1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,440 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie hort Ern. Join us each 4 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:21,440 Speaker 2: day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and 5 00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:24,759 Speaker 2: geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We 6 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,479 Speaker 2: are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to 7 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:31,040 Speaker 2: nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify 8 00:00:31,240 --> 00:00:33,519 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the 9 00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Andrew Seeds of 10 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 2: Morgan Stanley in the Soft Landing camp Self landings don't 11 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 2: have to play out in a straight line. This is 12 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 2: a tricky window where risk around growth are skewed to 13 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:47,239 Speaker 2: the downside. A few false negatives in the data can 14 00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:50,760 Speaker 2: lead to belts of volatility. Andrew joins us now for more. Andrew, 15 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,240 Speaker 2: welcome to the program. Let's start with that phrase, soft landing. 16 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 2: What does it mean to you? 17 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: Good morning? It's great to be here. 18 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:01,560 Speaker 3: So for us it means inflation coming down, the FED easing, 19 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:04,319 Speaker 3: and no recession. And that's you know, very much what 20 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 3: Morgan Stanley has been forecasting what we continue to forecast, 21 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 3: and I think that's what I think, fortunately, we've. 22 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:12,360 Speaker 1: Been seeing from the data. 23 00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 3: I think we were in a critical window over September 24 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 3: and still in October where you know, the market's going 25 00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:21,320 Speaker 3: to be more vulnerable to weaker data because the FED 26 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 3: and the ECB haven't really gotten underway yet with rate cuts. 27 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 3: But I think so far that data has come in 28 00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:29,320 Speaker 3: pretty solid, and I think that supports the soft landing view. 29 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:31,119 Speaker 2: Andrew, do you refer to some of the data as 30 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:33,560 Speaker 2: a few false negatives potentially in our future? Can we 31 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 2: talk about the data we had through the summer and 32 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 2: at the other side, which one was the head fake, 33 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,880 Speaker 2: the deceleration in jombs through the summer, or the reacceleration 34 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:42,440 Speaker 2: we saw on Friday. 35 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:46,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, so I think it was potentially this kind of 36 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 3: rise in the unemployment rate. And this has been something 37 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:51,640 Speaker 3: that's in a lot of focus because you know, over 38 00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 3: a long period of time, it's consistently been one of 39 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:58,640 Speaker 3: the more worry cyclical indicators for markets. You know, once 40 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 3: the unemployment rate has rise, it's almost kind of too 41 00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 3: late at that point. 42 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:03,800 Speaker 1: That's one of the last. 43 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,880 Speaker 3: Indicators historically to crack, and at that point it's very 44 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:09,800 Speaker 3: bad for equities and credit, and I think that's what 45 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:13,240 Speaker 3: the market was concerned about. You had concerns about triggering 46 00:02:13,240 --> 00:02:15,760 Speaker 3: the SAM rule, You had concerns at the unemployment rate 47 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:18,640 Speaker 3: was already going up, and yet the FED as of 48 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 3: the July meeting had still kept rates on hold. 49 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 1: Now you know, there was another view there, and that 50 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: was the. 51 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 3: View closer to the view of Morgan Stanley's economist, which 52 00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:29,680 Speaker 3: is at the unemployment rate was giving somewhat potentially kind 53 00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:32,680 Speaker 3: of misleading signals because of the shape of the labor 54 00:02:32,680 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 3: market the fact that participation was actually quite strong, that 55 00:02:36,400 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 3: was kind of confounding the. 56 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:39,720 Speaker 1: Picture a bit. But we really didn't know. 57 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 3: And even you know, heading into the other week with 58 00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 3: the the latest non farm payroll number, you had a 59 00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:48,960 Speaker 3: really wide set of expectations going into that number, and 60 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 3: the usually wide set. So I think the number we 61 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:53,400 Speaker 3: got was was good. We were at one hundred and 62 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:56,080 Speaker 3: sixty thousand at Morgan Stanley. We got a better number 63 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:58,440 Speaker 3: than that. And also I think given some of these 64 00:02:58,520 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 3: very kind of unfortunate track natural disasters that we're seeing 65 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 3: in the US, that could make the next several data 66 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 3: prints more uncertain. So I think the fact that we 67 00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 3: got one solid reading for the economy or another solid 68 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:14,359 Speaker 3: reading on jobs is quite helpful for I think assuring 69 00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 3: the market that for now the economy is still in 70 00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:16,880 Speaker 3: an okay place. 71 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:19,639 Speaker 4: Even with those prints. It's interesting to look, Andrew at 72 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 4: how FED language hasn't changed. They are still talking about 73 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,040 Speaker 4: a balanced approach. Balanced is the new buzzword. Collin said 74 00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:30,000 Speaker 4: it yesterday. Jefferson said it too. And we have an 75 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 4: Atlanta GDP now tracker at three point two percent. If 76 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 4: it is a FED that is still biased to cut 77 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 4: with a strong economy, how positive is that for risk asses? 78 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, so we do think we're still in a good 79 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 3: is good environment, you know you mentioned correctly. 80 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,240 Speaker 1: We also followed that Atlanta FED tracker. 81 00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 3: We think it's been a great indicator recently and it 82 00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 3: is suggesting a very strong US economy. 83 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 1: But I think the other. 84 00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 3: Important thing is inflation is really looking like it's getting 85 00:03:57,120 --> 00:03:58,120 Speaker 3: back under control. 86 00:03:58,200 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: That kind of the battle against. 87 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 3: Inflation has been one and if you look at forward 88 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 3: looking inflation expectations from the interest rate market, say over 89 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 3: the next two years, those are kind of below. Those 90 00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 3: are implying a number below what the FED is targeting. 91 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 3: So if we think about kind of historical performance patterns, 92 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 3: certainly historical patterns for credit, you know, a scenario where 93 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 3: the economy is holding up better, where the FED is 94 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:24,520 Speaker 3: cutting more gradually towards neutral, which is what we're forecasting 95 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,160 Speaker 3: at Morgan Stanley. We think from this point on they're 96 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:30,719 Speaker 3: doing twenty five basis point cuts. That's been a much 97 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:34,920 Speaker 3: better kind of trade off for risky assets than one 98 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:37,360 Speaker 3: where growth is weakening more and you're getting a lot 99 00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:39,520 Speaker 3: more FED cuts. So I think the scenario that we're 100 00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:42,159 Speaker 3: getting in the data is very much tracking closer to 101 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 3: that better soft landing base case that. 102 00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:46,760 Speaker 4: Scenario lay out. It's happening in the treasury market, that 103 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:49,599 Speaker 4: repricing has happened since Friday, but Andrew, in the corporate 104 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 4: credit market, the repricing hasn't happened. Investment grade spreads are 105 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 4: still at eighty three basis points, exactly where they were 106 00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 4: on Friday. Are you surprised by the resilience the unmovedness 107 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:00,240 Speaker 4: of this market. 108 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:04,760 Speaker 3: Well, you know, look, spreads, spreads are tight, but our 109 00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 3: view at Morgan Stanley has been that spreads should be 110 00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:11,800 Speaker 3: tighted that we're in an environment of better than expected fundamentals. 111 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 3: We think soft landing is an unusually good backdrop for credit. 112 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:17,480 Speaker 1: Credit likes moderation. 113 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:21,200 Speaker 3: A soft landing is all about moderation and growth and 114 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:23,240 Speaker 3: inflation and monetary policy. 115 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:26,279 Speaker 1: And you still have very good technicals, You still. 116 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 3: Have very strong demand relative to supply in the market, 117 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,640 Speaker 3: and better than average fundamentals. Better than average technicals probably 118 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 3: should mean, you know, tighter than average, richer than average valuation. 119 00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:38,599 Speaker 3: So I think another important factor, and I'm glad you 120 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 3: linked it to yields, is we do think we're in 121 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 3: an environment where higher yields are good for spreads, That 122 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:47,520 Speaker 3: higher yields are bringing in more demand from insurers, from 123 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,840 Speaker 3: pension front funds, from a lot of the buyers who've 124 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:53,120 Speaker 3: been really driving the market over the last year. And 125 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:55,680 Speaker 3: so you know, with the yields going up to four percent, 126 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,159 Speaker 3: all of a sudden, that same spread hits a lot 127 00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:00,919 Speaker 3: more yield bug for those buyers. 128 00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 5: Andrew, right now, we're dealing an environment where there's a 129 00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:06,640 Speaker 5: number of potential risks in the United States. There's the 130 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 5: politics potentially we're not going to know for days weeks, 131 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:11,920 Speaker 5: and we could see a contested election. Then there's the geopolitics. 132 00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:15,080 Speaker 5: We see in the short term increase in the oil price. 133 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:19,839 Speaker 5: What is the biggest catalyst to potentially your soft landing scenario. 134 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 3: Well, I do think, you know, understandably, I think the 135 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:27,760 Speaker 3: US election is going to and will get a lot 136 00:06:27,800 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 3: of that focus. You know, I think you are facing 137 00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 3: a close election, that's one important factor, and between two 138 00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 3: candidates with very very different policy agendas and policy proposals, 139 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,600 Speaker 3: and so, you know, I think in terms of thinking 140 00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 3: about factors that are not just going to affect the 141 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 3: market over the next next month, and we are less 142 00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,120 Speaker 3: than a month away from the US election, but also 143 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 3: really going to potentially affect how investors think about pricing 144 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 3: into next year, I do think the US election probably 145 00:06:57,480 --> 00:07:00,360 Speaker 3: stands out as a really important factor, and and that's 146 00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 3: why certainly, you know, at Morgan Stanley we've been devoting 147 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:04,719 Speaker 3: a lot of our effort to trying to understand the 148 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,880 Speaker 3: issues around it and research related to election implications. 149 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 5: Do you think the market right now is properly hedged 150 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 5: for a scenario where the election might be contested. 151 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:17,080 Speaker 1: Well, I think that's it's difficult to say. 152 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:19,400 Speaker 3: I mean, I think we have seen some increase in 153 00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:23,720 Speaker 3: volatility around the month of November but it's also a 154 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:25,840 Speaker 3: factor where this is an issue. 155 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: I mean, I'll talk about the election more. 156 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:30,800 Speaker 3: Generally, that is a kind of an unknown heading into 157 00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:33,240 Speaker 3: heading into next month. The markets had this on their 158 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 3: calendar for a long period of time. I think a 159 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 3: lot of investors in our meetings cite the election as 160 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,040 Speaker 3: a major source of uncertainty. 161 00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 1: So, you know, I do think. 162 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:43,960 Speaker 3: We as much as it's fair to say that the 163 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:47,360 Speaker 3: election is bringing up the potential for volatility, is bringing 164 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 3: the potential for uncertainty, I think it's also possible. You know, 165 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 3: it's also fair to say that investors are very aware 166 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:54,880 Speaker 3: of this and that they are they're going in with 167 00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 3: their eyes open. 168 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 1: Now. You know. 169 00:07:56,440 --> 00:07:58,640 Speaker 3: Again, I think it's a factor that we also when 170 00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 3: we look out into twenty twenty five, and you know, 171 00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 3: again we're pretty optimistic, say on more m and a 172 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:06,520 Speaker 3: activity in the market. You know, we actually think that 173 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 3: moving past the election, just kind of having this once 174 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:12,840 Speaker 3: this question is resolved, that that can be a positive 175 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 3: catalyst in certain ways. So that can help, we think 176 00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 3: trigger more corporate activity, and that there are some you know, 177 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:22,200 Speaker 3: some risks associated with it, but also some positives As 178 00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 3: you move past the event. 179 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 2: You're not the only one who's said that. Andrew appreciate it. 180 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 2: Andrew sheets the more constanting Camra Dawson of New Edge Wealth, 181 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 2: saying we would not be surprised to see continued volatility 182 00:08:41,040 --> 00:08:43,440 Speaker 2: in the near term as risk assets are going into 183 00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:47,480 Speaker 2: this historically high volatility month price for perfection. The volatility 184 00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:50,840 Speaker 2: is unlikely to be ctist clinics caatis clissmic given the 185 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:53,400 Speaker 2: backdrop of strong economic growth and a shift to more 186 00:08:53,400 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 2: supportive monetary policy. With a very long word, Cameron Dawson 187 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 2: joins us now for more easy to write than say 188 00:08:58,240 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 2: out loud. Cameron, thanks for that, put it in just 189 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 2: for you, Thank you very much. Let's talk about this 190 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:03,880 Speaker 2: run we've seen in some of these individual names and 191 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 2: video has had a massive run five days of gains, 192 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:09,080 Speaker 2: and for some people they're reflecting on the first half 193 00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:11,120 Speaker 2: of this year where we had this big boost in 194 00:09:11,160 --> 00:09:13,079 Speaker 2: inflation turned out to be a bit of a head fake. 195 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:15,480 Speaker 2: We started to think about high rates for longer, and 196 00:09:15,559 --> 00:09:17,840 Speaker 2: tech stocks really started to perform and we reached in 197 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:19,760 Speaker 2: for that playbook all over again. 198 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:22,400 Speaker 6: It is interesting to see the equal weight S and 199 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:24,760 Speaker 6: P five hundred, which has been doing better over the 200 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:27,960 Speaker 6: last couple of months start to roll over on a 201 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 6: relative basis, which just suggests that maybe there's this narrowness 202 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,320 Speaker 6: creeping back into the market. And you see it within 203 00:09:34,360 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 6: the tech sector itself. Look at video being strong driving semiconductors, 204 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 6: but flip the page to software. Microsoft is breaking down. 205 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,760 Speaker 6: It's now below it's two hundred day moving average. So 206 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 6: even within the all great tech sector, there are pockets 207 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 6: of weakness being held up by just a couple of names. 208 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,000 Speaker 2: Is this all about red cup expectations? Is that in 209 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:54,520 Speaker 2: the drive and see or is it something else? 210 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 6: We think it's the confluence of everything if you take 211 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 6: a step back and appreciate the fact that you have 212 00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 6: strong economic growth. Look at Atlanta fed GDP now at 213 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:05,760 Speaker 6: three point two percent, supported by fiscal deficits. As if 214 00:10:05,760 --> 00:10:08,560 Speaker 6: we're in a crisis now with the bond market pricing 215 00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:12,400 Speaker 6: in the largest non recessionary cutting cycle in forty years, 216 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:15,440 Speaker 6: What is rate or what are risk assets not to like? 217 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:18,400 Speaker 6: And we think that's why you see credit spread so tight. 218 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:21,559 Speaker 6: The b DOUBLEA credit spread is now one hundred basis points, 219 00:10:21,600 --> 00:10:24,000 Speaker 6: nearly at the lows that we saw in twenty twenty one. 220 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:27,080 Speaker 6: Equity valuations twenty one and a half times. That's at 221 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:29,760 Speaker 6: nearly the highs we saw in twenty twenty one. So 222 00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:32,600 Speaker 6: these markets are priced for perfection, but that's because the 223 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:36,120 Speaker 6: backdrop is quite nearly perfect. The question is can it 224 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 6: last and where does it go from here? 225 00:10:37,960 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 4: Does earning season help? With expectations of under five percent 226 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 4: growth your rear, that's relative to what we've seen before, 227 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:44,839 Speaker 4: kind of a low bar. 228 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 6: It is a low bar because you've also seen those 229 00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:50,720 Speaker 6: estimates get trimmed going into this earning season, so maybe 230 00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 6: we can jump over this lower bar. The thing that's 231 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:56,200 Speaker 6: interesting is over the last two months you've actually seen 232 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,560 Speaker 6: twenty twenty five estimates get trimmed as well. We think 233 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 6: that's why markets have stalled out over the last couple 234 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:02,439 Speaker 6: of months. 235 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 7: They've been relatively flat. 236 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 6: So you do need to see earning sestments continue to rise, 237 00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 6: we think, in order to support the market. The one 238 00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 6: thing that has been the key underlying support for this 239 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:16,200 Speaker 6: market since the beginning of twenty twenty two is rising 240 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 6: twelve month forward earning sestments. 241 00:11:18,200 --> 00:11:21,120 Speaker 7: That is absolutely critical to maintain, and. 242 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 4: You've seen that in seventy two percent of the companies. 243 00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:25,680 Speaker 4: That's according to Bank of America are expected to grow 244 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 4: their EPs. That's some good breath, but as John was 245 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 4: just describing, the market doesn't have breath at this very moment. 246 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,440 Speaker 7: Do you expect that to change? It's certainly the hope 247 00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 7: of a lot of people. 248 00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:39,800 Speaker 6: And if you look into next year's earnings estments for 249 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:42,880 Speaker 6: twenty twenty five, the market has priced in the mag 250 00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:47,720 Speaker 6: seven decelerating materially and the rest of the market accelerating 251 00:11:47,760 --> 00:11:50,560 Speaker 6: in their earnings growth. But in a way that actually 252 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 6: creates a high bar for the rest of the market 253 00:11:53,720 --> 00:11:56,960 Speaker 6: to deliver because you have these big accelerations in earnings 254 00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,199 Speaker 6: growth which are already priced in and forecasted. 255 00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:01,520 Speaker 2: So the banks would put on Friday, and we're all 256 00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:03,839 Speaker 2: reflecting on what we heard maybe two weeks ago when 257 00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:06,800 Speaker 2: we heard from Alli Financial warn about credit risk, and 258 00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 2: we heard from Dan Pinto JP Morgan. We talked about 259 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 2: lower interest rates maybe weighing go on that interest income. 260 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:13,079 Speaker 2: What do you think is going to be the standout 261 00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:15,320 Speaker 2: theme for this reporting season for some of the banks, 262 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 2: both big and small. 263 00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 6: I think it all comes back to the credit risk question, 264 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:21,720 Speaker 6: which is the underlying question that we've all been asking. 265 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:25,760 Speaker 6: Is the economic data overstating the strength of this economy, 266 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 6: and the message from the banks will be important because 267 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:31,720 Speaker 6: they'll give us a notion about small businesses, they'll give 268 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 6: us a notion about consumers. 269 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:35,400 Speaker 7: And if we continue to see. 270 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:38,439 Speaker 6: Credit risks bubble up, look at default rates within consumers. 271 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:41,360 Speaker 6: That's where ALI was flagging back a couple of weeks ago. 272 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 6: If you continue to see that, it would question some 273 00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:48,480 Speaker 6: of this headline data necessarily not being as strong as 274 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 6: maybe it looks on the surface. 275 00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:52,199 Speaker 2: In the Wait a little bit, Jack Caffrey, JP Morgan 276 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 2: mentioned this yesterday. It's very unusual to see defaults on 277 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:57,600 Speaker 2: auto loans. If you go back to GFC, I remember 278 00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:00,079 Speaker 2: all the stories we tell the car was the last thing. 279 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:01,840 Speaker 2: It was the one thing you held on, so you 280 00:13:01,880 --> 00:13:03,400 Speaker 2: always made that payment. 281 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:04,720 Speaker 1: What could that be about. 282 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,679 Speaker 6: It's partially a function of the price increases that we 283 00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 6: saw coming out of the pandemic. It's partially a function 284 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:13,040 Speaker 6: of people reaching for cars coming out of the pandemic, 285 00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:16,600 Speaker 6: but it also likely reflects the true K shaped economy. 286 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,680 Speaker 6: It's usually the lower income consumer that's more likely to 287 00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:22,840 Speaker 6: finance their cars and have floating rate debt overall, with 288 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:26,200 Speaker 6: credit cards, we do know that the low income consumer 289 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 6: is under pressure and the one thing that is keeping 290 00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:33,400 Speaker 6: them above water is this jobs market. It's pretty incredible 291 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:36,120 Speaker 6: that you're seeing this huge uptick in default with a 292 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:37,760 Speaker 6: relatively robust jobs market. 293 00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 7: Look at where the unemployment rate is. 294 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 6: If that goes up any higher, this could actually have 295 00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 6: default in that cohort of consumers that would be in 296 00:13:45,160 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 6: line with the GFC, even though consensus seems to be 297 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:50,560 Speaker 6: that we're not going to have a consumer led kind 298 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:52,760 Speaker 6: of recession in this cycle. So I think it is 299 00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 6: incredibly unique, but it is certainly something that catches our 300 00:13:56,240 --> 00:13:57,920 Speaker 6: e that makes us question the data. 301 00:13:58,000 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 4: That is one of those things again just out of 302 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:02,960 Speaker 4: line with an economy that's been driven by consumer spending. 303 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 4: You also see it in some of these companies in 304 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:09,240 Speaker 4: just the past month. Pepsi, Constellation, Nike, Fedaches, rh Hormal, 305 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 4: Dollar Tree, Lululemon have all cut their sales or earnings 306 00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 4: again just in the past month. 307 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 7: Is there a sector. 308 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:18,320 Speaker 4: Because this has continued to be a problem for this 309 00:14:18,360 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 4: equity market of staples of packaged food companies that you 310 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:23,600 Speaker 4: just can't buy until we figure out what's happening with 311 00:14:23,640 --> 00:14:24,200 Speaker 4: the consumer. 312 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:27,160 Speaker 6: I think it's all a reflection of this fading pricing power, 313 00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:29,800 Speaker 6: and that comes squarely to head with what we're seeing 314 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 6: within forecasts for earnings, because earnings are forecasted to actually 315 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:34,560 Speaker 6: accelerate next. 316 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:35,920 Speaker 7: Year on the revenue line. 317 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:39,400 Speaker 6: If you see fading pricing power companies effectively saying we 318 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,280 Speaker 6: want to raise prices, but consumers are pushing back because 319 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,600 Speaker 6: they can't take it anymore. That suggests that you'll actually 320 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:48,920 Speaker 6: see a deceleration in revenue next year, which is certainly 321 00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 6: not what's being priced in. 322 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 4: Does that cap just how bullish you can be on 323 00:14:52,840 --> 00:14:57,080 Speaker 4: an overall equity market which with otherwise has good fundamental 324 00:14:57,120 --> 00:14:58,680 Speaker 4: growth in the economy behind it. 325 00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:00,640 Speaker 6: We don't think it would be be the end of 326 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:03,320 Speaker 6: the world or a two reaching of a base case 327 00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 6: to expect relatively flat returns in twenty twenty five. It's 328 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 6: not enough to say get out of your equities and 329 00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:12,000 Speaker 6: run for the hills. It's just to appreciate that if 330 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 6: that twelve month forward earnings number starts to flatline, it's 331 00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:18,200 Speaker 6: likely that returns flat line. It looks a lot more 332 00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:21,520 Speaker 6: like a year like twenty fifteen or twenty eighteen, or 333 00:15:21,520 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 6: the market chopped sideways. And the good news in that 334 00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 6: is it effectively allowed you to grow into very fulsome 335 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 6: valuation multiples, which is where we are today. 336 00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:31,040 Speaker 5: Cameron, I hate to be the debbie downer, but what 337 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:32,360 Speaker 5: if tariff Man comes back? 338 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:36,000 Speaker 7: What if forward earnings actually look like for these companies. 339 00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:40,240 Speaker 6: We didn't necessarily see it impact company earnings in a 340 00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 6: material way in twenty eighteen because it was far more pocketed. 341 00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 6: If we have broad tariffs, though, this is certainly something 342 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:51,000 Speaker 6: that could challenge the earnings picture because we do know 343 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:52,800 Speaker 6: it's effectively a regressive tax. 344 00:15:52,840 --> 00:15:54,680 Speaker 7: We do know it does lower consumption. 345 00:15:55,120 --> 00:15:57,360 Speaker 6: It's less of an inflation risk and more of the 346 00:15:57,360 --> 00:15:59,880 Speaker 6: fact that it would dampen consumption, which then, of course 347 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:02,520 Speaker 6: would cause you to question earning sestements and that would 348 00:16:02,520 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 6: be a source of volatility for equities. 349 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 5: I meant, too, the debbie downer on the earnings estimates. 350 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:09,240 Speaker 5: Do you think companies are going to have to focus 351 00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 5: on this in this quarter because it is just around 352 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:15,440 Speaker 5: the block in terms of what this election is going 353 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 5: to look like. 354 00:16:16,440 --> 00:16:19,120 Speaker 6: We've already been hearing from companies over the last let's 355 00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 6: call it three four months that they've been delaying some 356 00:16:22,360 --> 00:16:26,640 Speaker 6: capital spending, they've been delaying some hiring decisions, because of 357 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:30,360 Speaker 6: election uncertainty, So certainly that is something that's weighing on 358 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:33,800 Speaker 6: their mind whether or not they're going to absolutely make 359 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:37,560 Speaker 6: changes because of the election going into this earning season, 360 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 6: they'll probably say, we have to wait and see. 361 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:41,880 Speaker 2: Think about how wide the rank is for twenty twenty 362 00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 2: five a sweep fre either side. We can have a 363 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,720 Speaker 2: corporate taxt right of what twenty eight percent on the 364 00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:48,320 Speaker 2: one side and fifteen percent on the other with conditions, 365 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:49,920 Speaker 2: What does that look like for you? Just how wide 366 00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:51,240 Speaker 2: is the range for twenty twenty five? 367 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:52,880 Speaker 7: Completely massive? 368 00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 6: And I think that what we have to appreciate is 369 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,080 Speaker 6: that both sides what they have in common is that 370 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:01,800 Speaker 6: they're talking about higher deficit spending and growth dampening policies. 371 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:04,520 Speaker 6: So on one side you get growth dampening from tariffs 372 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:07,720 Speaker 6: and potential immigration. The other side you get potential growth 373 00:17:07,800 --> 00:17:10,960 Speaker 6: dampening on higher corporate taxes, which just means that we 374 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:12,919 Speaker 6: then have to turn our minds to the bond market 375 00:17:13,000 --> 00:17:15,159 Speaker 6: and how does the bond market digest all of this. 376 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:17,960 Speaker 6: We do know that the bond market did not like 377 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 6: the higher treasury issuance in the third quarter twenty twenty three. 378 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:23,800 Speaker 6: Treasury yields went up by one hundred and fifty basis 379 00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 6: points and valuations within the equity market hated it. So 380 00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:30,040 Speaker 6: we do think that instead of this idea by the 381 00:17:30,119 --> 00:17:33,840 Speaker 6: rumor sell the news with the election, that the election 382 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:37,520 Speaker 6: itself could be a source of volatility if it results 383 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 6: in a sweep. 384 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:40,919 Speaker 2: That could be charactistmic camera, thank you, Did I do 385 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:41,239 Speaker 2: that right? 386 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:41,880 Speaker 8: Yeah? 387 00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:42,600 Speaker 1: Thank you? All right? 388 00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:45,160 Speaker 2: Second guard Cameron Dason and new h Wow Cameron, thank 389 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:57,240 Speaker 2: you very much. So here's the latest fame of bracing 390 00:17:57,320 --> 00:18:00,639 Speaker 2: for Milton's landfall. Already stretched thin following how Urricane Helene. 391 00:18:00,680 --> 00:18:03,400 Speaker 2: The agency is preparing for a three billion dollars deficit 392 00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:06,119 Speaker 2: by temporary but the government says it has the resources 393 00:18:06,119 --> 00:18:09,639 Speaker 2: to meet immediate needs. The former FEMA administrator, Craig Fugu, 394 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 2: joins us now he let the agency under the Obama administration. Craig, 395 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:15,560 Speaker 2: thank you for giving us your time this morning. We 396 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:17,280 Speaker 2: recall also some of the work that you did with 397 00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:19,800 Speaker 2: Governor Jeff Bush back in the early two thousands, and 398 00:18:19,840 --> 00:18:22,560 Speaker 2: maybe we can start the conversation there of the hurricane 399 00:18:22,600 --> 00:18:25,440 Speaker 2: seasons that you oversaw in two thousand and four, five six. 400 00:18:25,480 --> 00:18:28,120 Speaker 2: When you think back to that period. What's different about 401 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:31,400 Speaker 2: the hurricane seasons now that we have to confront in Florida. 402 00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:36,400 Speaker 8: Well, I think we're just seeing rapid tentification that we 403 00:18:36,680 --> 00:18:40,200 Speaker 8: haven't seen before in history. So when you look at 404 00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:42,920 Speaker 8: going back just ten years, how many storms went from 405 00:18:43,000 --> 00:18:45,880 Speaker 8: a tropical system to a Category by hurricane in less 406 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:49,040 Speaker 8: than a couple of days. And so, you know, I 407 00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:50,840 Speaker 8: think we're having to just get ready for these more 408 00:18:50,840 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 8: intense hurricanes as they're approaching and maybe. 409 00:18:54,160 --> 00:18:56,160 Speaker 1: Not have the leak time. The good thing. 410 00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:59,399 Speaker 8: About Milton is there's been a lot of time to 411 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:03,040 Speaker 8: get ready. Many people started evacuating as early as Sunday, 412 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:05,919 Speaker 8: So this is a little bit different than a storm 413 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:08,560 Speaker 8: that just popped up. They had time to get ready, 414 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,320 Speaker 8: but it will not reduce the impacts. 415 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 5: Craig, let's talk about the FEMA response. Are they prepared? 416 00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 1: Yeah? I get this question a lot. 417 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 8: And as bad as Selene was, FEMA has a lot 418 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:24,639 Speaker 8: more resources, a lot more capability, and they're not going 419 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:25,679 Speaker 8: to have to stop. 420 00:19:25,440 --> 00:19:27,360 Speaker 1: The response in Hurricane Helene. 421 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:29,199 Speaker 8: That's I think a big concern for people in that 422 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:32,520 Speaker 8: area that while the national media has focused now on 423 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:35,439 Speaker 8: what Milton's about to do, FEMA is still working and 424 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:38,120 Speaker 8: supporting the governors in the states that have already been hit. 425 00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 8: And again, the party in any of these disasters will 426 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:45,440 Speaker 8: be always life saving, life sustaining, and getting communities stabilized 427 00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:47,560 Speaker 8: to set the stage for long term recovery. 428 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:51,080 Speaker 5: FEMA recently said that they have only nine percent left 429 00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:55,440 Speaker 5: of their personnel reserves, that's about twelve hundred people. Where 430 00:19:55,440 --> 00:19:57,880 Speaker 5: do they look then, in terms of getting the bodies 431 00:19:57,880 --> 00:20:00,239 Speaker 5: they need to go to these areas that are going 432 00:20:00,280 --> 00:20:00,680 Speaker 5: to be hit. 433 00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:04,800 Speaker 8: Well, those numbers really referred to staffing required for long 434 00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:09,919 Speaker 8: term recovery. The initial response teams reset between disasters. FEMA 435 00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:14,120 Speaker 8: has a lot of capability to reprioritize their resources as 436 00:20:14,119 --> 00:20:17,159 Speaker 8: well as employ people from the headquarters. We did this 437 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:20,879 Speaker 8: in Superstorm Sandy. If EMA needs to, and given the 438 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:24,000 Speaker 8: size and impact of what Milton looks to do, I 439 00:20:24,040 --> 00:20:25,600 Speaker 8: would imagine there's going to be a lot of people 440 00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:28,320 Speaker 8: redeployed across the nation the support the state of Florida. 441 00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:32,000 Speaker 5: Is the current funding enough or do you think Congress 442 00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:34,840 Speaker 5: is going to be forced back into session and get 443 00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:35,960 Speaker 5: off the campaign trails? 444 00:20:37,359 --> 00:20:40,040 Speaker 8: Well, right now, FEMA does have money to do the 445 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,000 Speaker 8: initial response and provide support to the survivors. 446 00:20:43,440 --> 00:20:44,520 Speaker 1: I think the bigger. 447 00:20:44,320 --> 00:20:46,760 Speaker 8: Question is going to be the level of funding required 448 00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 8: for long term recovery, the permanent work. And that's not 449 00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:51,399 Speaker 8: just going to be FEMA. There'll be a lot of 450 00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:54,879 Speaker 8: federal agencies that will need additional funding to support the 451 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:58,879 Speaker 8: recoveries from these previous storms and disasters as well as 452 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:00,679 Speaker 8: what we're about to see with her Kane Melton. 453 00:21:00,920 --> 00:21:03,320 Speaker 4: And it's not even just those storms, Craig before it, 454 00:21:03,320 --> 00:21:06,840 Speaker 4: it was wildfires out west that also required FEMA money. 455 00:21:07,119 --> 00:21:08,879 Speaker 4: So you get to this point, as John mentioned, a 456 00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:11,679 Speaker 4: three billion dollar deficit. Does there need to be a 457 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:15,439 Speaker 4: structural change with FEMA and its funding to ensure that 458 00:21:15,480 --> 00:21:18,520 Speaker 4: it can continue to deal with successive climate issues. 459 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:22,960 Speaker 8: Well, this was a situation we actually faced it in 460 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:26,080 Speaker 8: the Bomb administration and then Speaker Ryan and at that 461 00:21:26,200 --> 00:21:28,439 Speaker 8: time OMB Director Jack lou had come up with a 462 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:31,680 Speaker 8: way to increase FEMA's funding, but it was always based 463 00:21:31,720 --> 00:21:35,919 Speaker 8: upon the past storms, the past disasters. So the problem 464 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:38,359 Speaker 8: is is we get bigger and more intense disasters with 465 00:21:38,520 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 8: little break between them. We really need to look at 466 00:21:41,320 --> 00:21:44,000 Speaker 8: a funding mechanism going forward. But I think it's critical 467 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:47,440 Speaker 8: we understand this is your federal tax dollars. This is 468 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 8: increasing cost to the budget that does not seem to 469 00:21:50,520 --> 00:21:53,960 Speaker 8: be slowing down. It's growing rapidly, and it's far beyond 470 00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:57,080 Speaker 8: just what FEMA programs are being taxed with. So for 471 00:21:57,119 --> 00:22:00,240 Speaker 8: the federal taxpayer, we're seeing a tremendous trans for a 472 00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:04,359 Speaker 8: risk to the taxpayer where previously insurance covered this, and 473 00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,200 Speaker 8: as the insurance markets are no longer able to provide 474 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 8: affordable or available insurance due to these increasing impacts, we're 475 00:22:12,240 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 8: seeing this transfer risk to the taxpayer and that's going 476 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 8: to grow. And I don't know if we have answers 477 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:18,359 Speaker 8: for that yet. 478 00:22:19,080 --> 00:22:19,720 Speaker 7: What does that mean? 479 00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:22,560 Speaker 4: Craig from when these areas get rebuilt that are still 480 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,640 Speaker 4: under risk, a place like Tampa also had impact from 481 00:22:25,680 --> 00:22:29,520 Speaker 4: Helen Now again Milton, when government agencies, when FEMA, when 482 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 4: others go in to rebuild these areas, does it need 483 00:22:31,640 --> 00:22:34,760 Speaker 4: to look different this time because they are under constant threat. 484 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:37,160 Speaker 1: The answer is yes, And. 485 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:40,840 Speaker 8: FEMA has for a long time been focused on rebuilding better, 486 00:22:41,119 --> 00:22:43,880 Speaker 8: not just putting things back. But the challenge is we're 487 00:22:43,880 --> 00:22:45,960 Speaker 8: going to have to not only just put it back better, 488 00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 8: We're going to have to build it for the future risk, 489 00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,880 Speaker 8: and that isn't going to be inexpensive. The other problem 490 00:22:51,920 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 8: I see is that we're going to increasingly see it 491 00:22:54,640 --> 00:22:57,800 Speaker 8: transfer risk to government run programs like the Citizens Insurance 492 00:22:57,800 --> 00:23:02,240 Speaker 8: program in Florida, because commercial assurance is finding extremely difficult 493 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:04,200 Speaker 8: to be able to stay in these markets where it's 494 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:07,160 Speaker 8: affordable product given their extreme exposures. 495 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:10,440 Speaker 2: It's a conversation we had earlier this morning, just devastating. Craig, 496 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 2: appreciate your time this morning. Thank you, sir, Craig Fuget there, 497 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:18,320 Speaker 2: the former FEMA administrator. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, 498 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:22,359 Speaker 2: bringing you the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You 499 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:25,159 Speaker 2: can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings 500 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:28,119 Speaker 2: from six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the 501 00:23:28,160 --> 00:23:31,639 Speaker 2: podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen, and 502 00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:34,560 Speaker 2: as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business 503 00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:34,800 Speaker 2: app