WEBVTT - Waiver Wire Leftovers, TNF Preview, Injury Updates

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Do dinnit? Yeah, that's welcome your five bay from races,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your co host five times say Prank staffall your co

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>host at five eleven from all why ladies and tentlemen

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>yours and with that we want are you inside of

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This easy to be f FS. Here's

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample, Here's Eui, Eric Young, and I am Greg Sauceman.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Frank's having a month Reggae double Digits. Week ten is here,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and I love that all of the prime time games

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in week ten we're all pretty good ones. I'm excited

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for tonight Opland Raiders in Los Angeles Chargers. We have

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings and Cowboys Sunday night. We had a great

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game between the Seahawks and forty Niners as well.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty fun. How are you doing, buddy? I just

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sleep last night. I slept very well last night. So great.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't have any pre wedding jitters. That's gonna go wrong? Man?

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>What don we go wrong? But nothing's gonna go wrong? Obvious.

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What needs to be nervous for? You know, I mean

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous, I asked Judy. You know, he's probably the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>one that's freaking out. You know, I'm nervous about e Y.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be like thirty degrees in Nashville next week. Yeah,

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's pouring rain here today. It definitely got cold,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'll give you a quick news flash. Fall

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is here in Nashville. It was, I mean two weeks

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>ago it was ninety degrees, right, That's what I was excited,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>not an exaggeration. Ninety degrees Like two and a half

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. I was sitting in my backyard smoking his

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cigar outside and now I don't want to leave my house. Great,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to be there next week. You're going here

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>for By the way, what you say, good timing on

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>your part. Yeah, awesome. I think there were three days,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>so this just like a post wedding, Yeah, a little bit.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to go back to work on one day.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yeah, what you mean that makes sense.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do anything crazy expensive. It was like,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what cheap light down in Nashville, you know

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what topical days and come back all right, the crazy

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>enjoy I try to enjoy it. The point is, you

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'll just have to drink this day one

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sure why this guy likes a lot of whiskey, So drink.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to some country music would be great. The

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>barroom at my house is being updated as we speak,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>massive record shelf being installed, moving stuff around. Uh. Some

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of the the a W Boys are going to be

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in town next week and might stop by for a liaison.

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, like I said to you, you and Judy

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are always Oh you know what's funny because I was

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>told I was talking to Frank, I think a W

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is there Wednesday or so, and I was like, oh,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, because I'm also there Wednesday. She's like, you

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>go to a W on on this track. I was like,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I know what, think you probably can't do that. You

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>probably can't finagle that one. But you're your boys with

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>m jf right, So yeah, if you wanted to, you

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>probably could probably be in town. Yeah. Anyway, are you

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have any uh any Bubbly in your in your

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>establishment next week? Yeah, the Masterard Master of the Bubbly

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna stop by. So we'll we'll see, And it

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>depends on how light the show goes and stuff. I've

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>been talking to a couple of the guys, so, uh,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>wrestling is definitely a small world. Um, Frank Chris Daniels

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are two of my very very good friends. So I'm

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>hoping that they're going to stop by, and uh the Champ,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Champ Mr Jericho also a very very good friend

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of mine. So we'll see what happens. Awesome Jergo was

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Jergy was in New York yesterday. Jerk

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>goes everywhere. Yeah, the dude's everywhere all the time. So

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, so aw this Saturday night full gear, so

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that'd be cool. Um, your birthday Saturday night, Frank, we

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all I going on this weekend? Yes, it is my

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>my birthday Saturday night. I won't really be able to

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>celebrate it. That's why sorrow. So I'm doing it tomorrow Friday,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll be celebrating my birthday and then Saturday the big extravaganza.

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going down, all right, let's get into what we're

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>doing on the show today. Show it all right? On

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the show we got the leftovers coming up in just

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a few moments. You know who's still in the waiver wire?

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Who's worth going out there? Uh? And in getting in

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball, I think the super Mario Herzonia. That's where

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we are in fantasy waivers, not northerly, Frank, I know,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I yelled at um. We don't have anyone to drop. Greg.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I might have been down with it, but our team

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is too stacked. All right. After that, we had inside

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>injuries with Virginia Zakis. Virginia will join us today. We

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>have coming up a Thursday night football preview charges of Raiders.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>As Frank said, it's a good one. And then we're

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a very special edition of is Mike Lying

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with a special guest host me? So it's is Greg lying?

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The show is named is Mike Lying. I don't want

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to take Florio show away from him? That fair copyrighted.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He he might have it's trademorrow, the whole deal, but

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I will filly from Mike Florio and host is Mike

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>lying to wrap up to day show. I'm gonna do

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it earlier. I want to make sure we, you know,

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>get it in. There's questions. Okay, this might be one

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the only things in life that I can actually

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>beat Eric young Att, because we know I won't beat

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>him at anything involving physicality or athleticism. So this is

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my only shot. So I will be trying my best.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I also will know e y. Frank spent a good

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>hour before the show's studying and I was like, are

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you seriously studying talking about I'm doing my rank? Are

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you really studying right now? I'm doing my rank? What

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about? I'm currently doing my rank. He's

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>scared to be the right, scared of being beaten. Right here, Greg,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>look look at the rankings page. I'm updating my rankings.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg has no idea what he's talking about. As usual,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I exactly what I'm talking about. Frank, I'm calling you

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>right at He didn't you like? That's sorry? You know what,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta study to keep up, keep up with the

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>y to keep pace. Yeah, so that is what is

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>happening on today's program should be a good one. Let's

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>start calling news and notes before we get to the leftovers.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The first A J. Green's engle hurts, So he's like,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I gotta play on Sunday And we're like, yeah,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we know when they call that, when they call that,

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>when they call that finneyitis, Yes, exactly, he's coming down

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with a serious case of it. But we've said this

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>all along, right, He's going into a contract year. He

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to get paid. Why is he going to risk

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>his hell for a team that is going nowhere? They

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are winless and he has said in the past that

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants to remain a Bengal for life. A lot

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of people say things that they don't necessarily mean. So

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens money talks in the off season.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure A J. Green would like to join a

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>contending team as well. I don't think that the Cincinnati

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Bengals will be contending anytime soon. The timeline just doesn't

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>match up here. You know again, I think at this

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>point in his career, he wants to get paid, He

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to try to compete and the Cincinnati Bengals are

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>going through a rebuild, so I don't think it makes

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense for him to remain with the

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals. But we shall see Greg. All right, we

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>take right here when we were or the leftovers are

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>up next, Well, you know who's still in the waiver wire,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth picking up. Figure it out together, the

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>three of us, the three best friends forever here on.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>The NFL season is now upon us, and you can

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>become the eighth person awayen one million dollars in a

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>FANDULA Draft Kings tournament by setting their lineups using the

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>playing daily Fantasy sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>results into promo code action for its head percent discount.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's promo code action for its head percent discount,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>dailor Order dot Com where millionaires are made. All right,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>let me start here with the leftover sports of the program.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Also overmind you subscribe. You were a channels Now Sports crediv,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy sports that were a channel. Still us still exist,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>new name of sports grew TVs. If you're watching us

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>right now on YouTube, subscribe like the comment, and no

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>more confusion. Grade. We don't. We don't have a sports

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>grid TV separate YouTube account. Now it's this same place,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>same time, and nothing has changed, only the name. It's not.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>The fantasy sports network is sports Grid. So make sure

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe. As Greg mentioned, give us a thumbs up,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>send us a comment, rate reviews, subscribe wherever you listen

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>to us. We'd appreciate it. Now we start with the

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>leftovers in my home league, where I again terrible team.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's right, Danny, you have a bump. Let's

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>play that. This is leftovers. Still didn't get your fill

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>from the waiver wire? One more? The BFFs has your leftovers?

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Watch this? Never mind, give me a whole lot of it.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, there we go. It's leftovers portion of the

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>program in my home league. But he was terrible. I

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>might need not one, but two snorting running backs. You

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>only need to start two running backs, and I might

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>need both of them. I'm sorry. Yeah, bye week Blues,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the bye bye bye bye bye bye correct week Blues. Indeed,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so I lost Sony Michelle. I don't have James Conner

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially se who happens there? So I gotta look to

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the leftovers. Is the only running back that was out

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there on waivers was Kylen Milage and I didn't get him.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Can he't care either? Was Kylen Milage? Sucks? So I

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>love Lamar Miller's Solar Miller. So I looked to the

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>leftovers right to try to find a starting running back.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have one for meat? I do have an

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting name if you are desperate, which it sounds like

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you are pretty desperate here, Greg and that man Thus

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Edwards of the Baltimore Ravens. This week, the Bengals are

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half point favorites. They could be playing

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>with a big lead in this one. The last time

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the Even's faced off against the Cincinnati Bengals, that was

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the exact case here, and it's a really good matchup obviously.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>With the Cincinnati Bengals allowing four point eight six yards

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>were carried to opposing running backs, they allow the second

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to running backs as well. I expect

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram to get his. I expect Lamar Jackson to

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>also get his. Lamar Jackson didn't practice today. He's only

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an illness. He is okay. But in the

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of that game, they're playing with a big lead,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I expect Gus Edwards to get his you know, six

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to ten carries, maybe even a little bit more if

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they do have that big lead that we all expect. Greg.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So if you're desperate, I think Gus Edwards makes a

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense based on the matchup. So Gus Edwards, Uy,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody I am considering picking up off the waiver wire.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other names. Frank Gore, he's out there.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I know. Devin Sildar, he stepped up. Frank Gore. You

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>can find the Enzo Kenny. Yeah, I mean he is

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the infinity Stone, uh everyone when he came out of

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the drops at all, his knees are no good. Even

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>if he's good in the first couple of years, he

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>won't play very long. Five years tops. Well, here we

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>are twenty nineteen. Frank Gore still playing football at a

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>high level. I might add, um so yeah, I mean

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you could do worse than him, for sure, um J D. Mckissic,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>because another guy that might be available, he to me,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>has looked like the best uh, Detroit Lions running back.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not saying a whole lot, but when he's had

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>his opportunities, he's like the best scored a touchdown last week,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and you get j D McKissick. J D McKissick, somebody

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's odd still on the waiver wire and if you're desperate.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Kind of makes sense for my TVR perspective. JD McKissick

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not a bad one at all. E y for me.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The other one I considering kind of similar to j

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>D McKissick, Jie Bernard, Why not, they're gonna be down

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>right right if he had to dumb it off to somebody, Well,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that somebody is Joe Mixon. The usage for

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon has been so frustrating all season. One of

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the best receiving backs in his draft class coming out

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of college, just not being used enough in the past game.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So we shall see. Greg. They're likely playing for behind

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.599
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, and Ryan Finley. He excels more so

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in he's short to intermediate routes. He had a high

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage in the preseason through a lot to his

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>running backs. So I think that your thought process is correct.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I would lean with e Y if both are available.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like j. D. McKissick. Last week only played

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent of the snaps, but he found pay

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>dirt going up against the Chicago Bears to allow a

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>ton of receptions to opposing running backs. And since you

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>since the Chem Hicks has gone down, Greg, they're now

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>allowing a ton of fantasy points as well and touchdowns.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed eight total touchdowns to running backs over

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>their last five games. So I think all of those

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>names make sense to me. Frank Gore is a little

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher because Devin siggles Harry really took over this

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>backfield last week, played sixty six percent of the snaps.

