WEBVTT - Tech News: India Cracks Down on Twitter

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech, and it is time

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for the tech news for Tuesday, July six, twenty one.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it. An infosec researcher who goes by

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the handle dr web Anti Virus. I love that handle,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>posted a list of ten apps that are were found

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Google Play Store that are host to a

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>trojan horse type of malware. This is a kind of

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>malware that acts as a carrier for some sort of

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>malicious payload. So you can think of it as kind

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the gel cap that contains something really nasty inside

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it and just slips into a system. What specifically goes

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>into a trojan can vary, but in this case, the

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>malware's purpose is to scrape Facebook log and credentials off

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of phones. So lots of apps have options that allow

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>users to link that app to a Facebook account, often

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>with dubious benefits to the user for doing so. It's

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty common practice and some users don't even think

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>twice about it. They just click right through. In this case,

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>doing that opens up the chance for someone to gain

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>your login and password to Facebook, which is also why

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's always a good idea to enable two factor authentication

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on any services that offer it. It's a bit of

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a hassle, but it can save you some real heartache

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. The ten apps include p I

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>P Photo or PIP Photo Processing, Photo, Rubbish Cleaner, Horoscope,

0:01:54.440 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Daily In, Well Fitness, app Lock, Keep block It, Mass Sir,

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Horoscope Pie, and app lock Manager. Google has removed all

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>ten apps from the app store, but people have downloaded

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these apps at least six million times collectively. Across all

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the apps, the apps gave no indication that they were malicious.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>All of them actually did what it was they claimed

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to do. They just went above and beyond and harvested

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook data to on top of that, so if you

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>use Android devices, it's a good idea to check to

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure you didn't download and install any of those apps.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also a good idea to change your Facebook password

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and to activate two factor authentication. It's time for another

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency story. This time the King of Bitcoin is in

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>legal trouble. I should add this is a self proclaimed

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>King of Bitcoin, Bitcoin is not now, nor has it

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ever been, an actual monarchy. This guy's name is Claudio Livera,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>and allegedly he embezzled a lot of money from investor

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>ers who are looking to get into cryptocurrency and buy

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. I'm talking somewhere in the neighborhood

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of three hundred million dollars. Yelza. Olivera is the president

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of a company called the Bitcoin Banko Group, and a

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, in twenty nineteen, the group was in

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>financial trouble. The company reported that after balancing its books,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it came up with a shortfall of seven thousand bitcoins

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or so. So, in other words, seven thousand bitcoins just

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed to up and vanish. Now that could actually happen,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of course. I mean if the company were to store

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoins in a digital wallet that in turn was

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on you know, some specific device, and then the company

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>lost access to that device, like maybe they sold it

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or threw it out or something, well, that money would

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>also be lost. It would be on that physical hardware.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>At least the record of it that allows you to

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>use that money would be on that physical hardware. This

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is equivalent to stuffing a physic sical like combination lock

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>safe full of cash and then throwing that safe into

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the ocean at any rate. The company then applied for

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>permission from the Brazilian government to go through a process

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that would allow the company to reorganize its finances in

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>order to you know, payoff creditors and and to not

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go bankrupt, and the government agreed to this. But then

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Brazilian government noted that a year on into this process,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the company didn't seem to actually be following the court

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>prescribed process of reorganization. It wasn't doing what it was

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do by court mandate. And that's when the

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Brazilian government formed an investigation into Olivera, which ultimately concluded

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that he had been skimming money from investors for himself,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and furthermore that he appeared to have had a history

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of doing this in other places, including the United States.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Olivera is now in police custody in Brazil. Last Friday,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we learned that a networking company called Kause, which makes

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>products designed to help I T professionals maintain a minister

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>network systems and I T infrastructure, got hit with a

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ransomware attack. Lots of companies rely on cause A products,

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and according to the company, anywhere from eight hundred to

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred customers may be affected by this UH and

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's actually kind of a cascading effects. So because A

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>gets targeted, right, they are the company that provides the

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>services overall. But in that process of targeting the company,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the hackers were able to breach data on about fifty

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of cause As direct customers. But those fifty customers in

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>turn provide services to smaller companies, so we start to

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>see the effects ripple outward. That's where we get to

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that range of eight d to fifteen hundred affected companies.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>The affected companies are essentially locked out of their cloud

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>based systems. Hacker group called REvil m R e v

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I L has claimed response ability and has demanded a

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>ransom of seventy million dollars in Bitcoin in order to

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>release the hold they have on that system to decrypt it. Essentially,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the most that any hacker group has ever demanded

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as a ransom so far. The previous record holder was

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>um let's see here, oh you know what, still Rebuild.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>They demanded fifty million dollars from Aser earlier this year.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>A spokesperson for CAZA has declined to comment on paying

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ransoms to terrorists, And just as a reminder, you know,

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>paying ransomware is not a great idea. It does not

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that you're actually going to regain control of your systems,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and paying off the ransom sends the message that this

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is an effective and profitable type of crime, and that

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>guarantees that you'll have more attacks in the future. Some

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>companies likely make the choice to pay off the ransom

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because they happen to have some form of cyber insurance

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>against that kind of thing, and I guess that makes

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sense from the company's perspective. I mean, if you can

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>pay off a ransom and get control of your systems

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>back and you get reimbursed for the money you spent

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 1>because you're insured, you kind of made it all someone

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>else's problem, right. Insurance companies are starting to see that

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>problem manifest now, which I imagine means we're going to

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>see some big changes in that kind of insurance moving forward. Anyway,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>INFOSEC researchers believe that revel is based out of Russia

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or possibly Eastern Europe, and we're seeing this a lot

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of criminal groups in Russia in particular

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>picking up the pace. There's a general belief that the

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Russian government allows these criminal groups to operate. Maybe they

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>even subcontract with these criminal organizations in order to target

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>specific political enemies. That's an allegation that the Russian government

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>itself denies. But generally speaking, if you're developing software and

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in Russia, you're pretty much confined to the Russian market,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and hacking becomes a more viable means of making money.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, I can't say for certain that the

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Russian government condones or actively supports these hacking uh activities,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but the government does seem to be reticent in pursuing

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>legal action against these hacker organizations. Let's put it that way.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>At best, it appears they're looking the other way, and

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at worst they're in cahoots. In addition to that, I

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>also want to mention that the company because has said

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it is working to get the services restored today July six.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>By the time you listen to this, that may have

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>already happened. Moving on, in India, Twitter is facing a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>very tough situation. The Indian government has ruled that Twitter

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>has not been compliant with content regulation within the country,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, will not enjoy liability protection against

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>stuff that people post on Twitter. While in India, the

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>law states that Twitter is to remove posts quickly in

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>response to legal requests from you know, law enforcement, and

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that the company is also supposed to share details about

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the owner of accounts that post offending messages. So, in

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>other words, if someone posts something that is in violation

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of these rules in India, then Twitter is supposed to

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>give up information about that person to Indian law enforcement.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was also to hire a compliance officer to ensure

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that the company would follow India's national policies. Also supposed

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to hire a grievance officer in charge of reviewing allegations

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and a contact person who would respond to law enforcement

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>messages as soon as possible. And according to the government,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement received a complaint from an unknown or unnamed

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter user that said that they were the victims of

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>malicious messages that were posted on Twitter that violated these

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>rules that I've mentioned, and that the company had not

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>yet hired the officers that I mentioned earlier. This follows

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on the heels of some really big stories in India

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>involving social media, including the government's attempts to suppress a

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>farmers protest within India, and also Twitter had labeled some

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>messages from Indian officials as being manipulated media, which caused

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a big mess in India. Here in the United States,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.599
<v Speaker 1>social networking sites enjoy legal protection thanks to Section to thirty,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>which says that platforms are not accountable for the stuff

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that their users post to those platforms. But officials in

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>India point out that it is unreasonable for a company

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to expect American laws and American legal protection while they're

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>operating in a totally different country. It is too early

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to say how all this is going to play out

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not Twitter executives will eventually have to

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stand charge for content posted on Twitter in India, content

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>posted by you know, other people. But I expect we're

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna see some pretty big stories come out of all this,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and not just with Twitter, but with any social networking

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>site that is operating within India, an enormous market. It's

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>not like these companies want to just pull out of India. However,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there is a place where they are threatening to do

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just that, just not in India. So, speaking of American

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>social networks facing big decisions and overseas markets, let's talk

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about Hong Kong. The local government there plans to enact

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some new rules that would change data protection laws within

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the city of Hong Kong, and the goal is to

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>fight doxing. Now, that's the practice of a person sharing

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>some other person's personal information without their consent, UH, typically

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for malicious purposes, like to either encourage harassment or worse. So,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, if I were to share Ben Boland's home

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>address on this program, that would be doxing, and I

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>suspect that's why Ben always forces me to wear a

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>blindfold and sit in a card that then randomly drives

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>around the city for two hours before I can never

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>visit him anyway, Hong Kong's rules would set finds of

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly dollars per incident plus up to five years imprisonment.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And apparently, as the rules are written, they could apply

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to platforms that includes companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>so not just the people posting to them, but the

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>platforms that carry the messages as well. The company's sent

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a letter back in June that just became public this week,

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and that letter warns Hong Kong officials that if the

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>rules are going to go into practice, these companies will

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have no choice but to stop providing services within Hong Kong.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of an ultimatum. Dots ng is a

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>truly abhorrent practice. But just to be clear and to

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get the full context of this, these rules seem to

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>stem not from the way that private citizens have been

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>affected in Hong Kong, but that rather, during the anti

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>government protests in Hong Kong back in twenty nineteen, some

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>people were sharing private information about several police officers that

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up making the rounds online. Now, again, this is

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a terrible practice, like you know, it's it's it's not

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>good no matter which side is using this, and many

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of those police officers ended up facing targeted harassment and worse,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>including you know, their families. But I just wanted to

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>give context that the rules don't seem to be in

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>response to, you know, citizen concerns. It seems to be

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a response to try and clamp down on

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>citizens and as a response to civilian challenges to the

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>government's activities. So in other words, I guess the the

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>short way of saying all that is people are way

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than technology ever will be. We have a

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>couple more stories to get through. But before I do that,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. Okay, we're back so over

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom, there is a semiconductor company called

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Newport Wafer Fab or n WF, and it has a

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>new owner. That owner is next spire A That is

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a company that is based in the Netherlands. However, that

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>company has its own parent company, because things always get

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more complicated, and that parent company is a Chinese firm

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>called Wingtech Group. NWF is the UK's largest silicon chip

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing company. The UK government might actually look into these

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>things a little more closely because the UK passed a

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>law that's called the National Security and Investment Act specifically

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to review all acquisitions that could affect national security. In general,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK government views the practice of a foreign company

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in to purchase big UK companies as being a

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>bit risky. But so far there's been no official resistance

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to this acquisition. Resistance. That's an electricity pun about silicon chips,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't even mean to make that. So we'll

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have to see if the UK government allows this to

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>move forward with no further comment. It is a little weird.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I find the way the UK government handles

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>things to be odd anyway. Now, I look at things

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>like Brexit, which seems to indicate that England or Britain,

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>rather the United Kingdom wants to stand on its own

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and not be part of a larger collective. And yet

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily blinking an eye when large foreign companies come

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in and acquire major companies within the UK. Just seems

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a disconnect, is all I'm saying, Just trying

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand it. Also in acquisition news, we've got some

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about Bugatti, which is a company that's known for its

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>outrageously expensive supercars that very wealthy folks drive at very

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fast speeds. The company of Bugatti started more than a

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>century ago, and I covered a bit about it in

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>my episodes about the history of Volkswagen. The original run

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bugatti ended around the nineteen fifties nineteen sixties. It

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>followed the death of its founder, A Torre Bugatti. His

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>son had passed away a few years earlier before he died,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and it essentially kind of faded from memory. And in

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seven a an investor, a man named Roman rt Oli,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>purchased the rights to the brand name Bugatti, so he

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was able to bring Bugatti back from you know, like

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the Junkyard of history. Volkswagen would then later purchase those

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>rights and launched Bugatti Automobiles in ninet So while the

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>name Bugatti has been in the automotive world since you know,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>nine nine, you could argue that the Bugatti automobile line

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has had sort of three distinct phases. Had the original

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>run with the founder, the run under Artioli when he

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bought the branding, and then the Volkswagen run. Now an

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle startup called Ramack has acquired a majority stake

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in Bugatti from Volkswagen Mate Ramak or perhaps Mate Ramak

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know how to say his name anyway.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>The founder of Ramak will lead the new organization, which

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>will fittingly be called Bugatti Ramak. The deal was an

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all stock deal, and according to Raemak, the Bugotti and

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Rhemack departments will still operate separately as distinct brands. They're

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be merged together. The Bugatti Raemack company

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>will guide both brands. Essentially, it will make the decisions

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for each brand, but each brand will remain its own thing.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The plan is to introduce an electric vehicle version of

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Bugatti by the end of the decade, along with some

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>hybrid models. Users of Audacity have noticed some changes since

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the company mus Group acquired the open source app earlier

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this year. Audacity is a free to download and free

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to use audio recording and editing app. Uh And in fact,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's what I used to record tech stuff when I'm

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>working from home, like today, I'm using Audacity. At work,

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we use Adobe Audition in case you're curious. Audacity is

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>popular because one it's free and to it has a

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly extensive set of features, features that I hardly use

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of them, but understanding what

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>each one does takes a little bit of digging, so

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I've only kind of dipped my toe in like maybe

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the features that are available on Audacity.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>The latest version of Audacity, however, includes changes to the

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>apps privacy policy, and those changes mentioned that the app

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>will collect quote data necessary for law enforcement, IT, litigation

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and authorities requests if any end quote, which huh, yikes.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>This is a piece of software that you use to

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>record audio and then edit that audio. You probably wouldn't

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think of it as also passing information on to some

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>other entity, right, but apparently that's the case. These changes

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>prompted some folks to refer to Audacity as spyware, and

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>there's some indication that we might see a fork in

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Audacity as open source developers go back to earlier versions,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>pre muse group acquisition of Audacity and continue developing the

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>software through the open source approach. And in case you're

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with open source, the idea is that you

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>make code readily available so that people can see exactly

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>how something is coded, and they can then take that

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and depending upon the licensing agreement you set up, they

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>can take that code and build it in to something

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of their own. Maybe they make their own version of

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing that code stands for, and they can then,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on the license agreement, market that themselves. This all

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>depends on how the open code licensing is approached. There

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different ways of doing that. I've

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>covered that on previous episodes. But the big benefit of

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>open source is that you have it open to the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>entire world of developers, as opposed to say, an internal

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>group working on a project. And when you open it

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>up to everyone, well, by nature, you end up getting

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the best ideas. It may take some time for them

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to all kind of rise to the top. But you're

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going to benefit from the experience of the collective. So

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a very effective way of creating powerful applications, but

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it does come with this sort of limitation on how

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you monetize it, or at least there are other factors

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to take into consideration. Moving on, Atari, a

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>company that lays claim to an historic name in video

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>game culture is making a change. Now, before I get

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>into this, I should mention that the Atari of today

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is not the same company as the Atari that was

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the initial video game console boom of the

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>late seventies and early eighties. That version of Atari pretty

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>much doesn't exist anymore. Some of its intellectual property exists,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but but you could think of the current Atari as being,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a reincarnation maybe. So the Attari of today

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to really establish itself in the modern gaming

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>sphere and announced that it's going to transition away from

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>developing free to play mobile games, which is an incredibly

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>competitive field, to focus more on making games for consoles

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and the PC. These plans would potentially include developing new

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>games for the Atari VCS console, which was finally released

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>after multiple delays. This is a console that has a

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>throwback retro look to it. It plays classic Atari twenty

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>six games, among other things like it technically can play

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of other stuff, but it was designed to kind

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of dip into that nostalgia for gamers who are, you know,

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>my age or older. No word yet on how the

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>company is handling the planned opening of its string of

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Attari hotels that we heard about a couple of years ago.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually wonder if that project is still on track

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or not. The first of those hotels is supposed to

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>open in Las Vegas next year, and I know that

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if I ever do return to c e S, I'm

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have to try and book a room in

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that hotel, assuming you know that it exists. And finally,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>has this ever happened to you? You find yourself in

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>a tedious situation, so you reach over and pick up

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>your phone for a distraction. Maybe you're standing in a

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>line and you just want something to take your mind

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>off the fact that you're five people back from being

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>able to order your coffee. Maybe you're watching a TV

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>show and it's just gone to commercial. Maybe you're listening

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to a podcast and the bald guy is just droning

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on about stuff, or maybe you're part of a government

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>body hosting a debate about matters that could potentially affect

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people's lives. That last one is a kicker, right, Like,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's this general feeling that if you're at

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an important debate, for example, let's say you are a

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>US politician in Congress, maybe you should be paying attention

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to the proceedings, as at least theoretically, the outcome of

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>them stands to impact countless people, many of whom you

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>might actually represent. And yet politicians, like everyone else, you

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>can get a bit bored and occasionally they will look

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to their phones for distractions. But the question how occasionally,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like how much or how little attention are the politicians

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>actually paying when it comes to, you know, running a government.

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So an AI that's being called Drees Deporter is scrying

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>through video of televised political debates in Belgium. It's doing

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that to see how frequently people are looking at their phones.

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>So the AI is looking at signs that politicians are

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>looking down at their phones, are actively typing on their

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>phones rather than paying attention to the proceedings at hand.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Then the AI takes screenshots of moments that determines count

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as you know, politicians being distracted. Uh, and it even

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 1>highlights the region showing the phone in the hands of

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that politician then posts those images to Twitter. So it's

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially public shaming. It's it's saying, hey, you are

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>elected to do a job. That job might be boring,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's still important and you are entrusted to do

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that job, so get off you gosh darn phone. Now.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm the first to say this does not sound entirely

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>fair to me, because we don't actually know why the

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>politicians are looking at their phones at any given time.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>There could be cases where there is a legitimate reason

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that isn't related to just you know, checking out from

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever political discussion is going on at the moment. Still,

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a fairly funny story to end

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>our episode on today. And that is it. That's the

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>news for Tuesday, July six one. We'll have more coming

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>up on Thursday. If you have any suggestions for topics

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I should cover in future episodes of Tech Stuff, reach

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>out to me and let me know what those are.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>The best way to do that is over on Twitter,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the handle we use on Twitter is at text Stuff

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>hs W Now I will talk to you again really soon.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.