WEBVTT - Jalen Hurts & Eagles IMPLODING? 49ers-Seahawks grudge match, WHINY Bills | Nick Wright

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:09.100
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving the Great, episode 512. This episode,

0:00:09.260 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>as always, is brought to you by our friends at

0:00:12.660 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile. Damanze, good to see you. How are you

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>this morning?

0:00:16.460 --> 0:00:18.820
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you. Doing great. Feeling refreshed.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.099
<v Speaker 1>Good. I'm glad you're feeling refreshed. I'm finally, I think,

0:00:23.180 --> 0:00:26.060
<v Speaker 1>caught up on sleep after a weekend in Vegas without

0:00:26.140 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>much sleep. I also have some quick little business to

0:00:30.380 --> 0:00:33.450
<v Speaker 1>handle before we get to the actual show, which On

0:00:33.490 --> 0:00:36.150
<v Speaker 1>today's show, by the way, we will talk about the

0:00:36.190 --> 0:00:39.610
<v Speaker 1>potential collapse of one of my Super Bowl picks, the

0:00:39.650 --> 0:00:43.150
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. The only saving grace for me is all offseason,

0:00:43.170 --> 0:00:46.900
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, could see them going 14-3, could

0:00:46.940 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>also see them going 7-10. Now, I did end up

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.420
<v Speaker 1>landing on the 14-3 go to the Super Bowl side

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:58.100
<v Speaker 1>of it, but this was always on the board, and

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss why and what they do from here later on.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.540
<v Speaker 1>There's a Thursday night football game tonight that the Cowboys

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>can kind of just end. Another one of my not

0:01:09.580 --> 0:01:11.860
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl picks, but playoff picks, the Bucs season. I'm

0:01:12.340 --> 0:01:18.490
<v Speaker 1>a little worried about that game for the Cowboys. Whenever

0:01:18.510 --> 0:01:23.410
<v Speaker 1>your defense is that bad, an upset is always on

0:01:23.450 --> 0:01:25.330
<v Speaker 1>the board, is what I would say. Even against a

0:01:25.350 --> 0:01:29.970
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback, if you have just a terrible defense... All

0:01:30.030 --> 0:01:34.510
<v Speaker 1>it takes is one mishandled kick return, the other team

0:01:34.530 --> 0:01:37.330
<v Speaker 1>gets back-to-back possessions, and you're playing from behind the eight

0:01:37.350 --> 0:01:40.809
<v Speaker 1>ball the whole game. So we will discuss that and

0:01:40.830 --> 0:01:45.550
<v Speaker 1>a little sports media ombudsman on What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:01:45.630 --> 0:01:50.930
<v Speaker 1>a little media commentary after some viral takes yesterday. But

0:01:50.970 --> 0:01:55.210
<v Speaker 1>before we get to any of that, I have been

0:01:55.690 --> 0:02:01.020
<v Speaker 1>dealing with, for years... The tax demands a of at

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some point on some pod on this show or some,

0:02:06.740 --> 0:02:12.980
<v Speaker 1>I did a power ranking of my children. And I put,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.890
<v Speaker 1>I said in that very moment, when you were asking me,

0:02:18.669 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>your youngest sister was in last place and she has a,

0:02:24.330 --> 0:02:26.929
<v Speaker 1>I forgot even what she had done. It was something

0:02:26.990 --> 0:02:28.870
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was. I thought I was being, as

0:02:28.930 --> 0:02:32.410
<v Speaker 1>they would say, cheeky. She has never taken it that way.

0:02:32.810 --> 0:02:37.660
<v Speaker 1>She brings it up quite a bit. I guess. I

0:02:37.690 --> 0:02:42.300
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man. There are two things she brings up

0:02:42.980 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>all the, not all the time, but way more often

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>than she should. One is six years ago, seven years ago,

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.860
<v Speaker 1>I guess, actually. When we were moving into the house

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.460
<v Speaker 1>we currently live in and I was building an Ikea closet,

0:02:59.180 --> 0:03:02.980
<v Speaker 1>she came by as a five or a six-year-old and

0:03:03.100 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>asked me for a hug. And I said, not right now,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.820
<v Speaker 1>because I was like lifting something up. And she, to

0:03:08.860 --> 0:03:11.700
<v Speaker 1>this day, will be like, don't say I can have

0:03:11.740 --> 0:03:15.340
<v Speaker 1>a hug whenever I want. Remember the time in the closet?

0:03:15.940 --> 0:03:19.620
<v Speaker 1>And she'll bring up the power rankings thing. So... With

0:03:19.710 --> 0:03:24.230
<v Speaker 1>that said, today happens to be, and this is kind

0:03:24.290 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of horrifying for me, my baby girl's 13th birthday. Your

0:03:31.260 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>little sister is a teenager now. And so if you

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:40.770
<v Speaker 1>were to ask me this very moment, this second, power

0:03:40.850 --> 0:03:45.570
<v Speaker 1>rank the kids she is in pole position you are

0:03:45.630 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in a strong number two and nothing against diorah who's

0:03:49.700 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very often the favorite but she left me on red

0:03:52.500 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday on a text message that was good advice so

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>right now she's.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.860
<v Speaker 2>In last everybody's getting left on red by diorah It's crazy.

0:04:01.500 --> 0:04:04.780
<v Speaker 1>What is she doing? I mean, she's just out to lunch.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>She just won't even come see us or won't even

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to us. It's really unbelievable. But so happy birthday,

0:04:11.180 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>baby girl. I'm going to tell you one other quick

0:04:15.780 --> 0:04:19.590
<v Speaker 1>thing before we get to the real show. Um, she

0:04:19.670 --> 0:04:22.830
<v Speaker 1>sent us a birthday list. That was like a Christmas list.

0:04:23.450 --> 0:04:26.850
<v Speaker 1>It's like, like, you know, calm down a bit on this,

0:04:27.470 --> 0:04:30.970
<v Speaker 1>but one of the things on there is, was for

0:04:31.070 --> 0:04:36.370
<v Speaker 1>me to talk to my agent about her because because

0:04:36.529 --> 0:04:40.050
<v Speaker 1>she's an aspiring actress and she is determined because i

0:04:40.110 --> 0:04:41.940
<v Speaker 1>always said like no you're not going to be a

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>child actor like not i'm not doing it and now

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>she thinks that she since she is 13 she's you

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.070
<v Speaker 1>know no longer little kid coming off a little bit

0:04:54.130 --> 0:04:55.630
<v Speaker 1>she should have made that the only thing on the

0:04:55.650 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>list Oh, strong take. Strong take.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:00.659
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>All right. So happy birthday to Deanna. Let's get straight

0:05:04.230 --> 0:05:06.890
<v Speaker 1>to voicemail brought to you by our friends at Boost Mobile.

0:05:07.210 --> 0:05:10.310
<v Speaker 1>Drake Mays, not certain we landed on the moon. Tyrese

0:05:10.330 --> 0:05:14.450
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton returns from his Achilles injury. Probably upset that game

0:05:14.850 --> 0:05:22.260
<v Speaker 1>wasn't on ESPN National Television. And Lamar, unconventional ankle sprain. Now,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Schefter came out yesterday and was like, maybe he'll play the–

0:05:26.820 --> 0:05:31.450
<v Speaker 1>I Lamar's injury stuff is always a little murkier than most.

0:05:31.870 --> 0:05:34.250
<v Speaker 1>I do not expect him to play this weekend. The

0:05:34.390 --> 0:05:36.580
<v Speaker 1>odds makers don't expect him to play this weekend.

0:05:36.620 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.740
<v Speaker 3>You think that it's always weird for Lamar with his

0:05:39.860 --> 0:05:41.410
<v Speaker 3>injury stuff because he doesn't have an agent.

0:05:42.510 --> 0:05:44.010
<v Speaker 2>Was that probably? Oh, okay.

0:05:44.070 --> 0:05:46.490
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly, that's, I don't think that's the only reason,

0:05:46.890 --> 0:05:49.210
<v Speaker 1>but I think, no, no, no. I think that's part

0:05:49.230 --> 0:05:52.390
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think, you know, from those reports that

0:05:52.430 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we got as Harbaugh was on the way out, he

0:05:55.100 --> 0:05:59.500
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem the most communicative within the building. So I

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>think that is, you know, can be problematic on its own,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:09.229
<v Speaker 1>but his own lack of communication with, you know, the

0:06:09.350 --> 0:06:13.450
<v Speaker 1>higher-ups within the organization, combined with the fact that he

0:06:13.500 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have an agent on the back end to go,

0:06:16.100 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, do that, I think those two things make

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it murky. Also, one last thing. The New York Liberty

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>got screwed yesterday, and I'd be really, really upset if

0:06:25.740 --> 0:06:29.300
<v Speaker 1>I were them. I just want to paint the picture. Overtime,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.790
<v Speaker 1>down three, playoff game. There's four and a half seconds left.

0:06:34.230 --> 0:06:37.150
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Rucco on the call doing a great job. They

0:06:37.230 --> 0:06:40.650
<v Speaker 1>have a timeout, DeMondsey, where they can advance the ball

0:06:40.670 --> 0:06:44.180
<v Speaker 1>to midcourt, which obviously you'd want to do. They don't

0:06:44.250 --> 0:06:47.940
<v Speaker 1>take it. They end up getting off actually a decent look,

0:06:48.260 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but a desperation look because it's in transition. You're trying

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.119
<v Speaker 1>not to get fouled the whole thing. Rucco can't believe

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't call timeout. After the game, Breonna Stewart says,

0:06:59.260 --> 0:07:01.980
<v Speaker 1>she's like, I don't want to blame the refs. But

0:07:02.010 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very frustrating when, because Atlanta was at the free

0:07:06.860 --> 0:07:10.030
<v Speaker 1>throw line leading up to it. When during those free throws,

0:07:10.970 --> 0:07:15.830
<v Speaker 1>I asked both refs, do we have a timeout? Can

0:07:15.890 --> 0:07:19.020
<v Speaker 1>we advance it? And both of them told us we

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.990
<v Speaker 1>were out. So they wanted to advance it. They asked

0:07:24.050 --> 0:07:28.650
<v Speaker 1>if they could. The refs both told them no. So

0:07:30.290 --> 0:07:34.590
<v Speaker 1>even though they thought they could, they were like, okay,

0:07:34.650 --> 0:07:37.670
<v Speaker 1>I guess we've miscounted. The refs told us no, and

0:07:37.710 --> 0:07:41.660
<v Speaker 1>then they did have one. That's a brutal mistake. And

0:07:41.940 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you're like, well, it's up to you to

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.100
<v Speaker 1>keep track of that stuff with the coaching staff, You

0:07:47.220 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>almost would, even if you're certain you have it, be like, well,

0:07:50.460 --> 0:07:53.060
<v Speaker 1>the refs who are the ones to determine this are telling.

