WEBVTT - Listener Mail V: Computing the Hyper-Real

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Hey, wasn't the Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I am Christian Seger

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and I am Joe McCormick, and we're here for another

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>listener mail episodes. We've been doing more of these lately

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because we begin we've been getting so much good listener mail. Yeah,

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the mail bag inside Carney has been very full. It's

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's been full of really good stuff too.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta throw this out up front, like, we've

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>gotten so much that there's no way that we can

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>address it in every listener mail episode. Now, even if

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>we do them more often, we could do them like

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>once a week, and we wouldn't be able to get there.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I mean, we're hearing from people via email

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>blow the mind at how stuff Works dot Com. We're

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>getting people from Facebook and Twitter. We're blow the mind

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on both of those. Some people right into us on

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler where we were stuff to Blow your Mind. Some

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>people on LinkedIn. We did get one on LinkedIn once, Yes,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even think it was just your LinkedIn profile. Yeah,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody go follow Robert on LinkedIn, but yeah, somebody wrote

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>us there, So yeah, thanks for everybody who's written in.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, just these are the ones that we

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>felt would make like the most compelling listener mail episode.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's lots of other stuff out there, and I'm

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna make an effort to try to sit down and

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to all of them. I need to take a

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>day and just go through everyone. Yeah, it kind of

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>depends on what day they come in, but we get

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great stuff for sure. Anyway, the takeaway

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is if you sent us an email, we don't get

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a chance to read it today. Please don't take that

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>as a slide against We've just got way more than

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>we can get to. But we really do appreciate all

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of your correspondence. And Carney does too. Because Carney is

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>just bulging with happy energy. I see a lot of

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>energy around him. There's like a rainbow field of luminescence. No,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what that is. Earlier this week, I set

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Carney to try to solve all of the P versus

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>MP problem, and I think this morning he might have

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>actually found a solution. He hasn't. He hasn't given us

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the solution yet. Maybe he judged that it's not for

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>our minds to know, but he has been glowing with

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a radiant light and emitting choirs of angels. The sound,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just coming out from inside him. So yeah,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been kind of warm and happy sitting in

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>his presence. Yeah, I'm basking in the glow of Carney. Well,

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>if if Carney has not evolved too far beyond our understanding,

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps he slash, she slash yet can present us with

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>some listener mail. Alright, so this first message is from

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>our listener, Nicole, and it's with reference to the episode

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I did on the intelligence of birds. Nicole says, Hi,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I just finished listening to your episode on avian intelligence

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and it brought to mind and experience I had as

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a teenager. We had some problem crows that were attacking

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>our postman and ripping the shingles off our roof to

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>pitch them onto the lawn. My dad heard that if

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you kill a crow and hang it from a tree,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>it will drive the other crows off, so he shot

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one with a pellet gun and hung it from a

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tree in our backyard. I've heard this as well, not

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never I haven't shot one but I've heard this, yeah,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>she continues. The next morning, I looked out the window

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to see hundreds and hundreds of crows sitting in the

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>trees encircling our backyard like a black wall. They were

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>making no noise and staring at the body of the

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dead crow hanging from the tree. They stayed the entire day,

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>barely moving, never making a sound. I don't know if

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>crows typically hold awake, or if my dad happened to

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have shot their grand chief, but the experience was chillingly terrifying.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Love your podcast, Nicole. That that is the most disturbing

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>piece of listener mail I've ever read. That's like the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Dark Half. Do you remember that it was a dark half?

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>What it was it sparrows and the sparrows are flying. Yeah.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They were like psychopomps. They were like embedded with the

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>energy of of malice or something that kind of drag

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you away. Yeah. Well, I mean I do kind of

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>wonder about her question, there was there something special about

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>this crow or was it? Was it just don't you

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>guys come across anything even even remotely like this in

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the episode. I mean, crows do have a startlingly complex

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>social intelligence. Yeah, they have social relationships, and they seem

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to display theory of mind where they can imagine the

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>intentions of other entities. Maybe they were like fronting to

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>her dad. They were like, oh, you want to kill

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>one of us, and then just like swarmed and we're like,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this is our gang. You can't row more so than

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>most birds. I believe there's the possibility for something I

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>had to be taking place. Yea though. Yeah, so thanks

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for sharing, Nicole. That is very weird alright. This next

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>one is from Issha. I believe, and she says, hello,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I love the podcast and love the episode on Jeff

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Killer. That's the creepy pasta two episode we did.

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to nitpick, but when you guys were

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about acid burning, one of you said it is

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>more prevalent in countries where it is quote more acceptable

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in society. I'm from Pakistan and I would like to

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>assure you that acid burning is not socially acceptable there.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It is a crime and perpetrators are punished. Saying it

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is acceptable in society simply because the rate of occurrence

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>is high is the same as saying that gun violence

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is acceptable in America's society for the same reason, I

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have attached an article detailing the legal repercussions of committing

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the crime of attacking someone with acid in Pakistan. Once again,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I love the podcast and apologize if it was a

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>little harsh. I don't I don't think that's a little

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>harsh at all. And actually when I first read this,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, jeez, I really hope I didn't

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>imply something like that. I think what we were trying

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>to get across was just that there are societies where

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's culturally prevalent. Yes, so that the exact quote in

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that bit in in that episode was there have been

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of incidents where there have been Western tourists

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in foreign countries where this is more acceptable, and um,

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the to the listeners point, yeah, acceptable

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is maybe not the right word here, said yeah, yeah,

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>that that I mean, that's a spur of the moment

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that and that's my bad. But I would say,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>like to her analogy here, like, I think you could

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>make the the statement that gun violence in American society

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is prevalent. Yeah, I think that there there's a strong

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>comparison to be made here where a gun violence is

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>not something that is at all. I mean particularly the

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of like mass shooting thing to it it's been

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. Certainly, nobody is out there saying this is good,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this is great, this is happening, but it is happening

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>with enough of of a frequency that it exists in

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the uh in like the public mindset. And if one

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is to get you know, slightly poetic here, I guess

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if one's heart were to go to a dark place,

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>then that experience, that motive behavior is waiting for them

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>there as an American um. But yeah, I don't. I

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's the use of the word acceptable. Maybe that

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>caused the confusion, and that's certainly not what I was implaying. Yeah,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's a good clarification. Thank you, actually, and thank

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you for letting us know. All right, Well, you know,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I did an episode on the Tip of

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the Tongue or taught so we when we asked everyone

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>out there to share their taughts, and we receive a

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of good feedback. So here's one from Ashley says, Hey, guys,

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just finished up your Tip of the Tongue episode and

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought I might have some insight into a couple

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of topics that you brought up. First, I am fluent

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in both English and as all American Sign Language. I

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>found that this is a most helpful skill in resolving

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>taughts in my world. Not only is a s L

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>far more primitive of a language than English, whose discrepancy

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>aids me in thinking of words by their death nisition

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and not just their uses, but since ASL is a

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>physical language and English verbal, I often have the pieces

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in one side when I don't on the other, translating

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the discovery into the desired language becomes easy at that point.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting point because we talked in the

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>episode about how I was surprised to find that there

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is such a similarity between looking for the word in

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>English and or any language in a spoken language. And

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then this also this thing known as the tip of

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the fingers phenomenon in deaf signers, where they have the

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>same experience. They're looking for the sign and they have

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the semantic meaning of the word, but they can't remember

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what you do with your hands. So I wasn't on

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but it reminds me of when we did

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cyborg episode recently. We were talking about how one

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the guys had coined the word cyborg was very

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in the ways that uh cyborgs could process language differently,

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to the point that he was trying to come up

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with a way to come up with averages of words,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like he was thinking about words as math and I

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's a bit of a connection here. And at

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the time I said, you know, this reminds me of

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>structuralism and post structuralism. This seems to be, as often

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>happens on stuff to blow your mind, one of those

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>topics that we circle around. Maybe we should do something

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about it in the future. Although uh Man, post structuralism

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>with your real tough topic to try to spell out

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in a like an hour long podcast. It would be

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, but hey, we're all about a good challenge.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Ashley does continue. Yes, she says, I also

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>produce write the words the anchors say at my local

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>news station. You mentioned during the podcast some of the

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>differences between speech and written Producing is a fun exercise

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in both rooms. Not only must the words make sense

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to the viewer who listens, but also to the anchor

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>who reads the words I assemble. Anyways, thanks for keeping

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>my mind entertained as I drive about town. Ashley. So,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Ashley is the shadow figure behind the news echo borg.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of like how you and I are

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the shadow figures behind brain stuff. Yeah. Yeah, Jonathan Strickland

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is our little puppet. Yeah. Most people have only seen

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>him from the but from the behind. But from looking

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>him from behind, it's just like the flesh opens up

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>into these rods. They've never seen the armhole. I kid,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland is full of wonderful insights on his own

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and rods and gears. Okay. Also a couple of quick

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>messages we got back about the Tip of the Tongue episode.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Listener Sophia writes in good morning, gentlemen, love love, love

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast. You're too kind, she says, seeing as

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you asked, I constantly have a tip of the Tongue

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>moment with Christopher Walkin. I've seen most of his films,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>his infamous SNL episode, and perhaps every celebrity imitation of him.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>But when I talk about him, for whatever reason, I

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot get his name out. Fun fact of which I'm

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>sure you're aware. He was in The Deer Hunter, which

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is what I googled to get his name with wait

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for it, John Kaze, John Kaze. Christian figured big into

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>our tip of the Tongue episode, Oh is he one

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that you? One of you have a tip of the tongue?

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>We I mean, if i'd asked you who played Fredo

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in The Godfather, would you have that name? No, and

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why. I've never seen The god What. Yeah, well,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's stunning. I've never seen any of the

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Godfather films. I'm planning to sometime this year though. Okay, well, um,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>don't let anybody build them up too much for you.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, but I think I know who Jun Kazale is.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I know he was in a Deer Hunter dog day

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>after Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know that guy. Yeah. So

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks for writing in, Sophia. Sophia comments that she's in

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Rome and so we appreciate that message. But I had

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to read back to back with this, also a message

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from Parker, who has a strange convergence here with Sophia's comments.

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So Parker writes in says hey guys. Also Parker's referencing

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Tip of the Tongue episode. He says, hey guys,

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>super interesting episode. As always, you asked what were the

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>words that always tripped us up? For myself, I had

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>many years where I had ceaselessly confused Paul Giamati, Steve Bashemi,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and Christopher walkin Uh. It's likely that they all have

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat sad faces, and specifically that Giomati and Bashemy have

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Italian last names, while Bashimmy and Walking looks somewhat similar

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in their character, acting a bit scrawny and pale. It's

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting as a Venn diagram, however, because the subsets of

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>two would always be confused, but never all three. I eat,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Giamati and Bashemmy interchangeable. Bashemy and Walking were interchangeable, but

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I would never confuse Geomati and Walking. Uh. This aspect

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is surely an extra phenomenon of its own, but it

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>seems as if it came into play as well. Do

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>you think the same part of the brain would be

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>affected when confusing people and trying to recollect people slash words?

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for everything always entertained as I listen to you

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>guys while crunching numbers at my business management job. Have

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a great day. Thank you for the message. But I

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's an interesting question. I do pretty much think

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be the same part of the brain.

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I am not a neurologist, or a psychologist or an

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>expert on speech production. So that is my my lay

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>person's opinion as somebody who's read about this. But from

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>what I've read, I think, yeah, that we use sort

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>of most of the same gear in our brains to

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>come up with proper names that we do to come

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>up with words where in either case, you know the

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>semantic meaning you're either thinking about the person, you're thinking

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about the definition of the word, but you just can't

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>come up with the sounds your mouth is supposed to make. Yeah,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so spoilers for our our listeners. Actually this happens to

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>us in the studio quite often, and we just edited

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>out where it will be me going, uh that, what's

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>his name? Uh, and then our producer Noel thankfully edits

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>it out so we sound, uh, you know, the right

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>thing as we as we brought up in the episode.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The best thing you can do to solve that problem

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more or less on your own as quickly as possible.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That otherwise that the part of the brain ties Paul,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>part of your brain. Yeah, don't sit in that tip

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of the tongue state forever. It's not interesting to think

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of Steve Bushemi as being like the sort of center

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of this uh universe of character actor is that are

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to confuse with one another. I would never be

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>confused about Steve to shimmy like his name. I look

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>at people who aren't Steve for shimmy, and I think

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Steve a shimmy. All right, here's another one. This one

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Jonathan in Melbourne, Australia says, quote

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in the show, you mentioned the French version of the phrase,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which translates to hole in the head. However, I think

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you may have taken the phrase too literally. From your

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>banter around the show, it sounds like you interpreted the

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase as being like a hole through the skull. And granted,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>given a trepidation style, and since we've covered trepidation on

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the show, we kind of can't help but do that.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>We can just have a predisposition to talk about holes

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the skull. Um. That's another topic that the show keeps. Yeah, well,

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of in the title of the show, right,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff to blow your mind? How are you gonna blow

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the mind of not creating a hole? And speaking of Todd,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the guy we've talked about him on the show before,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the famous guy with a rod through the head. Yeah, yeah, anyway,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan continues, However, I interpret it as a meaning u

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of a void or space in which the name or

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>idea should exist but is missing. That makes the phrase

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>more like the descriptions earlier in the episode where you

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>quoted descriptions of the feeling is being similar to have

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>having the shape for the idea in your head and

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing else would quite fit there, but the idea itself

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is missing, it can't be grasped. That interpretation makes the

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>French version of the phrase perhaps the most accurate. Thanks

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>again for a great podcast. I think it makes it.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I like this, It makes this as a black hole

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the mind. Yeah, I think Jonathan sounds like you're

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. I bet you are interpreting this right and

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we were interpreting it wrong. Uh. The hole in the

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>head is like what you're referencing is when we talked

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about William James. You know, William James sort of has

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the wraith, the wraith of the name.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It's this mold where the name should be, and nothing

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>else will fit in the mold except the name. But

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't come up with the name. Yeah, that's scary. Actually,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought about the black hole in your head, and

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it getting larger larger the longer he's been thinking about it.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Always starts with Steve. Okay, one more about the tip

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tongue episode before we move on. We heard

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from our listener Tyler, who said, hello there. I frequently

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>experience taught moments as a bilingual, and this is something

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that actually comes up in the literature, is bilingualism and taughts.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Tyler writes, often I experienced the problem of having the

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>correct word but not in the correct language. This happens

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more frequently in times when I've when I have to

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>switch back and forth from Spanish to English. I enjoyed

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the explanation on knowing the starting point and the ending

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but not being able to make the connection. I've personally

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>felt that it's caused by modes. Sometimes when I'm in

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a Spanish mode, it's hard to get out of it. Uh. Similarly,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I experience it when talking on different subjects. I might

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be in a movie mode and then the conversation goes

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to music, but the connections are still trying for movies.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the episode. I very much enjoy your explanations

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of every day often overlooked occurrences Kadado uh Tyler, and

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's an interesting insight, like the different modes,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Like you're you're almost in one warehouse in your brain

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>looking for product codes to locate the correct items on

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the shelves, and if you quickly transition to a different

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>warehouse part of your brain, that that it might be

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>harder to locate the things you're looking for. I can

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>see how that would be true. Yeah, yeah, indeed. Okay,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>here's two that are about the same thing, and it's

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>something that came up in our episode on cargo Cults

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and Richard Feynman. The first comes from Carson and he says,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>just listening to the cargo cult episode, I laughed at

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the part about the reflexology student and then realized what

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was probably going on. I'm not going to call it

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>mumbo jumbo because someone near and dear to me practices it,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but I am also not ready to deny the placebo effect. Well,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say that I think that we should do

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>an episode on reflexology. So I don't think it's mumbo

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>jumbo either. But anyway, the theory is that your body

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has energy fields that are all connected, all across the body,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and using this knowledge, you can massage a specific pressure

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>point on the foot and have an effect on the pituitary.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>So the student probably didn't think the pituitary was actually

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the foot. He probably just meant he was on

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the pressure point. However, I wasn't personally there in that

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hot tub, so I can't say for sure. Thanks for

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that clarification, Carson. Yeah, and then we received another message

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from Jonathan similar thing. He says, a wonderful podcast on

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cargo cults. But I have one comment that's not for you,

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but for Richard Feynman. I don't think Richard Feynman still

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this now. He's quite yeah, I have

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>no desire to validate foot reflexology as a science. But

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>according to a system, there are channels of energy that

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>run through the body. Points of the feet correspond to

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>different organs of the body. So this is the same thing. Uh.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>And he's basically saying that it's possible that Feynman just

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>took this the wrong way. So to recap from that

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>episode Fineman, the story goes that Fineman wasn't a hot

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tub with some reflexology students, and they were kind of

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like rubbing on each other, and one said I think

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that I've got your pituitary and he was rubbing on

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a girl's foot, and Fineman was like, clearly, that's not

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>your pituitary, and he uses that as an example of

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>cargo cult science and then like they didn't really understand science. However,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>these two messages seem to indicate that the student actually

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was probably thinking he was accessing the energy lines connecting

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to the pituitary, and that Feynman was just being grumpy. Well,

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be unfair because I haven't read

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>all that much about reflexology, but it it sounds like

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it is a reasonable assumption to say, massaging somebody's foot

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is not really affecting the energy lines going to their pituitary. See,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And that's why I think we should

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>do an episode on it, because I don't know. Well,

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds like it's based on some kind

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of non evidence based thoughts about like spirit energy and stuff.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe well maybe I I always took it to be

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>like more like pressure points and things like that, like

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to acupuncture. But yeah, maybe we should investigate this

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and unravel it. Oh man, if we want to open

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that can of worms. I don't know if you. We

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>could start with me rubbing your feet, Joe, see what happens. Well,

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we can do some acupuncture and see if we get

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the CBO effect. Okay, alright, So next we're gonna talk

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>about some emails we got with reference to the episode

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I did on hyper Real Religions. That was

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the episode about religions that are founded based on texts

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>or or canons or ideas that the believers in the

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>religion explicitly acknowledge our fictional and there's not like a

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody thinks there's a real spiritual revelation, you're

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>basing it on the Big Lebowski or Star Wars or

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>something you know is not real to begin with. And

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that Robert put it to me later on

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like a Cyborgian version of religion, and

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that like, you take aspects that work for your personal

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>worldview and helped the kind of guide you along what

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you consider to be a sort of righteous path already. Yeah,

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>so we got a lot of interesting feedback about this episode.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's true that I think almost any time we

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about religion, which we do a fair amount on

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the show, we get results sort of from both sides

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of the the issue. It seems like if you bring

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>up religion from a you know, critical or investigatory way

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of thinking, you're you're gonna get some feedback. You know,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna have some feelings. Yeah. I always feel

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that the approach that we take to religion on the

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>show is let's let's get it out of the box,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>let's look at it, Let's hold it up to the light,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how how the light goes through it, you know,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>treat it like this sort of crystal object. And in

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that, you have to put yourself sometimes in a

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>state of vulnerable open mindedness. And that's where that's where

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I like to put myself, and that's where I try

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to invite the listeners to reach that point as well.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's not always a comfortable place. Well. I mean,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>we hear from a lot of you guys out there

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>who seem to really like this approach, and this is

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree, Robert. That's exactly the same way I

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like to come at it, to to to understand it more,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at it, uh, and not just to be

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>focused on either propping it up as perfect and wonderful

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and true, or in bashing it and tearing it down.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we will hear from people who have

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>their feelings stimulated by us talking about this. So we

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give a sampling of a couple of types

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of responses we got from the hyper Real Religions episode,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>right and and in reading these, and especially in reading

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>one or two of the more critical bits of listener

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>mail we're received, I want to also recognize that sometimes

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a hostile reaction is sort of like the the initial

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>reaction to immunization, you know. It's it's kind of like

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>like like I can look back at my own history

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with religion, and there have been times where I go

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into a situation with a certain set of beliefs, those

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>beliefs are challenged, and my initial response is to harden up,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and uh and say, you know, get away

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>from me. I don't want to think about that. It's

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>only later than I'm able to to think about some

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of these criticisms and incorporate that in and emerge ultimately

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>stronger from it. Now. Specifically, I think what some listeners

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were responding to in the hyper Real Religion episode was

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>us talking about Young Earth creationism because we had to

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>explain the origins of the postafarianism idea, and that that

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out of a criticism of the campaign to teach

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>creationist ideas in American public schools. So it's it's like

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a datast kind of performance. Yeah, it's a it's basically

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a parody, all right. So I'm gonna kick off this

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>kick this off by reading a listener mail from a

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>listener who wants to remain anonymous. I'm just gonna read

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a segment here, and they were essentially comparing our handling

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of religion to other house stuff Works podcast handling of religion. Uh?

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And did that? I cannot speak because I cannot specifically

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>remember an example of another show handling religion uh in

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>any way, shape or form. I know they have, but

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't listen to all the episodes that come out

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other shows. So this individual says, as I

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>listened listen to your show on hyper real religions, I

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>discovered that no such mutual respect exists on your part.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>My faith was blatantly attacked. My belief system was literally mocked.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>As one of you laughed out loud when mentioning the

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Young Earth model of creation. And I was made to

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>feel shamed for being a Christian and a fan of

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>your show at the same time. Please know that I'm

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>not trying to retaliate or speak out of anger or

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. I'm not looking for an apology or

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>any sort of acknowledgement at all. I just wanted to

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>let you know that I'm sorry you had to speak

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this way, and I sincerely hope that you will cease

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from abusing people for their beliefs in the future. Well,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not my intention when we talk about religion

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to abuse anybody for their beliefs, and certainly not to

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>make them feel ashamed. I just uh, I just like

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to think and talk about these ideas. Uh. And so

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if you are a Christian or somebody of any other faith,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>please do not feel ashamed listening to the show. I

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>hope you will go on this journey of exploration with us.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I also think we should be able to laugh at

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>about just we should be able to laugh at anything. Yeah,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>well just about that's another point. Yeah, I mean, we

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>we make jokes about every kind of idea that we

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about on the show, including scientific ideas. Uh. And

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so that certainly if you're if you're especially troubled by

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>making jokes about out a certain subject that I guess

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe we we might be able to get to you

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, and we're not trying to hurt your feelings.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So like, I wasn't on this episode, but I do

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just want to chime in and back up what you

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>guys are saying in the sense that, like, yeah, there's

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of opportunities out there where you can be listening

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to things, especially in the podcast world, right where like

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not all going to have the exact same beliefs

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to overlap, but like podcasts in

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>particular have like a sort of personal resonance with a

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people right where they start to feel like

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we're in your with us, right. Uh, Like, I'll give

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you an example from my own life. So, like, I'm

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of stand up comedy. I like Louis Black.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You guys know Louis Black, right. Lewis Black on one

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of his albums has this pretty long bit about like

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>how stupid soy milk is Okay? I drink soy milk,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I love Louis Black. I listened to it and I

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just go, Okay, we disagree, drink soy milk. I didn't

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>know you were such a moron exactly. Well, but see,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I remember the first time out there.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Please know I'm kidding. Yeah, he is totally choking. Uh.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, like that's a sort of like

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>non religious version of this where it's like you can

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>hear something like that and go, well, we don't agree

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>on this particular thing, but I still like this person.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I like what they're bringing to me. I'm going to

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>keep up with it, you know, And I can and

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I can also laugh at jokes about SWI milk. Well,

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I hope it comes through at least most of the

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>time that we do take an inquisitive approach to religion

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show. But we also I tend to think

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>we're fairly friendly and open minded about it. I like

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to think so too, especially knowing you guys, you know,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>outside of the studio as well. Whenever we've talked about religion,

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys, it's not like your bemoana or demeaning and

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, any particular kind of beliefs. Yeah, and it's

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>not like even within this room, the three of us

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have a uniformed outlook on religion, spirituality. Like we each

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have our own system, we have our own worldview that

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had it may incorporate religion religion into it to varying degrees. Yeah,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I worship the Great God Cthulhu and and and I'm

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm of the cult of Falsa Doom. We all know

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what is stronger than steel? You don't know, do you?

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a flash. Yeah, of course the flesh really does

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not hold up well to steal on that movie. I

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>recall that's a good point. Steel really cuts through it.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Falsa Doom's philosophy. It sounds real good until it meets

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the steel, so clear clarifying for the audience. Thalsa Doom

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is the James Earl Jones character from the movie, Yes,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Barbarian Yeah. So anyway, following up, but we

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>got one more email we wanted to share, actually a

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>couple more, but here's one that we got about the

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>hyper Real Religions episode, and this is from our listener, Gustavo. So.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Gustavo says, Hi, guys, I really enjoyed the hyper Real

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Religion episode. You made some new connections between both official

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>religions and the hyper real stuff that I hadn't really

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>considered the search for meaning means quite a lot to me.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.239
<v Speaker 1>My life is more or less built on seeking the

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>deepest truths I can find. The question never ends. Having

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>read Dune quite a few times, I can relate to

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of reverence for a story that becomes part

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of one's being. You didn't quite say that, but I

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>hope I'm reflecting your intention. Yeah. Yeah, you don't have

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to believe Dune is literally true for it to start

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to take on some kind of deep meaning or spiritual

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>significance for you. Anyway, Gustavo continues, maybe I'll memorize the

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Litany against Fear to quote it now that I know

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at least one person who who has done that. That

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was impressive to me. I wanted to clarify, as I

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>did replying to Gustavo, I have not memorized the Litany

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>against Fear, though I think I should. I was reading

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it off of the screen and this is the thing

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>when they put their hand in the box here, Yeah,

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the little death that brings total obliteration. Yeah. Total. I

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>once wrote it on my arm before a job interview,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, not where it could be seen, but

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be a good tattoo. Yeah, I would would

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>uh anyway, Gustavo continues, when I was twenty, I found Mormonism.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Before that, I was Catholic. I searched so many philosophies

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and religions. Nowadays, I can't say I identify with any

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>particular belief system, but I love systems of evidence along

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with speculation about what might be. I call myself a nonbeliever.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the supernatural is real, but I'd like

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to fly, breathe underwater, and do some other things rather

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fantastic and deliberately escapist. That would be damn cool. So

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope there's more. Maybe this is a simulation, and

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll wake up saying, holy jumping, Juniper Batman, that was

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a trip. What's next? I love that reference, good old

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Burt word as robin Uh. Gustavo rights, you were fair,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>reverent and kind, considering especially how religious slash spiritual discussions

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so often devolved into needless, wasteful arguments. Your podcast is informative,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and I feel pleased for having listened. Related one funny

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about the Wicked Problems episode is that explaining wicked

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>problems is somewhat of a wicked problem. We know it.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The recursion leads to endless complexity, as with the nature

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of life evolution in the quest for meaning. I hope

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>your day is pleasant, which is a great way to

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>end an email. But um, yeah, and so I find

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it kind of funny that we've heard both from people

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>who thought that we were way too harsh about religion,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and we heard from multiple people who said that they

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>were very uh, they appreciated how fair and polite we were.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what to make of that. I

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good sign. I think if you hear

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>two extremes that we're probably doing something right. I hope so.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But that might just be my own narcissism talking. But

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the email, Gustavo. This is it was really great.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>All right. Here's another one Chris from San Marcos, California

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Rights and it says have been listening to your podcast

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for a while and have never been moved to write

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in until now. I just wanted to say that I

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate Robert's win app analogy with regard to religion

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or religious beliefs. This is about the win App skins. Yes,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we are all really just trying to choose the

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>right skin. As the case may be, it was a rich,

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>engaging episode, and I hope that you'll do a follow up.

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps some day I can say that I was listening

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to the launch of Winampism and I like that, and

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to classify myself as one of the

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>early win ampist Or is it when when I'm Pete

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and there'd be like real playerism and stuff like that,

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be the really bad religion during your episodes? During your episode,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and image sprang to mind of the theme in Galaxy

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Quest and the reverence for the quote historical documents. Not

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sure if this falls under hyper religion or cargo cult

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or just an interesting crossover for both. Thank you for

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>helping to keep my brain functioning during a nasty so

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Cow commute. I think Galaxy Quest is actually a really

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>great point of comparison because in in the movie Galaxy Quest,

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we meet aliens who have seen old episodes of what's

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially Star Trek and they've interpreted it as true. Late

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>great Ellen Rickman, yeah and so, and then they build

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this entire way of interacting with the world around the

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>assumption that Star Trek is reality that's owns like cargo

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>cult to me, Big time. Yeah, and it's interesting because

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of it being a technological cargo cold it it's

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like, um, an imagination cargo call. Yeah. Yeah, this

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have time to read this listener mail, but

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody else wrote into us to say that the scene

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of Star Trek into Darkness is a

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>really good example of cargo cults. They violate the prime

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>directive and interact with this, like they let people see

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the starship Enterprise on this I don't want to say

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>primitive planet, but it's like a planet that doesn't have

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that technology yet, and they like, isn't it implied that

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they like worship the Enterprise as a god? After that? Yeah,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a pre warp drive planet. They see they see

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a starship and they think it's a god. Yeah, that's

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the science fiction is full of great examples like that. Okay,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this email comes to us from another person who listened

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Creepy Pasta two episode, the Jeff the Killer one,

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of, uh, you know, summarize that episode again,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Like we looked at all the various supposed attributes of

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff the Killer, one of which was the idea that

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he cut his own lids off, and we looked at

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the science of whether that was possible. And this listener writes,

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and hey, guys, I know I'm late to the game

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on this one, but I just heard the Creepy Pasta

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>two episode. While listening to it, I immediately thought, this

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast applies to me. When you were talking about eyelid reconstruction.

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I was in a car wreck when I was when

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I was sixteen. I was in the passenger seat and

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the car flipped over and slid on its hood. My

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>face went out the sunroof, and consequently I lost most

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of the skin on my forehead down to the skull

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and the skin on the left side of my face,

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>more specifically my left cheek and eyebrow eye area. I

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was fortunate that I didn't lose my eye, but the

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>initial skin grafts used to replace the missing skin twisted

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and pulled my eye open, so I couldn't close, especially

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>when I was asleep. And this is exactly what we

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about in the episode. I had to put a

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>greasy ointment in my eye to keep it from drying

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out for about a year until the scar tissue settled. Okay, Wow,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we didn't read anything about that kind of stuff. What

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 1>they ended up doing was taking the skin from behind

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>my ears because it is the closest smiliarity to eyelids

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>skin thickness and softness. I'm assuming he means for grafts,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think we all just touched. Yeah, they used

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the skin from behind both ears from my upper and

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>lower eyelids on my left eye. Fun story, I think

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>he's being sarcastic. The hospital I went to for these

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>procedures was about three hours from where I lived. When

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I got home from getting the stitches removed from behind

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>my ear, I took my shirt off not carefully enough

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and ripped the incision behind my ear open and had

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to get back in the car and read back to

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the hospital to have my ear restitched. I ended up

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>spending twelve hours in a car that day. I also

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting when you referenced the paper that

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>said an odyssey. I'm pretty sure the procedure they used

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to replace the skin on my forehead was fairly experimental,

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as they had to rotate muscle from the top of

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>my head to my forehead and then cut the skin

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>graph so it kind of looked like a fishing net.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>This is fascinating and this is the kind of stuff

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't get out of the academic literature, you know. Yeah,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you only get the not even sometimes the surgical, but

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint. But then sometimes it's like one step removed

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from that sort of the academic view of the surgical

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>procedure as opposed to the user experience. Uh. Just to

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>follow up on that last fishnet thing, he said, the

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>skin then grew together to be full, one full piece.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine how that works. But that's fascinating.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Plastic surgery, reconstructive surgery is just so amazing. Yeah, having

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>seen like you know, what was done to my own

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>song with his palette, right, it's just crazy to just

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like they went in there, they closed it and it

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>became solid flash again. It's just it's it's a testament

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to not only a surgical ability, but just the healing

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ability and flexibility of biology. Uh. Less bit here he

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>says this was just for functionality, not for looks. Of

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the course of five years, I had fifteen surgeries, six

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of which were skin expander projects to replace the scar

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>tissue on my forehead and cheek with smooth, healthy skin.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Not unless you're really paying attention, it looks like I'm

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>missing an eyebrow and have a black eye. I wear

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>glasses some most people don't notice. Happy ending. I have

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>an identical twin brother, and now and then my family

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>members will call me by the wrong name, which always

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>makes me smile. It's awesome. Man. Wow, Well, thanks for

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>sharing that story with us. His name is Jason. Thanks

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for sharing that. And yeah again, so like that amazing.

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of thing I like to hear about

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>because we do the research and we pull that all

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>together and we try to extrapolate out of that. But

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>like these real life experiences really, I think add another

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>dimension to it. Hey, so we got a lot of

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>listener feedback on our P versus n P episode, the

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>one Robert and I did about algorithms, complexity theory and

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this great unsolved problem in computer science that would be

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of revolutionary. It's what Carney's glowing with right now. Yeah,

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So we we don't know yet if he

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>solved it, but I don't know. The fact that he's

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>just like pooping out harps at an enormous rate does

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>make me think he's entered the computing realm of the gods.

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They sound great at these harps. I mean they're perfectly

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>tuned when they clung to the floor. Anyway, so we

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>got quite a few pieces of feedback, and one of

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>them that I thought we should start with was an

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>email we got from Jim in New Jersey. Now, Jim

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is the listener out there who inspired us to do

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the episode. I've been emailing back and forth with him

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>over a long time and he sent us some really smart,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>insightful emails that helped me figure out some ways to

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>approach the topic on the show. So big thanks to him.

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>But he contacted us after we did it. He said,

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>great job on the P versus n P segment, especially

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>without visuals. I wonder if we'll ever know the answer.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>What if it's one of Girdle's statements that cannot be proven.

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>This is referencing Kurt Girdle, who we talked about in

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the episode with the idea of the incompleteness theorems, the

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>idea that in a self consistent mathematical system, you can

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>never know the answer to every question. Um. But anyway,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim continues, you stated that P might not be m

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>P for us mortals, but it could be for the gods.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>While that argument is completely hypothetical. I don't think that

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>could be the case. If we were to have insistent

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>logical models, then if it's the case for Man, it

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>must be the case for the gods as well. However,

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the gods might have a nondeterministic machine that can solve

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>problems in P time. Keep in mind that NP are

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>still polynomial problems, but only a nondeterministic model. I could

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>see a nondeterministic machine being the realm of the gods

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and not for Man. That Yeah, so he's saying that,

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, P versus MP is about logic. It's it's

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>not something that could be different depending on what the

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, physical facts of the universe, where if it's

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>true here or not true here, the same would hold

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>true in whether it's the any other universe. I just

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>want to throw in on the P versus MP thing,

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because you guys are too humble to pat yourselves on

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the back about this. But not only did we receive

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a ton of listener mail, uh some of which we're

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go through now about how great that episode was.

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of messages that came to us

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>through Facebook and Twitter saying how great that they thought

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys did at exactly what what he just mentions here,

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>in particular without using visual reference explaining something like this,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and that you tackled a computer science topic that most

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>people would shy away from. So I'm giving you guys

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>high fives. Yeah, well, we were a little nervous going

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into it, but uh yeah, yeah, well, I mean I

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think we have to be honest and say, neither Robert

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or I or you know, we're we're not big computer

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>science and logic guys. So we were a little bit

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out of our depth, but we we get our best

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to make it, to understand it, and to make it

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>understandable to you. And you know, I found that actually

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I can man an advantage that's been my experience

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the past. It's like we're we're the we can

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be the ones that venture into the woods, uh, retrieve

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the mysteries and bring them back and explain them to

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to to everyone else. Well, yeah, we we don't have

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the This is actually a phrase that Jim used in

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>his emails that that I was having with him. He

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about the curse of knowledge. We don't have the

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>curse of knowledge on this issue, like, uh, knowing it

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with such depth and complexity of understanding that we lose

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability to give the gist of it. You ever

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have that problem where you know a topic so well

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't explain it in a simple way. This was

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>actually one of the reasons when I was a kid.

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>This is why my parents explained to me that my

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>math teacher was so mean to us. Was that, like,

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>she understood it so well that she didn't know how

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this was like fifth grade, but she she had the

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.959
<v Speaker 1>curse of knowledge. Yeah, and that she like was so

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>frustrated trying to explain these simple mathematical things to us

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and that we didn't get it. I've heard that from

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>an other disciplines before, Like people who are who find

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves given the opportunity to teach a thing that they

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>are great at, and sometimes they just don't have the

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>patients for it because it's like you know, breaking down

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the basics and the end of the introductory material. It's

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 1>just ultimately difficult for somebody that's gone too far beyond. Yeah.

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>If there's anything I learned from grad school, it's that

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge difference between an expert and something and

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's a great teacher and something. Oh yeah, sometimes

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they overlap. I don't mean that they're mutually exclusive, but

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>oh no, this is true. This is true outside the

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sciences as well. This is true. And like writing and stuff,

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people you go to a writing program

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>or something, you want to go where the famous, really

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>good writer is that famous really good writer might not

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be a very good teacher. Yeah, and even like physical

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>crafts as well. I've heard this with professional wrestlers. Actually,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it is uh the wrestler Daniel Bryan who

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>recently retired, and he is he's known for just being

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>a real master of his craft. You know, a lot

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of people think, oh, he should train. He can't. You know,

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be an active competitor anymore. He can

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>teach people what he knows, but he's he's gone on

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>record is saying no, I tried it. It's just not

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for me. I can't. I can't deal with the basics. Interesting,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't all be Rocky Balboa and Creed. That's right.

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Who would have thought the curse of knowledge would apply

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to wrestling? Indeed, now I think Christian you should read

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>another message and then maybe we'll get back to a

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>few more P versus NP messages. So this one comes

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>back to the episode the second only the second time

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that Joe and I have done an episode by ourselves

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>without Robert. It was our episode about Wilhelm Reich and Uh.

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 1>This guy says high hosts, I really enjoyed your Wilhelm

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Reich episode, which connected some historical dots that I was

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>vaguely aware of but had not really seen together. I

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>may a quote classically trained scientist with a PhD in

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>quantitative ecology. Uh. And he says that that means lots

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of probability and statistics and a master's in a hydrology.

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But I also went to a far out hippie massage

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>school prior to my graduate trade, and I'm an amateur

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>herbalist and gardner. This guy sounds fascinating. So I feel

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like I've seen both sides of the science as dominant

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 1>worldview divide. I feel like you show did a great

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>job of exploring the myth and mythos that Reik's ideology

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is so revealent of being neither dismissive and condescending nor credulous,

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that middle ground seems especially difficult to mind in the

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>modern era. I do have one comment, Slash critique that

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>arose in my mind several times throughout the episode. I

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>felt like you perhaps assigned an excess of rationality to

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the status quo of the era. Both in the legal

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>judicial system and in the medical field. Both are fields

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 1>where systematic discrimination, profiteering, and all around human venality have

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>historically been a rule rather than an exception, from the

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Dreadscott Decision to early twentieth century eugenics movements to McCarthy

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is m the U. S Government has not exactly been

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a paragon of fairness and equality. Likewise, with the medical profession.

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>In the past twenty years alone, many clear ethical breaches

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have been driven by profit, and countless more ambiguous cases

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of shoddy science and possible conflicts of interest exist. I

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>find this all so interesting because it's exactly what allows

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories to take root and flourish. From using prozac

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and children to full hysterectomyse the medical field is littered

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.919
<v Speaker 1>with cases of expensive and invasive interventions being used long

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 1>before any evidence of the efficacy has been shown. So

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when someone claims that all of modern science is flawed,

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there's an emotionally appealing argument to be made. In many cases,

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>older models of treatment such as relaxation, including things like prayer, yoga, etcetera. Massage,

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and herbs are quote as good and less harmful than

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>modern medical treatments for which limited scientific evidence of efficacy exists.

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 1>One interesting example is cancer, which you discussed at some length.

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Only recently has quality of life emerged as a valuable metric.

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Prolonging life has been the historical target, so that an

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>aggressive treatment that had some chance of extending a patient's

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>life by months would be common, even if the quality

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of those extra months was low. Increasingly, doctors are having

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>conversations with patients to ask their wishes and desired outcomes,

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose is something we can all agree is

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a good thing from a different perspective, pat It's absolutely

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>drive drug development, as indicated by the Great S s

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>r I Medical ghostwriting program in the face of prozacs

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>patent expiration. That's something that would be great to talk

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>about actually on the show. This in turn means that

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>unpatentable drugs receive much less scientific scrutiny solely due to funding.

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that traditional herbs are rarely studied by

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>modern medicine is a no brainer. Natural products are difficult

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.959
<v Speaker 1>or impossible to patent. There's a logical jump from Big

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Pharma's greedy bag of beep demonstrably true to big Pharma

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is suppressing the cure to cancer, which is unlikely. Still,

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard to see how some middle ground is

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>plausibly true, buying up competitors or even generics in the

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>interest of profit rather than health, for example. There's more

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to this, but I just want to pause and interject here.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, one thing that we've covered on the show

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>before that's very connected to what he's talking about here

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is m d m A and its use in both

0:45:56.400 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>cancer studies and uh in treating PTSD. And I just

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>did a write up on it for how stuff works now.

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the group MAPS that has been working on studying

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>therapeutic applications of m d m A for PTSD, that's

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of acronyms for you. Uh They just said

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're about five years out from it being legal

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for therapeutic application. And that's one of the problems with

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that too, is that m d m A doesn't have

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess a patent applied to it and or at

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>least as expired, and so so there's not a huge

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>amount of money behind exactly. The argument goes that that's

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>why pharmaceutical companies aren't making a great effort to do

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>similar studies. So you've got a group like Maps, which

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is a nonprofit that's raising millions of dollars through donations

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this kind of study. Um, you know, speaking

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of M D M A, I wanted to throw out

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a quick reference to a quote from Alexander Shulgun that

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I ran across instantly, and that was that he was

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>arguing that you could essentially find M D M A

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Pyramids. I mean, you will not find it

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in the pyramids. Let's say the ancient Egyptians had it.

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>He apparently said that if you found it in the pyramids,

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it would still be usable, Like it would really that

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like long term story. Yeah, we didn't talk

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>about that, like the longevity of Yeah, well Shulgun is fascinating.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So there's two more paragraphs. No, it's okay, I'm

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna keep reading it just because this guy

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Christians stuff. It's not me, his name is also Christian.

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just really like good, Yeah, like there's a lot

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to respond. He needs to start his own podcast. This

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty pretty good stuff, all right, he says, All

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of which is to say that it's not hard to

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>see of the nineteen forties establishment railroaded this particular quack

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about William right here, and how even the

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>quackiest quacks have plenty of good ideas, and the most

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>well meaning establishment players like judges or doctors will embrace

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever hocum is in vogue. Uh. And the great challenge

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is teasing out the truth from wishful thinking like reich mass,

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hysteria or greed. To do this requires basic research and

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a wrong educational system, which in turn requires government funding,

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which in turn has shrunk. So, just like infrastructure, research

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and education have the potential to greatly increase human well being,

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're expensive and often poorly supported by prevailing businesses

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and political interests. In that case, today is not so

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>unlike Right's time. Thanks again for the intriguing history lesson

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian And this was a really great email full of

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting ideas. A lot of it I

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think I can agree with here, Like I like the

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>new nuance and what he's talking about saying that, um,

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he it's easy for people to have conspiracy theories against

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.720
<v Speaker 1>say the scientific establishment, and say like, oh, they're trying

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to shut you down, um, because the scientific establishment is fallible.

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Even if I would like, what I would say is that, Um,

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of an equivocation issue on the word science

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>between how people use the word science, Like there's one

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>definition where you'd say it's basically a method it or

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a process like uh, you know, I, I replied to Christian,

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and I tried to define it like a systematic cognitive

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>toolbox for removing error and bias from observations and forming

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>predictive theory. And in that meaning it's kind of unassailable, right,

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, science is pretty unambiguously a good thing. But

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.879
<v Speaker 1>then there's also science. As you know, when the lay

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>person says science, they're often talking about some vaguely uh

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>vaguely imagined group of people who are in white lab

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.800
<v Speaker 1>coats doing things. And of course those people are people

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are people like any other people, and they might be

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>doing really good work, or they might have selfish motives

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It kind of gets to Cary exactly. That's

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>where it's going with the idea that the sort of

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I love science, bumper sticker level of scientific understanding exactly. Yeah,

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that we talk about that in the Cargo. Cold science

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is just this force that makes things better at it

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and is treated in a lot of ways by some

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>people like an infallible religion. Just one other thing that

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say about Christians message in particular. You know,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>his his comment critique was about how we were we

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>were maybe too nice to the legal judicial system in

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the medical field at the time, and I certainly didn't

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>mean to come across that way, no, And well, if

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we were being careful. It's funny because this is another

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>example of an episode where we received listener mail on

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>two sides of it, right. Oh yeah, we we got

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 1>some rich Ian's writing in we did not happy. They

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>thought that we were completely unfair, yeah, and that we

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.800
<v Speaker 1>hadn't done our research and that we were totally unfair

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to Reich and that we were rude about it. So

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 1>it's again, this is another one of those moments where

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, well, you know, and I'm seeing these

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>two different types of messages come in that that makes

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>me think like, maybe we did something right sides, then

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you must have hit the right Not that I would

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>say that Christians seems piste off, He's he's got a

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>very rational kind of critique. But I think that I

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>thought that we were probably being careful during that just

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:57.839
<v Speaker 1>so that we could give Reich like as fair shake

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.479
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Well, I mean, you don't have to buy

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>into Ricky and pseudoscience to say that, you know, he

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was probably still mistreated by the government. It is very

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>possible for existing authorities to to unfairly prosecute someone who

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>is in fact a quack. And I think that's what

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Christians outlining here is like all the ways that that

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that could be possible and still is possible. Okay, it

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like Carney has has another P versus MP listener

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to mail for you to read here, Joe, Oh wow,

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and look at this glitter is just dangling right, It's

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 1>going everywhere heavenly glitter. Okay, uh so this is P

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 1>versus MP and it's from our listener, Rowan. So Rowan

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Wright said, Hey, I'm Rowan, longtime listener, first time comment

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or love the show, YadA YadA. Anyway, I was listening

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to your P versus n P episode and as a

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>biologist starting to dip their toes into computer science, I

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>was fascinated. So it sounds like you are right in

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the bull's eye of this episode, Rowan. But anyway, Rowan says,

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys broke it down in a way that made

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it more accessible than all the cops ie resources I've

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 1>checked out and appreciated how you got into the implications

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.919
<v Speaker 1>without getting bogged down into the mats. Well, thank you, Rohan.

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 1>That's very encouraging to hear. Anyway, Rowan goes on, as

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for the question of whether natural selection is a brute

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>force algorithm, I vote no Rowan's and so this is

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>great because he's got experience with both biology and computer science.

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.919
<v Speaker 1>So Rowan says, I'm going to use the peppered moth

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>evolution during the Industrial Revolution as an example. The peppered

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>moth always had these random light and dark variants which

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>would have arisen thanks to random mutation, like a brute

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>force algorithm. But when the Industrial Revolution came around and

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 1>everything got covered in gross soot, the ratio shifted drastically

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>towards more black moths because they blended in better. They

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to wait for baby moths to get random

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>mutations for better camouflage. Because there was a huge environmental

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure killing off the white moths. If we want to

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>stick the comps ie analogies, the white moths subroutine gets

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>shut off early before it goes through every possible variation

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on white moths. You could think of natural selection within

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>an individual as a brute force algorithm, but when you

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>zoom out to the population level, it's definitely more sophisticated.

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's my take on it. Anyway, side note, uh oh.

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 1>He also asked that we put our email some more

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more prominent on the site for people who don't like

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to go to social media networks. Look, the site is

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>supposedly going to get redesigned in the next couple of months,

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see. Yeah, yeah, we can definitely throw that out. Yeah,

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if you if you've been to Stuff to Blow your

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.959
<v Speaker 1>mind in the past, if you're a regular visitor, then

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>get excited because facelift is on the way. But we

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>also try to throw it out at the top and

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of every episode. And and if you're listening

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, I wondering what it is, it's blow the

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 1>mind at how stuff works dot com. Yeah, so thanks

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot for that email, row, and I think that's

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way to think about it. So that we

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 1>were essentially asking you know, whether evolution is in any

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>way optimized or whether it's just force and and this

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, it's sort of optimized by the number you

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>know that that their natural variations occurring already. Yeah. One

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I really like about getting listener

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>mail like this is that kind of example, the moths

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and the soot and the environmental qualities of it. That's

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that even for us, like when

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>we're digging through research constantly to try to find something

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, are likely to is likely to get missed, right,

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's fascinating. And it's also one of those things

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that you won't see in a lot of like pop

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>si uh like magazines or feeds or whatever, because it

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have like a sexy headline, right, like soit covered

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>moths evolve blah blah blah, you know what I mean,

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Like like that it's old news. It's not something that

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly but that is like a really important thing to

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>learn from and one of the reasons why I love

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>doing this show. Yeah. All right, here's another little bit

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.839
<v Speaker 1>on P versus MP, and this one comes to us

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>from Jonathan. Jonathan. It's a great job on making a

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult topic understandable taking the issue in a specifically human context.

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Are you open minded enough for a thought experiment? Are we?

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>How about if we postulate the existence of a different

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>form of human intelligence, not digital, we can call intuition.

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>In this thought experiment, we style intuition is operating only conditionally,

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the specific conditions irrelevant for this purpose. With intuition, it's

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>possible to solve a problem directly without the need to

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>test a number of alternatives. This type of cognition is

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it is not repeatable using our standard scientific method, but

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it is experienced by many people at different times, and

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently has been throughout history. For a possible example, let's

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 1>again for the sake of thought experiment, consider the development

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of folklore medicine. Willow bark was used by some Native

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.279
<v Speaker 1>American people as an analgesic and have been proven to

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:53.320
<v Speaker 1>contain salosilic acid, the main ingredient in aspirant. For ancient

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people to experiment with dozens, perhaps hundreds of plant remedies

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>would not only have been time wasting, but extremely dangerous.

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>In this thought experiment, p equals in p under certain

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.320
<v Speaker 1>conditions only and only within the context of human intelligence.

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>For the podcasts keep up the great work. Well, that's interesting.

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I don't tend to ascribe intuition any

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>any spooky significance like that, but that is an interesting

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of counterfactual to think about. Now. I would tend

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to think that P equals in P or it doesn't.

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Right that there there there can't be conditions where it

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>does and conditions where it doesn't. Either that's the universe

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we live in or it's not. It's sort of like saying, uh,

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the law of non contradiction exists in some conditions but

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:37.239
<v Speaker 1>not in others. It's kind of seems like if A

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.399
<v Speaker 1>cannot equal not A, then there can't be conditions where

0:56:41.440 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. But I don't know. I like

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this discussion of intuition in all of this because I

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:51.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to remember that Ian M. Banks incorporates this a

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit into one of the early Culture novels that

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the the all powerful computer aies that run the culture.

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:00.120
<v Speaker 1>They keep humans around, of course because they're benevolent and

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they take care of the humans, but behind the humans

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes involved in operations because humans get bored and

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one adventures, but also because humans bring something unique to

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem solving scenario sometimes. Yeah, well, I mean that

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of gets into one of the examples we talked

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about in the P versus NP episode is you know,

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the people writing on this subject, I believe

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it was Scott Aaronson said, you know, if we live

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in a P equals MP universe, then there's nothing all

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that special about being able to compose the most beautiful

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 1>symphony on earth. Really that anybody should have the toolbox

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that equally um, And so I think that's

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way of looking at it. Like all of

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem solving tasks, all of the mental algorithms that

0:57:42.840 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>are the most interesting and the most impressive to us,

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to be mysterious. It's difficult to see how one

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>got from one end to the other, you know, So

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when you see somebody have a really novel solution to something,

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's often kind of mysterious where that solution came from. Wait, well,

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope I hate to interrupt you, Joe, but Carney

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is coming at us again, and he has one last

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>piece of listener mail there for us. Okay, I'm gonna

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 1>read this one. Uh, and it this is right up

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:17.439
<v Speaker 1>our alley. It's from Daniel, and he says, hey, there,

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a kind of interesting use for wicked problems

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that might not make it on the show, but you

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 1>might just find it interesting. Oh, Daniel, it's gonna make

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it on the show alright. I've run tabletop role playing

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>games with my friends, like Dungeons and Dragons, where I

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have to create a story with some kind of theme

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and objective to overcome. I tend to start with a

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 1>simple problem that has some kind of emotional component, like quote,

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>your king is corrupt. But then I add a layer

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty to prevent the players from approaching it traditionally

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>via a wicked problem. Let's say, in the same scenario,

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>every other person that would take over for the king

0:58:54.160 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>if he were to be killed or removed from power

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is just as corrupt. This way, my players have to

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think very dynamically about how to approach corruption in government,

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than something simple and emotionless like go get rid

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of that guy. This is a great example, and I

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>must say, if I understand the concept of a wicked

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>problem correctly, I think the classic way of of creating

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a wicked problem here would be to have the notion

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that absolute power corrupts. So what if you have a

0:59:21.000 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>corrupt king, but putting somebody else into that role necessarily

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>corrupts them. Yeah. Yeah, I think like the people who

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have defined wicked, wicked problem, wicked problems, wicked problems over

0:59:32.320 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the years would agree. Yeah that, Uh. I think it's

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like that politics would be a wicked problem, right,

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>The power is a wicked problem. And I do think

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that the role playing is role playing games it's a

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>great place to explore these because man, yeah, more more

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 1>government officials should be playing DD to hash out issues,

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, because you can. Because in a role playing game,

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do the straight up combat, you can do

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know some some just sort of basic mystery solving,

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's great, be tons of fun. It is

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>cool when you can put that little, uh, a little

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>shift on the situation where the players really don't know

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what the right decision is, if there's absolutely actually actually

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>no right decision. To me, yeah, I totally agree. And

1:00:13.000 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Daniel sounds like the exact kind of d M that

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I would want to play with. So so the reason

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>why we we got really excited about this is yet

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we're all gaming nerds here. Uh, we love dn d

1:00:23.360 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Robert runs a D and D game I have in

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the past. I love playing him, and man, it sounds

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>like he would be great to play with. Now here's

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a question, what do you think is the highest level

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of government ever achieved by a D n D player?

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a great Have we ever had a president who

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>has played? You know? I want to say, Uh, there's

1:00:43.120 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy in Japan that I've read about who's a

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>politician that is definitely a gamer. I don't know if

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he's in particular D and D guy, but he's in

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the tabletop role playing. Yeah. But I don't know if

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:57.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody out there knows the answer to this. Our first

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>DND play President President, teach your president social media accounts

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for uh? For the President United States? At that point,

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who is Mary? Maybe Barry Obama is like secretly like

1:01:10.760 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a crazy D and D player, Like every every Sunday

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>afternoon they're rolling up and playing games. Yeah, but I

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bet he's annoying to play with. He always plays a

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lawful good cleric. Right, that's the thing. Right, they'd all

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, I'm lawful good. They'd all roll up

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lawful good characters. Maybe not Bernie Sanders Man. Yeah, well

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we would, Hey, I would love to hear listeners this

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>year right in and let us know what what each

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the candidates would be in terms of their their alignment,

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>their species, and their role and their their character class

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>within a dungeon and dragon's environment. Now, of course we

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know that we're going to get both sides of this too. Now,

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody is gonna think since we mentioned presidential candidates. Hopefully,

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we made any judgments here, but people

1:01:57.440 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say, oh, you trashed mine. I said, They're

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>made judgments on all of them. I'm pretty sure Bernie

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>would be a gnome that's my god, like David the gnome. No, no, no,

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like like maybe a deep gnome. Oh, I don't know what. Yeah, yeah,

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>those those guys, they're great. We'll educate you on for

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Nipplin after the after the recording, Joe, all right, well,

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. Another listener Maile episode in the books,

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>um As, as we've said before, we didn't have time

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to get to everything. We just tried to focus in

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on some of the great correspondence that you guys and

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gals have been sending in and we would allow to

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>read more of in the future. Yeah, and so you

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>know we We obviously brought up a lot of ideas

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>here where we asked you for even more listener mail.

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Keep it coming, Yeah, we love it and the best

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>way is to hit us up Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler and

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the old fashioned way guys blow the mind at House

1:02:53.200 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to court stuff For more on this and thousands of

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com five