WEBVTT - I Ching: The Book of Changes

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how stup

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>McCormick and Robert. I've got a question for you about

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>childhood divination practices. Did you ever do this thing when

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you were a kid that I definitely did where you

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>were worried about some question you wanted an answer like

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>am I going to get in trouble because I said

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>butt head on the playground? And what you do is

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you go to some book, probably the Bible or any book,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but especially the Bible, and you just open to a

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>random page and you close your eyes and you put

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>your finger on a verse, and then you look down

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and it says, now Jehoram, the son of Ahab, began

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to reign over Israel and Samaria the eighteenth year of Jehosaphat,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>king of Judah, and reigned twelve years. That's the problem

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about randomly generated Bible quote patients is that you might

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get something really juicy and thoughtful and helpful. You might

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get something that's just an incident of hideous violence from

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the ancient past or some sort of of psychedelic prophecy,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you're very likely to get a list of progen a

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, exactly. Yeah, and now I never

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I ever did this with the intent

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of getting some sort of meaning or guidance from the book.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But I certainly did it out of out of boredom

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at times, because growing up in church, you're not everything

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>going on up there is going to be really interesting

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to a young person. So you you only have so

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>many things you can turn to. You can poke around

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the hymnal, you can poke around in the Bible,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or you can doodle a little bit on the program,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but you can only get away with so much of that.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So you turn to the Bible, and there's there's a

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of of interesting stuff in there, a lot of

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>boring stuff in there, just depending on where your fingertip

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>happens to land. Well, yeah, just after that verse I mentioned.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned verse from Second Kings because it seems like

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>very often when you split the Bible in half, you

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>go some where like in the later Middle Old Testament,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of that those kinds of verses that

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>are not super helpful. But right after that you'd get

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and he wrought evil in the side of the Lord,

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>but not like his father and like his mother, for

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he put away the image of Baal that his father

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>had made. Somehow that seems a little more relevant to

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>saying butt head on the playground, maybe like the but

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the ble is the butt head you've done something worthy

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>of guilt. Yeah, you simply miscast your initial divination there,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you just needed to be a one

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>degreeed to laughter the right. Well, it highlights the fact

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that some divination actually does feel more relevant than other divination,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even though we would probably say that no divination actually

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>has access to future or special knowledge, right, Yeah, Like

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>when one example that comes to mind that lines up

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with this is is something I used to do as

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>an adult, is that we just randomly pull up a

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>date on the writer's Almanac and see what the poem

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for that day happened to be. Uh. This is was

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a radio program about literary history, and each day that

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they aired it, it would have a certain poem by

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>by you know, a poet living or dad. You know,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it varied, and since each poem is generally going to

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>speak to the human condition in in some way, shape

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>or form, there's almost always going to be something you

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>can gain from. It's something you can compare to your

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>own experience, and at times that might feel rather poignant

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and perfect and just cosmically aligned. And because we have

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>such powers of interpretation, we can very easily do that.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like if I had been trying

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>really hard, I wouldn't need like a good verse like

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the one about baal and reeking wickedness, And I wouldn't

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>even need a good poem. I could probably make some

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of sense out of that weird lineage passage, right,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And you could make sense out of pretty much any

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>poem they throw at you, right, yeah, Yeah, if you

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>if you try hard enough, if you sort of twist

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the meaning enough, you can you can find something in

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>just about any poem to apply to you. And certainly

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you see plenty of examples of pastors and other clergical

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>individuals out there who who are following, say a liturgical calendar,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have a certain passage that they're given for

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a given Sunday that they have to transform into a message.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And UH, as a skilled preacher, will be able to

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. But in a divinatory context, I wonder, why

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are we so good at this? And why do we

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it. Why are we so intolerant of uncertainty

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that throughout history we always keep coming back to these

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>methods of seeking secret information from outside ourselves. Yeah, it's

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing that we fear the most in life, and

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>yet we summon it in trying to figure out how

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to tackle uncertainty. Yeah, and also like, why

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do we keep doing it on the assumption, like you

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and I, I know are not going to be advocating

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the magic powers of any divination method in this episode,

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So on the assumption that the information provide through divination

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is no better than chance at being correct, why do

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we keep doing it? Is there something actually adaptive or

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>powerful or useful about this process even though it doesn't

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>actually have magic access to the future. Well, it simply

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>makes choices easier at times. I think we've all been

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where, uh, maybe it's not as simple

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>as like who who's gonna serve first in a game

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of tennis? But it becomes too much of an effort

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, decide who's going to pick up the tab

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at a bar? Right, it becomes too much of an argument.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>There are too many social considerations to take into place. Uh,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier just to make it random, just a

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>complete random act. Flip a coin, paper rocks, is, there's whatever,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and just come up with with the with with an answer,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>and then you don't have to think about it anymore.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You got it. The cognitive load has just been dumped.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a great answer, like the laziness perspective,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and we know mother nature is quite lazy, and anything

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>we can do to reduce cognitive loads and take the

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>effort out of the process, that can be helpful. Yeah,

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>it's at the end of the day, you have decision

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fatigue from all the other decisions you've made, and you

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just can't decide if it's going to be, you know,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>macaroni or crab cakes for dinner. Let randomness, Let let

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a coin, a flip of a coin decided for me.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And yet there are some contradictions in there, aren't there?

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Because that seems to make sense for trivial decisions where

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be bothered by stuff. But people

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>use divination methods and you know, casting of lots and

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all all that kind of stuff and opening the Bible

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to a random verse to make the most important decisions

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in their lives. That that's almost when you've most find

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself seeking this, when you're really desperate, when you really

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>need to know something, when you really don't know what

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to do about something important, then people seek the wisdom

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the gods. That's an interesting contradiction, and I want

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to come back to that later. A second thing that

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is interesting give in the idea that we're

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be advocating that any books have magic

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>powers or have the power to predict to the future,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is that, nevertheless, some divination methods seem better, more powerful,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and more profound than others, even though none of them

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are actually magic. For example, your average newspaper horoscope is

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hilarious to most of us, right, if

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you've done some research on the forer effect in making

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>vague statements that seem like they apply specifically to you,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but in fact they applied almost everybody. You can see

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>these just the newspaper horoscopes just riddled with them, right.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Or another example would be and there's an even worse

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>example because there's even less methodology behind it, but the

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>fortune cookie, which would which we've many of us have

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>grown up obtaining at Chinese restaurants, is of course, not

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>even a legitimate Chinese cultural artifact. Sometimes it delightful. Nevertheless,

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it can't be the life. Well, it can be fun.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody loves a fortune cookie. It's it's it's

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a cookie and it has this shot of paper in

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it that you can talk about with your friends or

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>make a joke about. But it's pretty lightweight and inauthentic

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to considering Chinese divination. Well, to get

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>into Chinese divination, I want to say that while we're

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>highlighting divination methods that even while we fully acknowledge they're

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not magic and they are really just start effects of

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>culture that play on our psychological vulnerabilities, some feel like

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they get at something deeper. And I think, for me,

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the prime example of this would be the Chinese classic

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the Eaching, the Guided Divination Book, also known as the

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Book of Changes, and that's what we're gonna be talking

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about today now. I do want to drive home that

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if you ever looked up the Eaching and started to

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>read about it, and then you get intimidated by this

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>big block of symbols, well trust us, because we're gonna

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna guide you through the Eaching here and We're

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get too far into the weeds on the

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>particulars of Chinese divination and sorcery, right, we wanted to

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>look more at like the idea of the eaching, how

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it works in its most basic sense, how it fits

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>into the psychology of the human practice of divination, and

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>why so many thinkers, from ancient Chinese philosophers to Carl

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Young have believed it to contain such profundity despite the

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that it doesn't actually predict the future. It doesn't.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not magic. It doesn't predict the future. But it

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>does do something interesting. And what does it do well?

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>As the name implies that it speaks to change in

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>our lives and in the universe, as the as the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>title the Book of Changes implies. Uh, there's a There's

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful quote I want to read from Alan Watts,

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who who spoke and wrote at length about the eaching.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's almost a mapping of the thinking processes

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of man. Yeah, he has a lot of interesting thoughts

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about it, especially in the context of thinking about the

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Yin and yang imagery in Chinese culture. But Watts also

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>compares the functioning of the each ing to the logic

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>gates to the you know, buy aary logic in technology, Yeah, totally.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in essence, the Book of Changes is just

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>an ancient book of Chinese divination. Right. You seek the

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>answer to a question, and you have a process and

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the book will help give you some kind of answer. Right.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's also much of the more than that, and

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it I think it lacks a true parallel in the

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>West in terms of its influence. So one could perhaps

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>make a case for the Bible. But the Bible is

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>not explicitly intended as a book of divination, right, But

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking beyond like near divination, just in terms of

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>how important the work is. It's like a root text

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for a civilization. It's it's hard. I mean, you could

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>make a case for the Bible, but but but I

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's not really a direct one to one

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>between the I Ching and whatever version of the Bible

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>one is presenting. So this is a classical text that

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was recorded in the ninth century BC, and it contains

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the verses that incorporate divination terms and images. It was

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>used by diviners to read sticks or stalks of yarrow

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>plant that were cast six at a time so that

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they fell in the shape of a hexagram, and the

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>practice would have involved lore, art, and mathematics in interpreting it.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's considered one of the great five Chinese classical texts,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and and it serves as a root text for both

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Taoism and Confucianism, and beyond that, it also influenced Chinese

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>science and states craft. Uh. In other words, it's a

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>fundamental work of Chinese culture. And in fact, it alone

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>among all the Confucian classics, escaped the book burnings of

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Chin Chi Wong, who we recently discussed at link in

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an episode. Do you know why it survived? Is there

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a reasoning behind that or that just an accident? My

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>understanding is that there may be more to it, But

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it was it was just such a fundamental text. It

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was just again it was it is a root text.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You could not just rip it out of the culture,

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many other things you were ripping apart. So, like,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you're a person who's devoted to a racing

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>history and establishing a new world, you there are some

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>books that maybe seem so pivotal and so important to

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you as a tool that you can't get rid of them. Right, Yeah,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like you can rip down the house, but

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the foundation. So German sinologist Richard Wilhelm, who

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>lived through ninety he was a key individual in the

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>history of Western scholarship on the Eaching, as was his

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>son as well. Uh. He wrote that there were pros

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and cons to the book's importance. On one hand, quote

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>it forced Chinese philosophical thinking more and more into a

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>rigid formalization. Yet he also points out they quote apart

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>from this mechanistic number of mysticism, a living stream of

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>deep human wisdom was constantly flowing through the channel of

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this book into everyday life, giving to China's great civilization.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>The rightness of wisdom distilled through the ages. Well being

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a book and not just being say, you know, a

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>method of casting animal bones or something like that, but

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>having written content, we we do have to acknowledge that

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>it does contain inherent directional nous, right because it has

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>written words. There are things that this book says and

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>things that this book does not say. And that's different

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>from a totally like a totally free form type of

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>divination that could say anything at any time, right right,

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of magic eight ball kind of scenario right, Well, no,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean in a ball has a has a number

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of messages to like the eight ball has written content.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's less it's less literary, but no, I

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm thinking like as opposed to just sitting somewhere

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and saying, like, all right, what is what are the

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gods telling me? That could go in any direction? When

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got a book to guide you. The book says

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>some things in it and it doesn't say other things

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>constrains you, right, So it would be different than say,

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>setting in Central Park in New York City and say alright, God,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>give me a sign, and then you look around until

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you notice something that seems like it might be a

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>message from the divine And it could be anything. It

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>could be a peculiar looking dog, a child looks at

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you with a with a with a weird eye, or

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a you know, a large child eating corn on

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the cob. But you know that the portant could be anything.

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But I like where your brain went with that. But

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that was seeing the Robert Lamb reference for our Hodgman fans,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the portant City lays out one

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the weird eye or the corn on the corn of

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the cop Okay, yeah, I believe that was one of

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the signs of Ragnarok approaching. Now, is there a hexagram

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in the each ing of the child with the weird eye? Oh?

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There might be child with weird eye turning.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, well we should actually explain a little bit

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>more of the specifics of how the book works. So

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>if you are an ancient Chinese philosopher and you want

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to know something about the future, you want the answer

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to a question in your life, how would you use

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the book? All right? So at this point we really

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just need sort of break down the process of the eaching,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>how it works. So, what's the most basic question you

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>could ask of a god or the universe or what

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have you, or say a coin you could ask the

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>same question. You could ask it a yes or no question. Yeah,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>basic binary situation here, uh, and we can you can

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ask this a virtually anything. You could stare at the

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>park and say, all right, give me a sign God

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you have answer to my question is a yes, and

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then you wait till you see the child with the corn.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>In a way, it's the most efficient sort of information

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>dense way of consulting anything, just to ask it yes.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Or no question right yeah, And at the at the

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>heart the Book of Changes comes down to this yes

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>no binary. So the cast sticks form lines, and a

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>single unbroken line is a yes, while a broken line

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is a no. But pretty early on the ancient diviners

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>added additional details to these divined answers a second line,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so now you could have such answers as essentially yes, yes, no, no, yes, no, no, yes,

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and then a third line produces the eight trigrams. That's

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the that's that's the symbol. When you look at those

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>charts of all these weird lines and you're intimidated by

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the by the eaching, that's what you're looking at, the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>trigrams and as as. And also if you've if you've

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ever seen an image of the young symbol and it's

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by these different line based symbols than those are

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the trigrams. You typically you'll see that on just the

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the the logo for S Martial Arts Studio in any

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>given small town in America. M But but that also

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>underlines just how widespread these are in Chinese culture and

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things that are inspired by Chinese culture. Would you say

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so widespread that it makes it even into lots

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of imagery where the people employing it don't even know

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what it's from. Oh, without doubt. So, as will Ham

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>points out, quote, these eight triagrams were conceived as images

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of all that happens in Heaven and Earth. At the

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>same time, they were held to be in a state

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of continual transition, one changing into another, just as transition

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>from one phenomenon to another is continually taking place in

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the physical world. And that's the central idea of the

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Book of Change, a universe defined by changing transitional states. Yeah,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say that it seems that the primary ideas

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>within the Book of Changes are duality and binaries, and

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>then constant flux between them. Right right there, there are

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>two ways things can be, and you're always going back

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and forth between those two ways, right, Does that make sense? Yeah,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>totally so. So again, we have these eight triagrams at

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this point, and then each one takes on additional meanings.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, one is the father, the other than mother,

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>then first son, second son, third son, and then the

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>three daughters. One is Heaven, one is Earth. When his

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>thunderwater mountain, wind would fire lake, other attributes such as

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>strength or resting or penetration or or joyfulness. And then

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>these you take these these tigrooms and then you use

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>them in combination with each other, producing a total of

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty four signs six lines each. Change one line in

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>one of these, and you change the situation they represent, uh,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, such as the earth or thunder. So we're

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>left with a series of situations expressed as line based symbols,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and the movement of these lines change the situation. And

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in response to each situation, there's a right and a

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong course of action. And this is where the Book

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of Changes transforms from a mere book of divination to

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a book of wisdom. What should I do about the

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>situation just revealed to me? Now that's interesting, So the

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>book this is another way in which the content of

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the book actually matters. It's not just a process for

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>giving you random answers to yes or no questions. It

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>also tells you something about the situation and wreck men's behavior. Yeah,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty big. It's it's it's not merely revealed fate.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You have a role to play, and the germinal phase

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and all of this is key. This is when things

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are most susceptible to change, which matches up with our

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>experience of reality, you know, and out of this we

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>get the idea of the dow the course of things,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the great stirring represented in the yenyang symbol UH, and

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>it was used by sorcerers, diviners, Confucius, Daoist statesman, scientists,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and more, with writings popping up and vanishing over the

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ages devoted to the various interpretations and new writings, some

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of which we will discuss here, continue to pop up.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Is new individuals and new cultures discover the Book of Changes.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, on that note, we're going to take a

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>quick break, and when we come back we will bust

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>out an example of the eaching consultation before discussing it

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in greater depth than alright, we're back, alright, So today

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the eaching, this ancient Chinese method

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of divination, the Book of Changes and UH and some

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting psychological characteristics of it, how it works. But we

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we should show you what it feels like to consult

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the eaching and get some results. So one example I

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>came up with last night. For a while, I've been

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>working on a writing project and I just asked the

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>eaching last night whether I would get any good writing done.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>This coming weekend, because you never know is stuff going

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to come up that's gonna draw you away, distract you,

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>or am I going to be productive? So I did

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a virtual version that allows you to use virtual coin

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>flips to generate the hexagram number, so I didn't actually

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have to flip coins or throw sticks. Yeah, there are

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a number of different websites that allow you to do this,

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and some even give you the choice where you can

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you can physically flip your own coins and record it

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on the website, which if you if you're like me

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and you you play role playing games, you prefer actual

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 1>dice as opposed to just pure like it seems wrong

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>to trust the computer world completely. I want my my

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>physical uncertainty to take place on the table. Well, there's

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely a way in which if you actually believe there's

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>something magic about the process, then you people very often

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>default to wanting physical tokens for for magical kind of significance.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's harder to feel like something magic is happening inside

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the computer just generating random numbers. But either way, let's

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>say I don't believe anything magic is going on. I

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't I use the computer and it generates hexagram eighteen

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>repairing decay. So that bodes well for my writing project.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so I see repairing decay. Interesting. No, the

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Chinese word here is goo, which is a type of

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>venom based poison made from like combining I think scorpions

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>in different insects or worms. Yeah. Yeah. Anyone who listened

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to the episode I did with Christian about poisons a

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>while back will recognize this term. We discussed it at length.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>This idea that that this mix of magic and actual pharmacology.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh that and sometimes just like pure superstition attached to

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>various peoples that they have a magical power of poison

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or google now, but it's also linked to this idea

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of decay. And that's where repairing decay comes in. So

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>here's an example of the kind of thing that the

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Book of Changes might say to you if you get

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>hexagram eighteen or this is what it will say to

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you in this English translation, work on what has been

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Spoiled has supreme success. It furthers one to cross the

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>great water before the starting point three days after the

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>starting point three days and then also the wind blows

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>low on the mountain the image of decay. Thus the

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>superior man stirs up the people and strengthens their spirit.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I like that there's a little something in there for everybody.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>But I can see where could it definitely can apply

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to a writing project, because the thing that it's I

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>instantly think of as well, it sounds like you've got

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>editing this this weekend. That sounds like you're you're going

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to do some revisions on your existing work, and maybe

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be less the striking out into bold

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>new territory. I think this example shows some of the

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the qualities that I was talking about with

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the eaching at the beginning, and that even though I

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>believe that there's nothing magic about it, it's somehow useful

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>it it's doing something that other divination practices don't really do.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>And maybe part of that is just spurring lines of

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>thought going off in all different directions that allow one

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to consider possibilities of action. All right, well, let's do

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>another one, just just totally off the top of my head.

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a more important questions. Will the werewolves rise up

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>tonight to consume? Okay, let's consult. This is going to

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be the electronic version of the eaching, and so I'm

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>going to virtually throw the coins, right, it's three coins

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>for each line. I believe it's true. Yeah, so you

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have to throw three coins six times. Ah. And the

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>arrangement we've gotten sends us to hexagram fifty three chin

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>development or gradual progress development. The maiden is given in marriage,

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>good fortune, perseverance furthers on the mountain a tree the

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>image of development. Thus, the superior man abides in dignity

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and virtue in order to improve the Moray's So, so

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if we were playing a game of werewolf, this would

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot we could we could we could we

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>could gather from this. It seems to imply a certain

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>patients and dignity and dealing with the villagers. Uh and uh,

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and in the idea that we're maybe gonna pull this

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>off in the end if we don't overreact. I mean,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a little haunting because it all these images start

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a narrative in the mind, which is that

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if the werewolves are out there and they could rise

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>up against us tonight, actually they're going to take their

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>time and be patient and wait for a better striking position.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So it might not happen tonight, but it might be

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>worse in the long run. For us humans. Yeah, and

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>again this is just an off the cuff interpretation, Bye

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bye bye Joe and I. But but clearly someone the

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>more skilled with the with the eaching would be going

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>would be applying their own wisdom on top of the

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>existing wisdom in the literary passage, right, so their whole

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>traditions on how to interpret. And there's more text too.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just reading the little epigraph bits, right, there's more

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>text you can consult, and there are traditions of interpretation.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully at this point we've given you just just

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a basic idea of the eaching, and certainly feel free

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to play around with any of these websites to get

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a little better idea of how this rolling is taking

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>place and what the different trigegrams look like, and then

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>reading the passages to get a taste of the of

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the literary message for each one. So one thing I

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>think we should look at if we're considering the potential

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>adaptive nous of non magical divination systems, or even considering

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the relative merits of the Book of Changes compared to

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.959
<v Speaker 1>other divination systems, is to look at divination generally and

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>see where the eaching fits into the map of human

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>divination methods. And one of the sources who has actually

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>been very useful by coincidence, I guess, or maybe Young

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>would say by synchronicity, but certainly by coincidence on this

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>topic is Julian Jaynes. Not not so much for his

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bi cameral mind theory, but just he's got a very

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>succinct and interesting explanation of the different types of divination

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and how they occur. Yeah, and he's certainly his main

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>interest in it was that, as he saw it, this

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>was a new way of making decisions by returning to

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the directions of the gods by simple analogy. But but

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>even if you totally ignore the bi cameral mind theory,

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got a pretty good category system for

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>how divination takes place in human history. And he picked

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>out there are four sorts, right, You've got oh ones,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got sortilage, you've got augury, and you've got spontaneous divination. Now,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>now augury is of course in tailing said put pulling

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the the intestines out of animals, right, that would be

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>one type, one type. So you can cast judgments on

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of a ranged list of things by for example,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the livers of chickens or something like that.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Another category he uses is omens. Omens is the seeking

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of meaningful information in mundane patterns of events in the world.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So a blackbird landed on my window sill, that means death.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and we're all familiar with these. We still

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are ridiculously susceptible to these. A black cat crosses your path,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you spec you stepped on a crack. Now your mother

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is in the hospital. Yeah. If a fox runs into

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the public square of the town, will be devastated. That's

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one he sites. So those two you've got. Then you've

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>got sortilage, which is the casting of lots, which is

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>answering questions or receiving guidance by reference to unpredictable outcomes

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of pseudo random physical events, you know, throwing dice, throwing sticks,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>throwing animal bones, generating random numbers to get answers or

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>get some kind of wisdom. And we'll come back to

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this one, yes, And then of course his last category

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is spontaneous divination, which is going to be the most

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>free and the most direct, which is just receiving insights

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>directly from the gods into the mind of the diviner.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So this would be like a shower thought would be

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous divination if if you interpret it, or you could

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>compare spontaneous divination to being kind of like omens that

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't been pre established. So if like you didn't already

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>know that a blackbird means death, you just see a

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>thing and you think it means something. You see something

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, well, that is actually a metaphor

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>for what's going on in our country right now, or

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in my life or with my automobile. But so the

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Book of Changes would be an example of swordilage that

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the casting of lots. Right. Yes, I'm going to read

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a passage here from The Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like this just really drives at home.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>He says, of sort of edge quote. It consisted of

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.479
<v Speaker 1>throwing marked sticks, stones, bones, or beans upon the ground,

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or picking one out of a group held in a bowl,

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>or tossing such markers in the lap of a tunic

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>until one fell out. Sometimes it was to answer yes

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or no, at other times to choose one out of

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a group of men, plots or alternatives. But this simplicity,

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>even triviality, to us, should not blind us from seeing

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the profound psychological problem involved, as well as appreciating its

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>remarkable historic importance. We are so used to the huge

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>variety of games of chance, of throwing dice, roulette, wheels, etcetera,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all of them vestiges of this ancient practice of divination

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>by lots, that we find it difficult to really appreciate

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the significance of this practice historically. It is a help

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 1>here to realize that there was no concept of chance

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever until very recent times. Therefore, the discovery, how odd

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to think of it as a discovery of deciding an

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>issue by throwing sticks or beings on the ground, was

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>an extremely momentous one for the future of mankind. For

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>because there was no chance, the result had to be

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>caused by the gods whose intentions were being divined. Isn't

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that fascinating? The idea that randomness was a discovery in

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>history that, uh, I mean, we don't know that for sure,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think that is a reasonable way of interpreting

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what people generally acted like in history. A lot of times,

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if you go back into history, people don't seem to

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>believe in coincidence very much. That they believe that like

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>if something random happened. It happened because the God's made

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it happen that way. And thus, for example, if you

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and your friends draw straws, as to who's going to

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have to I don't know, do do the unwanted task,

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna have to sweep up after your poker games? Over,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the person who draws the short straw is not just

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>losing a game of chance. They were chosen by the

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>gods to sweep up. It might be a punishment. And

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>also the outcomes of all your poker hands were chosen

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>by the gods. Yeah, we have no real agency in

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>any of this. Now, that draws me to the fact

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that we mentioned earlier. I think that Carl Young was

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in the eaching, and for for Carl Young, I

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think the eaching definitely meshed with his idea of the

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>concept of synchronicity. Right. Young believed he had a lot

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of essentially magical beliefs, and he believed that there was

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>an a causal connecting principle in the universe where events

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.239
<v Speaker 1>could be connected by something other than physical causation. And

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.719
<v Speaker 1>he called that connecting principle synchronicity. Uh, it's it's kind

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of hard to explain exactly what he's saying, because, for example,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about someone and then suddenly the phone rings

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's that person, and so he would say, well,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not that your thought caused them to call. But

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he also would not just say well, it's just pure randomness,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's pure coincidence. He does think that there's some reason

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that happened, it's just not physical causation, and in that

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he saw that principle at work in the eaching. Yeah,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we just to break that down a little bit.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we can often break that that down

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's supposed synchronicity in our own lives. For instance,

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're watching a movie or TV show with with a

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>significant other and there's some framework, there's some mention or

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>symbol or emblem that shows up in the show, and

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>since you both have a shared such a shared history,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>shared path, shared live, it's liable to trigger the same

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>association in both of your minds at the same time.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And then one mentions, hey, do you remember that time

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we went to the Turkish restaurant? And then you're like,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking about that Turkish restaurant. But it's

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing mystical going on. It's just that they're there.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There's certain things between the two of you that are

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in attainment. Yeah, I think that's one good explanation for

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the feeling of synchronicity. I mean, one thing is just

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so election bias, because like most of the time, synchronicity

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>type events are not happening, and maybe when they do

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>happen by coincidence, you just happen to notice them and

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they seem very significant, but in fact they're very uncommon.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Another explanation could be maybe if they are more common,

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>then would actually be predicted by random chance. There were

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>often hidden causative factors, just like you're talking about. There

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are things that did cause this correlation of events that

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you just can't even imagine, but they are pure mundane

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>physical causes. All right, I think we'll take a quick

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>break and then when we come back, we will discuss

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some weird and esoteric beliefs about the eaching and then

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe try to answer that question of what could the

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>adaptive value of a totally non predictive, non magical prediction

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>book bank Alright, we're back, all right, So I think

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's time to talk about the Wizard of Psychedelics. Yes,

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Terrence McKenna, because because we mentioned earlier that various sorcerers,

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sign antis, etcetera. Have taken up the Book of Changes

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>over the years and found new spins to take on

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>its ancient wisdom. If there is anybody who qualifies as

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a modern wizard or sorcerer, I think maybe Terence McKenna

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I would fit that category best. Oh yeah, yeah. Terence McKinney,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who's not familiar, was an American ethnobotanist, mystic,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>psychonautic author, and he lived from nineteen forty six to

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand. He was a noted again, a

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>noted author, a definite counterculture figure. If you look him

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>up on YouTube, for instance, you will find various talks

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>by Terence McKenna. Interviews with Terence McKenna. I would say

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he's worth looking up for his talks because even though

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the time his talks are full of stuff

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think is absolute bs, he's so great to

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to. And he and even while he's saying stuff

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that I know is probably not true, it's very it's

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>very inspiring of paths of thought to go down. Yeah,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's clearly you listen to me, there's there's

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a brilliance to the man. There's a there's a deep

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>intelligence Terence McKenna. Uh. And and yet some of the

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>theories that he throughout there we're definite suit of science.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Some are a little more grounded. I guess. I will say,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we've received a number of suggestions that we cover his

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>stoned ape theory of human evolution. So perhaps we'll come

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>back at some point and do that, and even do

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a deeper treatment of Terence mckinna's life. Oh yeah, I mean,

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't write something off just because he said it.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I just mean that, Like as much as I like

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>listening to him most of the time, even though I've

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed his talk, it's been full of a lot of magic. Yeah.

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And for instance, you will find interviews where he's discussing

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the eaching. And it's interesting because at times he is

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very you know, spot on with with his interpretation of

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the eaching and what it means and now it matches

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>up with human experience and and I'll read a quote

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>from him in just just a minute. But other times

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>he is of course taking it and using it, wrapping

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it up in his what he called novelty theory. So

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he picked up the Book of Changes in the nineties

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>seventies following an experience on psilocybin or magic mushrooms, and

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he started looking at the sixty four hexagrams from the

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Kingland's sequence of the of the Eaching. And this, I

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think is often considered like the most traditionally authoritative sequence, Right.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll include an image of the sequence on the landing

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bait for this episode at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. But he he basically came to believe that

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the sequence revealed the way time flows through the world,

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>with peaks and valleys lining up with major events in

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>human history, all of it moving towards the end of

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the time wave, towards the end of time. And guess

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>when he figured that was going to be today? No, no,

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we were were tomorrow. No no, we're way past it now.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was November. Yeah, well, I guess, I guess

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>that was part of the whole twelve thing, wasn't it. Yeah, yeah,

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it was. Consider it's considered one of the major factors there.

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You know that along with various interpretations of the mind calendar. Uh,

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he even had a computer program had lined up with it.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Time wave zero. Yeah, McKenna did claim that in some

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>sense the eaching quote seems to work that quote against

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>all rational expectation. The carrying out of this random ritualistic

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>activity seems then to give a reading applicable to the

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>unique situation. And I would say that hinging on the

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>word seems there. I could probably actually agree with that.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think that it's actually a magic book,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that it actually predicts the future, but it does seem

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to provide some kind of value. Yeah, like it cannot

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it obviously cannot be used to actually map out the future,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but it does line up with our experience of reality

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and our experience of change in time. Yeah. Now he

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>went beyond that actually though, which is that McKenna thought

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that the eaching was not just a product of culture,

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but was evidence that the ancient Chinese had some how

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten ahead of even today's physicists in coming up with

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what he called an objectively predictive theory of time. Obviously,

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that does not seem very plausible to me, but I'll

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>admit it's an interesting idea. It would be a cool

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>idea to entertain. Yeah, and when McKinney is talking about

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean He's often talking way above my head about it,

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think the heads of of of many people

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>who are listening to him. Um, But he was not

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>approaching it from an area of ignorance. It's it's a

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>very complicated theories rolling out here is just ultimately the

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>domain of pseudo science or mysticism. But but, but some

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of his his quotes about the eaching I think are

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty spot on. Here's one from an interview quote. My

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>conclusions looking at the eaching have been that it is

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>not possible to know the future. For if it were

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>possible to know it, life would be a determinism and

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking would be divorced from meaning and we would be

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>out of business. But what is possible to know about

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the future is levels of novelty, which future states will

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fulfill by the happenstance of unpredictable events. Now, this is

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a formal well way of saying, we know where the

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>road goes, but we don't know what the scenery looks like.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there are two different ways of interpreting that.

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 1>One way is to interpret him literally as saying that

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>he thinks the teaching does in some sense literally predict

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to the future, in which case, I think he's wrong.

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But if he is saying that it contains insights about

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the way life tends to go, I think you could

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>say that that that could be true. Yeah, I think so.

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel as we've sort of demonstrated, you can pull

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much any of these trigrams out and they will

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>match up with experiences we've had, or anxieties we've felt,

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or situations that we've observed in others or read about

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in the history of civilization. But of course this may

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>lead many people to ask, well, then, does it have

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>any real value beyond just mirror literature, beyond mere uh,

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, ancient wisdom in a book? Well? Yeah, And

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>also does it have value? We asked this question earlier.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think does that have value comparable to other divination

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>systems with content like is it actually a better or

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>more useful book than say, consulting your horoscope in the newspaper?

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Or are they all just kind of kind of contain

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>vague statements about human life that are often going to

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>feel applicable to you and give you some kind of

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>feeling of knowing how to deal with things that ultimately

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>no better than the fortune cookie, which most of the

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>time you just toss it out, but one in a

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred or two hundred will have some sort of meaning

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and you'll tuck it away in your wallet. Yeah, and

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think people of a secular, skeptical frame of

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>mind about divination would tend to assume that, since there

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is no actual way to see into the future, all

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>divination systems are equally useless. They're equally perpetuated by people's

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias, in general gullibility. It's kind of like you had,

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have several different computer programmers write

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>programs to randomly predict the final scores of upcoming football games,

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't expect one random score pick or program to

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>work any better than any other. Right, they'd all be

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>equally useless. But just because people can't actually see into

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the future doesn't mean the different divination methods created by

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>different people's are of all the same equal worthless value.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>In a way, I think divination methods, especially the bibliomancy,

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like we've been talking about the eaching, As I said,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they have content, and that content, even when exerted at random,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>can be on average, more or less insightful about the

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>present and the future of the wisdom seeker. So while

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think McKenna was grossly overstating the case by claiming

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that the eaching is an objective scientific theory of time,

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there can be divination systems in which the contents,

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>more accurately or less accurately, tend to suggest to people

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>valuable insights about their lives and the situations they face.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And in a way, I think this is kind of

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>analogous to the idea that there could be like a

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>good palm reader and a bad palm reader. Right in

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>both cases, palm reading is pseudoscience or it's magic. Uh,

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no correlation between what your palm looks like and

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what your future will be, or there's little correlation. I

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You might be able to like see somebody's

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>rough hands and think you'll probably continue doing a lot

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of work with your hands, but there's not going to

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be much actual correlation there. So the reader has no

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>paranormal access to hidden information. But some palm readers are

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be better at making correct or insightful statements

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about the person they're reading by using all the standard

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.479
<v Speaker 1>cold reading tricks. You notice body language, you catch hits

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and build on them, and so forth. Or just by

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>being a wiser person and having more thoughtful stuff to say. Now,

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a book doesn't have any way of like reading the

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 1>body language of the reader and feeding back off that.

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But some books are written by wiser people who have

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>more insights about the way life goes. Then again you

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>might wonder, Okay, how could that apply to the eaching

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>since it has you know, it tends to trade in

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these like weird, cool, cryptic kind of statements, right, could

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>those really be all that insightful? I want to mention

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a personal essay. I read an Eon magazine by a

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>fiction writer named Will Buckingham about his personal relationship with

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the Eaching over the years, and he also, in his

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>own way kind of like McKenna, claimed that the eaching works,

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but not in a magical sense. And I think the

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>most interesting thing he writes in the essay is that

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he thinks the value of the eaching lies not in

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it giving accurate or certain predictions about the future, but

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in providing what he calls better uncertainties. He mentions a

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>twelfth century poet and scholar named Yang Wan Lee who wrote, quote,

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the profound implications of the Book of Changes are what

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>plunges people of the world into doubts and makes them think.

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And then he writes, I use the eaching not as

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain team machine, but as an uncertain team machine

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>does solving false certainties. It integrates the fact of unknowing

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>into the fabric of my thinking, opening me up to

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>hitherto unimagined possibilities, scattering the monotony of my either or

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>dilemmas into a myriad of forking paths. I like that,

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and I want to think about that well. To go

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back to your your example of consulting the the eaching

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on your your writing project this weekend, I can imagine

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a situation where one is thinking, is not even entertaining

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of of of doing some revisions you know,

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and then consulting the eaching seems to suggest that you

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>should do revisions or you know, and it it makes

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you contemplate a path that you had already decided to

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>steer away from, and it makes you reconsider your choices.

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a profound insight. I want to

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>think about the idea of introducing randomness into behavior. So

0:44:55.600 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>most studies show that humans are unable to spontaneous regenerate randomness.

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.959
<v Speaker 1>This is often demonstrated. If you get some people into

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a room and say I want you to create a

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>random list of digits, can you do it? Robert, give

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>me a random list of digits? Oh? What one, three, six, nine, two, three, eight?

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Not very good? Is it? Well? I don't know. It

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>fell random as I was belting it out. But but

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I did also I could I could sense myself sort

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of casting about for numbers. Yeah. Yeah. Most studies find

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that the lists people creative these digits are, in mathematical terms,

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>very non random. The brain has what it interprets as

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>an internal randomness generator, Like if I ask you to

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>say a random word, you'll be able to say a

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>word that feels random to you. But in fact it

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>might not be so random. It might be actually pretty

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>easy to predict what kind of words you're going to say.

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of listing numbers, it is provably

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>very easy to predict what number you're going to say,

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 1>because people have done it with computer models. So I

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>want to look at a study from Plos one by

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andre Schultz at all. What they did in this

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 1>study was that they did this like digit listing thing,

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and they came up with a computer model using a

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>principle called Lewenstein dam a rale distance to look at

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a list of supposedly random digits generated by human subject

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and then predict what the next number in the sequence

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>would be. The model was able to do this at

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a rate much better than chance. So if the numbers

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>were really random, they would have the model would not

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>have been able to do any better than chance right,

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and the percentage chance he would expect would be eleven

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>percent of the computer model getting the numbers right. But

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in reality, the mean prediction rate of this program was

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>twent This means that the lists of digits people generated

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.959
<v Speaker 1>were not random. They contained patterns that the human generators

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>were simply not aware of. And it gets worse. The

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>patterns were also persons specific. Not only could this computer

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>model look at a list of random members generated by

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>humans and do significantly better than chance predicting what numbers

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>would come next, it could identify patterns unique to each

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>individual subject. So like if Dale just said six, you

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can be pretty sure he's about to say three. But

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to extrapolate, isn't a lot of life like this? Like

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you find yourself with the urge to do something spontaneous,

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to seek novelty, But what do you actually do almost

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time, Yeah, you fall back on pre existing

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 1>patterns of behavior. Yeah, exactly, you do what you've done before,

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>even when you think you're being spontaneous, like this is

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a horrible example, Robert. I know you've had this experience

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I have. Do you ever sit down with somebody and say,

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>let's watch a new movie, let's find something new to watch,

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and you go through some complicated, drawn out selection process

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to find a new movie you've never seen before, and

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you start watching it, only to gradually realize, wait a second,

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't we try to watch this same movie a few

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago and we didn't like it, so we stopped

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>halfway through. I've had that experience with other people. I

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to remember. It's one of one of the few

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>things I can I can count on myself to remember,

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is whether I have seen a film or tried to

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>watch it before. But but as far as the long,

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>drawn out selection process, certainly, there's so many times where

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you end up just scrolling through Netflix or Hulu until

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you just you just sort of time out on it.

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You give up, and you just pull up something that

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you were already watching, and maybe we weren't that into

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>or just something you've seen before, right, But so this

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is just about what to watch, and even this shows

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that we are so much more patterned and predictable even

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when we're trying to seek spontaneity. Of course, randomness and

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>novelty are so much more important than that, and there's

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so much more important than just finding an interesting new movie.

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Like at the level of technology and science, random enough

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>pseudo random numbers and processes are necessary for accurate statistical sampling,

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for computer modeling of complex phenomenon, definitely for cryptography. At

0:48:56.000 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the level of biology, randomness is necessary in order or

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>organisms to evolve. The primary driver of evolution is natural selection,

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>picking from among random mutations. If you don't have enough

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>random mutations, if your mutation rate is too low, you

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>can't adapt, you can't evolve, you can't create a diverse biosphere.

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You could live in a world of fragile, cloned organisms,

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>highly vulnerable to extinction. So I wonder if there are

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>analogies to this and the behavior of complex animals, like

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>our macroscopic random mutations of behavior important for the quality

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and success of an individual's life. So anyway, I think

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this kind of brings us back to the question from

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier of how predictively worthless divination methods could still be adaptive,

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>how they might be useful even though they're not magic.

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 1>What if divination methods like the each ing are useful

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:59.240
<v Speaker 1>because they introduce an element of randomness into our behavior

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and motivation that we would not be able or willing

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to introduce on our own. Yeah, I mean, they could

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:09.439
<v Speaker 1>be the only way to introduce true randomness into your

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>life because even you know, certainly we live within chaotic systems.

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>But but even within those chaotic systems, there's there's a

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of dependability, you know. I mean, I mean

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we build whole structures for our lives to eliminate unpredictability, right, Yeah,

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and also playing with a certain amount of probability. Um,

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Like I I have to be prepared for various weather

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.879
<v Speaker 1>scenarios to take place in the next week, but I'm

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>fairly sure it's not going to snow. We'll see. Um.

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, these sort of these sort of considerations come

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>up time and time again. But if you have a

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 1>true random randomness generator, then you were gonna have to think, well,

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what if it did snow, what's my plan for the

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for the snow day next week, and uh and and

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that can force you to consider possibilities that just would

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.879
<v Speaker 1>not be there if you did not have something like

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that eaching to turn to yeah, exactly. So. The way

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about this is that what what if divination

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>methods are essentially a way we've come up with for

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>encouraging mutations in our behavior in the evolutionary sense, allowing

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>our lives and societies to test new ways of living

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and potentially culturally evolve. I can't help it come back

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Game of Werewolf that we just kind of

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>haphazardly mentioned earlier. But in the game of the Werewolf,

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it is random. It is completely random who is going

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to be the werewolf in a given game, which individuals

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>will be the villains of that round of play, and

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that pure randomness is one of the main reasons the

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>game is so engaging. But it brings out things in

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>people like the randomness can allow you to suddenly have

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the deceiver when you wouldn't normally play that

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>role in life, that's not part of your established patterns

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of behavior. It draws out things in your personality that

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:01.919
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't have accessed otherwise is yeah, I mean God,

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there's I don't want to talk too much

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>about gambling and all this, but but imagine like the

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>weirdness of the lottery. In considering this, somebody, we're just

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna make somebody a millionaire, just just randomly, and see

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens. See how it affects that everybody. It seems

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like it often doesn't work out too good. Well no,

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but for other people. For me, I feel like I

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>could handle it. But that's what we all tell each other, right, Yeah,

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that might be different. Even playing the lottery, though, is

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a contemplation of that uncertainty. What did happen?

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, generally that's the only option that someone is

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:40.799
<v Speaker 1>fantasizing about when they play it. What if I win?

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>What will that be like? Now, a counter factual to

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this hypothesis that I just put out there that divination

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>methods might be valuable because they introduce random to s

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into our lives is that you could think that, like

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in nature, most mutations are either either have no effect

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.319
<v Speaker 1>or are harmful. Right, But I wonder if there is

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>an overall selection effect on introducing randomness into behavior, because

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really good deviations from patterns of behavior are are beneficial

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep the whole thing in the in the black. Well,

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're bringing up at the very beginning of the

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>episode the idea of pulling up random passages from the Bible,

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and we can just apply this to any book that

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you yourself consider a book of wisdom. It could be,

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be any religious or secular work. The first

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>five times you do it, you could get nonsense, You

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:34.840
<v Speaker 1>could get what would be in a biological level, just

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a disastrous mutation. But but then you keep going until

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you hit the one that is novel that you hadn't

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>thought about. Uh, And I mean that's what makes the

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>process worthwhile. Yeah, well, but that what you just said

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 1>also makes me think about how this hypothesis could inform

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea that some divination methods are actually more adaptive

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>than others. Even though none of them are actually magic,

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>none of them can actually predict the future, some of

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>them do feel more useful. And this could be because,

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, spontaneous divination would not allow you to depart

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:13.280
<v Speaker 1>from internally establish mental patterns. Right if you're just looking

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at stuff and saying, what does this mean from the gods,

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you're probably you're just drawing on the same types of

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thought processes that would normally guide your behavior. Yeah. Yeah,

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not really reaching outside yourself for that answer. Sort

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of lige on the other hand, maybe more useful for

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing, because if you're employing sufficiently pseudo

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>random processes like rolling dice or yarrow sticks or flipping coins,

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>then you and then you use those numbers to consult

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>sections of a pre written text that you can't edit

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't create. You are introducing external random factors

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>into your life that you have no control over. Now,

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there might be to some extent and ability to sort

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of correct for that randomness by your process of interpretation.

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if some of the value of the

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the interpretive tradition ends about things like the eaching make

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 1>it harder for you to ignore the random aspects of

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:12.360
<v Speaker 1>these of these divination outcomes, right, They make it harder

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for you to rationalize away novelty and make you sort

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of like face the randomness. And of course randomness can

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>be pleasant, it can be terrifying, Yeah, depending on the

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 1>details of what you're contemplating. Totally true. Now, one last

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:29.879
<v Speaker 1>thing I have to kind of wonder about though, if

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this is true, If it is true that methods like

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this work by introducing randomness into your life, and that

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>can in many cases have some kind of benefit, do

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you lose the benefit if you understand that process, Like,

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't actually think that the wisdom provided by

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the eaching is some kind of magic thing delivered by

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the gods. If you think it's, well, this is just

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a random process that I'm using to introduce some creative

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>novelty into my life, does it still have the same

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>power to do that? So? Yeah, So the idea here

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>being that you would have to buy into the eaching

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to a certain amount to get anything out of it.

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm saying, I wonder if you would have to.

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the answer to that is going to

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 1>vary from individual to individual. You know, It's like to

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what to to varying degrees. I feel each individual is

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 1>able to turn to something like the eaching and and

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of divide it, you know, and understand that, Okay,

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not the voice of the divine, but I

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can find some wisdom in it, you know, Like, to

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what extent can the individual? Does the individual value insight

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in literature or in historical texts or or to what

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>extent do they view randomness as a beneficial aspect of

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:50.399
<v Speaker 1>life and not just pure chaos to be avoided. Right, Well,

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, I guess some people would get random

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:56.879
<v Speaker 1>insights or random charges to action, and they would tend

0:56:56.880 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to ignore them because they break patterns of behavior. Some

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>people are just we're very set in our ways, aren't we. Yeah,

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And changes terrifying, but that's that's all. That's the crazy

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>things that that is what this is all about. I mean,

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the Book of Changes. It's the book of dealing

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with the rate of change in our lives in the

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>universe and how one is supposed to react accordingly so

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as to avoid the more detrimental situations. It's the book

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of entropy. Yeah, all right, So there you have it.

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we gave you a lot to chew on here,

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>along with just a basic understanding of what the eaching

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is and how it fits in with other divination practices

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from around the world. If you'd like to reach out

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to us uh and discuss any of this, well, hey,

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on social media or on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, Instagram.

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>We're also, of course, that's stuff to blow your mind

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com that is the mothership. That is where you

0:57:48.920 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>will find all the episodes of the podcast, as well

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as the links out to those social media accounts. Thanks

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>as always to our excellent audio producers Alex Andry, and

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our guest producer Paul for stepping in today. Paul,

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing great. If you'd like to get in touch

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:06.320
<v Speaker 1>with us about this episode or any other, or if

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you would like to let us know a topic that

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you think we should do in the future, or just

0:58:10.240 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to say hi, you can always email us at Blow

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the Mind at how stuff works dot com for more

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>illness and thousands of other topics because it how stuff

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>works dot com.