Speaker 1: Center nights to be back here in our home studio.
Speaker 1: We've done some of these on the road recently, but
Speaker 1: it's going to be back here. And the American people
Speaker 1: were told a story this week that a special counsel
Speaker 1: is gonna get appointed to look into Hunter Biden to
Speaker 1: Biden crimes. I feel like we're getting screwed here. I'm
Speaker 1: not buying this your reaction.
Speaker 2: You're right. It is an utter and complete croc It
Speaker 2: is a cover up.
Speaker 3: You ought to be pissed at this announcement because this
Speaker 3: is an announcement that is cynical. It is cynical from
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland, it is cynical from Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: It's illegal, and it's.
Speaker 3: Designed to cover up wrongdoing, cover up wrongdoing of Hunter Biden,
Speaker 3: cover up wrongdoing of Joe Biden, and cover up wrongdoing
Speaker 3: of Merrick Garland.
Speaker 2: This is entirely.
Speaker 3: About appearing to enforce the law while at the same
Speaker 3: time obstructing investigations into doing that.
Speaker 1: You said it's illegal by law to become a special counsel.
Speaker 4: You have to, and I'm going to quote it.
Speaker 1: Be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial
Speaker 1: decision making conduct investigations expeditiously and thoroughly.
Speaker 4: I read that.
Speaker 1: And the guy who let the statute of limitations run
Speaker 1: out on the most serious financial crimes tax crimes is
Speaker 1: the guy that they're now saying is impartial and is
Speaker 1: going to run this as a special prosecutor. He also
Speaker 1: said he could do all the things are now giving
Speaker 1: the power to do before. So why even appoint him.
Speaker 2: For political cover?
Speaker 3: This is entirely political cover, and this is entirely obstruction.
Speaker 2: There's even more directories.
Speaker 3: And look, you raise a point why David Wise is
Speaker 3: an exceptionally poor choice for this, But there's an even
Speaker 3: more straightforward reason why this is an illegal choice. So
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice has regulations that govern special counsels,
Speaker 3: and when you appoint special counsels, and here's what Section
Speaker 3: six hundred point three of the regulation state quote, the
Speaker 3: special council shall be selected from outside the United States government.
Speaker 3: David Weiss is the sitting US Attorney for Delaware. He
Speaker 3: is not outside the US government. Under the Department of
Speaker 3: Justices regulations, his appointment is illegal. Now, I suppose Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland can rest comfortable because he's doing something illegal, But
Speaker 3: those same regulations section six hundred point ten makes clear
Speaker 3: that no one can sue Merrick Garland for refusing to
Speaker 3: follow his own regulations. So why is he doing it?
Speaker 3: Why is he appointing someone who's, on his face illegal.
Speaker 3: The reason is he wants this guy. He wants this
Speaker 3: guy because he doesn't meet the provision that you just read.
Speaker 3: He's not fair and impartial. He's not going to vigorously
Speaker 3: prosecute the case. And how do we know this because
Speaker 3: for five years we've seen the job he's done. He
Speaker 3: hasn't vigorously prosecuted the case. And in fact, to the contrary,
Speaker 3: David Weiss has slow walked this investigation for five years.
Speaker 2: For Pete's sakes.
Speaker 3: We have pictures and video of Hunter Biden with prostitutes
Speaker 3: and crack and a gun, and they're trying to prove
Speaker 3: that he had a gun while using drugs. Like at
Speaker 3: some point the Keystone cops can figure it out. And
Speaker 3: it's not that they couldn't figure this out. They didn't
Speaker 3: want to figure this out, so they they spend five
Speaker 3: years investigating. Then what they do, and you pointed out
Speaker 3: this is one of the most shocking aspects of it.
Speaker 3: David Weiss allows the statute of limitations to expire on
Speaker 3: the twenty fourteen and twenty fifteen tax offenses. Those were
Speaker 3: by far the most serious tax offenses.
Speaker 1: From a lawyer's perspective, I want to know when you're
Speaker 1: doing a case, and I think so many people may
Speaker 1: not understand this. You look at what you're looking at
Speaker 1: when you're charging some of the crimes. That's I'm assuming
Speaker 1: that's normal, and you would look at the statute of limitations.
Speaker 4: It's not like they would sneak up on you.
Speaker 3: So correct, you know it absolutely the statute limitations for
Speaker 3: the I'm here with six years, so you know when
Speaker 3: the statute limitations is going to expire. Now, the IRS
Speaker 3: whistleblowers have said that Weiss initially inquired about prosecuting those crimes.
Speaker 3: One of them would have to be in the Central
Speaker 3: District of California because you had to bring the crimes
Speaker 3: the prosecution where the crime occurred. Another would have to
Speaker 3: be in DC, and according to the IRS whistleblowers, the
Speaker 3: US attorneys in d C and the Central District California
Speaker 3: said no. Now, Merrick Garland told the United States Senate
Speaker 3: under oath in response to my questioning, that Weiss had
Speaker 3: all the authority to bring those cases a corner to
Speaker 3: the irs whistleblowers.
Speaker 2: That was a lie.
Speaker 3: Weiss then came back and said, no, no, no, I had
Speaker 3: all the authority to bring those cases. So if Weiss
Speaker 3: is telling the truth, then he chose not to bring
Speaker 3: the cases and he chose to let the statute limitations expire.
Speaker 3: And what that means is you can't prosecute Hunter for
Speaker 3: those crimes anymore because the statute has expired. But it's
Speaker 3: worse than that, and it's worse than that, doubly it over.
Speaker 3: Number one, it's not just the tax offenses in twenty
Speaker 3: fourteen and twenty fifteen that have expired, you know, all
Speaker 3: the criminal conduct and corruption, the twenty million dollars that
Speaker 3: was paid to Biden family members and associates while Joe
Speaker 3: Biden was president.
Speaker 4: Keyword Wiley was the vice president right.
Speaker 3: And to be clear, our last podcast went a deep
Speaker 3: dive into that. If you didn't listen to Friday's podcast,
Speaker 3: go back and listen to it, because we walk through
Speaker 3: what the House has put out now bank Wrecords, Wired
Speaker 3: wrecords more than twenty million dollars paid to Biden inc.
Speaker 3: To all the Biden family members and associates while Joe
Speaker 3: Biden was vice president. You know what, the Statute Limitations
Speaker 3: has run on all of that, every minute of Joe
Speaker 3: Biden's vice Presidency's now miraculously, gosh, the statute is run.
Speaker 3: And why is the statute on? Because David Weiss wanted
Speaker 3: it to run and we know that. And we know
Speaker 3: that because and the single most stunning thing the IRS
Speaker 3: whistleblower said that almost no one has commented on the
Speaker 3: IRIS whistleblowers said that Hunter Biden's attorneys said to David Weiss,
Speaker 3: will toll the Statute of limitations. Now, what does it
Speaker 3: mean to toll? To toll the Statute of limitations means
Speaker 3: a defendant agrees, okay, you could extend it, you can
Speaker 3: prosecute me beyond. We can just put a pause on
Speaker 3: the Statute of Limitations. And Hunter's lawyers were doing this
Speaker 3: because they were trying to negotiate a global plea deal,
Speaker 3: a sweetheart deal. And what the IRS whistleblower said is
Speaker 3: that David Weise said, no, no, that's okay, you don't
Speaker 3: need to toll the Statute of limitations. I'll just let
Speaker 3: him expire. I'll give you a get out of jail
Speaker 3: free card. That's what he did. That is a stunning statement.
Speaker 3: No prosecutor would do this. And so for five years,
Speaker 3: David Weiss has been covering up, he's been obstructing.
Speaker 2: And let's be clear.
Speaker 3: Those IRS whistleblowers, their testimony is that lawyers who worked
Speaker 3: for David Weiss obstructed this investigation from day one. They
Speaker 3: gave Hunter Biden the heads up before they questioned him,
Speaker 3: to let him prepare for the questioning. They gave Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden the heads up before they executed search warrants to
Speaker 3: let him presumably destroy incriminating evidence. They prohibited investigators from
Speaker 3: asking any questions about Joe Biden, about the big guy,
Speaker 3: about his dad. They said, nope, no, you're not allowed
Speaker 3: to ask. Not allowed to ask, not allowed to ask.
Speaker 3: They viewed their job as protecting the big guy. They
Speaker 3: blocked those off. They also, according to the IRS whistleblowers,
Speaker 3: prohibited investigators from examining GPS data to determine whether Joe
Speaker 3: Biden was sitting next to Hunter Biden when Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: sent the text to the senior Chinese Communist official saying
Speaker 3: I am sitting here next to my father and shaking
Speaker 3: him down for five million.
Speaker 4: Dollars and within ten days they got the money.
Speaker 3: And within ten days they got the money. We know
Speaker 3: the text was sent or the whatsapped encrypted message was sent,
Speaker 3: and we know that five times in that text, Hunter
Speaker 3: says he and his father that he's doing it on
Speaker 3: behalf of his father. It was a simple matter to say, well,
Speaker 3: Hunter says twice in that text, he's sitting next to
Speaker 3: his father. Was he sitting next to his father? We
Speaker 3: can compare the GPS data. Is Joe sitting next to him?
Speaker 3: And what did David Weiss and his lawyers say? No, No,
Speaker 3: you're not allowed to know. It's like the Three monkeys
Speaker 3: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. That's
Speaker 3: just evil. They're covering it up. And so I got
Speaker 3: to say, look, I look at this announcement and I'm pissed,
Speaker 3: and let me make a movie analogy. You've seen The Untouchables,
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, one of the greatest movies of all time.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine in The Untouchables if elliot Ness was
Speaker 3: told the prosecutor for al Capone is gonna be al
Speaker 3: Capone's accountant, Yeah, is gonna be the guy that covered
Speaker 3: it up, that hit it all that stopped him from
Speaker 3: being caught. He's the prosecutor. That's what Merrick Garland has done.
Speaker 3: He's put someone who has been covering up for Joe
Speaker 3: Biden for five years ostensibly in charge of the investigation.
Speaker 1: There's also been some fodder online and I want to
Speaker 1: know and I think I know the answer to this,
Speaker 1: but I think a lot of people have been saying
Speaker 1: this online.
Speaker 4: I want you to clarify it.
Speaker 1: There have been Democrats saying, well, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: a special prosecutor is a very important deal.
Speaker 4: It's a very big deal.
Speaker 1: It could put them in serious risk, and it could
Speaker 1: extend the statueentations.
Speaker 4: That's not true.
Speaker 3: Once it's run, the special prosecutor doesn't have any way
Speaker 3: to magically revive the statute.
Speaker 1: So it's not like because he's been named now he
Speaker 1: can say, Okay, I'm going to go back and look
Speaker 1: at all these things. The times up there's that stop
Speaker 1: watches ended the games over on.
Speaker 3: Those others, and I and many others called for a
Speaker 3: special counsel set to be appointed two years ago, to
Speaker 3: have a prosecutor that was actually vigorously investigating this. Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland refused to do that, but in this case, it's
Speaker 3: even more obstruction than that, because what's happened between those
Speaker 3: two years is now David Weiss himself. There are real
Speaker 3: allegations that he committed obstruction of justice. There are very
Speaker 3: serious allegations that Merrick Garland lied under oath, which is
Speaker 3: a felony, and obstructed justices into this investigation, which is
Speaker 3: a felony. As you and I have talked about on Verdict,
Speaker 3: the House of Representatives needs to have a hearing with
Speaker 3: the irs whistleblower sitting there, with David Weiss sitting there,
Speaker 3: and with Merrick Garland sitting there, because all of them
Speaker 3: can't be telling the truth. If the whistleblowers are telling
Speaker 3: the truth, then David Weiss and Merrick Garland are both
Speaker 3: lying and both face criminal liability individually. Now, what Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland has done is said, hey, who's one of the
Speaker 3: key witnesses against me. Let me name him a special
Speaker 3: council so then it'll look okay when he refuses to
Speaker 3: testify to Congress.
Speaker 2: This is about.
Speaker 3: This is not just covering up Hunter and Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: although it isn't a very significant respect covering up Hunter
Speaker 3: and Joe Biden. This is Merrick Garland covering his own ass.
Speaker 3: This is saying, who's the chief witness against me that
Speaker 3: can show that I lied under oath and committed a felony. Well,
Speaker 3: let me appoint him special counsel because I know he
Speaker 3: will be complicit, And let me be clear. From the
Speaker 3: IRS whistleblower's testimony, we don't know if David Weiss was
Speaker 3: an active and aggressive partisan covering up for Hunter and
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, if he himself was the one doing so,
Speaker 3: or if he was simply complicit, if he was simply
Speaker 3: so weak, Yeah, that he let the active, aggressive partisans
Speaker 3: at Main Justice do so. It's not clear from the
Speaker 3: IRS testimony who was the decider, although it's worth listening,
Speaker 3: all right, So listen to one of the IRS whistleblowers
Speaker 3: describe when he had enough with David Wise.
Speaker 2: Give a listen.
Speaker 5: The Justice Department allowed the president's political appoint to use
Speaker 5: the weigh in on whether they charged the President's son
Speaker 5: after United States Attorney for DC Matthew Graves, appointed by
Speaker 5: President Biden, refused to bring charges. In March twenty twenty two,
Speaker 5: I watched United States Attorney Wise tell a roomful of
Speaker 5: senior FBI and IRS senior leaders on October seventh, twenty
Speaker 5: twenty two, that he was not the deciding person on
Speaker 5: whether charges were filed. That was my red line. I
Speaker 5: had already seen a pattern of preferential treatment and obstruction
Speaker 5: now United States. Wis was admitting that what the American
Speaker 5: people believed based on the Attorney general sworn sworn statement
Speaker 5: was false. I can no longer stay silent.
Speaker 2: So listen.
Speaker 3: He just said he'd seen a pattern a preferential treatment,
Speaker 3: an obstruction, and he'd seen the Attorney General lie under oath.
Speaker 3: He's alleging multiple felonies not just by Merrick Garland, but
Speaker 3: implicitly by David Weiss as well. The pattern of obstruction
Speaker 3: and what he describes with David Weis. It may be
Speaker 3: and I don't know Weiss at all, never met the guy,
Speaker 3: don't know anything about him personally. It may just be
Speaker 3: that he's exceptionally weak, that he's a patsy, that he's
Speaker 3: someone that Merrick Garland's like, Okay, we can stick him
Speaker 3: in because yes, guy, because he'll just roll over, we
Speaker 3: can bully him and he'll do whatever we want. That's possible,
Speaker 3: or he himself might be a partisan. Now the corporate
Speaker 3: media says till they're red in the face that Weiss
Speaker 3: is a Donald Trump appointee.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they've said that a thousand times.
Speaker 3: And the nice thing is verdict listeners know the answer
Speaker 3: to that, which is the way US attorneys are appointed.
Speaker 3: You cannot be appointed US attorney without the sign off
Speaker 3: of both senators from that state. Delaware has two senators,
Speaker 3: both Democrats, Tom Carper and Chris Coon's hardcore liberals.
Speaker 4: Let's be clear about that.
Speaker 3: The only way David Weiss could be appointed is if
Speaker 3: both Tom Carper and Chris Coon said yes, we sign off.