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Funny Carries had four targets. Frank Gore had just eleven carries.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>He had just fifteen total yards. He was stuffed three

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>times on the goal line, and it wasn't a good game.

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's going up against the Cleveland Browns, who

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you there are fantasy points to be had

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Cleveland Browns. They're allowing four point nine three

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry two opposing running backs. That is the

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>second most in the NFL. But I expect a monster

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>game out of Devin Singletary here. Uh is JD. Mkissic

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>available in your league? Or no, let's find out. If

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>he's not, then the guys that I would lean with

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>our Gore and gust Edwards over Gio Bernardard alright, So

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>mckissic will be first for you. Maybe one of the

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Jets guys too, if either is available. If Levi Bell can't,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know he's practicing on a limited basic owned okay,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>um is Ball Powell available? He might be a sneaky

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>one as well. He has had more snaps and more

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>touches over the past two weeks than time Montgomery. Time

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery practicing in full there was some center limited limited practice. Yeah,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's kind of it's a situation where Gustbus

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is own a gust bus. Did he just get picked

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>up or all right? I would, I would Gio Bernard,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I would probably still speculate on Powell just for now.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone's gonna pick up Geobernard. You're probably yeah,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll be all right with that one, right,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic. I don't have any money for Gore. Let's go.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>The affinity stone starting to fade a little bit, Yes, yes,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he is not infinity anymore. All Right, If you're in

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>my position, but you're looking for a wide receiver, Frank,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>what are you get to? I think there's a few

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting names still available on the waiver wire. One of

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the ones that I was looking at is Deebo Samuel,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>who played more snaps last week. He had the snap

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>percentage up to six or six percent of the stats.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>He had seven targets in a good matchup, should have

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown. If you're watching last Thursday night a

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>week ago, this time, Deebo Samuel has dropped. That touchdown

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was wide open. I do not think that the Seahawks

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>secondary is a good one. I think that Jimmy Garoppolo

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>can have some success here. I still do think Emmanuel

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and George Kittle are are one and two in

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the pecking order in terms of targets. But Deebo Samuel

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is starting to come along a little bit more here.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Greg the targets starting to come along as well, So

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Deebo Samuel is an interesting name. I'll also

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>throw out your boy, Darius Layton of the New York Giants.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a good matchup going up against the Jets here.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they actually put Tremaine Johnson on I r

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>actually hurts because he's so bad. You want him to

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>be on the field so that wide receivers can take advantage.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But either way, we just saw Davante Parker, E Wise

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Boy and Preston Williams combined for three receiving touchdowns last week.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw the week before that Gardner Minshew through for

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns against this Jet secondary. They are not good.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd not looking like he's going to play. Evan

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Ingram already ruled out. So it's golden tape. And who

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that Darius Laton is actually in a good

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>spot here against the Jets. Craig, So I agree, Darius

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Layton could be an option. Manny Fowler, Cody Latimer also

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>playing snaps at wide receiver for the Giants. But Darius Layton,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>who is the clear number two option in these Giants offense.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>He has a Jet secondary that's vulnerable. I think you're desperate,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. He's certainly out there on a lot of

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>waiver wires. Why what are you thinking about the wide

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver position those that could be left over. Yeah, I

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think Slayton would be the guy that I would go

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>after first, just because he's probably gonna have the biggest opportunity.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But another guy you want to keep your eye on

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe is Adam Humphries. Uh kind of had a decent

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>game last week. Um, Mahomes is supposed to return, They're

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going to score. Tannehill is going to have the throw,

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he seems to really trust Humphries. Um. We

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>had to saw a big game out of John H.

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Smith and then last week we didn't see a whole lot.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>So Humphrey, especially in a PPR, could be a sneaky

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 1>guy to play this week. Why I want to ask you, man,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch the Titans, probably as close as I

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>should know he probably shouldn't. But but ultimately it's what's

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the deal with Corey Davis? Man? Is it just he's

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not good? He can't get on the same page with

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the quarterbacks because we made the excuse for

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>him that Marcus Mariota wasn't getting him the ball, and

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw that first game with Tannehill take over, and

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we thought that, all right, well, maybe this is what

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis finally needed. Someone who can consistently target him,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>consistently get him the ball out in space and he's

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna make the most of it. But now it's two

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>games in a row where he's let us down again.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You talk about Adam Humphries who's coming along, and A. J.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown is actually the one that's stepping up and making

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the most plays and he's playing more snaps. So you know,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing out of this Titans passing attack

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>right now? What is wrong with Corey Davis? Is he

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>just not good? Is? Is that the answer? Well? I

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>think it comes down to the bare minimum. Is this

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>look like Tannehill? I think is a very obvious and

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>present upgrade at the quarterback position. But in no way

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is Ryan Tannehill a good quarterback. I mean, like we've

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>seen this guy play football before. Um, he has an improvement.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The Titans want to run the ball, they want to

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.239
<v Speaker 1>control the clock, they want short passes. Um. I think

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Davis is a great athlete. Is he a good wide

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the NFL? We don't know yet. I think

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when they throw it his way, he looks good. I

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>mean he makes some good catches. But Brown does seem

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like the more explosive option at this point. We take

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a break here when we come back, Jusakis joins the

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>program Inside Injuries, He updates next NFL season is now

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>upon us, So you can be going to the eighth

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>person away in one million dollars in a Fandel Draft

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Kings tournament. My sittinger lineups using the Daily Order dot

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Com DFS lte of optimizer. If you were playing Daily

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>into promo code action for its ten percent discount. That's

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>promo code action for its head percent discount. Tailor Order

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com where millionaires are made. Oh I'm falling and

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I can get off Inside Injuries with Virginia Zakis. But

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a scratch, a scratch, the arms off all right? Thursday

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>brings us from Inside Injuries Virginia Zakas, what's happening in Virginia?

