 00:01:22,480 Speaker 1: the story of the week. I think the nature of 25 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:25,480 Speaker 1: the story is quite idiosyncratic in many ways. We had 26 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 1: a very specific primary vote over the weekend, which you 27 00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:33,600 Speaker 1: know clearly had an adverse result for investors in Argentinean 28 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 1: debt and currency, and investors have have voted with their feet. 29 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 1: You know, we've seen a pretty sharp sell off in 30 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 1: bonds and in currency markets. I think there's been a 31 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:46,559 Speaker 1: little bit of contusion, certainly yesterday, a little bit today 32 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 1: into the rest of emerging markets. I think it's you know, 33 00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,600 Speaker 1: maybe quite difficult for investors to exit the Argentinian market 34 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 1: at the moment. It's it's quite a liquid, it's under 35 00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 1: a lot of pressure. But I think from here on, 36 00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 1: with every passing day, I think for the rest of 37 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:05,040 Speaker 1: emerging markets, in terms of contagion, we'll probably see a 38 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:08,840 Speaker 1: reduced impact in terms of the spill over into the 39 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 1: rest of the market. Clearly, it's going to remain topical 40 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 1: and thematic for Argentina is specifically, but I think we've 41 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 1: probably seen the peak for the rest of EM in 42 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:22,480 Speaker 1: terms of contagion. Well, what is the node of contagion 43 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 1: that we should be looking at? I'm sorry I didn't 44 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:28,760 Speaker 1: In other words, what how how is the contagion expressing itself. 45 00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 1: Is it just that investors, if they can't get rid 46 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:36,000 Speaker 1: of Argentinean assets, they're simply selling other high beta emerging 47 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,720 Speaker 1: markets securities. Is that sort of the way it's expressed. 48 00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 1: Or is it just that you have negative news and 49 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:44,799 Speaker 1: in a big emerging market or one that a lot 50 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 1: of people own, and then certain retail investors say, you 51 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:50,640 Speaker 1: know what, I'm not going to go any into EM 52 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: or I'm going to yank some funds from my E 53 00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 1: M E TF. I think it's exactly that, I mean, 54 00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:58,799 Speaker 1: I mean, the two biggest risks with Argentina right throughout 55 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:02,840 Speaker 1: this year have always been politics and positioning, and on 56 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: the latter issue, you know, Argentinean dead and currency. You know, 57 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 1: it has been a popular, crowded market in many ways 58 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:13,120 Speaker 1: with investors. Clearly there's been a big draw down in 59 00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 1: terms of the performance that's hit you know, investors, funds, 60 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:19,960 Speaker 1: and we've seen a little bit of de risking in 61 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:24,440 Speaker 1: other markets. It's been most acute in Latin America, particularly 62 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:26,160 Speaker 1: on the f X side. I would say, you know, 63 00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 1: it's very difficult to sell the Argentinian pesto at the minute. 64 00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:32,560 Speaker 1: Liquidity is quite poor. So you know, certainly yesterday we 65 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 1: saw currencies like the Mexican pesso, Brazilian royale, Chile, Columbia, 66 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:40,720 Speaker 1: et cetera come under pressure as investors really look for 67 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 1: an option somehow to hedge the risk in Argentina. I 68 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 1: think it worked yesterday, you know, maybe a little bit today. 69 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 1: But with each passing day, I think the Argentinian story 70 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:55,360 Speaker 1: will become increasingly idiosyncratic and it will be harder to 71 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:59,080 Speaker 1: hedge it using, you know, other countries and other markets. 72 00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:01,560 Speaker 1: Earlier this year, you wrote a column for the Financial 73 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:04,560 Speaker 1: Times where you said that emerging markets are in a 74 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: sweet spot, and certainly that came to fruition and returns 75 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 1: with emerging markets debt outperforming us risk of your securities. 