WEBVTT - Just Keep Bidding: MMTLP, PE, ETFs

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levine and I write The Money Stuff Colin for Bloomberg.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Got Katie.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about a merger.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a merger. I think we're talking

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>about short squeeze.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about a short squeeze. That's not

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a merger. There is fraud involved. We're going to talk

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>about on cycle private equity recruiting. It wasn't a world

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that I was familiar with.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>That's an important world.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we're going to talk about bloom Er Candy Delicious.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say that. Okay, so this is a merger,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it's not.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>We're telling you about MMTLP.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's some more here.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Thing that people on social media really care about it.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, a lot, a lot.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I've been getting emails about it for years.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I was reading some Reddit posts from

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>three years ago this morning. Gosh, how to begin how

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to begin begin.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>So there's an oil company called Torchlight. It had some

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>leases that were not producing a lot of oil, but

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I like drill the releases. But it was a publicly

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>listed company and it did a reverse merger with a

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 2>like material science company, and they decided to get rid

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of the oil assets, and like they could do it bad,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>like spinning it out to shareholders. But like at some

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>point they had conceived this notion that short sellers were

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>bad and that like short sellers were the problem with

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the company, and they were like, we want to find

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a way to punish the short sellers. And the way

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>you do that, it turns out there's like a technology

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to punish short sellers, which is that instead of spinning

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>out Torchlight or like the oil assets as a new

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>company where people could buy and sell the stock, you

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>spin it out as a company where they can't buy

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and solve the stock. And the reason you do that

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>is like, if you were a short seller who is

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>short Torchlight, you've borrowed the stock and you have to

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>return what you borrowed. So if Torchlight splits up into

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>two companies, one of which is like the new Meta Materials,

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 2>that like has a public traded stock and one of

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 2>them is like this new not traded stock, then you

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>have to return both of those things to your stock lender.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Public get traded stock is easy, you just go buy

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it on the stock market, but the not traded stock

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you can't buy in the stock market, so you can't

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>return it to your stock lender. And so what Torchlight

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 2>figured out is if we do this merger and like

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>we have like this new meta material stock that's the

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 2>new public company, and we also have this other non

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>traded stock, then like the short sellers will see that,

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and before the merger closes, they will know they have

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to buy back their Torchlight short positions because after the

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 2>merger closes, they'll be host there'll be no way to

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>close out there short they'll be in big trouble. This

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>is the idea, and so they do that. They created

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>this non traded stock or this thing that wasn't supposed

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to be traded called MMTLP. It's like a weird preferred

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>stock of the new public company that wasn't supposed to

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 2>be traded on a public stock exchange, and like sort

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 2>of represented a claim on the oil and gas assets.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And they like announced this merger, and they went out

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>and sort of marketed quietly to the right people. They

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>marketed the idea that there would be a short squeeze,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and so they didn't put it in their public filings.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>They weren't like, oh, we're doing this to do a

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>short squeeze, but like privately amongst themselves, they were like,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>we're doing this to do a short squeeze, and like

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>they sort of like tried to convince short sellers that

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>they would get squeezed. And they also like tried to

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>convince some number of Torchlight shareholders that there would be

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the short squeeze. And the point of all this is

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>just before the merger, there's a short squeeze, all the

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>short sellers have to buy back the stock. The stock

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>goes way up, and what they do is just before

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the merger they sell a bunch of stock. They doing

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>at the market offering a stock like right before the

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>merger closes in order to take advantage of the short

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>squeeze and raise like one hundred million dollars to use

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to like keep drilling Torchlights oil leases.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>That feels like meme stock economics.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>It's very meme stock economics. The difference between this and

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>like game Stop is one, the company is explicitly like saying, hey,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be a short scueze, usually in like a

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>meme stock. It's like people on Reddit are saying, hey,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be a short scuzz here. It's the company doing.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>But then two, the other thing that's like really important

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>is they engineered the short squeeze by like giving out

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>this non traded stock in game Stop or whatever. The

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>short squeeze is not like a real short squeeze. It's

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>just like the price goes up and so short sellers

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like lose money and so they feel like they need

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 2>to cover their short positions. But this is a specific

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>designed structure to make it impossible to keep a short

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 2>position on. So even if the stock went down, the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>shorts would still be in trouble because they wouldn't be

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 2>able to buy back this weird non traded stock that

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>the company was giving out. So that was the idea.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Now I don't know if it worked. And the reason

