WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Who's Calling the Plays?

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for a break? Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com wall

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, January thirty, of the two thousand nineteen

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>season fourteen, episode number one hundred and fourteen. Welcome to

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>another edition of The Break. We are live nest WBC

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios at the Star and it's good to be

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>back on the year with you guys, talk a little

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys football for an hour. This is our normal schedule

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for the offseason. We'll be every Wednesday at eleven am.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, on Monday we have Hanging with the Boys

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at eleven. On Tuesdays we have Talking Cowboys will be

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays, and then on Thursdays the highly Rate It

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Now Draft show that Dave is also a party. I

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mean now, well, I mean, you guys are now at

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty five on on iTunes. That's pretty good,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Pretty good. I would argue we've been pretty

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>highly rated for TWI okay, all right, whatever draft I

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>need to get cocky here Draft Show, give a compliment

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>without him breaking it apart like fiercely defensive of the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>draft show. I'm sorry. All right, Well, good work to

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Shout out to my boy A K. Hill

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for starting that whole thing up. So let's just let's

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a little cowboys. But how are you day? Nick?

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm great? Thank you? Good? All right? Amber, Good to

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have you back in the building. Hey, the three of us,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking? Oh that's true? Well yeah, I

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>guess Yet where where were you? Where did you go

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>working on my side businesses making commercials art? I was

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in Mobile, Alabama? So yeah, very different than one yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. So we got a lot to talk about today. Um,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk first. I'm about this coaching staff,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and then a little later in the show. I have

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>some questions for you guys, and those questions will kind

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of give us a good bow or put a good

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>bow on this season. It will be a little bit

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of a season in review. We'll go around the table

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and get some answers on some of those questions. But

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start first with the coaching coaching staff. What we

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>know right now is that Scott landa hands out. Jason

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett said as much a week and a half ago.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it was at this point we know that

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>John Kittner is maybe in. Do we know that? What

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say. What we know is he was at

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl with the coaching staff. We know he

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>operating right operating with the coaching staff. But there's been

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing official that says that he's in and that he

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>has a role. Those are the things that we know

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right now with this coaching staff. So what I figured

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>we would do is let's talk a little bit about assumptions,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and let's make an assumption first that there will be

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>no new members added to this coaching staff. I want

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys to tell me what you think of these

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people in these roles. John Kitten as your quarterback coach,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I think he's a good coach. Number

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Number one, he's a coach. I mean, he he has

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no good He's done it, though, but he's done it.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been a coach before, and he's when you're a

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback for sixteen years, which sounds familiar. But Jason Garrett,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, but but you you've been coaching way

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>longer than when you started, you know, becoming a coach.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was coaching Carson Palmer at Cincinnati. He

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>was coaching Tony Romo when he was here, So he's

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback coach. He's he's gonna be very, very valuable

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for Dak And I love it. If that's the move.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I really like it, MP, I don't mind me it

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's I know, I did some research on

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>his whole experience, and I know one of y'all wrote

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an article about him and his whole story, which is, like,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the experience from college and all that stuff

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously helps a lot, and he can do a lot

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of things that I haven't. I mean, it's so hard.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so hard to evaluate Kelen because you're not there

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to what he's saying to Dack. But at the

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>same time, just watching from the outside, you feel that

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not really doing much to help him. But it's

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just going back and forth. But I have a feeling

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is a great addition and it's gonna add

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than subtract or not do anything. Dave. Everything they

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>just said, I agree with. I do like it. Overall,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>part of me is just kind of leery because it's

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>such a Jason Garrett higher, Like, like, who do I know? Who?

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Who do I know that? Who have I worked with

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that could maybe do this? Okay? Yeah, John, Like he's older,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he's coached in high school, Like I know him? Okay, Like,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know you know that's something I know frustrates

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>fans because I read my mentions every day, like you

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.119
<v Speaker 1>want new, you want different, you want conflicting ideas and ideologies,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably not this because it's a guy that's

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>played here that knows Jason Garrett really well. Familiarity is

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to him. He's never told me that,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but every higher he's ever made, suggesting that there was

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a big higher that they made last year and christ

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Chard stepped outside of enter and the results were right,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe great, awesome, And I think you hit the nail

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>on the head that when you look at this and

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the ability for someone to come in and create, to

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>create clash, I guess that's the best way to put

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it into in debate. That's kind of the thing, to

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to come in and create a different viewpoint,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to come in and challenge things that

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody just thinks are facts, which really aren't facts. They're

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>more opinions. But it takes somebody from the outside sometimes

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't think like that to say that's not really

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>a fact, that's an opinion. And I think there's another

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>opinion that might be better is Byron Jones a corner.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>If Christoh Chardon Wright higher, he might be, but you

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can't say for certainty that he would write yeah, stuff

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, And so at the end of the day,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a solid hire. Actually, you know, I

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>looked this up for the story I wrote, like kitt

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and I had success as a high school coach, Like

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he took over his alt right. Well, he started at

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>his alma mater and Tacoma, Washington. They were like, I

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>think they were like two and eight and he went

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eleven and one and you know, like they were. Yeah,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he turned him into a pretty good team. And then

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>he went back to the Cowboys for a game. Yeah,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he actually left it. Yeah, they hired him. They hired

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>him back. And I think that's important because because they

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>needed somebody on the fly who knows it and who

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>can come in and be smart and figure things out. Quickly.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know that was just a one game option.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But he obviously just proves just how much he's still

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with it. I mean, as far as what this offense is,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he can come in, he can adapt quickly. Was he

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as a player, He was a He was a pretty

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>good player, A solid quarter. Yeah, he was solid. He

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>was never a great athlete looking guy, you know, but

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like he wasn't the fastest, didn't have a great arm,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but he was good enough to be a backup. And

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that he had some pretty good years as

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a starting Cincinnati in Detroit, he had some pretty fantastic years.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>When they drafted Carson Palmer, I know he sat all

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>year because Kittna played, and he was good enough to

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>play and keep the first round to pick on the bench,

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which was what the philosophy was. But he obviously was

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>good enough to keep him there and then and then

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he better than anything. He handled it of like, all right, now,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you're the guy. I get it. I know that he

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>understands the dynamics of things. At the end of the day,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good hire. But the the the

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>familiarity of it gives me pause a little bit. But

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, and that, to be honest with you, think

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>any coach in the league is any different. I really

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of coaches higher than people they do.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh and you're right, you know, or at least somebody

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that they know knows him, you know, refer to him.

