WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM: The Quantum Shift in Biomedical Discovery

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, it's Robert and Joe here. Today we've got

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit different to share with you. It's

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a new season of the Smart Talks with IBM podcast series.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>This season on Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Gladwell is back,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and this time he's taking the show on the road.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm is stepping outside the studio to explore how IBM

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>clients are using artificial intelligence to solve real world challenges

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>and transform the way they do business.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>From accelerating scientific breakthroughs to reimagining education. It's a fresh

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>look at innovation in action, where big ideas meet cutting

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>edge solutions.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>You'll hear from industry leaders, creative thinkers, and of course

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Gladwell himself as he guides you through each story.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>New episodes of Smart Talks with IBM drop every month

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Learn more at IBM dot com slash smart Talks.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a paid advertisement from IBM.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>H'm Malcolm Gladwell and you're listening to Smart Talk with IBM.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>When doctor Laura Jahi began treating epilepsy patients in the

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands, she noticed something unsettling. Different surgeons could

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>look at the exact same case and recommend completely different treatments.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>One surgeon might remove one part of the brain, another

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>a different part, and a third might not operate at all.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Doctor j Hi believed there had to be a better way,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>one grounded in data. That conviction set her on a

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 3>path that would lead her to become Chief Research Information

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Officer at Cleveland Clinic and the executive program lead for

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the Discovery Accelerator. The Discovery Accelerator is a ten year

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 3>partnership between Cleveland Clinic and IBM where researchers are using

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>AI and quantum computing to make incredible discoveries in healthcare

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and life sciences. I sat down with doctor j Hi

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>to explore what's happening now, what's possible with quantum computing,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and where this next era of biomedical discovery is headed.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Epilepsy was your kind of specialty within neurology, correct? Yes,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 3>what led you to that?

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I was always fascinated by the brain. You know, it's

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the part of our body that lives still to this

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 4>day the most to be discovered. So I was always

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 4>intrigued by areas that leave more for discovery. And epilepsy

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 4>was my pragmatic side, wanting to choose a subspecialty where

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 4>the problem can be fixed. In epilepsy, there are many

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 4>medications that are very effective, and there's a brain surgery

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>that we can do to stop seizures when medicines don't work.

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 5>That attracted me.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, compared to other areas in neurology, like stroke,

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 4>for example, or dementia, where usually the damage is more definite.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to be able to tell my patients that

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 4>you have a big problem, but here's what I can.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 5>Do to fix it, and epilepsy offered me that.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 3>But what would There must have been interesting and intriguing

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 3>unsolved problems in neurology.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh, it's the whole brain, isn't it. Before

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 4>starting to deal with artificial intelligence and research. Right in

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 4>the neurology, I'm dealing with real intelligence, the human brain

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 4>and how it works and how we think and how

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 4>we make decisions, and how it.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Can grow and evolve.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And so there is many untaped questions in neurology.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 5>And that's part of the fascination in it.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 4>In epilepsy in particular, it's an electrical disease in the brain.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 4>It's actually one of the conditions in a neurology that's

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>a perfect alignment of all of the scientific disciplines. It's

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 4>biology and physics and chemistry all working together to make

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 4>us who we truly are. Right, So every other discipline,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 4>if you think of computing, for example, it's purely electricity.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Or if we do drug development or drug discovery, that's

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>mostly chemistry experiments in the lab, that's mostly biology. But

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 4>the human brain is all of those put together. The

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>cells in our brain secret these chemical substances that diffuse

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>everywhere and hook up where they need to to trigger

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 4>certain circuits and then trigger some effects afterwards. So it

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>was just an elegant science that has big impacts.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 3>We're shortly going to get there and talk about you've

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>taken on this kind of very techn aology focused roller

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland Clinic. I'm curious about if we go back to

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>when you were just starting out at Cleveland Clinic. Yeah,

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>how much were you thinking about this sort of technology piece,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>about what technology could do for your specialty? About was

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>that on your mind or is this something you've come

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>to more recently.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's been a journey, right, and when I started

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 4>training as a clinician, my priority was just to learn

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>how to better care for my patients and how to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 4>be a better physician.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, And then I.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Realized that clinical practice provides an immediate reward. I'm interacting

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>with a human being and helping them in the moment,

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 4>so there is that immediate reward that comes with that.