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about it is the SEC brought a fraud

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 2>case against Meta Materials, the company, and like the SEEO

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of Torchlight and the former CEO of Meta materials who

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 2>were sort of allegedly in on this plan. And the

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>SEC says what you were doing was fraud, but they

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know why it was fraud. They say, either it

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>was fraud because you did this short squeeze and that's

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 2>market manipulation. You're not allowed to do this thing that

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 2>causes the short squeeze, or it was fraud because you

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't actually succeeded during the short scuers. No short sellers

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 2>bought back their stock. There was fine, but you convinced

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>enough retail shareholders that there would be a short squeeze

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that they all bought the stock and then you were

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>able to sell because the stock did go up a lot,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>because just nobody knows why the.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Stock But either way, what you did is fraud.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what the SEC says.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean for the actual shareholders because

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there were actual shareholders in this company while this was

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>all happening.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, if you bought stock, there's a good chance

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you lost money. Right, Like the company sold you all

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the stock at basically the peak, right, like they did

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>this short squeeze or whatever it was, like the stock

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>went way up and they did an out the market offering,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>like right at the peak because they timed it to

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>when they were planning to have the short squeeze, and

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 2>so they sold one hundred million dollars worth of stock

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to people, maybe some short sellers, but a lot of

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>like regular investors at prices that you know, like then

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the stock fell by like, you know, eighty percent, so

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people lost money. The other thing it means, though,

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>is like if you bought the stock sort of leading

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 2>into the short squeeze, you got shares of Meta Materials,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 2>which is the public company, but you also got these

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 2>MMTLP shares. And the MMTLP shares were supposed to be

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>not traded, right, so like instead of having like a

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>public company, like you own torch Light, which is a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>public company, and now you have like this not traded company.

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Now it turns out they were traded. The company was like,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>we're going to make them not traded. We're going to

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 2>like not list them on a stock exchange. But that

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter. They can still trade over the counter. It's

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 2>still a public company. And so in fact, MMCLP shares

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 2>did trade, not a lot, but they traded. You know,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the sec cases about stuff that happened only twenty twenty one.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Since then, yeah, MMCLP has become even more of a

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>meme because what happened is at some point the company

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know what, the stock is not non

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>traded enough for us. There are still short sellers.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>We're still mad at short to exterminate them.

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to do this again, but like more so.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And so they did is they took MMTLP, which was

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of like a tracking stock on the oil assets,

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and they replaced it with they spun out the oil

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>assets into a new company called next Bridge, and the

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 2>stock of that company is like super duper not traded.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not registered with DTC, the like repository of all stock.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>And so what that means is your broker can't hold

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>or transfer your shares for you, so it's just you

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>really can't trade it at all. And the idea was

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>like that would really drive out the short sellers. You

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>definitely couldn't buy that stock to close out your short

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So I don't really know how many short sellers were

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>left at MMTLP because it was hard to trade it.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>The plan wasn't twenty twenty one they were gonna get

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>rid of all the short sellers, but they replaced MMTLP

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>with Next Bridge. They published a perspective for it that

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 2>like explicitly said there's going to be a short squeeze,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and there was, in fact, again a rally, and MMTLP

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>stock is like either because there was a short squeeze

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>or because people were like, oh, there's gonna be a

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>short squez, it's great. And then Finra, the financial regulator,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>halted trading in the stock like two days before it

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>poofed into Next Bridge, And so all these people who

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>had bought the stock expecting one there'd be a short

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>squeeze and two they would then sell at the peak,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>they got stuck in it. They had stuck holding mm

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>TOP for like the last two days, and then it

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 2>poofed into a Next Bridge, which they can't sell at all.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>So now I just own the stock in this oil

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>company that doesn't make any money, and like you know,

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>as in oil properties, it may one day make money,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>but they can't trade it because it's really super duper

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not tradable, and so it's like these decisions that the

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>company made were really bad for shareholders. Yeah, they made

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>life much worse for actual shareholders in the pursuit of

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>making life worse for short.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Sellers in a way, I find that sort of just

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>do whatever it takes kind of just amazing.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like such a sort of well known obvious

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 2>fact that if a company is going around doing stuff

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>for the purpose of hoording short sellers, one that's gonna

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 2>be bad for shareholders, but two, like that company is

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>focused on the wrong thing, right, Yeah, if you're thinking

