Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty Armstrong and
Speaker 1: Jetty and now he Armstrong and Letty.
Speaker 2: Ukraine landing a punishing blow against Russia with a surprise
Speaker 2: drone attack dubbed Operation Spiderweb. More than forty aircraft ablaze
Speaker 2: after the highly sophisticated operation was launched Sunday, the attack
Speaker 2: that was a year and a half in the planning.
Speaker 2: The drones were transported to Russia inside what looked to
Speaker 2: be shipping containers with retractable ruse that could be opened remotely.
Speaker 2: The drones flying out on their mission. The Ukrainians did
Speaker 2: not inform the US ahead of time. The high tech
Speaker 2: planes worth billions of dollars now in ruins and will
Speaker 2: take years to replace.
Speaker 3: It looks like around thirty percent high of their strategic
Speaker 3: bombers were destroyed. Some of these drones were as low
Speaker 3: as five hundred dollars, taking out million dollar aircraft.
Speaker 4: Five hundred dollars drones taking out multimillion dollar aircraft. A
Speaker 4: third of their strategic bombers blown up Russia's Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 4: Some people are calling it an amazing attack from Ukraine.
Speaker 4: The way they got the drones into the country and
Speaker 4: then had them in these crates in which the lid
Speaker 4: automatically opened up and the drones flew out, and they'd
Speaker 4: been according to Zelensky yesterday, they'd been planning this for
Speaker 4: a year and a half.
Speaker 5: Amazing stuff. Let's discuss with our military analyst Mike Lyons. Mike,
Speaker 5: it's always a pleasure.
Speaker 1: How are you, hey, guys, Great to be back with you.
Speaker 4: You called it in your tweet yesterday, a significant increase
Speaker 4: in capabilities by the Ukrainians.
Speaker 6: Explain that, Yeah, I mean, they combine their imagination with
Speaker 6: regard to what they thought they can do, and you know,
Speaker 6: out thinking Russia on so many perspectives. Number one, getting
Speaker 6: through the the Russian air defense systems. I mean, this
Speaker 6: was something that the United States never thought we would
Speaker 6: be able to get through. And you know, if we
Speaker 6: were having a you know, Cold war type nuclear attack,
Speaker 6: we thought the Russian air defense platforms were going to
Speaker 6: be amazing. The fact that they were able to target
Speaker 6: and get to as specific they were with with this
Speaker 6: drone swarm. We we've not really seen the drone swarm
Speaker 6: that that's a huge threat. Now from a military perspective,
Speaker 6: we're concerned about Chinese the military doing that. You know,
Speaker 6: you watch these Chinese lights shows with drones, and I
Speaker 6: always look at them saying, boy, if there was an
Speaker 6: armament on each one of those things, where we would
Speaker 6: be in trouble. So so you bring all that all
Speaker 6: together and to your you know, the point about the
Speaker 6: economic efficiency of this. Taking you know, about fifty grand
Speaker 6: worth of drones and knocking out hundreds of millions of
Speaker 6: dollars of Russian hardware, it shows real capability. And I
Speaker 6: wouldn't put it at at the Pearl Harbor level. I mean,
Speaker 6: obviously we know what that led to. I think I
Speaker 6: think it's more of a do little, you know, raider
Speaker 6: level type operation.
Speaker 1: It really is a.
Speaker 6: Big punch in the knows to Russia. We'll have to
Speaker 6: see now what retaliation looks like. But you take Ukraine's
Speaker 6: tremendous imagination combined with Russia just not thinking it through,
Speaker 6: and you get the result that we see.
Speaker 5: So, Mike, you've already partially answered this question, but help
Speaker 5: us understand why drones.
Speaker 1: Of this sort.
Speaker 5: As opposed to missiles, you know, standard armaments, What are
Speaker 5: the capabilities?
Speaker 1: Why are they so effective.
Speaker 6: So in a swarming perspective from a formation, they highlight
Speaker 6: the principle of mass that are used. You know, a
Speaker 6: missile and it is very accurate, provides you know, kind
Speaker 6: of a one for one travels at a tremendous speed.
Speaker 6: Maybe you can't knock it out. But if you put
Speaker 6: ten thousand drones in the sky and they can do
Speaker 6: a lot of different things, and you lay over now
Speaker 6: artificial intelligence on those, you take the human element out
Speaker 6: of the decision of what targets they go to hit.
Speaker 6: You have a tremendous war fighting capability that just hasn't
Speaker 6: existed on the battlefield yet. I mean this is from
Speaker 6: the economic perspective alone. I mean we you know, we
Speaker 6: look at equipment to take out tanks, for example, we
Speaker 6: have equipment that takes out Russian tanks that's not as
Speaker 6: expensive as a tank. You know, a tank is the
Speaker 6: best thing to take out another tank, for example. But
Speaker 6: you combine all those things and you get this kind
Speaker 6: of massive change. I had been waiting to see whether
Speaker 6: we were going to see a drawing swarm. I thought
Speaker 6: it would a drones swarm. I thought we would see
Speaker 6: it inside Ukraine itself. You could see, for example, the
Speaker 6: Russians haven't done it. They shows you that they don't
Speaker 6: have this kind of capability, and the targets that they
Speaker 6: would likely go after would be critical infrastructure. They don't
Speaker 6: even have to go after the military targets go after
Speaker 6: critical infrastructure. Now what Ukraine did you know? Doesn't violate
Speaker 6: the laws of modern warfare. They go after a military target.
Speaker 6: But I'd be concerned about our enemies looking at critical
Speaker 6: infrastructure on the United States. That I think is the
Speaker 6: saftness of all targets that a drone swarm would be
Speaker 6: effect to that.
Speaker 1: Yikes.
Speaker 5: So it occurs to me that for folks who haven't
Speaker 5: been following the story over the weekend, a couple of
Speaker 5: facts might helpful. This absolutely unique operation, that's a quote
Speaker 5: from Zelenski, involved one.
Speaker 1: Hundred and seventeen drones.
Speaker 5: Ukrainian intelligence officials said the agency moved the small quad
Speaker 5: copter drones to Russian territory, then moved wooden containers to Russia,
Speaker 5: which were used to hide the drones ahead of the attack.
Speaker 5: When it came to the strike, the containers were placed
Speaker 5: on trucks and the lids of the containers opened remotely and
Speaker 5: the swarm of drones like a swarm of bees, flew
Speaker 5: out to find their targets.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah, all artificially intelligence based and knew exactly where
Speaker 6: they were going to be. There was I saw some
Speaker 6: false reporting about whether or not these planes were not
Speaker 6: allowed to be in hangars and could be covered up
Speaker 6: because of some you know, treaties between the Russian states.
Speaker 6: That's just not true.
Speaker 1: Okay, Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up. I hadn't
Speaker 1: thought of that.
Speaker 4: But yeah, there's a bunch of stuff flowing around on
Speaker 4: the internet that Ukraine violated international nuclear treaties by attacking
Speaker 4: these planes. It's a it's a rule, but we all
Speaker 4: have to have all these planes out in the open,
Speaker 4: blah blah blah. And you're saying that's not true.
Speaker 6: No, that's not true. I mean, there were open sky
Speaker 6: treaties that were back in the eighties and nineties, and
Speaker 6: most of them expired in early two thousands, and the
Speaker 6: only thing we really have is a New Star Treaty,
Speaker 6: but Russia and the United States backed out of that
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty three, so there's no rules that said
Speaker 6: they have to be out in the open. In fact,
Speaker 6: they're out in the open for operational purposes, because in case,
Speaker 6: you have to get in a plane quick and get
Speaker 6: it going their store on the runways for that reason.
Speaker 6: So that's where the trade off was. Now again, they
Speaker 6: still should have been protected by air defense assets, I
Speaker 6: mean close in tactical air defense assets, but bring back
Speaker 6: the drone swarm. Those close in tactical air defense assets
Speaker 6: are usually a one for one. So now countries are
Speaker 6: going to have to be thinking how do I protect
Speaker 6: from a drone swarm? You think about you're going to
Speaker 6: need multiple more drones. You're going to have to nets
Speaker 6: other physical kind of aspects to figure out, you know,
Speaker 6: kind of what that looks like. So everybody's gone back
Speaker 6: to the drawing board now, figuring out how do I defend,
Speaker 6: how our country defend against something like this, how do
Speaker 6: we defend critical infrastructure. It's not the days of just
Speaker 6: putting a patriot missile in front of these nuclear capable
Speaker 6: bombers are over because that was a one for one,
Speaker 6: you know, kind of a segue. This is going to
Speaker 6: be a much more difficult asset to protect.
Speaker 1: So how big a deal is it that?
Speaker 4: A little over a week ago, the leader of Germany
Speaker 4: said Hey, restrictions are off Ukraine. Now they can fire
Speaker 4: as far into Russia as they want. And we're on
Speaker 4: board with that, so's Britain, so's the United States sales frants.
Speaker 1: How big a deal is that now?
Speaker 6: Probably a big deal because all this those assets are
Speaker 6: coming from NATO, they're coming from the West. It is
Speaker 6: and isn't an escalation. We saw that the Biden administration
Speaker 6: didn't want any kind of escalation. I'm still not sure
Speaker 6: where the Trump administration is going to land on this,
Speaker 6: if they're going to, you know, I've not seen anything
Speaker 6: that's come out about that, whether they knew about the attack,
Speaker 6: what exactly is going on there. I've not necessarily seen
Speaker 6: where they're going to land on this. I think am
Speaker 6: Given the way that Putin had been acting the week
Speaker 6: that past few weeks, I think you're going to see
Speaker 6: the support from the United States. But we just don't know.
Speaker 6: But all these assets come, in most cases come where
Speaker 6: the technology comes. Look, the reason why Ukraine knew that
Speaker 6: those bombers were those where they were obviously because the
Speaker 6: US intelligence that pinpointed them to probably fourteen digits the
Speaker 6: Greek coordinates as to where those planes were going to
Speaker 6: be and that's kind of the assets that were provided
Speaker 6: to Ukraine in order to make that the attack happen.
Speaker 1: We're talking to military analyst Mike Lyons.
Speaker 5: Mike, I read just earlier today that Russia has a
Speaker 5: fairly limited supply of these long range bombers and that
Speaker 5: it's not even clear how many of them are operational
Speaker 5: given their you know, the sorry state of their military.
Speaker 1: What do you know about that?
Speaker 6: Yeah, the Tublo bomber, long range, these were the things
Speaker 6: that we were worried about back in the nineteen eighties,
Speaker 6: and that's why we created the B one to B two,
Speaker 6: These long range nuclear capable bombers that can go great distance.
Speaker 6: Is from where they were going to be launched from.
Speaker 6: You know, they're well on the other side of the
Speaker 6: Arail Mountains, for example, and from Russia's perspective, you know,
Speaker 6: outside of any capability to be monitored. But they could
Speaker 6: easily have reached anywhere in Western Europe and go in
Speaker 6: the other direction, possibly hit the West coast of the
Speaker 6: United States. But they're old, but that's not to say
Speaker 6: that they're not good, because we still use the B
Speaker 6: fifty two airframe, and we know that that that airframe
Speaker 6: has been almost eighty years in existence now at this point,
Speaker 6: But Russia hasn't necessarily developed new technology to replace these
Speaker 6: specifical specific bombers. The new technology they've developed have more
Speaker 6: air to air. They've been more of you know, different
Speaker 6: kind of stealth fighters that that that don't necessarily carry
Speaker 6: the same level of equipment that these ones carried. So
Speaker 6: no question it's a loss, uh from from their perspective
Speaker 6: and whether they have the parts so they can get
Speaker 6: them up back up the speed. But they still have
Speaker 6: some capability to do this at this point.
Speaker 4: Joe, how do you feel about a pivot to China?
Speaker 4: That's fine, let's put second deef Hegzeth over the weekend
Speaker 4: gave a pretty exciting speech talking about we're going to
Speaker 4: move some ship destroying equipment close enough to Taiwan. If
Speaker 4: China decided to make that move, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 4: We're ready to defend Taiwan.
Speaker 1: Where are you on that whole story?
Speaker 6: Well, I think there's going to be enough indicators whether
Speaker 6: China is going to actually do that or not. I
Speaker 6: think we've got to be concerned about China placing assets
Speaker 6: close to the United States and containers like what the
Speaker 6: Ukraine did, right, they could do the same thing to
Speaker 6: us and threaten the United States if we decide to
Speaker 6: get involved militarily there by bringing these civilian container ships
Speaker 6: close to US cities, for example. And should we decide
Speaker 6: to attack inside of China, which is what we would
Speaker 6: have to do to defend Taiwan's there's no other way
Speaker 6: around that.
Speaker 1: And so wow, let's not go buy that real quick.
Speaker 4: So if they of on Taiwan, we have to attack
Speaker 4: inside China to defend Taiwan.
Speaker 6: Whether yeah, there's no other where They're effectively knocked down
Speaker 6: any kind of military action there because that that attack
Speaker 6: would come from China. The China missiles would be landing
Speaker 6: inside of Taiwan. I mean, there's no way they can
Speaker 6: perform a seaborne invasion of Taiwan without indirect air assets
Speaker 6: coming from the mainland China. So we would have to
Speaker 6: we would decide we must have to attack what those
Speaker 6: assets would be and they would not attack Taiwan unless
Speaker 6: they had that with them. And your souls are on
Speaker 6: the ground, You're not going to go in without the
Speaker 6: combined forces of all your capability, which is really what
Speaker 6: that would mean, which is why I think in some
Speaker 6: ways this is all creating this deterrence, but as we
Speaker 6: you know, it's going to be very much telegraphed a
Speaker 6: to whether or not they're going to do this or not,
Speaker 6: because if we see them moving assets, these container assets
Speaker 6: close to the United States or see what's going on there,
Speaker 6: we'll have an idea whether or not this is happening
Speaker 6: or not. We can short circuit that by saying, hey, look,
Speaker 6: you're going to have to move these ships and stuff
Speaker 6: that you have close the United States because we think
Speaker 6: they're going to threaten US based on a drune swarm
Speaker 6: that could happen from China to US.
Speaker 5: Holy Cow, this is almost too much to count, right.
Speaker 5: Military analyst Mike Cleines, Mike, go ahead, was there one
Speaker 5: more thing you were going to say?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 6: I think this is a big wake up call for everybody.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 6: You see this president talking about Golden Dome, and I
Speaker 6: think this is now the perfect confluence of you know,
Speaker 6: artificial intelligence into drone systems and the Golden Dome that
Speaker 6: you know we all remember from from the strategic initiatives
Speaker 6: back from the Reagan administration in the eighties did more
Speaker 6: to put a psychological advantage with US over Russia eventually
Speaker 6: bankrupts the country. But in this case, you know, think
Speaker 6: like what they do in Israel right now with the
Speaker 6: Iron Dome system. You know, the more and more warfare
Speaker 6: is going on, We're taking the we're taking the human
Speaker 6: element out of the decision making and what the targets on,
Speaker 6: and that that's going down a very slippery slope. But
Speaker 6: I think we're going to see a.
Speaker 1: Lot more of that.
Speaker 5: Military analyst Mike Clions, Mike, fascinating and chilling.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for the time.
Speaker 6: Great, thanks for me anytime.
Speaker 1: Holy crap.
Speaker 5: Yes, if the autonomous AI systems that refused to be
Speaker 5: turned off wasn't going to haunt my dreams, Now I
Speaker 5: have this.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, great super I.
Speaker 4: Know when I had him on, you were off for
Speaker 4: some reason. I think when you're at the Master's golf
Speaker 4: tournament and he talked about China striking Los Angeles San Francisco,
Speaker 4: I was like, God, dang it could that actually happen?
Speaker 4: I suppose I could. Of course it could actually happen,
Speaker 4: but yeah, waits for Tad.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 5: You know what's funny about American And we talked about
Speaker 5: this last week in context Russia is we have so
Speaker 5: not been attacked on our homeland. It seems like, oh no, no, no,
Speaker 5: nobody would ever do that. That would be a bridge
Speaker 5: far too far.
Speaker 4: And every other country on Earth is like it's happen
Speaker 4: at us thirty times.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh my god, would that get our attention? Anyway?
Speaker 4: If you have any thoughts on that text line four
Speaker 4: one five two nine five KFTC.
Speaker 7: I'm a former McDonald's corpus. I am going to divulge
Speaker 7: some information for you. Nobody believes me. Just to confirm
Speaker 7: this magic seasoning, they legally have to post the ingredient
Speaker 7: statement on their website. I'll even put the meat ingredient statement.
Speaker 7: It's just salt and pepper. There's literally no other things
Speaker 7: in it. Eighty six percent salt, fourteen percent pepper. The Hamburger,
Speaker 7: the Mickdouble, the Double Cheeseburger, and the Big Mac same
Speaker 7: seasoning is used on their quarter pounders. If you do
Speaker 7: not think this is true, along with the beef being
Speaker 7: all beef, go sue them. You could bring that product
Speaker 7: to an independent lab. Okay, but I didn't get to
Speaker 7: the secret sauce on them Big Mac. But they're saying
Speaker 7: it's post.
Speaker 1: Its thousand island dressing, isn't it?
Speaker 4: I think so. But that's interesting. I suppose that has
Speaker 4: to be true. Yeah, you can't actually have a secret
Speaker 4: right at a giant, nationwide corporate restaurant. But nobody's ever done.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 4: I don't care enough to ever go to the website
Speaker 4: and look. Oh no, I don't care at all. I
Speaker 4: shouldn't ever eat it again, my most my main thought.
Speaker 1: Well, it can't.
Speaker 5: It doesn't need to be precise obviously. I mean, because
Speaker 5: you get like KFC's seven herbs and spices, I don't
Speaker 5: get to know precisely how much cloves and oregano or whatever. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 5: all right, yeah, and so the secret sauce is just
Speaker 5: thousand nine ud dressing, which in turn is just ketchup
Speaker 5: and mayonnaise mayonnaise. Right, anyway, how much time do we have, Michael,
Speaker 5: I'm not sure. We haven't time to do anything so
Speaker 5: confident here?
Speaker 1: Oh we do. Okay.
Speaker 5: So I've mentioned a couple of times Judy and I
Speaker 5: are having a remodel done, and a fair amount of
Speaker 5: it has to do with the back wall, okay, of
Speaker 5: the house that kind of faces out into the weather
Speaker 5: and everything, and we'd known there was some water penetration
Speaker 5: in there.
Speaker 4: You got kind of bulgy trim work there. Wait a minute,
Speaker 4: is that this color? Did somebody paint over?
Speaker 5: And so in opening the wall up, any contractor can
Speaker 5: tell you open a house up, you never know what
Speaker 5: you're gonna find.
Speaker 1: There was so much rot in there that the new
Speaker 1: plan as.
Speaker 5: Of today today is yeah, we're coming inside your house
Speaker 5: weeks ahead of schedule because they're gonna do outdoor stuff first,
Speaker 5: the inside stuff. But no, we're coming in today. We're
Speaker 5: gonna tear down the back well. First, we're gonna build
Speaker 5: a new wall inside your home, temporary. Then we're gonna
Speaker 5: tear down the back wall of your home. Then we're
Speaker 5: gonna build a new back wall of your home, and
Speaker 5: then we're going to tear down the new new temporary
Speaker 5: back wall of your home. Yes, yes, sounds like a
Speaker 5: lot of noise for a long time. Uh a poop show. Yes, indeed,
Speaker 5: I'm looking into long term rentals. This is uh, I'm out,
Speaker 5: goodbye home man. Oh and we got our daughter's cats
Speaker 5: and they're looking around. They're hearing all this noise, and
Speaker 5: my daggs nervous and I'm nervous.
Speaker 1: It's no way to live. Boy.
Speaker 4: The finding out that previous owners painted over a bunch
Speaker 4: of rot. I've had that experience before.
Speaker 5: Or in any contractor will tell you this. The crappy
Speaker 5: job builders do in sealing stuff and calking stuff.
Speaker 1: They don't care. They paper it over and say move in.
Speaker 1: It's ready, armstrong and getty.
Speaker 4: The reporting around the terrorist attack in Colorado is it's
Speaker 4: odd to me that we're not focusing more on the
Speaker 4: fact that this is I assume he's a Muslim dude.
Speaker 4: I mean, based on his name, he's here illegally. I
Speaker 4: mean he's yelling free Palestine as he sets Jewish supporters
Speaker 4: on fire after nine to eleven. I mean, we were
Speaker 4: so unguard about this sort of thing. Now we just hell,
Speaker 4: you know, what are you gonna do? I don't understand,
Speaker 4: but maybe we'll talk about that more later. Well, I
Speaker 4: was gonna stay on air meeting.
Speaker 5: I just asson dive into that and we can do
Speaker 5: what we're gonna do in a few minutes, just because
Speaker 5: this is so important and you're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: It's a great point, and I think.
Speaker 5: This is a measure of how successful the Hoole Woke
Speaker 5: College campus victim oppressor narrative thing has been because they
Speaker 5: have convinced people, whether witningly or kind of subconsciously, that, oh,
Speaker 5: if it's like the Palestinians or Muslim people or something
Speaker 5: like that, they're the victims, you remember, and you can't
Speaker 5: really criticize them. And there's people have become uncomfortable with
Speaker 5: what was acutely just obvious in the wake of nine
Speaker 5: to eleven and the other terrorist attacks around the country
Speaker 5: by Islamo fascists.
Speaker 4: You how you got a guy name again, you got
Speaker 4: a guy named Mohammad Sabri Solomon from Egypt.
Speaker 1: He's here illegally and he said, you leave Jews out
Speaker 1: of it. He set a bunch of Americans on fire.
Speaker 4: So doesn't that fit into the whole Muslim extremist we
Speaker 4: got to be on guard thing? Yes, one percent, of course,
Speaker 4: Michael play thirty for us.
Speaker 8: From my point of view, all of a sudden, I
Speaker 8: felt the heat like it was a Molotov cocktail equivalent
Speaker 8: a gas bomb in a glass jar. Throne of saw
Speaker 8: it a big flame as high as a tree, and
Speaker 8: all I saw was someone on fire.
Speaker 1: And then next clip.
Speaker 8: He had said some along the lines of I mean
Speaker 8: f al Uzionists.
Speaker 1: This is for killing my people, or you kill my people.
Speaker 1: You guys should all die.
Speaker 5: Yeah, keeping in mind that Egypt this guy was an Egyptian,
Speaker 5: won't take any Palestinian rights.
Speaker 1: They don't want them.
Speaker 5: Every country that's accepted large amounts of Palestinian large numbers
Speaker 5: of Palestinian refugees has ended up with violence and revolution
Speaker 5: in their country. So your Muslim Middle Eastern countries want
Speaker 5: no part of that. This lunatic decided to set fire
Speaker 5: to Americans.
Speaker 1: He you know, you got the whole he was here
Speaker 1: illegally thing.
Speaker 4: How many people got into this country or have stayed
Speaker 4: during this crazy period of time of mass immigration that
Speaker 4: planned to do us ill? We will find out over time.
Speaker 4: I suppose that's a horrifying thought. Oh yeah, yeah, the
Speaker 4: number of Africans and Middle Easterners who came in that
Speaker 4: particular list of gripes, you know, never mind the gang
Speaker 4: members and everybody else.
Speaker 1: It's just you could you can.
Speaker 4: Employ the greatest speech writers known to man to write
Speaker 4: you an eloquent description of how profound the betrayal of
Speaker 4: our national security was by the Biden administration opening up
Speaker 4: the border, and it would not be sufficient. It would
Speaker 4: not be enough to accurately describe the horror of what
Speaker 4: was allowed to happen, because it will unfold for years
Speaker 4: and years and years. So now you got twice in
Speaker 4: two weeks and three times in two months, somebody yell
Speaker 4: in free Palestine. The one two months ago was when
Speaker 4: they tried to burn down Governor Shapiro's house with his
Speaker 4: family in it, and they luckily got out without anybody hurt.
Speaker 4: But that was a free Palestine guy. Then you had
Speaker 4: the murders of the diplomats two weeks ago. We know
Speaker 4: that story that the couple that was going to get married,
Speaker 4: and then this over the weekend. So at what point
Speaker 4: does free Palestine become a phrase that is attached to
Speaker 4: terrorism and then or the whole globalize the Intifada that
Speaker 4: college kids get to chant scream at Jewish students as
Speaker 4: they try to walk to class. This is globalizing the Intofada.
Speaker 4: This is what it is.
Speaker 5: Globalize the Intofada means killed Jews everywhere? Yeah, yeah, which
Speaker 5: is happening in New York Times headline is live updates.
Speaker 5: Colorado attacker is in US illegally, Homeland Security Department says, So.
Speaker 4: The FBI calls it a terrorist attack. At least as
Speaker 4: of this morning, the Boulder Police Department was not. They're saying,
Speaker 4: we're still not comfortable calling it a terrors attack.
Speaker 1: Do we do more?
Speaker 4: Boulder is like Berkeley or any other super lefty city
Speaker 4: in America, so they're not comfortable with that.
Speaker 1: Of course. Unfreaking believable.
Speaker 4: Now, if you've seen the video, the reason the guy
Speaker 4: is shirtless is because he accidentally set himself on fire
Speaker 4: with his flammable liquid his own shirt, so he had
Speaker 4: to take his shirt off. But he's standing there rant
Speaker 4: and raving about the Jews in Palestine and Gaza and
Speaker 4: that sort of stuff as he douses people in flammable
Speaker 4: liquid and sets him on fire. People were rolling on
Speaker 4: the ground screaming. Several people. Nobody has died yet, or
Speaker 4: it's been reported, even though the FBI indictment includes a
Speaker 4: murder charge. Nobody's been poured it dead yet, but people
Speaker 4: are near death. What a horrible way to go. Oh
Speaker 4: my god. Four men and four women, ranging in age
Speaker 4: from fifty two to eighty eight were hospitalized with injuries.
Speaker 4: At least two of them flown by helicopter to a
Speaker 4: burn unit in Denver. People were trying to but there
Speaker 4: was no water available, so people were running to a
Speaker 4: fountain that was near where the march was and filling
Speaker 4: up whatever big cup they had or whatever, and running
Speaker 4: back and trying to pourt on people. But obviously that's
Speaker 4: a slow way to try to put out a fire.
Speaker 1: And it's worth.
Speaker 5: Pointing out that this walk that they have regularly, I
Speaker 5: think it's weekly. This organization holds it's a walk to
Speaker 5: free the hostages.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 4: It's not a defeat Hamas or down with the Palestinians
Speaker 4: or up with Israel. It's just a please free the
Speaker 4: hostages walk. This guy's attempt to burn a bunch of
Speaker 4: people to death. Anyway, we are so slow to awake
Speaker 4: in this country.
Speaker 1: It's the other side of the coin. We were talking
Speaker 1: last week.
Speaker 5: It was actually a very good segment our four of
Speaker 5: Friday's show about how why Americans misjudge Vladimir Putin over
Speaker 5: and over and over again. It's because we're friendly, let's
Speaker 5: do business, naive dopes globally speaking, and it's going to
Speaker 5: take a while for us to wake up to the threat,
Speaker 5: the threat among us and the threat we've created by
Speaker 5: educating our kids to hate us.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I'm sorry.
Speaker 5: I don't want to go completely dark and negative, because
Speaker 5: there's plenty of good.
Speaker 1: News in the world.
Speaker 4: I just well, you know what, we've been yelling about
Speaker 4: this as it's unfolding, and now the birds are coming
Speaker 4: home to roost.
Speaker 1: Let's hope, you know, America wakes up in time.
Speaker 4: Tangentially to this story would be the still hard to
Speaker 4: figure out what's exactly going on with the attempted food
Speaker 4: distributions in Gaza. Oh yeah, who keeps shooting firing off guns?
Speaker 4: That's figuring out. Is Israeli soldiers trying to protect themselves
Speaker 4: or they lost their minds or whatever it is, or
Speaker 4: is it Hamas or whoever it is. But anyway, this
Speaker 4: cartoon was making the rounds on social media yesterday. It
Speaker 4: shows a newsroom with a news anchor and like a
Speaker 4: producer running up and saying, normally we don't trust terror groups,
Speaker 4: but what Hamas says, Israel did something terrible. We must
Speaker 4: report it immediately without verification. Because every news organization has
Speaker 4: been reporting, well not every but many of your mainstream
Speaker 4: news organizations have been reporting that it's Israel firing on
Speaker 4: the food distributions because that's.
Speaker 1: What Hamas told them, right, Their source is Hamas. I mean,
Speaker 1: how crazy is that? Yeah?
Speaker 5: I know, I will read an account of what happened
Speaker 5: and think this might be entirely true, entirely untrue, or
Speaker 5: somewhere in between, and I have no way of knowing.
Speaker 1: Turn the page.
Speaker 4: Well, why would you ever even assume for a second that.
Speaker 1: With Hamas as the source you're getting the actual story?
Speaker 1: Well right?
Speaker 5: And why in the world if you have any Well,
Speaker 5: I know the answer to this question, but I'll go
Speaker 5: ahead and ask it. Why in the world would you
Speaker 5: as aquote unquote journalists not say Hamas authorities claim this,
Speaker 5: it cannot be verified. Just write it like that if
Speaker 5: you want to say what they claim. Well, it's because
Speaker 5: we are reaping what we've sold.
Speaker 4: These the people writing and editing those articles are the
Speaker 4: graduates of Columbia Journalism School that we've been talking about
Speaker 4: now for years.
Speaker 1: They are now out among us.
Speaker 5: The body snatchers have infiltrated the population. They're in the
Speaker 5: nation's newsrooms, and they're they're living out their training.
Speaker 4: Okay, Well, so we got some interesting doings with dudes
Speaker 4: competing in girls track and field and in a couple
Speaker 4: of different ways to handle that situation.
Speaker 1: You want girls standing up for themselves, that's right. You
Speaker 1: want a good news.
Speaker 4: You want to get your gender Bending Madness Update when
Speaker 4: we come back.
Speaker 1: I love that idea.
Speaker 4: Fantastic you know, yo, yo, last week of school for
Speaker 4: one kid. My other kid's going to do summer school
Speaker 4: all year long. He's homeschooled. Long story, I'll tell you later,
Speaker 4: But anyway, the older.
Speaker 1: One is very excited.
Speaker 5: Excellent happy summer to him and to youngsters everywhere. But
Speaker 5: it's time for a gender Bending Madness Update.
Speaker 3: So I kept hearing about this thing called.
Speaker 1: By the loco. We're a Brave World.
Speaker 4: Special GBM Pride Month Edition. Welcome to it, GBM. Oh
Speaker 4: gender Bending Madness.
Speaker 5: Yes, yes, exactly. It's twenty first century. We don't have
Speaker 5: to have time to say words. We just use acronyms, abbreviations,
Speaker 5: we use parts of words. So anyway, let's start with
Speaker 5: Jonathan Serri. This is in cal unit Coornia, Special Sports
Speaker 5: edition of Gender Bending Madness Update.
Speaker 9: More than fifteen hundred students competed over two days, but
Speaker 9: the spotlight was firmly on just one. This one, sixteen
Speaker 9: year old transgender athlete ab Hernandez, whose participation is spot
Speaker 9: pro tests. From President Trump on down to parents of
Speaker 9: girls competing against Hernandez, we.
Speaker 10: Just need to stand up for these young ladies and
Speaker 10: make sure that we're protecting their sports and protecting their
Speaker 10: private spaces.
Speaker 1: Roll On, Michael, roll On.
Speaker 9: Hernandez placed first in both the high jump and triple jump.
Speaker 1: In each case.
Speaker 9: Under new California Interscholastic Federation rules introduced for this championship,
Speaker 9: the athlete who placed second was promoted to joint first
Speaker 9: alongside Hernandez and the podium.
Speaker 1: As you see, there was shared.
Speaker 9: None of the girls who competed against Hernandez appeared to
Speaker 9: stage any sort of protest.
Speaker 5: So the new rule in California is, yeah, you're in first,
Speaker 5: and you're the second place person.
Speaker 1: Since you're an actual girl, a, you're also in first.
Speaker 1: What the hell?
Speaker 4: It's madness. It's gender bending madness. Hell, so they're trying
Speaker 4: to fix the whole. So you finished first high school
Speaker 4: track meet for like qualifying for scholarships or in for
Speaker 4: college or any of that stuff. Metals, trophies, et cetera.
Speaker 4: Shir Yeah, wow.
Speaker 5: Right, and because this eighty twenty issue and give me
Speaker 5: five minutes, it would be a ninety three to seven issue. Seriously,
Speaker 5: with that twenty percent it was boys in girls' sports,
Speaker 5: it's sixty six to something like twenty five among Democrats friends, right.
Speaker 1: So who's this four?
Speaker 4: Well, the loudest activists on Twitter, the loudest leftist activists
Speaker 4: exactly who happened to be you know?
Speaker 5: Running rampant in California and also clip twenty eight In
Speaker 5: Oregon and.
Speaker 10: An Oregon, two female student athletes refused to take the
Speaker 10: podium alongside a transgender athlete who had competed as a
Speaker 10: boy in the past two years of their state championships
Speaker 10: over the weekend. The two girls would eventually be asked
Speaker 10: to leave the area by event official Wow.
Speaker 4: Girls were asked to leave, not the dude. Oregon has
Speaker 4: threatened to ban girls from competing for wearing t shirts
Speaker 4: that say save girls sports. Oregon is diseased. It's a
Speaker 4: wonderful place, but it's diseased. I'm surprised there hasn't been
Speaker 4: a bigger pushback against us. I was talking about this
Speaker 4: with somebody yesterday. How there haven't been like more dads
Speaker 4: on a basketball court losing their minds, trying to rally
Speaker 4: the crowd against letting a dude play, or like somebody
Speaker 4: hasn't come along in stage to let's have our own.
Speaker 1: High school championship over here.
Speaker 4: You all do your thing, We're gonna do ours over here,
Speaker 4: and everybody just goes over there and lets the girls
Speaker 4: compete against girls, right, Yeah, I know this, I pray
Speaker 4: will be a blip in our history. And as we've
Speaker 4: said many times, years down the road, you'll try to
Speaker 4: explain to people what happened.
Speaker 5: They won't believe you. Wait a minute. They let boys
Speaker 5: compete against the girls. Why now, Well, because they said
Speaker 5: they were girls. Well, and they'd taken a couple of
Speaker 5: hormones and we had a ponytail.
Speaker 4: And if you protest, but they're still boysed, Grandpa, Yeah.
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 4: If you protested as a high school girl, they'd kick
Speaker 4: you out of the event, but they'd let the boy
Speaker 4: win your medals.
Speaker 1: That's correct. I had to make you mad, Grandpa.
Speaker 5: It sure did, son, it sure did. Anyway, moving along,
Speaker 5: just absolute madness. I'm gonna summarize, excuse me, the study
Speaker 5: because it's it's fairly long and involved. But this is
Speaker 5: a studied done of Canadian inmates and offenders of various
Speaker 5: sorts and the trends in offending among men, women, trans men,
Speaker 5: and trans women. Now, if those terms like jack confuse you,
Speaker 5: not that jack confuses you, but if those terms confuse
Speaker 5: you like they confuse jack, there that's a much I'm
Speaker 5: easily confused. Just you can think fake instead of trans
Speaker 5: fake men, or fake women or new men and new women.
Speaker 5: But anyway, what's really interesting about this this study is
Speaker 5: that when it comes to sexual assault, well, like among
Speaker 5: you know, homicide, it's it's more men as you might expect.
Speaker 5: It's a shocking number of quote unquote trans women. Dudes
Speaker 5: pretending to be women commit homicides, a fair number of
Speaker 5: women and a lesser number of women who've become men.
Speaker 5: Assault is kind of up and down. Robbery is you know,
Speaker 5: no newly arrived men commit robbery because that implies force,
Speaker 5: the threat of force or the use of force.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 5: The number of trans women former well dodod's pretending to
Speaker 5: be women is actually higher than any other group committing robberies, drugs,
Speaker 5: it's very few.
Speaker 1: But sexual assault, it's.
Speaker 5: Only men and trans women meaning fake women. And in fact,
Speaker 5: sexual assault is a huge percentage of the transgender fellas
Speaker 5: behind bars. When it comes to testosterone and other hormones, aggression,
Speaker 5: sexual aggression.
Speaker 1: There is nobody, nobody, nobody.
Speaker 5: Who's either a female or an actual female who's now
Speaker 5: dressed up as a guy who does this. Percentage wise,
Speaker 5: The idea that well, that's a trans woman, so that's
Speaker 5: really a woman is belied by virtually every single statistic
Speaker 5: from speed, strength, oxygen capacity, lung capacity, you know, heart rate,
Speaker 5: blah blah blah, aggression, sexual assault.
Speaker 1: Those are dudes.
Speaker 5: Those are dudes in every meaningful regard. And the point
Speaker 5: of this article is how outrageous it is that male
Speaker 5: sex offenders who now present as women ought to be
Speaker 5: in women's prisons because in terms of sexual offense, they're
Speaker 5: absolutely dudes, and maybe even more prone to sexual offenses
Speaker 5: than regular dudes.
Speaker 4: It's a gender bending madness. Update Jack, that's the ending.
Speaker 4: That is the ending, the whole track and field thing.
Speaker 4: It's what's so weird about me? This to me is
Speaker 4: it's such a tail wagging the dog situation. It's it's
Speaker 4: a almost everybody wants it to stop, well, right, but
Speaker 4: education and media, but especially education, education is going to
Speaker 4: be The Japanese soldier still hiding in the jungle in
Speaker 4: nineteen sixty eight, thinking World War two is still going.
Speaker 1: It's going to take forever to clean the madness out
Speaker 1: of education. Wow.
Speaker 4: Anyway, if you miss a segment of the show, we
Speaker 4: do four hours every day. Get our podcast, Armstrong and
Speaker 4: Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty