WEBVTT - Design love in, with Marcus Buckingham

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be a slightly longer one part

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the series where I interview fascinating people about how

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they take their days from great to awesome and any

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>advice they have for the rest of us. So today

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I am delighted to welcome Marcus Buckingham to Before Breakfast.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Marcus is a longtime thought leader on leadership. He's a speaker.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>He is also the author of the new book Design

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Love In Marcus. Welcome to the show.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me, Laura, Yeah.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Very excited to have you. Why don't you tell our

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>listeners a little bit about yourself?

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm a psychometrician actually by training, which means that

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I measure things about human beings that are really important

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>but you can't count. So how do you measure strengths?

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you measure talents? How do you measure how

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>satisfied or half you are with your life? All those

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>kinds of things that kind of make life worth living.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>So I spent seventeen years with the Gallop organization and

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>building something called strength Finder, which is all about how

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>do you find out what your strengths are? And then,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 2>in the seventeen years since then, just built my own

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>business focused on how do you help leaders to get

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the most out themselves and the most other people that

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>they lead and the people that they serve.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well, I know a lot of listeners have done

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the various strength finders' assessments over the years. So in

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the intro to your new book, to Design Love in

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you talk about coming to love as a topic, which

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to at a sec but at some kind

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of dark moments for yourself. I wonder if you could

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that a little bit.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I've built my company over ten years focused

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>on folks, on helping leaders to get the best out

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of the people that they lead. And we've built this lovely, entrepreneurial,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>passionate group of people who'd come together to serve our

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>clients in a way that was very loving. I mean

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it was. It was the kind of environment where you

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>have family member joining the company and everyone else who

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>is friends feels like family. Everyone's sort of wearing company merch.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>It's all very passionate actually. And then because I believed

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in the mission so much, I sold the company in

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen to a much much larger fortune of average

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>company that had three thousand salespeople. Because in my brain,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, if you want to spread the mission quickly,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>you need a lot of smart friends. So a three

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand person sales person organization is enticing because of that.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>And yet over time, quite quickly, the passion drained away,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 2>the love drained away, And it wasn't It wasn't the

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>bigger company's fault, per se. It was just when you

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>get inside a big organization, other considerations start to dominate

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the conversation. It's the monthly returns, it's the quarterly earnings,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it's the performance reviews, it's the run this by legals.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>And what happens with love passion isn't that. It's not

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>like it gets killed. It just dies from neglect. You

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>just start talking about other things. So for me, I

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 2>saw up close and personal what happens when you don't

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>make love. I know how to say that sounds I'm

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 2>saying of it. If you don't make love the central

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>organizing principle of how you do work, whether it's the

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>employee side of things or the customer side of things,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>then it slips away and you wake up one day

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and you realize that nobody talks about it anymore, and

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>everyone's just going through the motions of that day. And

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 2>so that was the impetus of the book really is

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 2>to go, wait a minute, there is life is too

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>short for us to be going through the motions of

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 2>the day to get through the day. So that was

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the impetus of the book. Yeah.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, love is kind of a funny word for a

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>business book, as I know, you know, and you kind

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of shied away from that word at the beginning, right,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You kept looking for like synonyms that sound more business appropriate.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Well, the first thing to see is that when

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you look at the relationship between an experience, let's say

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>it's an employee experience, the relationship experience, and an outcome

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>like profitability or productivity or loyalty, the relationship isn't and

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>this is going to get a little datory, but the

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>relationship isn't linear. It's curve linear, which means that if

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 2>you've got a scale of one to five and the

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 2>quality of the experience five being strongly agree and one

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>being strongly disagree, moving someone from a two to a

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 2>three experience or a three to a four experience doesn't

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>drive their performance at all or their loyalty. It's really

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 2>only when you get to a five strongly agree that

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you can see any kind of relationship to their next behavior.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>So when you look at extreme positive behaviors, the thing

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>that drives them is extreme positive experiences, not fours, not threes, fives.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>And then when you dive into the fives and you go,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>what the heck of people saying when they say that

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they're having an extreme positive experience at work, in their day,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>in their life, what are they saying? Well, the word

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they actually say, the word we humans always say, which

