WEBVTT - 2018 Big Ten Autopsy Rulings

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. I'll that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for Dake Edith State.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Is that whoo whoom? And Dan and Tye welcome back

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 3>to the solid verbal, Boys and girls, my name is

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>ty Hildebrand, joining me as always over there in sunny, springy,

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 3>still fatherly New York City. My man Dan Rubinstein, I

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>guess I should add Sweet sixteen y New York City.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Your Organ ducks in the Sweet sixteen.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's true. They're not playing. I think they're playing wouis.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>This is a basketball show now, in case you weren't

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>made aware.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've watched three Organ games this year, and I'm

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>here to tell you all about them. They're tall, Thank

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much. I accomplished a lot with the Sweet sixteen.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if I sound distracted. The I'm hearing the

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>faint screams of my son, the solid baby in the back.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>We'll have this, see, we'll have this now.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has so many Wisconsin thoughts, and I told

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>him you're not able to articulate them in a concise manner.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So we can't have you on the show quite yet,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>so he's real bummed. What is the over under for

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.279
<v Speaker 1>when we'll get our first commentary from the solid baby

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show? When did you see the Clemson, Oklahoma

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>home and home that was announced in twenty thirty six

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seven? Yeah, okay, he will be a redshirt

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>freshman on one of those teams.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 3>See if we work this right, yeah, he can just

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>take over for you and then I'll just have to

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>come up with a filling on my end, much younger filling.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this like when Casey Caasem's daughter tried to take

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>over his Top forty show.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember that.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I am almost positive she there was something along those

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>lines that she got into broadcasting. I'm looking this up

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>while you give people the relevant information.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, welcome back to the show, boys and girls. We're

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>at Solid Verbal at gmail dot com, solid verbal dot com.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You can find us on Twitter, on Instagram, on Facebook,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>as well as our subreddit at reddit dot com slash

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>r slash solid verbal, and I do get the notifications

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>every time somebody signs up for our newsletter, it pops

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>up on my phone. So if you want to drive

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>me crazy, even if you're not interested in what we

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>send out. Occasionally you can drive me nuts and interrupt

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the mysterious day job by signing up for our newsletter,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 3>which you can find again at our website at solidverbal

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>dot com. So, if you've been listening to us this

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>long cold off season, it's only been a few months,

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>but you know that we've been doing these conference autopsies. Specifically,

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>you've been going out talking to the people, yeah, and

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 3>doing conference autopsies. We've got one major conference left and

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>that is the Big Ten Patriot going oh, sorry, the

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Big ten Dan, which we're going to be addressing today

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.559
<v Speaker 3>courtesy of our good friend whom.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be talking to, Matt Fortuna. Hopefully that's

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>how you pronounce it, and he doesn't hate people pronouncing

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it too. It's not my Fortuna Fortuna. I don't think

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the tuna. Yeah, Matt Fortuna from the Athletic He

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be at ESPN. He's a national college football

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>writer but based in the Midwest and does a saw.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>He just did a piece on Hunter Johnson, the transfer

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>quarterback coming into Northwestern, the former Blue Chipper from Clemson.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So figured we'd lean into the Big Ten with Matt Fortuna.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>He covered Notre Dame I believe for ESPN a while

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like that was the specific beat and did a very

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>good job with that. You would know better than I.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure you probably were assuming consuming more Irish content than

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I was, but quite excited. I don't think we've had

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>him on the show. We haven't.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually checked.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's tough because we've had such an incredible roster of

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>guests that it would have made sense for him to

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>be on at a certain point. But I guess if

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he were only covering Notre Dame, you and you and

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Pete Sampson are pretty hot and heavy, right, So that's uh.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That means I'm excited to have him on and welcome

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a new guest.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>So as you look back now on the Big Ten

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>from twenty eighteen, what is the one question that stands

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>out most to you? If you're doing a one man

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>autopsyn and you got to ask one question of what

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>you saw in the Big Ten last year?

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh? God, I don't know if there's a single question

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that covers it. There are certain themes that hit me

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as I was preparing for this show. Thematically, there were

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wasted windows to me in the Big Ten.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This year you had this, You had Ohio State finally

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>breaking through with a quarterback who is like a first

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>round NFL quality and was immediately and like, what could

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have been with this Ohio State team, which certainly had

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>its flaws on both sides of the ball, But to

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>have Dwayne Haskins, to have a more wide open offense,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to have this roster receivers, what could have happened if

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't blow the Purdue game, what could have happened

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with Michigan? And maybe forget about the Notre Dame game.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>But if they're just competitive against Ohio State, if they're

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>able to get it together, if their defense looks like

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a looks against Ohio State like what it did the

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year, could they have, you know, had

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a nice case to get into the playoff. A better

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>case in Ohio State. Who loses to Purdue in that fashion? Iowa, Iowa.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even think about the window for Iowa, but

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a crazy ideal schedule. They have two NFL first round

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we believe tight ends, an experienced quarterback, and unbelievable pass defense,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and they just they lost games in dumb moments and

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>dumb ways where I think the Iowa window was actually

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong, and I'm interested to talk to Matt about that.

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>So that kept popping up across a few teams that

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this year might say this year twenty eighteen set up

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>nicely and didn't work out and it was kind of

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>barely for a couple of these teams. Michigan is what

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>jumps out to me. Michigan has been this work in

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>progress now under Jim horror Boss since he got there.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Look a really good year, ten wins, ten and three overall,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>eight and one in conference. You speak of windows, they

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>had a window. Yeah, it really truly had a window.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>It didn't with what they returned on defense.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the addition of Shape Patterson was clearly a talking

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>point headed into the Big Ten season, and I'm curious

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 3>to get Matt's thoughts on how that worked out and

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 3>maybe take a peek forward where it might go next

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 3>for jib Harbaugh, because again for me, this is like

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 3>you look at the Big Ten. I know I'm a

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Penn State grad and Ohio State has ruled supreme in

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the Big Ten for quite some time now under Urban Meyer.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>But the Michigan storyline to me is what I find

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 3>most interesting.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I hadn't thought about after the fact

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>after the season ended, and just sort of pieced together

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>as I was going back because I was thinking about

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Maryland and looking up some Maryland stuff. Maryland came within

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what a single bad pass of beating both the Sugar

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and Rose Bull champs. This is one hundred percent accurate.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That is I had totally forgotten about. And this is

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a dumb dumb about just the Anthony McFarland

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>experience that came on at the end of the season

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>where it goes for over five hundred yards and just

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Us wrongly thinking he was Burger McFarland's son.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was unfortunate. Well, Booger McFarland's name is Anthony.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>That was all me.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's okay you you admitted faults and we circled back.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw in a Notre Dame question, I believe

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>as well from at Fortune and because we're not going

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to do a Notre Dame autopsy episode because I think

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that would take too much out of you. It would

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>having to relive some of some of twenty eight the

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>relitigation of that playoff game would be an issue. Yeah,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's what I'm There were little nuggets like that,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like I with the Purdue season, how weird it started,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>how weird it ended?

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>With that?

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Just one like how much should that win over Ohio State?

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Characterize what we think of Purdue? And they're twenty eighteen

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and moving forward in Indiana as well, a team where

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>there are just like, what the hell happened to that

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>defense in twenty eighteen? So it's really good to sort

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of fire a couple of darts, you know, at questions

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that that can't come up when I have a little

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more time to think about specifics like this and

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>then think about where things are headed for these teams.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, So again we're gonna be joined momentarily by

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Matt for Tuna from the Athletic going to talk through

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>all things twenty eighteen, Big ten and Notre Dame just

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>for good measure to sprinkle it in there, very Midwest.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 3>You know how to find us. We're on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>all the usual hotspots. Before we go any further though,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 3>this show brought to you by our good friends over at.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Bombas dan Ah.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, what is your favorite part of the Bombas socks

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that you own.

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>My favorite part. Okay, I'll tell you this is very specific,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>but I almost exclusively when I do run run in

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Bombas now because there's something about there that's the no

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>show socks, which I like running because I don't want

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to have weird tans on my legs summertime. And I'm

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>impressing everybody, that's right. But they have that the rim

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>around the top of the sock that I tend to

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>get irritated on my achilles where the running shoe hits

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the achilles.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 3>It's that little extra layer of padding. Right.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The shape of the Bombas is excellent. If you love

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>running an ankle or no show socks, you get that

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>padding and there's that zero irritation factor, which I've had

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some real gross looking achilles in years past. Ye no

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>more tie.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>My thing is that hive pattern that goes around your midfoot.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean. You got that real snug

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>fit around your midfoot, which gives you a lot of support.

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 3>It makes you feel extra comfortable. Not just the soft cotton,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>not just the stay up design, but just the way

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it supports your midfoot. To me, is a pretty big deal.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 3>They are really I think causing people to talk more

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>about socks. We always talk about how foot comfort is

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a big deal. It should be a big deal. Bombas

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>has sort of rediscovered the sock. They've reinvented it again.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 3>It is Bombas Bombas dot com, the most comfortable socks

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>in the history of feet. With super soft natural cotton.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 3>You got that arch support, a seamless tow, a cushion

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>footbed that's comfy but not too thick, all sorts of colors, patterns, lengths, styles.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 3>They look great in the gym, at the office, out

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 3>in the town, you name it. Buy your Bombas at

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Bombas dot com, bom Bas dot com slash Solid today

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna get twenty five percent off your very first purchase.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>That's bom Bas dot com slash Solid to get twenty

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>percent off best of all, Dan for every Bombas purchase

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>you make, they're going to donate a pair of socks

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>to someone in need. Hell Yeah, which is a pretty

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>damn cool thing if you ask me so. Check them out. Bombas,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 3>bo m Bas dot com slash Solid twenty percent off

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 3>b O M b a s dot Com slash Solid.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Just take a moment, take a second before you continue

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on with your life and think about how great the

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling is of putting on a brand new pair of

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>socks and kept multiple feelings at the same time. Tye,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a no brainer.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>On that note, let's hop in with Matt Fortuna from

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the athletic.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And with that we are now joined or I am

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>now joined by Matt Fortuna correct pronunciation. Yes, yes, Oh

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>my gosh. That's a relief, because I screw up names

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>all during the season because sometimes somehow I don't pay

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to the name of Iowa States kicker and then

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I sound like a moron. And so Fortuna is easy enough.

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You're in Chicago, you're from New York, and if I

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>am to read this correctly, you are the president of

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the Football Writers Association of America.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>That is correct. If you ever are in the Chicago area,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I will treat you to Wendy's, Burger King, McDonald's, or

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>any other fast food item of your accounts. That's the

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>kind hospitable guy I am.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's if you're a college football champion of any kind,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what you get served. That's how it works in

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's right. A shutdown or not. We are ready

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to go.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>So give out your phone number real quick. If anybody

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>has to complain about anything written about college football that

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>goes through you, correct. That's how it works pretty much.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I won't get too far into the

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>week too, but you're not too far off in some cases.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, I like it. Okay, good, a little bit

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of mystery, maybe a tease for another episode. Let's start here.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the big ten autopsy that we're conducting. I don't

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>know what the proper verb would be, but I'm now

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>intimidated that you are the writer of writers. But let's

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we're What we're doing is simple. We are going to

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>go through teams through a random style that we have

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>figured out. I'm going to ask you to give me

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a number between one and fourteen, and then we are

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>going to run through questions about twenty eighteen and how

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is how it relates to twenty nineteen, and hopefully we're

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>all a little bit smarter after the process.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 2>I will do my best to avoid whatever number of

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Rutgers is on and go thirte but we will. We'll

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>give it a go here.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>This is especially random because usually I'll just start writing

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and listing teams that I remember are in a conference

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and then it's the last ones. This is a peak

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>behind the curtain that I'm like, oh right, Iowa States

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Big twelve, Oh right, US half whatever. Give

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>me a number between one and fourteen.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go with lucky number thirteen.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Number thirteen. You didn't hit Rutgers. That's great. We're gonna

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>start with Iowa and the general the steadiness, the competitiveness

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of Iowa is definitely admirable. They have good lines every year,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>steady quarterback play, good defense all has gotten them. It's

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of pretty damn far. But with last year's tight

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ends and experience quarterback in Nate Stanley, a mostly yeah,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>very good defense. I would say last year had a

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>terrific schedule. Did the did the Hotkeyes waist maybe a

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>ten win regular season window last year? Was it there

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>for them?

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it absolutely was there for them. And that's

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of the beauty and the curse, if you will,

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>about really the entire Kirk Ferrench regime there. I mean,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you'll find a major college football program

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that has more of an identity than Iowa, who is

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>more comfortable with being themselves than Iowa they're good for

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>eight or nine wins probably every year, and in a

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>rare year like twenty fifteen, they're gonna make a run

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>and almost make the playoff and end up in the

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Rose Bowl. And I think, you know, when you run

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a clean program, when you represent your university the right

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>way on and off the field, there's not a whole

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>lot more you can ask for.

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>That.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>That said, when your neighbor is Wisconsin and they're swinging

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>slightly above your weight every year, definitely not last year,

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>but for the most part in the last fifteen twenty

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>years or so, I can understand why there's a hunger

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>for more. And it's always funny. You obviously held my

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>colleague Bruceselman on for the PAC twelve. Stuart Mendel's another

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>colleague of mine. They did their coaches rankings about a

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>month ago, and I don't think Stew's ever had Kirk

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Friends on there. And he said he's never hears more

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>backlash from any fan base than Iowa. And it's a

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>mixed bag. It's half them saying, what are you doing?

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the best there is, he's been there

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. How do you exclude him? And it's the

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>other half saying, like, you know, he's the worst, why

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>would you ever even entertain and thank god you didn't

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>have him on there. And when you look, especially at

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>last season, I mean that's kind of the Kirk Prince

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>tenured in a nutshell. I mean nine to four. But

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>every single one of those games that they lost they

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>should have won. Yeah, and look some of the ones

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>they won they probably should have lost too, if we

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>really want split hairs here, But I mean that Wisconsin

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 2>game went down to the final minute. That Northwestern game,

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they just did absolutely nothing offensively. Northwestern got one of

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the best catches in all the college football season to

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>multimately pull out a fourteen ten win and win the

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>division in Iowa City. The Perdue game they lost in

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the last second field goal. The Penn State game was

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>just a hot message back and forth, crazy touchdowns and

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>turnovers and you name it. And now you look up

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and you're losing two all American caliber tight ends and

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>all found in TJ. Hockinson, and you wonder, kind of,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>like you said, Dan, did they just waste a ten

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 2>or eleven one season? I mean, that division was there

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>for the taking. All due respect to Northwestern, who wanted

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Farren square and wanted I think pretty much going away.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I think they won it by two games last year,

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>three games over Iowa. Actually, that was a very wittable division,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>more so than any other time, because you had Wisconsin down,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 2>because you had a new coach at Nebraska. You know,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Northwestern obviously was great, but they didn't start off great

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>non conference and were certainly vulnerable, as pretty much every

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>other team in that division was. So when you look

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>ahead to this year, you have to feel comfortable and

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Stanley coming back at quarterback, you have to like

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 2>those pieces on defense. You have to like that offensive

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>line which is always pretty good, if not great, and

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>returns to starting tackles is coming here. But you talk

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to coaches around the league and elsewhere, and it's the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 2>same vein refrain. Every year it's Iowa. They'll probably win

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>eight games, they'll be who they are. Yeah.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>No, And for the record, Kirk Farence deserves to be

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in that best coaches grouping. When you take unhralded recruits,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>develop them and not only hang with, but regularly beat

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the powers the perceived powers of your conference. I'm pro

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>ferens in that regard. Give me another number. Let's go

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with seven number seven. Did you hit the Rutgers Wami?

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You did not, Michigan State. I'm a big believer that

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>two things can be true at once. In this case, Hey,

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark D'Antonio is a really good coach who deserves the

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt. And at the same time, Sparti's

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>offense has been this is an official journalism term, But

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do we live in a world where Michigan State's offense

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>can become dramatically more of what they look like in

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen with Connor Cook? Excuse me ahead of and

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>during a year in which I think they get Northwestern,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, Michigan, and Wisconsin all away from East Lansing.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe in a Mark d Antonio transformation project?

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you look at those box scores from

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 2>last season, it's not just losing seven to six in

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a bowl game. It's not just losing nine to six

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>at Nebraska, for sixteen to thirteen at Arizona State, or

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>only putting up six points against Ohio State. I mean,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>it was just really tough to watch. And then Mark

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>D'Antonio comes out with the big press conference this winter, Hey,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>what's the big news we're keeping everyone on SAP. We're

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>just give them all different titles. I'm not sure I've

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>seen anything like that, and I'm in the same boat

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>as you. I mean, if anyone has deserved the benefit

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 2>of the doubt over his decade plus tenure, it's probably

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>this guy. I mean, there's no reason Michigan State should

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>have been annually winning or contending for Big ten titles

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the way it has been for the most part under

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Mark D'Antonio. But you look at what they did last

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you look at what they did three years ago. Now

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen, you have to wonder. I don't want

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to say the jig is up, because it's not like

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>he was pulling then you want he's a great coach

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and he's built a tremendous program, But I don't know

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.239
<v Speaker 2>what you get excited about. To your point when you

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>look at that offense. I mean, I do like Brian Lawurki.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I like those receivers, but I like them a lot

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 2>going into last year too, and so did a lot

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of people I talked to in that league. And they

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't really deliver around the field on Saturdays, which is

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 2>why they finished with a seven and six record and

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>so Mark D'Antonio reminds me a lot of Jerry Patterson

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that they're both at programs that a

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>punch above their weight. When he's historically speaking, under these regimes,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>they've had a down season every now and then, and

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 2>they've almost always come back with authority. I Michigan State

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 2>went from playoff in fifteen to three and nine and

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>sixteen to ten wins in seventeen, and so I know

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>better than to doubt these guys. That said, looking at

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen from them and from the returning guys

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>from LA season on film, I can't understand why there's

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>some skepticalized in he's lanting.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I wouldn't hate them finding that grain of

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sand to stick into the I think it's an oyster

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>shell to make a pearl, to go outside of the program,

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring in somebody that makes things a little bit

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable to run the offense, whether it's somebody from a

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>lower level or a smaller school, to just refresh, reboot

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and hope for the best. Give me a number that's

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not seven or thirteen. Let's go one number one. Let's

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>talk Indiana. Let us talk about a team who they

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lost six of seven with a couple within reach. And

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the confusing part was, and there's there was definitely turnover.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Why did a Tom Allen defense fall basically off a cliff?

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like twenty fifth to seventy fifth

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the S and P plus rankings or ratings after

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeens version. And is this team, if this team

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to succeed now which I guess, which side

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>will it be on?

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>It has to be defense, right if you're Tom Allen.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's funny. I mean Tie and myself are

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>both Penn State graduates, and I use this analogy a lot.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Indiana football, to me is just like Penn State basketball.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to and I'm not sure if I

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>mean that in during way or an insulting way, but

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 2>it's clear which sports are the breadwinners on their respective campuses.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And when you watch either team play in conference play,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 2>and we saw it last year when they went to

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the Big House, I mean they are going to do

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 2>everything humanly possible to win a game and pull off

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>enough that they have no business winning, only to lose

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 2>it by three or seven points at the end. I

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>mean they do that every year against Missus and him

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Harbaugh's gone there and they've done it a good deal

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>against James Shrink withins Pence State teams as well. I

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that makes you proud or frustrated. Probably neither,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 2>because I'm not sure enough people in Bloemy can care

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>about the football product to really have strong feelings either way.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>That said, I think the worst thing to have this

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>program for years and I like Tom Allen is their

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>chief rival, got Jeff Brong, who I think is a

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 2>top and coaching college football right now, and even worse,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>he stayed, which when you look around the country at

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>all the hirings and firings elsewhere, the best hire, the

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 2>best move anyone made was perdue keeping Jeff bron because

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>when you look at what he's been able to do

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 2>his first two years in West Lafe, given the talent

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>or lack the aref that he inherited from the previous regime,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>there's no doubting that he's going to have the boiler

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Makers competing for at least the Vision titles year and

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a year out once he gets his full REGI full

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I should say, foraging full four recruiting classes in there,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and if you're Indiana, that's not working in your favor.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Getting the unluck of the draw and falling in the

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 2>east with penn State, Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, you name.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 2>It does not work in your favor. And again, like

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you said last year, that defense finished thirteenth out of

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>fourteens is a big tending guards for play, and that's

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be your mo when you promote a defense cordiator,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a head coach, and when you're not pulling your weight

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>on that side of the ball. Sure, how much optimism

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>is warranted when you're looking into your three of this regime.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an interesting thing. And I was thinking

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>about as you were talking about having Purdue in state.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Indiana also has Notre Dame in state, certainly not in

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the conference. But if you think about if there's a

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>top level blue chip recruit in Minnesota or in Iowa

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or in well, Pennsylvania, there's pit but in a lot

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of big ten states, there are not that many options,

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and you will always consider that hometown or the home

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>state school. And within Indiana, you had another down school

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and then you have this legendary program,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and so it almost feels like it's that much more

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult in Bloomington.

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>It is. And when you look at that schedule next year,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look Fall State, Eastern Illinois, Yukon in a

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>non conference. I mean, those should be three wins if

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you're a competent, big time program. The crossovers are Nebraska, Northwestern, obviously, Purdue.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>The West is just a craps here. I mean, yeah,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>one through six, with apologies and my friends in Champagne.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I think if you threw six of those teams in

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 2>a hat and they came out any which way, it

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 2>would not surprise me regardless, because I think it's that

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 2>wide open, especially this year as DJ fly Can Scott

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Cross start to get their things together. In the respect

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 2>of new locale, I just think it's wide open, especially

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>when we saw what Northwestern was able to do and

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>taking advantage of the down division last year. But so

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>that makes it hard to gauge, really strength to schedule

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>when you're looking at Indiana. But you need the breaks

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.239
<v Speaker 2>to fall in your favor, and you need to take

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>advantage of those breaks when they do fall in your

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>favorite Otherwise it's easy to get lost in the shovel.

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, give me a number that is not one

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>seven or thirteen.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Not one seven or thirteen, how about two two?

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We're still we have missed the Wammi of Rutgers Again. Northwestern,

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which is your hometown team, Northwestern is they're flat out good.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But when they had moments in twenty eighteen that were

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>less than that, it was generally because of the offense.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The hope is and I think you wrote about him,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the hope is blue chip Clemson quarterback transfer Hunter Johnson.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that difference? Is that all it? I guess, is

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that all it should take for Northwestern to stop losing

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>something stupid in September and close out one more power?

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Or is or is there more that needs to be

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>tapped into.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's that simple, because it's not

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>like he's replacing of guy who wasn't good. I mean,

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Clayton Thorson was a four year starter, and yeah, you know,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>for all of his ups and downs, he's going to

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 2>go down as one of the best quarterbacks in Northwestern

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Western history. Is definitely statistically speaking, it is probably going

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to make a lot of money in the draft, whether

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it's day one, Day two, or day three next month.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not sure, I look at it in that

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 2>sense like quarterback was the only piece they were missing,

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>because they had a pretty good one, right, But they

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't had a recruit at this position with these kind

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of credentials the way they have in Hunter Johnson, and

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>when you talk to people around the program, when you

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>talk to people familiar with Johnson, it was almost good

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 2>for this kid, who was, you know, the Camp Miss

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>number one quarterback prospect of the country two years ago

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>to kind of, want to say, be humbled because he,

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>by all County is a good head on his shoulders,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>but to get a year away from the spotlight, to

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>run the scout team against one of the better defenses

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 2>where they tend to learn from a guy like clating

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 2>course at Torson, to become familiar with the verbiage of

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the playbook and with the new coaching staff, and now

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a year later, to be kind of unvealed for the

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 2>world to see and look, this program is operating at

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 2>a level which I don't think it's ever been done. Certainly,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 2>they've been in the rosewell before and have had better

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>individual seasons, but they're coming off they're winning his four

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 2>year stretch in Big Ten play in program history. They

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 2>have now their first spring and first full year in

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that brand new two hundred and seventy million dollar facility

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>that overlooks Lake Michigan. That is worth the hype and

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>then some. I recommend anyone try to visit if you're

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>in the Chicago area. And they had a lot of young,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>talented pieces last year. I think that the roses the

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 2>surface at gul Isaiah Paus with the running back in particular,

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>is one. I mean, they plan on red shirting this

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 2>guy last year until Jeremy Larkin went down and was

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>forced to medically retired, and that guy looks like one

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of the best running backs in the big time forward

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the end of the season. So I think the pieces

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 2>are coming together where uh, they should probably win nine

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 2>games or more this season and Granny get an extra

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>game when when you win your division and go to Indianapolis.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think, like you said, everyone else is kind

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of waiting for them to take that not first set,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>but but get through September without a the fuddling loss.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't use lose to the UNLV in your home opener

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>next year, all right? That I think will help people,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the people of the been breathe a little bit easier.

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 2>You open at Stanford. I don't think there's any shame

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>in losing a hard fought game at Stanford, but don't

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>lose the UNLV please, no absolutely or masses that matter,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I should say that, Oh they.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Do have you, you masses when Oh, that's later on

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the season. There, Northwestern, your typical SEC scheduling team,

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>scheduling a low team in November. That's that's just how

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it works.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Big Get Ohio State off of By on a Friday night? Why? Yeah,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a rematch of the big time title game, a game

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that last time moves at Evanston. Got college Game Day

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 2>to Evanston. Why would you put that on a Friday night?

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. And knowing Chicago traffic with a six

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 2>or flock local start time, that's going to cause some problems.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Evanston in the direction of all the suburbs on

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the northern side of Chicago. Great job, big ten, great job.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Give me a number that is not one, two, seven,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>or thirteen. All right, number eight Ohio State. Oh, what

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a transition. That was so nice of you. It'd be

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it'd be easy and almost certainly true that the tangible

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>proof of Ryan Day's effect on Ohio State would be

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins and the superb that he had. But is

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there something beyond that in terms of his fingerprints on

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Buckeye offense from last year and how that potentially

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>carries forward to twenty nineteen that you saw or that

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that struck you.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question, because I mean, erban Meyer was

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>such an involved figure and not necessarily playholer, but figure

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 2>with the offense. And so when you get the blessing

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 2>of approval from irban Meyer, obviously that speaks very highly

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of you and Brian days sterling credentials as well. But

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>with new personnel, at least a quarterback, I'm just very

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>curious to see what this offense looks like with a

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>guy like Justin Fields, who's had so much hype, might

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 2>not playing a whole lot who got the hardship waiver

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is going to be able to start immediately, which is

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous early win for Ryan Day and his staff.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying the jury still out, because I think

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>we all know the talent in that building and on

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>those sidelines is far away the best of the Big

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Ten pretty much year and a year out. I just

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>don't want to take for granted the fact that there's

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a new coach on that sideline and things may be different.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I think pulling away Greg Madison from Michigan was a

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 2>nice way to stick it to your arrival again a

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>couple other guys Mike Carrits from Oklahoma State Washington as well.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I just think things are going to look different in

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Columbus next year. I'm just not sure how different they're

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>going to look. And I think a lot of that,

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 2>right le Ron is going to fall on a guy

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 2>like Justin Fields, who was one of the top quarterback

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 2>recruits in the country and who I think everyone is

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>expecting big things from, especially given how good Dwayne Haskins

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>looked in just as Loane. You're starting Columbus last year.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the advantage that Haskins had was he had

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>time to sit and learn and get mental rests. Where

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields will be expected to come in right away.

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He won't have that advantage. You won't have the advantage

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of Hunter Johnson, who you mentioned at Northwestern. So it

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is immediately, you know, feet to the fire kind of

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in Columbus.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, the other part of that too, I mean,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Dwayne Haskins ran a slower forward to an Eli Manning.

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We might be backing up next year, so they want

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to run him more than he did by all indicasions, and.

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>He just didn't do it.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>And Justin Fields is much more of a dual threat

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of guy. I don't want to say in the

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>mold of jac Barrett because I think they're completely different players.

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 2>But J. C. Barrett Bible has stayed out with his

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>legs a lot more than they did with his arms

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and times during his three or four year tenure as

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a starter. So I'm just curious to see how this

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>offense looks. I think, again, the pieces are there to

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>be the best in the Big Ten the way they

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>usually are. I think they were turn enough on defense

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>that's going to make all of us forget some of

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the tackling dummies and kind of whiffs they had throughout

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the middle of last season, which I think, when you

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>look at the big picture of Ohio State's twenty eighteen season,

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>was grossly overlooked because of the way they finishing, because

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 2>of Erbami retiring and so much overshadowing what happened on

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the field last year. But that defense was not great,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think they had the potential and the chance

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to be much much better this season. And I think

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that's something that we have almost forgotten about because they

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>still won the Big Ten last year despite not looking

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the part during October and November a.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Great point three, four, five, six, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, fourteen, ten. Oh,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you hit the whammy. It was gonna happen. Sorry, Rutgers fans,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you're probably good people. I assume you are. Scarlet Knights

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>were lately, yeah, well fair the Scarlet Knights. They were terrific.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet yet they were right there versus Northwestern and Michigan

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>State and sort of Penn State. Is Rutgers in any

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of position to scratch and claw their way to

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>more of that? Or is the the mess of Rutgers

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>athletics in general, the big picture mess too much for anyone,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, specifically Chris ash to overcome. Right now.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to put Rutgers in Illinois in the

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>same category because historically Illinois has had some success football life.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not recent history, but traditionally, especially in the Big Ten.

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>That said, I look at them in somewhat similar veins

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>when evaluating the work of those coaching staffs, because I

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>remember talking to someone familiar with the Rutgers program in

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>between years one and two of the Chris ash era,

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and it was what progress, as crazy as it sounds

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>might be, you know, losing thirty to nothing in says

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty Johan the way we were last year. I mean,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>that's how much of a whole I think that staff

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 2>has had to dig out of. And you saw it

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>last year. You win your first game against Texas State

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and you lose out. And there were games, like you said,

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>against Northwestern, even against Penn State for a little bit,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and of course against Michigan State, which forgot about offense

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>last year, where hey, maybe they're going to do this,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're going to break through, and they just didn't

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>do it. And I know people's patience is thin in

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>this environment, in this era of college football. But when

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at that division, I mean, what's a realistic expectation,

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 2>realistic high expectation. I mean, you tell me you're always

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be at best in that division? Right? Am

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I missing something? No?

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right?

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know. And you could say this about

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams. I think at the Power five

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>levels we're kind of ringing up the rear and the

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 2>respect and conferences. I don't know what you expect, but

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>when you lose by forty one points to a Kansas

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 2>team to end up firing as coach, I think that

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of speaks for itself.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>No, No, I think I think all of that is

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>all reasonable. And I don't know where they go, and

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the Big Ten is super happy

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>about having a team like this. At least Illinois has

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>carried its weight in the last decade, twelve years, whatever where,

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and basketball wise, they've They've been interesting at times. But yeah,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this is it's a rough stretch. It's a rough stretch

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>for the Big Ten.

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>With Rutgers, it's similar for vast well team. I mean,

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 2>they didn't win a whole lot to understand now they killed,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 2>They've been competitive, and it has been a team you

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>can't overlook anymore. And I don't want to say that's

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 2>all you can ask for, but early on, I mean,

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to take baby steps and celebrate

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.479
<v Speaker 2>not moral victories, but small victories on and off the court.

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>One other thing, look at their schedule. Now Hugh Breeze

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to town. How can we forget that?

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I did not even yep. That's good

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for Hugh Freese, good for the Liberty Flames. Three, four, five, six, nine, eleven, twelve, fourteen,

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go twelve, all right? Twelve? Wisconsin a much cheerier position,

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>even after disappointing twenty eighteen. By the Badger's standards, it

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>was rough. For sure, It'd be easy and it'd be

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>correct to point out the injuries all over the place.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But upon further reflection, we're now almost four months away

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>from this past season. Was it more than just a

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of injuries? And if so, is it correctable?

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 2>He gets correctable. I think it's the program. And I

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want to blame a kid or put too much

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>on a kid, but I think Alex hornybrook leaving, I mean,

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.479
<v Speaker 2>was best for both parties. I think both the team

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and the player were in need of a fresh start.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 2>It was a weird season for Wisconsin because they pretty

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>much win that division every year and they're always slept

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 2>on and last year they were off Sports Illustrated covers.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I picked them to win the league and go to

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the playoff. I mean, it was very antithetical to Wisconsin's DNA,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 2>if you will, in terms of being over sold and

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 2>under delivering. That said, bring back Chasit Taylor, who might

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>be the best player in college fotball, and you bring

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 2>back pretty much all your big playmakers in the receiving game.

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>You got four quarterbacks plugging out right now in spring.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Graham Mertz is the guy I know fans want to

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 2>eventually went out and be given the chance because he's

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the highest rated recruit they've ever had at the position,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 2>and this is a staff that knows what it's doing

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to quarterbacks. I think they've gone the

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>absolute most out of everyone they've had there so far.

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>And that defense was not bad. I mean they weren't great.

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 2>They weren't a top two unit the way they had

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 2>been the first couple of years under three different coordinators

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in three years. They're the latest of them beat being

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 2>former safety standout Jim Leonard. But they weren't bad. So

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a very fixable program or team,

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>if people, whatever you want to call it. I think

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they're a lot closer to winning that division this year

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 2>than they are to finishing at sixth or seventh. I'm

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 2>buying Wisconsin stock right now. I know last year left

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 2>a sour taste, a lot of people's mouths. But when

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you go through injury, is a quarterback, when you go

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>through uncertainty a quarterback every other week, it seemed like

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 2>it was a will here, won't he? With Alex Hornybrook

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and Jack Cone, And you could just see the looks

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 2>on people's faces, not just at Wisconsin but at other

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 2>places in the past. When you've had one guy there

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 2>for so long who's had so many ups and downs

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and has been subjected to so much scrutiny, you can

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 2>tell in the locker room on a coaching staff, and

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff seeps into a program and it

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>just wears everyone out. And again, I don't want to

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 2>be too harsh and all of torny Brook here, I

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 2>think everyone at Wisconsin thanks them for his service and

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 2>wishes them the best of the lockdown in Tallahassee, but

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone needed a fresh start, and I think

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 2>if Graham Mertz is that guy, maybe not if Jack

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>con is that guy. But but again, he's going to

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 2>be a junior now he's hopefully improved. A lot of

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin fans takes they should be better. I mean, they're

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 2>always going to be good on the offensive line. Charles

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 2>and Taylor had the quietest season I think of any

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 2>great player we've ever really seen last year, there's no

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>reason he shouldn't be as good or better. I think

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 2>this program's a good spot, I really do. I don't

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna be down for long. I think they

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 2>should be competing for a division title again this season

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 2>and maybe more if everything breaks their way the way

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 2>it did two years ago. But I just can't get

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 2>too down on these guys after they started thirty four

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and seven under Paul Chris in the.

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>First three years, though, Yeah, just underscorees how difficult it

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is to do to win ten games forever been a

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 1>program like Wisconsin with a an identity in place and

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, an advantageous division for these past few years,

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just difficult. It's just it's a tough ass to

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Every year they went eight and five and they were

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>finishing second in that division. I know there are two

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 2>games out of first and really three since they lost Northwestern,

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't the disaster. I think we're all remembering,

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>as I think our preaching the expectations of this team,

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 2>did U snow favors and coloring the reality of what

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>they were on the field last year.

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the will they won't they? I think

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they finished like their final eight games were win loss,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>win loss, win loss, win loss. So the will they

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>won't that thing is is very accurate. Three, four, five, six, nine, eleven, fourteen,

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's go nine, Let's go nine. You probably won't have

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot to say about this, but Illinois. It's it's

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of true to say Illinois got better in twenty eighteen.

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It is they ran the ball well, they were more

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>competitive overall. Please ignore the Iowa game. Is it? Is

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it a talent thing? Is it an approach thing? Is

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it a coaching thing? Is it an injury thing? Isn't

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an everything that could go wrong has thing? What is

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>it right now with Illinois that defines their status?

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's funny because today I had a story

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 2>on their athletic director, Josh Whitman, who had played there

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in the late nineties and early two thousands, and I

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 2>was actually unaware of this until he had said it

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to me. He got there during Ron Turner's first year

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and at enna seven they went oh to eleven, and

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 2>by year three they won eight or nine games. They

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 2>won it. The big pass against Tom Brady. They won

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 2>at Ohio State. This is not that situation, clearly. I

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 2>think Illinois football is digging out of a much deeper

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 2>hole at the beginning of the Lovey Smith regime than

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>it was at the beginning of the Ron Turner regime.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But they did get better last year. And again, I

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>know this sounds like faint praise, but they lost to

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Penn State by thirty nine points. They were winning that

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 2>game in the second half. Yeah, for what a that's worth? No?

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean yeah, that South Florida game I was at

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>at Soldier Field. They were up nineteen seven at the

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 2>start of the fourth quarter and South Florida basically need

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a Hail Mary to beat them at the end. I

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 2>know South Florida ended up collapsing and not being the

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 2>great group of five team that we all expected them

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 2>to be at the beginning of the year, but that's

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a game they should have won. Can they get to

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 2>a bowl this year? If they do, I think that

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 2>would be phenomenal for Lovely Smith, for that staff, for

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>momentum for that program moving forward. I think I'm Jay

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Rivers is probably going to be the guy at quarterback.

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that offense took tremendous strides under rad Smith.

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean again, when you go four and eight and

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 2>two and seven to Big ten play, people aren't looking

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 2>too closely at the numbers, and I understand that when

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you're in a Power five conference. But they went from

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to say one twenty seventh to maybe sixty

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>third nationally yards per play. The problem is that defense

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 2>was got awful, and they had a coordinator resign mid season,

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and with all that time to go out and hire someone,

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Lovely Smith ended up promoting himself this year, which we'll see.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's Lovely putting his chips on the table.

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's him saying, you know it's on me

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:08.439
<v Speaker 2>right now, make or break. I know it's year four,

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>we're going to look at it probably as year three

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 2>because he got hired in March to twenty sixteen and

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have a chance of recruiting and really install

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>things the way he wanted to for the spring. Then

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 2>they've had a lot of attrition. I think going into

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 2>this year, there's a clear line between one through six

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in that division and number seven, who in this case

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 2>is Illinois. But I'm not as sour on them as

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. I mean, even if they only win four

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 2>games again this year under Lovely Smith, that probably gets

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 2>it fired. I know it might be a little bit

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 2>premature to talk about toach of maneuvers, but I just

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 2>think with getting actually them up to eighty five scholarships,

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 2>getting them close to a level playing field with the

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of their peers, and not doing anything or gregious

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 2>off the field, that combined with an eighty million dollar

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 2>facility opening at the start of training camp this summer,

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to leave this program in better position or

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 2>whoever ends up getting the job going into next year.

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And I don't want to write this off as a

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 2>lost season just yet, but I think you need to

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 2>take baby steps, and I think you need to look

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 2>at Victory's beyond the box score, and unless that defense

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 2>can make the kind of improvements that the offense did

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>last year, I'm not sure I see five or six

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>wins on that schedule.

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we've got to go into a bit

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of a lightning mode because you are the president and

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you have things to do and people to speak to.

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So three four or five change diapers to change three four, five,

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>six eleven or fourteen fourteen fourteen, it is okay we're

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>talking Nebraska. At the beginning of last year, it seemed

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like there was optimism that faded and then rose like

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the phoenix, as the Huskers look like. At the very least,

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they were a competitive Big Ten team week in and

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>week out. Is it too mild to say maintaining that

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>seems like a win or is there reason to raise

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the Husker threat level from decent threat to full on threat.

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's too early to say full on

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 2>threat when you look at the state of the division,

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and when you look at Scott Frost's history, and when

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 2>you look at how well this team played even in

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>some losses. I mean, I was at that Northwestern game

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 2>last year, and I think the win probability with five

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>minutes left was probably ninety eight ninety nine percent Northwestern.

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Northwestern had to score ten points and basically

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 2>less than two minutes without any timeouts, using what at

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the time coming off that non conference slight which was

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a disaster, one of the worst offenses in all of

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 2>college football, and they were able to do that. I mean,

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the way Nebraska threw that game away was absolutely perplexing,

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>and Scott Frost and the press conference afterward I mean

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 2>he looked like his dog died. I mean, you just

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>want to give the poor guy a hug because he

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 2>just had no answers. But I also think, as gut

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Regen as it was to live through as a Nebraska

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 2>fan or player and coach, there's a lot of talent

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>on that raster. Adrian Martinez is like a thirty five

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 2>year old man in the nineteen year old's body. I mean,

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 2>he's just one of the most mature guys I think

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen speak publicly. And this will be a

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 2>plug here, but our Sherman, our new nebrassa writer, had

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous story going out to his hometown in California,

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.399
<v Speaker 2>writing about his background. When you read about this guy,

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>when you see what he was able to do last

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>year through the thick and the thin, I have no

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 2>doubt that this is going to be one of the

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 2>best quarterbacks of the big time as soon as next year.

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that highly of them. I think the highly

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 2>of the coaching staff. Even when they lost two of

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 2>their last six games last year, the Ohio State game

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and the Iowa game, they were both right in toward

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the end and had a chance to win both those games,

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think going forward to after an zero to

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 2>six start, winning the Michigan State game the way they

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>were able to win. I know it was nine to six,

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 2>but I think to win ugly after losing pretty for

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 2>lack of a better analogy, so much that season said

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the character of that team. And I

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 2>just think they've got a clicking right now down all

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the phases you need from a program standpoint to be

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 2>in position to compete for division titles. So I don't

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's too early to think of these guys as

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a contender in the Less this year.

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, three four, five six eleven three three Minnesota?

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>What was what was the biggest difference between the Minnesota

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>team that lost five of six relatively early, that includes

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>being demolished by Illinois, by the way, and the team

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that comfortably beat Purdue, Wisconsin and Georgia Tech. Is that

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is that all Tanner Morgan, Well, I mean.

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Tanner Morgan, but Joe ROSSI they fired their defense coordinator

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Rob Smith after Illinois, and they came out and beat

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Purdue the way they did, and they were able to

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 2>beat Wisconsin and send Paul Johnson into retirement on a

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 2>sour note, in the Detroit Bowl whatever they call it nowadays.

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean that defense from a personality standpoint just looks

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 2>so much different those last five or six games under Rossie,

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 2>who obviously was promoted to the coordinator position full time

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 2>after the season. I think they're flying to the ball better.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>They had much better morale, and you see that translate offensively.

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean the first three weeks, that injury report was

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 2>just the most oppressing thing to read in the world.

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Roddie Smith, who's going to go down as

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe the second leading rusher in school history, went down

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>for the year. They had another running back go down,

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 2>all of whom returned this year. They were very optimistic

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 2>in the Twin Cities this year. I haven't been up

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 2>there yet myself. I'm hoping to Final four weekend to

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 2>see that staff and to see you practice or two.

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 2>But they quietly think that they can compete for the

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 2>division title this year. And I know that's a familiar thing.

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I've been saying about every team outside

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 2>of Illinois in that division. But it's true. I mean,

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the margin for error is so close that when you

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>beat to Wisconsin the way you did last year on

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the road, when you win a bowl game by twenty

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 2>four points, when you return two quarterbacks with extensive playing time,

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and you're going to the year three with a different

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 2>level of recruit there than what has been coming to

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 2>campus in the past, there's reason propximism, and even PJ.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Flack at the start of springing ball a battle week ago, said,

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're not playing with that. You know, underdog,

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:18.439
<v Speaker 2>don't nobody believes in us. We expect to be here now.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 2>We know we're capable of with the way we finished

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 2>last season, and we're going to hope that translates to

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:23.919
<v Speaker 2>the field this fall.

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Four five six eleven four four Michigan with the with

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of time since the Michigan season ended, looking

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>back to you, if Michigan is to break through, which

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to me means win the Big Ten and go to

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoff, is job number one? Their their offensive style,

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which they've addressed, or big game defense that's been arguably

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a bigger factor holding Michigan back. Just a performance together

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the performances against the best that the Big Ten has

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to offer on offense, that's.

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 2>A good question. I leaned toward the offensive side of

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the all made the change there for a reason. Josh

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Gattis did a great job with Nicksaban Alabama for a

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 2>year and was tremendous at Penn State before that. Is

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 2>he the answer that remains to be seen. But I

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.359
<v Speaker 2>think we're in an era of college football right now

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 2>where a strong traditional defense will only get you so

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 2>far and makes you a little bit predictable and easy

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for. You need to have something on the

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 2>other side of the ball that's a threat and that

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 2>occupies the other team's defense. And when you see them

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 2>play against in Ohio State at the end of the

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 2>last season, when you see them play in the bowl

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 2>game against Florida last year, there was nothing that really

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.959
<v Speaker 2>scared you about them. They looked almost predictable at times.

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>And the hope is that Jash Gadason, Ben McDaniels, I

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 2>should add, who they had a quarterback coach this year,

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to fix things up. I mean, Jay Patterson,

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I think was pretty good, and I think he returns

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 2>most of his key skill players this season, which is

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be a major plus for Michigan. But I'm

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 2>lying to you if I say the biggest reason for opximism.

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:03.760
<v Speaker 2>If you're Jim Harbaugh, right now is that Herbert Myers

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 2>no longer coaching in the Big Ten. I don't want

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to oversimplify art the difference between first and second in

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the division this year, but that's certainly a huge factor.

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 2>But now the onus is on Michigan. I mean, there

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 2>are no more excuses now. It seems like we've been

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 2>saying that every year, but there really are't. Especially with

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State coming to the Big House this season, it

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 2>really is put up for shut up time. I think

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you've seen a lot less of the harbas cherates publicly

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 2>in the off season that we were used to in

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the first two years, and I think in an arbor

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 2>they know they need to take advantage right now. Without

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 2>one of the greatest college football coaches of all time

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 2>being just down the road in Columbus, this should be

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Michigan's lead to lose, and I think they have at

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 2>least the talent and the pieces there that will put

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 2>them in position to do it. It's a matter of

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 2>really that one game at the end of the year,

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 2>who's going to take it more personally and who's going

0:50:59.239 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 2>to prepare better.

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Five six eleven is what we have left six all right,

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Penn State so Nvie Lions had a weird year. The

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>offense took a noticeable step back without Choe Morehead and

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Sakwon Barkley should be mentioned. And with yes, they had

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of drops in the passing game, but

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with how Ohio State and Michigan State ended those two games,

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>they were about seventeen seconds away from being eleven to one,

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.879
<v Speaker 1>with the one being obviously uttered destruction at the hands

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan. Is that coupled with a wildly talented roster,

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is it? Is it cause for optimism or more big

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>game concern when you look at Michigan State and Ohio State.

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Now those games ended as they get farther away from

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the moorhead and now trace McSorley era.

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the year where James Franklin's recruiting

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>will be highlight are discounted more than any others. I

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 2>mean the freshman software junior classes here are all members

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of top fifteen classes nationally that have been really as

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 2>good as anyone in the Big ten outside of Ohio State.

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And so that talent is going to have to grow

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 2>up quickly because Trace mcsorely, I think made up for

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of holes on that roster, definitely last year

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 2>and at parts throughout his three seasons as start. I mean,

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that was a generational player for that program at quarterback,

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 2>with the records he broke, with the way he willed

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 2>them to big game victories again and again. You mentioned

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the Michigan State don't have state games. Is the same

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:36.839
<v Speaker 2>thing the year before, right, They lost to both those

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 2>teams in a two week span, and that threw them

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 2>out of the playoff mix. You could just as easily

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:45.360
<v Speaker 2>look at the Appalachian State games and maybe the Iowa

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 2>game and think, you know what, they probably should have

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 2>lost those, So they probably got what they deserved the

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 2>grand scheme of things when you look at their nine

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and four finish. But the biggest question is going to

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 2>be whose quarterback. I mean, we all had expected for

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 2>many years that Tommy Stevens would be it. I mean,

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 2>by all accounts, he almost beat Trades mc sorely in

0:53:01.840 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 2>camp before the twenty sixteen season, and they made great

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>use of him. I wouldn't say as the backup. I'd

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 2>say as a jack of all trades offensive player. He

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 2>throw her touchdowns, he rushed for touchdowns, he catch touchdowns,

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 2>and then he got hurt. He was banged up pretty

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 2>much every part of his body last season, and they

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 2>just weren't able to really unleash that new wrinkle in

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 2>their offense. So you do wonder about his health. You

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 2>wonder if Sean Clifford is going to push him to

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe overtake him for the starting spot. And as you

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.720
<v Speaker 2>mentioned to the outset, you do wonder about that offense

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 2>just because Joe Moore has not there anymore and they

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.319
<v Speaker 2>struggled at times without him. So I do have faith

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 2>and Ricky Ronnie, I think he's better than a lot

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of people are giving him credit for. I think some

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 2>of the holes on that roster came to fruition at

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:46.359
<v Speaker 2>the end of some of those big games last year.

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately it's going to come down to how good

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 2>is the quarterback? Whoever that is?

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Five or eleven?

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Eleven?

0:53:53.120 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, eleven is Maryland. And given the context of

0:53:56.520 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, the Terps were understandably all over the place

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on the field. At their best, they beat or came

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>within a play of beating top top teams, and at

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>their worst they were awful. They were very, very bad

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a steadying presence. Do you expect more

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>clarity from the Mike Loxley era, as in, Okay, this

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:24.359
<v Speaker 1>is clearly who they are good or bad. This is

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we understand what Maryland is, and they'll you know, beat

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>teams they're better then, and they'll lose teams that they're worse.

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Then Do you expect that?

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the range of possibilities, both good and bad,

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is greater with Mike Loxley than that of any new

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 2>head coach in twenty nineteen moving forward. I mean, yeah,

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously a great work in Alabama. He got the Nick

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Damn stamp of approval, he won the Broils Award. He's

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 2>obviously familiar with Maryland and will recruit that region well,

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 2>which is something they should have been doing in the past.

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's tough on that side of the big ten.

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you say his head coaching tenure beforehand was

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a disaster. I think would be the biggest understatement you

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 2>could possibly say. When you look at at other word gets.

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Culture gets thrown around a lot in Tel football. When

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you look at the culture around that program with the

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 2>way things ended last year, I think it's a bit

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of a head scratch. I really do they got Josh

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Jackson who looked a part when he was healthy under

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Justin Puente Virginia Tech, and I think I'd be surprised

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 2>if he wasn't their starter Week one going into next season,

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 2>assuming he's at full health. But as you said at

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:39.879
<v Speaker 2>the outfite of this, that's a tough division. Expectations are

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be really all over the place because there's

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 2>talent in that region. But historically Maryland football is not

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State football. It's not Penn State, it's not Michigan.

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 2>At their best last year they were beating Texas, who

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 2>ended up winning the Sugar Bowl. I'm not sure how

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 2>much more you can ask for from a program than that.

0:55:57.120 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 2>But at it's worse thirty eight to three against a good,

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:01.879
<v Speaker 2>not great Penn State team to close out the year.

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 2>This one is the hardest one to forecast because I

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 2>think there's potential with that job. I think there's potential

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 2>with Mike Croxley there. There's potential for a lot of

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>bad there too.

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mentioned this at the top of the show.

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that would have been a win over

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the Sugar Bowl champion, and they were a throwaway from

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>beating the rose Ball champion, which is so weird to

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think about when you think about the rest of Maryland season.

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, you look at that through and I don't want

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 2>to harp on Maryland too much, but that throw changed

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 2>so much. I mean, yeah, Michigan clinches the division if

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that's converted. So what's the higher State Michigan game like

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the next week without anything technically to play for? I mean,

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Ohio State is still hungry to get after it,

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 2>but they're not playing for a conference title. Then Michigan's

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:47.319
<v Speaker 2>going to Indianapolis next week regardless. That's going to change

0:56:47.320 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 2>the narrative we have on Jim Harbaugh, regardless of what

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 2>happens against Ohio State that week. And who knows the

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Erbami are going to retire after losing like that. I

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean, this is a large what a

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 2>scenario that has a lot of different legs to it,

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 2>But when you look back at that misfire two point conversion,

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 2>it really gets the mind wondering.

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So let's see Northwesterns within three points of Michigan.

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 1>They meet them again in a rematch in Indianapolis and

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>probably have a lot better shot to get back to Pasadena.

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that just that is my galaxy brain is firing.

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The final team is Purdue. You mentioned them earlier in

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the context of thinking Jeff Brahm is probably around a

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterback in the country, and the Boilers in

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the year they win four in a row,

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 1>with I believe the final of those four being that

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>huge emotional Ohio State win being just, you know, a

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>season if not era defining win, and then they lose

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>four of six, highlighted by getting just shellacked by Minnesota

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Auburn in the bowl game. If we shouldn't

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 1>judge I mean, we shouldn't judge people. We definitely shouldn't

0:57:56.960 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>judge teams. But if we shouldn't judge anybody by their

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>worst or their best day, So I don't know which is.

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the Minnesota the Auburn game being the

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>worst in Ohio State being the best. How should we

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>judge the status quo of Purdue if we're throwing out

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 1>those disparate outcomes.

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what you get when you have a

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 2>really good coaching staff with a really young team that

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily used to winning at a pretty high level.

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I was there. I want to say the week after

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 2>they be in Ohio State and I sat down with

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Brohm, and you know, they started zero to three too.

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it wasn't just losing the way they did

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in the bowl game and some other games. At the end,

0:58:36.040 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 2>they lost Eastern Michigan and Missouri at home, and Jeff

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Brohm said, you know, I take that one on the chin.

0:58:43.560 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 2>We lost one game early on and I thought we

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 2>should have bottled things up a little bit more. We

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 2>got out of character. We were afraid to make mistakes,

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's just not pretty football. Under Jeff Brom, I mean,

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 2>it is one of the most fun teams to watch

0:58:57.320 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 2>when they are slinging it and firing on all cylinders

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:02.439
<v Speaker 2>out of fredom main mistakes, which is why they're good

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 2>for a big upset every year under him. The hashtag

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that they have on her shirts there and that they

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 2>have on their Twitter kinds Let's play football, which he

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 2>obviously made famous from his XFL interview on the sideline

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 2>while playing half a Brain. Probably yeah, that is Purdue

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 2>football is m O and they really got away from

0:59:20.120 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 2>that early on in the season. In addition to probably

0:59:23.000 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 2>starting the wrong guy a quarterback to begin with with

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Elijisin Laara with David Black, who they lose this year.

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think now with three recruiting classes there, with

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 2>probably the best player of the conference and Rondel Moore

0:59:35.040 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 2>possibly superhighs made Trophy candle candidate going into this year,

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and with Elijah Cindelaar who's played a lot of football

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 2>there that knows this isn't very well, I think now

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 2>is when those losses will become less forgivable, especially with

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Brown gain the extension that he did, being courted so

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 2>publicly by his alma mater Louisville and turning them down

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to stay at Perdue, which by the way, has one

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 2>of the best football facilities indoors in all the country.

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I know no one talks about because it's not on

1:00:00.880 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the lake and it doesn't have a slide. I mean,

1:00:03.280 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>their facility is phenomenal. I went there for the first

1:00:07.600 --> 1:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>time and could not believe I was at Purdue University

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>that they have put money into that program that I

1:00:13.000 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>think few teams in the Big Ten have and what

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be going to come expectations. I think

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Brown is the guy who will altimately get them there.

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt for Tuna, thank you very much for

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your time. I know you have to run. We started

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about your presidency. Is there a perk that you

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>did not realize you would have. Do you have like

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a special card that gets you out of like you

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get a front row best seat in the house in

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>press boxes? Do you have a butler? Do you have

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>catered meals as the president? Is there a perk that

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't know?

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Well? I haven't covered a football game yet since I've

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>taken off of Oh okay, so I started again. They

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>do it at the National Peblicon every year, and I

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>was actually not there this year because my daughter was

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>born that week, so I missed the RSSLE. That was

1:00:57.960 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>an exciting week, right, I didn't miss much of a

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>game either. Nope, so we'll see. I hope the press

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>boxes in Evanston, South then and all my usual locales

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>give me a suite, maybe the presidential suite. I don't know.

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>That remains to be staying helples. I own too many

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>people off between now and then, and my approval rating

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't think too much between now and the start of

1:01:17.480 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the football season.

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I can I'm trying to now picture

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what a secret Service member for the head of the

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>f WAA might look like. And the division that comes

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>into my head of who would protect the head of

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a football writers association is not intimidating, not intimidating.

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll see if I can get Brian Kelly on my

1:01:35.240 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>side anytime he's on game. Danny has ooh boss is on.

1:01:37.920 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>He looks a lot like not necessarily Paul there from WW,

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>but he looks like a great classic WW wrestling manager,

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think that would be a role that would

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>suit him well whenever he decides to retire.

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's so true. Possibly a little bit

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>more bark than bite. You know, he's more of a present.

1:01:57.160 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not huge, but he has a presence.

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely has a presence. I want to say every

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 2>day should be Saturday. Said this first on Twitter many

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 2>years ago. I'm not one hundred percent sure about that.

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't take full credit for it. But while we're

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>talking secret service and bodyguards and a guy that I'm

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.080
<v Speaker 2>probably as familiar with as any coaches from my time

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>being a nerd a beat writer. Well, I hope you

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't hate me too much, but but I would feel

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>safe with him guarding me.

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Nice. That's a good compliment. I would if somebody said

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that about me, I would be thrilled. Not many people do.

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt for Tuna, Thank you very much for your time.

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope we all got smarter talking about the Big

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Ten today, and thank you for listening. Thank you for

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us, and we hope to have you on again soon.

1:02:39.880 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, my friend, long time. First time. I'm happy

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 2>we can have consecutive guests from the Athletic. Hope this

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't the last time.

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh. I would probably count on it because I think

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody there, everybody works at the Athletic now, so it

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>won't be terribly difficult.

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I appreciate buddy, Thanks for having me.

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Dan, we are back big thanks to Matt

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>for Tuna from the Athletic jumping in talking all things

1:03:11.840 --> 1:03:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Big ten with us, first time, longtime. Glad to finally

1:03:16.400 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 3>get him on the program. I did want to tease

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>out something that is unrelated to the Big Ten right time,

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>related to the Big Ten.

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Harris standing up on the back of my neck.

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got a show in the holster for next week.

1:03:34.720 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You're very mpr right now. I want to point that out,

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>am I. Yeah, yeah, If you want to add some

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like birds tweeting that kind of thing, Chirpin.

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:44.919
<v Speaker 3>I am very excited about this show now.

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Dateline, Alan Town.

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right, very excited about the show that I think

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>we've got ready for next week. Yes, didn't have enough

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>lead time to put it together for this evening, but

1:03:57.240 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>next week as we start April, I think it's a

1:04:00.600 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>good time topical topical. It's very timely, little out there, upbeat,

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>little out there, as is usually the case with this

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>dumb show. Japanese influence, Japanese influence yet love that kidding?

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Not even kidding about that or not?

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So stay tuned to the Solid Verbal Solidverbal dot Com

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 3>subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

1:04:22.880 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited, Ty, I'm just flat out excited. I'm not

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna beat around the bush here before we.

1:04:27.920 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Go any further and before we close out this show,

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>just because we haven't talked in a while, Yeah, let's talk.

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>I need a steaming hot food take from you.

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, here's okay. I'm going to tie together two things.

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>What the two things that I'm gonna tie together are

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>food and being a new parent. How about that? Please,

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>let's be obnoxious about it. When your child is born,

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it has been a very good decision that I've made.

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Recommend it. Don't have to don't drink or eat sugar

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because those two things can affect your sleep. Yeah, and

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get as nearly as much sleep

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as you think you are or that you used to get,

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and so give yourself. It's almost like performance enhancing giving up.

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Not like bread or anything like that. Just stop eating

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>M and m's and Starburst or Danishes or whatever, and

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>either don't drink or just cut way back on your drinking.

1:05:21.960 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>When I do sleep tie, I'm out in seconds. I

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sleep hard. Excuse me, that sounded wrong. I sleep hard.

1:05:31.520 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I stand by it. That's my steaming hot food take.

1:05:36.480 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You can like mayonnaise, you cannot like mayonnaise. I don't

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really care like what you like, but that is That

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is my constructive bit of food related life advice.

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I don't really have much to add.

1:05:48.400 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Why did you ask about food specifically? Because it's your

1:05:51.200 --> 1:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>thing and I feel like we haven't talked about it

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 3>in a while. People really subscribe to what Dan has to.

1:05:55.880 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh you're ready, I'll give you an actual hot take.

1:05:58.360 --> 1:05:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Give me hot take, real quick.

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>New York Pizzas overrated yeah, I agree. I agree with that,

1:06:04.040 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Like there is excellent pizza to be had in New York,

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but the barrier to entry making of making good pizza.

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You can make good pizza in Cincinnati, you can make

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it Indicator, you can make it in Amarillo, Texas. And

1:06:17.240 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there are probably fewer places in those places because of population.

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>There's just fewer people willing to put in the time

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to make good pizza. But New York pizza is largely

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just more everywhere than it is excellent. All right, how

1:06:32.320 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about that.

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's close out on that, Dan, what do you say?

1:06:35.040 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I like it. I mean this is a big

1:06:37.240 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ten town, so it all comes full circle. Indeed, thank

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you to Matt Fortu so wiped.

1:06:42.400 --> 1:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I love it from the Athletic for stopping on by

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>sharing his wisdom with us. Don't forget big show coming

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>next week. Big Show. I'm excited. I am excited. Good

1:06:53.400 --> 1:06:55.840
<v Speaker 3>keep it right here. We're at solid ruble dot com.

1:06:55.880 --> 1:06:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Find us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and check out the

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:05.840
<v Speaker 3>uh subreddit. Are slash Soliverble started buiver ballers for footballers,

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and sign up for the newsletter soliverb dot com for

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>that guy over there, Dan Rubinstein for myself, Ty hilden Brand,

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>enjoy your week enjoy your weekend, and stay solid Peace