Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. What a day of hysteria.
Speaker 1: You have the left, the Democrats, much of the media,
Speaker 1: including some of the more centrist media, saying that it
Speaker 1: was a treason summit between Trump and Putin. My friends,
Speaker 1: I will peel away the craziness, the historyonics the exaggerations,
Speaker 1: and discuss with you what really happened today, what did not,
Speaker 1: what it means going forward, and why everyone just needs
Speaker 1: to take a breath and take a chill. That are
Speaker 1: more coming up from the buck Sexton. This is the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to
Speaker 1: decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American,
Speaker 1: You're a great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins
Speaker 1: almost analysts no barer. Relationship has never been worse than
Speaker 1: it is now. However that changed as of about four
Speaker 1: hours ago. Nothing would be easier politically than to refuse
Speaker 1: to meet. As president, I cannot make decisions on foreign
Speaker 1: policy in a feudal effort to appease partisan critics or
Speaker 1: the media or Democrats who want to do nothing but
Speaker 1: resist and obstruct. I would rather take a political risk
Speaker 1: in pursuit of peace than to risk peace in pursuit
Speaker 1: of politics. People came to me, Dan Coates came to
Speaker 1: me and some others. They said, they think it's Russia.
Speaker 1: I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia.
Speaker 1: I will say this, I don't see any reason why
Speaker 1: it would be. But I really do want to see
Speaker 1: the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani
Speaker 1: gentleman that worked on the d n C. We have
Speaker 1: great confidence in my intelligence people, but uh, I will
Speaker 1: tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful
Speaker 1: in his denial. Today, Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody.
Speaker 1: It was quite a health sinky summit. Oh my, watch
Speaker 1: the whole thing today. You saw people in in a
Speaker 1: level of of rage. I mean, they have not been
Speaker 1: I think this upset at Trump since the day of
Speaker 1: the what was it the day of the the Muslim
Speaker 1: ban announcement? Right? That was maybe the last time I
Speaker 1: can remember this much. Oh no, Actually, they haven't been
Speaker 1: this upset at Trump really probably since uh, since the
Speaker 1: Charlotteville white supremacist rally. Um. They they are very angry
Speaker 1: at the president. A lot of Republicans. I saw the
Speaker 1: statement from John McCann. Everyone, everyone just piling on, piling on,
Speaker 1: piling on. Okay, let's try to peel this back for
Speaker 1: a moment. You know, I know it's it's very easy
Speaker 1: to to at this point take the position of, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I love Trump, He's doing a great job,
Speaker 1: but you know, this was uh, this was a huge, huge,
Speaker 1: terrible thing and we should all be ashamed, and will
Speaker 1: you know, hopefully the president will get back on track
Speaker 1: tomorrow or something. I'd say this said there was a
Speaker 1: an there were errors today, to be sure, I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't I can't say the President United States standing up,
Speaker 1: you know, next top Putin? Who can I just you know,
Speaker 1: there's some perspective like to add to this, like, for example,
Speaker 1: Putin is no worse now than he was four years ago,
Speaker 1: or eight years ago or fifteen years ago. Okay, he
Speaker 1: in fact, he hasn't invaded in any countries recently, and
Speaker 1: he has invaded a bunch of he did invade a
Speaker 1: bunch of countries. But Obama was president and this is
Speaker 1: not what about it? And this is fair game because
Speaker 1: they're saying they're comparing look at Trump now versus what
Speaker 1: Obama said, look at Trump now versus previous presidents. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: Russia has gone way out of line with previous presidents
Speaker 1: in a way that we have not seen yet with
Speaker 1: Trump as president. Remember the election hacking, People get yelled
Speaker 1: at me for this election hacking happened on Obama's watch.
Speaker 1: And by the way, this this little line that gets
Speaker 1: skipped over. You know, you'll hear people say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: and I saw someone over at CNN said, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: was it was the Obama administration to sleep at the wheel. No,
Speaker 1: that's actually a convenient narrative. It's not that the Obama
Speaker 1: administration was napping on this one. It's not that the
Speaker 1: Obama administration got caught off guard with Russia election interference,
Speaker 1: which went we're talking about Facebook accounts and Twitter bots, folks.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is not this is not the you know,
Speaker 1: the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and people are calling it that,
Speaker 1: which is just even crazier. The actual impact of this
Speaker 1: was almost certainly zero. What this did, as people say, oh,
Speaker 1: it undermine our democracy to you know it, it calls
Speaker 1: into question the foundations of the Republic, of the future,
Speaker 1: of the thing of the no, no, no, no. It
Speaker 1: accomplished almost certainly zero nothing. All those things that Russians
Speaker 1: did it Maybe caused Podesta a day or two of embarrassment.
Speaker 1: It caused a little bit of infighting in the d
Speaker 1: n C. Find me one Democrat who changed his or
Speaker 1: her mind about voting for Hillary because of the Wiki
Speaker 1: leagues act. I mean, I have not met a single person.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard anybody say that happened. I also need
Speaker 1: to know, hold on a second. So there's nothing There
Speaker 1: was nothing really bad in the d n C or
Speaker 1: the Podesta emails, right, Nothing to see here but the
Speaker 1: hack of those emails by a simple phishing scam, which
Speaker 1: you have probably been subjected to yourself and other auspices
Speaker 1: many times. I know I have. Is the is the
Speaker 1: cyber nine O level and of our era. This is
Speaker 1: this is hysterics, This is insanity. And I know that
Speaker 1: right now. You know that they've created this, this narrative,
Speaker 1: the media has created this construct of you know, Trump
Speaker 1: is Putin's puppet. Why is he doing this? Look at
Speaker 1: what he's doing? And and that said, I wish Trump
Speaker 1: would make it harder for them sometimes to say these things.
Speaker 1: Right today, you know, today he's he scored a couple
Speaker 1: of own goals, no question about it. But he was
Speaker 1: being Trump in the way that he speaks. He was
Speaker 1: being imprecise and you know, the the the actual statement
Speaker 1: he gave. I went back and read every word of
Speaker 1: the transcript twice the day after the press conference, so
Speaker 1: I didn't miss anything, and I want to make sure
Speaker 1: I saw everything that statement he gave us. Fine, he's
Speaker 1: meeting with Trump, he's trying to have you know, some
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, meeting with Putin. He's trying to have some
Speaker 1: rapport building, some relationship building. He said pretty straightforward stuff.
Speaker 1: It was in the Q and A when they started
Speaker 1: asking him about all this you know, the you know,
Speaker 1: Russia and hacking and do you you know who do
Speaker 1: you believe in all this stuff? And the press they
Speaker 1: feel like they finally got him with this stuff. They
Speaker 1: finally got him. Now there there. I I find this
Speaker 1: bother some of multiple levels. As I say, I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna see here pretend that Trump didn't make their job
Speaker 1: easier than he showed up because he did. Okay, he
Speaker 1: knows better. But I also sit here in judgment of
Speaker 1: a man who is completely undersieged by the media. I mean,
Speaker 1: the history onics you see from this media. Oh you
Speaker 1: cancel the meeting with us, or he didn't do this,
Speaker 1: or you know, he's destroying democracy with all this stuff
Speaker 1: that you're hearing all the time. Is it's just it's
Speaker 1: it's lunacy. They're not covering this president. They're trying to
Speaker 1: chear this president down. Any abbey, any honest observer would
Speaker 1: see the obvious here, which is that the the media,
Speaker 1: by and large, I know, it's not Fox, it's not
Speaker 1: talk radio, it's not it's not the Hill, you know,
Speaker 1: but the media by and large is an opposition party
Speaker 1: to this president. That's it. They're not trying to tell
Speaker 1: stories about national policy. They're not trying to inform the public.
Speaker 1: They're trying to propagandize to the public. And they want
Speaker 1: to destroy this administration and everybody around it and pretend
Speaker 1: like it never happened. And so the earth with salt
Speaker 1: and install Hillary as are you know, our great savior Hello,
Speaker 1: which I'm gonna have nightmares just thinking about it. I
Speaker 1: will walk you through the good, the bad, and the ugly. Here,
Speaker 1: I'll walk you through all the different components of of
Speaker 1: what happened, because I think it's really important cause you're
Speaker 1: gonna hear a lot of stuff from the next few
Speaker 1: days about how you know this is such an outrage
Speaker 1: and how good Trump and and the primary area where
Speaker 1: where I do not like what Trump did because it
Speaker 1: actually is a little bit of Obamaism. Okay, so look
Speaker 1: we're I'm keeping it real. I'm gonna tell you what
Speaker 1: I think is being overblown and over his stated I
Speaker 1: don't like the well, you know, we did beds. It
Speaker 1: was actually really Trump's tweet before the meeting, and and
Speaker 1: some of the insinuations or some of the suggestions when
Speaker 1: he says, you know, they've been dated bad stuff. We
Speaker 1: did bad stuff. It's kind of our fault, it's kind
Speaker 1: of their fault. No, no, no, no, no. Obama's Russia
Speaker 1: policy was a joke, and it's bad. But Russia is
Speaker 1: in a class by itself when it comes to doing
Speaker 1: bad stuff. All right, you just run down the whole list.
Speaker 1: Russia currently has a defector, which is what Snowden is
Speaker 1: in their custody who God knows how much how much
Speaker 1: damage he's done to our long term intelligence and military
Speaker 1: capabilities because he wanted us all to know that, you
Speaker 1: know that the stuff we do online the Internet at
Speaker 1: the government's monitoring like great, I mean I thought everybody
Speaker 1: kind of knew that already. I don't know really what's new.
Speaker 1: By the way, no laws have changed really because of this.
Speaker 1: Nothing is really been altered of any significance in your
Speaker 1: life as a result of what Snowden has done. But
Speaker 1: I know people get very mad about that a whistle er. No,
Speaker 1: Snowdon is a defector and he betrayed his country. So
Speaker 1: the Russians have given him, say harbor. The Russians they
Speaker 1: do in prison and murder journalists, they do act. You know,
Speaker 1: it's a kleptocracy. I mean, you had a you had
Speaker 1: a country that went through that decided or that you know,
Speaker 1: had this process of privatization of assets where the people
Speaker 1: who you know, had the biggest clubs and the most
Speaker 1: guns basically got to got to privatize all the national assets.
Speaker 1: And that's how you got ali arcs and billionaires. These
Speaker 1: people are not geniuses who are in that country. They
Speaker 1: didn't start Google, you know, they didn't start Apple. They
Speaker 1: were like, you will give me this little bust your skull,
Speaker 1: that's it. You know, this is this is one of
Speaker 1: the problems we have. All these Russian billionaires running around
Speaker 1: not so impressed. They were the guys at the top
Speaker 1: of the intel and mafia hierarchy, and they, you know,
Speaker 1: to the victor went to spoil, so to speak. So
Speaker 1: I have no illusions about Russia and no illusions about Putin.
Speaker 1: Do not think he's a good guy. People love this
Speaker 1: whole thing, though, you know, every needs to chill with this.
Speaker 1: He's a former intelligence offic I'm like, whoa, whoa, slow
Speaker 1: your role. I'm a former intell this officer. You know,
Speaker 1: not all of us are bad. You know, let's let's
Speaker 1: not get all it's like a crazy here. Former intelligence
Speaker 1: officer is trained the deception and lines. I'm like, hey, hey, hey,
Speaker 1: settle down still that captain um but now he is
Speaker 1: he's a KGB guy and and he's he's you know,
Speaker 1: the guy's got ice in his veins, and you know,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't want him to have power of life and
Speaker 1: death over here. How much is for sure? Okay? Fine.
Speaker 1: I don't like the you know, they do bad things.
Speaker 1: We do bad things construct because that's what the left
Speaker 1: does all the time, and I think Trump fell into
Speaker 1: that today And that's my main point of criticism that
Speaker 1: that part of it is. But it's also rhetorical, which
Speaker 1: is why I sit here like Buck, Why aren't you
Speaker 1: as panicked? Oh my gosh, Pie, partisan backlash and all
Speaker 1: these Republicans on the hill just rogers, just you know,
Speaker 1: I just don't feel like anyone is supporting or you know,
Speaker 1: America because Trump in there just everyone who take the
Speaker 1: temperature down a little bit. Nothing has changed because of
Speaker 1: Trump's beating. Today, I'm seeing all these people say, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, decades to come, we'll be talking. No, it's
Speaker 1: just not true. Oh does anyone think that Putin now
Speaker 1: makes moves against the United States because he thinks he
Speaker 1: understands Trump so well? I don't mean this disrespectfully, but
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't understand Trump so well. You think Putin wants
Speaker 1: to get on the wrong side of this guy. You know,
Speaker 1: I've said it before, but you know, those of you
Speaker 1: who are fans at Tombstone, you want Doc Holiday on
Speaker 1: the street Howitzer, if you know what I mean. You
Speaker 1: want the guy sometimes, the the one that has the
Speaker 1: most firepower, to be the one that nobody really knows, like,
Speaker 1: you know, they don't want to mess with him. So
Speaker 1: that's another part of this. And by the way, I
Speaker 1: think that's a if this North Korean situation works out,
Speaker 1: it will be in large part because Kim John guns
Speaker 1: like this guy. I don't. I don't think this guy
Speaker 1: is playing. I don't think he's messing around when he
Speaker 1: says that. If we step out a line, and with Obama,
Speaker 1: what we saw is was it was messing around. It
Speaker 1: was all for show. It was all multilateralism and let's
Speaker 1: all be friends and let's all chat. So but so
Speaker 1: when when we look at this, you know, on the
Speaker 1: one and my main point in criticism and this is
Speaker 1: what onces you take away from this, and then we'll
Speaker 1: get into the intel component of this. And John Brennan,
Speaker 1: the former CIA director, you know, tweeting out crazy stuff,
Speaker 1: and you know Anderson Cooper who's not an opinion journalist
Speaker 1: but says it's the worst thing he's ever seen from
Speaker 1: a president. Well, John could grab that audio. By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't see that on our list here, and I
Speaker 1: definitely want that, um just to refer to it. Uh,
Speaker 1: here's what I'll say. I don't like the I don't
Speaker 1: like the we're bad, they're bad construct ever, because America
Speaker 1: is better than everybody else. Okay, so let's start with that.
Speaker 1: And I think Trump didn't mean it that way, but
Speaker 1: it didn't sound good and and it's not it's not helpful. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: the other side of it. Let's just start from nothing
Speaker 1: changed today. Nothing happened. You know, no terrible decision was made,
Speaker 1: no one started a war, no one fired, no one
Speaker 1: even fired off a limited missile strike, or you know,
Speaker 1: engage in some behavior that's going to be you know,
Speaker 1: haunting us for years or decades to come. That's all hysteria.
