WEBVTT - Chinese Zodiac: Superstition, Economics & Destiny

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, wasn't it stuff to blow your mind?

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert lamp and I'm Joe mcformix. So Robert, Yes,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a horse, a rat, a dragon, and a metal pig

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>walk into a bar. Okay, the dragon says I'm a dragon.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else leave and they do because he's a dragon.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that would that would make sense. We're of course

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Chinese zodiac here, and you basically just

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>described my family. Yeah, because I am my zodiac sign.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese zodiac is horse, my son's is dragon, my

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>my wife's is actually pig. But for the longest she

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thought she was a rat. How can you be confused?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was just the year you were born. Um,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to make that mistake, especially if you know

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you're just sort of going on a surface level understanding

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. Particularly the surface in question is a place

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>man at a Chinese restaurants niet That is exactly where

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I learned about the Chinese zodiac first when I was

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>a child, and they're probably the early nineteen nineties. I

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>remember my family was one time meeting at a Chinese

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>restaurant and the place mat at my seat had all

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the drawings of the animals and years listed under them,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's where I got to find out that I

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>am a tiger, which sounded really cool at the time,

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but now it I find out that that's not such

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a cool thing. Yeah, it gets a little more complicated

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>than that. And and uh and in terms of just

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>being able to easily mistake what your animal might be,

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's because the Chinese zodiac is an astrological birth chart

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>based upon the Looni solar calendar year. So it doesn't

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>just match the solar calendar that we use right the

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>months or lunar, but the years are solar, so that

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>means it's a little off from the Gregorian calendar. And

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of a drift on the relative

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>start and stop points. So if you just look at

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the animal name and a year, you could get it wrong.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>If you have a birthday in January February, Um, where

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we see this overlap, and your wife does have a

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>birthday in January February, Yeah, she has a February birthday.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So for the longest she thought that she was a rat,

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but in in in actuality she was pig. Now there

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are also elements associated with certain years. Right, So she's

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>not just a pig, she's what a wooden pig and

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>earth pig. Oh, she's a metal pig, which I think

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>is the probably it sounds pretty good to me. Metal gear,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>solid metal pig. Yeah, they're they're at different astrological versions

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of each one. So you know, metal pig, water pig,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>would pig, fire pig, and earth pig would be the

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>complete pig collection. Uh. And just to to give everyone

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>an idea of where we are right now as we're

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>recording this in late January two thousand sixteen, we are

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about to enter into the year of the fire monkey.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>What what was this previous year? Here? We're exiting the

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>year of the goat. Okay, so bye bye goat. All

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>babies born today still goats, but pretty soon they will

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>be fire monkeys instead, that's right. Yeah, there are twelve

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>different animals involved in the zodiac. Uh, and they go

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in a particular or you have rat, ox, tiger, rabbit, dragon, snake, horse, goat, monkey, rooster, dog,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and then pig and then it goes back around. Okay,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get to know those animals a little bit

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more as the episode goes on, but we should have

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a little disclaimer here at the beginning. If you're like,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I thought we were gonna be talking

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about science in the Science podcast. So we are going

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about Chinese astrology in this episode. But

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that we're not necessarily endorsing Chinese astrology

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or any form of astrology or divination as an accurate

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.839
<v Speaker 1>tool for learning about reality, but instead examining it as

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a thing that exerts a powerful influence over human culture

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and behavior. Yeah, the mythology g and the symbolism is fascinating,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's also potent in Eastern culture, and we can

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>actually study the ramifications out of it from an economic standpoint,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from birthrate standpoint. Um, it's all really interesting stuff. So yeah,

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're rolling your eyes at the astrology,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>bear with us, because we're gonna get two numbers. We're

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to the science. Okay, we should check in

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>real quick with what the stuff to blow your minds

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>animal signs are before we move on. So, as we said,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm a tiger, but it turns out I'm married to

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a rat. Rats run run strong in this world, and

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate their power and craftiness. Our other host on

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, Christian Christian Seger, is a snake married to

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit, which sounds like a very fortuitous union. Yeah,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh no, no, what are you again? See a

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>fire pig? I don't think we know, we know he's

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>not a metal pig, but I'm not sure where he

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>falls in line with the with the other descriptors here.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a magic pig maybe. Okay. So, as we said,

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there are twelve signs in the Chinese zodiac, and if

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you're familiar, primarily with the Western zodiac, there will be

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>some similarities and some differences. Now in the Western zodiac,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we primarily judge things by the time of the year

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that you were born. It's seasonal in nature. And I

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think there are some other elements to the traditional Chinese

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>astrology right there. There are things about the time of

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the day you were born or the time of year.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But this this one thing that makes it onto the

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese place mats sort of the easily recognizable large scale

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>view of Chinese birth characteristics. In in this cultural form

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of astrology is based on the year you were born,

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and there there are twelve years in this cycle. That

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they are those twelve animals, And what's the story? Where

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>do these animals come from? And where do we get

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>these ideas about what their personality characteristics are? Well, this

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is the way the story goes. And this is just

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one version of the story. So if you grew up

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>with this or have encountered in a book somewhere, you

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>may have a slightly different version in your head. But

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it rolls out like this, according to the legend the

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Jade Emperor. So who's Who's the Jade Emperor. He's a

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the heavenly Grandfather. He's a mythological ruler, very important

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in Taoism. He's an emperor in a myth rich ancient time. Okay,

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and he wants to create a method of recording the

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>passage of time. So he does the logical thing. He

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>organizes a swim race on his birthday and invites a

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.559
<v Speaker 1>bunch of animals. Okay, And now are these all water

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>animals or they finished? No, none of them were. They're

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the ones we've been talking about before. Yes, pigs and

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>goats and stuff and plus plus cat was also invited

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>according to the version I read, so so that would

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>make it thirteen animals. Right, yes, but as we're gonna see,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>things aren't gonna really work out for the cat all

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that well. And then this is this fun story. By

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, I actually acted this out with my son

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday using toy animals. So if if you want to,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you need a rainy day activity for your your child,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I recommend this. That's so beautiful. Okay, so let's go

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>roll it, Jade Emperor's says, go, you know, the start

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of pistol goes off. Cat and rat are standing there.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They're the slowest swimmers, so what they do is they

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>asked to ride on the ox. But then once they're

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out in the water, the rat pushes the cat off

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 1>into the water and the cat as I guess, washed

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>away by the current. And uh. And then the ox

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>moves in and the rat jumps off of the ox

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is back and gets there first. The first place goes

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to to rat. Okay, so the oxes fording the river

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like an Oregon trail, and the rat rides on his back,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>jumps ahead. Sort of cheats. Is this maybe sort of cheating? Well, yeah,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's cheating, but hen he's also using his intellect and

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he's using he comes up with a creative way. He

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>knows he's not a great swimmer. He knows the ox

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good. This seems like a logical plant. Yeah yeah,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>rats are crafty. They're like Templeton in Charlotte's Web exactly.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So next comes the tiger, just you know, plunges head

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>first across and wait a minute, can tiger swim? The

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>cat can swim? Why can the tiger swim? Well, the

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>cat can swim. The cat was just pushed off. Not

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a good it's not a good swimmer. The tiger can swim,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>makes it across. Next comes the rabbit. Rabbits not a

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>good swimmer, but the rabbit crosses the river by hopping

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the stones. Then comes dragon and dragons. Of course

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be very important. We're gonna discuss dragon in

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in more depth here in a bit. But being a

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>flying cosmic creature, he could have easily come in first,

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but along the way he realized he needed to stop

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and generate some rain to control the weather and then

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>continue on his way. So he wasn't even really that

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>concerned with winning this thing. He had more important duties

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to attend to write, so he's a magnanimous runner up.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>He could have easily won by flying, but he he

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>had other things on his agenda exactly. Now next comes, uh, well,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>my sign and Christian sign. Uh so, here comes snake

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and horse. Alright, now, horse pretty good swimmer, So horses

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna gonna just swim across the river. Snake sneaks aboard,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wraps around the horse's leg, and then when the horse

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is about to climb out of the river and earn

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>its place, horse sees the snake freaks out because horses

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are afraid of snakes, and the snake jumps off and

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>secures the next place in the line, followed by the horse.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a little trickery on the snake's part. Okay, I

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like these trickster animals. Now next comes in this order goat, monkey,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and rooster. But the interesting thing here is that they

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all apparently work rather well together, and the Jade Emperor

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>is very appreciative. This is a good, good teamwork. These

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>three do they build a raft? Did I read that?

