WEBVTT - What is superdeterminism?

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Orney, what is your go to snack these days?

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you met me? Bananas? Of course, I knew you

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>were going to say that. I knew I was predicted

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>bulls like. I thought about saying something else, but you didn't. Yeah,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>then I figured you were expecting me to say something else,

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so saying banana was maybe the real surprise. Well that's

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>very clever, but I actually predicted that to what impossible?

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you also predict what I'm gonna say next? Like

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>weasel or yah my lama ding dong? Totally, that's exactly

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>what I predicted. What how is impossible? Well? I wrote

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the script for this goal open, Yes, but I always

0:00:43.680 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>go off script. Yes, but you do so very predictably. Hi.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm or Hamming, cartoonists and the co author of Frequently

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Asked Questions about the Universe. Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>particle physicist and a professor at U C Irvine, and

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm also quite predictable. Oh yeah, do you have a

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>regular routine that you always stick to? I do two

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast episodes a week with my friend Jorge. Oh my goodness,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a surprise that you're still friends with this horr

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>guy and that people are still listening. But what do

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you mean you did not like surprises? I am a

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>creature of habit. I like to lay out my schedule

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and follow it. My wife, on the other hand, likes

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous adventure, so you know, at least some interesting conversation.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>What about like lunch, Do you know what you're gonna

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>eat for lunch every day? I do? Yeah, I eat

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly nothing for lunch every day, So it's quite predictable.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That makes choosing easy. You don't have to think about

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it because there's nothing to think about exactly. And you know,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in our family, we used to argue a lot about

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what to eat for dinner, and then we hammered it

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out into a weekly schedule. So we have you know,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pasta on Mondays and tacos on two days, cetera, etcetera. Oh,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, completely predictable then until the end of time.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But what kind of tacos? See, that's a big question,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always room for improvisation. Yeah, we have

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it every time. Yeah, do you have

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>corn or tias or flower tortillas? Is that in your

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>schedule too? Oh we make our own tortillas. Yeah, corner

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>flower combination corn and flour, corner and flower. Yeah, a

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of each. It's like a quantum taco. It's

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a superposition. It's super taco and flower. Oh man, that's crazy.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it also chicken and carnitas. It's delicious, is what

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>it is. But anyways, welcome to our podcast Daniel and

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of My Heart Radio,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in which we roll up all the deliciousness of the

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>universe into a corn and flower and talk tortilla and

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>serve it all up to you. We fill that taco

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>up with the incredible mysteries that are the universe, the

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>weird quantum effects that seem to govern the microscopic nature

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of reality, and the incredible emergent phenomena that we enjoy

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and gaze at every night when we look at the stars.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We wonder about all of it. We talk about all

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, We explain all of it, and we take

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a big bite out of all of it with you.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we talk about it with you because it

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty delicious and amazing universe ready to be

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>rolled up and sandwich between amazing conversation and that jokes.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, do we just move from tacos to sandwiches

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>because like, not the same thing, man, well kind of.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think traditional tacos have two tortillas and then you

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>roll them up what or fold them? What are you

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Seriously? You know how to taco from a

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>taco truck. Yeah, but that's two tortillas underneath the filling, right,

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not the same as a sandwich and then you

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fold them over right. Gosh, so you're sandwiching kind of

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>things between them, right, you're seeing a sandwich and a

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>taco or topologically equivalent. We are waiting into a big

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>question here. Pretty you're gonna be saying a hot dog

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is a taco? Mathematical food science? Yeah, well, I think

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that pizzas and tacos and sandwiches are topologically non identical. Well,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>here's a question. Is a cauzone a pizza taco really?

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Or a pizza sandwich? That's like second root of food

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>food calculus. There, I think I have to go ask

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>my friends in the math department about that one. Yes,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were going to say that. But it

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful universe full of amazing and incredible things

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes seem kind of unpredictable. And random and chaotic,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's amazing that we've sort of looked out into

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe and figured out that there is a little

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of order to all of that. There are laws

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to the universe. Yeah. The great sweep of philosophy and

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>science is you try to look out in universe and

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, are there laws that describe the incredible complexity

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that we see in the universe. Is that lightning striking

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that tree because it's determined by some physical law or

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>is it just some god up there getting angry and

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>deciding to smite that tree? And the universe actually be

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>described in a compact set of mathematical rules which determine

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened, or is there still a little bit

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of fuzz left in those rules? Yeah? And if there

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>are laws that govern how the universe works down to

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>the atomic and particle level, does that mean that the

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>universe is totally predictable because if it follows laws, then

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what it's going to do. Right, That's exactly right.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And a few hundred years ago there was this growing

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>realization that, wow, the universe does seem to be kind

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of explainable. And if the universe is explainable, even on

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a microscopic scale. Doesn't that mean it's explainable on a

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>macroscopic scale. If everything is made out of tiny little

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>billiard balls, and you can describe and predict what happens

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>when two billiard balls bump into each other, then in principle,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can't you describe and predict what happens when ten to

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the twenties six billiard balls bump into each other? Or

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>even if you can't describe it computationally, doesn't that mean

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that it is determined? It's decided in advance. Yeah, it's

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of this idea that we sort of started to

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>realize this we came to understand science and physics a

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. It's kind of this idea that maybe

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the universe was kind of like a giant clock, right,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that everything was like clockwork, and that you could totally

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe predict or at least it seemed possible to predict

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what the universe was going to do in the long term,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and sort of mind blowing, right to imagine that these

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>tiny little brains on this little rock in the corner

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the universe could like derive physical laws, could like

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get the universe to reveal its actual underlying mechanism and

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that might determine the whole future of the universe. I mean,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like what humors, right, what incredible ego to imagine that

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we could understand the universe and predict its future, that

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we could like reveal its deepest mechanism, the rules that

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like force it to operate in a certain way. There

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>must have been a mind blowing sort of moment for physicists. Yeah,

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty crazy. It's like a crazy plot twism. I

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the universe predicted that too. And it's sort

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of terrifying and also of relief. You know, Like it's

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>terrifying to imagine that the universe is totally pre pdictable

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and that we are all sort of like locked into

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a future that's determined by the past. But it's also

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of terrifying to think that the universe like doesn't

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>make sense or doesn't follow laws, that there are like

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>capricious beings up there that could just like decide what

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>gets that by lightning instead of you know, following some rules.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which universe is more terrifying. I mean,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess the one that's unpredictable. It's more terrifying to

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you Danny, all right, yeah, exactly. That was an hard question.

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But emotionally it's sort of fascinating, you know, to think

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about being locked into these physical laws. Of course, as

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a person, as an individual, I want to know what

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>those laws are and how they work and spend my

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>life unraveling that mystery. But to imagine that the universe

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is locked in, that everything that you do and that

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>happens to you is determined by what happened in the past,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that is sort of scary. Yeah. I feel like this

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is getting a little psychological here, Daniel. Is physics for

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you just one big quest to find order in the

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>universe and predictability. I do this instead of going to therapy.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot cheaper to probably I get paid to

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do this instead of paying someone to do that to you. No,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's psychological because it's philosophical. And the reason

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that we do physics is because there are big consequences

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to the answers that we reveal. When we learn the

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of the universe, it tells us something about what

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be human and what the rules are

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and what the boundaries are for our lives. And so

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, there are big psychological imvocations to understanding

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works, and so upen to maybe about

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ago. We thought that maybe the universe

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>was like a big clock and that you could predict

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what it was going to do like a giant instead

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of clockward gears following Uton's laws. But then somebody learned

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that things aren't quite that way at the molecular level,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at the atomic level. That's right. You might be puzzling

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>over why we're talking about the universe as deterministic, because

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics paints a different picture of the universe at

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>its very smallest scale. Even though you're made out of

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ten to the twenty six little objects, those objects are

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>quantum objects, and they don't follow the same rules as

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>billiard balls or baseballs or any other kind of balls.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>They might not even be balls. They follow very strange rules,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and their futures are not necessarily determined by their past.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking about strange balls in this episode? That

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this might be going into not safe

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for work territory. But as you said, we learned that

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics cells is that there is sort of like

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an adherent randomness in the universe. At the very smallest levels,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like there are things we can't possibly ever know, Like

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain uncertainty um at the very smallest levels

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of velocity and position. Yeah, it gives you a really

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>different view of how the universe works, right, like the

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental mechanism for how things operated the smallest level and

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating twist. Of course, it doesn't change how things

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>work at the large level, right, Like you and me

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and baseballs and billiard balls can all still be deterministic,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>even if we're made out of tiny little things which

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are fundamentally fuzzy. I guess you can still predict what

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>strange police are going to do. You can still predict

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that they will make Daniel giggle on the podcast. Yeah,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so that was a big revolution in our thinking, going

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>from like things are like clockwork in the universe too,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's an inherent unpredictability or randomness to the universe

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can never ever predict, right. Yeah. It was

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a big shift and also maybe a bit of a relief, right, Like, oh,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that maybe I'm not locked into a

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>set of consequences that were determined by everything that happened

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in my childhood. You know, and there's philosophical consequences there.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>People wonder if it means there might be free will

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because our actions are not predetermined. So this question of

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical randomness and free will and like human autonomy

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and the soul and all this kind of stuff. There's

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of discussion about what it means for

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe to be fundamentally random, right, because I guess

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if tiny little particles are sort of random, right, or

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they act in random ways, then that means that you

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.599
<v Speaker 1>add them up, then maybe like people are random to

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.599
<v Speaker 1>or like unpredictable. At least there's a whole field of

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people trying to understand whether quantum particles and their randomness

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>actually do add up to unpredictability for larger objects like

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>me and you and hippos, or if it's more like baseballs,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>where the quantum randomness sort of like averages out and

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect the path of a baseball. So that's been

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of our thinking for the last hundred years, that

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>things are random at a fundamental level, But maybe things

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are starting to come back around from that today. That's right.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>There are a series of experiments in the last few

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>decades which seem to conclusively prove that the universe is

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally quantum mechanical, that it is not deterministic at the

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>smallest scale. But there's a lot of controversy about those

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>experiments and exactly what they mean and what the loopholes

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are in those experiments, and there's some really fun ideas

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that might be able to recover deterministic thinking about our universe.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>what is super determinism. I thought you were going to

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>say that in a sort of like a Superman voice.

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Super determinism is that like the alter ego of mild

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Manner determinism? Exactly? Determinism just works in the local newspaper

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and wears glasses. Did it escape from a dying planet

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in a pod? Yeah, it must have a fatal flaw.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So what is the fatal flaw of super determinism. I

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's quantum mechanic paps, it's physics site kryptonite quantum mechanics.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But this is an interesting idea. I feel like we've

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of swinging back and forth like a pendulum,

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like we thought we were like clockwork and deterministic, but

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>then then quantum mechanics came around and we realized things,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>we're actually kind of random, but now it's kind of

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>swinging all the other way around. That says that maybe

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics is not totally random. Yeah, and I think

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's hard to grapple with the consequences of

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>these experiments. If you accept that the universe is fundamentally random,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like that is weird man in even if it gives

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you an opportunity to not be predictable and you like that,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>it is strange to think about the universe picking numbers

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at random, deciding for every electron, so it's going to

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go left or oh, it's going to go right. That

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.599
<v Speaker 1>is really funky and it really counter to our intuitive

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding of how the universe works. And so that's been

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for people, including physicists right like Einstein, to swallow.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And so it makes people think creatively and try to

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like find ways around it, like are you really sure

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that it has to be that way? Couldn't it possibly

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>actually still be deterministic? Yeah, But it's always good to

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ask these questions because you never know maybe what do

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you think is true is actually not true. You just

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have to ask the question and come up with the experiment.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I remember, it's the experiments that really tell us what

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we know. It's thought about these theoretical constructs. It's about

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what the experiments have said, and so it's really crucial

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to understand what are the loopholes in those experiments, what

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>did they really measure, and what did that actually tell

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>us about the universe, because sometimes all the interesting stuff

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is in the loopholes. So as usually are wondering how

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>many people out there had heard of this theory of

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>super determinism, So Daniel went out there into the wild

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of the internet. I think right, yep. These come from

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>our cadre of Internet volunteers who are willing to answer

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>weird philosophical questions about tricky physics topics without any chance

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to look things up. So thank you very much to

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody who participated. If you enjoy hearing these and you'd

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>like to hear your voice on the podcast, please don't

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be shy. Right to us. Two questions at Daniel and

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Jorge dot com. To think about it for a second,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you think super determinism is? Here's what people

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have to say. It sounds like a made up word. Um,

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to say it's the kind of intense

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>determination than has exhibited when obtaining the infinity stones. I

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have absolutely no idea. I'm going to say it has

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>something to do with um, the fact that I've heard

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it said we actually have no free will and cause

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>an effect stems from entropy or something like that. I

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I guess that super determinism means that the

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>universe at the macroscopic level is predictable. It does indeed

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>act like clockwork because of the quantum effects being statistically

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>averaged away on a large scale. So perhaps at the

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>macroscopic level, God doesn't play dice. Well. I don't know exactly,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but it must be something, something interesting because starts with

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>super I think it has to do with determinism, with

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that knowing a particles position and velocity at

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>any given time, you could determine the position and velocity

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of that particle at any other point in time, so

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you could say that the future is fixed. I say

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it has something to do with that super determinism is

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>something that only philosophers worry about at night or particle physicists,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and it must have to do with fate destiny. If

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>determinism is just things being very determined. Super determinism would

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>be things being very much very determined. So I guess

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like that everything is very much predetermined, so like extreme

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect of things and particles. I don't know.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna guess on this one. Also, I think,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, determinism is the fact that there's no such

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>thing as free will, So maybe super determinism is the

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>opposite that there is a way to find free will

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. All right, very determined answers, very very determined,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a little predictable. Though I knew that were going to

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>say this exactly. Some people here confused it with the

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of being determined, like having a lot of purpose

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and will power. Yeah, I think my teenagers are super deterministic.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they're determined to be undetermined. They determined not to

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. So let's dive into this, Daniel, super determinism.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess determinism wasn't doing it, so they have to

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>call in superdeterminism, you know, as reinforcements. But then, who knows,

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe the next episode will cover ultra quantum mechanics. Quantum

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you knock it down, We just come back with something stronger.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's start with the basics. Here is there

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a physical or mathematical definition of determinism.

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So a deterministic view of the universe is one in

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which the future is completely determined by the past. So

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a set of initial conditions, meaning like you

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>know the location and the velocity of every object in

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and you have rules for what's going to

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>happen to those next, including like collisions or near misses.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Then you can predict exactly what's going to happen. So

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the future is determined by the past. The initial conditions

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and the rules of the universe determine exactly what will happen.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a deterministic set of laws, right, Like if you

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>have a little ball, strange or not, and you have

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a little ball and you know where it is and

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>what velocity it's going at, you can sort of know

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the future, right Like you know the trajectory that bought

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna take through the air, and you know where it's

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.239
<v Speaker 1>going to land and soil you can go there and

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>catch it. That's really like predicting the future, right, It

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>really is predicting the future. And when I was a

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>high school or first taking physics. That's the thing that

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>attracted me to it the most. I was like, oh

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, you can actually predict the future with physics.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of incredible. It's an amazing power, and it's

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>something that you also sort of know intuitively. Right, if

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing the ball to somebody who's running with your

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fast you know sort of how to throw so that

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>it gets to them at the right moment. You know,

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you factor in their velocity, in their direction, and all

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff. You don't expect that when you

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball it's going to take like a random

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>left turn or a random right turn. You think that

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>mostly it follows the same rules. And that's why we

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>practice sports, right, pictures practice pitching because they can throw

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball the same way over and over again and

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>get it into the captures Mith right, right. Unless you're

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 1>using strange balls, then who knows what they thought? We

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 1>were staying away from that joke, man. Predictably, I cannot

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>strange balls and strange strikes in this case. So that's

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the deterministic university idea that, like, you know, if you

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>can predict where a ball is gonna allod mebe you

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can predict everything down to like planets and galaxies, and

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>also down to the small levels, like you know, it's

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>tiny little particles if they move like little balls, and

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of predict what they're gonna do, and

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you can maybe predict the entire universe exactly. So that's fascinating.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But then, of course quantum mechanics sort of up ends that, right.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics says that things are not determined. Things are

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of random at a very basic level, like you

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>can't know something's position of velocity perfectly. And it's important

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand what quantum mechanics sort of does and doesn't

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>say about the universe. It doesn't say that like things

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are totally random, that electrons just like do whatever they want.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no like brain in their deciding. There's

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>just going to cruise over here and cruise over there. Right,

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics is still deterministic in one way, it's just

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not deterministic about specific outcomes. Instead, it's deterministic about probabilities.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Like quantum mechanics, there are laws and it says the

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>electron has a certain probability to be here in a

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>certain probability to be there that's fixed based on the

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>previous data, Like what happened to the electron in the

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>past determines the probabilities for its future. It just doesn't

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>determine the actual outcome. When it comes to like measuring

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where the electron is, the universe then decides, well, is

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it actually over here or is it actually over there?

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it's beIN up or is it spin down? So

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual specific outcome for a quantum object isn't determined

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>until you measure it, but the probabilities are determined in advance. Right,

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Although in quantum mechanics, isn't it sort of impossible to

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>know the initial conditions of something of like an electron

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>or a particle that you can't ever know where it

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is and where it's going, right, You're exactly right. You

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>can't know all of the information about its specific location

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and its velocity. Here, what we mean is you know

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's quantum state, which includes all of that fuzz So

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>if you know the quantum state of the electron, it's

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>probability for where it is right now, then you can

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>predict its quantum state in the future. It's probabilities for

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>where it's going to be in the future. So you

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have an electron over here and it's doing something. You

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly where it is, but it has some

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>probabilities to be here there, and you do something out

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>of like you fire a photon at it, then you

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can predict what its new probabilities are, So you don't

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have to know exactly where it was, but you can

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>predict how it's probabilities will evolve with time. Right, it's

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>almost like if you throw a ball, you don't know

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to be a right or left, but

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that half of the time maybe it's gonna

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>veer right and half of the time it's gonna bear

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the left, but you know you don't know in

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>any particular throw which way it's going to hear exactly.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Or if you roll to dice, then you know what

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the distribution of outcomes are, even though you don't know

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what any individual outcome are. Now that's a little bit

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of a tricky analogy because dice actually are deterministic, and

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason you don't know the outcome is not because

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they're truly quantum mechanical and random. They're actually just chaotic,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's approximately random. The universe we think is actually random,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of in the same way that it

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>describes the probabilities of various outcomes very specifically, but doesn't

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>actually pick which outcome until you collapse the wave function.

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.239
<v Speaker 1>For those of you who wonder, like, well, how does

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that happen? Does it mean to collapse the wave function?

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? Check out our episode about wave

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>functions and collapse with Adam Becker. Cool. So that's kind

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of the prevailing view of the universe, that it's quantum

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>mechanical and that it's random at a very fundamental level,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not deterministic. But maybe there's something wrong with

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the experiments that natives think that way. So let's get

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>into what those experiments are and what is superdeterminism. But

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. Alright, we're talking about superdeterminism,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>which is I guess it's superpower determinism, Like it can

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>run faster than a speeding prediction. Yeah, exactly, it's a

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>souped up version. It's got like, you know, extra exhaust,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's a low rider. It's a shiny paint. Should

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>have gone with turbot determinism. That would have been a

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>more fun name. So there's this idea that quantum mechanics

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>tells us that the universe is random and a pretty ball,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and you can actually sort of test this, right, Like

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you can do an experiment that tells you if something

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>truly is random or not, or maybe like it's actually

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not random, but you just think it's random. Yeah, because

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when this whole idea came out, people were skeptical because

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't see this process, right. You can never like

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>see the universe going from fuzzy to specific, going from

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like the electron has a probability to do this to

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the electron is actually here. You can't observe that process

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>because of course any observation collapses the way function. So

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>people were wondering, like, how do we know this is real?

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>How do we know that the path the electron isn't

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>actually just determined? But there's some like information we're missing,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the electron was going to go that

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>way the whole time, we just didn't know it. You're

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not comfortable thinking about electrons, you know, think about scenario

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>where you have, for example, two balls, a red one

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and a blue one, and you put one red ball

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in a bag and the blue ball in another bag.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>So you can't see them, and then you and your

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>friend just like randomly picked bags. You look in your bag,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have either a red ball or a blue ball, right,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>And you might say, oh, well, it was determined the

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>whole time, Like the ball is either red or blue

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. Right. It's not like magic that I

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have a red ball or a blue ball. And so

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>people are wondering, like if the same thing holds for

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum particles, like are they actually determined in advance? How

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>can we tell the difference between they're being really random

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>until the moment you check for them having been determined

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. Right. That's kind of the basis of

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>this famous experiment that sort of proves the randomness of

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics called Bell's experiment, Right. It it's sort of

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like if you take, as you say, at a red

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ball and a blue ball, and you put them each

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>into bags so you can't see their color, and then

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess, what do you do? You like hide them

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>behind your back and makes them up, and then you

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>give one to one person and they know they want

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to the other person. It's not like the ball suddenly

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lose their color or they're both colors at the same time.

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, one of them clearly has the

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>red ball and the other one clearly has the blue wall.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know what it is. And so that's

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the alternative to the idea of randomness and

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics. It's like, well, that's not like the balls

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>like do something magical. We just don't know which balls

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in which back exact. And the philosophically that goes by

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the name of hidden variables. People think, well, maybe there's

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>just some information we don't have access to, so it

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>seems random to us, but it's not actually random, right,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some hidden variables, some details, some information that's being

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>carried along with the ball or the electron whatever that's

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>determining the actual outcome, and you can't actually change it.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>The quantum mechanics is a very different view, right, And

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the analogy of the balls, it would be like, you know,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball has not always been read or always been

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>blued the whole time. It has a probability to be either,

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's in some weird quantum mechanical mixture state that

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you can never see. But once you look at it

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and boom, it collapses into red or blue. And the

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>craziest thing about the quantum mechanical interpretation is that this

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>can happen even if you're really far apart, Like you know,

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if I take one bag and you take the other bag,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and we got on spaceships and go ten light years

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>in opposite directions and then look at our bags simultaneously,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics says that those balls are not determined until

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one of us looks. If I look at my bag

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and I see red, then your bag instantaneously is from

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>undetermined to blue, even if you're ten light years away

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>from me. So that's the part that really got people confused,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>especially Einstein and his collaborators, and made him think like

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>this can't be true because it would mean that the

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>universe is like non local, that this is like instantaneous

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>effect that happens across space time, which really bothered folks

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like Einstein, right, because as soon as you open one bag,

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of like you're determining what the other bag

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be, even though it's really far away, exactly right,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the interesting thing is that the universe

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or quantum mechanics seems to have these bags in them, right,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Like there's some something about the universe sort of obscures

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>things or hides them from us until we actually look

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>at them. Right. That's a weird thing about the universe. Right,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a very weird thing about the universe. And it

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>relies on this interpretation or quantum mechanics called the Copenhagen interpretation.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Says that quantum objects or quantum objects and they like,

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>have weird fuzziness to them, and that's cool, except when

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a classical object like a person, looks at them, that

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they collapse and they can only

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have one possible result instead of having probabilities of multiple results.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And as we've talked about the podcast a lot, that's

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really problematic because we don't know what we mean by

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>classical object. We talked about this in the quantum eraser experiment.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really weird and fuzzy. And so there are other

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>views of quantum mechanics that try to avoid this, like

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bowl mean mechanics that says that there are these weird

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>initial conditions. But all this weird quantum behavior was described

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>by Einstein as spooky action at a distance, like he

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't imagine a way for the universe to do that

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if I look at my ball and it goes from

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like undetermined to red, that somehow that's going to make

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your ball go from undetermined to blue. He couldn't imagine

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that happening. He proposes as a thought experiment. He was like,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>isn't this ridiculous. Here's an example of what your quantum

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>mechanics would have to do for it to work. So

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>then John Bell came up with a series of experiments,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>try to see if we could tell the difference. Can

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you tell the difference between those balls being actually determined

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole time or them being undetermined until the moment

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at them and those wave functions sort of

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sign multaneously collapsing across space time, right, And I think

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that, you know, if you do this

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>experiment or this like hiding balls and put them in

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>bags and take them far apart with like actual physical

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>billiard balls, like a red Billard ball and a blue

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Buildard ball, then there's no question, like there's no randomness

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in there, right, Like there is an actual blue ball

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in my bag and an actual red ball in your bag.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no randoms there. But the I think the idea

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is that if you do it with electrons or something

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>really really small, where you maybe have with some experiment

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that takes an electron and splits it into two, like

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a red electron and a blue electron, and it's a

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical process, then that's when things start to get weird, right,

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when things sort of become spooky. Yeah, exactly. Nobody

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks that that ball is actually red and blue simultaneously,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's not a quantum object. We're just using that

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as a way for you to sort of grapple with

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>these things because it's hard to think about electrons. But

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>now let's think about electrons. Let's think about a quantum object.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>As you say, electrons have these weird properties, and so

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the key is that those two things are somehow constrained. Right.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We used red ball and blue ball because implicitly we

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>were saying they could only be one red ball and

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>only one blue ball. So if mine is red, yours

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>has to be blue. The constraints for the quantum objects

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is things like spin. You create two electrons together or

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>electron depositron or whatever so that their total spin is zero,

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and if I measure mind to be spin up, then

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>yours has to be spinned down, even if you're ten

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>light years away from each other. Now, the cool thing

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about this, the reason that it's different for electrons and

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for balls, is not just because they're tiny quantum objects,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but because they can have multiple versions of these properties. Like,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>when I measure the spin of the electron, I can

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>choose what direction to measure the spin around right like

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the top when you spin it, it spins around in access.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So when I measured the spin of the electron, I

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>can choose like some direction and measure the electron spin,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and the other electron ten light years away has to

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have the opposite spin along the same axis. The crazy

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>thing about electron spin is that you can't measure its

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>spin simultaneously multiple directions. You measure it one direction that

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>fuzzes the spin in the other direction, sort of like

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>momentum and position. John Bell was able to take advantage

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of this and came up with this crazy set of experiments.

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.959
<v Speaker 1>We take our electrons far apart, we agree randomly on

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>three directions that we can measure the electron on three axes,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and then we do a bunch of measurements. And he

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>showed that in the quantum mechanical case, where these things

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are not determined and they sort of like measurement along

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>one axis fuzzes the measurement along the other axis, then

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in that case you'll get a different set of statistical

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>correlations between your measurement, and in the classical case where

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's hidden variables, where things are like determined in advance.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So sort of mind blowing that he came up with

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this crazies beautiful, elegant set of experiments to force the

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>universe to reveal the fact that it was making these

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>decisions on the fly, that these things were really collapsing

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at the last moment, not in advance, that there's no

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>information going with these electrons. It's helping you determine where

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>their spin is, right, because I guess the you know,

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the counter the theory or the counter proposition is that

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you took this electron, you split it into

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a spin up and a spin down, you put him

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>into different bags. He took him far apart, and so

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you could say that, well, you know, we don't know

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>whether the electrons are spin up and down, but the

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>electron sort of know, like just like the red ball

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and the blue ball, like obviously one of them has

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>spin up and the other one's spin down. We just

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. And then when you open

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it you might be surprised. But you know, somebody who

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is tracking these electrons all along and totally knew which

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>one was up and which one's down. But I think

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the power of the Bell's experiment is

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that it somehow, through you know, complicated probabilities and scenarios,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it sort of proves that no, like not nobody knew

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>knows what these electrons were the whole time, like nobody,

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not even like whoever is making the universe or running

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the universe exactly, It's not determined. And the important thing

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand here is that it's not a single measurement.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not like I measure spin up and you measure

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>spin down and then we say, aha, it wasn't determined.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't decide that from one measurement, right because that

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>could have been determined. And if we're measuring along the

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>same axis, like I'm always going to get the opposite

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>answer as you. The genius of Bell's experiment is that

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's statistical, is that I'm measuring a bunch of different directions.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You're measuring a bunch of different directions, and the quantum

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>mechanics comes in with a correlation of our multiple measurements.

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very subtle effect. You can't see it from just

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>one measurement. You can do multiple measurements and study their correlations.

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like super smoking gun, but it's very

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>clear evidence because the correlations you get from quantum mechanics

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>are very different from the correlations you expect in the

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>case you describe where it's like all secretly determined in advance,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and when we do these measurements and people have actually

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>done these experiments, they get the numbers that agree with

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a quantum mechanical prediction, not the hidden variable prediction. Right.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like you can't tell if a coin

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is like a fake coin or a bias coin, but

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with one flip of the coin, you need to like

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>flip it a lot of times, you know, like, oh wait,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actually it's heads, you know, fifty one of the time

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a theater's coin. Right. That's kind of like

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the YEA behind builds experiment is that you run this

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>experiment where you split the electrons a whole bunch of

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>times and somehow you know the probabilities, the way you

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>set up the experiment, it tells you that the universe

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually random. Yeah, And it's more than just that

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's random, right, It's more than just that it's not

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>determined until the moment you look at the electron. It's

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>also that it's weirdly nonlocal. And these effects are somehow

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>happening across great distances in space time. And they've done

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>these experiments, you know, where things are close to each

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>other because they're complicated, and then they've managed to do

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>them further apart and further apart and further apart. And

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>now we've done them so far apart that there's no

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>possible way information can travel from one of the electrons

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to the other. Not like you're looking at one electron

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and then zoom at the speed of light. It tells

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thegether electron what to be, you know, I'm red, quick

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be blue. There's no time for that to happen. These

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>experiments have been done so far apart with synchronized clocks

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and everything, so there's no time for that to happen.

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And yet they still see these results, which means that

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the universe must be non local. Right, that like the

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is happening in one place can instantaneously affect things happening

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. That's like really hard to swallow, right, And

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>here I thought we were supposed to shop local environment. Well,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the point is that, you know, we thought

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that maybe quantum mechanics meant that the universe was random,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've actually proved it with Bell's experiments, and we're

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>actually going to dive into or at least trying to

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>dive into Bell's experiment in a later episode. But I

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>think the main point is that, you know, at least

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>until a few years ago, Bell's experiments sort put the

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>nail on the coffin that said that quantum mechanics is right,

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.959
<v Speaker 1>things are sort of unknowable and truly random at their court.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And so Bell's experiment shows that there can't be any

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>local hidden variables, right, that there's no information being carried

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>along with the electron that secretly determines in advance the

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>outcome of all of those experiments. And so now there's

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a theory that says that maybe the Bell's experiments are

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not all they're supposed to be, or maybe they're not

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>set up right, or maybe there are things actually in

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe that we're not seeing that maybe do make

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe totally deterministic or at least super deterministic. So

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get into that. But first let's take another quick break. Alright,

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about super determinism, which is um pretty super

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess at least super recent. Right, it's sort of

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a new idea that maybe Bell's experiments are not quite

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>properly set up, right. I think super determinism maybe oversells it,

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would call it like bonkers determinism. It's

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like deterministic determinism. It's like people who are really determined

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to find deterministic loopholes, you know. I think most people

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are convinced by Bell's experiments and the way they've been done.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really impressive to or to force experimentally. I think

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people are pushing hard to find loopholes, to say, like,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>are we absolutely sure is there a way you can

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>interpret these experiments and still have the universe b deterministic.

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Not like we want to reject Bell or anything. It's

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just like, let's just make absolutely sure is no other interpretation.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is sort of like an exercise in philosophical

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thorough nous, So it's more philosophical, it's not physics, you

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, Like, are you looking for loopholes

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in like the arguments of Bell's experiment, or looking for

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>loopholes in like the mechanics, or like the details of

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>how it's carried out? Well, I think it's all connected, right.

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The details of how it's carried out tell us exactly

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what we can and can't conclude. The first iterations of

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiments they did them sort of close by, because

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to have quantum particles that are entangled survive

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>travels long distances without getting perturbed by other stuff. To

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>preserve that entanglement over distances is challenging. So the first

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>iterations of Bell's experiments were sort of nearby, and there

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't that precise. People thought, well, you know, these electrons

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>could still be communicating. There's still time for them to

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>send messages back and forth somehow. So then they did

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>them further and further apart, which is harder and harder,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and now we're sure that they can't be communicating. So

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of thing we're doing, is like looking

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for those loopholes and then trying to close them wondering,

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is there a way we could do this experiment in

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a way that proves that that crazy alternative interpretation of

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiment can't be the case? So super determinism is

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in that category. It's like, well, are you sure it's

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not this crazy other bonker's idea? How do you actually know?

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, then what are the sort of the

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>arguments of super determinism. What are they saying about Bell's experiments?

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So super determinism and this is going to sound sort

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of nutty, says that, like the whole universe has basically

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>been contrived to trick us into thinking that the universe

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is random and quantum mechanical, but actually the whole thing

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>is just like a setup. You're right, it does sound bonker. Wait,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you're saying the idea is that the universe is not random,

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just sort of built in a way to make

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it look random. Maybe everything really is determined, and it's

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like determined all the way back to the Big Bang,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like things back in the very early times

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the universe determine things that happen now, including things

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that seem to be usually separated in a way that

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't coordinate them. Maybe if you just go like

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>far enough back in time and hatch your plot, you

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>can arrange things so that they look random, but they're

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>actually determined. I guess, how do you make something look random?

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And what's the difference between something looking random and actually

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>being random. Well, let's take your example of a coin. Right.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's say I give you a coin and I wanted

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you to test to see if it's fair. What are

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do. You're gonna flip it a thousand times

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or a million times. You'll measure the fraction of times

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that you get heads or tails. Right now, what if

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I give you a biased coin, one that gives you

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>heads seventy of the time, but I somehow arranged to

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>influence you and the way that you do your experiment.

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I distract you with bananas or you know, I do

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a silly dance because I know how you flip the coin,

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know how to affect you and bias your

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>experiment so that it looks like it's fifty percent of

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the time. Then you're going to measure the coin to

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>be fifty percent of time heads. You're going to declare

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's a fair coin. Even though it's not. So

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>if I can somehow interfere with the way you do

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your experiment because I know you and I know how

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate you, then maybe I can affect your conclusions

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of that experiment. Whoa, whoa, Wait a minute. Okay, So

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>here's the set up, the setup. As you gave me

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>biased coin, like a cheater's coin that's actually gonna give

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>me heads seventy of the time. But you're saying that somehow,

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 1>when I go to flip my coin a thousand times,

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're somehow going to you know, blow some air or

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>something so that it lands heads fifty percent of the

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>time during my experiments. But then when I go place

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a big bed, then you don't do that. Is that

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying? Yeah, something like that. And it's not

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>even as involved as I'm gonna blow some air. I'm

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna specifically interfere with the experiment. I'm gonna let you

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>do your experiment, but i'm gonna manipulate you somehow into

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking you've done it randomly, because when you flip a coin,

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not actually truly random, right, Like you

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>flip a coin the same way twice, you're gonna get

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the same answer. It's just sort of very difficult to

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>do that. So imagine I'm some super powerful demon and

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly how to make you flip a coin

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just the right way to get heads or tails, And

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm some super powerful mind controller guy, and I can

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>make you do that somehow. This is a very ridiculous, obviously,

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is a possible interpretation of the experiment, right,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's absurd and outlandish, but it's sort of possible.

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>But I guess my question is, how exactly are you

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>manipulating me? Like somehow you know how I'm holding the

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>coin or somehow you know, like if I start with

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my coin one way in my palm before I toss it,

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna do something so that it actually I

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>read it as heads or tails later on? Does that

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>what you mean? I'm not going to change how you

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>read the coin. I'm not going to change how the

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>coin flies through the air. I'm just gonna change how

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you throw the coin, because how you throw the coin

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>determines actually what happens. So if I can get you

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to throw it in a certain way, then I can

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>change the outcome of the experiment. Oh, I see, like

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>somehow this cheater's coin. If you throw it a certain way,

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll get heads tails, but if you throw it maybe

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a regular way, then you get heads tails. You're sort

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of controlling how I throw it either way way or

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the seventy percent way. And when I do the experiments,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.959
<v Speaker 1>you're controlling me to do it, to toss it the way.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you when I go to place the bed

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like for real, then you you have me through it

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the other way way. And so that sounds ridiculous and

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>contrived and implausible to you. Then getting ready for Bell's

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>experiment and the effects of superdeterminism, that says that maybe

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe is set up in a way so

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>that the people who have been doing these experiments, which

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 1>requires some randomness, right, because they're choosing these axes on

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which to make these electron spin measurements. What if those

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't actually random? What if that's been sort of like

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>contrived throughout the history of the universe, including like how

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>these people grew up, how they designed their experiments, how

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they chose to try to find random information to conduct

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>their experiments. All of that has been controlled since the

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning of time, such that these experiments would look like

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the random even though they're not. That's super determinism. You're

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that, like in in Bell's experiments, you know, um,

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.439
<v Speaker 1>it's an experiment and it's random, And so even if

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you like do the experiment perfectly, there is a possibility,

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>because it is sort of an experiment, that it might

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you that the coin is fair even though it's

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>not right, because it's still a coin. Like even if

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I take a fake bias coin, you know, and I

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>tossed it a thousand times, it's still technically possible for

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>me to get fifty heads tail. And so I think

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that somehow my coincidence, Um, the universe since

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of time has been set up in a

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>way so that every time somebody runs Bill's experiments, somehow

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they always pick the direction that tells me that the

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>coin is fifty, when actually it's exactly because there's this

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>step in these experiments when you have to pick what

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>access I'm not going to measure my electron on. You

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:50.959
<v Speaker 1>have one electron over here and one electron over there,

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and each electron you need to pick one of three

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>ACTSI and then Bell's experiment tells you how often you'll

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get the same result and how often you'll get opposite spins.

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But you need to pick the axti randomly so that

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you add up to the right correlations. And so if

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not picking those randomly, if you're like contriving those

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to always be the same direction, for example, then you're

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to get one third. You're gonna get this

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And so it's possible to manipulate these

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>experiments in theory to make that happen. Now in practice,

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the folks that do these experiments, they're very careful about this.

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 1>They don't just like use some random number generator off

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the internet, like. They have developed these hilarious efforts to

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>make their experiments like really random and impossible to manipulate.

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>In the case of these experiments I was reading about

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and fifteen, the measurement decisions were determined

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>by applying some operation to three bits of information from

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>three independent sources, one of which was random digits of pie,

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>another was binary strings derived from Monty Python and the

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Holy Grail transformed into a bit sequence, another from episodes

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of Saved by the Bell, which I love because you know,

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this is Bell's experiment, and so they're using episodes of

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Saved by the Bell, converting that script into a series

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of numbers, and using that to generate part of their input.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they're making the experiment more legit, you

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm saying, Like, I'm listening to this and

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking it's less legit. So these crazy antics, Now

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you know how television production works. In order to manipulate

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiment, Not only do you have to manipulate all

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>these experiments across space and time, you also have to

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>somehow manipulate these meetings where they talk about the script

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for these television episodes in a way that determines the

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>outcome of these experiments. Like it's ridiculous. You know how

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>impossible it is to get that through network executives. Well,

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it is that, you know, when you run

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiment, and again we'll get into more details of

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it in a later episode, but I think the it

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is that there's some choice in the experiments, Like you say, okay,

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll measure along this access, and it is technically possible

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to pick an access that tells you that the coin

0:44:55.960 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is fair, right, Like, technically it's possible, And so the

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it is that you know, maybe every time they've run

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this experiment and they've picked a random direction, they've somehow

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>picked the direction that tells you that the coin is fair,

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning like it's some strange, super weird coincidence that someone

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we think the universe is random, but really we just

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lived in this crazy universe where every time we run

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiments, we've always somehow chosen the direction that makes

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it look Yeah, maybe these electrons really are determined by

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>local information that's not available to us, and we do

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>these experiments to try to suss that out. But the

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>experiments have a bit of a random element to them,

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and if it's not actually random, and we think it's

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>random but were being tricked and manipulated, and then we

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>could conclude that the universe has this random element, that

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>there is this non local random thing happening, when in

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>reality it's not, And so that sounds ridiculous and unlikely,

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and it is. You know, it's the state we're at

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>where we're like trying to swallow the weirdness of quantum

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and just trying to make sure before we accept

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe is this weird way that there is no

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>other possible explanation, and so again this is like an

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>exercise and philosophical thoroughness, just to make sure we thought

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about all the other possibilities. Well, I guess you know,

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it could be like, um, maybe we live in some

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of multiverse and we just happen to live in

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the multiverse where every time we run Bell's experiments we

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a fair coin, But really we're just somehow

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>fooling ourselves into thinking the coin is fair. Yeah, it's possible, right,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems really unlikely because there's been so many iterations

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in these experiments in different conditions, and so it just

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gets more and more implausible the more times we tested,

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and the more times it comes out like bang on

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly what quantum mechanics predicts. So it's not something anybody

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.240
<v Speaker 1>should take seriously as anything other than like an interesting

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment, like how far do you have to go

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to rescue determinism? How ridiculous do you have to imagine

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe is in order for it to not be

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.879
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical in this way that we are slowly coming

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to grips with. I see, so when you say super determinism,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really more like super stubborn determinism, Like it's not

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>actually like likely that it's true, but it's you're still

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>clinging to the idea that maybe the universe is determined.

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like super desperate is um. People are desperate not

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to give up on determinism. Super desperate determinism. It's like

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the bizarro superman. All right, well, what what does it

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>all mean? Doesn't mean that there that we're increasingly thinking

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that there is free will or unpredictability in the universe,

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right that we've now maybe are getting closer to leaving

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>behind this idea that the universe is determined. Well, we

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are definitely coming to grips with and accepting this consequence

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is nonlocal that they have to somehow

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 1>make this collapse decision off space in no time, which

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is sort of amazing. And you know, another interesting loophole

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>or wrinkle to this interpretation of Bell's experiment is that

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember that Bell's experiment just tells us

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are no local hidden variables. It's possible for

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>them to be global hidden variables. Maybe there's like some

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>bank somewhere that keeps all this information and is arranging

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:08.399
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff. And can transmit it across space

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and time instantaneously. That's basically bow Mean mechanics. We had

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>an episode about that last year, so check that out

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:17.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're curious about that interpretation of Belle's experiment, which

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is actually one of Bell himself's favorite interpretations. But I

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>think that most people understand it to mean that the

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:26.760
<v Speaker 1>universe is fundamentally random, that there are these decisions being

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 1>made sort of at the last minute by the universe

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>when the wave function collapses. What that means for free

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>will is a question for philosophers. All right, well, I

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>guess um, maybe we should change their name to sad determinism.

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>But do you know, I thought maybe in our last

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>episode we talked about how there is no simultaneity in

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe, right, this idea that there's no real sort

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of like fixed time in the universe. Could there be

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>some sort of loophole there? That's a good point, right,

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how can you even talk about simultonay across space and time?

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There isn't a loophole there because they've separated them so

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>far apart that we know that these things cannot be

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>costly linked to each other. So while we can't say

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly which one happens first, this electron measurement or that

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>electron measurement. We do know that they can't be costly

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>linked because they're so far apart in space. All right, well,

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>then I guess maybe the universe is really is random

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and unpredictable. Um, let's test this right now. Daniel, what

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>am I going to say next? It's gonna be some

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 1>joke about strange balls. Wrong. I was gonna say, thanks

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We hope you enjoyed that. See you

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio.

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>For more podcast from my Heart Radio, visit the I

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:49:53.719 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.