WEBVTT - Draft Show: Pet Cat Talk; Making A Splash? 0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.560 Did. He's the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Cowboys 0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:09.880 on the our war room for incenter news and draft 0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.960 analysis from deep within the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at 0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:19.040 the Star in Fresco, Dallas Cowboys Select Elliot and now 0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:25.239 your hosts Dane Brugler, David Hellman, and Brian brought us. Well, 0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.920 we welcome you to the SWBC Mortgage Studios. You got 0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.120 the Draft show. Brian brought us here with Dane Brugler, 0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:37.000 David Hellman, King Garrison, Executive Producing. Why don't I start 0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.720 off the show bad pre show? Why don't I let 0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.559 people make me mad? That's just a thing that you 0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.760 do in life, like you just let people get you mad. 0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.599 You're easily riled. You're gonna set up for a nice 0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.440 show though, you got the fire in you. It's a 0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.360 good thing. Yeah, No, I you know what at not again, 0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.720 I'm I'm watching people out there talk about what they 0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.080 would do at nineteen and what they wouldn't do. And 0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.200 you know, and I respect what you're saying. You wouldn't 0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:09.039 take an offensive lineman at nineteen. I wouldn't philosophy to 0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.080 set this up. This is the argument we're having in 0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.080 the studio before the show. Yeah, I mean Brian, Brian 0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.080 and a number of people are very vocal in their 0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.559 belief that an offensive guard would be a good call 0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.000 at the nineteenth overall. Yeah. And then there's the other 0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.520 side of that argument that Dane tends to fall more on, 0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.000 that says it's not the best value in the world 0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:31.800 and there's got to be something better you could do, 0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.360 not for this team that has so many other weaknesses. 0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.480 Offensive line's already strength, and I would argue that the 0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:44.120 bigger need for this team is a swing tackle. I mean, 0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.840 I could make that argument, could you Okay, if I 0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.280 said you could take mcclinchy at nineteen, would you do that. 0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.520 I'm not as high mcclinchy. I don't be a tackle. 0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.080 Then if you're going to tell me if you're gonna 0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.720 if you're more Williams at nineteen, what are we dealing with? Boys? 0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.720 What do we do? You're acting like we're dealing with 0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.040 with Quentin Nelson? Oh no, no, no, Look, you know 0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.680 you got any Why why can't we not? And we 0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.760 focus on the players that are up and down on 0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.560 this board. You're saying people focus too much on the 0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.120 value position more so than just well, I wouldn't take it. 0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.079 I wouldn't take a guard at nineteen. But it's for 0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.160 the KA, it's for this team though it's not. But 0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.359 then you say a name of a guy that you 0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.200 don't really want at nineteen. Look, the thing is long term, 0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:28.800 what is best for this team. I do not think 0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.160 drafting a guard at nineteen is what's best for this team. 0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.000 I don't because I think you could find a guard 0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.799 elsewhere with the depth at wide receiver. Is it best 0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.440 to draft Ridley at nineteen? Oh, if you was there, 0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.640 I'm taking Ridley, yeah, no question. I don't know if 0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.280 the team would. So you feel like though that the 0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.079 definite need for this team is a wide receiver. It's 0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.880 not about definite need, it just it's I mean, why 0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.480 you arguing that. No, you're playing both sides because you're 0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.320 one reason you're saying guard is because of it's a 0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.919 definite need. It's not. I'm looking at nineteen and saying, 0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.240 and give me the names. The players are there, And 0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.200 again I go back to your argument when you when 0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.679 I when I bring up the name Vita Vea, which 0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.280 everybody in mock draft Land, it throws that name at 0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.280 the Cowboys Hurst Vita Vea. You know, and the first 0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.560 thing you say is, Brian, you like it more than me, 0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.520 You like it more than me. Yeah, where you going 0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.840 with this? I'm going I know exactly where he's going 0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.919 with this. Well, I mean, but but he's perplexed as 0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.920 to why you would draft a guy that you don't 0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.480 like that much at nineteen just instead of taking a 0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.880 position that could help your football team. When I say 0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.800 you like him more than me, it's you always say 0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.200 that because you liked them, like when we talk, that's fire, 0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.960 because he does the work. I have the utmost respect 0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.240 for you, which you like him as more of a 0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:46.720 when we talked about him before, you like him, no, 0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.960 more of a top ten player. Yeah, And that's because 0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.040 and then all of a sudden I start catching up 0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.960 and seeing, okay, we're gonna go through some pet cats here. 0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.480 So your opinions changed in Viet Vea. Yeah, okay, but 0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.600 you know what I think that if you look at 0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.360 if you look at the defense to tackle group as 0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.360 the one technique's hole, you can pass on b to 0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.240 Vea and be okay, using your argument you like it 0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.120 more than me, Brian, you do. That's a fact. It 0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.320 is a fact, But that doesn't mean I don't like him. No, 0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.640 But then when he's when he's when everybody. The narrative though, is, 0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.600 but you know, it's kind of like taking taco. Brian 0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.679 wants you to be in love with whoever you're picking 0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.440 at nineteen. But the problem with that is I'd like 0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.120 for you to be in love with him, but the 0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.200 problem is the quality of the player. Yeah, am I 0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.080 right about that? Why would you not take the best 0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.479 player at nineteen? The goal of picking the number nineteenth pick? 0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.719 The number one goal should be to add the player 0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.920 who's gonna help your team the best for the long term. 0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:44.960 That should be the number one goal. And I do 0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.560 not believe that guard is that player you can find. 0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.200 Even even though the player is a better player, even 0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.920 though the player say better player than it does anybody 0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:55.880 that you want to select, It doesn't matter. The goal 0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.839 should be what is best for this team long term? 0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.320 What is best for this team long term? That is 0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.200 the notice one that's for this team long term? Is 0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.840 it to try and help the quarterback? I mean, is 0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.039 that also say that ultimately, what's gonna be the most 0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.040 expensive thing on our team? What if Ronald Jones is 0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.960 the best player on your board at nineteen, should you 0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.039 take him? No, you don't take him? Okay, here we 0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.520 saw it. We saw that play out just last year. FYI, Yeah, 0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.479 that happened last year. That kid went a terrible player 0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.800 at Minnesotaly got hurt. It's not just list your best 0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.279 nineteen players in the draft, regardless of position or anything. 0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.440 You're talking about the quality of the again, if you're 0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:33.400 taking players that you don't feel great about our board player, rude. No. 0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.360 Me saying that you like a player more than me 0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.440 does not mean I don't like the player. No, I'm 0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.640 just saying, though you were just adamant about taking a 0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.080 player that potentially could be regardless of the position. You 0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.120 were adamant against it because when I do a draft board, 0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.000 it's not for this team. When I do a draft board, 0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.320 it is for I understand that. But when we talk 0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.080 about this team again, I want the best player at 0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.840 nineteen who's gonna be best for this team long term, 0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.680 and it might feel better about who. Do you feel 0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:06.360 better about Win or Vita Vea for this team. I'm 0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.200 taking Vita Okay. Now, Yes, I agree with you about 0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.440 your point about finding a nose tackle. Later i'd probably, 0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.920 I'd probably take a win. I agree with you. And 0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.240 you know what this this organization might hate Win. They 0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.320 might absolutely hat Win, and maybe they like her. Nandie 0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.800 is better. It's very possible. Maybe, hey, you know, and 0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.280 then let's let's not act like I mean, Hernande is 0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.760 in my board. Is the third best guard? Nelson Win, Hernandez. 0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.840 I think most people would agree. See, I you know 0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.360 the whole thing about it. At nineteen, I've said this, 0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.120 You're at the mercy of the board every pick you are, 0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.480 absolutely I think bait Like we can boil this down 0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.279 to the fact that Brian's frustrated that a sizable portion 0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.640 of people don't like the idea of drafting a guard. 0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.039 But then most of those people don't have a better 0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:56.880 idea ready to go. Well, yeah, and let me be 0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.200 clear about this. If the Cowboys come up at number 0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.440 nineteen and they drift to Zaiah Win, I will not 0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.080 be upset because Zaiah Win is a good player. Sure, 0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.520 but that doesn't mean I believe he was the best 0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.680 pick at that point. Again, I think I can find 0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600 a guard who can again, but it's like I can 0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.480 find a one technique maybe yeah, Again, it's more of 0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.600 a it's not. This isn't about a right and wrong. 0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.080 This is more philip it's not. And you know, and 0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.560 and sometimes you have to your your philosophy. I was. 0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.720 I felt like I had to get out of the 0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.040 nineties scouting, you know. And we'll get into this whole 0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.440 thing with Bill Polian by the way, you know, and oh, well, 0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.840 you know, this is what I believe. I get it. 0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.440 He's a Hall of Fame general manager. I get it. Okay, 0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:46.680 thank you, seriously, we're gonna get to our pet cats. Yeah, okay, 0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.520 let's get to our pet cats. David, hell and give 0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:49.880 me your pet cats. I don't I want to talk 0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.800 about that. I don't think we've ever gone off the 0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.280 deep end so quickly into a show. I like, I 0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.160 just I you know what though, philosophy or what you 0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:03.520 know again, the philosophy everybody thinks, my god, we've got 0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:04.920 to do it this way, You've got to do it. Yet, 0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.040 we've got to do it, you know. And the beauty 0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.880 of it is probably when you're picking nineteen, you really 0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:15.240 don't have your your player, the quality of player. Why 0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.280 would you regardless of position, why would you not go 0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.680 get the best one at that regardless, it might not 0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.960 be what's best for this team. The beauty of this, 0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.080 like that's the point of this whole show is like 0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.960 I just you're making a mistake if you're approaching the 0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.800 draft with like a fixed mindset on almost anything. Like 0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.840 though I would not take a guard, the whole point 0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.319 of the draft is you need to be ready to adapt. 0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.640 You just said, like five minutes ago, you wouldn't pitch 0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.560 a fit. I would not take him, But again, I 0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.560 think Isaiah wins. Would you have a more problem with 0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.440 him or Taco as that pick. I feel better about 0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.000 Win because Wins a better player, So again I would 0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:51.640 not be upset. I would not throw a fit like 0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.360 last year with Tacco. Is more perplexing that there were 0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.560 better players on the board at the same position, the 0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.880 same position. Yeah, okay, well it's not like you know this. 0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.640 We're talking about the same position here and we're just 0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.559 differing on the player. We're talking about a position that 0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.040 they're gonna take that I don't think this is the 0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.400 reason why the Giants might not take a quarterback. That's 0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.679 why they might not take a running back. They don't 0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.880 draft running backs high traditionally, So what gentleman does on 0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.920 that one. Yeah, I mean if he takes, if he takes, 0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:29.640 if he takes Quentin Nelson. Okay, traditionally he isn't. Oh 0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.240 yeah I am. But traditionally he has not drafted offensive 0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.520 lineman high, so the Giants might not go in that direction. 0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.920 Same with same with quarterback. Giants are really a wild 0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:45.240 getting the best players for the respective team. Yes to Yeah, 0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.920 it's more than about just that saying. I mean, you know, 0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.160 Dalvin Cook might have been the best player on the board. 0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.000 This team's never going to draft him, you know, that's 0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.439 we what We've talked about that already a few times. 0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.240 It's like it's best player available to taking that ram 0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.079 Chick a lot higher than the Saints did. Yeah, the 0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.480 best player available last year. Sure did, best player available 0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.840 within reason, you know, That's the whole thing. Which the 0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.200 beauty of it for the Cowboys is like nineteen, you 0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.839 could make a compelling argument for just about anybody that's 0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.200 going to be there. That's so I don't worry about 0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.840 it as much. I don't get as fired up about 0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:18.400 this because, like, if you want to take a plug 0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.719 and play guard, that's fine with me. If you want 0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.600 to take a nose tackle who could, if not start, 0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.560 at least be a regular part of the rotation. That's 0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.960 fine with me too. Like, I mean, you can make 0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.120 a pretty compelling case for just about anything that's going 0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.880 to happen. I think, I think we just don't want 0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.920 to box ourselves in. That's the whole exactly. That's I'm 0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.839 not gonna stop after some in general. I'm not some 0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.360 about the Dallas Cowboys. No. If I was running a 0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.480 war room right now, I would I would keep an 0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.840 open mind about this. I think I wouldn't sit there 0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.720 and act like I'm in nineteen seventy eight drafting player. 0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.920 You're screwing yourself if you're just like, we gotta do X, 0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:53.920 like whatever it is that you think you gotta do. 0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.920 If that's if you're leaving yourself one avenue of one 0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.320 rep whole idea. It's about getting the best players. That's 0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.400 the whole idea. And if you if you're if you're 0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.040 limiting yourself to getting the best players, then you're you're 0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.200 not drafting correctly. I'd say it's all about improving your 0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.160 football team in the best way possible. I agree, but 0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.000 those aren't always the same. You gotta strike that balance yeah, 0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.600 you can't. It can't just be about best player. No, 0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.440 but I'm just saying though it you can't just say, oh, 0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.160 because of the position, I'm not going to look at 0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.520 the guy, especially where they're picking. Yeah, you've got twelve 0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:34.840 first round grades. I think it's fourteen, that's five. You know, 0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.079 this is just this is just another iteration. If everybody 0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.000 in his in his gets picked, if all fourteen guys 0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.400 get picked ahead of us, we were taking a second 0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.600 round player, it's an entire right. Okay, we did it 0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.360 last year too. Wasn't a first sure, it's but it's 0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.559 just another wasn't the best player. That's my point though 0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.000 as well. No, we all agreed there. It's another iteration 0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.600 of Zeke verse Ramsey or botha. You know it's the same. 0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.360 I mean, you know that was a rare draft, those 0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.560 top five. Oh and I'm not I'm not picking tough. 0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.920 I'm not talking about the relative talent. But it's like, well, 0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.440 you can get a running back anywhere, why are you 0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.080 drafting a running back there, Bob, And like we're still debated. 0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.480 It's gonna play out over the next decade or so. Yeah, 0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.160 it's all I mean, it's more philosophical than absolutely someone's 0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:20.760 right and someone's wrong. And like I said, I think 0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.439 it's something that half the fans are gonna agree with you, 0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.920 half the fans will agree with me. It's something that 0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.199 is a worthy debate that we're going to be having 0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.760 up until draft day. Oh they're having this debate, or 0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.280 up until they add a garden free agency or add 0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.680 a tackling freedy. I'm I'm reluctant. I'm trying to think 0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.400 about how to help this quarterback because you know what 0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.160 this time when and we're likely gonna lose you. Next year, 0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.640 you'll be scouting somewhere. I know it. I just know it. 0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.400 You could go beat somebody else up, Dane. But I mean, 0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.920 I'm thinking, I am thinking this conversation next year will 0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.160 be about, well, should they look at a quarterback? Look 0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.040 at you're just writing Dacks twenty age. I'm just saying, 0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.520 I'm just saying at twelve they should look at a quarterback? 0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.680 Could be yeah, yeah, that's the that's the no. And 0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.120 you're like, why did he fail? Why did he fail? 0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.720 Did we give him every opportunity to succeed? I'm reluctant 0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.960 to jump off the fence here, because I think in 0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.800 another month. I'm not saying there's gonna be like an 0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.200 all Pro guard in the fold. But like this, you know, 0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:26.800 we talk about all the time, this team's not done 0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.280 adding talent. Like I, if they don't have a left 0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.800 guard candidate before the draft, I'll be surprised. They're not 0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.120 going to go into the draft just needing a left guard. 0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.440 I'd agree with they're just not so well they for 0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.440 that matter, they might not be going in. Yeah, they 0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.240 might add they added a defensive tackle last year. It 0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.040 obviously didn't work out, but they did it, and so 0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.720 I wouldn't be surprised to see him do it again 0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.240 this year. Yeah, I think the bigger need might even 0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:54.120 be a tackle. With you worry about a left tackle, 0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.040 the durability long term, You worried there anybody at nineteen 0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.400 you would take at tackle. No, not only that, but 0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.920 that goes back to philosophy again, because are you at 0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.640 the philosopher are you going to spend but are you 0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.480 going to spend a first round pick on a guy 0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:12.800 who ideally is your swing tackle? Yeah? Again, that's another conversation. 0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.600 I know, absolutely, and it's more like hopefully, I think 0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.240 we're bailed out by the fact that there aren't any candidates, right, 0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.360 I mean the highest guard or tackle on my board's 0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.040 Connor Williams down in like the late twenties. So I'm 0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.840 not taking a tackle. He's number one tackle on your 0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.280 board right now. Yeah, okay, and that's a mess. You're right, 0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.080 you're you're you're not wrong about that. And mcglinchey's spend 0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.120 mclinchey because I think like that he's I trust him 0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.800 more than Connor Williams. Sure, that's that sound crazy? No, 0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.880 I And I'm almost I would like to see them 0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.240 draft like a Tyrold Crosby in the second or third 0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.840 o Oregon, a guy that can help you a left 0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.600 guard iff needed, but he's yours. Also your swing tackle, yeah, 0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.240 you know, and you get some versatility there. Uh you know, 0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.320 there's so many different ways you can attack it, for sure. Um, 0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.560 you're pet cat. No no, no, no, no, no, we're 0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.160 gonna break. Okay, we're gonna whole. Yeah, No, that's gonna 0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.160 be I'm just gonna kick the other segment out that 0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:09.640 we were talking about. We do need to get in. 0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.840 I do pet cat talk maybe well in Twitter on 0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.920 the twenty early again, I appreciate everybody's comments and questions, 0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:18.400 and we'll get to Twitter on the tek has a 0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.600 fast twenty minutes. I didn't realize I could get that 0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.720 mad in twenty minutes, but I did at the drop 0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.320 of a hat. At a drop of hat, let's go 0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.600 to break. I promise you we'll do Twitter on the 0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.960 twenty and then we'll get into the pet cats because 0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.720 we got some you know, we got some elements of 0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.360 that I want to get to. And then I do 0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.160 want to get into Bill polian kiper the whole media 0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:38.800 scout thing. Okay, stay tune, we'll be back in the 0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.560 SWBC Morgan studios in just a minute. It can be 0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.240 hard to find the right resource for learning about important 0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.200 financial matters. You search how to build savings, you end 0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.280 up reading about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that 0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.520 can make you taller. That's why Bank of America build 0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.120 Better Money Habits dot com, a safe little corner of 0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.120 the Internet for answering your financial questions. Full of simple 0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.440 videos and tips. Better Money Habits can show you how 0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.600 to make the most of your money without resorting to 0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.800 random searches that always seem to lead to unbelievable photos 0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.920 of childhood stars grown up. To learn more, visit Better 0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.920 Money habits dot com. What does it mean to be 0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.280 a Dallas Cowboys fan? It means you've got the passion 0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.680 and the heart to do your part supporting the Boys 0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.920 no matter what. That's why when the game's on the line, 0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.120 you're on your feet, whether you're at home or in 0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.240 the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan. You are 0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.120 a member of Cowboys Nation, and so is AT and 0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.640 T doing their part to keep you connected to America's 0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.720 team all season. Law AT and T is a proud 0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.920 member of Cowboys Nations. I Skull, Doctor Pepper and the 0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.000 Dallas Cowboys go way back. They belonged together like Texas 0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.960 and football, Silver and Blue shotgun formations and Hail Mary's. 0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.400 Having a Cowboys football party without Doctor Pepper is like 0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.640 having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically, we wouldn't recommend it. 0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.960 So next time you have a tailgate, homegate, or whatever 0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.800 else kind of gate, wrap some ice called Doctor Pepper 0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.399 for you and your friends to enjoy. It's a Dallas 0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.560 Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper the one you crave to work 0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.640 this big land. You need equipment with values rooted as 0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.560 deep in Texas soil as you are like John Deer 0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.760 Compact tractors with a six year power train warranty h 0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.439 big features that help you work less so you have 0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.800 more time to do what you love. John Deer was 0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.080 first in the Texas fields, and we're proud to be 0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.720 on the field as the official agg and turf equipment 0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.600 of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals at my 0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.680 John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions 0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.600 and warranty limitations apply seem to love for details. This 0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.119 is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com draped show. Swboys are 0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.600 We're back here in the STBBC Mortgage Studios. Brian brought 0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.000 a Stain Burgler, David Hellman, KENK. Garrison Executive Producing. I 0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.480 do appreciate, I do appreciate you guys fight that we 0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.639 just let you yell at us now. I appreciate the 0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.000 back and forth war rooms. They call it a wor room. 0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.520 Use the word war for a reason. I had the 0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.959 utmost respect for these guys I'm sitting here with right now, 0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.600 but utmost respect for Kevin Turner and for Jeff cavan 0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.159 On those guys as well. You know, I said, this 0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.240 guy to my right, he could. He needs to be 0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.680 in the NFL. He needs to be scouting, he needs 0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.080 to be arguing with one of those general managers. You 0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.840 do need to do that one day. Maybe we'll see, 0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.800 all right, ever so modest, I hope, so, I really do. 0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.919 I hope it's this year. David Hellman. One of my 0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:33.920 favorite segments is Twitter on the twenty can't I jumped 0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.639 the gun? Go at it, Dave. As long as we're mad, 0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.359 I'm gonna start. I'm gonna start off with a question 0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.760 from Michael that this is something that makes me mad. 0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.879 I'll see if y'all follow along with this. Gears, it's 0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.720 it's I've gotten it a few times, and there seems 0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.000 to be a prevailing line of logic from a few 0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:54.960 people that because the Cowboys are hosting, because the Cowboys 0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.919 are hosting the Flashville, they're gonna do something nuts. Just yeah, 0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.600 and for okay, for the record, I think that's stupid 0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.720 and very unlikely. So you don't want to go to 0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.320 the you don't want to go to the Jets? Pick 0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:12.439 at six? No, No, I really don't. Just for the record, 0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.720 I would I would like I would just like one 0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.840 example of anything that's happened in the last decade that 0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.840 suggests that the Cowboys would do that. I'm not taught. 0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.520 I don't care about Joey Galloway. That was twenty years. 0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:28.840 What about the going up and getting from fourteen to six? 0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.239 I mean, is that at fourteen or fifteen? I think 0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.119 it was fourteen fourteen years? I don't. I mean that 0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.320 was a move. I don't qualify that as like this 0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.320 crazy splash move. I mean that's an eight spot jump, right, 0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.760 I'm taught like splash like, I mean, what going up 0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.800 for a quarterback? What are you going up for? What 0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.240 are you even? Is jumping up six spots for Calvin 0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.160 Ridley a splash? I mean that's that's you know, that's 0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.880 not And you were right by the way Atlanta did jump. 0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.760 They jumped way high to get Julio Jones. I mean 0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.680