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on. Let's talk about now the

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>role of play caller. And I'm gonna throw three names out,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to tell me of those three names,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>put them in priority order of which one you'd want

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to see first, second, and third. Now, again we're assuming

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to see that you think should be the

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>play caller in order of one. This is the guy

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely want, down to three, this is the guy don't want,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, And again we're assuming that there are now

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>no new people that are going to be added into

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this mix. The people that are already on the staff

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are presumed to be on the staff, will be the

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people that will they will be choosing from. All right,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's Kellen Moore, Jason Garrett, Doug nuss Meyer, and

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one other qualification. We're talking specifically about play caller, not

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily just offensive coordinator, but the person that's going to

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be calling the plays on Sundays. I think that you know,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this isn't to mess up your game or anything. I'll

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>give my answer because I don't you know all I've

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>seen really call plays as Jason Garrett. But I think

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we know who it's going to be, you know, Jason Garrett. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>he did talk at the Pro Bowl, not to us,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not to the media, but he talked to Jason Witten

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and the crew of the of the Monday Night crew

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that did the game. And if you listen to the game,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you put yourself through that misery and

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>watch that and listen to it, they said, you know,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Moore is gonna have a good year. You know he's

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to call the plays, and he's gonna

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have a different style. And it wasn't like this is

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what they think is going to happen. This is what's

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. So I think Jason Garrett told them

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to happen. I really believe that. So

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I that being said, Kellen Moore will probably be the

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>play caller. I've only seen Jason Garrett do it. He

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>did a nice job. You think should be calling place.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like seeing Smarr honestly, really why Um? I think

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Dak is the closest thing to a college quarterback. UM

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>college type system. I think that will work with him here,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's got the best experience when different

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>college systems. I think it'd be interesting to see what

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>he does. What do you know about his because I

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't researched it much, but just in reading little articles

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and tweets here and there, it sounds like he wasn't

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy that was beloved by a lot of college

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fans at the stops where he was an offensive coordinator.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you know about his career there? I guess

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as a college offensive coordinator, I know he did. He

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>did win a national title with Alabama as their play call.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Everybody exactly that's so yeah, I mean, pig that for

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth. And uh, his stint at Florida was

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not very memorable when you could. I mean that has

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with talent. Michigan to the Alabama

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was his best results also probably his best talent. I

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>think he got there right after McCarron left. I think

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he was there the year Jacob Coker one,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like the worst quarterback Alabama's one a national

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>title with he did something with a little less well,

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he had all Americans at every other position. He might

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>have been there with Amari Cooper, but don't quite me.

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe no, yeah he was, because that's they talked about

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it when they traded for and they're like, yeah, nus

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>knows amar from Alabama. Um, well good because he's got

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Bowl receiver, Pro Bowl running back, Pro Bowl quarterback,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and two offensive linemen. If if these are saying this

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is bamma, I'm saying, you've got some guys that if

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you need talent, they got here. You're right, You're right.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>If these are my options, I'd just as soon go

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with Kellen Moore, to be honest with you, because I

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of them are great options. But this

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is the route the Cowboys have decided to go with.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>But why would you defer to Kellen Moore with those

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>other two? Because I'm going to and I'm not saying

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that I should, but I'm going to choose to believe

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the glowing praise about him from every direction. You know,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Travis Frederick talked about it, His coaches at Boise have

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. Since all this kind of started to leak.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Dak has been effusive in his praise for Kellen from

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the get you know, in the time since he kind

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>of emerged as an offensive coordinator candidate. His John Gruden

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback camp videos have surfaced where he's breaking down tape

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with John Gruden and you can see that he's a

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>smart guy. You can see the type of offense that

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.359
<v Speaker 1>he ran at Boise State, and you know, they incorporated

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>things that I think a lot of Cowboys fans would

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like to see, you know, when it comes to misdirection

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and making simple things look complicated and things like that.

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he's gonna be good at it. I

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, but I'll take the young unknown who

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>has the chance to be really good at it over

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the guys that we've already seen doing. Like I said,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>no idea if it'll be worth it, but if these

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are my three choices, I'll just go with that. That's

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and it just absolutely blows my mind that that's even

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>an option. Like, no disrespect to Kellen Moore, absolutely no

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>disrespect and keeping in mind that I know very very

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>very little compared to what they know over there on

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the football side and what they do in those meetings.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But I just cannot comprehend how you go from being

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>in charge of one guy basically Dak Prescott training him,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you still didn't really see growth. I don't feel like

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw any growth and difference from Dak compared to

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>previous years. Just something not impressive, you know. And I

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>just feel that you get one person that you're looking after,

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't successful. Now you're given now you're being promoted,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and you give him the role to kind of manage

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different guys in a way in coordinate everything.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And again we haven't seen that, but we know we

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen him in this role. But we know the

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship he had with Scott Linehan. And I'm not saying

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they're one person, but we know how similar or from

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what we heard, how similar they were, and how how

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>connected they were. So I'm thinking, in my mind, my

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>assumption is where they must be very alike, and their

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>train of thought and their methods must be very alike.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You know something. I've heard of other people say that,

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a little bit unfair. Here's why

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that. I'll give you an example. Nick and

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I have worked together a very very long time, and

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for most of that time I've been a supervisor. A

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think me and Nick think alike because

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. I would guarantee you that if I were

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>no longer in this position and Nick was running this department,

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be a lot of things that will be

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>done very differently. I don't think it's fair to assume

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's true. It's very true, true, a lot of things

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would be done different I don't think it's fair to

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>assume that us two people are connected and have been

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>connected for years, and have known each other for a

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>long time, and have worked together for a long time,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and work in a relationship where they were kind of

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>doing similar jobs or doing the same kind of work,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that all of a sudden, if one would have the

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to make the call over the other, that things

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would stay the same. I don't think that's fair to say.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And Stephen Jones did his best to put that idea

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to the torch at the Senior Bowl. He he didn't

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say Kellen Moore's name once, but he just he was like,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you work under a coach, you have a

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of respect for him. That doesn't mean you agree

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with everything. And he was like, you know, we've got

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>young coaches on this staff who we think can implement

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>change if they're the ones calling the shots, which again

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>no idea if that will come to pass, but that

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is what they are hoping for, and and it's again

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's right in line with the way Jason Garrett

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>has done things like they yea, I'm sorry, you don't

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>want to hear this listening at home. Like they don't

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>want radical change. They want minor tweaks that feel familiar

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that will help them to be more efficient. They don't

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>want to completely overhaul everything. They just want it to

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit better. Do they need a radical change?

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because you can hear the arguments on both sides.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>On one side, you could say, well, this is a

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>team that has talent, this is a team that got

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the divisional round the playoffs, you don't need to

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>make radical change. But then on the flip side, you

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can say, yeah, this is a team that over the

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>last few years has been perpetually in this position to

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>get as far as a divisional round and can't seem

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to get over the hump. So maybe you need radical

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>change in order to see something different. What are your thoughts.

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they need a change in philosophy on this.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we do what we do because yep, teams

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the teams are they have five or six

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>guys on their staff that are looking at what the

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>cowboys are doing all weeks. So they know what the

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>cowboys do. It's their job to be better than that

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, oh, well they think we might

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do this or we you know, we might do that.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they need to be one step ahead of things.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, look no further than Dak when they

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>win games when he runs the ball. When he doesn't

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, they don't win. We need to think

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>about that kind of stuff and and just try to

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be better in and there, you know, play calling and

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just and being you know, an imaginative a little bit.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And they don't do that as well. It's very vanilla.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And as to Amber's point, you know here, but the

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>only reason Kelen Moore has ever been an NFL quarterback

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is because Scott Linahan pulled him from Detroit and put

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>him on the team and the team was so bad

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because Romo got hurt that he got to play, and

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he's played. He's probably the only reason he was on

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the staff. So yeah, I think there's something to be

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>said for you. They must have something, you know, that

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's linked together. I just hope he may think that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he's just smart and he's a good coach, I hope,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and he understands a sport. That doesn't necessarily mean that

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>if he were calling the plays he would do it

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the same way, right, it doesn't, But it's just it's

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just something that doesn't really get you excited at this point.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not as such a drastic change to where you

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>would expect a big change in the whole offense and

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the play calling. So I do wish him the best,

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and I hope he's if he is given that promotion,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I do hope he's able to turn things around. But

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point, it's nothing that gets me off my

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>chair jumping around and doing anything different. And one a

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago I had asked Nick, I'm like, okay,

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>when you start analyzing teams in the NFL, example, the

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and what they've been able to do for so

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>many years, be so constant, and that's keeping in mind

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that players come and go. I was asking you, what

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing? Because I don't watch enough games

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know that, um, they got a great quarterback

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>over there, there's absolutely no doubt exactly. But aside from that,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are some of the guys some of

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the things that from you watching the Patriots that they

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to accomplish year after year and just

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of make it happen what he just said, which first,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's a waste of time to try to

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>if we could all be the Patriots would be a

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>great example in a bad example. It's very very everybody

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>can't know. Nobody in the league can't. I will you know,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a thousand reasons why they are the way they are.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But going back to Nick's point, the one thing that

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they do so well that any team could learn from,

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of teams do, is that they adapt

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves to their opponent's weaknesses. And that's per game and

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>per season, like six years ago, within games yeah well no, yeah,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>but I mean six years ago they were winning with

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends and they you know that everybody thought

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that was going to be like a revolution in the league,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was for a little bit, and then they

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>were like, okay, one of these guys as a murderer. Well,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll switch our team up. That's fine, and now like

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>now they're back in the super Bowl. Matter of fact,

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Am I wrong? No, it's absolutely right, Dave.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>So just your way of saying it. I love the

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>way you see it. They go. They go from dominating

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the league with two tight ends and now now now

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing. They're they you know, they can

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>line you up five wide with Brady and the shotgun,

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>or they've now got a stable of running backs when

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>from Corey Dillon all the way until now, like they

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>were running forty year old Kevin Falk out there for

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like six years. Like they just adapt and they ever

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>look the same. Like I said, week by week they

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>switch that up. They can go power at you, they

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>can go spread at you. And they do it based

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>upon This goes back to Nick's original point too. They

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 1>do it based upon what you do well. Because if

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you watch it Patriots game every single week, the first

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing you can count on every single time you

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>watch the Patriots, whoever the opposing player is that's really

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>really good. He's not gonna have a great day. I

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>know that from watching from playing fantasy, like they're gonna

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>shut that guy down and say, now you gotta beat

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>us with your second guy. That guy's not gonna have

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a great day. Can you do that? And that means

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>every week they have to adapt their game plan and

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>their personnel to be able to stop a particular player

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and then say, now, with what's left, can you figure

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it out? And most teams cannot consistently figure it out.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So basically, not we do what we do, name it faceless.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly the opposite. It's exactly the opposite of philosophy

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that the coach says publicly. Now I don't know, maybe

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes they do something differently, but what he

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>says publicly it's exactly a different philosophy than what they

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett's mantra is like, if we do what we

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>want to do, you know, to the best of our abilities,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't stop us, whereas Belichick is like, hasn't worked out,

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty good at stopping that. So we're gonna do

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>something completely different. And that's I mean, that's that's the

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>essence of football, in my opinion. It's like having a

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>countermeasure to their best, Like that's like the essence of

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the game really, So that rules, Like the Patriots I mean,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there be. They've been though. They've

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>broken a few, they've broken, they've broken a few, miss

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>broken a few. Miss me, miss me with the cheating talk,

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like you don't. I'm sorry. You know that's fine that

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to buy into it. But it'sn't true.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's true cheating talk. I should they've been rules, they

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out ways to get around stuff. They've broken rules. Okay,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>it's documented at least twice. At least twice. Everybody cheats,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's done, but not every doing grazing nine super bowls,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can cheat on accident. The quarterback, not the

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback cheat on accident. Also, Tom Brady, you don't find

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>him in like the guy that makes the most money

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the league. No, because he's past all that. He's

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like okay, I know. And they also got a very

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>wealthy wife, like there are help. It helps the whole family.

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's I mean, it's like wife, it's bringing in

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a little too. There's a hundred thousand trust me, here's

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand reasons why the Patriots are where they are.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it's dumb to even try to compare it step

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>by step, but you can start with big, obvious examples

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like the one we just talked about that could probably

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>help you be more successful. Who's next? Though, Like, who's

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>after that? You know, people always like to say, well,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>look at the Patriots are well who's next? Who does it?

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Who has been consistent like that? Who? No, I was

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, let's take a break and then come back.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that. We'll do that when we come

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>right back to This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're like me and you love I mean, if

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a thing, then cutting the court is scary.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But then I found out I could switch to direct

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>TV now and still get the live sports I love.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>No set, I needed, no bulky hardware, no annual contract,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>just that the live sports you love. Try DirecTV now

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for ten dollars a month for three months. Visit DirecTV

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>now dot com DirecTV now more for your thing that's

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>out at the US called really a limited time price

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for lit little page if three months when he's monthayt

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>full prices currently midimum forty dollars and less cancer prices

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>may change. You subscribers on cancel any time. Content varies

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>by package and maybe limited You STIs in the plasf

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>You want the most interesting, up to the minute Dallas

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys news straight from the Star in Frisco. How about

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>exclusive and on command. That's right, news and nuggets you

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>can't find anywhere else. With our exclusive Cowboys content on Alexa,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you can have all the answers, secrets, stories and more.

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>What's Stephen Jones thinking during a game? What's Joe Looney's

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite pregame meal? We take your questions to Cowboys players

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and coaches and you can hear the answers directly back

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to you. Just say Alexa Open. Dallas Cowboys Star Sports

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Tours is the only official fan travel partner of the

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk xs and

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>those with senior direct or a player personnel, Will McClay,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys Travel dot Com to book your travel package today.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to use what the pros use. How about

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you can get the Jack Black Playmaker, a

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack Black

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized Intense Therapy lip bomb

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and a Cowboys can cooler. Go to get Jack Black

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word Cowboys

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Playmaker ten bucks free shipping. While a

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>player could look good on paper, it's when he's out

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the field that you really find out what he's

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>made of. That's why the Cowboys rely on more than

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just stats and scouting reports when building their team. When

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>picking a tractor, it's why you should rely on more

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>than just specs and features. You've got to take it

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>out and put it to the test. The Cowboys did

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>when they named John Deer their official tractor. Experience one

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for yourself. If this is my John deerdealer dot com

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>slash football. Back to the Break, Welcome back. It's the

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>second segment of The Break Live at the s WBC

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage studios at the Star We're talking Cowboys football. We've

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this coaching staff and Nick, just before

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the break, you had a question you wanted to throw

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>out there. What's your question? Well, we were just talking

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about obviously what the Patriots have done on a completely

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a different level. But you know, when you're talking about

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>other teams that have done it well on a consistent basis,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>continuity is also a big deal. And and and Jerry loves continuity,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. And don't think it doesn't matter. Don't think

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't This team hasn't has drafted well because there

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is continuity in what Will McClay wants to do. He

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>knows what Jason Garrett wants, and their staff they know

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what they want. It's working as far as drafting goes.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Other teams doing it, I mean other teams that consistent.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned well, Saints, well, we mentioned we mentioned teams

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>like the Steelers, like the Packers, like Seahawks, And to

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, there's one thing that I think

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>is in common with all of those. It is number one,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they've got a really good quarterback. And number two, the

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>continuity is between the quarterback and the head coach. There

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of other pieces that change. They'll change coordinators.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>They'll change other skill players on the team, They'll change

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>other you know, other pieces on the team. But what

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stays consistent on all three of those teams is their

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and their head coach have stayed pretty much the same.

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the Packers are changing their head coach, we'll see

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if that if that kind of reasserts their their consistency,

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>because obviously this year was a little bit of an

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>anomaly for them. But that all being said, again, the

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback the head coach makes a difference. I mean, sorry,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask a different question. Well, you

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>know what I was going to ask one two that

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking for the last few weeks. You said,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and head coach. Can you think of the greatest

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>head coaches in the history of the game? Belichick? Okay,

0:25:54.640 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the best coaches, every name, best coaches, A Lombardi All Sorry,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not of course, Landry Landry Law Yeah, every coach, Uh Parcels,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forget that, I'm getting there. But the thing about it

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is he's the only one. Bill Parcels is the only

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>coach that is considered a great coach that didn't really

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>have a Hall of Fame quarterback. Everybody that you would

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ever call it to be a great coach has had

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a great quarterback. Maybe it's the other way around, maybe

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the great quarterbacks because it's a great coach either way.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>The classic that is a really good parselves now blo.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Now he also moved around a lot to he made

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a Hall of Fame career out of kind of jumping.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I know that he didn't. I know he didn't play

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in that Super Bowl. But Parcels had sims for a while.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not a Hall of Fame He's pretty

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>good though. He's a good player. He's good. He was

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a really really good player. But he wasn't. He wasn't

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame worthy and Bledsoe has all these other

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>guys were talking about, sure their quarterbacks were in the

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. I get it. Yeah. So it's just

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they kind of go hand in hand. That's what I

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>was trying. It's a good point for Parcels. What was

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the drop? What was he saying? Mickey, Mickey? What would

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you what would you okay, not including the Patriots, what

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>would you say? What would you say of in the

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>most consistently good teams in the NFL over the last

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like ten or so years, Pittsburgh, I got, I got Pittsburgh,

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, Green Bay, and Denver pulled up right now,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say Seattle, oh, oh, Seattle is a good one.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Hang on because ten years yeah, last ten years say yeah, um,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing anybody would missing anybody here? Mean the Seahawks.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are probably a good example because so all right,

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>starting when Carol and them took over, they had two

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>losing seasons and they haven't had one since. Everybody else

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is a good resume, everybody else is Uh. Pittsburgh's gone

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>eight and eight two times in that span. They went

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>nine six and one. This year Green just went six

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>nine and one. They had an eight seven and one

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>when Rogers got hurt. Uh. Point being like, the best

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league are going to have down years, well,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>they pale in comparison to what the Patriots have done.

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely freaking The Patriots have been to the Super Bowl

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>nine of the last eighteen years. Half I'm talking in

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a late in a league of thirty two teams, half

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the last eighteen years they've been to the top,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to the game to win a championship. And if you

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to the last fifteen or seventeen years, eighteen years? Um,

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>how many Hall of Famers are going to be from

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots? One for sure out of Son? Well two okay,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Brady Gronk Bronk for sure. That's it? Unill well, I mean, well,

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>are we we're talking technically? Randy Moss is a Hall

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of Fame? Is lawyer Malloya in the finalist this year?

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he might be a guy that can get in, saying,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>um n they all was there for a little bit.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Rodney Harrison count No, he's charger. Rodney Harrison's probably not

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a Hall of Fame, or is he? Uh no, oh yeah,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>if Darren Woodson's not a Hall of Fame, No, I

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. They don't have the offensive lineman. They

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just William mc ginnis might get in maybe at some point.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, there's another defensive lineman that's finals too. Um no, no,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>no defensive lineman. Umm, will might get into. Yeah. Still

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a super long list. Yeah, no,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right, And it's a good point. It's a good point.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just the and that's what they've done

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the free agency era is unbelievable. It just really is.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's remarkable, and it's it puts all these other

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>coaches of like, why can't you be like that? I

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>mean they're just they're just on a different level. But yeah,

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe they guess something else going on. Okay, maybe maybe

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>good for them. I mean it's working right whatever that word?

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what I would win? I was driving down

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the highway yesterday and you know those signs that that

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, you'd buckle up and all that. You know what?

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They tweeted it out. Yeah, and then Darren Velt picked

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it up and and tweeted it and what is it?

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Finished the sentence? Then what does your tires flat? As

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a Patriots football call? Whatever the number is? How that

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>just seems in Dallas? But seven years later, five years later, No,

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just people. It's just people that are looking at

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl like the super Bowl is a big event.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to get my piece of it. So here's

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>my going to cause a wreck? Because you're like, what

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>what did I Why don't they do that? Like they

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I the one that I don't drink and drive and

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just move on. No, but no, I think it's great.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Like during the holidays, they were like the sign said

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was like you don't want to see your in laws anyway,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>slow down, drive safe or something. And I was like, yeah, okay,

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>smart not for me, but it's a good one. Yeah.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But they have jokey jokes like that. No, I think

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's running those I got one good, I got good.

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they ever step over the line, you

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>know how you a social media person, like you step

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>over the line where it's like, oh, you're gonna get

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>five whoa, whoa. No, don't don't say that. Yeah, yeah,

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I can guarantee you like I'm gonna put this around right. No. Yeah,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad idea. It just speaks I don't think

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to the Super Bowl. I really think it

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to how much people hate the Patriots, Like, oh, yeah,

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody hates the Patriots. If you're not a Patriots fan,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you hate the Patriots. But guess what, I don't hate that.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing that you that most people say

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about the Cowboys and would say about most big franchises

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that have had a sustained period of success. It's because

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>over that period people start to say, I just don't

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>want I want to see anybody win but them, And

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so if you're not a fan, then you become an

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>anti fan, you know. So it is what it is,

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>all right? Let me let me ask this real going

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back to what you started talking about, Nick, the whole

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>correlation between the head coach and the quarterback. Now that

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you got Dak Prescott and in three of his first

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>years here, they've made it to the playoffs. Three in

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the first years, two of those they made it to

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Does this start a new clock for Garrett?

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Or you're still running the same clock? Wait? Say again,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they explain that to me, Explain to me what you're asking. Well,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>now that he got a young quarterback, new one, he's

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>proven in three years out of those three he's they've

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>been able to get to the playoffs twice. And whether

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd like Dak or not, or you hate him and

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you think he sucked, they still made it to the

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>playoffs twice. Does having this and seeing what they've been

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>able to do in three years start a new different

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>clock on Jason Garrett? Or you're still running they asked me? Yeah,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>ask me, has gotten a new contract yet? Yeah, that's

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a good point. If if he starts a new contract,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>then yes, But which well that it's fascinating because you know,

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>before the season even ended, the rappaports of the world

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>were reporting that those conversations were going to ramp up

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they will, like Jeff Sullivan had Yeah, you're right,

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he did. Uh Jeff Sullivan had it in October yea, um,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe he does. And there's no and he's nobody still

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>believes that too. He's like, hey, this is happening. There's

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>no parameters for coaches. You know, we know when DeMarcus

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence needs to have a new contract by like, there's

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>no time limit on Jason Garrett, but other than by

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of next year, right, No, I'm just like,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they could sign it today, they could do it in

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>three months, so I don't know. But if he goes

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the next season without a deal, then hell no,

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's where he's win or you might not be. Right now,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>we're having the same conversation we were having last year.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Now a week from now, he might be on a

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>five year deal and that's a pretty telling indicator that

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got more time. And by the way, let's also

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>remember they did an improbable thing this year. They got

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs after starting three and five. If they

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn that around. It's my personal belief that we

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>would have already seen them make a move at the

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>head coach. I don't I don't think Garret would have

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>stuck around if they would have continued on the track

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they were on at three and five. Let's say they

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>end at six and ten, I don't think he comes back.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So that to me says that it didn't set a

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>new clock. It's about what are you doing right now?

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think he probably bought himself a year or

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>two with what they did this year getting back three

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and five. Well, but let them let them blow it

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. And I think all bets are we should

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have We should have talked about this when we were

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>more knee deep in the Kellen Moore stuff, because hey,

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe he is getting maybe he is getting a new deal.

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting that that's they're higher because I mean,

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>if Jason Garrett's getting a new contract, then you can

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>go get whoever you want. If Jason Garrett's going to

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>play out the rest of this deal and he doesn't

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>have a long term future, it hinders your ability to

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>go get some oc to come in here and not

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>know what it's Yeah, and I don't know this for sure.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised at all if Jason Garrett

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>gets an extension this offseason. But to me, it kind

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of says, all right, let's let's try this young hotshot out,

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>see what y'all can do, and hope for your sake

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that it's good. Like that doesn't Isn't that hope? Hope

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it works out? Guys? Isn't that kind of how that

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds to you? Like? Am I crazy for thinking that?

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>That's logical to me? And so we'll see im And

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe Garrett will get an extension, but

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like we would have heard more

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>about it. Maybe not though well that I think there's

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>still is that possibility, mainly because I believe him talking,

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>him not talking to Nick. You were there last week.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe him not talking last week. I think there

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of layers to that, and I think

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those layers could be he doesn't know what

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>his own status is, and I don't mean from the

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of necessarily getting fired, but he doesn't know like

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he might be getting a contract extension. If he gets

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to contract extension, maybe it changes how he looks at

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>being able to go and get a new OC. If

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, then he's sticking with the options that he

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has here. No, that's the point, like they don't have

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no timetable other than by the end of

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>next season, by the end of nineteen is is contract

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is up right, So at that point then there's a

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>timetable because he's basically free agent and you don't have

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't have franchise tax for head coaches, so he's

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a free aging do whatever where he wants to. But

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>before he didn't get his last extension until after the

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of his last year, which was fourteen. Like we right,

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But the point, but the point is, at that point

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he could walk. He doesn't have to take your off right,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>so he can go out and just bid this services out.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And if and if what Jerry said earlier this offseason,

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>which is if he'd have been out on the market

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this year, he'd have gotten five offers. And how you're

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>bidding against other teams, maybe it's a lot harder to

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>get him back for the money that you want to

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get him back for because some team is just like, hey,

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll throw more money at him because we feel like

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we really can get some value of what he brings,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, Yeah, all right, here we go. Let's talk

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of season and review. We're gonna go

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>back and look at twenty nineteen, and I have a

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>list of questions here. There are six questions, And feel free,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as we do in all of these instances, if there's

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a name that you want to throw in, feel free

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw it in for discussion sake. But I'd like

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to stick with the names I have here because I

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thought about him and I think I have a good

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>list here. All right, Okay, so let's start a question.

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one player who most exceeded expectations in twenty eighteen

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones or Layton Vanderesh. Layton Vanderesh exceeded my expectations.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know how you can't say Byron Jones.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm Layton played great. I think there was

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of doubt about that pick. He deserves a

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of credit, But I mean, you know, we were

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>we were labeling buyer and a bust or a disappointment

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you want to call it, and he got

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to a Pro Bowl. I've answered this and after a

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>position change, Yeah, I'm gonna go. I think it's Laton though,

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I at first when you said Byron,

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how's it gonna be anybody else? But

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that that Layton is like an All

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Pro player, he was second team All Pro and as

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a rookie, he he was just unbelievable and he had

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about it. Now, he's played linebacker two

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>years in his life and one year Boys State in

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one year, and the year of Boys State got him

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to a first round pick, the year the Coloys got

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>him to All Pro. I just think that was at

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the limit. I don't have a problem with that. But

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again, you know, he's a first round pick.

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>He's a rookie, like he's a fresh you know, he's

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a he's a block of clay that hasn't been molded.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Like who knows what your expectations are? Like some people

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>had low expectations, some people had high where as a Byron,

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he got benched at the end of the last season

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they changed his position and a lot of

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>people thought it wasn't gonna work out. And he's a

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pro bowler now. So I'm fine with either one. Garcia, Yeah,

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 1>either one or good options. And I would I would

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>go with Byron though, because like and he was new,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>he's something new, exciting. You have all the high expectations

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and hopes for him, and he exceeded them, which was great.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, when you go back to

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at Byron and his status playing corner, then back

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to safety, then back to corner. So the fact that

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>he was able to turning it around, yeah, okay, and

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's true. But if I had to tell you

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>one of those two guys is gonna kind of have

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a drop off next year, I think everyone would probably

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>say Byron because you actually started to see a little

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of it. Yeah, he didn't play as well towards

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the earl year, So I don't like calling the fluke

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>or one year deal. I don't like calling that at all.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying I feel like Layton is kind

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of here to stay a little bit, and that is

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>just surprising after one year that he is just so

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>dominant like that. But two great choices though we don't

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>know well, I mean, if you will name me a

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>guy finally, the guy that played well, yeah, no, but

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I still want him on the field for my most

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>important play of the season on third and eight. Yeah,

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to have kind of you, the kind I

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>mean and not to me. We don't know what the

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>long term future holds for Byron, but I would fair

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to guess that we've got four more years of Layton

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>playing at a pretty good level. So at least, yeah,

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at least all right, let's take our final break. We

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>come back. We'll go to that next question, which is

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be which player's absence was a greater loss,

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Travis Frederick or Jason Witten. When we come right back,

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. Well, a player

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can look good on paper, it's when he's out on

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the field that you really find out what he's made of.

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why the Cowboys rely on more than just stats

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and scouting reports when building their team. When picking the tractor,

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's why you should rely on more than just specs

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and features. You've got to take it out and put

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it to the test. The Cowboys did when they named

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>John Dear their official tractor experience one for yourself. I

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>visit my John Deerdealer dot com. Slash Football, It's time

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for tailgate with the Autobox Boys. Autterbox, the makers of

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>those crazy protective phonecases, so one and only. They're also

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>wild about protecting parking lot parties from sad drinks. It's

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>why they made elevation tumblers room around the crock pot

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>as they're made from stainless steel with a copper lining

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep temps hot or coal true. They even come

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in seven different sizes up to sixty four ounce the growler.

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I like cowauterbox drinks. I mean thanks, and that's been

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>tailgating with the autobox boys. Check out all the colors

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and sizes of their elevation tumblers at auterbox dot com.

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Want to use what the pros use? How about the

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Playmaker, a

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack Black

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized Intense Therapy lip bomb

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and a Cowboys Can cooler. Go to get Jack Black

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Slash Cowboys and use the code word Cowboys

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Playmakers ten bucks free shipping. Star Sports

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Tours is the only official fan travel partner of the

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk x's and

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us. You

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Travel dot com to book your travel package today. A

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>man's stepson doesn't just protect him from life's elements, it

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 1>projects an unstoppable and legendary spirit, just like the men

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wearing silver and Navy on the field every Sunday Sends

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American made with pride

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas. They are still the official crown

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of all self prospecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be on the field with America's team. Find steps and

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hats in the pro Shop or at Stetson dot Com. Today.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break, Welcome back to the final segment

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of the show, Live from the s WBC Bortgage Studios.

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>At the Start, Nick tell us about Tommy John you know,

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John is not like an offensive coordinator because Tommy John,

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no adjustment needed. You don't really need to make

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>these on the fly. So this would be perfect for

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett. Yeah, because you just go in to just

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>go and do what we do, do what you doing.

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't adjust anything. We're gonna be good. We're meaning

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so Tommy John Army dot com for Yeah, he went there.

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about in any offensive coach, offensive

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>coordinator David Hellman might be one. Tommy John dot com

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Forward Slice Cowboys. You get twenty percent off your first order,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and we've been doing this for a while, so I

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder what it's like for the second and third order,

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>because I bet you we have some listeners that have

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>gone back to the well yep, making some adjustments there.

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>There you go mark adjustments to your underwear order, but

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>not your underwear themselves. Exactly know what I mean. You're like,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I need more of these, I'm gonna adjust, but not

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>my actual underwear. Yeah, and we can make an adjustment too.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Dave can read these from now on. So why

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I like, because I'm why don't we

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>wait till the beginning of the of the the coundar

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or the NFL year, And yeah, we'll flip it and

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>then you start back over from one on your show count. Yeah,

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and when we do that, we're at one fourteen where

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we get to eighteen. Uh. The year will be up

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of March, so you mid March going

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two rounds in the playoffs, probably you know, spiked it

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. Huh uh. Yeah, we did a

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.879
<v Speaker 1>few more shows, and we probably would do otherwise. Ask

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>me some questions. All right, we go our next question,

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>which player's absence was a greater loss? Travis Frederick or

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten. It has to be Travis Frederick because as

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>much as I love Jason Witten, by the end of

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>his career he was not the best player in the

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL at his position. Travis Frederick was. And I love

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Looney, He's one of the feel good stories of

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the season for how well he played. But we're talking

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about a team that like you, We're gonna line up

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and run right at you and do what we do well.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You need a guy like Travis Frederick to do that.

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>He gets to the second level unlike anybody I've ever seen.

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He cuts defenses in half. He takes linebackers out of

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>plays effortlessly, and for the Cowboys to run things the

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>way they want to, you need him. I mean that's Hey.

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>This offense doing a lot of the same stuff with

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the same offensive coordinator was top five in the league

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.479
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen, and a lot of that is because

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line play was far and away better than

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it has been the last two years. So Arca, Travis Frederick,

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it has to be Jason, okay, and I don't disagree.

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with everything that Dave said, but at

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I mean they were able to do

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a good job still handle the situation with Joe Looney

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in there as a backup, and he gave me everything

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I would expect from a backup. He was able to

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>hold it down and Jason wouldn't. Although he was declining

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of last year, he was still I

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>think he would have still be able to provide you

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>some some production on the field, especially with the connection

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that he had with Dak. Dad would be able to

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>find him and it was always like a how do

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you say this? A comfortable throw, you know, And I

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>think he would have definitely helped in the red zone.

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Cowboys would have struggled as much.

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And aside from having him there, I mean, even with

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>having him there, that would have also opened things up

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for them in the red zone to whether if it

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was not a shot directly to Jason, it could have

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>been to Amari or somebody else, or maybe Zeke would

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have been better at running the ball in there, even

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>though the Cowboys didn't really put much effort in that.

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:52.879
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I would say

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Jason both great points red zone as he wouldn't would

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>have helped there. Frederick would have helped there as well. Um,

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's Frederick, though it's close. I think

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Frederick because just how great he was and Looney he

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>played well, but they did give up a lot of sacks,

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and so gun to your head. Who's more likely to

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be named in All Pro if they'd played twenty eighteen?

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why, why would have to be aggressive? All right?

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Forget your imagine your gun to my head, forget the gun.

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Just with as few words as possible, Yeah, it was

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>more likely. Yeah, Okay, Frederick was a better player at

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that point in his career. I get that. Yeah, I

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>get that. That's not always the answer because it's like,

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>how much was how much was the drop off? Joe

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Looney had been an All Pro, but he, you know,

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 1>was the drop off greater? I mean with jar One

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and Schultz running around trying to make plays. Given the chance.

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I Travis Frederick, if fully healthy and not dealing with

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>with gian Barre is probably he's no worse than the

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>fourth best player on this entire team, or fifth. I

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>mean Tyrn, Zach, DeMarcus, Zeke, and Travis like that, those

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are probably the five. So give me one of the

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 1>five best players on my roster. I'll okay, Yeah, I'm

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna go with Travis there, all right, Next question,

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more underutilized weapon Cole Beasley or Tavon Austin. Oh, well,

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's got what. I haven't check Tavon's Twitter, but it's

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>it's cold. I know how cold would vote him. It's

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Tavon by default, but that's he was just out for

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>so long. No, I get that. I guess I'm the

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>point of what I'm saying because even even before he

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>went out, they forgot how much did we talk about

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>every week? Like how do they get this guy get

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>more involved. They need to use in more in offense.

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>What are they doing. I'm gonna remember that. I'm just

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna remember. And it's not necessarily Tavon's fault. I

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have any beef with him. I would resign him

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for the right price. I would too. I'm gonna remember

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this when people get up in arms about offseason talking points,

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>because we were talking about how Tavon could theoretically touch

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball anywhere from eight to twelve times a game. Yeah,

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he might have touched at twelve times all year. It

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.479
<v Speaker 1>felt like, so just keep all that stuff in mind

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when we're going over Ota storylines. You know, the reality

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>is often not the offseason hype. We were talking about

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this before the show, like kole Yah. Yeah, he disappeared

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at times. In half of their games, he got targeted

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>left less than five times, which seems far too few,

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>especially to say that his average for the year was

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>five targets per game, which means if he was under five,

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of games where he was probably

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the eight to ten range, or at least half

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the games where he's in that range. At the same time,

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in a run happy offense with an all Pro running back?

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 1>How many? And as the third receiver? How many more?

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>He finished? Sixty five catches? Like? How many more does

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he reasonably expect to get? Right? So I do agree

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that he disappeared at times, but that's about the resume

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that I would expect him to have in this all

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in that role. Yeah, I don't mean to like change

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>your your different answer there. Oh yeah, it's a jazz answer. Yeah,

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but um, I think the most underutilized aspect was Dak's running.

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I would go with that. Did I say underutilized aspect?

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you say Nick plays by his own? What did

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you play? Play? Well? Then? That that press here? Now

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he said if we could find a better one, we

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>could go ahead. Okay Tavon, yeah he could have been.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>He was hurt for what five games? Yeah? So oh

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. I like your point. That's a

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good one. Um, but both of them are good. I mean,

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't it got to the point where nobody

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>trusted that they were going to use Tavon that way.

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And who did they play at the end? Oh Seattle,

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, seeing locket and you're like, man, that's what

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you want Tavon to be. But they just don't use it,

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're right. I mean, when Cole caught seventy five passes,

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it was like, look what he can do. He needs

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>more money and all that. Now I caught sixty five passes.

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, okay, that's I mean, you got Coop, you

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>got Zeke, and then you probably won't Gallup came on.

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But then they say Beasley is the third option. Sixty

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>five catches. I think in twenty sixteen when he was

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so good, I think he only had seventy five, so

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>he had ten more catches. I think ten and eleven

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are open next year. I think I think those jerseys

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are both. Okay, well, that's actually the next question. That's

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>actually that's actually the next question. I will say this,

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think hindsight, I don't need your had Ward. I

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>would rather have Switzer. I've come full circle. I'm saying

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I would I would rather have Bryan Switzer on the

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on the team he got. Beasley got targeted eleven more

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 1>times in sixteen, so over the court. So what that's

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like one extra target a game? Yeah, a little less? Yes?

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So both those guys being considered, do you

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 1>want if they're both gonna be a free agent, they're

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>both gonna be free agents. Do you want to keep

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one both or neither. But let me also clarify the switcher.

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 1>He's not better player than Cole Beasley. I'm not saying

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that at all. What I'm saying is Cole's a free agent.

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He obviously has made it clear he wants to get

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and I think it might be

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a time to kind of move on. They had Switzer

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>here and they wanted to get better with Tavon. They

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't really do that. And now you know, I thought

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Switzer was kind of a decent role player for for Pittsburgh.

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:26.399
<v Speaker 1>So to answer the question, I'm not bringing Tavon back

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Beasley really, no, why, I just I don't not even

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as a return guy. No, I don't remember what I mean.

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I just said it a few a few minutes. The

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dancing just really bothered That bothered him all. I thought

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>y'all would catch. But I said he was hurt for

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>five games this year. I know he missed ten, but

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I said he's hurt for five and he I just know.

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's I don't think no. And yes,

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, where they're smoked, there's fire literally, so

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't sing bothered now it did, It's fine, it

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely bothered. I think they're you know, the alarms went

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>off at the end of the season on that situation.

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I think I hear you. I hear you loud and clear. Ah.

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel it feels harsh to say I don't want

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley back. I think he's the hell of a player.

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's underrated. I think he could be outstanding

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in another offense. Like there's I have no doubt about that,

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a better chance he comes back

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with Lenehan being gone. Like, there's no beef between him

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and Dak that I'm aware of. They love each other.

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The thing Like, so you're applying that there is beef

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.240
<v Speaker 1>between him and Lenehan. I think he made that pretty obvious,

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't he. I mean, I'm just I'm from like October onward.

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's so. I did a radio hit yesterday with somebody

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in DC and they're like, oh, Beasley was on Twitter

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>last week. I was like, Beasley's been on Twitter since September.

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Man like his whole career. He went back from London.

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 1>He was, Yeah, he was. He's at some moments, some

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>memorable moments until his wife too. Yeah, they go in.

0:52:57.400 --> 0:53:00.319
<v Speaker 1>He's been a waiter for a while. If you can get,

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:05.399
<v Speaker 1>if you can get the god I can't. I can't.

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So I just caught that after you said it. It

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>took me a second, But go ahead, if you could

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>get if you could get him back on a team

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>friendly deal, I'd be fine with it. And I feel

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:15.720
<v Speaker 1>harsh saying this because I do think he's a good player,

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but like I'm I'm down to upgrade that position. And

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>basically what I mean by that is like there's no

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>rule in the NFL that says your slot receiver is

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>only effective within ten yards of the line of scrimmage.

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not that's not a thing. Like I know

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have had that guy for so long it feels

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like a thing. Juju Smith Shuster is a slot receiver.

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry is a slot receiver. Like these guys exist

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>who can be dynamic within ten yards of the line

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or downfield, and I'm all about getting one of those.

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's also precisely why, in my opinion, I don't

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think you go out and get a slot receiver. I

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think what you give is you can play in a

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>slot and outside. Cooper here you go and move them

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>around and make defenses have to adjust to the fact

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that you don't know what they're gonna lie, which is

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>why I sorry. If they they'll draft a tight end,

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they will do it, But I don't care about getting

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the second round. Just get one, because I'll

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 1>take Jarwin and Schultz and they can do their thing.

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And again, a badass slot receiver or a badass receiver

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 1>who can play in the slot will be far more

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of a friend to Dak than a tight end in

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:28.839
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Ye in my opinion, yep, Amber one boat,

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>one vote or neither. Who's in free agency. They're just

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>so close to each other. I mean, I don't know,

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing else to say than everything they've said already.

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But one of the like cold Bleasley, he doesn't want

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to be here anymore. He's over it. He's ready to

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>move on. Tavon. I would love to have him back,

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately did not see anything this season to where

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it would give me hope that the Cowboys would be

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>able to Utili. Yeah, but let me ask you this,

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think you guys are kind of glossing over

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that he was a much better option as

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a return guy than anything else you had on this team.

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And even if you brought him back for the purposes

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of being your main return guy, that still has value

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:08.399
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. Now, maybe he's not willing to take

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that contract that comes with that, but I think that

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has value, and I would, at the very least, if

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Cowboys try to resign him for that purpose alone,

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I will. I don't think it's fair to say Beasley

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to be here. I think about that. I

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think Beasley wants to be appreciated, Like Beasley wants to be,

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not a focal point, but a guy who is

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>not an afterthought. And he could maybe be that here

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>if the money's right or maybe not. Yeah, but at

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this time, if it doesn't feel I appreciate it, doesn't

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got it. He's got a better chance of getting

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what he wants somewhere else. I will, And I actually,

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I personally believe there will be other teams out in

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the free agent market that are willing to pay him

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 1>closer to what he wants than the Cowboys. Where's a

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>list out there somewhere that says he's one of the

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>top five available free agents in the Cole Beasley in

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, and I think the Cowboys let him go

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>do that. I agree with that, which is why I

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm all about bringing Tavon back mainly because of price.