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, how's it going? It's going very very well.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>How's going with you going well? Busy week of injuries.

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of injuries this week, not just in the

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>NFL either, Know you're dealing. This was going on Simmons

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>last night, Triple j in the n b A as well,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not good to return for him, Frank, But in the NFL,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of course it's always plentiful. So let me be game

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>with what happened last week to Adam Field and he returned. Uh,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in these games, he had a couple of weeks off

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>with a hamstring injury. It didn't even take him a

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter to re injure himself. He says, it's not severe.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back soon. Is that true? Yeah, Unfortunately, anytime

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an aggravation to a hamstring injury like this, it's

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely more serious the second time around. Um, you know

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>two weeks around. Two weeks wasn't enough for it to

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>heal last time. We're now saying that he needs four

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks um from last weekend for the injury to heal,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so actually saying that he shouldn't return until around week thirteen. Um,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 1>they have a buy in week twelve, so I think

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty good chance that that happens. If he

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>returns in week eleven, he's going to be at a

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>very very high risk of injury. Um. He's already not

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>expected to play this weekend, so hopefully he sits out

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>through week thirteen. And then he's good for the final

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>month of this season. So you go, Adam Feeling, this

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>is week ten, they have a bye week twelve, should

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be out ten, eleven, twelve. Essentially you get him back

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for the fantasy playoffs. Adam Feeling not gonna be a

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>part of your fantasy playoff push, And I think that

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense as well, just based on

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody re injuring their hamstring. They usually do take a

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks off after that, so I'm gonna likely

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>miss this week next week as well, and then they

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have that buy in week twelve. So not what Adam

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Feeling owners want to hear, but maybe music to Stefon

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Diggs's owner's ears right now, Greg and someone that week

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you had a dream about Stephen or Maryland Terrapins, So

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me. You're always dreaming about those terms, Greg.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Somebody that we share on a team together, Greg, that

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we really need to find out about here Virginia is

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>James Conner of the Pittsburgh Steelers. Apparently he's been practicing

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on a limited basis. He said last week on his

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>radio show that he was gonna play last week. Well

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>guess what he didn't He did not play last week.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>How are we looking for this week when it comes

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to James Conner and that a C joints frame, So

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>our outlook now is pretty similar to what it was

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>last week for James Connor. He's dealing with an A

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>C sprain to his right shoulder. UM, this is an

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>injury that might not heal within a few weeks, but

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>players should be able to return and play pretty well. UM.

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it is a pain management issue. That

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that you know, Connor should have played last

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>week because he likely would have been in a lot

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of pain had he played. UM. Sometimes when we say

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>pain management, a lot of you know, as viewers, want

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to just say suck it up, you'll be fine, But UM,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it can't be pretty painful. But I do think he

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>should be able to play this weekend. Unless this is

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a more serious UM sprain than they're letting on. But

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be good to go. UM. He is

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>still a high injury risk just because you know, anytime

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he takes a big hit or if he falls hard

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on that side, he could aggregate it. But his health

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>performance factor is in the above average category UM, which

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>indicates he should play pretty well this weekend, all right, Greg, alright,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>James Karner get back in the lineup. You read something

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier today that expected that James Connor would miss it. Actually,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>immediately somebody off the practice squad edited running or ended

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>running back to the active roster. And I don't know

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if that was related the Tray Admonds or James Conner,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>probably the former. But Ed Mouchette, a very popular and

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>very very good beat reporter from Pittsburgh, does not think

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that we will see James Conner on the Sunday. We'll say, yeah,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we shall see you. Trey Edmonds also dealing with an injury,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so they need some bodies there in the backfield, so

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that might make some sense for them as well. And

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we talking about Survivor earlier this week, cause I'm still

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>in Survivor and I need to win this week and

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious solution for me Virginia is to go

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Indianapolis Colts, but of course they're starting quarterback.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissett didn't really play last week after injuring his knee.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>It looked like an mcl sprain, nothing uh, super super significant.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>But if he came out all less week, he practiced

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on a limited basis yesterday. Do we think that Jacoby

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Brissette plays on Sunday? Um? Right now, I think it's

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>probably slightly better than that he plays. Um. It looked

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like he so his brent leg was planted as one

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of his linemen fell into his leg. Um. He also

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of appeared to tweak his ankle on the play.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think his me is more of an issue. UM.

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see anything that was too concerning on the play. UM,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And like many quarterbacks, he was already wearing a large

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>brace on his lead leg. Um. A lot of a

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of quarterbacks do it to protect themselves from this

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>exact kind of injury. So UM, if he does play,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>expect to see him wear a brace. His mobility could

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>very well be limited. But it's the kind of injury

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that he should should be able to play through, um,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if not this week, next week, and should be able

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to play pretty well on it. So he's an elevated

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>injury risk. But I think he has a decent chance

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>playing Week ten. Alright, so we'll take that quarterback uh

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in again. But the thing is they should win, right,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you're facing mihammy. You don't necessarily want to push it.

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I asked very much like him to play for set.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope they do. But even with Brian Horror, you

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>should probably feel pretty good about the Colts and survivor

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this week. Anyway, Look, Brian Hoyer just throw three touchdowns

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>against a really good Steelers secretary Virginia want to pivot

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to another quarterback in the a f C, and that

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is Patrick Mahomes, who, right up until game time last

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>week was a game time decisions and he was he

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>was questionable and it seemed like, you know, maybe there

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was a chance he could go. Ultimately they let him

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>rest one more week. He was a full participant in

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>practice yesterday as he's dealing with that knee injury. I

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>know all along that inside injuries has had a longer

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>timetable for Patrick Mahomes, but you've also said that you

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is something that he can play through once

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>he's good to go. Is this one of those weeks

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in week ten where he will be good to go? Yeah,

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So getting past that three week mark is huge for

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>this type of injury. Um and it was exactly three

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago that he was hurt. So I do think

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they held him out last week is

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very good news for his overall health. UM. He's still

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a high injury risk, but his numbers have improved significantly

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last week. UM. You know, when when a

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>player dislocates their kneecap, there's always going to be a

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>higher chance for the rest of the season that they

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dislocated again. UM. That MPFL ligament in there is likely

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>still stretched out. It's not going to get back to

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>normal yet. UM. And there could also be some cartilage

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>damage still going on in there. UM still believe it's

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>possible that he could also need surgery in the offseason,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>although I'm not sure about that. UM. And that's that's

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily That doesn't mean that he can't try to

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>play through it. So I think it's still gonna be painful. UM,

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we're sticking with our original six weeks optimal recovery time.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think his mobility is going to be affected a

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. UM, He's not gonna be able to scramble

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and kind of make those wild plays or as many

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>wild plays as he sometimes does. But I think he's

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty good shot at playing this weekend. UM.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But his style might change a little bit, and so

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the style can be not dismillar for what wee know.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Moore, who it wasn't really ability to move at

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this stage of his career, obviously can make all the

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>throws he needs to, and maybe that's what we have

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>from Patrick Mahomes on Sunday. Yeah, Greg, I just want

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to remind people that, you know, he was already hampered

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with an ankle injury earlier in the season that was

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>affecting his play as well, so we might see more

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of that Patrick Mahomes rather than the Mahomes of the

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>first couple of weeks where he was completely lighting up

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the scoreboard. I think he's still going to be very good,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but is he going to be the clear cut QB

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>one overall the way that Lamar Jackson is playing with

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I leaned towards probably not. But he's likely going to

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>still be a top five options for your fantasy teams.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Just keep in mind, you know, he's dealing with a

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lot right now between that knee and maybe even the ankle,

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>so just keep these things in mind. Let me ask

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>about a third quarterback, Frank And it's another game I'm

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>picking in Survivors New Orleans and Atlanta. Matt Ryan last

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>time we saw stand on the sideline. He didn't play

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>through an ankle injury, found us how to buy. The

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>expectation is he'll be back in that game. What do

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you think? Yeah, so we've given him a three week

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>optimal recovery time, which means his healthy to return date

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is in week ten. Um, he's not back in the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>low risk category, of course, just because once the player

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>suffers this kind of an ankle injury, the ligaments get

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 1>stretched out and it takes a lot longer for them

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to get back to normal. So he's an elevated injury

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>risk right now. But it looks like he's going to play.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>His health performance factor is also above average, so again

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a sign. I think he's gonna play pretty well

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>this weekend as long as they run about there. All right,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So sounds pretty good there from Virginia. I want to

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you about there's a lot of implications here because

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of Kamara is not maybe we see some more of

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Latavious Murray. Yesterday I thought this was interesting that Alvin

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Kamara was still limited in practice. Now. I don't know

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if that was just because all right, it's Wednesday, let's

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not push this guy too hard. But Virginia. I thought

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that coming back from the bye week, Alvin Kamara would

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have been from this ankle injury. Is that not the case?

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>What was his optimal recovery time? And should we be

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>worried heading into week ten? Yeah? So we originally gave

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>him a four week optimal recovery time. UM. That's for

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a combination of his ankle and his knee. Knee injury

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like a mild m c L sprain, so that

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>should you know, pretty much be healed within a few weeks.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Ankle injury appeared to be a mild high ankle sprain. UM.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So given that we thought he had a four week

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>optimal recovery time, that means we think he should be

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>good to go in week ten. UM. Now, his injury

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>risk is still elevated, so there's still some risk there

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're likely will be for at least the next

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, but I think he should be able to play. UM.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't get into full practice either today or tomorrow,

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I will be a little bit more concerned. But I'm

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping the limited practice on Wednesday was just you know,

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>them easing him back into things, making sure his ankle

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and his knee respond well overnight, he doesn't experience too

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>much swelling or soreness. UM, no setbacks, and then you

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>know again, hopefully he he continues to improve a practice

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and do a little bit more by the end of

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the week. UM, and if that happens, I think he'll

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>be good to go this weekend. Good news. Alvin Kamara,

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>who should be ready to rock here the Sunday for

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints going home. A couple more players

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to get to here, Virginia. Let me stay

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at the running back position where David Johnson has deemed

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>himself ready to rock for this weekend and levy On

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Bell had an m R in his knee, but he

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>did return to practice on a limited basis today. Are

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>both running backs ready to rock on Sunday? Yes? So

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson dealing with that ankle injury, he tried to

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>play through it, um and then went on to miss

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the next two weeks. UM, we're actually showing that he's

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>going to hit his healthy to return date in week ten. UM. Now,

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he's still a high injury risk because of this ankle

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>jury and other injuries he's dealt with recently, UM, but

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>his health performance back after his hovering between the below

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>average and above average category this weekend. So you know,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not too confident that he's going to have a huge game,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but he should be able to go out there and contribute.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the Cardinals don't play him, you know, every down,

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>um and really run him to the ground. Hopefully they

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>manage his rips um. Levan Bell underwent an m r

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I on his knee. I didn't see any concerning plays

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>in the game where he might have heard it, but um,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing structurally wrong with it. We're showing the grade one

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>knee sprain, um, so that's a milder knee spring two

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>week optimal recovery time. So we're actually showing that it's

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>better if he misses this week and then waits to

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>return in week eleven. All right, So pay attention again

