Speaker 1: So I always love having this guest on this show.
Speaker 1: He's been on the show a few times. Senator Ron
Speaker 1: Johnson of Wisconsin. Before he got reelected for the midterm elections,
Speaker 1: he was one of the only people in Congress willing
Speaker 1: to tell the truth about the vaccines, willing to tell
Speaker 1: the truth during COVID, he raised awareness about vaccine injuries.
Speaker 1: He got crucified for it. I mean, they really went
Speaker 1: after this guy before the midterm, so thank god he won.
Speaker 1: He's a truth teller, he's important to the Senate, important
Speaker 1: to the country. We're going to get his take on that.
Speaker 1: Does he feel vindicated about the vaccines now that a
Speaker 1: little bit more truth is coming to light? Will there
Speaker 1: ever be any accountability whatsoever for what their government did
Speaker 1: to us, did to its citizens during COVID. We'll talk
Speaker 1: to him about that. Also, Senator Joe Manchin is out.
Speaker 1: He's not seeking reelection in West Virginia, So what does
Speaker 1: that mean for Republicans' chances of taking back the Senate
Speaker 1: last Senator Ron Johnson will also get his take on
Speaker 1: the latest about the Biden family, corruption and all of
Speaker 1: that and more with Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Well,
Speaker 1: Senator Johnson. It's always great to have you on the show.
Speaker 1: I've not had you on since you won your reelection.
Speaker 1: They were really going after you before you won because
Speaker 1: you dared to try to get the truth out there
Speaker 1: about COVID, about the vaccines. I think you're one of
Speaker 1: the only members of Congress who held roundtables with Americans
Speaker 1: who suffered from vaccine injuries.
Speaker 2: You one, do you feel vindicated to.
Speaker 3: A certain extamp The slow uptake in the boosters, I
Speaker 3: think certainly reinforced the fact that those of us who
Speaker 3: have been trying to get information out the American public,
Speaker 3: the information that our federal health agencies have not been
Speaker 3: transparent with the medical establishment hasn't been transparent with Yeah,
Speaker 3: I think we feel good that people are getting informed
Speaker 3: and they're making informed choices now they have more information,
Speaker 3: and you know, it's not just what we've done, though,
Speaker 3: I mean the fact that you had harassmusen Pole said,
Speaker 3: but a corps of Americans thought they believed they knew
Speaker 3: somebody who died.
Speaker 4: After receiving the COVID vaccination.
Speaker 3: So many people, almost everybody knows somebody who certainly had
Speaker 3: an adverse event from getting the vaccine.
Speaker 4: If they didn't get it themselves.
Speaker 3: So the truth is getting out there as much as
Speaker 3: the COVID cartel is trying to bottle it up and
Speaker 3: prevent it from being communicated.
Speaker 1: But you really risked your political career to get out
Speaker 1: there and to tell the truth. I mean, they were
Speaker 1: really going after you, calling you, you know, all the
Speaker 1: different things.
Speaker 2: They call, you know, Republicans.
Speaker 1: What should Americans know about the safety of the COVID vaccines.
Speaker 3: They also know that we were lied to about them.
Speaker 3: We were told that the vaccine would stay in the arm.
Speaker 3: They knew that the lipid nanoparticle would buy distribute all
Speaker 3: with the body. They also knew that they modified the
Speaker 3: mr anda. They didn't know how long it last in
Speaker 3: the body. But it's lasting a whole lot longer than
Speaker 3: thought or that they told us. And it's not a
Speaker 3: true vaccine. A true vaccine is a virus that's been
Speaker 3: killed or attenuated and it enters the body. The body
Speaker 3: recognizes the foreign body, produces anti bodies, attacks it, and
Speaker 3: you're ready for a real infection.
Speaker 4: This actually enters the cell.
Speaker 3: It juices the mitochondria, so the cell has the energy
Speaker 3: to express the spike protein, which is toxic to the
Speaker 3: body outside the cell, and then the body attacks it.
Speaker 3: When that happens, that's called inflammation. That's what my cridatus is.
Speaker 3: But because this biodistributes all over the body, settling in
Speaker 3: the ovaries and adrenal glands that pierced the blood brain barrier,
Speaker 3: it's causing a host of adverse events that the federal
Speaker 3: agencies are not being honest with it. They won't even
Speaker 3: provide their analysis of their own veyor system to my
Speaker 3: congressional oversight. I've asked them repeatedly for show me your
Speaker 3: analysis of the veyors report, and they won't do it.
Speaker 3: Aaron Ciri had to sue to get the v safe information,
Speaker 3: which was a database specifically set up to monitor vaccine
Speaker 3: average reactions to the or average reaction to the vaccine.
Speaker 3: He had to sue that ten million people participated this.
Speaker 3: Seven of those ten million people had to seek medical
Speaker 3: care after the vaccination, a quarter from mister day worker
Speaker 3: or it certainly hampered their normal daily activity. That's a
Speaker 3: massive display of average events, and they tried to cover
Speaker 3: it all up. And they're still covering up their own
Speaker 3: analysis of the veyor's data.
Speaker 1: Do you think there will ever be any accountability for
Speaker 1: what the government has done to its citizens.
Speaker 3: If I have my way, there will be if I
Speaker 3: become chairman of the permaman's upcoming investigation, if Republicans can
Speaker 3: gain a majority. I mean, I'm laying all the groundwork,
Speaker 3: the foundation for my investigations and hearings. I've sent over
Speaker 3: sixty oversight letters that have largely gone unanswered. But you know,
Speaker 3: if the COVID cartel has its way, no, there won't
Speaker 3: be accountability. The American public will really never fully understand truth.
Speaker 3: That's one of the travesties here.
Speaker 1: Well, and about becoming chairman potentially, you know, Senator Mansion
Speaker 1: just announce that he's not running for reelection. I do
Speaker 1: worry a little bit about twenty twenty four, just in
Speaker 1: the sense we've had one tough election cycle after another.
Speaker 1: It seems, particularly this most recent off year election, Republicans
Speaker 1: do have.
Speaker 2: A favorable Senate map. You know, how do we win?
Speaker 2: Do you think we win well?
Speaker 3: In Wisconsin? You have to win with a strong ground game. Campaigns.
Speaker 3: The committees have to do far less spending on ads.
Speaker 3: You have to spend on ads, you have to do soals,
Speaker 3: but you need to literally have the kind of ground
Speaker 3: game that the Democrats get for free from unions.
Speaker 4: That type of thing.
Speaker 3: We got to pay for it or get a huge
Speaker 3: army of volunteers. And we need to go harvest votes
Speaker 3: like Democrats do. We do need to vote early. So
Speaker 3: it's really about a ground game. But then in terms
Speaker 3: of elected Republicans, we need to govern like we campaign.
Speaker 3: And I can't tell you how pleased I am with
Speaker 3: the new speaker. Just a good person. I can see
Speaker 3: why he was voted in unanimously. He's a man of faith,
Speaker 3: he's a man of principle. He's leading based on those principles.
Speaker 3: So his caucus knows, you know, what is going to
Speaker 3: guide him. Again, he's got a tough challenge and a
Speaker 3: few of us senators are trying to do is staying
Speaker 3: in touch with them. We just found him this morning
Speaker 3: and it's an open dialogue so we can understand his
Speaker 3: challenges and take that back and communicate it to our
Speaker 3: fellow senders and vice versa that he can understand our challenges.
Speaker 4: So he's just he's very collaborative. We've opened a very
Speaker 4: good dialogue. But he's got a really tough job.
Speaker 3: But if we follow him, because I think he's got
Speaker 3: great instincts. I think that is a road to better
Speaker 3: electoral success and we've had in the past.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and obviously there's a budget fight right now. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you saw. I just thought this was funny.
Speaker 1: The NSC chairman, Steve Daines released a statement about Mansion
Speaker 1: just saying, we like our odds in West Virginia.
Speaker 2: It's a good response.
Speaker 1: You know, now we've got this budget fight. How do
Speaker 1: you think this is going to go down? What do
Speaker 1: you think can pass in the Senate?
Speaker 3: Again, what the House is trying to do is give
Speaker 3: greater scrutiny to this massive amount of spending. And when
Speaker 3: you hear people return to regular order, that's called bringing
Speaker 3: up each appropriation bill individually, putting them on each chamber's floor,
Speaker 3: opening them up to amendments and to scrutiny, and then
Speaker 3: conferencing them and you know, moving toward final passage. I mean,
Speaker 3: we are we've already blown that opportunity for twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: So now we're in this mess that the Speaker's trying
Speaker 3: to help us get out of. But we're also trying
Speaker 3: to set ourselves up for fiscal year twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3: So We can have that type of scrutiny on spending,
Speaker 3: but you also have to understand that what we argue
Speaker 3: over here in DC is only about twenty per cent
Speaker 3: of our budget. Seventy two percent is mandatory spending. It's
Speaker 3: totally out of control. During COVID and during Democrat rule,
Speaker 3: we actually increased not just Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid,
Speaker 3: those went up mandatory spending, but other mandatory spending increased
Speaker 3: by more than half a trillion dollars.
Speaker 4: We never should allow that to happen, you know.
Speaker 3: Plus, you know, non defense discretion is up something like
Speaker 3: two hundred seventy four billion dollars since the twenty nineteen
Speaker 3: So spending is completely out of control. We're spending about
Speaker 3: two trillion dollars more this year than we did just
Speaker 3: four years ago. I mean, that is a massive increase
Speaker 3: in the baseline. And so it's going to it's going
Speaker 3: to be hard, it's going to be it's not going
Speaker 3: to be easy to break that mold, that well honed
Speaker 3: process of plundering and moreginer a kid's future by just
Speaker 3: printing money. So, you know, the uniparty, the Washington establishment,
Speaker 3: establishment is just going to be kicking and screaming, resisting.
Speaker 3: For example, what the new speaker did, Isa, Yeah, we
Speaker 3: want to supply supports to Israel, and we're going to
Speaker 3: pay for it in budget terms immediately fourteen a half
Speaker 3: trillion dollars taken out of the eighty billion dollars I
Speaker 3: mean fourteen zero point five billion dollars taking out of
Speaker 3: the eighty billion dollars for new IRS agents. Yeah, that's
Speaker 3: pretty pretty popular pay for But you know, get in
Speaker 3: the mindset that we just can't keep printing money and
Speaker 3: if if you want supplemental spending, emergency spending, we'll find
Speaker 3: something this lesser emergency, something that's lower priority.
Speaker 1: 's take a quick commercial break back with Senator Ron
Speaker 1: Johnson on the other side. I know you've been following
Speaker 1: the Biden family corruption to what extent do we know
Speaker 1: now was Joe Biden's involvement.
Speaker 3: Well, it's pretty interesting that James Biden wrote him a
Speaker 3: check for forty thousand dollars. It just happens to be
Speaker 3: ten percent but for the big guy from a four
Speaker 3: hundred thousand dollar payment. You know, James Cromer is doing
Speaker 3: a great job of filling in the piece of the
Speaker 3: puzzle that Senator Grassley and I kind of outlined. We
Speaker 3: showed all the money flowing into these you know, labyrinth
Speaker 3: of accounts and companies that Hunter Biden set up.
Speaker 4: It's a lot of money.
Speaker 3: Now James Cromer's looking at the outslow, So I think
Speaker 3: it's pretty obvious. I think the need is known about
Speaker 3: the corruption of the Biden family. They you know, years
Speaker 3: ago they wrote an article called Biden Inc. So they've
Speaker 3: been peddling the Biden name influenced pelling for for years,
Speaker 3: probably decades, and now it's all coming home to roost.
Speaker 2: How do you think this will play out?
Speaker 1: You know, politically there has been some shots fired at
Speaker 1: Joe Biden recently, you know, David Axelrod being you know,
Speaker 1: a notable name. How much information do you think we
Speaker 1: can get out before the twenty twenty four presidential election?
Speaker 1: And do you think Americans it'll impact the electorate.
Speaker 3: Democrats don't know how to govern. I mean they're liberals,
Speaker 3: so you know liberalism radical electivesm never builds anything, just
Speaker 3: destroy as. They do know how to play politics, and
Speaker 3: they do know how to clear a field. They do
Speaker 3: know how to throw their own members under the bus
Speaker 3: when they're.
Speaker 4: Not useful anymore.
Speaker 3: So I think, no matter what happens on the impeachment front,
Speaker 3: I think it's very low probability that Joe Bido will
Speaker 3: be there their nominee. He's just you know, writing too
Speaker 3: long on the polls, he's too old, he's too infirmed,
Speaker 3: and so they're going to pull some rap out of
Speaker 3: the hat and now may somebody who's far more appealing
Speaker 3: to the general electric than Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: All the way, I do word that.
Speaker 1: You know, we know what they're trying to do to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, who seems pretty likely at this point to
Speaker 1: be the Republican nominee. You know, they're going to try
Speaker 1: to tie him up in court throughout the duration of
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty four election. They're going to try to
Speaker 1: drain him financially on legal bills, and so I do
Speaker 1: wonder where that leaves us and our ability to win
Speaker 1: the presidential election and the down ballot.
Speaker 3: I think an awful lot of this done in part
Speaker 3: of Democrats is to ensure that that's who they face.
Speaker 3: I think they feel the only person that Joe Biden
Speaker 3: probably could be President Trump, and so that's who they're
Speaker 3: trying to set up as a nominee.
Speaker 4: I don't know whether the backfire on them or not,
Speaker 4: but I think it needs to be a concern.
Speaker 1: I worry about TikTok and the influenced tad on our
Speaker 1: youth and turning out young voters. And then you even
Speaker 1: look at this Prohama content that is really being driven
Speaker 1: on TikTok at a substantially higher rate than anything pro Israel.
Speaker 1: And it's like, if you were China, would you be
Speaker 1: doing anything different to capture a nation than what they're
Speaker 1: doing with TikTok.
Speaker 3: No, Listen, in China, TikTok is used for the benefit
Speaker 3: of their society. It tries to mold a good character
Speaker 3: in their young people. Here, they you know, Chinese uses
Speaker 3: TikTok to destroy American character in society, just like they're
Speaker 3: trying to destroy us with the pushing a fentanyl into
Speaker 3: our country, and unfortunately President Biden is playing right in
Speaker 3: their hands. But the support for hamas for Palestinians. You know,
Speaker 3: although it shockings, not overly surprising when you realize that
Speaker 3: our universities were taken over by radical leftists in the
Speaker 3: sixties and so they've been indocunating young minds for decades. Graduating,
Speaker 3: you know, fewer teachers and a lot more indoctrinators than
Speaker 3: K through twelve graduating, not journalists, but advocates for the left,
Speaker 3: So they control our culture.
Speaker 4: And it's coming as being fully exposed.
Speaker 3: First of all during COVID in K through twelve where
Speaker 3: parents are pretty amazed and shocked at the indoctionation coming
Speaker 3: out of K through twelve, and now with the brutal
Speaker 3: a slaughter in Israel by Hamas. The fact that university
Speaker 3: students in America are protests and support of the Palestines
Speaker 3: in Hamas again shocking but not surprising when you understand
Speaker 3: the level of indoctrination that's been going after decades.
Speaker 1: Well, and some members in the House on the left
Speaker 1: are calling for us to take in some of these
Speaker 1: gozen refugees when you know, we already know that we're
Speaker 1: encountering terrorists at a higher rate at the southern border
Speaker 1: than we have you know, I think in the past
Speaker 1: six years combined, that's a real concern.
Speaker 2: I assume you're totally against that.
Speaker 4: He absolutely no.
Speaker 3: Listen, the solution to the whole Palestine Israel situation should
Speaker 3: have been handled decades ago, and Palestinians that could live
Speaker 3: in peace with Israelis. They should hung around the area
Speaker 3: and live in peace and taking advantage of Israeli laws
Speaker 3: that would have stabilized your lives and offered freedom and
Speaker 3: greater prosperity. And those that just couldn't handle living next
Speaker 3: to the Jewish state, they should have been offered residency
Speaker 3: in all the other Arab nations. They need labor. By
Speaker 3: the way, some of these Arab nations have to import
Speaker 3: label anyway. So we'll bring him in, turn him into citizens.
Speaker 3: Let's let's end the situation. This never should have allowed
Speaker 3: to be faster over decades, but you know, the Arab
Speaker 3: States did not step up the plate, and you know,
Speaker 3: to a certain stemp, they kind of helped foment this crisis.
Speaker 1: Senator Ron Johnson, we appreciate your time, sir. Great to
Speaker 1: have you on the show. As always. I really appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Have ever great day. Stay well.
Speaker 1: That was Senator Ron Johnson. Appreciate him and taking the
Speaker 1: time to come on the show. I appreciate you guys
Speaker 1: at home for listening every Monday and Thursday, but you
Speaker 1: can listen throughout the week.
Speaker 2: What do you think.
Speaker 1: John cassh and my producer for putting the show together
Speaker 1: until next time.
Speaker 3: H