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 5>But that wasn't enough. I wanted something more.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>So then I learned biomedical research practices, and research offered

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 4>me this path towards a future. You know, the reward

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 4>there is more long term. I'm studying discovering things that

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 4>could help many people in the future, even though I

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>will never get to see them or meet them, or

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, have that immediate satisfaction. So that shifted me

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>from being a pure clinician to being a clinician scientist.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 4>And as that journey progressed, it became very clear, as

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 4>medicine evolved over the past twenty years, that we cannot

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 4>do any good biomedical research without understanding data and technology.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, the balance is shifting from most of the

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 4>research is happening we call it, you know, on the

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 4>wet bench, with actual experiments, physical experiments, to a place

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 4>where most of the work is happening through compute and

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 4>simulations and data. So I became much more involved for

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 4>my personal research in building big data models and learning

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 4>about AI and you know, learning about technology in general.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 4>And then as that journey progressed, I was fortunate enough

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>to be a role for Cleveland Clinic where my job

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>is to bring that technology and bridge it to research

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>for all researchers across our healthcare system.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 3>When you were talking about how in your own research

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 3>you were moving in that direction, what was your own

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>research focused on. What were you looking at?

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 4>I was looking at brain surgery for epilepsy. It's an

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 4>intervention that's been around for decades actually, but when I

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 4>started practice, I was shocked by, you know, the practice

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 4>that we had were making decisions around surgery, like, you know,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>what patients should get it versus not, how likely is

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 4>it to work? What part of the brain should we remove.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 4>All of those visions were at the time and the

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 4>early two thousands driven by clinical opinions. Right, you know,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>you have an experienced surgeon, they decide to do this.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Somebody else might decide to do something completely different. And

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 4>I didn't feel that that was the right way to

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 4>practice medicine.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 5>You know that we.

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Needed to be more evidence based and data driven. So

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I went in the business in research of building models,

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 4>predictive models that can ingest data from all of the

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 4>tests that we would do about on these patients before to.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Figure out surgery.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 4>So I learned how to analyze all types of data

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>from genetic data and individuals to pictures to electrical recordings

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 4>and then combine those into these prediction models.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 3>So basically you're looking at you're taking large numbers of

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>surgeries for epilepsy, and you're seeing what kind of connection

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 3>there is between the success of the surgical intervention and

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the underlying presentation of.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 5>The patient exactly.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>So I would be telling the patient what is your

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>specific chance of becoming seizure free with surgery instead of

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>giving them statistics about you know, like you know, in general,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 4>how well is that going to be effective? So that

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>piece of individualizing medicine.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>So Cleveland Clinic decides to create a post called Chief

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Information Officers.

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 4>If research information we have research, yes, always, chief information

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 4>officer runs it.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, chief research information.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so it for research.

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>This is parenthetically a huge job. Yes, So you apply

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 3>for this, do you know that you're going to be

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 3>thinking and talking and dealing with quantum.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 4>I started in January twenty twenty, and like every leader

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 4>who's put in a position, remember everybody tells you should

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 4>read that the first ninety days, Oh great, how to plan.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>So I was reading that and doing my listening tours

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 4>to understand, and then COVID hits and I had a

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 4>call from our executive suite about all, there is this

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>thing called COVID that's coming. We will start testing people

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 4>in four days. People will want to do research with COVID.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Make it happen.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 4>So it was there's no chapter in the book about that,

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, So so I then it really it was

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 4>like a pressure cooker, you know.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 5>Test with Yeah, I have to create.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 4>This access to data, structured you know, resources so that

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 4>we can learn from it as quickly as possible. And

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>so that was a catalyst. So then comes twenty twenty one.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 4>That was the year of our centennial one hundred years

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 4>for Cleveland Clinic. So everybody, not just me, we were

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 4>in a mindset where we were thinking long, long term,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, like what made us specialized till now? How

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 4>do we stay relevant? Where is the world going to

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>be ten years from now? And what should I get

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 4>going right this moment to shape that and be ready

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 4>for it. And that's when quantum came in my mind,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 4>where unless we invest in it now twenty twenty one,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 4>we will not be ready for this next computer revolution

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 4>that's coming after AI.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Everybody in the world right now is doing nothing but

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about AI, and you are already thinking one step

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 3>beyond the quantum? What's different about the opportunity that quantum

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 3>creates for American research than AI.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Biology?

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 4>The human body, by definition, is much closer to fundamentals

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of quantum, you know, to quantum mechanics and quantum physics

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 4>than it is to AI. AI is a classical computing

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 4>approach that in essence reduces every piece of data to

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 4>a black or white binary categorization of a.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 5>One or a zero.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 4>At its core nature around us, the human body, there

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 4>is nothing categorical about it. It's that whole, you know,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 4>continuum of colors of life. Quantum its principles are that,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, so there's all the scientific principles about quantum

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 4>physics and superposition and in tanker, all of these complex

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 4>things that people have a hard time with. But for

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 4>in essence, it really is much more aligned, Like if

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 4>I want to draw a colored picture, I will not

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 4>go and pick up charcoal. You know, It's much easier

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 4>for me to draw it if I had a colored

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 4>palette with me.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 5>And quantum offers that.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 4>There is plenty of situations in medicine that are just intractable,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, meaning it's not an issue just of it

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>being AI being slow, or it doesn't have enough data,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 4>or if only we got more GPUs, you know, we

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.479
<v Speaker 4>can answer those questions. There are some problems in medicine

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 4>that are fundamentally such that even if you give me

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 4>all the GPUs in the world, there is no way

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 4>that AI can model accurately how these molecules in the

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 4>body are interacting among each other, or how comp electrons

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 4>are moving within the mitochondria. These are the engines within

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 4>our cells. There's these fundamental things in biology that AI

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 4>and classical computers are just not built to be able

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 4>to simulate.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>So you must go to dinner parties, doctor j. High.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>People must ask you what is quantum computing? What do

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 3>you tell them?

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, although I often, you know, we talk about other

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 4>things at dinner parties.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Eventually it comes down to you. If I was at

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that dinner party with you, I would ask you what

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 3>is quantic computer?

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 6>I would say, depends on how much time we have

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 6>at the party to explain it. The short answer would be,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 6>it's a completely different way of working with computers than

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 6>what we're used to right now. You can imagine that

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 6>AI as being like a car that you take to

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 6>go from one place to another. No matter how fast

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 6>that Ferrari can get and how much fewre you put

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 6>in it, it's never going to be a fighter jet.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 5>It's never going to be a plane.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 4>AI is the car, the plane is quant They are

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 4>ways to get from point A to point B, but

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 4>they work very differently, and we always use them in together.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 4>If I'm flying from Shaker Heights to Yorktown Heights, I

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 4>drive to the airport, get on the plane, then take

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 4>an uber to get to Yorktown Heights. In research, we

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 4>will do the same. We do some piece of it

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 4>in AI, some piece of it in Quantum, and then

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>go back and forth.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Back in twenty twenty one, Cleveland Clinic and IBM announced

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 3>it they were starting something called the Discovery Accelerator. What

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>is that?

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 4>It's an initiative, a program, a partnership really that is

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 4>designed to a bridge at advanced computational tools and technology

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 4>through the leader in that space, IBM with biomedical science

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>and research and life sciences problems, and that is a

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland clinic. We called it a discovery accelerator because that

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 4>was our goal. You know, we were both on both

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 4>sides challenged to the fact that discovery in medicine was

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 4>just taking too long. The classical example that really brought

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>it to life to us then was drug discovery that

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>it took over a decade and it still does actually

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 4>over a decade. From the moment that there is a

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 4>compound that someone in a lab biomedical lab thinks it

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 4>would be effective to treat a certain disease, it takes

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 4>about ten to thirteen years from that moment to when

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 4>that drug is on a shelf for a patient to

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 4>get tool from a pharmacy. And that was just too

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 4>much of a gap to allow when we have so

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 4>many health conditions that we needed to address, and a

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 4>big part of that gap could be computationally solved. Better

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 4>simulation of compounds, designing drug trails that are more efficient,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, that would finish faster. So that was the

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 4>motivation to bring computational tools and technology closer to biomedical researchers.

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland Click and IBM team up, and I'm assuming the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 3>IBM Quantum guys and other people descend on Cleveland and

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you have your first meeting with them. Are they telling

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>you things you would never thought of? Or I mean,

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm just curious about what's the difference between what you

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 3>thought was the potential was and what you discovered the

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 3>potential was.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 4>That is an excellent question if I had to prioritize.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Is one lesson that I learned over the past few

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 4>years of doing this. It is that you can never

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>know what your you know where your brain is going

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 4>to go and discovery until you talk. You know, you

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 4>have to open it up and really listen to try

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 4>to learn what the other people are saying.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 5>It's it went both ways.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you give you an example.

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 4>So, okay, we built the quantum right, so it took

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 4>it took like eight months to get this machine put together, and.

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 5>We put it in our cafeteria. That's the whole other story.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Where you put the quantum machine computer in your cafeteria? Yes, yes, yes,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 3>Can you see it when you're eating lunch?

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have people eating lunch around it all the time.

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 4>We wanted to have a machine that people can see.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Otherwise it the program wouldn't launch properly.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 5>So I needed to have it physics.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 4>So we had to look at retrofitted in existing space,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>and the cafeteria space worked out.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 5>It was far enough from the street, you know, there was.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>No vibration that it was a double floor, you know,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>so the ceiling was high enough. It just like technically

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 4>fit all of those requirements. And it was either there

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 4>or we put it in our data center, which is

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 4>a building and like another city close to Cleveland, and

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 4>we picked the cafeteria.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now why I know this is sort of this

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 3>is kind of hilarious, but there's a serious point I

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I want to touch on, which is why do you

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 3>need it on premises?

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 4>On the premises Cleveland Clinic research, We needed to change

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>how we think about research and shift the mindset of

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 4>all of our researchers and all.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Of our researchers.

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about three thousand individuals who are one hundred

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 4>percent doing biomedical research and Cleveland Clinic two one hundred

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and thirty labs individual pis. So that's the scale that

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about that we had to create an impact

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>on so.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Having it having it be there was.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 4>As much for inspiration and to trigger our motivation to

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 4>change as it was a you know, a practical solution, say,

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 4>because we had the space and the connections and all of.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>That I saw in it. IBM headquarters. They're beautiful.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Their works of art they are They're gorgeous, and the

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 4>one that we have is the most gorgeous one of all.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 5>This is not me, you know, the mom bias talking

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>It is you know, they got an award, the Red

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Dot Award for Design went to IBM and Cleveland Clinic

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 4>for our quantum and the quantum that IBM built for

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 4>RPI a couple of years after hours. They modeled it

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>after hours, not after the you know the ones from before.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Just just so people know, we're talking about basically a

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>small garage.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 4>Size eleven foot by eleven eleven feet eleven feet.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, the cube small.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's a it's a glass cube, and the glass

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 4>comes all the way from Italy. It's the same glass

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 4>that protects the Crown jewels and you know the Mona

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Lisa and all that. So so there's a glass all

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 4>around and then there is the tube that you see,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 4>the stainless tube that's shiny, you know, and clean, but

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 4>the technologies all inside of it, you know, the the

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 4>leer and then the processor and the bottom.

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 5>And it's just a fascinating thing to watch. And it hums.

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 5>It makes the sound so even it sounds alive.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 3>You have a great deal of affection for your computer,

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and we.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Love our machine.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to something you said before,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>which is when you had your initial conversations with IBM,

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>both sides learned things that they hadn't previously thought of.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Give me an example of something that either side hadn't

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 3>realized could be done with this new technology.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I mean on the equivalent clinic side, we thought

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 4>that what quantum should be good for is that it

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>would be a faster computer, right, so that we have

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 4>these big data sets that are requiring much more compute

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 4>power and you know GPUs than what we have and

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 4>we should.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 5>Just run them on the quantum.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 4>And what we came to realize is that quantum actually

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 4>does not do well with these large data sets. What

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 4>it does well with our smaller, better defined data sets,

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 4>but ones where simulation is more important, you know, we

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 4>have to run them through multiple models, you multiple simulations

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 4>of how they interact. As an example, one of the

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 4>very first projects we threw at Quantum was wanting to

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 4>predict complications cardiac complications from general surgery using electronic health

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 4>record data. So data from our electronic health records are

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 4>by definition these really big data sets. You have in

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 4>them every single thing that you know about the patient

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 4>that you've collected. And we thought that Quantum would help

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 4>us build models, better models with this data. And it

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 4>failed miserably. It wasn't good, you know, at doing that thing.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 3>And why didn't it? Like that problem because it's too

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 3>it's too bigger than wieldy.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, because the hardware isn't tready right, So the hardware

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>with Quantum, that issue was back then. You know, now

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 4>we've upgraded our processor. But still Quantum now is limited

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 4>by noise and by its ability to correct for errors

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 4>when it's doing computation. And the more data that you

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 4>throw at it that you require it, you know, to

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 4>put in its system, you know, to model interactions, the

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 4>more errors it's likely to make. So then the harder

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 4>it is for it to get to an answer.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 5>That you can trust.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, we made a lot of progress sense, which I'm

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>sure we'll get to.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 5>I hope we'll get.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 4>To with some recent breakthroughs that we made in that

0:24:54.440 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 4>space with modeling large compounds and interactions. But the way

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 4>that got us to where we are now where we

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 4>could model large interactions, it took us figuring out that

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 4>we shouldn't be doing everything on quantum.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 3>So give me an example of a problem that quantum

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>is ideally suited for that the quantum really.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Likes in drug discovery, for examine chemistry, it likes chemistry

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot because in chemistry what it has to What

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 4>we wanted to model is how a drug that we

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 4>put in our body is going to interact with We

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>say the protein you know, the target, the ligand that

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 4>it needs to bind too, like you know, the drug

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>is the key and it needs to fit in a

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 4>lock in certain parts of the body to open it,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 4>get in, do it stay. And there are many keys,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 4>many potential compounds that we could test for many parts

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 4>of our body. We don't really know how they're going

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 4>to interact. Tradition, what we do is we have to

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 4>build all the keys. We have to manufacture all these

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 4>compounds and then do actual trial clinical trials, put them

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 4>in people, put them in animals and see what happens.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 3>See which one is best?

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 4>See yeah, which like two fit best together. So we

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 4>use AI to try to help us with that. But

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>AI can only model what it had learned, right, So

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 4>for rare diseases conditions that there isn't enough information out

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 4>there on what the you know, the locks look like,

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.239
<v Speaker 4>it's really hard to then model it with AI and

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 4>get an accurate prediction of whether there's a fit or not.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Quantum does not rely on the previous data for its modeling.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Quantum does.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 4>It's modeling purely based on the physical characteristics of the

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 4>compound of the key you know that you're designing. So

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 4>that makes it ideal because it's then untethered with It's

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 4>not limited by do we have enough samples or don't

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 4>we have enough samples, or you know, what the previous

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 4>studies find or not. It's purely based on those physical properties,

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 4>those quantum properties. So we found ourselves in situations where

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 4>we were able to predict the fits between certain targets,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 4>and where in conditions like Alzheimer's disease, for example, we

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 4>published where the quantum based modeling of the compound was

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 4>much better than what we would have gotten with what

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 4>we got right, Like, we did it both ways, and

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the quantum one was the better fit than the AI

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 4>generated one.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>This is fair. Quantum is a little more of an

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 3>artist and a little less of a of a kind

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>of nerd AI sounds nerdy to me. What seems like

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 3>creative and artistic, creative, creative.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 4>It's like people, Yeah, it's it opens up path that

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 4>you never knew existed. That's why when I get asked

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 4>about what do I see is the best, you know,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the the most important breakthrough that quantum is going to

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 4>allow us to do, my answer is I really don't know,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 4>because we I You know, when other people invented these

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 4>new technologies, I don't think they really knew that they're

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, like think of laser. I don't think the

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 4>person who invented laser thought that they will be used

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 4>to scan groceries at the grocery store.

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 4>But so technology developing technology, the way I think of

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 4>it is like having a baby. You know, you raise

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 4>it as best you can, but then they're going to

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 4>go off and do their thing, and you will be

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 4>tying them down if you restrict them to just what

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 4>you thought they should do, you know, So it.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Opens up that.

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Space, that creative space for us to ask questions.

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 5>Differently than we used to.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 4>We should train our mind to stop starting from classical

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 4>and then trying to squeeze it into quantum. We have

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 4>to learn how to think quantum up front, right from

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 4>the beginning, which we haven't really been doing as a

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 4>scientific community since our inception. We were trained, and how

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 4>do you convert what you're thinking into a formula that

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 4>you can ask from a computer which is a classical

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 4>right computer with quantum because of how it works, it

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 4>can answer questions, It can look at problems in a

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 4>very different way. So we have to think differently about

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 4>the questions and how we ask them.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>With IBM, you recently modeled protein with over twelve thousand atoms.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Talk to me about that and why it's so meaningful

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>for drug discovery.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 4>So in October of twenty twenty four, so just eighteen

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 4>months ago, the largest compound biological compound that could be

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 4>simulated with quantum was ten atoms big, and it was

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 4>unfathomable back then that we will get past the thousand

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 4>or few thousand atom simulation in the foreseeable future. And

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>what our team with IBM and with Rieken in Japan,

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 4>published last month April twenty twenty six, is a simulation

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 4>of the electrical properties of an enzyme trips in in

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 4>the body That is twelve thousand, six hundred atoms big

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 4>for you know, orders of magnitude beyond what anybody thought

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 4>was possible in that span of time. And the reason

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 4>why that happened was because of a you know, innovations

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>in the technology itself where the teams stopped thinking of

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 4>quantum and AI as competitors and instead thought of them

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>as different members of the same team. Right you're you're

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 4>We're now in basketball season in the US, the n

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 4>b A, and you need the you need defense, but

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>you also need your center, somebody to shoot.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 5>You need all of the pieces to work together.

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>So with this, it was figuring out where do I

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 4>put you know, when do I put AI on the field,

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 4>When do I put Quantum on the field, and how

0:31:58.640 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 4>do I tell them.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 5>To work together.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 4>It's the scientific terms the quantum centric super computing. So

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 4>quantum is at the center, but we're using our supercomputing

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>tools AI classical to interact with it and split that

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 4>big problem of the twelve thousand, six hundred atoms into pieces,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 4>where some pieces are best served with quantum and others

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:27.959
<v Speaker 4>are best served with classically.

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 3>This distinction that we now cling to AI and quantum

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>are these very different things develop by different people for

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>different purposes. What you're suggesting is that's probably going to

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>go away. Yeah, in the future, these things will work together.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>It's going to become teamwork and not one on one

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>competition exactly.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 5>And it is that now in Keeveland, Clank.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the way we've evolved our priorities with IBM,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 4>it's a realization that both organizations have come to where

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 4>really to for progress to happen, we should stop seeing

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 4>them as separate. We should put them together and work

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 4>to the best of what each piece of technology can provide.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 3>One theme running through a lot of your your what

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 3>you've been talking about is that the arrival of this

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 3>new technology requires the researcher to behave differently and that's

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons why you want the quantum machine

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and the on full display. And then you were talking

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 3>about how you have to ask different kinds of questions.

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious, can you can you can you elaborate on

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 3>that a little bit. So take me back, for example,

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to your earliest days. If I had given you all

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>these tools that people have now, how would your research

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>have proceeded differently? What would you have done differently?

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, I would have.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 4>Looked at the molecular components of the human brain as

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 4>they relate to outcomes of brain surgery way earlier than

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I did. The first ten years of my career doing

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 4>research was all spent building models that were purely based

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 4>on brain waves.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 5>And pictures of the brain.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't until after I hit a wall with my

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 4>models aren't getting past that eighty percent accuracy threshold that

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I started thinking, oh, you know, there must be something

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 4>genetic or you know, more biological that is influencing this.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Had I been exposed to quantum at least as a

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 4>onsept right, to quantum computing and what quantum science is

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 4>back then, I think it would have opened up my

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 4>mind to realize that it's not just about what I see.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 4>You know, there is hidden relationships that exist within the

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 4>human body, and that's our genetic makeup and our chemical

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 4>makeup that influence what comes to the surface that urge

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>to dig deeper.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 5>The other thing, it would have changed.

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 4>Is it would have made me reach out to engineers

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 4>and physicists and mathematicians much earlier in my career.

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah. And how would it have changed is

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>a very kind of prosaic question, but just kind of

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the day to day life of someone doing medical research.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the oh wow, you walk into the office

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in the morning. How does your day proceed differently when

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you're when you have these kinds of tools at your fingertips.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 4>That's the fundamental question in biomedical research right now, and

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 4>it's it's less to do with quantum, more to do

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 4>with agentic AI, right, these agents that we can work

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 4>with now to help us how to think more creatively

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 4>and how to do work that up until now was

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 4>more like Scott work that the researchers had to do,

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 4>whether it was you know, so the hypothesis generation has

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 4>always been the most creative part of aspect of scientific research.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 4>But what comes after it with the data collection, for example,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 4>that was always such a repetitive, you know, exercise, and

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 4>then the analysis after that was something that was very

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 4>resource intensive and you had to try so many different

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 4>approaches before you get to an answer, and that was

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 4>fairly complex. Now with access to urgantic AI and you know,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 4>some quantum. Of course, we can spend more of our

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 4>energy on the creative thinking part of the aspect of

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 4>the work and less on the you know, just that repetitive.

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 3>When you look around, I'm assuming you walk around Cleveland

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Clinic and you have lots of conversations with some of

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 3>the most brilliant medical researchers in the world. Are you

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 3>satisfied with how quickly and aggressively they are adopting these

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 3>new technologies or do they still need encouragement from you

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 3>to do you have to say that? People? Wait, I've

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 3>got this machine in the cafeteria. You should be using

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>it for this problem.

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 5>How much are you doing.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 3>That kind of encouraging in cheerleading or is it unnecessary?

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 4>No, there's plenty of cheerleading that's necessary people. You know,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 4>humans don't like to change. It's hardwired in us. So

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 4>there is plenty of cheerleading. But what happens is, i

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 4>mean the way we built our program to where we

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 4>are now, So Cleveland Clinic now is pretty much winning

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:35.720
<v Speaker 4>every global competition. And Quantum for life sciences, whether that's

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 4>the welcome trust, you know, Quantum for biological applications. We

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 4>our partner, there was a startup in Finland, Algorithmic.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 5>They're brilliant.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 4>We worked with them to develop a photodynamic drug therapy

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 4>for cancer or whether it is the NIH with they

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 4>had an X price challenge for quantum or university is

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 4>that we're collaborating with. We have a program that's bringing

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 4>startups to our ecosystem. We give them access to the

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 4>machine if they have a question that is significant enough

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 4>for life sciences universities that we're building a bachelor's, master's,

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 4>PhD programs with on quantum computing. We developed that whole

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem around it. If that's not cheerleading, I don't know

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 4>what else would qualify for cheerleading. But then what happens

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 4>is these early adopters, the risk takers, become the cheerleaders themselves, right,

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and then they work with it, they achieve success, and

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 4>we're nothing but competitive in medicine and science. Right, So

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 4>then it becomes okay, so and so I did this

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 4>with this machine, Let me learn it so I can

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 4>do the same. And it becomes this virtuous cycle of

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 4>then innovation and growth and people wanting to work together.

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 5>It's just been fascinating to watch.

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 3>You said that people don't like change, but you clearly do.

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 5>I do. That's the mindset of researchers, right.

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 4>A researcher is someone who is not afraid to fail,

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 4>actually sees failure as a chance to learn something right,

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 4>to do better the next time. So we get rejected

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 4>all the time and we don't care, right, we keep

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 4>moving on with papers.

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 5>Grant applications. So that mindset is what all of.

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Research is built around. So it's a very forward looking mindset.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 4>And Cleveland Clinic as they health system, we wouldn't have

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 4>survived one hundred years. We wouldn't have done all of

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 4>the firsts that we had. Serotonin the chemical that drives

0:40:54.960 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 4>the whole science of psychiatry and neuroscience that was discovered

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 4>in Cleveland Clinic. So as an organization, we have enough

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 4>of people who think that way that they will be

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 4>the early adopters who will pull the others with them.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one last question, look ahead ten years, pat me

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a picture of what quantum and related technologies look like

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 3>for a place like Cleveland Clinic and tenures.

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, what I hope is that ten years from now,

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 4>if I if I'm seeing a patient in clinic who

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 4>has bad epilepsy, and for the love of you know,

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 4>I can't figure out what medicine do I need to

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 4>prescribe to them to make them seizure free. I will

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 4>be able to send them to get a blood test

0:41:54.080 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 4>that we can then run through some analytical platform that

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>leverages both quantum and AI that can model exactly for

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 4>that patient what compound, either existing.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Or not to be developed.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 4>It's some new chemical that we haven't tested for that

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 4>indication yet is going to treat them, you know, make

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 4>them seizure free. It's and I think quantum is ideal

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 4>for a condition like mine epilepsy, because we are a

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 4>rare disease, and I think that benefit that it's going

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 4>to have will start with rare diseases, you know, as

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I explained earlier, So take any other rare disease. We

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 4>should start there and then expand from that to more

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 4>complex things like cancer for example, and others. But those

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 4>rare conditions where we are left now completely scratching our

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 4>heads and going intuition. It will make our care truly precise,

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 4>and it will make drug development a more tailored exercise

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 4>than the way it is now, where it's like a

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 4>hammer that's looking for nails?

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Am I right in thinking that of all of the

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 3>over the one hundred year history or more now of

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland clinic, this sounds like the absolute best time to

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 3>be a Cleveland clinic.

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I love it. No complaints, no complaints, And I

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 5>am hiring.

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 7>I need I need those quantum researchers, those people who

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 7>are wanting, you know, to apply quant to genetic research,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 7>imaging research, every single aspect of biomedical research.

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 4>We can't afford to just wait on the sideline and

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 4>until the technology is ready and then you know, then

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 4>it will teach us. It is ready now that twelve

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 4>thousand Atham Sam relation wouldn't have happened just a year

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 4>and a half ago.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 5>It's quidinn.

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 3>So the headline of this conversation is we're hiring.

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Yeah, that's a good headline. We're growing, how about that.

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Ramano, Amy Gains, McQuaid,

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Trina Menino and Jake Harper. Engineering by Nina Bird Lawrence,

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Mastering by Sarah Buguerer, Music by a Gramoscope, Strategy by

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Cassidy Meyer, Sophia Derlon and Tatiana Lieberman. Special thanks to

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 3>doctor Laura Jahi, Alicia Real Cooney, and the Cleveland Clinic team.

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia. To find more Pushkin podcasts,

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 3>listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 3>listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is a paid

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 3>advertisement for IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 3>represent IBM's positions, strategies, or opinions.