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to Bill all Powell and Tie Montgomery. Greg, and again

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Powell is the one play more snap, seeing more touches

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks. Desperation play but again,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>bye bye bye bye bye bye. Makes people very desperate.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Virginia appreciate the time. Let's do it again next week.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. I'll be back there, all right. Fantastic Kevin Ingram,

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not playing this week. Neither's a j. Green. As

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier on we come back at Thursday Night

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Preview, and is Mike lion't to answer those questions.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Next NFL season is now upon us, so you can

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>become the eighth person away one million dollars in a

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My setting their lineups using the

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you're

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>results into Promo Code Action first head percent discount. And

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that's promo Code Action, first head percent discount Dailey Order

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com where millionaires are made. Wait for talk with

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Covers at Route. Mike calls the Chargers all right,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>back to back wins. They were like, oh, this is

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what LA does over the back calf of the season.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The first win came on a missed field goal and

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it was wasn't even a hard field golf was a

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Bears field goal was in a forty yard or forty one.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And then last week. The wind coming is a team

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that flat out didn't show up and stead after the game,

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey we didn't show up. I'm not doing that as

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a by sign on l A. What's live week days

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>three or four pm Eastern on Sports Grade and Sumotiv

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Channel seven nine. Team all right, lots do not that

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>much time to do it, Frank, what do you want

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to do? You place first or you want to do

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football first? I want to make sure we

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>get enough time for Thursday night football in so let's

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>start with that. Alright, let's begin Thursday football is a

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>good one to night. Wise, the Chargers head to Oakland

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to take on the Raiders last two times, last time

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>these two two teams will play in Oakland, with the

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Raiders set to move to Vegas next year. You asked

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>during the break about starting Mike Williams tonight. I know

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank absolutely loves Mike Williams. What do you think? Yeah,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a guy that I was super

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>high on the off season and hasn't done a whole lot,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but showed up last week. Um, even with Hunter Henry

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on the field, which I think a lot of people

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to act as red zone play. I do.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think he scores a touchdown here. I think

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.239
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a bit of a shootout. I mean,

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, the most surprising thing thing in this game,

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in this NFL season is Derek Carr's quarterback play. He

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>looks really good, Yeah, he does. The QB rating is

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>up this year, yards per attempt up for Derek Carr

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. That's why this game is actually a really

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really tough one to call. It's one of these divisional matchups,

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's cliche. Oh, it's the division game. You know

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna come down to the wire. But I actually

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think that this is going to be a really really

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>close game because I think these teams are similar right now.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Oakland Raiders offense is playing really well.

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They do have some cracks in the defense in terms

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the secondary. You know, we'll talk about Mike Williams

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and Keenan Allen getting it done here, but they've been

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>tougher against the run. So Melvin Gordon, if you have him,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you're likely still using him. He's a high nd RB

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>two tonight. But yeah, let's let's start with Mike Williams

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and Keenan Allen here Greg, it was a book question.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why I did. Last week, both Marvin Jones and

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Galady went for over ards and scored a touchdown.

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Oakland is allowing these second most fantasy points to opposing

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. How about this, Greg. Since Hutcher Henry has return,

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he actually leads the Chargers in target share, which is

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>insane twenty percent of the target chair over the past month.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just a massive amount four tight ends. So really

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>really like Hunter Henry tonight, but again, really like the

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Keenan Allen has not scored a touchdown since

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Week three. I think that changes tonight. I think he

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gets in the end zone. Mike Williams has not scored

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown all season. He scored ten touchdowns last year

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>on limited targets. This year he's actually playing all the

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>time now and has not scored a touchdown. He has

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine plus yards gig in four of the last

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>five games. So I like the props the over in

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards for both Keenan Allen and Mike Williams. Night

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Craig Mike Williams inside my top twenty four. Love him

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy. I think both of these guys are awesome

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. You talked before about these Melvin Gordon and

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>how you like him tonight He's been much better as

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of late. What does it mean for Austin Neckler. I

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have also Neckler still as a low end r B two,

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just because six teams on a buy, it's gonna be

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to get away from him and Lovin Gordon played

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a season high scent of the snaps last week. He

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>actually had season highs across the board greg twenty carries,

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>eighty rushing yards, two rushing touchdowns. Austin Ekeler is still

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>very good, sixteen touches. He had four receptions as well,

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but that wasn't a positive game script where they could

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>afford to give both of those guys that many touches.

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about thirty six combined touches last week for

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>these running backs. I think we have a little bit

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>more of a back and forth affair tonight between these

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and the Raiders. The one reason why I still

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>do like Austin Ekeler as a low end RB two

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the Raiders have struggled to stop receiving touchdowns

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this year to running backs. They've allowed four receiving touchdowns.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This season, They've been a little bit stronger just against

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the run in general. Their eleventh and run defense TV away.

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But based on the way things are trending, Love and

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Gordon being used more. The carries her up, He's being

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>used in the red zone. I like Melvin Gordon more

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>than aust Nickeler, But if you own Ekeler with the

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>six teams on a buy, you're likely still getting him

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup just because of all those players were missing.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So the question I had was Austin ekel or Jalen Samuels,

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And I have to make a decision tonight. What do

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think James Connor is gonna play. I

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think based on the diagnosis we just got from Virginia,

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>everything that we've seen so far, understand James Conner is limited.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's going to play. Now hidden Samuels,

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're closer to a fifty fifty split, but I'd

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>rather just take the points for sure. I mean, there's

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>still a chance that James Conner plays and dominates the

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>touches and then you're left with at Jalen Samuels, who

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how much work he's gonna get and

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough matchup going up against the Rams. They

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have been really good against running backs, so it's a

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>close call. But I would go with Austin Ekeler, probably

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>more so of the safer option, but just to guarantee

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that I get myself some points. Let me go to

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Let me go to the Oakland Raiders

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the football, and e y tonight, Tyroll Williams

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is in that revenge game for the Raiders, going up

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>against his old team, the Chargers. Would you start Tyrell tonight? Yeah?

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I would, and I and I'm actually going to do that.

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And who of my league's actually Tyrolle Williams is benefiting

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>from Antonio Brown leaving the Raiders. Obviously he was said

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the number two. Uh. This is a guy

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that when he's been given an opportunity, is kind of

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 1>always showing up. You mean, there was a few down

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>games last year, but he's looked pretty good this year

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>as the number one wide receiver, which is I think

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a surprised to me and a surprise to most. But

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Tyrone Williams um is somewhere. I'm definitely starting tonight. Yeah,

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about this downstairs, Greg, and it's a

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>revenge game for Tyro Williams going up against the Chargers,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and we both kind of agreed that it would have surprised,

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 1>if it surprise us, if John Gruden is actually going

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>out of his way to make sure that Tyro Williams

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown against his former team. He has scored

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in five of six games played. I think

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that he is a solid wide receiver three. Still a

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tougher matchup going up against Casey Hayward here,

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think John Gruden is going to try his

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>best to get Tyroll Williams in the end zone here. Greg,

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think if you're really desperate again in a

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>PPR league, if you need a body replacement, I think

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Hunter renfro is a viable option. Over the past two weeks,

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>leads the Raiders in targets, share more targets than Darren Waller,

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>more targets than Tyrrell Williams. He has been that PPR

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>guy in the slot over the middle of the field

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for Derek Carr. Obviously you're getting Darren Waller in your lineup,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and then it's just a great match up here for

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs. Pay attention to the offensive lineman situation for

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Rodney Hudson and Trent Brown are questionable for tonight,

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but the Charges are allowing four point four six yards

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>per carry to opposing running backs, the tenth most Fantasy points,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and over his past four games, Josh Jacobs is averaging

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two and a half carries per game and a

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eight point three rushing yards per game. The

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>rookie has just been phenomenal. He is inside my top

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>five running backs this week, Greig top five running match

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Jacobs, and it makes sense. He has been

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely amazing. Anything else on this game, Frank, before we

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>move on, just throw we We didn't mention Philip rivers name,

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but obviously if we like the wide receivers, if we

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like Hunter Henry, Philip Rivers is inside my top twelve

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. Oakland has a twenty two passing touchdowns this

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>season that is the second most in the NFL. This

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>is a game where you pretty much start everybody. Greg,

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can make sense to me before we move

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on to is Mike line. I want to tell you

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>that if you want two risk free wages up to

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars. To go back and check out points

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>bet dot com slash grid. You can open up a

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 1>points bet sports waguring account into the promo code grid

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get two risk free bets up to two

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand bucks addition to the rigitional betting points bet. Also,

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>all prestes own many conset where customers are rewarded by

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>how much they win their bet. For example, who plant

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to night's NFL game? You but the charge, You're down

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at minus one there minus two now, then they beat

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rangers by seven points. You see seven times your

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>stake's points bet dot Com slash grid and the promo

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>code grid, and you get two risk frey bets up

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to a Grand Hamiling problem calling hundred Gambler in New

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Jersey only when you went and over eligible restriction supply

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>see website for details. You are Are you ready for

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>your first ever edition? Is Mike line? I was born ready?

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>All right? How it works. I will read a statement,

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You will let me know if it is true or

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I am lying, and we alternate based on answers. First First,

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>if the answer is false, you will each have two

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>chances each to try to guess the right answer. Okay, right.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys ready, Yes, sir? All right, let's go

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fire it up. All right, give me some music, Danny,

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>look at my friend. Let's do it. Uh, e y,

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you are going first. Here we go. He's before Beauty.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He did that. Mike Evans leads the NFL in targets

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the red zone. Uh. False false, Frank. I saw

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a stat on end zone targets yesterday. But red zone

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I will say, I will say this is true. It

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is not true. Eric is correct, it is false. One nothing, Eric,

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>e y. There are two players that have more d

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL I'm sorry, targets inside the red zone. Then, Mike Emmonds,

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can you name one. Let's go with Tyrrelle Williams. She's

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not Tyrrell Williams. Frank tied up. I'll say Cooper cup

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>It is not Cooper Cup. E y. One more chance.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>You got a point here? Uh, Tyler Lockett is not

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett. Frank. DK Metcalf is not Dk Metcalf. Question

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is over. We are looking for either Kenny Golladay or

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey. Both have nine red zone targets on the year.

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>SAT that I saw was that Mike Evans leads the

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL in end zone targets, which are different than red

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 1>zone targets. We go to you, Frank's Austin Hooper leads

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>all tight ends in fantasy points per game. That is

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>correct and it's true, says Franky. I'm gonna go with

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>true as well. You know with true and you were

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>both correct. It is fact true. We go back to

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Eric Young for this one. With a minimum of twelve targets,

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs leads the NFL in yards per target. True true,

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>says Eric. So now I have to decide if I

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>want to keep pace with e Y, because if I

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>get this wrong, it's gonna be hard to run out

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of time of a three one deficit. I will say

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>true as well, it is true. That is correct. Nice

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>shot you, I who answered without hesitation. That was awesome question.

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Before he goes to Frank. Julian Edelman leads all wide

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>receivers with six rushing attempts on the year. Leads all

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers rushing attempts with six. I will say that

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's false, false, says Franky. False false false is correct?

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Is false? There are two players that have double the

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>amount that you and Leman does. Frank knows one for sure.

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>D Robert Woods is correct. Frank, you are tie at

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>four e y. There is one more player? Can you

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 1>get it? Cor Darryl Patterson? It is corn Daryl Patterson.

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That is correct. Oh, he's running back eligible. That is awesome.

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Question number five goes back to e Y Eric. Leonard

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Fournette leads all running backs in targets with thirty one

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>true true, says e Y. Frank targets with thirty one

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>targets On the air, I will say that is false.

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It is false. Ties it up at five e y.

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>There are three players that have more targets and Leonard

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Fournette this season. Can you name one? Austin Ekeler is correct.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>He leads the NFL running backs and targets with sixty. Frank,

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there's two more. Christian McCaffrey. Christian caffrey is also correct.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>He has fifty two e y. There's one more player?

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you get him? Is it? Let's not? Is he

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>heel Elliott? Frank, you have one more chance. You get

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>this right. You will take the lead. If you do.

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>You had that Lull had a lot last week. I'll

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>say Levian Bell. It is not Levy on Bell The

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>answer we were looking for was James White. James White

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>asif five we have enough time, I will say for

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>one more question. Totally tied at sex. We have enough

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>time for one more question. Let's do it. Here we go.

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>The question is no running back has as many receiving

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns e y as Austin Ekeler's five for false false false, Frank, Oh,

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>we gotta make things interesting, don't we. Kind of thing?

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>He has five receiving to stowns. Nobody has more. Running

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>back has more. Running back has more than five receiving

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this season. All right, just running through an answer, Man,

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go opposite of what you said,

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>saying true, Yes, we do have a winner. Ladies, gentle,

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the winner of is Mike lying Young. However, however, Frank,

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it was false, which means you can guess the answer. Oh, well,

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I just heard he's his first. Your guest is Christian

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey's that correct? That is not correct, Frank, We go

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>over to you. You have a chance in thirty seconds.

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:47.919
<v Speaker 1>You need an answer receiving seconds. It's not the show

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is thirty seconds. Uh, I know, I'm thinking, Greg, this

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is that everything's on the line. You have fifteen seconds.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna say, wherever young Frank staff On, Greg Sausman,

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do you have an answer? I'm gonna say I've got letters,

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>E Y, the answers, Jamal Williams, these guys will we hope.

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us and you can become

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person awaying one million dollars in a Fandel

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings tournament my setting their lineups using the Daily

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results.

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Answer Promo code action for as ten percent discount. And

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that's promo code action for as ten percent discount. Daily

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com where millionaires are made. What did appen?

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>What did happen? Here's what you missed on the BFS.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We have all I going on this weekend. Yes, it

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>is my my birthday Saturday night. I won't really be

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>able to sell up tomorrow, so I'm doing it tomorrow Friday,

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll be celebrating my birthday and then Saturday, the big extravaganza.

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 1>It's going down, all right, let's get into what we're

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>doing on the show today, showing all right on the show,

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>we got the leftovers coming out in just a few moments.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You know who's still in the waiver wire? Who's worth

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>going out there? Uh? And in getting in fantasy basketball,

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the super Mario Herizone. Yeah, that's where we

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are in fantasy waivers. Not northerly, Frank, I know, I

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>yelled that, Um, we don't have anyone to drop. Greg.

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I might have been down with it, but our team

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is too stacked. All right. After that, we had inside

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>injuries with Virginia Zakis. Virginia will join us today. We

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have coming up a Thursday night football preview Charges of Raiders.

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>As Frank said, it's a good one. And then we're

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a very special edition of Is Mike Lying

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:47.439
<v Speaker 1>with a special guest host me. So it's the show

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.399
<v Speaker 1>is named is Mike Lying? And don't want to take

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Florio show away from him? The copyrighted he might have

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>it's trademorrow, the whole deal. But I will fill in

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>for Mike Florio and host is Mike Lying to wrap

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>up at a shot I'm at earlier. I want to

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>make sure we, you know, get it in. It's like questions, Okay,

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this might be one of the only things in life

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that I can actually beat Eric young att because we

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>know I won't beat him at anything involving physicality or athleticism.

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is my only shot. So I will be

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.879
<v Speaker 1>trying my best. I also will not ey. Frank spent

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a good hour where the show's studying, and I was like,

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are you seriously study talking about I'm doing my rank?

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you really studying right now? I'm doing my rank?

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about? I'm currently doing my rank.

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>He's scared to be the right, scared of being beaten

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>right here, Greg, look look at the rankings page. I'm

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>updating my rankings. Greg has no idea what he's talking about.

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>As usual, I know exactly what I'm talking about. Frank,

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling you right at He didn't you feel like that?

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That's all right? You know what. I gotta study to

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>keep up, keep up with the y, to keep pace. Yeah,

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so that is what is happening on today's program. It

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>should be a good one. Let's start out the calling

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>news and notes before we get to the leftovers. The

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>first A J. Green's eagle hurts, so he's like, you

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>know what, I gotta play on Sunday. And We're like, yeah,

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we know, A J. Green. What they call that? What

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they call that? What they call that finnellitis? Yes, exactly,

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's coming down with a serious case of it. But

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we've said this all along, right, He's going into a

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>contract year. He wants to get paid. Why is he

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>going to risk his hell for a team that is

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>going nowhere? They are winless, and he has said in

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the past that he wants to remain a Bengal for life.

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people say things that they don't necessarily mean,

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens money talks in the off season.

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure A J. Green would like to join a

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.240
<v Speaker 1>contending team as well. I don't think that the Cincinnati

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Bengals will be contending anytime soon. The timeline just doesn't

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>match up here. You know again, I think at this

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>point in his career, he wants to get paid, he

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to try to compete, and the Cincinnati Bengals are

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going through a rebuild, so I don't think it makes

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense for him to remain with the

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals, but we shall see