76 00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: I'm wondering, from your perspective, is that sweet spot over? 77 00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:19,599 Speaker 1: Have we sort of closed that out? Yeah? I don't 78 00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:21,840 Speaker 1: think it's quite over. I mean, if you look at 79 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 1: the returns year to did you know sovereign external debt, 80 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 1: you know, we're up twelve and a half percent. Local 81 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:32,040 Speaker 1: currency markets were up percent. I think probably the lion's 82 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:35,279 Speaker 1: share of the returns have already come and gone so 83 00:04:35,400 --> 00:04:39,280 Speaker 1: far in emerging markets this year, but between nine year end, 84 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:42,400 Speaker 1: we still think there'll be incremental positive returns for for 85 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: e M debt investors. I mean, it's it's not a 86 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:49,200 Speaker 1: perfect asset class. We've seen this horrible story in Argentina 87 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:52,360 Speaker 1: over the weekend. You know, em is still suffering from 88 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:55,839 Speaker 1: softening global growth. We've still got the threat of you know, 89 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:59,520 Speaker 1: US trying to cheer trade tarts, etcetera. But you know, 90 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 1: there's there's in lots of parallels with with last year, 91 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 1: you know, the big sell off and e M in 92 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:08,080 Speaker 1: summer eighteen, but there are also some notable differences. You know, 93 00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:11,600 Speaker 1: the industrate environment globally is a lot more favorable this year, 94 00:05:11,960 --> 00:05:14,640 Speaker 1: and we'll be seeing that the Fed and other central 95 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:17,560 Speaker 1: banks cut interest rates. So you know, yields have been 96 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:21,160 Speaker 1: falling generally in the G ten world. Investors have been 97 00:05:21,160 --> 00:05:25,400 Speaker 1: looking towards emerging markets as summer that has an attractive 98 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:28,719 Speaker 1: yield and a spread that that will offer them them 99 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: some returns. So I don't think the sweet story is 100 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,640 Speaker 1: that the sweet spot is is quite over. You know, 101 00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,719 Speaker 1: we're also seeing stimulus from the Chinese authorities as well, 102 00:05:38,080 --> 00:05:41,720 Speaker 1: but I think probably most of the returns for nineteen 103 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 1: have already been witnessed. Yeah, talking about picking up some 104 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:48,719 Speaker 1: yield and emerging markets. Argentinian A hundred year bonds currently 105 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 1: almost yield fourteen percent. Are you buying? We're not buying now. 106 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:55,840 Speaker 1: We think it pays to be cautious and in the 107 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 1: ear term. As I mentioned earlier, the two biggest risks 108 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,680 Speaker 1: this year in argent You for us, we're really politics 109 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 1: and positioning. And politics has clearly played out with the 110 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,720 Speaker 1: primary result in Sunday. But the positioning overhang that technical 111 00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:13,400 Speaker 1: is it's still quite awkward for investors. It's been crowded, 112 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,679 Speaker 1: it's been a popular trade. I think the market still 113 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 1: needs to find a balancing clearing level for for both 114 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 1: bonds and for currencies. So we think that positioning and 115 00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 1: technical angle will continue to to weigh in Argentina in 116 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:32,159 Speaker 1: the short term and more medium term. It does offer, 117 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,360 Speaker 1: you know, an interesting opportunity. The bonds, I guess are done, 118 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 1: you know, points in the last kind of one and 119 00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 1: a half days were very quickly moving towards the scenario 120 00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 1: where default is you know, getting towards priced in by 121 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,200 Speaker 1: the market, with you know, bonds trading below fifty cents 122 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:53,000 Speaker 1: in the dollar today, so you know, a lot of 123 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,200 Speaker 1: bad news has been priced in. We think in the 124 00:06:55,279 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 1: near term bonds are probably at risk of drifting further 125 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,000 Speaker 1: lower and by you know, as we get down to 126 00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 1: the forties and some of these Argentinean dollar bonds, and 127 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 1: you start to think about recovery values and kind of 128 00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 1: the assets that the country has, I think, you know, 129 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 1: over the media in term it could be an interesting opportunity, 130 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 1: but but certainly not in the short term. Where else 131 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: are you buying just quickly thirty seconds? Yeah, I mean 132 00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 1: our highest conviction and e m that at the minute 133 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:22,320 Speaker 1: is on the local currency side. You know, inflation and 134 00:07:22,360 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 1: growth has been falling in a number of countries and 135 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 1: many markets have got you know, steep yield curves and 136 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 1: pretty attractive real yields. So we really like local currency bonds, 137 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 1: and you know, countries like China, Russia, Indonesia, Serbia, Peru, etcetera. 