Speaker 1: That's all hysteria. That's all people unleashing all this pent
Speaker 1: up anxiety and craziness that's been built up by a
Speaker 1: media apparatus that just wants to see Trump destroyed. It's
Speaker 1: all gonna be. Okay, I will tell you how and why.
Speaker 1: We'll look at what the he Here's the big point
Speaker 1: of contention that I want to get into. Now they're
Speaker 1: they're saying, look at what Trump said about who he
Speaker 1: believes his intel agencies are the Russians, and it's like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, he's undermine all the intelligence brom First
Speaker 1: of all, everyone I know who's a Trump supporter, and
Speaker 1: I have quite a few an intelligence he's like, da,
Speaker 1: it's Trump. But anyway, I want to get into what's
Speaker 1: really going on here, why would Trump say what he said,
Speaker 1: and also what do we need to work into this
Speaker 1: conversation to really understand the full depth of it end.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm one advantage you have here listen to
Speaker 1: this show is I've actually been in the room with
Speaker 1: the cee I Director talking about top level intelligence policy.
Speaker 1: I've actually been the room with the President previously talking
Speaker 1: about intelligence matters. I've run the briefing for the President
Speaker 1: in the Oval office. So when I'm telling you like
Speaker 1: this is kind of what I'm seeing on the intel world,
Speaker 1: not just some guy that read in the book somewhere,
Speaker 1: Although you can learn a lot in books, I've actually
Speaker 1: experienced it. So that's one fun advantage you have a
Speaker 1: listened to this show versus that versus pretty much every
Speaker 1: other show across the country right now on radio or TV.
Speaker 1: So I got that going for me, which is nice.
Speaker 1: Eight four eight four nine buck more on this Helsinki
Speaker 1: summit when we come back. You have been watching perhaps
Speaker 1: one of the most disgraceful performances by an American presidents
Speaker 1: at his summit in front of a Russian leader, sly
Speaker 1: that I've ever seen. Shameful disgraceful treason US. I've never
Speaker 1: heard of American president talk that way on an international stage.
Speaker 1: That we talked about Hillary Server and what it's embarrassed
Speaker 1: Cilium is embarrassing. They came across as playmates on a
Speaker 1: soccer field more than they did international rivals. What many
Speaker 1: would say disgraceful performance. He chose to stand with Russia
Speaker 1: and walk away from our rule of law and our
Speaker 1: system of justice. It's just pathetic. He criticized American citizens,
Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton and um others as opposed to really taking
Speaker 1: advantage of a world stage with all the world's eyes
Speaker 1: upon them to point out how unacceptable Russia's behavior and
Speaker 1: in appearance in our election and the elections of other
Speaker 1: democratic countries around the quobe Is. But he just shirked
Speaker 1: those responsibilities. I just I cannot understand how the national
Speaker 1: city team can continue to abide by this, and how
Speaker 1: Pompeo and Bolton and Kelly can continue in their jobs. Uh.
Speaker 1: This I think rises to the point of good American
Speaker 1: patriots resigning. Yeah, that's right. Let's let's just have all
Speaker 1: the top national security officials resigned from the United States government.
Speaker 1: That's a great idea. John Brennan, who formally voted for
Speaker 1: a communist by the way, Uh you heard it all
Speaker 1: their folks. Disgraceful, pathetic, treason us, even in fact Brennan himself,
Speaker 1: who was a super hack and a leftist extraordinaire, which
Speaker 1: now we know, right thanks to social media, we know
Speaker 1: who these people really are before things. Oh no, just
Speaker 1: look at my resume. I'm just I'm just a public servant, right.
Speaker 1: They used to play that game all the time. Same
Speaker 1: thing with the media. Well I'm just Donald middle journalists. Well,
Speaker 1: your last ten tweets were negative to Trump, and you've
Speaker 1: never shown a tweet that was positive to him. So
Speaker 1: maybe we're onto something here. Here's what Brennan wrote, Donald Thomps.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's press conference performance in Helsinki rises to and
Speaker 1: exceeds the threshold of high crimes and misdemeanors. It was
Speaker 1: nothing short of treasonists. Not only were Trump's comments in basilic,
Speaker 1: he is holly in the pocket of Putin Republican patriots,
Speaker 1: where are you? How is it treas nous? What are
Speaker 1: We're not a war with Russia? He's not giving aid
Speaker 1: to the enemy at a time of war. Oh I'm sorry, Wait, no,
Speaker 1: I guess we figured out what's going on here. To laugh,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party really believes that hacking Podesta and the
Speaker 1: d n c's email accounts with a fishing scam, which
Speaker 1: is effectively a prank and propaganda via Facebook and Twitter
Speaker 1: is war. Well, they better strap on a helmet and
Speaker 1: grab the m for my friends, because war is a
Speaker 1: messy and dangerous business. We've got to talk more about this.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. Liberty, truth, and great hair. The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show is back. Truly, truly extraordinary, very moment
Speaker 1: in American history, something I thought I would never see.
Speaker 1: Up first, the President of the United States delivering a
Speaker 1: stunning rebuke to his own US intelligence community, with the
Speaker 1: entire world watching, not just the intelligence community, but the
Speaker 1: US law enforcement community, including his own Justice Department and
Speaker 1: his FBI. Standing right next to the Russian leader of
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin at a joint news conference here in Helsinki,
Speaker 1: the President simply refused to side with his own US
Speaker 1: intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the Russia investigation. Let's
Speaker 1: engage in some forbidden thoughts here, my friends. Let let's
Speaker 1: do the analysis that we're not allowed to do. How
Speaker 1: about that? Why not right, Let's let's just go for it.
Speaker 1: Let's forget about what they want us to think, what
Speaker 1: they want us to say, forget about all the things
Speaker 1: that they would say if any of them listening to
Speaker 1: this show or heard me talking to you, heard your
Speaker 1: thought in response to me. Let's just try to get
Speaker 1: right down to it, shall we? A few things that
Speaker 1: come to mind here? And I have I have so
Speaker 1: much on this. I mean we could spend gosh, we
Speaker 1: could spend not just the whole show. He's been a
Speaker 1: whole week he is talking about this, but I'll try
Speaker 1: to cut down to the essential parts. I know your
Speaker 1: time is very valuable, and I don't want to waste
Speaker 1: any of it, but only forbidden thoughts out it. First
Speaker 1: of all, let's say Trump had said, yeah, I know
Speaker 1: what I I believe my intelligence community, and I think
Speaker 1: that that my distinguished colleague or you know, whatever distinguished
Speaker 1: counterpart here. Mr Putin is incorrect in his assessment if
Speaker 1: he had said that, if he had sided with his
Speaker 1: intelligence community, do you think it would have resulted in
Speaker 1: any less of the history on its, the hysterics and
Speaker 1: the complete freak out we've seen from the meeting now.
Speaker 1: Of course, not would it buy him any goodwill? Would
Speaker 1: they stop saying his Putin's puppet? Would they stop saying
Speaker 1: that there's some mysterious information that Putin holding over his head. Right?
Speaker 1: Trump's a billionaire, folks, He didn't need this, Right, he
Speaker 1: didn't have to do this. He's not like Hillary. It's
Speaker 1: not like this was you know, ever since he was ten,
Speaker 1: hag I got to be president. Right, it's not it's
Speaker 1: not him. We're lucky that he saved us from Hillary.
Speaker 1: I am grateful to this man for saving us from
Speaker 1: not just Hillary, but decades of left wing soda mayor
Speaker 1: style justices on the Supreme Court, who would just be
Speaker 1: just you want to talk about undermining institutions. So Mayor
Speaker 1: takes a chainsaw to the constitution. It's a joke. Do
Speaker 1: you want to deal with that? That's the future you want,
Speaker 1: that's the country you want to live in. Join the
Speaker 1: never trumpers. You want to get down to some of
Speaker 1: the lost analysis here, some of the things that don't
Speaker 1: really make sense, we should ask some questions about. Well,
Speaker 1: then you know where you are. You're hearing the freedom
Speaker 1: of my friends. Let's get to it. So for so,
Speaker 1: this whole notion of him siding. Oh, if he'd only like, like,
Speaker 1: if he had sided with the intel community, there be
Speaker 1: no problem. I mean, now, let's let's take a look
Speaker 1: at this for a moment, shall we. I am old
Speaker 1: enough to remember because I worked in the CIA's Iraq office.
Speaker 1: You can imagine that meant that I knew quite a
Speaker 1: bit about And now I wasn't in it during the
Speaker 1: whole w m D run up, but I knew quite
Speaker 1: a bit about how that went down. Who you know,
Speaker 1: who was involved in what happened and everything else. And
Speaker 1: for eight years of the well, no more than that,
Speaker 1: for the eight years of the Obama administration, and for
Speaker 1: five years of the Bush administration, all I ever heard was, oh,
Speaker 1: my gosh, you see how stupid the intelligence community of
Speaker 1: the c i A was on a rock wm D.
Speaker 1: There are such idiots, and we went to war over that.
Speaker 1: A lot of people died over that decision. Now I
Speaker 1: don't plan on relitigating the wisdom of going into a
Speaker 1: rock right now, but to be sure, there were problems
Speaker 1: in the analysis about the w m D, and it
Speaker 1: was a mistake that the Bush administration made because there
Speaker 1: was a case for regime changing Iraq that was not
Speaker 1: solely dependent on w m D. That could have been
Speaker 1: made and I think might have been compelling enough that
Speaker 1: we would have had an international mandate to do it,
Speaker 1: But they decided to go with w m D. And
Speaker 1: that's a whole other thing. But they would say that
Speaker 1: the CIA was, you know, full of idiots, and we
Speaker 1: all they don't know anything. The intelligence community is infamous
Speaker 1: for its underperformance, etcetera, etcetera. Right full of idiots, c
Speaker 1: I a full of imbeciles according to the left and torturers.
Speaker 1: They want to talk about undermining institutions. Well, what do
Speaker 1: you think it's like when your college some of your
Speaker 1: colleagues are worried that the Obama administration, the new Obama administration,
Speaker 1: might prosecute them for doing their jobs, including with a
Speaker 1: legal opinion from the White House Council about how this
Speaker 1: is how talking about enhanced interrogation, this is legal. You
Speaker 1: have you have the White House lawyers saying yes, this
Speaker 1: is legal, and then you got a new administration. I
Speaker 1: was like, maybe we should throw you in prison forever,
Speaker 1: ruin your life and your reputation, because you know, the
Speaker 1: left wing wants some scalps. You think that, Oh and
Speaker 1: Buck he didn't do that. Yeah, he thought about it
Speaker 1: real close to do what you think that made people
Speaker 1: are working the talence community on the front lines feel good.
Speaker 1: I'm playing on the front lines too, not the the
Speaker 1: the desk bound analysts of which I am quite familiar with,
Speaker 1: my friends who tend to be very left wing intelligence
Speaker 1: community wide. Just as I've been telling you about law
Speaker 1: schools and the penetrations of the left everywhere else across
Speaker 1: the country, which we are not paying enough attention to,
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy has gone hard left. And to that point,
Speaker 1: she's that that's a perfect transition. But let me hold
Speaker 1: on the bureaucracy going hard left for second. This is important.
Speaker 1: It is important. This is a show that I hope
Speaker 1: some of you will play back and listen to more
Speaker 1: than once, or you'll listen to it more than once.
Speaker 1: Not played back. That might be a little intense, but
Speaker 1: you listen more than once. I think there's some very
Speaker 1: important arguments. You won't hear them anywhere else, at least
Speaker 1: not that I'm aware of. It's been all day going
Speaker 1: through the transcripts, reading the indictment last week. By the
Speaker 1: indictment last week's a joke. It's a joke, punch of
Speaker 1: punch a Russian g r U officers. They are drinking
Speaker 1: vodka by the bottle, laughing their butts off at Muller
Speaker 1: is going to indict this. That's funny. It is funny.
Speaker 1: It's not gonna do anything. But I'll get to that.
Speaker 1: There's so much here that no one spent any time
Speaker 1: focus on. Oh my gosh, Trump is a trader, no
Speaker 1: false lies. Stop. But they said that back to just
Speaker 1: the undermining the institutions and the game's left is willing
Speaker 1: to play. They said that that the you know that
Speaker 1: the w M d c I a intelligence community, intelligence
Speaker 1: community was was abused by the left and by the
Speaker 1: media for years because of what happened. They were rock
Speaker 1: and for missing not eleven okay, and but now we're
Speaker 1: told that they're infallible. The same thing you've you've kind
Speaker 1: of seen a little different. But you know, for years
Speaker 1: under the Obama administration, the real story, I mean, the
Speaker 1: real the real ideology behind say, the Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: movement and see and end which was gleefully covering like
Speaker 1: these protests and people burning down buildings and looting CDs
Speaker 1: s and selling all the pills on the streets, and
Speaker 1: you know, look at this fire and look at this
Speaker 1: buildings behind us. It's on fire, gosh, but it's a
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful protest people mostly peaceful, only some buildings on fire,
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful. But the main storyline you'd get from the
Speaker 1: left was that cops, you know, of whom I worked
Speaker 1: with and have cops in my in my family, cops
Speaker 1: are racist basically and including just so we're all clear,
Speaker 1: black and Hispanic and other all cops, right, So that's
Speaker 1: at least I guess they were across the board on
Speaker 1: this one. The cops are basically racist. That was the
Speaker 1: real underlying message of the Black Lives Matter movement, and
Speaker 1: that you know that they're hunting and murdering young black men.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I'll debate any I. I took
Speaker 1: Van Jones argument apart on this issue on TV on
Speaker 1: Wolf Blitzer Show, and they never had me back in
Speaker 1: Wolf Flitzer Show after that because he did the whole wall.
Speaker 1: That's not what they say. Actually, Van, I was at
Speaker 1: the Black Lives Matter protests. I have audio of it,
Speaker 1: I have video of it. I was there, I took photos.
Speaker 1: This is what they say, this is the mentality, this
Speaker 1: is the ideology. Don't don't tell me I covered it. WHOA,
Speaker 1: they're not creating a climate of hate towards cops. Yeah
Speaker 1: they are, But notice how that was what they're doing
Speaker 1: the A bombers And now with the FBI. How dare
Speaker 1: you All the FBI agents are looking at this and
Speaker 1: they're they can't believe the president is I want to
Speaker 1: ask you if if you get an FBI agent fifteen
Speaker 1: years in the job, doing the doing the real law
Speaker 1: enforcement work, not like hob nobbing with policymakers in d C,
Speaker 1: like out of the field office somewhere, what do you
Speaker 1: think theod chances he's probably more pro trumpety is pro Hillary.
Speaker 1: It just just put that out there. I think you
Speaker 1: know the answer. You know, if you're a real law
Speaker 1: and order guy, are you you tend to be more
Speaker 1: on Trump side of the issue or you tend to
Speaker 1: be more okay, so, but the real issue here for
Speaker 1: me is that they degrade these institutions when it's convenient
Speaker 1: for them and end for political reasons. They pretend to
Speaker 1: care so much about them. And I speak from from
Speaker 1: you know, I saw. I mean, the whole Scooter Libby
Speaker 1: thing was just a an effort to uh use, you know,
Speaker 1: use the intelligence community and use the feud over a
Speaker 1: rock as as a kind of as a political weapon,
Speaker 1: as a political catharsis for the left. They just needed
Speaker 1: to get somebody, right, That's what that was all about,
Speaker 1: the need to get somebody, and they want to get
Speaker 1: somebody now. But they're willing to undermine institutions, no question
Speaker 1: about it. And they've done in the past and now
Speaker 1: on Trump's point, and this is what got them all
Speaker 1: so upset. Right. I know I haven't played that much
Speaker 1: sound from the press conference. I'll play more. We got
Speaker 1: plenty of time. I'm also gonna make fun of the
Speaker 1: left new superstar for being a complete ignoramus auntil politics.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that. Okazia Cortez quite an interview she
Speaker 1: gave folks the left new progressive star. Yeah, I just
Speaker 1: don't know about that. Really, we'll get there. But here's
Speaker 1: what Trump said. This is the big the the oh
Speaker 1: my gosh moment or a couple of oh my gosh moments,
Speaker 1: I guess, but play clip twelve. I have confidence in
Speaker 1: both parties. I really believe that this will probably go
Speaker 1: on for a while, but I don't think it can
Speaker 1: go on without finding out what happened to the server,
Speaker 1: what happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that
Speaker 1: worked on the d n C. Where are the servers
Speaker 1: they're missing? Where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's emails?
Speaker 1: Thirty three thousand emails gone, just gone. I think in
Speaker 1: Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's
Speaker 1: a disgrace that we can't get Hillary Clinton's thirty three
Speaker 1: thousand emails. I have great confidence in my intelligence people,
Speaker 1: but uh, I will tell you that President Putin was
Speaker 1: extremely strong and powerful in his denial today, and what
Speaker 1: he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have
Speaker 1: the people working on the case come and work with
Speaker 1: their investigators with respect to the twelve phone. I think
Speaker 1: that's an incredible offer. Now you know it's it's not
Speaker 1: an incredible I mean it's incredible, and that he shouldn't
Speaker 1: believe it. It is incredible, as in, there should be
Speaker 1: lack of belief because you know, the Russian law enforce
Speaker 1: and Russian government and the rule of law is a joke. Okay,
Speaker 1: So it's like I said, folks, I'm not this is
Speaker 1: not the pro Putin zone. I no illusions about Russia.
Speaker 1: I'm just dealing in the reality of what we care
Speaker 1: about and what's really going on here. And I think
Speaker 1: Trump got a little ahead, got a little over Skis
Speaker 1: on that one. And he's like, well, you know, he's
Speaker 1: trying to make a good impression on Poot and he's
Speaker 1: trying to mend this relationship, and he knows the media
Speaker 1: is just trying to play gotcha and antagonize him and
Speaker 1: have him and soul putin to his face and all
Speaker 1: this stuff never before, is it. You know, for for
Speaker 1: decades the media when the Communists in in the Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: we're threatening to annihilate, truly annihilate ust, to truly actually
Speaker 1: destroy our country and our civilization and murder all of
Speaker 1: us in the process. The left was I was like, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I think they've got some good ideas and
Speaker 1: we shouldn't be so harsh with them. And you know
Speaker 1: now that Russia is like a is a a shadow
Speaker 1: of what it once was. And and we've had this
Speaker 1: strained relationship with him for a number of years. You know,
Speaker 1: Trumpet shown to reach other Look, how dare you, sir?
Speaker 1: Russia so evil? But on this point about whether he
Speaker 1: believes the intelligence community believes the Russians. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: put this out there. Not only have we had some
Speaker 1: intel community stuff that in the past is, as a
Speaker 1: left will tell you, under other circumstances, was a big problem.
Speaker 1: You've got the former CIA director under Obama today calling
Speaker 1: Trump a trader, saying that he's treason us, which means
Speaker 1: he's a trader. You're the former FBI director James Comey
Speaker 1: under Obama sharing this. This was the day an American
Speaker 1: president stood on foreign soil next to a murderous, lying
Speaker 1: thug and refused to back his own country. Patriots need
Speaker 1: to stand up and reject the behavior of this president.
Speaker 1: The head of the CIA, the former Director of National
Speaker 1: Intelligence under Obama Clapper, the former director of the FBI Colly,
Speaker 1: the former deputy director of the FBI McCabe from her
Speaker 1: acting Attorney General of the United States, Sally Yates. These
Speaker 1: are all people who are in the intel community world
Speaker 1: at the very top, who are rank partisans who want
Speaker 1: to destroy Trump, bring him down, ruined his presidency, and
Speaker 1: end this. Are we allowed to think about that at
Speaker 1: all when it comes to how much Trump is this
Speaker 1: gonna say, Yeah, whatever, the intelligence community says, now, are
Speaker 1: we allowed to think about how a dossier became the
Speaker 1: basis in part for a FISA warrant from within this
Speaker 1: whole intelligence community process we're talking about here, Are we
Speaker 1: allowed to say, you know that that seems a little problematic?
Speaker 1: Maybe that same I see, that same group of bureaucracies
Speaker 1: and agencies could use a second look when it comes
Speaker 1: to Trump related issues. And and that's what's really forbidden
Speaker 1: to say here, folks, That's what they really don't want
Speaker 1: you to get to. Who if you were Trump and
Speaker 1: I have we have to go to a break here,
Speaker 1: also gonna run over a station break, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: get into problems. But if you were Trump, oh and
Speaker 1: Michael Hayden and there too, tweeting out photos of concert
Speaker 1: creation camp saying that's Trump's policy at the border, would
Speaker 1: you think that the assessments that these people oversee we're
Speaker 1: fair to you. Let me let me dig into that
Speaker 1: a little more. We come back, because I know this process,
Speaker 1: and I don't think anyone else you're gonna listen to
Speaker 1: on radio does quite honestly, I know it from doing it,
Speaker 1: from being involved in it. Stay with me. We'll get
Speaker 1: back to it. Would you, now, with the whole world watching,
Speaker 1: tell President Putin, would you denounce what happened in and
Speaker 1: would you warn him to never do it again? Where
Speaker 1: is the server? I want to know where is the server?
Speaker 1: And what is the servers saying? Were that being said?
Speaker 1: All I can do is ask the question. My people
Speaker 1: came to me, Dan Coachs came to me and some others.
Speaker 1: They said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin,
Speaker 1: he just it it's not Russia. I will say this.
Speaker 1: I don't see any reason why it would be. But
Speaker 1: I really do want to see the server. You know,
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't also want to do what the media is
Speaker 1: trying to get him to do all the time, which
Speaker 1: is too insult Putin and just just play by their tune.
Speaker 1: He just doesn't want to do it. And why would
Speaker 1: he have any trust in the media. I mean, he
Speaker 1: he knows who's out to get him. I mean, they've
Speaker 1: staked their careers on it. What if they really think
Speaker 1: happens if if there is no you know, there's no collusion.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna talk about Muller indictments little more coming up,
Speaker 1: especially in light of what happened today. What happens over
Speaker 1: at CNN, where everyone just kind of moves on, and
Speaker 1: actually the main story they've been running with for eighteen
Speaker 1: months now is yeah, you know, no big deal is
Speaker 1: that we were wrong with that one. There's nothing there.
Speaker 1: I also can't help but notice that this phenomenon of
Speaker 1: every major former intel and law enforcement bureaucrat from a
Speaker 1: Democrat administration, how has come out forcefully and in every
Speaker 1: way possible against a sitting president you want to talk
Speaker 1: about undermining institutions. The former FBI director of, the former
Speaker 1: acting attorney general, the former deputy director of the FBI,
Speaker 1: the former CIA director of, the former director of National Intelligence.
Speaker 1: They are all anti Trump zealots. This is not normal.
Speaker 1: It used to be the case that once you had
Speaker 1: served in these roles, you would, sure you go into
Speaker 1: private sector, You do some consulting, maybe you write a book,
Speaker 1: but you don't leap into the political fray, and you
Speaker 1: certainly don't let it be thought widely that you have
Speaker 1: access to inside information about you know, just how this
Speaker 1: president is really a traitor. I mean, you're not gonna
Speaker 1: say you have it, but you know, you want everyone
Speaker 1: to think you got it, which Brennan has certainly done,
Speaker 1: which is completely unethical, by the way, and and and
Speaker 1: absolutely undermines, uh again, the faith that anybody, including Trump,
Speaker 1: should have in these institutions, given all the stuff the
Speaker 1: Intel community, even all the stuff that these see your folks,
Speaker 1: Remember it's not the rank and file analysts and officers.
Speaker 1: But given what's been going on at the top level,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it be kind of crazy if Trump didn't have
Speaker 1: a little bit of like, yeah, those guys, you know,
Speaker 1: we'll look at it. He's not saying he doesn't trust
Speaker 1: their analysis of North Korean nuclear weapons. He's saying he
Speaker 1: doesn't trust their analysis of him. That's a big difference.
Speaker 1: If you want to be competitive in today's marketplace, you
Speaker 1: have to have the best information possible at your disposal.
Speaker 1: My friends, that's where Global Verification Network comes in. They
Speaker 1: are the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and
Speaker 1: vetting company. Look, I know the CEO personally, and I
Speaker 1: know how seriously he takes the work of his company,
Speaker 1: the risk mitigation experts that he has. They're based in Chicago,
Speaker 1: they're all across the country. They will make sure that
Speaker 1: your case gets the attention that it deserves, and that
Speaker 1: you get all the answers you need in a timely fashion.
Speaker 1: They also make sure that the information they have on
Speaker 1: your background, investigation and vetting cases is kept here in
Speaker 1: the States. They don't off short in terms of the work.
Speaker 1: They don't off short in terms of the servers that's
Speaker 1: really important. They have total control the process. Go to
Speaker 1: my g VN dot com or call eight seven seven
Speaker 1: six nine five nine that's my GVN dot com or
Speaker 1: eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine Global
Speaker 1: Verification Network. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating
Speaker 1: information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America, You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Activity Analysts. No,
Speaker 1: let's go into clip fourteen. Chihlen's here what Putine had
Speaker 1: to say about an AP reporter and whether Russia chame
Speaker 1: dirt on Trump. I did hurt, We allegedly collected compromising
Speaker 1: material and Mr Trump when he was visiting Moscow distinguished.
Speaker 1: When President Trump visit Moscow, back then I didn't even
Speaker 1: know that he was in Moscow. I treat President Trump
Speaker 1: with utmost respect. But back then, when he was a
Speaker 1: private individual, a businessman, nobody informed me that he was
Speaker 1: in Moscow. Let's take St. Petersburg's Economic Forum, for instance,
Speaker 1: and there was over five hundred American businessman the high
Speaker 1: rank in the high level ones I don't even remember
Speaker 1: the last names of which, and every one of them.
Speaker 1: Do you think that we tried to collect compromising material
Speaker 1: and niche and every single one of them. Well, it's
Speaker 1: difficult to imagine another nonsense of a bigger scale than this. Well,
Speaker 1: please just disregard these issues and don't think about this
Speaker 1: anymore again, Welcome back to the box action show. So,
Speaker 1: so there you had putin apparently now the scariest man
Speaker 1: in the world for everybody, Right, he's been scary for
Speaker 1: a long time, or he's been the same guy for
Speaker 1: a long time, and now we're all supposed to be
Speaker 1: really worried about him because Trump won the election. Because
Speaker 1: you gotta remember, this is all this is all just
Speaker 1: an extension of Trump as president. He wasn't supposed to
Speaker 1: be president. Hillary is supposed to be president. People lost power,
Speaker 1: lost prestige, lost jobs, and they're mad and that drives
Speaker 1: all of this. Now, the media thought they were gonna
Speaker 1: have eight years. If really think about what a think
Speaker 1: about what a fantastic media and nirvana it would be
Speaker 1: for CNN and MSNBC if they had had a Hillary presidency. Oh,
Speaker 1: just strolling over to the White House, you know, Oh, yes,
Speaker 1: we're that's right, we're the media. We have no without
Speaker 1: without fear or favor. Hey, Hill, it's good to see you.
Speaker 1: I mean the whole thing. But yeah, you're here. We
Speaker 1: are now. And and the press asks a question before
Speaker 1: I get into Putin's answers. There here a Putin responding
Speaker 1: at this press conference today, the Helsinki summit, the Treason summit,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, yeah, the hells Summit. And and they're
Speaker 1: asking Putin, do you have compromise information on Trump? That's
Speaker 1: a that's just meant to disrespect the president, our president.
Speaker 1: That's all that is. Is there any universe in which
Speaker 1: in which Vladimir Putin says, oh, yeah, yes, we've got
Speaker 1: the information on him. No, of course not. There's no
Speaker 1: universe in which that's gonna be a thing. But they
Speaker 1: want to push on this because the press believes this,
Speaker 1: They think they have compromising information on Putin. And let
Speaker 1: me also say the Russians are, from an intelligence perspective,
Speaker 1: very aggressive, and it would not surprise me to find
Speaker 1: out that they do have comprom compromat as they called,
Speaker 1: uh compromat or however you say it in Russian. Uh,
Speaker 1: But it wouldn't surprise me if they had that on
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of businessmen. But what do what do
Speaker 1: we really think they could have on Trump that's so
Speaker 1: bad that they could change his behavior? You know, let's
Speaker 1: even this thing, the dossier and the you know, the
Speaker 1: pe tape and all the stuff they've talked about, the
Speaker 1: media still believes that. I go, I guess they still
Speaker 1: believe this. I think what they also understand is, you know,
Speaker 1: there's nothing that is conceivable at this point that they
Speaker 1: could come out with as a story about Trump where
Speaker 1: people would say, oh, well, well now he's you know,
Speaker 1: now it's gone too far, you know. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just they're just grasping. They're grasping. There's nothing there. And
Speaker 1: if Putin had this information on Trump, Uh, what is
Speaker 1: what is really the endgame here? How does Trump think
Speaker 1: this really goes? He's he's gonna trust Putin? All why
Speaker 1: do you put himself in such a compromising situation the
Speaker 1: first But it doesn't have to do this? So and
Speaker 1: the whole whole thing that just strikes me as as
Speaker 1: complete and utter garbage. But I wanted to get into
Speaker 1: something else here, um and that is the hacking and
Speaker 1: the propaganda has two different components of this, Right, there's
Speaker 1: hacking and there's propaganda. Let's now and and that was
Speaker 1: the whole the Russian effort that we know of during
Speaker 1: the during the election. You also have this woman today
Speaker 1: arrested in d C for essentially FARA violation Foreign Agent
Speaker 1: Registration Act violations, Maria Boutina, who studied American University and
Speaker 1: as a founder of the pro gun Russian advocacy group
Speaker 1: Right to Bear Arms um and UH. She was accused
Speaker 1: of operating the direction of high level official who worked
Speaker 1: for the Russian Central Bank. And they're effectively saying she
Speaker 1: was a Russian agent without declaring herself. And also they're
Speaker 1: charging her with conspiracy, which I will tell you is
Speaker 1: the most sweeping and malleable of all federal prosecutorial tools
Speaker 1: that exist. Conspiracy is like two people that have bad
Speaker 1: thoughts about something that the government doesn't like. And that's
Speaker 1: a little bit of a simplification, but they they conspiracy
Speaker 1: is you know a lot of things, A lot of
Speaker 1: things out there, But so what are we really talking
Speaker 1: about here? What did she really do? Um and the
Speaker 1: just departments complained. It says that quote Puccino worked with
Speaker 1: two unnamed U. S citizens and the Russian official to
Speaker 1: try to influence American politics and infiltrate a pro gun
Speaker 1: rights organization. Um and Butina allegedly arranged dinners in Washington
Speaker 1: and New York and try to develop relationships with American
Speaker 1: politicians to establish back channel lines of communication to penetrate
Speaker 1: the U S National decision making apparatus. So she's working
Speaker 1: as a as an as an agent. We would call
Speaker 1: this an agent of influence. And she didn't register nothing
Speaker 1: in this about actual espionage or trying to get classified
Speaker 1: information or like that. But she's working as an agent
Speaker 1: of influence for the Russians. Okay, so they're gonna they're
Speaker 1: gonna nail her now. But what did what did she
Speaker 1: accomplish anything? Did anything actually happen? And this is where
Speaker 1: you look at again hacking and propaganda. The hacking was
Speaker 1: the DNC server, some state election servers. So and these
Speaker 1: are phishing scams which are very easy to put to
Speaker 1: pull off. I mean, they're illegal, but it is. It
Speaker 1: is prank level expertise required to do this. And then
Speaker 1: there's the propagandic component, which is Facebook and Twitter and
Speaker 1: the the pushing stories out there. You know, there's there's
Speaker 1: a part of me that just sit around and says,
Speaker 1: we're we're really talking about a whole lot of nothing here,
Speaker 1: and if people want to, they want to get all
Speaker 1: energized about the Russians and interfering in our process. You know,
Speaker 1: this is a true thing. And I know I criticize
Speaker 1: the present before for a world we're bad, but they're bad.
Speaker 1: You know, everyone's bad. That's not that's not good. But
Speaker 1: I will say that we interfere and stuff all the time.
Speaker 1: I mean, we don't hack, but we we've got us
Speaker 1: based uh, you know n g os that go over
Speaker 1: and you know they're there, you're trying to undermine this
Speaker 1: regime or that regime. We occasionally go in and we
Speaker 1: flip a government and you know, please, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of there's so there is a lot of stuff that
Speaker 1: we do that is interfering. I'm not saying it's unethical
Speaker 1: or moral. I'm not even saying it's bad that we interfere,
Speaker 1: but this notion of you can't you know, you can't
Speaker 1: spread anti government propaganda, or you can't spread you know,
Speaker 1: memes or things that favor one government over another. As
Speaker 1: it's an interesting new standard were engaged in. It's also
Speaker 1: not new that the Russians have been doing this to
Speaker 1: us in all kinds of ways for a very long time.
Speaker 1: I'm just waiting to see when somebody decides to look
Speaker 1: into you know, how long have the Russians been doing
Speaker 1: this Facebook and Twitter around a long time. Here here's
Speaker 1: a here's a prediction, if anybody really wanted to look
Speaker 1: under the hood, we would find that the Russians have
Speaker 1: done hacking and propaganda stuff stretching back for a decade
Speaker 1: at least, that they were you know, in flaming tension
Speaker 1: is in the US under the obomba just phrase that
Speaker 1: they've been doing this for a long time. They've also
Speaker 1: created a situation where all they have to do is
Speaker 1: hack into one email account of one government official and
Speaker 1: maybe release some email that's a little you know, embarrassing.
Speaker 1: Nothing have to be that big a deal. And the
Speaker 1: election is now to be considered questionable. Right now, the
Speaker 1: election is maybe something we can't really trust. What could
Speaker 1: be a bigger victory for the Crumlin than that WoT
Speaker 1: undermining or institutions. This is undermining at them very core,
Speaker 1: and and and in perpetuity. This is what I keep saying.
Speaker 1: I asked the Director of National Intelligence point blank, what
Speaker 1: could we do to stop this? You know what? The
Speaker 1: answer was nothing? Nothing, nothing. What are you gonna stop
Speaker 1: and tell people? Don't be an idiot and open a
Speaker 1: phishing email. Guess what, Unless you're gonna lock off the
Speaker 1: US Internet, it's not gonna happen. Don't don't let people
Speaker 1: set up fake for you know, don't essentially let the
Speaker 1: Russians cat fish us. But on politics, never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: So this is not going away, right. This is the
Speaker 1: other part is that no one ever wants to, Oh
Speaker 1: why isn't he saying more about prudent and drama? Gosh,
Speaker 1: all the media hysterics around this when you really look
Speaker 1: at it, one nothing really happened, which I know people
Speaker 1: lose their minds of me what I say this to
Speaker 1: them who are liberals, But it's true, nothing really happened.
Speaker 1: There wasn't some fundamental attack on our democracy. Unless you
Speaker 1: equate Podesta, the d n C server and some some
Speaker 1: Facebook memes with our democracy and I know we're not
Speaker 1: really a democracy, but we'll get into that another time.
Speaker 1: But this is this is crazy, This is delusional. You know,
Speaker 1: nothing really happened, and and more maybe to the point
Speaker 1: right now, we don't have any idea how we could
Speaker 1: even change this going forward. People say we need to.
Speaker 1: This is the this is the dishonesty. Okay, let me
Speaker 1: let me look at the investigation top down, because I've
Speaker 1: seen a lot of Republicans saying, well, it's really about
Speaker 1: the Russian interference the election. Bull crap. You don't need
Speaker 1: a special counsel for the for that, the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice and the ft they can do that, they don't need.
Speaker 1: You don't need any special Oh look at this, and
Speaker 1: look at you don't need Mueller for Russian interference. That's crap.
Speaker 1: The only reason we have Mueller, this is a fact,
Speaker 1: is because of the allegation that Trump's campaign was involved
Speaker 1: with the Russians. That's the only reason you have a
Speaker 1: special counsel. Otherwise you wouldn't need a special counsel. You
Speaker 1: would have a special counsel. And you know, the whole
Speaker 1: thing is and I know people say, oh, Bak with
Speaker 1: the firing of Comy. Yeah, but what was that all about? Right? Well?
Speaker 1: What what? Oh? This allegation that Russia and collusion, that's
Speaker 1: why we we even got into this discussion with with
Speaker 1: Comy and can we trust them? And what's going on
Speaker 1: all of this right, it all ties in together. I
Speaker 1: know it's a big mess, but you don't need a
Speaker 1: special counsel if it's about Russian interference. And Russian interference
Speaker 1: as an investigation has always just been an excuse to
Speaker 1: try and drag in the Trump administration and piling up
Speaker 1: all these indictments and had tip Andy McCarthy for writing
Speaker 1: this the National Review. I've been saying along to piling
Speaker 1: up these in the indictments are this is clown show stuff.
Speaker 1: This is a joke. Now of these Russians are every
Speaker 1: be handed over people like whoa, well maybe you have
Speaker 1: Trump pushed him hard. Yeah, right, folks. This is essentially
Speaker 1: an intelligence operation and this is this is in the
Speaker 1: realm of espionage, not law enforcement g r U officers
Speaker 1: messing around online and personating people and hacking into accounts. Uh,
Speaker 1: this is stuff that one you generally don't want to
Speaker 1: expose that you're aware of it, and too, there's no universe,
Speaker 1: there is no reality in which landamer prutins like, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna hand over some of my military intelligence guys
Speaker 1: to you to see what goes on. So this is
Speaker 1: he was a look at it. More indictments, more indictments,
Speaker 1: more indictments. Um, are we gonna start subjecting our intelligence here?
Speaker 1: Here's here's one problem. John Brennan, one of who said
Speaker 1: one of the most idiotic things I've ever heard in
Speaker 1: my life about intelligence. And he was SEI director for
Speaker 1: four years, so this is really astonishing. Brennan said, and
Speaker 1: I'm not exacting the quote, but this is in substance
Speaker 1: what he said. We don't steal secrets in the CIA.
Speaker 1: We don't steal secrets in the U S. Intelligence community.
Speaker 1: That's a lie or Brennan's a moron. I don't. I mean,
Speaker 1: it could be both. We steal all the time. That's
Speaker 1: what espionage is. We steal, we mettle, we mess around,
Speaker 1: we do underhanded stuff. We do it for the greater good.
Speaker 1: We do it to you know, help freedom and justice
Speaker 1: in America in the world. But we do break other
Speaker 1: countries laws, folks. That's what espionage is. Are we now
Speaker 1: gonna sub subject our intel community to the laws of
Speaker 1: other countries when it comes to whatever stuff they may
Speaker 1: catch us on. Think about that for a moment, because
Speaker 1: that's really what this is. This isn't simple criminality. This
Speaker 1: isn't Hey, there's a murderer of the TIDG in Moscow,
Speaker 1: will you hand him over? They might actually do that.
Speaker 1: This is something else, and we have completely law side
Speaker 1: of this because it's useful for the left side. Oh
Speaker 1: look at all these indpends. It's all this criminality. It's
Speaker 1: it's this is again a counter This is a counterintelligence
Speaker 1: investigation that they're dressing up as a criminal investigation for
Speaker 1: political purposes. And the political purposes hurt Trump, Hit Trump,
Speaker 1: That's what this is about. Man, We're covering a lot
Speaker 1: of ground today. I'm sorry. I haven't even asked for
Speaker 1: any calls on the lines. I'm sorry, eight four or
Speaker 1: four to five, eight four four nine. Buck uh. We've
Speaker 1: got a little more on that. I do want to
Speaker 1: get to this Occasio Cortez and third hour. By the way,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get away from all this stuff. I've got
Speaker 1: to talk to you about a transgender activist who's telling
Speaker 1: kids that well, I can't even you're gonna have to
Speaker 1: listen to it. I'll tell you what it is. A
Speaker 1: third hour. Also, I'm talking to you about this new
Speaker 1: what is America show? That's uh or who is America? Show?
Speaker 1: Let's out with Saucer Baron Cohens some thoughts on that
Speaker 1: and then just something that's that's something that's inspiring. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be a little sad, but it's inspiring. I think
Speaker 1: you should all hear it. So we've got to really
Speaker 1: un and different third hour of the show coming up,
Speaker 1: So please stay around for that, cause you a Cortez
Speaker 1: and oh so much more, stay with me. A single
Speaker 1: ominous question now hangs over the White House. What could
Speaker 1: possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia
Speaker 1: over those of the United States. Millions of Americans will
Speaker 1: continue to wonder if the only possible explanation for this
Speaker 1: dangerous behavior is the possibility that President Putin holds damaging
Speaker 1: information over President Trump? What a clown? No, millions of
Speaker 1: people do not, or only think that because you tell
Speaker 1: them this is crazy. There's no evidence for this, there's nothing.
Speaker 1: They have produced, nothing, have nothing. Trump is a is
Speaker 1: an internationally famous billionaire. What what does Putin have on it.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is but they go out
Speaker 1: and say it, this is just like mid Romney's tax returns, right,
Speaker 1: remember that with Harry Reid. Just say a lie damage
Speaker 1: him doesn't matter. That's why when they say, oh, Trump
Speaker 1: line about this for that, I'm like, hey, lie about
Speaker 1: what he had for breakfast? Who cares you guys? Lie
Speaker 1: about real stuff. There's a big lie millions of Americans. No, Shumer,
Speaker 1: they're not. But but I want to give you a
Speaker 1: little bit of honestly before we get through with Kasio.
Speaker 1: Cork has a little bit honestly and analysis here on
Speaker 1: the notion of pressing Putin on meddling. I thought Bolton
Speaker 1: was was very much correct on this is what I
Speaker 1: would have said, play a teen. I think it's pretty
Speaker 1: silly for the president to demand something that he can't
Speaker 1: get legally. Uh, and this is a very serious matter.
Speaker 1: You know. The Russians take the position, you can, you
Speaker 1: can like it or not like it that their constitution
Speaker 1: forbids them to extradite Russian citizens. I think for the
Speaker 1: president to demand something that isn't going to have up
Speaker 1: and puts the president in a weak position. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: they just want to just antagonize him, antagonize him, just
Speaker 1: you know, let's get in Putin's face, you know, just
Speaker 1: maybe slap him a little bit. Just come on, come on, Trump,
Speaker 1: do it, do it, do it. That's what they're saying.
Speaker 1: These people are, These people cannot be taken seriously. They
Speaker 1: are un serious. Rampaul crushing it today. By the way,
Speaker 1: great stuff. We don't have the audio, but producer, Mike,
Speaker 1: that's on me because I didn't ask for this one. Um,
Speaker 1: Rampaul said on Wolf Blitzer Show. Quote this is our
Speaker 1: Senator Rampaul from Kentucky. He gets a high five. Quote.
Speaker 1: Any country that can spy does, and any country that
Speaker 1: can meddle in foreign elections does. All countries are doing this,
Speaker 1: rand Paul said. But we've elevated this to a higher degree,
Speaker 1: and we've made this all about the sour grapes of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton losing the election, and it's all about partisan politics. Now,
Speaker 1: this is truly the Trump derangement syndrome that motivates all
Speaker 1: of this. Amen standing ovations, Senator Rampaul, when everybody else
Speaker 1: is running for cover doing the high and mighty thing.
Speaker 1: Oh what is standing with America and Trumps too? With
Speaker 1: a dictator. Rand Paul's like, come on, guys, come on,
Speaker 1: what is going on here? What we're gonna accuse you
Speaker 1: is Rand Paul and Asian? What where do they have
Speaker 1: on Rand Paul? And when do they have it? You know?
Speaker 1: But what kind of what kind of compromont does the
Speaker 1: Krumlin have on Rand Paul and police? By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's beyond them. I'm sure give it time,
Speaker 1: we'll be hearing about all. You know, Rand Paul once
Speaker 1: went to a restaurant and ordered Borsch and it wasn't
Speaker 1: even on the menu. And you know, there's they'll come
Speaker 1: up with something. But Rand Paul's analysis is spot on.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's what I think too, which is
Speaker 1: just that everything. It's also it's just hyperventilation for media
Speaker 1: over all this stuff. They've created this insane, hyper sensitive
Speaker 1: atmosphere over all things Russia, all things Trump and Putin,
Speaker 1: and it's just all nonsense. It's being a nonsense. The
Speaker 1: left new rising star who took out one of the
Speaker 1: most prominent Democrat machine, Congressman uh Ocasio Cortez. She's got
Speaker 1: problems with stuff that involves, you know, knowing things. We'll
Speaker 1: get to that next. He's holding the line for America,
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton his back. The economy is going pretty strong, right,
Speaker 1: There's roughly four percent unemployment, three point nine percent unemployment. Um,
Speaker 1: do you think that capitalism has failed to deliver for
Speaker 1: working class Americans or is no longer the best vehicle
Speaker 1: for working class Americans? Well? I think the numbers that
Speaker 1: you just talked about is part of the problem, right
Speaker 1: because we look at these figures and we say, oh,
Speaker 1: unemployment is low, everything is fine, right, Well, Unemployment is
Speaker 1: low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because
Speaker 1: people are working sixty eight hours a week and can
Speaker 1: barely feed their kids. And so I do think that
Speaker 1: right now, when we have this no holds barred wild
Speaker 1: West hyper capitalism, what that means is profit at any cost.
Speaker 1: Capitalism has not always existed in the world, and it
Speaker 1: will not always exist in the world. Now you may
Speaker 1: be thinking to yourself, who is that that that incredible
Speaker 1: in the pantheon of ignorance? Who is this person we
Speaker 1: have to add to the to the you know, add
Speaker 1: a statue. Uh, that's Okazio cortez one. I just get
Speaker 1: annoyed because I don't like hyphenated. Last names. I know
Speaker 1: some of you probably have them. I'm sorry, I'm just
Speaker 1: not a fan. Okay, it's nothing. It's not about Okazi Cortez.
Speaker 1: I just don't like the last names. Period. Pick a
Speaker 1: last name, all right, I don't have to expand all
Speaker 1: this extra breath. Pick a last name. That's one too. Yeah,
Speaker 1: capitalism not so great, right, It's only elevated more people
Speaker 1: out of poverty, misery, and early death than any other
Speaker 1: system devised in the history of the planet. But sure,
Speaker 1: capitalism hasn't always existed, so maybe it won't always exist.
Speaker 1: This is who the Democrats are elevating as the future
Speaker 1: of their party. I kid you not. I do not
Speaker 1: exaggerate the future of the Democratic Party. Uh, Alejandra alex
Speaker 1: Ocazio Cortez, Alexandria, pardon me, Ocazio Cortez. The future of
Speaker 1: the party, they say, just defeated Crowdley, the number four
Speaker 1: Democrat in the House. I guess number three Democrat whatever.
Speaker 1: He was, been in there for like twenty or thirty years,
Speaker 1: A long time. Somebody's like, yeah, you know, capitalism not
Speaker 1: so great and just all of eighty hours a week.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be honest with you, I've never heard of
Speaker 1: anybody who's actually working a job for wages at eighty
Speaker 1: hours a week was trouble feeding themselves. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it's impossible, of just saying wow, because that's usually a
Speaker 1: work ethic that people would you know, there there would
Speaker 1: be ways to capitalize on just that work ethic that
Speaker 1: would make you more money that I just but you know,
Speaker 1: you can't ever pin people down on this stuff, right Oh,
Speaker 1: you know they're working five jobs and can't feed. You
Speaker 1: know that this class struggle rhetoric is always about stories
Speaker 1: that never are really about anyone. It's just about everyone,
Speaker 1: so that means it's about nothing at the same time.
Speaker 1: But she she got a little called up there beyond
Speaker 1: the usual social justice warrior rhetoric, and they love, they
Speaker 1: think this woman is incredible, right she ran she's just
Speaker 1: all about But I mean she's you know, abolished ice,
Speaker 1: abolished capitalism, all this stuff, all the things that there
Speaker 1: I say have made America great. She's got problems with capitalism,
Speaker 1: free enterprise, private property, you know that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: It seems she's got issues with that. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: she wants to get rid of all of it, but
Speaker 1: she's got issues with it for sure. And this is
Speaker 1: I remember the media owning profiles of her. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: Oh she's amazing. Oh she's the future. She's the female
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders. That's kind of what they're female Latina, telegenic
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, that's what they're going for. You canna see
Speaker 1: a lot more of this young lady. But she's you know,
Speaker 1: not even in Congress yet, and you're gonna, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: she's gonna media superstar MSNBC is gonna put her in
Speaker 1: every five minutes. But the little problem because when she
Speaker 1: got when she gets away from the social justice rhetoric,
Speaker 1: he's gotta know some stuff and um, well, I'll let
Speaker 1: you decide for yourself, folks. Here's her version of what's
Speaker 1: going on with Israel and Palestine plicklip one. But I am,
Speaker 1: of course that the dynamic there in terms of geopolitics
Speaker 1: and the war at least is very different than people
Speaker 1: expressing their First Amendment right to protest. Well here she
Speaker 1: is that. I also think that what people are starting
Speaker 1: to see, at least in the occupation of Palestine is
Speaker 1: um just an increasing crisis of humanitarian audition, and that
Speaker 1: to me is just where I tend to come from
Speaker 1: on this issue. You use the term the occupation of Palestine?
Speaker 1: What did you mean by that? Oh? Oh, I think
Speaker 1: what I meant is like the settlements that are increasing
Speaker 1: in some of these areas in places where, um, where
Speaker 1: Palestinians are experiencing difficulty and access to their housing and homes.
Speaker 1: Do you think you can expand on that? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean I think i'd also just I am not the
Speaker 1: expert at geopolitics on this issue, that's for sure. Are
Speaker 1: you having a you know, just remember, folks, I can
Speaker 1: see Russia from my house is a line that millions
Speaker 1: of Americans believe. Sarah Palin said. They're sure she said it,
Speaker 1: she never said it. Tina Fey, pretending to be Sarah
Speaker 1: Palent to skewer her on Saturday Night Live, said it,
Speaker 1: and Sarah Palin correctly said at the time, and look,
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm actually not a big Sarah Palin fan
Speaker 1: for whatever that's worth. So just put that aside. But
Speaker 1: Sarah Pillin correctly said that, you know, Russia is actually
Speaker 1: really close to Alaska, so I do have some you know,
Speaker 1: there's Russian, you know, there's Russian. Uh, flights the test
Speaker 1: a radar defenses to come near her here, and she
Speaker 1: was making a you can see Russia from you know,
Speaker 1: across the baring straight. I mean, there were some She's
Speaker 1: trying to talk about her She's got a little bit
Speaker 1: of explained. Look, governors do this all the time, you know,
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I can call the National Guard. I've got
Speaker 1: military experience, Like well, not really, but but you know,
Speaker 1: I can see Ratchef from my house. She never said that,
Speaker 1: but they made it seem like she said that. You know,
Speaker 1: Kasya Cortez, what do you think about the occupation? Will Well,
Speaker 1: it's like that it's like the housing and like the
Speaker 1: access and you know, humanitarian and justice, social justice and
Speaker 1: you know, the community and activism and you know, just
Speaker 1: just blather, just blather, and why not just you know,
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't look, I don't really have much
Speaker 1: on that. I'll honestly, I'm focused more on my district
Speaker 1: than what I can do in Congress. Right, That's that's
Speaker 1: an answer. I can't fault that answer. But you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: like those little jost is, because social justice warriors are
Speaker 1: just supposed to have a script. They're they're not supposed
Speaker 1: to know anything about these issues. They're just supposed to
Speaker 1: know what they're supposed to say. So she kind of
Speaker 1: knew what she was supposed to say, but she didn't
Speaker 1: know anything about what she was talking about. And that's
Speaker 1: what you saw there. And if it wasn't if it
Speaker 1: wasn't her, if it was a Republican, oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: You know, all the jokes and the media you will
Speaker 1: see not a single you will not see a sketch
Speaker 1: about on about this interview on SNL. You will not
Speaker 1: see people making fun of this. They will move right
Speaker 1: on past this. Whereas here somebody who's running for Congress
Speaker 1: who doesn't even know what she doesn't know. That's my
Speaker 1: real problem. It's not that she has to be an
Speaker 1: expert in Israeli Palestinian politics. She doesn't know what she
Speaker 1: doesn't know, she doesn't know enough not to pretend not
Speaker 1: to know, and she's hostile to capitalism. And this is
Speaker 1: the future of the Democratic Party. Folks, Hey, this is
Speaker 1: what they're offering up. Indeed, I pressing when you get
Speaker 1: into it, isn't it pretty much? Um? Speaking of Democrats
Speaker 1: and socialists and the left, what happens when your city
Speaker 1: becomes overwhelm with poop. The thing that's happening in a
Speaker 1: Democrats stronghold. We will talk about why in just a moment,
Speaker 1: your native of San Francisco, is this the worst you've
Speaker 1: seen that? I will say, um that there is more.
Speaker 1: There's more feces on the sidewalks. And I've ever seen,
Speaker 1: you know, growing up here, that was something that did
Speaker 1: not wasn't the norm, But you've ever seen that, I've
Speaker 1: ever seen for sure, and that is a huge problem.
Speaker 1: And we're not just talking about from from dogs. We're
Speaker 1: talking about from humans. Poop on the streets, not usually
Speaker 1: what you would hear a mayor of a major US
Speaker 1: city talking about. But sure enough, San Francisco Mayor London
Speaker 1: Breed is willing to admit that there's more poop on
Speaker 1: the streets now that ever before. And I'm going to
Speaker 1: guess by a lot. You see here we we are
Speaker 1: once again treated, or forced to endure, probably a better
Speaker 1: way of putting it, the end results of liberal do
Speaker 1: good heurism at the expense of civic virtue, decency, public order,
Speaker 1: all of those things that sound like they're just for
Speaker 1: squeems man, like you're just doing like, why can't we
Speaker 1: all just like just be free, and they leave in
Speaker 1: the streets. Man, they leave in the like tents and
Speaker 1: like go around with like my my adopted dog, and
Speaker 1: I just like bar from different friends so I can
Speaker 1: get more cash off at people when I walk around.
Speaker 1: I am not talking. I want to be very clear
Speaker 1: here about the homelessness epidemic that comes from people who
Speaker 1: are struggling with severe mental illness, severe drug abuse, severe alcoholism,
Speaker 1: or or any of those. That's real. It's it's been
Speaker 1: a problems for a long time, and those people deserve
Speaker 1: as much support as we can give them. We as
Speaker 1: a society owe it to them and ourselves to do
Speaker 1: everything we can within our power to be as decent
Speaker 1: to those people as we can, because they're deeply struggling.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about those who decided to opt out of
Speaker 1: being productive citizens, who are able, bodied, of sound mind,
Speaker 1: and they just choose vagrancy. This is a thing. I
Speaker 1: passed tents on the street on my way into work
Speaker 1: today here in d C. There is a park right
Speaker 1: near where I'm doing this broadcast that is effectively an
Speaker 1: open air UH camp site. Well, I guess all campsites
Speaker 1: are open air, but open air homeless shelter really, but
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of the people you'll see
Speaker 1: are um there. Well, I mean, look, I've there's differences
Speaker 1: when you see homeless people of different you know, that
Speaker 1: look like they're dealing with different things. I'm seeing people
Speaker 1: that have aspray camping backpacks, which which are fancy, which
Speaker 1: I know from my time when I used to go
Speaker 1: overseas with you know, legit camping gear stuff. People that
Speaker 1: have you know, our terrax and osprey gear who are
Speaker 1: traveling around and look like they've you know, have access
Speaker 1: to showers and look like they have access to clean clothing,
Speaker 1: and they just park themselves on the street asked for money.
Speaker 1: A lot of them are able body, by the way,
Speaker 1: a lot of them are a lot of them are
Speaker 1: Caucasian twentysomethings that you'll see in in New York and
Speaker 1: d C. Yes, but much more so in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: And so you know, this is not your stereotypical problem
Speaker 1: of homelessness that is affecting, UH disproportionately those with UH
Speaker 1: you know, mental health and and UH substance abuse issues
Speaker 1: disproportionately affecting minority communities in this country. This is something else.
Speaker 1: This is the choice of vagrancy. It's like homeless by decision,
Speaker 1: or homeless because we want to be because it's a
Speaker 1: lifestyle now. And you see this with with these campsites
Speaker 1: that are popping up all of their all over to
Speaker 1: Los Angeles or San Francisco is the worst now, to
Speaker 1: be fair, I haven't been in San Francisco number of years.
Speaker 1: I've been in l A just a matter of months ago,
Speaker 1: and I could see it in l A all over
Speaker 1: the place in San Francisco, assuming it's even worse, but
Speaker 1: you see, you know, so there's that's the background for this.
Speaker 1: But the how liberalism comes into play here is as follows.
Speaker 1: You know how this goes. Oh, come on, they're not
Speaker 1: bothering anybody. Why are you being so heartless? Why they're
Speaker 1: down on their luck? Why are you being so mean?
Speaker 1: Why would you have, you know, law enforcement enforced vagrancy statutes.
Speaker 1: Why would you tell people they can't amp out on
Speaker 1: the street. They're not bothering you, they're not causing you
Speaker 1: any problems, they're not causing the city any problems. And
Speaker 1: and you know, and then they get this whole thing
Speaker 1: about it's like a class struggle issue. And you know,
Speaker 1: like I'm some guy or you're some guy or gal
Speaker 1: who's walking around stepping over these vagrants with a top
Speaker 1: hat on a monocle. They like count they just get
Speaker 1: them out of here. No, this is about do you
Speaker 1: want to be able to walk your kids to school
Speaker 1: in your neighborhood if you live in somebod these I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you're like, buck, we don't have
Speaker 1: this problem where I live. But you know, congrats. I
Speaker 1: know you also measure your homes in acreage, not in
Speaker 1: square feet like I do, because you know I live
Speaker 1: in a box. But the uh, you know, can you
Speaker 1: walk your kid to school without your kid being exposed
Speaker 1: to people who are urinating defecating in the street, which
Speaker 1: is what we're talking about here right. You know, San
Speaker 1: Francisco is turning into Poopsville now because they've got people
Speaker 1: that just are going in the street all over the place, uh,
Speaker 1: urinating and defecating the street, having sex in maybe maybe
Speaker 1: in like a tent or some kind of a but
Speaker 1: you know, out in public. You know, you wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to. You can't just park your car in a
Speaker 1: lot and just get busy in the back seat. You
Speaker 1: can't just have a tent in a public park and
Speaker 1: just start going wild on each other. That's all that.
Speaker 1: That's a problem. People are having sex out in public squares,
Speaker 1: urinating and defecating, doing drugs because they're Look, there are
Speaker 1: drug addicts among I'm not saying that, you know, this
Speaker 1: isn't just the kind of vagrant by choice set or
Speaker 1: people that are also doing drugs, or some people aren't
Speaker 1: severely drug addicted yet but will become. They're doing drugs,
Speaker 1: leaving garbage everywhere, which is also a problem, and think
Speaker 1: they're trash all over the place, and there are health
Speaker 1: risks from this. You know, there's the very real risk
Speaker 1: of spread of disease that you know, the things that
Speaker 1: you would see in close quarters, whether in a prison
Speaker 1: or in you know, a military and camp in the
Speaker 1: front lines. I think of like World War One era.
Speaker 1: You know, stuff can spread very quickly. So you've got
Speaker 1: public health concerns, but none of that you you know,
Speaker 1: you have to suffer through it all before liberals will
Speaker 1: actually start to uh deal with the reality of because
Speaker 1: they just want to feel good about themselves. You know,
Speaker 1: San Francisco, hey man, they we just say San Francisco,
Speaker 1: like we just went everything feel like they can be
Speaker 1: themselves and like wild out and they do every Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: here's what a preschool teacher at Delita Oriana, so not
Speaker 1: exactly thirst and how the third here's what she had
Speaker 1: to said. Quote, we see poop, we seep, we see needles,
Speaker 1: and we see trash. She says that our kids sometimes
Speaker 1: ask what it is, and that's a conversation that's a
Speaker 1: little difficult to have with a two year old. But
Speaker 1: we just let them know that those things are full
Speaker 1: of germs, that they are dangerous and they should never
Speaker 1: be touched. There are seventy five hundred homeless people living
Speaker 1: full time in San Francisco, according to the city. By
Speaker 1: the way, I'm sure the numbers a law larger than that,
Speaker 1: which will spend two hundred and eighty million dollars this
Speaker 1: year on housing services for the homeless. Breed said San
Speaker 1: francisco high cost of living cast the cities homeless onto
Speaker 1: the streets. Quote. About seventy of the people estimated to
Speaker 1: be homeless in San Francisco were actually housed in San
Speaker 1: Francisco before they became homeless. It's unclear how Breed will
Speaker 1: hold public defecators accountable She said Friday that harsher penalties
Speaker 1: for offenders are not on the table. Instead, she directed
Speaker 1: her criticism towards homeless advocacy groups. It's all courtesy the
Speaker 1: Daily Caller, who's who, she said, aren't doing a good
Speaker 1: enough job teaching their clients how to keep the streets clean.
Speaker 1: Oh that's right, folks, like a classic liberal, instead of
Speaker 1: thinking about the overall policy, the ordinance of anything else.
Speaker 1: With the pool and the pee all over the streets.
Speaker 1: Now it's the it's the fault of the people trying
Speaker 1: to help the homelessness epidemic for not doing a good
Speaker 1: enough job training the homeless people not to urinate and
Speaker 1: defecating public. This is liberalism, one oh one. This is
Speaker 1: what happens right, whether it's Venezuela or the streets of
Speaker 1: San Francisco. It starts with when we just want to
Speaker 1: be nice and have the good ideas, and like, we
Speaker 1: don't want to be like you know, air and be
Speaker 1: tough on people or anything like maybe we can just
Speaker 1: give everybody what they want and nobody has any responsibility
Speaker 1: and nobody's ever held accountable on bad things happen when
Speaker 1: you apply liberalism, When you take the doctrines of the
Speaker 1: left and make them into a reality. Bad things happen,
Speaker 1: and San Francisco is just the the latest, very very stinky,
Speaker 1: very smelly example of that. I now I've gotta I
Speaker 1: gotta go and do some Actually, I don't want to
Speaker 1: do this kind of field research. Sounds like it's not
Speaker 1: gonna be that fun. I want to talk to you
Speaker 1: about a transgender activist who is competing in the Miss
Speaker 1: Universe competition female male the female. Uh. And then I
Speaker 1: have something that's gonna hopefully inspire you a little bit
Speaker 1: coming up the next hour. Definitely works staying around for
Speaker 1: stay with me. I want to tell you what I
Speaker 1: love about simply say. These guys are all about the details,
Speaker 1: and that's why the alarm system they give you is
Speaker 1: so good. Also, they're all about customer service. They're not
Speaker 1: locked you into a long term contract. We're not trying
Speaker 1: to trick you with fine print to make you pay
Speaker 1: and pay and pay. No. No, they want to help
Speaker 1: you be in full control of security situation at your home.
Speaker 1: I have a simply safe system. I can tell you
Speaker 1: it is so easy. It is foolproof. The entire interfaces
Speaker 1: very straightforward. It runs off your WiFi and you can
Speaker 1: check in on it remotely, so wherever you are, it's
Speaker 1: like you're carrying your home security system in your pocket,
Speaker 1: so you know your stuff and your family is safe.
Speaker 1: Gives you seven monitoring and there's no contract at all.
Speaker 1: Go check it out for yourself. Protect your home today.
Speaker 1: Visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck, no contracts, no games. Simply safe
Speaker 1: dot Com slash buck for the best security system in
Speaker 1: the business. Bussion decoding the news and disseminating information. Who
Speaker 1: is actionable and intelligence. Make no mistake America American again,
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Sexton Show. Analyst. No. You know,
Speaker 1: I try to have an open mind when it comes
Speaker 1: to the other side of the argument. You know, I
Speaker 1: really do, And I read a lot of Democrat left
Speaker 1: wing publications. I like to know what the other side thinks.
Speaker 1: I like to be familiar with their arguments and have
Speaker 1: an understanding of them culturally as much as I can,
Speaker 1: which also it helps being a born, raised New Yorker,
Speaker 1: you get a sense of what democrats are like and
Speaker 1: what they think because you're surrounded by them. But but
Speaker 1: then I see things like this and I wasn't even
Speaker 1: looking for this over the weekend, and I should probably
Speaker 1: bring myself two just not look at Twitter over the weekend.
Speaker 1: But I had to share this with you. Okay, this
Speaker 1: is This is a piece that the New York Times
Speaker 1: tweeted out. Here's here's the initial this is what they shared. Okay.
Speaker 1: This is from the New York Times, the premier liberal
Speaker 1: publication in the United States, and therefore I think you
Speaker 1: can argue at least in the world, and it certainly
Speaker 1: has among the largest circulations. They put out a piece.
Speaker 1: This is I'm reading this word for word. Okay, this
Speaker 1: is There's no exaggeration, there's no omissions. This is exactly
Speaker 1: what it says. Quote. Spain's Beauty Queen is a transgender
Speaker 1: activist with a message for the school children she visits.
Speaker 1: There are women with a penis and men with the vagina,
Speaker 1: because the only key part of being a woman is
Speaker 1: to be and feel like a woman. There is so
Speaker 1: much wrong and that's the end of the quote. There's
Speaker 1: so much wrong there. I I was somewhat flabbergasted by
Speaker 1: this um and I want to walk you through some
Speaker 1: of this because even even given that I'm aware of
Speaker 1: how the Left is undergoing a mass delusion right now politically,
Speaker 1: and they're out of power, and they realize that Americans
Speaker 1: don't really agree with them on stuff, and that they
Speaker 1: have to import non Americans to shore up their voting
Speaker 1: and there's all kinds of stuff that's that's going on here. Uh,
Speaker 1: but this is just crazy and and I I look
Speaker 1: at there, there's a number of level of create. Let
Speaker 1: me just start with this. This is a a person
Speaker 1: who is visiting small children, a transgender activist who is
Speaker 1: visiting small children, who is promoting the message, according to
Speaker 1: New York Times, that women have a penis and men
Speaker 1: have a vagina. Now that is false, that is not
Speaker 1: a true statements. But the New York Times is treating
Speaker 1: it with with the utmost seriousness and uh and believes
Speaker 1: that this deserves respect as a position. Obviously they're writing
Speaker 1: a piece on this, but just subject children before I
Speaker 1: even get it into the inherent falsehoods here. To subject
Speaker 1: children two, this should be be on the pale. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think this has told us something about where the
Speaker 1: situation is right now and how bad the situation is
Speaker 1: that you have kids who are being subjected to this. Okay,
Speaker 1: you know, if people want to play you know, left
Speaker 1: wing progressive superactivists on their own time, that's one thing.
Speaker 1: But to go and be telling little school kids weren't
Speaker 1: talking about school children, okay, little kids, that men have that,
Speaker 1: that women can have a penist, that men kind of
Speaker 1: vagina one that is that is biologically and an anatomie.
Speaker 1: False and too, it doesn't it reek of brainwashing and propaganda.
Speaker 1: I don't think we need to expose. I don't know
Speaker 1: of any other. I never had a beauty queen. I
Speaker 1: can tell you this. I never had a Miss America
Speaker 1: contestant come by my school when I was, like, you know,
Speaker 1: in the fifth grade, just to tell us about the
Speaker 1: birds and the bees or anything. Okay, that didn't happen.
Speaker 1: It doesn't strike me as normal in any regard. So first,
Speaker 1: the fact that they're going after kids with this stuff,
Speaker 1: I find that, on its face very disturbing. But then
Speaker 1: you get into more of this, and you know this, uh,
Speaker 1: this particular uh person and I don't know guys, am
Speaker 1: I now? Am I now? Legally The New York Times
Speaker 1: refers to uh this person as she everywhere uh Angela
Speaker 1: Ponce therefore do as she do. I have am I
Speaker 1: now a bigot? If I don't say she am, I
Speaker 1: gonna get sued. If I don't say she am I
Speaker 1: in trouble? Are people gonna come to my defense if
Speaker 1: I get in trouble for not saying she I? You know,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna be the the lone guy who charges
Speaker 1: the machine gun nest on this one. If you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, no, thank you? You know. If ever,
Speaker 1: if everyone else is gonna sit back and say, yeah, she,
Speaker 1: well what are we supposed to do? And now I
Speaker 1: try to stand for the truth here, but I'm also
Speaker 1: not going to expose myself. Pardon the expression. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to uh put myself in a vulnerable position here
Speaker 1: because I want to tell the truth while everybody else
Speaker 1: is already caved. So anyway, so for the purposes of now,
Speaker 1: we'll say she because I don't know much more about
Speaker 1: this person than that, and that's what they're writing in
Speaker 1: this piece. But let's just start with that Angela Ponce
Speaker 1: says about her to she she's gonna be the first
Speaker 1: UH person to ever compete in the Miss Universe contest,
Speaker 1: which is for women who as a biological male. So
Speaker 1: now we have a biological male competing in the Miss
Speaker 1: Universe competition, which is, you know, the the choice that
Speaker 1: anybody's it's an organization. They can make whatever rules they want. Fine,
Speaker 1: But what I just find fascinating is the deluded rhetoric
Speaker 1: around a lot of this, and how The New York
Speaker 1: Times is obviously celebrating this, and you could say, oh,
Speaker 1: bucket doesn't matter, it doesn't matter. Well, actually, politics is
Speaker 1: downstream from culture. And here I am reading to you
Speaker 1: from the premier publication of the the left in this country,
Speaker 1: the the flagship mainstream media news publication in the United States,
Speaker 1: and it's referring to a man as she everywhere and
Speaker 1: celebrating how he is now as she who is competing
Speaker 1: in a female beauty pageant and is telling little kids
Speaker 1: that this is great and that men have men have
Speaker 1: of a giant and women have a penis, and we're
Speaker 1: supposed to all sit here and clap and not our
Speaker 1: heads and say, yeah, isn't this great? I mean, the
Speaker 1: left is the left is just lost it. I don't know.
Speaker 1: And I can sit here and have a talk with
Speaker 1: somebody about minimum wage and workers rights and voting rights
Speaker 1: and you know, the stuff where people can people of
Speaker 1: good faith can disagree. But if you're gonna tell me
Speaker 1: that there are thirty seven genders, you're gonna tell me
Speaker 1: that a man is a woman and a woman is
Speaker 1: a man, We're gonna have a problem. And I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to be mean. You know that I'm probably too nice,
Speaker 1: if anything, is probably one of the biggest knocks on
Speaker 1: me in this industry. I'm too nice to people probably
Speaker 1: just start throwing haymakers all the time. But here's what ponce.
Speaker 1: We'll just go with that said quote. Her recent success
Speaker 1: as a beauty queen has brought her admirers, but also
Speaker 1: plenty of attacks, mostly from other women. She said, what
Speaker 1: strikes me is that a lot of the criticism has
Speaker 1: come from women and people from my own collective, just
Speaker 1: when women are taking to the streets to ask for recognition,
Speaker 1: She said, I find it weird that some women don't
Speaker 1: tolerate that I go to a competition to represent my
Speaker 1: country as the woman that I am. She added, if
Speaker 1: we want progress, we just have to stop looking whether
Speaker 1: what other women are doing is good or not. I
Speaker 1: don't know what that that doesn't that doesn't really seem
Speaker 1: to mean very much anyway, And then there are women
Speaker 1: with a penis and men with a vagina because the
Speaker 1: only key part of being a woman is to be
Speaker 1: and feel like a woman. You know, it's just not true.
Speaker 1: And I sit here and I look around and say,
Speaker 1: at what point do we did this person had had
Speaker 1: um genital recon you know, genital whatever they reconstructive surgery
Speaker 1: or I forget what the particular term is for it
Speaker 1: um when when when she was sixteen? And hormonal treatment
Speaker 1: and vaginal plastic surgery and they have to call a
Speaker 1: vaginal plastic surgery because it's not they cannot create female biology, folks,
Speaker 1: This is where the science is. It is is what
Speaker 1: it is. We consider just like in every cell in
Speaker 1: your body, there's xx chromosome, x y chromosome, and you know,
Speaker 1: for all the little smarty pants. So we're gonna send
Speaker 1: me um but buck, what about when people are born
Speaker 1: with both sense of equipment or oh book, what about
Speaker 1: the biological irregularity that happens? One of the bazillion times
Speaker 1: I said, okay, for those people, we can have a
Speaker 1: talk about the biological reality of being, you know, inter sex.
Speaker 1: But that's not we're talking about here. That's not the
Speaker 1: standard where that's not the transgender movement. It's not rooted
Speaker 1: in biology. They're saying it's a psychological disposition that determines
Speaker 1: the biological reality. Well, uh, well, so you know what
Speaker 1: does that mean? You can't have it both ways? Right, So,
Speaker 1: because I've gotten already emails. You know, I had somebody
Speaker 1: had a doctor who's gonna come on the show, bailed
Speaker 1: somebody it's dealt with gender dysphoria in the past, bailed,
Speaker 1: wouldn't do it. Uh. And I've had people that won't
Speaker 1: write to me anymore, are used to write to me
Speaker 1: about this issue because they just you know, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: closed minded. I'm not closed minded. Just tell me where
Speaker 1: I'm wrong on the facts, not on the feelings. Tell
Speaker 1: me where I'm wrong about what's real, not what people
Speaker 1: wish was real. Uh. But yeah, it's plastic surgery in
Speaker 1: the genital area because they can't actually make you a female.
Speaker 1: You cannot bear children, you you cannot undo God's Oh gosh,
Speaker 1: I just said it. You cannot undo God's creation in
Speaker 1: that sense. It's it's just we can't do it. Maybe
Speaker 1: at some point in the future will be able to,
Speaker 1: and then that's a whole other conversation about whether we
Speaker 1: should but also, well, at least then we'll be having
Speaker 1: a discussion based in the facts. But to feel like
Speaker 1: a woman is not the basis of being a woman.
Speaker 1: That is not true. That is a false statement. Why
Speaker 1: does The New York Times publish false statements? Why does
Speaker 1: The New York Times agonize over using plural person plural
Speaker 1: pronouns for singular person because they want to be polite,
Speaker 1: but they don't, But they also don't want to be
Speaker 1: wrong them and there for one person, because they're multi
Speaker 1: they're they're they're multi gender. Don't we understand that this
Speaker 1: is also becoming more of a fad now that that
Speaker 1: people are gonna be latching onto this and they're gonna
Speaker 1: be run you know, not just supporters of it, but
Speaker 1: young people are gonna be told people that are struggling
Speaker 1: with their identity. Look, it's hard to be a teenager.
Speaker 1: I remember acne everywhere, and you know, no one likes you,
Speaker 1: and you have all kinds of problems, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: and everyone goes through all this stuff, and you go
Speaker 1: through a lot of psychological stuff too, especially as you mature,
Speaker 1: you go through puberty. And I just think this is
Speaker 1: so damaging hormonal surgery at sixteen. I didn't know anything
Speaker 1: at sixteen, and I know a lot more than these
Speaker 1: people who are changing their lives at sixteen. Right, But
Speaker 1: this is just And I'm not I'm not looking into
Speaker 1: the bowels of the internet here. I'm not grabbing some
Speaker 1: random blogger from wherever I'm I'm pulling from the the
Speaker 1: premier newspaper of the Democratic Party and all the American
Speaker 1: left in this country and probably the most well, the
Speaker 1: most recognizable newspaper in the world. And it's saying he's
Speaker 1: a she and she should be celebrated for competing in
Speaker 1: a beauty pageant. And you know what's next, folks, And
Speaker 1: it's already started to happen a little bit, but just
Speaker 1: get ready for it. They're going to tell people like
Speaker 1: you and me, for the gentleman who are on who
Speaker 1: are listening to this right now, They're gonna tell us
Speaker 1: that if we are not sexually attracted to a person
Speaker 1: who is a transgender female, because I look at them
Speaker 1: and said, well, that is a male. I can look
Speaker 1: at their foe arms, I can look at their neck,
Speaker 1: I can actually tell side note. I mean, but you
Speaker 1: know they're always say, oh, you can't tell. No, actually
Speaker 1: you can tell. You can look at their face, you
Speaker 1: can tell. But if you're not attracted to somebody who
Speaker 1: is transgented, you know, this is a very personal thing, right,
Speaker 1: If you're not attracted to them, you're kind of a bigot.
Speaker 1: You're kind of bigot. It there they're mark my words.
Speaker 1: It's already started to happen. They've already been some fringy
Speaker 1: pieces on this, but that's coming next and the next.
Speaker 1: It's going to be if you're on a dating app
Speaker 1: and somebody pretends to be a female who's actually male
Speaker 1: when you meet them, and you have a problem with that,
Speaker 1: it's not that that's your choice, you're a bigot. You
Speaker 1: won't let them live their truth. You're a ad person.
Speaker 1: It's they're going to make it like you are the
Speaker 1: the moral equivalent of a racist. If you will not
Speaker 1: date somebody as a heterosexual who is transgender, it's going
Speaker 1: to happen, mark my words. And then where are we?
Speaker 1: You know? Then we're right now. I'm talking about how
Speaker 1: I gotta call people. She that I know where he
Speaker 1: just give it some time and I'm gonna have to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: if if he as she wants to go on a
Speaker 1: date with me, then V has the right to tell
Speaker 1: me that I can't say. I can't say boo about it.
Speaker 1: H crazy times. We live in folks, crazy times. Indeed,
Speaker 1: I this is just gonna keep getting worse and worried.
Speaker 1: I've got some thoughts on the this is America thing,
Speaker 1: that Sasha Baron Cohen thing. Let me let me tell
Speaker 1: you about want to come back. Sometimes you're gonna need
Speaker 1: a pick me up. Sometimes you're gonna need a little
Speaker 1: extra energy, whether it's getting up in the morning for
Speaker 1: that early work day call, or getting fired up at
Speaker 1: the end of the day to go to the gym,
Speaker 1: or just to push you through that afternoon. Lull, I
Speaker 1: have the answer for you, Strike Force Energy. Strike Force
Speaker 1: is veteran owned and American made. I have been giving
Speaker 1: it out to my colleagues here at the Hill, and
Speaker 1: let me tell you, people love Strike Force. They know
Speaker 1: they can give them that little extra boost and then
Speaker 1: it's all good for you. Ingredients, all the top kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. You can get, zero sugar, zero calories. They
Speaker 1: will fuel you through your toughest fights with Strike Force Energy.
Speaker 1: Try for yourself. You can mix it in with water,
Speaker 1: t lemonade, even a nice cold beer. Go to strike
Speaker 1: Force Energy dot com and or discount code buck that's
Speaker 1: b U c k at. Check out strike Force Energy
Speaker 1: dot com discount code bucket. For every packet you buy,
Speaker 1: strike Force will donate a packet to military members around
Speaker 1: the globe. Strike Force Energy is fuel for the Fight.
Speaker 1: So this This is America is the new series from
Speaker 1: Sasha Baron Cohen, you know him best as and I
Speaker 1: thought about playing some fun clips here because there's some
Speaker 1: funny Borat stuff and I'm the only person that I've
Speaker 1: ever heard say this Bora. The genius of Bora is
Speaker 1: that you got to make fun of essentially a regressive
Speaker 1: Islamic mentality without ever saying the guys a Muslim Okay,
Speaker 1: Kazak stands about seventy Muslim. So unless Borat happened to
Speaker 1: be some like minority Christian in kazakh Stan, guess what,
Speaker 1: he's a Muslim and he's running around saying really aggressive
Speaker 1: stuff about women and regressive stuff. Uh. And that's the
Speaker 1: only way he could get away with it, right, is
Speaker 1: that they they just made fun of Kazakhstan and they
Speaker 1: never got into regressive Islamic fundamentalism. Or anything like that.
Speaker 1: So there was some merit in the Bora character, and
Speaker 1: there were some funny bits, and I thought about playing
Speaker 1: as we came back on ear here, I thought about
Speaker 1: playing some of the uh you know, the man them
Speaker 1: a boot then all you know, and every every frat
Speaker 1: boy in the country, as I've said, has a borodd voice,
Speaker 1: and it's kind of easy to do. And so now
Speaker 1: Sasha Baron Cohen is back, and he's, from what I understand,
Speaker 1: spoofed a lot of different people. I've gotten a lot
Speaker 1: of politicians too, ah, you know, to sit down for
Speaker 1: interviews and and make fools of themselves, and one way
Speaker 1: or another, this just been a commonplace thing, right. He's
Speaker 1: making people look silly, and everyone's saying, oh ha ha ha,
Speaker 1: He's making all these people look so silly. Okay, fine, um,
Speaker 1: that's set looking at all. That The majority of the
Speaker 1: footage I've seen so far, it's just in previews, is
Speaker 1: him setting up a fictional program. He plays a what's
Speaker 1: what's an Israeli security specialist, and he does it pretty funny,
Speaker 1: like exaggerated, is really accent. Yeah, but he does this
Speaker 1: is really accent, and he's a you know, he's like
Speaker 1: you take the gun and you fight them with your hand,
Speaker 1: and you know, the whole thing. And and then he's
Speaker 1: gonna sit down and talk to members of Congress about
Speaker 1: arming toddlers with handguns and stuff. And look, it's a
Speaker 1: it's a bit, and it works shockingly because people are
Speaker 1: you know, we're we're so binary and are thinking on this.
Speaker 1: We're so pro gun anti gun that I think people
Speaker 1: get caught up and they're like, well, I'm pro gone,
Speaker 1: so I guess this guy seems pro gone and they
Speaker 1: get coned, right, I mean, they don't really think it through,
Speaker 1: but they're getting conned. And there's some funny bits that
Speaker 1: come from it. I haven't seen anything that you know
Speaker 1: so far. It's he plays the Israeli weapons expert, he
Speaker 1: plays uh and really sort of gun advocate, and then
Speaker 1: he plays a some kind of American Trump supporter character.
Speaker 1: And this is all based on just little snippets I've seen,
Speaker 1: so I have to watch more of the show. But
Speaker 1: here's just my my big takeaway from this uh so far,
Speaker 1: and if it changes, I'll let you know. I know,
Speaker 1: I just talked to you about a transgender beauty activists
Speaker 1: essentially a man and a woman's uh beauty competition. Do
Speaker 1: you think that Sasha Cohen or any comedian in the
Speaker 1: United States for that for that matter, would make a
Speaker 1: single joke about this? Do you think they would ever
Speaker 1: make a joke about a a transgender activist, a biological
Speaker 1: male competing in female beauty competitions, going and telling school
Speaker 1: children that women can have penises and men can have vaginas?
Speaker 1: Do you you will they ever see any humor in
Speaker 1: that whatsoever, or more to the point, anything worthy of
Speaker 1: derision and mockery and contempt even, no nothing, no jokes,
Speaker 1: no comedy there. You know. I brought it up today
Speaker 1: actually on on the show this morning, I said, you know,
Speaker 1: when when Sasha Baron Cohen is going to show up
Speaker 1: at the Harvard Admissions office and play and and play,
Speaker 1: uh you know, which of the thirty seven genders are you,
Speaker 1: then then I'll start to be a little open. I
Speaker 1: just feel like this is the same old lazy Oh
Speaker 1: look in America, these you know, these fat hamburger eating,
Speaker 1: gun toting hillbillies that like Trump and they're so xenophobic,
Speaker 1: and you know this caricature and it's just not only
Speaker 1: is it lazy and unfunny, it's just cowardly. It's cowardly
Speaker 1: because we all know there's a lot that could be
Speaker 1: mocked out there, that would be edgy, that would be wow,
Speaker 1: pushing boundaries, and these comedians like Cohen and others will
Speaker 1: not touch it. And let's try if I'm wrong on
Speaker 1: this one, if he goes for with some of us,
Speaker 1: I will come back and I will tell you. But
Speaker 1: so far, all I've seen is mocking the right and
Speaker 1: just gets like I wanted to completely change things up here,
Speaker 1: folks and just spend some time on what really matters.
Speaker 1: I know that we have all this today, I mean
Speaker 1: the political infighting and all the nastiness. Is is that
Speaker 1: an extreme which is saying a lot given the current climate.
Speaker 1: But I saw this courtesy of of actually the New
Speaker 1: York Times, which still does do some very good report
Speaker 1: against some good writing here and there. But it's the
Speaker 1: story of a five year old boy named Garrett Michael
Speaker 1: Matthias who came home one day and had what looked
Speaker 1: like a stroke according to his mother, who said that
Speaker 1: his face was partially paralyzed, and it turned out that
Speaker 1: he had a very rare form of inoperable cancer. And
Speaker 1: then five year old Garrett Matthias had to go through
Speaker 1: the battle with this rare form of cancer, one that
Speaker 1: he eventually lost um, but he left behind his own
Speaker 1: his own obituary which has been shared all over the
Speaker 1: place now and it's a it's a five year old's
Speaker 1: view of his life and what matters, and I wanted
Speaker 1: to share with you this. So this is young Garrett
Speaker 1: struggling fighting against cancer and what he wrote as his
Speaker 1: as his own obituary. And it's and it's online. Uh,
Speaker 1: and we'll we'll put it on Facebook in other places
Speaker 1: you can see it for yourselves. But here's what Here's
Speaker 1: what he wrote. Garrett Michael Matthias, a k a. The
Speaker 1: Great Garrett Underpants. My name is Garrett Michael Buffs. My
Speaker 1: birthday is I am five years old. My address is
Speaker 1: I am a Bulldog. My favorite color is blue and
Speaker 1: red and black and green. My favorite superhero is Batman
Speaker 1: and Thor, iron Man, the Holk, and Cyborg. When I
Speaker 1: grow up, I'm going to be a professional boxer. My
Speaker 1: favorite people are mommy, Daddy, my sister Delfina, and grandparents
Speaker 1: with the new house, the grandparents with the camper, my cousins, Grady,
Speaker 1: that guy I took down that one time, and London Marie,
Speaker 1: my entreetents, Sinky, Uncle Andy, those two guys you know,
Speaker 1: my uncle's and Batman. The things I love the most
Speaker 1: playing with my sister, my blue Bunny, thrash, metal legos,
Speaker 1: my daycare friends, Batman, and when they put me to
Speaker 1: sleep before they access my port things I hate pants,
Speaker 1: dirty stupid cancer when they access my port needles and
Speaker 1: the monkey knows that smells like cherry farts. I do
Speaker 1: like the mint monkey knows like at mayor radiation and
Speaker 1: that one guy that helped me build legos. When I die,
Speaker 1: I'm going to be a gorilla and throw pooa daddy
Speaker 1: burned or buried. I want to be burned like when
Speaker 1: Thor's mommy died and made into a tree so I
Speaker 1: can live in it when I'm a gorilla. Bigger. Small
Speaker 1: funeral funerals are sad. I want five bouncy houses because
Speaker 1: I'm five. Batman and snow cones. Emily and Ry Matthias
Speaker 1: honored Garrett's final wishes by having a celebration of his
Speaker 1: life this past weekend. So that was a five year
Speaker 1: old view of his life going through something that nobody
Speaker 1: should ever have to go through, particularly somebody so young
Speaker 1: in life. And despite all the pain and the fear
Speaker 1: and the uncertainty and the grief, little five year old
Speaker 1: Garrett was able to find joy and love and a
Speaker 1: loyalty and friendship and decency and kindness and things that
Speaker 1: really mattered. It would have been so easy for a
Speaker 1: boy that age, I think, to be completely despondent and
Speaker 1: closed off. But even though he knew he was writing
Speaker 1: his own obituary, folks, even though he knew his time
Speaker 1: was limited and so little time he had, he decided
Speaker 1: to make the most of it and love those around
Speaker 1: him as much as he could, enjoy his life as
Speaker 1: much as he could, and go out as much as
Speaker 1: anyone ever could. On top, I think there's a lesson
Speaker 1: in that lesson for all of us, not just today,
Speaker 1: but any day. We'll be right back. Hey, team Buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll call. All right, time for the
Speaker 1: roll call. You know it's your favorite, it's my favorite.
Speaker 1: Let's get into first up here, Jeffrey Rights, it is
Speaker 1: great to watch rising and see your restraint when conversing
Speaker 1: with Crystal. She is so sure that up as guilty
Speaker 1: of collusion, regardless of the evidence and you try to
Speaker 1: put a word in, but she just does not seem
Speaker 1: to care what you say. Well done, well, Jason, Uh,
Speaker 1: I'm giving her a shot. I'm glad you've tuned in
Speaker 1: for rising. Thank you very much for being a part
Speaker 1: of the audience in the early days. Jason Wright's gotta
Speaker 1: keep you honest, brother, Ben Kingsley's real name is Krishna
Speaker 1: Pandit Baje. He is totally Indian, so your your critique
Speaker 1: about him playing Gandhi is misplaced. Just trying to keep
Speaker 1: you honest. Shields high, Um, you are correct. He's half
Speaker 1: He's half Hindu South Asian by his descent. I did
Speaker 1: not know that, so I had to check into this
Speaker 1: and yeah, his father is a Hindu from India and
Speaker 1: mother is a an Anglo English person, so he is
Speaker 1: half I did not know that. I thought out he
Speaker 1: was stepping away up. But you know, the name kind
Speaker 1: of threw me obviously, I did not know you. But Jason,
Speaker 1: thank you for the always please I want to get
Speaker 1: it right. So when I when I mess one up
Speaker 1: like that one let me know and that that makes
Speaker 1: more sense because it seems like quite a stretch you
Speaker 1: just have. I thought it was just some I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know what else to say. I thought they
Speaker 1: just had some white dude playing Gandhi, but it turns
Speaker 1: out that was not the case. He is half Indian. Uh,
Speaker 1: Joshua rights. Uh what do we have here? No? Whoops?
Speaker 1: Next up here? We'll go right to Don Hey buck.
Speaker 1: I was doing my daily devotion I came across a
Speaker 1: verse that sheds light on how disillusion from reality the
Speaker 1: left has become with Trump as our president. Psalms seven
Speaker 1: fourteen says whoever is pregnant with evil conceives trouble and
Speaker 1: gives birth to delusionment. They've wished so much evil on
Speaker 1: this president, and every day to look for new way,
Speaker 1: they look for new ways to trouble him, which has
Speaker 1: them believing lies instead of truth. I know you're out
Speaker 1: of faith. Please pray for our president. Evil will not
Speaker 1: win in the end. I've read through the Bible, and
Speaker 1: I know how it ends. Well, Don, I hope you're
Speaker 1: right about even winning in the end. And Uh, I agree,
Speaker 1: And I certainly pray for the whole country. I pray
Speaker 1: for my fellow Americans, and and the President is, to
Speaker 1: be sure, a part of that. Erica writes, a milkshake
Speaker 1: you can indulge in. Take over ripe browner the better
Speaker 1: bananas and put them in the freezer once frozen, peel
Speaker 1: and chop them into one inch chunks. Put them in
Speaker 1: some milk in a blender mix and you have a
Speaker 1: healthy milkshake at Peanut butter and chocolate syrup not as healthy,
Speaker 1: but even yummier from Erica. Also, you mentioned mosquitoes, and
Speaker 1: I was wondering if we will need bug spray in
Speaker 1: d C to go out in the evening. Erica, if
Speaker 1: you are going to have exposed legs, then yes, absolutely
Speaker 1: you will want to have some bug spray for sure.
Speaker 1: So I think that's a good advice I'm giving you there.
Speaker 1: Jason writes, Hey, Buck buddy, you were talking of Friday
Speaker 1: thirteenth movies the other day. I have stayed at the
Speaker 1: campsite that Friday Thirteenth, Part six was filmed at. It
Speaker 1: was a tradition that my fraternity did every year, and
Speaker 1: while there we watched the movie. It was great. Well, Jason,
Speaker 1: that is very cool. I did not know about that,
Speaker 1: and uh, thank you for sharing. All right, next up
Speaker 1: here we have Vince. You right say what you want
Speaker 1: about president at Kron, but I admired him for standing
Speaker 1: in the rain to congratulate his country's world champion soccer team.
Speaker 1: By contrast, Putin had a guy with an umbrella, you know, Vince.
Speaker 1: I don't have any problem with Mt. Kron. Uh. He
Speaker 1: seems like a pretty the middle of the road centrist
Speaker 1: guy wants to do the best by his country and
Speaker 1: by his countrymen and women. Uh. And yeah, I think
Speaker 1: it was a good look for him to stand out
Speaker 1: there and just get doused in the rain and and
Speaker 1: you know, shake the guy's hands from his team. Look
Speaker 1: a great day for the French. I know I like
Speaker 1: to make a lot of French jokes and French accents,
Speaker 1: but French national team really accomplished something and I'm happy
Speaker 1: for the people of France. I would also say that
Speaker 1: I kind of wish that people wouldn't celebrate a really
Speaker 1: joyous occasion by breaking things and lighting things on fire
Speaker 1: and acting like maniacs. But only I know some of
Speaker 1: the French are doing that, but why it just does
Speaker 1: not make any sense. I wish people would just get
Speaker 1: a grip. Lauren writes, um I'm officially a comedy bear fan,
Speaker 1: and I totally remember Hanson. Well, Lauren, I'm glad you
Speaker 1: like Commy Bear and those you want to know Commy
Speaker 1: BERI is that say you have to listen to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt podcast. We had an Colter as the guest
Speaker 1: last week. I believe we have jededi up Bila joining
Speaker 1: this week. We are going to have a great time
Speaker 1: chatting with Jedediah and we also just talked about whatever
Speaker 1: else is on my mind. So if you have not
Speaker 1: listened already, please go and check out the conversation with
Speaker 1: a Coulter was a ton of fun. Jededia As an
Speaker 1: old friend of mine, you know, she was a host
Speaker 1: on the view. And we're gonna talk about what it's
Speaker 1: like to be a conservative in in these behind enemy
Speaker 1: line situations like d C, New York, and what's it
Speaker 1: like to be h a red state mind in a
Speaker 1: blue state place. You know. There you go, Candice Rights
Speaker 1: falling buck. Have you noticed there hasn't been a whole
Speaker 1: lot of talk in the liberal MSM about the recent
Speaker 1: SCOTUS rulings favoring Trump and conservatives. I can only assume
Speaker 1: they're not covering these things because to do so would
Speaker 1: be to legitimize Trump his presidency. And conservative beliefs. Can
Speaker 1: you imagine the coverage these rulings would have received had
Speaker 1: they gone against President Trump from Kansas, Canas is a
Speaker 1: very good point. Uh, clearly, you know the most obvious woman.
Speaker 1: Could you just think for a second, what would it
Speaker 1: be like with the media coverage of the travel band
Speaker 1: if they had ruled that it was unconstitutional? If the
Speaker 1: Muslim band came down by a five four decision quote
Speaker 1: Muslim band and they said, you know what, decision in
Speaker 1: fact racist and wrong and the president has no authority
Speaker 1: to do this. I think the media would have covered
Speaker 1: nothing else for almost a week, I really do. I
Speaker 1: think they would have been all over it. So you're
Speaker 1: you're right that because these decisions when in favor of conservatives,
Speaker 1: you're just not hearing a lot about it. And that's
Speaker 1: because of the very real liberal media bias. Jeremy writes
Speaker 1: book I was introduced today to Sierra Leone by an
Speaker 1: amazing organization that is drilling wells for clean drinking water there.
Speaker 1: It's called let Them l O L If you want
Speaker 1: to give them a plug, I'd like to learn more
Speaker 1: about the country and its people. Do you have any
Speaker 1: recommendations books, online resources? Et cetera. Thanks. Um, I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, Jeremy, I don't and I don't have anything
Speaker 1: good for you on Sierra Leone. Um, I could you
Speaker 1: know I know a bit more about Nigeria because of
Speaker 1: things that maybe one day I'll be able to tell
Speaker 1: you about, but haven't been able to up to this point.
Speaker 1: You know, I I, uh, I don't have any good
Speaker 1: for you on that. I wish I could say otherwise, UM,
Speaker 1: you know I could. The Biafran War on Nigeria's a
Speaker 1: book that I read and really thought was a really
Speaker 1: good It was a good rate. It's tough reading. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's when you learn about what's going on and in
Speaker 1: that part of the world. Obviously there's been a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of suffering and violence. But Sierra Leone is not
Speaker 1: something I know well. So if I have any good
Speaker 1: suggestions and recommendations, I'll pass along your way. I will
Speaker 1: tell you. I am currently reading a book. I mean
Speaker 1: I've I have several. I just finished Red Notice I
Speaker 1: think last week. Uh, and now I'm onto a couple
Speaker 1: of other things. One of them is I'm trying to
Speaker 1: finish Director at s, which is the Steve Cole book
Speaker 1: on Afghanistan. It's about six or seven hundred pages. I
Speaker 1: think almost halfway through it. I'm also in the middle
Speaker 1: in the middle of a book on Cortez the Conquistador,
Speaker 1: which is just incredible, And this is another one of
Speaker 1: these I want to I want to write a screenplay
Speaker 1: of quartet that this is, folks. He showed up with
Speaker 1: five guys, give or take, and took on an empire.
Speaker 1: The granted didn't have steel or horses or gunpowder, but
Speaker 1: had millions of people, including hundreds of thousands of military
Speaker 1: age males, with spears and knives and swords, and you know,
Speaker 1: five hundred against in single engagements ten thousand, fifteen thousand,
Speaker 1: twenty thousand, five hundred. And we think about the battle
Speaker 1: of the three hundred Spartans at Thermopoli against Xerxes and
Speaker 1: the invading Persians. This Cortez was a similar except these
Speaker 1: guys were on the move. It's five hundred instead of
Speaker 1: three hundred. But it's an incredible story. And also, and
Speaker 1: this is gonna be one of our writing history things.
Speaker 1: That's why why I'm reading about this, because I want
Speaker 1: to do some of this background. I'm gonna get back
Speaker 1: to Shield High as soon as I have time in
Speaker 1: my life to do it. I love it. I don't,
Speaker 1: you know, no matter what happens. I mean, if I
Speaker 1: end up quitting this whole media life and becoming a
Speaker 1: you know, a poet farmer somewhere, I'm still gonna be
Speaker 1: doing Shield High. It's just I enjoy the history stuff
Speaker 1: too much. But if if we're gonna writing history, one
Speaker 1: of the things that really comes up in these in
Speaker 1: this historical account of the conquistadors again versus the Aztecs
Speaker 1: Aztec civilization was was the level of brutality and violences
Speaker 1: is There's nothing else that I've ever read about her, see,
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe you could compare it to I mean,
Speaker 1: and I'm speaking out of cheer because it really don't
Speaker 1: know much about, you know, head hunters in Papua New
Speaker 1: Guinea or that part of the world. But there was
Speaker 1: cannibalism that was that was common in the Aztec empire.
Speaker 1: I mean, and not because people were starving. They would
Speaker 1: eat people because they didn't like them. They would sacrifice
Speaker 1: slaves in numbers that are mind boggling, you know, brutally
Speaker 1: just just open them up like they're doing surgery without
Speaker 1: the anesthesia. I mean, it's just there's there. There are
Speaker 1: these accounts of these Spanish conquistadors showing up at these
Speaker 1: religious sites, these religious temples, and there's just blood and
Speaker 1: entrails and intestines everywhere from human beings. Don't tell you
Speaker 1: much about that with the Oh yeah, you know, the
Speaker 1: the native populations of of the America's and and how
Speaker 1: oppressed they were. Well they were actually, in the case
Speaker 1: of the Aztecs, not just oppressing but mass murdering each
Speaker 1: other and enslaving each other. It was bad stuff. I see.
Speaker 1: I'm already getting fired up telling you the story about
Speaker 1: I haven't even gotten through the book yet. Uh So,
Speaker 1: there we have it. Um, let me get one more
Speaker 1: role call here before we close shop for the day.
Speaker 1: Tracy Rights. Hey, Buck. First off, you have the best
Speaker 1: hair on TV right now, Tracy, you have the best
Speaker 1: eye of anybody watching TV. So now that I got
Speaker 1: your attention, Yeah, she totally schooled me. I just watched Rising,
Speaker 1: which I am learning to love. I'm a bit perplexed
Speaker 1: at Crystal's reaction to Peter Struck's testimony. She makes a
Speaker 1: good point that there's no obvious effect on the investigation,
Speaker 1: but she fails to get the same justification to the
Speaker 1: long ongoing investigation led by Mueller that is being forgiven
Speaker 1: and even referenced every day. Typical liberal hypocrisy. I've turned
Speaker 1: quite a few of my friends onto you, and I'm
Speaker 1: a faithful everyday listener. You are witty, smart, and you're
Speaker 1: gurgling with gurgling Gurgan literally makes me laugh out loud
Speaker 1: every time. The best analysis on television four nuction reagularscretions analyzing.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work. You're changing hearts and minds
Speaker 1: every day. Shields High, Tracy, Old Tracy, thank thank you
Speaker 1: so much for your kind of marks and also for
Speaker 1: spreading the word about the show. That's a single, that
Speaker 1: and checking out our sponsors. Black Rifle, nine Line, uh
Speaker 1: Strike Force go down the list, simply Safe. All of
Speaker 1: our wonderful sponsors, please do check them out and type
Speaker 1: in the promo code so they know that you found
Speaker 1: out about them through this show. That's how we keep
Speaker 1: this freedom hunt rocking. I'm excited to be with you
Speaker 1: all tomorrow. Until then, Shields High,