WEBVTT - What's Wright - Pacers-Thunder Game 5 Reaction: SGA & J-Dub GO OFF, Haliburton ALL-TIME BAD

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in episode three forty What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>presented to you by Boost Mobile. And this is an

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>insane show we have today because last night we had

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>something of the Yin and the Yang of historic NBA

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Finals performances, And that's not an exaggeration. It was as

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>bad of a performance as you will see from a

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>team's best player, from a superstar in a finals game

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in your entire life. And it was just about as

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>good of a performance as you will see from a

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>team's second best player in an NBA Finals game, as

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll see in a decade. And so we will get

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>into all of that, and then we will also I

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>am going to make something of a faustian bargain with

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the audience and we'll see how it works out. Because

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it has a little to do with politics, It has

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a little to do with solitaire, it has a little

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with interness in media beefs, and it has

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a little to do with the future of the Republic

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. And I know there are a lot

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of you that are not at all interested in a

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>handful of those things, but are not like a moth

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to a flame. As soon as I say potential media beef.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, well, I guess I'm gonna have to stick

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>around for it, So so all of that is coming

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>later in the show. Also demandse you, if you would like,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>might actually be able to leave the show about twenty

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes early, because not only do you are you not

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>obligated to participate in the last third of the show.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know that I want you to for

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>your sake, for mine, for ever everyone's so you're welcome

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to stick around, but you also are not obligated to

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you would like the legitimate deniability of I

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even there, you feel free to take the ear

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>piece out and keep it moving. How are you doing

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning, sun?

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Doing pretty good? Puffs. Good to see you.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good to see you as well. You sound great.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they changed your microphone or what,

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but it sound better than ever in my ear.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We will get to Game five of the Finals in

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but first, thanks to our great friends at

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile. Straight to Voicemail, brought to you by boost

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mob Mobile show Hey O, Tani pitches uh for the

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>first time in a couple of years with the Dodgers,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>throws it inn we'll get to we won't actually get

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to that. That's why it's just missed the cut. Red Panda.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh is Red Panda hall of Famer? Great take? Oh

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, it wasn't such a busy show. I would

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I could do at least five minutes on it. Red

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Panda has certainly offered more to the lives of NBA

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fans over the last twenty years than a lot of

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>guys who actually made the Hall of Fame. That I mean,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that is a great take right there. And Joey Chestnut

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>returning to the Nathan to hot Dog eating contest a

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>story I do not care about it all, but because

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time I made the case Joey Chestnuts

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the world's greatest athlete in a segment called Nick Wright

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Public Defender, Defend the Indefensible. The producers are convinced I

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>care about Joey chestnutt no matter how many times I

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tell them, I actually do not care about Joey Chestnut.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Remindered everyone like rate, subscribe, review, follow us on YouTube,

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on YouTube, check out the you Know on iTunes, Spotify.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>All of that lee five star reviews. I never asked

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for reviews. It actually helps a lot. I don't totally

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>understand why, but that would be great. And here's the

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing about people watching live on YouTube right now.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The listener questions today are going to be interspersed throughout

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the show based on the topics we're doing. We're not

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have if if you have a question that's unrelated

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to everything, feel free to submit it and maybe we'll

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>get to it Thursday. But we're not gonna do questions

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at the very end of today's show. So it's interactive

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for people who are watching right now, and also about

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the topics at hand. But demons, let's get to what

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is likely the deciding moment of these NBA.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Finals deciding Yeah, so okay, see went up three to

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>two last night. It looked like the Pacers were gonna

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>erase another one of those big deficits.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't do it. Huge game from Jada and Shay.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Halliburton got a little dinged up there early in the game,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>had four points. You said, you have a crazy, crazy

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 3>take about Halliburn. Do you mind laying that one on us?

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't listen. I don't think it's crazy, and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I think at times. So here's what happens sometimes in

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of meta media criticism, if I will, if

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I may a little Amus boush before we get to

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>real media criticism later in the show. Because there are

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so many prisoner of the moment knee jerk over the

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>top takes on a daily basis, there are then times

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>when something actually might be the worst you've ever seen,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and it gets lumped into that doesn't it's a media

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>version of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, and where it

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>gets lumped into other Oh, well, how many you know?

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>We've heard this is the worst ever eleven times in

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the last three years. And while maybe some of the

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>tyrese Haliburton, why doesn't he score more? And the answer

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>is because he's not a scorer. That's not where he

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>makes his impact. Some of that maybe prior to Game

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>five was a touch over stated. There is nothing that

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I can think of that could overstate what happened last night,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>which is on the very short list and maybe at

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the very top of the list of worst performances by

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>a superstar and by a team's best player in a

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Gotta Have It Finals game. I have my other computer,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>so I have the computer I do the show on.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I have my other computer, right here that I am

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to glance at because because I have

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so many basketball reference pages open to try to find

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the context for what Haliburton did last night or didn't

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do last night, that I was worried this computer would

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>glitch on the pod even didn't.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>You go ahead, and even with him being banged up.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Man, unless the injury was he lost his vision for

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>forty five minutes, that's not an excuse. It's I understand

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he had calf soreness. I get it, and I understand

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that he probably because of what we have seen with

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>calf injuries, was a little tentative because of it. But

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>zero for six, four points, a line of four seven

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>six with three turnovers in thirty four minutes, simply in

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a game that somehow was a two point game in

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter thanks to what, in all honesty the

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>backup point guard TJ McConnell was able to do in

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>his minutes. I've just never seen something like it, and

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I so here again just to go over the different

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers that I threw on there, and one other note,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so Tyrese Halliburton last night again, game score is not

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a perfect metric, but it is pretty decent as far

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>as a catch all stat fifteen is an average game.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Anything above twenty five is exceptional, anything below ten is bad,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>anything in the negatives. It's one of the worst games

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in NBA history. Basketball Reference is able to do game

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>score in the playoffs dating back to the late seventies.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton last night had a game score of two point three.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Text on it. J. Dubb had a game score of

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty SGAT game score of twenty seven. If you want

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, how does this compare to the other

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton games these finals, because it's not like he's had

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>huge point games in the finals previously. His previous game

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>scores were eleven, fourteen, twenty three, twelve. This was again,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this was two point three. So I'm gonna throw some

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers at you, but I think they're noteworthy because it

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is not an exaggeration to say that in our lifetimes

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be the worst game a team's best player

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>has had in a critical game finals game. So I

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>threw this in the old stad heead not stat muse

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>stat Head, which partners Basketball Right Difference Hall of famers

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who played at least thirty minutes and made zero baskets

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in a finals game with a game score less than

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>five two times. Dennis Rodman did it. Makes sense, the

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>guy was a rebounder and a defender. Old Jason Kidd

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>did it. And then Ray Allen with a sneaky, horrific

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>game in the finals in twenty ten that they lost

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Lakers. He had an OH for thirteen night,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and Dennis Johnson for the seventy eight Sonics had an

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>OH for fourteen night. So the Dennis Johnson game, who

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>arguably was that team's best player, is the closest comp

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because Ray Allen, as great as he was, was in

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten the third best player on that Celtics team.

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>If we expand it to okay, remove the Hall of

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Fame qualifier from it, and we do at play at

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>least thirty minutes games score less than five field goals zero.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>The names on that list are I'm not going to

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>read you all of them, but it's Horace Grant, it's

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Rodman, it's Bruce Bowen, it's Old Jason Kidd, it's

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that Ray Allen game, and that Dennis Johnson game. There's

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>also the most recent one. The most recent ones were PJ.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Tucker four years ago and Jay Crowder four years ago.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>If we then say, okay, Hall of Famer, remove game

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>score and or game score less than five, and just

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>have it be two or fewer baskets made again, he

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>made zero. It's a couple man new Jenobli games. One

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul Pierce game that could qualify a Reggie Miller won

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for sixteen game. That one's rough, and I'm not picking

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on Reggie, but it is what it is. He was

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the best player on that team, and then a bunch

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of guys who weren't the best player on their team. Again,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you just can't find it. Wes Unseld had a brutal one,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cooper had a brutal one. Zero made baskets, best

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>player on the team and playing thirty minutes. It maybe

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has happened once in NBA history. And demon'sa you seem

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like you are you think I'm being unfair because of

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the injury.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>The injury, I mean, he took six shots. A lot

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 3>of those other guys you were saying, Denis Robins obviously

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 3>not a score first throw them out. Neither neither is

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Tyrese Halliburn. You know, it's like the same thing. If

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 3>he's not a guy that naturally looks for a shot.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that in a game where he gets banged

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 3>up early and he only takes six shots, like you said,

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Rayalna went oh for thirteen, it's I mean, he's if

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 3>he's already he's looking to get his teammates involved. I

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 3>think in a situation like that where his leg is

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 3>already kind of tweaked, he's definitely gonna be looking more

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 3>to get his team.

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So this is where I guess I'm gonna

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be an old man. I I do not care if

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>your leg is tweaked in Game five of the NBA Finals.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly, That's why he played through it, right, But yeah.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're I mean, he did play through it,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and they had a they had a chance to steal

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a game, and he he was I I am not.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I am known as like the like

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hot take negative guy. I might sometimes be known as

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the hot take positive guy. Mahomes is the greatest ever,

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's the greatest ever, like that, you know what I mean?

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Those types of things, And I think sometime people think

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of me as like the hot take trolling guy, like

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lamar James Harden thing, Like I know people that

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>rub people the wrong way. I get all that. I

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do not often come out and be like, that's one

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the worst performances I've ever seen. I'm just here

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. I went to bed last night thinking

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was that one of the worst Finals performances in NBA history?

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And I woke up this morning and I said, let

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>me check, and I checked and the answer was yeah.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The Lebron game that people will bring up to this

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>day the worst moment of his career Game five against Dallas.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>He was three for eleven, eight, nine and seven were

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>his stats. He had a five point nine game score.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Worst game of his career. Worst moment of his career

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as bad as that. The Kobe game that people

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>will bring up. In the two thousand Finals, he had

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a negative point four game score. He was four for

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty against the in a blowout loss to the Pacers.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>That one, I guess bothers me a little less because

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they were up three to one in a series they

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't lose. Wilt had an unbelievable Wilton sixty nine Wilt

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Chamberlain in nineteen sixty nine against old man Bill Russell.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>In Russell's final Championship, Wilt had a four point, an

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>eight point and an eight point game all in one finals,

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and one of those four point games he was only

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>one of six from the field. The eight point game

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he was one of five from the field. The yeah,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but to that is, in those three games where Wilt

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>scored four, eight, and eight, he had nineteen, thirty one

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen rebounds. So I'm like, okay, like you really

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything offensively. You did average twenty five rebounds

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a game. I don't really know. I didn't see those games.

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Bill Russell, you know, all time legendary guy,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't it. But if I am looking up

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like the historic, memorable worst lebron moment of his career,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the four for twenty Kobe game, the one of the

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>most famous Wilt series ever. Now again, you can say,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>those guys all are upper upper upper crust, top twelve

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>players of all time, you know, Hall of famers, and

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this Tyrese Halliburton, and I totally understand that, and so

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not holding him to that standard. What I'm saying

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is the best player on a team doing this in

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the finals does happen. It just doesn't even the Ray

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Allen game. He was the third option on that team.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You I guess you could argue second he was the

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>third option the Dennis Johnson in seventy eight. Is I

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the comp the issue with that one if that's

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the one like you want to use, because that, by

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the way, in fairness, was a Game seven that Dennis

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnson did that they came back to win the championship

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the next year, So it's like, oh, well that you

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>know that at least kind of makes up for it.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And so and I guess, listen, they maybe could yea,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>oh you know, no, no, no, so maybe they'll do

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that next year. He'll make up for it. But it

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>is It's on the shortest list of worst Finals performances

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>by a superstar ever. And not calling it that is

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>actually more disrespectful to Haliburton than what I'm doing right now,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you go on TV or on radio or

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast today and give him a pass, then

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is, ah, I I don't really I

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think of you as one of those guys because

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone else that is the the old guys. Steph lebron

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kd would get cracked if they had this game. The youngs,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Anthony Edwards, Shay Luca would not be allowed to

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>have this game. Jannis Joker, Jalen Brunson would not be

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have this game. And so is it an

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>indictment on his career? No do I think, though what demonds.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Every single player that you list are just so different

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 3>from this player specifically, like every.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Single one, like they they all the all the.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Players that you just listed might be more similar to

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>each other than Haliburton is to any of them, like,

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's just.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Like, if that's right, if that's already not.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The guys are passed first point guards.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Right like and if that's already his style. But it's

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll see what he does in the next game. You'll see.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing here. I get what you're saying, but

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he had thirteen assists. It's not like

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he like, so you're if it was just low scoring,

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>which is what it's been for him in a few

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of these finals games, you can deal with it. But

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>his assists, by the way, have been six, seven, eleven,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>great six six. The he he's turned the ball over

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>three plus times in all of these games. He didn't

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>get to the he didn't get to the line, which

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done. I mean, he has seven free throws

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this series. I I you're right, demons that and I

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about the other day how history says, man, if

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>your top guy is not a go get you a

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>bucket guy, if you don't have the best defense in basketball,

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>your name's not Magic Johnson, You're you're not winning the championship.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, But oh for six and four points

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in the finals is OH for six and four points

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in the finals. And if we can't, if we can't

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>call that for what it is, then I don't know.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to spend more time on it. But

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it is. It is as much of a no

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>show as you will see in a finals game by

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a superstar if you live a hundred years, it's what

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. And to have that come off the heels

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of them blowing Game four.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Again, I don't I'm not even one of the people

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't like Haliburton. So I don't love that. I

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious what other people are gonna say today.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm not like the face of like Anti

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Tyre's Halliburton it's not what I'm trying to be. But

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is the this is the part that will

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>probably make you, because you're naturally a bit of an impath, uncomfortable.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyre's Halliburton's gonna think of about these last

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>two games for the rest of his career because I

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I think the Pacers are going to

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be right back here. I don't know that, I don't know.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably the smart bet that Tyrese Halliburton

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that when his career is over, we look at the

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>two The two biggest games of his career were these

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>last two. And now, if Pacer fans are yelling, they

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are not anywhere close to there without him. Absolutely, it's

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>still an all time playoff run. You bet your ass.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He has imprinted himself on NBA history with the clutch

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>shots in this postseason and in thirty years when whoever

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the hell is going on an all time playoff run

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and the guy hits his third de facto buzzer beater

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs and people say this is the greatest

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>clutch shooting run in playoff history. Our AI over lords

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna pop a graphic that says, nope, Tyrese Haliburton

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>had four in one year, Like that's gonna happen. And

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but man, oh man, the flip side is in thirty

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>years when somebody has an over in a de facto

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>deciding game of the finals and people are like, has

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a team's best guy ever done that before? His name's

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna pop there too.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 3>When do we decide that he was the unanimous best

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 3>player on the Pacers? What about Pascal Siakam Oh?

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I think he's clearly the best player. I think everything

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>runs through him. I think it's like his style and

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>his and like Siakam's the best scorer. But I think

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>he's the best player the team. I mean, to me,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>that's it's fair. But that's that's not a to me,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not a question, all right. Ask a couple of

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these questions from the listeners or viewers.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 3>I guess Argent asked, do you regret having Holly in

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 3>club Superstar?

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>And is he still in the club?

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't regret it, and I and yes he's

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>still in the club. I I think that I think

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the twelve best players in the league.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>And he's had an unbelievable postseason.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>And he.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Carried a team that no one thought was going to

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>be in the finals to the finals. But I mean,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is this is really really, really really bad.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Ask Liam and Alden's questions.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Liam's in line with me. He says, why hog

0:24:58.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the ball when injured?

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I let's not hog the ball, man, Let's get a bucket.

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Get get one bucket. I'man again like the I mean

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I and also I the maybe I'm looking at the

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>injury different than you guys. I hit he had calf tightness.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean he almost did like the same thing that

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Paul George did. I feel like, like I want to say,

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 3>like hyperintended totally and Paul George is gone after that happened.

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I man, he but he was. He was running around

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like he did. This was not this was not og

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Nanobi in the playoffs last year against the Pacers, where

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>it's like I have a strained hamstring, I'm gonna go

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>out there and I'm limping up the court like I

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Man, that's a It's a tough one, all right, last.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 2>One for him?

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Move Adrian ass If you had to compare Halliburn's performance

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 3>yesterday with the recent postseason performance, but NFL quarterback.

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Which one would it be.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert's four picks? I mean, that's that's the answer,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Like the in a in a very winnable game that

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he threw four picks and didn't, But it would be

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it would have been that if briefly Justin Herbert left

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the game, his backup quarterback came in and started dealing,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and then he came back in and immediately threw another one.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not good, guys. All right, NBA Finals

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are here, at least for a little bit longer, and

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this really is your last chance to bet on the

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA until next season. Draftings Sportsbook, an official sports betting

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>partner of the NBA, is pulling out all the stops

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to make this a finals. To remember, one team will

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be crowned champ and the other maybe lost to history. Man,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who you got winning at all? Put your hoops expertise

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to the test. All season long, DraftKings has been the

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>go to spot for NBA player props and that doesn't stop.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to carry their team to the chip? Try

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>placing a bet on your personal MVP to drop thirty, forty,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe even fifty. Can you imagine if you had JDub

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to score forty last night. Holy moly. Ready to place

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>your first bet? Download Draftings Sportsbook Gap Now lock in

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>your bets, finish the season as a winner. Something special

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for first timers. New Draftings customers bet five dollars, get

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't miss your last chance to bet on the NBA

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this season. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook Gap and use code

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>right code right wrighd that's code right for new customers

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to get three hundred dollars in bonus bets if your

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>bet wins. When you bet five bucks only on DraftKings,

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Crown is yours.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 4>called eight seven seven eight open wire text hope and

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 4>wy at four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 4>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 4>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 4>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothillk

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 4>A Cinnamin resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent eligibility

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 4>varies by jurisdiction, Voyd and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 4>receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus bets

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 4>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue. In

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 4>four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG, dot

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 4>co slash audio.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, demons, let's get to the flip side of

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that coin. Jalen Williams.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Last night, Yeah, we talked about how the burdens little's

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about jadobs hies.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>He dropped forty yesterday.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to put that into context and being

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the second man and all that.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, listen, the example everyone's going to go

0:28:54.200 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to correctly is Kyrie twenty sixteen Game five. Lebron scored

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>forty one. Kyrie scored forty one in an all time

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>duo performance. This to me, I I'm not gonna this

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>was different than the Kyrie one in that SGA was

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like even in that Kyrie performance, I think for Lebron

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it was he had forty one eight and eleven and

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he had forty one sixteen and seven and back to

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>back games. I don't know which one was Game five

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and which one was Game six, but even in that game,

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Lebron was the driving force and Kyrie was right alongside him.

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>This game, j Dub as good as Shay was, and

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Shay was excellent. J Dubb was their best guy last night.

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I had heard somebody I forget who be like, man,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>could Jalen Williams be kind of this generation Scottie Pippen?

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And when I heard that, my initial reaction was that

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is so ridiculous and so disrespectful to Scotty. Now this

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be prisoner of the moment. He But

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>now I'm like, I don't know. Maybe Scotty's career playoff

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>high with Chicago career high was thirty two. He had

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he never scored forty in the playoffs. I know he

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>had one huge scoring game with Houston in the playoffs.

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember it, but it wasn't it was so high thirties.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>But with the Bulls. I looked it up this morning,

0:30:53.840 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it was thirty two. And now Scotty Jadob's an excellent defender.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not Scottie Pippen defensively, but I mean he's also

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>not a fully formed player yet. I Jalen Williams what

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he's his ARC is super fascinating and super fun to

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a positive way because Jalen Williams in

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. If someone wanted to say, why

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>did the thunder lose last year to the Maps other

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>than Luca was unbelievable and the MAVs shot the lights out.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>If your answer to that question is Jalen Williams didn't

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>show up, that's a fine answer. Last year Round two

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Maps, seventeen points a game on forty two

0:31:55.680 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>percent from the field, and his prime I Mary Guard

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>or one of them, Luca just lit them up right

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 1>for him to respond. And then this year in the

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets series in the same round, it looked like, uh oh,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is Jalen Williams gonna be one of those playoff guys,

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and not in a good way. When we saw him

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in that Game four that they ended up winning, he

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>goes two for thirteen. Game five, he's five for fourteen.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Game six, he's three for sixteen, and it's like, uh oh,

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna have sneakily a Jalen Williams problem. And

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>then Game seven of that series he was exceptional. And

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>then in these Finals, after two pretty non descript offensive games,

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he scored two twix on fifty percent in Game three,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven on forty four percent in Game four, and

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>forty on fifty percent in game five. And this is

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>another thing I looked up, like forty point games in

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the finals. Demonse, forty point games in the finals is

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty ever in NBA history. If we switch it to

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and then in fact, let me just leave that there

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>just for a second. So guys who are not on

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that list, Larry Bird not on that list. Tim Duncan

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not on that list. This one's not a big Oh

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Magic is on that list? Shout out Magic? Oh yeah,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, what am I thinking about? The most famous

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>game Magic s career, Game six, when he jump center

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>filling in for Kareem as a rookie, he scored forty

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>as a Magic as a rookie Game six, played center

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and scored forty And it was the only time you

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>ever scored forty in the finals. But so when we're

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about like all time, guys, a team not on

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that list, if we want to zero it in and

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I just switch it to, uh, if they're active or

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>not there we go, let me click active, yes, get

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>results all of the active players with forty point finals games.

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's got the second most all time with eight. Second

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, two. If it's not Michael demons, I'm

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw this one at you.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Well no, I was talking to myself, but now I'm

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw it to you. It's Jordan's got six, Lebron

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>got eight.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.959
<v Speaker 2>So it's so Lebron's two, Jordan's three, and then there's

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 2>this number one.

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Game correct, correct. So I'm gonna give you one hint.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is is final, Final Finals.

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a hint. He's a guy that,

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of months, all of a sudden,

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we didn't impromptu like eight minutes on his career, and

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>how great but unlucky he won.

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>It's us, is it? Russ? No, no, no, ok great but unlucky.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Jerry West Oh, Jerry Oh yeah.

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Jerry West as has ten Okay. But here is the

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>full list of active players with a forty point Finals

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>game Bron eight, Giannis three, Kyrie, Steph Booker shout out

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Booker two each, and then one apiece Russ so you

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>were close, Kevin Durant, Jimmy Butler, Chris Middleton, Joker, Jalen Williams.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the list. So that's remarkable. I mean, that is

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>utterly and thoroughly remarkable. It is it is in line

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with and the best example of that performance is the

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Middleton game. And I should have mentioned this before

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the Kyrie game, the game down to one

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Suns, the game that is famous for the

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yiannis block on eighton Chris Middleton dropped forty on fifteen

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of thirty three from the field. And similarly to how

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Shay was really good but not exceptional Giannis twenty six,

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and eight and that blocks, I mean, that's might

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be exceptional. That's pretty damn good, but you know, didn't

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 1>match his score it And so if I this, doing

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it as a second option is just such a special

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and unique thing. And I'm that's the only he's the

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>only guy on that list. Well, fairs Fair Russ in

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve would have been the other one. Russ he

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>had forty three on a you know, Durant obviously was

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on the team, so he would be the other of

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the active guys. That was a true and Kyrie, who

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, a true second option to go out

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>there and drop forty And it really does for a

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>kid who just turned twenty four and is an awesome

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>two way player for him to get better and better

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and explode offensively like this. That is the type of

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes you incredibly optimistic about what. Yeah, the

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>thunder future. Another like all time game by a team's

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>not their best player, the famous James Worthy game that

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of I don't want to say got him the

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>nickname Big Game James. Oh you know what that game?

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, I'm looking at it now. That's not the

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>game where he's because Worthy scored forty in a finals loss.

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Worthy had some big ones, but his only forty point

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>game was a finals loss, And so like Kobe as

0:38:54.640 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>great as Kobe was young Kobe, I mean scored forty

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>with Shack. He scored forty once in the finals, and

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it was when he the first championship they won without Shack.

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a special thing this kid just did, and you

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>have to raise the ceiling of what they and he

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>can be because of it.

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Like, well ahead with that game that he just had.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 3>If Shae where to like say, okay, see wins the

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 3>next game they win the finals, Jadab drops like thirty six,

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven or something. Shae drops like twenty two to

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty three points. You think there's a chance Shadeo gets

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 3>finals MVP over Shae.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So I saw that percolating. That to me would be crazy, Like,

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that right now. In the series, Shae

0:39:56.320 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is averaging thirty two, five and five with two and

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a half steals in two blocks. Jadab is averaging twenty six,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>six and four with one steal a game and zero blocks,

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and Shay's been more efficient. So I think that.

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Hard to do.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it would take kind of what you described,

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if listen, it's it's only seven or nine voters,

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's in the heat of the moment, you just vote

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for one name. So is there a scenario like if

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Jadub goes out and drops thirty five plus again and

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Shaye is Shae? Would the thing is this? And I

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think this can happen. Really, Shaye would have to

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>be bad like Shaye would. They would have to win

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>despite shit, Yeah, he'd have to have like fourteen Like

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>could you imagine if he was like zero for six

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with four points? Well, that's impossible and so like I

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't right now, I would say Shaye has

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to be minus one thousand for maybe that maybe you

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>guys can look that up for finals MVP, And so

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I I don't I get it, But I think Shae

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I also am of the belief demands that if it's

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>close and right now, it's not close. Right now, it

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is clear right now if the it's last night was

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the clinching game, yeah it should be. Also, she is

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>only minus five point fifty and the thunder to win

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the series or what like minus fifteen hundred or something,

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>so that they're saying it's closer than I think it is.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But if it is close, I think the best player

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>should get it. And right now I don't think it.

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's close. All right? What are some

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>follow ups before we get to.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.959
<v Speaker 3>How comfortable do you think okay See should be going

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 3>into this next game comfortable at all?

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be quite comfortable. De Monsey, I

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think the Pacers know they missed their shot.

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I hope that's not how they feel.

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think they absolutely have a shot with

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 3>this next game being at home. I mean, hopefully the

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Hallerbird injury isn't getting everybody's head. You know, you've got

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 3>a couple days to rest, got him at home. Those

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 3>role players for okay See, or like night and day

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to playing in Oklahoma or Indiana.

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So listen, I've underestimated Indiana every step of the way,

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so you might be right now. I mean, I also,

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if Oklahoma City wins Game six, it will so validate

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>why Bet of the Year was Bet of the year.

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>They lose a game on a buzzer beater. The Pacers

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are playing better than anyone could have possibly expected. TJ.

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>McConnell has a game, Benedict Mathern has a game. Like,

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all of these things happen, and Bet of the Year

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>still comes in.

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 2>If you're hedging, you know you can't.

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Really, here's the thing. It's very very difficult. Not that

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I would, but it's very very difficult to hedge minus

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>odds bets. This was a minus two sixty ish bet

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to begin with. So now all of a sudden, like

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and and so now I'm gonna bet the Pacers plus

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what's the Let me look the Pacers on

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the money line for Game six. I mean, I'm not

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. No, I was gonna through, but there's

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>no chance I'm doing it. And so no, this is better.

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The year was better the year for a reason, boys

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and girls. Now I will tell you Friday night in

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Miami watching Game four, the bet of the Year was

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:17.240
<v Speaker 1>dead because is the Pacers were gonna win that game.

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And I still think the Pacers are going to look

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>back on They had four consecutive possessions demand at the

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the third quarter of Game four, up ten,

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>where the Thunder had gone empty trips four straight times,

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was a McConnell miss back to back top

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and missed free throws and then two Siaka misses, and

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it just felt like that was their moment to take

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the game and maybe take control of the series, and

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't do it. All right, let's move on to

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder as villain's theory.

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, so you know how about that? So you

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 2>know how every time a team gets.

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Good or there's the threat of a dynasty, everybody starts

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to hate him. You know, Shay's Foal Bayden in Indiana

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 3>being a leveable team and then beating him. How long

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 3>do you think it'll take for fans to start hating Okay, see.

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to It's very hard to go

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from uh apathy to hate, and I I apathy is

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>too strong. But I don't think there's a ton of

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>people right now that have super passionate opinions about the

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Thunder in a negative or positive direction other than obviously

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>their fans, and like die hard basketball fans that just

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate what they've built and who they are. So

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I like this. At one point won three championships in

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>five years. They were never hated at least I don't

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>think they were. And by the way, as far as Foubating,

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I know he wasn't their best player, but nobody was

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in NBA history was more guilty of that than Manu.

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Wait wait, wait oh the Falbating You said, ye, yes,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Spurs is just a different team. I feel like, okay

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 3>sees those guys are just monotone to me. I don't know,

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Like you can't listen right, So that you're saying that

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the thunder Avenue.

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 2>More personality, very.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Gen z, I mean, yes, they are very They would

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>be our first true gen Z champion, and in god,

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if they're even are they Zoomers.

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if they're gen Z, Like I'm

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not even sure, like uh, and so or is it

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>jenn Alfa, I don't even know, but uh, but I

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think I also, and you thought I was premature

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>when I did this after Game five of the Western

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Conference I'm sorry East after game after game four of

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference finals, when I did the thunder winning

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the championship of pump the breaks on the dynasty talk,

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't premature. They are winning the championship, and I

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>still say pump the breaks on the dynasty talk with

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the caveat of let's see how much better Jadab can get,

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because I am not just like I am not going

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to underreact to Shay's performance last night, I'm not going

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to underreact to Jadab's performance either. Uh, And I think

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that is a stop you in your tracks. Wait a

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>minute here, what can this guy be at twenty four

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>years old when he does this type of moment. It's

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>forty points in the finals. Again, thirty guys ever have

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>done it forty points as a second option in the finals,

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Russ, James Worthy, Chris Middleton, and we're close to

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the list. So that is that's something

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 1>really really special. All right, So let's let's ask some

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of these chat questions before him move on.

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 3>TS, do you think Shay is essentially what Jordan would

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 3>look like in the modern NBA just more shifty, but

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.439
<v Speaker 3>less athletic and not the best guy in the league,

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 3>but like top five.

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>No, listen, Michael Jordan would be the best guy in

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the league right now. Yeah like that. I mean, guys,

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you're Jenna. I understand that. I think Jordan's legend might

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be a little overstated. But prime Kareem and prime Lebron

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are not active in the league. So I am couple

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>saying Michael Jordan, like prime Michael Jordan would pretty comfortably

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be the best player in the league. So that's first

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of all. Second of all, I am very I do

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>think there are I think that's a fair comp like

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a killer in the mid range, But Jordan's prime Jordan's

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan before the first retirement. His athleticism was just so unbelievable,

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and like Shay is more, you know, more of an artist.

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, uh and so but I understand the I

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>understand the point. I like Scott's question.

0:49:57.719 --> 0:49:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Scott says, well, SGA in spar king A to want

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to be basketball players more than ever before.

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I bet if the MVP of the league and champions

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>from your country, like that's one of the great things

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about the game expanding and the you saw once the

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>NBA got some stars or not even necessarily stars, just

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>big time players from Eastern Europe. We're getting getting paid

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the dividends now. Dream comes over the NBA puts a

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>real investment in Africa, that we're getting paid the dividends now,

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, I mean I would imagine, I you know,

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Steve Nash had a real impact on this as well,

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, I mean I think I think that

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>when you have a true superstar from a place that

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>otherwise wasn't producing stars, that yeah, that there is a groundswell.

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no there's no doubt about that. All right.

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This message applies to ninety nine percent of you listening

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, because that's how many of you can be

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>covered by fast and reliable service on the Boost Mobile

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>network with ninety nine percent nationwide coverage. And if you

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think you deserve a deal, listen up. You got

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:19.720
<v Speaker 1>another thing coming right now. When you switch to Boost Mobile,

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get iPhone fifteen with Dynamic Island and a

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>forty eight megapixel main camera for ninety nine ninety nine.

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>That's ninety nine dollars and ninety nine cents for iPhone

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:37.919
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on a nationwide five G network. This may only

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>apply to ninety nine percent of you, but I'm one

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent positive. Boost Mobile just gave all of us

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a really amazing deal in store offer. Thirty five dollars.

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Device setup fee may apply, requires credit qualification, ID verification

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and activation on sixty dollars plan taxes. Extra five G

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 1>speeds not available in all areas. All right, let's get

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to some of the NBA trade stuff before we get

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to lying media beefs and the future of the Republic

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. So go ahead to mind.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 3>NBA trade season has opened up. Memphis traded Desmond Bane

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to Orlando for Contavious Cabo, Pope, Cole Anthony, four first rounders,

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 3>and a swap. So now the Magic have the fifth

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:26.919
<v Speaker 3>best odds to win the East next year.

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Where's your reaction to this trade?

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, bunch of quick hitters. First one is this

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a low key diss of the Pacers. Here's what

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Because they're saying we could take the East right now, right,

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:40.720
<v Speaker 2>They're saying.

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Magic are like, well, Paul is our guy. Yeah,

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>if Indiana can do it, why can't we? So like,

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I I'm not exaggerating when I say I

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think this trade happens if Jason Tatum doesn't tear

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as Achilles, honestly, Like, I know that sounds silly, but

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Magic look at it and they're like, Okay,

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Paolo is gonna take a step. We like Franz, we

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>could not shoot at all. Let's go for it. I also,

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I am not as certain. I know there's been some reporting that, oh,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies, they're not making any more moves though they're

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>standing pat with Triple J and Jaw eh maybe and

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Brew and I talked of this yesterday. He's like, well,

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>do you really want to sell low on Jaw? And

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the question is do you think this is selling low

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or even because here's now the new problem with Jaw.

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Even if he has cleaned up everything off the court,

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know if he has, but let's say

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:55.399
<v Speaker 1>he has, he now has a different red flag, which

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is the injury stuff. He missed a bunch of time

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. He got hurt in the playoffs again, Like,

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so you might be selling low or it might you know,

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it might only feel low now compared to where he

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of years ago, but will feel high

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to where he is a year from now. So

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think the Magic are real, a

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>real threat in the East. If Paolo takes one more

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>little step forward. They needed shooting, they now have shooting.

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Here's my other reaction to this trade, demonse, So what's

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin reevesworth if Desmond Bane is worth four first rounders?

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Because I know KCP is a negative value contract, so

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of those first rounders was to take CACP

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>off their hands. So then it's three first rounders in

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a swap. You also got Cole Anthony and those first

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>rounders are not nothing like, they're not gold. But it's

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the sixteenth pick this year. It's a weird like triple

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 1>swap between Washington and Phoenix. Next year it'll probably it'll

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>will probably end up being Phoenix's first round pick next

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>year that should be top half of the draft, and

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>then unprotected Orlando twenty eight and thirty and any team's

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 1>unprotected thirty is interesting because the NBA is so crazy

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because things change. So those picks aren't fake first rounders,

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:48.240
<v Speaker 1>none of them are, like you know, an unprotected Utah

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. I like, it's not, holy shit, this

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a top five pick guaranteed. But they're

0:55:55.960 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not. I would say they are good, not great

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 1>first rounders. And if that's what Desmond Baine gets you,

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 1>then is the Lakers real path to getting a center?

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>A three team trade where I will use Utah as

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an example where Utah doesn't want Austin Reeves because they,

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't want to compete yet. But you flip

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves to a team that does want him, that

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>has a bunch of picks. Those picks go to Utah

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and Walker Kessler goes to the Lakers. Like, if that

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if Desmond Baine's worth four first round picks, Austin Reeves

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>worth three and a half first round picks, Like, is

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:53.799
<v Speaker 1>it is it fair? Tell me if you disagree with

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:57.359
<v Speaker 1>me to Monse? Is it fair to say Baine and

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Reeves are the same tier of player? Different players? Yeah,

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 1>but like if we're ranking players, they're within a few

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>spots of each other. Bain's a better defender and a

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>way better shooter. Reeves is a better shot creator and

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a better driver to the basket like Bin's on four years,

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:21.479
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty five million left on his deal.

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Reeves has one year, thirteen million left on his deal,

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which just means you're gonna have to extend him for

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty five plus million a year. Probably So

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I So, I think that if Mikale Bridges goes for

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 1>five firsts and Bain goes for four firsts, then the

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 1>price of cost controlled relatively quality top fifty but not

0:57:56.000 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 1>top twenty five players has been set. Uh, And I

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know it. It is a lot. And I also though,

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I know. Listen, the Luca trade was obviously a disaster.

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but people were like, you get four

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>first for Desmond Baine and one first for Luca. You

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>got Anthony fucking Davis with Luca.

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I was just conversation with producer this morning, like I.

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't understand, like the I'm if they wanted, I'm you

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten I'm sure five first for Anthony Davis.

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you're Dallas, you would have felt better if

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you got six first round picks. But no, Anthony Davis

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and Max Christy was probably worth one first round pick,

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like you got two players in the deal. And so

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>KCP on his two years forty million left on his

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>deal is worth a negative first round pick. Cole Anthony

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is probably worth just less than a first round pick.

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So those two kind of cross each other out. Uh so, yeah,

0:58:57.360 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Luca trade something different entirely. All right,

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:03.240
<v Speaker 1>let's do Kevin Durant before we get to the other stuff.

0:59:03.600 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Durant has preferences. He would like to be in Houston,

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 3>San Antonio, or Miami. Sham's reporter, he doesn't want to

0:59:11.240 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 3>be in Minnesota with his boy Mark Spears report of

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Katie Kity wanted to go to the Knicks, but they

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 3>weren't interested for some reason, being said that.

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 2>They'll take the best deal available. How do you think think?

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you think? How do you think things change

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:28.520
<v Speaker 2>for Katie in the market so far? I'm sorry for

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the mill, You're fine.

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Bay trade impacts Kevin Durant's trade much.

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 1>They're just such. One guy's ten years younger than the other.

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>One guy's on a contract that you know exactly what

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it is. The other guy's got a year left but

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>probably wants to extend. And if you trade for him,

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to extend him, but you have to make

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>for two years one twenty. You got to make sure

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll do it. You know, the Magic are taking a

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>long view of things. Whoever trades for Durant, you have

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to feel like you can win. Right now, I just

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think Houston makes the most sense. Uh. I think that

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Katie wants to live in the cold,

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that might be one of the reasons

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not high on Minnesota. And I know every like

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone's gonna mock Kevin Durant for that.

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>I I don't know man Minnesota.

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I for being like, oh like, I just I

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there's the so like in our business, right,

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>let me just defend Kevin. If it's true Katie doesn't

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go to Minnesota, and it's just like I

1:00:35.920 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to live in Minnesota. I want to live

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in Texas where I went to college, or I want

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to live in Miami because that's sweet. Here's the defense

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of Kevin Durant on that. Okay, in our business sports talk, right,

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>there's hubs in LA, hubs in New York City, and

1:00:55.920 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a hub in Bristol, Connecticut. LA is also New York's awesome.

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bristol Connecticut is Bristol, Connecticut. I'm not just you know,

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>small town and not a lot to do other than

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the As Dan Patrick put it, the mothership

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is there. Guess what, guys, every single person that has

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>found themselves with enough juice that was working in Bristol

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>got moved, Like every single one. Greeney wanted to be

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in New York. They went to New York. Will Bond

1:01:36.480 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and Corneiser were like, we're staying in DC if we're

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the show. They did it. Levittard was like, I'll

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>come to you, guys, but I'm staying in Miami. They

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>built a thing in la Like Scott Van Pelt was like, guys,

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do the eleven BM Sports Center. I'm gonna

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be awesome at it. I'm also from Maryland. I'd like

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to live there, like.

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>You got it.

1:01:57.680 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Like there's the people who have like options on this stuff.

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The usually end up. Where they live is a big

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>part of what they use their juice for. So Kevin

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Durant at the end of his career is like, man,

1:02:14.800 --> 1:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to live in Minnesota. I don't And

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's what it is or not,

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but if it, everyone's like that would be ridiculous. I

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't find that ridiculous. I would like I would understand it,

1:02:28.600 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and I understand Durant doesn't have, you know, a wife

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and kids, but he's still got people. I'm sure, people

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know kind of move where he moves and

1:02:39.840 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that.

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Like if we're like five ten years ago, I think

1:02:43.200 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 3>it would have been crazy. I don't think crazy, but

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>it would be like just because of the weather man

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to live in the cast, right.

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if you would never want a championship, or if

1:02:53.160 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you had been kind of an underachiever or any of

1:02:56.320 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those like, but if he looks at me, it's like, man,

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there is about as good of a chance

1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to win a title next year, the Cup, next couple

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of years in Minnesota, San Antonio or Houston. So uh,

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>send me to the place that's the state I went

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to college has better, whether you know is I'm more

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>comfortable no state taxes, whatever it is now. The Miami thing,

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I would look a slight a scance at because I

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>just feel like you can't win. But maybe you'd be like,

1:03:29.880 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the East, I can win. So I don't know, like,

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think Houston should be the team that doesn't.

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Jalen Green plus a guy, I said Dylan Brooks.

1:03:42.640 --> 1:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I know other people have said Jabari Smith. I try

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep Jabari and give Phoenix back the pick of

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>theirs that you have. And I think Phoenix with that

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>coach with if you just just think about Houston this

1:03:56.160 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>year with Kevin Durant, that series against the Warriors, even

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>place of Jalen Green was Kevin Durant. I mean that's

1:04:08.240 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a that defense. Shingoon be in the hub of everything.

1:04:12.120 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a real thing. So I would like Houston. It

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like some people think Scham's like body language like

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>told us it was the Spurs. I don't know that.

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying that. The Spurs are certainly an option. Also

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the argument of hey, Katie's bad at picking his teams.

1:04:29.760 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know, he picked the Nets, it didn't work.

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>He picked the Suns. It was a disaster, so you

1:04:35.920 --> 1:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>should send him where he doesn't want to go. That

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds good, but teams are only gonna want him if

1:04:41.800 --> 1:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be there, because if you trade for him,

1:04:44.040 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to sign the extension. Okay, Demonse, you're sticking around,

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>are you leaving?

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna watch it. I'm gonna. I'm gonna watch it later.

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you're gonna.

1:04:55.040 --> 1:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You're out of here, all right, demons out, Thank you pal.

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal. So I am going to talk

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Steven A. Smith Solitaire thing, but it's going

1:05:18.880 --> 1:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to be quite the bridge I build to get there,

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to have to deal with what I'm

1:05:26.440 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>sure some of you will think are is a lot

1:05:33.400 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of political commentary. It's not a lot, but all of

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you will think is some. And so it's kind of,

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, got to eat your vegetables to get the

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>dessert at the end of the meal. But we're going

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a real conversation for I don't know tenish

1:05:53.840 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes here about a scary direction to me the country

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is heading in which the country is heading, And I

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>promise I'm not being over dramatic in my view when

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I say that. So I think right now, the single

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem in our country is lying. I saw a

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>couple months ago a tweet that was like a long

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>form tweet talking about how we need to get back

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to treating outright lies as moral degeneracy. And I've thought

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about that tweet probably one hundred times since I saw it,

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because I one hundred percent agree, and here's why. And

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>here's why I think it's important for us that we

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>make outright line, not shading, not presenting facts in a

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>way that they're most beneficial to you, but outright, bald faced,

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>undeniable lies need to be a subject of shame and

1:07:29.880 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ridicule once again, because while a lot of people of

1:07:37.320 --> 1:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different political stripes, for very different reasons,

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>feel we're in a dangerous place in this country, our

1:07:50.200 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>collective inability to agree upon singular truths, actual facts that

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>did or that, facts that are or aren't true, events

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that did or did not happen, and any a lack

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of any real societal or media pressure to stay true

1:08:18.120 --> 1:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to objective facts, especially when we're in the midst of

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a fledgling age of deep fakes and real actual fake news,

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:39.759
<v Speaker 1>and artificial intelligence and different things that can really paw

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:43.879
<v Speaker 1>at our conception of reality in a way our brains

1:08:44.000 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>probably are not yet fully equipped to deal with. I

1:08:50.960 --> 1:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>think as a society, our moving away from the way

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>debates work on. Everyone agrees what happened, but then we

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>argue about what should be done about it, moving to

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a all of the time that should be spent arguing

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about what should be done is actually spent litigating what

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>actually has already occurred. Is incredibly damaging and incredibly dangerous,

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and it wrecks our ability to live in a collective reality.

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And no matter where you stand politically on anything, this

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>should be scary, okay. And so that is the premise

1:09:55.720 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with which I am going to explain to you why,

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and eventually we will get to solitaire why I have

1:10:07.520 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not talked at all about something that I personally have

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>found horrifying. Seems like you know about half the country

1:10:19.160 --> 1:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as as well, and half the country hasn't. But I

1:10:21.720 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't said a word about it. And that's the ice

1:10:28.479 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 1>raids and the different things that are been happening to

1:10:35.479 --> 1:10:39.759
<v Speaker 1>immigrants in this country. The reason I have not talked

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about that, and some people are like, Nick, you have platform,

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you have strong opinions, you have you know, a voice

1:10:49.360 --> 1:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that matters or doesn't.

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:10:52.280 --> 1:10:58.479
<v Speaker 1>The reason I have stayed out of that is because

1:10:58.560 --> 1:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as I hate it and I think it's

1:11:04.360 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>anathema to what America is supposed to be, and I

1:11:10.000 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it has been lawless, it is

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they said they were going to do, and

1:11:23.320 --> 1:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I do believe in democracy. I don't believe that the

1:11:31.800 --> 1:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>election was rigged.

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Or.

1:11:35.760 --> 1:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Voting centers were hacked or anything of that nonsense. I

1:11:40.040 --> 1:11:46.799
<v Speaker 1>think the guy who said we're gonna deport twenty million people,

1:11:47.920 --> 1:11:51.519
<v Speaker 1>as insane as that sounded to me, and kept saying it,

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and at the rallies they had signs that said mass deportations.

1:11:56.320 --> 1:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Now all of it. I think that guy won as

1:12:00.280 --> 1:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>much as I hate it. In a way, they're just

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>doing what they said they were going to do, and

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we had a contest to see if people liked that idea,

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, that guy won. So it feels

1:12:18.920 --> 1:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it has felt to me a little set like almost

1:12:21.320 --> 1:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sour grapesie for me, in my position, who's not a

1:12:26.040 --> 1:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>political commentator by trade, to talk about that a lot

1:12:30.080 --> 1:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>or at all, because it has felt like, well, they

1:12:35.280 --> 1:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to do it, and they're doing it.

1:12:37.880 --> 1:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So we can fight back against it, but we can't

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>say we didn't see this coming. But I do find

1:12:47.120 --> 1:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it abhorrent, and I find it so important that I

1:12:54.320 --> 1:13:01.799
<v Speaker 1>find anyone in bed with them or aiding and abetting.

1:13:02.520 --> 1:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the packaging of it uh to be a

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>real sting and a staying on the country that I

1:13:10.439 --> 1:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we're gonna quickly recover from. And so

1:13:17.200 --> 1:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with all that said, and with everything that's happened over

1:13:22.920 --> 1:13:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the last few months, the thing in relation to these

1:13:30.360 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>raids and deportations and the military and the streets and

1:13:34.160 --> 1:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>all of that that really struck a chord with me

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was not when Senator Alex Padilla got you know, kind

1:13:54.160 --> 1:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of shoved and then pushed to the ground and handcuffed,

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but that the response to that, despite it being on

1:14:06.200 --> 1:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>video and everyone knew it was on video, the response

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was blatant line and everyone just accepted that that, oh,

1:14:17.000 --> 1:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, that the immediate message was he lunged at

1:14:26.360 --> 1:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Gnome and that he quote never identified himself, and

1:14:32.760 --> 1:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as he identified himself, he was you know, unhanded. No,

1:14:41.680 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and none of that was true, and they knew that

1:14:46.439 --> 1:14:49.679
<v Speaker 1>none of that was true, but they said it anyway.

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:55.679
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not that I'm more bothered by one

1:14:55.880 --> 1:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>United States senator being roughed up than I am by

1:15:00.840 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of people being deported or anything like that.

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's that one thing was, Hey, we're gonna do this

1:15:13.160 --> 1:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if we win the election. We won the election. We're

1:15:14.960 --> 1:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it. The other one was just fiction, and it

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was fiction that they knew. They they felt they could

1:15:21.760 --> 1:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>get away with because they felt that either people are

1:15:24.760 --> 1:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>numb to it or in an effort to both sides everything,

1:15:31.200 --> 1:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>folks will justify it, or they won't flatly call it

1:15:35.000 --> 1:15:44.439
<v Speaker 1>what it was, which is degenerate line. And so when

1:15:44.479 --> 1:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I then saw a guy who I have always really respected,

1:15:55.640 --> 1:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy who I've always liked, a guy who I've

1:15:59.240 --> 1:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>always had a good relationship with, that last of which

1:16:04.040 --> 1:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is sadly probably in the past tense at this point,

1:16:07.920 --> 1:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not, Steven A use his massive platform to

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially kiss the ass of the people who were lying

1:16:30.360 --> 1:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>about what happened to Senator Padilla, didn't care that they

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:39.439
<v Speaker 1>were lying about it, and abandoned any obligation, in my eyes,

1:16:39.520 --> 1:16:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to truth or fairness in just a relentless pursuit of

1:16:45.479 --> 1:16:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a bigger and bigger tent and larger and larger audience

1:16:48.760 --> 1:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and more eyeballs. I found it just awful, And I'm like, really,

1:17:02.720 --> 1:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>your takeaway from this was he should have acted with

1:17:08.200 --> 1:17:11.759
<v Speaker 1>more decorum, which, by the way, is a fine opinion

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to have. I suppose, but everyone's takeaway, the top takeaway

1:17:17.720 --> 1:17:23.599
<v Speaker 1>should have been they're lying and we saw it, and

1:17:23.640 --> 1:17:26.599
<v Speaker 1>they know we saw it, and we know they're lying,

1:17:27.000 --> 1:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and they don't care. And then you saw an even

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>more egregious example by the Utah Senator Mike Lee on

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter this past few days after those horrific political assassinations

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota, just outright lying about what happened there, and

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>folks barely noticed because we've become numb to it. We

1:17:52.360 --> 1:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>become numb to the fact that folks with all the

1:17:54.360 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>power that we've been trusted so much society and are

1:17:57.640 --> 1:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>unrepent liars. And this part, I think is important, lying

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>without actually hoping to get away with it. It's not like, oh,

1:18:09.120 --> 1:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna know, it's that they know they're gonna

1:18:12.680 --> 1:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be called liars. They don't care because there is no

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>damage right now to being a liar, and they just

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>want to muddy the waters enough that people can then

1:18:23.720 --> 1:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>claim there's a disagreement or a debate or confusion about

1:18:27.960 --> 1:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened, and they don't have to confront any real truth,

1:18:34.479 --> 1:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>which oddly and hilariously brings us to Solitaire, because here

1:18:46.560 --> 1:18:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is the truth. I and I don't think many people

1:18:53.680 --> 1:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>actually give a shit that stephen A was playing solitaire,

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>don't I think that it was just an easy way

1:19:05.400 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to hit a guy that they don't like. And I

1:19:09.360 --> 1:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>do think it's objectively funny that it's solitaire. But he

1:19:15.760 --> 1:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>would have been just as distracted if he was doing

1:19:18.479 --> 1:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>online banking or sports betting or on Twitter. The sin

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of not being locked in on the game would have

1:19:28.080 --> 1:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>been just as it would have been just the same,

1:19:31.920 --> 1:19:35.519
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't have been as memorable or as you know,

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>just objectively funny. And so people are I think, feigning

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of outrage about how awful it was that

1:19:46.160 --> 1:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>during a game he wasn't locked in because they don't

1:19:50.960 --> 1:19:54.599
<v Speaker 1>like him. So and I don't really care. It's funny

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and solitaire of all the games, like if you were

1:19:56.920 --> 1:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>playing chess. Some people were like, oh, how about that.

1:20:02.479 --> 1:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>My issue is with the response because the response was

1:20:12.680 --> 1:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>instantaneous and easily disprovable as a lie during a time out,

1:20:26.760 --> 1:20:33.559
<v Speaker 1>knowing he's a very smart guy, knowing uh, if someone

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>took a picture, someone might have a video, they have

1:20:36.320 --> 1:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a video, the court might be in it, or sound

1:20:39.080 --> 1:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>might be on or someone or in the picture. Everyone

1:20:43.280 --> 1:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>in front of me is standing. Even in the still picture,

1:20:47.040 --> 1:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it sure looks like the game is going on. But

1:20:52.000 --> 1:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so the response just lie because who cares. And then

1:20:55.320 --> 1:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>even when it's the video comes out and it's clear

1:20:59.240 --> 1:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you lied, turn it into your own joke and meme

1:21:03.360 --> 1:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and move on because ah the truth, you know, And

1:21:12.800 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually is the lying or at least what I

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>would call not as a greevous but lying to Jason

1:21:19.000 --> 1:21:22.559
<v Speaker 1>behavior is what really caused my first tete a tet

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with steven A, which was I thought it was that's

1:21:26.120 --> 1:21:30.559
<v Speaker 1>not lying, to be fair, but a misrepresentation of the

1:21:30.640 --> 1:21:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Lebron stuff and a misrepresentation of what Lebron was mad about,

1:21:35.640 --> 1:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and a misrepresentation of you know, things that have been

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>said in the past. And so here's the sad thing

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for me is I don't like I said. I I

1:21:55.720 --> 1:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have always had a really uh positive even though we've

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>never worked together, a relationship with steven A. He's always

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been very kind to me. He's said nice things about

1:22:08.600 --> 1:22:13.519
<v Speaker 1>the show. He is very tight with brew and I

1:22:13.640 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>do think there are a lot of things about his

1:22:16.840 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>sportscasting that are unfairly maligned, and I've said as much

1:22:22.360 --> 1:22:27.519
<v Speaker 1>and I would imagine he probably is not gonna listen

1:22:27.520 --> 1:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to this whole thing. And I don't know if you

1:22:29.160 --> 1:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to this whole thing or just a clip, if

1:22:31.960 --> 1:22:38.559
<v Speaker 1>it would be better or worse, But regardless, but I

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>am I I am certainly not making my life easier here. Uh.

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But now that Stephen A has decided two, at this

1:22:59.800 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>moment in this country, in our history, to swim in

1:23:06.200 --> 1:23:10.519
<v Speaker 1>real political waters, and he wants to have a real

1:23:10.680 --> 1:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>political voice, whether or not he ever runs for office,

1:23:14.680 --> 1:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>which I would doubt, but I do think he will

1:23:20.040 --> 1:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have real impacts when we're talking about, you know, the

1:23:23.280 --> 1:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>left needing a Joe Rogan and the impact of podcasts

1:23:27.240 --> 1:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and media and all of it, and he is dove

1:23:34.960 --> 1:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>headfirst into these discussions. I think it's important that those

1:23:43.240 --> 1:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>people are held accountable. And I think that in a

1:23:47.320 --> 1:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>time where we cannot rely on the people who have

1:23:55.840 --> 1:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>actual power and our elected officials to give two shits

1:24:01.920 --> 1:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about what is or isn't the truth, what is or

1:24:07.920 --> 1:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't reality, what is or isn't easily disprovable, I think

1:24:15.880 --> 1:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it is.

1:24:17.960 --> 1:24:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And you have.

1:24:21.080 --> 1:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>In concert with it what I would call a lot

1:24:25.000 --> 1:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of very very gullible media of which I am not

1:24:30.160 --> 1:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lumping stephen A in at all, who just the last

1:24:35.280 --> 1:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>thing they were told is what they believe and can

1:24:42.280 --> 1:24:46.599
<v Speaker 1>be duped and tricked when you have those things going on,

1:24:48.880 --> 1:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is wildly important for people of which

1:24:58.160 --> 1:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I am. I check all these boxes. I

1:25:01.640 --> 1:25:12.599
<v Speaker 1>think Steven A checks all these boxes. Smart, more often

1:25:12.640 --> 1:25:20.759
<v Speaker 1>than not, on the right side of important things, knows

1:25:20.880 --> 1:25:28.559
<v Speaker 1>what truth actually is, and has the ability to really

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>move people with their words that those people move us

1:25:38.479 --> 1:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>back in a direction where we have at the very

1:25:42.320 --> 1:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>least a collective dedication to the truth mattering. And right

1:25:52.080 --> 1:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>now we're losing that one game of Solitaire at a time.

1:25:58.680 --> 1:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess talk to you guys Thursday. We'll train