0:07:52.860 --> 0:07:53.860
<v Speaker 2>Us we don't. You get a technical for that.

0:07:54.380 --> 0:07:57.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you get a technical and the game's over. So

0:07:57.260 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a really tough spot for a team that, you know,

0:08:01.190 --> 0:08:04.170
<v Speaker 1>had a huge upset in round one. And it's just

0:08:04.210 --> 0:08:10.290
<v Speaker 1>a tough spot. Okay. This has been a rough few

0:08:10.310 --> 0:08:16.250
<v Speaker 1>days for Eagles fans. It. was compounded a bit yesterday,

0:08:16.530 --> 0:08:27.500
<v Speaker 1>it would appear, by Stephen A. 's jocular, what many

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:35.380
<v Speaker 1>people perceived as mocking, Lane Johnson retiring for mental health purposes,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.929
<v Speaker 1>the too-long-didn't-read version of it is, Stephen A., not at

0:08:41.190 --> 0:08:44.110
<v Speaker 1>all to the amusement of his panel, You know, it

0:08:44.130 --> 0:08:48.290
<v Speaker 1>was like, basically, Eagle season's so bad, this guy's saying

0:08:48.330 --> 0:08:53.189
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for my mental health. And then he kind

0:08:53.330 --> 0:08:58.500
<v Speaker 1>of softened it after Kimberly Martin did him a solid.

0:08:58.510 --> 0:09:00.239
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, some people might think you're making light

0:09:00.260 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of a mental health situation. Then he went on his

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast and after promoting the TV show where he said

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it and then spending two and a half minutes explaining

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.780
<v Speaker 1>about his own struggles and he explained why the audience

0:09:13.820 --> 0:09:16.970
<v Speaker 1>might have misconstrued what he said. You're now caught up.

0:09:17.830 --> 0:09:19.949
<v Speaker 1>So there are three points I want to make on this.

0:09:21.490 --> 0:09:24.630
<v Speaker 1>The first one is, and all of these kind of,

0:09:25.309 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try to make them how I view it,

0:09:29.850 --> 0:09:32.230
<v Speaker 1>how it applies to me, so it doesn't feel like

0:09:32.250 --> 0:09:35.930
<v Speaker 1>an outward attack, even though I'm sure Paul's going to

0:09:35.990 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>put on YouTube, on the thumbnail on this, Nick writes,

0:09:39.500 --> 0:09:40.740
<v Speaker 1>eviscerates Stephen A.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:40.939
<v Speaker 2>Smith.

0:09:41.710 --> 0:09:47.020
<v Speaker 1>Not really what I'm doing, but maybe it is. One

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>thing I worry about for me is, and I try

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.710
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of, am I spreading myself too thin?

0:10:00.380 --> 0:10:02.260
<v Speaker 1>I do the TV show for two and a half

0:10:02.300 --> 0:10:07.020
<v Speaker 1>hours every day. I do this show three days a week,

0:10:07.100 --> 0:10:09.620
<v Speaker 1>and this show has gotten longer and longer and longer.

0:10:10.300 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I might start doing this show even more often. I am,

0:10:14.300 --> 0:10:20.710
<v Speaker 1>you know, side questing, trying to become a semi-professional poker player.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.510
<v Speaker 1>I have different stuff I'm thinking about doing on Sundays

0:10:26.010 --> 0:10:31.010
<v Speaker 1>during NFL football. And there's only so much time. There's

0:10:31.070 --> 0:10:35.700
<v Speaker 1>only so many hours in a day. I obviously have wife, kids, family.

0:10:36.260 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I worry at times. Not am I spreading myself

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.980
<v Speaker 1>too thin. Like, am I going to wear down? I

0:10:42.220 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>don't really worry about that. I'm 42. I'm an old

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.490
<v Speaker 1>42 because I'm a grandfather. However, I'm a young 42

0:10:49.490 --> 0:10:52.179
<v Speaker 1>and kind of how I live my life. I'm not

0:10:52.220 --> 0:10:58.020
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. I am worried, Demond, say, am I

0:10:58.110 --> 0:11:00.020
<v Speaker 1>not going to be quite as informed? Am I going

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.949
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about things? And because of that, I

0:11:02.990 --> 0:11:05.950
<v Speaker 1>am less informed about the things I'm talking about. Does

0:11:05.970 --> 0:11:10.270
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? Like, am I on the air so

0:11:10.350 --> 0:11:13.510
<v Speaker 1>much that I have less time to, like, consume the info,

0:11:13.590 --> 0:11:16.350
<v Speaker 1>watch all the games like I love to do? And

0:11:16.390 --> 0:11:18.650
<v Speaker 1>am I going to... Are you going to have an

0:11:18.770 --> 0:11:21.250
<v Speaker 1>emperor has no clothes moment of like, this guy doesn't

0:11:21.270 --> 0:11:24.689
<v Speaker 1>know what he's talking about. So that is why I

0:11:26.410 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>am so much more hesitant these days than I was

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.059
<v Speaker 1>10 years ago, or maybe even five years ago to

0:11:36.179 --> 0:11:43.980
<v Speaker 1>talk politics or real life stuff. Because if I make

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:54.730
<v Speaker 1>a mistake or if I'm not fully informed on nonsense,

0:11:54.910 --> 0:12:00.699
<v Speaker 1>fun carnival sports stuff, I can, you know, it's embarrassing.

0:12:01.380 --> 0:12:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I hate being, you know, having fact errors, but I can,

0:12:06.260 --> 0:12:10.060
<v Speaker 1>I can deal with that. But on real life stuff

0:12:10.860 --> 0:12:15.220
<v Speaker 1>that impacts people or affects people, I really don't want

0:12:15.300 --> 0:12:19.910
<v Speaker 1>to give my opinion if I don't feel totally 100%

0:12:19.910 --> 0:12:23.150
<v Speaker 1>buttoned up on things, which is why on this show,

0:12:23.230 --> 0:12:25.459
<v Speaker 1>really never on the TV show anyway, but on this

0:12:25.540 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>show or on Twitter, I only venture into the real

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>life stuff that I am super well-informed on, that I

0:12:33.770 --> 0:12:36.860
<v Speaker 1>am super passionate about, and I feel totally buttoned up about,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:42.860
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't followed the day-to-day of the closing of

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Strait of Hormuz. I haven't followed the day-to-day of

0:12:47.780 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming midterm elections. I think I followed it as

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>much as the average American has, but not in a

0:12:55.059 --> 0:12:58.860
<v Speaker 1>way that I feel comfortable giving opinions on it, because

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:04.740
<v Speaker 1>it's real-life stuff. And where I think, not where I think,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>where I know Stephen A steps on a rake somewhat

0:13:12.140 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>often is however much I'm working, he's working more. He

0:13:18.250 --> 0:13:23.430
<v Speaker 1>is on so many shows on multiple platforms that he owns,

0:13:23.490 --> 0:13:27.730
<v Speaker 1>that ESPN owns, that Sirius owns, other people's shows on CNN,

0:13:27.790 --> 0:13:30.910
<v Speaker 1>on Bill Maher, all of these things. And he is,

0:13:31.330 --> 0:13:34.170
<v Speaker 1>you know what he's talking about today? Whatever the hell

0:13:34.190 --> 0:13:37.950
<v Speaker 1>the big news of the day is across the board.

0:13:38.970 --> 0:13:47.010
<v Speaker 1>And you simply cannot be super well-informed on everything at

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:52.410
<v Speaker 1>all times. which is why it's so dangerous. Dangerous is

0:13:52.429 --> 0:13:59.190
<v Speaker 1>probably too strong, but it can be problematic if it's like, oh,

0:13:59.230 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the big topic? Listen, I'm doing my political show.

0:14:02.220 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff going on. Watch the football

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.180
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. It's a Wednesday. There were no games last night.

0:14:08.420 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I was catching up on this. What's the big story? Oh,

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.710
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson retired. Oh, he said it was for mental health. Man,

0:14:16.500 --> 0:14:19.380
<v Speaker 1>Eagles sure must suck. So bad. I got it. You

0:14:19.420 --> 0:14:20.979
<v Speaker 1>know what? I got it. Don't worry about it. I

0:14:21.020 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>got it covered. I got a good bit on this.

0:14:24.460 --> 0:14:26.940
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles are so bad right now. It's hurting guys'

0:14:26.980 --> 0:14:31.530
<v Speaker 1>mental health. That's funny. Without having the time or the

0:14:31.570 --> 0:14:36.229
<v Speaker 1>wherewithal to know the background that Lane Johnson thought about

0:14:36.270 --> 0:14:38.510
<v Speaker 1>retiring in the offseason. That Lane Johnson, I'm not going

0:14:38.530 --> 0:14:42.150
<v Speaker 1>to get into the specifics on this because it's been

0:14:42.270 --> 0:14:45.390
<v Speaker 1>lightly reported, but it's not really my business. He seems

0:14:45.430 --> 0:14:50.900
<v Speaker 1>to have family that is in failing physical health, that

0:14:50.980 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he is truly dealing with things outside of the day-to-day

0:14:57.060 --> 0:15:05.770
<v Speaker 1>stresses of an NFL season. Had, I believe, had Stephen A.