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 2>about short sellers like twenty percent of the time, like

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>you are not spending enough time on your business, and

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>these guys are thinking about short sellers like ninety percent, I.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Was gonna say that's one hundred percent. Well, there's a

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>few questions that I'm hoping you can help me out with.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So before this combination, it was Torchlight that was heavily shorted, right,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was the old version of Meta Materials that

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do the merger so that they would get

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the list in.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Meta material is like a small Canadian company and

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they were like listed on a I think on one

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of the secondary Canadian stock exchanges, and they wanted a

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>US listing, and so yeah, torch Light had a Nasdaq listing,

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>and so they did a reverse merger where basically Meta

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Materials would get Torchlights listing, and torch Light's assets would

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>be spun out into this like MMTLP whatever kind of thing.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>What I don't quite understand is both CEOs linking arms

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in this cause to just like kill all the shorts.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Why did this become the cause of the Meta Materials, Like,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It just feels like there was a

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>cleaner way to do this.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yes, but the SEC would say the goal here

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>was not just to kill the shorts. There was another goal,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>which the pump the stock up, right, and like so

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they did pump the stock up. They raised like one

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred million, a hundred plus million dollars selling stock into

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>this whatever it was rally, and then most of that

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>money went to Meta Materials M. The Canadian company got

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>not only the publicly thing, but like this money from

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this pumped up stock price. Now, the deal was they'd

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>give some of that money to like Torchlight, to like

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>keep drilling the assets. But the SEC would say they

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>went around looking for companies that wanted a reverse merger

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and then they're like, hey, by the way, we have

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>this great plan to pump up the stock price and

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>like raise a lot of money, and then you know,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>some number of CEOs would say like, oh great, yeah,

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 2>I want a pumped up stock price and I want

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money a good deal.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So they did it. Now, why did Meta Materials do

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the extra super duper not tradable thing? Why afterwards? I

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I think some of it might be they

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>were really mad at short sellers. Some of it was

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>like they had to get rid of this MMTLP things.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Somehow they did have this retail investor base that has

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>spent years having conspiracy theories about short sellers.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you wrote in your Money Steff column that they

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>took a page from the Overstock CEO's book from that

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>experience who did something similar. Then they did this, which

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was a lightly better version. That's what you called it.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder where this now evolves to.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're like really in the middle of the story

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 2>because the SEC brought these charges saying that the thing

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>they did in the merger in twenty twenty one was

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a fraud. But there's still the like MMTLP into next Bridge,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the trading halt that's hotly controversial. They've been writing letters

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to Congress, They've been sending threatening emails to journalists. They've

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>been sending very polite emails to me, honest, they sort

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of arguing about this, like, I, you know, all my

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>interactions with the MMTLP people have been fine, but there's

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them, like they're really passionate about it.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And the conspiracy theory at this point involves Finra. The

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 2>MMTLP community believes that the trading halt in that stock

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>was Finna trying to bail out short sellers, and like

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Finra is conspiring with short sellers. By the way, this

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is not true. The halt came after the X date

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>for short sellers to have to close out their positions,

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>like this is not true. But they you know, they're

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>calling for hearings and whatnot. And so meanwhile, the sec

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>like explicitly said in this case, we are still continuing

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>our investigation of the subsequent events MMTLP, so there will

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>probably be another case about the MMTLP.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So are you rooting for chaos here?

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>No? Okay, I kind of like.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you want there to be hearings because that's something

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a little.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Bit fun like to me, Like, I feel really bad

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>for the regulators here, who, like I think, are just

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>doing very straightforward market regulation, and you clearly think you

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 2>know the SEC's position here, which is what I've been saying,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, since I started writing about this, is like

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>this company was doing a fraud by trying to arrange

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the short squeeze, and all of the investors think the opposite.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>They think the short sellers were doing some sort of

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>fraud and the company was just helping out shareholders by

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>taking revenge on the shorts, which is again not true

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 2>because the shareholders are stuck in this non treaded stock

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and have lost a lot of money. So I just

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>think that the regulators are sort of very straightforwardly doing

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the right thing and trying to prevent weird market manipulations,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 2>and like somehow there's this populist view that that's all

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>wrong and the regulators should be punishing the short sellers

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and like this sort of short squeeze is good. So no,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not reading for I often read for Cass, but

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>here I'm like, these hard working regulators are just trying

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to keep orderly markets and we should.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Let them God bless them.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to talk about my favorite financial story. Ever.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting that the SEC believes that like

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>engineering a short squeeze is illegal. It's not like super

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>clear to me that that's right, but you know, it's

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 2>probably right. I mean it's market manipation, right. It's like

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>causing the price of a security not to reflect the

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>fundamentals of supply, and that's kind of market manipulation. So

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I understand the case. It's probably right, but it's a

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>little odd. And every so often not companies, just market

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 2>participants engineer a short squeeze. And my favorite of them

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>is in twenty twelve, the SEC brought acase against Phil Falcone,

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>who ran Arbager, the hedge fund he like owned some

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>bonds which are delightfully called the max zips. I don't

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 2>know what Max is. I don't know his bonds, right,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 2>And he like owned these boonds. He liked these bonds,

0:13:55.840 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and he heard that some bank was shorting them, also

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>encouraging its clients to short them, and he got mad

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>at short slash. And so what he did was like,

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>He's like, okay, you're shorting the bonds. So he would

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>buy them. Like people would short the bonds, he'd buy them,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and he would also lend out his bonds. If you

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 2>want a short bonds, you have to borrow them from someone,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, Phil Falcone would tell his prime broker,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 2>you can let out my bonds, and his bonds got

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>loaned up, and like he would keep landing at bonds.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>People would borrow them, they'd sell them, he'd buy them,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 2>he'd lend them out again, and ultimately he ended up

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>owning more than all of the bonds. The company issued

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>like two hundred million dollars of bonds and he had

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>own two hundred and twenty million because he had like

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>bought all of them and loan them out and then

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>bought them again. And so once he owned more than

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>all of the bonds, he stopped lending them out. He

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>called in the stock bar, He called all the brokerage

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>firms and said I want my bonds back, and they

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>had to go buy them to return them to Phil Falcon,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and they couldn't buy them because he owned all of

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>them and he wasn't selling. Yeah, and so the sec

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>has this incredible passage of like this unnamed at banker

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>brokerage called Phil Falcon. It was like, you know, we

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 2>understand you want your bonds back, but we can't find

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>them to buy them. And he said they should quote

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>just keep it bidding.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>And he said, sometimes you are just on the wrong

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>side of the trade.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, the bank was like, I don't understand. Apparently,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Falcone said that he knew that there was a long

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>position in the bonds and excess of like the size

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of the total bonds, and and the bank said, how

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>could you know this. Phial Cones said that he was

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 2>working the position himself and that he had acquired approximately

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ninety million bonds, meaning more than all

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>of the bonds. Yeah, And the SEC says the senior

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>officer and the other Wall Street firm personnel were stunned. Still,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I just like picture this conversation.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like he must have been having so much, just like.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>The greatest feeling in the world to be like, oh, yeah, just.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Keep bidding, but he's gonna I mean, I would be

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>chasing that high for the rest of my life.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean yeah, I tell you. The SEC determined that

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>this was market manipulation. Come on, they sued him, they settled.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he admitted wrongdoing. It my suspicions that

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>he thinks and also kind of I think this was

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>just extremely cool that you shouldn't have gotten in trouble

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>for it, but he did get in trouble for it.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>The SEC believes that engineering a short squeeze is market manipulation,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>so they got meta materials too.

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like short selling just breaks everyone's brain

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on every single side of it.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>It really does. People get mad at short sellers in

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a way that has just exceeds like what they're actually doing.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>People would say they're manipulating the market.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but like even if you think that, like to

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>arrange your entire public company around punishing short sellers is

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>just like an overreaction, even if they're.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Doing something ill, that man can hold a grudge. Should

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we talk about on cycle pe recruiting? I guess I

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>s Business Insider of course out with reporting this week

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that apparently his cycle is starting much than usual, or

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at least a month earlier then it started last year,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which was also starting.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's a key month. R So, like the

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 2>way it works is like you go to college, maybe

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>like one summer you intern at an investment bank. Sure,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>you graduate from college. I mean, if you're looking to

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>work in sort of like the standard financial path, and

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>you graduate from college and you go work at an

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>investment bank for to your analyst program, and at the

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>end of your two year analyst program, you often want

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to work in private equity, and so you get a

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>job offer from you know, a big private equity fund KKR, Apollo,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Blackstone or whatever to start there after your two years

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>as an analyst's end. And at some point in the

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 2>distant past, twenty months into your analyst program, after doing

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of deals and learning how you know, to

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>build financial models and generally, you know, getting some experience

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>in investment banking, you would go interview at the big

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>private equity funds and they'd ask you about your work

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>experience and they would hire you, and then you would

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a few months later leave your bank and go work

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in private equity. But over the years, the private equity

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>firms realized that they could get the best candidates by

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 2>interviewing a little bit earlier. So like, instead of interviewing

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>four months before your analysts program ms, they can interview

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>five months before your analyst program mens. And it has

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>moved up so much that now it is happening in

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 2>June before your analysts program starts. So like you started

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 2>at a bank in like let's say July or maybe August.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>And now the private equity interviewing is starting in June,

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 2>a little more than two years in advance of when

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 2>you'd start in private equity. So you haven't started at

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 2>your bank yet, and you are doing interviews for the

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>job that you will take after your two years the bank.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Is over to anyone not in that industry or who

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't very familiar with this sounds like lunacy. Like that

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds like crazy town. And Business Insider had some delicious

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>details about these analysts who haven't started at their investment bank.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't want to call them analysts anyway, these

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>people who had analysts, these pre analysts who hadn't started

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>their investment bank, not even being in the city yet

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>having to hop on a plane. I know that you

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are not sympathetic to their plate.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm sympathetic to their plate. I don't work in

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>private equity, yeah, like like I've made different life choices. No,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sympathetic to their plight. I think that's rough. What

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I wrote is like I sort of understand it as

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the interviewing conditions to some extent reflect the working conditions, right,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 2>where like you want people who are so dedicated to

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the cause of private equity that they will hop on

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>a plane before they've moved to New York to go

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>do an interview, Like you know you always read about

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>like the encycle recruiting. Like, in some ways this is

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 2>more humane than it was last year, because it used

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 2>to be like you started at your bank and then

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>like two weeks later you did your private equity interviewing,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and like you were working sixteen hour days as an

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>investment bank analyst. And so there are stories about like

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>people interviewing at two in the morning because that's the

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>only time they could get away from their desk.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Skipping their trainings or something else.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Skipping their trainings.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, fine, oh that's fine.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean I feel like in.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Tier days, Matt, you know, they weren't giving back, right, No.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>But as a matter of like how human it is

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>for them, I feel like interviewing at two am after

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a long day of yeah, building pitch books is worse

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>than skipping the training that you're probably gonna ignore anyway.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's wrong.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, so I hear your point that again,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like a good test of the actual working conditions

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to hop on a plane at

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>any time. But just hiring someone two years out with

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>zero work experience, it doesn't quite solve that problem for

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>me because that seems like lunacy.

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 2>It conveys a belief that what you learn in investment

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in banking is completely fungible, which it's true, not in

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a bad way. I think that the private equity firms

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>are sort of saying, we trust these banks so much

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 2>to train these people and all that they need to

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 2>know that we're not going to quiz them about what

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 2>they need to know. They're fine, they will go through

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>it to your analyst program. They will learn everything they

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>need to do private equity and that's fine, and we'll

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>just interview them now for like personality fit.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Are they giving them actual offers at the end of

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the year. That's so that's nut so to me.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Also, the average like a little bit conditional. Like if

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 2>you like really screw up at your bank, then like

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you lose your offer. I don't exactly know how the

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of that work. You arrive at your bank with

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>an offer at your private equity firm because the privatya

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 2>firm has like seen whatever they're seeing you right, like

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>they like your style, your work ethic. Maybe you've interned

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at a bank the previous summer, so you have some

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 2>knowledge of find.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you had some great jokes to tell me interview.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, and you've like studied, right, Like you get

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>asked questions about valuation and stuff. You have like some

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>ability to pretend that you know what you're talking about financially,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>but you haven't like actually done deals, or maybe you've

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 2>done like a little bit as a summer intern. But yeah, no,

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like the idea is they trust that the

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>banks will train you up, and you know, they know

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 2>what bank you're going to, and they know like what

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>department you'll be working in, and.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So kind of the banks field about this.

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 2>The banks have mixed feelings. You know. Goldmen for a

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 2>while was really fighting this and was saying like you

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>weren't allowed to have an accepted offer at a private

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>equity firm, which makes sense, right, Like it's a conflict

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of interest, right, I think you're working on deals, You're

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 2>like doing a cell side for a company, and like

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>one bidder is your private equity firm and another bid

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>is a different private agre. Like that's weird. Now you're

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>an analyst. There's only so much you can do to

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 2>influence the process. But Gulbe for a while hated it

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>and was like would say, you know, you can't work

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>here if you have accepted offer, but then like you

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>lose everyone. It's a mixed bag for the banks. I

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>think the banks have always been very inverted pyramid models

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 2>where they hire a lot of analysts to do a

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of grunt work, and then ultimately they only need

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>so many managing directors. So it's good if people leave

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>throughout their career. Now it is maybe not that good

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 2>if every analyst.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Leaves, right, Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Like it's good to have like fewer associates than analysts,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.239
<v Speaker 2>but you need a lot of associates, right, And if

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>it becomes like everyone in banking wants to go into

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>private equity, then you're left with kind of no middle

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>ranks and banking, and you need the middle ranks to

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>like one do the work and to like eventually produce

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the senior ranks. Yeah, part of what you do as

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a bank is try to convey to your junior bankers

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that like a career there is pretty good, pretty good

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>competitive with private equity. I think that's hard these days.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think like culturally, as you know from these articles,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like ninety nine percent of people who go into banking

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>as junior analysts, their dream is to go into private

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>equity and not to be investment bank vice presidents. But

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 2>some people, you know, along the way get convinced to

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>be investment bank a vice presidents instead. But no that

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 2>banks don't like it, but like they do need to

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 2>get rid of some people, and so it's a good way.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 2>But it's also like private equity is so important to banks, right,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Like it produces so many deals, produces so many financing fees. Right,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the private ecud firms are such big clients of the

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>banks that having a lot of your alumni working at

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 2>private equity is marginally good for the banks, right, Like

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you want your employees to leave, not to

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>become competitors, but to become clients, right, And like to

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 2>some extent, that's what's happening here, right, not entirely right,

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 2>because like a lot of these private equity firms are

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like really competitors of banks, right, Like you have like

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 2>private credit competing with bank lending. You have like you know,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>you have banks trying to compete with private equity, Like

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not as simple as like they're leaving to

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>go become clients, but it's like kind of like that,

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the story that people tell.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So this has been all over social media, which has

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>been fun to watch. I mean, Liquidity, for example, has

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>been posting a lot of the responses that he's gotten

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>outreach on his Instagram story. I also spent some time

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Oasis, sure, and I'd like to read

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you some of the posts. I think they're interesting. One

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets what we were talking about when it comes

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to being ready to hop on a plane and you know,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just do this very you know, kind of vicious sounding process.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>This person wrote, I should have studied sooner. Yeah, I

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>am probably like sixty percent there, but June is insane.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff like this makes me wonder if I am cut

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out for this quote high finance pipeline, which I guess

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is also part of the weeding out process.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny, like you do study right, like you

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>prepared to talk about DCF models, like you're going to

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 2>learn it in your two years at a bank, but

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 2>like you have to learn it in advance to be

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>able to talk about in interviews. It's like kind of

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 2>like a little oh, then maybe it gives you a

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>leg up on your job.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>This is my favorite post though the title was playing

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on cycle recruiting to a clueless europoor. All the threads

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>lately on the on cycle recruiting madness are really insane

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. It seems to be accepted that it is

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just the way it is, but I would love to

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>understand how it got to this point slash how it

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>works and what the logic is. From what I understand,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you recruit for a job you will start MP in

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>two years time, before you even hit the desk and

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>have any clue about what you were doing at the

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>largest pe funds? How does that make any sense? A

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>lot changes in two years, as does people's performance ability

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>slash motivation. And then my favorite reply, which I believe

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is the top reply, is we move fast here London boy,

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that time y'all blew a thirteen colony lead, which

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think is just the perfect answer. Yeah, I mean,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>fair points on both sides.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it definitely seems to me like a little crazy

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>to say, like we can identify someone two weeks out

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 2>of college who will be a good mid level employee

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 2>for us in two years. But I don't know, I

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of trust that, like there's some truth to that.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're combining like the personal characteristics you see

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>from that person and like their motivation and their ability

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to study for the interview and all that with your

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>assumption that, like the training they get at a bank

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 2>will be pretty good and pretty interchangeable.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do think there.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Must be duds, right, There must be people.

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Who like definitely who are you know, great in the interview,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>but who are kind of boud at their job actually, right.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And like the other thing is like what is your

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>motivation at your bank analyst program? Right? Like, on the

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>one hand, you want to learn a lot and like

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 2>be a big deal guy, so that like when you

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 2>get to your private acquity firm you'll be good at it.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, like you're not trying to

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>get promoted, you know, you're not trying to stay there

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 2>for the long term. You've got your next job lined up.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>There's some out I think there's like more coasting and

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 2>like the few months leading up to when they leave

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>for private equity than there is like day one. But

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>like you know, it is like a little bit demotivating.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely, the end is in sight.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the end is insight like before the beginning.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, I think the point on like, people's motivations change

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot, especially at that period in your life when

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you are so young out of college. Do you know

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to want to do in two years?

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Like two years ago, I wanted to be a TV anchor,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, but like.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 2>For instance, if you've never worked a sixteen hour day

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>at a finance job and you do it for a

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>month or two, you might decide you don't like it. Yeah,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and then you're like, well, I've signed up for two

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>years of this at my bank and then two more

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 2>years of it at my private equity firm. That's a

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, you might change your mind, But I guess

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the interview is to screen up people like them.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move along here to boomer candy, which

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it could mean sort of these very popular options writing ETFs,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>or it could mean these buffer ETFs. And what we're

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about right now are these buffer ETFs. So boomer

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>candy it's a label that Bloomberg Intelligence and Eric Belchunas

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>came up with. The Wall Street Journal published an article

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on it this week that it's sort of become this

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>catch all term for these derivatives backed products that promise

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you some degree of safety investing in the stock market.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you buy an ETF that gives you like stock exposure,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>but there's a floor, yeah, maybe a cap. Maybe you

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 2>get some income by selling call. There's some like you

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 2>add some derivatives to make it a little bit less

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 2>like stock and a little bit more like fixed income.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We are approaching, I feel like the extremes because now

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you have these one hundred percent downside protected buffer ETFs

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that are launching another couple which launched just this week.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you did some nice math on what that

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>actually means.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so buffer ETF is like you put money in

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and at the end of like six months or a

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>year or two years, you get all of your money back,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>plus like some of the return on the s and

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>P five hundred. But like if the SMP goes down,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>you still get all your money back. You get like

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>nothing else, but you get your money back, Whereas if

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the sp goes down, if you adjust been in stocks,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you would have lost money.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But the upside cap, especially on the one hundred percent products,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the upside cap is pretty slim.

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like I think like the math works out these

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>days that you can buy an ETF where you always

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>get back one hundred percent of your money and you

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 2>get the return on the SMP up to like eight

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 2>ish percent something like that. There was one I wrote

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>about on Thursday where you get back a cap of

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>four point eight percent, but that's for six months. So

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you do that twice and you're like, yeah, like nine percent,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you know something like that.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's super bad.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not terrible, but that math works because T bill

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>returns are over five percent. These things are like sort

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>of like they're giving you some range of returns around

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the risk free rate, and so if like the risk

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>free rate is five percent, then they give you, you know,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>zero to eight or nine percent. That's something.

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So I mean the criticism of these products is that

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of fancy maneuvering to basically not quite

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>get juicy equity returns for not that much protection. I

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>liked this quote from Ben Johnson, he's head of Client

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Solutions over at Morning Star. He said, we know, over

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>long enough periods of time that markets tend to go up,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and what you're giving up is going up every bit

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as the market does over longer periods of time. Now,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to make that trade in exchange for

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a degree of comfort, for being able to sleep at night,

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>then so be it. But I think it raises the

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>good question of where do you take away from in

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio to put this in? Are you taking away

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>from your equity allocation? Are you taking away from your

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>fixed income allocation? These are just these sort of hybrid products,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't quite know what the answer is.

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So two points on that. I think there's an argument

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 2>that these are to some extent marketed as you take

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>away from your fixed income allocation because it's fixed income

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>with better tax treatment. I don't know how true that is,

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>but that's my impression that, like, it's not fixed income, right,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like zero to nine percent return instead of like

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 2>a five percent return, so it's like sort of a

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>range around treasury returns. But I think it seems pretty

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>clear that the tax treatment of these things is that

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>your gains are capital gains. You can like roll them

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>over so that you only pay taxes when you sell

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the ETA, So you could keep the money in the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>thing for three years. You're paying long term capital gains

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>taxes and you're only paying it at the end of

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the three years, whereas if you just own treasuries, you'd

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 2>pay ordinary income taxes every year. So there are ETFs

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that are just explicitly that. There's the box ETF that

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm written about, where like it's explicitly you are buying

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a thing that promises you the Treasury Bill return but

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>tries to characterize it as long term capital gains. There's

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>debate about whether that works. But this is not that.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>This is like you get a range of returns. It's

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>like equity linked, but it's like equity linked enough that

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you get the good tax treatment, but fixed income enough that, like,

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, your money doesn't go down. So I think

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 2>that's part of the answer to your question is like,

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to some extent, this is a substitute for fixed income

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>with better tax treatment.

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I would say is like, your question

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is the right one. So I used to be like

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>an equity derivatives structure, of course, and so people would

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>come to us with various ideas for like have the stock.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to take as much risk as I'm taking.

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to give up some upside to take less risks.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Can you do a derivative? And the answers like, yeah,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 2>sure you can do it deriv But you know what

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 2>you could do. You could sell half your stock. Yeah,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>you could sell half your stock and then you have

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>half as much risk and half as much upset and

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>your design equity to drive it is like you know,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>you'd like do some stuff. You do some math, and

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 2>like the model tells you the delta of your product. Right.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>The delta is essentially how much stock it is, right,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So like a one hundred delta means that like it's

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 2>just owning stock, a zero delta means it's just owning

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, cash, and like a fifty delta means it's like, yeah,

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it's like half as much stock. And so what you know,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd like design to de rives for people, like, yeah,

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a collar where you get like it's like a

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy delta collar. And I've always want to be like,

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>why don't you just like sell thirty percent of the

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 2>stock because then you have the same delta and you

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>won't pay us.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we're charging.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>You a lot of money to do this for you.

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>You can like draw scenarios where it's like you'd be

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>much happier with the derivative than you would with just

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 2>selling some of the stock. But what the delta is

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>telling you is that in expectation, they're basically equivalent on Apple. Yeah,

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're paying us more to do the complicated derivative trade.

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>And so here it's the same sort of thing where

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it's like you're marketing this product that's like, oh, we're

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>giving you equity returns, but with less downside. It's like, yes,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 2>but another way to do that would be to like

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>sell three quarters or your stock and put it in

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>treasury bills, and then you're kind of in the same play.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 2>It's like that really, but kind of in the same.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Place for a lot of these products, like maybe you

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>would just be better off in cash or like.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, ninety ten percent stock.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but like one of the household names, I don't

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>know if that's true for everyone, but JEFPY, for example,

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the JP Morgan Equity Premium Income ETF. It's just

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ballooned in size. It's super super popular, and basically

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it owns low volatility stocks and then it writes call

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>options on top of that to harvest that income and

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it does outperform in a down market. That much is true.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But in twenty twenty two, for example, you know the

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred was down like twenty percent.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think JEFPY was down something like two. You know,

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't down is cash And then you look at

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a raging bowl market, it's going to

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lag as well. So it's doing exactly what it's supposed

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to do. But you could ask the existential question of

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>why bother.

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, like I don't actually know offhand, like

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 2>like it's always possible that some strategy like has you know,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>better returns than like some mix of cash and stock. Right,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 2>there's some like market reason for that, right, But I

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 2>do think that a lot of this is product designed

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to appeal to investors, right. It's just it's like, deep down,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>our tools are cash and stock, and we can like

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>mix those things together to produce a fancy package, right,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 2>And if we do that in the right way, you're like, oh,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.959
<v Speaker 2>that package looks so good. Yeah, And so you'll buy

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the thing that's made out of cash and stock and

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 2>you'll pass a fee rather than just like having you know,

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>your own mix of cash and stock. But that could

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 2>be good, right, Like you might like not be able

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 2>to figure out the right mix of cash and stock

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and someone else doing it for you is good, right,

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 2>But that's the game.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly fun to lunch of services do. It gives

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>me something to write and talk about.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we should talk about the fact that the podcast

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>is off next week, all right in July.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed this one because we're not here

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>next week. A Happy Birthday, America.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll be back on July twelve with them well rested.

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Episode A lot more stuff.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 2>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>every day between ten to eleven am Eastern.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 2>email to you Moneypot at Bloomberg dot net, ask us

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 2>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and Moses.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>On Our theme music was composed by Blake.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Maples, Brandon, Francis nunimss our.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer and Stage Bauman is Blomberg's head of podcasts.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Mody Stuff podcast.