WEBVTT - Day Two From Milken Global Conference

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanivik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>clus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. Do you are listening to Bloomberg

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Business Week cal Master along with Tim Stanivic live at

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the Milk and Institute Global Conference here on the West

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>coast um. And you know what's interesting is we did

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>talk with Mark Jenkins ahead of Global Credit Carlisle Group

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>earlier big players in the credit markets, and he talked

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>about making credit right private, uh, you name it, more

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>accessible to investors. And our next guest is working on

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>making alternative asset classes more accessible as well. Matt Brown

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and CEO of CASE. He joins us

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>here at the can Institute Global Conference. Matt, it's really

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on the show. You've been really

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>busy over the last couple of days. Yeah, it's been

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a it's been a great couple of days. Uh. This

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>theme of democratizing finance has really, uh just been a

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>big front and center topic for the for the conference.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll take us into your panel yesterday because you moderated

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a panel with people like Gene Case Cathy would Carol,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who you're speaking to? What in just a couple of hours, right, exactly?

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>What were some big takeaways from from what you learned?

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think the real big theme there was,

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, inclusion, making sure that we have a financial

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>system that actually allows all participants. Uh. It was about decentralization.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>It was about removing the intermediaries like big banks and

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>brokerage firms and allowing participants uh to have direct interaction

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with each other to reduce cost and efficiency and increased efficiency. Um.

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But overall it was a fascinating conversation. Kathy would really

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>uh dug into kind of democratizing access for individual investors,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>young and stirs, the millennials. Um, we're just living the

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>whole different world than I grew up in It's interesting.

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I just got off a panel talking with heads in

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the M and A world and and some of your

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>established players, whether it's a Deutch, a bank or city group, uh,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and talking about fintech and the up starts, you know,

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they're talking their book a little bit. But

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you know, there's incredible regulatory oversight over

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the investment space, and many would say that that's necessary

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that investors aren't unduly or folks who

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>tapped the financial system right that they are protected. So

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>how do the up starts? How are they because there's

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a feeling that the regulatory environment isn't

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>keeping up with it and maybe understand the risks or

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the benefits. Yeah, there's a big there's a big feeling

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>around that. Just to take a step back, you know, ten,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>well thirty years ago, especially around alternative investments or private

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>funds or private credit, the SEC and the government's position

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>was that, you know, you have to be wealthy enough

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can lose some money in these types of

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>investment credit and credit investor. And as a result, what

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they effectively did was exclude a huge population of you know,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the US and internationally from participating in alternative investments. What's

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>happening today is I think there's been a relook at

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that and they're realizing now that alternative investments, including private

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>credit as you mentioned, are doing their job. They have

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a really a role in a portfolio, and done the

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>right way, they can really preserve and grow wealth over time.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And to exclude and not allow the democratization of these

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>types of investments is not the right idea. How do

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you do that in the right way? Though? What what

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators need to do in order to make sure that

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if people who can't afford to lose money aren't aren't

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>excluded from these alternative asset classes. It's really coming down

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to certification, education, scalable education. Fintech as we think about,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes does allow access to to financial products. But fintech

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can bring a lot of different things in a scalable format,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the most of which could be education. So really you

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can't talk about democratizing access to investments and aless you're

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about educating a broad group of new participants who

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be making investments, so they're going in

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with open eyes. You look at Robin Hood and some

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of the read at some of the kind of the

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>concern there is the gamification of these platforms and maybe

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not everyone knows exactly what's going on and can they

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>lose too much money? So you're going to see a

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>real rise of education as kind of a cornerstone in this.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>There's education, there's education, and there's education and others. You

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can go to website and read some stuff. You know,

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very passive, but does it need to be something

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that's much more formal so that you've got to pass

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>some form of a financial literacy test that you're driving

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, so that you really know you're talking

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about your welfare, your investments, your money that you might

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>need to you know, live on. So the SEC right

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>now is currently amended the accreditation role to include a

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>new lane for education, and the way they're determining that

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is based on your uh, your your profession, your experience,

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>your licenses in the finance industry u UM. So they're

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>already moving away from net worth is just the only criteria,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and now they're saying, you know what, if you're smart

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>enough and you can certify that, then you should be

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>able to participate. So that's that first step in removing

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a net worth requirement, but you're right, it's actually about

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>making sure you can prove that the work has been

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>done right. Is there any concern that there could be

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, people getting around these guard rails and

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>some ugly situations that cause regulators think differently about this, Well,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what regulators are doing around robin Hood right now. Yeah,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>it is a concern, and so our company hasn't reached

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out to the end investor. Were a B two B platform,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So our client who uses our platform to access alternative

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>investments is a financial advisor, professional investment and r I

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>A exactly, so we are all we do have our

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>concerns as well. So we're watching it very closely, watching

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what the government's doing, and we want to be part

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of the solution on that. And I do wonder if

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it's some of these all the investments, is it is?

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If it's a fun you're getting a piece of it right,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so that you're not all in and that you would

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>do some of your risk. It's a diversified pool, but

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>liquid it is a big point as well. I know

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of about a time here, but you know,

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>are you locking your capital up for a month a

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>week for five years or ten. So, but you think

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>about if universities and endowments wanted to be able to

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>tap these all investments because they because in the search

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for yield, but they've also got to make sure that

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>those endowments are there for the future. You have to

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder about opening up to a wider pool up investors.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's basically what we're talking about. Hey, Matt Brown, thank you, Hey,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We want to at bit about spacks because

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they've had their ups. They've had their downs this year,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. Uh. And we have a great

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>guest to talk about. Orlando Bravo is founder and managing

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>partner at Toma Bravo. He's with us at the Milk

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and Institute Global Conference right now. First of all, how's

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>your conference going. I mean we talked a lot about yesterday.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>How really feels like things are kind of getting back

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to normal, albeit with masks on. Well, First, thanks so

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. The conference is awesome. Think about it.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We're here in l A. A lot of it is outside.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>The weather's perfect. I've gotten to see some of our

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>limited partners that I haven't seen in two to three years,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so some of the old friends, and also meet a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of new people. So it's just been great, one

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>meeting after the other, right, fifteen minute meetings and then

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to see as many people face to face, like

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's remarkable, right, unbelievable. So okay, let's talk about SPACs

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>because I was looking at some of the indexes. They're

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>down as as a group about ten percent so far

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. They're down about if you look at certain

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>indexes from the mid February hype, where are we because

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about the death of SPACs um and

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as to mention earlier, I mean, these are cycles that

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>things go through. SPACs are not a new investment vehicle exactly.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Sparks are going to come back. They are They've been

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>around for whatever five or thirty years. But why do

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>why do we think that there was this incredible craze

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to SPACs. It's because I think knowlogy companies, there's so

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>much innovation and so much new business creation and so

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>many tech companies being performed that are getting to scale

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that the financial markets are trying to adapt of how

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can we absorb all these new assets into the market

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're not seeing a lot of I I mean,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw the I p O market fall off a

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, right it didn't now it's back. Now it's back.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying that you know that there's alternatives

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for growing public here, and the alternatives are great. Direct

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>listings are great, and this fact provides a great alternative

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because it really really does is it allows a company

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to openly talk about its projections with

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>its investors. Every investor think about it. If you're looking

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>to buy a company, if you're if we are together

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to buy a private company, wouldn't we like to

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sit down with management and say, let's see what you've

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>done in the past, and how do you think about

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>next year and the following year, and how does your

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>operating plan and strategic plan aligned with that financial plan

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 1>that you have. It gives you so much insights as

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to how management thinks about their own business. But are

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you concerned at all that there is a lack of

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>quality companies to be acquired by SPACs that are out

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>there looking for targets Right now? I'm always concerned about quality.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>What ended up happening as well with this pac boom

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is a number of companies went public through SPACs or

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>merged with SPACs that are venture capital companies that are

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really young companies. Now. Retail investors in particular participated in

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that because the regulatory environment doesn't allow them to participate

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in venture capital and private equity, so they rush to

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>this market and then the regulators get worried that, oh,

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna lose money, or these companies have lack of

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a track record, or they're gonna miss their numbers. Now

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what ultimately happens. But one of the things

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you said at the beginning is SPACs are out of favor. Now,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of course nobody likes backs, but the trading should be

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the underlying company. Forget of whether it was a SPAC

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>or I p O or direct listing. It's what matters

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is the underlying business. And is that what happened though, Orlando,

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in your view that we get a little floppy in

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of looking at the end of underlying fundamentals, the

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>basics of like understanding the business and the growth trajectory. Absolutely,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>there is a It takes about nine months for a

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>de SPAC to begin trading on its own merits versus

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that it was a SPAC to begin with.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's an inefficiency in the market that shouldn't exist.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But is there something that the industry needs to get

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I just came through a panel um of folks in

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the M and A world and saying, you know, we'll

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>get through this, okay, but just got about forty seconds

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>left here. But we need to as an industry get

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>together and maybe set some rules, some understandings of what

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a SPACT needs to be. I give you two great

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>rules that we should have intwods on one's transparency, So

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the SPAC should be able to post these are my

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>projections or our projections and every quarter compare to how

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you were doing every quarter. Just show that in the

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>front page or show that in your communications. And the

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other one it is alignment. Bring the best of private

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>equity to SPACs, which is the sponsor has to invest

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>significant capital in that pipe sub get in the game.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely all right, That would certainly be a game changer. Orlando,

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. So he scratched the surface, but

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully we can continue in the future. Orlando, Bravo.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Founder imaging partner of Tomo Bravo joining us here at Milkin.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Can I just

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you you know? At Milking yesterday I hosted a

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>panel and it was all about the role of technology

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and longevity. We're talking about aging. One of the panelists

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>studies the brain. We talked a lot about what happens

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as we age and what we can do about it.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You gotta tell the panelist about Sarah McBride's next story.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I am totally. It's in the special double issue. It's

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the Persuasion issue of Bloomberg Business Week. So let's get

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to it. Let's get to it with Sarah McBride, venture

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>capital reporter at Bloomberg News. She joins us on the

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. Sarah's story what a brain scan

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>reveals about the science of persuasion. It's in the current

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week, which Carol mentioned is the

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>persuasion issue. Sarah, neuroscientists have come a long way and

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>understanding how and when people come around to a different

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>point of view. So what exactly happens to our brain

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>when we change our mind. Okay, well they have come

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a long way, but there's still a long way to go.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like that particular area of study is really

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>tricky for hero scientists, and that's because other things we

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>do are more localized to one or just a few

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of the brain. For example, if you move a limb,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas something that requires spot like persuasion, is spread out

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>across so many parts of the brain. It's actually much

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>harder to understand exactly what's going on. And this was

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a lesson in brain science and anatomy for me. I

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>had to learn about all these different parts of the

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>brain that get involved. And um, they're asking really interesting

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>questions like if you're analyzing something, how do you separate

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those neurons to the neurons you lose used in memory,

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like when you're trying to remember what you analyzed previous

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>flee or what your previous opinion was. And um, they

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>scanned my brain, which was fascinating, and they're looking at

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>areas like the ventral medial prefrontal cortex and the central

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>strie itum and all these things which are kind of

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>spread out in different areas across the brain and reflect persuasion.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're talking about yeah, go ahead, jail, come

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on in. Joel Weber's with us Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>back Uh in New York, Sarah, I just have to

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for lending us your your brain. Um and

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like actually living up published photo of your brain. Uh So,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so what was the whole process, Like, what was the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>whole process like to to have have your brain scanned

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of persuasion. So I've never done anything

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>like this, and um, I was hoping that they would

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have something very interesting to say about my brain. But

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they were like, yeah, it's very similar to the forty

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>five other brains and we looked at for this study.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Brain is special, right, Um So I had to get

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in this f m R. I don't know if we've

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ever done that before, but it's just a weird experience.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You're in this big cylinder. It's very noisy. You can't

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>really move a whole lot in there. My head was

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of drapped in I had They even gave me

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a little alarm unless I suddenly got plastrophobic and needed

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to come out. But they kind of arranged these mirrors

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and screens, so that I had this sensation that's having

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>more room in there than what's actually the case. And then,

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, I just got to watch cartoons.

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's like the greatest assignment ever. Careful you're talking

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to your boss here, so system so as you're watching cartoons, like,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>let's let's kind of get to the point where this, uh,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, becomes a business story again, what what what

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are the potential takeaways for you know, the frontier of

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this research and what it means for for where where

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>persuasion and business could go. Yeah, so they wanted me

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch normalized behavior, which was by day, we're watching uh,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>screening cartoons, whereas things like being unhealthy or not taking

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>care of the environment were just standard in the cartoon.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they showed me persuasive messages to see that

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of been showing the opposite. What would

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>my brain be doing when I lift? Now shown Okay,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you should exercise or you should recycle. So, um, the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>implications for this are pretty big for anybody trying to

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>sell somebody something, or a politician trying to get some

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>any to vote for them. So there's actually millions of

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars being invested in this science, and um, the hope

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is that UH will kind of know exactly what parts

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the brain are affected when you're persuaded, which means

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not only will people be able to better persuade you,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but the general public will also have a better idea

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on to if the science will kind

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of build up on both sides. Just so it sounds

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that listening about marketers, right, like sales and marketing, like

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just think about That's my question for you, Sarah. And

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering when you reported this story, when when you

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>went through this experience, if it makes you think differently

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about the way that you see advertisements, the way that

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>people try to sell you something. I mean, are you

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are you taking a Do you have a different way

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about that? Now? Oh God, I've always been

0:16:53.920 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so successible to advertising this tradiction. Now I do kind

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of think about it, like what little things they might

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be tweaking. And I hadn't devoted much back to this

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of your social conditioning and what happens if people

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>all around you think one thing. You know how much

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>harter it is to change your mind about that? And

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>then there are very fascinating things they're studying, like what

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>happened if you're pretending to agree with something whereas deep

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>down you don't really, but you wanted the social credibility

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that goes along with agreeing with your friends. So there

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are so many layers of this. It's really nuanced and

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>got fascinating, you know, sir, I just wanted to say

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>when I when I saw your brain, I was like,

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that looks like someone who's very perceptible to persuasive sales pitches.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>This is like a lot of home shopping at night. No, Like,

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>show me an ice cream cone and I'll immediately think,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, that looks delicious. So how much more

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>research do we expect to be done before this might enter? Uh,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next the next phases of applications. Well

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of these things where they've made tremendous strides,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but then it's just kind of showing them how much

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>farther they have to go. So um, each piece of

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>information they Jane is just one more step. But advertising

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is constantly being tweaked based on what we know and

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what people think they know about the brain. So I

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think elements of it will be reflected in advertising and

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>marketing um in just a few years, and it will

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>get better and better the deeper they can go into

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the brain and the more they learn about it. I'd

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>say ten years. I wonder if Jill walked in, would

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they make him watch like the Squid Game or something.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of a worse thing to do, And

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>put me in an f R M R I machine

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and make me watch a squid game like no Ane

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on Squid Game. I'd pushing that button to get me

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out of there as quickly as possible. Oh, he knows.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I want those images. Al right, guys, we gotta run

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>venture capital reporter at Bloomberg New Sarah McBride. Check out

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>her story What a brain scan reveals about the science

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of persuasion. This is fascinating. She of course was joining

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>us with Bloomberg Business We get at her toe up.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That's in the current special double issue, the Persuasion Issue,

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a business week magazine. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>The stock is up nearly two percent this year. The

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>company CEO is known to retail investors as the silver Back,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because they are the apes. We are talking none other

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>than Adam Aaron. He's the chairman and CEO of AMC Entertainment.

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He joins us now here at the Milk and Institute

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Global Conference. Adam, it's good to see you. It's been

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time, Tim, Nice see you again. How are

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you great? Um? You know, if you had told me

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I run AMC now for almost six years and the

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>company that I joined was a second largest movie theater

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>chain the United States. A year and a half later,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the largest movie theater chain in the world. Uh,

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>everything was just happening, just fine. And if you told

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>me in February of that we would somehow relive as

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a people on this planet the Spanish flu epidemic of

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighteen and nineteen nineteen, I just couldn't have imagined,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in this era of modern medicine that we would in

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>our near term go through the last year and a

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>half of disease and lockdown and mask wearing and uh uh,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just think about all the loss and pain that has

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>been suffered on this planet. Everyone has financially sacrificed, everyone

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>has been overloaded with stress, except the people who work

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at claros. They're they're their business is really fooling nice people.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Though they helped us with our safe and clean protocols

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>at AMC. Theaters um and many people got sick and

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>many people died. But that's only part of it. Uh.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was the story of where AMC uh did

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>everything in our power to have financial collapse, but we did.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>We raised billions of dollars in the equity and debt markets,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>got incredible assistance from our theater landlords and our lenders,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and we entered one knowing that we could survive this

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic no matter what came. Then. Well, we would never

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have predicted was that retail investors would descend on AMC

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the way they have this year. Uh. And so yeah,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been a fascinating two years. Needless to sign,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>They certainly have descended on AMC. And you announced earlier

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this year program for retail investors free popcorn and platform

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for them on the website. Does that seems like they're

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>losing a little bit of momentum. The folks at Vanda

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Research said that retail traders have bought less than sixteen

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a MC stock over the past week,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>compared to six million dollars at the height of things

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year. What are you working on to continue

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to connect with retail investors. Well, I have no Uh,

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no sense of whether they're uh picking up

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>steam or losing steam through the research tools that you're

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. But I do know that I tweet every

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>single day, almost every day. Everyone I take I did,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I take the day off? Everyone awhile from my Twitter feed.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's fun. But I my tweets. I started tweeting in

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>earnest in April, and every single day my Twitter followers

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>increase A hundred ninety thousand this morning, Uh, my average

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tweet is reading one point one million times. My tweets

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>since April have been read cumulatively a hundred and thirty

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>million times. Uh. Just three or four weeks ago, I

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>put out a tweet that had my all time highest

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>readership at almost six and a half million people read

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my tweets. Unwelcomes are unwarranted celebrity Like are you?

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've become a celebrity of sorts, especially on

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>social Yeah, well, your company and your stock certainly have been.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the business that justifies the run

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>up that we've seen in the price because we're I'm

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at it in terms of you know, your market cap,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're well over twenty billion at this point um roughly

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>five times the value it was if you go back

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to that's when we saw the industry and economy much

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>much better place. So how do you actually deliver on

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the growth expectations there? Those are high expectations. That's pressure.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh So the answer to your question is that back

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in June, I think it was when we were raising

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>money yet again, we put out a very important disclosure,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>uh so important that the Wall Street Journal carried it

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on page one above the fold in the banner headline,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>where we cautioned investors that we were trading away from

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>historic fundamentals and that something entirely different was going on

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>at a MC. And I don't think you drive a

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>car by looking in the rearview mirror only, and so

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you look, you drive a car by looking through the

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>windshield and looking at what's ahead. And our goal at

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>AMC is not just to bring back from this pandemic

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the company that existed in two thousand nineteen, and our

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>shareholders thankfully have armed us with what at the end

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the June quarter was a more than a two

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar war chest of cash in the bank or

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>undrawn revolving credit line to put to work to fundamentally

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>transform the company. And that's what we're engaged in right now,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in addition to bringing back the company of old, because look,

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we're uh, there's there's some really good news for AMC,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater company. Uh, and yet we have a

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>way to go. So the really good news is that

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the period of October, in the

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks of this month, it was the biggest

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen days of industry box office, which is the basic

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>measure of the health of our industry. This you know

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>what what the revenues are. Um, it was the biggest

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen day box office since February, since the pandemic started

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and forced the closure of theaters. It took a long time,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>took twenty months, but finally we got the highest box

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>office in over a year and a half. Now we're

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>still not a two thousand nineteen levels. But if you

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>compare the box office so far in October to the

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>box office in the third quarter, or the box office

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, or the box office in the

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>first quarter or the box office last year. You can

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>see this enormous progress you're making. We're making. No, that's

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>hang in a second because we have to do a

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial break, But we're gonna come back and do some more. Sure. Yeah.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>One thing I want to talk about is if we

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ever yes or no, do we ever get back to

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>uh pre pandemic levels en levels? In my judgment, yes,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But the question is what when do you think? Uh,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't. We're not in the business of making predictions.

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Were in the We're in the business of trying to

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>make it happen as soon as we possibly can make

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it happen. Adam, you referred to the war chest that

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you have at AMC Entertainment. Right now, what are you

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>doing in order to transform the theater experience to get

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>people back into the theater, especially at a time when

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, wait a second, I can just watch this

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on streaming in a couple of weeks. Well, we have

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>two challenges of the company. First, we can have to

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to innovate at our theaters and uh so that

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we get more movie cars and more theater goers. Tell

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>me to our theaters. Uh, this is on the AMC

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good at We've been the innovator in our

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>industry for many years now, and UH, some of the

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we've just done in the last few months.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We started showing professional sporting events. We are showing professional

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>football on Sunday afternoons. For example. We've had some uh

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>UFC fights, some w w E matches. UH we've had

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a big professional boxing fight in the night. Addition, we've

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>been showing some live concerts or some concert movies. Both

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>people go to them and they enjoy it. But but

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got something that's much bigger than just continue to

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>innovated our theaters, because if all we do it is

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>innovated our theaters. We're gonna bring back Post Pandemic, the

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>company that existed in two thousand nineteen. And as you

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>said in your build up in the last segment, the

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>market cap of that company wasn't twenty billion dollars. So

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>our next challenge is to transform the entire company, not

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just transformed the theatrical experience. And in that you're correct.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>We entered the second quarter with more than two billion

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars of cash and undrawn revolving credit line. We're gonna

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>do something with that war chest. Uh, and add line

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of business that are related to our expertise, but not

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>necessarily being a pure movie theater. Play Adam in twenty seconds,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you said you are recently said that you'd accept crypto,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>including doscoin, Bitcoin, lightcoin and more. Are people buying tickets

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in crypto? They are there, but right now they're buying

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gift cards in crypto. Uh. But in a few weeks time,

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll actually be able to take cryptocurrency for online purchases

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of AMC tickets and AMC movie concessions at our theaters.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, we gotta write it. Adam cool, come back.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to talk about Adam Aaron over at AMC Entertainment.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a lot about sustainable investing yesterday and

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the money going into it. But I'm really

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to this next guest. We were just talking

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>before we got going, because there is E s G

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and then there's impact investing, and this is something that's

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly in her world. Joining us right now is Joanna

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Rees she's co Heed co lead, I should say, of

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Impact Investing at Apollo Global Management with us on site

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at Milkin. Nice to have you here on Bloomberg. Thank

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for having me. Um. We did start

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>talking and I like throughout something about E s Genia Like, well,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, Carol, there's a difference between E s

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>G and Impact because and so talk to us about that,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because it does get used, I think sometimes interchangeable. Yes,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the terms definitely run into each other and everyone

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>has their own set of terms SOW which is part

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. Which is part of the problem, but

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll get there. Um. So E s G has been

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time. We had Apollo or just

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>issued our twelfth annual E s G Report. So it's

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a big focus on the part of our firm, really

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on the part of any alternative asset manager or any

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>asset manager overall. And we think of that as the

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>ownership practices of the company, you know, being mindful of

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the environmental, social, and governments governance factors associated with a

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>specific business measure them, get better understand what's unique to

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wipe the company you own. So that is relevant to

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>any type of company in any type of ownership, so

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you would focus on e s G. Whether you were

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at, you know, a green energy type UM player

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as if you were looking at something that

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was on the on the far end. On the other

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you won't say it, but I'll say a coal company. Indeed,

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know we're there for you. You can still focus

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the s G from parting coal mine, you can

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>still get better. Is that so is that troubling to you?

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Though not at all, because I think we need to

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as asset owners engage with the companies that are where

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they are today. But that is that is, you know,

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>separate and apart from what what we're looking to do

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in the impact side, which is building upon that foundation.

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we the data points are astonishing just coming

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Apollo. Our last report has data on fifty

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>seven companies that have three thousand employees across their ploy

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>based so it's a huge effort. But what we're doing

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact is related in the sense that we still

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>need to be focused on the s G, we still

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>need to report on it, get better at it. But

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>impact is investing in companies where their goods or services

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>improve the world, either socially or environmentally. Direct like, So

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that they donate to the local charity,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that they have great governance practices, it's

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that what they do for a living makes the world

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a better place. So give us an example. So, the

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>first investment we made on our platform is a company

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the circular economy. Uh. It's the company is called

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Raino da Medici. They manufacture recycled carton board in Europe.

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know that's a very clear sustainability story where

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but the company recycling those fibers, they can be used

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>seven times. It's so much better environmentally than either using

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>virgin fibers or using you know, god forbid, like plastic packaging. Uh.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know that's a company we're looking to support,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to grow, to to consolidate that industry and

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>build upon their environmental leadership, which we think is you know,

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental to what the company does. And that's why it's

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a non concessionary investment. It looks a lot like any

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>other investment Apollo would have made. It just happens to

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be in a company that is focused on driving environment

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you look at the same metrics, right absolutely, Okay,

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>because because I do think that there's always like, Okay,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>do we do a little bit of a trade off

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of performance or something. But I mean, you

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are looking you know, you're you're managing money for

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your investors, right, and there's going to be, you know,

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that exit point and you've got to make some money. Absolutely,

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we're underwriting the exact same way that we see in

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like our large cat fund, with the added focus on

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the impact of that company has, how do

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we measure it, how do we maximize that through our

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>ownership period. But the concept that impact has to be

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>concessionary I think comes in part from trying to shoehorn

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>assets that don't have that kind of fundamental, mutually reinforcing

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamic that a company in the circular economy has where

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>if they grow, earnings grow, they're also doing better for

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. If you're trying to be having an impact

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in a positive way, if you're trying to buy a

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>company where profit and purpose or intention every day and

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do it in an impact portfolio, you're going to have

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to make that decision. Johan, are you are you ever

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>doing any due diligence And you say to yourself, well,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are there from where we think we expected

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 1>returns are going to be, but E s G just

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>asn't and as a result, we have to pass absolutely

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that happens with E s G across our platform where

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we find business businesses with business practices we can't fix

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and we walk away. But for us as we do,

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we do that, and then we also do our impact diligence.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And if we can't confirm to ourselves that there is

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a tangible measurable positivity either socially or environmentally from what

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the company knows, we're not making that investment. But what

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>happens then or do you leave it then to the

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists the angel investors, because there are going to

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>be those firms that will change the world. Look at

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>an elon Musk and Tesla and for how long people

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah, whatever, right, and here he is today, right,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And if the investment money wasn't there to back it up,

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what a shame. So but do you leave those companies

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that financially might not fit your criteria at a apole

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, okay, there's plenty of other money at the

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.479
<v Speaker 1>venture angel stage, and then when it grows we can

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>jump in and the preponderance of capital focus stan impact

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in private funds is focused on early stage businesses, and

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are doing incredible work supporting you know,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the Tesla's of the future. That's just not us.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And so we're looking u to do impact what we

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>call it impact at scale later stage businesses Ibata and

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Casula positive, but UM to widen that aperture away from

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking that the only company that can have impact is

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a newborn company that is so mission driven. Um. You know,

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the company we just acquired was founded in nine seven,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>which is great. They didn't start out planning to improve

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the environment, right, That's where they are now, right, join

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>very briefly, do we get to a point within our

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lifetimes where E s G is no longer a thing

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's just everything adheres to E s G standards?

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You know? That would be great, But I think where

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we are as a as a you know, human beings

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>to constantly push for more, and so if we can

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>improve the employment practices of our businesses will raise the standard.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Joanna reee Over at Apollo thank you. Thanks for listening

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to Blomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also Listen to

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News m