1
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:06,160
Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff Mom Never Told You from House top

2
00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:14,000
Speaker 1: Works dot Com. Hello, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

3
00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: Kristen and I'm Caroline, So Caroline. Last time on stuff

4
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,560
Speaker 1: Mom Never Told You, we talked about couple speak and

5
00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:26,680
Speaker 1: the intimate ways that we talked to people that we love,

6
00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:30,840
Speaker 1: whether that's we love them romantically or their best friends

7
00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:34,800
Speaker 1: or family. But now we're going to talk about our

8
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:39,960
Speaker 1: public presentation of those private relationships and specifically what we

9
00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:48,519
Speaker 1: call our significant others. Business partner, yes, my business partner, No,

10
00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:52,560
Speaker 1: that's gonna come up. Professional boyfriend? Well, what do you found?

11
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:57,640
Speaker 1: Like a gigglow? Yeah? Who's to say? Really, it's true.

12
00:00:57,960 --> 00:00:59,880
Speaker 1: I mean that's the thing. For all the language that

13
00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,280
Speaker 1: you have to talk about love, it can be surprisingly

14
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:09,520
Speaker 1: hard to find a label that fits unless you are married,

15
00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:13,960
Speaker 1: in which you're like, oh, well, spouse, husband, wife done. Yeah. Now,

16
00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:18,840
Speaker 1: I my aunt has been with her boyfriend question Mark

17
00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:24,160
Speaker 1: for like thirty years. Um, and I don't know how

18
00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:27,080
Speaker 1: to refer to him obviously, Like, yeah, when I'm talking

19
00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:30,080
Speaker 1: to other people telling them about I guess like he's

20
00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:32,759
Speaker 1: my uncle. But what's what do I call him? Well?

21
00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:35,160
Speaker 1: Is there also the age factor of it feeling strange

22
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:41,120
Speaker 1: to call a significantly older dude boyfriend. Yeah, there is

23
00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:45,479
Speaker 1: something that feels a little juvenile, little high school about that.

24
00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:49,440
Speaker 1: I mean, I still feel comfortable calling my boyfriend a boyfriend.

25
00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:53,440
Speaker 1: But then again, you know, I I feel like I'm fifteen.

26
00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:57,600
Speaker 1: I can't even drive yet. I can't. Well, I've had

27
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,840
Speaker 1: friends my age. You are the exact opposite who already

28
00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,040
Speaker 1: feel too old for boyfriend girlfriend. And we'll switch to

29
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,200
Speaker 1: the partner. Have they been together a long time? Yeah,

30
00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,680
Speaker 1: I mean it's it's always with a serious relationship, but

31
00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:14,480
Speaker 1: not that long. I'm saying, like after like the year

32
00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,760
Speaker 1: or two mark. Yeah, but no, my boyfriend I've been

33
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:21,800
Speaker 1: together for just a little every year and we're still

34
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:25,280
Speaker 1: like sailing right along in boyfriend girlfriend land. Yeah, I

35
00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:29,320
Speaker 1: had I had no issue with boyfriend before I got

36
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,560
Speaker 1: the old bump. I don't know if it's up or sideways,

37
00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:36,079
Speaker 1: just like in a circle. Uh. To fiance. The thing

38
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:38,280
Speaker 1: I like about fiance, though, even though the spellings are

39
00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:41,120
Speaker 1: different it's pronounced the same, is that it's just across

40
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:45,280
Speaker 1: the board, everybody's a fiance nothing. It's very gender neutral.

41
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:49,200
Speaker 1: So I feel like that's that's interesting to think about.

42
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:51,919
Speaker 1: Although I know some people who hate fiance and think

43
00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:56,080
Speaker 1: that it's stilted really like it's old fashioned or too fancy,

44
00:02:56,200 --> 00:03:02,519
Speaker 1: or yeah, it just sounds weird, very affected since it's French. Yeah, yeah,

45
00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:08,640
Speaker 1: speak Americans speak American? Uh, and betrothed, right, because that

46
00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:12,400
Speaker 1: doesn't sound still to their old fashioned at all. No. Um,

47
00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:14,720
Speaker 1: So today on the show, we're going to talk about

48
00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:20,640
Speaker 1: this question of what to call your bay basically because

49
00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:23,679
Speaker 1: in terms of us waiting longer than ever before to

50
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:27,280
Speaker 1: get married, of us, you know, being perhaps in our forties,

51
00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:31,280
Speaker 1: fifties and even sixties with technically boyfriends and girlfriends if

52
00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:35,400
Speaker 1: we aren't married, gender fluidity, these two boxes either or

53
00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:39,160
Speaker 1: a boyfriend or a girlfriend not really fitting everyone in

54
00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:42,320
Speaker 1: the same way that they were supposed to so long ago. Uh,

55
00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:47,800
Speaker 1: it's interesting to consider the language of how we publicly

56
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:53,600
Speaker 1: identify ourselves as a unit. Yeah. Before the twentieth century,

57
00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:58,440
Speaker 1: the terms boyfriend and girlfriend had slightly different meanings than

58
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,360
Speaker 1: what we think of now. For instance, there was an

59
00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:06,760
Speaker 1: eighteen fifty publication that describes a boy friend to words

60
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:10,680
Speaker 1: lending books to his pal. So that was purely like

61
00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:15,160
Speaker 1: you are my male friend. Yeah, yeah, you're just a guy.

62
00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:18,159
Speaker 1: You're just a guy that I'm friends with. And according

63
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:20,960
Speaker 1: to Jan Freeman, who was writing in the Boston Globe,

64
00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:24,560
Speaker 1: there's an eighteen seventy history that quotes a letter sent

65
00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:29,560
Speaker 1: by a young Richard Henry Lee to his boyfriend George Washington.

66
00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:35,200
Speaker 1: But that's hyphenated boyfriend. Issues of punctuation. Well that's a

67
00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:37,720
Speaker 1: big Well, it's a big difference between a boy friend

68
00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:40,560
Speaker 1: and a boyfriend. Yeah. Well, we're getting closer to it

69
00:04:40,640 --> 00:04:46,359
Speaker 1: becoming one word. Yeah. Yeah, So in girlfriend takes a

70
00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,600
Speaker 1: turn for the romantic. According to the Oxford English Dictionary,

71
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:54,080
Speaker 1: we have one F. J. Furnival, who wrote a book

72
00:04:54,120 --> 00:04:58,839
Speaker 1: dedicated that year to quote the memory of Tina Rockfort Smith.

73
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:03,240
Speaker 1: My much respect it and deeply regretted girlfriend. And he

74
00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:06,640
Speaker 1: doesn't mean deeply regretted. And then it was a terrible relationship. Yeah. No,

75
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:11,039
Speaker 1: Tina died. Yeah, Fernival left his wife for Tina, who

76
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:15,040
Speaker 1: was apparently a Shakespearean scholar. Hey, Tina, she died by

77
00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:19,080
Speaker 1: setting her petticoats on fire. Tina, Tina, Tina, I'm just

78
00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:22,760
Speaker 1: imagining Tina from Bob's Burgers. Even though this Tina is

79
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:26,640
Speaker 1: spelled with two ease um. But it is around the

80
00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:30,159
Speaker 1: turn of the century that both boyfriend and girlfriend take

81
00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:34,920
Speaker 1: on them more romantic meaning. But side note, it is

82
00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:41,480
Speaker 1: interesting to note that platonic girlfriend sticks around in our vernacular.

83
00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:46,240
Speaker 1: We still refer to our platonic girlfriends. But I'm hard

84
00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:50,280
Speaker 1: pressed to find a straight dude at least, or any dude. Really.

85
00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,279
Speaker 1: I don't know if any guy who refers to his

86
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:57,000
Speaker 1: boyfriends who aren't boyfriends that he's sleeping with. No. The

87
00:05:57,120 --> 00:05:58,960
Speaker 1: only I don't know that I've ever heard at the

88
00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:01,720
Speaker 1: only instance I can even imagine would be some guy

89
00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:05,880
Speaker 1: trying to be funny or ironic because he's uncomfortable with

90
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:08,599
Speaker 1: that idea. But yeah, my mom. I you know, my

91
00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:11,120
Speaker 1: mom still refers to her best friend as her girlfriend

92
00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:13,599
Speaker 1: all the time. And to me, as a child, like

93
00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:16,279
Speaker 1: a young child, being very literal minded, I was always

94
00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:18,680
Speaker 1: a little bit confused. I didn't ever think my mother

95
00:06:18,839 --> 00:06:21,120
Speaker 1: was a lesbian, but I was always very confused at

96
00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,080
Speaker 1: her use of the word girlfriend because to my child brain,

97
00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:26,600
Speaker 1: I was like, well, no, that means somebody that you're dating.

98
00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:28,719
Speaker 1: And so I was always confused, like why do you

99
00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:32,920
Speaker 1: call her your girlfriend? Your voice was so quam worn't

100
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:38,640
Speaker 1: I was nervous about everything. Well, even with the platonic boyfriend,

101
00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:42,360
Speaker 1: you're far likelier for anyone to more jokingly say, oh,

102
00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:45,719
Speaker 1: his man friend, yeah, which is I mean, how I

103
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:49,120
Speaker 1: have jokingly referred to my boyfriend before my man friend,

104
00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:55,080
Speaker 1: my gentleman calla a gentleman cola. That's very m fonbl

105
00:06:55,279 --> 00:06:57,680
Speaker 1: of you. Yeah. I just hope my petticoats don't get

106
00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:01,600
Speaker 1: set on fine. Watch out, um. As we move though

107
00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:06,719
Speaker 1: into the twentieth century, with the automobile and teenage culture

108
00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:11,200
Speaker 1: happening like never before, literally like never before. After World

109
00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:15,840
Speaker 1: War Two, we really see boyfriend girlfriend get set in stone.

110
00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:21,160
Speaker 1: For instance, in Emily post New Etiquette answers a question

111
00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,680
Speaker 1: about seating arrangements when a girl picks up her boyfriend

112
00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:28,720
Speaker 1: one word and girlfriend two words, and I think the

113
00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:30,400
Speaker 1: boy is supposed to sit in the middle so he

114
00:07:30,440 --> 00:07:32,840
Speaker 1: can know the boy was supposed to sit on the

115
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,040
Speaker 1: outside the passenger seat so that he could turn and

116
00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:39,200
Speaker 1: speak with both ladies, both the girlfriend and the girl friends,

117
00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:42,280
Speaker 1: so that he would never be turning away from the

118
00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:46,400
Speaker 1: girl friend so as not to exclude the female friend.

119
00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:51,000
Speaker 1: How nice avoid and being the third wheel. Thanks Emily

120
00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:54,000
Speaker 1: post Um but if we look at its usage, at

121
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:59,520
Speaker 1: least in literature, it also skyrockets in the nineteen sixties.

122
00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:03,559
Speaker 1: Again not surprising, we have this major revival of team

123
00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:09,360
Speaker 1: culture in pop music, seeing about hand holding and girlfriends

124
00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:12,160
Speaker 1: and boyfriends. Um, and you can see this plotted out

125
00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:16,040
Speaker 1: in google Ingraham of just in the sixties and my

126
00:08:16,280 --> 00:08:18,720
Speaker 1: boyfriend and girlfriend. Yeah, not just teen culture. But I

127
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:20,840
Speaker 1: would also think that starting in the sixties and then

128
00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:23,080
Speaker 1: moving into the seventies and eighties, you would start to

129
00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:26,200
Speaker 1: see more people living together or or just being in

130
00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:29,600
Speaker 1: romantic relationships with each other and they're not married, right,

131
00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:33,720
Speaker 1: there's that longer period between being your parents child and

132
00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:37,760
Speaker 1: being someone's spouse. So did we miss an opportunity then,

133
00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:42,040
Speaker 1: like in the sixties too, we because we were around, uh,

134
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,720
Speaker 1: to come up with a different and better name for

135
00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:49,200
Speaker 1: our significant others than girlfriend and boyfriend. No, because you know,

136
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:51,520
Speaker 1: if it were in the sixties, it would be something

137
00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:58,160
Speaker 1: real groovy and awful. Probably probably it would probably like

138
00:08:58,200 --> 00:09:05,840
Speaker 1: your something mate, I bet like you're I'm just picturing

139
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,600
Speaker 1: the SNL skits with Will Ferrell and Rachel Dratch in

140
00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:16,200
Speaker 1: the hot tub Lover Lover. But speaking though of the

141
00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 1: eighties and people living together living in sin This was

142
00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:25,040
Speaker 1: when the Census Bureau discovered that enough straight folks at

143
00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:27,360
Speaker 1: least because again this is the eighties, so that the

144
00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:30,880
Speaker 1: very headeronormative eighties, they identified enough straight people in the

145
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:36,520
Speaker 1: United States living together as unmarried couples that they decide

146
00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:40,400
Speaker 1: they need to begin counting them. Um, but it can't

147
00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:43,200
Speaker 1: label them boyfriends and girlfriends, so it comes up with

148
00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:48,040
Speaker 1: its own special acronym, which is the most romantic acronym

149
00:09:48,080 --> 00:09:52,720
Speaker 1: that a couple could imagine. Apostle que. But what in

150
00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:58,559
Speaker 1: the heck apostle que persons of opposite sexes sharing living quarters.

151
00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:00,920
Speaker 1: Oh if that's not sexy, I don't know what is.

152
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:04,880
Speaker 1: All I'm saying is a Census Bureau missed an opportunity

153
00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:09,920
Speaker 1: to make some major cheddar off of the Valentines. Will

154
00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:13,400
Speaker 1: you be my bossil que? Oh yeah, that's a good

155
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:16,400
Speaker 1: idea for us for February, Kristen. We could come up

156
00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,920
Speaker 1: with her on sminty Valentine. Although I mean again, though,

157
00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:24,400
Speaker 1: it's very heteronormative. Persons of opposite sexes sharing living quarters.

158
00:10:24,520 --> 00:10:27,679
Speaker 1: So you could be apostle queue or could you could

159
00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 1: still be apostle que? Would just be apostle que with

160
00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:32,840
Speaker 1: with an extra s in there person of the same

161
00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:37,480
Speaker 1: sex sharing living quarters. So cute, we're still a post

162
00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:40,880
Speaker 1: in their person of Oh yeah, person of same sex. Okay, yeah,

163
00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:43,480
Speaker 1: you're right, So thanks Census Bureau. I want to know

164
00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:48,880
Speaker 1: how much, uh I do love imagining though the meetings,

165
00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:52,520
Speaker 1: the brainstorming meetings around that acronym. You know, someone at

166
00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:57,440
Speaker 1: the chalkboard and you know some eighties fabulous clothes really

167
00:10:57,480 --> 00:10:59,720
Speaker 1: trying to figure out, like what do we call these people?

168
00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:02,360
Speaker 1: And then you have a young, dynamic person with shoulder

169
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,079
Speaker 1: pads who sees the acronym and yells out, we'll call

170
00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:08,880
Speaker 1: it possile Q. And and she was a secretary. She

171
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:11,120
Speaker 1: was just like in for the day. You certain things

172
00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:14,800
Speaker 1: are like awesome idea, Brad. And then this is actually

173
00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:18,720
Speaker 1: it's actually the plot of the sequel to Working Girl. Yeah,

174
00:11:18,800 --> 00:11:24,360
Speaker 1: Working Girl calling possible ques. Well, fast forward out of

175
00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:26,679
Speaker 1: the eighties, unfortunately, I mean, we could just stay in

176
00:11:26,720 --> 00:11:30,320
Speaker 1: the eighties due today and we have the average age

177
00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:34,280
Speaker 1: of marriage in the US up to seven for women

178
00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:37,040
Speaker 1: and twenty nine for men. In other words, were waiting

179
00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:39,800
Speaker 1: longer than ever to get married. If we get married

180
00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:43,360
Speaker 1: We did a whole week long exploration on people who

181
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:47,040
Speaker 1: are single by choice or just not interested in even

182
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,040
Speaker 1: if they're in a couple, just not interested in making

183
00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:54,440
Speaker 1: it legal. You meant, of all Americans over eighteen aren't married,

184
00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:57,960
Speaker 1: and you also have more unmarried couples than ever before

185
00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:02,480
Speaker 1: having kids. Yes, it's no surprise that we're having conversations

186
00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:04,640
Speaker 1: about what do you What do I call this person

187
00:12:04,679 --> 00:12:07,520
Speaker 1: that doesn't sound like we're in high school? Yeah, because

188
00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:12,400
Speaker 1: that was something that uh follower on Twitter noted how

189
00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:18,920
Speaker 1: strange it is to call his long term girlfriend technically

190
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:22,320
Speaker 1: his girlfriend because they also just had a kid together.

191
00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:25,360
Speaker 1: It's like, she's so much more than a girlfriend to me,

192
00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:30,840
Speaker 1: but she's not my wife technically number one gal number

193
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:36,880
Speaker 1: one gal um but unscientific observation Caroline when researching on

194
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:39,800
Speaker 1: too old for boyfriend and Google just to like see

195
00:12:39,840 --> 00:12:44,000
Speaker 1: what people were saying about it. If you search that,

196
00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:47,600
Speaker 1: all the Google results focused on what to call dudes

197
00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:50,040
Speaker 1: you're dating who seemed way too old to call boy

198
00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:53,760
Speaker 1: so your man friend, for instance. But if you start

199
00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,640
Speaker 1: looking up too old for girlfriend, most of the Google

200
00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:01,760
Speaker 1: results are about guys wonder whether they're too old to

201
00:13:01,880 --> 00:13:05,240
Speaker 1: go for a hot young girlfriend. And I don't exactly

202
00:13:05,280 --> 00:13:08,840
Speaker 1: know what that means other than that society ages men

203
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,720
Speaker 1: and women in very different ways. They do or or

204
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,440
Speaker 1: people definitely internalize those social messages differently in terms of

205
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,280
Speaker 1: what's acceptable. Yeah, I mean it seems like not many

206
00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:22,559
Speaker 1: guys are concerned about being too old to be called boyfriend,

207
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:26,240
Speaker 1: seems like or two, or too old to call their

208
00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:31,120
Speaker 1: significant other girlfriend. Yeah, but women straight women in this

209
00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:37,280
Speaker 1: context are seemed more invested in it. But moving out

210
00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:41,320
Speaker 1: of my my just mental google queries. Uh. The New

211
00:13:41,400 --> 00:13:45,440
Speaker 1: York Times Style Guide says that boyfriend girlfriend are quote

212
00:13:45,520 --> 00:13:50,000
Speaker 1: informal and best reserved for teenagers, but it doesn't offer

213
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,000
Speaker 1: any substitute. Just like a winey person on the team,

214
00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:56,880
Speaker 1: springing your problems around, but not offering a solution. Thanks

215
00:13:56,920 --> 00:14:01,120
Speaker 1: a lot, Obama, that's thanks a lot. Oprah, what does

216
00:14:01,120 --> 00:14:06,200
Speaker 1: she call studman? Whatever she wants? Yeah, I wonder if

217
00:14:06,200 --> 00:14:10,200
Speaker 1: she just I just maybe she just says studman, you're

218
00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:13,960
Speaker 1: my studman. Yeah, I mean there there is a label necessary.

219
00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:17,680
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're Oprah, you're my steady man, Stan

220
00:14:18,559 --> 00:14:26,160
Speaker 1: Hey steady man or studman, so stud muffin and so

221
00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:30,520
Speaker 1: it is. Though this uncertainty, not with Oprah, but with

222
00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:33,800
Speaker 1: what to call your significant other? That The New York

223
00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,080
Speaker 1: Times ended up devoting an entire style section piece to

224
00:14:37,160 --> 00:14:41,800
Speaker 1: what unmarried, long term sometimes our kids couples call each

225
00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:44,600
Speaker 1: other and one that I hated. I'm so sorry if

226
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:48,120
Speaker 1: you were listening by chance to this episode. Individuals who

227
00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:51,280
Speaker 1: use this term um, but one woman said she uses

228
00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:55,920
Speaker 1: the term husband for fake or future husband. Yeah. And

229
00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:59,880
Speaker 1: plus there's another F word that could make that entirely controversial. Yeah.

230
00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:04,320
Speaker 1: Has been not my favorite either. Some other people they

231
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:08,000
Speaker 1: talked to in that article refer to their partners as

232
00:15:08,120 --> 00:15:11,560
Speaker 1: mere or just baby daddy. But I feel like a

233
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:14,280
Speaker 1: lot of these are almost like their pet names for

234
00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:17,000
Speaker 1: each other. It felt like it's not like they're gonna

235
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:21,920
Speaker 1: walk into a fancy cocktail party and be like, and Jim,

236
00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:26,760
Speaker 1: here is my baby daddy. Although if she does that

237
00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:29,920
Speaker 1: or he does that at high five bit, I don't know,

238
00:15:30,080 --> 00:15:32,680
Speaker 1: that sounds like a really like yuppy white thing to do. Yeah,

239
00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:38,480
Speaker 1: that's true, my baby's daddy, isn't that hilarious? Um? But

240
00:15:39,040 --> 00:15:42,160
Speaker 1: this is the pickle though, where it's you're not technically

241
00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:46,400
Speaker 1: a fiancee, spouse, husband, wife, all of which are so

242
00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:51,000
Speaker 1: linguistically simple when you think about it. I mean, I've

243
00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:54,960
Speaker 1: taken all of these terms for granted until researching this,

244
00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:59,200
Speaker 1: because there's that universal understanding of what all of those

245
00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,520
Speaker 1: were it's mean. And when we're in more of this

246
00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:05,880
Speaker 1: like relationship gray area, as many of us are in

247
00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:10,640
Speaker 1: these days, we have to develop our own terms, and

248
00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:15,240
Speaker 1: sometimes they get ridiculous, like fuzzband. And Carmen Fought, who's

249
00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:18,720
Speaker 1: a linguist at pittsur College, thinks that there's a reason

250
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:21,920
Speaker 1: why these terms get so ridiculous. Yeah, it's because we're

251
00:16:22,040 --> 00:16:26,760
Speaker 1: uncomfortable still, no matter what the percentages from the Census

252
00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:30,240
Speaker 1: Bureau say, we're uncomfortable with the idea of unmarried people

253
00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:34,920
Speaker 1: living together, having children together, doing the it's together, and

254
00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:38,640
Speaker 1: not being married. What's the it's Caroline, You'll you'll learn

255
00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:41,640
Speaker 1: one day. Yeah, it's just the whole thing of using

256
00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:47,400
Speaker 1: humor to soften or deflect social deviance, which the thing

257
00:16:47,520 --> 00:16:50,960
Speaker 1: is not being married these days. Really isn't that socially deviant,

258
00:16:51,040 --> 00:16:55,200
Speaker 1: But there's still that puritanical part of our culture that

259
00:16:56,000 --> 00:17:01,320
Speaker 1: considers it not entirely appropriate. Well, there's that, but there's

260
00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:04,560
Speaker 1: also the self consciousness that comes along with the fact

261
00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:07,479
Speaker 1: that we don't have a good across the board word.

262
00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:10,439
Speaker 1: So even if you're you've been with your left's just

263
00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:12,320
Speaker 1: say partner, even if you've been with your partner for

264
00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:15,359
Speaker 1: twenty five years, there's still kind of a self conscious

265
00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:18,560
Speaker 1: thing of like, well, this isn't my husband's slash wife,

266
00:17:18,920 --> 00:17:21,199
Speaker 1: Like what are you going to think about it? Like,

267
00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:24,920
Speaker 1: I'm fine with our situation, but it kind of having

268
00:17:24,960 --> 00:17:27,560
Speaker 1: to introduce a person in public sort of throws into

269
00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:30,280
Speaker 1: stark relief, like, oh, well, I don't want to call

270
00:17:30,320 --> 00:17:34,840
Speaker 1: you boyfriend because you know whatever, we're sixty but I

271
00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:37,840
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe sweetheart, Well sweetheart, I wonder too if

272
00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:42,440
Speaker 1: that self consciousness also comes from the implications of commitment

273
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:45,520
Speaker 1: or a lack of commitment, because if someone is your spouse,

274
00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:47,679
Speaker 1: you're like, oh, those two people are in it to

275
00:17:47,720 --> 00:17:50,720
Speaker 1: win it for the long haul or until the wars happens.

276
00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:55,560
Speaker 1: But boyfriend girlfriend implies a casual nature to it, which

277
00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:57,920
Speaker 1: obviously is not the case for someone like your aunt

278
00:17:57,960 --> 00:18:02,480
Speaker 1: who has been a girlfriend for many, many, many years. Yeah. Well,

279
00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:04,600
Speaker 1: there's also the idea that they talked about in this article.

280
00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:06,400
Speaker 1: I don't know if it was Carmen Fodd who brought

281
00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:09,920
Speaker 1: it up. But the idea of slowing down the whole

282
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:15,359
Speaker 1: adapting to convention process, so like getting married, like legally

283
00:18:15,400 --> 00:18:18,439
Speaker 1: being married and then therefore referring to someone as your

284
00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:21,880
Speaker 1: spouse or your husband or your wife. Um, even if

285
00:18:21,880 --> 00:18:25,360
Speaker 1: you have a very unconventional relationship, that's still sort of

286
00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:28,080
Speaker 1: buying into a degree of convention. So some of the

287
00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:31,240
Speaker 1: people in this article were discussing the fact that not

288
00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:34,040
Speaker 1: a not getting married and be referring to them as

289
00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:36,199
Speaker 1: something other than a partner or a spouse or a

290
00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:40,160
Speaker 1: husband is a way of sort of bucking that convention. Yeah,

291
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:43,920
Speaker 1: and if you are into bucking that convention. Cat stofall

292
00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:47,120
Speaker 1: at the Cut provided a handy guide for figuring out

293
00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:52,600
Speaker 1: the best non boyfriend girlfriend title for your coupling. And

294
00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:56,400
Speaker 1: that's boyfriend girlfriend like interchangeable of its boyfriend boyfriend girlfriend girlfriend,

295
00:18:56,640 --> 00:18:59,400
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. Um, so some of them

296
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:03,240
Speaker 1: that I wanted to highlight. There's other half, which she

297
00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:08,000
Speaker 1: says is good for codependent people. There's also help meat,

298
00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:10,960
Speaker 1: which sounds like something you put on the grill or

299
00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:15,360
Speaker 1: it just reminds me of minced meat. Yeah, help me brains.

300
00:19:16,280 --> 00:19:18,280
Speaker 1: But she says it's good for Adam and even people

301
00:19:18,320 --> 00:19:20,720
Speaker 1: who are supposed to be submissive since it is that

302
00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:23,639
Speaker 1: biblical term. Although I kind of like help me, you know,

303
00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:26,760
Speaker 1: when I'm loving the dishwasher, I'd like to help me please.

304
00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:34,680
Speaker 1: M hmm. Yeah. She also lists the term bow, which,

305
00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:37,720
Speaker 1: by the way, the Oxford English Dictionary she just may

306
00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:41,400
Speaker 1: have given rise to the term boo. I don't mind bow.

307
00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:43,639
Speaker 1: To be honest, I don't mind it either, but she

308
00:19:43,720 --> 00:19:45,800
Speaker 1: says that that's good for parents who are trying not

309
00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:49,359
Speaker 1: to embarrass their recently sexually active children. And I thought

310
00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:52,200
Speaker 1: about it and I was like, yeah, I can absolutely

311
00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:58,240
Speaker 1: see parents being like, oh, how's your bow? Oh yeah,

312
00:19:58,280 --> 00:20:02,640
Speaker 1: oh parents ruined everything. Here's just an understand And then,

313
00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,680
Speaker 1: on a side note, can we just mention the pre

314
00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:11,520
Speaker 1: boyfriend girlfriend semi awkward label of the guy girl whomever

315
00:20:11,640 --> 00:20:14,320
Speaker 1: that I'm seeing. It's like, you don't you're in the

316
00:20:14,320 --> 00:20:18,480
Speaker 1: phase before that person even gets a label. But in

317
00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:22,720
Speaker 1: saying that I'm seeing this person, that's also coded too. Yeah,

318
00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:25,800
Speaker 1: it's coated. It's also awkward and has that whole self

319
00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:28,720
Speaker 1: conscious thing that we just talked about. When my boyfriend

320
00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:32,000
Speaker 1: and I first started dating, we realized very early on

321
00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:34,200
Speaker 1: that we were really good together and that we had

322
00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:38,399
Speaker 1: something special. Um, but he was very much more I

323
00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:40,760
Speaker 1: don't want to say eager, because that that gives it

324
00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:43,359
Speaker 1: the wrong tone. But he was very much more like,

325
00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:46,080
Speaker 1: you're you're my girlfriend, Like let's let's be honest. And

326
00:20:46,080 --> 00:20:48,359
Speaker 1: I was like, no, I'm not, and he's like, yeah, yeah,

327
00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:51,360
Speaker 1: let's just call it what it is, you're my girlfriend.

328
00:20:51,760 --> 00:20:57,320
Speaker 1: And so we had about like a two week period where, uh,

329
00:20:57,400 --> 00:21:00,800
Speaker 1: anytime we referred to that topic, I would be like, well, no,

330
00:21:01,160 --> 00:21:05,360
Speaker 1: because I'm only like sixt your girlfriend. So I don't

331
00:21:05,359 --> 00:21:07,800
Speaker 1: know that we ever even had a period where we

332
00:21:07,800 --> 00:21:10,919
Speaker 1: were people that were seeing each other, you know, we

333
00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:15,080
Speaker 1: were dating. But even in that dating period, it was like, well,

334
00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:17,600
Speaker 1: now i think I'm like eighty five percent your girlfriend,

335
00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:19,760
Speaker 1: and he would do something and I'm like, oh, negative

336
00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:22,359
Speaker 1: seven your girlfriend. So there was a lot of a

337
00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,440
Speaker 1: lot of playfulness around the terms boyfriend and girlfriend. You're

338
00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:30,160
Speaker 1: never just seeing each other. Biblically speaking, it wasn't your

339
00:21:30,280 --> 00:21:36,240
Speaker 1: casual help me. Still, that just sounds it just sounds meaty.

340
00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:38,760
Speaker 1: Now at this point, some listeners might be thinking Christal

341
00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:45,400
Speaker 1: and Caroline Duh partner just use partner. It's gender neutral.

342
00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:49,520
Speaker 1: It doesn't imply marriage, but there's also the implication of

343
00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:53,960
Speaker 1: commitment in it, yes and no, Yes, yes and no. Yeah,

344
00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:57,280
Speaker 1: I mean there's some kind of commitment, not necessarily romantic commitment.

345
00:21:57,359 --> 00:22:00,480
Speaker 1: Perhaps you're opening a grocery store together. Yes, I mean so,

346
00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:05,040
Speaker 1: some people complained that it does feel very clinical and

347
00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:12,680
Speaker 1: yes professional um also unscientific. Observation number two. Women who

348
00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:16,160
Speaker 1: refer to their partners are often assumed lesbian, whether they

349
00:22:16,160 --> 00:22:18,800
Speaker 1: are or not, while men who refer to their partners

350
00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:22,800
Speaker 1: are often thought to be referring to business partners. And again,

351
00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:26,800
Speaker 1: all of this is just reflective of health society views

352
00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:31,240
Speaker 1: men and women differently, isn't interesting. Yeah, Now I have thought, Well,

353
00:22:31,359 --> 00:22:33,680
Speaker 1: someone who I knew what her business was, so I

354
00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:36,879
Speaker 1: knew she wasn't referring to a business partner, she did

355
00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:39,680
Speaker 1: mention a partner one time, and I did automatically assume

356
00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:44,000
Speaker 1: she meant her lesbian life partner. But no, she's married

357
00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:46,679
Speaker 1: to a man, so she was just calling him partner,

358
00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:48,920
Speaker 1: and I was confused. And that's that's my own brain.

359
00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:53,680
Speaker 1: There you have it. Well, pre gay marriage legalization, there

360
00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:58,280
Speaker 1: was the use of partner by straight folks almost as

361
00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:02,680
Speaker 1: a sign of solidarity, you know, of let's just let's

362
00:23:02,720 --> 00:23:05,600
Speaker 1: make it equal across the board. Everyone can be each

363
00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:09,000
Speaker 1: other's partners or should be nothing wrong with that. Yeah,

364
00:23:09,240 --> 00:23:12,080
Speaker 1: I feel like I remember Angelina Julian brad Pitt doing

365
00:23:12,119 --> 00:23:15,239
Speaker 1: this before they got married. Yeah. I mean it's not

366
00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:20,120
Speaker 1: only gender neutral, it is sexual orientation neutral as well.

367
00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:24,560
Speaker 1: But not all LGBT people are like, yeah, partner, it's

368
00:23:24,600 --> 00:23:28,119
Speaker 1: our special term and we love it. For instance, Brett Burke,

369
00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:30,800
Speaker 1: who is forty three, well it was forty three the

370
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:33,520
Speaker 1: time when The New York Times interviewed him, had been

371
00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:37,040
Speaker 1: with his boyfriend for twenty three years, and he said

372
00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:42,439
Speaker 1: that quote partner is disgusting, but he says it's boyfriend,

373
00:23:42,640 --> 00:23:46,880
Speaker 1: which he and his boyfriend use. Um is also challenging

374
00:23:46,920 --> 00:23:50,159
Speaker 1: sometimes because it makes people assume that he and his

375
00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:56,360
Speaker 1: twenty three year long relationship person haven't been dating long

376
00:23:56,400 --> 00:23:59,080
Speaker 1: at all, Like it implies that it's a new relationship.

377
00:23:59,280 --> 00:24:01,879
Speaker 1: Well yeah, but now the same sex couples can get married.

378
00:24:01,880 --> 00:24:05,320
Speaker 1: There are questions that apparently a bunch of straight people

379
00:24:05,359 --> 00:24:08,400
Speaker 1: have about like what do you call each other? And

380
00:24:08,600 --> 00:24:11,760
Speaker 1: Washington Post columnist Stephen Petro actually did a great job

381
00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:14,600
Speaker 1: of tackling this question because I believe it was not

382
00:24:14,800 --> 00:24:17,600
Speaker 1: just why can't you just call each other partner, but

383
00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:20,280
Speaker 1: it was I think the person was asking like, if

384
00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:23,240
Speaker 1: two women or two men get married, who's the wife

385
00:24:23,520 --> 00:24:26,239
Speaker 1: and who's the husband, which is like, you know, my

386
00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:29,040
Speaker 1: head is just on the desk, head desk uh. And

387
00:24:29,119 --> 00:24:32,439
Speaker 1: he he handled it with grace and he just said, well,

388
00:24:32,480 --> 00:24:34,600
Speaker 1: first of all, he said, please don't ever ask a

389
00:24:34,680 --> 00:24:37,040
Speaker 1: same sex couple who's the husband and who's the wife.

390
00:24:37,320 --> 00:24:41,000
Speaker 1: That's really demeaning. But he went on to explain like, yeah,

391
00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:43,840
Speaker 1: people can call whoever you want, call them your partner

392
00:24:43,880 --> 00:24:45,520
Speaker 1: if you want, if that's what you choose to do,

393
00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,120
Speaker 1: but we have earned the right to refer to our

394
00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:51,520
Speaker 1: legal spouses as husband and wife. That's a term. Therese

395
00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:53,639
Speaker 1: are terms that have been around forever, they've been in

396
00:24:53,720 --> 00:24:56,600
Speaker 1: use forever, and they have meaning you can't just divorce

397
00:24:56,680 --> 00:25:00,359
Speaker 1: them of meaning. Well, they're very privileged terms. You know

398
00:25:00,440 --> 00:25:04,760
Speaker 1: that that we're exclusive to specific groups of people. So

399
00:25:04,840 --> 00:25:08,000
Speaker 1: it makes sense that yeah, I mean someone is your

400
00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:10,359
Speaker 1: husband your wife that like you said, I mean that

401
00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:15,280
Speaker 1: has a universal significance to it, that that partner can

402
00:25:15,400 --> 00:25:17,200
Speaker 1: have I mean, I think it's up to every couple

403
00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:22,320
Speaker 1: obviously to determine what label fits them best. But by

404
00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:25,000
Speaker 1: the same token, I don't think that a part that

405
00:25:25,119 --> 00:25:29,400
Speaker 1: partner is a one size fits all either. Sure. Now,

406
00:25:29,400 --> 00:25:32,600
Speaker 1: what I was fascinated to learn in all of this, Caroline,

407
00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:39,159
Speaker 1: was that before partner came around, significant other predated it

408
00:25:39,240 --> 00:25:45,600
Speaker 1: as the gender neutral, unmarried couple, universal one size fits

409
00:25:45,640 --> 00:25:50,920
Speaker 1: all attempted term. But it didn't originate specifically to refer

410
00:25:51,119 --> 00:25:55,720
Speaker 1: to a boyfriend or husband or whatever, right correct? Yeah.

411
00:25:55,720 --> 00:26:00,720
Speaker 1: In a column, Williams. Sapphire explains that the term significant

412
00:26:00,720 --> 00:26:06,560
Speaker 1: other originated in psychotherapy. Psychiatrist Harry Stack Sullivan defined personality

413
00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:10,520
Speaker 1: as a relatively enduring pattern of our current interpersonal situations,

414
00:26:10,720 --> 00:26:15,360
Speaker 1: especially involving relationships with quote significant others, and that could

415
00:26:15,359 --> 00:26:19,520
Speaker 1: be friends, family, or really anyone else who helps shapes

416
00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:22,439
Speaker 1: those norms and behaviors that make up your personality. And

417
00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:25,480
Speaker 1: at the time, significant other caught on as a more

418
00:26:25,640 --> 00:26:30,119
Speaker 1: vogue reference to live in live togethers in the super

419
00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:33,239
Speaker 1: vague roommates that people were using because this was a

420
00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:36,760
Speaker 1: new landscape. Again, Like I mean, Sapphire was writing this

421
00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:43,120
Speaker 1: in um in pre marital cohabitation still wasn't nearly as

422
00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:47,240
Speaker 1: common as it is today, so we're grappling for what

423
00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:54,000
Speaker 1: to call our apostle cues essentially um. But significant other

424
00:26:54,080 --> 00:26:57,600
Speaker 1: also is a little bit clunky. Yeah, that's another one

425
00:26:57,640 --> 00:27:01,760
Speaker 1: of those terms that I used with a wink, you know, like, yes,

426
00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,359
Speaker 1: technically my boyfriend is my significant other, like in the

427
00:27:04,359 --> 00:27:06,520
Speaker 1: way that we use that term today. But I'm not

428
00:27:06,560 --> 00:27:10,840
Speaker 1: going to be like, hello, Kristin, meet my significant other.

429
00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:13,120
Speaker 1: It does just kind of sound a little, like you said,

430
00:27:13,160 --> 00:27:16,120
Speaker 1: clunky and a little dusty, yeah, like it's you your

431
00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:23,320
Speaker 1: significant other. What. But I do like how sapphire prefers

432
00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:27,560
Speaker 1: sweetheart because quote it doesn't draw leers and we could

433
00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:31,600
Speaker 1: all use a little romanticism and describing romances that exist

434
00:27:31,640 --> 00:27:35,199
Speaker 1: without benefit of clergy. I like that too, And so

435
00:27:35,280 --> 00:27:39,040
Speaker 1: in our last episode, Kristen and I mentioned use of

436
00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:41,639
Speaker 1: the word sweetheart and how I can be one of

437
00:27:41,680 --> 00:27:45,919
Speaker 1: those toxic pet names that like listen sweetheart or you

438
00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:49,040
Speaker 1: know something that's not as as positive and romantic. But

439
00:27:49,119 --> 00:27:53,040
Speaker 1: I do like it in terms of this is my sweetheart.

440
00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:55,000
Speaker 1: I think it's very cute, and it's very fifties and

441
00:27:55,080 --> 00:27:56,879
Speaker 1: not that I want to be all retrograde, but I

442
00:27:56,920 --> 00:28:00,240
Speaker 1: think it's cute. Well, I gotta tell you, Caroline, I

443
00:28:00,240 --> 00:28:03,600
Speaker 1: would opt for Bay over sweetheart. Yeah, and do you.

444
00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:09,840
Speaker 1: I'm a fan of Bay. I use babe and boo

445
00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:13,040
Speaker 1: more often with my fiance, but that's just between us.

446
00:28:13,080 --> 00:28:17,400
Speaker 1: I don't introduce him as my boo. Well sometimes casually

447
00:28:17,960 --> 00:28:21,960
Speaker 1: I will. Um, but I like this idea of Bay

448
00:28:22,040 --> 00:28:29,120
Speaker 1: b a e. As perhaps the gender neutral unmarried couple

449
00:28:29,640 --> 00:28:34,160
Speaker 1: commitment specifying term that we've all been waiting for. It's

450
00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:39,400
Speaker 1: just been an African American vernacular English just just waiting

451
00:28:39,440 --> 00:28:42,920
Speaker 1: to permeate the culture as it has now, sometimes much

452
00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:45,640
Speaker 1: to the chagrin of people who are like you were

453
00:28:45,720 --> 00:28:48,600
Speaker 1: using this so wrong. Um, but what do you think

454
00:28:48,600 --> 00:28:52,480
Speaker 1: about Bay? I I still don't think that that will

455
00:28:52,520 --> 00:28:56,720
Speaker 1: replace boyfriend. I mean, maybe it will, who knows, But

456
00:28:56,840 --> 00:28:59,320
Speaker 1: I still it's still just like to me, like babe,

457
00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:02,120
Speaker 1: which is basically what it's a shortened version of babe

458
00:29:02,160 --> 00:29:04,560
Speaker 1: or baby. You know, I'm still not going to introduce

459
00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,720
Speaker 1: my boyfriend is Hey, Kristen, this is my babe, because

460
00:29:07,720 --> 00:29:10,840
Speaker 1: you'd be like, oh what, I don't know, I don't

461
00:29:10,840 --> 00:29:13,440
Speaker 1: I don't mean to put judgments in your mouth. I

462
00:29:13,520 --> 00:29:16,840
Speaker 1: do think though, that it's way more common and totally

463
00:29:16,840 --> 00:29:21,480
Speaker 1: acceptable for people to introduce their significant older as Bay

464
00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:24,719
Speaker 1: on social media. And don't we know that social media

465
00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:29,640
Speaker 1: and relationship status is are everything now? Yeah, well, so

466
00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:32,000
Speaker 1: does that that just means to me that Bay is

467
00:29:32,040 --> 00:29:35,160
Speaker 1: about to be over? Maybe? I don't think so. I

468
00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:38,920
Speaker 1: think Bay is here to stay. I think Bay overtook

469
00:29:38,960 --> 00:29:42,280
Speaker 1: Boo obviously, and it's here to stay. Even though it's

470
00:29:42,320 --> 00:29:44,520
Speaker 1: to the point where everything can be Bay. It can

471
00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:47,360
Speaker 1: be used as like every part of speech, Yeah, like

472
00:29:47,440 --> 00:29:52,120
Speaker 1: something is Bay, you are Bay, they are Bay. I

473
00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:55,200
Speaker 1: kind of love that though. I really love how interchangeable

474
00:29:55,880 --> 00:29:59,040
Speaker 1: it is. Um. But yeah, I mean like it's it's

475
00:29:59,040 --> 00:30:02,760
Speaker 1: definitely we reach peak Bay. But I don't think that

476
00:30:02,760 --> 00:30:05,000
Speaker 1: that means that that Bay is going to go anywhere. Also,

477
00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:09,480
Speaker 1: because it's been around for quite a while, well yeah,

478
00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:13,240
Speaker 1: it's better after like a decade. But I do think

479
00:30:13,240 --> 00:30:16,720
Speaker 1: that the fact that it's everywhere on social media, I

480
00:30:16,800 --> 00:30:19,400
Speaker 1: just wonder, like, surely, if we are at peak Bay,

481
00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:21,600
Speaker 1: that we're going to reach a tipping point, and then

482
00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:24,360
Speaker 1: what does that mean for who still uses it? Eventually? Okay,

483
00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:26,120
Speaker 1: so we'll hit the tipping point, it won't be cool

484
00:30:26,120 --> 00:30:27,960
Speaker 1: to say anymore. It'll mean that you're out of touch.

485
00:30:27,960 --> 00:30:31,120
Speaker 1: You're probably a fifth year old white man using it. Um.

486
00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:33,320
Speaker 1: But then give it another couple of years and it

487
00:30:33,320 --> 00:30:35,680
Speaker 1: will come back around. Yeah, my dad, if I ever

488
00:30:35,720 --> 00:30:38,680
Speaker 1: hear my dad saying my daughter Christian is so Bay,

489
00:30:39,240 --> 00:30:40,840
Speaker 1: I would actually love it. I was about to say

490
00:30:40,840 --> 00:30:43,840
Speaker 1: that'd be ridiculous, but I'd be down with that. I

491
00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:46,520
Speaker 1: mean in terms of who when we've reached peak Bay

492
00:30:46,640 --> 00:30:48,800
Speaker 1: and it and it dies, it just means that white

493
00:30:48,800 --> 00:30:51,560
Speaker 1: people will stop saying that. I mean, that's also what

494
00:30:51,600 --> 00:30:54,800
Speaker 1: we're saying in all of this. It's like we've like

495
00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:58,440
Speaker 1: grabbed it and tried to make it our own, and

496
00:30:59,360 --> 00:31:05,440
Speaker 1: we loved it to death probably. Um. But aside from Bay,

497
00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:10,400
Speaker 1: there are lots of gender neutral options. Because boyfriend girlfriend

498
00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:14,800
Speaker 1: can be unfitting for those who age factor a side

499
00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:17,320
Speaker 1: marriage episide, Let's talk about people who are not so

500
00:31:17,400 --> 00:31:23,240
Speaker 1: down with binaries, who want a term that fits their

501
00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:28,040
Speaker 1: gender identity in a more comfortable manner, because that's also

502
00:31:28,160 --> 00:31:31,360
Speaker 1: important too. Sure. Yeah, we pulled some examples from Everyday

503
00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:35,840
Speaker 1: Feminism and non binary dot org and they include boyfriend,

504
00:31:36,640 --> 00:31:39,880
Speaker 1: fay friend, and date mate, which that just makes me think,

505
00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:43,080
Speaker 1: honestly Kristen of a past episode we did about peammates,

506
00:31:44,080 --> 00:31:46,920
Speaker 1: So I can't I wouldn't be able to use date mate,

507
00:31:47,240 --> 00:31:49,120
Speaker 1: But I don't know. Maybe date mate and helped meat

508
00:31:49,160 --> 00:31:51,080
Speaker 1: could be kind of the same thing. You've got date

509
00:31:51,120 --> 00:31:54,520
Speaker 1: meat date. It sounds like something you would bring to

510
00:31:55,000 --> 00:31:59,520
Speaker 1: a picnic date or enjoy on a date hubba hubba. Well,

511
00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:03,480
Speaker 1: and then friend, since Fay is fe Y, it does

512
00:32:03,560 --> 00:32:06,600
Speaker 1: make me think of a special term I can use

513
00:32:06,600 --> 00:32:09,600
Speaker 1: when Tina Fey is actually my friend. Oh yeah, Fay

514
00:32:09,680 --> 00:32:12,640
Speaker 1: friends friend. She's a fairy friend. Um. I also like

515
00:32:12,680 --> 00:32:16,720
Speaker 1: the very basic companion um, which non binary dot org

516
00:32:16,840 --> 00:32:20,760
Speaker 1: notes is a neutral reference to dr Who's companions or

517
00:32:20,880 --> 00:32:24,600
Speaker 1: fireflies companions And that's the sweet thing to my companion.

518
00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:29,880
Speaker 1: It's nice that implies like commitment and uh intimacy. But

519
00:32:29,880 --> 00:32:32,480
Speaker 1: I mean, the word companion is nothing new. It's a

520
00:32:32,520 --> 00:32:35,960
Speaker 1: word you've often heard for for decades and decades, for

521
00:32:35,960 --> 00:32:39,160
Speaker 1: for a lesbian couple or a gameil couple back in

522
00:32:39,160 --> 00:32:44,239
Speaker 1: the days when their relationship had to be closeted. So

523
00:32:44,320 --> 00:32:47,240
Speaker 1: the whole euphemistic companion, yeah, I mean, I can say

524
00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:51,040
Speaker 1: that coming from a newspaper background, reading lots of obituaries,

525
00:32:51,280 --> 00:32:53,400
Speaker 1: you know, editing obituaries and things like that, you would

526
00:32:53,440 --> 00:32:57,160
Speaker 1: often see companion and and it's it's not used with

527
00:32:57,200 --> 00:33:00,760
Speaker 1: a wink. It's absolutely meant as a respectful term for like, well,

528
00:33:00,840 --> 00:33:02,880
Speaker 1: we don't really know what to call them, because that's

529
00:33:02,920 --> 00:33:04,920
Speaker 1: the day and age we live in. Yeah, I mean,

530
00:33:05,320 --> 00:33:07,680
Speaker 1: but there is still something There is something sweet for

531
00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:11,640
Speaker 1: sure about companion um stuff on ever told you listeners

532
00:33:11,680 --> 00:33:16,120
Speaker 1: also have lots of ideas about what to call your

533
00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:19,920
Speaker 1: significant others. I'm just now defaulting to significant other, I'm

534
00:33:19,960 --> 00:33:24,160
Speaker 1: realizing as I'm talking on this podcast. Caroline Sminty fan Catherine,

535
00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:27,840
Speaker 1: for instance, let us know via Facebook that she said,

536
00:33:28,240 --> 00:33:30,120
Speaker 1: it took me until last year to figure out that

537
00:33:30,160 --> 00:33:33,360
Speaker 1: my preferred term is spouse. At least in Canada, after

538
00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:36,480
Speaker 1: two years of living together, we're considered common law spouses,

539
00:33:36,840 --> 00:33:39,320
Speaker 1: so it made sense. It had the right amount of

540
00:33:39,360 --> 00:33:43,240
Speaker 1: grown up without being too clinical or mushy. Just when

541
00:33:43,240 --> 00:33:46,520
Speaker 1: I figured out this perfect alternative to calling him my boyfriend,

542
00:33:46,760 --> 00:33:50,080
Speaker 1: he became my fiance. Not that I'm complaining. Yeah, and

543
00:33:50,160 --> 00:33:54,240
Speaker 1: Agnes says, in my language, we use sharista, which means dearest,

544
00:33:54,320 --> 00:33:57,600
Speaker 1: but it doesn't sound that goofy for boyfriend and girlfriend

545
00:33:57,600 --> 00:34:00,920
Speaker 1: no matter what age they are. And Sam boyd which

546
00:34:00,960 --> 00:34:04,960
Speaker 1: means co liver. She says it's useful and age and

547
00:34:05,080 --> 00:34:08,680
Speaker 1: gender neutral. I kind of love that. How do you

548
00:34:08,719 --> 00:34:13,880
Speaker 1: say the dearest again, Charista, Charista or Charista one of

549
00:34:13,880 --> 00:34:16,120
Speaker 1: the two. That's really sweet. Also co liver. I'll take

550
00:34:16,160 --> 00:34:19,880
Speaker 1: co liver too, Will you be my co liver? Um

551
00:34:19,880 --> 00:34:22,120
Speaker 1: Ali said, if I ever end up with someone, I

552
00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:25,240
Speaker 1: might say they're my cuteness and in return I shall

553
00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:28,160
Speaker 1: be their cuteness. I like that, but that's that's also

554
00:34:28,200 --> 00:34:32,439
Speaker 1: kind of a pet name. And uh Amy said there's

555
00:34:32,440 --> 00:34:35,600
Speaker 1: a whole new word needed. How about protagonist? And I

556
00:34:35,600 --> 00:34:37,719
Speaker 1: was like, wait, did I read that wrong? No protagonist,

557
00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:41,360
Speaker 1: she says, proto meaning first or most important, and gammist

558
00:34:41,840 --> 00:34:45,000
Speaker 1: meaning married to are mating with. She says it's gender neutral,

559
00:34:45,239 --> 00:34:49,520
Speaker 1: adult sounding, and most importantly, in my mind, grammatically correct.

560
00:34:49,800 --> 00:34:52,759
Speaker 1: I'm Amy and this is my protagonist, and I'm his

561
00:34:52,920 --> 00:34:57,319
Speaker 1: or her protagonist. And then Sam suggested lifemate and paramore

562
00:34:57,960 --> 00:35:02,080
Speaker 1: as good terms as well, and paramore is pretty fancy.

563
00:35:02,239 --> 00:35:05,239
Speaker 1: Paramore is very fancy again French, making people feel like

564
00:35:05,280 --> 00:35:09,880
Speaker 1: it's stuffy. Isn't there that band paramore? There is that

565
00:35:09,920 --> 00:35:13,840
Speaker 1: band paramore. It also for me, paramore is like the

566
00:35:13,920 --> 00:35:19,400
Speaker 1: more chaste version of lover lover, which is so creepy

567
00:35:20,040 --> 00:35:23,239
Speaker 1: it kind of makes my skin crawl to refer to

568
00:35:23,400 --> 00:35:26,960
Speaker 1: use lover in that way, and right paramore to me,

569
00:35:27,280 --> 00:35:29,600
Speaker 1: to my ears, just sounds like a little bit more

570
00:35:29,640 --> 00:35:32,040
Speaker 1: of a fancy, chaste version of that. I feel like

571
00:35:32,120 --> 00:35:35,120
Speaker 1: you can't introduce someone as your lover if you're not

572
00:35:35,200 --> 00:35:39,120
Speaker 1: at that point touching them, like with both both hands

573
00:35:40,600 --> 00:35:43,200
Speaker 1: on as much of their physical real estate as possible.

574
00:35:43,400 --> 00:35:46,240
Speaker 1: Is my lover. I feel like that's only either used

575
00:35:46,400 --> 00:35:48,560
Speaker 1: ironically to be funny and to try to make your

576
00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:52,480
Speaker 1: friends uncomfortable or your significant other uncomfortable, nor your parents,

577
00:35:52,800 --> 00:35:55,840
Speaker 1: or it's used by like some new aged person in

578
00:35:55,920 --> 00:35:59,200
Speaker 1: Santa fe Well, listeners, now, we want to know what

579
00:35:59,360 --> 00:36:02,640
Speaker 1: your couple labels are. Do you just stick with a

580
00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:05,759
Speaker 1: boyfriend girlfriend or have you found those terms to not

581
00:36:05,880 --> 00:36:09,839
Speaker 1: exactly fit your relationship or just you who you are

582
00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:12,799
Speaker 1: in love? Let us know your thoughts. Mom Stuff at

583
00:36:12,840 --> 00:36:15,000
Speaker 1: how stuff works dot com is our email address. You

584
00:36:15,000 --> 00:36:17,800
Speaker 1: can also tweet us at mom stuff podcast or messages

585
00:36:17,880 --> 00:36:20,040
Speaker 1: on Facebook, and we've got a couple of messages to

586
00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:28,719
Speaker 1: share with you right now. So I've got a Facebook

587
00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:32,359
Speaker 1: message here from Josie about our waitressing episode. She said,

588
00:36:32,400 --> 00:36:34,919
Speaker 1: as someone who's worked in the service industry for eight

589
00:36:34,960 --> 00:36:37,719
Speaker 1: plus years, I really enjoyed listening to your episode on waitressing.

590
00:36:38,280 --> 00:36:40,839
Speaker 1: Most of my employment as a waitress, I worked at

591
00:36:40,840 --> 00:36:44,560
Speaker 1: a little low place called Denny's, where I worked four

592
00:36:44,600 --> 00:36:46,560
Speaker 1: to ten hour shifts for five days a week, but

593
00:36:46,640 --> 00:36:49,520
Speaker 1: never over forty hours. Sure on the weekends I would

594
00:36:49,560 --> 00:36:51,759
Speaker 1: make twelve to fifteen bucks an hour at night, but

595
00:36:51,840 --> 00:36:53,799
Speaker 1: during the slow times in the day, I would most

596
00:36:53,840 --> 00:36:55,919
Speaker 1: likely be sent home after four to six hours, only

597
00:36:55,960 --> 00:36:59,160
Speaker 1: making five dollars an hour, and this includes that to

598
00:36:59,360 --> 00:37:02,480
Speaker 1: thirteen an hour. Until your episode, i'd never heard of

599
00:37:02,520 --> 00:37:04,960
Speaker 1: a union for servers and seriously wished they were still

600
00:37:05,000 --> 00:37:07,640
Speaker 1: around today. I always thought it was unfair that I

601
00:37:07,680 --> 00:37:10,239
Speaker 1: wasn't expected to work for tips, but often required to

602
00:37:10,239 --> 00:37:13,400
Speaker 1: take time away from serving in deep clean work areas

603
00:37:13,400 --> 00:37:15,960
Speaker 1: when it was slow enough. This meant that I was

604
00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:18,720
Speaker 1: being paid only the two thirteen an hour for work

605
00:37:19,080 --> 00:37:21,640
Speaker 1: that in any other job would pay minimum wage or more.

606
00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:25,080
Speaker 1: We were also asked many times to train other waitresses

607
00:37:25,120 --> 00:37:28,399
Speaker 1: without clocking over to training, which would have paid us

608
00:37:28,440 --> 00:37:31,960
Speaker 1: around five dollars an hour plus tips. Our incentive given

609
00:37:32,080 --> 00:37:34,080
Speaker 1: was that we could keep the tips the waitress and

610
00:37:34,120 --> 00:37:36,839
Speaker 1: training received, and if we refused to do it without

611
00:37:36,840 --> 00:37:39,640
Speaker 1: switching over, they just said someone else do it. I

612
00:37:39,760 --> 00:37:42,719
Speaker 1: know a union would have been able to prevent this. Now.

613
00:37:42,840 --> 00:37:46,520
Speaker 1: As for sexual harassment, I can tell you it happened daily.

614
00:37:47,200 --> 00:37:49,440
Speaker 1: When I turned eighteen, a regular customer that I had

615
00:37:49,440 --> 00:37:52,440
Speaker 1: always liked and thought of his grandfatherly suddenly started to

616
00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:54,560
Speaker 1: tell me how he liked how I swayed my hips

617
00:37:54,560 --> 00:37:57,279
Speaker 1: when I walked away from his table. All this and

618
00:37:57,320 --> 00:37:59,600
Speaker 1: more led me to wear baggy clothing and minimal makeup

619
00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:02,200
Speaker 1: to work, which I felt did hinder the amount of

620
00:38:02,200 --> 00:38:04,040
Speaker 1: tips I made, but people were less likely to make

621
00:38:04,040 --> 00:38:06,880
Speaker 1: comments to my face. Luckily, I started to work at

622
00:38:06,920 --> 00:38:09,000
Speaker 1: a different restaurant where people did focus more on the

623
00:38:09,080 --> 00:38:11,960
Speaker 1: quality of service rather than my looks, and eventually outside

624
00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:14,800
Speaker 1: of the service industry completely. But I've always thought of

625
00:38:14,840 --> 00:38:16,920
Speaker 1: it as a valuable skill set and could get a

626
00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:18,759
Speaker 1: job as a waitress again if I ever lost my

627
00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:21,880
Speaker 1: current job. I've always thought everyone should work as a

628
00:38:21,920 --> 00:38:24,160
Speaker 1: server at least once to get a good idea of

629
00:38:24,200 --> 00:38:25,840
Speaker 1: what it's like on the other side of the table.

630
00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:29,840
Speaker 1: Maybe it would teach people to tip better. Thank you

631
00:38:29,880 --> 00:38:32,200
Speaker 1: for the episode and all the great things you too do.

632
00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:34,480
Speaker 1: I can't tell you how many times I've recommended your

633
00:38:34,480 --> 00:38:38,399
Speaker 1: podcast to friends and family. So thank you. Josie. Yeah,

634
00:38:38,440 --> 00:38:40,360
Speaker 1: I had this episode in mine last night when I

635
00:38:40,400 --> 00:38:43,200
Speaker 1: was at a bar with some friends and was tipping

636
00:38:44,400 --> 00:38:50,839
Speaker 1: generously more much more than because I was thinking back

637
00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:53,040
Speaker 1: to some of the comments that we received on Facebook

638
00:38:53,120 --> 00:38:56,440
Speaker 1: that were against the idea of tipping in general, or

639
00:38:56,760 --> 00:39:01,919
Speaker 1: tipping to help servers out who don't make living wage. UM.

640
00:39:01,960 --> 00:39:05,480
Speaker 1: I have a letter here from lu Jene. She says,

641
00:39:05,600 --> 00:39:07,840
Speaker 1: high C and C. I was just thinking into a

642
00:39:07,880 --> 00:39:09,799
Speaker 1: hot bath after a long day and hit play on

643
00:39:09,840 --> 00:39:12,840
Speaker 1: your podcast about waitresses. I almost couldn't wait until I

644
00:39:12,920 --> 00:39:15,440
Speaker 1: drive off to write you about my experiences in seven

645
00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:18,360
Speaker 1: years of waiting tables in the college town of Logan, Utah.

646
00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:22,560
Speaker 1: Go Aggies. First, the issue of semantics. My experience with

647
00:39:22,600 --> 00:39:24,839
Speaker 1: the great waitress server debate has been that it all

648
00:39:24,880 --> 00:39:27,799
Speaker 1: depends on the establishment, not just the environment, but the

649
00:39:27,840 --> 00:39:30,399
Speaker 1: actual age of the business. I've worked in a local

650
00:39:30,480 --> 00:39:32,719
Speaker 1: Chinese restaurant and a bar that were both about thirty

651
00:39:32,760 --> 00:39:35,719
Speaker 1: year old businesses, and in both I was most decidedly

652
00:39:35,760 --> 00:39:38,879
Speaker 1: a waitress. However, in any restaurant established within the last

653
00:39:38,920 --> 00:39:42,080
Speaker 1: ten years, I've always been referred to as a server. Personally,

654
00:39:42,160 --> 00:39:44,560
Speaker 1: I prefer the term waitress. I agree that the term

655
00:39:44,680 --> 00:39:47,440
Speaker 1: server is a little too close for comfort to servant.

656
00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:49,840
Speaker 1: I'd also like to share my experience in my current

657
00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:52,359
Speaker 1: job as a waitress in said thirty year old bar.

658
00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:56,400
Speaker 1: Until six months ago, my workplace was completely gender segregated.

659
00:39:56,719 --> 00:39:59,319
Speaker 1: Men were cooks and then were promoted to bartenders, but

660
00:39:59,320 --> 00:40:02,279
Speaker 1: women could only ever be waitresses. I always found this

661
00:40:02,719 --> 00:40:05,799
Speaker 1: to be so incredibly discriminatory. I thought for a few

662
00:40:05,800 --> 00:40:07,680
Speaker 1: weeks that it had to just be a fluke, or

663
00:40:07,719 --> 00:40:09,839
Speaker 1: that somehow the other ladies I work with simply didn't

664
00:40:09,840 --> 00:40:12,279
Speaker 1: want to be bartenders. I quickly realized this was not

665
00:40:12,360 --> 00:40:15,680
Speaker 1: the case. Not only was the division discriminatory, but bartenders

666
00:40:15,680 --> 00:40:18,319
Speaker 1: were paid three seventy five hour where the waitresses made

667
00:40:18,320 --> 00:40:21,040
Speaker 1: two thirty and we were also required to tip the

668
00:40:21,080 --> 00:40:23,960
Speaker 1: bartender of our tips at the end of each shift.

669
00:40:24,480 --> 00:40:27,480
Speaker 1: Gender discrimination is alive and well in the service industry

670
00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:30,840
Speaker 1: thanks to a change to a somewhat more enlightened management staff.

671
00:40:30,880 --> 00:40:33,560
Speaker 1: A few of us ladies now bartend occasionally, but very

672
00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:36,280
Speaker 1: rarely have ships with other waitresses who would be required

673
00:40:36,320 --> 00:40:38,960
Speaker 1: to tip us out. Still to this day, we have

674
00:40:39,120 --> 00:40:41,959
Speaker 1: no male waiters. I do feel the need to point

675
00:40:41,960 --> 00:40:46,560
Speaker 1: out that this arrangement inspires no animosity between waitresses and bartenders. Overall,

676
00:40:46,560 --> 00:40:48,800
Speaker 1: the men I work with are extremely supportive and vigilant

677
00:40:48,800 --> 00:40:51,800
Speaker 1: about harassment in the bar. Any time of belligerent patron

678
00:40:51,800 --> 00:40:54,560
Speaker 1: harasses a waitress or a female customer, the bartenders the

679
00:40:54,600 --> 00:40:56,880
Speaker 1: first to show them to the door. Thanks for the

680
00:40:56,920 --> 00:40:59,400
Speaker 1: amazing podcast, ladies, and thank you for shedding light on

681
00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:03,400
Speaker 1: my oft disregarded and degraded profession. Whenever someone says serving

682
00:41:03,480 --> 00:41:05,799
Speaker 1: is not a real job, I simply wipe away my

683
00:41:05,880 --> 00:41:08,919
Speaker 1: tears with the crisp, large denomination bills I bring home

684
00:41:09,000 --> 00:41:12,319
Speaker 1: each night. So thank you for your letter, and thanks

685
00:41:12,320 --> 00:41:14,640
Speaker 1: to everybody who's written to us. Mom Stuff at how

686
00:41:14,719 --> 00:41:17,120
Speaker 1: stuff works dot com is our email address, and Thrill

687
00:41:17,120 --> 00:41:19,239
Speaker 1: links all of our social media as well as all

688
00:41:19,280 --> 00:41:22,160
Speaker 1: of our blogs, videos, and podcasts, including this one, with

689
00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,760
Speaker 1: links to our sources so you can learn more about

690
00:41:25,800 --> 00:41:29,759
Speaker 1: boyfriends and girlfriends. Head on over to stuff mom Never

691
00:41:29,840 --> 00:41:36,640
Speaker 1: told You dot com for more on this and thousands

692
00:41:36,640 --> 00:41:46,360
Speaker 1: of other topics. Does it, How stuff works dot com