WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: What Went Wrong vs. LAR?

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Monday, October two, twenty seventeen, Season thirteen,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>episode number forty eight. Welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in Frisco, and today we're talking about the Cowboys loss.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys lose to the Rams thirty five thirty in what

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I would call an unexpected loss. I think all of

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>us picked the Cowboys to win. Um. I don't think

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody really expect to see you yesterday. But I will

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>say this. It was twenty four to thirteen at in

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter with one fifty one fifty one left

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, and then for that yeah, and

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>then the wheels fell off. So I'll answered, I'll ask

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys the question. We can go around the table.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What happened? Just in your own brief synopsis and we'll

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>get into the details, but in your own brief synopsis

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened from that point to the Cowboys final of

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty five thirty Well, I think, you know, I picked

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys to win by three touchdowns, and and I

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely overestimated the Cowboys and more than anything, more than

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Rams or anything, they overestimated this team of what

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they could do. They didn't make any adjustments either that

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>they should have. They kind of got got, you know,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>set in their ways. The Rams did a nice job,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>but they dominated up front on Brilli on both sides

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. And you know, there's the Cowboys had

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>no business losing this game, and they did, and that's

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna hamp them. This this loss will definitely

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>hamp them. Amber Well, clearly, they like Nick just said,

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make any adjustments coming back after the first

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>half of the game. And then I was listening to

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott and he answered that question. He basically said

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Rams didn't do anything differently. It was just

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on them that they weren't finishing plays and making the

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>right moves, which not that is true. But the Rams

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>did make some adjustment and they did come back stronger

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Cowboys did in halftime. I

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Dave, stop me if you've heard this before,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's gonna sound really similar to every time we've

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ever talked about a loss in the five years i've

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>been here. This is a defense that isn't equipped to

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>carry a game if their offense isn't clicking. And that's

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what I put it on. Clearly, the

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>offense looked great. Honestly, the first half of this game

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>looked like twenty sixteen. They did all of the stuff

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that we got used to seeing last year on that

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven game win streak, and you know, honestly, defensively, at least,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just watching the tape upstairs with Brian. The

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense didn't look like they changed a whole lot.

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't look a lot different. But when you're not

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hitting open receivers, when you're not secure in blocks on run,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not catching passes, and you're getting flagged on you know,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>crucial two point conversions, this type of stuff happens. And

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know if if you want to

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>say they came out of the locker room flat because

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they thought they had everything under control. Or whatever. They

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just forgot how to execute. But this offense lost all

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>semblance of competency coming out of the break, and when

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you put it on your defense to carry the game

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>against an offense like that, it's probably not going to

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>go very well. Yeah, we were upstairs before the show

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and we were watching some of the tape with with Brian,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was what the one thing this did to me, Dave,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was that they were they were all these little things.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Like every play it seemed like we're as we were

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>watching this, every play, it seemed like there was a

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>little thing. Oh that got missed the block right there,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh that guy, that guy's routes should have been Cooper

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>had a rough day, but that guy should have gotten

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a little deep run his route, you know, Oh, Da

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>should have made a better throw there. It was it

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 1>was all these little and it happened play after play

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>after play after play. So Amber, getting back to what

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you said, I do wonder to some degree if there

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was a situation where it wasn't that the Cowboys needed

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to do something different, they just weren't executing. They At

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>one point they had two offensive linemen, one of them

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>being they're all pro guard that were trying to block

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald and move him off the point and could

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not move him one step. I mean, it wasn't It

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was a situation where they just weren't executing. And where

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you gonna I was just gonna say, we know that

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys strength is the running game. Based on what

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they did in the running game, they should have won

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this game. They did. They did pretty well. One hundred

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and eighty nine yards. That's not a whole bunch, but

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>it's still good a lot. Oh it could have been higher.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>It could have been higher. But again, I'm just saying

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember you, Derek saying the Cowboys only win if

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they're good in the running game. We saw Why are

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you making that vague? I'm listening. We saw what the

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line did, and which is consider or was consider

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>one of the best offensive lines in the NFL. Now

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>they're different. And I saw you pretty upset yesterday about

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>why you saw this little line, de little line, but big,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>big line too. What what is your concern here based

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on what you saw last night? My issue with the

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is more about the fact that I felt

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like yesterday Dak was running for his life, specifically in

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the second half quite a bit. Now, I get it.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You were playing a defensive front that had Brockers, that

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had Aaron Donald, which I'm convinced Aaron Donald's the best

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>defensive lineman maybe in pro football. But all that being said,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he was running for his life in the second half.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And to me, there have been two times this year

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that this offensive line, who I thought was elite, played

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>elite talent on the defensive front that they faced, and

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>in both instances, I felt like they the other line

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>won the battle and ultimately the war because they won

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>both those games. So to me, it start I start

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to question whether this offensive line. I know they're good,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I started to question whether I think they're elite because

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think against elite talent, we haven't seen elite play. Yeah, exactly.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's what I wrote as well, they're not.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>This is an a dominating offensive line anymore, at least

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>not right now. And I think there's a lot of

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that. I mean, I think that teams have

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>looked at this and said, all right, we have to

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just stack the line and we're gonna We're gonna. Now

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>some of the situations they just got beat, they got beat.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Cooper played horrible yesterday, And from what I saw

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that there was one play where Dak was running for

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>his life at the end of the game where he

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was straight up with Aaron Donald and then and instead

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of Zeke having to help, it was just one on

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>one because he got beat so badly right off the line.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It was one one one between Zeke and Donald, and

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Zeke knocked him down to the ground. And so I

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, seriously, like who's the guard, Like who's the

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>actually left guard in this play? Was unbelievable. But I

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just think that there's a lot of reasons for this,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And I go back to these wide receivers, and they're

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna beat anybody. They don't scare anybody. You don't

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go deep, you don't really you have to maybe go

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>make a play in Arizona, but they're not gonna beat anybody.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Just like catch the ball and then run away from them.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can play this way because they don't have

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody at the passing game that's gonna scare you. So

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's kind of there's more than one

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>reason here. But it's like you got one dynamic player

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in Zeke and Dez is the is dynamic at times,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but not in a speed aspect. So a lot of

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>drop passes yesterday, Debt Terrence, Yeah, I was thinking, who yeah, Terrence,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that was the one I remember third third and something

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, I think is their second possession. Dak mid range,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>probably fifteen eighteen yard throw on the left side, low ball,

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not the best throw ever, but went right through, right

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>through Jez's hands, right right in between his arms and

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>onto the ground. Yeah. Just and that's I came out

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. I came out of that game thinking Dak's

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just gotta be better, like he wasn't good enough. And

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I still believe that. But having gone back and watched

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the offense play over again, they all were bad. The

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive line had its miscues. Daz drops a big ball,

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Terrence had a couple drops, Dak had some probably three

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>or four pretty poor throws, Jason Witten's missing blocks. I mean,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the great thing about the tape is it doesn't lie,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and it very clearly points you in the direction of

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, what all went wrong, And there's plenty of

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>blame to go around, that's for sure. Yeah, I think

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning, if you're looking at it, I know there

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of people a lot of articles I'm

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>seeing online today where people are pointing the finger at Dak,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and yes, Dak needs to take part of the blame

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for this, because it's the quarterback that's your responsibility. Even

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>when things aren't going well and other guys around you

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing what they're supposed to, necessarily, quarterback still is

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the one that's going to fall to. He's got to

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>make the play, and there was some plays yesterday that

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he left on the table. He even said it after

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the game, he said, there's some throws in the second

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>half that I didn't make that I did make in

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the first half. But I gotta be better. I gotta

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be more consistent. But all that being said, this was

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a team loss, and we talked about that after the

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday. This is a team loss because around that offense,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of guys that had their moments,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and when you've got everybody having a moment at different times,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and it platoons every play because on every play somebody

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>screwing something up. It's amazing that we've gotten what twelve

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>minutes into the show, and we haven't talked about Ryan

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Switzer's muff the punt. I mean that's was that the

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest If you had one play that you could take

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>back in that game, is that the play you take back? Yes,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>because the Cowboys had just scored two times in a

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>row on two touchdowns in a row, and they were

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to get it. They had the ball with about

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>five or six minutes to go. I believe maybe it

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was about eight minutes to go in the second quarter,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know that they had shown everything that they

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to go down there, marched down and drive

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>again twenty to six, twenty four to six, and then

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that would change everything. Instead the Rams score touchdown. You

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>realize the Rams never drove the field and scored a touchdown.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>They had a long pass to to Girly and then

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they had that short field. You know. So it's hard

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to put the whole thing on the defense because it's

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a bend but don't break defense, and they did a

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of bending and then they would they would buckle

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>down and lead to field goals. So I mean they

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>got off the field when it was time to kick

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>field goals. The problem is there was just too many

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of them. They add up too. Yeah, you know, if

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I had one play to take back, though I'm not

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>certain I wouldn't take back the two point conversion where

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Terence drops the ball, because at that point you tie

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that game up. If the Rams drive down the field

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as they did and kicked the field goal as they did.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Now all you need is a field goal to tie.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You'd rather have back the one where Terrence drops the

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>tipped ball. Why wouldn't you just take back the one

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where Travis Frederick gets called for holding on them. Either way,

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you take either one of those, either one of those.

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's a little part of the game. That

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>little part of the game to me was that that

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I think doomed the Cowboys. I think I do.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it. I think it did. I didn't feel

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>comfortable when they were when they were in a situation.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We were down on the field and we were talking

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>about and I asked, you know, different people like you

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think that if if they hold them a field goal here,

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys win. I didn't feel comfortable with the fact that

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they were going to drive the field and win at

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that point. I really didn't. I just I'm thinking, Okay,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you get the two point conversion, it's tied

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>to tide. I mean, the way it had been going

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a ton of confidence that the Cowboys

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>are going to stop them from scoring points right there,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and they took and they wouldn't have. They took four

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>minutes off the claus That's what I'm saying, they wouldn't have.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think they would have. I stid. I

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>think the difference, though, is if you're driving to get

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>into field goal range versus driving for a touchdown, I

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's different. And I do think the Cowboys could

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.599
<v Speaker 1>have gotten into field goal range field goal range to

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at least tie and then go to overtime. I said

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this after the game because people were people were in

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter mentions killing Ryan Switzer and saying, you know,

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference in the game. That's not the way

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>football works because every action completely, you know, every game,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>every action is informed by the last play. So to

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>just say, well, you take out that play, you win

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the game, that's not reasonable. But I would still if

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I could take back any play, that would be the

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>one because if he doesn't Muffet, Cowboys get the ball

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>on their eighteen with eight thirty to play, up seventeen

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to six. Best case scenario, they go down and make

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it an eighteen point game heading into halftime. Even worst

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>case scenario, they run three plays and punt from their

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>own thirty And I like their odds of keeping the

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams from scoring a tome down on a long field

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>at least, so I think that changes the complexion of

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the first half. I still think that's probably the biggest

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>play in the game. It's clearly not the only reason

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>why they lost. That's lazy, but it was big yep,

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the five players that I had, but obviously

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>there were some other ones too, And you know, after

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that two point conversion, and we were going to the

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>elevator on this, so we didn't really maybe get a

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>great look, but it seemed like Anthony Brown had a

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>chance for an interception. On second down. They floated up

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a pass that when they do defensive back drills, that's

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what they do that. You know, Joe Baker throws the

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ball a high in the sky and you die and

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you jump up at you and like that. There couldn't

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have been an easier interception, wasn't to me. I looked

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at that. I thought he was fully outstretched and the

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ball went over his hand. Is that not what happened?

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Hit him right in the hands. I need to see

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it again. It was that happened while we were going

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>down to the field, and I didn't get a good

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>look at it. Yeah, me either, and it but that's

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>what I saw. Maybe you're saying it had actually hit

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>his hands and he just dropped it, dropped it. Okay,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I look at it again either, I mean, whether or

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>not that's the case. I mean, how about the force

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fumble by DeMarcus Lawrence that Tyrone Crawford you would think

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>would have seen but clearly didn't. That's two games in

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a row without a takeaway. Yes, that's they didn't ever

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>take away against, not against Arizona. Yeah, that's not what

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you want. It's not hard to getty hard to get

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to forty when you're chunking up donuts two weeks in

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a row, for sure. But you know, honestly, I don't

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think I saw anything different from this defense. It goes

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>back to what you said in your first thing. I

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't see anything different from this defense than what we

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>saw last year. And that's always been my contention about

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this defense. I don't think this defense is any worse.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of game they play last year,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and actually this is what they're expecting from their defense.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Hold to field goals. Hold, and guess what Roline made,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them. I get in I get

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in fights with people all the time about this because

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are killing me in the game about

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>how bad the defense is. This defense played well enough

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to win the game. I agree they did. They held

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>him to seven field goals. They one of the two

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns they allowed was on a very short field, like

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rams started in the Dallas red zone. That's how

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>short the field was. They weren't great by any stretch

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination. Jalen Smith has a long way to

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>go to be I mean, he's a hard hitter, he

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is an instinctive player. His abilities in pass coverage have

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a long way to go. That that much we learned

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>just from watching Todd Gurley in that second half. The

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>secondary has its issues. The pass rush didn't show up

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first time this year. That looked more like

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the pass rush we thought we were going to see

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. They're not great, and nobody should have thought

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they would be, but they they played well enough to win.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>They forced him to field goals. They kept things manageable,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>especially in the first half. The Cowboys last year, last

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>year too, last year. In this year, the Cowboys are

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as good as their offense will allow them to be.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>For them to be the team that they want to be,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>their offense has to click, and it really, for the

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the first month of the season has

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not been, in my opinion. You know, nobody wants to

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hear this because they always everyone's afraid to throw out excuses.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they're played without their best player on defense,

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and then that's a fact. They played without Sean Lee

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was very noticeable yesterday. I mean, I think

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean it would would have made a lot more plays

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the open field. He would have probably stopped some

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of these runs from being a little bit um from

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>from gashing them into the You know, I don't know

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if girl's gonna average five point three yards to carry.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's long with seventeen, so it's not like

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a big chunk play there for as far

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>as runs go. So you know, I I don't know

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what you can say about the corners. I'm not sure

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're playing not playing with the with their best

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>corners right now. They've got guys that hurt. But I

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know but see, I mean, okay, maybe Anthony Brown

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>dropped the pick. We need to go back and watch that,

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But like, did the corners play back? No, No, I'm

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm not gonna say that Nolan Carroll and been

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>been um Cheeto being out affects them. I'm not because

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who their best corners are when they're

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all healthy, and I don't know if Carroll's even in there,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but I know Sean Lee's won't their best shutterbacker. And

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. I'm not going to try to

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>pile on and say, hey, also, this guy was hurt too,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and David Irving comes back about about I think it's well,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly noticeable too. And I guess the point I'm

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to make is Sammy Watkins and Robert Woods combined

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for thirty four yards. Cooper Cupp was their best receiver

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and he had six d and a touchdown, which, okay,

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but somebody's gonna get yards. All of their

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>damage came from Todd Gurley and the tight ends yep,

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what does that say? And mostly from Gurley it's and

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of it from Gurley. A lot of

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that says says stuff about your lineback. Sean Lee's not there.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>If there's a silver lining here, I know, I know

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>David Irving's coming back this week. I never bought into

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the hype that he's that guy, at least not yet. Um.

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>If there's a silver lining that I'm looking for here

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as a Cowboys fan, it's that I don't expect Sean

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Lee to miss too much time more time, and I

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>expect Anthony Hitchins to be back really soon. And I

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>think those two guys healthy and playing together can make

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount of difference for the huge different defense,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. I think what we got to do is

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we got to see Jalen Smith get out there. We

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>got to see him run around. The hope is that

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>by twenty eighteen he's better, But right now, those other

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two guys are clearly better linebackers than he is. Even

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in light of this game, which was easily his worst

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the four, I'm still very encouraged about where he is.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's not He's not that guy. He's not in

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the top ten pick yet, and I feel I still

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>feel encouraged that he can be in time. But I

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think Anthony Hitchins is a much better all around linebacker

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>than he is right now. All right, let's take our

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>first break. When we come back, we do need to

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about the running back, Ezekiel Elliott and what he

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>did and what's going on with him today or tomorrow,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>today or tomorrow here in court. And in addition to that,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you guys, if you think the

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys short week last week, combined with the Rams long

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>week coming off a ten day layoff, affected the Cowboys

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>in this game. We'll talk about that when we come

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment loving people, demand the best unlimited wireless plan

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ever from ATNT. What else do you want? Are you

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in Aicorn? Maybe only at and T offers you unlimited

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>data with HBO included and never pay overages. Get ATNT

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Unlimited plus our best wireless deal and unlimited data plus

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>save twenty five dollars per month on direct TV. It's

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>entertainment your way after twenty two tidleys of dat Us

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and TAMA Slow Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>stream and stand definition unless you're turn it off. Twenty

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>five dollars Direct TV savings across AT and T Unlimited

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Plus credits start within three bills. Service prices subject to change,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>other usage speed fees, charges and restriction supplyeseatt dot com

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>slash unlimited for details. Hey Cowboys fans, did you know

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that over the next few years, more than a million

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>service members will transition from military to civilian life. Veterans

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>face unique challenges when they get out of the military,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bank of America and the Dallas Cowboys are teaming

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 1>up to help with financial education, career opportunities, and support

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of military nonprofit It's in organizations locally in North Texas

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and across the country. We're proud to support our troops

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and are deeply grateful for the dedication and sacrifice of

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our service members and veterans. Bank of America Official Bank

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys invites you to join us in

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>our efforts to get involved by tagging game day photos

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on social media using hashtag troop thanks. That's hashtag troop thanks,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and by learning more about our commitment to veterans at

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America dot com slash Military Support. Together, we

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>can thank our troops in ways that make a real difference.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Copyright twenty sixteen. Bank of America Corporation. It's pulling night

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>with brands and you're hanging out together. Get up us there,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but you're creating something better. But they're sposed deep inside.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what to do. You like to believe

0:20:55.880 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper Pepper. When you crave a doctor Pepper, nothing

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>else will do. Pick up a nice cold, twenty ounce

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bottle today, doctor Pepper to lunch you grave. I hear

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>all this talk about what it takes to be a cowboy.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's got their ideas, but I just say to myself,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's what's up top that matters. Sure, you need men

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with the muscle and heart to get her done. But

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if your scouts and coaches are listening out there, a

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>word of advice. Pick the man with the most well

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>worn stetson. That's the one most cut out to be

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a cowboy. Stetson hats her handmade right here in Texas

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and have been on cowboys heads for over one hundred

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years. The rest of you can visit stetson

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash cowboy to find a retailer nearest you.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break Welcome Back. It's the second segment

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Breaklock from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. At

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the start, we're talking about the Cowboys loss. They lose

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty five thirty at home against the Rams and a

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit unexpected. But that's how the NFL is. You

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>just never know every single week. And that was as

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, Dave in the break, it is a good team.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm certainly not saying the Rams are not

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a good team. They are a good team. I just

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're a playoff team. Let me, I'll fully

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>elaborate that, which which you know Jason Garrett hates this,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but he's not here. That's not his job. It's my job.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are a good team, and I mean I

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>picked the Cowboys to win, so I'm not trying to

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sit here and say I told you so. But I'm

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to go as far as to say that

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was unexpected. I did not. I was unexpected from a

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of our picks. We all picked exactly. But I'm

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not sitting here just like man, I can't believe they

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lost to that dog crap team like it's it's the NFL.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But having said that, you look at the schedule and

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what's coming for the Cowboys over the next six weeks

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>other than a road trip to San Francisco. This is

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the most manageable game on the schedule. And if you

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can't win this at Spells at home at Spells, trouble.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And here's the other part. And when I said, and

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when I said in the break that I couldn't believe

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they lost his game, it was less about the Rams

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and way more about the fact that they were up

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to three with less than two thirteen, with

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>less than two minutes left in the first half. Yes,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that at home against again, a team that I don't

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's necessarily a playoff team. A good team, but

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're a playoff tam. I don't think

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win their division, and I don't think more

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>than one team's gonna come out of the NFC West.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So all that being said, I still can't believe the

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were in that position at twenty four to thirteen

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>right before the half and end up losing. If you

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>at home, if you had told me on Friday they

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>were gonna lose, I'd say, Okay, that's not ideal, but

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not the most surprising thing I've ever heard. But

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to have really full control of that game nearing halftime

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and to just completely not even it's not like they

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lose lost control, like the Rams just ripped it away

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from them. They were like, hey, up yours, We're taking

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing and right nothing you can do about it.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>That's the part that's kind of surprised. It's hard to

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's hard to fathom when you, I mean, the way

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this team win games in the past. To

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have somebody just bossom around like that down the stretch

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was surprising and the best and I mean I thought

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting part when you look at that is

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that they actually ran the ball. Well, you look at

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys in their running game, and we always say,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we said it last week, the Cowboys team is going

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be successful if they can run the ball effectively.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And yesterday they ran the ball effectively one hundred and

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine yards on the ground. That included a big

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>run from a sect from the second running back in

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris. But Zeke had a pretty good day. He

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was averaging four yards per carry, so I mean they

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>were running the ball effectively. Even in the second half.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>They were still when he touched the ball, they were

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>getting good yardage. Out of it. They just weren't able

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to get enough out of the passing game to be

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>able to make it all work. I never would have

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>guessed that this. You know, in their current configuration, that

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they could run for almost two hundred yards, which is

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the NFL, by the way, Amber and

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lose the game. It's okay, lose. I mean that's crazy. Yeah,

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. Where is Jason Witton? Where is Cole Beastley?

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I was telling you this, Derek yesterday. Where are they?

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Why are they not using them? I just feel like

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to keep throwing the ball as many

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>times to des Bryan. Let's say Terrence Williams after I

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>see him dropping a couple of plays again, I'm not

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep throwing it that way. I'm gonna go for

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the secure, even if it's shorter. I feel secure like

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley can catch right there, even for a few yards.

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So can Jason Witten. And you can keep moving the

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ball just in a more secure way. Let me ask

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you this question, And because I don't know this, and

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe you guys saw it yesterday, was Cole open a

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>lot that he was just being missed? Or was this

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a situation where they would just going to other people

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with the ball. Well, I mean that can happen. I mean,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously Cole's gonna be open sometimes. I know, I'm just

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that you can miss him. Yeah, he's easily missed sometimes.

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>But I think Dak's got to be looking for him

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. I mean, six targets only three receptions.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>That's actually low for for him because he's usually you know,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>he's usually gonna catch most of the passes that are

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thrown his way. Some of them were too high. But

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that I agree with her. I mean, I

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think that Whitten and Beasley have got to be you

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have a ball controlled offense where you don't have to

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>try to throw it down the field as much. You

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>don't try to have to throw you know, these outpass

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>passes to Dez and try to get him that involved.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll get involved if you just if you just kind

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of if it goes to him. So I don't know,

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why Witten and Beasley are not being

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, since Witten caught ten passes against Denver, he's

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>only had one two catches for twelve yards, so that

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be and I think You're right, there isn't

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>an explosive element to this offense, but there wasn't last

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>year and they didn't need it. Like their whole m

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is methodical, like you run the ball, you complete the

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>nine yard come back to witness and it works. It

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>works when when everything's humming the right way. And it

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is kind of unbelievable to me to think that that

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>these guys just weren't ever open over the course of

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a three hour game. And you look, you know, I

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>defended the amount of targets des was getting through the

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks, but what I meant thirteen yesterday and

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I think nine in Arizona. So I mean he's been

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>targeted fifty times in four games, which I just don't

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's the way this team's going to be successful.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it goes back to what Dak

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was so good at last year, which is just making

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the easy throw to the guy that the defense isn't

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>focusing on. And I'm that's so simplified. I know it's

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than that, but it just seems this whole

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>offense seems like they're forcing it and it's not. It

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>worked beautifully for thirty minutes yesterday, and that's probably as

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>well as it's worked all season, and the rest of

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the time, it's just been very herky jerky. So not

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to make an excuse, because I don't believe that an

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>excuse is warranted here other than the fact Cowboys didn't

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>play well in the second half. But do you think

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there was at least something to the idea that the

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys had a short week? They played a Monday night game,

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then came back to play a Sunday at noon, and

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>their opponent played the previous Thursday, which meant they had

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ten days to prepare for this game. Do you think

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>that maybe part of what we saw in the second

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>half yesterday could have been affected by Cowboys having less rest,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>much less rest than than the Rams did. Well, I

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the Rams, but let's just focus on

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Cowboys part of it. Yeah, I mean, having

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a short week, and even shorter because it's a noon game.

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, you do you think Sean Lee could have

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>used one more day, one more day for a hamstring injury? Um? Perhaps,

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's just the way that it goes.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't. I don't sit there and worry

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean the ram that they looked fresh,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they had a little bit more juice in the second half.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can, you can make that case if

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to. I know the NBA is changing their

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>rules all because of that, because they feel like, you know,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>short and you know, back to backs and all that matters.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it does. But my favorite garotism that he

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>repeats all the time that I actually like and don't

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>roll my eyes at is when people ask questions like

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this and he says, nobody feels sorry for you. Yeah,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares. Sorry. I guess what if you don't like it,

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to do it again this week because the

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers have been off since Thursday, So I mean, what

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want me to do? And honestly, I think

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the defense getting tired out in the second half yesterday

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has a lot more to do with the offense putting

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up three plays, three plays, five plays, three plays for

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the first four possessions of the second half than what

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>happened on Monday in Arizona. I don't it sucks. It's

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not an ideal scenario, but nobody feels sorry for you.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. You have to do it again this week,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>so figure it out. Did they have an Arizona off

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a short week? I think they did the Cowboys Arizona

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>played you're talking about when the Cowboys played Arizona. Was

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Arizona coming off a short week? I don't think so. Remember, No,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Arizona played the Colts on a Sunday heading into that game.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>But I'm certain at this some point that year Cowboys

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>will be the benefactor of you would like to come

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>off short week? You would like I guess going back

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to what point, That's why I was pointing it out.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It is because there will be Every team's gonna have

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with that, and that's kind of why you

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>hear Garrett talking about it. And I do agree with

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea like you just got to be prepared to play,

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. I mean, that's the nature of the NFL.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You knew when the schedule came out that it was

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be like that. So it is what it is.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You just gotta figure it out. Do I agree with

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL's thought process that grown men slamming into each

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>other two hundred times a game need to be playing

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday games. No, but they do. So you just gotta

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>make do. Yep, not really much. You can do about that.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get some phone calls and some questions.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You guys can call us a numbers two one four

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>eight seven two twenty one O two. Again it is

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>two one four eight seven two twenty one O two.

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also hit us on Twitter at Cowboys Break.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Twitter first. Well, I'm just seeing a

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions, I mean a lot of comments, not

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily questions in regards to Dak Prescott's performance, and it's

0:30:55.640 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of upsetting to me. I just think that's dumb, because, yes,

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Dad didn't really play his best. He made a lot

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of mistakes, but at the same time, he's good. He's

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be as good as the offensive line is. And

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday we could all see how much pressure he got

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and how how that affects him and his success in

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen came off what the offensive line did came

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>off the running game. Yesterday we had the running game going,

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but again, the offensive line wasn't performing at their highest level.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to disagree a little bit when you said

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to play as well as the offensive

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>line will. I think he played better than that because

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the offensive he had to make plays in spite of

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. There's one about one drive. There was

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>three times on that one drive where he was spending in.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it looked the whole thing looked like Romo,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, yeah, but you can't go a

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whole game being pressured like that. Oh, I know. And

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I know what I'm saying is is that he actually

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>outperformed the offensive line. Yea, if it wasn't for his

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>upper body strength and you know, throwing off Aaron Donald

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like that and then going and turning and spending and

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>going back and throwing the ball to Dez Brian across

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I mean, he made some plays. He made

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some plays that most quarterbacks are not going to make

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have the body structure to do that.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's unfortunate for him that the third down throw

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to Dez where he literally shook off a blindside hit

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from Aaron Donald, which is amazing. And then on the

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>same drive he does the same thing and finds Bryce

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Butler for a touchdown. I mean, those are like when

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Dak retires, those will go in the reel. You know.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It's very reminiscent of the JJ Watt play that Romo made.

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>In twenty fourteen, but they will be completely overshadowed by

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they lost this game. And honestly, I'm

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out on a lemon say there's not a

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger Dak fan in here than me. I'm I'm very

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>much hitched to the Dak Prescott bandwagon. Whatever. You can

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>disagree if you want. That's life in the NFL. If

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you're a quarterback, Yeah, that's your job in the NFL's

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and your job in the NFL dictates that you're gonna

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>take some heat if you make some bad plays in

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a loss. The offensive line was not great, it did

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not give him a lot of help. A lot of

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>other guys around him made mistakes too, but you're the quarterback.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You're the guy that has to go to the podium

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and account for that. So I mean, nobody feels sorry

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. Basically, that's the way. That's the way this

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>league works. And what he's gonna be judged on even

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>more than that is that final drive. You had one

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>something left I think it is almost two minutes left,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one fifty one, and you had your opportunity at that

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>point to drive your team down to win the ball game,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and no matter what the circumstances are. That's how quarterbacks

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are judged. Every time those situations come up, they say,

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this quarterback is won this number of games in a

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>comeback situation, and that is a that is to me,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that was what Tony Romo did so well. Is you

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>got Tony. And I know Tony took a lot of

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>flak from people about, you know, bombing out in in situations,

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but way more often than not, if you got into

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation where you got the ball back and you

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>had two minutes and you just needed the offense to drive,

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>drive down and score, Tony was usually going to deliver that.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought, especially in a regular season game. You think

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it was weird. Did you listen to that? I heard

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff I wasn't in there. I mean,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty blunt after losses. And he said on the

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>last play, he said, you know, I thought I could

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>dump the ball off to Zeke. I thought he could

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe make one guy miss so we could get a

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>first down. I mean, if you were for nitpicking here,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not trying to, you know, make this a

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue, but it was. I thought it's kind of

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>surprising that he would say that you know, because it

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>did kind of sound like I thought Zeke would do it.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I gave it to him and he and

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and watch it, he did make

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that guy miss and he made another guy miss, and

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>he was like kind of bulldozing his way. There's no

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he had no business getting nine and a half yards,

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but he did. I really he thought. I thought he

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>was going to get to the sticks. I really did.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, that's you know, I know he played well

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in some of those touchdowns. Yeah, yeah, he had a

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>good day. He had a really good day, which is again,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>why so surprising they lost is Yeah, it's a very

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a perplexing loss. And actually, I mean, you know,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about going back and watching the tape, it pains

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>me to say it. In that situation, Dak Dak probably

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>had three, maybe four throws that he probably really wants back,

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and there might not be a worse one than the

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>third down before that Zeke play. Yep, he had deaz

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on a on a seven out route to the sidelines.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>He has room whiffed it as bad as I've ever

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seen him with a throw like it just I mean,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sailed on him and it's definitely a first down

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely gets Daz out of bounds and keeps the game

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>alive if he gets it. Um, you get a hindsight

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>here for sure. But I mean it's kind of I

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>even said it to you on the field that it's

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminded me of the of the Packer game

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. But you get down there, and I

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know that they're moving fast, But in hindsight, do you

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>stop the clock there? You got forty eight seconds? You're

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about the spike. Yeah, you spike the ball because

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you need every one of these plays, and if you

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>can get to the twenty five yard line, now you

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have a legitimate shot. Even with like one second on

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the clock, you've got you've got a shot to throw

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it into the end zone and make a play. Because

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you have dead you're not gonna maybe do a hell Mary.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you get in the twenty five twenty eight range,

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think everything counts, every snap counts to get

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>everything you can to get down into that twenty yard line,

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and then even with one or two seconds, you can

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>still make plays. And I think spiking it there. I

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>know it's hindsight, but that to that point though, and

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Derek was talking about, you can put

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of this on everybody because on that

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>same drive, if Terrence Williams catches that pass, he's got

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a good to get out of bounds. You probably stop

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the clock with something like one thirty one brought us

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and I did the math on this, you're probably talking

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>one thirty one. Instead, he drops it. You run the

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>ball with sak just to make sure you get a

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>fresh set of downs, and then you're taking your next

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>snap at like one oh eight, So you're talking twenty

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five seconds off the clock that didn't need to

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>come off the clock. Just a regrettable second half by

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>basically everybody involved. And that's the thing. It's like a

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>little thing here, a little thing there, a little thing there,

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a little thing there, and it one thing in isolation.

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>If you have that one play, it doesn't kill the game,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but you put them all together and it spells how

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you lose a game when you had, when you had

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a really good game going, how you can lose a

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>game in that What do you think Terrence Williams's timeline

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>looked like yesterday? I don't know because he blocked me right,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but bet it wasn't good. Oh, I'm sure it wasn't good.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>But that's also that also comes with the territory. When

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you play well, then it's you know, it's Terence Williams.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But when you have a rough game then' he did.

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>He did. Let everybody know it was his bad. He

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't hate that, oh after the play like that's not me.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he did die? Why like fifty times ninety thousand

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>people in the building. Oh, you know, I think you

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch the ball. I hate twelve players do it too.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You know I missed the last They tucking to his teammate.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not talking to the risk his teammates. No, they know.

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they weren't looking busy blocking dack. That was my bad, man,

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't catch that. Let's work my bad or the

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>clap either way when you do them both like bad clap.

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take our final break. We'll come back.

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get some questions. Call us two one four

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>eight seven to twenty one O two again it's two

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>one four eight seven two twenty one O two or

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hit us on Twitter at Cowboys break. This is the break.

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land, you need equipment with values

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are like

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>John Deer Compact tractors with a six year power training

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>warren to him big features that help you work less

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>deals in my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash Football terms, Conditions,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations applies you to belimed details. We

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment loving people, demand the best unlimited wireless plan

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ever from ATNT. What else do you want? Are you unicorn? Maybe?

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Only at and T offers you unlimited data with HBO

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>included and never payoverages. Get ATNT Unlimited plus our best

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>wireless deal and unlimited data plus save twenty five dollars

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 1>per month on direct TV. It's entertainment, You're right after

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two three delights of data. Us A and TAM

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 1>may Slow Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will streaming

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>standard definition unless you're turn it off twenty five dollars

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Direct D savings Aprise at and T Unlimited plus credits

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>start within three bills. Service prices subject to change, other

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>usage speed fees, charges and restrictions. Supplies the att dot

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>com Slash Unlimited for details. Star Sports Tours is the

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk xs and those with Senior Director

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>truly me Brian brought us you can trust the official

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. Back to the Break

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It's the final segment of the Break Clap

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in SWBC Morga Studios. Make take it away. Adjust your cleats,

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>adjust your pads, adjust your helmet, maybe adjust to the

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>rams in the second half, but don't adjust your underwear

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because once it's seen, it cannot be unseen. Tommy John,

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>No adjustment needed. Shop exclusive Cowboys underwear at Tommy John

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Forward Slash Cowboys for twenty percent off your

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>first order Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys. Thank

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>you Nick, and thank you Tommy John. All right, let's

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>get back to it. We're taking calls. Call us two

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one four eighty seven to twenty one oh two or

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>hit us on Twitter at Cowboys Break. Let's start with

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a call. And before we go to this call, just

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>want to say my thoughts and prayers it with all

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>those folks out in Las Vegas. Rob is calling from

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. What you got robbing you? Luckily I came

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in for the game. I was at the game yesterday

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for my fifty birthday, Happy birthday, birthday. Thank you. So

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I woke up to what happened in Vegas and you

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>still in doubt where you? Did you wake up in

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Dallas or did you head back home? Now? I'm still

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in Dallas. Okay, okay, okay, all night. I

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>got a text for my daughter. She worked Amanda. Oh wow,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and she was, you know, freaking out and shooting. I

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can imagine. I assume she's okay though, right everybody, I

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think I know them? Kay, yes, okay, all right, Well,

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts and prayers with you, guys, man. I appreciate it.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, being at the game first here in Texas,

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was a pretty cool scene. But

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I disagree a little bit. I don't think they ran

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball that good at all. I mean, if you

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>take that seventy something, you'd run them what they have?

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>What Zeke? You know? They didn't really they held them

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in check. And I think what's really hurting his team? Come,

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>let's compare it to last year. This team lived second

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and five last year. I think first down is killing

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this team. It seemed yesterday a start off play action

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they throw to jump out the DEAs and everybody's like great.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It took everybody, buddy by surprise, because you just assume

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a run up the middle. And

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then they got away from that, and then it was

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it was second half. It was second and nine. It

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was second and eight. Last year they used to do

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>those uh swing passes, he'd roll out. I think he

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>throw to swing. I don't think swings could bowl the

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>whole year. And I think number eighty four, I forget

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>his name, and touchdown pass. I think that was his

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>first catch all year. Yea, it's like they throw to

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>only a handful of guys. Des Beasley Witten and Williams.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it. And these defenses are squeezing back yesterday. If

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't make kind of Tony Romo plays, they're going

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to get blown off this field. And the difference to

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>me in the game Golf was just too comfortable. I mean,

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to run. He's not a big guy.

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>You hit him. I mean he was going to fly,

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but he was just too comfortable. And I tweeted Dave

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith. Everybody likes Jalen Smith. I mean, he's just

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a class guy. But you're asking a guy who cannot

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>really run at one hundred percent play middle linebacker where

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to cover both sides of the field, and

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>now you're going to try to have to cover their

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>best offensive weapon. And that's the best to come up with.

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't put maybe another safety, but somebody he was.

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>That was the difference. He was the difference for them.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think the difference with us was Dak just

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't comfortable. And I don't know what to deal with

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line. It's hard to watch an offensive line

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>during the game, So I can't tell you who to

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>breakdowns are. But what I'm noticing is Tyrren Smith's not

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the same guy, and maybe that's because next it is

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not doing what he supposed to do. And I gotta

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you the president there, the guard on the right side,

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>who's probably regarded as the best, Zack Martin, he didn't.

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think I don't think they're gonna flip it

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>during the season, but I think bytions now you're affecting everybody.

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if they're gonna I don't know

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if they're gonna take a chance and try to put

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it back where Collins goes back to guard. But this

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>offense needs to get back to little little passes. Get

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get comfortable second and five, and that's where I

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think Zeke could be more effective. But all right, right now,

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately I'm starting to see an eight and eighteen. All right,

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the call. The one thing I will disagree,

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of my pet peeves. I don't

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like when when fans say, hey, if you take this

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one runaway, well that's the point. You can't take that

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.919
<v Speaker 1>one runaway. Is that seventy yard run was a part

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of what they did yesterday. But if you if you

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about the two runs from Alfred Morris. I

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>still think you look at Ezekiel Elliott and you say

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy was averaging four yards to carry. They ran

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball well, they ran the ball effectively yesterday. I

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>just think personally, their passing game failed them in moments

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>when they needed their passing game. I don't think there

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was anything wrong with the running game yesterday. I know

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are there still has been this this pension

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this season for these negative runs that we really didn't

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>see last year, like on first down, and so yes,

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that can be a problem, but in a lot of

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>instances yesterday and a lot of instances yesterday, the Cowboys

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>overcame that and they were picking up first downs on

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>second and eight. So I don't think that that was

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem the Cowboys experience yesterday. I think I

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>agreed with a lot of what the coller just said.

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Some of it not so much, but for whatever reason,

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard, it's hard to try to simplify it.

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But so offensive line is not as dominant as they

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>were last year. I think everybody can agree with that.

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the number of negative zero and one yard

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>games we've seen in the running game is shockingly larger

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>than it was last year. I don't know that you

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can even argue that fact. I still think they ran

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball pretty well. I still think they found a

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>way to get the job done more often than they didn't.

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Even if you want to play that game and take

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Morris run out of it, they still ran for

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty yards, which is good by nil standards.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It is more than four yards per carry. I can't

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>really kill him too much for that. Um, Dave, add

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this up in your head. They're asking the wrong guy.

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That was like a wrong guy. He had five runs

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on first down in the second half, Okay, minus one zero,

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 1>two zero, So we're at we're at one. What was

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the last one? Five? About six? He had six yards

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 1>on first down and five and five attempts. Yeah, and

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that was all in a row, all in the second half.

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are your second half runs. Now, only one of

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>those times did they get a first down in that series,

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's a Dak went for twelve yards on a

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>run which probably was more of a scramble where he

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>did his own there. My question would be how much

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>did they do that in the first first in the

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, first and second quarter. I'll start talking about

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, now we gotta start. It's gonna take

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, which als I'll check out of I really again,

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to try to simplify this too much. Sorry,

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna call him out four five, nine, three, twelve,

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>one thirteen, three sixteen. It's first quarter right there. That's

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>way better than the second sixteen on how many was

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it four or five carries? It sounded like four, so

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>roughly four the first down. Here's the first down run

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for seventy. Here we go that one counts. That'll blow

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>up your average, though. And then and then Zeke on

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>first and goal and zero, so yeah uh. And then

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>he get first and goal again from the from the

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:55.800
<v Speaker 1>two and scored um three. And that's whether whether you

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>want to blame Green Cooper and Lyle Collins or get

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>out of here maybe oh good, great, hey shan, Whether

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to blame the newcomers or whether Zach Martin,

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Travis Frederick and Tyrn Smith aren't playing up to their

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>old level, whatever however you want to pinpoint this, I

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they're capable of just dominantly running the ball.

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>We know we're doing it. You know we're doing it

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>tough cookies. This is what's coming and we're gonna get

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>five yards like I think they could do that last year.

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't look like they can do that this year. Is

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this all about though, the left guard and the right tackle,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, the changes, and what I mean by

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that is you have different Those are only two pieces

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that are different. Is it all about them and whatever

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing as a result of their play and those

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>other guys maybe trying to do more than they should

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>do because they're trying to make up for them, or

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is it more just about sixty four? Like what what

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can it be? This is a cop out, But that's

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a question for broad us really, Like, I'm not the scout.

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I'm not going to try to tell you

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that this guy's not pulling the right way and this

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>guy is too worried about his weak side. Help. I

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>don't have those answers. I am going to go back

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and watch it again because I'm curious. Um, But I

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if I had to guess, it's a combination of everything.

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I think your left guard and your right tackle aren't

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as good as they were last year. I think your

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>three all pros are probably overcompensating. Plus they've played some

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty dominant fronts. When you think about Aaron Donald, Michael

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Brocker's Damon Harrison Denver obviously, um, and then on top

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the US, who sucks on defense? Can we get

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a valid that's about Guess what I mean this

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>defense coming up is even though God is coming to town, like,

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that. Oh I'm like who she's

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Wow? Um, I pray he's one more One

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 1>more thing that I wanted to point out is I

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>throw some on Ezekiel Elliott as well, because we were

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about it this morning too. I mean, you can

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>go back and find plays where there's a hole that

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.479
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't hit, or there's something that he doesn't happen

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a few times. Yeah, it's all as is usually the

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 1>case in these situations, Like to successfully run the ball

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, you have to seamlessly do about six

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>things right on every play, and it's just it hasn't

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.319
<v Speaker 1>been there for him on a consistent basis this year.

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say I don't think they can get

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>it right. And again that goes back to our point

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>from last week. I think continuity is your best bet.

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It sucks for everybody that Chads Green couldn't start this game.

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna dog the guy for getting hurt, you know,

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to do that, but he needs to

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>be in there getting snaps. But the fact is, and

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't want to dog him, and I

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:32.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to dog him either because of his injury.

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is is if you went into this

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>season assuming that Chaz Green was going to play sixteen games,

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably the fool because his history does not

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>suggest that that's going to be the case, and as

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw this weekend, wasn't. But here's what I'm a

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>fool about. How are you getting hurt in practice? Or

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? What's happening where you have a hip in practice? Well?

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>When was it in the game practice? I was just

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>making an out, Okay, I was gonna say, I mean

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about yes, well what are they doing? Is

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this like the program? Like what what do they get

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>around in the circle as bullrush? And I means I

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.280
<v Speaker 1>will say this other injury, I will say this. Okay,

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you're right, you're probably foolish if you were counting on

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Chatz to play sixteen games. Based on his prior history,

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but having just come out of this game, we all

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like Chaz Green has had the better outings at

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.800
<v Speaker 1>left guard this season. He's well, you want him starting

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have. The One thing I will say though,

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.479
<v Speaker 1>is no, I mean Chaz hasn't faced Darren Don Chazz

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>would have, so yeah, I don't know if I know

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty four wasn't the answer against Iron. Donald was slapping

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Zack Martin around on a case. And that's my point.

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:38.919
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know the Chaz would have fared any

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>better yesterday. Zekel throw him down on his ass. I'm serious,

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>go back and watch that play that he couldn't believe

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that plays believe the guy could whiff that much that

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 1>quick and then all of a sudden it was just

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>it was just like one on one with and he

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of tossed him around so fast. Protector. He's gonna

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>play left guard and Alfred Morris can run the ball

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>since he's so great, right Alfred Morris? And does that

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>mean we get to mark? I mean that that Darren

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.880
<v Speaker 1>McFadden is now active, maybe he could be active running

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>back now. Yeah, it's uh anyway, keep tweeting me, keep

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tweeting me on that one like that, oh hide score.

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean that. I think that was my point though.

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>My point all along was about juice, a guy that

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.720
<v Speaker 1>can bring you a little bit. I don't trusted Darren McFadden.

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet you fifty dollars. I don't trust you, Aaron Donald.

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Darren McFadden's not getting that ball to the end zone either. Yeah,

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust you no way. How are you gonna

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bet me fifty dollars? I can't, obviously I can, but

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I just prove it. Hey, the Packers are coming to town.

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember twenty fifteen, Darren McFadden had a hole the

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>size of the Red Sea and couldn't get into the

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>end zone. I mean, and he was running by himself

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for about twenty yards and got brought down. There aren't

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of running backs that are scoring from there,

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliot. It's one of them, unfortunately, but unfortunately be

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't have able, he didn't have the ball

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in his hands. Yes, well, they end up scoring anyways,

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's to go back. We kind of deviated from the call,

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean there's some really very real concerns

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>with the way the offense is playing and really their

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>rhythm in their consistency more than anything else. Again, that

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was great. The first half was amazing. If they play

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>like that all the time, they'll win thirteen games again.

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But they've only managed to reach that level of play

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know, eight of their seventy some odd

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 1>possessions this season. Yeah, I mean, how many possessions this

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>season have they looked like that? Probably four in the

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>first half, one against the Giants, which resulted in a

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten touchdown. None against Denver, and even against the Cardinals.

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Not really, because you're just chunking up fifty fifty balls

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to Bryce Butler and hoping for the best. It's it's

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>been disjointed. That's the word that I would use to

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this point. I don't get Jason Witten back involved. Get

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>him back involved, to move the sticks a little bit,

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>because it's there. It's there, and like he can get

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>eight to nine yards when you want to, So quit

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to be cute and try to go for all

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>these great big plays and you can decondunc with him

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>because he him and Beasley, these guys they can move

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the ball down the field. And I don't know why

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't use it as much because every single time

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:21.399
<v Speaker 1>when they need to, you see it in two minute

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>drill and they like really need to move the ball.

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's Jason Witten and there Jason Witten for ten, Jason

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>went for twelve. And I know defense is played differently

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in a two minute but I promise you Jason Witten

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is available to move the sticks and get first down

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>if they went that route. It's got another question from Twitter.

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We kind of talked about this already, but do you

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 1>guys think that this would be a solution to pass

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:50.439
<v Speaker 1>more on the first down to give Seek a little

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>more running room. I mean, honestly, I don't think that

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>passing more is their answer. Like the amount of times

0:54:57.920 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've been passing this season win. Like, if this

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>team's gonna win, their route success is going to be

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>running the ball now again, they're gonna have to vary

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it up. I think they need to do some more.

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I was I was happy that they handed the ball

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to to Switzer on a play yesterday because I do

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they need to do something else in the

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>running game. It can't just always be about giving Zeke

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball in first downs. Um, But I do think

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the running game is how this team's gonna gonna win.

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:27.439
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't think the answer is let's throw more.

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I just think they have to be more creative and

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>find better ways to run the ball than than saying

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get away from running the ball. And I throw

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:37.439
<v Speaker 1>something out there that I hate myself for even saying

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>out loud. I think these guys miss Lucky Whitehead at all.

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that role, Yeah, I think I'm talking about Yes,

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about his snap stories or or you know, uh,

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>he won't mind the crap in the locker room. I'm

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about defenses for whatever reason, respected the hell out

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of him going in motion across that formation. But that's

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not about them all. He averaged ten yards, Yeah, but

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't I don't think that was as much about

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>him as they haven't really done it this year like

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they have. They could try it with Switzer that yesterday

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was the first time they tried it he has, and

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they got what four yards on that play? They got

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>three yards when they actually gave it to him, but

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>he motioned a few more times other than that word.

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They didn't hand it him. No, But even still, it

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly seemed like teams respected it when Lucky did it,

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think they respect Switzer doing this. Yes,

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they respected it after If you go back to last season,

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys were regularly running that every game for like

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the first how many games, Like they were consistently running

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that play every game, so teams had to respect it.

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>They haven't run it enough for teams to respect it yet.

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>He's come across, but they have only handed it to

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>him one time in four games. So do you think

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>if you were the defense, would you respect that much

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, yeah, we gotta make sure we watched that

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>guy coming across. Well, he hasn't done it, so that

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make me respect it. So just I don't know

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that they respect that Ryan Switzer's gonna gash him for

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>until he does it. Well, yeah, we'll see. Um it's

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a funny catch twenty two because I think just about

0:57:04.800 --> 0:57:08.799
<v Speaker 1>everybody would agree that this offense looks fairly predictable right now.

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you can sit here and say, maybe

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you throw the ball on first down instead of handing

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it off to Zeke. But if you if you throw

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it in completion, then it's second and ten, then you're

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>behind the eight ball. Where now you gotta pick up

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>five yards on second down or you're in third and long.

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So I just knocked it up. Damned if you do.

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Damn it didn't. I didn't count it, but it looks

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like about almost fifty fifty pass on first down. Yeah,

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it might be a little bit more run, but that

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was because when they got down there at the five

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>yard line. They got down there and they they should

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do it three times. So I don't. I think they're

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>mixing it up pretty good there, run pass first up.

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd just like to see a little bit more creativity,

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 1>try try the Switzer play a little bit more. I

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>think there are other things you can do just to

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of um use your running game a little more effectively.

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We saw it yesterday. When you have Alfred Morrison. There

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes defenses you bring in the second running back and

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not keying on him like they would the first

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>running back, and so it does create some opportunities for you.

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see some of those kinds of things happen.

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not saying take Zeke out a game a lot,

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but I want that second running back to be able

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to give me a little something like he did yesterday.

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>What if you sorry, nick. What was the what was

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a two point conversion at the three yard line? It's

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much yeah, No, it's at the three yeah, I mean,

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so that's a three yard play. I mean, I'd like

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to see that more often. I think it just in

0:58:25.640 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field, you know, spread out a

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit and and use dak in a situation like that. Um,

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think at holding call, I didn't. I don't know.

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he really was holding. I think he

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was more dominating the play. I don't think he was either.

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>But he had his hand on That's that's the thing.

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And when you have your hand outside right and you

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>hand outside in the other hand, it's just just handcaking

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Um. Because because when you hold a guy,

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're holding him up for something. Usually it's

0:58:56.720 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he's standing up and you're that's why he's not moving

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>forward because you're holding him. But when you're smashing him

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to the ground, I don't really think that hand, that

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 1>left hand is doing you know, but it's hard to

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You just see hand and you have to make the call.

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's a tough break. But I can't fault the

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>ref for throw because of what he saw, you know,

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if Terrence catches that ball, he catches that ball and

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:19.680
<v Speaker 1>tie the game, they go win, you win it with

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a field goal. We're talking about Dak's strength. We're talking

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about a guy that's getting tackled, still pointing, tackling, fires

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it over there. That was a heck of a player.

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I really don't think Dak played poorly. He had some

0:59:34.240 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 1>throws he could take back. But I think they were

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in this game because of Dak, not because they didn't

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lose because of him. I think they I think if

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for him and his athletic ability, I don't

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're even as close as they were. I think

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. It is fair. All right, we appreciate you

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 1>guys us. We're back tomorrow. We'll take a bigger picture

0:59:52.880 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on around this CNFC East to

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Nichael Rochington Redskins play the undefeated Kansas City Chiefs, so

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that plays out. We'll talk about all

1:00:00.840 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that tomorrow. So then for Nick even, Dave hellmant amber Garcia,

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Derek Eaglem. This has been the Break live on

1:00:05.600 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas Cowboys dot com and the Dallas Cowboys Football

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Club