WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed Cuts with Ausenbaugh

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lisa Abramoids along with Tom Keen and Jonathan Ferrell,

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>join us each day for insight from the best in economics, geopolitics,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>finance and investment. Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple,

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Spotify and anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot Com, the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>I was distracted. The average heighte of a cruise passenger

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 3>is forty seven years old. Hi, fool, didn't know that?

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, there you go.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Didn't know that?

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to Nope?

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>At least as some badges now investment strategists that Jpre

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Morgan glob wal have that listened to me about cruises.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>The stocks are doing great. At least, it's good to see.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 4>You, great to see you.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Vibe shift, Let's talk about the vibe shift. We're not

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about recessions. What are we talking about.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Look, we can sede at this point that we came

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 4>into this year probably too pessimistic on the macro front.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 4>What we're seeing is this resurgence, or rather perseverance of

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 4>the resilience in the US economic backdrop, and I think

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that's been driven by a handful of different dynamics, But

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 4>it seems like a lot of people are kind of

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 4>coming around, facing the music and trying to figure out

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 4>where we go from here.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Equity market rallies usually do that. People start to jump

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 3>on board and now they're thinking about where else they

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>need to be, what's missed out, what's lagged, and they're

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>shifting towards the stike of the course. Banks had a

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 3>great month in July. Do you see reason for that

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>to continue?

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>We do, actually, so I think it's really important to

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>think about the anatomy of the year today equity market rally.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Everyone at this point knows that it has been predominantly

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 4>driven by the megacap complex that you know, kind of

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.279
<v Speaker 4>has been flying on the wings of artificial intelligence hopes.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>But we do think that this rally can start to

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 4>broaden out. And that's a big reason why we've been

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 4>encouraging investors to focus on the other four hundred and

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>ninety three names in the S and P five hundred,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 4>which taken together are actually still trading at evaluation below

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 4>their ten year average.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>What money are they going to use to buy these stocks?

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 2>In other words, do you start to recommend that people

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>take money out of money markets and put them into,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>so you know, the other sectors of the equity markets,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>or are you saying to people that you have to

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>have a balance.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how does this.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Sort of come to for if you don't want people

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>to necessarily cash out of big tech?

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Look, cash is a great place to start. We think

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>we know that a lot of our clients are still

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>heavily overweight excess cash based on the anonymioused client data

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 4>that we look through for our mid year outlook exercise.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 4>So even in light of this shift in our macro

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>view that the FED could possibly pull off a soft landing,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>we do still think that reinvestment risk is here. Come

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 4>first quarter of next year, we think the FED could

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 4>be in a place to start gradually cutting interest rates,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>and we would much prefer that investors take that excess

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>cash exten duration or start rebuilding that equity portfolio that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 4>they want to carry through the next cycle.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Does it bother you that you're looking at earnings yield

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on the S and P five hundred that are the

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>lowest relative to what you're getting on a ten year

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>treasury Going back to two thousand and one. Does that

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>raise some alarm bells that maybe valuations are at a

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>whack and that bonds look better than some people are

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 2>making them out.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Look, we continue to love core bonds. It's one of

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>our highest conviction ideas, and it does bother me a

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>little bit, but we certainly take it into account when

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 4>we think through portfolio construction. I think investors more than

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>ever need to be mindful of goals based or outcome

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 4>oriented approach. And if that means then the choosing core

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 4>fixed income with yields at these current elevated levels is

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 4>enough to get you to your long term goals, then

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 4>by all means, but long term ten year plus time horizon,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>we still see the potential for stocks to act as

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that engine of capital appreciation in portfolios, so we don't

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>want to sleep on the opportunity.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>We started this conversation by talking about resilience, and about

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>four minutes into it you were talking about right cuts.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>What are the factors behind resilience of the year so

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>far that you think are going to fade sufficiently enough

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>that the Fed's cutting rates in early twenty twenty four.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Can you identify the factors first and then just walk

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>us through where you're seeing signs of weakness that you

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 3>think will continue coming through that eventually are going to

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>lead this fed to cut rates.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 4>So in terms of what's been driving the resilience, start

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 4>first with the consumer. I think excess savings perhaps weren't

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>drawn down as quickly as everyone thought they might have been,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 4>but we do see that kind of tapering to an

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 4>end over the course of this year. You also have

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>to consider the businesses and consumers. Both have been relatively

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 4>insulated from interest rate pressures given that they locked in

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 4>lower levels of financing. And you've got these tailwinds coming

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 4>from the fiscal spending front related to the you know,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 4>more than two trillion dollars worth of infrastructure investment that's

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of you know, earmarked to be doled out over

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the course of the next ten years. So those are

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the reasons for resilience. And you add to that what

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 4>we've been seeing in the labor market, which is pretty

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 4>favorable trends when it comes to labor force participation, but

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>to the extent that growth continues to slow and we

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>are still calling for you know, flat to slightly negative

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>growth in the first and second quarters of next year,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe you do see a modest rise in the unemployment rate,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>and that I think continues to urge investors to heed

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>some caution and not get two over the skis when

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 4>it comes to adding risk.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 2>How much does that really hinge? An oil price is

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>staying where they are, an inflation continuing to steadily come down.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think oil prices are definitely kind of one

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>of the you know, variables or X factors here. We'll

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 4>be curious to see if prices do continue to consolidate higher.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 4>We're doing the work right now on our oil price outlook,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>but that could potentially change the outlook for the FED.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 4>And we know, just looking at the past year of data,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 4>right a year ago, when oil prices had exploded higher,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 4>that's when you had consumer confidence hitting all time lows.

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 4>And so to the extent that we see that kind

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 4>of rear its ugly head again, it could potentially weigh

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 4>on the outlook and you know, bring a resurgence of

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 4>bearish sentiment.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Bring crude eighty five. At least this was great. Thanks

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>for joining us and thanks for coming in of course,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.239
<v Speaker 3>thank you. At least Austin, by that of JP Morgan

0:05:47.279 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Global Wealth Management, I could join us now seeing research

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>ouna list at TD count Helene, let's talk about these

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>airlines and the distinction that Lisa draws between the performance

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 3>of the domestic focused airlines and international what's happening in

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 3>the two markets at the moment, Helene.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, Lisa hit it on ahead. We are seeing very

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 5>good demand on the North Atlantic especially, and we're seeing

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 5>less good demand in the US domestic market. And what

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 5>we have been thinking is that twenty twenty one and

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two we're all about US domestic because there

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 5>really wasn't a lot of places to go internationally. And

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 5>now that the international markets are open again, people are

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 5>traveling again, and we think this summer is all about

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Europe and next summer will be all about Asia, especially

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 5>because the US passport is not going to get you

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>as far as it gets you now, beginning in twenty

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 5>twenty four, you're going to need a visa to go

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 5>to Europe. You're going to need a visa to go

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 5>to the UK. You can do it online, but it's

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 5>going to cost you. And so I think you'll see

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 5>that shift away from European countries to Asian countries.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>We've got a playbook with regards to that heline when

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>we introduce the Esta visa for Europeans and others to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>come to the United States, do is it really hit

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>travel in that way, given how easy it is to

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 3>actually complete the thing. I remember many years ago I

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>used to have to do that when I came to

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>New York, when it actually moved the dial on visitors

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>to Europe.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think I think it'll be a combination of that.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 5>And I think fares have been really, really high this summer.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 5>It's turned a lot of people off if you didn't

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 5>book really early. And then and I think as Asia reopens,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 5>it's kind of you know, we did Europe, Now let's

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 5>go someplace new. And I think that's the trend you're

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 5>going to see probably beginning after a Labor Day this

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.559
<v Speaker 5>year and then going into twenty twenty four and five,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 5>and it'll probably be twenty five before we get whatever

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 5>normal is going to be. You know, that single digit

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 5>growth that's probably sustainable. The ten to twenty percent growth

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing in the industry and we've seen in the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 5>last couple of years is just not sustainable for a

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 5>whole variety of reasons.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I have to say we've done Europe, now let's do Asia.

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>It makes it seem like we're all just living in

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>this hard mentality of post pandemic reality.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Helene.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking right now also at visas to go to Europe,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and they range from it looks like seven euros to

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>forty euros depending.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>On where you're going.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Although I could be getting this somewhat wrong, Helene. How

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>much is this driven by business versus personal travel? How

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>long can individuals and families continue to pay prices that

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>seem pretty sticky and.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Unresponsive to demand pressure it Anyway.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 5>I've been trying to figure that question out too, because

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 5>the answer to that too, because it seems to me

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 5>when I go on a plane and I make a

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 5>right turn, all these families are making the left turn,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 5>and I'm trying to figure out, Gee, I've paid a

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 5>lot of money for my ticket. I booked it two

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 5>months ago or ten weeks ago, and how come you're

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 5>going there and I'm not. And I think that there's

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 5>going to be pushback. I mean, I do think that

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 5>people will just say, Okay, we you know, we bought

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 5>all our stuff during the pandemic, and then we did

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 5>all our traveling after the pandemic, and now We're just

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 5>going to get back to kind of a normal lifestyle

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 5>of working because I think over time, as we get

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 5>further and further away from the pandemic, companies are going

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 5>to require people, even in a hybrid environment, to come

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 5>to the office more off and then they've been.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 7>Going and that won't lend itself to traveling Thursday to

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 7>Tuesday or Thursday to Monday, and then business travel will shift, right,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 7>You'll see that shift and mix.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You're laughing at me, Well, no, I'm not laughing at you.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Just the image that you paint of everybody who's not

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 2>working going with their families, paying through the nose to do.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Your going to give us a commentary on newborn babies

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and business class and whether they should be allowed in

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>there or.

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 2>To I'm just sitting here wondering, you know, how long

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>can people keep networking and spending all their money. Have

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you seen any signs of pushback on the pricing, Helene,

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>as of yet or is all of your anticipation of

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that simply an extrapolation of pure logic.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's a combination of both. We have

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 5>seen pushback on pricing. You've seen domestic prices come down

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 5>pretty much on a year over year basis from really

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 5>levels that again we're not sustainable, so you're still above

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen levels, but we're below twenty twenty two levels,

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 5>so I think that's a positive. And then you know,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 5>when you think about shifting demand, airlines can shift demand

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 5>by lowering ticket prices and people will respond to that.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 5>And then the last thing I would point out is

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 5>in terms of visiting friends and relatives. You know, China

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 5>was closed for years, right, three four years and it

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 5>opened earlier this year, and you don't see a lot

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 5>of business travel there, some business travel. You don't see

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of leisure for sure, but what you do

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 5>see is a lot of people who couldn't get home

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 5>for a couple of years going home. So that's the trend.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 5>And then six eight months a year later, you start

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 5>to see tourists pick up. But for sure, we're seeing

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 5>pushback on pricing. And every Tuesday I get fair sale

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 5>offerings from a lot of the airlines. You know, just

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 5>sign up for the email alerts to monitor discounts, and

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 5>the discounts are deeper than they were six months ago.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 5>So yes, we're seeing some pressure on price.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Helene, I've got ten seconds. So just pick a name

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 3>favorite airline right now? Which stock is it?

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're still on United. Okay, well we're domestic and

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 5>higher international.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Scott Kirby getting it done over night, Helene, Thank you,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Helene Becker of TD Jordan Rochester joins US now G

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 3>ten FX strategiest for at Namura Jordan. What for to

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 3>catch up with you, sir, Let's start with the Bank

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of England later this week. Is it twenty five? Is

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>it fifty?

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Is it?

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 3>What the ECB and the Federal Reserve delivered over the

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>last week, which is a lot of communication about a

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 3>ton of nothing?

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 9>What is it?

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 10>A ton of nothing? Well, in terms of the Bank

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 10>of Ingland, we think they'll do twenty five. And the

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 10>problem John for Sterling is that there's about thirty two

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 10>and a half basis points price for that meeting, and

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 10>that's going to move Sterling.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 9>Now, it's not too much.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 10>It's not like a fifty to fifty chance of them

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 10>going for a fifty basis point hike at this meeting

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 10>priced in. But you saw with the RBA overnight when

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 10>there's around eight basis points are so priced in for

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 10>potential hiking they don't deliver, it can see a big

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 10>move lower in the currency. So it could be the

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 10>case that on Thursday we have banking and doing twenty five.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 10>It's too early for them to declare a victory lap,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 10>that's the thing. So we think there's gonna be another

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 10>few more hikes to come, maybe seventy five basis points

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 10>overall from where we are now today this year, and

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 10>that's the reason why sterling has relatively traded quite well.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 10>It's become a carry trade, John, it's one of the

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 10>highest carry currencies the G ten. But all the charts

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 10>we follow that tell us where inflation's going say it's

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 10>going to slow down quite noticeably. So the good sector, John,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 10>really go to slow down this inflation is here. The

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 10>problem with the UK with services inflation are indicators suggested

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 10>it should have gone down starting around a few months.

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 9>Ago, and it didn't.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 10>But the good news is the last CPI print was

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 10>possibly the peak of service inflation in the UK. That's

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 10>why the banking might take note of that and say,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 10>actually there's some early signs that policy is working to

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 10>slow down that sector.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 9>But it's just one data point.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 10>We need a few more CPR reports until that victuy

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 10>lap can be declared.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 3>On this side of the Atlantic, we've had a similar

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 3>conversation about whether the Federal Reserve is sufficiently restrictive. When

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 3>you put everything together that you've just said, Jordan, can

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 3>you draw that conclusion that the Bank of England is

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 3>sufficiently restrictive?

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 9>I think they are. John.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing evidence in terms of PMI, input prices, supply

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 10>side all saying it's restrictive. Demand is slowing down, retail sales.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 10>All these sort of indicators are nowhere near astrong as

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 10>what they were last year. But a lot of the

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 10>analysis that goes into it sometimes just proves wrong in

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 10>terms of the hard data. So the pms have been

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 10>very weak on the manufacturing sector, but the industrial production

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 10>figures haven't been as weak.

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 9>The soft versus hard debate.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 10>So if you're looking at hard data, you're looking at

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 10>realized inflation, you'd you're.

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 9>The Bank of England saying we need to do more.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 10>But if you're in my space, if you're looking at

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 10>the forward looking indicators, they suggest, yeah, we are pretty

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 10>close to being sufficiently restrictive.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>That's over in England where John was mentioning UK housing

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>prices which dropped the most since two thousand and nine,

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>as you do see these rate increases, and we will

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about that later. Over in Europe and the European Union,

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>there is a question around whether they are sufficiently restrictive

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>at a time when core inflation has exceeded headline CPI

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the most going back to twenty twenty one, and at

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>a time when you're starting to hear a little bit

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>more of a dubbish conversation from some of the members.

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>There can you still get bullish and long.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Euro versus dollar if you do have that kind of

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>shift even among the hucks.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 10>Indeed, we've had a shift already, and that's kind of

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 10>why euro dollar has really fallen from the one twelve

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 10>handle to where we are today just below one ten.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 10>We've had various moments this year where it felt like

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 10>euro dollar might break to the upside and to the downside,

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 10>but the pain has been this range that we've had

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 10>for most of twenty twenty three. We need a trend,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 10>and these false breakouts are just mutton dressed as lamb.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 10>We need to have some sign that either the US

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 10>disinflation story is strong enough and we'll see that dollar weakness,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 10>or that the ECB perhaps doesn't need to cut rates

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 10>at all next year, or if they do towards the

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 10>n Q four. If we get that sort of story,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 10>then euro dollar can be supported from the rates angle.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 10>But the problem at the moment, Lisa, equities are rallying,

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 10>which is a reason to buy euro and it's the

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 10>reason why we are long euro. We're looking for one

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 10>fourteen by the end of September. But oil prices are

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 10>picking back up and the rates market in the EGb

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 10>space have softened. In terms of what's price for the

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 10>ECB by your end, we think they're done. We think

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 10>that's possibly the last rate hype by the ECB. Little

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 10>bit of market price and that's left for year end.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 9>Will be disappointed. It's not too much.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 10>We are pricing less than one rate height now, but

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 10>that is a drag on the euro. But if equities

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 10>go to five thousand in the SMP like your previous

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 10>guests were talking about, then the only way is for

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 10>dollar weakness in that environment.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>In my view, how disruptive could higher oil process be

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and natural gas for that matter, given some of the

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>recent disruptions and cost sun carriers.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 10>The biggest headache I have right now is oil prices.

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 10>I would say it upsets the apple cart for sure,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 10>because the story is about US disinflation.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 9>Energy.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 10>Before this oil price rally was down forty percent year

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 10>and new in the US, and if it had stayed

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 10>at those levels before we had this rally, it would

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 10>have really dragged down USCPI. But now we've seen retail

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 10>gasoline prices in the US pick up by five percent

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 10>towards the end of July, and it could go further.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 10>If we break ninety dollars a barrel in oil, I

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 10>think central bankers will be too cautious and they'll say, actually,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 10>we don't need to even discuss about cutting grapes at all.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 10>We need to stay higher for longer or even surprise

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 10>with another hike this year. And we think both the

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 10>FED and the ECB are done. But if we have

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 10>oil go to ninety dollars, let's say it goes to

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 10>one hundred, that's clearly a mixture of supply concerns, but

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 10>it probably is due to demand picking backups in a

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 10>surprising fashion that we'll see a few central banks have

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 10>to turn hawkish in the second half of this year,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 10>which we don't really expect. We think that most center

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 10>banks are close to the end of their cycle. But

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 10>if we get to ninety to one hundred lisa, a

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 10>lot of things will have to change in the narratives

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 10>that are out there.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Jordan, I've got thirty seconds. Is it too early for

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>aston Villa predictions for next season?

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 10>Well, look, I think we're now a top ten club

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 10>that's whole ten day after last year. Okay, that's a

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 10>massive improvement of where we were when we had Gerard.

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Jordan, Rochester Namura with a subtle dig as Steven Gerrard

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Regina Mayor joints as clobal head of Clients and Markets

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 3>over at pmg Regina, Let's start there and talk about

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 3>this run and greater catch up with you and working

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 3>program as always. What's on depending that rally through July

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 3>and can it continue through August?

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 8>Well, demand continues to outpace supply and opiq plus with

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 8>its strategic cuts and even the Saudi's voluntary one million

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 8>barrel per day that they've indicated they will extend through

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 8>September has created buoyancy in the crew markets like Brent

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 8>above eighty five, WTI once again above above eighty and

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 8>that demand is outpacing supply. There are some analysts that

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 8>are saying, when we're able to go back and analyze

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 8>the actual demand figures that July, given it was one

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 8>of the hottest months on record, or the hottest month

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 8>on record, and we still rely on a lot of

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 8>fossil fuels to drive cooling, that July of twenty twenty

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 8>three will be the highest demand for hydrocarbons ever, outpacing

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 8>August of twenty nineteen.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Regina, where's that incremental demound coming from? Has it

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 3>been Europe where we've had this massive heat the United States?

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Has it come from China? Where's it coming from?

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, China has just not given us the demand uptick

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 8>that we keep expecting. I think I've been on your

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 8>program multiple times and you know it's always Chinese demand

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 8>will pick up in the next few months. Chinese demand

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 8>will pick up in the next few months.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's really.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 8>Created the added demand is industrial activity is picking up

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 8>in the Western market. So the supply chain challenges, you know,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 8>the deep bottlenecking that's occurred, and the travel you all

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 8>were talking about crews, passengers, there's still tremendous travel consumption,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 8>tremendous bullishness in the consuming population. We continue to consume,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 8>we continue to travel. Companies continue to produce, and that's

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 8>driving record demand. On top of it's a really, really,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 8>really hot summer, and it takes a lot to drive

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 8>the cooling.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>That we need, and it also is interrupting some of

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the processing. There was a piece out this.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Morning talking about how the very hot weather has reduced

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the refining capabilities of certain companies. You also

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 2>are seeing some of the shipping costs for even natural

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 2>gas rising substantially over in Europe.

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>How much is this fueling a call.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 2>From you that oil prices are going to go substantially higher,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 2>even natural gas over in Europe.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not as bit bullish that the prices will continue

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 8>to go higher, Lisa. I do think that supply continues

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 8>to meet the record demand that we're facing, and we're

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 8>going to get a peak right summer. Travel is in

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 8>the US is starting to tail off. I know in

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 8>Europe it's kicking off for August, but there's an end

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 8>to that, and so I don't think we'll see the

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 8>big spikes that we've seen in the past. I think

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 8>that demand continues to or supply continues to roughly meet demand.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 8>The story in the gasoline price spikes that we've seen

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 8>in the US, it's just inventory. It's inventory inventory, inventory,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 8>and motor gasoline and refined products don't move around the

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 8>world as well as as crew does, so they are

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 8>very geographically specific. And in the US, motor gasoline stocks

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 8>inventory stocks are down to its lowest level since twenty fifteen.

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 8>I think that is a remarkable statistic.

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>How do they rebuild that, especially at a time when

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>there is concern about the strategic petroleum reserve of the

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>US and there's a question about rebuilding that, and there

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 2>is a lack of refineries in the United States.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so the refining industry has contracted significantly, but it's

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 8>also incredibly more efficient than it ever was. Refineries are

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 8>still running pretty flat out. The statistics I was looking

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 8>at showed roughly ninety four percent utilization throughout the month

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 8>of July, which is really about as high as it

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 8>can get it. Maybe ninety five ninety six, but just

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 8>a little bit a few basis points above what they're

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 8>currently at. But we will see summer driving season come

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 8>back down, the demand for motor gasoline will rationalize, and

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 8>the refineries will be able to catch up. We will

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 8>see a short term spike and gasoline prices, But I

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 8>do see consumers seem to be less reactive to the

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 8>price at the pump. Our survey KPMG recently did forty

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 8>nine percent of consumers say they're moderately or concerned about

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 8>the higher price of gasoline. That's down from seventy percent

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 8>last year at this time. So I think there's less

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 8>price sensitivity in terms of gasoline consumption as well.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Regina, how do you do friendship between less price sensitivity

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and price is just not being as high as they

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 3>were last year?

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Fairpoint?

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 8>Fair point, John, But I do think because of this

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 8>consumption boom and that there's inflationary pressure across a lot

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 8>of activities. We've seen price spikes and different commodities like

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 8>eggs over time, and you know, the prices for experiences

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 8>and restaurant activity, travel costs, and we still see consumption moving.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 8>So I do think there is perhaps less price sensitivity

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 8>overall with the consumer. Maybe we're becoming more immune to

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 8>some of the inflationary impacts that'll only last for a

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 8>certain period of time. But I do think we're benefiting

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 8>from that lack of price sensitivity.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Downtown, the airlines, Jana Thank you. Jina Mah of KPMG.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 2>We have been talking all day about the UK housing

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>market and how much prices have declined. We're talking two

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine levels at a time when the US

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>has been bolliant, amazingly resilient, defin all expectations. Bizarre, however,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 2>you want to categorize at joining US now to do

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>a much better job than I could. Jonathan Miller, President

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of Miller Samuel, who has an overview of

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>US housing markets and global housing markets at a time

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 2>where it has be fuddled pretty much everyone. What's your

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>take on the resilience in a US market that should

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 2>have been brought down by these higher rates akin to

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>what we've.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Seen in the UK.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 6>Right, It's the difference between variable and fixed rates. Most

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 6>of the world relies on variable mortgage rates, and in

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 6>the US people are locked in. Actually, the reason why

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 6>we don't have a lot of inventory and inventory is

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 6>the metric to focus on, or lack of listening inventory,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 6>and that's because people are wedded to their low rates

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 6>because rates were probably kept too low for too long.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>There is a study that I was looking at.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 2>US homeowners are nearly twice as willing to sell if

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>their mortgage rate is five percent or higher. But just

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>one in five mortgaged homes.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Meet that criteria. In other words, they have such low rates,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to move right.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 6>It's like eighty percent, Yeah, eighty percent are sort of

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 6>just sitting and waiting. There's uncertainty. Everybody's expecting a recession.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 6>We've been forecasting a recession for in six months for

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 6>two years. You know, people are just sitting. When consumers

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 6>are uncertain, they sit, they wait, and as a result,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 6>and also too people that may want to buy, they

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 6>have to sell their house to do it, but they

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 6>can't find a house, so they're stuck. Inventory is extremely

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 6>low across most of the markets that we cover.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Could you give us a sense of historical precedent of

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 2>last time the inventory was so low. Basically, the number

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of homes on the market that you could potentially.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 6>Buy there hasn't been you know. The inventory now, for example,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 6>in Florida is sixty percent below pre pandemic levels. Many

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 6>housing markets, you're looking at inventory thirty forty fifty percent

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 6>lower than it was in twenty nineteen before the pandemic,

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 6>when rates really dropped and demand surged and there was

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 6>a frenzy. I'm not sure people realize how extensive the

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 6>obliteration of listing inventory was during the pandemic. With rates

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 6>being so low.

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, so here's a question.

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we see home builders going nuts, building as

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 2>much as they possibly can because there is no inventory and.

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>People need a place to live.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 2>If rates do come back down, if there is what

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>of new housing supply? Could you see prices go down

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>dramatically when the door is actually open to true price discovery?

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 6>I think so. I mean the way to think of

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 6>inventory coming back into the market. If rates drop substantially,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, they're sort of in the sixes, you know,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 6>high sixes and low sevens. You know, if they're in

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 6>the fives, maybe we start talking about more supply coming on.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 6>But we have unemployment at three and a half percent.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 10>You know, it.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 6>Seems like there's more rate cuts in store just on

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 6>that item alone, which sort of goes in the opposite

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 6>direction of rates falling.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 2>We were talking earlier about the UK, and I do

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>want to just wonder if there is any corollary, what

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>would happen in the US if there were variable rates.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 2>We saw prices fall at the fastest pace going back

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 2>to two thousand and nine in the United Kingdom, they

0:26:58.720 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 2>do have variable rates.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We talked to at that earlier.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Would that be what we would see in the US

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 2>if we weren't shielded by a thirty year mortgage rate?

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, that's you know, the idea here is that the

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 6>psychologist people are locked in and they're able to enjoy

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 6>a lower rate, while people new to the market can't.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 6>And there's a premium for that. And one of the

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 6>premiums is to sit and wait. It's a luxury rather

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 6>that to sit and wait. You don't have to. You know,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 6>we have home equity at you know, some of the

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 6>highest levels in history. There's no stress for people having

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 6>to sell economies pretty good. People just sit and wait.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 6>And so I think this whole process is going to

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 6>take time, which as opposed to, you know, a few

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 6>years rather than a few quarters.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>One thing that some people will say is that the

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 2>housing market is bottomed and you're seeing a recovery. Is

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that an accurate way of careterizing a market that's essentially stagnating.

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 6>So I think when you refer to that, the reference

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 6>is really to pricing, because pricing has leveled off and

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 6>is rising in some markets from pandemic highs if you will.

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 6>But sales activity, you know, is still way off and

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 6>the rate of descent is slowed. It's somewhat stable. But

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 6>sales activity is held back because of inventory, and inventory

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 6>is held back because of high rates, and high rates

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 6>are held back because of low unemployment. I mean, it's

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 6>just this whole domino thing.

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Talking about the domino effect.

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 2>You speak to a lot of mortgage brokers, I'm sure,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and people who work in real estate.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 6>Yes, what's the mood like, Well, it's interesting. Over the

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 6>last year, there's been this sentiment that, hey, you know,

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 6>rates are going to come down, and I keep asking

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 6>the question. You know, with unemployment, you know, add or

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 6>near record lows consistently, how can rates be cut? You know,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 6>maybe they'll drift lower. If the FED stabilizes for a while,

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 6>we can. I think it's reasonable to expect that, but

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 6>not a sharp decline. The economy is too strong on

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 6>the unemployment side, so it really, you know, the FED

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 6>is going to have to keep using their baseball bat

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 6>to damage the economy.

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, if the rate structure, if we stayed around five

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent, or even if we go down

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to five percent, say for a full year. What does

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that do to inventory? What does that do to the

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 2>mortgage market?

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 6>So, first of all, that would be great to get

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 6>things going. You know, rates in the mid fives even,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 6>I think would pull a lot more people into the market,

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 6>which would not in a panic sort of flood of inventory,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 6>but it would be it would normalize to a certain degree.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 6>And we see transactions pick up right now because of

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 6>the lack of inventory. We're seeing bidding wars start to

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 6>approach forty to fifty percent of local housing markets, meaning

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 6>sales that close above the last asking price. We're seeing

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 6>some big numbers in certain markets, and that's because of

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 6>chronic lack of supply. So the demand is still there

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 6>even with higher rates. Yeah, so New York Metro is

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 6>a prime example. In Southern California another example where we're

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 6>seeing bidding wars at nearly half of the close transactions

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 6>in the quarter last quarter.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing any soft patches?

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Not really, I mean, you know, soft patch to me

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 6>would be defining it by price. Pricing is stable in

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 6>terms of activity, sales that is certainly almost every market

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 6>is very slow, and it's because everybody's stuck. No supply,

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 6>no sales.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Is a Sun Belt still as hot as it used

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be?

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I shouldn't have said that bad metaphor, but

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>i'm you know, is it still as popular?

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 6>I should say as a star, I'd say it's hotter

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 6>than outside the Sunbelt, but to use that same phrase,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.479
<v Speaker 6>but yeah, I mean, but not as robust as it was.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 6>But I think in a lot of the Sun Belt

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 6>markets inventory is even tighter than in say markets like

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 6>the Northeast, where inventory while it's in many markets twenty

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 6>percent off a pre pandemic, it's not sixty percent off.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller, thank you so much.

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 2>This is really one of the most fascinating times I

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 2>could possibly imagine for the housing market of Miller, Samuel.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I look forward to reading your next report, which will

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>highlight all of the latest trends. Subscribes the Bloomberg Surveillance

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>podcast on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Listen live every weekday starting at seven am Eastern on

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberok dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app. You can watch us live on Bloomberg

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Television and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:31:57.640 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lisa Abramowitz and this is bloomberghm