WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Sleeping On It

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh and

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's Chuck and Jerry sitting in for Dave. So that

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>makes this short stuff and this is a good one.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty excited about it, Chuck, that's right, big thanks

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to web md, the National Institute of Health, and then

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what Live Science. He found a cool interview from Live Science. Well,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they had a guest post from a guy named doctor

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>John Growhole. I think that's how you say his name,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but he's CEO and founder of psych Central and Live

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Science apparently said doctor grohole, why don't you come over

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and write about sleeping on it for us? And he

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>said sure, and that was one of the sources we used.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I bet it's a grohole. That's what I said. Grohole,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>no groal basically roll. Yeah, you're probably right, but I

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the extra O between the H and the L

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is what's throwed me off. But maybe the good doctor

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>did not say, Chary, I'll do it. Maybe he said, oh,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>let me sleep on it and I'll let you know

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>very nice. What word are we not going to say

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, Chuck, don't grow whole? So um, it

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting if you stop and think about it.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, basically all of us have had, if not

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>by design them, probably by accident, a period where we

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>were facing some dilemma, some big decision, and we slapped

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on it. We slept before making the decision, and after

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we slept, it was just way clearer the next day,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and we probably made the right decision from that point on.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what everybody calls sleeping on the decision, right, But

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>why would that actually happen? Like that's an actual, like

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating, amazing component of human life that I just

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think is the tops. Yeah, and there's Here's the thing is,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>there's more to it than like we all know sleep

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is just great for everything, but there's more to it

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>than like, but it is also this and like, you know,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't send that email, that angry email, like sleep

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on that sleep on the maybe sleep on the argument

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that you're in the middle of having with your significant

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>other or your friend or whoever. Supposedly not going to

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bed angry as a rule is not actually a very

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>good rule. We go to bed angry all the time

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>every night, not every night, but man, like you gotta sleep,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you're still angry, what are you gonna do? Right?

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Exactly like it is for in the morning. We got

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to works as out right, but there is more to

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it than that, because just human sort of intuition would

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you that, you know, you get some sleep, you

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>clear your head out, you make a better decision in

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the morning. It just makes sense, but it's it's more

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>specific than that, right, Yeah, And we should say that

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this pretty much applies as far as the research goes

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to important, tough, complex decisions, like if you're at a

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>deli and you're like, should I have roast beef or

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>past me on rye? And you go and curl up

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the corner for thirty minutes and then wake up

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>with your answer. It's actually not going to help. You're

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>probably going to have the same answer. It's complicated decisions

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that this works for. And most people say the reason

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>why is because when we sleep, we organize our memories

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and process information during that period, and that we're probably

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>taking all this different information, new information, connecting it to

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>old information, cementing these neural pathways so that we understand

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it better after we've slept than we understood it before,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and that we can gain clarity from sleeping on a decision.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's how that works. Yeah, and they've also found

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and this comes from cal Berkeley, from doctor Matthew Walker

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that who was a sleep scientist, which I'm fascinated by

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that job that you know at getting good sleep helps

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you learn, Like that's why you probably learn better, Like

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>right when after you wake up in the morning, your

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>morning classes in school, you're sharper than those afternoon classes.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But also that going to sleep after you learn for

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>reasons that you mentioned is a really big deal, which

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>led me to my next topic that I'm going to

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>do for a long form episode, which is napping. Oh okay,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think I told you on our super secret

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>research trip that I've been started taking a daily nap

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah, yeah, and then it's been like life changing.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So I really want to know more about why so napping,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and again it has to do I'm sure in a

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>smaller way the reason a good night's sleep is good

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. I would think so for sure. So napping

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is coming soon, is what I'm saying. Okay, for me personally,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>right after I record and then we'll take a breaking

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you can take a nap and then we'll come back.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>How about that. Okay, let's do it. Okay, Chuck, it's

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five minutes later. I've been standing here waiting. Well,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I spoke up nap. I feel gratefully this is an

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>even better episode had you not napped. All right, So

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>we're moving on to some even more specifics which I

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>found super, super fascinating about sleeping on it, which is

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the way your conscious mind and your unconscious mind works. Right. Yeah.

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They think that maybe it doesn't really have much to

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do with the actual act of sleeping or cementing memories

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or new information, but that while we're sleeping, we're using

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>unconscious thought rather than conscious thought, and that you could actually,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if this is true, you could do the same thing

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>um as sleeping on a decision without actually having to

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep, if you can engage an unconscious thought

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. And that sounds hard, but actually I think

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it amounts to, um, just stopping thinking about and chewing

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>over the decision and going and doing something else, building

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a model airplane, doing your tax It's just something else

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>because while you're doing that, um this this um. The

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>guy doctor Groholm points out that you um that that

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>unconscious thought is like not just zoning out, and it's

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not not thinking, it's just a different mode of thinking,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and that you're you're still engaging an unconscious thought about

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this problem, this dilemma, it's just not in the front

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of your mind. And by removing it from the front

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of your mind, putting it into unconscious thought, it seems

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that that actually can produce really good decisions, just like

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on something can too. Yeah, and it seems like

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the big reasons why is buy it if

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you are And I think this is where where overthinking,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like if you say, oh, you're overthinking it, or if

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you think something to death or something uh, that is

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that is concentrating so hard on something on a decision

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that your biases are creeping in. You're thinking about all

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>these different angles and you're quite literally just sort of

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>overdoing it. And apparently when you're just using your unconscious

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thought and kind of parking it for a second in

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the forefront of your brain, those biases will fade away.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And the way I read it, or at least the

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>way it feels like in my brain, because I, you know,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>try to do this stuff some is it feels like

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of clears the table a little bit

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and what's left is what's important. Yeah, because if with

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>your biases, with your conscious biases, you're you might push

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>yourself to a bad decision, because that's the one where

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you get, like a snickerdoodle cookie, you know, where if

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you engage it, I would do a lot for a

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>snickerdoodle cook but like probably things I should not be

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>doing if somebody offered a snickerdoodle, Right, But that if

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you just engage in unconscious thinking, your brain is like,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>snickerdoodle cookie doesn't really matter that much. We're not going

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to use that to weight the different factors in the decision.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>These are all going to be fairly balanced out because

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the biases are removed. So you can essentially step back,

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>look at all the different components, all the different possible

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>outcomes pretty much equally on an equal basis, and then say,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the one that's obviously the right decision to make.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Even though I'm not getting a Snickerdoodle cookie. I can

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>go buy a snickerdoodle cookie and still make this correct

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>decision and have the best of both worlds. I could

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have my snick snickerdoodle and eat it too. Oh man,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I knew that's what you're gonna say. Did you sure

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you knew me, you know me. It's man, the wheels

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are starting to fall off of this brain. I'll tell

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you that there has been some study on this as

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>far as sleeping on it. There was that one that

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess you found from. Was this from the NIH

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or was this web MD? It was doctor grohol that

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>cited this one. The Okay, let me see if I

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can hazard this name dister Hughes Dixterhuse. I think I

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>nailed it that last time, Dixterhuse, d I j K

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>S t E R h U I S And I'll

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>bet during college everybody call them the dixter Oh sure

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>at parties. Yeah, yeah, I don't know how you pronounce that.

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>That sounds about right now, Dixterhus. So this was an

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>experiment where they would try to get results from having,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, people sleep on a big decision or just

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a decision that's um. I think in this case they

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>were talking about like choosing apartments, yeah, and like where

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to live. I guess. So they would choose these participants,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they would have a few apartments to choose from. They

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>would describe what's going on in these apartments, of course,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like you would with any movie real estate decision like

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's scutto this one has an extra half baths. That

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>one has a chalk body outline, that's right, I want

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to avoid that one unless that's your thing. Uh. And

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>after reading these descriptions, they were asked to make their

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>choice UM following an additional period of conscious thought or

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>unconscious thought. And as you would expect, the unconscious thinkers,

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>well this is this is the only part I wonder about.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It has made the better decision than conscious thinkers. But

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the better decision? Like would they be like, well,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he shows the wrong place clearly. Yeah, now you have

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to actually go live in there in reality because that

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>part is subjective, right, And whether or not that was

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the right choice, yeah, I don't know what the what

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the criteria was, but clearly something was more desirable than

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>than others in the apartments, because maybe outline probably was.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that I saw there was like some

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>other follow up UM studies or subsections to the study,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and they found that experts as well are subject to

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Like you could take an expert and

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ask them to make a snap decision about something and

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they're probably going to make a worse decision than a

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>non expert who has had time to sleep on it

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or engage an unconscious thought about that decision. Interesting, And

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what that tracks, because I think one of

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the traits of what you would call highly successful people

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>is to be able to make the right decision quickly

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and even under duress. Yes, but that is asking for

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot and a lot of people who say one

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why sleeping on it or engaging in

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>unconscious thought is just by virtue of stepping away from

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem, you are relinquishing the stress of immediacy. You're saying,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make this decision under duress. I'm

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>going to give myself some time and up away from it,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And you are just automatically taking yourself out of a

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stressful situation, and then by virtue of that alone, you're

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>probably going to make a better decision. So I think

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the upshot is is unless someone has a gun to

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>your head and is telling you to hack into some mainframe,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you can probably step away from the decision. You're probably

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>putting yourself under undue pressure, and the more likely you

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are to do that, the more likely you are to

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>probably make a better decision than if you just make

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a snap one under duress. The only thing I'm going

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with there is that people are a sort

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of can ask for and or afforded that luxury because

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think far too many jobs when they don't need

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to require immediacy of action that you know, if you're

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like can I sleep on it, They're like, this isn't

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the job for you? Then? So like, give me an example, Oh,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean any big, high stakes, sort of high pressure

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>upper management stuff. I don't feel like there's a lot

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of those people that are. I think the ones that

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are maybe truly successful are probably drawing those boundaries and

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>saying like, no, we should take our time with this decision.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But sure, I feel like a lot of those are like, no,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to we need to figure this out and

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>act on it. That's probably true. I'm not disagreeing with that,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'll bet that they That means that the decisions

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>that are being made at these higher echelons are probably

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>routinely bad decisions. Well, there may be something anythink about it,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, yeah, I want my CEOs to

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>go sleep on things. That's my that's my game. Yeah,

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we should start a new corporation called sleep on It.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a great idea. We'll have to edit that out

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so nobody steals our idea. It's probably out there already. Okay, well,

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>well we'll look, we'll do a business search. Okay, Well,

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>while we're doing a business search, everybody, this short stuff

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is out. Stuff you should know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the I heart

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.