0:15:05.870 --> 0:15:10.820
<v Speaker 1>known that, had he had the time to research it,

0:15:11.460 --> 0:15:15.670
<v Speaker 1>or if he had just been dialed in enough to

0:15:15.810 --> 0:15:18.810
<v Speaker 1>just sports. Like I'm not, I wasn't, I didn't know

0:15:19.070 --> 0:15:22.229
<v Speaker 1>all the specifics. When we saw Lane Johnson retired, I

0:15:22.250 --> 0:15:24.850
<v Speaker 1>didn't know all the specifics of everything. I know more

0:15:24.870 --> 0:15:28.479
<v Speaker 1>of it now, but I'm dialed in enough to the

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:32.100
<v Speaker 1>day-to-day sports that I remembered, oh, he thought about retiring

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.140
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. I think he has a family

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>situation going on. He missed this Sunday's game because of

0:15:39.780 --> 0:15:44.330
<v Speaker 1>last minute personal reasons and I saw someone report he

0:15:44.370 --> 0:15:48.250
<v Speaker 1>was contemplating retirement. So it gave me a context of

0:15:48.790 --> 0:15:51.500
<v Speaker 1>if I had to be on the air the moment

0:15:51.630 --> 0:15:58.100
<v Speaker 1>after he retired, which by the way, he retired Tuesday.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>This was Wednesday morning that this happened. So it wasn't

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.780
<v Speaker 1>like live on the air reaction. You had time, but regardless,

0:16:07.500 --> 0:16:10.260
<v Speaker 1>I would have at the very least known air on

0:16:10.300 --> 0:16:13.790
<v Speaker 1>the side of caution here. You know, there's other things

0:16:13.830 --> 0:16:18.990
<v Speaker 1>at play. But if you're doing a hundred different things

0:16:19.050 --> 0:16:21.729
<v Speaker 1>at all times, you don't have that context. So that's

0:16:21.790 --> 0:16:25.830
<v Speaker 1>first point. There is a tax to spreading yourself this thin.

0:16:25.930 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even saying you shouldn't do it, but you

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.390
<v Speaker 1>might have a responsibility to the audience if you are

0:16:30.430 --> 0:16:36.359
<v Speaker 1>going to do it to really, really make sure you're

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.830
<v Speaker 1>coloring within the lines once we're not talking about Is

0:16:40.890 --> 0:16:45.510
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott overrated? That's the first point. Second point is this.

0:16:46.750 --> 0:16:51.010
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that, again, applies to me personally.

0:16:51.390 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And you guys have heard me talk about this a bit.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.820
<v Speaker 1>If you go back and watch the initial clip that

0:16:57.860 --> 0:17:03.700
<v Speaker 1>everyone got mad at, watch it through the eye of

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:10.130
<v Speaker 1>and asking this question. Is Stephen A. trying in that

0:17:10.230 --> 0:17:14.179
<v Speaker 1>moment to do a good television show? Or is he

0:17:14.260 --> 0:17:18.940
<v Speaker 1>trying to create a good viral clip? Also, under the

0:17:18.980 --> 0:17:21.540
<v Speaker 1>context of, he did not in that moment think he

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.939
<v Speaker 1>was doing anything wrong or being harmful or hurtful. I'm

0:17:23.980 --> 0:17:30.350
<v Speaker 1>not saying... And this is... If you are at one

0:17:30.390 --> 0:17:34.550
<v Speaker 1>of those tables on TV, it is such a different

0:17:34.690 --> 0:17:38.859
<v Speaker 1>medium than how I am right now. Right now, I

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.660
<v Speaker 1>am talking to you. Right now, I occasionally do things

0:17:42.700 --> 0:17:45.060
<v Speaker 1>that I'm like, you know what? This will be good

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>as a 90-second breakout on social media. It is not communal.

0:17:49.900 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It is when Demanze and I are riffing back and forth,

0:17:52.220 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhat communal. But this is a lot of me monologuing,

0:17:57.180 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you and I bouncing off each other. It's very different

0:18:00.460 --> 0:18:03.740
<v Speaker 1>than the TV show, which is we're out there playing jazz,

0:18:03.780 --> 0:18:10.149
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth. And there is a... There are moments,

0:18:11.540 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and this again, it is why, in my opinion, that

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>TV show is not as good as it once was,

0:18:19.660 --> 0:18:23.780
<v Speaker 1>and it once was the best. There are moments on

0:18:23.820 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that show, and there are other folks, some very, very

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.990
<v Speaker 1>popular folks, that consistently do this on their TV shows,

0:18:32.770 --> 0:18:38.730
<v Speaker 1>which is, I'm not trying to have a communal experience,

0:18:38.780 --> 0:18:41.980
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a good segment. I am trying to have

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the hottest, most viral take of the day. There's a very,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:56.590
<v Speaker 1>very popular sports media guy who you can't go a

0:18:56.630 --> 0:18:59.970
<v Speaker 1>week without him for two minutes staring down the barrel

0:19:00.030 --> 0:19:05.490
<v Speaker 1>of the camera, delivering some rant, semi- you know, straw

0:19:05.530 --> 0:19:10.100
<v Speaker 1>man angry about something that exists on a TV show,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but it is not for that TV show at all.

0:19:12.580 --> 0:19:15.180
<v Speaker 1>It is for him to be able to put on Twitter.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.260
<v Speaker 1>And it felt like that's what Stephen A was doing yesterday.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>It felt like he didn't care that nobody was laughing

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>with him. He didn't care that the room wasn't with him.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.980
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he recognized how much he had stepped

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:29.850
<v Speaker 1>in it, but he's like, this is going to be good.

0:19:30.740 --> 0:19:33.550
<v Speaker 1>They're going to put on the internet The Eagles are

0:19:33.609 --> 0:19:37.100
<v Speaker 1>so bad. Stephen A says they're wrecking guys' mental health.

0:19:37.580 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, laughing emojis. And it's surprising when someone does

0:19:43.980 --> 0:19:47.449
<v Speaker 1>that when they have a separate platform like this. I

0:19:47.570 --> 0:19:49.929
<v Speaker 1>used to do that a lot when the TV show

0:19:49.970 --> 0:19:54.050
<v Speaker 1>first started. I was not doing right by Chris Carter

0:19:54.090 --> 0:19:57.770
<v Speaker 1>and Jenna Wolf when I did it, which was I

0:19:57.970 --> 0:20:00.630
<v Speaker 1>would put stuff into the show that I didn't even

0:20:00.670 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think was going to be good TV. But I'm like, shit, man,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a good clip. Like I've got

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>a good 90 seconds on it. But now I have this.

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's surprising to see Stephen A doing that when

0:20:15.140 --> 0:20:18.090
<v Speaker 1>he has these other platforms to do it. And then

0:20:18.150 --> 0:20:20.369
<v Speaker 1>last but not least, and then we will move on.

0:20:21.050 --> 0:20:26.109
<v Speaker 1>And this is something the last time we discussed Stephen

0:20:26.130 --> 0:20:31.619
<v Speaker 1>A that I made the point of. And sadly, it

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:40.910
<v Speaker 1>still really applies. You've got to simply be able to

0:20:41.090 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>take an L and actually apologize. Not I'm sorry for

0:20:48.820 --> 0:20:52.979
<v Speaker 1>how this was misconstrued on my TV show that you

0:20:53.020 --> 0:20:56.980
<v Speaker 1>can watch 10 to noon every day on ESPN and

0:20:57.060 --> 0:21:03.169
<v Speaker 1>then try to garner your own level of sympathy or

0:21:03.210 --> 0:21:07.369
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was by explaining your own very real struggles

0:21:07.410 --> 0:21:11.820
<v Speaker 1>with mental health after a very real personal tragedy, it

0:21:11.900 --> 0:21:16.020
<v Speaker 1>is not that hard, folks, to simply be able to

0:21:16.060 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, earlier today, I was on TV. You

0:21:23.180 --> 0:21:26.149
<v Speaker 1>guys know I do a lot of stuff. I have

0:21:26.170 --> 0:21:28.830
<v Speaker 1>a lot of responsibilities. There are a lot of things

0:21:28.910 --> 0:21:33.230
<v Speaker 1>I'm following. I did not have the full context of

0:21:34.150 --> 0:21:37.950
<v Speaker 1>of everything Lane Johnson was going through. It's my responsibility

0:21:38.060 --> 0:21:42.420
<v Speaker 1>to have that context. That's totally on me. It's not

0:21:42.540 --> 0:21:45.140
<v Speaker 1>on any producers. It's not on anyone else. I thank

0:21:45.180 --> 0:21:48.260
<v Speaker 1>Kimberly Martin for having my back in it, but it

0:21:48.300 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>was my responsibility and my screw up. I thought this

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was a lighthearted moment and I was trying to be funny.

0:22:00.650 --> 0:22:03.650
<v Speaker 1>Now that I do have the full context, I realize

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.900
<v Speaker 1>that was wholly and totally inappropriate for the situation. I've

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:14.700
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Lane via the Eagles to apologize. And,

0:22:15.180 --> 0:22:17.710
<v Speaker 1>you know, I will try to do better to make

0:22:17.810 --> 0:22:22.710
<v Speaker 1>sure that when real life stuff happens, that I triple

0:22:22.770 --> 0:22:26.230
<v Speaker 1>check I have all the facts rather than assume I

0:22:26.250 --> 0:22:29.230
<v Speaker 1>have all the facts and just go with you know,

0:22:29.270 --> 0:22:32.470
<v Speaker 1>trying to be entertaining and funny and that stuff. So

0:22:33.010 --> 0:22:37.250
<v Speaker 1>I'm really sorry about that. I screwed that up. It's

0:22:37.270 --> 0:22:41.550
<v Speaker 1>not hard. And the audience appreciates it. And it doesn't

0:22:41.590 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>make you a lesser man. It doesn't make you a

0:22:43.430 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>lesser broadcaster. Doesn't make you any of those things. To

0:22:47.940 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>just be like, I screwed that up. Here's why I

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>screwed it up. Here's what I will do in the

0:22:53.700 --> 0:22:55.460
<v Speaker 1>future to try to make sure I don't screw that

0:22:55.540 --> 0:23:00.450
<v Speaker 1>up again. And we roll. But putting it on the audience,

0:23:01.050 --> 0:23:04.610
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that you guys didn't get what I was saying.

0:23:04.630 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And then doing an appeal to authority fallacy of actually

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>here's how tuned in to mental health issues I actually

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.900
<v Speaker 1>am because of real life stuff I had to deal

0:23:16.940 --> 0:23:20.020
<v Speaker 1>with myself. That ain't it, man. It's just not it.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.060
<v Speaker 1>It's not the biggest thing in the world, but he

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.580
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest person in the world in the space.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:26.900
<v Speaker 3>And.

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.629
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of folks that take little pot

0:23:30.670 --> 0:23:36.469
<v Speaker 1>shots at, you know, what the craft I have dedicated

0:23:36.550 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my professional life to because of stuff like that. And

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.620
<v Speaker 1>so it's worth 15 minutes for me off the top

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:54.750
<v Speaker 1>of the show. That's it. This will do shockingly well

0:23:54.850 --> 0:23:58.730
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube because people love media on media crime. But

0:23:58.750 --> 0:24:02.620
<v Speaker 1>Monty said on a podcast yesterday that he thinks his

0:24:02.690 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>podcast might do bigger numbers if it was just this stuff.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.659
<v Speaker 1>If it was only if he just did like was

0:24:10.780 --> 0:24:15.010
<v Speaker 1>the ESPN ombudsman and just commentated on what was going

0:24:15.070 --> 0:24:17.030
<v Speaker 1>on there. Might be right. I don't know why the

0:24:17.130 --> 0:24:20.590
<v Speaker 1>algorithm loves it. They love it. That is not why

0:24:20.710 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I did this. I tried to do it sparingly, but

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.740
<v Speaker 1>it was a big story. I thought it deserved the time.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.899
<v Speaker 1>Now we can talk about the actual football implications, pal.

0:24:30.700 --> 0:24:32.300
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring the Monza back in. Go ahead.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so along with Lane Johnson retiring, Cam Jurgens got

0:24:36.150 --> 0:24:39.910
<v Speaker 3>traded to my Ravens. So they're now down three offensive

0:24:39.950 --> 0:24:43.209
<v Speaker 3>linemen from opening night. They've had some weird situations, but

0:24:43.250 --> 0:24:45.050
<v Speaker 3>still going on to win the Super Bowl in a

0:24:45.090 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 3>couple years past. Does this situation feel different?

0:24:50.500 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>It feels really different. So Lane Johnson, do you remember

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.139
<v Speaker 1>a couple years ago, not a couple years ago, a

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>year ago to Monza, when Micah got traded and we

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:09.450
<v Speaker 1>showed the Barnwell stat, Cowboys with Micah on the field,

0:25:10.050 --> 0:25:13.930
<v Speaker 1>top three defense, Cowboys with Micah off the field, bottom

0:25:13.990 --> 0:25:16.909
<v Speaker 1>three defense, and like over the course of his career

0:25:18.010 --> 0:25:21.970
<v Speaker 1>and just the impact that one player had, those same

0:25:22.050 --> 0:25:25.300
<v Speaker 1>exact stats just on the offensive side of the ball

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>exists for the Eagles with Lane Johnson. Their offensive efficiency,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.860
<v Speaker 1>their passing game, their running game, their win percentage, all

0:25:32.900 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of it has hinged on whether he is or isn't

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>playing over the years.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:39.030
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:47.790
<v Speaker 1>A dominant all-time player. And so him walking away is devastating.

0:25:48.850 --> 0:25:54.930
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the Eagles team, more than any team

0:25:54.970 --> 0:25:59.950
<v Speaker 1>in the league, is built inside out. And now all

0:25:59.990 --> 0:26:03.149
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden it's Jordan Mailata and a bunch of

0:26:03.250 --> 0:26:08.500
<v Speaker 1>kids is devastating for the Eagles. The fact that this

0:26:08.580 --> 0:26:11.500
<v Speaker 1>is happening in the midst of what I think is

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:17.500
<v Speaker 1>fair to call the biggest slump of Jalen Hurts' career

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:23.909
<v Speaker 1>since he's been an established starter is problematic. In the

0:26:23.970 --> 0:26:28.610
<v Speaker 1>context of Saquon Hurta's hamstring, Tank Bigsby's on the IR,

0:26:28.950 --> 0:26:35.890
<v Speaker 1>Devontae's dealing with something, this could be a system failure.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:47.070
<v Speaker 1>This could be an absolute unrecoverable spot for them. And

0:26:47.090 --> 0:26:53.629
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if that is one of the reasons

0:26:55.190 --> 0:27:01.250
<v Speaker 1>Howie Roseman decided, you know what? If we're going to

0:27:01.290 --> 0:27:04.129
<v Speaker 1>move on from Cam Juergens at some point, do it now.

0:27:04.540 --> 0:27:09.609
<v Speaker 1>Second round picks are good. return. He wasn't playing great anyway.

0:27:09.990 --> 0:27:13.210
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens really need a center as they were like

0:27:13.230 --> 0:27:17.629
<v Speaker 1>down to their fourth string and this season might really

0:27:17.690 --> 0:27:20.090
<v Speaker 1>get away from us. I think that's on the board.

0:27:21.430 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I said before the year that when I picked him

0:27:23.540 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Super Bowl, they had the biggest

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>variance of any team in the league and that I

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.780
<v Speaker 1>could see them winning seven games and Sirianni hot seat

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.770
<v Speaker 1>or maybe mid-season firing and It certainly looks like they

0:27:36.810 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are closer to that than they are to rallying. They've

0:27:42.890 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>played four games this year. First game against what I

0:27:45.859 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>believe will end up being a below average Washington team.

0:27:49.460 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington has a two-point conversion to force overtime. Next game,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans dare them to try to beat them through

0:27:56.420 --> 0:28:00.330
<v Speaker 1>the air. The Eagles take that dare. The Titans win

0:28:00.369 --> 0:28:03.409
<v Speaker 1>it for 58 minutes, and then Jalen, to his credit,

0:28:03.490 --> 0:28:06.610
<v Speaker 1>and the only reason this season is not totally off

0:28:06.650 --> 0:28:10.970
<v Speaker 1>the rails is because Jalen's final drive in that 90

0:28:10.970 --> 0:28:16.210
<v Speaker 1>seconds against the Titans. You then get annihilated by 38-year-old

0:28:16.250 --> 0:28:20.590
<v Speaker 1>Case Keenum and the Chicago Bears, and then you blow

0:28:20.670 --> 0:28:25.109
<v Speaker 1>a game to the Rams where you have negative passing

0:28:25.130 --> 0:28:28.250
<v Speaker 1>yards in the second half. All of that plus the

0:28:28.330 --> 0:28:33.790
<v Speaker 1>injuries and the retirement and the trade. And so I don't,

0:28:35.630 --> 0:28:39.470
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how they pull themselves out of this.

0:28:40.860 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And it is stunning to Monza to see the Philadelphia

0:28:45.420 --> 0:28:51.340
<v Speaker 1>Eagles as seven and a half point neutral field underdogs.

0:28:52.260 --> 0:28:56.940
<v Speaker 1>Like I, that is, oh, with Jalen Hurts playing, That

0:28:57.020 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is a wild, wild situation.

0:29:00.380 --> 0:29:06.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're doing weird stuff. Team doesn't look great. So, understandables.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

0:29:08.580 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia now is two firsts and two seconds in the

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.610
<v Speaker 3>2028 draft. Do you think that a rebuild is on

0:29:13.630 --> 0:29:16.510
<v Speaker 3>the horizon? And if so, do you think that they

0:29:16.530 --> 0:29:17.510
<v Speaker 3>should keep Sirianni?

0:29:19.010 --> 0:29:23.670
<v Speaker 1>Well... I would at this moment, I would be surprised

0:29:23.730 --> 0:29:27.010
<v Speaker 1>if Sirianni is right now. Yes or no. Will Sirianni

0:29:27.050 --> 0:29:29.709
<v Speaker 1>be the head coach of the Philadelphia Eagles in 2027?

0:29:29.710 --> 0:29:35.100
<v Speaker 1>I would say no. And this is where we have

0:29:35.140 --> 0:29:43.420
<v Speaker 1>to do quickly some nerdy salary cap stuff. Okay? So

0:29:43.460 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>many times the Eagles have signed a player or done

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a contract. Some folks in the media have been like, see,

0:29:55.020 --> 0:29:58.700
<v Speaker 1>salary cap's fake. Look at what they're able to do,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.340
<v Speaker 1>the way they manipulate the cap with void years, all

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. And it is true that if you have

0:30:06.340 --> 0:30:10.740
<v Speaker 1>an owner like Jeffrey Lurie, who does not mind forking

0:30:10.900 --> 0:30:16.900
<v Speaker 1>over a ton of cash up front, you can temporarily

0:30:17.420 --> 0:30:23.450
<v Speaker 1>render the salary cap effectively meaningless via option bonuses, prorated

0:30:23.530 --> 0:30:30.250
<v Speaker 1>signing bonuses, and void years. But that bill, 100% of

0:30:30.270 --> 0:30:36.910
<v Speaker 1>the time, comes due. And what I mean by that is,

0:30:37.850 --> 0:30:44.330
<v Speaker 1>every single dollar you pay any player shows up at

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.820
<v Speaker 1>some point on some year's salary cap. Now, I understand

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>folks are like, yeah, but the salary cap's always raising. Sure.

0:30:53.620 --> 0:30:56.570
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it as not only an interest-free loan,

0:30:57.010 --> 0:31:00.270
<v Speaker 1>but a plus money loan where you're taking a loan

0:31:00.350 --> 0:31:02.710
<v Speaker 1>and it actually costs you less to pay it back

0:31:02.770 --> 0:31:05.150
<v Speaker 1>in four years than it does right now. So you

0:31:05.190 --> 0:31:07.750
<v Speaker 1>can look at it as a smart way to do

0:31:07.830 --> 0:31:13.190
<v Speaker 1>business to a degree. The Eagles have done business to

0:31:13.410 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>such a degree like that, that they have sitting waiting

0:31:18.900 --> 0:31:26.020
<v Speaker 1>for them a massive, salary cap, dead money, time bomb

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:34.220
<v Speaker 1>is too strong, but potentially catastrophic situation in the year 2028,

0:31:34.220 --> 0:31:39.130
<v Speaker 1>but really the year 2029, where you're talking about 90

0:31:39.130 --> 0:31:44.110
<v Speaker 1>some million in Jalen Hurts void years that if you

0:31:44.150 --> 0:31:48.710
<v Speaker 1>don't extend him, will accelerate onto the cap. A Jalen

0:31:48.830 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Carter deal where he averages nearly $ 40 million a year

0:31:56.660 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in salary, yet his cap hit in each year of

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:02.870
<v Speaker 1>the extension is 8.5, 15, 22, and then 29. So

0:32:03.290 --> 0:32:05.750
<v Speaker 1>you have 70 million in void years for Jalen Carter.