138 00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 1: Love these countries were expecting to see more interest rate 139 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:42,960 Speaker 1: cuts from central banks, and we think the risk premium 140 00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: is is pretty attractive even at these levels. Paul Greer, 141 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 1: thank you so much for spending the time, wonderful speaking 142 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:51,840 Speaker 1: with you. Paul Greers, portfolio manager focusing on emerging markets, 143 00:07:51,880 --> 00:07:55,480 Speaker 1: debt and f X for Fidelity International, joining us from 144 00:07:55,480 --> 00:08:08,640 Speaker 1: our London studios. How do you trade this market? The 145 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,360 Speaker 1: key question facing so many portfolio managers today. We're going 146 00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 1: to post that question to Grady Briquette. He's a portfolio 147 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:17,680 Speaker 1: manager at diamond Hill Capital Management, joining us here in 148 00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 1: our interactive broker studio. So, Grady, one key question here 149 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 1: as markets get whipside, who's trading? Are you out there 150 00:08:24,520 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 1: actively trading these headlines? Thanks for having me. We're not. 151 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:32,840 Speaker 1: So we take a strategic approach to the portfolio construction. 152 00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 1: We my team and I meet on a on a 153 00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:39,040 Speaker 1: scheduled basis to decide what we want to buy and 154 00:08:39,040 --> 00:08:40,440 Speaker 1: what we want to sell, and it's really based on 155 00:08:40,520 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 1: valuation and our expectations for future fundamental fundamentals of each business. 156 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:48,959 Speaker 1: So a day like today, you it's unlikely that you'd 157 00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:51,439 Speaker 1: see us make any any big changes, if if any 158 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:54,560 Speaker 1: changes at all. So Diamond Hill Capital Management, overseeing twenty 159 00:08:54,559 --> 00:08:58,000 Speaker 1: three billion dollars normally in Columbus, Ohio. Grady, I'm wondering 160 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,480 Speaker 1: if you're saying, and so many people are saying, we're 161 00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:03,160 Speaker 1: not trading this, In fact, we're trading less. Are you 162 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:07,120 Speaker 1: trading less due to some of the geopolitical uncertainty and 163 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 1: the backdrop of the trade tensions. Well, if we we 164 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 1: would trade less if we don't see relative valuation opportunities. 165 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 1: If we saw relative evaluation opportunities emerge as a result 166 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:23,080 Speaker 1: of these issues, then we might allocate more. So, for instance, 167 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: if we saw China become relatively attractive compared to Europe 168 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: or some of the other markets, we might start to 169 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 1: allocate more to China. Right now, we have a larger 170 00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: allocation to the UK because first a couple of years now, 171 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:37,439 Speaker 1: we've we've felt that the valuations in the UK attractive. 172 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:39,760 Speaker 1: But on a day to day basis, we're gonna we're 173 00:09:39,760 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: gonna step back and breathe and uh and look and 174 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,360 Speaker 1: make sure that we're comfortable buying more of the businesses 175 00:09:44,360 --> 00:09:46,520 Speaker 1: that we own as they get cheaper. So when did 176 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:49,520 Speaker 1: you start buying UK? Oh? We started? We we we've 177 00:09:49,559 --> 00:09:52,839 Speaker 1: We've always allocated the UK since the funds inception. Um, 178 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,439 Speaker 1: but we we we I'd say we increase the weight 179 00:09:56,600 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 1: over time right after the initial vote to to leave 180 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:03,320 Speaker 1: the European Union, and how how are you accessing it 181 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 1: with bonds? Stocks? So we're so in the international fund, 182 00:10:06,280 --> 00:10:08,680 Speaker 1: we're all equity, all equity. And one thing that you 183 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:11,400 Speaker 1: mentioned in a note recently was it's reasonable to expect 184 00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 1: seven to nine percent annualized returns for global equities over 185 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 1: the next ten years. I'm wondering how that can be 186 00:10:20,080 --> 00:10:23,360 Speaker 1: given the fact that so much of the growth has 187 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 1: already been front loaded, priced in, and sort of juiced 188 00:10:26,880 --> 00:10:28,960 Speaker 1: by the central banks. Do you ever get pushed back 189 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 1: on that that that yield target? I just did from 190 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:34,400 Speaker 1: one of my colleagues when I presented it to you. 191 00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 1: All right, so what did you say? Well, so my 192 00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:39,199 Speaker 1: answer is, right now, when I look at our portfolio, 193 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: and I'm using our portfolio as a proxy for for 194 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 1: global equities because we are global portfolio, the dividend yield 195 00:10:45,080 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 1: right now is about two point six percent. I think 196 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 1: the valuations are reasonable now, some some markets are more 197 00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:53,599 Speaker 1: valuations are more stretched than others. I would argue the 198 00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:55,679 Speaker 1: US is one of the more stretched markets in terms 199 00:10:55,720 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 1: of just statistical valuation. UM. But I think that you 200 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:02,560 Speaker 1: get three percent uh real GDP growth, and you get 201 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:04,720 Speaker 1: a couple of percentage points of earnings growth on top 202 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:07,439 Speaker 1: of that through share by backs, that operating efficiencies. So 203 00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: you've got five percent on the on the earnings growth potential, 204 00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:13,480 Speaker 1: and then you've got another two at two point six 205 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 1: percent DIVEN yields. That's that's right at eight percent. The 206 00:11:16,040 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 1: idea of predicting out ten years at a time of 207 00:11:19,240 --> 00:11:23,040 Speaker 1: you know, tweets and things moving uh really quickly depending 208 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 1: on the headline of the day is mind boggling. And 209 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:30,640 Speaker 1: I wonder how sensitive your returns prediction is to a 210 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:34,680 Speaker 1: trade deal or some sort of kind of global order 211 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:36,679 Speaker 1: staying the same way that it is right now. So 212 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,680 Speaker 1: again this is this is my base case, and so 213 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:40,680 Speaker 1: there's certain enter tails around that and you can see 214 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: return and we have seen historical returns be much higher 215 00:11:43,440 --> 00:11:45,880 Speaker 1: and much lower. UM. I think that if you get 216 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,840 Speaker 1: a negative sentiment in the market that compresses valuations, than 217 00:11:48,880 --> 00:11:51,199 Speaker 1: our forward tenure return would be higher. And if you 218 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:54,640 Speaker 1: get positive sentiment that causes valuations to stretch further than 219 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: there are today that I would expect my return expectations 220 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 1: to go down, but on a tenure basis, it's more 221 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 1: about the current dividend yield and earnings growth expectations. Do 222 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,960 Speaker 1: you expect a recession anytime soon? I think within the 223 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:09,720 Speaker 1: tenure time frame that I mentioned, But in the next 224 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,679 Speaker 1: and the next day, in the next year, uh, potentially 225 00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:17,160 Speaker 1: earnings some earnings pressure, but but a true recession, global recession, 226 00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 1: I don't personally see it. What about emerging markets? I 227 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 1: think emerging markets can be attractive. The way that we 228 00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:25,640 Speaker 1: typically access that is through developed market companies that have 229 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:29,680 Speaker 1: strong exposure to emerging markets. So like a b NBEV Ashmore, 230 00:12:29,760 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 1: which is a UK asset manager that's emerging market debt 231 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,959 Speaker 1: manager UM Diagio and so we understand that we're out 232 00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:38,360 Speaker 1: on the ground and emerging markets as a team, so 233 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:40,560 Speaker 1: we want to access companies with good management teams who 234 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: have people on the ground to understand those markets well. 235 00:12:43,400 --> 00:12:47,240 Speaker 1: Any areas you're absolutely avoiding well UM. Fortunately we haven't 236 00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:49,559 Speaker 1: been allocated to Argentina on a direct basis, although we 237 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:52,240 Speaker 1: do have exposure through COPA Airlines. They have seven percent 238 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:55,000 Speaker 1: of the revenue from Argentina. UM any market where we 239 00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:58,319 Speaker 1: see very high inflation and unstable political environments, we tend 240 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:00,920 Speaker 1: to tend to avoid. Great cat Thank you so much 241 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 1: for being here. Grady brick Hats, portfolio manager at Diamond 242 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:08,160 Speaker 1: Hil Capital Management, overseeing twenty three billion dollars, joining us 243 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:22,560 Speaker 1: here in New York. Try to check in with Bloomberg Opinion. 244 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:25,560 Speaker 1: We're joined by the Bloomberg Opinion Commnst. Max Neeson. Uh. 245 00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:29,240 Speaker 1: There have been recent proposals out of the Trump administration's 246 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 1: headquarters that perhaps the way to lower prices on prescription 247 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:36,280 Speaker 1: drugs in the United States is simply to import drugs 248 00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:38,520 Speaker 1: from Canada. Can you just give us a little bit 249 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 1: more about the proposal. Yeah, absolutely so. It's basically a 250 00:13:42,559 --> 00:13:45,719 Speaker 1: two part proposal, One that that states and wholesalers and 251 00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:50,679 Speaker 1: pharmacies can apply to HHS to basically give them a 252 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 1: proposal for importing certain subsets of drugs from Canada, which 253 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:57,520 Speaker 1: has lower prices than we do, if they can prove 254 00:13:57,600 --> 00:13:59,400 Speaker 1: that it's going to be safe for consumers for them 255 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: to do so. The other one, which is a little 256 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: bit more puzzling, is that drug makers would be able 257 00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:07,319 Speaker 1: to import their own medicines from another country. That part 258 00:14:07,400 --> 00:14:09,559 Speaker 1: I basically ignore because it doesn't make any sense to me. 259 00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:14,199 Speaker 1: But um, the issue, as always with drug pricing is 260 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:17,199 Speaker 1: that although this sounds good, you know you have lower 261 00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:19,720 Speaker 1: price in an other country. If you bring those drugs in, 262 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 1: it's good for consumers, it brings in competition, it brings 263 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:26,320 Speaker 1: the price down. But it's it's more complicated because in 264 00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 1: order to actually do this, you need Canadian wholesalers and 265 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 1: the government of Canada to cooperate, and they have no 266 00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:36,120 Speaker 1: incentive whatsoever to do So why not more business, more 267 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:39,720 Speaker 1: profits because they depend on on drug makers to actually 268 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 1: provide those medicines, and the price differential in the US 269 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,240 Speaker 1: is basically the most valuable thing in the world for 270 00:14:48,360 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: the pharmaceutical industry, the fact that they can charge higher 271 00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:54,160 Speaker 1: prices here. They will do whatever they can to preserve it. 272 00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:58,120 Speaker 1: And if that means basically cutting off drug supply for 273 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 1: Canadian wholesalers that that start importing drugs in the United States, 274 00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:05,600 Speaker 1: they may very well do so. Um. So you know, 275 00:15:05,680 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: they really relies on drug makers to cooperate in a 276 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:12,200 Speaker 1: scheme that would cost them money in the long run, 277 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:15,760 Speaker 1: and I don't I don't expect them to do that. Yeah, Max, 278 00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:17,880 Speaker 1: here's what I'm struggling with. We have been talking about 279 00:15:17,920 --> 00:15:20,800 Speaker 1: prescription drug prices for decades, right, I mean, this has 280 00:15:20,840 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 1: been an issue for a really long time. Why has 281 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 1: there been no material progress and coming up with some 282 00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:31,480 Speaker 1: way to lower drug prices while continuing to encourage uh 283 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 1: innovation within the pharmaceutical industry. I think it's because there's 284 00:15:37,520 --> 00:15:40,160 Speaker 1: such a lobby on the second part of that thing 285 00:15:40,400 --> 00:15:43,360 Speaker 1: where or it's become sort of this perceived wisdom for 286 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 1: for a lot of politicians that anything you do to 287 00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:50,480 Speaker 1: to bring down drug prices is going to irrevocably and 288 00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:55,120 Speaker 1: harmfully impact innovation. The reality is is probably something a 289 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:57,640 Speaker 1: little bit different, and and the problem is, in order 290 00:15:57,680 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 1: to actually bring prices down, you really do have to 291 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:03,120 Speaker 1: make big structural change. You need to do what every 292 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 1: other developed country in the world does, which is make 293 00:16:06,240 --> 00:16:10,600 Speaker 1: drug approval conditional on and pricing conditional on the value 294 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:13,120 Speaker 1: it brings to patients, as opposed to the system we 295 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 1: have right now where negotiating power is so fragmented that 296 00:16:16,680 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 1: that that sort of fundamental market action that the real 297 00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:25,640 Speaker 1: competition only happens in limited ways and is specifically prohibited 298 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: from happening in certain government programs. So it's just a mess, 299 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:30,400 Speaker 1: and there has to be a kind of a