1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:09,080 Speaker 2: All right, let's get it right to our next guest, 3 00:00:09,080 --> 00:00:11,320 Speaker 2: because this leads us in perfectly to liz Ane Sanders, 4 00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:16,000 Speaker 2: chief investment Strategies at Charles Schwab. Liz, what did you 5 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:20,439 Speaker 2: take away from the Fed's action this week and particularly 6 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:22,639 Speaker 2: as it relates to maybe what they may do in 7 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:23,439 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six. 8 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:28,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, and good morning to you both. Happy holidays. Obviously, 9 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:29,800 Speaker 1: the cut was not a surprise. I don't tend to 10 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:34,279 Speaker 1: buck market expectations, especially when they are particularly dominant in 11 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 1: one direction or another. We did expect what could be 12 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 1: defined as a hawkish cut where they certainly didn't lay 13 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: out any promises for the glide path going forward, and 14 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,239 Speaker 1: that's what happened. And just before I came on, you 15 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,920 Speaker 1: were talking about increasing dissents on the FED. I agree. 16 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:50,479 Speaker 1: I think that that is a good thing. I think 17 00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:53,640 Speaker 1: it also helps to temper some of the concerns about 18 00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:58,720 Speaker 1: independence of the FED and maybe something that either implicitly 19 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: or explo powerless supporting that we can hear from lots 20 00:01:03,160 --> 00:01:05,640 Speaker 1: of voices, and I think it's a reminder that the 21 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:09,920 Speaker 1: see in FOMC is committee not share so I think 22 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: from the standpoint of that amount of uncertainty with regard 23 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:16,960 Speaker 1: to FED independence, I think the sense and a wider 24 00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:19,960 Speaker 1: array of views is a positive. Yeah. 25 00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 3: And speaking of new voices, Lizen, we're going to get 26 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:26,280 Speaker 3: a new FED share. We know this in May. So 27 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,080 Speaker 3: how do you how are you thinking about the interest 28 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:32,480 Speaker 3: rate landscape in twenty twenty six? Are we going to 29 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 3: get more? Do you think than that one cut that 30 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 3: Powell was talking about this week? 31 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 1: Tell me what the data is going to be, and 32 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 1: I could give you a pribume an easier way to 33 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 1: I mean, when you're a data dependent FED and then 34 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 1: you had the effects of the government shutdown, which means 35 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,640 Speaker 1: we don't We haven't had any official labor market data 36 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,400 Speaker 1: since the September release. We don't have GDP data, we 37 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:58,520 Speaker 1: don't have National income and Product accounts, corporate profit margins data. 38 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: So I think as we start to get the data, 39 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: I do think that the FED, as it relates to 40 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 1: their data dependency, they don't have a blind eye to 41 00:02:07,560 --> 00:02:11,880 Speaker 1: inflation clearly, but I think the needle mover from a 42 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:15,280 Speaker 1: reaction function will continue to be on the labor market. 43 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 1: So you could have a scenario where they cut more 44 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 1: than the one or two that is priced into expectations. 45 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 1: I'm not sure that that's universally a positive thing if 46 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: it comes because of serious deterioration in a labor market. 47 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 1: But I think the labor market is what's driving the 48 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:30,400 Speaker 1: bus right now. 49 00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:32,840 Speaker 2: Le Zan. From an earning perspective, we had some really 50 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,200 Speaker 2: good earnings over the past several quarters here. The third 51 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:37,920 Speaker 2: quarter in particular, I think was really surprisingly on the 52 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:41,760 Speaker 2: positive side of these v street expectations. Is the current 53 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 2: earnings environment enough to support this market here, do you think? 54 00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 1: Well? Actually, the trajectory of earnings among different cohorts I 55 00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 1: think is one of the reasons why we have started 56 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 1: to see this broadening out. Over the last six months. 57 00:02:56,520 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 1: Only seventeen percent of the S and p's constituents about 58 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 1: perform the index itself over the past month. That's up 59 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 1: to fifty four percent, and I think it's the differential 60 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 1: in earnings growth profile. So if you look at any 61 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:15,520 Speaker 1: typical AI megacap cohort MAG seven or maybe a slightly 62 00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 1: broader AI basket, or even if you just hone in 63 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:22,040 Speaker 1: on the tech sector, over the last six to seven quarters, 64 00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 1: you've seen a pretty meaningful deceleration in the pace of 65 00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:30,080 Speaker 1: earnings growth. Still strong, earnings growth, still better than the 66 00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 1: rest of the market called the other four hundred and 67 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: ninety three. But we're starting to see convergence there because 68 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 1: you have the rest of the market seeing an accelerating 69 00:03:39,960 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 1: pace of earnings growth. And I'm always fond of saying 70 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 1: better or worse matters more than good or bad, and 71 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: it's that better in the case of the rest of 72 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: the market. A little bit worse, though in an absolute sense, 73 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: still strong. That has been a support for this broadening out, 74 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: and I think that has legs in twenty twenty six. 75 00:03:57,200 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 3: So Liza and we talk a lot about valuations and 76 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 3: value being pretty frothy, But where is there the bargain 77 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:07,720 Speaker 3: buy for investors in equities in the new year. 78 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 1: I don't know that there's any one monolithic place where 79 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 1: you can find a bargain buy. I think that there 80 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 1: is value to be found, and that has a lot 81 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 1: to do with what's been happening under the surface. You know, 82 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,240 Speaker 1: there's so much focus on just what the indexer is doing. 83 00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: The cap weighted indexes SMP is up thirty eight percent 84 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,599 Speaker 1: from the early April closing low on April eighth, but 85 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 1: the average member within the smp IS had a maximum 86 00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: draw down of nineteen percent just since April eighth. The 87 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 1: NASA's up fifty five percent justince April eight, but the 88 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,720 Speaker 1: average member within the NASDAQ has had a forty percent 89 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:47,160 Speaker 1: maximum draw down. So with all this churn in rotation 90 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 1: under the surface, that's where value is being found. I 91 00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:53,320 Speaker 1: think this is an environment though, where you to bring 92 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 1: back an old school acronym where you want to be 93 00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 1: mindful of value, but you don't want to sacrifice growth. 94 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:02,960 Speaker 1: It's very Garpye in terms of the factors. We think 95 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 1: you want to focus on. 96 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 2: Lizen From a factor perspective, is there anything that screens 97 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:11,560 Speaker 2: particularly well for you? These days? 98 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,479 Speaker 1: Growth oriented factors are doing very well, and I think 99 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:18,599 Speaker 1: that is particularly important when you go down the CAF spectrum. 100 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,599 Speaker 1: So if you look at the Russell two thousand and 101 00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:24,840 Speaker 1: you break it out between its profitable and non profitable components, 102 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 1: the nonprofitable components are outperforming the profitable components by more 103 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: than double on a year to day basis. And it's 104 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 1: even more extreme if you just go back to the 105 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:39,680 Speaker 1: April eighth closing low I would absolutely fade that lower 106 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 1: quality unprofitable cohort within the Russell two thousand and lean 107 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 1: into the profitability piece where you have better fundamentals and 108 00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:54,359 Speaker 1: you have had the relative underperformance to the unprofitable. So 109 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 1: again you want to look at value components, price to book, 110 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:01,279 Speaker 1: price to sales. You want strong balance sheet, high interest coverage. 111 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 1: But you want those positive earnings trends, forward revisions, earnings 112 00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:10,720 Speaker 1: expectations being exceeded during earning season. So it's a combination 113 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 1: of both value and growth factors. 114 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 2: Luziane, thanks so much for joining us. Lazanne Saunders, he's 115 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 2: the chief investment strategist at Charles Schwap