Speaker 3: And so look, I don't have any affirmative evidence that
Speaker 3: Weiss is a partisan Democrat.
Speaker 2: He was not a big Democrat donor. There are others.
Speaker 3: The US attorney in DC who turned down prosecuting Hunter,
Speaker 3: he was a partisan Democrat who'd been a donor to
Speaker 3: Joe Biden. The US attorney in the Central District, California
Speaker 3: who turned down prosecuting Hunter. He was a partisan Democrat
Speaker 3: who'd been a donor to Kamala Harris. We don't have
Speaker 3: that same information on David Weiss. But we also don't
Speaker 3: have any information that Weiss was a Republican was a
Speaker 3: donor to Trump or any Republicans.
Speaker 2: We don't have information on that.
Speaker 3: We do know the two Democrats in Delaware signed off,
Speaker 3: and Delaware is a very small state. It's a state
Speaker 3: where the relevant players all know each other, so they
Speaker 3: presumably knew what they were getting. And what we do
Speaker 3: know is the job he has done, and the job
Speaker 3: he has done has been disgraceful. This sweetheart deal that
Speaker 3: was negotiated with Hunter was designed not only to be
Speaker 3: a slap on the wrist to Hunter and get him off,
Speaker 3: but the entire purpose was to protect the big guy.
Speaker 2: It was a cover up of Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: And this latest Special Council appointment is exactly that I
Speaker 3: want to.
Speaker 1: Tell you about our friends of Augusta Precious Medals real quick.
Speaker 1: If you are planning for retirement, you're close to retirement.
Speaker 1: In retirement, you know how important it is right now
Speaker 1: to protect your assets and diversify well. All over the
Speaker 1: world people are using gold and silver and they're using
Speaker 1: them in their iras. Their four oh one k's right
Speaker 1: here in this country. And that is why I want
Speaker 1: you to know about august of Precious Medals. You've seen
Speaker 1: what's been happening with our economy inflation. You've seen what's
Speaker 1: happened with some bank failures this year as well, and
Speaker 1: that's where gold and silver can come in to help
Speaker 1: you protect your assets. Now, if you are in retirement,
Speaker 1: you know there's no time to make up losses. That's
Speaker 1: the other reason why you should call Augusta Precious Metals.
Speaker 1: They're gonna do two things for you, and you call
Speaker 1: number one. They're going to send you the information guide
Speaker 1: on gold specifically with your IRA and your four O
Speaker 1: one K. Then they're going to do a one on
Speaker 1: one web conference with you to answer all of your
Speaker 1: questions and so that you know if gold is right
Speaker 1: for you in diversifying your hard earned dollars. Call them
Speaker 1: right now eight seven seven the number four Gold IRA.
Speaker 1: Eight seven seven the number four Gold IRA, or online
Speaker 1: at Augusta Precious Metals dot Com. Tell them I sent you,
Speaker 1: and you'll get your fees from up to ten years
Speaker 1: covered with a promo code Verdict Augusta Precious Metals dot
Speaker 1: Com or eight seven seven the number four Gold IRA.
Speaker 1: Two more questions on this center, I want to ask
Speaker 1: you one. There seems to be a walking contradiction. Now
Speaker 1: just to the fact they appointed Wise's special counsel. They
Speaker 1: said he had all the power he needed to do
Speaker 1: his job before. He said he had all that he
Speaker 1: needed to do his job before. So if that was true,
Speaker 1: and Garland was telling the truth and Wiss was telling
Speaker 1: the truth, why then appoint him right now special prosecutor
Speaker 1: when the fact that the matters.
Speaker 4: You've said he didn't need this test to.
Speaker 1: Do his j Does that open them up to even
Speaker 1: more criticism about what they've been doing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's pure politics.
Speaker 3: This appointment was done so Merrick Garland can say, see,
Speaker 3: we're being tough. I appointed a special counsel.
Speaker 4: Does that mean by the fault they were being weak before?
Speaker 2: Then?
Speaker 3: Well he's trying to demonstrate. Look, I'm responding like holy crap.
Speaker 3: Last week, the House released wires and bank records of
Speaker 3: more than twenty million dollars paid to the family and
Speaker 3: associates of Joe Biden while he was Vice president from
Speaker 3: foreign nationals in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.
Speaker 2: That's a big damn deal.
Speaker 3: Twenty million dollars and by the way, another eight million
Speaker 3: dollars from Chinese communists in the few months after he
Speaker 3: was vice president.
Speaker 2: So twenty eight million dollars, and most.
Speaker 1: Of that you're now saying sexul limitations wise has already disappeared.
Speaker 2: Thanks to David Weiss. Nice job.
Speaker 3: I mean, he did a great job of dragging his
Speaker 3: feet long enough that he gave a significant degree of
Speaker 3: immunity to everyone who broke the law here. But look
Speaker 3: what we started off in this podcasts on it's worth
Speaker 3: going back and reflecting on. I pointed out that under
Speaker 3: the DOJ rules, David Weiss's appointment is illegal. The special
Speaker 3: counsels designed to be someone from outside of government, and
Speaker 3: that's not an accident. There's a right what does So
Speaker 3: there's a reason for that. You appoint a special counsel
Speaker 3: when there's a conflict of interest within the Department of Justice,
Speaker 3: when it's not possible for DOJ to fairly investigate it,
Speaker 3: you appoint someone from outside the government who can actually
Speaker 3: take it on and be fair and impartial.
Speaker 1: So that's calling a law firm a top person saying, hey,
Speaker 1: what qualifies you for that?
Speaker 3: So it's typically a former prosecutor who is outside of government,
Speaker 3: who is usually of the opposing party. So for example,
Speaker 3: think back to Bill Clinton when Bill Clinton, Janet Reno
Speaker 3: is Attorney General. When she decided they needed to appoint
Speaker 3: a special counsel, who did they appoint Ken Starr? Ken
Speaker 3: Starr was a prominent Republican. He was not a friend
Speaker 3: of Bill Clinton. He was not a crony of Bill Clinton.
Speaker 3: He hadn't been signed off on by two Democrat senators
Speaker 3: in Delaware. He didn't have five years of dragging his
Speaker 3: feet and covering up Hunter Biden Joe Biden. The reason
Speaker 3: the Special Council's rules say pick someone from out of
Speaker 3: government is it should be someone who cannot reasonably and
Speaker 3: plausibly be said is going to be a patsy for
Speaker 3: the president and the party in power. You know who
Speaker 3: they ought to point. They ought to point someone like
Speaker 3: John Ratcliffe. John Ratcliffe's former acting US Attorney in Texas,
Speaker 3: was head of the Department of National Intelligence, was a
Speaker 3: US Congressman. Now John is a conservative Republican. John is
Speaker 3: a real prosecutor. And by the way, if John Ratcliffe
Speaker 3: were appointed Special counsel to investigate Merrick Garland for lying
Speaker 3: under oath and obstruction of justice, to investigate Hunter Biden,
Speaker 3: and most significantly, to investigate Joe Biden. If John Ratcliffe
Speaker 3: were appointed, it would scare the living crap out of
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, at a Hunter Biden, at a Merrick Gard,
Speaker 3: out of every partisan Democrat, because you'd actually have a
Speaker 3: prosecutor willing to follow the facts. And by the way,
Speaker 3: I haven't talked to John about this, he has no idea.
Speaker 3: I'm suggesting his name until this podcast comes out, and
Speaker 3: then then I'll find out, presumably. But that's the kind
Speaker 3: of person you to point, which is a serious prosecutor
Speaker 3: on the other team. That's the whole point.
Speaker 4: With a fresh set of eyes, it wasn't involved in
Speaker 4: any of this, and.
Speaker 3: Who has no credible argument that they're going to be
Speaker 3: a patsy, They're going to be a rubber stamp that
Speaker 3: they're going to cover up. Who doesn't have a political
Speaker 3: reason to want to protect the president of the United States.
Speaker 3: That's what the Special Council law is for. It's why
Speaker 3: people don't like it because it can be it could
Speaker 3: have real bite to it that when you put a
Speaker 3: real prosecutor who is not your guy, bad things happen.
Speaker 4: Let's break down the media aspect of this as well.
Speaker 1: The media erupted this week when it came out there
Speaker 1: was a special council appointed. They played it up as
Speaker 1: a really big deal to look like there was some
Speaker 1: sort of accountability here. Oh, if there is a crime
Speaker 1: that's been committed by the Bidens, now it's going to
Speaker 1: really be found.
Speaker 4: Katherin Heritage at CBS said this, take a look.
Speaker 6: Former federal prosecutor I spoke to just before this event
Speaker 6: said to me, the appointment of a special counsel would
Speaker 6: have the effect of delaying a resolution on the Hunter
Speaker 6: Biden matter, in his opinion, and it would certainly delay
Speaker 6: any anticipated testimony from the US Attorney in Delaware to
Speaker 6: Republicans on Capitol Hill who have been seeking that testimony
Speaker 6: for several months. So it's an extraordinary development considering where
Speaker 6: the two parties were two weeks ago, to wrap up
Speaker 6: this year's long case. Now to the appointment of a
Speaker 6: special council that will have these broad authorities, most importantly
Speaker 6: to continue this ongoing investigation.
Speaker 1: Margaret, Now they say extraordinary. You noticed how the word
Speaker 1: extraordinary was here. They were reporting on this like this
Speaker 1: is a massive thing when they think they already know
Speaker 1: the fix is in and that Weiss is already the
Speaker 1: I mean the act like Weiss is somehow like a
Speaker 1: new guy. He's the same guy that just did the
Speaker 1: investigation that just allowed for the statute limitations to come out.
Speaker 1: And you compare that to John and Turleiot Fox, who's
Speaker 1: coming out saying this is not a big deal.
Speaker 4: In fact, this is a cover up. Take a look.
Speaker 7: I was not surprised, but I was not nearly as
Speaker 7: delighted as I would have been two years ago when
Speaker 7: many of us were calling for this appointment. They waited
Speaker 7: for the appointment of a special counsel after the statue
Speaker 7: limitations has run on critical crimes like the tax violations
Speaker 7: in twenty fourteen twenty fifteen. They waited until Weiss himself
Speaker 7: was accused of slowing our suppressing efforts. At least the
Speaker 7: whistlebler suggested that he was not able to pursue cases
Speaker 7: and didn't aggressively push back on that. A lot of
Speaker 7: questions here. This is occurring as Congress is moving aggressively
Speaker 7: to pursue some of these issues. This new status can
Speaker 7: certainly slow that process down. Weiss was at the top
Speaker 7: of the list of Congress to be brought in to
Speaker 7: explain why did you allow the sessional limitations to run?
Speaker 7: Why were Biden people tipped off about raids. Why was
Speaker 7: there an interference with investigators and trying to interview Hunter Biden?
Speaker 7: All of those questions are now likely to be delayed
Speaker 7: before they are answered.
Speaker 1: Now, he said delayed, and I think it was he's
Speaker 1: saying exactly what you said. By the way, two years
Speaker 1: ago you were calling for this, that was an honest
Speaker 1: media assessment of what just happened here. But he also,
Speaker 1: I think is foreshadowing, Hey, this could get delayed into
Speaker 1: or even past the president's election where Joe Biden's up
Speaker 1: for reelection.
Speaker 2: Now, what are you saying? Something's happening in November of
Speaker 2: next year.
Speaker 4: Yes, something's happening.
Speaker 3: And you're suggesting maybe the White House is aware of
Speaker 3: that date of November next year. Yep, and maybe Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland is as well. Yeah, and maybe all of the
Speaker 3: press that are treating this as ooh look, how exciting. Yeah, yea,
Speaker 3: a special counsel. Oh well, a year and a half.
Speaker 3: Nothing more to see here. Let's go back to talking
Speaker 3: about our favorite topic, which is the four hundred and
Speaker 3: thirty seventh indictment of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Yeah, with more coming this week, more than like that
Speaker 1: at Atlanta.
Speaker 3: I expect this week, we will be talking about indictment
Speaker 3: number four of Donald Trump. Every time something bad comes
Speaker 3: out about the Bidens, they indict Trump again. Look, Catherine
Speaker 3: Herritge on CBS, I want to give her a shout out.
Speaker 3: She is about the only reporter, I think, in the
Speaker 3: entire tirety of the corporate media who is covering this.
Speaker 3: So that is significant, and she's acknowledging. She acknowledged rightly
Speaker 3: that this naming and why says special counsel is going
Speaker 3: to delay everything. Turley said the same thing. They're both
Speaker 3: exactly right, and that is not a bug, it's a feature.
Speaker 3: It's the entire point, and it was striking when Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland made this announcement, he took zero questions.
Speaker 4: Yeah, just made the announcement. Walk off the state.
Speaker 3: The appointment's illegal, but you know how, you don't get
Speaker 3: questions on an illegal appointment. You don't take questions. I
Speaker 3: am the king and the King can do no wrong.
Speaker 3: That is Joe Biden's view, that is Merrick Garland's view.
Speaker 3: It's good to be the king, screw the law. That's
Speaker 3: how they are approaching this. And there still is not
Speaker 3: a single Democratic cares final.
Speaker 1: Question on this before we move the border, and that
Speaker 1: is is there a chance that having this special prosecutor
Speaker 1: appointed that it could actually hurt us from getting information
Speaker 1: in Congress with the investigation that James Comer is doing,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan is doing, because they can say, hey, we
Speaker 1: got a special prosecutor right now, we can't we can't
Speaker 1: answer that question, we can't talk about this. I worry
Speaker 1: that this actually can help them protect themselves from new
Speaker 1: intel coming out in Congress.
Speaker 3: Well, sure, that's that's that's their intention. We talked about
Speaker 3: in the last podcast how Comer intends to subpoena Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden and presumably Joe Biden. I don't think either one
Speaker 3: of them is going to testify in the House, whether
Speaker 3: or not yet a special counsel. Hunter Biden will plead
Speaker 3: the fifth no lawyer with it worth assault would let
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden answer questions At this point, the criminal liability
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden is facing is significant. Joe Biden, he isn't
Speaker 3: gonna do it. He's gonna scream malarkey and refuse to come.
Speaker 3: That was true regardless of whether or not Weiss was
Speaker 3: named special counsel. The person who this does the most
Speaker 3: to decrease the chances that he testifies as David Weiss,
Speaker 3: because David Wess is the most important witness against Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland for Merrick Garland's potential lying under oath and obstruction
Speaker 3: of justice, So they now have an excuse to say no,
Speaker 3: we won't give you David Weiss, which protects Merrick Garland.
Speaker 3: I think that was a big part of it. I
Speaker 3: think part of it was Merrick Garland protecting his own
Speaker 3: rear end, and part of it was Garland wanting to
Speaker 3: do something that seems tough that in fact will continue
Speaker 3: to obstruct the investigation into Hunter and Joe Biden, additional witnesses.
Speaker 3: Congress will continue to investigate. The House has been the
Speaker 3: only place we've made progress on this issue. I expect
Speaker 3: them to continue as j subpoenas. I expect if witnesses
Speaker 3: refuse to respond to the subpoenas, that the House will
Speaker 3: vote to hold them into contempt, and then I expect
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland at the Department of Justice to refuse to
Speaker 3: prosecute those contempt holdings because Merrick Garland wants nobody to
Speaker 3: testify to Congress, because he wants this information covered up.
Speaker 3: He Merrick Garland's behavior as attorney general is making John
Speaker 3: Mitchell roll over in his grave. And John Mitchell was
Speaker 3: Nixon's corrupt attorney general who served twenty two months in jail.
Speaker 3: And Garland's comment is more lawless and more partisan than
Speaker 3: John Mitchell ever was.
Speaker 1: Chances this is wrapped up before election day general election
Speaker 1: next year zero, so you have no doubt.
Speaker 4: Here this is going to still be going on.
Speaker 3: That's why you appoint David Whye's special counsel.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about our friends of Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: If you are like me and you're sick and tired
Speaker 1: of giving your money to woke companies that are fighting
Speaker 1: against your values, you now have a choice with your
Speaker 1: cell phone.
Speaker 4: Nine nine percent of you have a cell phone.
Speaker 1: How would you like to know that you get amazing coverage,
Speaker 1: nationwide coverage you and it's the best coverage in your area.
Speaker 1: And when you pay your bill, you are actually supporting
Speaker 1: conservative causes. That is exactly what Patriot Mobile does.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: If you haven't switched to Patriot Mobile, you need to
Speaker 1: check them out, because not only do usually save real
Speaker 1: money every month, but they're supporting your First and your
Speaker 1: Second Amendment rights, the rights of unborn children, they're supporting
Speaker 1: our veterans, our first responders, our heroes have fought for
Speaker 1: this country. This is a company that when you pay
Speaker 1: your bill, you know you're standing up for what you
Speaker 1: believe in. They take a portion of your bill every
Speaker 1: month and they give it back to these causes at
Speaker 1: no extra cost to you. So stop sending your money
Speaker 1: to woke companies that are against your values. Many big
Speaker 1: mobile companies are giving money to Planned Parenthood. If you
Speaker 1: don't want that, check out Patriot Mobile. You can call
Speaker 1: them eight seven eight Patriot. That's eight seven eight Patriot.
Speaker 1: If you have a small business or a family plan,
Speaker 1: they can switch you easily. One hundred percent US based
Speaker 1: call center and switching is easy eight seven eight Patriot.
Speaker 1: Call them or go online to Patriot Mobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash Verdict use the.
Speaker 4: Promo code Verdict.
Speaker 1: You'll also get free activation and the best deals of
Speaker 1: the year Patriot Mobile dot com slash Verdict Center.
Speaker 4: I want to move to the border.
Speaker 1: There was a shocking picture and I want to put
Speaker 1: it up of our men coming across the border caught
Speaker 1: on camera this past past week. And this is now
Speaker 1: where we are with a border. Now, Now this is
Speaker 1: what we've seen. What you've seen for years, what we've
Speaker 1: witnessed for years. But what's happening now is Democrats are
Speaker 1: coming out mayor at New York, another state in this
Speaker 1: country to clear to Stan emergency and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: sending migrants around the country to blue states is having
Speaker 1: a big impact on them saying hey, this is out
Speaker 1: of control, and I would say welcome to Texas well.
Speaker 3: This is a photograph of two men coming across the
Speaker 3: border illegally. They are both carrying weapons that appear to
Speaker 3: be they may be machine guns. It's hard to tell
Speaker 3: from the granularity the picture whether they're machine guns or
Speaker 3: whether they're semi automatic, but they are our serious weapons
Speaker 3: crossing the border illegally. They are heavily armed men. And
Speaker 3: I got to say, for all the Democrats in the
Speaker 3: corporate media, how do you not call this an invasion
Speaker 3: when you literally have armed men coming across the border.
Speaker 3: We don't know if these individuals are cicarios, if they're
Speaker 3: hit men's for the cartels. We don't know if they're
Speaker 3: just human traffickers who are heavily armed and dumb enough
Speaker 3: to get photographed. We do know that we are facing
Speaker 3: the worst illegal immigration in the history of our nation,
Speaker 3: more than seven million people who crossed illegal in or
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, and Joe Biden wants these men coming into
Speaker 3: your community.
Speaker 1: You mentioned the hit man, and I think we should
Speaker 1: expand on that for a moment, because I don't think
Speaker 1: people realize what's happening. There are enforcers that are coming
Speaker 1: into America from the cartels that are coming across the border,
Speaker 1: and when there's people that haven't paid them, there's family
Speaker 1: members that came across and they haven't done their obligations,
Speaker 1: they will come in and go after them, either to
Speaker 1: get shake them down for the money of their owed
Speaker 1: or even kill them. There's also there's people that try
Speaker 1: to get out of the drug trade or the human
Speaker 1: trafficking trade that owe them and that's how they're paying
Speaker 1: off their debt. They come in as enforcers and they
Speaker 1: send a clear message that is part of what's coming
Speaker 1: across the border that no one seems to want to
Speaker 1: talk about.
Speaker 3: The crime, the lawlessness, the murder, the brutalization that has
Speaker 3: happened because of this Biden border crisis is truly horrific.
Speaker 3: Eight hundred and fifty three migrants died last year crossing illegally.
Speaker 3: Tens of thousands of children were brutalized crossing illegally, physically assaulted,
Speaker 3: sexually assaulted. Tens of thousands of women were brutalized sexually
Speaker 3: assaulted crossing illegally. Over one hundred thousand people died last
Speaker 3: year of drug overdoses, two thirds of which was illegal
Speaker 3: Chinese fentanyl flooding across the border. And all of that
Speaker 3: is enforced through fear, through violence, through vicious drug cartels.
Speaker 3: We've talked before about the bracelets that the migrants wear.
Speaker 3: The bracelets are color coded for how many thousands of
Speaker 3: dollars they owe the cartels.
Speaker 4: And my Arcis said he didn't even know what those
Speaker 4: were were.
Speaker 3: No idea. He admitted he didn't care about doing his job.
Speaker 3: He's never apparently been to the border and looked down.
Speaker 3: Because you see thousands of those colored wristbands in the
Speaker 3: grass along the Rio Grande Valley. I have a number
Speaker 3: of in my office that I just picked up from
Speaker 3: the grass right there. He doesn't know, and they correspond
Speaker 3: when they owe thousands of dollars to the cartels. It's
Speaker 3: men like that that enforced the thousands of dollars and
Speaker 3: that threaten to kill the families of those migrants if
Speaker 3: they don't pay the money back. This is a multi
Speaker 3: billion dollar criminal organization that has been made rich, has
Speaker 3: been empowered by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and every
Speaker 3: single congressional Democrat who has facilitated this lawless open borders.
Speaker 1: I had to almost laugh over the last ten days.
Speaker 1: How what's been happening with Democratic leaders. One of them
Speaker 1: is the Massachusetts governor, who came out earlier this week
Speaker 1: citing an influx of just twenty thousand legal immigrants into
Speaker 1: the state, saying that this is up from the three thousand,
Speaker 1: one hundred families a year ago, which amounts to an
Speaker 1: eighty percent increase, and now is declared a state of
Speaker 1: emergency begging for federal funds. Twenty thousand legal immigrants in
Speaker 1: the entire state in Texas, that's like can be a
Speaker 1: day or two.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So the utter hypocrisy of Democrats has now gotten
Speaker 3: blindingly obvious. We have had emergencies declared in the state
Speaker 3: of Massachusetts by the governor, in the state of New York,
Speaker 3: by the governor in the City of New York, by
Speaker 3: the mayor in the city of Chicago by the mayor,
Speaker 3: and every one of them, and in Martha's Vineyard, by
Speaker 3: the way, all of them have declared emergencies. And if
Speaker 3: you want to go through, I want to take a
Speaker 3: minute and actually focus on this and quantify a the
Speaker 3: hypocrisy of all of these democrats, but be the point
Speaker 3: you made. I want to quantify it the comparative difference
Speaker 3: between these blue cities and blue states and Texas. So
Speaker 3: let's start with Mayor Adams and what he tweeted out
Speaker 3: right when he was coming in. Okay, so this is
Speaker 3: October twentieth, twenty twenty one. We should protect our immigrants, period. Yes,
Speaker 3: New York City will remain a sanctuary city under an
Speaker 3: Atoms administration.
Speaker 1: Hashtag I love this Eric on NBC like promoting his
Speaker 1: promoting his time on TV while pushing this.
Speaker 3: Well, and to be clear, NBC is a wholly owned
Speaker 3: subsidiary of the DNC, and so it's understandable that he's
Speaker 3: promoting NBC because he knows NBC will promote his partisan
Speaker 3: propaganda every single day. All right, So that's what he said,
Speaker 3: New York City will remain a sanctuary city. Well, now
Speaker 3: fast forward to what's happened to New York City, let's
Speaker 3: listen to them more recently.
Speaker 4: We are past our breaking point.
Speaker 8: New York's compassion may be limitless, but our resources are not.
Speaker 8: We expect to have more than one hundred thousand assylums
Speaker 8: seekers in our care by the end of June twenty
Speaker 8: twenty five. We're also asking the federal government to declare
Speaker 8: a state of emergency. This will allow federal funds to
Speaker 8: be allocated quickly to help address the urgent challenges we face.
Speaker 8: If we don't get the support we need, New Yorkers
Speaker 8: could be left for a twelve billion dollar bill.
Speaker 4: If they care that much about the money.
Speaker 1: The twelve billion as you mentioned you mentioned there like
Speaker 1: this could be a twelve billion dollar bill. Well, if
Speaker 1: it's federal funds, it's still a bill on the American people,
Speaker 1: the American taxpayer. Now all of a sudden, they're worried
Speaker 1: about the money they're spending on this.
Speaker 3: So I want to lay out and go through the
Speaker 3: map on this. So New York City, what Mayor Adams
Speaker 3: said is that is is that they could face one
Speaker 3: hundred thousand or more illegal immigrants in New York. Now,
Speaker 3: one hundred thousand illegal immigrants cord to the US Census
Speaker 3: b Euro estimates for twenty twenty two, New York City
Speaker 3: has a total of eight million, three hundred and thirty
Speaker 3: five thousand, eight hundred and ninety seven residents. So one
Speaker 3: hundred thousand illegal immigrants out of eight point three million
Speaker 3: is one point one percent of the city. So one
Speaker 3: point one percent of the city of illegal immigrants is
Speaker 3: an emergency, which he's declared. And by the way, he
Speaker 3: declared an emergency on October seventh, twenty twenty two, and
Speaker 3: then on May ninth, twenty twenty three, Governor Hotel declared
Speaker 3: a statewide emergency because of the just over one percent
Speaker 3: of illegal immigrants in New York City.
Speaker 2: Now, New York is not alone Chicago.
Speaker 3: Chicago has received just over twelve thousand illegal immigrants in
Speaker 3: the last eleven months. According to the US sense Its Bureau,
Speaker 3: Chicago has two million, seven hundred and forty six thousand,
Speaker 3: three hundred and eighty eight residents. Doing some quick math,
Speaker 3: that means the twelve thousand people is point four percent
Speaker 3: of the population in Chicago, so less than one percent,
Speaker 3: less than half a percent, It is point four percent.
Speaker 3: And yet on May ninth, twenty twenty three, then Mayor
Speaker 3: Lightfoot declared an emergency. So less than half a percent
Speaker 3: in Chicago is an emergency. One point one percent in
Speaker 3: New York City is an emergency. By the way, Boston,
Speaker 3: Boston has had more than twenty thousand individuals in the
Speaker 3: state shelter. Boston's population, according to the census in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two, is six hundred and fifty thousand, seven hundred
Speaker 3: and six So twenty thousand is roughly three percent of
Speaker 3: the population. So Boston got it worse than New York
Speaker 3: about three x about six x Chicago. And what did
Speaker 3: the left wing governor of Massachusetts do, who, by the way,
Speaker 3: campaigned on saying Boston and Massachusetts will be sanctuary cities
Speaker 3: in a sanctuary state, she declared an emergency.
Speaker 2: Now I want to compare that to Texas. El Paso.
Speaker 3: City of El Paso has a population according to the
Speaker 3: census of six hundred eighty seven thousand. El Paso recorded
Speaker 3: twenty six thousand and sixty seven illegal immigrants in May
Speaker 3: of twenty twenty three, in one month twenty six thousand.
Speaker 3: By the way, for fiscal year twenty two, el Paso
Speaker 3: had two hundred and four thousand, thirty zero thirty four
Speaker 3: illegal immigrants. What does that work out to thirty four
Speaker 3: percent of the population of El Paso.
Speaker 2: In one year?
Speaker 3: Mind you, according to New York one percent is a crisis.
Speaker 3: According to Chicago, less than half a percent as a crisis.
Speaker 3: El Paso has had thirty four percent. How about Laredo.
Speaker 3: Laredo population is two hundred fifty five on thy two
Speaker 3: hundred and five, and fiscal year twenty twenty two there
Speaker 3: were eighty seven thousand, six hundred early in encounters in
Speaker 3: the Laredo sector. What is that thirty four percent of Laredo?
Speaker 3: How about the real Grand Valley, Real Grand Valley population
Speaker 3: That Real Grand Valley is one million, two hundred ninety
Speaker 3: one thousand, seven hundred ninety eight. In fiscal year twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two, there were three hundred and seventy seven thousand,
Speaker 3: nine hundred and seventy encounters with illegal aliens. That is
Speaker 3: twenty nine percent. Yeah, left wing mayors, left wing governors
Speaker 3: out on presents is a crisis. We've got cities throughout
Speaker 3: South Texas where it's thirty thirty five, thirty four, thirty
Speaker 3: five percent. And let me give you the cherry on top.
Speaker 3: You want to understand this issue perfectly. I want to
Speaker 3: contrast two dramatically different communities about the same size, Martha's
Speaker 3: Vineyard and del Rio.
Speaker 2: So Martha's Vineyard.
Speaker 3: Martha's Vineyard has a population where in the winter time,
Speaker 3: when it's in low season, its population is about sixteen thousand.
Speaker 3: In the summertime, in high season, when people like Barack
Speaker 3: Obama and Michelle Obama and rich liberals go out there,
Speaker 3: the population soars to about two hundred thousand. So it
Speaker 3: varies widely depending on the season. Ron de Santis sent
Speaker 3: fifty five zero illegal immigrants to Martha's vineyard. Now, mind you,
Speaker 3: a year before Ron did that, I had filed legislation
Speaker 3: proposing that we send illegal immigrants to Martha's Vineyard and
Speaker 3: Nantucket and Palo Alto and the Hampton's and all the
Speaker 3: fancy places rich liberals go. The county executive in Martha's
Speaker 3: Vineyard when I filed my legislation, said we would welcome
Speaker 3: illegal immigrants here with open arms. Cruz does not understand
Speaker 3: what's happening at the border. He doesn't understand illegal immigration well.
Speaker 3: Dessantas sent fifty five zero within twenty four hours Martha's
Speaker 3: Vineyard declared an emergency fifty. Now, let's do the math
Speaker 3: at their low point. In other words, when all the
Speaker 3: rich liberals go home and it's just just the sort
Speaker 3: of serving class who are mowing the lawn and cleaning
Speaker 3: the estates, when it just has sixteen thousand, fifty people,
Speaker 3: is point three percent, so less than half a percent.
Speaker 3: When Martha's vineyard is flush with liberals fifty people, is
Speaker 3: point zero two five percent, So it's less than one percent.
Speaker 3: It's less than a half a percent. It's less than
Speaker 3: a tenth of a percent. It is one quarter of
Speaker 3: one tenth of a percent that in Martha's vineyard is
Speaker 3: an emergency. Now, let's contrast it to a city about
Speaker 3: the same size, del Rio. Del Rio has a population
Speaker 3: of about thirty four thousand, five hundred.
Speaker 4: Small town.
Speaker 2: It's a very small town.
Speaker 3: In June of twenty twenty three, one month, del Rio
Speaker 3: saw twenty nine thousand, nine hundred and forty one alien encounters.
Speaker 3: In other words, the entire population of the city in
Speaker 3: one month. In fiscal year twenty twenty two, the number
Speaker 3: of alien encounters in Del Rio was four hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty thousand, That is, one thousand, four hundred percent of
Speaker 3: the population of the city in New York, one percent
Speaker 3: of crisis in Chicago, a half percent of crisis del Rio, Texas,
Speaker 3: which is not a wealthy city, it is a poor
Speaker 3: city on the Rio Grande Valley had one four hundred
Speaker 3: percent of the population of their town come through illegally
Speaker 3: because of Joe Biden and the Democrats all say no
Speaker 3: crisis at all. Well, I'll tell you how ridiculous the
Speaker 3: hypocrisy is. I want you to listen to Chuck Todd
Speaker 3: on NBC. Yeah, Eric Adams points out NBC is his
Speaker 3: captive propaganda network. Will listen to what Chuck Dodd was
Speaker 3: forced to admit coming.
Speaker 9: Up New York City's growing humanitarian crisis, the shelter system
Speaker 9: slammed by an influx of migrants, new.
Speaker 4: Calls for federal health.
Speaker 9: Yes, Greg Abbott was right. He said once he got
Speaker 9: loose cities to deal with this, that they would be
Speaker 9: very upset at the.
Speaker 4: Federal government watching eth.
Speaker 1: The president, which Reuly means the Biden administration. He says,
Speaker 1: federal government. No, they're mat the White House because the
Speaker 1: White House's policy that's allowed for this open board. They
Speaker 1: changed everything that was working the day they got into
Speaker 1: office January twentieth of the first year of Joe Biden's presidency,
Speaker 1: and they never looked back from that time.
Speaker 3: And by the way, it's worth noting that the mayor
Speaker 3: of New York, the mayor of Chicago, the mayor of
Speaker 3: d C. The mayor of Boston, the mayor of San Francisco,
Speaker 3: they're not asking Biden to secure the border as for
Speaker 3: more money, You're just.
Speaker 2: Saying, give me money. Yeah.
Speaker 3: They actually agree with the political objective of let tens
Speaker 3: of millions of people in illegally, because they look at
Speaker 3: those illegal immigrants and they say, ooh, future Democrats, we
Speaker 3: want them. They just would prefer them not to come
Speaker 3: to their city, send them elsewhere, make other people pay
Speaker 3: for them. And they said, would you please send us
Speaker 3: billions of dollars? By the way, who's sending billions of
Speaker 3: dollars to tell RYO?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 2: But do they care about that? No?
Speaker 3: No, it is caused not just by Joe Biden, not
Speaker 3: just by Kamala Harris Ferrik Adams wants to yell at someone,
Speaker 3: how about Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 2: He lives in your city.
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer blocks every single effort to secure the border.
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer is directly responsible. Send the bill to Chuck.
Speaker 3: Chuck ought to pay for it twelve billion dollars. You know,
Speaker 3: Chuck can probably get Hunter and Joe to shake down
Speaker 3: some Ukrainians and they'll pay for it for him.
Speaker 1: Oh, they end up going to a hotel that's toned
Speaker 1: by some oligark in some other country right now that
Speaker 1: they own in New York City.
Speaker 3: No matter how bad it gets, the Democrats put partisanship above.
Speaker 3: They don't care about the people who are brutalized when
Speaker 3: you see. Look in Texas, we've got a whole stream
Speaker 3: of Democrats who are suddenly running down to the border,
Speaker 3: first time in two and a half years, have gone
Speaker 3: down to the border. Why because Governor Greg Abbott put
Speaker 3: buoyes up and suddenly they're out showing their enormous care.
Speaker 3: Not for the eight hundred and fifty three migrants who
Speaker 3: died in the last year crossing illegally, Not for the
Speaker 3: tens of thousands of children brutalized by the cartels, Not
Speaker 3: for the tens of thousands of women raped by the cartels,
Speaker 3: Not for the one hundred thousand people who died of
Speaker 3: drug overdose. Says nope, they're mad because the buoys there
Speaker 3: that might be risky, and that means Abbot is responsible
Speaker 3: if something happens in the booies. They do not care
Speaker 3: about the humans suffering their policies cause it is only
Speaker 3: politics all the time for Democrats, and it's disgraceful.
Speaker 4: I want to tell you about Chalk. Are good friends
Speaker 4: at Chalk.
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you feel like you've lost
Speaker 1: your edge, you feel like you've gotten a little bit
Speaker 1: weak and complacency set in, and you're sick and tired
Speaker 1: of feeling that way, you need to check.
Speaker 4: Out chalk choq dot com. So what can they do?
Speaker 1: They can help you boost your testosterum levels up to
Speaker 1: twenty percent over ninety days, getting back that strength and
Speaker 1: vitality that you may have lost. Yes, chalk choq dot
Speaker 1: com has the Male Vitality Stack.
Speaker 4: I've been taking it now for several months. I can
Speaker 4: tell you it works.
Speaker 1: You can maximize your masculinity today by going to chalk
Speaker 1: choq dot com. Use the promo code Ben You'll get
Speaker 1: thirty five percent off any Chalk subscription for life. So
Speaker 1: get off the couch, fight back and get back.
Speaker 4: To the way you used to feel.
Speaker 1: Choq dot Com use the promo code ben for thirty
Speaker 1: five percent off any subscription for life. There's one other
Speaker 1: aspect of this at the border as well center that
Speaker 1: I think has to be talked about, and that is
Speaker 1: when Greg Abbott and you were another one of those
Speaker 1: that was out there on the federal level saying we're
Speaker 1: gonna put people on buses and send them to these
Speaker 1: places like Martha's vineyard. They referred to it as a stunt, yep,
Speaker 1: and they said that this is in humane, it's a stunt,
Speaker 1: and we said, no, we're just gonna you want to
Speaker 1: be a welcoming city, you want to be an open city,
Speaker 1: like Mayor adams tweet was out there that he put
Speaker 1: out there, and we said, okay, we will send you
Speaker 1: bus loads of illegal immigrants that we're dealing with in
Speaker 1: Texas every single day.
Speaker 4: And they said it was a stunt.
Speaker 1: And guess what, it clearly now worked because these mayors
Speaker 1: are terrified and these governors are terrified they can't handle
Speaker 1: the problem and be there afraid they're going to run
Speaker 1: out of money if they don't get more from the
Speaker 1: federal government. When you look at it from that perspective,
Speaker 1: how right was Texas to say, here's part of our problem.
Speaker 3: Enjoy it, unquestionably right, and let's just contrast the utter
Speaker 3: hypocrisy of these elected Democrats. So I'm just going to
Speaker 3: read their words so you can assess the difference.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 3: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, when she was running for
Speaker 3: mayor in October of twenty twenty two, she answered questions
Speaker 3: from a LATINX news outlet. Whatever the hell a LATINX
Speaker 3: news outlet is, here's a quote. Los Angeles is and
Speaker 3: should remain a sanctuary city, and the LAPD should not
Speaker 3: be burdened with the federal government's responsibility to enforce immigration law.
Speaker 3: I do not support an ICE presence in local state
Speaker 3: correctional facilities, nor do I support ICE transfers absin a
Speaker 3: judicial warrant. Fast forward to June of twenty three, when
Speaker 3: Governor Abbots sent forty for zero illegal immigrants to LA.
Speaker 3: Mayor Bass released a statement that said, quote, it is
Speaker 3: abhorrent that an American elected official is using human beings
Speaker 3: as pawns in cheap political games. Here's Philadelphia Mayor James Keeney.
Speaker 3: June of twenty eighteen. Keeney literally dances in support of
Speaker 3: a court ruling in favor of Philadelphia's sanctuary city policies.
Speaker 3: He said, we are a sanctuary city. Fast forward October
Speaker 3: twenty twenty two, when Governor Abbots sent twenty eight illegal
Speaker 3: immigrants to PHILADELI. If you mind you, del Rio has
Speaker 3: had what four hundred, four hundred and eighty thousand, Philadelphia
Speaker 3: got twenty eight. Here's what Markini said, quote, it is
Speaker 3: truly disgusting to hear today that Governor Abbott and his
Speaker 3: administration continued to implement their purposefully cruel policy, using immigrant families,
Speaker 3: including women and children, as pawns to shapelessly push his
Speaker 3: warped political agenda. All right, let's take Chicago. Chicago Mayor
Speaker 3: Brandon Johnson when he was running for mayor. On his website,
Speaker 3: he said, quote, Chicago is a sanctuary city. As such,
Speaker 3: we must always resist attempts to pit communities against each
Speaker 3: other and extend the sanctuary promise to everyone who needs
Speaker 3: it in our city, both longtime residents and newcomers alike.
Speaker 3: Come to Chicago. That's me ed, Come on, come on, right.
Speaker 3: May of twenty twenty three, Brandon Johnson said this about
Speaker 3: Republican governor sending illegal immigrants to Chicago. Quote it's wicked,
Speaker 3: it's unconscionable. But as you know, the City of Chicago
Speaker 3: is coming together to make sure that people who wish
Speaker 3: to find real comfort here in the City of Chicago,
Speaker 3: that we provide that. And let me just give you
Speaker 3: one more San Francisco Mayor London Breed, So in July thirteenth,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty, here's a press release from Mayor Breed on
Speaker 3: San Francisco being a sanctuary city.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 3: Here in San Francisco, we will always demonstrate our values
Speaker 3: of diversity and inclusiveness by being a sanctuary city that
Speaker 3: stands up for all of our residents and neighbors. The
Speaker 3: court ruling today further validates what we already know. The
Speaker 3: Trump Administration's attempt to overreach and bully San Francisco into
Speaker 3: abandoning our values and complying with unfair, unjust immigration enforcement
Speaker 3: laws is unconstitutional, all right. So that's in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: Let's fast forward owing also in twenty twenty. Another quote
Speaker 3: from her is our sanctuary ordinance makes our entire city safer.
Speaker 3: Okayaf being a sanctuary city makes San Francisco. Two years later,
Speaker 3: October twenty twenty two, Mayor Breed blames the drug crisis
Speaker 3: in San Francisco on illegal immigrants coming from Honduras.
Speaker 2: Here's a quote. There are unfortunately a.
Speaker 3: Lot of people who come from a particular country, come
Speaker 3: from Honduras, and a lot of people who are dealing
Speaker 3: drugs happen to be of that ethnicity. It is nothing
Speaker 3: racial profile about this. We all know it. It's the reality.
Speaker 3: It's what you see, it's what's out there. Those are quotes.
Speaker 3: I'm not editorializing about if Republicans said that, I am
Speaker 3: reading her words. By the way, then in May, when
Speaker 3: she's talking about the drug and fetanyl crisis in San Francisco,
Speaker 3: particularly in the Tenderloin district, here's what she said.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 3: At the end of the day, we can't keep just
Speaker 3: throwing our hands up and think all of a sudden,
Speaker 3: what we are doing is working. Compassion is killing people,
Speaker 3: and we have to push forth some tough love to
Speaker 3: change what's happening on the streets of San Francisco.
Speaker 2: No kidding.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And you know what, let's see if the mayor
Speaker 3: can use some rocket science to figure out whose policies
Speaker 3: it is that has let seven million people into this country,
Speaker 3: including drug dealers, including gang members, including criminals, including people
Speaker 3: who commit horrific crimes. Let's see if any of these
Speaker 3: Democrats can figure out what caused it.
Speaker 2: And if they dare to admit it out loud.
Speaker 1: I will end with a brilliant political commentator the reminded
Speaker 1: America this week you shouldn't mess with Texas when it
Speaker 1: comes to legal immigration. I remember when they said that
Speaker 1: Greg Abbott was doing a political stunt by sending I
Speaker 1: legal immigrants to places like New York.
Speaker 4: I think it's pretty cleoar. Now, don't mess with Texas.
Speaker 1: We've been dealing with this, and if you think it's
Speaker 1: an emergency now in New York, come to Texas. This
Speaker 1: is one one thousands of what we did with every
Speaker 1: single day. And this idea that if you just send
Speaker 1: money that it's going to fix a problem you mentioned.
Speaker 1: I hope more money comes. I it's not a money issue.
Speaker 1: You have to secure a border.
Speaker 4: It doesn't matter how much money you spend.
Speaker 1: If you have an open border, it's going to continue
Speaker 1: to happen this way all over the country.
Speaker 4: I couldn't agree with that guy more, Senator. I mean,
Speaker 4: what a great point, right.
Speaker 3: So let me say number one, that's an awfully good
Speaker 3: looking political commentator.
Speaker 4: Thank you, thank you.
Speaker 3: Let me put that up again and play like the
Speaker 3: first few seconds of it.
Speaker 4: So this is what I know he's about to give
Speaker 4: me a hard time. Greg Abbott was doing a part
Speaker 4: of Freeze.
Speaker 3: Just pause right there, all right, Before I talk about
Speaker 3: the wisdom that is emanating, I just want to talk
Speaker 3: about the visual.
Speaker 4: I'm ready, and I was going to pay suit there.
Speaker 3: So look, I'm the father of two young daughters, and
Speaker 3: I will say, young girls everywhere are told cross your
Speaker 3: legs at your ankles.
Speaker 7: A ha ha.
Speaker 4: And you notice they ever play a clip of me
Speaker 4: on this show.
Speaker 3: All the women there have their eggs legs crossed at
Speaker 3: their ankles, and with your boots you are being a
Speaker 3: very dainty lady crossing your boots at your ankles.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying it's nice. Never a good look.
Speaker 4: Never again, am I playing a clip. Don't mess with Texas.
Speaker 4: Just remember that.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying, for what it's worth. Actually, have no
Speaker 3: idea what you said. Yeah, this is shameless self promotion. Ah,
Speaker 3: and I will admit I'm no stranger to shameless self promotion.
Speaker 2: Want to have my.
Speaker 4: Moment can you fly all the way to New York.
Speaker 4: I just wanted to have the moment.
Speaker 3: I'm you know you you look profound and I'm pretty
Speaker 3: sure you're saying New York mayor Adams your absolute total hypocrite.
Speaker 3: There you go, as you have New York in the background,
Speaker 3: and on that you are unquestionably correct, as you are
Speaker 3: when you said rightly, don't mess with text.
Speaker 5: There you go.
Speaker 4: Don't forget down with this podcast.
Speaker 1: Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, hit that follow button, subscribe button.
Speaker 1: If you're watching on YouTube or Facebook, make sure you
Speaker 1: share on your timeline so others can grab this podcast
Speaker 1: and we will see you back here in a couple
Speaker 1: of days.