0:32:05.850 --> 0:32:08.430
<v Speaker 1>You have so many of these guys that they clearly

0:32:08.470 --> 0:32:22.900
<v Speaker 1>have What the Eagles have done historically is supercharge a run,

0:32:23.350 --> 0:32:26.490
<v Speaker 1>tear it down, and then get back at it. The

0:32:26.550 --> 0:32:29.970
<v Speaker 1>fact that they now have multiple first and second round

0:32:30.010 --> 0:32:34.170
<v Speaker 1>picks in 2028 gives you a little idea of when

0:32:34.230 --> 0:32:38.070
<v Speaker 1>they think they are going to need young, cheap players

0:32:38.450 --> 0:32:42.510
<v Speaker 1>because all of these bills are coming due. I am

0:32:42.690 --> 0:32:44.790
<v Speaker 1>here to tell you, and we'll see if I end

0:32:44.830 --> 0:32:46.850
<v Speaker 1>up being proven right. We don't have to spend too

0:32:46.890 --> 0:32:54.770
<v Speaker 1>much more time on it. It is very, very on

0:32:54.810 --> 0:32:59.300
<v Speaker 1>the board that whether it's next year or the year after,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Eagles go into a season with more dead

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.860
<v Speaker 1>money on their salary cap than any team in NFL history.

0:33:11.900 --> 0:33:15.110
<v Speaker 1>That they have a hundred plus million in dead money,

0:33:15.530 --> 0:33:19.220
<v Speaker 1>try to take the whole pill at once and then

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.860
<v Speaker 1>use those new draft picks, the additional draft picks, to

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.820
<v Speaker 1>reboot the whole thing. They are a great organization. There's

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really good ownership, really good GM, good infrastructure. But they

0:33:33.010 --> 0:33:39.350
<v Speaker 1>have kept putting things on the credit card and basically

0:33:39.430 --> 0:33:41.970
<v Speaker 1>doing it the way, shoot, I used to do it

0:33:42.010 --> 0:33:45.770
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, Demanze. Demanze knows this. The audience may or

0:33:45.810 --> 0:33:49.980
<v Speaker 1>may not. When I, when Deanna, who's now 13 years old,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:56.260
<v Speaker 1>shortly after she was born, I convinced Demanze's mom, my wife, Danielle,

0:33:56.860 --> 0:33:59.540
<v Speaker 1>to quit her job. I was like, you've worked your

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>whole life. You've worked since you were 14.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know what I mean?

0:34:05.580 --> 0:34:08.930
<v Speaker 1>You now finally have, you know, when Demanze was born,

0:34:08.950 --> 0:34:12.530
<v Speaker 1>she was a kid and working multiple jobs. When Diora

0:34:12.550 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was born, she was you know, very young and working

0:34:15.500 --> 0:34:18.770
<v Speaker 1>three jobs. I'm like, just rest and relax a bit.

0:34:19.350 --> 0:34:22.129
<v Speaker 1>And she took me up on it, but we didn't

0:34:22.210 --> 0:34:26.210
<v Speaker 1>change our spending one bit. It's not like, okay, we've

0:34:26.250 --> 0:34:27.510
<v Speaker 1>gone from a two income.

0:34:27.290 --> 0:34:29.730
<v Speaker 2>Household to one income household.

0:34:29.930 --> 0:34:32.009
<v Speaker 1>And so I just started for the first time in

0:34:32.050 --> 0:34:34.529
<v Speaker 1>my life. This is not good financial advice, by the way.

0:34:34.860 --> 0:34:36.299
<v Speaker 1>I just started for the first time in my life,

0:34:37.100 --> 0:34:43.030
<v Speaker 1>just spending tons on credit cards. And every few months,

0:34:43.450 --> 0:34:47.810
<v Speaker 1>there would be a different credit card offer essentially where, hey,

0:34:48.860 --> 0:34:53.180
<v Speaker 1>do a balance transfer from one credit card to another,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>pay like a 3% VIG on it, but get six

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.290
<v Speaker 1>months of no interest. So it'd be like, okay, that

0:35:00.310 --> 0:35:03.390
<v Speaker 1>buys me another six months or buys me another three

0:35:03.430 --> 0:35:07.629
<v Speaker 1>months or whatever it is. But eventually that, you know,

0:35:07.910 --> 0:35:11.330
<v Speaker 1>either the credit situation in America changes or your own

0:35:11.410 --> 0:35:15.530
<v Speaker 1>credit worthiness changes. And eventually you find yourself, as I did,

0:35:17.590 --> 0:35:23.109
<v Speaker 1>owing upwards of, God, I know what the number exactly was,

0:35:23.110 --> 0:35:26.660
<v Speaker 1>$ 68, 000 in credit card bills.

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.670
<v Speaker 2>I was going to guess like 20.

0:35:28.660 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no. When at the time I wasn't making

0:35:32.580 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>much more than that annually. And there's nowhere like there's

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:39.890
<v Speaker 1>no one else that wants to give you a six

0:35:39.930 --> 0:35:45.730
<v Speaker 1>month zero percent. And now for me, I got a

0:35:45.790 --> 0:35:49.050
<v Speaker 1>lifeline and the lifeline was fuck sports. I got a

0:35:49.070 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>job and I was fine. But the that balloon payment

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming for the Eagles. They were going to, I think,

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>push it off a couple more years. But with Lane retiring,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>trading Cam Juergens, Saquon maybe showing signs that that is

0:36:11.300 --> 0:36:16.110
<v Speaker 1>diminishing returns, AJ Brown trade, I could see them accelerating

0:36:16.150 --> 0:36:19.730
<v Speaker 1>when they do it. So there's that. Also, kids, that

0:36:19.790 --> 0:36:23.229
<v Speaker 1>is not good financial advice. Don't do that. I woke

0:36:23.290 --> 0:36:25.650
<v Speaker 1>up every morning feeling like a vice around. Like, oh,

0:36:25.710 --> 0:36:28.710
<v Speaker 1>my God. I can't tell my wife that it was wrong.

0:36:28.770 --> 0:36:30.690
<v Speaker 1>Because she didn't want to quit her job. I convinced

0:36:30.710 --> 0:36:34.010
<v Speaker 1>her to. I certainly can't be like, well, here's the thing.

0:36:34.070 --> 0:36:38.259
<v Speaker 1>Got to go back to work. So, no, that is

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.660
<v Speaker 1>what it is. All right. Let's go to, oh, we

0:36:42.700 --> 0:36:45.779
<v Speaker 1>have breaking news, I think. We'll get to that in

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>just a second. But first, let me tell you guys

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about this new prediction market called Poly market, it's the

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>best new way to trade in sports. In the past,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted action on the game, you'd put some

0:36:57.380 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>money in, and if your team was doing well and

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to cash out, you either wouldn't be able

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to or there would be a huge fee. But poly

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>market is different. It's a prediction market, which is similar to,

0:37:09.980 --> 0:37:12.819
<v Speaker 1>it works similarly to a stock exchange, but it's for

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.500
<v Speaker 1>sports where you can buy in and sell out on

0:37:15.540 --> 0:37:19.469
<v Speaker 1>your own terms. I've tried all the prediction markets. I

0:37:19.510 --> 0:37:22.730
<v Speaker 1>even tried prediction markets years ago before prediction markets really

0:37:23.050 --> 0:37:26.710
<v Speaker 1>like a mainstream thing. PolyMarket's simply the best. The UI

0:37:26.770 --> 0:37:29.489
<v Speaker 1>is the most intuitive. It's the easiest to use. It's

0:37:29.550 --> 0:37:32.670
<v Speaker 1>the best. They're so confident you'll never go back to

0:37:32.690 --> 0:37:35.590
<v Speaker 1>the other guys. They're giving you a free $ 25 on

0:37:35.630 --> 0:37:38.930
<v Speaker 1>your first trade when you deposit just $ 10. And now

0:37:39.310 --> 0:37:43.169
<v Speaker 1>they've launched a new feature, Squads, a group chat where

0:37:43.210 --> 0:37:46.180
<v Speaker 1>you can see what everyone is trading on. So download

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.569
<v Speaker 1>the PolyMarket app today. and use code NICKWRIGHT when you

0:37:49.590 --> 0:37:53.299
<v Speaker 1>sign up. That's code NICKWRIGHT to get $ 25 free after

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.810
<v Speaker 1>you deposit just $ 10. All right, Demanze, we have some

0:37:56.850 --> 0:37:57.989
<v Speaker 1>Florio news, I guess.

0:38:24.390 --> 0:38:26.690
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Sean Payton sounds like he's taking back over

0:38:26.710 --> 0:38:29.549
<v Speaker 3>the play calling from Davis Webb. From Vic Lombardi here,

0:38:29.570 --> 0:38:31.820
<v Speaker 3>it says that Davis Webb will meet with the Broncos

0:38:31.860 --> 0:38:34.700
<v Speaker 3>media today. He will be asked about play calling duties.

0:38:34.780 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm told Sean Payton will be playing a bigger role

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>in those duties. How big remains to be seen?

0:38:41.100 --> 0:38:42.740
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Is, so hold on, let me see. So this is not,

0:38:51.540 --> 0:38:54.740
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, Florio is. So I'm going to read directly

0:38:54.820 --> 0:38:59.739
<v Speaker 1>from Florio's article, which came out like 45 minutes ago.

0:39:00.180 --> 0:39:02.989
<v Speaker 1>The Davis-Webb experiment is over. Webb, who was promoted to

0:39:03.050 --> 0:39:05.870
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator in the offseason and given the keys to

0:39:05.910 --> 0:39:08.910
<v Speaker 1>the play-calling car, will have those keys rescinded this weekend

0:39:09.250 --> 0:39:13.469
<v Speaker 1>when the Broncos face the Chargers. Former NFL receiver Brandon Stokely,

0:39:13.489 --> 0:39:15.750
<v Speaker 1>who is now part of the morning show on 104.3

0:39:15.750 --> 0:39:17.750
<v Speaker 1>The Fan in Denver, was the first to let the

0:39:17.770 --> 0:39:20.130
<v Speaker 1>cat out of the bag. He said... I'm hearing that

0:39:20.170 --> 0:39:22.500
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton is going to be taking over play calling

0:39:22.540 --> 0:39:26.950
<v Speaker 1>this week, Stokely tweeted Wednesday night. Back to Florio. We've

0:39:27.010 --> 0:39:29.950
<v Speaker 1>since confirmed that indeed Payton will be calling the plays again.

0:39:31.950 --> 0:39:35.540
<v Speaker 1>He then, you know, writes, you know, all about the

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>context of it. My immediate reaction, and this is again,

0:39:40.700 --> 0:39:44.700
<v Speaker 1>this show is kind of a life advice show at times. Man,

0:39:47.580 --> 0:39:51.950
<v Speaker 1>if you have an opportunity, And I'm not sure Davis

0:39:51.969 --> 0:39:54.970
<v Speaker 1>Webb did or didn't. But if you have an opportunity

0:39:55.130 --> 0:39:59.610
<v Speaker 1>to take a great job, a big promotion, and you

0:39:59.650 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>have to leave where you're at to do it, and

0:40:02.820 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>then in order to convince you not to leave, the

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>place you're at offers you things they never previously would

0:40:11.460 --> 0:40:16.469
<v Speaker 1>have offered you, you maybe should just leave. Because it

0:40:16.610 --> 0:40:20.570
<v Speaker 1>probably means they are offering you those things under duress.

0:40:21.420 --> 0:40:24.590
<v Speaker 1>And they might not really want to offer them to you.

0:40:25.020 --> 0:40:28.569
<v Speaker 1>That's what happened with Davis Webb. Davis Webb, now maybe

0:40:28.610 --> 0:40:31.170
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't going to get it, but Davis Webb was

0:40:31.230 --> 0:40:35.780
<v Speaker 1>being considered for the Bills head coaching job. Davis Webb

0:40:36.780 --> 0:40:42.830
<v Speaker 1>was a hot head coaching candidate. And he did not,

0:40:43.170 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm remembering the stories correctly, fully pursue them because

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.300
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton's like, stay here and in addition to being OC,

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:59.330
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you call plays. And it took one half

0:40:59.570 --> 0:41:04.690
<v Speaker 1>of one game for Sean Payton to publicly regret it.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>It was halftime of week one against the Chiefs when

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>he was asked about it. And he said, ask me

0:41:12.910 --> 0:41:14.430
<v Speaker 1>after the game and I'll tell you how I feel.

0:41:16.910 --> 0:41:19.930
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton loves calling plays. It's what Sean Payton does

0:41:19.989 --> 0:41:27.029
<v Speaker 1>the best. And so this is, I'm not even saying

0:41:27.090 --> 0:41:31.410
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton is wrong for doing it. They have scored

0:41:31.410 --> 0:41:36.709
<v Speaker 1>13 points in the first half of games. 13, 3.3

0:41:36.710 --> 0:41:39.330
<v Speaker 1>points per game in the first halves.

0:41:39.469 --> 0:41:41.180
<v Speaker 2>They were bad in the first half last year, though,

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:41.530
<v Speaker 2>weren't they?

0:41:42.860 --> 0:41:43.580
<v Speaker 1>That is true.

0:41:44.900 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I felt bad for Davis Webb in this situation. All

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the public criticism, and when something's going wrong, they're like, oh,

0:41:52.580 --> 0:41:54.780
<v Speaker 3>Sean Payton going to take, like, he gave him the job.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I hate how it was, like, dangling it in front

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 3>of him and how it's like, oh, he maybe shouldn't

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 3>deserve it. And it's like, this is not much different

0:42:02.060 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 3>from what was going on last year.

0:42:03.930 --> 0:42:05.549
<v Speaker 2>It's just like you gave the guy the job. Show

0:42:05.570 --> 0:42:06.250
<v Speaker 2>him some respect.

0:42:07.230 --> 0:42:10.770
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with that. I totally agree with that.

0:42:11.070 --> 0:42:17.620
<v Speaker 1>And even if behind the scenes, Sean Payton instantly regretted

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>it and was like, shoot, this might not work. You

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:27.580
<v Speaker 1>have to publicly be totally back your guy. Even if

0:42:27.620 --> 0:42:29.980
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, you might end up knifing him. But

0:42:30.020 --> 0:42:37.590
<v Speaker 1>it was humiliating. For Davis Webb. Just consistently humiliating. On that.

0:42:37.610 --> 0:42:44.890
<v Speaker 1>And it is not. A couple things. One is, Sean

0:42:44.930 --> 0:42:47.290
<v Speaker 1>Payton's the head coach. It's not like he doesn't have

0:42:47.350 --> 0:42:49.890
<v Speaker 1>any say. He's an offensive-minded head coach. He doesn't have

0:42:49.910 --> 0:42:53.130
<v Speaker 1>any say in the offensive game plan. The opening script,

0:42:53.190 --> 0:42:56.569
<v Speaker 1>the opening couple drives of these games are scripted. That's

0:42:56.590 --> 0:42:59.709
<v Speaker 1>not even play-calling, really. You can have a huge say

0:42:59.750 --> 0:43:02.489
<v Speaker 1>in that, and they've scored no points. I mean, they've

0:43:02.510 --> 0:43:05.410
<v Speaker 1>scored 13 first-half points, the whole thing. The other piece

0:43:05.450 --> 0:43:08.390
<v Speaker 1>of it is, your quarterback might not be that good.

0:43:09.700 --> 0:43:12.299
<v Speaker 1>And that could be a huge piece of it. And

0:43:12.380 --> 0:43:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it's your hand-picked quarterback that you took victory laps about

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.290
<v Speaker 1>how you tricked the Vikings into trading up for JJ.

0:43:19.330 --> 0:43:23.130
<v Speaker 1>You always wanted Bo Nix. You had this, remember his

0:43:23.750 --> 0:43:28.170
<v Speaker 1>unique independent algorithm on evaluating quarterbacks and Bo Nix checked

0:43:28.210 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all these boxes. Listen, Sean Payton's a brilliant offensive mind

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and has a very good coaching resume. I don't have

0:43:39.180 --> 0:43:46.270
<v Speaker 1>a ton of evidence that, how do I put this gently,

0:43:46.950 --> 0:43:51.169
<v Speaker 1>that I would enjoy hanging out with him. Now, he

0:43:51.210 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>might not enjoy hanging out with me, but doesn't just

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.979
<v Speaker 1>strike me as my type of guy. And so we'll

0:44:00.020 --> 0:44:02.820
<v Speaker 1>see if it fixes it. They're playing the hapless Chargers.

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.850
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk NFC East here.

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.500
<v Speaker 3>NFC East is wide open. We talked about the Eagles

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.420
<v Speaker 3>and their struggles. The Cowboys play tonight, and they cannot

0:44:13.460 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>figure out the defense. Washington has Jaden Daniels back, which

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:20.240
<v Speaker 3>might be a bad decision. New York has Jameis Winston

0:44:20.260 --> 0:44:23.020
<v Speaker 3>starting at quarterback and is at the top of the division.

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.950
<v Speaker 2>Who do you trust in this division, if anybody?

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:32.270
<v Speaker 1>Right now, nobody. And this is stunning. But I think, Demond,

0:44:32.310 --> 0:44:34.610
<v Speaker 1>say this is the worst division in the NFL.

0:44:35.090 --> 0:44:35.589
<v Speaker 2>It might be.

0:44:36.090 --> 0:44:47.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Think about it. NFC South has some friskiness to it.

0:44:48.070 --> 0:44:51.270
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers are a real team. The Falcons, since they

0:44:51.310 --> 0:44:53.770
<v Speaker 1>got Pennix back, are a real team.

0:44:54.550 --> 0:44:56.490
<v Speaker 2>The AFC South, I would say, is the closest.

0:44:58.330 --> 0:45:03.750
<v Speaker 1>Yes, however, the Jags are excellent. Jags are legit excellent.

0:45:04.510 --> 0:45:07.140
<v Speaker 1>The Colts... It's like, hey, we lost to the Ravens

0:45:07.180 --> 0:45:12.509
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs. Like, we beat the other teams. And

0:45:12.530 --> 0:45:17.690
<v Speaker 1>the Texans are bad, but it's hard to accept in

0:45:17.710 --> 0:45:19.989
<v Speaker 1>your brain they're bad. Yeah. You know what I mean? Like,

0:45:20.030 --> 0:45:22.850
<v Speaker 1>the Texans is like, come on. The CJ's playing good. Yeah.

0:45:23.450 --> 0:45:28.950
<v Speaker 1>And so the Giants are 3-1, but Jameis has really struggled.

0:45:34.340 --> 0:45:37.469
<v Speaker 1>And so the Giants, I can't fully believe in. We

0:45:37.530 --> 0:45:43.950
<v Speaker 1>just talked about the Eagles ad nauseum. You then have Washington.

0:45:44.250 --> 0:45:48.630
<v Speaker 1>We'll see with Jaden back. And they did beat Philly.

0:45:48.710 --> 0:45:52.650
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sorry, they did beat Seattle. So credit to

0:45:52.710 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Washington on that front. However, I didn't think they were

0:45:56.780 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good team before Jaden once again

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. And we'll see how healthy he is. And

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's Dallas. which I got to, it would not

0:46:09.660 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>shock me to Monzae if Dallas wins by 30 tonight.

0:46:13.100 --> 0:46:17.020
<v Speaker 1>Let me be clear. You're playing an undrafted rookie free

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.610
<v Speaker 1>agent quarterback out of Kansas for a team in the

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:23.830
<v Speaker 1>box that is dating back to basically week seven of

0:46:23.870 --> 0:46:27.330
<v Speaker 1>last year has just been totally lost. And Todd Bowles,

0:46:27.530 --> 0:46:32.549
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure is, you know, checking out like, sick European

0:46:32.630 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>cruise options in November because he thinks he's going to

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:41.580
<v Speaker 1>have time available. With that said, when you have a

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:47.180
<v Speaker 1>defense as bad as Dallas is, you always can get got.

0:46:49.340 --> 0:47:01.609
<v Speaker 1>And typically the, the bugaboo, if you will, of young,

0:47:02.380 --> 0:47:11.879
<v Speaker 1>untested quarterbacks is they get absolutely undressed by good defenses.

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:20.090
<v Speaker 1>They get semi-often tricked by decent defenses. But against bad defenses,

0:47:20.489 --> 0:47:23.850
<v Speaker 1>where their first read is open, they can look good.

0:47:25.690 --> 0:47:34.430
<v Speaker 1>And so, I... If I'm a Cowboys fan, I am

0:47:35.870 --> 0:47:44.210
<v Speaker 1>semi-anxious about this evening's game. Because it's now three straight

0:47:44.250 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>years of the Cowboys defense just being utterly hapless. And

0:47:52.820 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they allowed 28 to Jackson Dart, 20 to the Commanders

0:47:58.100 --> 0:48:02.489
<v Speaker 1>in a game where Jaden goes out. 34 to Baltimore,

0:48:02.489 --> 0:48:07.489
<v Speaker 1>30 to Houston. And so the answer is no, I

0:48:07.510 --> 0:48:12.299
<v Speaker 1>don't trust any of these teams. I will say if

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.700
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys don't win the division this year, it's a

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe for them. And also, let me add one other thing.

0:48:21.219 --> 0:48:24.850
<v Speaker 1>If I'm a Giants fan watching all this, I am

0:48:25.110 --> 0:48:29.790
<v Speaker 1>sick to my stomach. Dart is hurt. You're sick either way.

0:48:30.380 --> 0:48:35.250
<v Speaker 1>but particularly sick because geez, man, Philly's falling apart. We're already,

0:48:35.290 --> 0:48:38.290
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've proven we can beat Dallas. Jaden's going

0:48:38.370 --> 0:48:40.850
<v Speaker 1>out there with the inspector gadget thing on his arm.

0:48:40.910 --> 0:48:45.090
<v Speaker 1>Like I, it's not, if you're a giant fan, I do.

0:48:45.430 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Yankees just lost yesterday.

0:48:47.219 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Yikes.

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.900
<v Speaker 1>Boost mobile proven. You don't have to overpay for great wireless.

0:48:50.940 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Unlock the savings of $ 25 a month forever. Unlimited plan,

0:48:54.820 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>permanent price, no contracts, no price hikes. You can keep

0:48:57.300 --> 0:49:00.620
<v Speaker 1>your phone and your number. but you save up to

0:49:00.620 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>$ 600 a year compared to the major carriers. Stop overpaying.

0:49:03.860 --> 0:49:07.980
<v Speaker 1>Switch to a fair price at BoostMobile.com today. Based on

0:49:08.180 --> 0:49:10.860
<v Speaker 1>average annual single-line payment of AT &amp; T, Verizon, and

0:49:10.900 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>T-Mobile customers, compared to 12 months on the Boost Mobile

0:49:14.260 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Unlimited plan as of January 2026. For full offer details,

0:49:18.580 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>visit BoostMobile.com. All right, Demondze, let's talk about America's Game

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:25.940
<v Speaker 1>of the Week 425 Eastern on Fox this Sunday.

0:49:28.890 --> 0:49:31.629
<v Speaker 3>We've got Niners who have looked great undefeated. You've got

0:49:31.650 --> 0:49:33.330
<v Speaker 3>to think that the injuries are going to come back

0:49:33.370 --> 0:49:34.470
<v Speaker 3>to bite them at some point.

0:49:34.590 --> 0:49:35.569
<v Speaker 2>And then Seattle.

0:49:35.860 --> 0:49:37.779
<v Speaker 1>They haven't yet.

0:49:37.820 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Who's got Darnold who's struggled since he's been back, but

0:49:40.140 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 3>they are missing Kenneth Walker. Who do you think has

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:43.819
<v Speaker 3>more to prove in this one?

0:49:45.860 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think the Niners have more to prove. But

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:51.660
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle's going to win. The reason I say

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.950
<v Speaker 1>the Niners have more to prove is Seattle is the

0:49:54.969 --> 0:49:59.859
<v Speaker 1>defending champ. who won games with its backup quarterback, had

0:49:59.930 --> 0:50:02.530
<v Speaker 1>kind of a weird loss to Washington and then bounced

0:50:02.590 --> 0:50:07.129
<v Speaker 1>back last week. And that was a weird Seattle game

0:50:07.170 --> 0:50:10.070
<v Speaker 1>last week. Now, I will admit, this is a game

0:50:10.090 --> 0:50:13.270
<v Speaker 1>that I saw very little of live because I was

0:50:13.510 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>at the Chiefs game. Now, in the suite I was in,

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:19.380
<v Speaker 1>they did have red zone on a TV, so during

0:50:19.420 --> 0:50:21.380
<v Speaker 1>breaks in the Chiefs game, I would catch moments, but

0:50:21.420 --> 0:50:23.460
<v Speaker 1>I had to go back and kind of catch up

0:50:23.910 --> 0:50:28.009
<v Speaker 1>back up on the late afternoon window Sunday. But Seattle

0:50:28.070 --> 0:50:34.290
<v Speaker 1>was in total control of that Chargers game. They're up

0:50:34.310 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>27-6 midway through the third. And then I, you know,

0:50:39.820 --> 0:50:44.380
<v Speaker 1>lost to me, it appeared, a degree of concentration. And

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it's like, oh crap, we got

0:50:46.739 --> 0:50:48.590
<v Speaker 1>to pick up this third down or the Chargers can

0:50:48.610 --> 0:50:52.910
<v Speaker 1>get the ball back down seven. Seattle, I think, is excellent.

0:50:53.920 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>The Niners have been absolutely outstanding, and the Niners' defense

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has been, to me, one of the biggest shocks of

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:07.009
<v Speaker 1>the season. A bigger shock than Purdy playing great is

0:51:07.090 --> 0:51:12.730
<v Speaker 1>how well the Niners have played. We have the, yeah,

0:51:12.890 --> 0:51:18.989
<v Speaker 1>buts for the Niners on play the Dolphins, play the Cardinals,

0:51:20.830 --> 0:51:30.050
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos' offense. And right. So there's a lot of the, again,

0:51:31.070 --> 0:51:33.690
<v Speaker 1>you beat the Rams by 20, you beat the Broncos

0:51:33.730 --> 0:51:36.290
<v Speaker 1>who were supposed to be good by 10. Like, so those,

0:51:36.670 --> 0:51:40.470
<v Speaker 1>those are good wins. The context of them is the

0:51:40.530 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Rams seemed to instantly be like, you know, our travel

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.770
<v Speaker 1>plans ruined us. Plus, basically no Miles Garrett and no

0:51:48.870 --> 0:51:52.580
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald. Like, that was a Stafford played poorly. Now,

0:51:52.620 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>some of that they did to him. I'm not, I

0:51:54.780 --> 0:51:58.299
<v Speaker 1>am not, it sounds like I'm hedging here. I'm not

0:51:58.340 --> 0:52:02.660
<v Speaker 1>trying to hedge. What I'm trying to say is, there

0:52:02.739 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>are nits you can pick in the 4-0 Niners, just

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:08.110
<v Speaker 1>like there are nits you can pick in the 4-0 Chiefs.

0:52:08.620 --> 0:52:10.859
<v Speaker 1>And the Vikings, it's obvious, it's not a nit to pick,

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:15.509
<v Speaker 1>it's that their offense is awful. That one's staring you

0:52:15.550 --> 0:52:19.710
<v Speaker 1>in the face. If the Niners go to Seattle and win,

0:52:20.989 --> 0:52:27.649
<v Speaker 1>they're just the best team in the NFL. I don't

0:52:27.770 --> 0:52:31.130
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to go that way. And as great

0:52:31.310 --> 0:52:35.549
<v Speaker 1>as Purdy's been, I could see, maybe I'll be wrong,

0:52:36.590 --> 0:52:40.110
<v Speaker 1>I could see Brock Purdy, who's been sacked zero times

0:52:40.550 --> 0:52:46.790
<v Speaker 1>and has thrown one interception all year, having five combined

0:52:47.590 --> 0:52:53.070
<v Speaker 1>sacks and interceptions in this game alone. That's Seattle, something

0:52:53.130 --> 0:52:58.410
<v Speaker 1>to prove. And they, you know, the fact that they

0:52:58.450 --> 0:53:02.910
<v Speaker 1>are chasing the Niners, and the Niners come into this

0:53:02.930 --> 0:53:05.900
<v Speaker 1>game like, hey man, we already beat the Rams. We

0:53:05.940 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>beat Seattle. Both our division opponents have two losses, and

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.870
<v Speaker 1>we have the head-to-head victories. It's also a little hard

0:53:13.930 --> 0:53:16.250
<v Speaker 1>for me to get out of my head. We saw

0:53:16.310 --> 0:53:21.730
<v Speaker 1>these two teams play in the playoffs. Seattle beat them 41-6.

0:53:23.460 --> 0:53:26.060
<v Speaker 1>We saw these two teams play at the end of

0:53:26.100 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the regular season last year for the one seed on

0:53:28.739 --> 0:53:31.660
<v Speaker 1>the line. Seattle beat them 13-3. Now, the 13's not great, obviously.

0:53:34.380 --> 0:53:38.980
<v Speaker 1>But they have played twice in 2026. You know, twice

0:53:39.530 --> 0:53:44.390
<v Speaker 1>this year, technically. And the Niners scored a combined nine points.

0:53:45.130 --> 0:53:46.310
<v Speaker 1>In the 13-3 game, Brock Purdy was 19-27 for a

0:53:46.350 --> 0:53:49.430
<v Speaker 1>buck 27, zero touchdowns, one pick, a 65 rating. And

0:53:49.489 --> 0:53:50.870
<v Speaker 1>in the 41-6 game, I think he was worse. In

0:53:51.190 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that game, Purdy was... 15 of 27, a buck 40,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 1>a 54 rating, zero touchdowns, one pick. That defense, which

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:10.260
<v Speaker 1>is a little different this year, but mostly the same,

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:17.169
<v Speaker 1>really annihilated the Niners' attack. So I lean that that

0:54:17.210 --> 0:54:18.090
<v Speaker 1>could happen again.

0:54:18.110 --> 0:54:22.410
<v Speaker 3>Does Purdy jump Josh Allen with a win here in

0:54:22.850 --> 0:54:23.549
<v Speaker 3>the MVP race?

0:54:24.489 --> 0:54:27.049
<v Speaker 1>I think Purdy is already the favorite. I know he's

0:54:27.110 --> 0:54:35.450
<v Speaker 1>not in the prediction markets and stuff. I am... I

0:54:35.550 --> 0:54:39.089
<v Speaker 1>understand the prediction markets are saying who we think is

0:54:39.140 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>going to win. That is different than who is the

0:54:43.380 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>MVP right now. Like if there was a quarterly MVP vote,

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:54.980
<v Speaker 1>I think the prediction markets would have Brock Purdy as

0:54:55.020 --> 0:54:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a strong favorite and Kenneth Walker as second. It's like, hey,

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:04.969
<v Speaker 1>everyone's voting today on MVP through four weeks. Purdy would

0:55:05.010 --> 0:55:08.009
<v Speaker 1>win and Kenneth Walker would be right there after him.

0:55:08.390 --> 0:55:13.129
<v Speaker 1>And third would probably be Trevor. Um, like Josh Allen

0:55:13.170 --> 0:55:16.189
<v Speaker 1>would not listen. So there'll be some folks that vote

0:55:16.210 --> 0:55:19.029
<v Speaker 1>Josh first because some folks vote Josh first every year,

0:55:19.530 --> 0:55:23.299
<v Speaker 1>but it, he would not win. What they're anticipating is

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:25.500
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to have a great year that the

0:55:25.540 --> 0:55:28.420
<v Speaker 1>Niners are an aggressive at all of that. Speaking of Josh,

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the bills, please.

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:35.589
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we got some complaints. Defensive back D.

0:55:35.710 --> 0:55:37.989
<v Speaker 3>Alford was talking about the new stadium, saying that it's

0:55:38.050 --> 0:55:39.790
<v Speaker 3>super loud to the point where we're not able to

0:55:39.830 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 3>get the play in as fast as we need it.

0:55:41.750 --> 0:55:44.529
<v Speaker 3>Their defensive coordinator, Jim Leonard, came in and said, it's

0:55:44.550 --> 0:55:46.670
<v Speaker 3>always harder to communicate at home than it is on

0:55:46.690 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the road. If we complain about that, we are a-holes. Yeah,

0:55:51.300 --> 0:55:53.540
<v Speaker 3>so you want to talk? What's going on?

0:55:53.780 --> 0:56:00.549
<v Speaker 1>Listen, the Bills defense is... right now a problem, which

0:56:00.610 --> 0:56:03.380
<v Speaker 1>is crazy because they have a great D-line. Greg Rousseau

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:06.919
<v Speaker 1>leads the NFL in sacks. It's just everything after their

0:56:06.980 --> 0:56:11.660
<v Speaker 1>D-line has been problematic, particularly their secondary. They do seem

0:56:11.700 --> 0:56:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to miss Sean McDermott in that regard. Defense complaining about

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:19.140
<v Speaker 1>it being so loud when they're on the field is

0:56:19.219 --> 0:56:21.700
<v Speaker 1>one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard in sports.

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:27.500
<v Speaker 1>It's just not a thing. Literally, it's the biggest piece

0:56:27.540 --> 0:56:28.660
<v Speaker 1>of home field advantage.

0:56:29.060 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like as a coach or as the owner,

0:56:31.180 --> 0:56:33.219
<v Speaker 3>you got to tell your team, like you can never

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:36.259
<v Speaker 3>publicly complain about how loud it is inside of our

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:36.860
<v Speaker 3>home stadium.

0:56:37.500 --> 0:56:41.940
<v Speaker 1>No, especially because it's beneficial because here's again, I don't

0:56:41.980 --> 0:56:47.609
<v Speaker 1>want to, it's not that complicated, but defensive calls are

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:52.550
<v Speaker 1>relatively basic. There's only so many coverages you're going to run.

0:56:52.870 --> 0:56:56.450
<v Speaker 1>There's most of them can be communicated via hand signal

0:56:56.510 --> 0:57:02.339
<v Speaker 1>if need be. Offensive calls are very complicated. You got

0:57:02.380 --> 0:57:08.420
<v Speaker 1>to tell every single eligible receiver what their job is

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and shout out protections and very often need to change

0:57:13.930 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on the fly, which is why when a team is

0:57:17.300 --> 0:57:21.630
<v Speaker 1>at home, it very often says on the scoreboard, quiet, please,

0:57:21.750 --> 0:57:26.190
<v Speaker 1>offense at work. And when a team's at home and

0:57:26.210 --> 0:57:29.490
<v Speaker 1>they're on defense, they put the little decibel meter thing

0:57:29.590 --> 0:57:32.220
<v Speaker 1>up and people are supposed to get crazy. Like, it's

0:57:32.260 --> 0:57:37.420
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous complaint. I also am really curious to Monze.

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw it. Max Harrison, who

0:57:42.900 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was their first round pick two years ago. I want

0:57:48.420 --> 0:57:52.100
<v Speaker 1>to make sure I have this right. Maxwell Harrison was

0:57:52.180 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, their first round pick in the 2025 draft.

0:57:58.060 --> 0:58:04.830
<v Speaker 1>It's third and ten. There's a minute left. The Pats

0:58:04.870 --> 0:58:09.250
<v Speaker 1>do a dump off to Hunter Henry. The Bills have timeouts.

0:58:09.610 --> 0:58:11.290
<v Speaker 1>If the Bills get a stop, they're going to get

0:58:11.310 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball back down three with around 50 seconds left. Like,

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:23.790
<v Speaker 1>very alive. Maxwell Hairston... I... simply does not attempt to

0:58:23.830 --> 0:58:28.050
<v Speaker 1>make the tackle. We're not allowed to show NFL footage

0:58:28.110 --> 0:58:32.209
<v Speaker 1>on this, so I can't... This is something you should see.

0:58:32.230 --> 0:58:36.050
<v Speaker 1>I showed it to Coach Mangini. I thought he was

0:58:36.070 --> 0:58:36.790
<v Speaker 1>going to pass out.

0:58:36.810 --> 0:58:39.220
<v Speaker 2>He was so mad.

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:42.460
<v Speaker 1>And then Harrison, after the game, skipped media. It was

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a really... I just wonder how much friction there is

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:50.930
<v Speaker 1>in those Bills defensive meetings. And now they have the Rams,

0:58:53.270 --> 0:58:55.830
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be on the road. A Rams team that

0:58:55.870 --> 0:58:58.770
<v Speaker 1>Stafford has looked not good this year, and a Rams

0:58:58.810 --> 0:59:03.770
<v Speaker 1>team that is very fortunate not to be 1-3. We'll

0:59:03.810 --> 0:59:08.300
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that game in Friday's show, but whomever

0:59:08.420 --> 0:59:17.090
<v Speaker 1>loses that game, is different type of panic. The Rams

0:59:17.150 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>lose and it's like, are we not that good? And

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:27.340
<v Speaker 1>the Bills lose and it's like, oh, okay. Wow. Familiar feeling.

0:59:27.980 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's loving us. We're the best team in the league

0:59:30.020 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the first couple weeks. Then we have an October swoon

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that puts us behind the eight ball for the one seed.

0:59:36.820 --> 0:59:40.300
<v Speaker 1>Then we get hot in December. We're the two seed.

0:59:40.620 --> 0:59:43.150
<v Speaker 1>We kick somebody's ass in the wild card round, and

0:59:43.190 --> 0:59:47.270
<v Speaker 1>then we're back where we've been. So, like, for real.

0:59:47.770 --> 0:59:52.050
<v Speaker 1>And so, huge, huge Monday night football game. I lean

0:59:52.130 --> 0:59:56.660
<v Speaker 1>Rams because... while Stafford hasn't played great, I think he'll

0:59:56.680 --> 1:00:00.980
<v Speaker 1>be able to exploit the bills. Um, secondary.

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:02.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:00:02.540 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Puka getting healthier. And so, and the Rams did

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:12.660
<v Speaker 1>get a jolt of energy by stealing that game against Philly. Um, okay. Uh, huge.

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:16.270
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to boost mobile and the poly market. Huge.

1:00:16.330 --> 1:00:19.510
<v Speaker 1>Thank you as always to blue duck and the volume demands.

1:00:19.530 --> 1:00:21.830
<v Speaker 1>And I are actually going to stay right here as

1:00:21.890 --> 1:00:25.140
<v Speaker 1>we are going to do our week five pick show,

1:00:25.460 --> 1:00:29.580
<v Speaker 1>week four pick show, DeMondse finally got on the right

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>side of a teaser. I got absolutely, to quote the

1:00:34.680 --> 1:00:38.729
<v Speaker 1>great Nacho Barbaro, cramastified. And if there was a week

1:00:38.770 --> 1:00:41.970
<v Speaker 1>in DeMondse, I didn't want to go one and four

1:00:41.990 --> 1:00:45.430
<v Speaker 1>in picks. It's a weekend when I am literally in

1:00:45.490 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas and have all, everything about that just in

1:00:50.780 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>front of me. So not great, but we roll. We'll

1:00:53.700 --> 1:00:56.660
<v Speaker 1>be fine. Week five pick show. I bounce back to

1:00:56.680 --> 1:01:01.260
<v Speaker 1>Monza stays hot. That's coming to your inboxes or inboxes.

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not a newsletter to your RSS feeds tomorrow to YouTube, Spotify, iTunes.

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>See you guys there. Talk to you tomorrow for the

1:01:08.340 --> 1:01:09.090
<v Speaker 1>week five pick show.