WEBVTT - Executive Disorder: 2026 Midterms Edition 

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.420
<v Speaker 1>It could happen here!

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.580
<v Speaker 2>That's not how we open the show.

0:00:13.980 --> 0:00:18.419
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Executive Disorder, our special midterm election 2026 edition.

0:00:20.690 --> 0:00:22.670
<v Speaker 3>But we're going to talk about everything that we can

0:00:22.750 --> 0:00:26.150
<v Speaker 3>in the next hour and change. I'm Garrison Davis. I'm

0:00:26.210 --> 0:00:30.870
<v Speaker 3>joined by Robert Evans, James Stout, Kevin Foster, and special

0:00:30.930 --> 0:00:36.269
<v Speaker 3>Texas correspondent Stephen Monacelli. Welcome, everyone. Yes.

0:00:36.550 --> 0:00:39.940
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to the show, everybody. Stephen, I'm so glad

0:00:39.979 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>we made the decision several decades ago to embed you

0:00:42.500 --> 0:00:45.300
<v Speaker 4>in Texas, knowing that years later we would start a

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 4>media network and need a correspondent in Texas for the

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 4>2026 midterm elections.

0:00:50.510 --> 0:00:52.630
<v Speaker 5>The long-term planning really paid off.

0:00:53.170 --> 0:00:53.650
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah.

0:00:53.670 --> 0:00:55.650
<v Speaker 4>We actually went and scouted you like they do with

0:00:55.770 --> 0:00:57.630
<v Speaker 4>NBA players when you were a little kid.

0:00:58.170 --> 0:00:59.310
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, this one, this one.

0:00:59.670 --> 0:01:01.490
<v Speaker 2>Someone's going to take that seriously.

0:01:01.530 --> 0:01:03.390
<v Speaker 5>Someone's going to take that seriously.

0:01:03.410 --> 0:01:04.580
<v Speaker 7>Oh, God.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we're looking for the LeBron James of podcasting about

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:09.819
<v Speaker 4>the news.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.500
<v Speaker 3>We will get to Texas shortly. But similar to LeBron James,

0:01:17.380 --> 0:01:22.370
<v Speaker 3>the elections this year saw A super tall blue wave,

0:01:22.790 --> 0:01:26.390
<v Speaker 3>something that they are calling a blue tsunami.

0:01:26.750 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Blue-nami, come on.

0:01:28.140 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>A blue-nami.

0:01:29.260 --> 0:01:36.220
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. All right, guys. All right. So, Democrats have completely

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.390
<v Speaker 3>dominated in the midterm elections.

0:01:38.670 --> 0:01:39.250
<v Speaker 1>They sure did.

0:01:39.610 --> 0:01:45.460
<v Speaker 3>Outpacing the polling in many cases, outpacing most expectations. They

0:01:45.500 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>are projected to win 258 seats in the House, at least,

0:01:50.220 --> 0:01:54.470
<v Speaker 3>possibly a few more. Jesus. At the very least, an

0:01:54.490 --> 0:01:58.230
<v Speaker 3>81-seat majority, the largest majority either party has had since 1992.

0:01:58.230 --> 0:01:59.500
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Fuck me.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.540
<v Speaker 3>It's an incredible victory. Unfortunately, we'll have to kind of

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>blaze through some of the House results because the Senate

0:02:06.660 --> 0:02:11.030
<v Speaker 3>results are... Yeah, super, super important as well. But obviously

0:02:11.050 --> 0:02:12.549
<v Speaker 3>the House race was kind of in the shadow of

0:02:12.590 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>this redistricting effort done by Republicans and some Democrats. The

0:02:17.580 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 3>GOP wanted to flip about 15 House seats through redistricting.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.859
<v Speaker 3>And how many did they flip? Zero, zero seats.

0:02:25.630 --> 0:02:29.410
<v Speaker 2>It's stunning. Now, Garrison, is zero a large number?

0:02:29.770 --> 0:02:32.299
<v Speaker 3>No, no. It's actually one of the smaller numbers.

0:02:32.860 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Really? Oh, this is interesting.

0:02:34.260 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thank you. Thank you for that context.

0:02:36.300 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>In fact, one could argue we've gotten into negative number

0:02:39.340 --> 0:02:42.559
<v Speaker 3>territory because Democrats did not just hold on to those

0:02:42.620 --> 0:02:46.910
<v Speaker 3>gerrymandered seats. They went on to flip at least 35 more.

0:02:46.930 --> 0:02:48.790
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. Good God.

0:02:48.850 --> 0:02:53.370
<v Speaker 3>Winning all 28 battleground districts identified by NBC. Wow. At

0:02:53.410 --> 0:02:56.750
<v Speaker 3>least 11 flips in the New York Times most competitive districts.

0:02:56.790 --> 0:02:58.850
<v Speaker 3>And that's an undercount because the New York Times isn't

0:02:58.889 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>counting any redistricted district. And then another 10 flips in

0:03:04.100 --> 0:03:08.380
<v Speaker 3>districts that Republicans expected to win. And then another nine

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.370
<v Speaker 3>flips in districts Republicans expected to win easily. A lot

0:03:12.380 --> 0:03:16.730
<v Speaker 3>of those in North Carolina, which Democrats just obliterated.

0:03:16.750 --> 0:03:16.820
<v Speaker 7>Oof.

0:03:17.370 --> 0:03:20.190
<v Speaker 3>The Republican Party in North Carolina. It's a bloodbath.

0:03:20.270 --> 0:03:22.510
<v Speaker 2>North Blair-alina, as they call it now.

0:03:22.530 --> 0:03:25.590
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. Actually, it was just announced a few

0:03:25.610 --> 0:03:27.970
<v Speaker 3>hours ago. That's what they're changing the state's name to.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Carolinas haven't gotten hit this hard since the

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Civil War. It's crazy stuff.

0:03:40.900 --> 0:03:44.260
<v Speaker 3>There's so many house races we could focus on. I

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.380
<v Speaker 3>do want to highlight it is expected. that Lauren Boebert

0:03:48.670 --> 0:03:52.790
<v Speaker 3>will no longer be a congressperson come January.

0:03:53.070 --> 0:03:57.790
<v Speaker 2>Fuck yeah. God, that's... That's just.

0:03:58.150 --> 0:04:02.550
<v Speaker 3>She is currently trailing by 6,000 votes. They're still counting, but.

0:04:02.570 --> 0:04:03.250
<v Speaker 2>Hearing you.

0:04:03.150 --> 0:04:06.730
<v Speaker 4>Say that is like the auditory equivalent of biting into

0:04:06.770 --> 0:04:09.060
<v Speaker 4>a perfectly cooked piece of steak.

0:04:09.130 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just glorious. Oh, God, that feels good.

0:04:13.020 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I want to mention... because we've reported

0:04:15.940 --> 0:04:18.580
<v Speaker 3>on this on Executive Disorder this past year, Max Miller,

0:04:18.740 --> 0:04:24.860
<v Speaker 3>the Republican congressman accused of some very horrific familial abuse

0:04:24.900 --> 0:04:28.050
<v Speaker 3>that was covered up by the Republican Party in general.

0:04:28.270 --> 0:04:29.270
<v Speaker 1>Real monster shit.

0:04:29.450 --> 0:04:33.350
<v Speaker 3>He has lost by almost 10 points. He is out.

0:04:33.370 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Brian Poindexter is in. That's in Ohio. This was a

0:04:37.570 --> 0:04:41.260
<v Speaker 3>race that Miller was expected to win, and he did not.

0:04:42.810 --> 0:04:48.300
<v Speaker 3>Other big Trump House districts, we have Indiana 5, Kentucky 6,

0:04:48.300 --> 0:04:53.140
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina 6, and Ohio 10, which Democrats won. These

0:04:53.180 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>are like 20, 30 point shifts away from Trump's performance

0:04:57.100 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 3>in 2024.

0:04:57.180 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Christ almighty.

0:04:58.990 --> 0:05:00.270
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty incredible. Yeah.

0:05:00.930 --> 0:05:01.969
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in general.

0:05:02.850 --> 0:05:05.610
<v Speaker 2>I expected the House to flip. Yes.

0:05:05.830 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 4>And I think most people did and have like somewhere

0:05:09.060 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 4>between a slim and like a solid lead for the Dems.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.500
<v Speaker 4>And the Senate was kind of like there's a decent

0:05:14.540 --> 0:05:16.220
<v Speaker 4>chance it would flip, but it was going to. I

0:05:16.260 --> 0:05:20.260
<v Speaker 4>don't think anyone really thought this would happen. Even when

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.780
<v Speaker 4>the polls were showing it, I couldn't... Yeah. It's been

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 4>so hard to trust them, right? Like, the fact that

0:05:25.300 --> 0:05:29.740
<v Speaker 4>they undercounted the dims is certainly not... Like, I'm incredibly happy.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I just.

0:05:30.339 --> 0:05:33.270
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't let myself believe it was going to go

0:05:33.350 --> 0:05:36.310
<v Speaker 4>this well. And I'm still kind of in shock that

0:05:36.370 --> 0:05:36.730
<v Speaker 4>it did.

0:05:36.850 --> 0:05:38.170
<v Speaker 3>Like, this is nuts.

0:05:39.310 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 6>I felt like I didn't know what to do with

0:05:40.650 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 6>myself last night. I'm so used to everything just being bad.

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Right. Like I was remembering last election.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:47.740 --> 0:05:50.779
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to feel good, I guess, but.

0:05:51.580 --> 0:05:53.740
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, there's obviously there's bad news as we'll

0:05:53.779 --> 0:05:56.500
<v Speaker 4>talk about too, but just, I don't know. I felt

0:05:56.540 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>like the need to take a second on air to

0:05:58.300 --> 0:06:00.020
<v Speaker 4>go like, yeah, holy shit.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That went pretty well.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:03.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:03.540 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 3>We can talk about this more in the voter trends section,

0:06:06.100 --> 0:06:09.410
<v Speaker 3>like specifically, but I mean, yeah, this is like, A

0:06:09.510 --> 0:06:14.890
<v Speaker 3>total reversal of the 2024 election. Yeah. On almost every metric. Now,

0:06:15.470 --> 0:06:18.460
<v Speaker 3>as Robert mentioned, Democrats were expected to win the House,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.340
<v Speaker 3>not by this much. Not like this, but yeah. The

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.860
<v Speaker 3>tally is still being counted. So when I say they're

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.900
<v Speaker 3>expected to get around 258, 260, not all those have

0:06:28.940 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>been confirmed yet, but that is the NBC projection, which

0:06:32.100 --> 0:06:35.050
<v Speaker 3>they're projecting more confidently than the New York Times, which

0:06:35.070 --> 0:06:36.770
<v Speaker 3>is a bit more conservative in their projections. Yeah.

0:06:37.930 --> 0:06:40.190
<v Speaker 4>They've done well enough that like the outstanding, obviously the

0:06:40.250 --> 0:06:42.650
<v Speaker 4>races that aren't called yet matter, but none of them

0:06:42.710 --> 0:06:45.469
<v Speaker 4>matter in the sense of determining what the Dems will

0:06:45.510 --> 0:06:48.390
<v Speaker 4>be able to do or not, probably. Like the margins

0:06:48.470 --> 0:06:50.810
<v Speaker 4>are so big that these like last couple of seats

0:06:51.410 --> 0:06:55.210
<v Speaker 4>won't shift. Obviously it matters, but won't shift the overall battle.

0:06:55.770 --> 0:06:55.940
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:56.650 --> 0:06:57.210
<v Speaker 1>Which is crazy.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.500
<v Speaker 3>The big question was what was going to happen with

0:07:00.540 --> 0:07:03.979
<v Speaker 3>the Senate. Yeah. Dems needed to net four to five seats,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 3>getting to like 51, 52 seats. considering, you know, J.D.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Vance and John Fetterman, you know, to counteract their votes.

0:07:11.380 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Fetterman.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 3>So they would have to claw back a fair number

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:20.020
<v Speaker 3>of seats. As of Wednesday afternoon, Democrats have secured 54 seats.

0:07:20.020 --> 0:07:24.590
<v Speaker 2>53, right, with Fetterman being not a Democrat.

0:07:25.370 --> 0:07:25.830
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:07:25.890 --> 0:07:28.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Fetterman's ex-account has gone suspiciously quiet this morning.

0:07:29.810 --> 0:07:31.340
<v Speaker 1>Tragic, tragic. He's in mourning.

0:07:31.380 --> 0:07:32.420
<v Speaker 2>A lot of his friends lost.

0:07:32.900 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>And Democrats could win upwards of 56 seats. Jesus Christ.

0:07:37.580 --> 0:07:41.330
<v Speaker 3>Between Alaska and the surprise possible Flip of the Night Mississippi,

0:07:41.350 --> 0:07:42.490
<v Speaker 3>which we'll get to in a sec.

0:07:42.950 --> 0:07:43.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:07:43.810 --> 0:07:47.350
<v Speaker 3>Between like seven, eight or nine flips. It's incredible.

0:07:47.630 --> 0:07:48.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's bonkers.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>I've not seen a Senate race like this ever.

0:07:51.940 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.900
<v Speaker 2>It's more like I remember, I'm sure some of us

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.230
<v Speaker 2>who are older remember 2008, right? And the Obama election.

0:08:01.230 --> 0:08:05.690
<v Speaker 4>2008 and 98 too, I think, was another shellacking for

0:08:05.710 --> 0:08:06.030
<v Speaker 4>the right.

0:08:06.050 --> 0:08:08.110
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, evidently nothing to this extent.

0:08:08.310 --> 0:08:08.770
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:08:09.730 --> 0:08:12.460
<v Speaker 2>This is remarkable. And the incumbent party tends to do

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>worse in midterms, yeah, but not to this extent.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:19.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, getting possibly 56 Senate seats.

0:08:19.710 --> 0:08:23.570
<v Speaker 2>This isn't doing worse. This is like end of days. Yeah,

0:08:24.070 --> 0:08:26.530
<v Speaker 2>extinction level event, to quote Ron DeSantis.

0:08:26.750 --> 0:08:30.740
<v Speaker 3>As Ron DeSantis says, an extinction level event for the

0:08:30.780 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Republican Party.

0:08:31.700 --> 0:08:33.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank God.

0:08:35.580 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about Michigan, one of the big races of

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.620
<v Speaker 3>the night, Abdul El-Sayed versus Mike Rogers. This was an

0:08:41.750 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>open seat previously held by a Democrat. And El-Sayed... held

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.010
<v Speaker 3>this seat for the Democrats. He won 53 to Rogers 45,

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.860
<v Speaker 3>a seven point win. Nice. The entire GOP apparatus and frankly,

0:08:56.420 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a big portion of the Democratic establishment mobilized against El-Sayed

0:09:00.059 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 3>hard on like a national level. He became this sort

0:09:03.740 --> 0:09:06.570
<v Speaker 3>of like poster child of this whole election cycle. The

0:09:06.610 --> 0:09:09.690
<v Speaker 3>Republicans hoping that painting him as an extremist by doing that,

0:09:09.730 --> 0:09:12.970
<v Speaker 3>his candidacy could like negatively affect Democrats and races all

0:09:13.010 --> 0:09:16.580
<v Speaker 3>across the country. And that did not happen at all.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Nope.

0:09:18.940 --> 0:09:20.660
<v Speaker 4>It's the same kind of deal with like, if we

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.100
<v Speaker 4>really focus on Hassan Piker, that'll scare everybody away from

0:09:24.140 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>voting for the Democrats.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Didn't work. Didn't seem to work.

0:09:26.980 --> 0:09:29.490
<v Speaker 3>And if you get a look at the voter demographic numbers,

0:09:30.010 --> 0:09:31.809
<v Speaker 3>seemed like the opposite may have happened.

0:09:31.990 --> 0:09:32.250
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:09:32.870 --> 0:09:36.689
<v Speaker 3>I would be remiss to mention that Haley Stevens decided

0:09:36.750 --> 0:09:40.750
<v Speaker 3>to endorse the quote unquote nightmare, her words, Mike Rogers,

0:09:41.410 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>like two or three days before the election because of

0:09:45.340 --> 0:09:49.540
<v Speaker 3>El-Sayed's anti-Israel stances and essentially threw her career away for,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess, probably some AIPAC money. I was going to

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.350
<v Speaker 3>say nothing, but... What's she going to do with it?

0:09:54.610 --> 0:09:55.090
<v Speaker 3>But yeah.

0:09:56.050 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>She's like self-immolated as a career politician. Buy the flight

0:09:59.340 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to Israel. Yeah, right.

0:10:01.340 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 3>That does seem like kind of her only option.

0:10:04.140 --> 0:10:05.180
<v Speaker 2>Join Netanyahu.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 3>She's been kicked out of the Democratic Party.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.750
<v Speaker 2>Well, Netanyahu might not be in power all that much longer,

0:10:09.790 --> 0:10:11.650
<v Speaker 2>depending on how things go over there. She doesn't have

0:10:11.670 --> 0:10:14.130
<v Speaker 2>to join him in Parliament. Join him in the International

0:10:14.150 --> 0:10:15.270
<v Speaker 2>Criminal Court if she wants to.

0:10:15.429 --> 0:10:15.630
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:10:15.809 --> 0:10:16.650
<v Speaker 1>She might build a win.

0:10:16.950 --> 0:10:20.900
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Moving on to Maine, another... race with a lot

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.900
<v Speaker 3>of focus. Troy Jackson versus Susan Collins, who's held this

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.730
<v Speaker 3>seat for 200 years. That can't be right.

0:10:30.809 --> 0:10:33.050
<v Speaker 2>Since 1776. Yeah, actually.

0:10:33.070 --> 0:10:36.790
<v Speaker 4>I mean, she very famously stood with Washington at Yorktown.

0:10:36.809 --> 0:10:40.620
<v Speaker 2>So have a little bit of respect. She's a veteran

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.980
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about. Signed the Declaration of Independence, Garrison.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 3>And come election night, union logger and former Maine Senate

0:10:46.340 --> 0:10:50.900
<v Speaker 3>President Troy Jackson unseated. Longtime Republican Senator Susan Collins, who

0:10:50.940 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>defied the polls in 2020 when she held onto her

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>seat that year. Jackson has won by about eight points,

0:10:57.900 --> 0:11:01.469
<v Speaker 3>close to Kamala's margins against Trump. This is a huge

0:11:01.510 --> 0:11:05.790
<v Speaker 3>win for labor and like the Bernie wing of the Democrats. And,

0:11:05.830 --> 0:11:08.030
<v Speaker 3>you know, just getting Collins out of there is just

0:11:08.090 --> 0:11:08.590
<v Speaker 3>feels good.

0:11:09.010 --> 0:11:11.170
<v Speaker 2>Feels good, man.

0:11:11.190 --> 0:11:15.030
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. One of the scenes that Democrats expected to flip

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.250
<v Speaker 3>was in North Carolina with Roy Cooper and the man

0:11:18.290 --> 0:11:20.860
<v Speaker 3>who has never lost an election, going up against Mike

0:11:20.940 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Watley for a previously Republican-held seat. And former Governor Cooper

0:11:26.940 --> 0:11:32.260
<v Speaker 3>did flip this, winning 60-40. Like I said, just North Carolina,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:37.590
<v Speaker 3>total bloodbath. Trump won this by three. And down-ballot races,

0:11:37.710 --> 0:11:42.150
<v Speaker 3>the House races, state legislature, just really, in North Carolina,

0:11:42.210 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the bluest you've ever seen. What's much more surprising...

0:11:46.510 --> 0:11:50.670
<v Speaker 3>is the neighbor down south, South Carolina, with Annie Andrews

0:11:50.820 --> 0:11:54.220
<v Speaker 3>against Darlene Graham, the Republican incumbent.

0:11:54.500 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:11:55.300 --> 0:11:58.180
<v Speaker 3>Democrat Annie Andrews lost a U.S. House race to Nancy

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Mace in 2022. But last night, she beat short-term Republican

0:12:04.540 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Senator Darlene Graham, flipping the seat formerly held by late

0:12:07.380 --> 0:12:10.730
<v Speaker 3>queer icon Lindsey Graham, who served as a senator since 2003.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:16.730
<v Speaker 3>In 2020, he won by 10 points. Trump won the

0:12:16.750 --> 0:12:21.330
<v Speaker 3>state by 18 points in 2024. Andrews won by four.

0:12:22.110 --> 0:12:24.910
<v Speaker 3>So that's what, like a 22 point swing from 24

0:12:24.910 --> 0:12:25.309
<v Speaker 3>to 26?

0:12:25.309 --> 0:12:25.709
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:25.950 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Annie Andrews is like in between moderate and progressive. She

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.179
<v Speaker 3>ran on like a public health care option, right? Not

0:12:35.220 --> 0:12:39.270
<v Speaker 3>Medicare for all, but a public option. Abortion rights, education funding,

0:12:39.370 --> 0:12:42.970
<v Speaker 3>banning corporate PAC money. cracking down on congressional stock trading,

0:12:43.170 --> 0:12:46.750
<v Speaker 3>term limits, AI regulation, border security, and path to citizenship

0:12:46.830 --> 0:12:47.850
<v Speaker 3>while keeping families together.

0:12:47.870 --> 0:12:51.410
<v Speaker 2>Is she one of the Dignidad Act people?

0:12:51.929 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that is.

0:12:53.059 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't want to divert the episode too much.

0:12:56.300 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It is a thing that like Blue Dog Dems and

0:12:58.660 --> 0:13:02.020
<v Speaker 2>some Republicans, including Florida Republicans, have been trying to introduce

0:13:02.059 --> 0:13:05.140
<v Speaker 2>for a long time that would effectively create an underclass

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.970
<v Speaker 2>of people who had no pathway to citizenship and had

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.830
<v Speaker 2>a right to remain. And they tend to couple this

0:13:10.850 --> 0:13:15.569
<v Speaker 2>with border security. It's like a faux amnesty, almost. Okay, okay.

0:13:16.370 --> 0:13:20.910
<v Speaker 3>Her exact platform does not go into that level of specificity. Okay.

0:13:21.309 --> 0:13:24.809
<v Speaker 3>I will say, coupling path to citizenship with border security

0:13:24.830 --> 0:13:27.550
<v Speaker 3>has been one of the most common talking points across

0:13:27.590 --> 0:13:32.410
<v Speaker 3>these swing states. Yeah. What exactly that means once they're

0:13:32.460 --> 0:13:34.980
<v Speaker 3>in office is kind of a black box. Yeah.

0:13:35.220 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we have failed to reform our immigration policy for

0:13:38.380 --> 0:13:40.540
<v Speaker 2>decades and decades and decades, which is how we got

0:13:40.570 --> 0:13:43.730
<v Speaker 2>to this fucked up situation that we're in. So like, yeah,

0:13:43.750 --> 0:13:45.569
<v Speaker 2>we're going to cross that bridge when we come to it. Obviously,

0:13:45.950 --> 0:13:47.290
<v Speaker 2>I will report on it when it happens.

0:13:47.990 --> 0:13:51.990
<v Speaker 3>Another thing to cross, hopefully sooner than later, is the

0:13:52.050 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>trans issue and the way that's been weaponized in these

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 3>past few elections. And last month, Annie Andrews did release

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>an ad directly opposing, quote, biological men in women's sports and, quote,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.500
<v Speaker 3>gender surgery for minors. in response to a swath of

0:14:05.540 --> 0:14:09.670
<v Speaker 3>attack ads against her. This ad is not good. This

0:14:09.710 --> 0:14:12.050
<v Speaker 3>is bad. This is bad. And this is handled much

0:14:12.130 --> 0:14:17.130
<v Speaker 3>worse than other candidates handled this, like Sherrod Brown, who

0:14:17.210 --> 0:14:21.290
<v Speaker 3>also faced a wave of ads attacking him and the

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Democrats for the support of trans people. And he released

0:14:24.220 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>an ad calling the Republicans pedophiles. That was his response.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:14:29.540 --> 0:14:32.620
<v Speaker 3>Instead of throwing trans people under the bus... And Sherrod

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.420
<v Speaker 3>Brown won. He beat incumbent Republican Senator John Husted, who

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.900
<v Speaker 3>was occupying Vance's seat in Ohio. Sherrod Brown's a former senator,

0:14:42.060 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>a progressive populist. Brown won by about five points, over

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 3>200,000 votes. In 2022, Vance won by six points. Trump

0:14:50.900 --> 0:14:54.420
<v Speaker 3>won Ohio by 11. Sherrod Brown, I think, handled this

0:14:55.110 --> 0:14:57.850
<v Speaker 3>as well as any, better than any other kind of

0:14:57.910 --> 0:15:01.590
<v Speaker 3>swing state Democrat. Much better than Josh Turek, who handled

0:15:01.610 --> 0:15:04.630
<v Speaker 3>this the worst, the most kind of anti-trans one of

0:15:04.670 --> 0:15:09.310
<v Speaker 3>these swing state Democrats. In Iowa, Josh Turek beat Ashley

0:15:09.330 --> 0:15:13.930
<v Speaker 3>Hinson in an open seat held by Republicans. Turek won

0:15:13.950 --> 0:15:18.250
<v Speaker 3>by five points. Trump won the state by three points. Remember,

0:15:18.290 --> 0:15:23.270
<v Speaker 3>there was that late polling with the infamous Seltzer poll

0:15:23.310 --> 0:15:28.890
<v Speaker 3>that put Kamala ahead in the 2024 election. Seltzer wasn't wrong.

0:15:28.930 --> 0:15:31.989
<v Speaker 3>She was early. She was two years early. That's the

0:15:32.030 --> 0:15:36.550
<v Speaker 3>election Twitter joke. Because Iowa, not as much as North Carolina,

0:15:36.670 --> 0:15:39.910
<v Speaker 3>but did shift blue and shifted blue in house races

0:15:39.970 --> 0:15:43.250
<v Speaker 3>and special elections these past two years. But Josh Turek,

0:15:43.550 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the new senator, is definitely more of a moderate. He's

0:15:47.620 --> 0:15:50.020
<v Speaker 3>a self-proclaimed, quote, prairie populist.

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:51.380
<v Speaker 2>Whatever, man.

0:15:51.900 --> 0:15:54.130
<v Speaker 3>While campaigning, he moved the farthest to the right on

0:15:54.210 --> 0:15:57.230
<v Speaker 3>trans issues. He definitely bought the hardest into this kind

0:15:57.270 --> 0:15:58.710
<v Speaker 3>of gender war stuff.

0:15:59.950 --> 0:16:02.130
<v Speaker 2>Prairie populist? What the hell?

0:16:03.190 --> 0:16:10.270
<v Speaker 3>Populism for agricultural workers, small businesses, small farms. I hate

0:16:10.450 --> 0:16:14.470
<v Speaker 3>prairie populist because he is a moderate. A lot of

0:16:14.490 --> 0:16:18.980
<v Speaker 3>these guys are running on affordability populist-esque kind of messaging

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>because that's really what has shown to be successful.

0:16:21.780 --> 0:16:26.060
<v Speaker 2>Mary Peltola had a pretty anti-trans ad towards the end

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>of her campaign.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.780
<v Speaker 3>She is also one of the more moderate ones.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 3>This is in Alaska.

0:16:31.820 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Alaska.

0:16:32.660 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.810
<v Speaker 3>Who definitely ran as a kind of, I would say

0:16:35.850 --> 0:16:39.990
<v Speaker 3>probably the most conservative out of all of the swing

0:16:40.050 --> 0:16:44.150
<v Speaker 3>state Democratic senators in Alaska. Just like in general, like

0:16:44.190 --> 0:16:46.550
<v Speaker 3>in general, the most conservative out of all of these

0:16:46.590 --> 0:16:47.430
<v Speaker 3>Democratic candidates.

0:16:47.790 --> 0:16:50.270
<v Speaker 2>Like Alaska will always be different, right? Like she's one

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.490
<v Speaker 2>of the... Yeah, a few indigenous women who was like

0:16:53.570 --> 0:16:55.970
<v Speaker 2>running for Senate and she ran some stuff on like

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.100
<v Speaker 2>fishing and stuff like that, which would be more radical.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Fish, family and faith, I think, were like her main

0:17:03.740 --> 0:17:05.540
<v Speaker 3>campaign slogan.

0:17:07.859 --> 0:17:12.949
<v Speaker 1>Man, drop the last two, and I agree. I'm on board. Fish.

0:17:12.970 --> 0:17:13.450
<v Speaker 3>Just fish.

0:17:13.550 --> 0:17:14.790
<v Speaker 1>Just fish, yeah.

0:17:14.990 --> 0:17:17.150
<v Speaker 2>We've spoken about this on this podcast before, but we,

0:17:17.470 --> 0:17:19.810
<v Speaker 2>as always on Behind the Bastard, someone holding a fish,

0:17:20.670 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you got to support them. But yeah, it'll be a

0:17:23.910 --> 0:17:25.700
<v Speaker 2>long time. It takes a long time for us to

0:17:25.740 --> 0:17:27.700
<v Speaker 2>get the votes in Alaska, so it'll be a while

0:17:27.740 --> 0:17:28.699
<v Speaker 2>before we know about that one.

0:17:29.500 --> 0:17:33.379
<v Speaker 3>Correct. So we know South Carolina, Iowa, Ohio. These are

0:17:33.420 --> 0:17:37.290
<v Speaker 3>all flips. Yeah. Alaska- Could be a flip in the

0:17:37.350 --> 0:17:40.010
<v Speaker 3>next day, few days. Right.

0:17:40.510 --> 0:17:40.770
<v Speaker 1>Uh-huh.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 3>Peltola's right now about like 60 votes ahead with 77%

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:46.540
<v Speaker 3>of the vote in.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:47.100
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ.

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 3>She's expected to gain.

0:17:48.780 --> 0:17:49.619
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:17:49.859 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Gain in her lead, but she's sitting at 48.2. So

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.659
<v Speaker 3>depending on how that goes, this might result in a

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.609
<v Speaker 3>ranked choice instant runoff. Yeah, yeah. And I've not looked into...

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>This race specifically and the opinions that I've seen from

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.460
<v Speaker 3>my election people have kind of gone either way of

0:18:09.540 --> 0:18:14.020
<v Speaker 3>whether that runoff would benefit her or hurt her. This

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.180
<v Speaker 3>is the race with the two Dan Sullivans, the Republican

0:18:17.220 --> 0:18:24.929
<v Speaker 3>incumbent senator, Dan Sullivan, Daniel Sullivan Jr., the non-senator, who

0:18:24.970 --> 0:18:29.260
<v Speaker 3>did receive not... like totally insignificant part of the vote.

0:18:29.300 --> 0:18:31.020
<v Speaker 3>And based on how close this race is, like I said,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.100
<v Speaker 3>like 70 vote difference.

0:18:32.380 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I feel like if I had been in Alaska,

0:18:34.900 --> 0:18:37.430
<v Speaker 2>I might've just like, I've no idea about Dan Sullivan Jr.

0:18:37.430 --> 0:18:39.970
<v Speaker 2>'s policies to be clear. But like when you're presented

0:18:40.010 --> 0:18:43.050
<v Speaker 2>with someone like either the Republican candidate or the Democrat

0:18:43.090 --> 0:18:46.670
<v Speaker 2>candidate doing transphobic bullshit, like maybe you're just having a

0:18:46.690 --> 0:18:49.930
<v Speaker 2>laugh of voting for Dan Sullivan Jr., Like an active abstention.

0:18:50.030 --> 0:18:53.410
<v Speaker 3>I think that's more likely than people who mistook him

0:18:53.930 --> 0:18:56.609
<v Speaker 3>for being the Republican. The idea of people voting for

0:18:56.630 --> 0:18:59.090
<v Speaker 3>him as a sort of joke or protest candidate is

0:18:59.130 --> 0:19:01.710
<v Speaker 3>certainly possible. So that's part of sort of these ranked

0:19:01.730 --> 0:19:05.310
<v Speaker 3>choice calculations. If Paltola is ranked second on some of

0:19:05.350 --> 0:19:09.570
<v Speaker 3>those Sullivan Jr. ballots, that'll change the game as opposed

0:19:09.590 --> 0:19:13.260
<v Speaker 3>to assuming... that all the Sullivan Jr. votes in ranked

0:19:13.300 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 3>choice will go towards Senator Sullivan.

0:19:15.859 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:19:16.700 --> 0:19:18.350
<v Speaker 3>And that's why it's hard to predict exactly what will

0:19:18.369 --> 0:19:19.590
<v Speaker 3>happen with this race.

0:19:20.170 --> 0:19:23.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ranked choices is, well, it offers some benefits, but

0:19:23.310 --> 0:19:25.169
<v Speaker 2>just like it can sometimes take a little bit longer.

0:19:25.190 --> 0:19:29.929
<v Speaker 2>I will say, I think it's extraordinarily condescending to suggest

0:19:29.990 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that people in Alaska don't understand what incumbent means.

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:33.580
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:19:33.619 --> 0:19:37.420
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's just a fucking nothing burger. Like, it just,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.260
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I find it incredibly, like, snooty and

0:19:41.300 --> 0:19:43.340
<v Speaker 2>condescending to suggest that people are that fucking dumb.

0:19:44.300 --> 0:19:46.830
<v Speaker 3>The one other race that we don't quite know the

0:19:46.850 --> 0:19:50.139
<v Speaker 3>result yet and is possibly the most shocking result of

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the entire night is in Mississippi, which might somehow become

0:19:53.100 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Mississippi with Scott Column against Sidney Hyde-Smith, the Republican incumbent.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.460
<v Speaker 3>Right now, this race is tied at 48.9 with Democratic

0:20:04.500 --> 0:20:08.860
<v Speaker 3>candidate Scott Column up less than 100 votes. with about

0:20:08.859 --> 0:20:14.660
<v Speaker 3>44,000 votes to be expected still to come in. And

0:20:14.790 --> 0:20:16.810
<v Speaker 3>these are going to be mostly coming in from areas

0:20:16.930 --> 0:20:21.369
<v Speaker 3>where the Democrat column has performed well. But a lot

0:20:21.390 --> 0:20:23.210
<v Speaker 3>of these are going to be mail-in and provisional ballots,

0:20:23.450 --> 0:20:25.790
<v Speaker 3>which can be counted up to five days after the election.

0:20:25.850 --> 0:20:27.610
<v Speaker 3>So we probably won't know the results of this till

0:20:27.630 --> 0:20:31.409
<v Speaker 3>like Saturday. This is super shocking. This deserves its own

0:20:31.450 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of deep dive. I did see one of Colum's

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.820
<v Speaker 3>ads circulating, which targets cost of living and affordability. The

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.669
<v Speaker 3>ad is this clip of Sidney Hyde-Smith being asked on

0:20:43.710 --> 0:20:47.330
<v Speaker 3>a news show what people should do about the price

0:20:47.530 --> 0:20:51.140
<v Speaker 3>of beef getting so expensive. And she said that people should, quote,

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:57.790
<v Speaker 3>pick another protein. And this ad just totally skewered, skewered

0:20:57.810 --> 0:21:02.350
<v Speaker 3>her over this insane, like, elitist, like, response.

0:21:02.670 --> 0:21:06.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a let them eat cake for half of America.

0:21:06.650 --> 0:21:09.170
<v Speaker 3>And the crux of the ad was all these, like,

0:21:09.190 --> 0:21:13.580
<v Speaker 3>you know, actors playing constituents saying, pick another protein. No,

0:21:13.980 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather pick another senator. And that's the, that's the ad.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:18.420
<v Speaker 2>Amazing.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:23.030
<v Speaker 3>So that's Mississippi. We will learn if both Alaska and

0:21:23.050 --> 0:21:27.270
<v Speaker 3>Mississippi flip in these next few days. One state that

0:21:27.290 --> 0:21:29.530
<v Speaker 3>did not flip that I will mention is Florida with

0:21:29.590 --> 0:21:32.370
<v Speaker 3>Angie Nixon going up against Ashley Moody, the Republican incumbent

0:21:32.550 --> 0:21:37.180
<v Speaker 3>in Rubio's former seat. This race was way closer than

0:21:37.220 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Democrats expected. This is like a two to three point margin,

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.340
<v Speaker 3>just like over 200,000 votes. if Dems did more spending

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in this race, it could have been even more competitive.

0:21:48.220 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Like the fact that Nixon did so good in Florida

0:21:51.260 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is a testament to her as a candidate and her

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:54.700
<v Speaker 3>like direct ground game.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:55.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:55.970 --> 0:21:59.530
<v Speaker 3>But she got just completely outspent, like just, just, just

0:21:59.590 --> 0:22:02.629
<v Speaker 3>demolished in, in terms, in terms of ad spending. But

0:22:02.730 --> 0:22:05.409
<v Speaker 3>a really, I think a good show for her. I'm

0:22:05.450 --> 0:22:08.190
<v Speaker 3>excited to see what she does in the future. She's

0:22:08.430 --> 0:22:12.429
<v Speaker 3>a strong, a strong labor candidate. Unfortunately, a few days

0:22:12.470 --> 0:22:15.820
<v Speaker 3>before the election, the head of the Teamster, Sean O'Brien,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:21.260
<v Speaker 3>endorsed Ashley Moody, the anti-labor candidate. Get O'Brien out of there!

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.270
<v Speaker 3>He sucks!

0:22:23.660 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Get him out!

0:22:24.790 --> 0:22:30.109
<v Speaker 3>Sean O'Brien, fuck off. Anyway, there's two other flips that

0:22:30.150 --> 0:22:33.369
<v Speaker 3>we should talk about. And it's time to put on

0:22:33.410 --> 0:22:36.790
<v Speaker 3>my little cross necklace, time to revert back to my

0:22:36.850 --> 0:22:43.700
<v Speaker 3>childhood Protestantism, because Methodist minister Adam Hamilton flipped the Kansas

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>beating Republican incumbent Senator Roger Marshall by five points. Just

0:22:49.619 --> 0:22:53.620
<v Speaker 3>two years ago, Trump won Kansas by 16. Marshall won

0:22:53.660 --> 0:22:56.850
<v Speaker 3>the Senate race by almost 12 points in 2020. Adam

0:22:56.910 --> 0:23:00.750
<v Speaker 3>Hamilton ran on cost of living, strengthening the right to organize,

0:23:00.810 --> 0:23:05.650
<v Speaker 3>regulating data centers, abortion rights, spanning algorithmic price fixing, combating

0:23:05.750 --> 0:23:09.620
<v Speaker 3>fraud and scams, targeting seniors, protecting their health care, term

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>limits for Congress and the Supreme Court, and banning congressional

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 3>stock trading, and also banning politicians from using prediction markets,

0:23:18.820 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>which is a new kind of addendum to all these

0:23:21.020 --> 0:23:23.140
<v Speaker 3>congressional stock trading measures.

0:23:23.619 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.570
<v Speaker 3>The Kansas flip is, I know, something that the Republicans

0:23:27.609 --> 0:23:31.310
<v Speaker 3>were increasingly worried about these past few months, moving ad

0:23:31.330 --> 0:23:33.830
<v Speaker 3>spending over from North Carolina, which they kind of gave

0:23:33.890 --> 0:23:39.130
<v Speaker 3>up on, into Kansas. But it wasn't enough. Now, there

0:23:39.170 --> 0:23:45.219
<v Speaker 3>is one other big win for Christian Democrats. And we

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.970
<v Speaker 3>will talk about that after this ad break.

0:23:59.930 --> 0:24:00.930
<v Speaker 2>And we're back.

0:24:01.380 --> 0:24:06.220
<v Speaker 4>And the stars at night are big and bright, deep

0:24:06.300 --> 0:24:08.500
<v Speaker 4>in the heart of Texas. I was waiting to see

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 4>if you were going to do the clap, Stephen, and

0:24:10.100 --> 0:24:10.500
<v Speaker 4>you didn't.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>You let me down. You let me down.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:12.940
<v Speaker 5>Oh, sorry.

0:24:13.180 --> 0:24:13.540
<v Speaker 2>No, no.

0:24:14.500 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry. I just, you know, it's with the Zoom,

0:24:18.180 --> 0:24:20.250
<v Speaker 5>the timing, it's always off with the claps.

0:24:20.430 --> 0:24:24.210
<v Speaker 4>This is the first time I have been really shocked

0:24:24.650 --> 0:24:27.609
<v Speaker 4>by an election in Texas. I had come around to

0:24:27.650 --> 0:24:30.149
<v Speaker 4>the fact that Tallarico had a really good chance of winning.

0:24:30.210 --> 0:24:31.790
<v Speaker 4>In fact, was probably going to win.

0:24:31.890 --> 0:24:35.470
<v Speaker 1>And he did. Everything else that happened surprised the shit

0:24:35.570 --> 0:24:38.460
<v Speaker 1>out of me. Yeah, we should probably start by talking

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:39.220
<v Speaker 1>about Tallarico.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what an absolute bloodbath of an election this was.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:45.460
<v Speaker 1>Just a disaster.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, so Tallarico uniquely performed among Texan candidates, I think,

0:24:50.790 --> 0:24:52.010
<v Speaker 5>in competitive races.

0:24:52.030 --> 0:24:52.109
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:53.090 --> 0:24:56.810
<v Speaker 5>Crushed Ken Paxton by 12 points. And, you know, that

0:24:56.830 --> 0:25:01.350
<v Speaker 5>could be attributed to Tallarico being a good candidate. It

0:25:01.369 --> 0:25:05.300
<v Speaker 5>could also be attributed to Ken Paxton being widely regarded

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.500
<v Speaker 5>as the most corrupt guy in politics in recent history. Oh, yeah.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 3>The devil incarnate.

0:25:12.650 --> 0:25:15.970
<v Speaker 4>Aidan McLaughlin with Vanity Fair went to a Republican Party

0:25:16.170 --> 0:25:19.670
<v Speaker 4>event at like a fancy steakhouse Butterworth's in D.C. It

0:25:20.010 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 4>was like an election night party. And obviously the Republicans

0:25:22.900 --> 0:25:26.220
<v Speaker 4>were expecting it to go bad, but it went so

0:25:26.300 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 4>much worse than they thought. And like the schadenfreude in

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.310
<v Speaker 4>this article is outrageous, but especially like the point in

0:25:33.330 --> 0:25:36.109
<v Speaker 4>the article when it becomes clear that Tallarico is going

0:25:36.150 --> 0:25:38.650
<v Speaker 4>to beat Paxton by like a sizable amount.

0:25:38.690 --> 0:25:40.129
<v Speaker 1>And here's a paragraph from that article.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 4>As Ella Langley's Choose in Texas blared through the speakers,

0:25:43.820 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 4>two men at the bar lamented the cruel irony of

0:25:45.780 --> 0:25:48.980
<v Speaker 4>the song playing as Tallarico's comfortable lead expanded over Ken Paxton,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.020
<v Speaker 4>his Republican challenger. I'm not trying to crash out, said

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 4>one of the men, a Republican organizer of the party.

0:25:54.300 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 4>But we nominated Hitler with Down syndrome.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And guess what? He lost. He lost.

0:25:58.570 --> 0:26:00.510
<v Speaker 4>And now we lose a Supreme Court justice. It's a

0:26:00.570 --> 0:26:05.129
<v Speaker 4>fucking disaster. This is at an official Republican Party event.

0:26:05.550 --> 0:26:10.389
<v Speaker 4>This Republican just called Ken Paxton. Hitler was– which like–

0:26:10.820 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of things wrong with that. But wow.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:13.740
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:19.659
<v Speaker 2>Like the candidness. Yeah.

0:26:19.830 --> 0:26:22.149
<v Speaker 5>I mean it was an issue early on. People were

0:26:22.950 --> 0:26:26.490
<v Speaker 5>worried that Paxton was a uniquely deficient candidate.

0:26:26.510 --> 0:26:26.890
<v Speaker 3>And he was.

0:26:27.070 --> 0:26:30.540
<v Speaker 5>Relative– to his alternative, John Cornyn, who he beat in

0:26:30.580 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 5>the primary. But the margins in this race- Cornyn would

0:26:33.619 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 5>have lost. It's just so large, even Cornyn would have lost.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 5>It would not have mattered if it had been Cornyn

0:26:41.109 --> 0:26:44.709
<v Speaker 5>or Paxton. But for it to have been Paxton, it

0:26:44.770 --> 0:26:48.550
<v Speaker 5>really added a lot of sugar to that Schengen-Freud sauce

0:26:48.590 --> 0:26:50.510
<v Speaker 5>that you were tasting in that article.

0:26:50.750 --> 0:26:52.870
<v Speaker 2>And the way that they.

0:26:52.830 --> 0:26:56.270
<v Speaker 5>Campaigned towards the end was pretty despicable. I mean, they

0:26:56.630 --> 0:26:59.939
<v Speaker 5>unleashed a whole set of Dirty tricks. You mentioned the

0:26:59.980 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 5>trans issue earlier, Garrison. That was the last streak of

0:27:03.300 --> 0:27:07.220
<v Speaker 5>the campaign all throughout October. It was either bogus allegations

0:27:07.270 --> 0:27:11.210
<v Speaker 5>that Tallarico is in a mental hospital in Ohio, which

0:27:11.270 --> 0:27:14.990
<v Speaker 5>had been ginned up by an account that is run

0:27:15.010 --> 0:27:19.980
<v Speaker 5>by a criminal old woman, but it's using an AI-generated

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:25.350
<v Speaker 5>young woman's face. Classic stuff. And that got amplified by

0:27:25.670 --> 0:27:32.100
<v Speaker 5>official campaign operatives incredibly. And when that was quickly batted down,

0:27:32.180 --> 0:27:35.580
<v Speaker 5>it just became all about trans issues. And Paxson had

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.900
<v Speaker 5>interviewed on TV saying that's what they think their best

0:27:38.940 --> 0:27:43.770
<v Speaker 5>line of attack is against Tallarico. And consequently, they leaned

0:27:43.830 --> 0:27:47.830
<v Speaker 5>into that. And now we're trying to figure out still

0:27:47.869 --> 0:27:51.949
<v Speaker 5>who sent three million fraudulent mailers to Texans purporting to

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.780
<v Speaker 5>provide support to trans kids, but it was really actually

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 5>just Republican operatives. So it was like a desperate election

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 5>for these folks. And the issue is no longer resonating

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:07.670
<v Speaker 5>with Americans, at least in Texas, in the way that

0:28:07.690 --> 0:28:11.410
<v Speaker 5>it maybe was four years ago. And I mean, Alarica

0:28:11.450 --> 0:28:14.389
<v Speaker 5>was expected to be the one out of the pack

0:28:14.430 --> 0:28:17.189
<v Speaker 5>probably to win, but I don't think anyone called it

0:28:17.330 --> 0:28:22.350
<v Speaker 5>with this level of just obliteration on the Republican side.

0:28:22.930 --> 0:28:23.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:24.230 --> 0:28:24.450
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:28:24.650 --> 0:28:25.990
<v Speaker 1>And it's important.

0:28:26.020 --> 0:28:28.740
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, gas prices are a big part of this, especially

0:28:28.780 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 4>for Texans. Like when you tell them you can no

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.580
<v Speaker 4>longer afford to drive for gigantic diesel trucks, that pisses

0:28:33.619 --> 0:28:37.449
<v Speaker 4>them off. It's bad for agriculture. It's bad for I mean,

0:28:37.470 --> 0:28:39.510
<v Speaker 4>like cost of living is a part of this. Another

0:28:39.570 --> 0:28:41.510
<v Speaker 4>part of this that I think has not gotten enough

0:28:41.550 --> 0:28:45.180
<v Speaker 4>attention nationally is. is what Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.780
<v Speaker 4>the governor and lieutenant governor, did to the school voucher

0:28:47.820 --> 0:28:49.780
<v Speaker 4>program in 2025.

0:28:49.780 --> 0:28:50.620
<v Speaker 1>Like they worked.

0:28:50.500 --> 0:28:55.020
<v Speaker 4>Very hard to ram through a school voucher program that

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.900
<v Speaker 4>was not super popular in a lot of like rural

0:28:57.980 --> 0:29:01.290
<v Speaker 4>school districts, like because I think people just saw the

0:29:01.330 --> 0:29:03.250
<v Speaker 4>danger it was going to do to their local schools.

0:29:03.270 --> 0:29:06.210
<v Speaker 4>And he had to like really, Patrick especially had to

0:29:06.230 --> 0:29:09.530
<v Speaker 4>like basically threaten a lot of like local legislators in

0:29:09.630 --> 0:29:11.810
<v Speaker 4>order to like make this happen the way they wanted to.

0:29:12.540 --> 0:29:14.660
<v Speaker 4>And I think that cost them a lot of like

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 4>political capital to going into this. And it really was

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:23.810
<v Speaker 4>like this churn of both Patrick and Abbott's decisions over

0:29:23.830 --> 0:29:26.430
<v Speaker 4>the last like they've been in power for so long

0:29:26.970 --> 0:29:29.670
<v Speaker 4>and so much has gotten worse. So you can't campaign

0:29:29.710 --> 0:29:31.410
<v Speaker 4>and I'm going to fix everything when I've been in

0:29:31.470 --> 0:29:34.730
<v Speaker 4>power for a decade. And then Trump making the situation

0:29:34.770 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>just all that more calamitous. And I do agree, Stephen,

0:29:38.300 --> 0:29:41.020
<v Speaker 4>that like, I think that Cornyn would have lost too.

0:29:41.060 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 4>But part of me wonders, did Paxton being such an

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 4>obvious criminal, so obviously corrupt, and that being front and

0:29:50.020 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 4>center in like the part, you know, the most funded

0:29:53.580 --> 0:29:55.980
<v Speaker 4>election in the state, which was the election between Tallarico

0:29:56.030 --> 0:29:58.350
<v Speaker 4>and Paxton, like, by far the most money was spent

0:29:58.410 --> 0:30:01.050
<v Speaker 4>on that. And it got the most attention. Did the

0:30:01.090 --> 0:30:03.190
<v Speaker 4>fact that Paxton was in the limelight as such a

0:30:03.290 --> 0:30:08.410
<v Speaker 4>scumbag also maybe drag down enthusiasm for the Republican Party

0:30:08.470 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 4>in a broader way of like, I'm wondering, were there people,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.700
<v Speaker 4>you know, just kind of habitual Republican voters like a

0:30:15.740 --> 0:30:19.090
<v Speaker 4>lot of my family? who were just looking at Paxton

0:30:19.210 --> 0:30:21.490
<v Speaker 4>and the way he was– his past and the way

0:30:21.530 --> 0:30:23.060
<v Speaker 4>he was performing the selection and going like, I don't

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.780
<v Speaker 4>want to do this anymore. That compounding with the cost

0:30:26.820 --> 0:30:30.950
<v Speaker 4>of living, compounding with the war, like I really do think–

0:30:31.610 --> 0:30:34.770
<v Speaker 4>there was a stew of sickness that got boiled up

0:30:34.810 --> 0:30:38.820
<v Speaker 4>by the Republican Party both in Texas and nationwide. And

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.719
<v Speaker 4>I think Texas got the biggest dose of it in

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.580
<v Speaker 4>some ways, right? Because there's so much Republican control, because

0:30:45.620 --> 0:30:48.260
<v Speaker 4>there has been the Democratic Party has been useless for

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:49.300
<v Speaker 4>so long in Texas.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.580
<v Speaker 5>Zooming out. I mean, it's not just been a decade.

0:30:51.620 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 5>It's been over three decades.

0:30:53.700 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Since.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.700
<v Speaker 5>Democrats have won a statewide seat. So Republicans have had

0:30:58.850 --> 0:31:01.970
<v Speaker 5>dominance for, you know, as long as I've been able

0:31:02.010 --> 0:31:05.750
<v Speaker 5>to speak in this state. And so the idea that

0:31:05.870 --> 0:31:10.510
<v Speaker 5>they aren't responsible for where we are now is incredibly ridiculous.

0:31:10.530 --> 0:31:12.580
<v Speaker 2>It's been a long ass time since Ann Richards.

0:31:12.890 --> 0:31:15.380
<v Speaker 5>And to your point, Paxton was uniquely bad, but it

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 5>wasn't just Paxton. I mean, low energy Paxton, criminal Paxton.

0:31:20.460 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 5>We had this guy, Beau French, who.

0:31:23.740 --> 0:31:24.860
<v Speaker 2>Beau French.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 5>He's running for basically a seat that regulates oil and

0:31:28.310 --> 0:31:30.050
<v Speaker 5>gas on a three-seat commission.

0:31:30.140 --> 0:31:31.970
<v Speaker 1>It's the Texas Railroad Commission.

0:31:31.990 --> 0:31:32.910
<v Speaker 5>Stupid name.

0:31:32.970 --> 0:31:36.050
<v Speaker 2>It does not sound important, but is.

0:31:36.450 --> 0:31:36.610
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:36.910 --> 0:31:37.150
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:31:37.790 --> 0:31:43.070
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, he's running, and that was an unnecessary seat because

0:31:43.410 --> 0:31:45.590
<v Speaker 5>they didn't even need to win it to still have

0:31:45.610 --> 0:31:49.420
<v Speaker 5>a majority on the railroad commission. And yet, you know,

0:31:49.580 --> 0:31:52.300
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people went in basically making it seem

0:31:52.340 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 5>like he must win. And I'm going to be a

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.700
<v Speaker 5>little colorful in my language here, but he basically ran

0:31:58.740 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 5>on a platform of I am a Hitler youth troop leader.

0:32:03.060 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Like that's kind of how it came across. And so consequently,

0:32:07.420 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 5>he was dragging everybody else around with him down. We

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.550
<v Speaker 5>had another person running for Congress, Brandon Herrera, who's a

0:32:14.590 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 5>ridiculous gun tuber, did not. successfully moderate his online edginess,

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 5>said a bunch of ridiculous stuff, wouldn't even walk back

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 5>some of the stuff that he had said in the past.

0:32:26.340 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 5>And I mean, I think he suffered for it. And

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 5>also he was running to represent a district that had

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.610
<v Speaker 5>one of the most horrific mass shootings at a school

0:32:35.090 --> 0:32:40.190
<v Speaker 5>in recent history. And he was this guy who's out

0:32:40.250 --> 0:32:43.750
<v Speaker 5>there downplaying or making light of political violence when it

0:32:43.790 --> 0:32:45.870
<v Speaker 5>happens to people who he doesn't like.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.940
<v Speaker 2>And talking of like Hitler youth, he literally dressed up

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:50.980
<v Speaker 2>as a Nazi, right? Oh, yeah.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 5>I profiled him. I mean, yeah, his YouTube stuff was

0:32:53.500 --> 0:32:59.820
<v Speaker 5>incredibly over the top, really, really signaling language to extremists,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 5>whether it was nods to Rhodesia, to the Nazis, to

0:33:04.510 --> 0:33:08.450
<v Speaker 5>the Boogaloos, you know, you name it. He really was

0:33:08.770 --> 0:33:13.020
<v Speaker 5>in that online stew that was happening in the early 2020s.

0:33:14.420 --> 0:33:17.510
<v Speaker 5>And that's how he rose to fame for being this

0:33:17.710 --> 0:33:22.250
<v Speaker 5>edgy guy. And now that that has not landed. I mean,

0:33:22.310 --> 0:33:26.900
<v Speaker 5>I think both him and Beau French mistook Twitter for

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 5>the campaign.

0:33:28.580 --> 0:33:28.780
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:30.260
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people did.

0:33:30.940 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Yeah, I think that's what I wanted to get to.

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.340
<v Speaker 4>And I think we'll talk more about that, I mean,

0:33:36.540 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 4>today and tomorrow, I'm sure. Speaking more on Texas, one

0:33:39.300 --> 0:33:41.500
<v Speaker 4>thing I want to emphasize to people that surprised me,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 4>because again, I was open to the Tallarico winning, and

0:33:43.740 --> 0:33:46.740
<v Speaker 4>I thought Gina Hinojosa had a chance. She was polling

0:33:46.810 --> 0:33:48.290
<v Speaker 4>close enough that I was like, she might.

0:33:48.850 --> 0:33:51.729
<v Speaker 2>It's possible. But I kind of thought it was going

0:33:51.750 --> 0:33:52.030
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:33:52.030 --> 0:33:57.090
<v Speaker 4>Limited to those two big and highly publicized seats. I

0:33:57.130 --> 0:33:59.430
<v Speaker 4>assume maybe the Democrats will do better than usual at

0:33:59.450 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 4>the state level. this is not what we're seeing is

0:34:02.540 --> 0:34:06.340
<v Speaker 4>not like a few big seats flip in a year

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 4>in which like there's just a lot of things going

0:34:08.690 --> 0:34:13.030
<v Speaker 4>against the Republicans in terms of inertia wise. Texas flipped

0:34:13.410 --> 0:34:16.450
<v Speaker 4>like this was comprehensive across the board, rural districts, a

0:34:16.530 --> 0:34:19.290
<v Speaker 4>lot of rural districts elected Democrats in a variety of

0:34:19.330 --> 0:34:23.029
<v Speaker 4>state positions, too. Like I cannot overemphasize how comprehensive this

0:34:23.150 --> 0:34:26.100
<v Speaker 4>is like the fact that Greg Abbott is out and

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.100
<v Speaker 4>lost to Hinojosa is, is huge. But one thing that

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.339
<v Speaker 4>is not getting as much attention outside of Texas and should,

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.819
<v Speaker 4>is that Dan Patrick, the Lieutenant governor got his ass

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.900
<v Speaker 4>kicked too. And Dan Patrick is the fucking, like I've

0:34:37.940 --> 0:34:39.900
<v Speaker 4>talked about Paxton is like the most corrupt guy in

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.340
<v Speaker 4>Texas politics. Patrick might be the smartest in terms of

0:34:43.390 --> 0:34:46.210
<v Speaker 4>like right-wing politics. Like he is, he's a bad person,

0:34:46.230 --> 0:34:49.190
<v Speaker 4>but he was a really good politician in terms of

0:34:49.230 --> 0:34:52.790
<v Speaker 4>his ability to marshal power and like votes and get

0:34:52.850 --> 0:34:53.469
<v Speaker 4>things done.

0:34:54.140 --> 0:34:54.739
<v Speaker 2>He got in.

0:34:54.780 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 4>He started in the Senate in 2006 and was reelected

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 4>in 2010. And immediately after winning reelection, he created the

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 4>Texas Tea Party caucus in the Texas state legislature. Like

0:35:05.340 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 4>that was kind of like one of his first big

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.710
<v Speaker 4>political moves. He got elected. He ran in 2014 against

0:35:10.730 --> 0:35:14.410
<v Speaker 4>David Dewhurst and became the lieutenant governor and immediately started

0:35:14.469 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 4>pushing like some of the most like regressive movements. Like,

0:35:17.980 --> 0:35:20.989
<v Speaker 4>especially on abortion bills, he was the guy who authored

0:35:21.030 --> 0:35:23.530
<v Speaker 4>Texas's mandatory, and this is when he was in the Senate,

0:35:23.570 --> 0:35:27.270
<v Speaker 4>mandatory ultrasound bill, which got signed into law in 2011

0:35:27.270 --> 0:35:30.130
<v Speaker 4>by Governor Perry, which forced women seeking an abortion to

0:35:30.170 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 4>have an sonogram of the fetus taken before the abortion

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 4>was performed.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:35.020
<v Speaker 2>Holy shit.

0:35:35.340 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Like, that's just one of the fucking hideous things he's

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 4>responsible to. He's a big charter school guy. And I

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.940
<v Speaker 4>talked about how he rammed that stuff through. And he's

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 4>also one of the things that's really important about him.

0:35:44.950 --> 0:35:48.469
<v Speaker 4>He's been really good up until now. A big thing

0:35:48.510 --> 0:35:50.109
<v Speaker 4>he would always do is he would endorse a bunch

0:35:50.150 --> 0:35:54.169
<v Speaker 4>of like local candidates for like state positions. And he

0:35:54.410 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 4>usually won like his picked candidates usually won. So Patrick

0:35:57.900 --> 0:36:01.740
<v Speaker 4>had like a massive influence on how the Republican Party's

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.589
<v Speaker 4>like like human infrastructure got constructed in the state government.

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that his ass is out, too, is

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.819
<v Speaker 4>a huge fucking deal. Like, I did not expect him

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 4>to misjudge the moment and lose this election so badly,

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:17.500
<v Speaker 4>but he fucking did.

0:36:17.860 --> 0:36:21.590
<v Speaker 5>They definitely walked right into some landmines. I mean, flock

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.029
<v Speaker 5>have been a huge issue.

0:36:23.050 --> 0:36:23.130
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:36:23.150 --> 0:36:27.549
<v Speaker 5>I mean, nationally, but also in Texas. Abbott was left

0:36:27.590 --> 0:36:32.110
<v Speaker 5>holding the bag there. Dan Patrick went after pot during

0:36:32.250 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 5>the most you know, liberalized form of pot laws in Texas,

0:36:36.500 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 5>where it was actually pretty easy to get it. And

0:36:38.980 --> 0:36:41.149
<v Speaker 5>you could get edibles, you could get whatever at these

0:36:41.390 --> 0:36:43.710
<v Speaker 5>stores locally. And it was kind of a gray market area,

0:36:43.750 --> 0:36:44.710
<v Speaker 5>thanks to the hemp bill.

0:36:45.150 --> 0:36:46.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, the hemp stuff, yeah.

0:36:47.130 --> 0:36:50.150
<v Speaker 5>He went hard against that. And he pissed off a

0:36:50.210 --> 0:36:51.710
<v Speaker 5>whole swath of people.

0:36:51.969 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like the vast majority of Texans, even rural Texans, love.

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:59.219
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that crosses political lines. And so this is

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of the chickens coming home to roost. I mean, this...

0:37:03.070 --> 0:37:06.710
<v Speaker 5>Part of the Republican Party that has taken power up

0:37:06.750 --> 0:37:10.870
<v Speaker 5>until now in Texas was the furthest right version of

0:37:10.910 --> 0:37:14.580
<v Speaker 5>the Republican Party. They've been having this civil war that's

0:37:14.620 --> 0:37:18.980
<v Speaker 5>been playing out. These huge donors have been backing these

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:24.060
<v Speaker 5>primary challengers and consolidating power within the Republican Party. And

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:28.090
<v Speaker 5>there's this one influencer who posted this insane video recently.

0:37:28.630 --> 0:37:32.010
<v Speaker 5>The caption was like total chud victory. And in fact,

0:37:32.170 --> 0:37:34.890
<v Speaker 5>that is what they have. They had a total chud

0:37:35.110 --> 0:37:37.860
<v Speaker 5>victory within the Republican Party of Texas.

0:37:37.989 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 5>And they confused that victory with the actual general victory

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.690
<v Speaker 5>because they assumed that they had this inertia effect. And

0:37:48.730 --> 0:37:51.569
<v Speaker 5>they could not be displaced in this way. Maybe they

0:37:51.590 --> 0:37:54.049
<v Speaker 5>could get a couple seats picked off. Maybe they would

0:37:54.090 --> 0:37:56.090
<v Speaker 5>have to try to get a Senate seat back.

0:37:56.130 --> 0:37:59.489
<v Speaker 1>But Texas will never flip. So I do want.

0:37:59.430 --> 0:38:01.450
<v Speaker 5>To caveat one thing, Robert. You're right to say that

0:38:01.500 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 5>this has been a total shift.

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:03.980
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.380
<v Speaker 5>Really major regime change. But the Senate in Texas, the

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.500
<v Speaker 5>state Senate is still Republican majority. Yes, they still have

0:38:11.660 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 5>one majority on the Supreme Court. So yes, you know,

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.779
<v Speaker 5>there's there's going to be some interesting stuff in the

0:38:15.820 --> 0:38:18.700
<v Speaker 5>next two years. It's impossible to even really say what

0:38:18.860 --> 0:38:21.459
<v Speaker 5>is possible at this point. Yes, yes.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.259
<v Speaker 4>And I don't mean to say flipped in the terms

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.460
<v Speaker 4>that and now Texas is blue forever. It could it

0:38:25.500 --> 0:38:27.910
<v Speaker 4>could there's a very good chance and probably likeliest that

0:38:27.950 --> 0:38:29.950
<v Speaker 4>it'll vote for Republican in 2028.

0:38:29.950 --> 0:38:31.290
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not saying that.

0:38:31.350 --> 0:38:35.029
<v Speaker 4>But like, This is more than just, oh, Trump's doing

0:38:35.050 --> 0:38:37.509
<v Speaker 4>bad this year, so a couple of Democrats slipped in, right?

0:38:37.550 --> 0:38:42.310
<v Speaker 4>This is evidence of a deep structural rot in the

0:38:42.370 --> 0:38:44.830
<v Speaker 4>Texas Republican Party, right? And I think it is what

0:38:44.850 --> 0:38:48.380
<v Speaker 4>you were saying, Stephen. These guys convinced themselves– because the

0:38:48.460 --> 0:38:51.100
<v Speaker 4>chuds were able to take over and dominate the state

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:55.489
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party– And because Texas just kind of habitually elected Republicans,

0:38:55.550 --> 0:38:58.270
<v Speaker 4>they convinced themselves, well, what we're doing is popular and

0:38:58.310 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 4>we can never lose, right? And it's not popular. Just

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 4>as one last bit before we move on of Texas

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.660
<v Speaker 4>of schadenfreude, you can really be satisfied with the fact

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 4>that Dan Patrick is out of his job, among many

0:39:10.460 --> 0:39:14.290
<v Speaker 4>other shitty things. In 2016, Dan Patrick, after the Pulse

0:39:14.330 --> 0:39:16.990
<v Speaker 4>nightclub shooting in Orlando, is the guy who tweeted, Do

0:39:17.050 --> 0:39:20.089
<v Speaker 4>not be deceived. God cannot be mocked. A man reaps

0:39:20.130 --> 0:39:23.810
<v Speaker 4>what he sows. Galatians 6, 7. That's fucking Dan Patrick,

0:39:23.850 --> 0:39:24.830
<v Speaker 4>and he's out on his ass.

0:39:25.230 --> 0:39:25.629
<v Speaker 1>Fuck him.

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:28.580
<v Speaker 3>Any other things you wanted to add in, Stephen, from

0:39:28.620 --> 0:39:29.500
<v Speaker 3>your write-up?

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean, I just encourage people to maybe temper

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:36.820
<v Speaker 5>their expectations, right? Because just because it's a result, it

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:41.109
<v Speaker 5>doesn't mean that anything of major significance will even happen

0:39:41.260 --> 0:39:43.150
<v Speaker 5>in the next two years. They have a bunch of

0:39:43.190 --> 0:39:47.950
<v Speaker 5>roadblocks that will prevent some major changes, but I think

0:39:47.989 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 5>we could see reasonably that some moderate Republicans crossing the

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.219
<v Speaker 5>aisle on some specific issues, maybe pot, for example, because

0:39:56.260 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 5>those are easy and popular. You know, it's going to

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 5>take at least another election or two in this same

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:08.450
<v Speaker 5>trajectory for Texas to really have like a reconstruction type

0:40:08.730 --> 0:40:12.970
<v Speaker 5>situation at hand. But I do think, you know, these

0:40:13.030 --> 0:40:16.810
<v Speaker 5>results make me believe that the election two years from now,

0:40:17.270 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 5>it'll be competitive. Yeah, it depends on who's running. But Texas,

0:40:21.380 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 5>it's incredible. But Texas is very likely to be a

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 5>battleground state.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.140
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I feel the same way right now about Texas, honestly,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 4>that I do about Brazil in the wake of Lula's

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 4>victory and that like there's a lot of problems. This

0:40:31.260 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 4>does not mean it's going to be an easy road.

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 4>Like there's you know, there's still a shitload of right

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 4>wing power in Texas, but it's a fight now. They're

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 4>not just going to be curb stomping the left Democrats,

0:40:42.940 --> 0:40:44.930
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want to call them for the next however

0:40:44.950 --> 0:40:48.190
<v Speaker 4>many years. There's actually going to be a struggle. Over

0:40:48.270 --> 0:40:50.489
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen in state politics. And that has

0:40:50.530 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 4>not been the case since I've been alive. Anyway, I'm

0:40:54.860 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 4>feeling good.

0:40:56.700 --> 0:40:58.459
<v Speaker 3>Let's go one more ad break and then we will

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 3>return to talk about, I don't know, voter trends, miscellaneous

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.860
<v Speaker 3>other election news. There's a lot of news. It's a

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:21.620
<v Speaker 3>big election. Welcome back. We just discussed Greg Abbott, who

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is now out of a job.

0:41:23.020 --> 0:41:24.060
<v Speaker 2>I'll grab it.

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:24.919
<v Speaker 7>Sure.

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.420
<v Speaker 3>You know what? Sure. I'll give it to you. This

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:28.710
<v Speaker 3>is your day, Robert. You get it.

0:41:28.980 --> 0:41:30.859
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Gare.

0:41:32.050 --> 0:41:34.990
<v Speaker 3>But there's actually four other Republican governors who are also

0:41:35.210 --> 0:41:38.350
<v Speaker 3>out of a job, or at least candidates who will

0:41:38.370 --> 0:41:42.629
<v Speaker 3>not be taking a job, like Vivek Ramaswamy, who will

0:41:42.730 --> 0:41:47.489
<v Speaker 3>not be the governor of Ohio. Amy Acton will be

0:41:47.570 --> 0:41:52.430
<v Speaker 3>governor of Ohio. Fuck Ramaswamy. Oh, my God.

0:41:52.450 --> 0:41:56.590
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what a disgusting campaign. Fuck me.

0:41:56.860 --> 0:41:58.380
<v Speaker 1>Vivek, it rhymes with loser.

0:42:02.180 --> 0:42:05.540
<v Speaker 4>It's it's amazing to see even a line for like

0:42:05.780 --> 0:42:09.859
<v Speaker 4>some people in the modern Republican Party, like clearly not

0:42:09.910 --> 0:42:12.310
<v Speaker 4>Trump because he endorsed that ad. But like the degree

0:42:12.330 --> 0:42:14.090
<v Speaker 4>to which people are like, what the fuck, man, on

0:42:14.150 --> 0:42:15.450
<v Speaker 4>his own side was nuts.

0:42:16.460 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Acton has a lot of problems, a lot of the

0:42:18.620 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 3>same kind of trans issues that a lot of these

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.250
<v Speaker 3>swing state candidates on the statewide races have. But what

0:42:25.489 --> 0:42:28.610
<v Speaker 3>the Ramaswamy campaign did these past few weeks is so,

0:42:29.010 --> 0:42:32.710
<v Speaker 3>so despicable that I want whatever is worse for him

0:42:33.170 --> 0:42:36.510
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of his life. It's so gross. He

0:42:36.570 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 3>ended up losing by eight points. I hope to never

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 3>see him again. I'm sure I will. I'm sure I'll

0:42:41.620 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 3>be sitting here two years from now talking about Ramaswamy.

0:42:45.020 --> 0:42:46.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's going to try something.

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 6>It's going to be hard to come back from rapping

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:54.060
<v Speaker 6>Lose Yourself at a rally event and knowing seemingly all

0:42:54.100 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 6>the lyrics.

0:42:54.820 --> 0:42:57.990
<v Speaker 2>He sure did lose himself, though. Yeah, and then losing

0:42:58.050 --> 0:43:01.630
<v Speaker 2>really bad. Yeah, and then losing. Unfortunately, he did not

0:43:01.670 --> 0:43:04.529
<v Speaker 2>have one shot. He's had two already. He's fucked them

0:43:04.550 --> 0:43:05.969
<v Speaker 2>both up, but he keeps coming back.

0:43:06.630 --> 0:43:07.770
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wish him only the worst.

0:43:08.420 --> 0:43:08.860
<v Speaker 1>Georgia.

0:43:09.739 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Georgia. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms won the race

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:20.090
<v Speaker 3>for Georgia governor, beating Rick Jackson, who was running for

0:43:20.270 --> 0:43:26.190
<v Speaker 3>a previously Republican-held position. Also won by around eight to

0:43:26.270 --> 0:43:31.170
<v Speaker 3>nine points. Rob Sand beat Zach Lind in Iowa to

0:43:31.190 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 3>also claim the governorship for the Democrats. The one that

0:43:34.580 --> 0:43:36.819
<v Speaker 3>I really did not see coming, or at least didn't

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:41.690
<v Speaker 3>have on my radar... is Nevada, where Democrat Aaron Ford

0:43:42.489 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 3>beat incumbent Republican Joe Lombardo by about seven points. These

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 3>flips kind of go alongside of various state legislatures also

0:43:54.340 --> 0:43:57.700
<v Speaker 3>flipping or at least moving towards the Democrats, which is

0:43:57.980 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 3>the big trend of the night, around 15 to 30

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:06.330
<v Speaker 3>point shifts towards the Democrats in both top ballot races

0:44:06.510 --> 0:44:10.790
<v Speaker 3>and down ballot races. Dems ended up gaining five new

0:44:10.950 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 3>state trifectas after flipping Nevada's governor, the Minnesota and Michigan

0:44:16.260 --> 0:44:21.140
<v Speaker 3>state houses, the Pennsylvania Senate, and flipping the Wisconsin Senate

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and House while holding onto control of the governor's office.

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 3>And on top of that, balance was shifted to Democrats

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.770
<v Speaker 3>by winning the Arizona State Senate, the Georgia House, the

0:44:33.810 --> 0:44:37.610
<v Speaker 3>New Hampshire House and Senate, North Carolina's House, and the

0:44:37.670 --> 0:44:41.549
<v Speaker 3>Texas House, though Democrats fell short of a trifecta in

0:44:41.690 --> 0:44:47.090
<v Speaker 3>those states. Kevin, do we want to discuss the West Coast?

0:44:47.489 --> 0:44:51.089
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I can start with the West Coast. So, you know,

0:44:51.210 --> 0:44:55.770
<v Speaker 6>in Oregon, things are generally a little bit boring. Not

0:44:55.790 --> 0:44:59.630
<v Speaker 6>a whole lot really happened. It's possible that the Democrats

0:44:59.730 --> 0:45:02.529
<v Speaker 6>might expand a little bit in the state legislature with

0:45:02.550 --> 0:45:06.819
<v Speaker 6>their supermajority, but that hasn't necessarily gotten us a whole

0:45:06.860 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 6>lot in the past few.

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:09.820
<v Speaker 2>Years, unfortunately.

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:12.740
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what you should expect from a slightly

0:45:12.780 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 4>bigger Democratic lead in Oregon that's different from what we've got,

0:45:16.860 --> 0:45:18.380
<v Speaker 4>which people are not happy with, by the way.

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 6>It's been a disappointing time, but I think one of

0:45:21.219 --> 0:45:26.270
<v Speaker 6>the interesting things is like, despite Our Oregon governor, Tina Kotek,

0:45:26.330 --> 0:45:28.489
<v Speaker 6>is like one of the least popular governors in the

0:45:28.530 --> 0:45:33.169
<v Speaker 6>entire country. And even still, she's very bad at it. Yeah,

0:45:33.190 --> 0:45:35.969
<v Speaker 6>she's really bad at it. And she gained it looks

0:45:36.070 --> 0:45:38.589
<v Speaker 6>at least preliminary results are showing that she actually has

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 6>an even wider margin on Christine Drazen. So it's it's

0:45:42.580 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 6>just like it just didn't matter. Everybody just hates it.

0:45:45.570 --> 0:45:50.750
<v Speaker 4>Mostly Republican poll– sponsored polls that showed Drazen ahead during

0:45:50.790 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 4>that period of time when she was polling ahead. And

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:54.220
<v Speaker 4>I kept– I always felt like.

0:45:54.100 --> 0:45:54.899
<v Speaker 1>That can't be right.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:57.740
<v Speaker 4>Like I know we all hate Tina Kotek, but that

0:45:57.860 --> 0:46:00.270
<v Speaker 4>can't be right. They don't– no one likes Drazen.

0:46:00.410 --> 0:46:00.589
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:46:00.870 --> 0:46:03.069
<v Speaker 6>She's I mean, it's like I've been to events where

0:46:03.090 --> 0:46:05.230
<v Speaker 6>they're talking. It's just like she's trying to sell like

0:46:05.450 --> 0:46:07.529
<v Speaker 6>I am not a crazy Trumper. And it's like, well,

0:46:07.550 --> 0:46:08.750
<v Speaker 6>we all know who you are.

0:46:08.930 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Like she was her big ad that people were really

0:46:11.900 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 4>worried about in the Democratic Party because they thought it

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.620
<v Speaker 4>was going to work. Some of them did was, hey,

0:46:16.660 --> 0:46:18.940
<v Speaker 4>don't worry, I won't ban abortion. Like she literally ran

0:46:18.980 --> 0:46:20.299
<v Speaker 4>an ad to be like, I'm not going to ban

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.100
<v Speaker 4>abortion if I if I'm the governor.

0:46:22.180 --> 0:46:22.620
<v Speaker 1>Trust me.

0:46:22.860 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:46:23.060 --> 0:46:27.410
<v Speaker 2>Like that's not a good sign. No, God, no. Yeah.

0:46:27.510 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 6>Other than that, like the. DSA candidates held on Portland

0:46:31.739 --> 0:46:34.660
<v Speaker 6>City Council, so that's a pretty big win for them.

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 6>And then I think there's one of the kind of

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 6>more concerning DSA statehouse races that I think went to

0:46:41.060 --> 0:46:43.980
<v Speaker 6>a ballot chase last time with Leslie Munoz. It looks

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:46.700
<v Speaker 6>like she is going to win, so they're going to

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:51.210
<v Speaker 6>expand a little bit in the state legislature. But that's

0:46:51.450 --> 0:46:54.330
<v Speaker 6>kind of all that really happened in Oregon as far

0:46:54.370 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 6>as I can tell right now. And then in Washington, well,

0:46:58.380 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 6>I think we'll probably talk a little bit about the

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:05.540
<v Speaker 6>unfortunate prop results in California around the billionaire's tax, but

0:47:05.580 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 6>we did get a win, it looks like, in Washington.

0:47:08.700 --> 0:47:13.430
<v Speaker 6>They voted not to repeal the millionaire's tax, so that's

0:47:13.489 --> 0:47:15.330
<v Speaker 6>a nice little bit of a counter there.

0:47:15.350 --> 0:47:15.430
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:47:16.950 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately, the other measure was the school sports by biological

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:27.430
<v Speaker 6>sex one, which is... really disappointing looking right now. It

0:47:27.690 --> 0:47:30.690
<v Speaker 6>seems very unlikely that it would flip back, but basically

0:47:31.410 --> 0:47:37.380
<v Speaker 6>anti-trans legislation, according to Como News, they said that it's

0:47:37.420 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 6>a measure that would require students to undergo a physical

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 6>exam documenting sex assigned at birth before participating in interscholastic sports, which,

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:53.450
<v Speaker 6>Jesus fucking Christ, I don't know how people... justify voting

0:47:53.510 --> 0:47:54.150
<v Speaker 6>on these things.

0:47:54.270 --> 0:47:54.850
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:47:55.030 --> 0:47:59.049
<v Speaker 4>This needs to get fucking sued. This needs to be

0:47:59.070 --> 0:48:00.550
<v Speaker 4>a state Supreme Court case.

0:48:00.830 --> 0:48:01.110
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:48:01.210 --> 0:48:02.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. This is massive.

0:48:03.010 --> 0:48:07.340
<v Speaker 6>Like another article from KNKX was saying the ACLU plans

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 6>to fight it with discrimination lawsuits. And there's also questions

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 6>remaining about implementation. But yeah, it's even stupider because there

0:48:17.020 --> 0:48:21.110
<v Speaker 6>was another thing where like the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association,

0:48:21.350 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 6>they don't even have account of how many like trans

0:48:24.940 --> 0:48:27.859
<v Speaker 6>students are there's no they don't track this there's like

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 6>this could be right like literally no it it's just

0:48:31.100 --> 0:48:34.410
<v Speaker 6>insane it's ridiculous i don't yeah really.

0:48:34.230 --> 0:48:38.150
<v Speaker 3>Disappointing not enough people pay attention to ballot measures and

0:48:38.210 --> 0:48:40.390
<v Speaker 3>yeah the fact that this thing won by a few

0:48:40.410 --> 0:48:43.130
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand votes i mean that is awful yeah yeah

0:48:43.810 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 3>then there needed to be more organized against this and

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:49.460
<v Speaker 3>people in general they need to get The whole ballot

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:54.410
<v Speaker 3>measure process needs to be reformed. It's so confusing and

0:48:55.230 --> 0:48:58.810
<v Speaker 3>it allows people to shoehorn all these things in that

0:48:58.830 --> 0:49:00.489
<v Speaker 3>don't get the same attention as some of the other

0:49:02.010 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 3>candidate races do.

0:49:03.739 --> 0:49:08.750
<v Speaker 4>No, and they're often mis- represented badly by the people

0:49:08.790 --> 0:49:11.060
<v Speaker 4>who are getting signatures to get them on the ballot.

0:49:11.180 --> 0:49:12.720
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of like how they're framed.

0:49:12.900 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:49:13.219 --> 0:49:14.100
<v Speaker 2>Even the phrasing.

0:49:14.260 --> 0:49:15.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:49:15.180 --> 0:49:16.770
<v Speaker 2>It's issues. We have a lot of issues with that

0:49:16.790 --> 0:49:18.770
<v Speaker 2>in the Northwest in particular. Yeah. It's been bad in

0:49:18.810 --> 0:49:19.569
<v Speaker 2>California too.

0:49:19.590 --> 0:49:19.910
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:49:20.020 --> 0:49:20.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, God.

0:49:21.340 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 3>And this Washington trans sports restriction is not the only

0:49:24.900 --> 0:49:28.460
<v Speaker 3>one of its kind that passed this election. No. One

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona, one in Colorado, and then another proposition in

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:37.089
<v Speaker 3>Colorado prohibiting, quote, surgeries to alter a minor's sex characteristics. Yeah.

0:49:37.410 --> 0:49:40.830
<v Speaker 3>Which similarly passed by just like less than 100,000 votes

0:49:41.010 --> 0:49:44.950
<v Speaker 3>as of time of recording. These are very small margins,

0:49:45.489 --> 0:49:47.450
<v Speaker 3>but they did pass. And that is bad.

0:49:47.650 --> 0:49:49.250
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what matters.

0:49:49.650 --> 0:49:51.930
<v Speaker 3>Which is very interesting is there was something similar in Missouri,

0:49:52.410 --> 0:49:55.230
<v Speaker 3>which did not pass. There was a constitutional amendment to

0:49:55.270 --> 0:49:58.310
<v Speaker 3>repeal the right to abortion and prohibit gender transition care

0:49:58.330 --> 0:50:02.170
<v Speaker 3>for minors, which did not pass. And this is a

0:50:02.210 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 3>really interesting example of something not passing in Missouri, but

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:08.300
<v Speaker 3>passing in Washington state.

0:50:08.860 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 4>You said it was an abortion, was it an abortion

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:13.219
<v Speaker 4>ban and an anti, were those two bills or one?

0:50:13.300 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 3>They crammed them together, yeah.

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.450
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, yeah, that helps probably explain it, yeah.

0:50:18.110 --> 0:50:20.529
<v Speaker 6>Another small thing in the Northwest, I did see that

0:50:20.790 --> 0:50:23.770
<v Speaker 6>Idaho did not- I was about to mention that, yeah.

0:50:23.790 --> 0:50:24.530
<v Speaker 2>I think they.

0:50:24.430 --> 0:50:28.230
<v Speaker 6>Also did not, or they blocked abortion access. I forget exactly, James,

0:50:28.250 --> 0:50:29.529
<v Speaker 6>you might know a little better than me, but.

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was Prop 1, which Idaho voters would amend

0:50:33.860 --> 0:50:37.270
<v Speaker 2>state law to establish like a right to abortion- up

0:50:37.330 --> 0:50:39.490
<v Speaker 2>to the point where the fetus is viable.

0:50:40.070 --> 0:50:40.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:50:40.690 --> 0:50:44.050
<v Speaker 2>Idaho, of course, also voted for its state gun yesterday.

0:50:44.150 --> 0:50:45.350
<v Speaker 2>Not sure how that went down for them.

0:50:45.430 --> 0:50:46.050
<v Speaker 3>Are you serious?

0:50:46.300 --> 0:50:50.180
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, absolutely. Yes, they did, but they were all bad.

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:51.580
<v Speaker 4>None of them are, for one thing, none of them

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:53.460
<v Speaker 4>are Idaho guns, although a couple of them were made

0:50:53.500 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 4>by a Mormon, and Idaho has a large Mormon population,

0:50:55.900 --> 0:50:58.860
<v Speaker 4>but Yep. None of them are appropriate because the state

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.089
<v Speaker 4>gun for Idaho should be the same state gun that

0:51:01.170 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 4>I approve of for Oregon, the life card, which is a,

0:51:04.170 --> 0:51:07.529
<v Speaker 4>it looks like a little, like a card you'd fit

0:51:07.570 --> 0:51:11.069
<v Speaker 4>in your wallet, but it unfolds into a.

0:51:11.010 --> 0:51:11.300
<v Speaker 1>380 or a.

0:51:11.230 --> 0:51:11.720
<v Speaker 2>22 or a.

0:51:11.670 --> 0:51:11.770
<v Speaker 3>32.

0:51:11.770 --> 0:51:12.529
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a.

0:51:12.510 --> 0:51:12.570
<v Speaker 4>22.

0:51:12.550 --> 0:51:13.790
<v Speaker 1>No, they have three calibers now, James.

0:51:13.810 --> 0:51:14.650
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they have the three calibers.

0:51:14.670 --> 0:51:17.450
<v Speaker 4>But there's no trigger guard, which means there's nothing between

0:51:17.489 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 4>your gun firing and the world but air. And I

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 4>think that perfectly embodies the frontier spirit of the Northwest,

0:51:24.460 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 4>you know?

0:51:26.270 --> 0:51:28.310
<v Speaker 2>People seem really shocked by the state gun thing. Tons

0:51:28.350 --> 0:51:31.870
<v Speaker 2>of states already have state guns. Tennessee's is a stupidest.

0:51:32.070 --> 0:51:34.700
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like the Barrett Light 50 Cal. That's

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:35.240
<v Speaker 2>just dumb.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just like Reddit shit.

0:51:37.900 --> 0:51:38.379
<v Speaker 2>Fuck off.

0:51:39.739 --> 0:51:41.860
<v Speaker 4>One last piece of Northwest election news I wanted to cover.

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:45.489
<v Speaker 4>So in the Portland City Council races, because we had

0:51:45.650 --> 0:51:48.390
<v Speaker 4>several people up for election there, Mitch Green is an

0:51:48.450 --> 0:51:53.300
<v Speaker 4>economist who represents District 4. And he got earlier this year,

0:51:53.860 --> 0:51:57.779
<v Speaker 4>a right wing reporter dug up some old tweets from

0:51:57.820 --> 0:51:59.589
<v Speaker 4>his Twitter in 2022.

0:51:59.590 --> 0:52:01.129
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't call him a reporter, but.

0:52:01.810 --> 0:52:05.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a reporter, quote unquote, right? A blogger, Max Steele.

0:52:05.750 --> 0:52:05.950
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:06.190 --> 0:52:08.810
<v Speaker 4>Found some posts that he, Mitch had deleted in 2022,

0:52:08.810 --> 0:52:10.950
<v Speaker 4>I guess, in preparation for his political career, but he

0:52:10.989 --> 0:52:14.690
<v Speaker 4>posted into 2020 and 2021 during the protests. And he

0:52:14.710 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 4>had expressed his pure hatred for the Portland police. And

0:52:17.980 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 4>so that got brought up and there was a, there

0:52:19.540 --> 0:52:22.430
<v Speaker 4>were like billboards outside of like my place and like

0:52:22.469 --> 0:52:25.170
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of places in Portland that have like Mitch's

0:52:25.230 --> 0:52:28.310
<v Speaker 4>hatred of police or also he was laid on taxes once.

0:52:28.730 --> 0:52:30.710
<v Speaker 4>He had a fire in his yard when he shouldn't

0:52:30.730 --> 0:52:32.930
<v Speaker 4>have had a fire in his yard. Like crazy shit.

0:52:32.950 --> 0:52:34.509
<v Speaker 3>Like a normal Portlander.

0:52:34.790 --> 0:52:35.009
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:52:35.370 --> 0:52:35.569
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:35.590 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 2>What a fucking nextdoor.com coded fucking campaign.

0:52:38.260 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 6>It's all massive like business lobby pack spending and stuff

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 6>that's all like sheltered and different.

0:52:43.580 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy.

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:45.940
<v Speaker 2>And it didn't work.

0:52:46.390 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Mitch won re-election along with the other people that he

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 4>was running alongside the other progressives.

0:52:51.580 --> 0:52:53.739
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was one of like the six Oregon statewide

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.460
<v Speaker 3>DSA candidates. Partly, I think generally it was a good

0:52:56.520 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 3>response when he was asked like, do you still stand

0:52:59.180 --> 0:53:01.830
<v Speaker 3>by your pure hatred for the Portland police? He said,

0:53:01.890 --> 0:53:03.870
<v Speaker 3>I would not characterize the police today that way. I

0:53:03.910 --> 0:53:06.010
<v Speaker 3>know some police officers now because I'm a city counselor.

0:53:06.070 --> 0:53:08.290
<v Speaker 3>I've met some police officers who I think genuinely care

0:53:08.310 --> 0:53:10.069
<v Speaker 3>about our city. I do want a world where we

0:53:10.110 --> 0:53:11.830
<v Speaker 3>abolish the police. That's what I'm trying to build.

0:53:13.050 --> 0:53:15.780
<v Speaker 4>So he kind of hemmed by saying there's some good ones,

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:19.140
<v Speaker 4>but also I want to abolish them. So I don't know.

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 4>More or less on balance, good. And I'm glad he

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 4>won real. I'm glad the fucking massive ad campaign against

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:26.820
<v Speaker 4>him didn't work because it was really gross.

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:28.219
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's all I got.

0:53:28.580 --> 0:53:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Funny note on that.

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 6>I actually wrote a story on my sub stack not

0:53:31.739 --> 0:53:35.140
<v Speaker 6>too long ago about how his donations massively went up

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:36.620
<v Speaker 6>after that story ran.

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:53:39.130 --> 0:53:40.830
<v Speaker 2>It made me want to. That's awesome.

0:53:41.070 --> 0:53:44.690
<v Speaker 6>Should I take us to something positive on data centers?

0:53:45.030 --> 0:53:48.989
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Let's talk about some good proposition or ballot measures.

0:53:49.130 --> 0:53:49.770
<v Speaker 2>Oh, are we building?

0:53:49.870 --> 0:53:51.589
<v Speaker 1>I love data centers. Are we building a new one?

0:53:51.910 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 6>The short of it is that data center just got

0:53:54.450 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 6>absolutely clobbered in this election. According to CNBC, there were

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 6>41 data center-related ballot measures on the docket across 10

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:07.089
<v Speaker 6>different states, 21 of which were in Ohio. And All

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.850
<v Speaker 6>but one of those failed, or at least in the direction.

0:54:10.890 --> 0:54:13.930
<v Speaker 6>So everybody voted against data centers. The one that did

0:54:14.010 --> 0:54:18.090
<v Speaker 6>pass was in Harwood, North Dakota, where voters went against

0:54:18.130 --> 0:54:22.310
<v Speaker 6>the charter amendment, which required additional review before city approval

0:54:22.330 --> 0:54:24.830
<v Speaker 6>of industrial projects, which includes data centers.

0:54:25.050 --> 0:54:26.430
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these are like.

0:54:26.390 --> 0:54:30.310
<v Speaker 6>Local jurisdictional things. But I think something that was interesting

0:54:30.350 --> 0:54:32.430
<v Speaker 6>is while a lot of the vote counts are quite small,

0:54:32.890 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 6>in nearly all of the cases, the margins were Very wide.

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 6>I think I was looking at Ballotpedia and only one

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 6>of them, I think, was within 10 points.

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 2>They were all like huge.

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense.

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:46.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:54:47.140 --> 0:54:49.250
<v Speaker 3>Among the people who care about this issue, they really

0:54:49.330 --> 0:54:50.330
<v Speaker 3>care about this issue.

0:54:50.350 --> 0:54:50.430
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:54:50.750 --> 0:54:50.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:54:52.730 --> 0:54:54.110
<v Speaker 1>I personally am shocked.

0:54:54.170 --> 0:54:57.170
<v Speaker 4>And I really, I feel like the only explanation for

0:54:57.190 --> 0:55:00.370
<v Speaker 4>this is that people haven't read quite enough articles by

0:55:00.390 --> 0:55:03.089
<v Speaker 4>AI company CEOs talking about how their product is going

0:55:03.110 --> 0:55:05.210
<v Speaker 4>to kill everybody. You know, one more of those will

0:55:05.230 --> 0:55:07.910
<v Speaker 4>convince people that data centers, more data centers are good.

0:55:08.150 --> 0:55:08.370
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:55:10.030 --> 0:55:13.110
<v Speaker 6>It went so poorly for them that even Elon Musk

0:55:13.210 --> 0:55:16.340
<v Speaker 6>posted last night, the data centers in space looking pretty

0:55:16.390 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 6>appealing right now.

0:55:18.140 --> 0:55:22.100
<v Speaker 2>Which hopefully... That's as real as everything else you advocate, Elon.

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:55:24.690 --> 0:55:27.509
<v Speaker 6>I think this is just kind of an interesting position

0:55:27.590 --> 0:55:31.570
<v Speaker 6>for these companies. With Ohio, with 21 of these failing,

0:55:31.610 --> 0:55:33.779
<v Speaker 6>and they were, I guess, according to CNBC, the most

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 6>business-friendly state in the nation last year, OpenAI has a

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 6>giant project coming in there. But this is just a

0:55:41.260 --> 0:55:46.430
<v Speaker 6>massive setback. And there was the crypto AI and gambling industry.

0:55:47.590 --> 0:55:51.730
<v Speaker 6>lobby spent hundreds of millions of dollars this year. And

0:55:51.790 --> 0:55:54.149
<v Speaker 6>so having, and I think a lot of that might,

0:55:54.310 --> 0:55:57.009
<v Speaker 6>might have gone more into like candidate races. I don't

0:55:57.050 --> 0:55:59.529
<v Speaker 6>know exactly how this would have worked with measures, but

0:56:00.310 --> 0:56:03.770
<v Speaker 6>basically this, you know, follows the polling on data centers.

0:56:03.930 --> 0:56:05.989
<v Speaker 6>And I just think it'll be interesting to see how

0:56:06.030 --> 0:56:09.009
<v Speaker 6>this plays out with how shaky things are in the

0:56:09.050 --> 0:56:12.700
<v Speaker 6>stock market. And it's like data, these companies do not

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 6>need more barriers to, to building compute capacity right now.

0:56:17.300 --> 0:56:19.700
<v Speaker 6>That is like really bad for them.

0:56:19.780 --> 0:56:22.320
<v Speaker 4>And this is like, to caveat off of your point,

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:26.690
<v Speaker 4>this is something that like the AI and crypto industries

0:56:26.770 --> 0:56:29.770
<v Speaker 4>spent a shitload on this on the midterms, and it

0:56:30.070 --> 0:56:31.370
<v Speaker 4>nearly all failed.

0:56:31.489 --> 0:56:32.730
<v Speaker 1>Like massive disasters.

0:56:32.750 --> 0:56:35.450
<v Speaker 4>There's a really good Gizmodo article on this by Bruce Gill,

0:56:35.530 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 4>and I'm going to read just a brief quote from that.

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Crypto and AI-focused super PACs spent $ 112 million supporting and

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 4>opposing candidates in the general election alone, according to Tech

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:48.290
<v Speaker 4>Influence Watch. As of Wednesday morning, $ 74. 7 million of that

0:56:48.330 --> 0:56:51.090
<v Speaker 4>spending had gone toward losing candidates or efforts to defeat

0:56:51.170 --> 0:56:54.069
<v Speaker 4>winning candidates. The losses came despite an influx of money

0:56:54.090 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 4>from Silicon Valley into this year's elections. Overall, crypto and

0:56:56.739 --> 0:57:00.380
<v Speaker 4>AI companies and employees contributed more than $ 506 million to

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.820
<v Speaker 4>political committees this election cycle, according to Tech Influence Watch's estimates. Meanwhile,

0:57:04.860 --> 0:57:07.860
<v Speaker 4>industry-focused PAC spent nearly $ 250 million on the federal elections,

0:57:07.900 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 4>including primaries. And just the vast majority of that has

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:17.590
<v Speaker 4>been completely disastrous. In Ohio, Sherrod Brown won his Senate

0:57:17.610 --> 0:57:20.730
<v Speaker 4>seat against John Husted, even though the crypto industry put

0:57:20.870 --> 0:57:24.910
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of money, like $ 64 million into supporting Husted.

0:57:24.910 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 4>$ 64 million into one campaign by the crypto industry.

0:57:30.420 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 3>All my apes gone. Yeah.

0:57:32.660 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, and that's not all.

0:57:33.940 --> 0:57:38.340
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk's backed Senate leadership fund spent another $ 95. 6 million

0:57:38.460 --> 0:57:40.300
<v Speaker 4>on the race trying to beat Brown.

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's good. Oh, that's good.

0:57:42.540 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 7>Oh.

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:45.800
<v Speaker 4>And then Musk's America pack spent almost $ 10 million. Like,

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:49.770
<v Speaker 4>they lot through so much money into beating Sherrod Brown.

0:57:49.810 --> 0:57:50.630
<v Speaker 1>It just did fucking nothing.

0:57:50.650 --> 0:57:53.370
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that makes me so happy. It's so funny.

0:57:54.250 --> 0:57:57.750
<v Speaker 4>They also put, there was like the AI-focused Building the

0:57:57.810 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Future in America mission pack put almost $ 5 million into

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 4>supporting Darlene Graham's campaign.

0:58:03.460 --> 0:58:03.530
<v Speaker 7>Ooh!

0:58:06.530 --> 0:58:08.630
<v Speaker 2>Good bet, guys. Good bet, guys.

0:58:08.730 --> 0:58:11.670
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense because out of all these races that

0:58:11.950 --> 0:58:14.930
<v Speaker 3>I was going through last night, both Sherrod Brown and

0:58:14.970 --> 0:58:18.310
<v Speaker 3>Annie Andrews had the strongest anti-AI stuff, with the exception

0:58:18.930 --> 0:58:22.050
<v Speaker 3>of Al Sayed, who's had very strong AI policies.

0:58:23.030 --> 0:58:24.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And they did have some successes, but it was

0:58:24.810 --> 0:58:27.950
<v Speaker 4>mostly in not really competitive races. The one that was,

0:58:28.290 --> 0:58:32.010
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of meaningful, is they did the Defend American

0:58:32.070 --> 0:58:34.220
<v Speaker 4>Jobs PAC, which was an AI.

0:58:35.170 --> 0:58:36.230
<v Speaker 2>industry, backed.

0:58:36.110 --> 0:58:39.830
<v Speaker 4>One, put like $ 14 million almost into Senator Pete Ricketts'

0:58:39.910 --> 0:58:41.770
<v Speaker 4>campaign in Nebraska, and he did win.

0:58:42.630 --> 0:58:46.290
<v Speaker 3>That is something I did want to mention. Yes, in Nebraska,

0:58:46.390 --> 0:58:49.050
<v Speaker 3>Dan Osborne was running as an independent on like a

0:58:49.090 --> 0:58:53.180
<v Speaker 3>working class labor platform. And this was very competitive in

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:57.620
<v Speaker 3>the polls, but Ricketts ended up really, really pulling ahead

0:58:57.660 --> 0:59:02.420
<v Speaker 3>at the end. And so this Senate seat stayed stayed Republican.

0:59:02.940 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Besides Angie Nixon, this is kind of one of the

0:59:04.620 --> 0:59:07.810
<v Speaker 3>big kind of losses for the night, you could say.

0:59:07.830 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Or at least one of the examples of Republicans being

0:59:10.700 --> 0:59:11.459
<v Speaker 3>able to hold on to power.

0:59:11.900 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Yeah, let's talk about California briefly, right? So I

0:59:16.700 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 2>guess the big news out of California is it's not

0:59:18.860 --> 0:59:23.450
<v Speaker 2>looking good for Prop 40. California overall, disappointing. And we'll

0:59:23.490 --> 0:59:25.670
<v Speaker 2>get into this later, but California is what happens when

0:59:25.690 --> 0:59:29.030
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats feel safe. And what we saw here, it's

0:59:29.070 --> 0:59:30.820
<v Speaker 2>like a There are a lot of votes still to

0:59:30.860 --> 0:59:33.140
<v Speaker 2>be counted in California. I should probably lead with that, right?

0:59:33.580 --> 0:59:38.020
<v Speaker 2>Right now, Prop 40. Prop 40 was a one-time 5%

0:59:38.020 --> 0:59:43.530
<v Speaker 2>tax on individuals or trusts that had assets over $ 1 billion.

0:59:44.010 --> 0:59:50.710
<v Speaker 2>There are less than 300 billionaires in California. Currently, no,

0:59:50.990 --> 0:59:53.130
<v Speaker 2>it's leading with 55.6% of the vote. According to the AP, 44.4%.

0:59:53.130 --> 0:59:53.210
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:59:53.250 --> 0:59:53.450
<v Speaker 7>Bummer.

0:59:58.670 --> 1:00:02.650
<v Speaker 2>California's ballot had a number of props that sought to

1:00:02.690 --> 1:00:07.270
<v Speaker 2>directly cancel or invalidate prop 40, like suggesting that the

1:00:07.310 --> 1:00:12.130
<v Speaker 2>wealthy were afraid, right? Looking by county, I was looking

1:00:12.170 --> 1:00:15.690
<v Speaker 2>at a county breakdown, a prop 40. It succeeded in

1:00:15.870 --> 1:00:20.550
<v Speaker 2>LA County. Otherwise, there are very few, it succeeded in

1:00:20.590 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>like Alameda County and like Mendocino County, Yolo County, Monterey,

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:29.380
<v Speaker 2>like less big urban counties. For instance, it did not

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>succeed at this point in San Diego County. There was

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.450
<v Speaker 2>obviously a lot of spending against Prop 40. Gavin Newsom

1:00:36.530 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>has also been opposed to it. California continues to be

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:46.860
<v Speaker 2>a disappointment in every aspect. It's very corporate Dems here.

1:00:46.900 --> 1:00:51.110
<v Speaker 2>We didn't really see... at a statewide level, that swing

1:00:51.170 --> 1:00:55.100
<v Speaker 2>towards more progressive Democrats that we have seen in other places.

1:00:55.720 --> 1:01:00.940
<v Speaker 2>In terms of local races, Marnie Van Wilpert beat Jim Desmond,

1:01:01.580 --> 1:01:05.070
<v Speaker 2>which Desmond was taking over Daryl Issa's seat. Issa has

1:01:05.090 --> 1:01:09.050
<v Speaker 2>been a pretty hard caller. He's not a California Republican. Well,

1:01:09.090 --> 1:01:12.390
<v Speaker 2>he is obviously a Republican for California, but he's a Trumper.

1:01:12.990 --> 1:01:15.330
<v Speaker 2>For the most part, Duncan Hunter had previously held a

1:01:15.370 --> 1:01:18.790
<v Speaker 2>version of that. It's been redrawn, right? California redrew a

1:01:18.830 --> 1:01:22.420
<v Speaker 2>number of districts. But Duncan Hunter, people will remember, A,

1:01:23.150 --> 1:01:26.630
<v Speaker 2>for being one of the more far-right members of Congress, B,

1:01:26.650 --> 1:01:29.070
<v Speaker 2>for buying flights for his bunny rabbit and spending campaign

1:01:29.110 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>funds on Steam games, among other things. Respect.

1:01:33.900 --> 1:01:36.740
<v Speaker 3>Most useful Republican campaign expenditure.

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 7>Sorry.

1:01:39.820 --> 1:01:40.490
<v Speaker 1>I had to say.

1:01:40.550 --> 1:01:43.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right. You know what? If they took that money

1:01:43.770 --> 1:01:46.790
<v Speaker 2>and they spent it all on Steam games, I wouldn't complain.

1:01:46.810 --> 1:01:49.669
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're a worse thing for them to spend

1:01:49.690 --> 1:01:55.690
<v Speaker 2>their money on. Generally, California has seen its characteristic, like

1:01:55.910 --> 1:01:59.460
<v Speaker 2>highly democratic, right? I think there were, I'm seeing four

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>house districts that returned Republicans, the rest Democrats, right? California

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:08.260
<v Speaker 2>lines were redrawn. And so some of these Republicans have

1:02:08.380 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong, it's not like a, it's not like a

1:02:10.980 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>one for one comparison, right. But we can look at

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>like how that area would have voted before, but we,

1:02:16.360 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>we see like strong Germany, strong results for Republicans where

1:02:19.900 --> 1:02:23.130
<v Speaker 2>they've won, but everywhere else, big wins for Democrats. I

1:02:23.150 --> 1:02:26.370
<v Speaker 2>did want to mention in San Diego news that yesterday,

1:02:26.410 --> 1:02:30.870
<v Speaker 2>a little election day treat for us San Diegans. The

1:02:30.910 --> 1:02:33.690
<v Speaker 2>first process of recalling a mayor in California is to

1:02:33.790 --> 1:02:37.530
<v Speaker 2>publish your intent. to serve a recall notice and a

1:02:37.590 --> 1:02:41.050
<v Speaker 2>group published intent to serve a recall notice for Todd Gloria.

1:02:41.630 --> 1:02:44.430
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Todd's supporters in the Republican Party have immediately

1:02:44.470 --> 1:02:47.530
<v Speaker 2>closed ranks behind that guy. But for those who are

1:02:47.570 --> 1:02:51.790
<v Speaker 2>not familiar, Todd Gloria, San Diego's mayor, Another example of

1:02:51.870 --> 1:02:54.470
<v Speaker 2>what happens in California, where you get people running on

1:02:54.550 --> 1:02:58.030
<v Speaker 2>supposedly progressive values and then turning out to be massive grifters,

1:02:58.070 --> 1:03:02.890
<v Speaker 2>liars and chuds. So the group cited Gloria's failure to

1:03:02.930 --> 1:03:07.270
<v Speaker 2>address our increasing crisis of people living on the street

1:03:07.490 --> 1:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and not having access to services and his like persistent

1:03:11.900 --> 1:03:15.980
<v Speaker 2>real estate grift. It'll be really interesting. I think Gloria,

1:03:16.060 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I know this can seem like a small local thing

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:19.500
<v Speaker 2>at a time when it's been a massive swing in

1:03:19.540 --> 1:03:24.420
<v Speaker 2>national politics. Gloria, at least for me, really represents the

1:03:24.500 --> 1:03:33.790
<v Speaker 2>pro-genocide corporate Democrats who have failed in 2024 specifically to

1:03:33.830 --> 1:03:36.850
<v Speaker 2>inspire people to turn out to vote for them because

1:03:36.870 --> 1:03:38.780
<v Speaker 2>they seem so out of touch, because they didn't offer

1:03:38.860 --> 1:03:41.710
<v Speaker 2>solutions to problems that people had. We spoke about this

1:03:41.770 --> 1:03:43.710
<v Speaker 2>on ED a couple of weeks ago, right? But Gloria

1:03:43.750 --> 1:03:47.700
<v Speaker 2>is probably Flock Camera's strongest defender, and he has absolutely

1:03:47.780 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>refused to concede on that. When it comes to kind

1:03:50.640 --> 1:03:53.580
<v Speaker 2>of carceral, out-of-touch liberalism, I see him as like a

1:03:53.620 --> 1:03:57.220
<v Speaker 2>totem of that. And so, although he will term out

1:03:57.280 --> 1:03:59.970
<v Speaker 2>at the end of this term Although this recall will

1:03:59.990 --> 1:04:02.990
<v Speaker 2>be expensive, I think it sends a really important notice

1:04:03.030 --> 1:04:05.950
<v Speaker 2>to the Democratic Party that this kind of aloof, out

1:04:05.970 --> 1:04:08.870
<v Speaker 2>of touch, giving all our money to the cops liberalism

1:04:09.190 --> 1:04:11.790
<v Speaker 2>is not what people want in 2028. And I do

1:04:11.830 --> 1:04:15.250
<v Speaker 2>think there's a real risk of Democrats falling back into

1:04:15.310 --> 1:04:18.650
<v Speaker 2>well-worn patterns of doing that shit. So he has to

1:04:18.670 --> 1:04:20.630
<v Speaker 2>be served the recall notice by the 8th, then he

1:04:20.650 --> 1:04:23.700
<v Speaker 2>has a chance to respond. It won't be until the

1:04:23.780 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>third or fourth week of this month that people will

1:04:26.580 --> 1:04:29.770
<v Speaker 2>actually begin gathering information. big in-gathering signatures, and it would

1:04:29.790 --> 1:04:32.510
<v Speaker 2>have to be 15% of the electorate from the last election.

1:04:33.010 --> 1:04:34.670
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if that's the last election when they

1:04:34.710 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>served the notice or the last election at the time

1:04:37.220 --> 1:04:40.020
<v Speaker 2>that they published it. I'm wondering if that's why they

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:42.780
<v Speaker 2>published it on election day, because the turnout was relatively

1:04:42.840 --> 1:04:45.420
<v Speaker 2>high for a midterm election, right? To get a lower number,

1:04:45.500 --> 1:04:50.610
<v Speaker 2>but it would be around... like 120, 130,000 voters that

1:04:50.630 --> 1:04:53.070
<v Speaker 2>they would need to sign that signature to trigger a recall.

1:04:53.430 --> 1:04:55.010
<v Speaker 2>And I believe we're still working out if it will

1:04:55.050 --> 1:04:58.270
<v Speaker 2>be recalled then election, or if it would be recall

1:04:58.370 --> 1:05:01.189
<v Speaker 2>and election. You see what I mean? So I'll keep

1:05:01.210 --> 1:05:05.030
<v Speaker 2>updated on that. It's always a fairly predictable and disappointing

1:05:05.590 --> 1:05:09.900
<v Speaker 2>result in California. We're still waiting on LA mayor. It's

1:05:10.160 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>very close right now. The last I saw it was

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:16.380
<v Speaker 2>like 51 to 49. I don't know if anyone's been

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at it while we've been recording.

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:24.250
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. It's the same. There's about a 17,000 vote difference

1:05:25.090 --> 1:05:27.930
<v Speaker 3>with still almost half a million votes to come in.

1:05:28.270 --> 1:05:28.530
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:05:28.970 --> 1:05:32.930
<v Speaker 2>That's ramen leading bass, which would be a major upset

1:05:33.510 --> 1:05:35.690
<v Speaker 2>for the corporate Dem contingent. Wait, did you say ramen

1:05:35.750 --> 1:05:36.170
<v Speaker 2>is leading?

1:05:36.870 --> 1:05:37.990
<v Speaker 3>Yes, ramen is leading.

1:05:38.010 --> 1:05:38.290
<v Speaker 1>Oh, correct.

1:05:38.310 --> 1:05:38.630
<v Speaker 2>Oh, wow.

1:05:38.650 --> 1:05:38.890
<v Speaker 4>By 17,000 votes.

1:05:38.970 --> 1:05:39.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

1:05:42.140 --> 1:05:43.939
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, yeah. It looked a lot better for Bass

1:05:43.960 --> 1:05:47.010
<v Speaker 2>when we went to bed last night. Yeah, I didn't check. Okay,

1:05:47.110 --> 1:05:51.210
<v Speaker 2>that's good. So, yeah, that will be a big win

1:05:51.410 --> 1:05:52.630
<v Speaker 2>for the LADSA.

1:05:52.890 --> 1:05:56.350
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully we'll know by Thanksgiving, California.

1:05:58.590 --> 1:06:05.890
<v Speaker 2>We'll see. Yeah, but it would be... Ramen winning LA

1:06:06.570 --> 1:06:10.270
<v Speaker 2>would be a really interesting, like we've got Mandami in

1:06:10.310 --> 1:06:13.470
<v Speaker 2>New York, right? Like seeing the two, I think the

1:06:13.490 --> 1:06:15.990
<v Speaker 2>two most popular cities in the US, I would imagine,

1:06:16.180 --> 1:06:19.500
<v Speaker 2>going both to DSA mares, I think would set a

1:06:19.540 --> 1:06:21.420
<v Speaker 2>really interesting trajectory going into 2028.

1:06:21.420 --> 1:06:21.620
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:06:22.180 --> 1:06:25.380
<v Speaker 6>I can bring some on the ground reporting too. I

1:06:25.400 --> 1:06:28.680
<v Speaker 6>stopped by the DSA thing in Portland last night and

1:06:29.820 --> 1:06:33.450
<v Speaker 6>there's some speculation about them trying to run mitch for

1:06:33.510 --> 1:06:36.660
<v Speaker 6>mayor mitch green for mayor which is uh who knows

1:06:37.020 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 6>if that's even a good idea at all.

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>But no i think like uh similarly in san diego

1:06:42.100 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>right like who will we get if they were called

1:06:43.660 --> 1:06:48.060
<v Speaker 2>tall gloria yeah uh like this this like dsa local

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:51.460
<v Speaker 2>politics running on economic issues and local issues has been

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>a positive pathway for them.

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>This is something we'll talk a lot about these probably

1:06:55.820 --> 1:06:58.570
<v Speaker 3>these next few weeks is like what the left should

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>do or what the left is doing. Now that Democrats

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>have this majority, how can people ensure that Democrats will

1:07:07.540 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 3>actually do things that are useful once they have this majority?

1:07:10.820 --> 1:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>This will be kind of an ongoing discussion these next

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>few months and years, frankly.

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:19.140
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the immediate thing that needs to happen, and

1:07:19.180 --> 1:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>we've already had a couple of newly elected House members

1:07:22.930 --> 1:07:25.810
<v Speaker 4>make comments along the lines of like, lawyer up to

1:07:25.910 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 4>members of the Trump administration. And that's what I want

1:07:29.320 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 4>to see immediately is investigations, right? I want to see investigations.

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:36.100
<v Speaker 4>I want to see attempts at impeaching like figures, even

1:07:36.120 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>if they don't go after Trump himself. I want to

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:44.780
<v Speaker 4>see like a dogged and vicious attempt to enact consequences

1:07:45.140 --> 1:07:49.550
<v Speaker 4>for like Doge, for Pete Hegseth, for people in the DOJ,

1:07:49.620 --> 1:07:53.370
<v Speaker 4>for ICE, like whatever they can do. And they'll be limited, obviously,

1:07:53.390 --> 1:07:54.970
<v Speaker 4>while Trump is president. But I want to see that

1:07:54.990 --> 1:07:57.810
<v Speaker 4>shit starting now. Like they need to be striking back.

1:07:58.350 --> 1:07:58.650
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:07:59.030 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>One more on California before I forget. Prop 3 is

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>looking good. Prop 3 would extend a tax. The tax

1:08:05.420 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>was enacted in 2012, but it was set to expire

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:11.340
<v Speaker 2>in 2031. And that is, it has a higher income

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:14.670
<v Speaker 2>tax for top earners. So it's 10.3% over 360 grand, 12.3%

1:08:14.670 --> 1:08:22.220
<v Speaker 2>over 721 grand individual income. So at least we kept that.

1:08:22.380 --> 1:08:26.140
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that is ring fence for public schools

1:08:26.160 --> 1:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>with a little bit of it going to community colleges.

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:28.580
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

1:08:29.260 --> 1:08:29.860
<v Speaker 2>So that's a good one.

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 3>We'll probably discuss voter trends more also in these next

1:08:34.650 --> 1:08:39.170
<v Speaker 3>few weeks. But I mean, TLDR, the whole country shifted

1:08:39.210 --> 1:08:42.410
<v Speaker 3>towards the Democrats by like 15 to 30 points, depending

1:08:42.470 --> 1:08:43.130
<v Speaker 3>on the district.

1:08:43.490 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes. And again, I'm sure we'll talk more, but like

1:08:45.939 --> 1:08:48.300
<v Speaker 4>young people seem to, or young men seem to have

1:08:48.340 --> 1:08:51.760
<v Speaker 4>shifted 28 points away from Republicans towards Democrats.

1:08:52.080 --> 1:08:52.980
<v Speaker 1>Which is crazy, right?

1:08:53.380 --> 1:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Men 18 to 29 shift 38 points.

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:54.599
<v Speaker 7>Jesus.

1:08:54.939 --> 1:08:55.250
<v Speaker 6>Jesus. God.

1:08:55.340 --> 1:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:09:00.160 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:09:01.260 --> 1:09:04.540
<v Speaker 4>And the numbers weren't even that insane last night, but

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:07.860
<v Speaker 4>that came up on Steve Bannon's radio show or podcast

1:09:07.880 --> 1:09:09.639
<v Speaker 4>when he was doing his election night coverage.

1:09:09.740 --> 1:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And someone pointed out to him, actually, a.

1:09:13.010 --> 1:09:17.250
<v Speaker 4>Majority of young men are voting for The Democrats right now,

1:09:17.290 --> 1:09:19.830
<v Speaker 4>like we've lost them. And Bannon said that can't be right.

1:09:20.010 --> 1:09:21.750
<v Speaker 4>Like those numbers have to be wrong because he was

1:09:21.830 --> 1:09:25.400
<v Speaker 4>so convinced that that was a permanent majority that they'd

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>gained in 2024, that like they had captured young men.

1:09:28.660 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:09:29.780 --> 1:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's what all their messaging has been. That's all

1:09:31.860 --> 1:09:35.439
<v Speaker 3>of their fucking, like, based Tungus memes on Twitter. Their

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>whole comms strategy is like... Yeah, yeah.

1:09:39.460 --> 1:09:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I can't overemphasize a huge number of the most influential, like,

1:09:43.380 --> 1:09:47.400
<v Speaker 4>thought leaders on the conservative right on Twitter convinced themselves

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that a mix of memes about a gender-bent Draco Malfoy

1:09:51.100 --> 1:09:56.090
<v Speaker 4>and fucking Anakin Skywalker had handed them the election. they

1:09:56.120 --> 1:09:58.349
<v Speaker 4>walked themselves into that just in the same way that

1:09:58.390 --> 1:10:01.350
<v Speaker 4>they convinced themselves that like the trans stuff or like

1:10:01.390 --> 1:10:04.590
<v Speaker 4>Harambe was how they won in 2016. And like, The

1:10:04.610 --> 1:10:06.970
<v Speaker 4>degree to which they keep convincing– and in 2024, they

1:10:07.010 --> 1:10:09.290
<v Speaker 4>were like, oh, it was the anti-trans messaging that like

1:10:09.410 --> 1:10:11.219
<v Speaker 4>won it for us. The degree to which they convince

1:10:11.229 --> 1:10:14.620
<v Speaker 4>themselves that whatever this little bubble in Twitter is talking

1:10:14.660 --> 1:10:16.480
<v Speaker 4>about is what the nation gives a shit about.

1:10:16.540 --> 1:10:16.740
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:10:16.960 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Has really bit them in the ass this time, right?

1:10:20.020 --> 1:10:23.099
<v Speaker 4>Like they were able to kind of ignore reality because

1:10:23.140 --> 1:10:27.020
<v Speaker 4>in general, things were so bad for any incumbent in 2024.

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:27.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:10:28.350 --> 1:10:30.370
<v Speaker 4>But there's none of that shielding left.

1:10:30.510 --> 1:10:30.730
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:10:30.790 --> 1:10:33.550
<v Speaker 4>They're left purely with the consequences of their actions and

1:10:33.570 --> 1:10:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they have convinced themselves of a fantasy

1:10:37.040 --> 1:10:39.979
<v Speaker 4>that like weirdos on Twitter who spend all of their

1:10:40.020 --> 1:10:45.440
<v Speaker 4>time like AI generating fucking images of characters from 25

1:10:45.439 --> 1:10:48.070
<v Speaker 4>year old movies is like the normal American voter.

1:10:48.570 --> 1:10:51.830
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's what they did. That's part of why

1:10:51.850 --> 1:10:52.370
<v Speaker 1>they lost.

1:10:53.050 --> 1:10:57.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty bleak. Two years of prefrontal cortex development

1:10:57.110 --> 1:11:00.070
<v Speaker 2>will go a long way for my fellow young white lads,

1:11:00.150 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess. Hopefully.

1:11:03.600 --> 1:11:04.020
<v Speaker 3>Jesus.

1:11:06.080 --> 1:11:09.740
<v Speaker 5>I do want to point out that the NBC exit

1:11:09.760 --> 1:11:11.970
<v Speaker 5>polls are pretty fascinating.

1:11:11.990 --> 1:11:12.059
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

1:11:13.670 --> 1:11:18.990
<v Speaker 5>And if you look at young voters, 18 to 29...

1:11:19.770 --> 1:11:23.510
<v Speaker 5>one third of them said, yes, they consider themselves a

1:11:23.530 --> 1:11:28.550
<v Speaker 5>democratic socialist. And 99% of those people said they were

1:11:28.750 --> 1:11:34.090
<v Speaker 5>Democrats and only 9% said they were MAGA. So who

1:11:34.110 --> 1:11:39.610
<v Speaker 5>would have predicted that Anakin posting and Malfoy posting would

1:11:39.670 --> 1:11:44.970
<v Speaker 5>be in parallel with this massive socialist swing? I mean,

1:11:44.990 --> 1:11:47.110
<v Speaker 5>you don't have to be too vulgar about it, but

1:11:47.150 --> 1:11:52.290
<v Speaker 5>basically every older person that gets out of the voting

1:11:52.330 --> 1:11:56.030
<v Speaker 5>base is losing. It's like two thirds less of a

1:11:56.050 --> 1:11:59.130
<v Speaker 5>vote for a socialist. And then there's like, you know,

1:12:00.189 --> 1:12:03.350
<v Speaker 5>many more people who are aging in who are leaning socialist.

1:12:03.380 --> 1:12:06.500
<v Speaker 5>So it is dramatically backfired. I mean, it is the

1:12:07.120 --> 1:12:10.000
<v Speaker 5>entire opposite of what these people wanted. It is truly

1:12:10.180 --> 1:12:13.740
<v Speaker 5>their worst fears coming to pass, which is just delightful

1:12:13.780 --> 1:12:14.260
<v Speaker 5>to watch.

1:12:14.950 --> 1:12:18.990
<v Speaker 3>No, 17% of the electorate identified as socialists.

1:12:19.490 --> 1:12:19.750
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:12:19.990 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 3>It's wild. It's pretty shocking. And I mean, we would

1:12:24.000 --> 1:12:27.780
<v Speaker 3>be remiss to mention the massive swings in Hispanic votes

1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:31.180
<v Speaker 3>towards the Democrats that played a big part in Florida,

1:12:31.680 --> 1:12:35.390
<v Speaker 3>getting Angie Nixon closer and pushing Tallarico way over the

1:12:35.470 --> 1:12:38.729
<v Speaker 3>edge in Texas. Based on everything ICE has been doing

1:12:38.770 --> 1:12:41.070
<v Speaker 3>the past few years, this was to be expected, but

1:12:41.110 --> 1:12:44.350
<v Speaker 3>the extent to which a 28-point swing- Good lord. Really-

1:12:44.890 --> 1:12:48.460
<v Speaker 3>really large. Similarly, I mentioned at the top of the

1:12:48.479 --> 1:12:51.639
<v Speaker 3>episode how Republicans were not able to gain any seats

1:12:51.760 --> 1:12:55.969
<v Speaker 3>from their redistricting measures. And if anything, all the redistricting

1:12:55.990 --> 1:13:00.210
<v Speaker 3>did was enrage people. It really pissed people off. And

1:13:00.250 --> 1:13:05.590
<v Speaker 3>generate massive, massive black voter turnout. Because- Republicans were trying

1:13:05.610 --> 1:13:08.790
<v Speaker 3>to take away their ability to vote, to have their

1:13:08.850 --> 1:13:09.549
<v Speaker 3>votes matter.

1:13:09.670 --> 1:13:10.370
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:13:10.550 --> 1:13:13.190
<v Speaker 3>And that caused a huge black turnout and a big

1:13:13.630 --> 1:13:16.050
<v Speaker 3>swing also towards Democrats. The other thing it did, and

1:13:16.070 --> 1:13:19.510
<v Speaker 3>this is something that's really funny, is because Republicans were

1:13:19.530 --> 1:13:24.430
<v Speaker 3>trying to make more Trump districts, what they ended up

1:13:24.490 --> 1:13:31.379
<v Speaker 3>doing is diluting their own mega Trump voters across multiple districts,

1:13:31.800 --> 1:13:35.059
<v Speaker 3>which then in North Carolina... because of the big turnout

1:13:35.200 --> 1:13:40.010
<v Speaker 3>for Democrats, made Democrats take districts that were previously Republican strongholds.

1:13:40.450 --> 1:13:43.650
<v Speaker 3>So it was a complete backfiring of redistricting. They diluted

1:13:43.670 --> 1:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>their own support by trying to dilute Black people's ability

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to have their votes matter.

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:53.960
<v Speaker 4>No, the- The tighter they clenched their grip, the more

1:13:54.020 --> 1:13:56.770
<v Speaker 4>systems slipped through their fingers, right?

1:13:56.860 --> 1:13:58.389
<v Speaker 2>It's all Star Wars, man.

1:13:58.570 --> 1:14:00.010
<v Speaker 3>The whole election is Star Wars.

1:14:00.410 --> 1:14:01.189
<v Speaker 7>Yep, yep.

1:14:01.390 --> 1:14:05.150
<v Speaker 4>They convinced themselves not just that, yeah, this has been

1:14:05.189 --> 1:14:09.530
<v Speaker 4>a permanent realignment, and now we can do anything, and

1:14:09.550 --> 1:14:11.530
<v Speaker 4>we can laugh about it. We can laugh about how

1:14:11.610 --> 1:14:14.110
<v Speaker 4>cruel we're being. We can laugh about the people we're killing.

1:14:14.150 --> 1:14:16.310
<v Speaker 4>We can laugh about the programs we're cutting, the lives

1:14:16.350 --> 1:14:20.389
<v Speaker 4>we're destroying, and no one will ever– make us stand

1:14:20.470 --> 1:14:21.710
<v Speaker 4>for it, like accountable for it.

1:14:21.710 --> 1:14:23.550
<v Speaker 3>They thought they could do all this bullshit the past

1:14:23.590 --> 1:14:25.150
<v Speaker 3>two years and just get away with it. That they

1:14:25.189 --> 1:14:26.650
<v Speaker 3>would not face consequences for it.

1:14:26.650 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Because they thought people loved it.

1:14:28.490 --> 1:14:29.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they thought they were locked in forever.

1:14:30.220 --> 1:14:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Because they thought their entire electorate was like 15% of

1:14:33.439 --> 1:14:36.040
<v Speaker 4>the Republican Party who were the craziest people in the world, right?

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:39.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and to an extent they're still fucking doing it.

1:14:40.040 --> 1:14:42.690
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if you saw that Mark Wayne Mullen

1:14:43.630 --> 1:14:46.349
<v Speaker 2>went on Twitter today to post deportations will continue.

1:14:46.450 --> 1:14:50.189
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure they will. Like, yeah, they will, right?

1:14:50.210 --> 1:14:53.850
<v Speaker 2>Like, they will go wild with the executive branch shit

1:14:53.910 --> 1:14:55.290
<v Speaker 2>that they think they can get away with.

1:14:55.590 --> 1:14:55.790
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:14:55.850 --> 1:14:56.849
<v Speaker 2>Because why not?

1:14:56.910 --> 1:14:58.990
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're going to go as hard as they think

1:14:59.050 --> 1:15:01.520
<v Speaker 4>they can get away with. The only way it might

1:15:01.570 --> 1:15:05.189
<v Speaker 4>stop and mitigate that is depending on, like, how... afraid

1:15:05.250 --> 1:15:07.530
<v Speaker 4>they are of being prosecuted after this, which I am

1:15:07.570 --> 1:15:09.070
<v Speaker 4>seeing a lot of talk about, quite frankly.

1:15:09.090 --> 1:15:09.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:15:09.870 --> 1:15:13.689
<v Speaker 4>And that might do some, that might actually mitigate how,

1:15:13.870 --> 1:15:15.689
<v Speaker 4>what they're willing to do, right?

1:15:15.770 --> 1:15:16.769
<v Speaker 3>Like, I don't know.

1:15:16.810 --> 1:15:18.110
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that's been interesting to me is

1:15:18.150 --> 1:15:20.300
<v Speaker 4>that despite all of the talk ahead of this is like, oh,

1:15:20.340 --> 1:15:21.900
<v Speaker 4>is Trump going to, are they going to recognize the

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:23.860
<v Speaker 4>results of the election? You know, are they going to

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:26.380
<v Speaker 4>be sending troops out to stop this if it goes

1:15:26.420 --> 1:15:29.500
<v Speaker 4>against them? That talk dropped on the right when it

1:15:29.520 --> 1:15:31.979
<v Speaker 4>became clear how big a loss this was.

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:32.780
<v Speaker 3>Within hours.

1:15:33.060 --> 1:15:33.230
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:15:33.240 --> 1:15:33.389
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:15:34.100 --> 1:15:35.980
<v Speaker 6>I feel like a bit of a dumbass with my

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:39.660
<v Speaker 6>episode yesterday because it.

1:15:39.620 --> 1:15:40.590
<v Speaker 2>Was like, oh, there's going to be.

1:15:41.020 --> 1:15:44.350
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure they'll still come after various things, but it's like, oh, wow,

1:15:44.390 --> 1:15:47.370
<v Speaker 6>it really was just like an absolute blue nami.

1:15:47.390 --> 1:15:49.370
<v Speaker 2>Too big to rip. Yeah.

1:15:49.729 --> 1:15:51.799
<v Speaker 5>I mean, just to end on that note, we were

1:15:51.840 --> 1:15:54.299
<v Speaker 5>thinking here in Texas that one of the better outcomes

1:15:54.340 --> 1:15:58.420
<v Speaker 5>might actually be Greg Abbott winning and, you know, Tallarico

1:15:58.479 --> 1:16:01.710
<v Speaker 5>winning because... If it's a split vote, they can't cry

1:16:01.810 --> 1:16:05.400
<v Speaker 5>wolf with the same effect. But, I mean, we ended

1:16:05.439 --> 1:16:09.040
<v Speaker 5>up getting the same effect, but just through a different mechanism,

1:16:09.060 --> 1:16:10.620
<v Speaker 5>which is amazing.

1:16:11.520 --> 1:16:12.740
<v Speaker 1>They all lost.

1:16:13.180 --> 1:16:16.790
<v Speaker 5>If all politics has to be Star Wars, I want

1:16:16.810 --> 1:16:18.830
<v Speaker 5>to see a lot more glup shittos. I don't want

1:16:18.850 --> 1:16:21.820
<v Speaker 5>to see fascist Anakin. I want to know who... He's

1:16:21.860 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 5>the glupshiddo, the new glupshiddo of this.

1:16:24.520 --> 1:16:26.740
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot, you know, a lot of glupshiddos came

1:16:26.800 --> 1:16:29.240
<v Speaker 4>out of the woodwork to win it for, for the

1:16:29.280 --> 1:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Democrats last night.

1:16:31.580 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 7>Oops, all glupshiddos. Before we go, I do want to mention,

1:16:35.400 --> 1:16:41.820
<v Speaker 7>they're like, just we glupshiddo, sorry. Newsome to glupshiddo.

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:45.389
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Really good night for indigenous candidates, right?

1:16:45.590 --> 1:16:45.810
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:16:46.130 --> 1:16:50.300
<v Speaker 2>Deb Haaland. governor in new mexico nez is looking pretty

1:16:50.320 --> 1:16:53.280
<v Speaker 2>good like former chairman of the navajo nation it remains

1:16:53.380 --> 1:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to be seen in arizona right peggy uh flanagan in

1:16:57.720 --> 1:17:01.229
<v Speaker 2>minnesota like i was talking to some friends uh some

1:17:01.350 --> 1:17:06.070
<v Speaker 2>some yaki friends yesterday about like incredible turnout in indigenous

1:17:06.110 --> 1:17:09.070
<v Speaker 2>communities like at least where they were uh and from

1:17:09.110 --> 1:17:11.389
<v Speaker 2>what i've heard it was it was pretty high everywhere

1:17:11.410 --> 1:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and uh Yeah, that's good to see. Trump has been

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:19.719
<v Speaker 2>fucking extensively with indigenous people, their rights and their land.

1:17:21.540 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see them showing up and it's good

1:17:23.939 --> 1:17:26.460
<v Speaker 2>to see indigenous candidates being returned at a state level.

1:17:26.939 --> 1:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk more about some of this sort of stuff

1:17:28.780 --> 1:17:31.219
<v Speaker 3>where the Democrats will do next, that kind of thing,

1:17:31.520 --> 1:17:34.939
<v Speaker 3>in tomorrow's edition of Executive Disorder, as well as some

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:38.880
<v Speaker 3>non-election related stories to help get a general sense of

1:17:38.900 --> 1:17:42.500
<v Speaker 3>what's going on in the world. But before we close... Steven,

1:17:42.580 --> 1:17:44.900
<v Speaker 3>where can people find your work, especially to keep up

1:17:45.020 --> 1:17:48.730
<v Speaker 3>on the politics of Texas? And who sent those fucking mailers?

1:17:49.270 --> 1:17:50.990
<v Speaker 5>God, we are going to get to the bottom of

1:17:51.030 --> 1:17:53.870
<v Speaker 5>those mailers, even if it may not be as consequential.

1:17:54.030 --> 1:17:59.340
<v Speaker 5>To Robert's point, the accountability must continue. We must get

1:17:59.380 --> 1:18:01.980
<v Speaker 5>to the bottom of who is behind that so their

1:18:02.060 --> 1:18:04.719
<v Speaker 5>feet can be held to the fire. You can find

1:18:04.740 --> 1:18:08.180
<v Speaker 5>my reporting often at the Texas Observer. But if you

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:11.610
<v Speaker 5>just Google my Italian ass name, you can find my website.

1:18:12.250 --> 1:18:15.689
<v Speaker 5>And all my articles get consolidated there because I do

1:18:15.729 --> 1:18:19.450
<v Speaker 5>write for a few different outlets. And, you know, I'm

1:18:19.490 --> 1:18:21.790
<v Speaker 5>always excited to be on the show with you all.

1:18:21.810 --> 1:18:23.750
<v Speaker 5>So thanks for having me. Yeah.

1:18:24.689 --> 1:18:26.310
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for holding Texas down.

1:18:26.330 --> 1:18:30.410
<v Speaker 2>How about you, Kevin? Where can people find your coverage

1:18:30.450 --> 1:18:31.950
<v Speaker 2>of the places with pine trees and rain?

1:18:33.160 --> 1:18:36.940
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm on like all the social media channels at

1:18:37.040 --> 1:18:37.620
<v Speaker 6>Kevin H.

1:18:37.680 --> 1:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Foster.

1:18:38.400 --> 1:18:40.760
<v Speaker 6>And then my sub stack is last week in hell.

1:18:41.729 --> 1:18:45.430
<v Speaker 6>And this week, it's not the most fitting name because

1:18:45.490 --> 1:18:47.570
<v Speaker 6>it seems like things have generally gone okay.

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:51.660
<v Speaker 3>But this week in purgatory yeah this week in purgatory

1:18:51.680 --> 1:18:54.120
<v Speaker 3>one level up baby one level up at a.

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Time we're clawing our way out.

1:18:57.500 --> 1:18:59.600
<v Speaker 3>That does it for us here at it could happen

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:02.360
<v Speaker 3>here we'll see you tomorrow for another episode of executive

1:19:02.380 --> 1:19:04.970
<v Speaker 3>disorder we reported the news.

1:19:06.870 --> 1:19:07.670
<v Speaker 2>We reported the news

1:19:16.189 --> 1:19:16.809
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for listening.