WEBVTT - What is Supersymmetry?

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, how do you convince the government to give

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you ten billion dollars? Oh, you just have to promise

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>an aircraft carrier or two. I think that's right. That's

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about the cost of one. But it's also kind of

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the cost of a big physics experiment, right, that's true.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Although I didn't personally get the check for ten billion

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the large H. John collider. But you're write

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of world governments all chipped in and spent

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on a physics experiment, right, And

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and I imagined that in each of those countries there

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>had to be some physicists who went up to the

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>government officials and said, hey, gave was this money to

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>discover this thing or that thing? Right? Um? Yeah, Well,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't send me to pitch these things to the government,

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>probably very good reason. I'm unusual in particle physics. I

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>think most particle physicists like to make more concrete predictions

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about what we might find. My view is that we

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>should just sell the exploration. But I think the one

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you're referring to is a kind of a famous area

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics about the storage for the search for supersymmetry.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Exactly a lot of people thought we were going to

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>find supersymmetry at the large a John Collider. So far nothing.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw that movie from the eighties, wasn't

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it called Despritley Seeking Susie. That's right, supersymmetry is short

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes as Susie Susie here, give me a billion dollars,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll find her. Okay, Um, you start looking and I'll

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>send you a chet. Sounds good. I'll be right back. Hi.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Organ and I'm Daniel, and welcome to our podcast,

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of I

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, in which we take things in the universe

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and explain them to you. Things that are super, things

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that are not so super, things that are symmetrical, and

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>things that are asymmetrical, things that are antithetical to everything

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you believe in, but actually true. That's right. Today on

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, we're going to talk about a pretty kind

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of it's kind of a corner of particle physics, right

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's probably not super well known, but it

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is it can have incredible implications for our entire theory

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. Right. Yeah, it's sort of like particle

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>physicists big hope. Right, it's like a beautiful idea that

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody really really wishes were true. It's solve a bunch

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of problems. It would work really well, it would be gorgeous.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants us to find it. Yeah, that's right. Today

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on the program, we're going to talk about super symmetry.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Not just everyday symmetry, not just good symmetry,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>not just extra symmetry, but super not just mild mannered Tonian,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>superpowered flying symmetry. That's right, supersymmetry. It's supposed to be

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the next big thing in physics. You know. It's motivated

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by looking at the equations and thinking this doesn't quite

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fit together. How can we make this prettier? How can

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we find something that's simpler, that hangs together in a

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>way that that satisfies us aesthetically. You know, that's sort

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of surprising how much beauty we search for sometimes in physics. Yeah,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's it's kind of interesting that physicists think about beauty

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in their equations, right, Like, isn't that a subjective quality?

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Completely subjective? Absolutely, But you know it's a very important

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>guiding principle, Like it goes all the way back to

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Acam's razor. We prefer simple explanations over complex ones. Right,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>If your theory has one moving part, it's simpler than

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>something that has two moving parts or ten moving parts. Right.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Even also just in your life, right, you prefer simpler

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>explanations to answer the questions you have. Right, So is

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it more about elegant Do you think like that's an

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>elegant solution or an elegant answer in that it's it's

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>simple and directly to the point. Yeah, And I think

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes to the questions we have as humans. You know,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how was the universe put together?

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'd love if that answer was short, you know,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>if it was simple. If the answer to the question

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like how is the universe organized is like a huge

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>list of what every single particle in the universe is

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do, then that's not really simplification. Right. In

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>some sense, the search for simplicity is inherent. It's core

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to physics, right. That's what physics is is take everything

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we observe and describe in terms of a few equations. Right. Well,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're you're basically looking for laws, right, I

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the idea you know, the idea of a

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>law is is something that's applicable to many situations and

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not just specific situations, right, exactly. You want you want

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rules that generalize, Right. You want to measure something here

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and know you can apply it later. You want to say, oh,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I studied this baseball's ocean, now I know how the

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>next baseball is going to move. Right. You don't want

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to a rule that applies a different rule applies to

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>every baseball. Yeah, Like you can't have a government that

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>runs with a huge book that says, all right, if

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Whorehead does a podcast and he does

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this and that's not allowed, or if he does this,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not allowed. But then if it's a guy named Daniel,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>then he can't do this or that of that. You

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of want rule that applies to a general rule

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that applies to everyone. YEA, Well, you know, I wouldn't

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mind having special rule just for me. Daniel doesn't have

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to pay taxes, Daniel can drive as fast as he likes.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be nice. But you're right, it's not a

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sustainable way to do it. And and it's not just

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>not sustainable, you know, I think the whole job of

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>physics is to come up with generalizable laws. And so

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we've done this a lot of times in physics. We've said, hey,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>look at this um electricity is kind of similar to magnetism.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we simplify things and describe it in terms of

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>just one idea electro magnetism. Oh look, you know this

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>piece fits together with that piece. It turns out, you know,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all part of the same thing, right, or

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like a discovering F equals m A. And you find

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that this lab applies to a whole bunch of things,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and it helps you in many many situations, right, yeah, exactly,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we do this a lot. We just

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>were stumbling over stuff in physics and we don't necessarily

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know what connects to what. So, like, you know, it's

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>like finding the front of the elephant, and then a

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred years later you discover, oh, elephants have butts too,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And then finally somebody says, wait, put them together. You

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>get a whole animal. Right, it makes much more sense.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Elephant heads and elephant butts are not separate ideas. Um,

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the guy, the person who wins

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that Nobel prize the discovery of the elephant but yeah, exactly.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>You can put that on your tombstone. Um. But that's

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea, is like connecting different observations that happened to

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, happen at different times or different places, and

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>realizing they're part of the whole. And so that's the

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>driving ideas. Let's look at what we know and look

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for patterns, look for symmetry, symmetries that we can be

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>used to simplify things. So that's what this supersymmetry is

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>all about. It it's about simplifying the equations of the universe. Right.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>It's like finding like a finding a kind of another

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>set of patterns that make it easier to understand or

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>easier to um put together right exactly. And it's a

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretical exercise, right you say, hey, I notice these patterns

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, and then you can test that. You

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>can say is this pattern real? Is it true? If

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it is, then I expect to find this new particle

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for example. The patterns usually predict something new, and amazingly

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that works, like that's exactly what happened with the

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Higgs Boson. Higgs and other folks were like, hey, look,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe doesn't quite make sense. This is weird wrinkle

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that wrinkled goes away if you add one more particle,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and then we actually found the Higgs boson. So like

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this strategy has worked. It's not just like something we

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, enjoy doing that has worked, right, Well, it's

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a pretty cool word, supersymmetry. And and

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>just to be sure, it is one word. Like you

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't write superspace symmetry. You write it like Superman.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like supersymmetry. Yeah, we have long meetings about punctuation

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and particle physics, you know, whether to hyphenate where a

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>common goes. And because people come from all over the world,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they have different ideas about how to do this kind

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. But yeah, we all agree supersymmetry is one word.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's very commonly abbreviated as susie s U s

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>WA because supersymmetries were just way too long to say. Right. Well,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of people know susie or two um,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but we were wondering how many people out there had

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>heard of this word supersymmetry. I know, it's basically one

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of the most important motivators for governments to spend billions

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of dollars on an experiment. So you think maybe there

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was a pr campaign, Maybe people know what this is,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe they have an opinion about it. And so, as usual,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel went out there and ask people in the street

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if they knew what the word supersymmetry means. Here's what

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>people had to say. Yeah, I've heard about it, but

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is. I've heard about it

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in some lectures I was listening to from from from

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Fineman I think, and Paul to Rock No no idea.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Who would you guess just from the name, I would

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>have to do something symmetrical, thanks very much from Big

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Bang Theory Ya from the TV show. Just heard it,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really know what it means to be.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>To guess, what do you think big supersymmetry might be?

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably has to do with symmetry and how you make

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>things easier in science, probably because usually like everything that

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>symmetrical makes it easier because you can divide and a

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>half when it's too geometry, or it's just like easier

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>to apply some rules and equations on it. So I

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>guess it would just be like a simplification of something

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>really complicated. Okay, awesome, I don't know what that means.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But my guess is like something about math, like thanks

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>very much, assumes something is symmetrical, or like something is

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like balanced, or even maybe no, no, never, no, I

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to guess what it might be. What do

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you think it might be symmetrical? So, as usual, the

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang Theory has educated Americans and what a word

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is without explaining what it actually means. I bet you

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>plus love and hate that show like you probably you

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>probably don't love the writing or the way that physicists

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are portrayed. But at the same time, you know, it's

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of educated so many people in the words and

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of maybe a little bit of the concepts

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics. Right right as they're laughing and making

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fun of physicists, they accidentally learned a few pieces of vocabulary.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>There is a positive side of that. You're right, you

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't You wouldn't let people laugh at you too if

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they ended up learning something. Isn't that the premise of

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this entire podcast? Listen laugh learn something? Anyway? Well, there

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>you go. You're right up there with Sheldon and and

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even even know the other characters. But no, no,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I would totally humiliate myself if everybody in the world

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>could learn a little bit more physics. Whatever you want,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to do a dunk tank, you want me

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to wear a silly costume, sign me up on man.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>That should totally be our live traveling show for this podcast.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You have a dunk tank with like if you answer

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a physics question correctly, you get the dunk Daniel with.

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>You have like a short Anger's dunk tank. You know, oh,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like is he dunked or is he not done? Behind

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a cave with like a box and people throw things

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it's all connected to some quantum particle and

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you may or may not get wet mm hmm. So

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess that will be my sacrifice for the art. Right,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That's how I'm going to make sure that I'm suffering

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for our art. Right. That's good because my creative partner

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is a joy to worker. Good. He sounds like a

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>nice guy. He's an amazing, amazing um anyway. But yeah,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so not a lot of people have heard of the concept.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everyone knows what super beans, and I imagine

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of most people out there know what symmetry means.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But when you put it together, suddenly it's a it's

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a new word, right. Yeah. You could hear people trying

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out on the fly, speculating what it

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>might mean based on zero knowledge and just the atomology.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, so nobody had an idea supersymmetry needs to

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be better sold, right right, Well, let's get into it

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, um, And for me, you know, I think

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we just let's talk about what symmetry means in the

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>first place. I mean, I know that in the common usage,

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>symmetry just means that it's kind of like a like

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a mirror image, like something symmetrically something else. If it's

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if it looks the same as if you were looking

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at it in a mirror. Right. Yeah. It's all about patterns, right,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is can you do two things look similar? Right? And Um?

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>For particles, we find a lot of these patterns among

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the particles. And what we do is we instead of

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the individual particles the way you were talking

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about individual laws for each person, we try to think

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about the particles together in groups. So for example, you

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have the electron, and then you have the electrons, antiparticle,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the positron. Right, we don't really think about the electron

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and the positron is separate particles. We think about the

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we think of them as two sides of a coin, right,

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the positive and negative version of this part particle, and

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we think of it as one concept. It's kind of

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like a it's the same except you flip a sign

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or you know. It's kind of like if you you

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>put them electron in front of the mirror, one of

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>them would be spinning one way, either one would be

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>spinning kind of the other way. Right. Yeah, it's like

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you don't think about the heads separately from the tails

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of a coin, right, There just different sides of the

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>same coin, literally, And we think about particles the same way.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And because every particle seems to have an antiparticle, you know,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with some funny exceptions like the photon, that it's a

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>very useful strategy. We notice this relationship between positrons and electrons,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>between muans and anti muons, and so that's a really

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>important symmetry and it it helps us ask questions. Right,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>We're like, well, why is there this symmetry? What does

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it mean? We think it reveals something deep about the universe.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>We still don't know the answer to that one, right,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Like why do particles have antiparticles. We have no idea,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's an important clue about something fundamental

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. So we're always looking for these patterns,

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not just because it helps us simplify and right thing

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>down more quickly, but because we were hopeful that their

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>clues about what's going on on the deeper level. Right. So, okay,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so that's what symmetry means. It's it's kind of like

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>um an electron having a mirror image of itself called

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the anti electron. That's right. But symmetry works in lots

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of different ways, like there are other symmetries in particle physics.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If you remember the episode where we introduced sort of

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the standard model, the electron has the anti electron, but

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>also has symmetries in other ways, Like there's the mun

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and the taw. These particles are exactly the same as

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the electron, but they're heavier, right, So the electron has

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two kinds of symmetries. That's a symmetry as well, But

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're not they're not like they don't weigh the same,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they just sort of act the same, that's right. There

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is a difference, right, So they're not the identical particle.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's a pattern there because the electron is not

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the only one with too heavier cousins, right, The neutrino

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is too heavier cousins. The up coork has too heavier cousins,

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the down cork is too heavier cousins. There's something going

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on where every particle has two heavier versions of itself.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>We call the flavors. Sometimes, because we're not great in

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>particle physics about coming with new names, adopt an existing word,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>which is very confusing. Wait, so that's that's a symmetry

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, these kind of heavier versions of an electron.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are absolutely really what how is that symmetric? Because

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know it imagine symmetry means like the same or

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mirror image. Yeah, it's just you have to change your

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>definition of what the mirror means. Right. So in the

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>case of positive and negative electrons, your mirror is changing

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the charge, right, it's changing from positive to negative. But

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that mirror can have lots of different kinds of reflections.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Right in this case, an electron and a muon and

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a town. We think of its just different varieties of

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of particle. So sort of like a

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three way mirror. These particles are definitely related. Right, an

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>electron is much more close relationship with the muon than

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it does with like corks. But why why do you

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>call it a symmetry? Is it in the equation? Something

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about the equations that somehow you know what I mean?

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You can write all those particles, all those particles have

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the same kinds of interactions, right, they interact with the

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>same forces. Uh, they interact with the forces in very

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>similar ways. And so when you write down the equations,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of writing down here, how here's how an electron works,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's how a mun works, Here's how a tow works.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Here the laws for those particles, we just write down

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one set of laws because they follow the same laws.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit of a difference. Each one has

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a different mass, right, but the laws, the basic structure

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of how it works is the same. Is it kind

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of like different solutions to the same equation? Or Well,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know is why we have them, right,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of suggesting like the reason we have three, right, Well,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the answer to that. We don't know

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>why there is more than one at all, Like why

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>does this symmetry exist? And then we don't know why

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there are three in a four or seven or two. Right,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>those are deep questions. When you discover symmetry, it's helpful because,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>as we said, it gives you a clue about some

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>deep questions, but doesn't always give you the answer, right,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of raises the question. So in this case, when

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>when you say symmetry, you kind of mean like an

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>imperfect copy. Yeah, exactly, and the perfection there can vary, right,

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Like the positron of the electron are really exactly the

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>same except for the charge um. In the case of

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the electron, the mu and the too, they're very similar.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There are some differences, the most important one is the mass.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So you can have more or less perfect symmetries. None

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of these symmetries are exact, so just sort of like

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>guiding patterns that we used to organize how how we

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>write down the equations. Okay, so if you had to,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if you had to christen this thing another name, would

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you still call it some symmetry or would you maybe

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>use another word? Oh? I think symmetry is a nice word.

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, symmetry shows like aesthetic purity, right, I mean,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at art, you like symmetry. But when

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at a face. Scientists have like discovered right

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that symmetric faces are considered the most beautiful. So I

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a connection between symmetry and beauty and simplicity.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So I like the word symmetry. Yeah, No, I think

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty nice. It's hard to spell for her

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>young students. I've I've seen a creatively spelled in lots

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of different way is. But it's a nice word. Well,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I'm still stuck a little bit in symmetry.

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So why is symmetry Plano mild manner symmetry? Why is

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that um important in the equations of physics because you

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>see it or it's it's something that helps you solve

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the equations. Well, it's for the same reason that you

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>um you said earlier about like writing laws. You wouldn't

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>want to write down a different law for everybody. You'd notice, Hey,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm rinning now all the same laws, except I'm just

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>substituting Jorge some places and Daniel in other places. Maybe

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I should just write one law for everybody, right, And

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's what we're doing with symmetries, is we're trying

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to find these patterns to simplify things. We could say, hey, look,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the same laws apply to the electron and the muan

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and the tow. We just need to tweak this a

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and the same rules apply. So that's what

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going for. Maybe, Okay, So maybe when you when

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you say symmetry, you actually means like same rules apply. Yeah,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Or you could think of it like a pattern, right,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, So it's kind of like you might say,

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like a living in the US is very symmetric to

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>living in Suitland in that blah blah blah blah blah

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>blah blah, and it's kind of like it's it's the

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>magrick thing that it's sort of like the same rules apply,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or there's some sort of pattern between living here in

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the vein in Switzerland. Yeah. I don't know if there's

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>much in common between living in Switzerland living in the US.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I've lived in both places. They're pretty different experiences. Um,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess they both eat yogurt. Super symmetric. It's not

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a super symmetric analogy, Daniel, Exactly right. That was not

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a super analogy about symmetry. It's an underwhelming symmetry, yeah, exactly.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you could look for example, what are

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the laws of different countries, And you might say, hey, look,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>there is these underlying things everybody wants to the value

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of property and everyone who wants life, and everyone wants liberty,

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and you could say those are inherent about being human.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Is something about forming a human society that makes people

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>want these things, and so we should encode those as

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the bedrock principles of humanity. Right, so we call those

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>human rights. You so and and and you've learned something

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about humanity that way by identifying in these core principles. Right.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like a perspective. It's like when

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you say you want the laws of physics to be symmetric,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you're saying you want them to be kind of a universal,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and you want them to be applicable to many different things,

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and you want them to not very on a Willie

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Neely basis, wanted to be kind of rock solid. Yeah, exactly.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Symmetries allow us to write these things more compactly, write

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to write down fewer laws because we identify patterns and

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>so the same laws can apply to different kinds of phenomena. Right, Okay,

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of regular mild manner. Clark Kent glasses wearing.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Symmetry is some sort of like a perspective on the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics that say that it's, um, it's sort

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of applicable everywhere. So then um, but now they're supersymmetry.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready to put spandex on the look like

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the clothes off and see what he's wearing underneath? When

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>making a family friendly podcast, Well, he's taking his clothes up,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's got an outfit on underneath. Folks. Okay, well

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's get into supersymmetry, but first let's take a quick break. Okay,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's a that's a pretty good breakdown of symmetry,

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which is, um, it's kind of like the perspective that

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>things should, um, they have a pattern in nature and

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>things should have fundamental laws that don't change. Is because

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you move from one place to the other or from

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one particle to the other. Right, Yeah, it's yeah exactly.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like if you notice, hey, there's sort of two

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of things. What can we find that relates them?

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>How can we think of them the same way? Right?

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Do we have to have two different totally separate categories

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>or can we say there's a relationship between them and

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>understand them and sort of in the context of a

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>larger idea. Right, it's like, why do we have Democrats

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans? Oh, they're both just political parties, right, that's

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the symmetry between that. Okay, so then now

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the topic of the podcast. Um supersymmetry.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's like the regular symmetry, but more so or

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is like, what are an all

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>symmetries super? Like? What's special about supersymmetries? Supersymmetry is called

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>super because the folks that named it were like grandiose

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in their ideas. Um, it's called super because it sort

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 1>of encompasses the whole set of particles. Here's the idea.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that we noticed that there are kind

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of two kinds of particles out there that we've discovered.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>There's the particles that make up stuff, right, the matter particles,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>electrons and corks and all that kind of stuff. Those

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>particles have a technical name called fermions. Then there's a

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>different kind of particle. These are These are particles that

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>describe the forces. So the ones that like are responsible

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for electromagnetism, the photon or the weak nuclear force the

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>W and Z boson or the strong force the glue on.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>These particles are different. We call them bosons, and the

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>difference between them is technical and we don't need to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>get deeply into it. We have these two different kinds

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of particles, the fermions which are matter particles, and the bosons,

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which are the force particles, and I always get them confused.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So maybe for this podcast, let's just call the matter

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 1>particles and force particles. About that? Sure that sounds good,

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a matter particles and force particles, And that's odd to

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are like, that's weird that we have two

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>different kinds, And they thought, what if what if there's

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a symmetry, right, what if there's a connection,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Like what if every force particle had some sort of

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>matter particle that was like its reflection, right, imagine like

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the mirror now, force versus matter. What if

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>every matter particle had a corresponding force particle and every

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>forest particle had a corresponding matter particle. Wouldn't that be

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty right? Wouldn't that be a nice connection between these two?

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise just disparate groups of particles, These just two lists

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that we have. Yeah, well that's weird, isn't it, because

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>force and matter are so different. But you're saying that

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics. In quantum physics, you just treat them

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all a particles. We do treat them as particles. Yeah,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and forced particles and matter particles we treat them a

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit different in quantum field theory. Um. But we'd

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like to see the connection between them, right. We have

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like this one group of matter particles and this other

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>group of force particles, and we're wondering, like, why do

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we have two different kinds, and why is there this

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one list longer than that other list? Is there a

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>way we can sort of fit them all together into

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one grand symmetry that I dare say a super symmetry? Right? Oh,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I see, So, like the matter particles are maybe symmetric

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>among themselves, and the forced particles are maybe symmetric among themselves.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And so you've always had these two groups, and so

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering, are they maybe just reflections of each other

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>across board? Yeah? Exactly the problem is that there isn't

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>really an easy way to make them correspond to each other.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Like there's no forced particle that corresponds to the electron

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and there's no like matter particle that corresponds to the

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>photon for example. So if this is gonna work, you

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have to invent a reflection particle for each one. Right,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so the every matter particle have to invent a new

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>force particle that we haven't yet found, and for every

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>force particle you have to invent a new matter particle

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't yet seen. Wait, so like, um, if

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I have a matter particle like the electron or like

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a cork, you're saying that if there if there are supersymmetry,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>then that means that there's a forced particle that is

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just like the cork or the electron, but it's a

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>forced particle and something about a change that makes it

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a forced particle and not a matter particle. Exactly, if

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you have that symmetry, there should be a reflection for

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>every particle, just like well, we know there are particles

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and antiparticles. So if there's some particle out there, you say, well,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>it should have an antiparticle, right in the same way

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>we say, well the electron, there should be some forced

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>particle that corresponds to it, and there should be some

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>matter correspond particle that corresponds to the photon. Why couldn't

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you have what couldn't the photon be the supersymmetric version

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the electron? Do you know what I mean? Like,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>why can't we just match them up? Well, we want

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>them to have the same mass, right, because that would

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be the nicest symmetry. And so the photon of the

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>electron have nothing like the same mass, and then what

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would match up with the muan right, and what we

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>match up with the tow So we want sort of

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>all the symmetries in the matter particles to be reflected

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in the symmetries and the force particles, um. And then

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of other technical reasons why that just

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>can't work. Well, the important thing is that they have

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really silly names, right, That's the away from this exactly.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So what they did was they saying, well, we can't

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just invent a bunch of crazy new names for all

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>these particles, right, we need a name for the particle

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the force version of the electron, and the particle

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the force version of the cork, and the particle

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>that's the matter version of the photon. So they came

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up with a rule for how to name the reflection particles.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And the rule is if you take a matter particle

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and you want to name its force reflection, right, the

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>particle the force particle. That's it's sort of supersymmetric partner's hypothetical. Hypothetically,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't discovered them. Like if there's a Swiss version

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of korhe, it would be named this. That's right. And

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what you do is you put an S in front

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of the name, right, so you have a particle. The

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>super symmetric version is a sparticle. And so for example,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the electron, it's super symmetric version. The fourth version of

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it is the selectron. Why is it one s and

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not two s? Is? You know, like supersymmetry should be

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like this selectron. And that's why because we don't want

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to be sounding like all the time in our meetings.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It gets pretty silly, like we have the top cork

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's super symmetric version is the stop cork, right,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>or the bottom cork and it's verse. It's super symmetric

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>version is the spottom cork. Right. Wow, that sounds like

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>like an invitation for funny meetings exactly. Um, everybody who

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>learns these rules has a good giggle over it. For

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks and then it just becomes a part

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of your day. Um and and and then in the

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>other direction, if you have a force particle like the photon,

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and you need a name for the matter version of it,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you add eno to the end. So, for example, a

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>photon is a force particle, it's a matter version would

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>be a photino. So if there's a Daniel in Switzerland

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and you're wondering, what would the Daniel be named in

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the US, it would be Daniel Leno. Daniel Leno, Yeah, exactly,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Leno and sorehe that's the super symmetric version of

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this podcast Daniel universe. But can you can you just

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do that? Can you just post the existence of a

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>force particle you've never seen? Wouldn't that? Isn't that weird?

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that like making up a whole new force in

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe? Exactly it is. But that's what you want

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to do, right when you make a when you observe

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a pattern, the next thing to do is to say, well,

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if this pattern holes, if it really is true, what

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can I predict that hasn't been seen before. That's how

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you test it, right, That's how they That's how the

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson was verified, they saw this pattern. The pattern

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is complete. Only of the Higgs boson exists, and they

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>looked for it found it. Boom pattern probably correct. In

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the case of supersymmetry. You say, well, what if every

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>particle has this supersymmetric reflection. If so, that all these

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>other particles should exist. And it's crazy because what you're

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>doing is doubling the number of particles. Right, you say, Okay,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we have twelve matter particles and five for particles. Now

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say we have twenty four particles and

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ten particles. Right, So it's um, it's a big prediction. Yeah,

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's It's kind of like saying, hey, I have a theory.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that for every person in the US, there's

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an there's a Swiss version in Switzerland of that person.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in in Switzerland has a as version in the

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>US and n't seen any of them yet. Yeah, they're

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.959
<v Speaker 1>all hidden somewhere underneath, underneath, and exactly. And when you

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>make a theory of physics, you have to explain all

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. You have to say, here's something you could

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do to prove my theory is correct. Here's a prediction

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I can make. You will go and find this particle,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and you also have to explain why we haven't seen

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it yet, right, because if they're all these other particles

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>out there in the universe that the universe can make,

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to explain why we didn't see them yet.

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And the standard answer was, until very recently, the standard

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>answer was why they were a little too heavy. That those,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, the supersymmetric version of our particles, were

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all too heavy to just like hang out in the universe.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They didn't last for very long because they were so heavy.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So you have to give me ten billion dollars to

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>build a particle collider so I can create the energy

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>density needed to make these particles that would then prove

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my crazy theory, right, which would then prove my crazy

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>theory if we had found it. Yeah, you're like, it's

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not my fault that you can't see them. They they're

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a little overweight. Yeah, exactly, they're a

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>little overweight. And that was the key that, right there

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is the crux of it. We had to say, all right,

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you give us ten billion dollars, will build a

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>collider that's such and such big that can search for

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>particles up to a certain energy, because remember, the bigger

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the collider, the more energy you're pouring into it, right,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because you can push the particles faster and faster, which

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>means the heavier new particles you can make. It's directly correlation,

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like the more money you spend, the bigger the collider,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the heavier particles you can make. Than The question was,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is this collider big enough to find supersymmetry? Is supersymmetry

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of in the next chunk of unexplored territory that

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can be searched by this collider. Okay, so that that's

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what supersymmetry is. It's the theory that all the particles

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have these crazy twins hidden out there in the universe,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and so if you give me ten billion dollars, I'm

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty I'm pretty sure I'm gonna find them. That's right.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was a fun idea, and it was invented

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies and eighties and played with and um

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>people thought, hey, this is kind of cool. It's cute mathematically,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of a big prediction, you know. But

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then people notice that not only was acute mathematically, but

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it actually solved a different problem we have in there

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in physics. And so if it was true, it would

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be like really nice. It would like tie up a

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different loose ends all at the same time. Oh,

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I see it's Um, it's a crazy theory, but it's

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the answer to more than one puzzle in physics. Yeah.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, one puzzle we have in physics is like,

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>why does the Higgs boson have the mass that it does.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.959
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why. Um, we can calculate what massive

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>should have, and the calculation is kind of complicated. But

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the short version of the story is that force particles

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>make them make it push the mass in one direction,

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and matter particles push in the other direction. And so

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and these and these are really big pushes right there,

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>push it by by huge amounts. And so the fact

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that the two sort of balance out to give us

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a Higgs Boson that's not like ridiculously heavy. It seems

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like a big coincidence. You know. It's like, Um, you

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have two different numbers that happen to almost cancel out,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and you think, oh, there's no relationship between them. It's

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. Well, if every force particle has a matter particle,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then it's very natural for them to cancel each other.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Out because there's a symmetry there, right, and everything that's

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>pushing one way, it gets automatically pushed the other way.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So it would sort of solve that problem, like in

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a really nice, nice way. Like when I first heard

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that idea of was like, Oh, that's clever, that's beautiful.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>That's like a really nice natural explanation, right, because a

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>coincidence in the universe. You guys don't like coincidences, Yeah,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>coincidences beg the question You're like, is that really a

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>coincidence or is there an explanation? Right? Um, It's like

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if you discover, hey, this supermarket seems to sell the

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>same number of hot dogs and hot dog buns every year,

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder why. Right, Well, it turns out people buy

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hot dogs and hot dog buns together for a reason, right,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They're connected. Um, And so you want to discover these

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>apparent coincidences because they tell you something about the universe

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or about hot dogs. It's kind of like if you

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you find a if you do find an identical

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Jorge in Switzerland, you'd be like, that's too much of

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. They must have there must be something going

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on that somehow split them apart. And put them in

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>each country. Exactly. If I ever went to Switzerland and

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>met soorhe, then thank you, Um, yeah, exactly, I would

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a clue. Right, there's something going on.

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the idea of supersymmetry, and if it's

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>solved a bunch of problems, it might even explain dark matter, right,

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a really it's a tantalizing idea because

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they could they could kill a lot of birds with

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>one stone, kill a lot of matter and forces and

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>one Yeah, you can win five Nobel Prizes with one discovery. Wow.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into whether or not this is

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 1>actually real and if we you have found evidence for it.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. All right, So

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that's supersymmetry. We um, we broke it down a little bit,

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and you said it might explain dark matter. What does

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Well, there's a particle. A one of the

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>super symmetric particles is something that doesn't turn into anything else.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It just sort of hangs out because it's the lightest

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one can't turn into anything else. And so if it exists,

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>it might be the dark matter particle. Right, So it

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>might be the dark matter is made of particles, and

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the particles is made out of might be super symmetric particles. Wow,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is it the super symmetric version of the photon? Like

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that would be cool? Yeah, exactly. The opposite of light

0:35:56.800 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is dark matter. Let's that's that's beautiful. We're writing right

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>there there you go. See you're searching for beauty in

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your answers. Right. You don't want just any answer, you

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>want poetry, right, and that's what this is for us.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Symmetry is the physicist version of poetry, except it doesn't rhyme. Oh,

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I know it doesn't rhyme because all the particles and

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>with the same kenoes you write a pretty silly song

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>using only supersymmetric particle names. Yeah exactly. Okay, So let's

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>get into whether it's real or not. So is this

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>theory real? Have they found evidence for it? We have

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly zero evidence that supersymmetry is really exactly we have

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>symmetric So in a way, you sort of confirmed the

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>beauty of the universe. No, the only thing supersymmetry has

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going for it is its elegance. Is its beauty is

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that it would solve these problems. But you know, nature

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is not interested in the ideas that we think are beautiful.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of gorgeous theories out there that turned

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>out to not be true. And so we you know,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people said we would find supersymmetry and

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we turned on the Large Change and collider um, but

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. They thought you would find like these crazy

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical particles to just start popping out of the collider. Yeah,

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty exciting when you turn on a new collider,

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a collider and an energy nobody has ever collided particles

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that before. You could discover something in minutes, right, It

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really is like landing on a new new planet that

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>nobody's ever been to before, nobody's ever created collisions of

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>this energy. So it could be the first time you

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>had enough energy to make these particles, and it could

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>be that they're just like you know, flew out of

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the collider like crazy. So the first few days the

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Large Hadron Collider, everybody was very excited, Right, We're like,

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what's in the data, what's in the data? Did you

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>discover supersymmetry? Is it there? Is it there? And there

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was a big community of theorists who really believed that

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we would find it and that we would find it

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very early on, but we didn't. So far. The only

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thing we found that the large Hadron collider that we

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about before was the Higgs boson. Huge triumph,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but um. A lot of people sold supersymmetry as a

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>potential discovery of the large hGe On collider and so

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>far not there. Maybe they were just hedging in case

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they didentified the Higgs. They're like, Wow, we might not

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>find the Higgs, but we might find Susie. Yeah, it

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>could have been that we didn't see the Higgs, right.

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We weren't guaranteed right, We didn't know um. And one

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>question is like how far away is Susie? How heavy

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are these particles? Are these particles real and part of

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the nature, but the large hGe On collider is just

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not quite big enough to find them? Right? Or is

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it that there there's like super far away and you'd

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have to build a collider the size of the Solar

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>System to make them. We don't really have a good

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question. We don't really good theoretical clues

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that tell us how big the collider has to be.

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>The theory doesn't tell you what's the maximum, Like you

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>can just keep going. The theory doesn't tell you, well,

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't found them by this mask, then they

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>probably don't exist. Right, the most beautiful version of supersymmetry

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>all the particles had the same mass as their super particles.

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that's not true because there if the

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>electron had a superparticle that had the same mass, we

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>would have found it already. I like how you say

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the most beautiful, Like you guys have beauty contest for theories, simplest,

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>most poetic theories, right, Um, you know, and uh, some

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of these some of these series look great in the

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>swimsuit competition. They stumble when they asked them of geopolitics,

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they do their best, and then the

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>judges flip a sign saying ten seven. You can have

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>versions of supersymmetry where the supersymmetric particles are like, way, way,

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>way too heavy for us to ever practically make them

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in any collider we would build, So we're not guaranteed. Yeah,

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>so there's different flavors of supersymmetry, and some of them

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>are more super than others. Yeah, there's a huge number

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of supersymmetric theories, and we've ruled out a bunch of them,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's a huge number left, so you can't really

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kill supersymmetries. It's always got another rock for it itself

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to hide under. Um. But as I was saying before,

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a controversy because people thought maybe the theory

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>community was too bullish on whether the LATEC was big

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to find supersymmetry. And now that we didn't, like,

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, should they rethink how they made those arguments

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>because we're in the beginning stages of arguing for the

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>next collider, right, and people are wondering, what this wouldn't

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be big enough to find supersymmetry. How do you know

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you were wrong last time? Should we believe you this time? Right? Well,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I told you, but I once

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gave the keynote address at a supersymmetry conference. Did you

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>give us super talk? It was you give two super talks?

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It was it was super ansymmetric. Did you give it

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>forward and then backwards? That's right? I walked down stage

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I walked off stage. But no, yeah, yeah,

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I talked a lot of physicists that they're physicists there,

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were, you know a lot of them were

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like really convinced that supersymmetry was is true, and and

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how do you what makes you so

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>confident or when? And it was really sort of came

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>down to a sense of faith or a sense of

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, like the like this believe that

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe has to be beautiful and it has to

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>be symmetric in this way. Yeah, a lot of people

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>who bought that story. Personally, me not interested. I think ridiculous.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I've never spent any of my professional scientific energy searching

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for supersymmetry, and I have no interest in it. Really.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Why what makes you so down on it? There's a

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 1>few reasons. Um. One is it's a bit too complex

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for me. I mean, you're predicting a lot of different particles, right,

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of a big it's a big thing

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to predict. Um. I prefer a sort of simpler, more

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>compact answer. Um. And But I think more fundamentally, I'm

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>not into particle physics to confirm theoretical ideas. I'm not.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>My job is not to say yes or no to

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the ideas some folks have in their office. My interesting

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is to explore my scientific fantasy, is not

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to discover something that Professor x y Z predicted, But

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to discover something weird unanticipated, it's something that makes Professor

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>x y Z go what that can't happen? Um, That's

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>why I'm an experimentalist, because I think I see it

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>as a as an exploration, right, right, But you need

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the theories to tell you if what you're seeing is

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>weird or not. Right, Like, if there weren't any theories,

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know it is weird. Well, you can discover

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a particle that nobody's ever seen before, right and say, oh,

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>what's this? How does it work? What does it do?

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>How heavy is it? How does it interact? Right? What

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? And you know, then the theorists can

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get started understanding how it fits into the other patterns.

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But you can definitely have experiment be the leader. Right.

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a period in particle physics earlier this century

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>where basically every time you turned on the collider you

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>found a new particle and nobody knew what they were

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was a it was a huge mess, and

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it was called the particles Zoo And that one must

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have been really fun, you know. Um, these days I

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just want to just like fuzzy little particles actually I'm

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>totally anti zoo. Um things, those are crazy. They're locking

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>up these beautiful animals and cages. Um. That's the topic

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of a different podcast. So my interest in particle physics

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is more about looking for something unanticipated than box checking

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the ideas of other people. Um. But it's a huge area,

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like some big fraction of particle physicists search for supersymmetry. Right,

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But you're saying that you're telling me earlier that some

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>people a lot of people that are have given up.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>They're like, all right, forget it, it's not real. M. Yeah. Well,

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people feel like if supersymmetry is going

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to be real and it's going to be natural and

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and explain all these things, it has to be

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>light that you can't have super duper heavy particles. They

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like the versions of supersymmetry with the particles are

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>too heavy for us to have found them. Yeah. Um,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think a good number of people have

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>given up on it or are thinking about other ideas well.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope that you guys find that the universe

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is beautiful and has perfect facial structure, the symmetric and

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wins A lot of beauty contests. Well, I'm sure that

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever we find about the universe, it will be beautiful,

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and it will be symmetric, and it will be incredible.

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>It just might not be the idea of beauty that

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we went out looking for. You know, when we go

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>out and look for things on other planets, we expect

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to find incredible, mind blowing things. We just don't predict

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 1>them in advance, right, and we embrace that. We look

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>forward to being surprised by nature. That's the whole idea

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of science. Yeah. I think what you're saying is giving.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>They should give you the billion dollars and not this theories.

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>My checking account is open, so people free to send

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>me checks for billions of dollars. Yes, that's how you agree?

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? What's our Veno account? Daniel Venoll and Daniel

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge dot com. Yeah exactly, or you know, I

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>accept gold blue Yon also. You know that's fine. Great.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you accept menos and zenos? Exactly? Only a lot

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, though it takes a big pile and mean

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a certain arrangement. All right, thank you very much. That's

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a supersymmetry. I hope you guys learned what it is

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's so super and it's something that we might discover.

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe by the time this podcast comes out, we

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>will have a hint of supersymmetry. Or maybe it will

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>take another hundred years. Nobody knews until then, See you

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>next time. If you still have a question after listening

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to all these explanations, please drop us a line. We'd

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. You can find us at Facebook, Twitter,

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge That's one Word, or

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>email us at Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com.

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio. From

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>More podcast from my Heart Radio visit the I Heart

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:49.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.