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he could he's the closest thing you have to

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic returner. He can do some of that slot stuff.

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Not going to command huge money on the free agent one.

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That's I think you can get him back relatively cheaply.

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>His injury history, his lack of really being able to

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>find a true position, bring him back very cheaply to

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>be my fifth or sixth receiver slash return guy. I'm

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fine with that. Ye all right, um, next question, who's

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>more in need of backup support? Rod Smith? And I'm

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:28.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about the position and the player, right running back

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with Rod Smith, linebacker with Damian Wilson, or safety with

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Cavon Frasier. Were they more in need of backup support?

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>They need to upgrade the backup person? Oh boy, well

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know safety? Well? Actually starting go ahead, Nick, Well,

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I still this is about time you want

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the starter. I want to talk about

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the backup they don't need. They don't need backup help

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at safety. They need starter because they're going to get

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a good backup. Okay, so let's weed that one, that

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.439
<v Speaker 1>one out or Heath Yeah, let's okay, good point. Let's

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>leave leave that one out because I know where you're

0:57:04.440 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going with that. We'll talk about that later. They need

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to running back, running back or linebacker. With Damian Wilson

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and Rod Smith running back running back. One look at

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. I mean, look, who's who's gonna be

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the best running back in the game. Girly, girly you think, yes,

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm out at his back up? I'm putting my house

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yes, okay, but no, I'm not who's the

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 1>best running No, who's gonna be the best one in

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that game? It will be Girly. Girly has two weeks

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to be He'll be fine, he'll be ready. I get it.

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying C. J. Anderson has a role.

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots have seventeen backs that they were they run

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.440
<v Speaker 1>got it. But I'm saying you got it, Okay. They

0:57:39.480 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't get there without it, don't get there. They don't

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>get there. To say is that it's okay to have

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the best running back in the game, and and I

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 1>also have a good backup. And the saying, what are

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you saying, I'm saying, he's not a running back? Oh,

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he's really not, Like what is he? He's a good player,

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's he's he's tall, He's not really a dynamic

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>type of running back. I know I want to get

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to draft one in the fifth round. And

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he wanted him to be earlier than that third. Yeah,

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that. I got other needs for that, Sure

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you do. But honestly, I believe it by the end

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of this season, I believe they had beaten up, They'd

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>beaten Zeke to death. I think I think Zeke was.

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>He was kind of at the point where it just

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have the same juice I think by the

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>end tough and but and it's because of the mouth

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that they used him. And I think that if you're

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>smart in today's NFL, you need to have two quality

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>backs that can that you can take one out and

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 1>put the other one in and you don't lose a

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>whole lot by doing it. And fact the matter is,

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the really good teams and

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you brought up in the break the Saints. Saints got

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>really good again when they got Kamara. They already had

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a running back that was a really good running back,

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Roll Bowl Running, Yes, exactly. But they went out and

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>got Kamara, and Kamara added a whole different dimension to

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their offense. To me, that's how I look at this.

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You can have a great running back, you give me

0:59:00.720 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 1>another another running back that has that kind of dynamic ability,

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and you will make your offense infinitely better. I bet,

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet, I'll bet a paycheck that they upgrade their

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 1>backup running back position the offseason. And that's a key

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>position for him, Like we know, when they don't have

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a good running back in there, they just completely crash yep.

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Which and I wrote about that actually yesterday shameless plug.

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>They do have other needs, but I really think this

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:28.080
<v Speaker 1>roster is uniquely positioned, like they have enough talent in

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 1>enough places that they can afford to do that. If

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the best guy on their board in the third round

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or even the second round is a running back, I

0:59:34.560 --> 0:59:37.439
<v Speaker 1>think they would do it, because this is as few

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>holes they have on the starting lineup as they've had

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in a long long time. Yep. And I think I

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think if he had another backup spot that needs to

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be addressed, and maybe he'll be a starter, But I

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think defensive tackle is something they need to be looking

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at as well, just because you know, they didn't have

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Irving's not going to be a part of this, and

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they had the Daniel Rosses and guys like that. But

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not too early to start, you don't. You

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the future is going to be the

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>next few years, about Tyrone Crawford and Malite Collins and

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Woods and all that. Just keep them coming, keep

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>getting these young guys in there a defensive tackle. How

1:00:10.920 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>many more questions do you have? I just I had

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>guessing we only got to like three out of ten. No, no, no,

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we got to five of the six, and there was

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one that was gonna be like multiple questions, So we'll

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>save that one. Okay, we gotta We're already over time.

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to ask this last question. Hopefully

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>done too long, but a better chance of being here

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>three years from now, Taco Charlton or Jordan Lewis. Oh

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>did I just introduced a whole new show? Maybe? Well?

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Taco has the better chance just

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>because of his contract, Like he's got the first and

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a first round pick. You're probably not gonna cut

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick, you could trade him. Not that

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna cut Jordan, but I said three years,

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so that would be at the time when they would

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>give him a fifth year option, and all that kicks in, right,

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's that would have said Byron Jones is out,

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but right options, so you never know. You never know,

1:01:01.960 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's why it's it is not fair or

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>right to call Taco a bust based on what we

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just saw with Byron. It is fair to say he

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is not a hit. You know what I like you see, Well, no,

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not a hit because if you hit Layton vander

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Esch just made a Pro Bowl as a rookie. Zach

1:01:18.920 --> 1:01:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Martin has never not been all Pro. So you're saying

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Byron's not a hit. Byron's not a Hittitron just salvaged

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>his draft stock, he became a good player. He's not

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a hit. You only got one Pro Bowl season out

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of him in four years. Like that's he's not a hit.

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin is a hit, a Grand Slam. So Taco

1:01:35.040 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a hit. That doesn't mean he's not a bust.

1:01:36.920 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it doesn't mean he's a bust, but he's

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>got Work's got to be an in between between a

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bust and a hit. I mean a little touch butt,

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a butt like a butt. He's a walk right now.

1:01:48.120 --> 1:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>He looks double a single. I don't know, triple whiff

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, the whiff, he's a strikeout. If you're a

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>first round pick and you're a healthy scratch in your

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>second year, there's I can't defend that. Yeah, and I

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was a big defender of Taco, But that means that

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>means they didn't want you on the field. Yeah, there's

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not that they didn't just give you a few like

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want if they made you a healthy strategy,

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't want you on the field. Although I will say,

1:02:10.720 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think the world of Jordan Lewis as a

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guy and as a player, but the guy that's calling

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the defense does not favor his style of play, for

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better way to phrase it. So it's

1:02:23.000 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. I don't I don't really know for sure.

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised. I would not be surprised if

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one or both of them doesn't finish their contract here. Yeah, wait,

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know anything, Like I don't mean to

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>speculate it, but we'll see. They're both in a precarious

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>situation right now. You would think just because of the

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lack of opportunities that they got this year, that does

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>signal something, right. Yeah, all right, we appreciate you guys.

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>You on us. We're back next week on Wednesday, Wednesday

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven a m. Till then for Nick Eatman, Dave Helm

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and Amber Garcia. I'm Derek Helton. This has been The

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys Football Club.