fundamental 300 00:16:30,520 --> 00:16:34,480 Speaker 1: shift in in mindset and ambition that's just not happening 301 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 1: right now. Max. When I talked to a lot of 302 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:39,760 Speaker 1: investment managers right now, they say that because of the 303 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:43,200 Speaker 1: trade wars, because of what's going on with geopolitical uncertainty, 304 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 1: they are piling into healthcare shares in the United States 305 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:50,520 Speaker 1: because they see that as immune to some of these 306 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 1: tensions and immune to a potential downturn. People still have 307 00:16:54,040 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 1: to spend on their healthcare. Do you think that the 308 00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:01,240 Speaker 1: outlook for healthcare companies right now it's pretty positive or 309 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,320 Speaker 1: do you think that perhaps people are overlooking other issues 310 00:17:04,400 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 1: that are facing some of these companies. I think in 311 00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:10,119 Speaker 1: the near to midterm, and and kind of in a 312 00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:13,720 Speaker 1: general macro sense, they're They're probably right in the sense 313 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 1: that we're not going to see a significant health reform, 314 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 1: which is kind of the health or drug press reform, 315 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:21,680 Speaker 1: which is the real only real threat to that sort 316 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 1: of thesis, at least until you know, the after the 317 00:17:25,480 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 1: next election, and who knows that how that's going to 318 00:17:28,080 --> 00:17:30,720 Speaker 1: go in the first place. Um, you know, the things 319 00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:32,639 Speaker 1: that we're seeing out of the sentence out of Congress 320 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:36,000 Speaker 1: right now, would definitely have an impact on on drugmakers 321 00:17:36,040 --> 00:17:39,320 Speaker 1: and potentially on providers as well. Speaking about UM, basically 322 00:17:39,359 --> 00:17:42,600 Speaker 1: an effort to reform how Medicare pays for drugs and 323 00:17:43,080 --> 00:17:47,000 Speaker 1: to crimp surprise bills from from hospitals. But those are 324 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:51,359 Speaker 1: all sort of incremental changes, especially when compared to the 325 00:17:51,520 --> 00:17:54,359 Speaker 1: more ambitious reform efforts you're you're just seeing proposed by 326 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:58,280 Speaker 1: by Democrats that are running for president UM. In order 327 00:17:58,359 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 1: to kind of pass those those larger efforts at reform, 328 00:18:01,240 --> 00:18:04,640 Speaker 1: they basically have to throw put aside any other political 329 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:10,240 Speaker 1: priority and also have a very specific outcome in Congress 330 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:12,239 Speaker 1: as well in the next year's elections. So they may 331 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:14,879 Speaker 1: not be too far off. It's cynical, but but they 332 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:17,280 Speaker 1: may be right. And just real quick here in general, 333 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:21,760 Speaker 1: is the idea that healthcare companies are somewhat recession immune. 334 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 1: Is that accurate? It historically has been the case. You know, 335 00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:29,400 Speaker 1: as you said, you know, people are going to get 336 00:18:29,440 --> 00:18:31,800 Speaker 1: sick no matter what. People are going to have to 337 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:34,520 Speaker 1: pay for healthcare no matter what. And at the end 338 00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:36,119 Speaker 1: of the day, there are there are these sort of 339 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:39,360 Speaker 1: safety net programs that even if people do lose their 340 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:43,520 Speaker 1: jobs or lose some part of discretionary income, they're they're 341 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:46,080 Speaker 1: going to fall back on those There there is at 342 00:18:46,119 --> 00:18:49,240 Speaker 1: the margin an impact. You know, there's more uncompensated care. 343 00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:53,000 Speaker 1: People choose to you know, not fill prescriptions that they 344 00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:55,399 Speaker 1: might otherwise feel if they they were seeing you know, 345 00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 1: they had jobs that they were seeing wage growth. But 346 00:18:57,880 --> 00:19:01,120 Speaker 1: you know, relative to other parts of the economy, when 347 00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 1: when things go badly, healthcare does does generally turn out 348 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:06,720 Speaker 1: to be a lot safer. Max Neeson, thank you so 349 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 1: much for being with us today. Max Neeson is biotech, pharma, 350 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:13,040 Speaker 1: and healthcare columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. Read all his columns, 351 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:15,639 Speaker 1: They're fantastic. You can read them at O. P I 352 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:18,000 Speaker 1: N Go on the Bloomberg or you can read them 353 00:19:18,040 --> 00:19:32,000 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com Slash Opinion. Right now, we are 354 00:19:32,119 --> 00:19:36,400 Speaker 1: talking so much about the shift from active fund management 355 00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: to passive fund management at a time of index outperformance, 356 00:19:41,119 --> 00:19:43,399 Speaker 1: but there really is a more important question, which is 357 00:19:43,880 --> 00:19:46,840 Speaker 1: what's behind this shift? And joining us now Michelle Sites 358 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 1: She's chairman and chief executive officer of Russell Investments, which 359 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:54,679 Speaker 1: oversees two hundred and ninety billion dollars of assets. Michelle 360 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:57,600 Speaker 1: joins us here in our eleven three oh studios or 361 00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:00,320 Speaker 1: interactive broker studios. Michelle, I want to pull this to 362 00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: you because I think it's more important to view this 363 00:20:03,119 --> 00:20:06,280 Speaker 1: shift in light of the drivers than it is the 364 00:20:06,359 --> 00:20:09,160 Speaker 1: shift itself. So what do you think is behind the move? 365 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:13,359 Speaker 1: Right well throughout my career, but also at Russell Investments, 366 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:17,199 Speaker 1: you know, the touchstone always is the clients and whatever 367 00:20:17,320 --> 00:20:20,360 Speaker 1: the client's problems are or where the industry is going 368 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,280 Speaker 1: to go. And so at the moment, the problem is 369 00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: more people are concerned about going broke than they are dying. 370 00:20:27,359 --> 00:20:30,720 Speaker 1: We're living longer, and we have a massive underfunding of 371 00:20:30,920 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 1: pension plans. dB plans are being frozen or shut down 372 00:20:34,880 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 1: going to d C. So you have this massive shift 373 00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:43,080 Speaker 1: from institutions providing for retirements to individuals having to provide 374 00:20:43,359 --> 00:20:46,800 Speaker 1: for their own retirements. That is driving down in a 375 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:51,440 Speaker 1: low return environment, driving down the costs of what we've 376 00:20:51,480 --> 00:20:54,600 Speaker 1: all we all used to do. And so that is 377 00:20:54,640 --> 00:20:59,159 Speaker 1: a byproduct passive to active. Active from passive, etcetera. Is 378 00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: a byproduct of really trying to solve a root problem, 379 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:05,400 Speaker 1: which is the retirement crisis. So some people would turn 380 00:21:05,440 --> 00:21:07,400 Speaker 1: that on its head and say, as people get more 381 00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:10,600 Speaker 1: aware of the income that they get, they become more 382 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:13,160 Speaker 1: aware of the fees they're paying out, and because they're 383 00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:17,040 Speaker 1: not able to necessarily prove outperformance, some of these active 384 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,920 Speaker 1: funds investors are fleeing. Do you think that that narrative 385 00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:24,480 Speaker 1: is accurate? That simply put, Yes, as people get more 386 00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:26,200 Speaker 1: focused on the fact that they've got to make money 387 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:30,040 Speaker 1: on their money, they realize that the human managers aren't 388 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:32,440 Speaker 1: aren't doing the job. Yeah, no, that's that's a very 389 00:21:32,560 --> 00:21:36,399 Speaker 1: accurate depiction as well. Uh, the focus is increasingly on 390 00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 1: the returns that are needed in order for people to 391 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:42,719 Speaker 1: be able to retire well. And so as the focus 392 00:21:42,840 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: goes on that, as returns are lower, and the percent 393 00:21:46,680 --> 00:21:50,439 Speaker 1: of the return that we're taking and fees collectively as 394 00:21:50,520 --> 00:21:53,880 Speaker 1: an as an industry needs to go down. Right, When 395 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,440 Speaker 1: you have double digit returns and the average fee is 396 00:21:56,640 --> 00:21:59,320 Speaker 1: one percent or whatever it might be, that's one thing. 397 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:01,840 Speaker 1: When you have a goal digit returns and it's still 398 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: one percent, that's a very different thing. So what do 399 00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:08,520 Speaker 1: you advise clients as the sort of risk reward factor 400 00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:12,520 Speaker 1: becomes so tenuous where people are less worried about dying 401 00:22:12,600 --> 00:22:15,240 Speaker 1: than they are about just making enough money to survive 402 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:17,600 Speaker 1: for the thirty years after the retirement. How do you 403 00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:21,719 Speaker 1: advise clients this late in the credit cycle, right, Well, well, 404 00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:24,960 Speaker 1: there's a structural change going on in the industry, which 405 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: is this gap uh and the need to be focused 406 00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:31,720 Speaker 1: on outcomes and solutions that are tailored to individuals. And 407 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:35,280 Speaker 1: then there's the amplification of the cyclical, which is what 408 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:38,240 Speaker 1: you're talking about, which which is the this long in 409 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 1: the cycle, there's going to be risk two returns as well, 410 00:22:41,920 --> 00:22:45,720 Speaker 1: So that's an amplification, but the structural problem will still 411 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,600 Speaker 1: be here, and so focus is first and foremost on 412 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:52,720 Speaker 1: the liability that you're trying to cover, and so our 413 00:22:53,040 --> 00:22:57,240 Speaker 1: work with our clients, through intermediaries and through advisors is 414 00:22:57,320 --> 00:23:00,480 Speaker 1: to make sure that people understand the liability, how to 415 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:03,480 Speaker 1: get their cost effectively, and how to make sure that 416 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:07,919 Speaker 1: they measure not a benchmark relative performance. You can't retire 417 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:11,040 Speaker 1: on a benchmark. You have to retire on absolute returns. 418 00:23:11,400 --> 00:23:14,399 Speaker 1: That's the key focus. We're speaking with Michelle Sites, chairman 419 00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:17,800 Speaker 1: and CEO of Russell Investments over seeing two billion dollars 420 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:21,880 Speaker 1: in assets. We were talking about the expected return rate 421 00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:25,520 Speaker 1: that individual investors should target. And I think it's important 422 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:27,879 Speaker 1: when you talk about the mix between stocks and bonds 423 00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:30,440 Speaker 1: and how much risk to take on, what is appropriate 424 00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 1: for individuals to expect over the next ten years? Right, Well, 425 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:38,479 Speaker 1: I love this question because we're all different. And target 426 00:23:38,560 --> 00:23:42,359 Speaker 1: date funds, which were a great invention and have been 427 00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,240 Speaker 1: a great default option, assumed that everyone at the same 428 00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,960 Speaker 1: age as exactly the same and should have the same 429 00:23:48,040 --> 00:23:53,440 Speaker 1: target return. We believe that that's not not effective, not enough. 430 00:23:53,800 --> 00:23:58,919 Speaker 1: It's effective, but not enough. And so what we're espousing 431 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 1: and really put in and implementation mode is personalized retirement 432 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:05,680 Speaker 1: accounts where we take every data point that we can 433 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:09,680 Speaker 1: for you and virtually create many define benefit plans for 434 00:24:10,040 --> 00:24:13,280 Speaker 1: each individual, how how old you are, how long you're 435 00:24:13,320 --> 00:24:15,960 Speaker 1: going to work, what your gender is, what your salary is, 436 00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:19,280 Speaker 1: what your income needs are, and so that it's less 437 00:24:19,320 --> 00:24:23,560 Speaker 1: about a target return, it's more about customizing around your 438 00:24:23,680 --> 00:24:27,359 Speaker 1: unique your unique attributes and what the outcome is that 439 00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:29,680 Speaker 1: you need. How far are we in this shift from 440 00:24:29,960 --> 00:24:35,240 Speaker 1: active to passive? I mean, how far in the transformation? Um? Well, 441 00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:37,879 Speaker 1: first of all, we we do believe that active is 442 00:24:37,920 --> 00:24:41,040 Speaker 1: a critical part of the ecosystem of capital markets. So 443 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:44,560 Speaker 1: we believe in active, UM, we do need to deliver 444 00:24:44,760 --> 00:24:48,280 Speaker 1: active more consistent for a value price point that's uh 445 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:51,960 Speaker 1: in line with the value derived for the clients. So 446 00:24:52,119 --> 00:24:55,120 Speaker 1: agreed on all of that. But but I would say 447 00:24:55,119 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 1: there have been a lot of studies. I don't know 448 00:24:56,840 --> 00:25:00,800 Speaker 1: that fifty fifty is uh the exact right talents. It 449 00:25:00,920 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 1: could be uh that the majority of investing is done 450 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 1: through index and systematic and factor investing UM, but it's not. 451 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:12,359 Speaker 1: It's not ever going to stamp out the value that 452 00:25:12,480 --> 00:25:15,800 Speaker 1: active brings to the equation. Just real quick here, I'm 453 00:25:15,840 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 1: just trying to understand going forward with the next step 454 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:23,200 Speaker 1: is in terms of the evolution of the asset management industry. 455 00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 1: I mean, what's sort of the next thing we should 456 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 1: be talking about. Yeah, so I think absolutely the next shift. 457 00:25:28,160 --> 00:25:31,880 Speaker 1: It's a major pivot. The pivot is from managing money 458 00:25:32,359 --> 00:25:35,920 Speaker 1: primarily for institutions to making sure that we're managing money 459 00:25:36,320 --> 00:25:39,800 Speaker 1: for the end individual so that we can do mass 460 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:43,919 Speaker 1: customization at scale and it's much more tailored. The second 461 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 1: major pivot is to alternative asset classes. Michelle Sides, Chairman 462 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:49,960 Speaker 1: and CEO of Russell Investments, Thank you so much for 463 00:25:50,040 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: being with us. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P 464 00:25:53,920 --> 00:25:56,440 Speaker 1: and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews 465 00:25:56,520 --> 00:26:00,320 Speaker 1: at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paulse Sweeney, 466 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Wohits. 467 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:06,120 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram Wohits. One before the podcast, 468 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:08,760 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio