WEBVTT - Target Surprises With Upbeat Forecast on Improving Demand 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>He's done on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 2>All about the geopolitics front and center here, But there

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>are earnings. Companies reporting earnings, and one of the companies

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>we want to focus on here is Target because it

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>goes to the consumer. Here Emily con joins his consumer

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>team leader for Bloomberg News. Target reporters cenumbers is some

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 2>better than expected profit for the full year.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>What you learn from the Target and what's the management saying?

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 4>So on management, it's important to remember this is a

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 4>new CEO, Michael Fidelki's first earnings call, and there's some

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>optimism here. There's an upbeat forecast on the coming years

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 4>and tease talking about this improving the store experience and

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 4>bringing shoppers back with that cheap chic appeal that the

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>that the stores have definitely lost in recent years. So

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 4>the stock is responding quite positively.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I love the term cheap chic. I do agree that

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 5>when I go to Target, I find some quirky fines

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 5>and I'm like, is this really this cheap? But how

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 5>does Target plant to differentiate itself from competitors like Walmart

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 5>and Amazon, especially as consumers remain price sensitive and their

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 5>spending is shifting towards more essential so not anymore they're

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 5>random things that.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 4>Totally find Yeah, you nailed it. I mean what we

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 4>What Target used to do really well is you'd go

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 4>in for some rolls of toilet paper and you'd come

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 4>out with sweatshirts and sweatpants and fun things that you

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 4>didn't know you needed. That was that tarje appeal. It

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 4>attracted wealthier clients to Target. That was its advantage over

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Walmart for many years. It's lost that appeal. A big

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 4>part of it is partnership. So we heard Fidelki just

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>now speaking about increasing the pace of partnerships. They have

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 4>a partnership with Roller Rabbit and more to come. That's

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 4>part of it, bringing in brands that you know and

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 4>love into Target at a at a good price point.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 4>They have a partnership with other partnerships with other brands

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>coming out over the course of the year. I think

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 4>that's part of the way they want to differentiate themselves

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>for sure. Food and beverage we heard about this morning too.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 3>What do they really compete against day to day do

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think it's obviously Walmart and Amazon. I

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 4>think one of the reasons Target is struggling right now

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>is because they haven't invested as much in grocery as

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Walmart has. So one of the reasons that Walmart is

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>seeing higher income shoppers come to Walmart increasingly is because

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>they've made their grocery section a lot more appealing. There's

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you can find organic there, you can find a lot

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 4>of fresh products. You go to Target, it it's just

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 4>not there. So I think with you're going to increasingly

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 4>see Target try to get more competitive in the grocery aisles,

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 4>which would put it up against lots of other grocery companies.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 5>So does Target then plan to expand their food and

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 5>essential assortments to I don't know, maybe stabilized traffic or

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 5>do you think it'll double down on more discretionary or

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 5>style lad categories.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think we'll see, we'll see a bit of both.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that they called out beauty and food and

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 4>beverage this morning as some bright spots, and I think

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>we'd expect to see.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 6>More of that.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>So what's Target saying about their consumer? How's their consumer behaving?

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the word of the you know that

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 4>we're still seeing like very picky consumers who aren't spending

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 4>as much in the discretionary categories. So I think Target

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 4>is focusing on what it can do to bring people back.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>The CEO just said that they're going to be investing

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 4>in hiring more workers and raising pay. That's pretty key

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>to making the stores more enjoyable to shop in.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Because that's what Alexis Christophers was saying earlier about her

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Target experiences.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Not enough help on the floors.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 2>That's something that's a shared concern among this company aware

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>that kind of is.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>It sounded like it. I mean raising pay is key.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 4>I think you know, there's going to spend a billion

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 4>dollars on making the stores more pleasant. I think they

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 4>laid off a lot of corporate employees to you know,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>perhaps that investment is going into making the stores better. So, yeah,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 4>that is a problem. Slow lines, lots of things locked

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 4>up in cages when you.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Try to don't get Matt Miller started all the stuff, gosh.

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 5>So then with a new CEO, any cultural or operational

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 5>changes that signaled that the company truly turning a page

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 5>after recent challenges, because you have probably skeptic saying maybe

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>this is a one off.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, we've seen he's been in the job

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>for a month, we've seen a reshuffling in leadership, we've

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>seen some layoffs. But where you know, the company is

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>hosting its investor day later today, so we're hoping to

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 4>learn more about what that turnaround strategy is and any

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 4>specifics on new initiatives. How big are these investments and stores.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Those are the things we're looking for later today with

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 4>the event that's kicking off shortly.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, cocklay and

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>This military conflict in the Mid East cannot be good

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 2>for logistics, the global supply chain, all that kind of stuff.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>We learned about this. Every time there's something wrong in

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the world, it impacts global trade, which means we need

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>to check in with Lee Glasgow, Senior transport Logistics and

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>shipping analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 7>Lee, what do you make here of what we're.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Seeing in the Middle East and how it may impact

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>global trade? How are you thinking about it?

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, I mean, at the end of the day,

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 6>it's going to put upward pressure on rates because there's

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 6>now a premium on capacity, especially as it relates to

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 6>the tanker industry. We've seen tanker rates get closed to

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 6>almost five hundred thousand dollars a day. That is just

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 6>being driven by the fact that people want oil, they're

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 6>going to have to pay to get it. And the

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 6>ripple effect really for my world because you know, I

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 6>cover marine shipping, air freight guys, and also the folks

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 6>here in the US, the railroads and trucking companies, the

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 6>biggest impact is going to be the inflationary aspect and

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 6>the higher decail prices. When diesel prices rise significantly, it

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 6>tends to weigh on margins because there is a lag

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 6>effect on the fuel search charges that they charge their customers.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 6>So you're going to see margins getting pressed. And also

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 6>the you know, the one two punch from that is

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 6>going to be if consumers have less discritionary money to

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 6>spend on goods. That means it's going to be less

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 6>stuff shipped around. So you know, there's really kind of

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 6>a ripple effect going on with the events unfolding in

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 6>the Middle East.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>If disruptions persist, do you think we could see supply

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 5>chain bottlenecks similar to twenty twenty one to twenty two

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 5>And if so, which sectors do you see will be

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 5>falling first or will be affected first?

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't think you're going to see what we saw

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 6>during the pandemic, because at the end of the day,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 6>the biggest impact really is the crude and energy markets.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 6>So you know, container aligners that are leaving Asia are

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 6>still going to go to southern California to unload their goods.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, the only time it's going to become a

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 6>problem is that if you know, this is really prolonged

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 6>and just people just don't have the energy to manufacture stuff.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 6>But let's hope you don't get there.

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 5>What about vessels with vessels stalled and re routing around

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 5>choke points? How sharply are fright and tanker rates going

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 5>to rise? In your view?

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, my colleague ken Low out of Singapore, you

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 6>just put out a note on the Blueberg terminal earlier

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 6>today and he was calling for over five hundred thousand

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 6>dollars a day and time traiter rates.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 8>Again.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 6>You know what, it's not so much the diversion, it's

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 6>the kind of the demand. So people are willing to

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 6>pay up high. A lot of insurance companies are no

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 6>longer insuring in the region. So, uh, the you know,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 6>the straight of her Moves is pretty much you know,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 6>the right the Persian Gulf and the strade of her

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Moves is pretty much shut down no matter what the

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 6>Iranians do.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Solely, if I'm a FedEx pilot, I'm not flying anywhere

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>near that airspace, so I'm gonna fly around.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>It is not going to raise costs for everybody.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and so like the ripple effect, you know, after

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 6>the the ocean markets, probably the air markets are most impacted.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 6>A lot of the airspace and the Middle East has

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 6>been shut down. A lot of commercial flights are no

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 6>longer going in and out. And you know what the

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 6>commercial airlines do is, you know, where we put our luggage,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 6>they also take cargo, so that that capacity is not available,

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 6>and you know, it is going to impact FedEx UPS

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 6>and DHL. DHL is more exposed to the Middle East

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 6>than the other two. But you know, I think right

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 6>now it's kind of a deminomous impact to UPS and FedEx.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>The real question is is how long does this go for?

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 6>You know, is it going to be days, weeks or months?

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 6>You know, if it's just going to be weeks, the

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 6>impact earnings probably won't be that that significant for the

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 6>FedEx is and the UPS is the world and slightly

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 6>more for DHL. All right then, and then also, you

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 6>know a lot of a lot of these businesses, they

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 6>have forwarder freightforwarding businesses as well, and when you have

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 6>these supply chains disruptions, shippers will lean heavily on the

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 6>freightfowarders and help them navigate these new situations. So you

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 6>might see, you know, the freightfowarders also could benefit. They

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 6>can benefit from a higher rates and be also getting

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 6>more customs business.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts or watch US live on YouTube.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 2>The US Israeli war on Iran has entered its fourth day,

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>with oil and gas prices surging in.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 3>The world adjusting to a conflict.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 2>The President Donald Trump says has no fixed timeline, and

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>now we're see other countries in the region being pulled

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>into the conflict, with Iranian response.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Hitting a number of countries in the region.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Our next guest has twenty years experience working in at

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East through various forms of the US government

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 2>and private practice. Kirsten Fontain Rose joins his heare senior

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Fellow at the Atlantic Council, joining us via zoom from Washington, DC. Kirston,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of the US action against Iran here?

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Just from your experience in the State Department in other areas.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 9>If the question is why are we doing this now

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 9>or why is the US getting involved, there are two answers.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 9>One is that during the talks that people were tracking

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 9>on the nuclearphile, the US team assessed that Iran was

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 9>not actually making concessions. We heard encouraging things about movement

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 9>being made, but the reality is what Iran was offering

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 9>was not to enrich uranium. For three years, this time

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 9>period is what the International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 9>told us same timeframe it would take Iran to restore

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 9>their Uranian Richmond if no restrictions were placed on it.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 9>So the US team said, Iran is just toying with us.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 9>This is the same delay diplomacy they've been displaying for

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 9>several US administrations. This is a problem. Back in DC,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 9>the military and the National Security Council and the presidents

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 9>and our team said when the regime revealed this, that

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 9>they were not willing to truly make concessions on the

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 9>nuclear file or on their missile file, even though the

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 9>US had a massive military build up on their shores.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 9>It caused the US administration to say they intend to

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 9>build out both programs to the point where the international

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 9>community would lose any leverage to negotiate with them. They

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 9>would either build up their nuclear program to the extent

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 9>that you could no longer safely go after their missile

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 9>program kinetically, or they would build up their missile program

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 9>to the extent that it made it too risky to

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 9>destroy any of their nuclear facilities. So if the current

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 9>on their borders was not enough, nothing would be, and

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 9>therefore the time was now or never. The other pressure

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 9>that was in was the US got signals from Israel

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 9>that they were going to strike potentially unilaterally because of

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 9>their own feeling of this being a small window of

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 9>opportunity and being an existential threat. The US knew that

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 9>that would mean that the US would be receiving attacks,

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 9>our bases would be on the receiving end, because the

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 9>Iranian regime had made it clear that any strike by

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 9>Israel would also be considered a strike by the US.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 9>So combine those, then add in sprinkle in intelligence that

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 9>told us that there would be clustered meetings of senior

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 9>Iranian leadership almost too good to be true, and you

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 9>wound up with the recipe for strikes when they happened.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 5>So, with Iran signaling reddiness for a long war, where

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 5>does that leave the US when it comes to reshaping

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 5>their strategy. We have some people saying it'll be three,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 5>four or five weeks.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 9>It's not really a reshaping. However, the US battle plan

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 9>has been laid. You know, these can agencies have been

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 9>on the shelf for quite some time, and of course

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 9>they've been updated, massively updated. But the intent is to

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 9>wipe out the military, wipe out the navy and prevent

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 9>Iran from having a nuclear weapon and create a pathway

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 9>for the Iranian people to govern themselves, to decide whether

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 9>they want that to be someone new or to be

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 9>levels three or four down within the regime. It's on them.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 9>But this kind of operation to destroy an entire military,

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 9>an entire navy, including underwater assets, all the ships, all

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 9>the bases, any missile facilities, drawn facilities, factories, manufacturing stockpiles,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 9>the like.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>It takes some time.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 9>So the US and Israel started with those air defenses

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 9>that would prevent Iran from being able to guard against

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 9>these kinds of strikes, and it went then to long range,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 9>medium range ballistic missiles, things that would threaten our bases

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 9>and Israel. And it's moving on then to leadership, to

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 9>things like the short range ballistic missiles that Terran barely

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 9>touched in the June war and is what we're seeing

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 9>them fire along with drones onto their golf neighbors now.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 9>So there's kind of a tiered hierarchy of places that

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 9>were first priority to hit and now moving down. But

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 9>the US operations won't finish until they hit all of

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 9>their high value target list, some of those being individuals,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 9>but mostly being regime assets the ways they exert control.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So, given your experience at Kirsten, is this something that

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 2>can be achieved in the space of four to five weeks,

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>as President Trump was suggesting, or going to go perhaps

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>even longer.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 9>It depends on the state of Iran's air defenses, which

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 9>right now we assess being pretty low, and then on intelligence,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 9>because we know Iran moves things around. So right now,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 9>satellite imagery, for instance, is helping our jets that are

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 9>doing launcher hunting. They're literally scanning the air to look

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 9>for launchers being moved from the places where they are

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 9>secretly stored to the places where they are intended to launch,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 9>taking them out that way. How many of the stockpiles

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 9>underground can we reach? Is the leadership on that list

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 9>moving around? Do we know where they are? So it's

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 9>the battle plan is there. It's just whether or not

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 9>intelligence shifts day to day that lays out whether or

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 9>not the timeline stays solid or not. It also will

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 9>depend on some geopolitical factors. How is the economy reacting

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 9>around the world, What kind of damage is coming to

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 9>golf partners. It's not that things like damage would cut

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 9>short US operations. In fact, if anything, it would probably

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 9>speed them up.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 5>What are the odds that Golf states like cut there

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 5>or UAE will be pulled deeper into a direct confrontation.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 9>Perhaps well, the US may not even want that. These

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 9>Golf states have a lot of assets, They have standoff weaponry,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 9>they have great air defenses that the US is interoperable with.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 9>But you don't want to clutter the air space. You

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 9>don't want more situations like we had in Kuwait. We're

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 9>turning on Kuwait's air defenses wound up crashing three US

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 9>fighter jets. So anything would have to be well coordinated.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 9>The US has planned the battle plan around those territories

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 9>and that airspace not being available, so it certainly won't

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 9>be a message, hey, everybody, pitch in when you're ready.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 9>All of that would be integrated. The Golf also tends

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 9>to have a lot of their air defenses on automode,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 9>so it expends quite a bit of interceptor stockpile on

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 9>perhaps one drone and its remnants and the like. So

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 9>the US would want to say, before you get involved

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 9>directly in anything offensive, let's really watch your defenses and

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 9>make sure they're being well strategically expended. And then if

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 9>we're going to use things like your standoff weapons, let's

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 9>coordinate targeting. We want to really limit civilian casualties here.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 9>That's a big percentage of the planning has gone into

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 9>how to limit those civilian casualties. But when you look around,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 9>even them participating in air defense is a contribution, and

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 9>now that you have their civilians being hit, they're much

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 9>more likely to say we would like to participate on

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 9>the offensive side. Saw Cutter already take down two jet fighters.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 9>That's more than just turning on a jammer, for instance.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 9>And now that Saudi has had embassy's hit in their capital,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 9>they made their rethinking the Saudis prior to any engagement

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 9>message to the your on nimes very clearly we're not

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 9>allowing the US to use this as a base for launches,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 9>but if you do anything that strikes civilian architecture, we

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 9>will consider it an act of war. And everything's on

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 9>the table then, so we could be seeing the golf

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 9>being drawn in.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>auto with the Bloomberg Business App, Listen on demand wherever

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Congressional warpower votes aimed at blocking President Donald Trump from

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>further military action in Iran will likely fail.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 3>That is the assessment of our next.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Guest, Nathan Dee, senior policy analyst the Bloomberg intelligencies down.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 3>There in DC. I mean this is just for show,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>isn't it, Nathan.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean that Congress has given up a whole you know,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>war power thing a long time ago to this to

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 2>our US presidency, haven't they.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely. I mean this is essentially a symbolic vote here.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 8>I mean, in order to get this through law, you

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 8>would have to have both chambers pass it, and you'd

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 8>have to have pass it in a way to get

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 8>a veto proof majority, because President Trump would obviously vetoed

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 8>this measured. So I think what you know Senator Tim Kaine,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 8>who is the sponsor of this legislation or this resolution,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 8>and he did something very similar to Venezuela is aiming

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 8>to do, is essentially just put people on record ahead

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 8>of the US midterms. Because current bully suggests that sixty

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 8>percent of Americans are not on board with President Trump's

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 8>strategy in Iran, and you know, as you can do

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 8>in an election year, people like to play politics, and

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 8>so this is something that I think just generally is

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 8>more so about political aspects as we get closer and

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 8>closer to November.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 5>But even if passed, resolutions would need a super majority

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 5>to override Trump's veto, and so that leaves them, to

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 5>Paul's points, something largely symbolics. So what is the ideal

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 5>situation in your view?

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so there's two reasons why Senator Tim Tim Kane

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 8>is pushing this. The first is Congress doesn't like it

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 8>when presidents start conflicts. And then you don't even have

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 8>to have a Republican president or a Democratic president, you

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 8>go all the way back, you know, over the last

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 8>fifty sixty years. Congress doesn't like when president starts conflicts

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 8>without going for congressional authorization. So this is the first reason.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 8>The second reason is is that, you know, just going

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 8>back to my point about politics, all four hundred and

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 8>thirty five members of the House representatives in one third

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 8>of the Senate are running in November, and this could

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 8>be a situation where Senator Keane wants to put people

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 8>on the record, so that if that's sixty percent of

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 8>the American populace isn't on board with President Trump's I

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 8>RAN strategy grows larger. You can have some very difficult conversations.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this is not going to change President Trump's,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, strategy. When he says that he doesn't need

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 8>to even think of the polling numbers, he's correct, But

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 8>you know, he's also not running on the ticket in November.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 8>You know, there are going to be some Republicans on

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 8>the other hand, who are looking at this and looking

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 8>at the chances the Democrats take the House in November.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 8>And I'm not going to say there going to speak

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 8>in opposition to this, but they certainly would be a

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 8>little bit more wary or at least their uneasiness would

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 8>rise as a result of this vote.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Nathan realistically is the Senate up for play here in

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the midterms.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 8>So right now, the prediction markets have it about a

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 8>forty percent chance, and the Democrats are going to take

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 8>the Senate, and a lot of it hinges on today,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 8>specifically what's happening here primary day in Texas. Now, you

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 8>have two reasons. You have the Republican race and the

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 8>Democratic race. On the Republican race, you have Ken Pax

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 8>and the Attorney General, who, according to the prediction markets,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 8>has an eighty five percent chance of beating the incumbent

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 8>Senator John Cornyn. On the Democratic side, a similar number

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 8>eighty two percent, suggests that James tallerco the moderate Democrat,

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 8>has a good chance of beating Jasmine Crockett, the Progressive

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 8>on that is the ticket that the Democrats want to

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 8>see if they have a chance of beating the taking

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 8>the Texas race. But again, you know, like I think

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 8>most people, at least according to the prediction markets here

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 8>in Washington, are sort of just taking into account as

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 8>their scenario. The Democrats are have a really decent chance

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 8>to take in the House about eighty to eighty five

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 8>percent according to the prediction markets. The Senate is still

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 8>going to be very difficult despite what happens today.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 5>What's the most likely geopolitical scenario your sources are telling

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 5>you say, in the next thirty days, what are they

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 5>preparing for maybe best case or worst case scenarios? Best

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 5>case depending on the view you're taking.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, obviously, I think it's the timeline of Iran.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean, our colleague from the Worgo economic expector. Wasser

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 8>has been looking at this, Our colleague Queen Sanders has

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 8>been looking at this, and there's this idea if you

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 8>look at the prediction markets again in terms of where

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 8>this is going to end. CALCI has a contract here.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 8>It essentially says the majority of folks think that this

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 8>is going to be over this month. That's very different

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 8>to this idea of the geopolitical risk will continue for months,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 8>especially in terms of like the trait of war moves

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 8>and all that other stuff. So I think that's the

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 8>number one thing here to keep in mind from the

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 8>geopolitical perspective. But I would also just say from the

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 8>US domestic perspective, keep in mind that there's going to

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 8>be a rush to push legislation out this month and

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 8>next month because Congress, like I said, is going to

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 8>really focus on the midterm elections and then generally stopped

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 8>them for passing legislation.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune in, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal