WEBVTT - Investors Are Starting To Look At Argentinian Assets

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>markets in general are pretty calm, at least if you

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the United States. Look elsewhere, not so much.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>In particular, I'm talking about Argentina, which today asked the

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>i m F the International Monetary Funds to expedite and

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>already agreed upon credit line the payments of fifty billion

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars still out there. Joining us now to talk about

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets and specifically some of the troubled child children

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>within them. Damien Sassaur, chief Merging markets credit strategist here

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. Damien, what do you make of Argentina

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point, basically asking for help with their currency

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>falling to a record low versus the dollar. Yeah, well,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean Argentina has been trading heavy for a very

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>long time now, I mean technicals have improved, but again

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced it's all clean positioning here. I mean

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's fundamentals remain very very weak, declining GDP. I mean,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to enter its second recession in as many

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>years this year. Rising interest rates, I mean interest rates

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>have literally doubled. I mean, I think dollar interest rates

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in Argentina now are are hovering around ten percent. Uh,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you're in the high if you look at local currency rates.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, No, I mean rising inflation week externals, there's

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot not to like about Argentina. But interestingly enough,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the past forty eight hours, I've received some interesting calls

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>from investors, particularly advent riven investors, who are actually looking

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>at current levels and perhaps looking to get involved, which

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>may be a sign that you know, things might change. Uh.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason I is because wait a minute, when when

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when this election took place? When when we got the

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>new president mackri I remember distinctly people beating the drums

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>saying this is different. You've got to get in. Argentina

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the best place to invest money.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh come on, well, I mean you're right, Pim. I mean, look,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you look at going into March of

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, when Iam sort of melted down. It was

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the largest overweight in emerging markets according to JP Morgan's

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Positioning survey. Right, so people were definitely long and wrong.

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're aut. You make a very good point.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, people who held on on the way down

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last few months, it's gonna be very difficult

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for them to reload at current levels. Well, I'm just

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about credibility. Well, yeah, right, what credibility do they

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have when they are dealing with the second recession in

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>two years and having defaulted what five times in the

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>past century. I would I would argue the other thing.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, they've they've made quite a bit of

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>progress in structural reforms. They've liberalized their effects rate, they've

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>reduced export duties, they've cut fuel subsidies. I mean, they've

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>re established times with global capital markets after being in

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the black for ten years. But um, but you're absolutely right.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know they want fifty billion dollars from the International

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Monetary Fund. Well, I mean, look, the government. If I think,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the government would be better served if it

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>put disinflation efforts aside, engineered a controlled real depreciation of

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the PAS. So with the attention of again, boosting external competitiveness,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>attracting FDI and and reducing the fiscal deficit. And I

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>think that fifty billion I m F line goes a

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>long way to giving them the support they need and

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the credibility they need to put through, you know, to

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually do that. Unlike Turkey, right, I mean, Turkey,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, has shown the I m F. They've shunned

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>their Western investors. You know, Argentina has taken a very

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>different tack. And yet Argentina five year CDs is trading

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>above six hundred basis points in Turkeys only at what

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and eighty? So where's the disconnect their? Right?

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would make the case that perhaps Argentina

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>looks relatively attractive at current levels. Interesting I think that

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>right now I want to add not a little bit

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Argentina as an adysentcratic story for sure. Uh Turkey as well,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>both of them seeing distress. But at a time when

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a number of pretty big asset managers have gotten burned

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>very badly based on Argentinean and Turkish sell offs of assets,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder is this going to lead to

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a broader risk off in e m just because burned once,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>burned twice? How many times can these people get burned

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>before they just say, forget it, I'm going to cast

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't want to play this time in

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a different story with Argentina because you know, we've lived

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>through Argentina. I mean, we um guys that live through

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Argentina for the better part of our careers. But you know,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>while the pacers plunged and rates have searched, um. You know,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>thus far, Argentine's remain quite confident in their banking system.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>They have not withdrawn deposits as they have in Latin

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in previous crisis. Is like we're seeing in other places

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like Turkey and and and look, I mean cross border

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>market funding and liquid assets remain ample in both dollars

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and pacias in Argentina, So the banking system remains, you know,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>relatively healthy. So you don't contagion either within Argentina or

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>more broadly in emerging markets. I think I think Turkey

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and Argentina have Look, they're a very small part of

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets, you know, and so far, yeah, we've

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>been relatively I guess fortunate that we haven't seen contagion.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not China it's not you know, it's not even

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>brazila Russia. Um. But you know, I I take your point.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, as things, you know, get worse and look,

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>performances and perception is reality. So long as performance remains

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, low and poor. Um. You know, you know

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>this will eventually slip into the real economy. You know.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The longer that you know these economies failed to perform,

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the longer that they you know, they are mired in

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this weakness, you know, things are going to get more

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and more challenging and and so you're right from that perspective,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>but we're not quite there yet. UM. I still think

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Argentina, you know, can can manage their

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>way out of this. Turkey is a different story. But Argentina,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I think at current levels, it's starting

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to look a little bit of attractive. I sense a

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>trip to Buenos airis in the future for Damian Sasaur.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You never know, Damian Sassaura, thank you very much, Chief

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Emerging markets credit strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us the

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lowdown on investing in emerging markets. Canada's Foreign Affairs and

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Minister Christopher Freelan is meeting in Washington, d C with

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>her US counterparts. This comes a day after US President

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump announced a deal with Mexico on trade, and

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of course Canada was absent from those US Mexican discussions.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about this three way complicated

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>trade agreement is Antonio Ortiz Mayna. He is a senior

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>vice president for Albright stone Bridge Group a s G. Formerly,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he served for eight years as head of Economics Affairs

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Embassy of Mexico in the United States, where

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>he advised US companies with a presence in Mexico as

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>well as Mexican companies doing business in the United States. Ambassador,

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. Can you

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us what is so terrible about if indeed that

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is so Canada not being part of the negotiations between

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Mexico, And then why would Mexico

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have those negotiations solely with the US if indeed having

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Canada there was so important. Yes, thank you for the

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>invitation and glad to share my views on that. First

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, I would say that even though Canada was

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not at the table over the past two months, let's say,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>after the G seven summit in Canada, where there was

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a fallout between Canada and the US. Canada was in

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a way of participating in the negotiations above all, with

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>great consultations between Mexico and Canada, and Mexico was dealing

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with the US on some pretty contentious issues, I would say,

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>chief among them the automobile rules of origin, and was

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that was settled. It was pretty easy for Canada to

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>buy into that and then to deal with issues that

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are more three way challenges rather than bilateral issues. So

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where we stand. But the clock is sticking from

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>now until of Friday, and I don't know what will happen.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Has a lot changed really between the US and Mexico.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this deal likely to stick and is

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it really that different? Um, well, there there are open questions.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>First of all, will it be bilateral or trilateral? We

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>will now buy Friday. And this is not trivial because

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>under U s Trade Promotion Authority, the Congress delegated authority

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to US negotiators to update NAFTA, to modernize NAFTA, not

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to do a bilateral deal with Mexico or even another

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bilateral deal with Canada. Some so, some members of the

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>House and Senate are questioning whether uh USDR has authority

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to submit a bilateral deal with Mexico. That's on a

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of a legal technical perspective, but even more importantly,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>from a substantial perspective, I don't think it would be

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to have a bilateral agreement. I think

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>a trilateral agreement is much more significant from an economic perspective.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>So why did you believe Mexico entered into this bilateral negotiation.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that Mexico wanted to accelerate negotiations as as

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>much as possible to see if they could sign the

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>agreement with the current government that will end on December one,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and to do that they had to advance on a

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>number of bilater role issues with the US, and as

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, the main one was over all the rules

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of origin. So once they got that of out of

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, it was easier to accelerate negotiations. Our guest

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is Dr Antonio ortiz Amina. He is the senior vice

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>president at albright Stone Bridge Group, previously serving as the

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>head of Economic Affairs at the Embassy of Mexico. And

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing surprising their Doctor Ortismina from the Foreign Minister of

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Canada that they're having good negotiations. But what could have

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>changed in such a brief amount of time. Is it

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that Canada realizes that the clock is taking in at

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Mexico or will go their own

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>way with or without Canada. Well, a couple of things

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have happened. First the agreement on autos, which is critically

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>important for Canada. Secondly, UH an important agreement on the

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sunset class. So the sunset class was an absolute deal

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>breaker UH for both Mexico Canada. So with those two

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>big items out of the way, I think Canada can

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.359
<v Speaker 1>now deal with some bilateral issues, above all supply management

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in their dairy industry, and then to deal with something

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think will be very complicated, and that's NAPTER

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>chapter nineteen, which deals with unfair trade practices, dumping and subsidies.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It is my understanding that Mexico on the US reached

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an agreement to do away with NAPTA chapter nineteen, and

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>chapter nineteen is very important for Canada, but substantively over

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the endless software lumber dispute and politically so they will

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have to see how they can resolve that. So one

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm struck by here is that President Trump

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is negotiating directly with Canada and with Mexico. But Congress

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily on board. So how much cloud does President

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump have in these renegotiations when Congress ultimately has to

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sign off and it's unclear how connected they are to

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to this whole process. Absolutely, they are different negotiations going

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on right now. So it's US Canada trade negotiations finalizing

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Mexico U S trade negotiations, and that trilateral negotiations, and then, uh,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the executive will have to make sure that Congress accepts

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>whatever they submit. And it is not a foregone conclusion

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Congress will accept a bilateral deal because the

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>authority was granted to do a trilateral deal. Right. Well, yeah,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but those are the legal issues that you that you

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned previously. Now you mentioned Mexico's domestic political situation wanting

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal done before the new administration of

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Loprez Lopez Oprador takes office. Canada is also facing an election,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and then we have the US mid term elections in November.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that politics is currently driving the negotiations. Yes,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that politics are are to great extin

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>driving the negotiation. And my view is that it might

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>be more US politics rather than Mexican politics. And let

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>me explain why. So, the upcoming Lopezo ad Or administration

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to get the NAFTA issue out of the way

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to focus on other domestic politics issues and additional very

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated by lateral issues with the US, including undocumented migration,

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>cooperation and security, et cetera. So it's more of an

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that they want to close this chapter and move

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on to other things, rather than there being a risk

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that the next Mexican Congress would not ratify a new

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA agreement. So that is my view in terms of

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican politics. The US politics, I think are more

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>complicated because the calculation by us DR has to do

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with the current Congress and what could be ratified by

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the current House and Senate. If they wait until they have,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the a new Senate next year, then the

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>political calculus might change and what could have been acceptable

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the current Congress in terms of the

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Mexican concessions might not be acceptable later on. So I

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do have say more questions about the effect of US

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics on the negotiations and ratification than I do

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about Mexican politics. Even though there will be a change

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in government in Mexico. This is really compellingentis it suggests

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to me that everyone's going to try to expedite this

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>through the process very quickly in order to avoid any

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of political turmoil. That that is correct, But I'm

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not concerned about US political turmoil than Mexican political turmoil. Yeah,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Ortiz at Manna, thank you so much for being

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with us. Antonio Ortiz at Manna, see your vice president

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of the all Bright stone Bridge Group. He's also the

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>former head of economic affairs at the Embassy of Mexico

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, joining us now Alex Wayne Bloomberg

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>White House team Leader Alex. Interestingly, in response to this announcement,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Io S Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican, tweeted out that

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he hopes that is not the case, that this is

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not true, and he tweeted this to President Trump, Alex,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what are we to make of all of this? So

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>arguably the president's biggest achievement has been getting judicial nominees

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>appointed to positions in the federal court system. He's gotten

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>uh sixty appointments to the court system already, including appeals

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Court judges and a Supreme Court justice with more on

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the way. Probably, so the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Chuck

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Grassley is the guy who has moved all those appointments

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>through the process. He's worked closely with McGann. Megan gets

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credits on the right among conservatives and

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>among Republican members of Congress for shepherding all these judicial appointments.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that is what Grassley is concerned about,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that if there is turmoil in the White House Counsel's

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>position that the steady flow of judicial appointments may may

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>may get a little a little bumpy. Can you give

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of the background to this. I mean,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Don McGann is not President Trump's personal lawyer and has

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>said he was not aware of some of the payments

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that were made to people to not talk about. So

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is that related to his decision to leave or has

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this been in the works for a while now? What

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what McGann is is involved in his UH Special Counsel

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Mueller's investigations. He has taught extensively with the Special

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Counsel UH, essentially because the President gave him the green

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>light to do so. And so McGann that the White

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>House never expressed privilege over McGann to to limit what

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>he said to the Special Counsel, So he's He's believed

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to have told Bob Mueller's folks a lot about how

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the early days of the White House worked, the firing

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of James Comey, UM, the Trump's decision making process with

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>regard to Michael Flynn as former National Security advisor, all

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of those things Don McGann was very involved with and

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>uh and has has spoken on the Special Council about UM.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He and Trump have also reportedly budded heads over sort

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of the limits of presidential power. Trump is, I think,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>asked McGann to do things and McGann has had to

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>tell him no, and that's made the President a little

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with him. Alex Washington is a political town. Is

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this a firing or a resignation something in between? I think, um,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. We we don't know whether mcgannny this is coming.

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a report at Axioist this morning, uh, tip

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of the hat to them that said McGann was preparing

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>to leave either after Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court or after the midterm elections. In November. But um,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the President seems to have sort of quickened the pace

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on that departure a little bit with the tweet today.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So it's, UM, I don't know, it's it's sort

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of like a slow motion of firing or something. I'm

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure. What is the role of the White

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>House Council. What does the White House Council do? The

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>White House Council defends the White House and the Office

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Presidency, uh and represents the White House in

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the Office of the Presidency in legal matters. The White

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>House Council does not represent the President. That was apparently

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a misunderstanding that Donald Trump had upon entering the White House.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>He wanted. One thing we've we've seen reported is that

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he sort of thought that Don mgan was his personal attorney.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's not what the White House Council does.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And go ahead, going forward, who's likely to replace Don

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And does this expedited potential firing a Jeff Jeff Sessions

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that some people have been suggesting this morning. Uh, don't

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>know that it has anything to do with Jeff Sessions.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>But the guy that is regarded as probably the likely

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>successor to McGann isn't as a lawyer named Emmett Flood.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>He was hired earlier this year to replace Ty Cobb,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>who had been dealing with UH with Mueller. So Emmett

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Flood is now the the special counsel, the guy dealing

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with the special counsel investigation. He also handled UH investigations

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Clinton White House. Interestingly, UM, so he's he's

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>not really a partisan guy and at Flood he's just

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a guy who strongly believes in the independence of the

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the White House and in defending the president whoever

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it is um from investigations both by by by Counsel

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and the and the Justice Freman or by Congress. And

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this would require no approval process. Is that correct? Right?

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Especially the the White House Counsel is not a Senate

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>confirmed edition. It's not. It's not a count of position.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's entirely up to the president. As far as Emmett

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Flood is concerned, he's got experience, as you said, in

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a variety of administrations. What would be his role in

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>disappointment of judges and in the general role of being

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a White House counsel. I remember that he was representing

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time Vice President Dick Cheney. Uh in the

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that was filed by Valerie Plaie I believe about

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the Plame affair about the right. So conventional wisdom is

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats are going to take the House in the

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections. And if that happens, UH, the White House

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can expect a flood of congressional investigations. Uh. Every subcommittee

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in the House with investigation investigatory powers is going to

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be probing one scandal or another within the Trump administration.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And so Emmett Flood will be the guy if he

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if he assumes the job, he will be the guy

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>who has to respond to all these investigations and fight

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>back against them. Alex, if we could just take a

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>step back and talk about the turnover that we've seen

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so far in the White House and try to draw

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of implication from it. Is this pretty typical

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>or is this a sign of something else? But if

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not typical, then then what can we draw from it?

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it just that President Trump is known for high

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>turnover just generally, and this is his style? Is this

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>good guy to work for the President is a difficult

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>person to work for? And this is a very tumultuous

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>White House. There has been a lot, a lot of turnover,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more turnover than any previous presidency than anybody's ever looked

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>closely at Brookings Institute has has good numbers on that um.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's all because of the kind of guy Donald

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump is. Uh. He demands loyalty from his subordinates. Uh,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't tend to show them much loyalty himself, and

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people come in and out. I

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you very much for joining us, alex

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Wayne of Bloomberg sharing some insight into what's going on

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the White House. Of course, Don McGan the announcement

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>from President Donald Trump that he will be leaving his

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>position as the White House Counsel uh sometime in the fall,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>based on the tweet from the President to speaking about

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>also the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to alex Wayne joining us down to tell

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>us all about the world of video gaming. Is Ted Pollock.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>He is a video game technology analyst and the co

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>founder of The Gamer E t F G a m

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>R E t F. Ted Pollock, thanks very much for

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>being here. How old were you when you first played

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>video games? Well, I think my parents brought home about

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>age seven or eight, and have you've been playing them

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>continuously since then? Not quite. I have a lot of

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>different hobbies, but it's a great thing to do for

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>your screen time, and it's it's more intellectually engaging than television.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about the technology set up that many gamers have,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>because if you're not in the gaming world, you're not

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily aware of the power, the complexity, the vibrancy of

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the graphics that are now rudimentary when it comes to

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a game. That's a great point. There's a huge spectrum

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of of systems ranging from the most powerful, which will

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be your gaming PCs made by companies like Dell, alien Ware, HP, Lenovo,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. And then you go down

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>into the PlayStation four, the Xbox one, the Nintendo Switch.

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You have tablet gaming, you have mobile phone gaming. There's

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>still arcade gaming out there, you have virtual reality. Uh,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just a huge spectrum of gaming. And coming up in

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the next three to five years, there's going to be

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a revolutionary change in gaming as we moved to cloud streaming.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Cloud streaming is where the game is being processed on

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a remote server and all you need is a very

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>low power processor to play high quality graphics. So certainly

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>gaming has expanded dramatically, and not just from a playing perspective,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>but also a spectating perspective. And there's one study that

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you highlighted that showed that professional video gaming just in general,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry will search just this year alone. Okay, that's

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop. Let's move fast forward to where we are

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Or there's some questions, particularly in China with

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>their decision not to approve some pretty mainstream games, and

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this has led to a lot of uncertainty. What's the

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>impact of that, How how significantly should people take that? Well, China,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their cultural agencies are very dringent on all sorts of media,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and they they throttle certain certain media titles, certain brands,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're also very careful about the business models that

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the game companies are using. There. Some of the uh,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the free to play models encourage kids to perhaps play

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much, so they're being careful about

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how they do that. But on a positive note in China, uh,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a game company called net Dragon Websoft that just

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>today announced six increase in earnings and they make educational games.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's some positive things going on in China as well.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not all bad news. So I'm looking right now

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>at the geographic allocation of your assets in the game

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>or e t F. China is nearly ten, the US

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is about thirty. Uh. How will that, how will that

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>shift over the next couple of years from your expectations,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that it should remain fairly stable and in

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>those and then allocations, I gonna I'd be remiss if

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask you about any fall out having to

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>do with the tragedy in uh, Jacksonville in Florida, having

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to do with those public games that was NFL MAT

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen. I think security is important at schools, at

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>music concerts, at any place where people gather, and that uh,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's really what's going on here that you're

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be It's gonna be a sort of the fact though,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the operational procedure. Everybody gets wanded, Everybody goes through

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>some kind of metal detector to check for any kind

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of suspicious Uh. This this could this could segue into

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a discussion not about the gaming industry, and but bottom

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>line is that you have to deal with the environment

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that is out there currently in the current environment is

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that when people gather, there's a risk that someone crazy

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>will do something bad. Just real quick. Uh. From your perspective,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>do you expect gaming to be a rival to, say, football,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in ten years on the sports front? YEP, that's a

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>difficult question. I think that when you look at there's

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there's three ways of looking at the popularity. There's there's participants,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>there's followers, and there's revenue. So certainly the number of

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>followers and gaming. You have a billion people playing games

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>globally and just a small percentage of that would be

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of people. So I think gaming could

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely rival professional sports and the number of followers. Monetizing

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that is something that a lot of the game companies

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>are going after and some of them are doing a

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really good job. Ted Pollock, thank you so much for

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Thanks for having me on. Ted Pollock

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Senior Game Menalist at John Petty Research. She's also the

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>President portfolio manager of the fund management management co founding

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Gamer et F. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Blueberg Radio.