WEBVTT - What Tucker Carlson's Firing Means For Us All

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It could happen here. It in Today's Harlance, meaning Tucker

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Carlson getting fired, because that's what we're talking about today

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is Today is one of our classic timely reaction episodes

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to the firing of Fox News fascist and popular anti

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>semite Tucker Carlson. Today on the show to chat about

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>all of this, I've got Garrison Davis, James Stout, Mio Wong,

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and Sophie Lichterman. Hi.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Everybody, Wow, how was the last time we got like

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the whole crew together.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>A long time? This is a this is the bulk

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of us. Yeah. Yeah, And so.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Sophie wasn't here for the com episode.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>No, Sophie. Sophie refused to be on for the come episode,

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>threatening to quit.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Sadly.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah uh yeah. But so you know, today is a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of days since we all got the surprising news

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that Tucker has been let go at Fox. This was

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>news that was surprising to Tucker. There's a couple things

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that are funny about the announcement itself, namely that he

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>signed off his last episode saying see you guys next week.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Fox Play in the messaging they've put out was like,

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we both agreed that he needed to leave

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the network, that this is an amicable split. The Brian Kilmead,

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who replaced him the next episode with Fox News tonight,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, Tucker and I are still good friends. He's

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just decided mutually to take a leave from the company.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>This is definitely not true. We'll talk a little bit

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about all of this, but the gist of I think

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of worth talking about, like why this happened.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>As far as we know, there's not, you know, objective

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of confirmation about why specifically he got fired, but

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the broad speculation some articles have like quoted a Fox

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>News insider who says that it was due to something

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>either he said in a recorded but unaired episode of

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the show, or that it was something that was found

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the emails that were revealed during discovery that was

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>profoundly anti semitic. I've heard out, like in one source

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>at least said that it was anti semitic enough that

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>it might have been legally actionable. That's obviously, like what

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the fuck. I would love to know what that specifically means.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But what we do know is that a former producer

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for The Tucker Carlson Show who was a booking for

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>him is currently suing the network both for a hostile

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>work environment. She claims that she was exposed to intense

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>anti semitism while we're working there, and she alleges that

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>she was basically threatened into changing her deposition. So the

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit came alongside her like issuing a correction to her

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>deposition and saying that she had basically lied in order

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like because she was being threatened by people at Fox,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which is like, So there's a lot going on here.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the gist of what we know

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>right now as to like why he got shit canned. Yeah,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the basics.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting too that he it's been like a day

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>now and he has said nothing. There have been multiple

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>people who said that he's not responding to his texts,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>which is extremely funny.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw one.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Report that I don't I don't know how accurate is.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I saw one report that says he found out ten

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>minutes before Fox like released a statement.

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was in contract negotiations, so he was in

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle of presumably getting a Fox to agree to

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>pay him a shitload more money.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and now he has no money, which is very funny.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, he'll still probably get a lot of money somehow.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, i'd be interesting to see if he like pivots

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to something like like o Ann or news Max. I

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>don't know if they have the means to pay him

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>what he would probably see.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, I mean this is this is one of

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 4>the questions kind of following this and how and how

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>this decision is gonna affect, you know, politics going forward,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 4>especially with twenty twenty four two big questions being where

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>is Tucker going to go and who is going to

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>take his place?

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>For the next few weeks.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Fox is probably just going to be doing like a

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 4>rotating selection of hosts until they like make a final decision.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 4>So you know, a lot of people could could end

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 4>up end up with that job. But in terms of

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 4>where he's going, there's there's a few interesting options. Now

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 4>it kind of does come down to who's going to

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>be willing to pay the probably pretty high price, or

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 4>if he's just going to try to stay independent. But

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>I think something like Newsmax isn't isn't out of the question.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 4>I think I think this that this is this is

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 4>just like a guess, but I think there's a decent

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 4>chance that the Daily Wire is going to go after

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 4>him really hard. Yeah, he's already pretty friendly with a

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of the people there. They've been willing to dishout

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money for someone like Stephen Crowder. Now

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 4>Tucker will be undoubtedly more, but also he's going to

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 4>be more of a pull, and that that is something

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 4>that's entirely possible. I mean, The Daily Wire already produces

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>like usually two of the most popular podcasts in the world,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 4>like in the top ten. They already have a lot,

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 4>They have a lot of web traffic. They don't have

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>like cable, but they get a lot of like other

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 4>other ways to to to to spread their work.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>They have a paid streaming service then they yes, yes,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>they also have The Daily Wire Plus.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Yep, they are. I think that they're probably the only

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>people in their right that can offer Tucker both money

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's broadly in line with what Fox could and an

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>audience that's that's sizable, potentially even an audience that's larger.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the things to kind of keep in mind

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is that Tucker was going to get out three and

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a half million viewers a night somewhere around there, which

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>made him the most popular host on cable news, but

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>also is minuscule based on historical number one, minuscule based

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the kind of audiences that like you can get

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on streaming platforms today, which are much larger than cable audiences,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and is minuscule based on like I mean, it was

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>like ten years ago that three and a half million

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>viewers on a night ten fifteen years ago would have

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>been like an unsuccessful show on ANBC, right for some

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>For some perspective, the most successful TV finale of all

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>time was the Mash finale, which had like one hundred

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and five million viewers. Like cable don't or you know,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>television period does not get the kind of viewership that

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it does anymore. And I think when you're looking at

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Tucker he is the main draw for him has to

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be the audience. He's not and he's the heir to

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Campbell or to the Swanson, you know, Dinner of Fortune.

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>He cannot be motivated primarily by the paycheck, right that

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that that there's He's simply like it. Just that can't

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be the reason he's doing it. It has to be

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the fame, you know. And so Daily Wire I think

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is a likely place for him as a result of that.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another thing that's interesting. I thought it is, like

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Mea mentioned that he hasn't said anything yet and he's

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>probably taking advice from his lawyer, Brian Friedman, who incidentally

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>is the same dude who's representing Don Lemon who lost

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>his job on the same day, which which is.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>A good year for that guy, It.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Is a good year for this guy. He like, this

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>is the guy who gets a shit ton of money

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>from networks when people get fired from networks, like he

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 3>has represented like Megan Kelly before. Like, when you hear

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>of a famous person getting let go by network, it's

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>probably this guy who's representing them. I thought it was

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>utterly hilarious that, yeah, both of them retained the same

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>guy on the same day having been fired. But thinking

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>about lawyering up, it made me think about like Topi

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 3>mentioned it that like Carlson defames people, he lies on

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>an almost daily basis. Right, we recently spoke about how

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>he took the statistics of Russian deaths from those Leaks documents,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>that he used the blatantly altered version of those documents

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 3>long after everyone knew they'd been altered. Right, he needs

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>serious legal clout to defend him from the fact that

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 3>he lies. Into fames people every single day, So like

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>going even though he has a sign simple fortune, going

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>out on his own would be costly in the sense

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>of like he would almost have to be permanently defending himself.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think I think this is one of

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the things where, well, I'm it's not clear to me

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 2>what the impact of the Alex Johones trial has been,

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>but this is one of those things where I think

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>the dominion people actually just nailing Fox to the wall

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a sort of big factor here

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>because it makes it seem easier and more plausible on

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 2>things that like lawyers are willing to risk getting in

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 2>fights about for actually going after these people, for just

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>like defending people. And so yeah, it'll be it'll be

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see, like how how long Tucker can last

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 2>on his own before he gets into a giant court

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>battle with someone, and whether he is I don't know,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>attempts to be slightly more careful.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like I yeah, exactly, I didn't think if he's

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>if he goes to YouTube or don't think he's not

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be spending his his frozen dinner fortune on

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>legal fees. I don't think. So he just and he

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>can't do what he does without spouting shit, right, Like

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>his right thing is just straight up lying and doing

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 3>this sort of credulous fool routine that he does, which

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 3>always results in these ridiculous conclusions that he comes to.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So like, I don't know with that, maybe the daily

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>why I can sudstain that I don't really have a

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>good sense of sort of their clout if people aren't familiar.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Should we summarize the Dominion case? I know you've spoken

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>about it on Fast.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I did. I mean, you can listen to the

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>two parter I did with Katie and Cody on the

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Dominion lawsuit where we basically just go over the entire

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>document that Dominion prepared for that. But the gist of

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it is that Tucker knowingly and knowingly We know that

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he knew because the discovery process revealed a bunch of

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>his text messages and emails where he talked about knowing

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that the election fraud conspiracy theory was bullshit and he

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>propagated it and attacks against Dominion and another company, smart Matic,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep his audience on board, which is

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a criminal you know, defamation or not criminal, but at

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>least like legally actionable you can sue as as Dominion

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>did and one like eight hundred million bucks. So and

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's really worth that. That is kind

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of pertinent when we're talking about who's going to take

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>him next, because like, obviously the Daily Wire would want

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Tucker except for the fact that he

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>could cost them another eight hundred million dollars, which has

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to be has to be part of the calculus of

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>any company looking at taking him on. And I think

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is something none of us, nobody really knows what's going

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen with this, but I think there is a

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>good chance he is permanently marginalized in terms of audience

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just because of how much like eight hundred million dollars

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is not enough to sink Fox on its own, but

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it is enough to make anybody looking at bringing Tucker

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>on board the second guest himself.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I SA also numbers that were I think I

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>think they were saying he was bringing in the highest

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 2>like amount of revenue of any like like him will

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>do his anchor, but was like it was like seventy

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 2>eight million dollars a year and he lost like so

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>he lost ten years of his income.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He basically lost everything he'd made Fox during the time

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when he was the number one Kettle news house.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that has to be that has to be

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a huge part of the coculus of like, Okay, you

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>know these are these people like as as as as

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 2>much as the right is ideological, it is also capitalist

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>and the risk award on that is terrifying.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I like, especially when it comes to the

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Daily Wire, a cost like that would just probably make

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 4>their entire company fold.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Because they don't have Murdock behind them.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 4>They're not they're they're not that big of a company.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>They just have a disproportionate amount of influence because their

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 4>hosts are really good at like marketing and social media manipulation.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I ad revenue now would be a

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 3>great time for us to pivot to And there's some

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 3>go to coins with Reagan.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah yeah. You can hear the ads for the

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>new podcasts that are your colleague Tucker Carlson's gonna be doing.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's way heyman, Don Lemon just.

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Have yeah, him and Don Lemon, we we're calling it.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there's there's a good there's a good

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a good joke with their two names somewhere. I

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't figured it out yet though, So you do that

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for yourselves, audience. Ah, what a good what a good

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>time that we're talking about here. This is just just

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a just a great day, great week. Uh So, yeah,

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at you know, I think kind of when

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about what's possible here and Daily Wirey agree

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the most likely thing. If you look

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at what leaked recently during their drama with Stephen Crowder.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>The contract that we're offering Crowder was somewhere around thirty

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, which from everything people have said, is a

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>big deal for them. That's one of the biggest bigger

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>offerings as they're capable of doing. Uh. That is, you know,

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the most Tucker is realistically going to be able

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to get. But also, uh, one of the things that

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of is noteworthy about the contract they were offering

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Crowder is that it included clauses where like crowders take

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>home could be reduced significantly if he got kicked off

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of platforms and fucking Tucker Carlson is not going to

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>keep it a YouTube count.

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean it is. It is interesting in that sense

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 4>of like they were they all of his content was

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>able to be kept up when he was under Fox,

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Like on YouTube you can find all of his segments,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 4>and it'd be interesting to see how the content moderation

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 4>differs if like he starts his own channel and how

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and how comparatively what things would be would be counted

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 4>as like community guideline strikes. But yeah, I mean just

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 4>I think I think, like last week Matt Walsh's show

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 4>got demonetized on YouTube, which if his contract is anything

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 4>like the Crowtters, means that he is going to be

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 4>suffering up like a personal financial hit.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's they're taking probably you know, in the millions

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's losing.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's something I think this is an interesting

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>thing that's been happening in the last maybe like six months,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>has been there's there's been sort of increasing tension between

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of the far right that's basically sees control the

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party and like the money, and they keep running

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>into these issues where in order to keep their base going,

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>they need to say stuff that like their sort of

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>like corporate backers are like this is either losing us

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>money or is so far out there that like it's

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's it's either directly losing US money from lawsuits,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>or it's losing US elections, or it's losing us like business.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm never.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Gonna claim that like Murdoch is not the far right,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 2>because he is is. But it's interesting that we've gotten

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to a point where people like Murdoch are getting more

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>gun shy about what they can put on air because

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>it's finally like the money is finally starting to see

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>actual consequences, and they're starting to pull back from the

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>stuff a little bit.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, see, that's part of what I'm questioning is I'm

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that that is something that's entering his calculus more

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>now since the settlement, but it's at least the early

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>reporting suggests that's not really why, or at least not

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>most of the reason why Tucker got shit canned. It's

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of shit like stuff that is not revealed

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>yet in the deposition that he was saying an email,

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the things came out that woman

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>who is accusing him of creating a sexist and anti

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>semitic work environment, is that he like when she got hired,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he plastered swimsuit photos of Nancy Pelosi over her office

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we've heard, like the shit that, Like,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's possible, uh that what actually got Murdoch

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to make the call to can him is that he

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch himself found out through discovery that he was saying

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>shit in emails that would sink the company, Like if

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he's saying full on Nazi shit. Yeah, and there's there's

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>documentation of that, which I don't think is unlikely on it,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like yeah.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 2>There's no there's there's there's no there's no limit at.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 3>That point, like yeah, no, the like clearly that ship

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>aligns with his views, and he's made a concerted effort

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to mainstream more and more outright fascist and genesis white

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 3>supremacist talking points every year that he's had that show.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>So it would not especially when they got his text messages,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Like he might be smart enough not to like maybe

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>use his work email. But I think that the fact

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 3>that there were some things in his text messages and yeah,

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that wouldn't surprise me. It's either that or he said

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 3>something personal about one of the Murdochs and they.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Well he did. He did talk shit about Fox executives,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which some people have suggested as like part of why

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they made the decision. It can him that he actually

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just pissed off the moneymen too, and this was kind

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of an excuse to take more action. Again, like it's

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of unclear exactly what happened. I think

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it's probably worth talking about in the last portion of

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this what impact, because it is likely that whatever happens,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>He's he's going to have less reach, and at least

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>less reach in like a practical way. Because if Tucker

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>starts a podcast, even if the podcast has kind of

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>more you know, through Daily Wire or whatever, even if

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got on paper more listeners than Fox, I think

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>there's something about cable news where you're reaching an audience

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's different with the ideas that he was He's

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>when he was on Fox, he was hitting people who

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>would never have encountered some of this like fascist shit,

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>this great replacement stuff, Whereas if he's saying the same

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>thing on a Daily Wire podcast, he's probably talking more

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to people who are already pilled, so to speak. So

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a good chance that overall this

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of tanks his ability to.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Actually like influence culture in a meaningful way.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Radicalize boomers, like everyone listening can probably think of a

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 3>person who they know or is in their sort of

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 3>greatest circle of people who their friends know, who is

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 3>an older person who is very much offline and has

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>encountered these great replacement ideas through Tucker Carlson and become

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a significantly worse person because of Tucker Carlson's program.

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and you can see how all of

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>the Daily Wire guys like like Walsh and Mike, Michael

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 4>Noles and even someone like Andy No, they suck up

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 4>to Carlson so much and have been for the past

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 4>few years because they realize that that actually gives the

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 4>cultural access to be on his show on that platform

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 4>in a way that they're much.

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 3>More like Peterson too.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Pete Peterson, Sure, I think pet Peterson's broken into the mainstream.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I think a bit more.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 4>But like all of these other guys like Andy No, Walsh, Knowles,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 4>they're all heavily like Internet people, and they influence like

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Internet shit, and sometimes that can start crossing over. But

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 4>in general, the cable news platform kind of reiffies things

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 4>into broader culture in a way that someone like Walsh

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 4>just doesn't because he's like most people don't know who Walshes.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 4>But most people do know who Tucker is, and.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That is my dad is lifelong Republican voter. And when

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I talked to him complaining about shit Matt Walsh is doing,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Like the first thing he said was like, I've never

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>heard of this guy. Yeah, And it's like, yeah, because

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a fucking internet weirdo. And my dad doesn't

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he knows Ben Shapiro because Ben breaks through

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to the mainstream, but he knows Been Shapiro from like

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>catching clips of him randomly being shared on Facebook by

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 1>other people in his age group, as opposed to like

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>seeking this shit out. And that's kind of the power

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of Tucker. And I think one of the things you've

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>seen Gear that you were kind of talking at, which

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that is maybe most hopeful to me,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is how scared people like Andy know Glenn Greenwald flip

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the fuck out when this gun announced because they see

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a major threat to their reach into their

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>earning potential. Yeah, Tucker can't host them anymore. That's potentially

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>disastrous for them. And the fact that that's happening right

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>as we're gearing up for twenty twenty four is something

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful about at least I'll say.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, it is a massive like rejection of that platform

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>to yeah, people like that like this type of like

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 4>rhetoric that Tucker is doing. Having this be like publicly

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 4>rejected in this way will make all these people that

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 4>are more on the fringes probably make it harder for

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 4>them to breakthrough in little ways like they used to

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 4>try to by being on Tucker is a show.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of reifying things into the broader culture by these products.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>In Okay, So there's one other thing that I we've

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 2>could have been touching on it, but I think it's

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 2>really interesting is that Tucker. Tucker basically has a sort

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of media ecosystem that revolves around him. And you know,

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a very established pathway for how you can become

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a sort of like a successful and profitable right wing

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 2>grifter which goes through you know, you sort of go

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 2>viral on Twitter, you go viral on TikTok, and then

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>you go on to Tucker and you know and like

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>like people like lives at TikTok, right, Like, I think

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I think there's there's a certific kind of media campaign

0:22:55.520 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 2>that even with whoever, like whatever, absolute asshole that like

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Fox puts in that slot after Tucker's you know, when

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>whatever they sort of figure out who that's going to be, Like,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 2>there's still I think going to be sort of a

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>hole there, Yeah, where I think it gets harder to

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>run the kinds the very the very very specific kinds

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of campaigns like little TikTok, like the sort of mods

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>for liberty shit that that's been just making the country

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 2>unfathomably awful for the past few years.

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 3>With like that, I've been kind of working on writing

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 3>something scripted about this trans panic that happened in a

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>town very near me in Santi right, which like was

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 3>an extremely clear like like that was the goal, right,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 3>like like do to speech, go go viral, go on

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 3>Tucker create, you know, then go on the speaking circuit,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 3>make money. Like to me, at least, it seems very

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 3>clear that that was that was the goal.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I yeah, he's he's a weapons system that they

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>they have learned, like has become kind of the center

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of right wing strategy really is like get on Tucker

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>car as you know, moral panic culture warship yep.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and and you know and like obviously like other

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Fox shows do this stuff. It doesn't work anywhere anywhere

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 2>near as well.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 4>And now I think it's the person the person that

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 4>gets the closest is probably Laura Ingram, but I think

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 4>she she kind of suffers from the glass ceiling problems.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she actually cannot be.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, but.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm brad Masogy.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I stand with Laura.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Ingram rub Big specifically viewing Tucker as this thing that

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 4>was like a targeted weapon. I think it's a really

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 4>good way to look at this, and specifically now that

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 4>that weapon no longer can like actually aim correctly because

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 4>or at.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Least may not be able to write. I mean, maybe

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll come back and we're wrong, but I I am optimistic.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think all say, yeah, it.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Puts a spanner in the works of the hate machine

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 3>that that he built and the folks built, and that's

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 3>a good thing.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 4>But Mia, you were saying before I rudely interrupted you.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>U asshole.

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You cannot remember what what I was gonna say.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about how how how other other hosts kind

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 4>of do the thing but not.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>The Yeah, well, I mean part of it also is

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 2>just you know, part of the power of Tucker is

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>just the time slot that he's in, Yeah, which is

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you know that that that's the one where like all

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of the people who've gotten off of work, who are

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 2>like turning on the television at night get to But yeah,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 2>like Tuck Tucker was I think was really in the

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 2>entirety of the sort of TV and media sphere, was

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>uniquely good at that stuff. And no one else, no

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>one else can do it like that. And you know,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 2>like the like if the Fox people will create someone else,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>but until they fill that spot, A, there's a gap,

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>and B it really remains to be seen whether seeing

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>whether they're going to sort of pick someone who is

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 2>as embedded in like that part of the sort of

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>fascists right as Tucker is, or if they're going to

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>find someone who's like, i mean still really really right

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and sucks but isn't like having ye on.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and it's I mean, I am kind of

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>curious slash worried about who's going to follow him into

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that time slot. Folks, real old heads will know. Tucker

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>got his job after Bill O'Reilly, who was the Fox

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>News fascist of my childhood, got shit canned for sexual

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>harassment on an industrial scale. Uh, And so that's that's

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>why Tucker is in and Obviously as bad as Bill was,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Tucker was worse, and maybe the person who follows Tucker

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>will be worse than Tucker. I do have trouble imagining

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what that could be, because my god, he really he went.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>He went right up to the edge of putting on

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a fucking swastik arm band.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say about the Bill o. Riley people,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>people have been like, oh, like, Tucker's going to disappear

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 2>in the way Bill O'reiley did.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's I think he's going to be

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 2>a bigger like, assuming he winds up somewhere, I think

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 2>he'll still be a bigger influence than like Bill was

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>after he got fired.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean Bill was also a lot older, right.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, No, I think that is that is an

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 4>accurate assessment.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 4>Well excited, excited to get my new Rumble subscriptions so

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 4>we can watch Oh yeah, yeah.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>No, it's going to be uh glorious to see him

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>finally pair up with Tim Poole, the two the two

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of them carrying AK forty seven, so doing field journalism

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Tucker casting for those are not familiar, carried

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a gun when reporting in a rock, which for many

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>reasons it's a fucking terrible idea, including putting f one

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 3>else doing your job changer.

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But it is really funny, it's very well. I will,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I will say that it is funny.

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>I I genuine like part of me doesn't, but part

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>of me does. Hope he decides to do a thing

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>where he's like, I'm gonna go do field journalism in

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine and just seemed so, I will.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's fucking marked by God, damn like happens.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, you know what happens. He he imbeds

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 4>with the aesof battalion. Yeah, and they all get taken

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 4>out God willing kindness. But I think one thing I

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 4>was deerfinally thinking about, like the past few years, less

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 4>less so that this this like past year specifically, but

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 4>for a while it was a quite frightening prospect to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 4>think about what if Tucker was going to run for president?

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think he is. He is not going

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to do that in twenty twenty four. Absolutely, that's that's

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 4>that's not happening. But I mean it's still possible he

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 4>could in the future. Twenty twenty eight is likely. Uh,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 4>if if he wants, But I think the loss of

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 4>this position at this point in time will probably affect

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 4>that decision because it's something he's certainly been thinking about.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Considering he's one of the most influential conservative people on

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 4>the Yeah, like on the planet.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 3>He determines policy or did it if he did?

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and and and now it's interesting with him with

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 4>him leaving his job in this way, it'll be interesting

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 4>to see if how that, how that affects any kind

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 4>of potential of prospect for him for him, yeah, running

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 4>for office.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>My big question around all that, and this is kind

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of unanswerable, is like, does Tucker have any appeal outside

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of the right wing base? Three and a half million

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>cable news viewers is not evidence of the kind of

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>broad based appeal that can drawn independence and win an election.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And Tucker has never you know, the one the closest

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>thing he's been to a political candidate is when he

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>went up against John Stewart and that didn't go great

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. No, he and he moved aft after John

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Stewart kind of destroyed his crossfire career. He moved to

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a situation where he was he had unprecedented control over

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>his show, It was almost entirely recorded and stuff out

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of a studio in Maine that he set up. He

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>built everything he was doing around being able to totally

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>control how he was seen, what was shown, what of

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>his was like put out to the public. And you

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>simply can't do that as a presidential candidate. You have

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to accept and be able to make work for you

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that every eye is on you and you

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do not have total control over what about you is

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>put out and published, among other things. You're going to

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be repeatedly questioned in situations where you can't edit the

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>footage or stop things from going out afterwards. And I

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Tucker has what it takes to succeed

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of environment.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, enchilade, he fucking never succeeds again and we never

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>have to hear about him.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we should shout out this lady, kat Ab Gazzale,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 3>that the person who had to watch Tucker Carlson for

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>years and years and years and then explain it to people.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 3>She works at Media Matters for America, but she is

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 3>taking the biggest victory lap that anyone has ever taken

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>right now, and it's kind of glorious to.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Watch doing the lord's work. Truly.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, taking on trauma for all her stuff was quite good.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Like she she did a good job explaining how toxic

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Tucker was to people who might not have been aware

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Anyway, in conclusion, Tucker, we would love to have

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you on at cool Zone totally welcome to come host

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>your own podcast. We'll bring you on to It could

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>happen here. You can do a bastard's guest appearance. He can, Yeah,

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>right into the jungle.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Directly.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Come on, come on, Tucker, We'd love to have you anyway.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that's a sode. It could

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>happen here as a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 4>You can find sources for It could Happen here, updated

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 4>monthly at cool zone meedia dot com slash sources. Thanks

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 4>for listening.