1 00:00:00,600 --> 00:00:03,520 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here, 2 00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,640 --> 00:00:11,559 Speaker 1: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:14,960 Speaker 1: the studio ad staff, give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:17,280 Speaker 1: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:19,920 Speaker 1: it just means the absolute world to have your support. 8 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 1: But enough with that, let's get to the show. Welcome 9 00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: back to Counterpoints Friday. We've got an incredible amount of 10 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:29,440 Speaker 1: mid term dramedas to talk about. We've got a call 11 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 1: in the Arizona Senate race, We've got a likely call 12 00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:35,200 Speaker 1: in the Nevada Senate race, and we have the possibility 13 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,919 Speaker 1: that one of the parties is going to end up 14 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:42,199 Speaker 1: with two hundred and seventeen seats in the House of Representatives, 15 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:45,280 Speaker 1: meaning whoever is the speaker, whether it's McCarthy or Pelosi 16 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:47,400 Speaker 1: or whatever DEM's put in there, would have a one 17 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 1: vote margin. And I was just telling Emily, nobody in 18 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:52,199 Speaker 1: this world deserves to have one vote margin more than 19 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy. He has wanted this job his entire life, 20 00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 1: and when he finally gets it, it will just fault 21 00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:01,840 Speaker 1: to pieces of his hands. We'll break all of that 22 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 1: down in the midterm block because there's so much to 23 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:05,880 Speaker 1: talk about in terms of the dynamics, in terms of 24 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: what's ongoing, and speaking of the dynamics. Yeah, and also 25 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 1: we'll get to Ukraine in a moment, Russia and retreat 26 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:17,399 Speaker 1: around Carson. But back here in the United States, twenty 27 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 1: twenty four, kicking off Donald Trump, not waiting for the 28 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:24,520 Speaker 1: House results, not waiting for the Senate results. I can't 29 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:28,959 Speaker 1: even keep up with his tax on RHNDA Sanctimonious. He 30 00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:32,399 Speaker 1: hit him on Air Force one last night after his 31 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 1: rally and date, and then he hit him all over 32 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:39,320 Speaker 1: truth social appeared to be confessing to crimes that he 33 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:44,480 Speaker 1: himself committed. But the fact that we don't necessarily believe 34 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:46,840 Speaker 1: him he might be lying about his own criminal behavior, 35 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: it means that he's not necessarily guilty innocent until proven guilty, 36 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 1: which is really bold, by the way, And I'm talking 37 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 1: about his claim that he stopped the count for Ron Destantus. 38 00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 1: But tell us, tell us, what is the indictment that 39 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 1: Trump is laying out against mister sanctimonious here. Well, it's 40 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: kind of a sort of smattering. If we put a 41 00:02:05,160 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 1: one up on the screen. This is the New York 42 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:08,840 Speaker 1: Times write up of everything that's been going on. Trump 43 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,239 Speaker 1: threatens to reveal unflattering information about DeSantis if he runs. Now. 44 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 1: Trump reportedly said I know more about him than anybody 45 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 1: other than perhaps his wife. That's a Maggie Haberman byline. 46 00:02:19,960 --> 00:02:23,440 Speaker 1: So she got the goods apparently from an inside Trump world. 47 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:27,120 Speaker 1: And this is there have been some posts you can 48 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:30,480 Speaker 1: see in A two some of the barbs. I was 49 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:32,840 Speaker 1: gonna say that I've been gone back and forth, but 50 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,919 Speaker 1: it's only gone in one direction, right, just the fourth 51 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 1: nobody's trading barbs. So okay, So Donald Trump is saying 52 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 1: that News Corps is basically undermining him in favor of DeSantis. 53 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 1: Ryan came to me desperate, in desperate shape. In twenty seventeen. 54 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:51,240 Speaker 1: He was politically dead, losing in a landslide. And he 55 00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:53,960 Speaker 1: keeps going. I mean, he this is a pretty long thread, 56 00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 1: and just on and on. I was all in for 57 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 1: Ron and he beat Gillham. But after the race, when 58 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: votes were being counted, that's what Ryan said. Yeah, he says, 59 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,560 Speaker 1: when votes are being counted, basically, I sent a prosecutor 60 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 1: and the FBI down to Broward County. He says Rhonda 61 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:13,360 Speaker 1: Stantis was losing ten thousand votes a day as they 62 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:15,840 Speaker 1: were counting more votes. I went down there and I 63 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:19,960 Speaker 1: stopped the count. He just stops it right there. He 64 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: is likely reflect Again, I'm no Trump whisperer. My best guess, 65 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:28,799 Speaker 1: as somebody who is on the right, is that he's 66 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 1: referring to what a lot of people think happens in 67 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,720 Speaker 1: deep blue counties is that they're just finding fake votes, 68 00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 1: and they're going through yeah, ballots like absentee ballots that 69 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:43,560 Speaker 1: don't count and curing them or fixing them, et cetera, 70 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 1: et cetera, and that's where they find different margins. That's 71 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 1: the idea. That's what I'm assuming. So I'm assuming he's 72 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:54,200 Speaker 1: saying he stopped. He's saying he stopped the process. I 73 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 1: find it hard to believe that he did that without 74 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,839 Speaker 1: it becoming public. But if he did that, that needs 75 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:03,360 Speaker 1: to be investigated. I think it's absolutely yes. The FBI 76 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 1: apparently can just ask itself. He's saying he told the 77 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:09,600 Speaker 1: FBI to go do it. It seems like there's a 78 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 1: pretty easy answer there. I mean, it is true that 79 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,680 Speaker 1: that I can't stop calling him to sanctimonious love it. 80 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 1: It's such a funny name. It is true that DeSantis 81 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 1: was losing to Andrew Gillim, yes, and that and that 82 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 1: Trump's endorsement played a key role, as well as the 83 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 1: FBI's role in tying Tallahassee and gill him up in 84 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,520 Speaker 1: this investigation around Hamilton tickets. There's the best way for 85 00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:35,720 Speaker 1: a Democrat to go down. It's over. Of course, it's 86 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 1: over Hamilton tickets. Yeah, you couldn't script that better. No, 87 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:44,080 Speaker 1: you couldn't. So this feud between Trump and DeSantis, again, 88 00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 1: this is something that's been simmering because DeSantis is seen, 89 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,800 Speaker 1: as many people on the right by the person who's 90 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:52,040 Speaker 1: Trump without Trump. You hear that over and over again. 91 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,840 Speaker 1: DeSantis has all the goods of Donald Trump with none 92 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:57,360 Speaker 1: of the baggage of Donald Trump. I think that's mistaken, 93 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 1: and that's not a particularly smart analysis, but that's sort 94 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:07,960 Speaker 1: of a congealing conventional wisdom on the right, and it 95 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 1: really irks Donald Trump. He's seen the cover jump Fox News. 96 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:13,679 Speaker 1: A lot of people are very favorable to DeSantis there, 97 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: and frankly not very favorable to Trump there. If you 98 00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 1: really have been watching Fox closely. Lately there's a lot 99 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:23,599 Speaker 1: of pro DeSantis and a lot of pro DeSantis talk, 100 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 1: And you know, there's this idea that I think exists 101 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 1: in the minds actually have a lot of voters. We 102 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 1: see this in the midterm results, that there's just deep 103 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,120 Speaker 1: exhaustion with Donald Trump, even among people who may have 104 00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 1: voted for him, even on the right. But what that 105 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,800 Speaker 1: doesn't take into account is that there's some thirty percent 106 00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: of his base, thirty percent of the Republican Party is 107 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,320 Speaker 1: hardcore MAGA. These are people who vote for Donald Trump 108 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 1: who may not have even been voting Republican before, but 109 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:51,159 Speaker 1: they're the people who are showing up at rallies. They're 110 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: the people who are activated, They're the people who are 111 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:59,359 Speaker 1: animated like this is that is something that political parties. 112 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,800 Speaker 1: That's a huge built an advantage for political parties. And 113 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:06,839 Speaker 1: DeSantis is very popular. I'm pretty favorable to DeSantis. There 114 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: is this congealing conventional wisdom and what's I think really 115 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: dangerous about that if you're a DeSantis person, is that 116 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 1: you're going to continue to inflame Donald Trump. And if 117 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 1: you have this if it smacks of this conspiratorial orchestration 118 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:29,360 Speaker 1: from political professionals, whether than in Florida or DC. Voters 119 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,440 Speaker 1: hate that. They hate that. And it happened all throughout 120 00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 1: twenty fifteen. Everyone in DC thought they had the way 121 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: to stop Donald Trump. How many times did we hear 122 00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 1: that this is what's going to do him in We're 123 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:41,560 Speaker 1: going to take him down at the convention. We're going 124 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:45,040 Speaker 1: to like, oh this thing that he said, he's done. No, 125 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 1: because there's that chunk of the party that loves the guy. 126 00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:52,839 Speaker 1: And he's not a politician, Franklin. That means he sort 127 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: of has fighting advantages. He can take everybody out because 128 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 1: he doesn't play by the rules. How does an indictment 129 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 1: play into the politics here? Let's say he gets an 130 00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:03,440 Speaker 1: does that rally Republicans around him? And is that bad 131 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:06,640 Speaker 1: for DeSantis? Is Desanta's hoping that they back off him? 132 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 1: And Trump just continues to flail? And how does DeSantis 133 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 1: weather this for a year? Like we're that that, we're 134 00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 1: more than that, We're like fourteen months away from are 135 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 1: you guys doing Iowa still? I don't know? Actually, so 136 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 1: what Iowa, New Hampshire where wherever this ends up starting, 137 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:31,280 Speaker 1: It's fourteen months of him just savaging him. Well in 138 00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:34,080 Speaker 1: DeSantis so far, and this is the again you see 139 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 1: this among sort of the Dysantis And I don't say 140 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: this as a pejorative the Desantas fan club, because it 141 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 1: definitely exists. They're saying all DeSantis has to do is 142 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 1: stay quiet, and I think actually that's absolutely true because 143 00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 1: Donald Trump just sort of talks into the ether. Right. 144 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: The people who are following Donald Trump on truth social 145 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 1: are the people who are following Donald Trump. They're the 146 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:55,920 Speaker 1: people who go to the rallies. They're the people who 147 00:07:55,960 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 1: are you know, that are never going to leave from 148 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:01,840 Speaker 1: the side of Donald Trump. And I don't know that 149 00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:05,280 Speaker 1: an indictment changes that. Sincerely, I don't know if an 150 00:08:05,320 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 1: indictment change that. We've heard it over and over again. 151 00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 1: I said it before. This week, the Wednesday felt like 152 00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 1: January seventh on the right, and in a sense that 153 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:19,440 Speaker 1: there was finally it felt like once again, here we go. 154 00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:22,840 Speaker 1: He's done. We can kick him out, we can you know, 155 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,800 Speaker 1: orchestrate our purge. This is it or it's just sort 156 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:28,239 Speaker 1: of this idea that you can quietly say Donald Trump 157 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,240 Speaker 1: did what he needed to do for the party and 158 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:33,199 Speaker 1: now we can move on to Ron DeSantis. Is there 159 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:36,520 Speaker 1: anything he wants that the Republican Party can offer him 160 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 1: other than the president's right. I don't know, I mean, 161 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:42,320 Speaker 1: can you think of anything. I think he wants to 162 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:47,280 Speaker 1: be president. I think he wants to be vindicated. Yeah, yeah, 163 00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 1: it's I mean, just you guys think Rhonda Santa's promises 164 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 1: to pardon him and all his children and everybody, like 165 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 1: he can have four year blanket pardon power anybody that 166 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 1: Trump wants to pardon. He just sends a note to 167 00:08:57,559 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 1: DeSantis that could get interesting. Pardon Steve Bannon like four times, 168 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:08,320 Speaker 1: Pardon Lee Harvey Oswald because it was actually Tied Cruise's dad. Yeah, 169 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: he has to release the he has to release the JFK, 170 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,000 Speaker 1: which is the most shameful thing that Trump did is 171 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:20,080 Speaker 1: not release that. What a loser. Well also did Roger Stone. 172 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:23,800 Speaker 1: You had one job, Rogers couldn't get your man to 173 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 1: release the JFK papers. So you know this is a 174 00:09:26,880 --> 00:09:31,400 Speaker 1: real This is a This has serious implications for the 175 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:33,240 Speaker 1: way things are sort of panning out in the right. 176 00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:36,079 Speaker 1: To your point about how DeSantis Weather's it, I think 177 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,560 Speaker 1: you can probably still just expect him to stay quiet 178 00:09:38,600 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 1: and be polite when he's asked about Donald Trump, which 179 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 1: again reinforces exactly what everybody likes about running. What we 180 00:09:43,559 --> 00:09:45,440 Speaker 1: need is a big bull of popcorn for the next year. 181 00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 1: I'll take it. I'll take it again. Like Donald Trump 182 00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: is said to announce his presidential run what next week, 183 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 1: A lot of people want him to put that on 184 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:57,359 Speaker 1: pause as well. I think that's also very very unlikely. 185 00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 1: Who said the who said let Trump be Trump? A 186 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:04,800 Speaker 1: bunch of those folks have said that. Again, it's the 187 00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 1: conventional WI was Trump circles and so I'm going to 188 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:11,520 Speaker 1: spoil it for everyone. They're going to let Trump be Trump. 189 00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 1: There you go, all right? Moving on to the developments 190 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: on the ground in Ukraine, not just on the ground 191 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:21,600 Speaker 1: in Ukraine, but also here. We had news yesterday on 192 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 1: the United States front from Jake Sullivan. Let's start with 193 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 1: a one which should be Washing Post headline, an exit 194 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:35,640 Speaker 1: from kersone city that's from Putin's orders. They're giving up 195 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:39,120 Speaker 1: that key regional capital. Ryan. What's your reaction here? This 196 00:10:39,440 --> 00:10:44,839 Speaker 1: was the capital that Putin said six weeks ago would 197 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:50,360 Speaker 1: be Russian forever. He orchestrated a referendum there. The you know, 198 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 1: the vote was ninety nine percent to zero or maybe 199 00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:56,160 Speaker 1: one percent. I'm staining or whatever, you know, one of 200 00:10:56,160 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 1: those hilarious lopsided elections that you're supposed to say, hmm, 201 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:04,679 Speaker 1: not so sure that that was free and fair. Uh. 202 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 1: And so to to lose this without much of a 203 00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:12,960 Speaker 1: fight in six weeks after declaring that it would be 204 00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:17,520 Speaker 1: part of Russia forever is you know, utterly humiliating blow. 205 00:11:17,520 --> 00:11:20,240 Speaker 1: The best the best that the Russian Federation is saying 206 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 1: about it is that they're regrouping on the other side 207 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:26,360 Speaker 1: of the river nearby. They've been doing an enormous amount 208 00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:29,360 Speaker 1: of regrouping over the last over the last several months, 209 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:34,719 Speaker 1: before the Ukrainian assault caught them off guard. Over in 210 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:38,280 Speaker 1: the East. They were really hoping that this winter was 211 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:41,160 Speaker 1: was going to kind of bury Europe, that it would 212 00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:45,400 Speaker 1: lead to enough protests that you'd have right wing governments 213 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:48,880 Speaker 1: taking over, and that there'd be enough public anger at 214 00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:51,880 Speaker 1: the war that that would be enough to pull the 215 00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:54,920 Speaker 1: funding back, pull the support back, and that and that 216 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 1: Russia would then either be able to just maintain all 217 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 1: its games or even continue to creep forward. Nothing is 218 00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 1: going right on as it goes as that plan works. 219 00:12:04,240 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: Even the right wing Italian you know, Prime Minister maloney 220 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 1: is not anti Ukraine, even though the Italian publican polls 221 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: is actually turning against involvement in the war, probably the 222 00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 1: most skeptical of any European country's public, but even their 223 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:24,680 Speaker 1: right wing government. It's like, no, we're in this. There's 224 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:29,000 Speaker 1: a heat wave going on now, like Putin's was praying for, 225 00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 1: you know, the coldest winter that Europe seen in a 226 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,280 Speaker 1: long time. It's like over seventy degrees in a lot 227 00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 1: of Europe right now, late November, so, I mean that's 228 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:47,040 Speaker 1: early November. So global warming might actually be undermining this 229 00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:49,800 Speaker 1: kind of oil producing country's war effort, which is which 230 00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:54,120 Speaker 1: is a little bit ironic. Meanwhile, to add insult to injury, 231 00:12:54,280 --> 00:13:00,480 Speaker 1: you put up the next element here, the Ukrainians open 232 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:03,120 Speaker 1: fire on the Russians as they were retreating, saying that 233 00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:07,200 Speaker 1: they didn't ask for a green cord or to retreat. 234 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 1: This comes at the same time that you've seen reports 235 00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:14,680 Speaker 1: of the wives of Russian conscripts kind of storming into 236 00:13:14,760 --> 00:13:19,040 Speaker 1: the kind of back lines trying to find their husbands 237 00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:22,199 Speaker 1: and bring them back. Putin has relied for so long 238 00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:27,199 Speaker 1: on a demobilized public to maintain power, and this mobilization 239 00:13:27,520 --> 00:13:31,400 Speaker 1: is extremely dangerous for him because it doesn't mobilize just 240 00:13:32,240 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: troops for his war effort. It mobilizes Russian citizens to 241 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:39,520 Speaker 1: once again be involved politically, and that's not a good 242 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:43,120 Speaker 1: thing for him. Yeah. Well, and again to your point, 243 00:13:43,240 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 1: this was supposed to be, in and of itself, kind 244 00:13:45,960 --> 00:13:48,720 Speaker 1: of an inflection point. This was going to be a 245 00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 1: time when things were turning more closely into his favor. Meanwhile, 246 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: Jake Sullivan at the White House Press briefing yesterday came 247 00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:59,840 Speaker 1: out and I believe he announced that we're providing an 248 00:13:59,840 --> 00:14:04,960 Speaker 1: additional aid package. Is that right? Yeah? So what what 249 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:09,320 Speaker 1: struck you most about the Jack Sullivan announcement? Well, yeah, 250 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: and he also said, I have the quote here right 251 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 1: in front of me. He also said basically that you 252 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 1: can see he saw the signs of the possible Russian 253 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:22,080 Speaker 1: pull out from Cersone, and so it sounds like that 254 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:27,280 Speaker 1: our government is feeling pretty good that the momentum is continuing, 255 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: not going not not first shifting to the side, but 256 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:35,040 Speaker 1: continuing to shift on the side of Ukraine. And that's 257 00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:39,080 Speaker 1: where you know they are not going to course, they're 258 00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:43,320 Speaker 1: not going to do, for instance, what the Congressional Progressive 259 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:46,960 Speaker 1: Caucus letter you know said to do in public, although 260 00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 1: we have indications from the Washington Post rights Sullivan is 261 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,640 Speaker 1: in conversations with his counterpart in Russia, which is precisely 262 00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:56,080 Speaker 1: what the letter was asking for. Yes, although it was 263 00:14:56,120 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 1: I think also asking for some public acknowledgment that we 264 00:14:59,680 --> 00:15:03,880 Speaker 1: were sort of prioritiz some type of pressure because the 265 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:08,080 Speaker 1: narrative had been for so long that diplomacy is impossible 266 00:15:08,240 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 1: and irresponsible in a situation like this, and dark Brandon 267 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 1: kind of feeling his oats as well. We talked a 268 00:15:13,800 --> 00:15:16,120 Speaker 1: little bit yesterday about this moment from the press conference. 269 00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 1: We have the we have the sound from it here. 270 00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:21,960 Speaker 1: This sol back and forth I thought was pretty revealing. 271 00:15:22,400 --> 00:15:27,000 Speaker 1: Russia today claimed that it had evacuated the Croissana region 272 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:28,800 Speaker 1: in the Chissan city. Do you believe that this is 273 00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 1: potentially an inflection point in that conflict? And do you 274 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:34,840 Speaker 1: believe that Ukraine now has the leverage it needs to 275 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 1: begin peace and negotiations with Moscow? First of all, I 276 00:15:38,960 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 1: found it interesting, and they waited till after election to 277 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 1: make that judgment, which we knew for some time that 278 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,040 Speaker 1: they were going to be doing, And they said, this 279 00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:50,680 Speaker 1: is the fact that they have some real problems Russian 280 00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:55,680 Speaker 1: the Russian military number one, number two, whether or not 281 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:59,440 Speaker 1: that leads to a minimum that will lead to uh 282 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 1: to for everyone to re calibrate their positions over the 283 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:07,560 Speaker 1: winners period, and there remains to be seen whether or 284 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:12,480 Speaker 1: not there will be a judgment made as to whether 285 00:16:12,560 --> 00:16:16,960 Speaker 1: or not Ukraine is prepared to compromise with Russia. I'm 286 00:16:16,960 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 1: going to be going to the G twenty. I'm told 287 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:22,440 Speaker 1: that President Putin is not likely to be there, but 288 00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 1: other world leaders are going to be there in Indonesia, 289 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:27,320 Speaker 1: and we're going to have an opportunity to see what 290 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: the next steps may be. Yeah. So there he's saying 291 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 1: that they knew that this was coming, and he finds 292 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 1: it interesting that Putin waited until after the midterms. Kind 293 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,840 Speaker 1: of an interesting observation. And then later in his remarks 294 00:16:43,080 --> 00:16:47,640 Speaker 1: he says, we'll see whether you know and where Ukraine 295 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:51,840 Speaker 1: is when it comes to making compromises, which at least 296 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:59,160 Speaker 1: has the US talking publicly about what compromises are going 297 00:16:59,200 --> 00:17:00,880 Speaker 1: to lead to the end of the war, because I 298 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 1: think that is a huge that's a huge inflection point 299 00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: because for so long the line has been and I 300 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:13,200 Speaker 1: think you could have missed the importance of that line. 301 00:17:12,800 --> 00:17:16,280 Speaker 1: The line has been that the US supports whatever the 302 00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 1: Ukrainians are doing exactly full stop. And the Ukrainians have 303 00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:24,680 Speaker 1: been saying, you know what, not only do we want 304 00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:28,600 Speaker 1: every you know, Russian boot off of every inch of 305 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:31,760 Speaker 1: Ukrainians territory, including all the dumbos which has been contested 306 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 1: since twenty fourteen, we're also going to take Crimea back. 307 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:39,600 Speaker 1: In twenty fourteen, not even John McCain wanted to go 308 00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:43,120 Speaker 1: to war with Russia over that illegal annexation of Crimea. 309 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:48,000 Speaker 1: The result, there were sanctions, there's public statements of condemnation, 310 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:50,880 Speaker 1: but the idea that you would have a hot war 311 00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:55,120 Speaker 1: between these two countries over that was not something that 312 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 1: anybody in the US, even the most hawkish people thought 313 00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 1: was in the best in the of the United States. 314 00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:03,959 Speaker 1: Right well, frankly even necessarily the Ukrainian people, although that's 315 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:07,640 Speaker 1: up to them to decide, but it's up for us 316 00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,880 Speaker 1: to decide what we support, right well, that's what that's 317 00:18:10,880 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 1: what Biden is inching towards right there by talking about 318 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 1: the need for compromise to end this. Yes, and without 319 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,680 Speaker 1: our support, there is no real fight at this point 320 00:18:20,840 --> 00:18:24,320 Speaker 1: because it would be I mean, listen, the Ukrainian people 321 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 1: have shown incredible bravery and the casualties are just tragic, 322 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:33,439 Speaker 1: I mean especially it's just the announcement. Yes, it was 323 00:18:33,440 --> 00:18:36,159 Speaker 1: a possibly one hundred thousand on the Russian side, in 324 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:39,720 Speaker 1: one hundred thousand on the Ukrainian side. It don't believe 325 00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 1: any numbers that are that round, but you can believe 326 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,639 Speaker 1: the scale, the scale, absolutely scale of misery. And so 327 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:49,720 Speaker 1: Jake Selvin said that we were announcing another package of 328 00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 1: security systems for Ukraine, and that includes air defense contributions 329 00:18:53,280 --> 00:18:55,840 Speaker 1: like missiles for Hawk air defense systems as well as 330 00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:59,280 Speaker 1: for US Avenger air defense systems equipped with Stinger missiles. 331 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:02,800 Speaker 1: And so Ryan, I'm curious if you think that announcement 332 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:07,760 Speaker 1: was made in conjunction with their cersone thing as a 333 00:19:07,920 --> 00:19:12,440 Speaker 1: with his with with Jake Sullivan's perspective on cersone, are 334 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 1: we seeing the United States start to see it like 335 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:19,360 Speaker 1: this is in sight, like there's an end in sight there? 336 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 1: Certainly does seem to be an end insight. Whether or 337 00:19:21,760 --> 00:19:24,879 Speaker 1: not Putin sees it is I think an open question, 338 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:28,119 Speaker 1: but it does seem from these developments that that the 339 00:19:28,240 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 1: US sees it. And then the question is what does 340 00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 1: does Ukraine see it exactly? Or and does? But but 341 00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:36,760 Speaker 1: the key question of course is does Putin see it? 342 00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:38,399 Speaker 1: Does and how does Putin get out of it and 343 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 1: maintain his position in power? Because the Ukrainians are still saying, 344 00:19:41,560 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 1: we're not going to negotiate with Putin, we want the 345 00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:47,200 Speaker 1: next leader. And it's like this, we're not regime change, 346 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:49,359 Speaker 1: We're not really trying to do regime change. Yeah, well, 347 00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:51,879 Speaker 1: maybe maybe you are, and maybe we there were some 348 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:54,160 Speaker 1: there were some people who wanted to do regime change. 349 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:58,520 Speaker 1: It would be absurd because the most likely outcome is 350 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:01,399 Speaker 1: a much further right yes. And that's and one of 351 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:04,520 Speaker 1: the problems with we have we not learned that lesson? Yeah, 352 00:20:04,520 --> 00:20:09,440 Speaker 1: the problem with the propagandistic demonization of all of our 353 00:20:09,480 --> 00:20:12,520 Speaker 1: adversaries around the world is that it clouds us to 354 00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:15,120 Speaker 1: the reality that it could get worse. Yes, because we've 355 00:20:15,119 --> 00:20:18,440 Speaker 1: built people up to be these like incredible monsters who 356 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:21,399 Speaker 1: can't think rationally and can't be negotiated with. So the 357 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:24,879 Speaker 1: only possibility that is, well, you got to get rid 358 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:27,720 Speaker 1: of them, Well, somebody's going to replace them. An a 359 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:30,359 Speaker 1: close look at Russian politics doesn't show that there's much 360 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:34,199 Speaker 1: of a progressive wing. So if the progressive wing is 361 00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:36,720 Speaker 1: in prison, what's left of it? So, speaking of the 362 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:39,280 Speaker 1: progressive wing here in the United States, this week, I 363 00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:43,680 Speaker 1: interviewed Alexandria Kasyuo Kortez and I asked her about her 364 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:50,480 Speaker 1: position on Ukraine, and particularly about the absence of a 365 00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:54,240 Speaker 1: real kind of progressive position in Congress on the question 366 00:20:54,440 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 1: of peace between Ukraine and Russia. We can play a 367 00:20:59,520 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: little bit of it clip here. Democrats also hammered progressives 368 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:06,560 Speaker 1: for that CPC letter encouraging the pursuit of negotiations to 369 00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:08,920 Speaker 1: end the war in Ukraine, saying that like doing it 370 00:21:09,359 --> 00:21:11,840 Speaker 1: right before the election would end up hurting Democrats. That letter, 371 00:21:12,119 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 1: as you know, that was retracted. You never you never 372 00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:17,240 Speaker 1: commented on that on whether you still stood by it, 373 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:19,480 Speaker 1: And you and other progressives have been kind of criticized 374 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:21,479 Speaker 1: for not laying out your thinking on kind of what 375 00:21:21,520 --> 00:21:23,560 Speaker 1: the progressive position ought to be when it comes to 376 00:21:23,600 --> 00:21:24,960 Speaker 1: this war. I don't know if you saw this a 377 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,440 Speaker 1: Russia just announced it's withdrawing from Curson, which is a 378 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:30,199 Speaker 1: massive defeat for them. But so, why hasn't there been 379 00:21:30,240 --> 00:21:32,360 Speaker 1: more of a progressive voice on the debate over war 380 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:34,960 Speaker 1: funding and what's your thinking on what the US approach 381 00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 1: should be now, Yeah, well, you know, I think and 382 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:41,680 Speaker 1: I think, you know, to be clear, both the decision 383 00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:43,920 Speaker 1: to publish that letter at that time and withdraw that 384 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:46,919 Speaker 1: letter at that time, we're just that we were not 385 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:50,440 Speaker 1: made privy to. But in terms of the content of 386 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:53,000 Speaker 1: the letter, like timing aside, in terms of the content 387 00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:55,320 Speaker 1: of the letter, I believe that a lot of it 388 00:21:55,359 --> 00:21:58,640 Speaker 1: is quite consistent with what we've also been hearing from 389 00:21:58,760 --> 00:22:02,680 Speaker 1: former Obama administration, of the Biden administration, and now even 390 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 1: recently there have also been you know, there has also 391 00:22:06,080 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: been I believe, some developments coming out of Ukraine indicating 392 00:22:10,560 --> 00:22:15,679 Speaker 1: an openness to negotiat and negotiate under certain preconditions. And 393 00:22:16,080 --> 00:22:21,280 Speaker 1: you know, I believe that progressives have always advocated to 394 00:22:21,280 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: to leaning on diplomatic solutions. We should continue to lean 395 00:22:25,119 --> 00:22:27,399 Speaker 1: on that. Uh. You know, I just I think that 396 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 1: the large asterisk is is will Russia is Russia. How 397 00:22:34,200 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 1: can we bring Russia to the table without without compromising 398 00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:43,520 Speaker 1: Ukrainian sovereignty and just core principles of self determination. But 399 00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:45,720 Speaker 1: that is really what the landscape of diplomacy is about. 400 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,840 Speaker 1: And even when Obama was on pasitive America. Several weeks ago, 401 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:53,480 Speaker 1: he discussed about how at this present time, diplomatic relations 402 00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 1: are likely worse than they may have been almost at 403 00:22:56,040 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 1: any point during the Cold War, which is a very 404 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:02,080 Speaker 1: dangerous place to be. And so, so, you know, the 405 00:23:02,080 --> 00:23:06,479 Speaker 1: the reaction to the publication of this letter, I, you know, 406 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:10,359 Speaker 1: I think continues to be a bit overblown, and I 407 00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:13,560 Speaker 1: think that there's almost a it's almost like people are 408 00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:17,440 Speaker 1: looking for a problem where they're really I don't think 409 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:20,119 Speaker 1: is any intent for there to be one. And I 410 00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:22,199 Speaker 1: also think that it's quite consistent with what we've been 411 00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 1: hearing from Frankly, the Biden administration, formal Bide administration officials, 412 00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:28,199 Speaker 1: and even certain Ukrainian officials. And when it comes to, 413 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:30,320 Speaker 1: you know, that recent development in Russia, I do believe 414 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:35,159 Speaker 1: that there's some skepticism that we're hearing from from Ukrainian 415 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:40,200 Speaker 1: officials about whether that is in you know, the the 416 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:43,360 Speaker 1: the genuine iss or authenticy or good faith that announcement 417 00:23:43,400 --> 00:23:44,840 Speaker 1: was made. But you know, I think that's something that 418 00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:48,200 Speaker 1: that we will that we will soon see play out. 419 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:52,240 Speaker 1: A couple of highlights of that include your furious typing 420 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:55,960 Speaker 1: and your kids in the background so what did you 421 00:23:56,040 --> 00:23:59,480 Speaker 1: make of her comments? Again, I from the perspective of 422 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:02,679 Speaker 1: somebody kind of outside the left, it's really interesting to 423 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:05,640 Speaker 1: hear her say, listen, we were not privy to what 424 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 1: was happening with that retraction. Yeah, right, that so everyone 425 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:13,159 Speaker 1: has thrown the initial letter under the bus. It's interesting 426 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:15,080 Speaker 1: to see her throw the retraction of the letter under 427 00:24:15,080 --> 00:24:19,119 Speaker 1: the bus. Yes, yeah, I'm sure she got a call. Actually, really, 428 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:24,399 Speaker 1: I would think about that. People can read the full 429 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 1: Q and A over at the intercept. It's broken up 430 00:24:26,800 --> 00:24:33,159 Speaker 1: into two parts. The question, the outstanding question, which I 431 00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 1: didn't follow up on I should have, but I moved 432 00:24:34,840 --> 00:24:40,720 Speaker 1: back to abortion rights questions, is well, what what is 433 00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:44,119 Speaker 1: the role of Congress? Okay, so Congress tried to do 434 00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:49,320 Speaker 1: this letter. It may actually have had some impact by 435 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:54,360 Speaker 1: having a creating a four day conversation about negotiations. Well, 436 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:56,240 Speaker 1: how long was it after that we found out that 437 00:24:56,240 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 1: the Biden administration we've yet we found that out, and 438 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:00,679 Speaker 1: then you had and then all of a sudden you 439 00:25:00,720 --> 00:25:03,400 Speaker 1: started seeing other people coming forward saying, yeah, actually, there's 440 00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:07,879 Speaker 1: nothing nothing wrong with this. So even in retreat, they 441 00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:10,479 Speaker 1: may have taken one for the team there, But what 442 00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:14,080 Speaker 1: else can they do now? Do they have enough votes 443 00:25:14,119 --> 00:25:17,480 Speaker 1: to be relevant players on this? You know, I suspect 444 00:25:17,880 --> 00:25:20,440 Speaker 1: that the Lame Duck will see a big war spending 445 00:25:20,480 --> 00:25:23,239 Speaker 1: package because they won't want to leave it in the 446 00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:27,120 Speaker 1: hands of an uncertain Congress going forward. Well, and especially if, 447 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:29,960 Speaker 1: as we were talking about, there's a sense that there's 448 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:32,760 Speaker 1: some blood in the water that if you sort of 449 00:25:32,760 --> 00:25:36,480 Speaker 1: double down right now, because then you said you're sending 450 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:39,440 Speaker 1: a signal that could be you could like that, would 451 00:25:39,640 --> 00:25:42,320 Speaker 1: you you would from the defenders of a package like that, 452 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 1: they would say, this is actually diplomatic because we're going 453 00:25:44,640 --> 00:25:47,879 Speaker 1: to approve another x billion dollars and that's going to 454 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: be such a morale blow it to the Russians that 455 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:53,639 Speaker 1: they're going to say, okay, you know what, fine, like 456 00:25:54,240 --> 00:25:57,840 Speaker 1: what can we keep the right? And then you sit 457 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:01,200 Speaker 1: and then you sit down and drawn into the war 458 00:26:01,440 --> 00:26:04,560 Speaker 1: right like that's as people keep saying in Europe leaders 459 00:26:04,600 --> 00:26:07,719 Speaker 1: over there, war's end, Like wars have to end, they 460 00:26:07,800 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 1: usually end with negotiations, So let's get them going faster. 461 00:26:10,280 --> 00:26:12,320 Speaker 1: And so if it's clear in the Lame Duck that 462 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:15,840 Speaker 1: the US is like in this with another eighty billion 463 00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:17,679 Speaker 1: dollars or whatever insane amount they're going to put on 464 00:26:17,680 --> 00:26:19,480 Speaker 1: the table. But then the question is what role do 465 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:22,639 Speaker 1: the progressives have there? And because so many curious if 466 00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:25,120 Speaker 1: you're taking on it, so many Republicans are for this spending, 467 00:26:25,400 --> 00:26:27,120 Speaker 1: You've got plenty that there are against it, You've got 468 00:26:27,160 --> 00:26:30,280 Speaker 1: plenty that are still for it. That means a block 469 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 1: of four or five six Democrats who would be able 470 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:37,800 Speaker 1: to stop a partisan bill. Because Democrats only have two 471 00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:39,520 Speaker 1: hundred and twenty two right now in the lame Duck 472 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:42,040 Speaker 1: or whatever it is. So if you can get five Democrats, boom, 473 00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:45,040 Speaker 1: Pelosi doesn't have a majority anymore, right, five Democrats voting 474 00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:47,000 Speaker 1: no on war funding, you just got to go find 475 00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:50,320 Speaker 1: five Republicans. No. I think the interview actually in the 476 00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:52,080 Speaker 1: points in the interview, and I actually think now that 477 00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:54,879 Speaker 1: we're talking about sort of that shift from the retraction, 478 00:26:55,119 --> 00:26:58,000 Speaker 1: the actually the entire krefuffle with that underscores is the 479 00:26:58,040 --> 00:27:03,199 Speaker 1: need for progressives and serious peace minded conservatives to be 480 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:08,560 Speaker 1: like extremely dogged right now, because that's how you push 481 00:27:08,640 --> 00:27:11,280 Speaker 1: people to the negotiating table, and that's how you continue 482 00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:14,640 Speaker 1: to shift the Overton window towards negotiations, because if you're 483 00:27:14,640 --> 00:27:17,960 Speaker 1: not shifting the window to negotiations, and if you're not 484 00:27:18,080 --> 00:27:21,399 Speaker 1: seriously doing that, if these conversations aren't happening, and it 485 00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:26,520 Speaker 1: isn't clear to party leadership that progressives conservatives are willing 486 00:27:26,560 --> 00:27:29,720 Speaker 1: to negotiate to get or or are willing to stand 487 00:27:29,760 --> 00:27:33,840 Speaker 1: firm to get to negotiations, are willing to withhold votes 488 00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:37,119 Speaker 1: to get to a point of negotiation, or to ensure 489 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:40,119 Speaker 1: that that's a priority for leadership and it's not something 490 00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:45,120 Speaker 1: silly that's like we're dismissed as you know, the cranks perspective. 491 00:27:46,119 --> 00:27:48,880 Speaker 1: That's why I think it's really important. Actually, this underscorees 492 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:51,959 Speaker 1: how important it is for progressives conservatives who are who 493 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:54,600 Speaker 1: are on the negotiation side that are less hawkish, to 494 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:58,439 Speaker 1: be very like not to say, okay, we kind of 495 00:27:58,720 --> 00:28:02,159 Speaker 1: we got them talking and they're doing what we asked for, 496 00:28:02,359 --> 00:28:04,359 Speaker 1: so now we can sort of go along and get along. 497 00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:06,679 Speaker 1: Absolutely not if anything is the opposite right, And in 498 00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:09,880 Speaker 1: all wars, all the time, the camp that's arguing against 499 00:28:09,920 --> 00:28:14,160 Speaker 1: war is in the weakest position when there when their 500 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:18,119 Speaker 1: side is rolling to victory. But there have been so 501 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:21,440 Speaker 1: many opportunities that people have lost to reach a peace 502 00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:24,560 Speaker 1: agreement because they were rolling to victory, and they thought 503 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:28,320 Speaker 1: that right around the corner. And then four years later, 504 00:28:28,320 --> 00:28:30,879 Speaker 1: you're still fighting, You're still fighting, still spending crazy amounts 505 00:28:30,880 --> 00:28:37,480 Speaker 1: of money, still losing just an unbelievable amount of people. Yeah, 506 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:40,160 Speaker 1: that's the last thing that we would want to happen. 507 00:28:40,240 --> 00:28:42,160 Speaker 1: It doesn't have to happen. It doesn't have to happen. 508 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:47,880 Speaker 1: Back here in the United States, some wild developments in 509 00:28:47,920 --> 00:28:50,920 Speaker 1: the mid term so far. So we had a call 510 00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:55,719 Speaker 1: in the Arizona Senate race from it was from Wasserman. 511 00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 1: But it does it looks solid, it looks I mean 512 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:03,960 Speaker 1: this until Mark Kelly beating Blake Masters is what they're calling. 513 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:07,200 Speaker 1: You asked me this question yesterday. I think the Master's 514 00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:11,520 Speaker 1: Camp and the carry Lake camp both still feel good now. 515 00:29:11,880 --> 00:29:14,680 Speaker 1: Dave Washerman saying it's hard to see a path. It's 516 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:16,880 Speaker 1: so hard to see a path forward that you know 517 00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:22,080 Speaker 1: it's unlikely that Masters can pull it off. I think 518 00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:24,600 Speaker 1: is probably a sign that the optimism and the Master's 519 00:29:24,680 --> 00:29:28,800 Speaker 1: camp is over inflated. And you know that's always the 520 00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:32,120 Speaker 1: case with campaigns. They're always overly they're projecting optimism, and 521 00:29:32,440 --> 00:29:34,440 Speaker 1: sometimes it's very sincere and real because they have a 522 00:29:34,440 --> 00:29:37,400 Speaker 1: lot of blood sweat and tears on the line. But 523 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:40,800 Speaker 1: I mean, I think Arizona because of this, because of 524 00:29:40,840 --> 00:29:44,000 Speaker 1: what happened in Maricopa County. There's an election official in 525 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:47,600 Speaker 1: Maericopa County yesterday saying some four hundred thousand ballot ballots 526 00:29:47,640 --> 00:29:49,640 Speaker 1: weren't going to be counted until like Monday, but he 527 00:29:49,680 --> 00:29:52,440 Speaker 1: didn't know when they were actually going to be counted, 528 00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:55,720 Speaker 1: which just inflamed a lot of folks on the right. 529 00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:59,720 Speaker 1: So with that happening, I mean, washerman could call it 530 00:29:59,760 --> 00:30:02,840 Speaker 1: for can call from Mark Kelly. I think that that's 531 00:30:02,840 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 1: a very plausible outcome. I also think things in Arizona 532 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 1: are about to get really hairy, and I think there's 533 00:30:07,560 --> 00:30:12,000 Speaker 1: going to be a lot of sort of litigation. Yeah, 534 00:30:12,000 --> 00:30:16,720 Speaker 1: and I think so, I think it's worth calling out 535 00:30:17,080 --> 00:30:21,719 Speaker 1: some democratic hypocrisy in Arizona. Here is the situation that 536 00:30:21,760 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 1: you had on election day or there was some mechanical 537 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:29,400 Speaker 1: failures and other problems. Twenty percent of the election machines 538 00:30:29,400 --> 00:30:32,960 Speaker 1: in Maricopa County were down in that morning, so that 539 00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:38,040 Speaker 1: led to very long lines. The Republicans sued to try 540 00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:41,720 Speaker 1: to get an extended time period. Often those extensions are granted. 541 00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:45,920 Speaker 1: This time that judge said, you didn't demonstrate, you know, 542 00:30:45,920 --> 00:30:48,760 Speaker 1: whether or not anybody was unable to vote as a 543 00:30:48,760 --> 00:30:52,120 Speaker 1: result of this, and Democrats just said, okay, well, good 544 00:30:52,120 --> 00:30:57,160 Speaker 1: for us, we won that one. But historically that argument 545 00:30:57,160 --> 00:30:59,440 Speaker 1: would have been left out of the room. Like long 546 00:30:59,520 --> 00:31:03,720 Speaker 1: lines suppression are by definition suppression. That's what Democrats have 547 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 1: always said. And Democrats have always been correct about that, 548 00:31:07,760 --> 00:31:10,680 Speaker 1: because you drive by the polling place and it's a 549 00:31:10,720 --> 00:31:15,120 Speaker 1: two hour line you drive on, and just because you 550 00:31:15,160 --> 00:31:18,720 Speaker 1: can't prove, you know, that person didn't like register somewhere 551 00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:23,320 Speaker 1: like that, so that person's vote was suppressed as a 552 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:25,719 Speaker 1: result of it. I'm sure that happened in Americopa County, 553 00:31:25,920 --> 00:31:27,920 Speaker 1: and I'm sure it has happened in cities all across 554 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:30,720 Speaker 1: the country over the last fifty years where they have 555 00:31:31,080 --> 00:31:35,120 Speaker 1: kind of either manufactured or through incompetence, you know, produced 556 00:31:35,240 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 1: these these long lines, or just through the kind of 557 00:31:37,120 --> 00:31:40,239 Speaker 1: structural pressures of so many people living and so with 558 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 1: so few precincts. And this also goes to a prison 559 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:48,000 Speaker 1: that or a trap that Republicans have built for themselves. 560 00:31:48,560 --> 00:31:51,600 Speaker 1: So what they did is they convinced all of their 561 00:31:51,680 --> 00:31:55,480 Speaker 1: voters that early voting is not safe. If it's fraudulent, 562 00:31:55,920 --> 00:31:58,960 Speaker 1: you're you're wrong if you do this. And so, as 563 00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 1: a result, in a place like Maricopa County, which is 564 00:32:02,080 --> 00:32:07,560 Speaker 1: heavily Democratic and where the Democratic Party kind of oversees 565 00:32:07,800 --> 00:32:13,160 Speaker 1: the election machinery, the actual the election day voters are Republican. Right, 566 00:32:13,160 --> 00:32:15,360 Speaker 1: the election day voters are Republican, And in this case, 567 00:32:15,440 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 1: the Secretary of State is on the ballot and refuse 568 00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:20,600 Speaker 1: to re yes. That was the thing that what Rafensberger 569 00:32:20,640 --> 00:32:24,480 Speaker 1: did against Abrams in twenty eighteen, which Abrams and Democrats 570 00:32:24,600 --> 00:32:28,400 Speaker 1: used to call that election corrupt for years. So is 571 00:32:28,440 --> 00:32:30,920 Speaker 1: this why is this any different? And it's not just 572 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:35,040 Speaker 1: the potential for software updates to go badly and boy, 573 00:32:35,240 --> 00:32:37,400 Speaker 1: what a shame you've got these three hour lines now 574 00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:42,680 Speaker 1: or whatever or whatever cause these malfunctions. The Republicans are 575 00:32:42,680 --> 00:32:47,080 Speaker 1: also setting themselves up for weather events. I think if 576 00:32:47,520 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 1: Laxalt loses, it is likely because of a freak snowstorm 577 00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:55,640 Speaker 1: in Reno and Rain and Nevada. In Las Vegas on 578 00:32:55,680 --> 00:32:58,280 Speaker 1: election day, you were talking to some folks who were like, hey, 579 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:00,360 Speaker 1: if the weather's bad, that's the best thing that could 580 00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:02,840 Speaker 1: happened to Catherine Cortez Master, right, I was talking to 581 00:33:02,920 --> 00:33:05,840 Speaker 1: Republican this Republican operative who was working on the campaign 582 00:33:06,440 --> 00:33:10,120 Speaker 1: or you're working on an outside campaign, and that morning 583 00:33:10,160 --> 00:33:12,760 Speaker 1: and he's likely. We're in really good shape in Nevada. 584 00:33:12,920 --> 00:33:15,400 Speaker 1: I'm feeling very good about it. We're hearing it might 585 00:33:15,440 --> 00:33:18,560 Speaker 1: snow in Reno in my reign in Vegas, and if 586 00:33:18,560 --> 00:33:20,800 Speaker 1: it does, that sucks, but I think we're still okay. 587 00:33:21,240 --> 00:33:24,160 Speaker 1: It was, But this is an era of climate change. 588 00:33:24,160 --> 00:33:26,320 Speaker 1: You're going to get freak weather events all the time. 589 00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:29,000 Speaker 1: And so if you have three weeks to vote and 590 00:33:29,040 --> 00:33:30,920 Speaker 1: you get two weeks of freak weather, you still have 591 00:33:30,960 --> 00:33:33,280 Speaker 1: a whole week to get your ballot in. If you 592 00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:38,360 Speaker 1: have ten hours to vote, you are, over the long run, 593 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 1: going to get hit with freak weather events in some 594 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 1: of those ten hour stretches. And you're also going to 595 00:33:42,720 --> 00:33:47,120 Speaker 1: get hit with malfunctioning computers. And some of those computers 596 00:33:47,160 --> 00:33:50,200 Speaker 1: might malfunction just because you don't now, you don't have 597 00:33:50,240 --> 00:33:53,840 Speaker 1: democratic officials that are that incentivized to make things run 598 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:57,640 Speaker 1: perfectly on election day because guess who's coming out to 599 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:01,320 Speaker 1: vote three to one Republicans or whatever, like, yeah, you guys, 600 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,720 Speaker 1: hate you guys won't fund our elections. You know, we 601 00:34:04,760 --> 00:34:07,880 Speaker 1: asked for more money, the legislature rejected us. You wouldn't 602 00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:10,120 Speaker 1: let us start counting ballots. You kind of doing everything 603 00:34:10,120 --> 00:34:13,000 Speaker 1: you can to slow down our ability to get this going. 604 00:34:13,040 --> 00:34:15,120 Speaker 1: You made us spend two years going through these audits. 605 00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:16,800 Speaker 1: So yeah, you know what, maybe we don't do the 606 00:34:16,840 --> 00:34:19,400 Speaker 1: maintenance on these machines as fast as we could have. 607 00:34:20,239 --> 00:34:22,640 Speaker 1: You can't. It's very it'll be hard to prove that 608 00:34:22,640 --> 00:34:25,920 Speaker 1: that was malicious. But the incentives that Republicans have created 609 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:29,279 Speaker 1: are for Democrats to be like, oh yeah, you know, 610 00:34:29,400 --> 00:34:32,480 Speaker 1: real shame about those machines. Well, yeah, I don't disagree 611 00:34:32,480 --> 00:34:35,839 Speaker 1: with that, although I will also say what, I don't 612 00:34:35,880 --> 00:34:37,520 Speaker 1: even want to gloss over this because I think it's 613 00:34:37,560 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 1: hugely important that when the bill in Georgia was up 614 00:34:42,040 --> 00:34:45,120 Speaker 1: for debate that Brian Kemp ended up signing, voter turnout 615 00:34:45,160 --> 00:34:47,440 Speaker 1: was really high in Georgia. That doesn't necessarily negate the 616 00:34:47,560 --> 00:34:50,160 Speaker 1: argument that the bill was suppressive to some extent, but 617 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:53,200 Speaker 1: I think the evidence suggests that it was not. It 618 00:34:53,320 --> 00:34:56,319 Speaker 1: was if that was the goal, Yeah, yeah, And on 619 00:34:56,360 --> 00:34:59,480 Speaker 1: that case, I mean it was a milder even the 620 00:35:00,440 --> 00:35:02,279 Speaker 1: that it implemented were milder than a lot of other 621 00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:06,080 Speaker 1: states have, including those Delaware, the home of the President 622 00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:08,120 Speaker 1: of the United States, who referred to that law as 623 00:35:08,200 --> 00:35:10,359 Speaker 1: Jim Eagle, who referred to it as Jim Crow two 624 00:35:10,400 --> 00:35:13,080 Speaker 1: point zero. And what drives me crazy is how the 625 00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:16,080 Speaker 1: media ran with that narrative and what we're seeing right 626 00:35:16,080 --> 00:35:19,759 Speaker 1: now in Maricopa County. I actually, I don't I would 627 00:35:19,840 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 1: quibble with the label suppression. I don't think it was malicious. 628 00:35:24,040 --> 00:35:26,799 Speaker 1: I think it was incompetent, and I think it looks 629 00:35:26,840 --> 00:35:29,879 Speaker 1: really bad and it's really bad for institutional trust. All 630 00:35:29,920 --> 00:35:33,960 Speaker 1: that said, by their own definitions and their own metrics, 631 00:35:34,400 --> 00:35:39,319 Speaker 1: democrats and the media are just like almost gleeful about it, 632 00:35:39,360 --> 00:35:42,440 Speaker 1: as opposed to like highly highly concerned. And so the 633 00:35:42,480 --> 00:35:45,680 Speaker 1: way that the media constructs narratives. We've talked about this before, 634 00:35:45,800 --> 00:35:47,719 Speaker 1: we talked about it last week. I think, I mean, 635 00:35:47,760 --> 00:35:51,640 Speaker 1: it's just incredible how they can create alternate realities and 636 00:35:51,719 --> 00:35:54,799 Speaker 1: have everybody talking about Jim Eagle Jim Crow two point zero, 637 00:35:54,800 --> 00:35:57,719 Speaker 1: and then you see something like this happen and it's 638 00:35:57,760 --> 00:36:01,320 Speaker 1: just crickets. So the suppression and which we don't have 639 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:04,759 Speaker 1: a call on yet, that was from the Lord from 640 00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:08,480 Speaker 1: the skies, but divine intervention. Yeah, according to people who 641 00:36:08,520 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 1: are watching this really closely, they feel like, at least 642 00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:14,040 Speaker 1: the people that I'm seeing, Maybe tell me if your 643 00:36:14,440 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 1: kind of feed is telling you something different, that Cortez 644 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:20,360 Speaker 1: Mastow has a very very very very strong path. It 645 00:36:20,360 --> 00:36:23,480 Speaker 1: looks good to reelection, right, Yeah, which that means that 646 00:36:23,560 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 1: Warnock would be fifty one if he wins, yeah, or 647 00:36:27,200 --> 00:36:29,680 Speaker 1: fifty and they'd still control the Senate regardless of what 648 00:36:29,719 --> 00:36:32,279 Speaker 1: happens with the Georgia. And the strange place we've been 649 00:36:32,320 --> 00:36:34,319 Speaker 1: in for the last two days is that you can 650 00:36:34,400 --> 00:36:38,520 Speaker 1: either have Democrats actually ending up losing both Houses of Congress, 651 00:36:38,760 --> 00:36:42,520 Speaker 1: losing the House and losing the Senate, or you can 652 00:36:42,560 --> 00:36:47,080 Speaker 1: have Republicans failing to capture even the House. I mean, 653 00:36:47,280 --> 00:36:50,400 Speaker 1: that could end up, as Ryan suggested earlier around two seventeen, 654 00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:54,240 Speaker 1: a one vote margin for either Kevin McCarthy or Nancy 655 00:36:54,239 --> 00:36:58,200 Speaker 1: Pelosi or Hakim Jeffers or whoever steps into that vacuum, 656 00:36:58,520 --> 00:37:02,400 Speaker 1: which is just none of these outcomes were like on 657 00:37:03,200 --> 00:37:05,600 Speaker 1: They weren't on my radar that it would be that 658 00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:08,600 Speaker 1: close at all. So let's have some fun with that one. 659 00:37:08,640 --> 00:37:11,600 Speaker 1: So the House of Representatives on Friday after the election 660 00:37:12,360 --> 00:37:15,800 Speaker 1: is genuinely still in play. And so if you're listening 661 00:37:15,880 --> 00:37:18,759 Speaker 1: to this on the podcast you're watching on YouTube, i'd 662 00:37:18,760 --> 00:37:21,120 Speaker 1: suggest pausing and writing some of these downs. You can 663 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:23,440 Speaker 1: have fun with these over the weekend following some of 664 00:37:23,480 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 1: these House races as the votes are coming in. So 665 00:37:25,760 --> 00:37:29,640 Speaker 1: currently the Republicans look to have the lead in about 666 00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:36,919 Speaker 1: two hundred and eleven districts, with Democrats having the lead 667 00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:40,279 Speaker 1: in about well no, Republicans have about two hundred and 668 00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:45,400 Speaker 1: eleven called Democrats lead in two hundred and fourteen. In 669 00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:48,760 Speaker 1: other words, Republicans are in the lead, and if everything 670 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:52,800 Speaker 1: stays at as it is, they will narrowly win the House. 671 00:37:53,239 --> 00:37:56,280 Speaker 1: But there are there are a significant number of races 672 00:37:56,320 --> 00:37:59,960 Speaker 1: that could flip. And here are the ones that Daniel 673 00:38:00,719 --> 00:38:04,759 Speaker 1: at Taniel eight at Tanil He's great if you don't 674 00:38:04,760 --> 00:38:08,880 Speaker 1: follow him for elections, so good. What's the name of 675 00:38:08,920 --> 00:38:11,600 Speaker 1: his new publication? I don't know. Well, I'll try to 676 00:38:11,600 --> 00:38:13,359 Speaker 1: remember it and put it in. I'll give Hi an 677 00:38:13,400 --> 00:38:15,600 Speaker 1: extra tweet for forgetting the name of his new publication. 678 00:38:15,800 --> 00:38:19,520 Speaker 1: But it's great. So here are the races. So Arizona 679 00:38:19,680 --> 00:38:23,759 Speaker 1: six Democrats are slightly trailing in that, but there's a 680 00:38:23,800 --> 00:38:29,520 Speaker 1: lot left to go. California three, and then he lists 681 00:38:29,560 --> 00:38:33,799 Speaker 1: also California thirteen, twenty two, twenty seven, forty one, and 682 00:38:33,840 --> 00:38:38,160 Speaker 1: forty five. A couple of those, forty one in particular, 683 00:38:38,200 --> 00:38:43,160 Speaker 1: I think thirteen in particular are very close. Colorado three, 684 00:38:43,880 --> 00:38:47,640 Speaker 1: which is Bobert that we'll see looks like she's pulling 685 00:38:47,640 --> 00:38:49,200 Speaker 1: it off. Looks like she's pulling it off. And then 686 00:38:49,200 --> 00:38:52,480 Speaker 1: there's some weird shenanigans going on with the They fired 687 00:38:52,520 --> 00:38:55,359 Speaker 1: the election counter in Pueblo. Did you see this? I didn't. 688 00:38:55,400 --> 00:38:57,239 Speaker 1: It'll it's this is going to recount either way, and 689 00:38:57,280 --> 00:39:00,200 Speaker 1: the Secretary of State has sent a new supervisor into 690 00:39:00,200 --> 00:39:03,320 Speaker 1: Pueblo saying that the supervisor screwed up. The Democratic supervisor. 691 00:39:03,360 --> 00:39:05,680 Speaker 1: They're screwed up. That one will go to recount. That 692 00:39:05,719 --> 00:39:09,799 Speaker 1: could decide it. Then New York twenty two, which Republicans 693 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 1: are up by about two thousand in right now. That 694 00:39:12,280 --> 00:39:17,879 Speaker 1: looks fairly strong for Republicans. But then Oregon five, and 695 00:39:17,920 --> 00:39:20,719 Speaker 1: so they need to win four of the ones that 696 00:39:20,760 --> 00:39:24,839 Speaker 1: I just listed, and I think there's two in California 697 00:39:25,640 --> 00:39:28,839 Speaker 1: that they have a very solid shot on because in California, 698 00:39:29,200 --> 00:39:33,680 Speaker 1: the votes become more democratic as they continue to count. 699 00:39:33,680 --> 00:39:36,839 Speaker 1: That's been the pattern. More young people vote super late 700 00:39:38,000 --> 00:39:39,920 Speaker 1: on election day, they drop their mail ballot in and 701 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:43,120 Speaker 1: so it could take weeks for us to know these 702 00:39:43,239 --> 00:39:46,600 Speaker 1: but historically the pattern has been that every day that 703 00:39:46,680 --> 00:39:49,320 Speaker 1: goes on, the democratic margin grows, which they've got to 704 00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:51,920 Speaker 1: get a better system because it just feeds paranoia, like 705 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:54,880 Speaker 1: it's not like, this is not corrupt. There is a 706 00:39:54,920 --> 00:39:58,279 Speaker 1: reason you can explain exactly why it happens this way. 707 00:39:58,480 --> 00:40:01,919 Speaker 1: Hong people procrastinate, but still Republicans look at it and like, boy, 708 00:40:02,080 --> 00:40:04,480 Speaker 1: isn't that interesting. We thought we had it, and then 709 00:40:04,520 --> 00:40:06,359 Speaker 1: all of a sudden the votes are gone. So there's 710 00:40:06,360 --> 00:40:10,359 Speaker 1: at least two there and then Arizona six. I think 711 00:40:10,360 --> 00:40:12,920 Speaker 1: it's probably their best shot to get the third and 712 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:15,000 Speaker 1: then there and then the fourth, which would be two 713 00:40:15,080 --> 00:40:18,400 Speaker 1: hundred and eighteen, would be Oregon five, which is Jamie 714 00:40:18,440 --> 00:40:22,880 Speaker 1: McLeod Skinner. It's an interesting race. Progressive who knocked Kurt Schrader, 715 00:40:22,960 --> 00:40:25,279 Speaker 1: who was one of the unbreakable nine, this like right 716 00:40:25,280 --> 00:40:28,239 Speaker 1: wing democrat who held up built the Build Back Better bill. 717 00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:33,040 Speaker 1: She primaried him, she beat him, and then the D 718 00:40:33,080 --> 00:40:37,640 Speaker 1: Triple C did invest almost two million dollars in the race, 719 00:40:37,840 --> 00:40:40,560 Speaker 1: but then left in the last several weeks of the race. 720 00:40:41,960 --> 00:40:44,040 Speaker 1: You know, they say that they were expecting the House 721 00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:46,319 Speaker 1: Majority pack to come in, because that's how it works 722 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:48,640 Speaker 1: in general, like D Triple C super pac does a 723 00:40:48,680 --> 00:40:50,600 Speaker 1: couple of weeks, then House Majority pack, the other super 724 00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:52,719 Speaker 1: pac comes in. House Majority pack did not come in 725 00:40:53,239 --> 00:40:56,560 Speaker 1: like too progressive, not going to win. And so if 726 00:40:56,600 --> 00:40:59,320 Speaker 1: they lose a race because they felt the Cannate was 727 00:40:59,360 --> 00:41:02,840 Speaker 1: too progressive, and she loses by less than a thousand 728 00:41:02,920 --> 00:41:05,360 Speaker 1: votes and as a result, they lose the House after 729 00:41:05,360 --> 00:41:07,640 Speaker 1: instead spending the money on Sean Patrick Maloney, the D 730 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:12,120 Speaker 1: Triple C chair who lost. I'd like to say there'd 731 00:41:12,120 --> 00:41:14,160 Speaker 1: be a reckoning, but I've been doing this long enough 732 00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:16,960 Speaker 1: that they're probably there, probably won't be, But so that 733 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:19,880 Speaker 1: means you're the most likely outcome I see from this, 734 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:25,239 Speaker 1: hilariously is two eighteen for Republicans wild, which means that 735 00:41:25,320 --> 00:41:27,960 Speaker 1: over the next year, if that happens, over the next year, 736 00:41:28,600 --> 00:41:31,520 Speaker 1: there's a considerable chance that there's an open seat for 737 00:41:31,520 --> 00:41:35,400 Speaker 1: some reason, and then there's a special election for control 738 00:41:35,480 --> 00:41:38,239 Speaker 1: of the House of Representatives. And again we're kind of 739 00:41:38,280 --> 00:41:42,640 Speaker 1: gonna see something like that in Georgia on the Senate side. Likely, 740 00:41:42,760 --> 00:41:45,360 Speaker 1: it depends on how some of these racist shakeout, Nevada 741 00:41:45,400 --> 00:41:47,960 Speaker 1: being one of them. But we're we're seeing the runoff 742 00:41:48,040 --> 00:41:50,680 Speaker 1: turn into something like that kind of but a special 743 00:41:50,680 --> 00:41:52,520 Speaker 1: election for control of the House in the next year. 744 00:41:52,560 --> 00:41:55,200 Speaker 1: I mean, just think during the special election, then it's 745 00:41:55,239 --> 00:41:59,279 Speaker 1: two seventeen, two seventeen, right, right, right right? What do 746 00:41:59,320 --> 00:42:01,320 Speaker 1: you do with that? What do you do with it? Period? 747 00:42:01,360 --> 00:42:04,359 Speaker 1: I mean, what happens in Washington, This could get really 748 00:42:04,440 --> 00:42:11,480 Speaker 1: interesting actually at deadlocked House. Yeah, anti trust, wild, just wild, 749 00:42:11,800 --> 00:42:15,000 Speaker 1: so extremely wild. And on the right. There are some 750 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:17,719 Speaker 1: complaints also about McCarthy and what we were just talking 751 00:42:17,760 --> 00:42:20,120 Speaker 1: about with the d trip, that he put money into 752 00:42:20,360 --> 00:42:21,920 Speaker 1: places that they didn't need. I mean, we could talk 753 00:42:21,960 --> 00:42:24,759 Speaker 1: about McConnell and McCarthy both, but a lot of that 754 00:42:24,880 --> 00:42:27,600 Speaker 1: is he was very proud that he recruited and fielded 755 00:42:27,640 --> 00:42:29,680 Speaker 1: a lot of female candidates, a lot of minority candidates 756 00:42:29,680 --> 00:42:35,000 Speaker 1: in particular, and there's a little bit of I think anger, 757 00:42:35,120 --> 00:42:39,080 Speaker 1: irritation that the money wasn't apportioned in the right way 758 00:42:39,400 --> 00:42:41,480 Speaker 1: races that were more winnable as opposed to races that 759 00:42:41,520 --> 00:42:44,480 Speaker 1: were to prove, you know, somebody like Myra Flores could 760 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:47,279 Speaker 1: hang on to these D plus fourteen redrawn district with 761 00:42:47,440 --> 00:42:51,080 Speaker 1: san Antonio in it. She cut into that margin, She 762 00:42:51,120 --> 00:42:53,960 Speaker 1: cut into the she upper fromed Trump in the district. 763 00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:56,319 Speaker 1: But you know that was never it was it was 764 00:42:56,320 --> 00:42:58,760 Speaker 1: really never probably going to happen. But then if she doesn't, 765 00:42:58,880 --> 00:43:00,760 Speaker 1: it's tough because if you don't be in that race, 766 00:43:01,520 --> 00:43:03,319 Speaker 1: then you get dunked on for that. Like, I do 767 00:43:03,360 --> 00:43:06,000 Speaker 1: feel some sympathy for people at the end of this 768 00:43:06,040 --> 00:43:08,600 Speaker 1: because you know you're going to get You're going to 769 00:43:08,640 --> 00:43:10,640 Speaker 1: get hammered for some of the races that you miss. 770 00:43:10,680 --> 00:43:14,000 Speaker 1: It's just it's just going to happen. So we've got 771 00:43:14,120 --> 00:43:17,280 Speaker 1: Orncasset in about six minutes. Can we do Elon Musk 772 00:43:17,280 --> 00:43:19,080 Speaker 1: that quickly? Or is he so much of a dumpster 773 00:43:19,120 --> 00:43:20,319 Speaker 1: fire that we need more time. I think we can 774 00:43:20,320 --> 00:43:22,040 Speaker 1: do him in five minutes. I think I think we 775 00:43:22,080 --> 00:43:25,560 Speaker 1: can handle Elon here. So let's start with CEE one. 776 00:43:25,840 --> 00:43:28,640 Speaker 1: This is a tweet from Brionna Wu. What a disaster 777 00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:31,239 Speaker 1: unfolding at Twitter. But by the way, I don't think 778 00:43:31,280 --> 00:43:36,239 Speaker 1: any of this is unforeseen disaster from on Elon Musk 779 00:43:36,320 --> 00:43:39,160 Speaker 1: scale of it. Yeah, so senior people at Twitter resigned 780 00:43:39,160 --> 00:43:41,520 Speaker 1: in the last forty eight hours. We now know why. 781 00:43:41,560 --> 00:43:43,640 Speaker 1: They said in private slack channels that Elon Musk is 782 00:43:43,640 --> 00:43:46,320 Speaker 1: so desperate to recoup his money. He's taking crazy risks 783 00:43:46,320 --> 00:43:50,120 Speaker 1: with your privacy and safer safety. Brianna Wu continue to 784 00:43:50,120 --> 00:43:53,759 Speaker 1: say Twitter is extremely hackable right now. Every user is 785 00:43:53,800 --> 00:43:57,440 Speaker 1: at risk. Elon wants his money. The FCC just announced 786 00:43:57,440 --> 00:44:00,759 Speaker 1: they're investigating. They have the power to find Twitter billions. 787 00:44:01,239 --> 00:44:06,560 Speaker 1: All right, so this is yeah, everybody's resigning, like right, people, 788 00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:09,960 Speaker 1: even people that were senior executives who were publicly defending him, 789 00:44:09,960 --> 00:44:13,439 Speaker 1: and that Elon Musk was holding up as like, look, 790 00:44:13,480 --> 00:44:15,279 Speaker 1: I'm not a bad guy. This person that you all 791 00:44:15,320 --> 00:44:18,719 Speaker 1: really respect is still publicly defending me. He's an executive 792 00:44:18,719 --> 00:44:21,040 Speaker 1: here at Twitter. Those people have resigned. Yeah, can we 793 00:44:21,040 --> 00:44:23,000 Speaker 1: put C two up on the up on the screen. 794 00:44:23,040 --> 00:44:26,520 Speaker 1: This is from the New York Times. Elon Musk says 795 00:44:26,560 --> 00:44:30,799 Speaker 1: the economic picture ahead is dire. That's from his first 796 00:44:31,080 --> 00:44:35,359 Speaker 1: communication with Twitter staff. And more people are resigning, more 797 00:44:35,360 --> 00:44:38,960 Speaker 1: people out the door, and he's saying he floated bankruptcy, right, 798 00:44:39,000 --> 00:44:42,680 Speaker 1: he floated bankruptcy. Which what are your thoughts on that 799 00:44:42,760 --> 00:44:45,359 Speaker 1: because to my point earlier that I don't there's this 800 00:44:45,400 --> 00:44:48,600 Speaker 1: perception that Elon Musk is just in over his head 801 00:44:48,680 --> 00:44:51,560 Speaker 1: at Twitter, and I don't think. I think he absolutely 802 00:44:51,640 --> 00:44:54,359 Speaker 1: knew that this was all likely to unfold exactly as 803 00:44:54,360 --> 00:44:57,279 Speaker 1: it's unfolding. Again. My perspective is that the best thing 804 00:44:57,320 --> 00:44:59,479 Speaker 1: that could happen is is Elon Musk by Twitter nukes 805 00:44:59,480 --> 00:45:02,640 Speaker 1: it from orbit. But you may get your wish, I 806 00:45:02,719 --> 00:45:04,520 Speaker 1: might get my wish, But I don't think any of 807 00:45:04,520 --> 00:45:07,960 Speaker 1: this is unforeseen, and I don't think the bankruptcy floating 808 00:45:08,239 --> 00:45:11,600 Speaker 1: is like shocking in the least bit. So one of 809 00:45:11,600 --> 00:45:15,080 Speaker 1: the pieces that he probably did not foresee did you 810 00:45:15,120 --> 00:45:17,360 Speaker 1: see that? Did you see the way in which Twitter 811 00:45:18,239 --> 00:45:20,839 Speaker 1: missed out on something like, you know, half of its 812 00:45:20,880 --> 00:45:25,600 Speaker 1: revenue at this annual sales conference recently, So that if 813 00:45:25,600 --> 00:45:28,360 Speaker 1: you weren't following this, that there's there's a conference that 814 00:45:28,400 --> 00:45:31,480 Speaker 1: comes at the end of every year where corporations kind 815 00:45:31,520 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 1: of bank you know, a lot of their ad spending 816 00:45:34,400 --> 00:45:38,239 Speaker 1: and then the and then media companies then can bank 817 00:45:38,320 --> 00:45:41,040 Speaker 1: on getting like X amount we're going to get you know, 818 00:45:41,360 --> 00:45:45,160 Speaker 1: eight hundred million dollars from these this group of corporations 819 00:45:45,600 --> 00:45:47,439 Speaker 1: now we know that we need to go and get 820 00:45:47,520 --> 00:45:52,480 Speaker 1: another one point three billion from all of other different programs. 821 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:56,239 Speaker 1: It was a disaster on a number of levels. There 822 00:45:56,239 --> 00:45:58,839 Speaker 1: were some there and Elon Musk blames activists who are 823 00:45:58,920 --> 00:46:02,560 Speaker 1: at the who were at the convention telling and so 824 00:46:02,600 --> 00:46:06,080 Speaker 1: what the activists were telling the corporations was Elon Musk 825 00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:09,880 Speaker 1: is planning to you know, monkey with the verification. So 826 00:46:09,880 --> 00:46:11,279 Speaker 1: there's going to be a lot of like spam and 827 00:46:11,280 --> 00:46:13,480 Speaker 1: stuff that you can't you know, you can't tell if 828 00:46:13,480 --> 00:46:15,520 Speaker 1: it's true or not. And he's going to let all 829 00:46:15,600 --> 00:46:18,440 Speaker 1: kinds of hate speech run wild on the site. And 830 00:46:18,520 --> 00:46:22,160 Speaker 1: so the corporations went to you know, the Twitter executives 831 00:46:22,160 --> 00:46:24,040 Speaker 1: and said, here's what we're hearing from these activists, what 832 00:46:24,040 --> 00:46:26,840 Speaker 1: can you tell us? And they didn't get anything that 833 00:46:26,920 --> 00:46:30,279 Speaker 1: satisfied them on these questions, and so they said, all right, 834 00:46:30,280 --> 00:46:32,759 Speaker 1: we're going to pause our spending and so boom, there's 835 00:46:32,800 --> 00:46:35,160 Speaker 1: like a billion dollars like out the door. So there's that. 836 00:46:35,600 --> 00:46:37,480 Speaker 1: Then you've got one of the guys I was talking 837 00:46:37,480 --> 00:46:42,360 Speaker 1: about was Yoel Roth. He was the head of Trust 838 00:46:42,400 --> 00:46:46,439 Speaker 1: and Safety, who Musk was, you know, saying like, look, 839 00:46:46,520 --> 00:46:50,360 Speaker 1: Yoel's with me. He's still here, Like you can trust 840 00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:53,920 Speaker 1: me because you trust Yoel, and Yo'll trusts me, and 841 00:46:54,000 --> 00:46:57,160 Speaker 1: Yoel's like, I'm out by the transitive property of trust, yes, 842 00:46:57,800 --> 00:47:01,040 Speaker 1: which there's something to that, like if somebody, if somebody 843 00:47:01,040 --> 00:47:02,960 Speaker 1: that you trust at Twitter is like, you know, look, 844 00:47:03,120 --> 00:47:05,560 Speaker 1: I'm I'm with Elana, he's got a vision. We're going 845 00:47:05,600 --> 00:47:07,960 Speaker 1: to go for this. And then the head of sales, 846 00:47:08,040 --> 00:47:11,400 Speaker 1: Robin Wheeler, also quitting, right, like, these are not positions 847 00:47:12,040 --> 00:47:14,840 Speaker 1: that you want to see, you know, vacant, but again, 848 00:47:14,840 --> 00:47:17,000 Speaker 1: if you care about this thing functioning. And then there 849 00:47:17,080 --> 00:47:19,640 Speaker 1: was another report I forget where it was saying that 850 00:47:20,960 --> 00:47:24,320 Speaker 1: a lot of the engineers are worried that that pieces 851 00:47:24,320 --> 00:47:27,640 Speaker 1: of it are just going to gradually stop working. Sure, 852 00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:32,279 Speaker 1: and have you noticed anything, No, I mean, it's he's 853 00:47:32,320 --> 00:47:34,879 Speaker 1: mostly fine so far to me, but other I've heard 854 00:47:34,920 --> 00:47:38,160 Speaker 1: complaints from other people about like janky stuff. I haven't 855 00:47:38,200 --> 00:47:41,960 Speaker 1: noticed anything at all, except other than what was happening 856 00:47:41,960 --> 00:47:45,000 Speaker 1: with verification over the course of yesterday, where you had 857 00:47:45,040 --> 00:47:49,920 Speaker 1: George Washington and Jesus being verified on Twitter, in George 858 00:47:49,960 --> 00:47:52,920 Speaker 1: Washington tweeting that he did not sign NAFTA, which is 859 00:47:53,120 --> 00:47:57,200 Speaker 1: I think important historical context but this is acting like 860 00:47:57,239 --> 00:48:00,760 Speaker 1: this stuff is an l for Elon again, just Twitter 861 00:48:00,960 --> 00:48:04,839 Speaker 1: was a disaster. I mean, he paid way more than 862 00:48:04,920 --> 00:48:08,600 Speaker 1: what Twitter was worth because the company was in tatters 863 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:12,440 Speaker 1: when he inherited it. Now, that's not to say there 864 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:16,799 Speaker 1: isn't a more like normal, calmer way to take over 865 00:48:16,880 --> 00:48:19,880 Speaker 1: a company that's not really his style, and anybody who 866 00:48:19,960 --> 00:48:22,040 Speaker 1: expected it to be his style, I think would be 867 00:48:22,280 --> 00:48:25,040 Speaker 1: I mean that's kind of a laughable notion. But Elon 868 00:48:25,160 --> 00:48:29,160 Speaker 1: Musk is not going to just quietly, you know, become 869 00:48:29,280 --> 00:48:34,040 Speaker 1: the new Jack Dorsey. That that company was in tatters, 870 00:48:34,040 --> 00:48:38,320 Speaker 1: I mean, too many employees, a really bad economy for tech, 871 00:48:38,640 --> 00:48:43,000 Speaker 1: and it was always going to be extremely extremely chaotic, 872 00:48:43,040 --> 00:48:48,800 Speaker 1: culture clash all that stuff. Well, we're doing something a 873 00:48:48,840 --> 00:48:51,640 Speaker 1: little bit different here because it's midterm week and it's 874 00:48:51,640 --> 00:48:53,840 Speaker 1: certainly something you won't see on cable news or in 875 00:48:53,960 --> 00:48:59,279 Speaker 1: legacy media ever. Ryan, what's your point today? Well, we 876 00:48:59,280 --> 00:49:01,040 Speaker 1: were going to talk about what we got wrong today. 877 00:49:01,160 --> 00:49:04,800 Speaker 1: I looked looked through all of my different forecast predictions, 878 00:49:04,800 --> 00:49:10,360 Speaker 1: couldn't find anything, So gonna gonna hand it over you now, seriously. So, 879 00:49:10,360 --> 00:49:14,440 Speaker 1: so I'll start with Pennsylvania here. I think the mistake 880 00:49:14,520 --> 00:49:18,440 Speaker 1: here was a not trusting my gut but also be 881 00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:23,360 Speaker 1: having a conflicted gut after the debate. I always thought 882 00:49:23,600 --> 00:49:26,600 Speaker 1: coming out of the primary that you know, Fetterman was 883 00:49:26,600 --> 00:49:29,200 Speaker 1: going to annihilate Doctor Oz like you you've got you 884 00:49:29,719 --> 00:49:33,000 Speaker 1: spend any time in Pennsylvania, the idea that any part 885 00:49:33,040 --> 00:49:36,440 Speaker 1: of that state is Doctor Oz country, whether it's Philadelphia, 886 00:49:36,480 --> 00:49:39,520 Speaker 1: the Philadelphia suburbs, the all the area in between there, 887 00:49:39,560 --> 00:49:43,000 Speaker 1: Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh suburbs, Northeast Pennsylvania, Lei Valley, none 888 00:49:43,040 --> 00:49:46,120 Speaker 1: of it. It's not doctor Oz. He hasn't been to 889 00:49:46,160 --> 00:49:49,560 Speaker 1: most of these places. Watching him try to see saying 890 00:49:49,680 --> 00:49:52,720 Speaker 1: fly eagles fly during the debate was just absolutely hilarious. 891 00:49:52,760 --> 00:49:57,480 Speaker 1: He He's saying only the first line and even botched that, so, uh, 892 00:49:57,640 --> 00:49:59,760 Speaker 1: my gut was saying, like this guy doesn't have a chance. 893 00:50:00,600 --> 00:50:02,839 Speaker 1: At the same time, there were two things working against that. 894 00:50:02,880 --> 00:50:07,200 Speaker 1: One was the tracking poles. Hearing privately from people on 895 00:50:07,239 --> 00:50:10,880 Speaker 1: the on both sides saying who were seeing the tracking 896 00:50:10,920 --> 00:50:14,120 Speaker 1: polls just after the after the debate, moving so quickly 897 00:50:14,520 --> 00:50:18,319 Speaker 1: and strongly away from Fetterman, and then my gut at 898 00:50:18,560 --> 00:50:24,359 Speaker 1: watching the debate wondering, and then the the and then 899 00:50:24,360 --> 00:50:26,480 Speaker 1: looking at a couple of focus groups of people who said, 900 00:50:26,480 --> 00:50:28,640 Speaker 1: I don't think he's qualified to be a senator anymore, 901 00:50:28,880 --> 00:50:32,799 Speaker 1: and then extrapolating that out from there, whereas I'm talking 902 00:50:32,840 --> 00:50:35,239 Speaker 1: to all everybody in my family, both the Republican and 903 00:50:35,320 --> 00:50:40,600 Speaker 1: Democrat and and Independence, Uh, they nothing about the debate 904 00:50:40,640 --> 00:50:43,480 Speaker 1: changed their mind. The Independence who were leading Democratic were like, yeah, 905 00:50:43,480 --> 00:50:48,440 Speaker 1: that was like ridiculous, But I don't like Oz. I'm 906 00:50:48,520 --> 00:50:51,799 Speaker 1: voting for Fetterman. And I should have gone with that. 907 00:50:51,920 --> 00:50:53,200 Speaker 1: I should have gone with my gut on that one, 908 00:50:53,200 --> 00:50:57,239 Speaker 1: because he, uh, the the fundamentals of Fetterman ended up 909 00:50:57,400 --> 00:51:01,880 Speaker 1: ended up prevailing there. What do we wisconsant And like 910 00:51:01,960 --> 00:51:07,880 Speaker 1: a lot of pundits and operatives here in Washington, we 911 00:51:08,000 --> 00:51:12,480 Speaker 1: have stopped listening to Wisconsin polls. They bungled it so 912 00:51:12,560 --> 00:51:15,880 Speaker 1: badly in twenty sixteen, and bungled again so badly in 913 00:51:15,920 --> 00:51:19,360 Speaker 1: twenty twenty that, and they bungled it so badly in 914 00:51:19,719 --> 00:51:23,040 Speaker 1: the Democratic direction, in other words, where they say Hillary 915 00:51:23,040 --> 00:51:25,200 Speaker 1: Clinton was going to win by seventeen or something like that, 916 00:51:25,239 --> 00:51:29,240 Speaker 1: they had Biden up by huge numbers. Hillary lost barely 917 00:51:29,360 --> 00:51:32,480 Speaker 1: in Wisconsin, and then Biden won barely in Wisconsins, they're 918 00:51:32,520 --> 00:51:37,720 Speaker 1: wildly off. Fine Gold was well ahead, although the polls 919 00:51:37,760 --> 00:51:41,879 Speaker 1: were narrowing in that race against Ron Johnson six years ago. 920 00:51:42,200 --> 00:51:45,799 Speaker 1: And so even though the polls were saying that this was, 921 00:51:45,960 --> 00:51:48,239 Speaker 1: you know, within the margin of error, I just I 922 00:51:48,320 --> 00:51:52,120 Speaker 1: just didn't believe those polls. So I think that was 923 00:51:52,920 --> 00:51:55,239 Speaker 1: and I think a lot of operatives in Washington didn't. 924 00:51:55,280 --> 00:51:57,960 Speaker 1: And that's why Democrats didn't spend more. Although that was 925 00:51:58,000 --> 00:52:00,880 Speaker 1: still idiotic because even if they don't believe those polls, 926 00:52:01,440 --> 00:52:04,919 Speaker 1: polls at Florida, where they spend seventy plus million dollars 927 00:52:05,040 --> 00:52:08,719 Speaker 1: on Valve Dammings were much worse. So it's kind of 928 00:52:09,160 --> 00:52:12,440 Speaker 1: inscrutable why they ended up making that decision. And some 929 00:52:12,440 --> 00:52:14,880 Speaker 1: of that is grassroots just sending money to val Dammings 930 00:52:14,880 --> 00:52:17,200 Speaker 1: because they hate Marco Rubio more than they hate Ron Johnson. 931 00:52:17,960 --> 00:52:20,640 Speaker 1: Because I guess Ron Johnson didn't run for president anyway, 932 00:52:20,680 --> 00:52:23,600 Speaker 1: So what do we got? New Hampshire? I think with 933 00:52:23,719 --> 00:52:27,640 Speaker 1: New Hampshire, so I thought that towards the end that 934 00:52:27,719 --> 00:52:31,040 Speaker 1: this would be a very very close race. Thinking that 935 00:52:31,239 --> 00:52:33,160 Speaker 1: a Senate election is going to be very close in 936 00:52:33,200 --> 00:52:36,840 Speaker 1: New Hampshire doesn't take a genius because they've all recently 937 00:52:36,840 --> 00:52:39,920 Speaker 1: been decided by just a couple thousand votes. Hassen ended 938 00:52:40,000 --> 00:52:42,400 Speaker 1: up blowing out Don Bolduke, who was this kind of 939 00:52:42,440 --> 00:52:47,399 Speaker 1: Maga general, Maga retired general who both Democrats and kind 940 00:52:47,400 --> 00:52:50,040 Speaker 1: of the Maga Crown had boosted to the nomination over 941 00:52:50,080 --> 00:52:53,520 Speaker 1: a more normy, kind of New Hampshire friendly Democrat. I 942 00:52:53,520 --> 00:52:56,719 Speaker 1: think one of the things that I missed or forgot 943 00:52:56,760 --> 00:52:59,560 Speaker 1: about New Hampshire is how much it's changing. Like we 944 00:52:59,560 --> 00:53:02,600 Speaker 1: shouldn't get stuck in our ideas about a state New Hampshire. 945 00:53:02,760 --> 00:53:04,600 Speaker 1: It's obviously the live, free or die state. It's going 946 00:53:04,680 --> 00:53:08,200 Speaker 1: to have that, you know, forever, and you had this 947 00:53:08,280 --> 00:53:11,399 Speaker 1: big influx of libertarians, which you know, influenced its its 948 00:53:11,440 --> 00:53:14,279 Speaker 1: political culture. But over the last couple of years, New 949 00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:18,480 Speaker 1: Hampshire has been the fastest growing state in New England, 950 00:53:18,680 --> 00:53:21,319 Speaker 1: one of the fastest growing states in the country. And 951 00:53:21,360 --> 00:53:25,040 Speaker 1: those are people that are coming from Massachusetts, New York, 952 00:53:25,200 --> 00:53:29,200 Speaker 1: New Jersey and they're bringing their politics with them. Couple 953 00:53:29,320 --> 00:53:33,960 Speaker 1: that with the nationalization of our political climate, and New 954 00:53:33,960 --> 00:53:38,680 Speaker 1: Hampshire winds up looking much more like a typical well educated, 955 00:53:38,680 --> 00:53:42,840 Speaker 1: you know, college educated state rather than the kind of 956 00:53:43,200 --> 00:53:47,000 Speaker 1: anomalous New Hampshire, New England state that it has been 957 00:53:47,040 --> 00:53:49,680 Speaker 1: in the past, and so I think that actually played 958 00:53:49,680 --> 00:53:53,480 Speaker 1: a significant role, and so Hassen was able to lean 959 00:53:53,520 --> 00:53:58,320 Speaker 1: into that a lot more comfortably. Let's do in a 960 00:53:58,320 --> 00:54:01,200 Speaker 1: couple of victory laps. Let's see. Also, I didn't think 961 00:54:01,200 --> 00:54:03,240 Speaker 1: that they were going to be in contention for the House, 962 00:54:04,280 --> 00:54:08,680 Speaker 1: although I and this can be, I'll do that. Yeah, 963 00:54:08,800 --> 00:54:11,120 Speaker 1: this could be. This would be our transition into victory laps. 964 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:16,440 Speaker 1: I interviewed Tom Bonyer of Target Smart on my podcast 965 00:54:16,520 --> 00:54:22,640 Speaker 1: Deconstructed and continued following his analysis throughout the throughout the campaign. 966 00:54:22,680 --> 00:54:26,080 Speaker 1: He was he was the kind of the most optimistic Democrat, 967 00:54:26,239 --> 00:54:28,560 Speaker 1: and because I was taking in so much of his 968 00:54:28,840 --> 00:54:31,920 Speaker 1: I think I was one of the least pessimistic on 969 00:54:31,960 --> 00:54:35,680 Speaker 1: the left. Because he kept saying, look, there is a 970 00:54:35,800 --> 00:54:40,640 Speaker 1: secret abortion rights voter and youth vote is going to 971 00:54:40,760 --> 00:54:43,960 Speaker 1: surge like and he was looking at what Target smart 972 00:54:44,000 --> 00:54:48,200 Speaker 1: is is they do They take voter registration data, They 973 00:54:48,280 --> 00:54:50,480 Speaker 1: take voting data and they couple it with a bunch 974 00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:53,600 Speaker 1: of consumer data and other like one of these massively 975 00:54:53,600 --> 00:54:58,080 Speaker 1: sophisticated operations that knows way more about you than you 976 00:54:58,400 --> 00:55:01,399 Speaker 1: would you'd like to know, and so then then they 977 00:55:01,440 --> 00:55:03,480 Speaker 1: forecast and model that out around the country. And they 978 00:55:03,600 --> 00:55:07,080 Speaker 1: kept saying, look, our models and our forecasts here based 979 00:55:07,120 --> 00:55:12,080 Speaker 1: on actual actions by people, including voter registrations, early voting requests, 980 00:55:12,080 --> 00:55:15,040 Speaker 1: and ballots turned in, do not match what you're seeing 981 00:55:15,040 --> 00:55:17,200 Speaker 1: in the polls here, and here is why. And they 982 00:55:17,239 --> 00:55:19,680 Speaker 1: had a theory of the case, and so going in 983 00:55:20,040 --> 00:55:22,560 Speaker 1: I was giving it maybe a third And I talked 984 00:55:22,600 --> 00:55:25,719 Speaker 1: about this on my little substack chat that like, no, 985 00:55:25,920 --> 00:55:27,839 Speaker 1: if Democrats are going to do well, and it's because 986 00:55:27,840 --> 00:55:29,680 Speaker 1: there's this secret abortion voter, and I was giving that 987 00:55:29,719 --> 00:55:33,840 Speaker 1: a lot more credence I think some other than a 988 00:55:33,840 --> 00:55:37,160 Speaker 1: lot of other pundits were, which brings me into the 989 00:55:37,200 --> 00:55:40,319 Speaker 1: other victory lap, which is Kentucky. I was pretty sure 990 00:55:40,360 --> 00:55:44,719 Speaker 1: that Kentucky voters would side with abortion rights, which for 991 00:55:45,239 --> 00:55:47,640 Speaker 1: people in Louisville that actually might not have been that 992 00:55:47,680 --> 00:55:49,960 Speaker 1: tough of a call. But I think for national reporters 993 00:55:50,520 --> 00:55:53,719 Speaker 1: they might have been pretty surprised at how robust that 994 00:55:53,760 --> 00:55:56,400 Speaker 1: support was for abortion rights in a place like Kentucky, 995 00:55:56,400 --> 00:56:03,560 Speaker 1: because there's such stereotypes around around voters in Kentucky. Yeah, 996 00:56:03,640 --> 00:56:08,120 Speaker 1: this is a purchasing I mean, I think there's a lot. 997 00:56:08,840 --> 00:56:10,920 Speaker 1: Maybe this is a good transition into what I got wrong, 998 00:56:11,000 --> 00:56:16,240 Speaker 1: because I think it's really unwise for anybody, especially in media, 999 00:56:16,280 --> 00:56:19,600 Speaker 1: to mock anybody else for their predictions, because we are 1000 00:56:20,040 --> 00:56:22,560 Speaker 1: no I mean sincerely. Actually, I was going to start 1001 00:56:22,600 --> 00:56:24,800 Speaker 1: by saying one of the things that I was told 1002 00:56:25,320 --> 00:56:28,080 Speaker 1: before going on cable news for the first time years ago, 1003 00:56:28,480 --> 00:56:30,440 Speaker 1: was never say I don't know. I think I had 1004 00:56:30,440 --> 00:56:33,000 Speaker 1: done a practice and I said I don't know, and 1005 00:56:33,320 --> 00:56:36,760 Speaker 1: that sounded really wrong to me then, and it's very wrong. 1006 00:56:36,840 --> 00:56:39,560 Speaker 1: I can say that confidently it's a very wrong thing 1007 00:56:39,840 --> 00:56:43,560 Speaker 1: now because from my perspective at the time as a viewer, 1008 00:56:43,960 --> 00:56:46,239 Speaker 1: I wanted to know when people you know you sort 1009 00:56:46,280 --> 00:56:48,160 Speaker 1: of I grew up in the age of reality TV. 1010 00:56:48,280 --> 00:56:50,240 Speaker 1: I want to know when somebody doesn't know the answer 1011 00:56:50,320 --> 00:56:53,680 Speaker 1: to the question. I'd much rather the transparency than some 1012 00:56:53,800 --> 00:56:57,640 Speaker 1: like hackneyed approach where you're stumbling and stammering to find 1013 00:56:58,480 --> 00:57:01,279 Speaker 1: some bs that you can and you know, just go 1014 00:57:01,400 --> 00:57:04,279 Speaker 1: back to the green room and grab another espresso. So 1015 00:57:04,480 --> 00:57:07,800 Speaker 1: I don't mind that at all, and I'm happy to 1016 00:57:07,800 --> 00:57:11,560 Speaker 1: always say when I don't know something, because again, as 1017 00:57:11,560 --> 00:57:13,840 Speaker 1: a viewer, that's what I like So let's get to 1018 00:57:13,880 --> 00:57:15,760 Speaker 1: what I don't know. Let's get to what I got wrong. 1019 00:57:16,120 --> 00:57:20,240 Speaker 1: I'll start with Poles. So I assumed that polls were undercutting, 1020 00:57:20,600 --> 00:57:24,600 Speaker 1: under counting Trump voters, and that people like Trafalgar, who 1021 00:57:24,760 --> 00:57:28,520 Speaker 1: had corrected for those undercounts in years past, were at 1022 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:33,680 Speaker 1: least somewhat closer to reality. You had Trafalgar saying that 1023 00:57:33,720 --> 00:57:36,040 Speaker 1: they what they did right in twenty sixteen and twenty 1024 00:57:36,080 --> 00:57:39,480 Speaker 1: twenty was pick up on this sort of stealth Trump 1025 00:57:39,560 --> 00:57:42,280 Speaker 1: voter who didn't want to talk to polsters and who 1026 00:57:42,440 --> 00:57:47,440 Speaker 1: was they said, actually after Biden's semi fascist speech in Philadelphia, 1027 00:57:47,480 --> 00:57:49,160 Speaker 1: they were picking up on a lot of people just 1028 00:57:49,200 --> 00:57:51,480 Speaker 1: not wanting to identify as a Trump voter because they 1029 00:57:51,480 --> 00:57:55,120 Speaker 1: didn't want to identify themselves in a way that could 1030 00:57:55,280 --> 00:57:57,560 Speaker 1: harm them in the future. Something like that. There was 1031 00:57:57,600 --> 00:57:59,400 Speaker 1: just not a lot of trusted pulsters, not a lot 1032 00:57:59,400 --> 00:58:03,120 Speaker 1: of willingness to polsters. So I actually assumed that the 1033 00:58:03,160 --> 00:58:06,320 Speaker 1: Trifalger polls, which were caused a lot of folks in 1034 00:58:06,360 --> 00:58:08,000 Speaker 1: the media to say we could be looking at a 1035 00:58:08,040 --> 00:58:11,840 Speaker 1: red tidal wave. I assumed that those were correcting in 1036 00:58:11,840 --> 00:58:14,400 Speaker 1: a way that was closer to reality, not necessarily on 1037 00:58:14,440 --> 00:58:18,160 Speaker 1: the dot, but closer to reality by correcting for undercounting 1038 00:58:18,520 --> 00:58:20,720 Speaker 1: of that sort of stealth Trump voter. Now Trump wasn't 1039 00:58:20,720 --> 00:58:23,080 Speaker 1: on the ballot, and it seems that that must be 1040 00:58:23,400 --> 00:58:25,880 Speaker 1: that might be something that makes a really big difference 1041 00:58:25,960 --> 00:58:28,920 Speaker 1: on that count. So secondly, now we go to the 1042 00:58:28,960 --> 00:58:31,680 Speaker 1: youth vote, which, as we're sort of starting to look 1043 00:58:31,720 --> 00:58:34,080 Speaker 1: through the numbers, Charlotte Alter had a couple of good 1044 00:58:34,120 --> 00:58:37,080 Speaker 1: tweets about this. It was on par with twenty eighteen, 1045 00:58:37,120 --> 00:58:39,920 Speaker 1: which was very high. It's still second to twenty eighteen 1046 00:58:40,080 --> 00:58:42,040 Speaker 1: at twenty eighteen in terms of youth turnout by the 1047 00:58:42,120 --> 00:58:45,760 Speaker 1: numbers we have so far, but in key battleground states 1048 00:58:45,800 --> 00:58:49,120 Speaker 1: it was very much the same as twenty eighteen. So 1049 00:58:49,360 --> 00:58:53,400 Speaker 1: I underestimated one the degree to which abortion, democracy and 1050 00:58:53,480 --> 00:58:56,960 Speaker 1: student loan relief could have on youth and swing voters. 1051 00:58:57,400 --> 00:59:00,880 Speaker 1: Then two, the degree to which republic would be harmed 1052 00:59:00,880 --> 00:59:04,160 Speaker 1: by their lack of an economic agenda, because this is 1053 00:59:04,200 --> 00:59:06,280 Speaker 1: point three. This is a three point when I got wrong. 1054 00:59:06,760 --> 00:59:12,280 Speaker 1: The economic picture, crime problems, and cultural radicalism seemed sufficiently 1055 00:59:12,640 --> 00:59:15,960 Speaker 1: dire as to offset the losses that would be caused, 1056 00:59:16,240 --> 00:59:21,560 Speaker 1: for instance, by gains from gains to Democrats from voters 1057 00:59:21,600 --> 00:59:24,800 Speaker 1: animated by the issues of abortion, animated by student loan 1058 00:59:24,840 --> 00:59:29,400 Speaker 1: debt relief, and animated by those especially if you're looking 1059 00:59:29,400 --> 00:59:32,680 Speaker 1: at like Tim Michaels in Wisconsin or Doug Mastrianna in Pennsylvania, 1060 00:59:33,000 --> 00:59:36,840 Speaker 1: the democracy question, right, So I assumed that all of 1061 00:59:36,880 --> 00:59:40,160 Speaker 1: that would sort of be offset by those voters who 1062 00:59:40,200 --> 00:59:44,400 Speaker 1: were coming in and saying, listen, democracy to me means 1063 00:59:45,240 --> 00:59:49,040 Speaker 1: a strong economy. Democracy to me means being able to 1064 00:59:49,040 --> 00:59:51,520 Speaker 1: feed my family. That's what I'm voting for first and 1065 00:59:51,760 --> 00:59:55,120 Speaker 1: first and foremost, and the rest of the sort of secondary. 1066 00:59:55,200 --> 00:59:58,680 Speaker 1: If you're looking at Michigan, there was an abortion referendum 1067 00:59:58,720 --> 01:00:03,240 Speaker 1: on the ballot there. This is a quote from Alissa Slotkin, 1068 01:00:03,320 --> 01:00:06,960 Speaker 1: who won reelection in that suburban Michigan district by like 1069 01:00:07,000 --> 01:00:10,400 Speaker 1: a six point margin. She was targeted as being very vulnerable. 1070 01:00:10,800 --> 01:00:13,120 Speaker 1: She thought, never thought I'd do it. This is from her. 1071 01:00:13,200 --> 01:00:16,000 Speaker 1: She said, I did do an ad on choice. Never 1072 01:00:16,040 --> 01:00:17,919 Speaker 1: thought i'd do one in my life in a pro 1073 01:00:17,960 --> 01:00:20,400 Speaker 1: life district. But I did do one ad in choice. 1074 01:00:20,680 --> 01:00:24,240 Speaker 1: Then she added, but I did four on the economy. 1075 01:00:24,600 --> 01:00:27,400 Speaker 1: So to a point that Crystal makes in lever In 1076 01:00:27,520 --> 01:00:32,760 Speaker 1: lever News this morning, actually democrats running in swing districts 1077 01:00:32,800 --> 01:00:34,920 Speaker 1: or in the rust belt. They shifted their focus a 1078 01:00:34,960 --> 01:00:38,920 Speaker 1: bit in certain areas to the economy in recent weeks 1079 01:00:39,240 --> 01:00:40,919 Speaker 1: in a way that I think really could have made 1080 01:00:40,960 --> 01:00:43,640 Speaker 1: a major difference down the stretch. And not every Democrat 1081 01:00:43,680 --> 01:00:47,280 Speaker 1: focused on abortion, to Slatkin's point, So there was a 1082 01:00:47,400 --> 01:00:50,080 Speaker 1: change in tone, and it actually may have happened in 1083 01:00:50,160 --> 01:00:54,439 Speaker 1: time for people to come down and say, well, actually, yeah, 1084 01:00:54,480 --> 01:00:57,800 Speaker 1: I did hear this candidate talking about the fact that 1085 01:00:57,880 --> 01:01:03,040 Speaker 1: there's some corporate malfeasans play and inflation, and that really 1086 01:01:03,040 --> 01:01:06,800 Speaker 1: could have been a deciding factor down the home stretch 1087 01:01:07,240 --> 01:01:10,320 Speaker 1: for Democrats. That had been one thing that I was 1088 01:01:10,400 --> 01:01:13,160 Speaker 1: right about to Ryan's point about taking some victory laps, 1089 01:01:13,360 --> 01:01:15,760 Speaker 1: is that Democrats did have a reason to focus on abortion. 1090 01:01:15,880 --> 01:01:18,360 Speaker 1: This wasn't just being plucked out of nowhere, coming from 1091 01:01:18,480 --> 01:01:21,680 Speaker 1: completely out of touch consultants. The consultants are surely out 1092 01:01:21,720 --> 01:01:23,600 Speaker 1: of touch, but they did have a reason to do that. 1093 01:01:23,640 --> 01:01:27,160 Speaker 1: It's because midterm elections, it's all about turnout. We've been 1094 01:01:27,200 --> 01:01:30,440 Speaker 1: saying that all along here. It's absolutely why the democracy 1095 01:01:30,440 --> 01:01:33,320 Speaker 1: message and the abortion message were being hammer home in 1096 01:01:33,440 --> 01:01:36,840 Speaker 1: ads in swing districts because you know, if you can 1097 01:01:36,880 --> 01:01:38,800 Speaker 1: turn out the liberal base if you can turn out 1098 01:01:38,840 --> 01:01:41,800 Speaker 1: the suburban mom for whom that is the difference between 1099 01:01:41,800 --> 01:01:44,680 Speaker 1: staying home and not voting. It's not even just about 1100 01:01:44,720 --> 01:01:46,919 Speaker 1: getting people to vote for the Democrat. It's about getting 1101 01:01:46,960 --> 01:01:50,120 Speaker 1: people to just get off their couch and get in 1102 01:01:50,200 --> 01:01:54,200 Speaker 1: and vote. That's why they were running on abortion and democracy. 1103 01:01:54,640 --> 01:01:59,240 Speaker 1: I suggested that the democracy message, the abortion message, Democrats 1104 01:01:59,240 --> 01:02:00,880 Speaker 1: would have had a better cheane if they had tied 1105 01:02:00,920 --> 01:02:04,400 Speaker 1: it into the economic message, especially when it comes to democracy. 1106 01:02:05,320 --> 01:02:07,800 Speaker 1: But I think some of them actually really did, and 1107 01:02:08,040 --> 01:02:12,160 Speaker 1: in ways that I was not convinced would be as 1108 01:02:12,280 --> 01:02:17,280 Speaker 1: powerful as they ultimately were. Finally, the early vote, Oh 1109 01:02:17,360 --> 01:02:20,440 Speaker 1: my goodness, Pennsylvania is the best example of this. I 1110 01:02:20,480 --> 01:02:24,560 Speaker 1: didn't factor that, even though we had the numbers by 1111 01:02:24,600 --> 01:02:31,280 Speaker 1: the time doctor Oz debated John Fetterman, that some seven 1112 01:02:31,360 --> 01:02:34,800 Speaker 1: hundred plus thousand votes, probably around seven hundred and fifty 1113 01:02:34,840 --> 01:02:37,960 Speaker 1: thousand votes had already been cast. Seventy three percent of 1114 01:02:37,960 --> 01:02:42,280 Speaker 1: those votes were cast by Democrats. That's about five hundred thousand. 1115 01:02:43,640 --> 01:02:46,960 Speaker 1: That's about five hundred thousand votes four Fettermen before the 1116 01:02:47,000 --> 01:02:50,320 Speaker 1: debate happened. The margin between Oz and Fetterman ultimately is 1117 01:02:50,320 --> 01:02:53,360 Speaker 1: somewhere north of two hundred thousand votes. Think about that 1118 01:02:53,760 --> 01:02:56,400 Speaker 1: if early voting, let's say you take all those early 1119 01:02:56,440 --> 01:02:58,720 Speaker 1: voting off the table, say early voting had started after 1120 01:02:58,800 --> 01:03:04,240 Speaker 1: that debate, you indeed maybe looking at Senator Oz, because 1121 01:03:04,320 --> 01:03:08,560 Speaker 1: you have five hundred thousand votes cast for Fetterman already, 1122 01:03:08,600 --> 01:03:11,800 Speaker 1: and that margin is still slim. One thing, another thing 1123 01:03:11,880 --> 01:03:13,320 Speaker 1: that I was right about, and I say Ryan and 1124 01:03:13,400 --> 01:03:16,200 Speaker 1: I both would write about, is that the national media 1125 01:03:16,240 --> 01:03:18,840 Speaker 1: didn't like John Fetterman. The national media does not fall 1126 01:03:18,880 --> 01:03:22,840 Speaker 1: for economic populists, because again, Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post. 1127 01:03:23,000 --> 01:03:25,240 Speaker 1: In need I go on, we can talk about Comcast, 1128 01:03:25,360 --> 01:03:28,040 Speaker 1: we could talk about other folks. But that's just one 1129 01:03:28,200 --> 01:03:31,400 Speaker 1: example of why. And so there was always a even 1130 01:03:31,440 --> 01:03:34,080 Speaker 1: before John's Fetterman suffered a stroke, there was always this 1131 01:03:34,200 --> 01:03:37,920 Speaker 1: idea that, you know, he just he wasn't a great candidate. 1132 01:03:38,800 --> 01:03:40,919 Speaker 1: I think that's wrong. I've always thought that's wrong. I thought, 1133 01:03:40,920 --> 01:03:42,600 Speaker 1: I said from the beginning, he was one of the 1134 01:03:42,640 --> 01:03:45,840 Speaker 1: best candidates that Democrats had fielded that cycle. And he's 1135 01:03:45,960 --> 01:03:49,360 Speaker 1: especially the perfect foil to doctor Oz. You could not 1136 01:03:49,480 --> 01:03:51,640 Speaker 1: pick a better person to run against doctor Oz than 1137 01:03:51,680 --> 01:03:58,960 Speaker 1: John Fetterman. Obviously his candidacy was weakened enormously. We're joined 1138 01:03:59,000 --> 01:04:02,959 Speaker 1: now by ORNs executive director over at American Compass, which 1139 01:04:03,040 --> 01:04:06,080 Speaker 1: is working on coming up with a plan an economic 1140 01:04:06,120 --> 01:04:09,480 Speaker 1: agenda for the Republican Party that would actually be an 1141 01:04:09,520 --> 01:04:14,439 Speaker 1: agenda that benefits the working class and would enable Republicans 1142 01:04:14,480 --> 01:04:16,920 Speaker 1: to be a party that helps the working class. I 1143 01:04:16,920 --> 01:04:18,920 Speaker 1: know there's a lot of skepticism about that. Or in 1144 01:04:19,000 --> 01:04:21,439 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us, Thanks for having 1145 01:04:21,480 --> 01:04:24,640 Speaker 1: me well, or in let's start with some of your 1146 01:04:24,680 --> 01:04:27,000 Speaker 1: post mortem tweets here. I really liked the way that 1147 01:04:27,040 --> 01:04:29,960 Speaker 1: you put it. We have the thread from Oran that 1148 01:04:30,000 --> 01:04:33,920 Speaker 1: we can pop up on the screen. Political realignment continues. 1149 01:04:33,960 --> 01:04:36,080 Speaker 1: A pace who said the opportunity to translate a multi 1150 01:04:36,120 --> 01:04:38,920 Speaker 1: ethnic working class Conservatism into a durable government majority is 1151 01:04:39,000 --> 01:04:42,080 Speaker 1: just sitting there staring at everyone. While Trump spurred a 1152 01:04:42,080 --> 01:04:45,040 Speaker 1: working class realignment, he does not have the formula for 1153 01:04:45,040 --> 01:04:48,880 Speaker 1: conservatives to capitalize on it. Or in tell us why 1154 01:04:48,920 --> 01:04:53,720 Speaker 1: you think the midterms kind of evidenced that, especially since 1155 01:04:53,760 --> 01:04:55,600 Speaker 1: there's been a lot of chatter kind of in our 1156 01:04:55,640 --> 01:04:58,120 Speaker 1: circles on the right about how the Republican Party just 1157 01:04:58,240 --> 01:05:01,120 Speaker 1: didn't have a message to work class voters. You saw 1158 01:05:01,200 --> 01:05:03,920 Speaker 1: Fetterman run up the numbers in places like Erie County. 1159 01:05:04,800 --> 01:05:07,760 Speaker 1: That should be you know, in an ideal world. I 1160 01:05:07,760 --> 01:05:09,240 Speaker 1: don't know if doctor Oz is ever going to be 1161 01:05:09,280 --> 01:05:12,320 Speaker 1: the vehicle for a real pro working class message, but 1162 01:05:12,360 --> 01:05:15,160 Speaker 1: that should be, you know, prime a prime opportunity for 1163 01:05:15,200 --> 01:05:18,080 Speaker 1: a post Trump Republican party to take this message to 1164 01:05:18,520 --> 01:05:22,480 Speaker 1: folks in places like Erie County. What happened, well, you know, 1165 01:05:22,560 --> 01:05:26,280 Speaker 1: Erie County is a great example. And your point, what 1166 01:05:26,320 --> 01:05:28,680 Speaker 1: did Republicans bring to them? I think we're at a 1167 01:05:28,680 --> 01:05:32,560 Speaker 1: really interesting point on the right where what used to 1168 01:05:32,560 --> 01:05:35,960 Speaker 1: be has been knocked over as it needed to be. 1169 01:05:36,200 --> 01:05:39,400 Speaker 1: I don't think anyone is envisioning sort of twenty fourteen 1170 01:05:39,480 --> 01:05:43,680 Speaker 1: Paul Ryanism as the future of the Republican Party. But 1171 01:05:44,240 --> 01:05:46,920 Speaker 1: there isn't really anything new yet. I mean, there really 1172 01:05:47,000 --> 01:05:50,760 Speaker 1: wasn't an agenda that that Republicans were running on, and 1173 01:05:50,840 --> 01:05:53,600 Speaker 1: in a lot of cases it's not clear what candidates 1174 01:05:53,600 --> 01:05:57,840 Speaker 1: were representing or what the pitch was. Besides, we're not Democrats, 1175 01:05:58,280 --> 01:06:00,520 Speaker 1: and I think we've seen for a while now when 1176 01:06:00,520 --> 01:06:03,240 Speaker 1: each party runs is just we're not the other party. 1177 01:06:03,800 --> 01:06:05,480 Speaker 1: It's a great way to kind of land at a 1178 01:06:05,520 --> 01:06:09,120 Speaker 1: fifty to fifty nation. But at the same time, and 1179 01:06:09,160 --> 01:06:11,400 Speaker 1: you see this in places like Florida where you had 1180 01:06:11,440 --> 01:06:15,960 Speaker 1: candidates like Emnord Santis and Senator Rubio who really were 1181 01:06:16,080 --> 01:06:21,480 Speaker 1: running on a clear agenda. If you combine social conservatism 1182 01:06:21,600 --> 01:06:26,360 Speaker 1: with a real commitment to an economic agenda that pays 1183 01:06:26,360 --> 01:06:30,920 Speaker 1: attention to workers, there's a real majority there. And we 1184 01:06:31,040 --> 01:06:34,280 Speaker 1: just I think need more people to focus on that. 1185 01:06:34,480 --> 01:06:36,240 Speaker 1: And as you said, we're doing a lot of work 1186 01:06:36,280 --> 01:06:39,320 Speaker 1: at American Compass to try to develop with that economic 1187 01:06:39,520 --> 01:06:42,280 Speaker 1: agenda could be. But then you need elected leaders to 1188 01:06:42,320 --> 01:06:45,760 Speaker 1: actually or candidates to realize that that has to be 1189 01:06:45,760 --> 01:06:48,720 Speaker 1: a part of the message too. And so our colleague 1190 01:06:48,760 --> 01:06:51,680 Speaker 1: Crystal Ball has a piece actually on lever News this morning, 1191 01:06:52,080 --> 01:06:55,200 Speaker 1: headline the real reason for Dems Russ Belt Revival, and 1192 01:06:55,240 --> 01:06:58,680 Speaker 1: she makes the case that in the industrial Midwest and 1193 01:06:58,920 --> 01:07:02,720 Speaker 1: lumping Pennsylvania there too, that Democrats, on top of abortion 1194 01:07:02,840 --> 01:07:06,200 Speaker 1: really did run on economic populism in a way that 1195 01:07:06,360 --> 01:07:13,080 Speaker 1: was distinct than say New York or some say California, Oregon. Yeah, 1196 01:07:12,640 --> 01:07:14,880 Speaker 1: and and that that was a key difference. Did you 1197 01:07:14,960 --> 01:07:18,800 Speaker 1: notice a difference in the democratic competition around the country 1198 01:07:18,840 --> 01:07:22,440 Speaker 1: and is it your sense from the right that Democrats 1199 01:07:22,440 --> 01:07:28,320 Speaker 1: who embraced populism economic populism performed better well, I think, 1200 01:07:28,480 --> 01:07:31,280 Speaker 1: you know, frankly, at the sort of house race level 1201 01:07:31,840 --> 01:07:34,360 Speaker 1: or even Senate races, it felt like it came down 1202 01:07:34,520 --> 01:07:38,800 Speaker 1: an awful lot to sort of national environment and the 1203 01:07:38,840 --> 01:07:41,440 Speaker 1: specifics of candidates. I do think if you look at 1204 01:07:41,440 --> 01:07:44,439 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party generally, it's it's important to notice how, 1205 01:07:44,480 --> 01:07:47,640 Speaker 1: for instance, Joe Biden differs from Barack Obama. I mean, 1206 01:07:48,200 --> 01:07:50,960 Speaker 1: you know, the White House is certainly doing things on 1207 01:07:51,000 --> 01:07:55,439 Speaker 1: for instance, reshoring industry, focusing on labor in a way 1208 01:07:55,440 --> 01:07:58,400 Speaker 1: that I think kind of Clinton Obama Democrats have really 1209 01:07:58,400 --> 01:08:01,680 Speaker 1: gotten away from. But of course, the flip side is 1210 01:08:01,680 --> 01:08:06,320 Speaker 1: that that gets paired with this extreme social progressivism that 1211 01:08:06,360 --> 01:08:10,600 Speaker 1: then makes everything about either just outright social and identity 1212 01:08:10,600 --> 01:08:13,720 Speaker 1: issues or climate change and you know, for giving student 1213 01:08:13,800 --> 01:08:16,080 Speaker 1: loans and so at the end of the day, I 1214 01:08:16,120 --> 01:08:18,559 Speaker 1: think you're right. There are Democrats who do get this, 1215 01:08:18,760 --> 01:08:21,160 Speaker 1: just as there are Republicans who get this. But the 1216 01:08:21,200 --> 01:08:24,040 Speaker 1: Democratic Party as a whole is so beholden at this 1217 01:08:24,080 --> 01:08:27,559 Speaker 1: point to this progressive bubble that seems to dictate what 1218 01:08:27,600 --> 01:08:30,880 Speaker 1: they think the country cares about that it's hard to 1219 01:08:30,880 --> 01:08:34,719 Speaker 1: see the Democratic Party actually actually going in this direction. 1220 01:08:35,000 --> 01:08:37,679 Speaker 1: And that's why, as Emily noticed in the tweet, I said, 1221 01:08:37,920 --> 01:08:41,879 Speaker 1: you know, this opportunity is just sitting there staring at everybody. 1222 01:08:42,000 --> 01:08:44,960 Speaker 1: I mean, there's certainly a hypothetical world where the left 1223 01:08:44,960 --> 01:08:47,760 Speaker 1: of center kind of goes in this direction. I don't 1224 01:08:47,760 --> 01:08:50,760 Speaker 1: think that's where we are in America today. I think 1225 01:08:50,760 --> 01:08:53,000 Speaker 1: there's a much better chance that the right of center 1226 01:08:53,520 --> 01:08:56,879 Speaker 1: that has the right message on so many values related 1227 01:08:56,960 --> 01:09:00,160 Speaker 1: questions and is at least open at this point to 1228 01:09:00,680 --> 01:09:04,679 Speaker 1: taking workers interests seriously. On the economic side, I think 1229 01:09:04,680 --> 01:09:07,479 Speaker 1: that's the right coalition, and I think we're moving that direction. 1230 01:09:08,160 --> 01:09:10,720 Speaker 1: But you know, maybe that it also takes some failures 1231 01:09:11,120 --> 01:09:13,320 Speaker 1: and people realizing that that if you don't have that, 1232 01:09:13,360 --> 01:09:17,040 Speaker 1: it doesn't work for people to really dig in and 1233 01:09:17,400 --> 01:09:20,599 Speaker 1: start focusing on this stuff. Or and again I mentioned 1234 01:09:20,600 --> 01:09:23,439 Speaker 1: this in the introduction, but at American Compass, you've put 1235 01:09:23,439 --> 01:09:27,439 Speaker 1: out basically a plan, and it's still kind of hard 1236 01:09:27,680 --> 01:09:31,559 Speaker 1: to envision. You know, a Ron Johnson who squeaked out 1237 01:09:31,560 --> 01:09:35,439 Speaker 1: a way in Wisconsin. Certainly a doctor Oz taking this 1238 01:09:35,640 --> 01:09:39,080 Speaker 1: to you know, Erie County, to rural areas of Wisconsin 1239 01:09:39,400 --> 01:09:42,400 Speaker 1: and making this case and being well, you know, Ron 1240 01:09:42,479 --> 01:09:44,599 Speaker 1: Johnson was somebody came in on the Tea party way 1241 01:09:44,600 --> 01:09:48,720 Speaker 1: of business guy being sort of open to what it 1242 01:09:48,720 --> 01:09:51,320 Speaker 1: would take. I mean, Republican Party can talk until it's 1243 01:09:51,320 --> 01:09:53,920 Speaker 1: blue in the face about the new working class, multiethnic 1244 01:09:54,040 --> 01:09:57,280 Speaker 1: coalition and how Donald Trump changed the party forever and 1245 01:09:57,640 --> 01:10:01,439 Speaker 1: you know, one those those Russbell counties that Obama Trump country. 1246 01:10:02,000 --> 01:10:05,080 Speaker 1: But unless you actually come up, you can't run on vibes. 1247 01:10:05,240 --> 01:10:08,280 Speaker 1: You have to actually bite the bullet and piss off 1248 01:10:08,280 --> 01:10:10,960 Speaker 1: some of your corporate benefactors. And I think some of 1249 01:10:10,960 --> 01:10:14,519 Speaker 1: the ideas that you've laid out that would involve biting 1250 01:10:14,560 --> 01:10:19,559 Speaker 1: the bullet for some folks. Or what should Republicans be 1251 01:10:19,680 --> 01:10:24,559 Speaker 1: running on. What are some very specific points in your plan? Yeah, 1252 01:10:24,560 --> 01:10:27,240 Speaker 1: thanks for bringing that up. We released right after the 1253 01:10:27,760 --> 01:10:32,439 Speaker 1: polls closed pretty much what we're calling New Direction, which 1254 01:10:32,560 --> 01:10:35,040 Speaker 1: tries to outline what this kind of economic agenda would 1255 01:10:35,040 --> 01:10:37,960 Speaker 1: look like. And you know, as you said, I think 1256 01:10:38,040 --> 01:10:41,120 Speaker 1: we've got kind of eight different sections, but starting at 1257 01:10:41,120 --> 01:10:43,320 Speaker 1: the top, you know, one really big one is the 1258 01:10:43,320 --> 01:10:48,120 Speaker 1: idea of reshoring industry and recognizing that that manufacturing matters, 1259 01:10:48,200 --> 01:10:51,920 Speaker 1: other forms of industry and the physical economy matter. And 1260 01:10:51,960 --> 01:10:54,400 Speaker 1: you can't have a flourishing economy where you say, you know, 1261 01:10:54,439 --> 01:10:58,479 Speaker 1: we'll just design everything in California and make everything somewhere else. 1262 01:10:59,120 --> 01:11:00,719 Speaker 1: And so I think there's all a lot of really 1263 01:11:00,720 --> 01:11:04,600 Speaker 1: substantive things we can do on trade policy, on industrial 1264 01:11:04,640 --> 01:11:08,200 Speaker 1: policy that would really make a big difference in making 1265 01:11:08,240 --> 01:11:11,599 Speaker 1: America a place where people want to invest, create good jobs, 1266 01:11:11,640 --> 01:11:15,280 Speaker 1: and manufacture things, which then also is where the research 1267 01:11:15,280 --> 01:11:19,080 Speaker 1: and the innovation and the progress comes from. So that 1268 01:11:19,120 --> 01:11:22,200 Speaker 1: we think is one really important area of focus. A 1269 01:11:22,280 --> 01:11:25,960 Speaker 1: second is non college pathways. You know, we including the 1270 01:11:25,960 --> 01:11:28,519 Speaker 1: Republican Party, focused for so long on just you know, 1271 01:11:28,680 --> 01:11:30,599 Speaker 1: we're going to basically find a way to get everybody 1272 01:11:30,600 --> 01:11:34,880 Speaker 1: into and through college and pay for it somehow, and 1273 01:11:35,160 --> 01:11:38,400 Speaker 1: that just doesn't work. Most Americas don't have a college degree, 1274 01:11:38,479 --> 01:11:40,880 Speaker 1: A huge majority are not sort of going high school 1275 01:11:40,880 --> 01:11:45,599 Speaker 1: college career, and so really shifting investment to non college 1276 01:11:45,600 --> 01:11:47,760 Speaker 1: pathways and ways to get into the workforce, get on 1277 01:11:47,800 --> 01:11:51,559 Speaker 1: the job training, I think is super important. And then 1278 01:11:51,600 --> 01:11:54,439 Speaker 1: just to mention one more, you know, we think family 1279 01:11:54,479 --> 01:11:58,720 Speaker 1: policy is really important. Families generally are struggling the very 1280 01:11:58,720 --> 01:12:01,479 Speaker 1: idea of the family America. In America struggling marriage rates 1281 01:12:01,479 --> 01:12:04,240 Speaker 1: are down, birth rates are down, and and we have 1282 01:12:04,280 --> 01:12:07,599 Speaker 1: to have strong families first and foremost for their own sake. 1283 01:12:07,720 --> 01:12:09,920 Speaker 1: That's that's that's sort of the end goal here in 1284 01:12:09,920 --> 01:12:12,439 Speaker 1: a lot of ways. But but also if we want 1285 01:12:12,439 --> 01:12:15,960 Speaker 1: after riding communities and a strong economy, and so look, 1286 01:12:16,000 --> 01:12:18,559 Speaker 1: I think you're right. You know, someone like Ron Johnson 1287 01:12:18,800 --> 01:12:22,640 Speaker 1: probably isn't isn't going to head in this direction or 1288 01:12:22,840 --> 01:12:25,040 Speaker 1: or at least maybe need to be dragged in this direction. 1289 01:12:25,680 --> 01:12:27,160 Speaker 1: But but I think if you look at who the 1290 01:12:27,160 --> 01:12:29,960 Speaker 1: real emerging leaders are in the Republican Party, you know, 1291 01:12:30,040 --> 01:12:36,040 Speaker 1: folks in the Senate like Marco Rubio, Josh Holly, Tom Cotton, JD. 1292 01:12:36,040 --> 01:12:38,160 Speaker 1: I'd say, folks, he's not there yet. But but someone 1293 01:12:38,240 --> 01:12:42,400 Speaker 1: like JD. Vance. You know, I'll certainly take my chances 1294 01:12:42,439 --> 01:12:44,200 Speaker 1: if you're asking whether the party is going to head 1295 01:12:44,200 --> 01:12:46,880 Speaker 1: in the direction of Ron Johnson or JD. Vance. And 1296 01:12:46,960 --> 01:12:49,400 Speaker 1: so I think in the medium to the long term 1297 01:12:49,840 --> 01:12:53,800 Speaker 1: things are really promising. But but you know, to to 1298 01:12:53,840 --> 01:12:56,120 Speaker 1: steal a phrase from the left, you know, we have 1299 01:12:56,200 --> 01:12:59,360 Speaker 1: to do the work, and we have to actually develop 1300 01:12:59,400 --> 01:13:01,479 Speaker 1: the ideas and the platform and has to be built 1301 01:13:01,520 --> 01:13:04,680 Speaker 1: on a coherence stead of principles, and so that's what 1302 01:13:04,720 --> 01:13:08,040 Speaker 1: we're doing at American Compass, and hopefully as as we 1303 01:13:08,080 --> 01:13:11,280 Speaker 1: head into the next election cycle, well we'll have a 1304 01:13:11,320 --> 01:13:13,880 Speaker 1: lot more candidates who are ready to focus on this. 1305 01:13:14,720 --> 01:13:16,080 Speaker 1: I wanted to pick up on one thing you had 1306 01:13:16,080 --> 01:13:18,599 Speaker 1: said in one of your earlier answers about, you know, 1307 01:13:19,400 --> 01:13:21,760 Speaker 1: student debt coming from kind of a bubble about what 1308 01:13:21,800 --> 01:13:24,000 Speaker 1: people don't really understand, and I want to press you 1309 01:13:24,000 --> 01:13:26,839 Speaker 1: on that because I'm wondering if you're kind of relying 1310 01:13:26,880 --> 01:13:29,919 Speaker 1: on kind of a mythologized version of what the American 1311 01:13:29,960 --> 01:13:33,320 Speaker 1: working class is rather than kind of what the actual 1312 01:13:33,760 --> 01:13:36,559 Speaker 1: you know, American working classes. Because it's it's easy to 1313 01:13:36,720 --> 01:13:40,240 Speaker 1: caricature anybody who went to college, as you know, some 1314 01:13:40,320 --> 01:13:44,040 Speaker 1: woll oberliningrad who has rich parents and you know, just 1315 01:13:44,120 --> 01:13:46,880 Speaker 1: wants just wants to bail out so they can you know, 1316 01:13:46,920 --> 01:13:50,479 Speaker 1: go get there like multicultural studies, master's degree or whatever, 1317 01:13:50,479 --> 01:13:53,200 Speaker 1: you know, whatever it is like. But if you look 1318 01:13:53,240 --> 01:13:56,200 Speaker 1: at the actual data or you go around the country, 1319 01:13:56,240 --> 01:13:59,240 Speaker 1: something like more than sixty sixty five percent of the 1320 01:13:59,280 --> 01:14:03,439 Speaker 1: country have some college you know, roughly, maybe I think 1321 01:14:03,439 --> 01:14:05,559 Speaker 1: it's what between thirty five and forty percent of people 1322 01:14:05,640 --> 01:14:09,240 Speaker 1: have bachelor's degrees or higher. And so that means you've 1323 01:14:09,240 --> 01:14:11,759 Speaker 1: got twenty twenty five percent of people who have some college, 1324 01:14:12,720 --> 01:14:16,680 Speaker 1: but they're disproportionately going to be white collar. Not the 1325 01:14:16,680 --> 01:14:19,360 Speaker 1: people I think who didn't graduate, like who spent several 1326 01:14:19,400 --> 01:14:21,840 Speaker 1: years in college, racked up a whole bunch of debt. 1327 01:14:22,240 --> 01:14:26,680 Speaker 1: Something went wrong. They're now their paycheck to paycheck, but 1328 01:14:26,720 --> 01:14:29,639 Speaker 1: they're sitting there with fifteen thousand dollars in student loan 1329 01:14:29,680 --> 01:14:32,120 Speaker 1: debt for a degree that they don't even have. I 1330 01:14:32,120 --> 01:14:34,200 Speaker 1: think there are a lot of people who are struggling 1331 01:14:34,600 --> 01:14:37,320 Speaker 1: with debt who you would look at and meet and say, 1332 01:14:37,320 --> 01:14:41,320 Speaker 1: this is a working class person, sure who benefits from 1333 01:14:41,560 --> 01:14:46,000 Speaker 1: student debt cancelation and who is not an Oberlin graduate. 1334 01:14:46,400 --> 01:14:48,840 Speaker 1: What do you what do you think we're in. I 1335 01:14:48,840 --> 01:14:51,040 Speaker 1: think that's absolutely right, and that's the point we try 1336 01:14:51,040 --> 01:14:54,479 Speaker 1: to emphasize that American compass. When you're talking about the 1337 01:14:54,640 --> 01:14:58,920 Speaker 1: educational maintainment of the population. You know, we talk about 1338 01:14:58,960 --> 01:15:01,720 Speaker 1: in sort of five roughly equal groups, you still have 1339 01:15:01,880 --> 01:15:04,000 Speaker 1: a close to a fifth of the country that doesn't 1340 01:15:04,040 --> 01:15:06,479 Speaker 1: earn a meaningful high school degree, and we should keep 1341 01:15:06,520 --> 01:15:08,840 Speaker 1: that in mind. You know, you've got about twenty percent 1342 01:15:08,880 --> 01:15:12,040 Speaker 1: who never go to college exactly your point. You're about 1343 01:15:12,040 --> 01:15:15,639 Speaker 1: twenty percent who enroll but don't complete. And that's really 1344 01:15:15,640 --> 01:15:17,959 Speaker 1: important to remember that even of those who hold degrees, 1345 01:15:18,600 --> 01:15:21,679 Speaker 1: barely over half then going to a job that requires 1346 01:15:21,760 --> 01:15:24,439 Speaker 1: a degree. So even among college graduates, you have an 1347 01:15:24,439 --> 01:15:28,320 Speaker 1: awful lot of folks for whom it hasn't worked. And 1348 01:15:28,360 --> 01:15:31,160 Speaker 1: you really get down to about twenty percent who have 1349 01:15:31,200 --> 01:15:34,320 Speaker 1: actually gone high school to college to career the way 1350 01:15:34,840 --> 01:15:38,040 Speaker 1: the system is intended. And so I don't by any 1351 01:15:38,120 --> 01:15:40,680 Speaker 1: means to suggest there aren't working class people who are 1352 01:15:40,720 --> 01:15:43,599 Speaker 1: struggling with student debt. And you know, one thing we've 1353 01:15:43,640 --> 01:15:46,439 Speaker 1: proposed at an American Compass is that we should just 1354 01:15:46,520 --> 01:15:50,439 Speaker 1: treat student debt like other debt. There are people struggling 1355 01:15:50,479 --> 01:15:52,360 Speaker 1: with all sorts of debt. The problem is that student 1356 01:15:52,400 --> 01:15:56,800 Speaker 1: debt is uniquely not dischargeable in bankruptcy. And so what 1357 01:15:56,800 --> 01:16:00,879 Speaker 1: we would say is stop mythologizing student debt and spending 1358 01:16:00,880 --> 01:16:04,720 Speaker 1: on higher education and recognize that it's not something that 1359 01:16:04,760 --> 01:16:07,800 Speaker 1: works for everybody, that people who have been burdened by 1360 01:16:07,840 --> 01:16:10,080 Speaker 1: it and can't get out from under it should have 1361 01:16:10,120 --> 01:16:12,280 Speaker 1: a way to get out from under it. But then 1362 01:16:12,280 --> 01:16:14,800 Speaker 1: my gosh, you have to pair that with reforms to 1363 01:16:14,840 --> 01:16:18,679 Speaker 1: the underlying system. You can't do five hundred billion dollars 1364 01:16:18,680 --> 01:16:22,240 Speaker 1: of student debt forgiveness and not admit that this means 1365 01:16:22,240 --> 01:16:24,880 Speaker 1: the higher education system is a total failure and has 1366 01:16:24,920 --> 01:16:28,080 Speaker 1: to be overhauled and has to stop being funded this way. 1367 01:16:28,479 --> 01:16:31,040 Speaker 1: And what you get instead from the White House is 1368 01:16:31,080 --> 01:16:34,720 Speaker 1: here's five hundred billion dollars essentially just flung out of helicopters, 1369 01:16:34,760 --> 01:16:38,720 Speaker 1: with very little to concern for who actually needs the assistance. 1370 01:16:39,200 --> 01:16:40,840 Speaker 1: And by the way, we're just going to double down 1371 01:16:40,880 --> 01:16:44,639 Speaker 1: on recreating the exact same problem going forward. And that's 1372 01:16:44,680 --> 01:16:46,679 Speaker 1: what you get from the progressive bubble, and that's what's 1373 01:16:46,720 --> 01:16:50,080 Speaker 1: not responsive to would actually benefit the working class, which 1374 01:16:50,120 --> 01:16:54,120 Speaker 1: is in most cases other pathways that come with public 1375 01:16:54,160 --> 01:16:57,200 Speaker 1: support that get you connected to a good job. Not 1376 01:16:57,320 --> 01:17:00,400 Speaker 1: to make this all about student debt, but you know, 1377 01:17:01,080 --> 01:17:02,800 Speaker 1: in the past, there was a policy that allowed you 1378 01:17:02,880 --> 01:17:06,160 Speaker 1: to discharge student debt through bankruptcy. And what was happening 1379 01:17:06,200 --> 01:17:09,040 Speaker 1: is you'd have a bunch of very young people, a 1380 01:17:09,320 --> 01:17:11,920 Speaker 1: lot of lost law students, who would then come out 1381 01:17:11,920 --> 01:17:14,960 Speaker 1: with these huge amounts of debt, discharge all of it, 1382 01:17:15,200 --> 01:17:18,479 Speaker 1: and because they were twenty three, twenty four years old, 1383 01:17:18,479 --> 01:17:21,559 Speaker 1: they didn't have any assets. Even if their parents were 1384 01:17:21,600 --> 01:17:24,880 Speaker 1: super rich, then you know, then they have the repercussions 1385 01:17:24,920 --> 01:17:28,160 Speaker 1: of bankruptcy. But otherwise they're they're cruising, which is and 1386 01:17:28,200 --> 01:17:31,719 Speaker 1: so it's not the benefit seemed to be disproportionately available 1387 01:17:31,760 --> 01:17:37,280 Speaker 1: to people who were in that situation. But I don't 1388 01:17:37,320 --> 01:17:38,960 Speaker 1: know if you have any respond to that, But I 1389 01:17:38,960 --> 01:17:42,000 Speaker 1: also want to ask, like, yeah, real quickly. I don't 1390 01:17:42,040 --> 01:17:44,120 Speaker 1: mean to be a rude guest, but I just don't 1391 01:17:44,160 --> 01:17:47,400 Speaker 1: think that's a very accurate characterization. We did a bunch 1392 01:17:47,439 --> 01:17:51,200 Speaker 1: of research on this for this exact proposal, and it 1393 01:17:51,240 --> 01:17:53,240 Speaker 1: was all the way back in the nineteen seventies at 1394 01:17:53,280 --> 01:17:56,760 Speaker 1: a point where visually no one was actually defaulting on 1395 01:17:56,840 --> 01:18:00,200 Speaker 1: their debt. Is is that a myth that upon of 1396 01:18:00,200 --> 01:18:03,680 Speaker 1: people were. It is the rate that increased, But you 1397 01:18:03,760 --> 01:18:07,120 Speaker 1: have to remember that how little, how little college cost, 1398 01:18:07,200 --> 01:18:09,600 Speaker 1: how little that it was in the nineteen seventies. It 1399 01:18:09,880 --> 01:18:12,080 Speaker 1: might have been just a media panic that it was. 1400 01:18:12,280 --> 01:18:14,920 Speaker 1: It was a preemptive overreaction. And again the question is 1401 01:18:14,920 --> 01:18:18,080 Speaker 1: why is student debt different? Right? I mean, somebody, could 1402 01:18:18,400 --> 01:18:20,559 Speaker 1: you know this law suit you're describing, could also go 1403 01:18:20,640 --> 01:18:23,720 Speaker 1: out rack up tons of credit card debt and declare bankruptcy, 1404 01:18:25,040 --> 01:18:28,519 Speaker 1: and we don't have the same reaction. So will there 1405 01:18:28,560 --> 01:18:32,120 Speaker 1: be situations where it gets taken advantage of Sure, sure 1406 01:18:32,160 --> 01:18:35,280 Speaker 1: there will, But compared to the system we have now, 1407 01:18:35,520 --> 01:18:38,680 Speaker 1: it would be a vastly better and fairer one. And 1408 01:18:38,720 --> 01:18:40,040 Speaker 1: the last thing I say is I just I think 1409 01:18:40,040 --> 01:18:42,400 Speaker 1: it's really important not to minimize you sort of glossed 1410 01:18:42,439 --> 01:18:46,120 Speaker 1: over they bear the consequences of bankruptcy. The consequences of 1411 01:18:46,120 --> 01:18:50,200 Speaker 1: bankruptcy are huge. The reason our system works is that 1412 01:18:50,360 --> 01:18:53,040 Speaker 1: we have a very lenient system in the sense that 1413 01:18:53,280 --> 01:18:55,800 Speaker 1: if you if you want to declare bankruptcy, you can 1414 01:18:56,400 --> 01:19:00,639 Speaker 1: much much more leni infancy in Europe. But many people 1415 01:19:00,720 --> 01:19:04,120 Speaker 1: do it because declaring bankruptcy is incredibly costly in all 1416 01:19:04,160 --> 01:19:07,719 Speaker 1: sorts of ways, financially, reputationally for a very long time. 1417 01:19:08,240 --> 01:19:09,680 Speaker 1: And so we actually have a very good system I 1418 01:19:09,720 --> 01:19:12,799 Speaker 1: would say in America that says, look, if you're somebody 1419 01:19:12,920 --> 01:19:16,400 Speaker 1: who feels like those costs are actually worth bearing because 1420 01:19:16,400 --> 01:19:19,840 Speaker 1: of your situation, then we actually want to allow you 1421 01:19:19,880 --> 01:19:23,000 Speaker 1: to do that, and far from causing some collapse of 1422 01:19:23,040 --> 01:19:27,479 Speaker 1: our consumer credit system, we obviously have a quite large 1423 01:19:28,160 --> 01:19:31,599 Speaker 1: consumer credit system, So I don't think we should sort 1424 01:19:31,600 --> 01:19:35,240 Speaker 1: of turn away from a bankruptcy system that works so well. 1425 01:19:36,080 --> 01:19:39,320 Speaker 1: We should recognize that student debt is just debt, and 1426 01:19:39,520 --> 01:19:42,280 Speaker 1: spending on higher education is just one way people spend money, 1427 01:19:42,479 --> 01:19:46,120 Speaker 1: and it's not some special mythical status because you're in 1428 01:19:46,120 --> 01:19:50,080 Speaker 1: the Ivory Tower and that gets treated differently than everything 1429 01:19:50,080 --> 01:19:53,200 Speaker 1: else in society. And I do love the idea about, 1430 01:19:53,360 --> 01:19:58,280 Speaker 1: you know, reinvesting in skills of vocational training. What has 1431 01:19:58,280 --> 01:20:00,400 Speaker 1: bothered me about is that it's seen as to acts 1432 01:20:00,439 --> 01:20:03,400 Speaker 1: like one one crew goes off and does the AP 1433 01:20:03,520 --> 01:20:05,120 Speaker 1: classes and then it goes to college and the other 1434 01:20:05,560 --> 01:20:09,519 Speaker 1: crew get gets shopping mechanics, And we ought to have 1435 01:20:09,560 --> 01:20:11,920 Speaker 1: that option of shop at mechanics, but I think the 1436 01:20:11,960 --> 01:20:15,160 Speaker 1: AP kids need that too. It's pathetic that nobody can 1437 01:20:15,200 --> 01:20:19,120 Speaker 1: fix anything anymore. Soft hands. Yes, everybody should be in 1438 01:20:19,479 --> 01:20:23,280 Speaker 1: both these just absolutely soft hands. Just two soft hands 1439 01:20:23,280 --> 01:20:26,080 Speaker 1: out there. Ryan didn't bring a makeup bag to work today, 1440 01:20:26,120 --> 01:20:30,880 Speaker 1: but that's true makeup bag. Folks can read actually about 1441 01:20:30,960 --> 01:20:34,400 Speaker 1: Orange plans for that pipeline over at the American Compass 1442 01:20:34,400 --> 01:20:36,760 Speaker 1: website or and this stuff is so interesting and it's 1443 01:20:36,800 --> 01:20:40,400 Speaker 1: really serious and just appreciate you coming on to chat 1444 01:20:40,439 --> 01:20:42,760 Speaker 1: about it. Really glad you guys are talking about it. 1445 01:20:42,760 --> 01:20:46,200 Speaker 1: Thanks for having of course, Well that does it for 1446 01:20:46,320 --> 01:20:49,200 Speaker 1: us today at Counterpoints Friday. This Actually that does it 1447 01:20:49,200 --> 01:20:51,559 Speaker 1: for us this week because we've been around a lot 1448 01:20:51,640 --> 01:20:54,360 Speaker 1: this week. Thanks for hanging in there with us. Actually, 1449 01:20:54,479 --> 01:20:56,519 Speaker 1: a big thanks to the crew and a big thanks 1450 01:20:56,600 --> 01:20:58,920 Speaker 1: to Ryan. I had an early scheduled today, so everyone 1451 01:20:58,920 --> 01:21:00,519 Speaker 1: had to wake up early. And are you getting to 1452 01:21:00,520 --> 01:21:03,920 Speaker 1: watch this earlier? Because that's right, that's right, And we 1453 01:21:03,960 --> 01:21:06,639 Speaker 1: got our coffee. We got our coffee, so we're we're 1454 01:21:06,640 --> 01:21:08,920 Speaker 1: good to go to. But I hope everybody is having 1455 01:21:09,040 --> 01:21:10,519 Speaker 1: a good weekend. I know it's about to get really 1456 01:21:10,520 --> 01:21:12,800 Speaker 1: cold in the Midwest and there's a lot of fall 1457 01:21:12,880 --> 01:21:14,439 Speaker 1: up from the hurricane here on the East coast. So 1458 01:21:14,520 --> 01:21:17,639 Speaker 1: hope everybody says safe and warm, have fun refreshing those 1459 01:21:17,720 --> 01:21:19,479 Speaker 1: vote tallies, and have a great weekend.