WEBVTT - Tech Stock Bubbles In the 17th Century

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Blots podcast.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allowin and I'm Chill so Joe. You know,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we just recorded that podcast with Lee Drogan where we

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>were talking about tech stocks and earnings. Right. Yeah. I

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>really like that one and is another one of one

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts, and they're kind of rare for what

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we do, where we actually talk about markets right now,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as we're going, as are happening, because we often sort

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of talk about esoteric stuff that doesn't directly involve the

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>day to day. So I like that we got a

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>chance to actually talk about what's happening right now, give

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the listeners something useful. I really dispute the notion that

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>we talked about esoteric stuff, But as I say that,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I'm about to start talking about esoteric stuff.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Well that podcast about Cracy Crazy, do you know that?

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what our podcast is called Odd Thoughts,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's about bond trading? Okay, yeah, but we all know. Okay,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that episode about tech stocks got me thinking about I

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guess companies and company earnings throughout history, and I was

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of thinking on a very meta level, almost every

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>company is a tech stock, right because winners throughout history

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are companies that have either invented new technology or used

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it to the best effect. Right, Yeah, absolutely, And I

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>think Lee made that point as well, that really we're

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>not seeing an emergence of tech stocks per se. What

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is an incredible use of technology across a

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>range of industries that allows essentially capital to have incredible

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>leverage over labor. And what we call tech stocks like

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>your Netflix is and your facebooks are really the companies

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that are at the most extreme dream and of being

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>able to get incredible amounts of output without that much

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that many people working for them exactly. So after I

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>started thinking about that, I started thinking about what a

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, tech stock per se would look like, say

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred or two hundred or three hundred years ago,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Like would it be a company that I don't know

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>was inventing like new methods of producing railroad spikes or

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, something like that. Would that be considered a

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>technology company and would investors react to it in a

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>similar way that they would to a Facebook or an Amazon. Now,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>luckily for us, there's someone out there who thinks a

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>lot about this, so that we don't have to Um

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and his name is Jamie Catherwood. A lot of people

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>might know him as finance history guy. Uh. Yeah, there's

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he's on Twitter, he's on Medium, and he's always producing

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>these amazing articles about incredible episodes from financial history. I

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>saw he tweeted something I think it was just yesterday

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about the I p O of the Guinness Beer Company

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and how people talked about that and how oversubscribed it

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was and that was in there. And so looking back

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at financial history, you really do. It's it's sort of

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>confirms I think what is one of our general themes

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that to some extent nothing ever changes. And so Mania

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is about what we call tech stocks today presumably have

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>many echoes in the past as well, exactly, and so

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about exactly those echoes. And I

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>should just say that Jamie has also been a multiple

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>listener request for an All Thoughts interview, So I'm glad

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we're finally making it happen. Uh. Jamie Catherwood, a k a.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Finance history Guy. His real life job as an analyst

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>over at Arthur J. Gallagher and Company. Jamie, it's so

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good to have you on. Thank you so much for

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>having me. So I guess just to begin with, I'd

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be really curious to get some insight into how you

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>became finance history guy and what exactly piqued your interest in,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, going back to stories from the sixteen hundreds

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and even earlier to talk about finance and investing. Yeah,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so I've always been a history that um I did

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>history as my major at King's College, London, and I

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.679
<v Speaker 1>became interested in finance. And after joining Twitter, I saw

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that a ton of people were putting out content related

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, just to investing finance in general, but

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>no one had kind of focused on history itself and

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just financial history. So I figured I can't compete with

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who have been doing finance for decades or

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>investing and you know, much smarter than I am. But

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I can bring the history aspect because that's what I

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of know. So it was just kind of finding

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>my own niche. And I'm lucky that no one else

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was doing it because if they were, I'm sure it

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have worked out as well for me. Because there's

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>some really good writers out there on Twitter. I like

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that this This goes to my theory of life alpha

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of finding some profitable niche to exploit

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that other people aren't doing and sort of putting yourself

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out there and uh yeah, making hay in a way

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that others aren't very comparable to investing alpha. Um, do

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you find that it benefits you to study history in

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>your day to day career as an analyst, as an

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>observer of the market today, certainly, I mean it's I

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>even I get tired of hearing it. But you know,

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>people say the more things change is the more they

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>stay the same, But it is true. It's I mean,

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>as we'll talk about today, the kind of tech hype

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteen nineties, it's a kind of good reminder

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to not get caught up with the latest fat and

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that whatever everyone's talking about is going to

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be the next big thing, because when you study history,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at I mean, I did one article on

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>active investing in the Roman Empire. You can kind of

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>see that these fads quickly go away, and so don't

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>change what your overall strategy is just because there's some

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>hot new stock or sector or technology, because odds are

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just going to be something that someone's going to

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>write about in two hundred years. The next finance history

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>guy on Medium, right or on Twitter. Um, so Jamie,

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about whatever they're posting on but they're just

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna wire directly into our brains. That's probably more likely

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>download it. Yeah. So Jamie, let's talk about what a

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>tech stock might have looked like in say, the sixteen hundreds.

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I sort of alluded to it in the intro, but

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess to some extent, every company is sort of

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about technological innovation, but in the sixteen hundreds, technological innovation

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would look very different to what we think about today. Yeah.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So the sixteen nineties was kind of known as a I.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>P O bubble in London on the London Stock Exchange.

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Some people call it a tech bubble and some people

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean nerdy financial historians. And basically what spurred this

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of hype around tech stocks in that day was

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there's two factors. One was the Nine Years War was

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>going on, which restricted trade with other nations, and so

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>any capital that investors wanted to deploy they kind of

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>had to turn inward and invest within Britain. So when

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for new opportunities, they stumbled upon new joint

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>stock companies that were starting to form more quickly. Than before.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And there was one quote from a guy who started

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>writing a sort of bi weekly financial markets review who said,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a great many stocks have arisen since this war with

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>France for trade being obstructed at sea. A few that

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have money, we're willing it to lie idle, and a

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>great many found that they could employ their money more

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>easily and joint dock companies than in laying out the

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>same in lands, houses or commodities. So I thought that

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting that he was pointing out that

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to invest in these new text docs than

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>other asset classes. But what really set off the hype

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was the success of a treasure hunt by Sir William Phipps.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>He was actually eventually the first governor of the Massachusetts

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Bay Colony, which is kind of interesting, and he oversaw

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Salem which trials, but he went out and convinced

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a duke in England he could kind of think of

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as like a VC firm in the modern day, to

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>invest in his voyage to go find some treasure. And

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time he failed, but then he came back,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got more financing, went back out, and he had just

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>heard rumors of some sunken treasure ship in the Caribbean

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and he goes out finds it and he hauls up

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two tons of treasure, which I can't even begin

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of wrap my head around, and brings it

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back and the investors received a ten thousand percent return,

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which is just unbelievable. And as soon as that happened,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of just sparked a menia because dozens of

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>new companies started forming to either provide the technology to

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>retrieve treasures. So that was the kind of hype tech

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>stock of the day. It was these diving companies that

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>had either suits or other diving apparatus is and you

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just have to look up the drawings of these because

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they're insane. There's one was like the Edmund Halle bell,

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was this weird contraption where they would lower

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you down into the water and like this bell, but

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>trap air so that divers could stay down longer and

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>search for treasure. And so all these companies form basically

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>promising investors and one of the prospective is for this company.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>One of these companies actually put in the prospectives. We

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>promised a hundred percent return to investors, and their whole

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>pitch was, you know, oh, look at that guy you

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know who made ten percent on the Phipps treasure hunt.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>This technology will do even better or just the same,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And so investors just poured money into these stocks and

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't it didn't end up so well. Um, but

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there was Yeah, it was just crazy there. From sixteen

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy two to nine there were five patents related to

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>diving technology, and then in just two years from six

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>there were seventeen patents filed. And it was of all

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>patents filed in those two years, So the kind of

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hype was clear. I already loved this story so much.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it would just have never occurred to

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>me that in the sixteen hundred they had any technology,

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>no matter how rudimentary, that could get lower someone to

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the sea for long enough to dig

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>up treasure. I would have just assumed then the six

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>dreds there was no way to do this. So the

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that they invented various ways to do that, that

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>already blows my mind. What were the returns like? So

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously I don't you know, I don't think I'm going

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb much to imagine that most of

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>these endeavors did not produce ten thousand percent returns and

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>probably many of them didn't return anything like that. Is

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>there a distribution of returns though that like that one

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can collate that sort of resemble, you know, like if

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about you compared the initial funding to kind

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of like a VC funding, and vcs sort of they

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>famously are willing to take losses on a lot of

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>their investments to hit the occasional home run or a

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>mega home run. Like if you have a portfolio that

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>has Facebook and then fifty losers, you're totally fine. So

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is there was there a sort of power law distribution

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>like that to the companies that were able to successfully

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>uh dig up or find sunken treasure. So obviously we're

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of restricted by what has survived since in terms

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of sources, there's a there's not a good data set exactly.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh so from what I've read, there was a

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century historian who wrote a like really intricate um

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>detailing of all the joint stock companies of that day,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote, I have a quote that none of

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the companies or expeditions because in addition to just the

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>diving technology companies, there were a lot of groups of

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>actual treasure hunters who would set up like the Jamie

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Catherwood Exploration Company and they were just dedicated to treasure hunting.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But this nineteenth century historians said that none of these

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>companies or expeditions were successful. Indeed, the only finds consisted

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of a few cannons at the bottom of the sea.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't sound like any of them really worked out. Um,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I wish it was more optimistic, but it

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds like Phips kind of got the job done and

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>then no one could replicate his success. Another fault question

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that I have related to this. So you talked about

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the mania, You talked about them, the surge and patents

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that were associated with the treasure hunting diving technology. One

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we see in modern bubbles and

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>even tech is you start with something like Okay, a

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>few vcs invest in tech companies, and then a few

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>years later, I'm getting ads on my iPhone on Instagram

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to say invest in tech startups for as little as

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars a month, and people find a way to

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>democratize what had been this sort of very exclusive and

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult way to invest. Talk to me about the mass

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>participation and the degree to which this extended beyond the

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>vcas and the dukes to normal people who just wanted

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to put some money down in search of massive returns. Yeah,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so it definitely was a wider spread investment than just

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>these vcs as we're calling them, because these companies are

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>formed as joint stock companies and so the average investor

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was able to put their money into these companies. Obviously

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that probably wasn't necessarily a benefit in hindsight once the

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of crash came, but yeah, it was definitely a widespread,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of speculative mania. And there were and there

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>was an account later of the Treasury, the British Treasury

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>starting a lottery system because that's how they did a

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of their financing in the day, because they wanted

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of pull the money away from these speculative

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>joint stocks into funds that benefit the government. And there

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was an analysis done that showed that something like eighties

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the money that in your average investor

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>had been putting into these joint stock tech companies then

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>went to these lotteries. And I thought that was interesting

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>because it was kind of just proving that investors didn't

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have a specific you know, dedication to these tech stocks.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>They were just going wherever offered the higher return. So

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>as soon as these lotteries offered a better chance at that,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they ditched the joint stock companies and kind of forgot

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about them. So, Jamie, the natural route for a lot

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of companies, and tech companies in particular, is that you're

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a startup and you get started out of someone's garage,

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you get venture capital funds, and then you

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually do a listing and a big I p O

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you have public investors. You wrote a really

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting post, I think it was back in October about

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of the companies um that happened I

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>p O ing in the US over the past year

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have basically never produced a profit, and a lot of

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>those companies would be tech companies that investors are just

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of betting on on the off chance that they

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>will get a big payoff eventually. What's the historic parallel

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to those sorts of I p o s that you

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>were looking at. Yeah, So in the early nineteen hundreds,

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a rubber boom, if you can believe it,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and essentially these rubber plantations in Malaysia were they're like

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the largest plantation I believe is in Malaysia. There's one

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil, so I might botch which one it was,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but closed down, which meant that the supply of rubber

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was going down and prices were shooting up. And so

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>as investors saw that, they did what they always do

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of flocked to rubber as their new hot,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>hot fad, and a lot of companies in England, interestingly

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>not Malaysia, were setting up rubber plantations, or at least

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>claiming that they were in Malaysia to take advantage of

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this rubber boom, and investors just poured money into it,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and companies were listing their shares on the market without

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>even actually having a plantation. Yet. There was one company

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that put in their prospectives that they would basically offer

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the secrets of the company in exchange for a direct

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>buyout of the whole company. So I don't know, I

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that was reassuring if you were just investing

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that the founders were looking to get out so quickly. Um,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's some guy who went to Malaysia and

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>basically they're just like these stubs of rubber tree, whatever

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the tree is that they're planting on these plantations and

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing even growing. And the perspectuses back at

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.239
<v Speaker 1>home in England were saying that they had, you know,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>these really high yielding plantations and everything was going great,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but in reality there was nothing even set up in Malaysia.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it was a case of kind of just

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>listing a prospectus to raise money or just you know,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>ly in your pockets before doing any actual work. And

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>no one was doing real due diligence. So look for

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a while, I'm curious about that because you're talking about

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the perspectuses of this rubber company. You mentioned the perspectuses

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of this uh, the companies that the Sunken Treasure I

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the intro. You tweeted about the prospectus and

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the initial subscribe subscribe over subscription of the Guinness I

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>p O. Was there any when we think about perspectus

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is today and companies file s one FI length and

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they're all very regulated and there's very sort of strict

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>patterns about you talk about this and then you lay

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>out the balance sheet and then you lay out the

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>income statements. Was there any sort of common approach to

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>laying out a prospectus or was it in those days,

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>basically you just write whatever you want. I'm not an

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>expert on this, but from what I've seen, that kind

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, I can't imagine a government that was

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>regulating perspectuses would let someone say I'll give you the

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>secrets to the company if you buy me out, um,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't say that. Looking at various perspectuses, there

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be a kind of common format or approach.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So it certainly didn't seem to me that there is

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>any regulation of it. But I could read something that

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>proves proves me wrong. So what are some of your

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>other favorite finance stories, especially anything related to sort of

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>tech or mania, which seems to be what we're what

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we're discussing here. I gotta say reference the Guinness example.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That's probably one of my favorite examples a kind of

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a mania in history, because it was just insane that

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>sources describing what went down on the actual day of

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the quote I p O. I mean, the economist said

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>something like it's a day that witnesses will never forget.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>And then another newspaper the time called the Spectator said

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that the scene that took place on Saturday outside of

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Barings Bank is enough to show that a speculative mania

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>exists or something along those lines. And as you mentioned,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted all these takes at the time by analysts

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>or you know, writers at The Economist and this other

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>newspaper kind of taking their different views of the valuation

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the company because a lot of investors were getting

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hyped up around Guinnesses ramped up production and there I

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>guess new technology to bring it back to tech that

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>was allowing them to produce more at a lower cost.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>But then some analysts were saying that was really just

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>because the materials had gotten cheaper, and so that was interesting.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of mania, when the Guinness I p

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>O actually took place, the Bearings Bank basically came out

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and said that it would be open for thirty six hours,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and investors who wanted to get in on the action

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>had to come with their subscription form and deliver it

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to the bank, all signed and everything, and the bank

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>only ended up being open for three hours because there

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was such a mad rush and they had to call

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in a special police brigade to police the area because

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>investors were going crazy. They had to barricade the doors

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so they couldn't let anyone in but people still wanted

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to get their shares in. But obviously this was way

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>before anything electronics, so they still had to deliver their

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>subscription form. So seen as there was police lining the

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>perimeter and the doors were barricaded, investors started tying their

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>subscription forms two rocks and literally throwing themselves at the

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity by launching these rocks with their subscription forms like

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>through the windows of Barings Bank in order to get

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>their shares in. Uh So that is I don't know.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's one of the craziest stories, because you

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>just imagine some i PO today and investors sitting in

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan somewhere just launching rocks through banks windows and buy shares.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>That kind of reminds me, Tracy. Remember when we did

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the episode about the housing bubble in Florida like a

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago, and we talked about the binder boys,

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just like we're out on the street in Florida who

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.239
<v Speaker 1>just had these binders full of properties for sale and

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>these manias in essentially in the days before electronic trading,

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when things had to be done physically, when you had

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these manias that people actually had together in one place.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>In the case of Miami was just sort of gathering

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>out on the street. They're actually like all kinds of traffic,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>traffic jams and other stuff like that, because essentially everyone

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was out in the street trying to buy property. And

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so it very much reminds me of that that sometimes

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.719
<v Speaker 1>these things get so intense that they start to like

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>break down the physical infrastructure of the place where transactions

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are done. Yeah. Um, it makes you think a lot

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about like whether current manias are more difficult to spot

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because they don't happen in some physical capacity, Like you

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a bunch of people standing outside the New

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange hurling rocks in order to get their

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>share subscriptions. But I but I did think of that

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that the the analogy would be remember in late seventeen

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>when all the cryptocurrency exchanges couldn't handle the traffic load

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and start going down right, and they would have these

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>crashes and people complained that their trades weren't going through.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So even though it's digital, I do think that there's

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some interesting analogies where you just get such a rush.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>In that case, it was digital infrastructure that they were

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just buckling onto the load. Yeah, so maybe when demand

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>starts to overload the market infrastructure. That's a bad sign. Um.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're speaking over Jamie, so I feel bad, Jamie. Um.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing that you pointed out in your your

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>post about Guinness, which was that, you know, when this

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>all was happening in the late eighteen hundreds, there were

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of commentators who were watching this from afar

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and going, oh, yeah, this is crazy and it's definitely

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a speculative mania, and yet it's still happened. Why was that.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That was the craziest part to me is that we're

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm writing today, you know, all high and mighty, like,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>look at these it's you know, launching rocks through windows.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>But people were saying the same thing at the time,

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>which it was kind of depressing but also fascinating. Depressing

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that we're still having those same sorts

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of manias in different ways today, but also just that

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we kind of always assume that in the past when

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>these manias happened, everyone was caught up in the mania.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But there were people who sound just like I would

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>write today, saying that this is absolutely ridiculous. You know,

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no guarantee that this company is gonna be a

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>success and its valuation is ridiculous. UM. And so that

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just really that's particular Spectator article UM really stood out

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to me because the guy had some really good quotes

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about how the public will public will never listen to

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>someone talking about fraud when returns are good, just as

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a soldier will never listen to a thirsty soldier will

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>never listen to someone talk about poisoned water. Something along

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>those lines. Basically, you know, it falls on deaf ears

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>because if there's returns, you're gonna go for it, and

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're some parched soldier in the middle of the desert,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to drink the water no matter what someone

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>tells you. Definitely, the idea of nobody wanting to hear

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about fraud in good time, it definitely falls with that

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>category of the more things change, the more things stay

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the same, Jamie, before we go, I do think there

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are probably a lot of listeners that are interested in

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>economic history, and probably people are sorry financial history, and

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people have read a lot of books. But do you

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>have any favorite resource material for what you learn that

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe people haven't heard about that they should check out. UM.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way would be to plug my own own

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>account and follow me. But outside of that, um archive

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dot org is just an unreal resource that I've kind

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of recently stumbled a upon. You can search like stock

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>market and then do sort by date published, and they

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>have like source material archived from literally like six hundred

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundreds, and it's just full PDFs that you can

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>look at and go through. So if that sounds interesting

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to you, then that would be my recommendation. But there's

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot of people who won't do that. Yeah,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's safe to say. Yeah, but I find that stuff fascinating.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>That's where I find a lot of these kind of

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting stories and quotes is just from reading the stuff

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>written at the time. All right, But but the best

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>way is for people to follow you on Twitter. Right, Yeah,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be my recommendation, but I'm biased, all right.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Catherwood, a k A finance history guy, thank you

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on. Finally. I'm glad we could

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. Yeah, thank you so much so, Joe.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I found that conversation really, really great, and I just

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 1>love the notion that you know, we're sat here in

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the year nineteen. I had to think about that for

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a second, it is, and we're talking about technology like

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>social media and you know, microchips and things like that.

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>But in the sixteen hundreds, there were a bunch of

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>people sitting around, you know, tables in London thinking about

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>technology as a diving bell that would let them go

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>underwater and search for sunken treasure. Yeah, the first thing

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do after I get out of the studio

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>here is go google images of the diving bell, because

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I still find it almost unfathomable that in the sixteen

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hundreds they created ways for people to get to the

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the sea and be able to breathe. So

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that's I wonder how many people died. You have to

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder in those endeavors. But anyway, because that's the first

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm curious about, because I still almost find it

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>impossible to believe. But there are I mean, there's this

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing that seems to happen in all these

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>instances of big technology breakthroughs, which is you get maybe

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know one person who innovates and I think Jamie

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 1>has made this point on his on his Medium page,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>but you get one innovator, then you get a bunch

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of imitators. And then inevitably you get a bunch of

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>fraudsters who just sort of mess up the whole space

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and make it a lot more dangerous for all investors,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's sort of an oversupply, and it becomes very,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for investors to pick out who is actually

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>doing something substantive in the space. It really does seem

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the classic pattern of history in so many ways.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again not to just keep going back to

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the crypto bubble, but you couldn't have a more perfect

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of description of what happened there. Some people earlier

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>early on tinker as computer scientists, uh, sort of radical anarchists,

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and then by the end essentially like pure scammers and fraudsters.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And just as the mania grew and the demand for

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>supply grows up or accelerate, people will just put up

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>any sort of paper or coins because they know there

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a thirst for it. Yeah, start Bucks. What

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was that? Um, sorry, we did an episode on that. Yeah,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we did know, we were we were among the early crowd.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Was just you know, we were not in it for

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the money, We were not scammers, and you were in

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it for the technology. Okay. On a serious note, though,

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, the good news is the good

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>news is uh Stalwart Bucks never they they never acquired

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>any monetary value relation. So the good news is no

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>one right lost anything. Okay, that's all I wanted to say. Okay,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to pay you a compliment and say that

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought your observation about um market manias and how

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, again going back to crypto, but when we

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of the blockchains and the exchanges being

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of overwhelmed by demand, that might have been a

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>good indication of basically a speculative mania taking place. And

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think you're onto something because I think

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if the existing infrastructure can't handle demand for a particular security,

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>then it's usually a good sign that something is out

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of balance in the market. Yeah, I mean you see

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this pattern pattern repeat in thousand. A lot of the

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>online brokerages the people are using to trade tech stocks

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or head regular outages. You can go back and look

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>at those, going back to the Florida bubble. Just even

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the trains to get into Florida started getting too crowded

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>because so many people are traveling down there. So whether

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's digital in person or people throwing rocks into a

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>window because they can't get into the bank. I do

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think that, um, it's one of those telltale signs that

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mania is afoot. All right, this has been another episode

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Odd Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wisn'hal.

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. And

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely follow our guest today on Twitter because

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we keep referencing how great his Twitter account is and

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>his Medium account, Jamie Catherwood. He's JFC Underscore three Underscore.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Check him out on Twitter, and you should definitely follow

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>our producer to fur Foreheads. He's at foreheads T, as

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>well as the Bloomberg head of podcast, Princesca Leavy at

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.