1 00:00:02,360 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,400 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day 4 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,280 Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,880 Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are 6 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine 7 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,280 Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or 8 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,919 Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg 9 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:37,200 Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. So here's the laces 10 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,480 Speaker 2: this morning. How's lawmakers set to vote on the fate 11 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 2: of President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada. A trio of 12 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,559 Speaker 2: Republicans joining Democrats calling for the vote, joining us now 13 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 2: to extend the conversation. Scott Lindscombe at the Cana Institute, Scott, 14 00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 2: Welcome to the program. Interest in Exchange with the President. 15 00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 2: In an interview broadcast in the United States in the 16 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 2: last forty eight hours or so, Scott, the President was 17 00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:59,520 Speaker 2: asked about tariff and he brought up the example of Switzerland, 18 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 2: said that he didn't like the way he was spoken to. 19 00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 2: So we ratchet up the tariff just a little bit 20 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,680 Speaker 2: more does not undermine the official justification for these tariffs. 21 00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:09,680 Speaker 3: Well, it certainly does. 22 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 4: This is supposed to be about a national emergency that 23 00:01:15,240 --> 00:01:19,720 Speaker 4: requires it's an event that's so abrupt and so urgent 24 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 4: that the president needs to invoke powers that are typically 25 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 4: reserved to Congress and that the president typically isn't allowed 26 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 4: to access. So if the whole basis for these tariffs 27 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:39,600 Speaker 4: is not the trade deficit or fentanyl coming across the border, 28 00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:44,280 Speaker 4: and instead is the Swiss representative's voice, then the president 29 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:47,639 Speaker 4: shouldn't really have the ability to invoke these tariff powers 30 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 4: at all. 31 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 1: Scott, this is definitely going to be something that I'm 32 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:52,320 Speaker 1: sure the Supreme Court is paying attention to, at least 33 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: the lawyers who are arguing for it. I am curious 34 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:57,120 Speaker 1: about what Tyler was just talking about, which is that 35 00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 1: you are getting some pushback now from Republicans around some 36 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 1: of this tariff policy, in particular tied to affordability concerns 37 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 1: and how this is playing through to their voters. How 38 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:08,600 Speaker 1: much more of that do you expect? 39 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:11,920 Speaker 4: I mean, I expect a lot of it this year. 40 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 4: In poll after poll after poll, the President's tariffs just 41 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 4: aren't popular, and voters have tied them to continued concerns 42 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:28,799 Speaker 4: about affordability. You know, economists don't want deflation, but voters do. 43 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 4: And the fact is that while inflation is slowed, prices 44 00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 4: definitely haven't gone down, and particularly for key staples at 45 00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:40,679 Speaker 4: the grocery store, like beef. And so you're going to, 46 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 4: I think, see continued connection of the tariffs to the 47 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 4: affordability issues, and you're going to see Democrats, I think, 48 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:51,400 Speaker 4: use that as a lever including through symbolic votes like 49 00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:54,359 Speaker 4: the one we're going to get I think today, if 50 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:54,960 Speaker 4: not tomorrow. 51 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:57,359 Speaker 1: This is the reason why people haven't been paying attention 52 00:02:57,360 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 1: to symbolic votes is because they are symbolic, and that's 53 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 1: the reason why the Democrats have kind of been a 54 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 1: little impotent on this. The interesting aspect is that there 55 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 1: are a number of Republicans that are starting to join forces. 56 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 1: And I do wonder how much heading into and after 57 00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 1: the midterms you start to get a real check coming 58 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,960 Speaker 1: from some Republican constituents based on what they're hearing from voters. 59 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:18,240 Speaker 1: Do you see that as crumping some of the tariff 60 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 1: plans that have currently been laid out. 61 00:03:21,560 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, quite Frankly, I don't think that the 62 00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 4: Congress is going to have the ability to do too 63 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 4: much to stop these emergency tariffs under the International Emergency 64 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 4: Economic Powers Act, simply because they're going to need veto 65 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 4: proof majorities to get past Trump. So even after the midterms, 66 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 4: I think it'd be really difficult for Congress to really 67 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 4: pass any sort of tariff reform, whether it's to the 68 00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 4: emergency tariffs or to the national security tariffs under section 69 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 4: two the two. I mean, I'd love to see it, 70 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 4: but the reality is, these institutional checks are pretty weak 71 00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 4: because of the veto proof majority. 72 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:01,840 Speaker 3: And that's why I think one of the. 73 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 4: Reasons why the Supreme Court's decision, whenever we get it, 74 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 4: is so important here because that would be a legitimate 75 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 4: check on those emergency tariffs if the court really does 76 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:13,240 Speaker 4: say the president's not allowed to use them. 77 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 2: Scott, We've seen lots of justifications for the terifts that 78 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 2: were introduced a year ago, raising revenue, national security, bringing 79 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 2: manufacturing home, getting your own back when someone upsets you 80 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 2: on the phone, all of those things. The number one 81 00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:28,359 Speaker 2: issue for me, Scott, is getting China to rebalance, and 82 00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 2: the Treasury Secretary had come out repeatedly and articulated quite 83 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:33,440 Speaker 2: perfectly as to why we need to do that, and 84 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 2: not just ask the Europeans as well. Now, Scott, I 85 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 2: think it begs the question now, after the evidence of 86 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 2: the last twelve months, what we can actually do about that, 87 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 2: because that trade surplus from China has never been wired 88 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 2: to despite the tariffs introduced last year. 89 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:50,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, it really shows the limitations of unilateral tariffs to 90 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 4: do a lot to change foreign government behavior, particularly when 91 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 4: it comes to a massive economy like China that's dealing 92 00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:01,760 Speaker 4: with really systemic issues that simply can't be fixed by 93 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 4: subsidizing a factory or removing a subsidy or something like that. 94 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 4: So the fact is that you need a lot more 95 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:17,080 Speaker 4: than simply applying attacks on some imported goods to fundamentally 96 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:21,640 Speaker 4: change a China's economic model, and quite frankly, you might 97 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 4: not be able to do it at all. Unilateral policies 98 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 4: coming from a single government tend to produce backlash in 99 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 4: the target country. You've seen some of that in China 100 00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:35,520 Speaker 4: as well, where they're actually doubling down on nationalization and 101 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:39,159 Speaker 4: self sufficiency efforts. And then the last thing, of course, 102 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 4: is that Trump's tariffs haven't just targeted China. When you're 103 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:48,280 Speaker 4: also targeting China competitors like India, Vietnam, Malaysia, even Mexico 104 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:52,600 Speaker 4: and Canada, it makes it even harder to induce those 105 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,440 Speaker 4: types of changes. And I think again that's why we've 106 00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:58,640 Speaker 4: seen record exports out of China simply getting moved to 107 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 4: third countries that don't have Trump tariffs attached. 108 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:15,680 Speaker 2: Stay with US mult Bloomberg Savannah's coming up off to this. 109 00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 1: This is actually a comment from a Bloomberg user which 110 00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:20,440 Speaker 1: I think is a really interesting one, which is annual 111 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 1: benchmark revisions, updated birth death model, and new seasonal factors. 112 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,360 Speaker 1: It's apples to oranges comparisons. What data are we actually 113 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:30,000 Speaker 1: looking at? I mean, look, ultimately, the market is taking 114 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 1: this at face value, and I am too, because ultimately 115 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:35,159 Speaker 1: it's a good sign to see that there is job creation, 116 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:38,040 Speaker 1: particularly in the private sector. On the flip side, how 117 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:41,599 Speaker 1: do you get some sort of longer trajectory look based 118 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:43,960 Speaker 1: in all of the revisions that seasonal everything that's been 119 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 1: going on. 120 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:46,360 Speaker 2: Good luck, Mike Keay Beddy joins US now, Michael cape 121 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 2: at MULK and Stanley Mike, good to see you. Welcome 122 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 2: to the program. 123 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:50,040 Speaker 5: It's all clear now, is it? 124 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:52,280 Speaker 2: If I was calling you as a client, my first 125 00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 2: question would be how much confidence can I have in this? 126 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:56,200 Speaker 2: Is this the real deal? 127 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:58,560 Speaker 5: I think it's largely the real deal. 128 00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:02,320 Speaker 6: Everything that you mentioned is completely fair, benchmark revisions, new 129 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:07,799 Speaker 6: birth death adjustments, there's favorable seasonal factors in this report. 130 00:07:08,360 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 6: But does it wipe away one hundred and seventy thousand 131 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 6: private payrolls? 132 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 5: Probably not. 133 00:07:12,200 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 6: I mean we were at ninety thousand n private payrolls 134 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,080 Speaker 6: and I felt optimistic, right, So if truth is ninety, 135 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:19,720 Speaker 6: I'm super happy with that number. 136 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 5: Right. 137 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:22,520 Speaker 6: So at one seventy, I think it's hard to bring 138 00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 6: all of that. 139 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:24,640 Speaker 5: Back and look through it. 140 00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 6: So, and to your point, it does fit a lot 141 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,000 Speaker 6: of other data points in the economy. Durable goods have 142 00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:34,400 Speaker 6: been strong, Ism has picked up, Manufacturing output. 143 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 5: Has been on an upward trend. 144 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 6: So seeing some complementary hiring alongside that is a welcome 145 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:42,280 Speaker 6: sign for the economy. 146 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 2: Do you think focusing on December retail sales like we 147 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:46,200 Speaker 2: will guess today is a waste of time? Are you 148 00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 2: explained to bounce back? Should we just see that as 149 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:48,880 Speaker 2: a headfake? 150 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 6: I think we will see some bounce back, but not entirely. 151 00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:55,720 Speaker 6: There is softness in that report. But just remember, even 152 00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 6: in what i'll call normal times, retail sales is very volatile. 153 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:02,200 Speaker 6: It gets revised frequently, So the signal out of retail 154 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:05,160 Speaker 6: sales I think is always kind of maybe second order. 155 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 6: I think the market puts more weight on it than 156 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 6: it otherwise should. But look, even with that number, consumption 157 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 6: is likely to come in at around two point three 158 00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 6: percent in the fourth quarter, still a solid number with 159 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 6: a week December retail sales. 160 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 1: Are these good jobs that are being created? Do we 161 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 1: have a sense of the quality of them? 162 00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:28,720 Speaker 6: Well, I haven't seen the mix, but I think you know, 163 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:31,680 Speaker 6: the average hourly earnings number at point four suggests that 164 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:34,920 Speaker 6: you know they are quality jobs on that front. That's 165 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:38,920 Speaker 6: an average number across all the sectors. So I think 166 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:41,840 Speaker 6: any job is better than no job, So I certainly 167 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:42,839 Speaker 6: think there's quality in it. 168 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:45,000 Speaker 1: Yes, I guess I'm looking at for example, one hundred 169 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:47,800 Speaker 1: and twenty four thousand created in health and social assistance, 170 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: private education one hundred thirty seven. I mean some of 171 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: the main winners have really come from a couple of 172 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,559 Speaker 1: secers that are sort of independent of the cycle. Is 173 00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:57,439 Speaker 1: that we're getting older, and that we're paying a lot 174 00:08:57,440 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 1: of money for our kids to go to college. I mean, 175 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 1: how much can we glean strength from these numbers and 176 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:03,160 Speaker 1: a sense of sustainability. 177 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,079 Speaker 6: Well, the narrowness of job gains has always been the question. 178 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 6: The narrowness of growth in the economy has always been 179 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:12,839 Speaker 6: an issue. It's spending by upper income consumers, it's ai 180 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 6: related business spending. Our thesis is that you will see 181 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:20,120 Speaker 6: some broadening out in twenty twenty six. So, as you 182 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:24,240 Speaker 6: mentioned the rebounded small caps, we do think that if 183 00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 6: you get a stabilization in the labor market, inflation does 184 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 6: come down, it can support purchasing power of other parts 185 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:34,480 Speaker 6: of the economy, and the economy can broaden out. So 186 00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:39,280 Speaker 6: the narrowness of the recovery and the ongoing expansion is 187 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 6: an issue. 188 00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,280 Speaker 5: We think it will broaden out. We'll see if it happens. 189 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 1: Right now, you're seeing the market price out or push 190 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: back some of the expected rate cuts to July from 191 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:50,719 Speaker 1: June previously, in the sense that maybe this is not 192 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:52,640 Speaker 1: an economy that needs rate cuts. There are a number 193 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 1: of people at the Federal Reserve who believe you should 194 00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:58,480 Speaker 1: keep running this economy hot because otherwise people could lose 195 00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 1: their jobs. And the whole we're structuring takes place with 196 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:03,040 Speaker 1: artificial intelligence, and if you don't do that, you'll get 197 00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 1: scarring that lasts a long time. 198 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:06,000 Speaker 3: Where do you fall on that? 199 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:08,080 Speaker 1: Do you think that that's a legitimate argument that you 200 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,720 Speaker 1: should proactively cut rates at a time of structural change. 201 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:13,480 Speaker 5: I think they've done some of that. 202 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 6: I think it's easy to see that they've done that 203 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:18,959 Speaker 6: over the last two years. The question is kind of 204 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 6: where does that process end. I think the June July 205 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,400 Speaker 6: period for the next rate cut is about right, and 206 00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:29,080 Speaker 6: this data today says rate cuts, if and when they come, 207 00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:32,560 Speaker 6: will be based on inflation. So when does the committee 208 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:35,679 Speaker 6: get evidence that inflation is decelerating, that tariffs are a 209 00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:40,040 Speaker 6: transitory upward push on inflation. Sometime around the middle of 210 00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:42,600 Speaker 6: the year is probably where that evidence comes through. But 211 00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 6: to your question, I think they have done some cutting 212 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 6: preemptively to support the labor market and prevent some downside risk. 213 00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:50,680 Speaker 6: We'll see ultimately if that was enough. 214 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:53,200 Speaker 2: I noticed that was your focus coming into the new year, 215 00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:56,080 Speaker 2: looking at the dual mandate, that you thought the inflation 216 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:57,880 Speaker 2: sign of things, price stability was going to be more 217 00:10:57,880 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 2: instructive for the future of FED policy. 218 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 3: Is that right? 219 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:02,719 Speaker 6: That's right, and this number I think confirms that right. 220 00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 6: So they had to do some They decided to FED 221 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 6: to do some risk management rate cuts to support downside 222 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:11,839 Speaker 6: or prevent downside risk to the labor market. They put 223 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:14,920 Speaker 6: in seventy five basis points of cuts. The data suggests 224 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 6: that things are stabilizing, So if and when the FED 225 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:21,200 Speaker 6: cuts further, it will be you know where inflation is 226 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 6: coming out of the first quarter, we think it'll be 227 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:25,280 Speaker 6: about three percent year on year. We think it'll settle 228 00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 6: down to about two and a half by the end 229 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,600 Speaker 6: of the year. Somewhere in there is room for a 230 00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:30,560 Speaker 6: few more rate cuts. 231 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,079 Speaker 2: The two and a half we cut around two and 232 00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:33,680 Speaker 2: a half. 233 00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 6: Now, well we're thinking three. 234 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 2: Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this. 235 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:52,359 Speaker 2: Let's turn to energy and critical minerals. The Trump administration 236 00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:55,240 Speaker 2: so to announce some major shift in climate rules, rolling 237 00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 2: back and Obama era policy regulating fossil fuels. On that 238 00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:01,360 Speaker 2: and more, the US and Serier Sancretary Dunkbergham joins us. 239 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 2: Now for more, missus Secretary, you have been a busy 240 00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 2: man over the last week. I just want to start 241 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 2: with Project Vote and then we'll get to the EPI 242 00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 2: and what's going to happen with regulations around fossil fuels 243 00:12:09,640 --> 00:12:12,640 Speaker 2: and such. MISSUS Secretary, What is Project Vote and how 244 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 2: should I be thinking about this in comparison to say 245 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 2: the SPI. 246 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 7: Well, it's absolutely a comparison. The Strategic Patrolling Reserve has 247 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 7: created a great buffer on price shocks for American consumers 248 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:29,079 Speaker 7: for decades and decades we had no equivalent on critical minerals. 249 00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 7: There are sixty minerals on the Critical Minerals list. 250 00:12:31,679 --> 00:12:34,679 Speaker 3: Some of those are rare earth elements. China, as you 251 00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:35,880 Speaker 3: know Jonathan. 252 00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 7: Controls about eighty five to one hundred percent of the 253 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:43,360 Speaker 7: processing and refining on about twenty of those, enough to 254 00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 7: put a stranglehold on global industry, whether it's tech high tech, 255 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:52,840 Speaker 7: whether it's defense, whether it's consumer and so with the 256 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:55,520 Speaker 7: threats last year put out by China on export controls, 257 00:12:55,559 --> 00:13:00,880 Speaker 7: the US leapt into action. We're broadly bringing mining back 258 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 7: in America. But this idea of creating a strategic Critical 259 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:09,520 Speaker 7: Minerals Reserve across sixty different elements, driven by the private sector, 260 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 7: great leadership by across the board of multiple Cabinet secretaries 261 00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 7: in the Trump administration, working with the up XM Bank, 262 00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 7: working with the private sector about ten billion and alone 263 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:23,360 Speaker 7: about two billion in equity capital going in. 264 00:13:23,920 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 3: This is going to be private sector. 265 00:13:25,440 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 7: Funded, market driven, and those critical minerals will be stored 266 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:35,480 Speaker 7: at locations that are economically smart and economically efficient. 267 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 3: Around the country. But the idea is that we will. 268 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 7: In addition to that, last week, there was also at 269 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:44,440 Speaker 7: the State Department a historic meeting. Over fifty countries came 270 00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:47,439 Speaker 7: to the US, all of them some of them already 271 00:13:47,440 --> 00:13:51,080 Speaker 7: signed on others many others interested joining a club of 272 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:54,679 Speaker 7: nations with free trade on critical minerals with price floors. 273 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:58,080 Speaker 7: The key on price floors is that would block China 274 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 7: from illegal dumping to kill the vice across anyone particularly 275 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 7: critical mineral, and that's going to allow the assurance for 276 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 7: capital to start flowing back into mining and refining of 277 00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:12,959 Speaker 7: these minerals in the US and in our allies. So tremendous, 278 00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 7: tremendous interest from the leaders of ministers from around the 279 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 7: country that were there at the event hosted the State 280 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:25,240 Speaker 7: Department last week. So anyway, great progress going to make 281 00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:27,760 Speaker 7: sure that US is secure relative to our position on 282 00:14:27,800 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 7: critical minerals. 283 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:31,160 Speaker 2: And MISSUS Secretary, you certainly alluded to it. China's got 284 00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:33,840 Speaker 2: a stranglehold over critical minerals, and America needs to do 285 00:14:33,880 --> 00:14:36,600 Speaker 2: something about it, and overwhelmingly this agreement on this program 286 00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 2: often almost weekly to do something about it. What is 287 00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:42,240 Speaker 2: less understood is why they have that stranglehold. You talked 288 00:14:42,280 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 2: about pricing and dumping. What about regulations this is typically 289 00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:50,000 Speaker 2: quite a dirty process. Is that held back production domestically 290 00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 2: as well? 291 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 3: Well? 292 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:55,320 Speaker 7: There's been an attack on American energy in this country, 293 00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:57,480 Speaker 7: but even longer than that, there's been an attack on 294 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:01,640 Speaker 7: mining in our country. And just like President Trump's drill, 295 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:02,720 Speaker 7: baby drill, we've got. 296 00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:04,280 Speaker 3: To get back to mind, baby mine. 297 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:08,640 Speaker 7: The US graduated thirty six thousand lawyers last year and 298 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:13,000 Speaker 7: about three hundred people with mining and metallurgical degrees. China, 299 00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 7: of course, is not doing it cleaner than any I mean, 300 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 7: whether they're tearing up the Congo or Indonesia, child labor, 301 00:15:22,120 --> 00:15:25,840 Speaker 7: illegal cartels, criminal organizations. 302 00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 3: All of these things that are going on. 303 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 7: It's a dirty industry potentially for the environment, but there's 304 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:33,240 Speaker 7: a lot of corruption around that. In part because countries 305 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:36,400 Speaker 7: like America are like those in Europe that have rules 306 00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 7: that have epas that can do things cleaner, better, safer, smarter, 307 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:42,040 Speaker 7: both in terms of the environment, in terms of the 308 00:15:42,120 --> 00:15:45,560 Speaker 7: labor force. Basically got out of this business, and we've 309 00:15:45,560 --> 00:15:47,240 Speaker 7: got to get the free world's got to get back 310 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 7: into the mining business and show that with innovation that 311 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:51,720 Speaker 7: we can do it, and we can do it in 312 00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:54,760 Speaker 7: a way that protects the environment, protects the workers, and 313 00:15:54,920 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 7: also then protects the economies of these countries. And so 314 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 7: this is a strategic important for the United States to 315 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:05,720 Speaker 7: get back in and be part of that is the 316 00:16:05,760 --> 00:16:09,520 Speaker 7: permitting process. We've put a stranglehold on permitting. But for 317 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:13,800 Speaker 7: President Trump, we're breaking the logjam on permitting. Big announcements 318 00:16:13,840 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 7: coming around the engagement finding and this is going to 319 00:16:16,120 --> 00:16:19,880 Speaker 7: be a huge, huge step forward in terms of getting 320 00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:23,080 Speaker 7: projects done and keeping plants open in America. 321 00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 1: Mister Secretary, there's a question around refinding things like lithia 322 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:29,480 Speaker 1: that are crucial for a lot of the high tech 323 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 1: aspects that go into our economy. There's a question about 324 00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:34,760 Speaker 1: copper really necessary for the build out of some of 325 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 1: the hyperscalers in particular. On the other side, there are 326 00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:40,360 Speaker 1: things like coal and there's a real question of some 327 00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 1: of the rollbacks the EPA rules, like lowering emission standards 328 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: as well as potentially increasing the use of coal. Why 329 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 1: are those necessary to get some of the national security 330 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 1: goals that you're talking about. 331 00:16:53,720 --> 00:16:58,040 Speaker 7: Well, we'll be making some more announcements on beautiful clean 332 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:00,400 Speaker 7: coal today, as President Trump likes to call it, and 333 00:17:00,440 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 7: should call it, because there's a coal plant running in 334 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:06,240 Speaker 7: America today. It has survived an onslaught for twenty years. 335 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:10,800 Speaker 7: But they've taken everything, virtually everything out of the Knox, 336 00:17:10,840 --> 00:17:15,320 Speaker 7: the socks, that anything that would be considered an issue 337 00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 7: relative the environment, and what's left. The attack on coal 338 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 7: as a baseload power has been largely around CO two emissions, 339 00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 7: and with the reversal of the endangement finding that says 340 00:17:25,440 --> 00:17:29,720 Speaker 7: that this was massive overreach by the Obama EPA, that 341 00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:32,480 Speaker 7: we are going to go back to a thing where 342 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:36,200 Speaker 7: we can have consumer choice that's lower prices. And of course, 343 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:38,560 Speaker 7: with the big storms we had in the Northeast last week, 344 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 7: I mean check back on Secretary Rights press conference last Friday, 345 00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:46,760 Speaker 7: but we would have had millions and millions of people 346 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:49,840 Speaker 7: in this country without power if coal hadn't stepped up. 347 00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:52,720 Speaker 7: Coal was the hero of keeping the lights and the 348 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:55,720 Speaker 7: heat on in America, and all of the money that 349 00:17:55,760 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 7: has been spent in the northeastern part of this country 350 00:17:58,280 --> 00:18:01,320 Speaker 7: on renewables. There is times those storms where we had 351 00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 7: less than two percent of the power coming from wind 352 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:06,679 Speaker 7: and solar. There was more coming from burning wooden trash 353 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:10,639 Speaker 7: than there was coming from wind and solar, and coal 354 00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:12,720 Speaker 7: in some parts of the country was providing twenty five 355 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:17,040 Speaker 7: percent of the electricity, So we need The Biden plan 356 00:18:17,200 --> 00:18:21,360 Speaker 7: of energy transition was actually energy subtraction. It wasn't addition, 357 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 7: It wasn't transition, it was subtraction. They were shutting down 358 00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:29,440 Speaker 7: baseload and then replacing it with intermittent, unreliable, foreign sourced 359 00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:33,920 Speaker 7: forms of energy that required us to build out all 360 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 7: kinds of additional infrastructure on top of the infrastructure we 361 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,560 Speaker 7: already had. That's what drove up prices. And now we're 362 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:42,560 Speaker 7: facing this AI arms race with China. We need more power, 363 00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 7: We need energy audition. The way to have energy addition 364 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 7: is to stop stop getting rid of the stuff that 365 00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:51,840 Speaker 7: already works, and of course that includes our fossil fuel 366 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:54,919 Speaker 7: baseload and the PGM market. Seventy percent of the power 367 00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 7: was coming from hydrocarbons. 368 00:18:58,359 --> 00:18:59,240 Speaker 3: During those storms. 369 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:01,480 Speaker 7: I mean, America and the world is dependent on it 370 00:19:01,520 --> 00:19:03,639 Speaker 7: is going to be for in long future. 371 00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:06,240 Speaker 3: Innovation is what we need to help solve any. 372 00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:08,760 Speaker 7: Concerns that people might have about future climate change. 373 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:10,640 Speaker 1: Mister Secretary, A lot of people could get on board 374 00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:12,160 Speaker 1: with that. The problem is that a lot of people 375 00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:14,080 Speaker 1: have pointed out that it feels like there are certain 376 00:19:14,240 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 1: energy sources that have gotten subtracted in this administration, as well, 377 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:20,920 Speaker 1: wind being among them. It's not necessarily that we want 378 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:24,040 Speaker 1: all energy sources, but picking winners and losers. How do 379 00:19:24,040 --> 00:19:24,639 Speaker 1: you counter that? 380 00:19:25,960 --> 00:19:29,119 Speaker 7: Well, it's easy because we're not picking winners and losers. 381 00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:37,880 Speaker 7: We're picking reliable, affordable, nationally secure sources that can provide 382 00:19:37,960 --> 00:19:41,120 Speaker 7: what Americans need, what we need for low prices for consumers, 383 00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:43,080 Speaker 7: what we need for industry, and what we need for AI. 384 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 7: What we're not subsidizing any longer is intermittent, weather dependent 385 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 7: foreign source, which, in the case of offshore wind, hits 386 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 7: all three of those, but it's also the highest cost, 387 00:19:55,160 --> 00:19:58,240 Speaker 7: it's not affordable, and it's also opposed. 388 00:19:57,800 --> 00:19:59,160 Speaker 3: By our marine fisheries. 389 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 7: I was meeting with a group of third and fourth 390 00:20:01,920 --> 00:20:05,640 Speaker 7: generation fishermen in New England last Friday. 391 00:20:06,080 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 3: It's blowing up their business. 392 00:20:07,600 --> 00:20:09,480 Speaker 7: These are the farmers of the sea that put food 393 00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:12,040 Speaker 7: on our table. You meet with the marine mammal groups 394 00:20:12,080 --> 00:20:15,679 Speaker 7: that save the whale groups. They're opposed to offshore national security. 395 00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:22,040 Speaker 7: Now there's a classified reports out that the radar interference 396 00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:25,199 Speaker 7: and above the water in the sonar interference below the 397 00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:29,520 Speaker 7: water of these massive offshore products represent real national security risks. 398 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:30,879 Speaker 3: These are not made up things. 399 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:34,280 Speaker 7: These are things that have to be considered, particularly related 400 00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:37,840 Speaker 7: to offshore. But with the Working Families tax cut bill 401 00:20:37,920 --> 00:20:42,400 Speaker 7: that got passed last July, are people are not contemplating 402 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:44,760 Speaker 7: new projects. We have companies that are coming to us 403 00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:47,000 Speaker 7: from around the world that are saying, hey, we're not 404 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:49,679 Speaker 7: going to be building offshore because we get it. It 405 00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:53,080 Speaker 7: was only viable because of the massive tax subsidies. So 406 00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 7: Americans had to pay twice. They had to pay in 407 00:20:55,440 --> 00:20:58,000 Speaker 7: terms of higher electric costs, and then they also had 408 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 7: to pay through their these tax subsidies. 409 00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:04,720 Speaker 3: So it's all of the it's all of the above. 410 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:09,600 Speaker 7: That a reliable, affordable, and dispatchable and don't require massive subsidies, 411 00:21:09,640 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 7: I mean, and that's the level playing field. 412 00:21:11,320 --> 00:21:12,000 Speaker 3: That we're at right. 413 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 2: Now, MISSUS Secretary, just quickly, because people will hate us 414 00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:16,959 Speaker 2: if we're talking about wind farms when payrolls comes out 415 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:19,120 Speaker 2: in about sixty seconds time. But I want to squeeze 416 00:21:19,119 --> 00:21:22,360 Speaker 2: this in course. As you know, have ruled against your 417 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,760 Speaker 2: administration stunt work orders on these offshore wind farms. Are 418 00:21:25,760 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 2: you going to appeal that? 419 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:31,480 Speaker 7: Absolutely we are, and as I'm sure as we get 420 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:35,359 Speaker 7: into court and have sessions and share share classified information, 421 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:40,440 Speaker 7: there will be further discussions on this. You know, people 422 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:43,200 Speaker 7: are saying that, oh, this is some ideological attack on 423 00:21:43,280 --> 00:21:46,240 Speaker 7: offshore win. No, this is like a real, genuine concern, 424 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:48,880 Speaker 7: and as Americans, we should be concerned. No one's reading 425 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,360 Speaker 7: a story about pilots getting shot down in the Iran 426 00:21:52,920 --> 00:21:56,119 Speaker 7: or in the Russian Ukraine War. Because everything is autonomous. 427 00:21:56,119 --> 00:21:59,440 Speaker 7: It's autonomous on autonomous. And if you've got massive radar 428 00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:02,840 Speaker 7: interference just off our huge population centers, if you wanted 429 00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:06,320 Speaker 7: to attack America, you would launch autonomous drones through those 430 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:10,160 Speaker 7: through those things, or you do not launch autonomous submarines 431 00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:12,679 Speaker 7: because of the sonar interference. And so we just have 432 00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:14,920 Speaker 7: to wake up. Warfare has changed in the last four years. 433 00:22:14,960 --> 00:22:16,520 Speaker 7: The world's different, and we have to be ready to 434 00:22:16,520 --> 00:22:17,240 Speaker 7: respond to it. 435 00:22:17,960 --> 00:22:21,560 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Survendons podcast, bringing you the best 436 00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:24,880 Speaker 2: in markets, economics, anchient politics. You can watch the show 437 00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:27,879 Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to 438 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:31,760 Speaker 2: nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, 439 00:22:31,920 --> 00:22:34,159 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the 440 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:36,560 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app