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe so. I think that's in some of the version,

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's their their method of teamwork. Otherwise, I guess,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, they could pile on each other's heads or

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>something and walk across that smart. Okay, who's next, Well,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>next comes dog, and Dog is the strongest swimmer of

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the bunch, but he's also easily distracted. So basically he

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just played and splashed in the water for most of

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the race and then realized, oh I need to actually

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>get across. Man, are dogs great? And then come pig,

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>who rather stereotypically here falls asleep after eating during the journey,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's a very late arrival to the other side.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is in the classic Tortoise and the Hair story,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the pig is the hair. In this version, he just

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>decides to take a nap. Yeah, yeah, and uh uh.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, finally, the cat makes its way across

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the river after being betrayed by the rat earlier. But

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the cat is too late to qualify, so the cat

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>does not make it into the official Chinese zodiac and

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is it's instead just left on the outside hating the

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>rat for all eternity. Man, that's harsh. Yeah, So it's

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's it's a fun little story. It's it doesn't

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>give a perfect description of all the the the the

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>astrological significance of each animal. It gives you a kind

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of a base understanding and it's far better than some

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of the other There's actually one version where apparently the

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Buddha simply calls all the animals together in names years

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>after them, which sounds like a pretty boring party. Yeah,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>why not have a river race? And you can't make

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a reality show out of Buddha naming people? Yeah, So, John,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just roll through these, uh, these various animals just

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one final time here to to just lay out their

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>positive and negative attributes. Yeah, because we will be talking

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about in this episode the personality characteristics that are typically

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>attributed to each of these animals in the twelve year cycle.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.119
<v Speaker 1>If you're born under the year, these are the attributes

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>that are supposed to belong to you. So the first

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one we've got is the rat. Now what do they

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>say about the rat? Well, the rat is innovative, opportunistic,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>very organized, but prone to uh letting his temper get

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>out of the out of control and possibly his or

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>her agreed. Now, I've got to give credit where credit

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is due. I was reading this out loud to my

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>wife Rachel last night, and she was like, sounds like

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Walter White from Breaking Bad. I was like, Walter White,

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. That is the perfect rat. Okay, so

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good sort of modern fictional embodiment. Uh. Next

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up the the Ox. Of course, oxes honest, conservative, patient,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>but the Ox can be stubborn when pushed and can

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be slow to start things. Now, there are a couple

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of fictional versions we came up with to match this.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Sounds kind of like Ned Stark from Game of Thrones,

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of an honest, respectable, but conservative person. Another option

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I came up with is Ellen Ripley from the Alien series.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one, you know, because she is essentially

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a She's one of the few heroes who's really a

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>rule follower. She's all about obeying protocol. We need to

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing here and not break quarantine. You know.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>She she's conservative, but she's patient, she's on top of things,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't want to budge from her position. And

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>unlike the astrological Ox, she actually gets the cat across

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the river. Okay. Next we have the tiger, right, this

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is mine. So they say about the tiger that the

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tiger is powerful, brave, and risk taker, but can also

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be very brash and offensive. Full feather is caused trouble.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So what came to my mind is Fox Mulder from

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>The X Files. Oh yeah, you know, he's he's he's

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a risk taker, he's courageous, he stands up for what

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he believes in, but he really just makes people mad.

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He says the wrong thing and he makes offensive comments

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Okay, I feel like, you know the

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>tiger characters when we probably see a lot in fiction. Um,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because we like we like characters like that. We like

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>our characters to be strong and confident. But I also

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have certain pitfalls. The one that comes to my mind,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and this is because I'm currently watching a MCS Halt

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and catch Fire. Lee pays his character Joe McMillan um

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>brilliant risk taker but also just a life wrecking idiot

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at times. Alright, Next up we have the Rabbit. Gentle, talented, diplomatic,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a little bit shy and sentimental. Okay, what

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have you got for the rabbit? The only thing, the

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>only one that came to mind instantly here is Luna

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>love Good in Harry Potter. Oh that's a pretty good one,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all right. Next is in it very important one dragon imagination, energetic, dramatic,

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but can be moody, can be a perfectionist, and uh,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course, as we'll discussed, can their destructive elements

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to the dragon as well. Huh. You know, I had

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a hard time thinking of a good example of a

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>dragon in fiction. One that obviously came to mind is

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>another one from Game of Thrones, de Naris targ Arian. Yeah,

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>but then again, I don't know how well she fits

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that because I don't really think of her as dramatic

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or even necessarily moody, but certainly that that imagination and energy,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, she's very determined. Yeah, I think she she

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is prone to being a little moody, especially later in

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the series. Yeah, I guess so, but yeah, it's not

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfect fit though. Of course, she is the mother

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of dragons, so it seems like it should fit. Yeah,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have too many Game of Thrones characters in

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this It's just such a rich world to draw various

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>character personalities from. I guess. Yeah, Well the next from Snake.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The snake is graceful, intuitive and wise, but prone to

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>stinginess and unscrupulous behavior. I guess yeah, Yeah, I guess

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what I was referring to. Hear, because it

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the spider Lord Veris from Game of Thrones,

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Old Baldy. He is graceful, he is intuitive, and he

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is wise, but he's not necessarily so full of scruples. Well,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the next one is horse my sign. And this one's

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>uh characterized by being energetic, spirited, optimistic, independent, but prone

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to impatience and unfinished tasks. Does that sound like you

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to you? Well, as we'll get into later. Just about

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>any of these, you can see yourself in them if

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to. That's a good point. Yeah, we'll get

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>into that. So I do see a bit of myself

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in that. Um And in terms of fictional characters, makes

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>me think of Clive Owens, Dr John Thackeray on the Nick,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>who is, you know, very energetic and spirited, but does

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not have the patients for rigorous scientific investigation. And we'll

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>also just completely abandon a task if it's not really

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>working out. You gotta be you gotta be cautious about

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>those people who have an emphasis on getting things done.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You know. I haven't seen the Nick, but I've heard

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very good. Oh, I love it. I I highly

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>recommend it. Um. You know, for individuals who weren't too

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>squeamish about a turn of the century surgery scene. Okay,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>how about how about the next one? Goat? Oh yeah,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they say the goat is loving, gentle, and creative, but

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe shy and reluctant to directness and set in their ways. Well,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this one I thought was kind of difficult because that's

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not really that this type of central character you tend

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to encounter in a story. But it did make me

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think of Donnie from The Big Lebowski. Yeah, Donnie who

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>loves surfing. He was sweet, yeah, loving and creative. Al right.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Next we have the monkey, when again we're about to

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>enter into monkey. Uh smart, happy, curious, energetic, but prone

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to over confidence and all the pitfalls that come with

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over confidence. So the one that came to my mind

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>based on this is Tony Stark from Iron And So

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who who likes to have a

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>good time. He's curious, he's full of energy, he's very smart,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but he's kind of full of himself. Yeah. I think

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good a good fit, all right. Next up

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we have a rooster. Rooster is punctual, reliable, independent, but

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit conceded. This one was a hard one

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for me to really think about in terms of modern fiction.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, again, how many characters can you think of

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that are known for punctuality, yeah, and being vain without

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>being just like movie vain or Dorian gray vein. The

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one that came to mind, though, is Christoph Waltz character Dr.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>King Schultz in Django and Chain, because he's a plant,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>great planner, he's loyal, but he's ultimately brought down by

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>his own form of vanity, moral of a you know,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a cultural intellectual vanity, the physical vanity. He can't walk away.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>He's got to make his point. He's got to make

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>his point, even if it's the most it's the most

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>disastrous choice in the movie. Okay, so we got two left.

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>One of them is the dog. And what do they

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>say about the dog? The dog is gregarious, honest, fun, loyal,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>prone to worrying, you know, whimpering in the corner. That's

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>an interesting combination of things. Two people came to mind

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. One of them is another Big Lebowski character,

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the dude from The Big Oldowski. So he's gregarious, honest, fun, loyal,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's all those things, but he also worries a lot.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>He's worried that they're gonna cut off various parts of

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his body. Another one that came to my mind is say,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have you seen Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt? Serious Kimmy Schmidt. She's

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a dog here, I think, I mean she's a in

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Zodia accents. Very much gregarious, honest, loyal, fun

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and prone to worrying. Another one that maybe came to

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>my mind is grom It from Wallace and Grommet, but

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's kind of disqualified because he's actually a dog,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>all right. And then finally last place, Pig. Pig is noble, strong,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>fiercely loyal to family and friends, though they can be

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult at times and can be a bit reckless. This

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is this is another one. I got a credit to

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>my wife Rachel. I was talking to her about this

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>last night and she was like, Mrs Vorhees from Freddie

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but a strong mother, right yeah? Um? Well. Another mother

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that comes to mind from Game of Thrones Cercy Lanister, who,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for all her faults, and she has many, she's very

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>loyal to her children specifically, and pretty much only to

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>her children. You know, it's all about protecting her children,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and she can be a bit reckless outside of that, Robert,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you've designed websites before, haven't you I have? Yeah, I

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>mean I love a good website, but it's can be

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so tedious to try and manage to build one out

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the tools in hand. Yeah, without a really good

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>suite of tools, it can just be such a pain

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>getting the site to look the way you want to,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to be easy and intuitive and work well for the

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>person the audience you're trying to reach with the website.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But fortunately it doesn't always have to be such a pain.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>That's right, because now we have a new set of

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>tools at our disposal thanks to square Space. Right. Square

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Space is there to make it easy, simple, in intuitive,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and very professional. So it gets you a site that

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>looks professionally designed, even if you don't really have any

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>skills with web design, or if you do it regardless

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of skill level. You don't need to know how to

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>code a web page. And that's crucial because I feel

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like anytime I build or augment a website myself, I

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have to relearn very primitive codings. And you can get

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a free domain if you sign up for a year. Yeah,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and we want everyone listening here to have the same opportunity,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So why don't you start your free trial today at

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>square Space dot com. And when you decide to sign

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>up for square Space, make sure to use the offera

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>code mind blown to get ten percent off your first purchase. Again,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the promo code is mind Blown. The product is square Space.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Go try it out and build that website you've been

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:48.719
<v Speaker 1>dreaming off. Okay, so that has been the basic crash

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>course on the very popularly broadly accessible version of the

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese zodiac. But now we want to get more into

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the specifics about the scientificly measurable effects of belief in

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese zodiac, what people think about it, how it

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>influences culture, and what economic and sociological influences it might have.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know what a lot of you are thinking

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>too at this point. It is one thing to think

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>about as seasonal zodiac having as an effect, right, you

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>know this and it was born in winter, this one

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in summer, etcetera. But you know, how could everybody in

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a single year have the same basic personality type. It

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just it's unbelievable. It's just ridiculous. Really, Like, everybody born

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the year of the Dragon is not going to

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>be this massive go getter leader person. Uh, everybody born

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the year of the Rat is not going to

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be unscrewed. It's it's not gonna be this unscrupulous individual. Um.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So how does it work? How does it end up,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing into our perceptions of self, uh, perceptions

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of what our offspring should be. And and you know,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>even how we should hire people. Yes, and now we're

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>going to turn our attention to the dragon child, the

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>children born in the year of the Dragon. Why is

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the year of the dragon considered special in the Chinese zodiac? Ah, well,

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this this is a great question. And uh, and I

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>promise I'm not going to spend an excessive amount of

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>time here. We're gonna maybe do an episode on dragons

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>later on. Um. But but just to be brief about it.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Western dragon is this earthy, wormy, off

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and downright infernal creature. The Eastern dragon is the celestial creature.

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a big difference here because in in Western

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>mythology of the dragon is very often a monster, right,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing that must be fought or defeated. It's

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a thing that causes havoc. It's it's a threat, and

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it often is not very sometimes even not very sentient.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it depends on which mythology you're going with.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's a big monstrous thing that's gross and

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't want it around, right. Yeah, it's coiling up

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground, whereas the celestial dragon of the East,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese dragon, it's coming out of the sky. It's

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>controlling the weather, it's controlling the flow of the rivers,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's controlling the ocean. It's all about potency and strength.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a divine creature. It's sometimes a bearer of gods

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and demi gods, but often the dragon itself is viewed

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as a god or demi god in terms of its power.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not only an important creature among the Han people,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the primary ethnic group in the in China, but also

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for the other fifty six ethnic groups. The dragon is

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is old and just and pre dates the other religions

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and philosophies that flowed into China, such as Taoism, Buddhism,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>um Islam, etcetera. So it sounds like the the listeners

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who are familiar with the Western dragon just we're all

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>going to have this stumbling block in our understanding of

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the significance of the dragon in Chinese culture. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>because you know so often that the dragon plays into

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>creation myths. One in particular that I like the Miao

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>people of southwest China, believe that the divine dragon lived

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in a cave and a bunch of monkeys came to

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the cave, and the dragon breathed on the monkeys and

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>turn them into humans. That also sounds like a perfectly

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>adaptable creation myth of humanity. If if you're a person

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who wants to fuse a traditional creation myth with modern

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary theory. Yeah, indeed, I mean it sounds like you.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm instantly imagining a dragon showing up in

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one of Space Odyssey. Um. Yeah. And

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I should also point out that occasionally you do have

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>an evil dragon or a very destructive dragon, but for

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the for the most part, even if they're destructive, it

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>has more to do with their tie to like primal

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>forces of nature any thing. Um. Another thing to keep

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in mind about the dragon is that they're basically two

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>different ways to look at what their composition is. But

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to think we we have such a clear

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>idea in our mind of what a dragon is, even

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>an Eastern dragon. It's a huge lizard with wings that

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>breathes fire. Yeah, And and it's very ornate, and we

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tend not to think about, you know, what is this

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>composed of? But according to an excellent book, A Handbook

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese Mythology by um uh Lee Yang ming On

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and Jessica Anderson Turner, um either two ways to look

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>at one. One is that a dragon is basically crocodile, tornado,

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lightning river, all sort of put together. But you can

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>also see the dragon as a composite of various fanciful

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>images of other important creatures, creatures that were important to

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>various tribes in ancient China that were then integrated. UM

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so that you know, there's several different types of Chinese

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dragon as the myths rollout over the centuries, but you'll

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>see interesting descriptions of their composed composite parts. Head of

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a horse, tail of a snake, ears of a deer,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>horns of an ox, rabbit's eyes, clams, abdomen, A second

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>clams abdomen I mean the abdomen of a clam, or

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an abdomen just covered in clamshells. I don't know. I

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like both the interpretations of fish scales, tiger pause, eagle talents.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting to think to me, I can't help

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but think, well, to what extent is not only the

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>dragon the only mythological creature on the zodiac, he is

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>also composed of elements from various other animals. It's the

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>best of all possible world. It's like like an animal voltron.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the dragon is big business. Um. People of

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>China often think of themselves as the children of the dragon.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The five claud dragon was an exclusive symbol of later dynasties,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the Chang dynasty from nineteen eleven. The flag featured a

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>coiled dragon against a yellow background. So the dragon is

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.959
<v Speaker 1>just inherently tied with Chinese culture. Okay, so you can

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely see why the dragon carries a lot of mythological

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and cultural significance. But what is its specifically supposed to

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>mean for a child born in the year of a dragon?

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Because all of the animals we described in that long

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>list of the zodiac, they all had admirable characteristics, and

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the dragon just seemed like another one of them with

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>some kind of general, vague admirable characteristics listed. So, so

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what what makes a dragon special? I mean, basically, I mean,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you can list off a bunch of adjectives like honest,

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>courage is powerful, sensitive, But basically they're a go getter.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Like they are, they're the They're the kid that you want,

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you want your child to be this dragon that is

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>fierce enough to uh to win it life, but also

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, humble and important enough to not get you know,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to not fall into the rats, the situation of sort

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of cheating to get to the head of the line. Yeah,

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so it is primarily it is an animal that is

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>powerful and can get things done and will move to

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the head of the pack, but is also concerned with duty, right,

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with with helping others and with doing what it needs

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to do. You said, it stopped to make the rain,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I didn't win. It just wasn't all

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that bothered about winning. According to to Chinese strology, the

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>dragon that's who you want leading your company, right, leading

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>your nation, not one of those tigers. Yeah, because the

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tigers another one that you could maybe think of as

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a go getter. Remember that they're they're courageous, they're powerful,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they can get things done, but there is also their

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>negative characteristics associated with the tiger, And in some Chinese cultures,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, especially in like Singapore and Taiwan, and

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe Hong Kong that the tiger is considered an undesirable

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>birth sign, or at least it has been in the past.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a two thousand eleven article by Yen's Kastner

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in The Asia Times called Tiger Throttling Taiwan's birth Room,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it it says that it lists some years of

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the tiger. It says, whoever is born in nineteen fifty,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty two, nineteen seventy four, nineteen eighty six, my

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>birth year or nineteen tends to question authority and is

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore likely to cause trouble for himself, his family, or

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>his employers at some stage in life. Yeah. I think

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this was also the article that pointed out that some

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>firms would actually hire a fortune teller to go through, um,

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the applications that were coming in, to go through the

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>resumes and look at the birth years. Yeah. Oh man, Yeah,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>because in order to prevent tigers from coming in and

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wrecking your office place. You know. Another thing that's interesting

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the tiger is different than all of the

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>other animals in the zodiac in one important respect. Right.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's the the only real meat eater, I mean,

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the the only real man eater rather on the list. Yeah,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe you could in some wild circumstances, maybe

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a pig or a dog or something could attack a person,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but the tiger is the only one that's a definite

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>human predator. Yeah, it's a definite real world threat. Don't

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>get carried away by the way that. I don't think

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that means you should go hunt tigers. Most of the time,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't attack people. But we're saying potentially could. Yeah,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and and again back to your point, it's not something

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you see just across the board, but certain areas are

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have more the stigma about the tiger than others,

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that you'll go to other nations,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>other nationalities and find the tiger as more of a

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>noble creature. Uh So, it just varies depending on where

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you are. Okay, So, but back to dragons. There's a

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>general idea that wagons are successful and have good lives.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There's good fate for a dragon. They're gonna get good grades,

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna find success in life, they're gonna bring honor

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to the family there. They're just gonna be good ones

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to have in your family. Are there any famous dragons

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you can list. Uh, you know, born in the year

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the dragon, so we can see what a dragon

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Oh yeah, and uh and again it's easy

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to put together a list like this, right because out

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of any given year, they're gonna be some exemplary examples

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of of accomplishment and fame. So yeah, Bruce Lee, you

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>got actress Maggie Chung. You've got former Chinese Piramount leader

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Dom Shaoping. You gotta Liam Neeson, John Lennon, Salvador Dolly,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Sigmund Freud, Plee, Giermo del Toro, Stephen Colbert, Sarah Palin

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Bennetet Cumberbatch, Sasha Gray, Connor McGregor, Vladimir Putin, the Macho

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Man Randy Savage, Brandy Savage, Mr T. Paul Rubens, Chuck Norris,

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank Zappa, Waynes Eyre, John Gotti, Fred Savage, Saga Era,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Kubrick, and Philip k. Dick, Richard Pryor, and Rashida Jones,

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>just to name a few. The only one I needed

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear was Macho Man Randy Savage. Now I understand

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the dragon fate leads to a slim jim ad deal.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you've probably noticed we did have some some some

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese names on there, but most of those were Western examples, uh,

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and part of that is that we're more

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>versed in Western pop culture here than we are in

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese culture. But the other thing is when you start

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick out examples of Chinese dragons, yes, you'll

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>find some some good examples. But I actually was looking around.

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I've poken around on the the top ten entries on

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Forbes China Celebrity one hundred uh, and I was

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at everything between two thousand and four and two

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen. Again, the top ten uh famous you know,

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>important people, um, A lot of them in entertainment, but

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>some in business. And the only top tenor that I

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>found between two thousand and four and two thousand and

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen that was a dragon was Chinese director Chin Kegi,

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>who directed the claim film Farewell My Concubine. Huh. Now

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this basically all means nothing, but but I think it

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is important to look at, you know, as we try

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to figure out does does being born in the dragon?

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Does being a dragon actually have any tangible benefit on

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>your life? You know, certainly not do to any kind

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of magical astrological reason, but due to just the importance

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that is projected on you. Well, obviously some parents seem

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to think so, because it turns out to be a

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Dragon year has been a boom year

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for baby births in many Chinese cultures. Right yeah, and

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this is where we really get into, you know, analyzing

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the tangible power of the thing. To what extent does

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>does the desire to have a dragon as your offspring,

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to birth a dragon? To to what extent does that

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>actually influence the birth rate of a given population? That is,

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, under the power of the superstitious thinking. Now

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you linked me to a really interesting piece on this

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>by a writer named Rosie Seema, Right yeah, this is

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a priceonomics piece and uh two Goman fifteen piece, and

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.719
<v Speaker 1>she does a really good job just rolling through some

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of the statistic statistics here. It was called how the

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Zodiac effects National birth Rates? Yes, and another paper

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that found particularly helpful was paper called creating New Traditions

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in Modern Chinese Populations Aiming for Birth in the Year

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Dragon by Daniel Iam Goodkind and that was

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>published in Population and Developmental Review. Okay, so what's the deal,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what what are the what are the stats on birthrates

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and dragon years tell us basically, and we're gonna we're

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna break this down a bit, but basically, you do

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>see spikes in particular areas that line up with the

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>year of the dragon, right, So this is supposed to

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what we were mainly looking at was measuring

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>fertility rates among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan, Hong Kong, uh

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and other places, right yeah, uh, Peninsular Malaysia and

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of Asia. And that we also looked

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>at data for mainland China, for the People's Republic of

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.439
<v Speaker 1>China as well. Okay, so let's look at one. Let's

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>look at one non dragon year to dragon year transition

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and what what does it look like? Okay? Well, one

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>of the big ones here, one of the most impressive

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>areas in the stats. In seventy six and eighty eight,

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fertility rates among Chinese and Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Peninsular

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia and other parts of Asia surge. And in eight

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly the rabbit to dragon increase in Singapore and Peninsular

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia was a whopping twenty four to twenty six percent.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So it went up by twenty four correct, that's unbelievable. Yeah,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to put this in perspective, the only other times we

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>see surges of this magnitude in the birth rate, it

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>involves something really major happening. For instance, nineteen sixty six,

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the prohibition of abortion in Romania caused a substantial spike

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like this. I guess I could imagine maybe at the

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of a civil war, some of their huge human

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>disaster that was preventing births. Yes, I mean a particular

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>example of that also comes from China in nineteen sixty two,

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>as everybody's recovering from the famine of the Great Leap Forward.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>So some other examples. In two thousand, Hong Kong saw

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more than a five percent rise in the number of

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.959
<v Speaker 1>births according to official data. That just to be clear,

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that's another dragon year. And when questioned about this in

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>various polls, um the parents, there are parents who are saying, yes,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I we were trying to aim for that dragon here.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and eleven two thousand and twelve, during

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a BBC poll, prospective parents in Hong Kong, Taiwan and

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Singapore all admitted to consciously timing their pregnancy for a

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Dragon year. Uh. In that same year, By the way,

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>China was anticipating a five percent birth rate increase. That's

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>mainland know itself. They didn't quite hit that as well,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>discussed in a bit, but there was a there was

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a boost. Now, I expect this would be interesting to

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>see in contrast to what I bet you'd find in

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>especially some of these areas, which would be a generally

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>downward trending birth rate, right yeah, I mean, certainly matching

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>up with some of these signs that are viewed as

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>less desirable, such as the tiger As we've already mentioned,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand ten a Taiwan's fertility rate was already

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>trending downward, but then you're the tiger hits and the

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>drop made it plumb at two point eight nine five,

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the lowest in the world. Uh yeah, and

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then the dread Then two thousand twelve Dragon year two

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>years later, it brought the fertility right back up to

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one point to seven, higher than it had been in

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>almost a decade. That's interesting because the tiger and Dragon

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>years come pretty close together, right yeah. Yeah, it's tiger,

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rabbit and then dragons. So you know, if you're if

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you're skipping Tiger year, you could aim for rabbit or

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can just hold on and then try

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and calibrate your reproductive schedule, so you hit dragon instead

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of rabbit, man to be that rabbit caught between the

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 1>tiger and the dragon. It's worth noting that this population,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>these population trends have an impact on a number of factors,

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>from just an individual dragons school experience at college aspirations,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to the effects on institutions and services. I mean, imagine

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a hospital or school rolling with the lull and boom

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of tiger and dragon years. Oh yeah. Or imagine if

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge surge in in the number of children

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>during a dragon year, imagine the year all of those

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>children start leaving school and entering the workforce, right, I mean,

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a suddenly way more supply of of

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>adult workers than there was than the market was prepared

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to absorb. Right now, at this point, you're probably saying,

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, and you said, well, hey, Robert and Joe, uh,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese zodiac has been along been around for thousands and

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years, so surely the dragon surge has been

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>in effect for thousands and thousands of years. I don't

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's any evidence of that is there no the

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>evidence uh, seems to suggest that the opposite, that the

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>dragon effect on birth rates has only been in effect

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen seventies. Now why would that be surely? Now,

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what I would not suspect is that more people started

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>believing in astrology in the nineteen seventies, right and and

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly it would it seems like it was. It's the opposite.

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are certainly still gonna be individuals who

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>heavily believe in it, and it still has just a

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of cultural power over people and just symbolic power.

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as modernization takes hold, and especially in

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>communist China, there is for a while a tendency to

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>move away from old beliefs and uh and and certainly superstition. Uh.

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Though we will definitely talk in a little bit about

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly to what extent true belief in in the power

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of the zodiac really figures into this, Like how deeply

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>do you have to believe in it to time for

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a dragon birth? Right now? You know, one of the

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>big factors, obviously is that you see birth control becoming

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a of an option right in becomes widely

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>available in the affected areas, so family planning becomes more

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of a reality, planning around finances and ambitions, but also

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the ability to plan around the astrological calendar. Oh, that

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So that is an argument that is generally

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>made um for you know, for why we see this

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>modern boom. Yeah. And there's a parallel that goes along

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with this. In this often cited paper on this subject

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>called the Influence of the Chinese Zodiac on Fertility in

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong s A r. By Paul SF, Joseph Lee,

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and Y. B. Chung. Right, Yeah, they point out that

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>prior to the nineteen seventies, you know, there was just

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>no there was no family planning at all. Really, you

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>just had kids for as long as you could. You

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just grew the family as large as you could, and

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that was that was life. You might you'll have a

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>dragon in the family, maybe you'll have a tiger, you'll

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have a horse. But that's just how things rolled out.

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But then, of course, the the age of contraception, because

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to change that, uh, certainly, Um, you reach the point

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineteen seven days where the People's Republic

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of China rolls out the one child policy, and uh,

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this it's believed might have had an effect on zodiological

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>birth timing as well. Now that brings us to another

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting question, which is the mainland China itself, People's Republic

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of China. We've been talking about places like Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan,

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>but there seems to be some disagreement, or at least

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>some ambiguity in the numbers about to what extent this

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon has presented itself in in China, right, Yeah, because

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you you just don't see those same spikes in in

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the data for mainland China, at least until two thousand,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>if not two thousand twelve. Now, I have to admit

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that I was a little I was a little confused

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by the numbers here because I was seeing some conflicting

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>reports about whether this, uh, this dragon birth surge does

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>show up in China or not for the past couple

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of cycles. Yeah, because on one hand, I saw staff

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that said China's crude birth rate was six point eight

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 1>percent higher in two thousand, But then some other data,

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly some data in that Prisonomics paper, seemed to show

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it as being rather flat for two thousand. But when

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you when you do look at the statistics from two

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven two thousand twelve to thirteen. According to the website,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>statistic of the number of Chinese births went from sixteen

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>point oh four million in two thousand eleven to sixteen

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>point thirty five million in two thousand and twelve. So

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>there was a one point nine percent bump uh in

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the birth rate then, uh. But then in the years

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to follow you see sixteen point four million births in

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen, sixteen point eighty seven million in two

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen. So the growth continues regardless of the sign.

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there are different you know, the different ways. So

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to look at that, uh, I've seen it argue that

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that essentially the population is just so vast in mainland

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>China that any any boost that's taking place in various regions,

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be lost in the just just

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the weight of the of the population data. Right.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So there might be some parts of the culture where

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the dragon births do prevail, but it's just become such

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a small blip on the radar of Chinese population dynamics

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't really show up as a very strong trend. Yes,

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to see the strong trend, you have to look to Taiwan, Singapore,

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>those other examples. Okay, now this brings us back to

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the question of why right, Why is why is it

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a modern setting? Why is this this ancient superstitious manner

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. Why is this suddenly exerting more control in

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some areas of Chinese culture? Well, a few things to

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind here. First of all, this first point

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from paper creating new traditions in modern

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese populations aiming for birth in the year of the

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Drag and this is that good article. Uh points out

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese astrology traditionally places more emphasis on the day

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and hour of the birth rather than the year. So

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you break down the traditional Chinese day, it's

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>composed of twelve hours, one for each animal that we've

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned. Um So, therefore the roots here seem to

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>be perhaps less the two thousand plus yer tradition of

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese astrology, and rather it's more a matter of a

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>cloud of loose modern folk beliefs. That's interesting. Yeah, So

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much that people are are deeply superstitious

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or deeply involved in you know, ancient Chinese magical beliefs,

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but there's more just kind of like it's the place

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Zodiac. It's the most easily accessible and broadly available

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>impressions of the of the Chinese zodiac that filter through

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>into having large effects on culture. Yeah. Yeah, it's except

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not only on your menu. It's in your house,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's in the park, it's part of it's just the

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>shadow of it is just unavoidable. So as you find

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>yourself in a modern setting where you're you get to

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>be choosier about everything regarding your family. You get to

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be choosier about how many children you have, regardless if

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you live under the one child policy or not. You

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have all these choices. You can make choices based on,

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, what the kid's gonna wear, when the kid's

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be born, what kind of school schooling is going

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to be involved there, And so the superstition ends up

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>weighing into that choice. Right. Another factor to keep in

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>mind here, and this is brought up by by Goodkin

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in his article, is that you know, we we we

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>make arguments about modern contraception in their role. That was

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>one explanation offer for why this didn't show up until

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the seventies. Yeah, because suddenly people can choose when they're

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have kids, but is he argues, ancient texts indicated

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there there were various methods on the table to adjust

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sexual behavior and aim for the dragon birth. If that's

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what a couple wanted, You mean you had in fantaside,

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>you had, you know, a board of agency you could

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>get from a Chinese apothecary. But a particular note for

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:13.760
<v Speaker 1>good can was Dallas practices of semen retention. And this Uh,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go down to a rabbit hole

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>here too much, but basically this gets into u yin

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and yang and male and feminine energy, and this Dallas

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that if you could control your ejaculation and ejaculate

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>less semen during intercourse, then you could better retain your

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 1>yang energy and possibly even absorb a little bit of

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>your partners a yen energy. You wrote about this in

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>UH You got a post about the fox spirit, didn't you. Yeah, yeah,

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it plays into that a little bit because the fox

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>spirit is a feminine creature that can drain you of

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>your vital yang essence. Basically, the main idea here is

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that there were were various pseudo uh alchemical sexual practices

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to control ejaculation and granted the emphasis here wasn't on contraception.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>It was more on in this magical belief system of

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Vien and yang Uh. But the change the Chinese knew

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>how reproduction worked, they knew how where babies came from.

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, like, even a long time ago before

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 1>modern birth control, if they were really concerned about timing

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>for dragon births, they could have done it. Yeah, if

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a real tangible cultural emphasis put on aiming

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for that dragon birth, they could have done it if

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to. Now, you can also argues that the

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.760
<v Speaker 1>snake year, which comes immediately after the dragon, may also

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have a role here, because that could be viewed by

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>some as a bad birth year, thus affecting the the

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon right, making people want to get in there early,

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of double it up right, right, like if you're

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a kid, it's beneficial to have a dragon,

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and then right after that as a snake, which some

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>people might not want. Better, better to hit the dragon

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>before the snake or hit horse afterwards. Unless here in

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, which also uses a form of the zodiac um,

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>where horse mails are apparently favorite and horse females are not,

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and the gender ratio of births in horse years excuse mail, huh?

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason here is, on one hand, you know,

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>abortion may play a role the the aborting of female offspring,

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but also misreporting a birth date in order to hit

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.959
<v Speaker 1>a more desirable zodiac year. So if you're on the fence,

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so your kids on the fence of possibly being a horse,

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want her to have that kind of association,

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>then you could just say, oh, she's not a horse.

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, she's a snake. Okay, So now I think

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's time to turn our attention to the fate of

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>dragon children. It is a dragon child really more likely

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to succeed in the world than children born under other signs? Yeah?

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the is the the magical thinking involved here? Is

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that giving them? Uh? Is that projecting some sort of

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>importance on them? Is it giving them a boost? Is

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it putting too much pressure on them? Um? Yeah? Are

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>they gonna have opportunities that their individuals are not going

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to have just because of their birth here? Yeah? Well

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>there was a two thousand two Forbes article titled is

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Success in the Stars? By Virginia Citronto, and that compared

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>birth here on Forbes' list of the four hundred wealthiest

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Americans at the time. That's interesting. Remember the Americans and

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.919
<v Speaker 1>what did they find, well, son of a Gun. Even

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in this list of Americans, the dragons came out on

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>top forty three of the Forbes four hundred or ten

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 1>point seven five percent were born in dragon years, which

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was more than any other Chinese zodiac sign, which is weird.

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so maybe there is something to this superstition.

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>But then again, this is this is Americans. I mean,

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people probably are not even aware

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of what Chinese zodiac sign they are, or if anything,

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>they probably have just that Chinese menu association that we

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier exactly. But then there was a there was

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a paper in Economic Inquiry called do Dragons Have Better Faith?

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This came out in two thousand five by Cafu Wong

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and Linda Young and Wong and Young investigate weather dragons

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>actually have better outcomes in life by looking at data

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sets from the nineteen one in nineteen ninety six Hong

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Kong census, and the authors explained that the Hong Kong

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Census data was used because one most of the community

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong is Chinese to the lunar calendar, is

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 1>used extensively. And three, this census model provides data on

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:31.839
<v Speaker 1>other useful variables like level of education and so Wong

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and Young founded in the nineteen nine one census, Dragons

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:39.240
<v Speaker 1>actually did have a slightly higher than average mean earnings variable.

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.399
<v Speaker 1>So they're comparing year of birth to how much money

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you make. It was a plus four point eight five

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>percent on earnings. But in nineteen ninety six dragons had

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.919
<v Speaker 1>a slightly lower than average mean earning report, with a

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>negative zero point twenty two percent. However, they said that

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>when mitigating variables like schooling are taken to account, they

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>conclude that the that quote, statistically, the coefficients are unstable

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>across sensus years and insignificantly different from zero in most cases.

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately they don't find any strong evidence for the

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 1>superstition that dragons do better. So an effect on birthrates

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in some places, yes, an effect on the actual success

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:25.919
<v Speaker 1>level of individuals born in that year, no evidence at all.

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Well there, you know, as we said, in one of

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the years, there was a slight advantage. In another year

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there there wasn't. And they said, overall, when you compare

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>it to years of schooling and stuff like that, a

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>strong trend does not emerge. But there could be other

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>reasons that that a dragon birth could seem to have

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an effect that you could look at the people around

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you in society or look at yourself and say, hey, yeah, man,

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>those dragons are really great. I want to have a

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>dragon child too. And it wouldn't necessarily have to be

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>economically measurable. It could be entirely based on, you know,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of human capital or just just social perception.

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And here I want to bring in something that we've

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.479
<v Speaker 1>talked about in a previous episode, which is the role

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of the forror effect also known as the Barnum effect.

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Will use those interchangeably for and Barnum in astrology. So

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if you if you missed our episode Something for Everybody,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Horror Effect from July, let's do a brief refresher

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>on it. What what was the horror effect? All right,

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So what we're talking about here is the Tennessee of

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>people to accept vague general personality of descriptions is highly

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.479
<v Speaker 1>accurate and applying to them specifically. Yeah, this is why

0:51:38.560 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>these personality tests are so popular. Yeah, Like, like any

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of those descriptions we made earlier, we say, oh, here

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the pros and the cons of year of the rat.

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And if you're you're the rat, you instantly cling under

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that seem to fit, that you know are true,

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the things you like would like to be true. And

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if and if something doesn't quite stick, you just let

0:51:58.200 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it fall away. Yeah, and it helps them or general

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the description is, so, there are a few things we

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>found in that episode, Uh, what were especially conducive to

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people judging personality descriptions, especially vague general ones as applying

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically to them. One is that if it's supposedly tailored

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to them by a competent authority, and in some cases

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a competent authority may include something like tradition. You know,

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 1>zodiacal tradition could be considered a competent authority, or especially

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's flattering or favorable to the dupe in question,

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you or me. Uh, you're more likely to accept descriptions

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of yourself that sound kind of good. Now. There was

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a study on the Barnum effect or the horror effect

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and popular horoscopes in the Journal of Psychology in nineteen

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 1>eighty three by Katherine S. Fichton and Betty Sunterton. This

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is an older paper, but I think it's it's interesting

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and it applies to what we're talking about here. It's

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 1>also going to be dealing with Western astrology, not Chinese astrology,

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think the same principles can apply in interesting ways.

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>So this was carried out in nineteen eight three, and

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what they addressed was the perceived accuracy of astrological personality descriptions.

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So an interesting starting question is this some sometimes, even nonbelievers,

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are not into astrology, they don't give it

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>any credence, will read an astrology based description of their

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>signs supposed personality traits and report finding this description highly accurate.

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So you are a Scorpio and I tell you what

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a scorpio's personality is supposed to be like, and you're like, well,

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's me. Yeah. How could How could they know

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so much? So they got three hundred and sixty six

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 1>college students and they examined a individual differences associated with

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>horoscope reading habits, be the reliability and validity of daily

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and monthly horoscope forecasts and astrologically based personality descriptions, and

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>see the effects of knowing the zodiac sign on the

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>perception of usefulness of horoscope forecasts and on the accuracy

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of astrologically based personality descriptions. So we're mainly interested in

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the second half of B and then c there how

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>accurate these personality descriptions are and whether it matters that

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 1>you know zodiac signs. Uh. So they did. They broke

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it up like this. There were two hundred and three

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 1>subjects that rated thirteen one paragraph personality descriptions on a

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 1>ten point scale from not at all like me to

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>very much like me. So it might say, you know,

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you're very brave, powerful, courageous, and strong, you love lobster

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 1>butter and jet packs. Uh and and you would say, yeah,

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that sounds a lot like me, or no, that does

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.399
<v Speaker 1>not sound very much like me. And so twelve of

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.800
<v Speaker 1>these descriptions came from a couple of different purse size

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>horoscope booklets, and the thirteen was a control paragraph that

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:56.879
<v Speaker 1>was known as a Barnum paragraph, or what it was

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>was playing on the Barnum horror effect. It was personality

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>description specifically designed to appear highly accurate by exploiting this

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:10.360
<v Speaker 1>horror effect. Contained vague statements that have a very high

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>base rate of occurrence in the population. It was supposed

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to be the kind of thing that anybody would look

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at and say, yeah, that's me. Some of the subjects

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>got to see the paragraphs identified with the appropriate zodiac

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>signs so that it would say like cancer and then

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 1>described the described the personality. Others just saw the paragraphs

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>without the zodiac signs associated with them, and and no

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 1>indication of the astrological significance. Uh. And one of the

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>things before I report the results is that it's it's

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>important to emphasize that this was studying self perceived validity,

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>not externally verified validity. So it's what people's idea is

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of how well it describes them, not how well it

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually matches any external behavior. Okay, and interesting to hear

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that on one hand we have the description and in

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>another hand, we have a description with the symbolic power

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the zodiac. Yeah, yeah, exactly. In a separate part

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the paper, one that we're not really focusing on,

0:56:06.080 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that they found that the daily and monthly forecasts were unreliable.

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, so when it tells you, like, hey, what

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, what you're gonna need to do today as

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a cancer is not choked to death on a hot

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:20.400
<v Speaker 1>dog and makeing make an investment with somebody who offers

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you an opportunity those kinds of things. They match those

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:26.839
<v Speaker 1>two previous days, and and it turned out that these

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had no effect whatsoever. They were not any more reliable

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for the one zone zodiac sign than for the other one.

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They was so specific that they just didn't hold up. Yeah,

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that these were the forecasts for events. But the personality descriptions,

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, were in some cases found to

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have some significant reliability. And this is the weird thing,

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>they say, quote an average of four point twelve of

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the twelve personality descriptions were matched correctly by the seventeen subjects.

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The probability of such results being due to chance is

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:02.720
<v Speaker 1>less than five per cent, so that's kind of weird.

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So when no identification of personality descriptions with zodiac signs

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was supplied the subjects, first of all, they clearly liked

0:57:10.640 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the barnum paragraph the best, The one they thought that

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>most accurately described them. Was not a zodiac paragraph at all.

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It was just this barnum paragraph that's supposed to match anybody.

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But when the subjects knew the zodiac signs associated with

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the descriptions, they tended to think that their own signs

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>description was more accurate than that of the eleven other signs,

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But there was an unexpected finding with one of the

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>two astrology books, the Purse Book be the second one.

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Even when the descriptions didn't have the zodiac sign matched

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with them, people found their own people's You know, so

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cancer and I'm reading through these unlabeled personality descriptions.

0:57:53.680 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I was more likely in the study to pick the

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>description lick linked with the cancer sign, even when it

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't say cancer. Wow, and that is weird. That makes

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>me wonder, Wait a minute, is there something to astrology? Well, no,

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Purse Book B was not full of real magic.

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Subsequent analysis of the data showed that when someone who

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>had at some time in the past read a description

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of their own science personality, they tended to rate their

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>own science descriptions is more accurate even when it wasn't

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>identified by the sign. Thus, the culprit could simply be

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>conscious or unconscious familiarity with what the sign is supposed

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to be like. So even the shadow of that of

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that set of that symbol of that sign. Yeah, and

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 1>these people didn't have to be deep into astrology. It

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>could be somebody like me who I don't pay attention

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to astrology. I don't. I don't really know anything about it.

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But I have read the cancer description sometime in the past,

0:58:51.880 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and if I answered that way on the questionnaire, it

0:58:54.840 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>turned out I could look at unlabeled descriptions of personality

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at ease and pick the one for cancer as most

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>likely applying to me. And I just want to read

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a quote from their conclusion. They say, two possible mechanisms

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 1>underlying the effect of familiarity on acceptance of personality descriptions

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>can be proposed. Uh. First of all, having read that

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as a Virgo you are an honest person, one self

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>assessment may come to include the trait honest, so in

0:59:25.640 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that way that the personality description, once you've read it,

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>actually influences how you think of yourself. Uh. Back to them,

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>A personality description which stresses honesty may therefore be accepted

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as an accurate characteristic of oneself. Alternately, having some previous

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>information about one's supposed character traits e g. I'm a Virgo,

0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Virgos are honest may give one the opportunity to notice

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and subsequently recall instances of behavioral confirmation. I returned the

0:59:55.680 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>bus ticket to the man who dropped it that was

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>really honest of me. That's the miliarity may operate in

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this instance through having repeatedly noticed oneself behaving in an

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:09.439
<v Speaker 1>honest fashion. So they're The second idea there is that

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>if you've read a description of your personality before, you

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>have primed your brain to cherry pick from then on

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>instances of things that match with what you've read in

1:00:20.920 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the past. And this I feel like this makes particular sense, uh,

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>when thinking about the Chinese zodiac, because you're talking about

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>how these different zodiac signs and symbols and how they

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>end up casting the shadow in our life and you

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just can't avoid it just subconsciously thinking about it. I

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like the Chinese zodiac signs are even easier to

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just casually fall into because they have the animal at

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the center. They have that personality that so even you

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the pig, you have enough of familiarity with

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>stories of pigs and reality of pigs you have some

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>idea what that personality consists of. Yeah, totally. The animal

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>character brings a level of personnality to the characterization that

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is just not present in many of the

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Western zodiac signs. Yeah, I mean especially if you're stuck

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with Pisces with the scales or whatnot. Right, Yeah, I

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>always wanted a Scorpion. I'm some scales. Wouldn't it be

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>great if it were more directly tailored to exactly what

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the things were? So it's like, oh, I'm a Pisces.

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>When somebody puts something on one half of me, I

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tip over to that side. I'm a cancer and I

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can't help pinching people when I'm in public, right exactly,

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Scorpio, and some when somebody cuts my tail off,

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't immediately die. I just can't poop until I die. Yeah,

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I did that. That would be that would of course

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be way too specific in generality. That's where the power

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is when it comes to a zodiac. You know. Another

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting about how this applies to society at

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>large is the way at which I wonder if something

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like this could become a self fulfilling prophecy across generations,

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>because think about it like this, This is just sculation.

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>This is not based on a finding um. But we

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do know that the Barnum effect or the horror effect,

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>through that people tend to grant more credence to the

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>accuracy of vague personality descriptions when they're worded in a

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>favorable or flattering way. So for this reason, I think

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it might be sensible to guess that dragons are more

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>likely than other people to believe in the virtues of dragons.

1:02:26.040 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>When that makes sense, yeah, because the sign like if

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a pig, some people can have some issues with that.

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's worth remembering that there are Chinese Muslims

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and um I understand for for Chinese muslim this can

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be kind of rather problematic and end up not referring

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to the year of the Pig as the year of

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the pig directly because of the pigs status in Islamic culture. Yeah, yeah,

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so totally. I I can see how ones uh, like

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the positive or negative qualities associated with the thing can

1:02:57.360 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>affect the extent to which you believe in it. So

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're a dragon, you might be more likely to

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in the virtues of dragons. And if selective timing

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and reproduction means that there are more dragons than any

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>other animal of the zodiac over time, especially in I

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:15.439
<v Speaker 1>don't mean across all Chinese, but in certain areas where

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a pronounced trend. This could also mean that

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there are more adults of reproductive age every generation that

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>believe in the superiority of dragons because they themselves are

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dragons and thus also aimed to produce dragons. So could

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this lead to something like a runaway dragon effect. I'm

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>just imagining like a sci fi story where there's a

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:41.439
<v Speaker 1>culture where something like this has happened over many generations

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it gets to the point where they only breed

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a large crop of new children once every twelve years

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the terrible taboo on children born as non dragons.

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that sci fi vision there, Joe. Somehow, I

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>suspect that's probably not going to happen in the real world,

1:03:56.160 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because there are just enough other factors controlling when people

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>give birth, and the fact that, as we've said, it

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be that people are are strongly motivated

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>by a powerful belief in the Chinese zodiac and and

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:14.479
<v Speaker 1>like that this is the main thing deciding when when

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they have a child. But that maybe if it's convenient,

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it might kind of push you a little bit in

1:04:20.280 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that direction, even just some yeah, some vague loose cultural knowledge,

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>even just if you don't believe in the magic of it,

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but have some positive associations about dragons. It might make

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to do it. Yeah, the sweet spot here

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be um not rigid belief in it, and

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>also not the complete rejection of it for that place

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in the middle where it's not really a part of

1:04:43.720 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>your daily conscious life, but you cannot escape its cultural

1:04:48.240 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on you. Oh. I think that's the way most

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of us interact with our cultural superstitions, right. I know

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm that way that I I don't if you pin

1:04:56.720 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>me down, I don't believe in any of these superstitions.

1:04:59.240 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually believe it's bad luck to cross a

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>black cat's path. I don't actually believe one shouldn't walk

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>under a ladder, But I know that when there are

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>no stakes involved, uh, that it might sort of influence

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the path I take when I'm walking. Yeah, exactly if

1:05:16.600 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you if it does, all things being equal, which path

1:05:19.800 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are you're gonna take? The one that looks little spooky?

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Are the one that that doesn't Even though I don't

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>believe in it, it's just it's just kind of there.

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a cultural association. And and when I'm not otherwise

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>motivated by any other strong factor it kind of guides me. Yeah,

1:05:34.080 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the remarkable thing about this this

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:39.439
<v Speaker 1>topic that really helps to illuminate the power of myth,

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the power of symbolism, and the power of sort of

1:05:42.600 --> 1:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>um background folklore over our lives. Hey, I mean, that's

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorite themes here. Now, obviously we'd love

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear from all of you, Um, what's here zodiac sign?

1:05:53.960 --> 1:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel it's accurate? Do you feel like it's

1:05:56.080 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>made a marked impact on your life in any way whatsoever?

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh. And we know that we have listeners who

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Chinese households as well. If so, I'd

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>love for you to share your experience with us on

1:06:08.160 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>these matters, because obviously the Chinese zodiac is gonna cast

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a shadow in your life than it did

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on our. So one of the things I would love

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear is if you're a person who knows more

1:06:17.920 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese zodiac, who understands some of the complexities

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that are no doubt lost on us. I mean, you know,

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we we only have the that that place Matt kind

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of understanding. I think, yeah, place Matt, And then you know,

1:06:29.840 --> 1:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so some book learning on top of that, but but

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that's about it. Yeah, if you if you are somebody

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>who knows a lot more about the complexities of the

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese zodiac and wants to wants to get in touch

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with us about that, we we'd love to hear from

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you as well, exactly. And hey, in the meantime, head

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on over the Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the mothership. That is where you will find all

1:06:47.720 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the podcast episodes, including this one, and we'll make sure

1:06:50.360 --> 1:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that the landing page has some links out to related

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>material on the site as well as some of the

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>resources we used in researching it. Also their videos. There

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there are block post if you'll also find links up

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to our very social media accounts that just Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler.

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We are blow the Mind on all of those and

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us about

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:10.959
<v Speaker 1>any of those things we brought up just a little

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>while ago, you can email us at blow the Mind

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at how Stuff Works, Doctor Well more on this and

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Is that how Stuff Works dot

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>com