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you want to extrive an extreme positive experience is love.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>We say I love that. Now, we say it about

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of things, Laura, we say it about I

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>love those shoes, I love that movie, I love that song,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 2>I love my mom, I love that mentor so we

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>use it in all sorts of interesting contexts. But when

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to explain something extreme positive, we pick the

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>word love. And I kept hearing it as a researcher,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and I kept trying to change it into things that

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>were more palatable to the business world. Those so things

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>like passion or joy or engagement or stray and those

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>are good words, but they're not actually what the words

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that we humans use when we're trying to explain something

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that's extremely positive for us, the word we pick is love.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>And so as a researcher in the end, I just

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 2>had to go crying out loud, Marcus. Just go with

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the word people are using. Let's explore it, let's be

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>curious about it, because it's the only thing that drives behavior.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So love is predictive of positive human behavior in a

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>way that no other word is respect, learning, enjoyment, satisfaction,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>None of those predict what someone's going to do next.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So if we want to be serious about actual, super

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 2>productive human behavior, well we've got to go to the

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>thing that causes it. And the thing that causes it

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 2>is love.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And how do you define love then, because people like again,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you use it with all sorts of things. I love

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>my mom, I love my job. We mean different things

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>when we're saying that.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, so well, first of all, there's eight billion

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>definitions of the word love, right, there's many as many

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>definitions there are humans alive. And yet when you look

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 2>at the data around the world, when people use the

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 2>word love in China, we can predict their behavior. People

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>use the word love in Argentina. We can predict their behavior.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you go around the world, love is predictive. So

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>there must be something common about that definition of love,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 2>even though every humans got their own definition. So in

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the end, if you push and push and push on that,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>what you bump into is this definition. Love is the

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>deep and unwavering commitment of the flourishing of a human

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about their word flourishing, every single

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>one of us as human beings feel that we've got

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>something unique inside of us, and we want to get

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to the end of our life and feel that we've

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>had some chances to express what's inside of us. If

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you've got kids, you want them to be able to

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>express what's inside of them. And yet most of us

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>go through life balled up like an armadillo with armor

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>plating because the world's scary and frankly, it doesn't care

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that much about us. So we go through life balled up.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Any time we bump into any sort of experience that

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>allows us to take one plate of armor off, even

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's a small thing, like I love that outfit,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I know it sounds silly, but if you feel more yourself,

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>if you feel more fully yourself wearing that outfit, the

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>word you pick is love. If you work for a

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>leader who cuts through your performance review and allows you

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to stretch yourself in some way that expresses the best

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of you, use the word love. If you've seen a

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>movie where a scene, or a character or some aspect

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of the movie helps you sort of explain your own

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>experience to yourself a little bit better. You walk out

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of the movie and go, I love that. So in

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a way, love just means bigger any experience, no matter

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>how small or how large, which lets us take the

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>armor plating off a moment even and let's just take

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>what's inside and put it out. The word we humans

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>reach for to describe the specificity that experience is love,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>whether it's about a shoe or whether it's about a

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>mom So there is something common about what we mean

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>when we say love. And it's not like it's not

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>lots and lots and lots of like. Love is just

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>categorically different as an experience.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Love isn't just more likes. Well, we're going to take

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a quick ad break and I'll be back with more

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from Marcus Buckingham. Well, I am back talking with Marcus

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Buckingham about how to design love in so we've been

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>talking that, you know, people having love as a driving force.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we want to be a company that people

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>love to work for, or you know, companies that are

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>selling things want customers to love their products. But part

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of that is flourishing as humans. And you know, you

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about this a lot. So much of the world

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seems designed not for humans these days. I mean so

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>much of what we experience in terms of you know,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>robocalls or you know, horrible customer experiences at a doctor's

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>office or in an airline. I mean, it's like people

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>forgot there were humans or something.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny we coming out with the word love.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I thought the problem would be that people would go,

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>oh love, that's not real, or oh love, come on.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>I thought they'd pushed back against the word love. But

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 2>funnily enough, the word that people push back more on

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>is experiences we humans we go through. Let's say you

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>go to the doctor's office. That's an experience for us,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and we as the human are going through that experience.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 2>You would have thought the doctors, let's say, would have

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 2>designed an experience as though the whole human was going

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>through it. But we don't. We design it for process.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 2>So in the doctor's office, there's a series of handoffs

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that you have from the person who's there as the

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>receptionist or the person who that hands you off to

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>one nurse, to another nurse, to the doctor, to a

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>different nurse on the way out to and insurer, one

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>handoff after another. If you call your bank, it's one

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>handoff after another. If you call your airline, it's one

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>handoff off another, call the insurance company it and we

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>have to we as the human, have to contain the

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>coherence of our own story, repeating our story, whether it's

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>at the hospital, whether it's at the restaurant, whether it's

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 2>at the bank. We're the ones who have to try

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to keep the coherence of our story together because the

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>whole darn world we live in has not been designed

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>for a coherent experience. It's one vertical process after another,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're just handed off. The whole world's been designed transactionally,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>which is why, for the first time, by the way,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>in thirty years, we asked this question. I started doing

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.599
<v Speaker 2>this back in the early two thousands when I was

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>still at Gallup. We were just measuring trust, trust in

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>big business, trust in school RULs, trust in the government,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>trust in big media. Last year was the first year

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>where not a single one of those institutions I've just

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>mentioned had more than fifteen percent of people saying I

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>strongly trust them. We are living in a world where

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 2>we just do not trust the institutions that are a

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>big part of our world, from schools to hospitals to banks.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>But we just don't think it's not built for us,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>because it's not. It's built for process and efficiency and transactionalism,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 2>and it feels terrible for us. It feels terrible when

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you call your bank. It feels terrible when you try

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to buy tickets for a Taylor Swift concert and she's

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>outsourced the selling of tickets to Ticketmaster, who then gouge you.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>But by the way, which is why she took that

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>back interestingly enough, because she did take the experience seriously

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and started, I think it's taylorswifticks dot Com to take

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>it back in so that she could own the totality

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of the experience. But most experiences for us in our

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 2>world are designed as though we aren't the human going

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>through them and it feels rotten.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you say that it's not so much that

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>people are evil about it. I mean they're not. It's

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not immoral. It's just a moral right that it hasn't

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>been considered to make a human being flourish, right.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean. The simplest and the most banal example would

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 2>be you go to a restaurant and the person who

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>you made the reservation through, who is probably interactive voice response,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way, which is not a relationship strategy. It's

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>a containment strategy. That's what IVR is. You've made your

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>reservation online. The person you bump into at the hostess

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>down is not the same person whose voice you have

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>been when you made the reservation. The person who seeks

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 2>you is not the same person. The person you can

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>order your drink from is not the same person. The

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 2>person who then takes your order is not the person

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>who brings you. The whole thing is designed to efficiently

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>contain table four as efficiently as possible. It's not designed

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to go you're a human, you probably want to feel

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>as that there's another human going through the experience with

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you who's probably thinking about you as having a holistic experience.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Even something as banal as a restaurant isn't designed that

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 2>way for you. And so we live in a world

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>where trust is low, love is low. There's an experience

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 2>which back in the late eighth nineteenth century, actually a

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>very famous sociologist called Amil Durkheim coined to term an

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>m which means alien nation. We live in a world

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 2>which feels like it's blind to us humans as employees

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of work. We're not called employees. We're called full time

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>equivalents FTEs or headcount. All of the human capital management

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>systems that do our pay, that do our recognition, programs,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that do our goal setting, those are all extensions of

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>financial systems. All of our human systems are actually financial systems.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 2>And so we live in a world where of humanity.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Even at school, if you think about it, the uniqueness

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>of the student from the ages about zero to ten,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the uniqueness of your child is kind of interesting to

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>schools from ten onwards, it's how closely do you match

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>up to the standardized testing that we're going to do

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>all the way up through college actually, and the great

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>point average of the seniors who graduate from the college.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the preoccupation of schools, education at large, and then

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>it continues at work. So and there are exceptions, that's

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>beautiful leaders and beautiful managers and beautiful teachers who really

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>get to know us as unique humans. But most of

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the world is set up to turn us from a

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>human into a financial element of a transaction and more.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>With AI barreling down the track, we're going to get

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>more of that, not less of that. And the point

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of this book is that's stupid. It makes very bad

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>business sense. Why because love's the most powerful driver of

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>productive human behavior for employees or for customers. So when

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you put systems in place that drive love out, you

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>are undermining the behaviors that you want, whether it's productivity

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>or loyal or advocacy or word of mouth or whatever

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it is.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's say somebody is yeah, listening to this, and

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they are a manager of a team, and they're like, Okay, well,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I may not be the CEO of a huge corporation,

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but I would still like people to love to work

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with me, yeah, right, and to help my team members flourish.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the things that a manager can

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>do to cultivate that within their team.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, the simplest thing that you can do if you

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>think about what's the handmaiden of love? Well, attention is

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the handmaiden of love. Humans don't do very well when

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>we're ignored. Like, what's the opposite of love? Hate? No,

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the opposite of love is ignoring someone. So the simplest

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>thing that a manager can do, which so many managers don't.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>But you know that put upon and the company's yanking

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>them one way and another. But really, what you should

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>do is check in with each of your people for

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minutes, one on one every week. It's the simplest thing.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Are some two questions, and do it fifty two times

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a year. And the two questions are how do you

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>feel about last week? And what are you working on

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>this week? And how can I help? Do it fifty

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>two times a year. It's fifteen minutes and you're not

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>coming in with some amazing coaching tip every week, that's fine.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>What you're doing is giving someone the benefit of attention

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 2>about the short term past. How was last week for you?

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Did you love it or loath it? What'd you love like? Seriously,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>go what'd you love about last week? And what's your loath? Okay, interesting,

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm right with you now. What's your focus for this week?

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>How can I help? And you just keep doing that

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>fifty two times a year. Then for all of you,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>but you and the rest of your team, what you'll

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>be doing is establishing emotional harmony with your team, because,

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it, a year oscillates. Everybody goes

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>through ups and downs and challenges, and what you want

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>as a person on a team is just having a

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>leader who pays attention to it. They don't have to

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>fix it, they just have to pay attention to it

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>every week. Now, maybe on some weeks you can tweak

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 2>or adjust or course correct, but for most of us

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>when we go to work, we feel unseen. So if

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you want to fix that, have a frequent light touch

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>check in or conversation call or whatever you want, check

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 2>in touch base. It turns out when you look at

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the modality, it doesn't matter. You can do it online,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 2>you can do it with an email, you can do

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>it face to face, you can do it on the phone.

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>What matters isn't the modality of it, Laura, it's the

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>frequency of it. Do you repeatedly touch based on each

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of your people about the near term future every week.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 2>If you don't do that, by the way, that sounds

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 2>boring to you to do, then you shouldn't lead people,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 2>because leading is actually individualized attention to the human and

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the work and the human and the work and the

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>human and the work. Gosh, you do that fifty two

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>times a year, you'll be in the top five percent

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of leaders in terms of the loyalty and the productivity

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you get from your people.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And then one other thing you mentioned is is sort

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>of paying attention to customs, which I know a lot

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of people listening to this show are very much into

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 1>routines and rituals. Are there certain sort of rituals that

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>good managers do in our to build love into their teams.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the two but by the way, every single leader,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>of course, I call it the ABCS of leadership Authenticity, beliefs, customs.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>So whatever your customs are, they better be authentic and

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>they better be a manifestation of your beliefs. If you're

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to fake it. If your customs are just a manipulation,

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 2>we humans can sort of sniff that out. So the

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>C comes after the A and the B. Authenticity means

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't need you to be perfect, we need you

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>to be you beliefs means don't assume that we can

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 2>read your mind. What do you believe is deeply important

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to you? Tell us, help us know that because we

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>can't actually dive into your heart. Customs would be like,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>what are the things that you repeatedly do that bring

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 2>those first two to life? If you were to think

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 2>about some super predictable ones that probably work for most leaders,

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>although the way in which you do that might vary

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 2>according to your style. First of all, catch people doing

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>things right. There's a million different ways in which things

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>can go wrong. Your goal as a leader should be

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>to keep looking for excellence. And when you say good job,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.239
<v Speaker 2>that is not the end of a sentence. It's the

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>beginning of an inquiry. So when you say good job

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to someone, that should be the beginning of why did

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>that work for you? Let's unpack that a little bit,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 2>why so that you can do it again, so that

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>we can refine it or improve it. Let's look at

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the bits that worked. Because excellence in any job isn't

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>just the opposite of failure. It's like you don't write

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 2>a great poem by fixing all the dangling partibles or

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 2>the split infinitives. So you as the leader. You've got

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>to be really interested in what works. When it works,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>what works, catch people doing things right, not just to

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 2>make them happier, but because that's the raw material for

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>future greatness. Is current goodness, not current badness. So many

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>leaders get kind of get drawn into remediation and fixedness. No,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 2>keep looking for what's right. And then another custom, which

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is do it once a quarter for yourself. I would

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>suggest you actually don't want to quote it with each

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 2>of your people, but start with yourself. Just take a

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>black pad around with you for a week, draw a

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>line down the middle of it right, loved it at

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the top of one column, and loathed it a top

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of the other. Take it around with you for a week.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Any time you find some activity or interaction that you love,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that you lean into, that you find yourself looking forward to.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Time speeds up when you're doing it. Scribble it down

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and loved it column and in the loaded it when

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you see the opposite when you're procrastinating, when time drags

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 2>on when you're doing it, Okay, scribble that down. Take

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 2>an inventory of a regular week of your life and

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>put it through the lens of love. I know again,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I know that sounds a bit combin our. But really,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're trying to do is use love as your

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 2>decoder for what are the particular activities or situations that

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>super energize you. No one else is going to do

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>it for you. I actually call those lower red threads.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Every job has thousands of different activities in it, and

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 2>some of the threads are pretty neutral. You just got

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 2>to do them. They're black, they're green, they're gray, whatever,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 2>you just got to do them. But some of the

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>threads are red. These are activities that you love, and

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>everyone's colorblind to your red threads. Even your mum, who

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.959
<v Speaker 2>may love you to the anth degree, doesn't know what

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 2>your red threads are. She doesn't know what activities, moments,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 2>or situations super energize you. You do, You do know them.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>You're the wisest person about what you love in your life.

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Do love it, loath it once a quarter, and use

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the raw material of your own day or week to

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 2>pinpoint where are my red threads. Because if you want

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>a really really happy life at work or frankly life,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>you don't need a red quilt. There's research out of

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the Mayor Clinic which suggests you need twenty percent red

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 2>threads twenty percent red threads.

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the equivalent of one day a week, right.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, or twenty percent every day. But you don't need

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent every day. You're never going to find

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 2>a job you love like, that's just not real. But

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you can find the love and what you do that's different.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 2>That's doable.

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, Well, we're going to take one more quick

0:21:54.920 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ad break and then I will be back with Marcus Buckingham. Well,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I am back talking with Marcus Buckingham, the author of

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the new book Design Love in So we've been talking

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>about things that energize us, you know, as we go

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about our schedules. I'm curious about you your schedule. This

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is a time management podcast. So do you have any

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, rituals or things you do during your day

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that you think make you more productive.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, not to be too subperfrentual, but I start The

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>first thing is attitudinal. You've got to think to yourself,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 2>my day is my smartest, wisest, most loving friend, which

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I know sounds a bit silly, but so many of

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 2>us look through the look at our days as something

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>to get through the days. The enemy. It's a to

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>do list that rolled over from yesterday, and I've got

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to get through the day, get through the list. And

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 2>of course there is some part about this real, but

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I always start off every day. It's right now, it's

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>early in my day. I start off and go, what

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>red threads am I going to weave today? Because my

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>trying to show me my day is trying to show

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>me a whole bunch of threads, And it's basically saying

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 2>to me, every day, is this one read? Is that

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 2>one read? Is this one read? My Day's trying to

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>help me find the energy that I need to be

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 2>invigurated in my life. It's trying to if I would

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>but listen. So for me, initially, it's always start off

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and go, what red threats will I leave today? Because

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 2>if I don't set that intention around, what are the

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>activities that I can seek out, linger on pay attention to.

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 2>If I don't do it, no one's doing it. So

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 2>every day for me starts that way. Over time, I

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>end up writing, I mean, I've written down, you know,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>ten or so red threads that I know will invigorate me.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 2>They always do so for me, and it's going to

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 2>sound boring, but one of my red threads is finding

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>patterns in data. I love finding patterns in data. And

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 2>if I let days go by and I don't do that,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't sit with some data to go what does

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 2>it mean? Which I know for some of your listeners,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure sounds like pulling teeth.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We love data over here. This is exactly how people

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>spend their time, for instance, is fascinating. I love looking

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at data sets of thousands of people and how they

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>spend their time.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely so for me, Like if you the moment

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 2>you say the word data set and patterns, I just

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>lean in. I just always have leaned in, and I'm

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>just so I love doing that. I love, I mean

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>turning it into narrative. I love turning data into narrative.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 2>So for me, that could be a podcast like this,

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 2>by the way, which is I mean I'm loving like

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>times fine by For me, I don't know how much

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>time has gone by, but it could be three hours.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's just whipping by. For me, I

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 2>will deliberately seek out opportunities to Now. I can write,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I can record, I can do it put. But any

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>time where I can seek out an opportunity to tell

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a story from data, I'm going to lean in and

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>see that out. So those sort of rituals for me

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>give me some intention and control, not control over you

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>or control over someone else, but gives me control over

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>way in which I'm spending the time in my own days.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 2>That's hugely important. It gives me agency absolutely.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, Marcus, I always ask my guest, So we've sort

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of been getting at this, but what is something you

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have done recently to take a day from great to awesome?

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Well that's a jolly good question. I mean, for me,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the challenge in a day is always that it doesn't

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>like no one who's calling you knows you the way

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that you know you. So for me, every day has

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 2>to start off and it's not really like something I

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 2>did that is special about a particular day. For me,

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 2>every day's got to be do you want to take

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>love seriously in your own life? Marcus? Do you want

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that that day today you're feeling a

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit more full of yourself today as compared to yesterday. So,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 2>for I mean, I'm not saying I have every single

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 2>day is an awesome day. But once you understand that

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>love is your decoder and that love is available, activities

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that you love interactions that you love, situations that you

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 2>love that are so specific and unique to you. Once

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 2>you understand that that's there every day, then I don't know.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>For me, it feels like every day is being designed

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>by me to have a lot of love in it,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and that is awesome. I mean, I'm sorry to sound

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 2>too woo woo.

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>That works for me. We're going to design love into

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>our days as well in order to take them.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Just some great one quick thing about that, Laura. The

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>opposite of design. I've been thinking about a lot about

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 2>this because of the book. But what's the opposite of design?

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>What happened with my company, what happens to so many

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>people in their lives is drift. When you don't design,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you drift. And sometimes you're lucky, you have a great day,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 2>but in a world which is pulling you and pushing

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 2>you this way and that, which doesn't really think about

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>your flourishing very much at all. In fact, as we

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>talked about, it sort of ignores your flourishing. You can

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>drift a long way from the authority and the energy

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that you need to have a full life. It's not bad,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 2>it's just you've drifted. And so design feels like the

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>right word to say, no, no, no, let's bring it back.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>We're all designers. You can design experiences in your own

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>life that invigorate you, and it's up to you to

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>do it because no one else.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, absolutely, it's all about being intentional with our time,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>our lives, everything we are doing. So, Marcus, where can

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>people find you?

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, rather unsurprisingly, probably got a design loove in dot com,

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>which is the book site. We've just launched the pre

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>orders of the book and we're doing this masterclass series

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 2>for folks with the book with the Harvard Business Review

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>who's the publisher, So Design Love in dot Com would

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>be great. And then my various socials I'm always pottering about,

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to be helpful and thought provoking for folks.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Excellent, Well, Michaus, thank you so much for joining us.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to everyone for listening. If you have feedback

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about this or any other episode, you can always reach

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>me at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. In the meantime,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and here's to making

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the most of our time. Thanks for listening to Before Breakfast.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>If you've got questions, ideas, or feedback, you can reach

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>me at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. Before Breakfast

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartMedia. For more podcasts from iHeartMedia,

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>please visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.