1 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:09,440 Speaker 1: Fish Bites podcast. I'm Aram Layton and we have a 2 00:00:09,560 --> 00:00:12,399 Speaker 1: unique episode for you guys today. I felt like I'd 3 00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:15,320 Speaker 1: be wasting your time discussing anything other than the potential 4 00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:18,240 Speaker 1: John Carlos Stanton trade that has set the baseball world 5 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,479 Speaker 1: on fire. We at Fish Stripes identified three of the 6 00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:25,079 Speaker 1: most likely destinations that John Carlos Stanton could land, that 7 00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:29,160 Speaker 1: being San Francisco Giants, Saint Louis Cardinals, and Los Angeles 8 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,559 Speaker 1: Dodgers in no particular order. It's worth noting that the 9 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,239 Speaker 1: three interviews didn't occur on the same day, so some 10 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:37,920 Speaker 1: advancements were made in terms of trade talks minor, but 11 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:42,519 Speaker 1: some were made between interviews. Other than that incredible insight 12 00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 1: given by the three writers, can't thank them enough. First up, 13 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 1: Grant Brisbee, National SBR Nation writer and also writer for 14 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,200 Speaker 1: The McCovey Chronicles. Grant, thanks for being on. 15 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:54,920 Speaker 2: You gotta thanks for having me. 16 00:00:56,320 --> 00:00:58,639 Speaker 1: The Giants have emerged is one of the favorites in 17 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 1: the potential acquisition of John Carlos Stanton because of their 18 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 1: expressed interest in taking on more salary, perhaps than other teams. 19 00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:08,240 Speaker 1: What can you tell us about how much money you 20 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 1: think the Giants might be willing to take on And 21 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:12,360 Speaker 1: is that notion correct that they might be willing to 22 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:13,759 Speaker 1: take on more money than other teams. 23 00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the only thing that's going to get them 24 00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 2: in the discussion. When this started coming up last summer, 25 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 2: my assumption was, look, the only way the Giants are 26 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:27,120 Speaker 2: even going to be in the hunt is if the 27 00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 2: Marlins are truly just interested in dumping you know, the 28 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:32,680 Speaker 2: two hundred and ninety five million, and no other team 29 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 2: is willing to pick up all that, Like, that's the 30 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:36,119 Speaker 2: only way because they didn't have the prospects, they don't 31 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 2: have the desirable young players to compete with, you know, 32 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 2: the Dodgers, the Cardinals or whomever they can come up 33 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 2: in the discussion. Since then, it's kind of like the 34 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:48,400 Speaker 2: new owners came in and they're not so subtly saying, yeah, 35 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 2: we just sort of want to, you know, not have 36 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:53,520 Speaker 2: that contract on the books after paying a billion dollars, 37 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:56,200 Speaker 2: and other teams are a little bit wary of giving 38 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,120 Speaker 2: up their best prospects for a contract that a lot 39 00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 2: of people see as being a market value if you 40 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,480 Speaker 2: are a free agent. Right now, So the Giants are 41 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 2: the Giants are involved. I mean they technically don't have 42 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 2: the money. I mean, like they shouldn't. They have a 43 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 2: ton of commitments in the next few years. They're going 44 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:16,520 Speaker 2: to be paying Brandon Crawford, Brandon belt Buster Posey, johnn Equato, 45 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:19,800 Speaker 2: Mark Malance and Jeff Samarga. They're paying all these guys 46 00:02:20,160 --> 00:02:23,240 Speaker 2: deep into their thirties, and you're not going to get 47 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 2: production out of all of them, you know, maybe not 48 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:29,079 Speaker 2: even next year, much less twenty twenty. So it's a huge, 49 00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 2: huge risk. But of all the players who would come up, 50 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 2: Stanton is the one that would make them sort of 51 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:36,880 Speaker 2: step back and go, this is different. This is a 52 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:40,639 Speaker 2: guy who's going to help us stay relevant. Attendance was 53 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:44,639 Speaker 2: down last year, you know, more than the bad year. 54 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 2: It was just sort of a down a tendancy here 55 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 2: for them, and they want to jump back and kind 56 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 2: of send a message to their fans, and this is 57 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:56,080 Speaker 2: like a generational player. This is a chance. This isn't 58 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,920 Speaker 2: them getting JD. Martinez, This isn't them getting like Jason 59 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:02,000 Speaker 2: Bay back in the day. This is gen Carlo Stanton. 60 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,679 Speaker 2: He's a big deal. So I believe that this is 61 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 2: the one player they would spend. 62 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:08,680 Speaker 1: On that was actually going to be My follow up 63 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,360 Speaker 1: question is what's the pulse of the fan base. I 64 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:14,360 Speaker 1: know everyone wants, you know, the big slugger, the reigning MVP, 65 00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: but at the same time, you don't want your hands tied, 66 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:19,240 Speaker 1: like you said, with all these contracts that the Giants 67 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:22,520 Speaker 1: have for the next few years in financial obligations, are 68 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:24,919 Speaker 1: fans really pushing for Stanton and are they willing to 69 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 1: kind of get him at all costs or what's the 70 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 1: pulse with the fan base. 71 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 2: There are some people who are really worried about the payroll, 72 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 2: and I don't blame them. In two years, the Giants 73 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 2: you have to figure out if they're keeping Madison Bumgarner. 74 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 2: There are concerns with that, But I'm coming from the 75 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:43,320 Speaker 2: perspective of someone who followed the team in the nineties 76 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 2: and even the early two thousands, when the Giants weren't 77 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:48,560 Speaker 2: one of the top five payroll teams, you know, the 78 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 2: eighties and nineties, they were generally fifteenth or lower, usually lower. 79 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 2: Even in the when they got the new ballpark, they 80 00:03:56,960 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 2: were reluctant to bring in guys to get bonds or 81 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 2: some help. So it was like you would have bonds, 82 00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 2: but you'd have to trade Jeff kemp because you couldn't 83 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:07,760 Speaker 2: afford anything. So this status is like a top payroll team. 84 00:04:07,800 --> 00:04:10,600 Speaker 2: To me is like, wow, this is amazing because if 85 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 2: you're willing to do this every year, you can make 86 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:15,560 Speaker 2: mistakes and still build on the back side. It's when 87 00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:18,240 Speaker 2: they made a huge mistake with Barry Zito, they were 88 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 2: still able with some drafting, some luck, some minor league 89 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 2: free agents that panned out to build a team around 90 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,600 Speaker 2: that bad contract. Now, if you're going to do that, 91 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 2: do it with the player like Stanton who is young, 92 00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:35,919 Speaker 2: who is probably going to be really, really really good 93 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 2: for at least three four five years. I mean, the 94 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,279 Speaker 2: odds that he doesn't give them some value in the 95 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:45,160 Speaker 2: near future is very, very very low. The odds of 96 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:48,599 Speaker 2: him having the remainder of a Hall of Fame career 97 00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 2: with the Giants a lot higher than they would be 98 00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:55,359 Speaker 2: with almost anyone else. So if you're going to constrict 99 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:58,240 Speaker 2: future payroll, I mean, do it with a generational player. 100 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,080 Speaker 1: Talk about that. The offer, the reported offer at least, 101 00:05:03,080 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 1: I mean, it's unconfirmed that the Giants put forward, and 102 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:11,599 Speaker 1: it was Chris Shaw, Tyler Bead and Joe Panic and 103 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:13,320 Speaker 1: assuming that they would take on a lot of the 104 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:15,920 Speaker 1: payroll as well, But there was also said that Dee 105 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 1: Gordon was a part of that deal, and I think 106 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 1: the Marlins might be more inclined to trade him as 107 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:23,159 Speaker 1: a separate asset. Do you think that the Giants would 108 00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:25,039 Speaker 1: be willing to give up more than that in the 109 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 1: assumption that they're taking on more money, because from what 110 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 1: I've seen with the Giants prospects, and I'm sure you 111 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: could tell me a lot more about them, is Chris 112 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:34,839 Speaker 1: Shaw and Tyler beid have underwhelmed to an extent and 113 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,480 Speaker 1: the upper minor league levels. Joe Panic obviously had a 114 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 1: great bounce back year. But I'd love to hear what 115 00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 1: you could tell us about these prospects and whether you 116 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: think it might take more against Dan. 117 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 2: You know that the initial report from Craig Mish was 118 00:05:47,920 --> 00:05:50,919 Speaker 2: I think misconstrued a little bit in that he was 119 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 2: saying names that have been discussed included Tyler Beattie, Joe Panic, 120 00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 2: Chris Shaw, not necessarily like that was the offer. And 121 00:05:58,680 --> 00:06:01,479 Speaker 2: then the report today, I think think from John Morosi 122 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 2: was that, look, the Marlins would take Joe Panic, like 123 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 2: if that were the hypothetical offer, they would take it. 124 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:14,000 Speaker 2: It's a very weird deal for me, just because Joe 125 00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 2: Panic doesn't necessarily fit what the Marlins are going after. 126 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 2: He's not necessarily cheap for the next three years he's 127 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:24,599 Speaker 2: under contract, but he's already in his arbitration years. Second 128 00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 2: basement aren't the wildest hot commodity in baseball, and so 129 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:30,920 Speaker 2: they wouldn't necessarily need to flip them, especially if they're 130 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 2: looking to trade d Gordon. It's just a really, really 131 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:36,720 Speaker 2: weird piece. So I think if that were the offer 132 00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:40,280 Speaker 2: and the Marlins were putting in forty five million, I 133 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:42,280 Speaker 2: think was the rumor. I think they could do better. 134 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:42,800 Speaker 3: I really do. 135 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:45,360 Speaker 2: I mean, I love Joe Panic, I think Shaw's got 136 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,080 Speaker 2: some potential bat is maybe a mid or back rotation guy. 137 00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:51,720 Speaker 2: But I would think another team would do better than that. 138 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 2: That rumor really surprised me. I also think the Giants 139 00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:58,280 Speaker 2: and Marlins could do better than that with each other. 140 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 2: I think Panic just made such a weird fit for 141 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 2: the Marlins. There's got to be another way to get 142 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 2: some Salarui fin. There some better prospects for the Marlins. 143 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 2: You know, the Giants actually do have, in my opinion, 144 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 2: a better prospect than that. They've got Hell or Ramirez, 145 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:19,600 Speaker 2: who is very, very He's a young seventeen. He was 146 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 2: their first round pick and he's got just wild tools 147 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 2: and his performance he's hitting. His performance in the Arizona 148 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 2: League was great. He's hitting balls four hundred and fifty 149 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:35,080 Speaker 2: feet as a teenager. That's the kind of prospect. If 150 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 2: I were the Marlins, I would be saying, great offer, 151 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 2: we need Ramos, and if they're not going to do that, 152 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 2: you know, I would think another team could could beat 153 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:48,680 Speaker 2: the offer. But yeah, I think the rumor that was 154 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,360 Speaker 2: reported is a little little odd to me. 155 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:53,960 Speaker 1: In the Marlins position where you're kind of cleaning Slayton 156 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:57,160 Speaker 1: starting over, a guy like like Ramos with a higher 157 00:07:57,240 --> 00:07:59,880 Speaker 1: ceiling seems like he makes more sense than these higher 158 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:02,840 Speaker 1: floor but lower ceiling type of guys like Chris Shaw 159 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,680 Speaker 1: and Beattie. But also a lot of Marlins fans have 160 00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:07,840 Speaker 1: been asking about Christian Arroyo. He got a taste of 161 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 1: the major league, struggled a little bit last year. But 162 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: the Marlins are likely going to deal prodo away, don't. 163 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 1: They don't want to pay that contract. They still don't 164 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:18,720 Speaker 1: really have a steady shortstop. I'm not sure if he 165 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 1: can play shortstop. I'm not sure if that's something that 166 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: he's still trying to do. But do you think that 167 00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:26,200 Speaker 1: there's any chance that the Giants would deal Christian Arroyo 168 00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 1: or is he something of their long term plans. 169 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:31,840 Speaker 2: I would think there's certainly a chance in so far 170 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:35,280 Speaker 2: that he's not you know, a top top fifty prospect 171 00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:36,120 Speaker 2: or anything like that. 172 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:36,880 Speaker 1: He is. 173 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:39,840 Speaker 2: He's a fun player to watch defensively at third base. 174 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:43,880 Speaker 2: Giants fans haven't really seen too much of him at shortstop. 175 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 2: Seems like he can handle it, seems like he can 176 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 2: handle second base. You know. That is what Giants fans 177 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:52,840 Speaker 2: really got to see was his defense at third and 178 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 2: it was generally excellent. So if you are looking at 179 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:58,040 Speaker 2: his minor league numbers, as a career three hundred hitter 180 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 2: in the minors, he doesn't necessarily have huge walk totals, 181 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:03,520 Speaker 2: but he's not striking out a lot. He's a you know, 182 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 2: maybe a similar profile to to Martin Prato in a 183 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 2: lot of ways. I would think he could be included 184 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 2: in a deal. The only caveat I have is that 185 00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 2: the Giants would really really like him as sort of 186 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:20,000 Speaker 2: an organizational emergency plan for if they can't fill third base. 187 00:09:20,040 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 2: Properly this offseason if Crawford or Panic does go down, 188 00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 2: and you know, that's a pretty nice guy to have 189 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:29,400 Speaker 2: in a glass case. So if he had to be included, 190 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 2: I could see the Giants doing it. I would think 191 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:34,800 Speaker 2: that they would go a long way to trying to 192 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 2: include anybody else. 193 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:39,000 Speaker 1: Do you think that the Giants have more of a 194 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:42,559 Speaker 1: probability in terms of acquiring Stanton because of their willingness 195 00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:45,319 Speaker 1: to spend the money or does their lack of prospects 196 00:09:45,400 --> 00:09:46,920 Speaker 1: kind of tie their hands behind their back. 197 00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:50,640 Speaker 2: It definitely ties them a little bit because they don't 198 00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 2: want to pick up all that money. They really don't 199 00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 2: want to go over the competitive balance tax for a 200 00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 2: third star year and all the penalties that come with that. 201 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 2: They really want to reset it, go under, try for 202 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:09,120 Speaker 2: next year. But I think that they're looking at this 203 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:11,520 Speaker 2: as sort of like you're not going to get a 204 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 2: chance at San Carlo Stanton every year, just like the 205 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:18,679 Speaker 2: Yankees got a shot at Alex Rodriguez and they took it. 206 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:21,760 Speaker 2: The Giants didn't take their shot at Vladimir Guerrero when 207 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 2: he was a free agent and I think he was 208 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 2: twenty six, twenty seven, and they sort of regretted it 209 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:27,600 Speaker 2: ever since. He would have been a good fit for 210 00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:31,160 Speaker 2: that park, that team. This is one of those players 211 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 2: where it's not going to happen again. It's coming at 212 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:38,160 Speaker 2: a time where interest in the franchise is flagging just 213 00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:40,959 Speaker 2: enough to scare the ownership group, which is one of 214 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:45,760 Speaker 2: the richest in baseball. It's a player whose skill power 215 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 2: happens to be completely what the Giants need. It's an 216 00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:53,760 Speaker 2: exciting skill in an area that the Giants are totally 217 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:56,559 Speaker 2: totally lacking. You know, the Giants had one of the 218 00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 2: worst home run hitting seasons of all time last year, 219 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:01,920 Speaker 2: at least in the era, and suddenly you're going to 220 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 2: get a guy who almost hit sixty. It's like a 221 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:08,240 Speaker 2: real quick fix. But it's also not that sort of 222 00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:11,360 Speaker 2: implausible that he'll give you value because he's so young. 223 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,600 Speaker 2: It's a really special opportunity for them if they're willing 224 00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:17,439 Speaker 2: to pay that money, and I think that's the only 225 00:11:17,520 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 2: chance they have is if they pay that money. 226 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:24,280 Speaker 1: And another huge obstacle in the potential trade that I've 227 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:26,959 Speaker 1: failed to mention so far is the fact that Stanton 228 00:11:27,040 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 1: does have that no trade clause. He's made it very 229 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 1: public that he does want to be in the West Coast. 230 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:34,120 Speaker 1: That's where he's from, you know, It's where he went 231 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: to high school. He was drafted out of high school 232 00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 1: in California. But he also made it just as clear 233 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 1: that he wants to win now and he doesn't want 234 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: to be part of a rebuilding operation. Not to say 235 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:48,880 Speaker 1: that the San Francisco Giants are rebuilding by any means, 236 00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:51,559 Speaker 1: but they did just have one of the worst seasons 237 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 1: in a long time that the franchise has had. Do 238 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:56,760 Speaker 1: you think that the Giants could sell stanton on winning 239 00:11:56,800 --> 00:11:59,160 Speaker 1: and say, like, hey, we're pretty close to winning. If 240 00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 1: we bring you in, I will surround you with some 241 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 1: pieces and next year will be a bounce back season. 242 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 2: It shouldn't be too hard. I think the Giants last 243 00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 2: year was a calamity on so many fronts. It was 244 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 2: their second worst season since moving to San Francisco. I mean, 245 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 2: just phenomenally bad in so many respects. At the same time, 246 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:24,000 Speaker 2: before last season, when Fangrafts released their Steamer projections, they 247 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 2: built their expected standings around that. The top seven teams 248 00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:34,480 Speaker 2: were the Dodgers, the Cubs, the Nationals, the Red Sox, 249 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 2: the Indians, the Astros, and the Giants. That's six division 250 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:42,920 Speaker 2: winners and the Giants, and they nailed it with. 251 00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 3: Six of them. 252 00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:45,319 Speaker 2: And then the Giants are the only team that just 253 00:12:45,360 --> 00:12:48,160 Speaker 2: fell in through the trap door. So the Giants, what 254 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:51,679 Speaker 2: the Giants are expecting from their bounce back candidates, isn't 255 00:12:51,679 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 2: that bizarre? I mean, they're already sort of projected to 256 00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:56,840 Speaker 2: be a five hundred team and that's just based on 257 00:12:56,960 --> 00:13:01,760 Speaker 2: Madison Bumgarner not falling off a dang dirt bike, Johnny 258 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 2: Quato bouncing back to the player he was the seven 259 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 2: years before. You know, there are reasonable assumptions sort of 260 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:10,439 Speaker 2: baked into what the Giants can do. You know, panic 261 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:12,440 Speaker 2: can hit a little bit, craw for a belt, like 262 00:13:12,480 --> 00:13:16,240 Speaker 2: these are all all stars. Everyone in that infield that 263 00:13:16,280 --> 00:13:18,400 Speaker 2: they have currently is an All Star. And then you 264 00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:21,760 Speaker 2: slap Stanton onto that they're not like thirty six year 265 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:24,560 Speaker 2: old guys. They're you know, twenty nine, thirty thirty one. 266 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:28,240 Speaker 2: Reasonable to hope for a bounce back, you know, it's 267 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 2: it's not implausible to think that they could contend. I 268 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:34,240 Speaker 2: know that seems pollyannish, but it's that's not just me talking. 269 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:37,120 Speaker 2: It's the computers you put Stanton onto this current roster 270 00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:39,959 Speaker 2: no improvements and the Giants are probably an eighty three 271 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 2: eighty four win team. Then you start focusing on improving 272 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,000 Speaker 2: the center field defense, which was completely abysmal last year, 273 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 2: and you can get some more wins by fidgeting, squeaking 274 00:13:50,679 --> 00:13:52,920 Speaker 2: or tweaking the roster here and there. So it's not 275 00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 2: totally impossible. It's something you could sell Stanton on, and 276 00:13:55,679 --> 00:13:58,480 Speaker 2: then you factor in, you know, the three million fans 277 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:02,200 Speaker 2: a year, the generally healthy franchise and ownership group, that 278 00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:04,560 Speaker 2: sort of stuff. It shouldn't be that hard of a sell. 279 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 2: But I mean, I also watched the Giants play one 280 00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:08,600 Speaker 2: hundred and sixty two games last year and they were 281 00:14:08,640 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 2: pretty terrible. 282 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: So that was my big hesitation in terms of fan 283 00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:15,680 Speaker 1: base is the Giants are up there with anyone the 284 00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:18,120 Speaker 1: most spirited and supportive fans, even though you said they 285 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: did take a little hit with the attendance numbers last year, 286 00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:24,080 Speaker 1: but who doesn't when you have as bad of a 287 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:28,360 Speaker 1: season as the Giants had last year. Objectively speaking, to 288 00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 1: wrap up here, what would you put the probability at 289 00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 1: percent chance that you think that the Giants would land stand. 290 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,840 Speaker 2: I'm still low. I'm still going maybe twenty percent. I 291 00:14:37,880 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 2: know that everyone's saying the favorites. I know that it's 292 00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:42,760 Speaker 2: they'll take more money on and stuff like that. I 293 00:14:42,840 --> 00:14:45,360 Speaker 2: would have to think if the money comes down just 294 00:14:45,400 --> 00:14:48,560 Speaker 2: a little bit, that the Marlins can really buy themselves 295 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:52,520 Speaker 2: some good prospects from another team, some really some prospects 296 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:57,160 Speaker 2: to take back to their fans, their new fans, and say, hey, 297 00:14:57,240 --> 00:15:00,320 Speaker 2: we had to do this. Here's the bounty. If they're 298 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 2: doing it and they're taken back guys who aren't appearing 299 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:06,080 Speaker 2: in the Baseball America Top one hundred list, man, that's 300 00:15:06,080 --> 00:15:08,320 Speaker 2: going to be a hard sell. And it's not you know, 301 00:15:08,600 --> 00:15:11,120 Speaker 2: I know that most Marlins fans aren't necessarily up on 302 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:14,160 Speaker 2: the Baseball America Top one hundred list, but you get 303 00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 2: a sense, you get the idea if you're following the 304 00:15:16,520 --> 00:15:19,520 Speaker 2: team just enough that people will say, wow, that's an 305 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:22,360 Speaker 2: underwhelming return for the dude that just won the MVP 306 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 2: and hit fifty nine home runs. I don't think the 307 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:28,680 Speaker 2: Marlins want to do that, and I, you know, unless 308 00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 2: they really really want to just ditch that contract. I'm 309 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:34,640 Speaker 2: still a little skeptical about the Giants chances, but that's 310 00:15:34,840 --> 00:15:35,840 Speaker 2: me being a little cynical. 311 00:15:36,920 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 1: No I'm right there with you, to be honest. As 312 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:41,880 Speaker 1: much as I would like to see Stanton make it 313 00:15:41,920 --> 00:15:44,240 Speaker 1: out to the West Coast, personally, I think the Cardinals 314 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 1: might be the favorite with what they have to offer 315 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:51,240 Speaker 1: monetarily and in terms of prospects. Thank you so much. 316 00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:54,760 Speaker 1: Graham Brisbye of the McCovey Chronicles does really really good 317 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 1: work over there, and he's been covering the Ston saga 318 00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:00,920 Speaker 1: for lack of a better words this offseason and definitely 319 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 1: an excellent place to follow as well. Grant, thank you 320 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:06,040 Speaker 1: once again, really appreciate. 321 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 2: It absolutely, Thanks so much for having me on. 322 00:16:07,760 --> 00:16:10,800 Speaker 1: So next up we have the Dodgers. Some have been 323 00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:13,720 Speaker 1: playing up the interest that LA might have in a 324 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:16,640 Speaker 1: potential John Carlos Stanton trade and some have played it 325 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 1: down totally. Not totally sure on what the Dodgers might 326 00:16:20,200 --> 00:16:22,640 Speaker 1: be willing to give up, But that's why we brought 327 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:25,840 Speaker 1: in Eric Steven from True Blue LA. Eric, thanks for 328 00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:26,600 Speaker 1: being on today. 329 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:28,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, no, no problem, Thanks for having me. 330 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:31,960 Speaker 1: So what can you tell us about the Dodgers' interest 331 00:16:32,040 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 1: in John Carlos Stanton and what's what's kind of the 332 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:36,280 Speaker 1: pulse in LA. 333 00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 3: I mean, I think there's some like there's definite like 334 00:16:40,480 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 3: fan interest or I mean at least on the internet 335 00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:47,600 Speaker 3: the comments sections, et cetera. But you know, he's from 336 00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:51,400 Speaker 3: out here. I just think from the from the Dodgers perspective, 337 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 3: I would probably gauge it as luke warm right now. 338 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:56,480 Speaker 3: But I think they're just sort of like on the 339 00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:59,880 Speaker 3: on the periphery, kind of waiting things out. But I 340 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 3: don't know, I really haven't had a sense of how 341 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 3: like to gauge like just how quickly this might happen, 342 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 3: you know, like if he were to go to another team, 343 00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 3: or if the Dodgers think they can, you know, wait 344 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:16,160 Speaker 3: it out till sort of I don't know. He sort 345 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:18,400 Speaker 3: of makes it clear that he would like only want 346 00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:21,080 Speaker 3: to come out here. I think that's the most likely scenario. 347 00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 3: But yeah, for me, like it's kind of lukewarm interest 348 00:17:24,840 --> 00:17:27,760 Speaker 3: for now, but like sort of I can never really 349 00:17:27,800 --> 00:17:29,280 Speaker 3: and I don't really have a good read on what 350 00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:31,600 Speaker 3: their sort of mindset is at this point. 351 00:17:32,040 --> 00:17:35,840 Speaker 1: Well, Stanton's veto power is a really interesting point because 352 00:17:37,040 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 1: he said he wants to win, and he also said 353 00:17:38,760 --> 00:17:40,640 Speaker 1: he wants to be on the coast. The other two 354 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,560 Speaker 1: teams that have been said to be interested in Stanton 355 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:46,760 Speaker 1: are the Saint Louis Cardinals who are not on the coast, 356 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: and the Giants who are not in a great position 357 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:52,440 Speaker 1: to win, So that, like you said, the Dodgers could 358 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 1: end up being the default and have a little bit 359 00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:57,520 Speaker 1: more power and trade negotiations. What do you think the 360 00:17:57,560 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 1: Dodgers would potentially be willing to give up? I don't 361 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 1: think they'd be willing to eat too much of the 362 00:18:01,880 --> 00:18:05,080 Speaker 1: contract because of how high the payroll is. But I'm 363 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 1: curious what your perspective is on that. How much money 364 00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:09,919 Speaker 1: do you think they'd be willing to eat and who 365 00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:11,399 Speaker 1: do you think they'd be willing to give up in 366 00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:12,440 Speaker 1: a potential trade. 367 00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:16,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the money is an issue. It's probably 368 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 3: less of an issue for the Dodgers, although they've they've 369 00:18:19,720 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 3: I mean they'll never I think they want to get 370 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 3: like under the luxury tax threshold, which this coming year 371 00:18:27,800 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 3: maintan might not be feasible. It's one hundred and ninety 372 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:33,240 Speaker 3: seven million. Next year in twenty nineteen it's two oh six. 373 00:18:35,040 --> 00:18:38,040 Speaker 3: I just like I can't say for certain that they 374 00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 3: want to get completely under that. The issue with getting 375 00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:43,199 Speaker 3: under is they're paying like a fifty percent tax now 376 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:46,000 Speaker 3: on anything they go over, and if you get under 377 00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:48,440 Speaker 3: just one year, and if you then you start going 378 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:51,359 Speaker 3: over the cap again, that first year tax is twenty 379 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:55,320 Speaker 3: percent and then thirty and then fifty, so it buys 380 00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:57,560 Speaker 3: them like a few years of like reduced tax. So 381 00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 3: the benefits are substantial. But I think the main thing 382 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:06,000 Speaker 3: is there's now there's these like secondary penalties of like 383 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:08,280 Speaker 3: it's you know, if you're twenty million over the cap, 384 00:19:08,359 --> 00:19:12,359 Speaker 3: you get text at another higher rate, and then if 385 00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 3: you're forty million over, which they almost were last year, 386 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:19,880 Speaker 3: it's like a ninety five percent rate, plus your your 387 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:24,040 Speaker 3: first draft pick goes back ten spaces. So then the 388 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:26,320 Speaker 3: costs get to be a little more real or not, 389 00:19:26,720 --> 00:19:28,600 Speaker 3: not that money's not real, but you know, it's a 390 00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:32,639 Speaker 3: little more substantial. I think those are the bigger numbers 391 00:19:32,680 --> 00:19:35,840 Speaker 3: that they're probably worried about. So you know, obviously adding 392 00:19:36,000 --> 00:19:39,800 Speaker 3: someone like Stanton uh with what ten years, two hundred 393 00:19:39,800 --> 00:19:41,920 Speaker 3: and ninety five million left, that's a huge sort of 394 00:19:44,119 --> 00:19:46,679 Speaker 3: I keep seeing it sort of referred to as a burden, 395 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:50,280 Speaker 3: although I think all the talk of like his contract 396 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,440 Speaker 3: being so onerous is that I think people are now 397 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 3: almost underrating is how good he is, like it seems weird, like, 398 00:19:57,800 --> 00:20:01,360 Speaker 3: so I think like he's worth getting. I don't think 399 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:04,000 Speaker 3: their interest in taking on the whole contract is there 400 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,400 Speaker 3: because you know, look like he was placed on waivers. 401 00:20:06,440 --> 00:20:09,119 Speaker 3: Everyone gets placed on waivers in August and he cleared. 402 00:20:09,480 --> 00:20:11,680 Speaker 3: I don't think that necessarily means no one would have 403 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:13,520 Speaker 3: wanted to take the contract for free. I think part 404 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 3: of that was knowing the Marlins probably would have just 405 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:19,400 Speaker 3: pulled him back like because thinking they could get something 406 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:22,040 Speaker 3: for him in trade. So it's not like a clear 407 00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:27,359 Speaker 3: one to one like relationship for me there, but it's close. 408 00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:30,520 Speaker 3: I mean I think they would probably you know, you 409 00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:35,160 Speaker 3: know this reported like giants trade that I can't really 410 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:37,280 Speaker 3: and it's hard to say for certain what's real and 411 00:20:37,359 --> 00:20:40,840 Speaker 3: what's not. But you know, like Joe Panic Tyler Beattie 412 00:20:41,160 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 3: and I forget the third piece in that deal. But 413 00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:46,200 Speaker 3: that and the Giants like paying two hundred and fifty 414 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:50,560 Speaker 3: million of the contract, that seems like a pretty like 415 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:55,240 Speaker 3: beatable deal. Like to me, what the Dodgers would give up, 416 00:20:55,280 --> 00:20:58,359 Speaker 3: I would say, you know, probably if it's in that 417 00:20:58,480 --> 00:21:01,400 Speaker 3: price range you're looking at probably like Alex Verdugo, who's 418 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:05,040 Speaker 3: like their top outfield prospect and would be sort of 419 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 3: on the outside looking in for a spot they have 420 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:12,200 Speaker 3: like Andrew Toles coming back from injury. Jack Peterson is 421 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:14,800 Speaker 3: getting into his arbitration years. He might be you know, 422 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 3: someone you know the Dodgers would be willing to part with. 423 00:21:18,359 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 3: He has three years before free agency. Not sure exactly 424 00:21:21,800 --> 00:21:25,879 Speaker 3: how if the Marlins would be interested there. You know, 425 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 3: they have some pitching talent, like you know on the 426 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:32,720 Speaker 3: you know, Brock Stewart, it's probably a guy who would 427 00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:36,479 Speaker 3: get mentioned. Uh, you know Yati or Alvarez is one 428 00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:38,720 Speaker 3: of their top pitching prospects. And then you know, I 429 00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:40,879 Speaker 3: don't they wouldn't give up like Walker Bueler for me, 430 00:21:40,920 --> 00:21:44,119 Speaker 3: he's their top pitching prospect, but like some of the 431 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:48,480 Speaker 3: lesser ones they would probably consider. But it's really I 432 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,200 Speaker 3: like it said, this is such a weird market I have. 433 00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 3: I don't know exactly like if that, if that Giants 434 00:21:54,640 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 3: deal is like any indication of what the market is like. 435 00:21:57,200 --> 00:21:58,919 Speaker 3: I don't suspect the Dodgers would have to give up 436 00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:01,800 Speaker 3: like one of their hot prospects just to land him. 437 00:22:02,119 --> 00:22:03,800 Speaker 3: And I think, but I think their best bet is 438 00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:07,600 Speaker 3: sort of waiting him out and truly seeing what, like 439 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:10,680 Speaker 3: where he wants to go. And if it's if it's 440 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:13,440 Speaker 3: clear that like he wants to sort of almost force 441 00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:15,040 Speaker 3: his way to La, then then then that's when you 442 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:16,760 Speaker 3: sort of swoop in and take advantage of that. But 443 00:22:17,119 --> 00:22:19,720 Speaker 3: other than that, it's hard to really see a concrete 444 00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 3: interest at this point. 445 00:22:20,800 --> 00:22:22,720 Speaker 1: It's funny that you brought that up, because I really 446 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 1: when I saw that Giants offer, or for what the 447 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:30,159 Speaker 1: report's worth, I definitely thought it was beatable, and I 448 00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:33,000 Speaker 1: know both the Dodgers and the Cardinals can beat that 449 00:22:33,119 --> 00:22:36,280 Speaker 1: offer with ease. But I think it will ultimately come 450 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:39,840 Speaker 1: up come down to whether the Marlins are really just 451 00:22:39,920 --> 00:22:43,160 Speaker 1: trying to shed salary, because the Giants will probably eat 452 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:46,440 Speaker 1: more of the contract, if not all of it, compared 453 00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:49,359 Speaker 1: to the other two teams we just mentioned, or they 454 00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: want to get some talent, And personally, I think for 455 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 1: the sake of the fan base and for the sake 456 00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:59,200 Speaker 1: of just rebuilding, I think the Marlins are in better 457 00:22:59,240 --> 00:23:02,320 Speaker 1: shape eating some of the contract and trying to get 458 00:23:02,359 --> 00:23:05,000 Speaker 1: some better talent out of the deal. What can you 459 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:07,280 Speaker 1: tell Marlins fans about Jock Peterson. I know it's an 460 00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:11,640 Speaker 1: intriguing He's an intriguing return because we've seen him play 461 00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:14,000 Speaker 1: on the big stage. We just watched him hit you know, 462 00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:17,200 Speaker 1: home runs in the World Series. Obviously, he was not 463 00:23:17,320 --> 00:23:18,840 Speaker 1: having that great of a year. He had a pretty 464 00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:22,159 Speaker 1: good postseason towards the back end. Do you think he 465 00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:24,760 Speaker 1: can bounce back after the last two years being a 466 00:23:24,800 --> 00:23:26,719 Speaker 1: little shaky and coming out of the gate so hot 467 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:27,680 Speaker 1: as his rookie season. 468 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:32,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think he's definitely someone who could bounce back. 469 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:35,359 Speaker 3: I mean, he's been such a streaky hitter, like really, 470 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:38,000 Speaker 3: like all three of his seasons have almost been split 471 00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:41,640 Speaker 3: into parts. Like the twenty seventeen it was a little 472 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:46,800 Speaker 3: more injury plagued for him. He had an injury earlier 473 00:23:46,840 --> 00:23:48,920 Speaker 3: in the year, and then and then at some point 474 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:51,879 Speaker 3: he crashed into Yasiel Puige and then the wall and 475 00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:55,879 Speaker 3: got a concussion and was out for a while. He 476 00:23:56,040 --> 00:23:59,359 Speaker 3: was hitting very well like in the middle part of 477 00:23:59,400 --> 00:24:01,760 Speaker 3: the season, and then went into this horrific slump. He 478 00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:04,040 Speaker 3: was like two for forty one. They sent him to 479 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:06,960 Speaker 3: the miners. He worked on some stuff and came back 480 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:10,320 Speaker 3: and then was he made the NLCS roster when and 481 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:13,320 Speaker 3: he really was a fortuitous thing for him he wasn't 482 00:24:13,359 --> 00:24:15,800 Speaker 3: on the Division Series roster, but Corey Seger got hurt, 483 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:18,399 Speaker 3: and because they had to sort of use Chris Taylor 484 00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:20,680 Speaker 3: as sort of an infielder and outfielder at that point, 485 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:23,760 Speaker 3: they needed another outfielder on the roster, so they added 486 00:24:23,800 --> 00:24:25,640 Speaker 3: Peterson and then he stayed on for the World Series 487 00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:28,560 Speaker 3: and then he just really started hitting again and he 488 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 3: had you know, three home runs and some doubles mixed in, 489 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:36,360 Speaker 3: and yeah, like the power for him is there. He's 490 00:24:36,400 --> 00:24:38,399 Speaker 3: not gonna he's not a high average here. He's going 491 00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:40,080 Speaker 3: to strike out a lot. He's He's one of those 492 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:44,080 Speaker 3: guys I think fans will probably think a lot, very 493 00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:46,640 Speaker 3: very very frustrated while watching him because he strikes out, 494 00:24:46,680 --> 00:24:48,840 Speaker 3: and you'll hear an announcers complain about him because of that. 495 00:24:49,280 --> 00:24:53,639 Speaker 3: But he'll he has a good eye. The power is 496 00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:57,400 Speaker 3: definitely there. The one concern I guess is his defense. 497 00:24:58,280 --> 00:25:01,040 Speaker 3: I don't know what you know, metrics available that. I'm 498 00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 3: sure the teams have better metrics than are available publicly, 499 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:07,280 Speaker 3: but his like sort of publicly available defensive ratings really 500 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 3: plummeted this year. And then I think stat cast rates 501 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:12,320 Speaker 3: him is one of the slowest like center fielders, so 502 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:17,040 Speaker 3: he's probably better suited for a corner spot. But yeah, 503 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:19,040 Speaker 3: I think he's definitely someone who could help and you know, 504 00:25:19,280 --> 00:25:22,880 Speaker 3: three years of you know, relatively cheap, you know, arbitration 505 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:26,479 Speaker 3: fueled salaries. Like he's going to be like someone who 506 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:29,880 Speaker 3: would you know, major league ready obviously and then who 507 00:25:29,920 --> 00:25:30,920 Speaker 3: could help like right away. 508 00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:33,639 Speaker 1: And that's the thing. It's going to be interesting to 509 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:35,920 Speaker 1: see which way the Marlins go in terms of the 510 00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:39,359 Speaker 1: prospects they acquire, because I don't know if they would 511 00:25:39,440 --> 00:25:43,280 Speaker 1: rather have higher ceiling guys that are further from ready 512 00:25:43,359 --> 00:25:45,480 Speaker 1: in the major leagues or guys like Jock Peterson that 513 00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:48,000 Speaker 1: can come right away and will be in your opening 514 00:25:48,080 --> 00:25:51,600 Speaker 1: day roster and you know, can contribute right off the bat. 515 00:25:51,960 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 1: What about Verdugo, I know he struggled in his small 516 00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:59,840 Speaker 1: sample size in the MLB last year, but he absolutely 517 00:25:59,880 --> 00:26:03,040 Speaker 1: can killed the ball in the minor leagues. What's kind 518 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:05,879 Speaker 1: of the consensus on Verdugo as he is the second 519 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:08,320 Speaker 1: best prospect in the Dodger system right now. 520 00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:11,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, so he's he's going to be someone who could 521 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:13,240 Speaker 3: play all three outfield spots, has a really good arm. 522 00:26:14,680 --> 00:26:17,200 Speaker 3: I think the you know, the issue with him. Is 523 00:26:17,640 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 3: is going to be will he develop power? The good 524 00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:22,119 Speaker 3: thing he was still young. He was a twenty one 525 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,600 Speaker 3: year old at Triple A all year and and still 526 00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:27,159 Speaker 3: you know, his hit tool is pretty good, but in 527 00:26:27,320 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 3: terms of the power, it really didn't show up a 528 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 3: ton until he had a few streaks with it. But 529 00:26:32,480 --> 00:26:34,800 Speaker 3: I think that'll be a concern. But there's like a 530 00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:37,800 Speaker 3: sort of a lingering like under the radar concern that 531 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:41,920 Speaker 3: he's like, you know, there was some some effort question 532 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:45,440 Speaker 3: and then also he or he showed up or showed 533 00:26:45,520 --> 00:26:47,760 Speaker 3: up late to a game when in the in September 534 00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:50,719 Speaker 3: with the Dodgers, and then so really didn't play much 535 00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:52,679 Speaker 3: after that, although they were sort of in the pen ray, 536 00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:55,360 Speaker 3: so that was part of why he didn't play a ton. 537 00:26:55,480 --> 00:26:58,840 Speaker 3: But but I think that's part of just him being young. 538 00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:00,600 Speaker 3: I don't think it's going to be a necessarily a 539 00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:04,240 Speaker 3: lingering concern, but uh yeah, I think he's someone who 540 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:07,280 Speaker 3: could who could also be like, you know, at the 541 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:11,000 Speaker 3: very least a fourth outfielder now and then someone you know, 542 00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:13,719 Speaker 3: I don't know what to what extent the Marlins are 543 00:27:13,760 --> 00:27:15,680 Speaker 3: planning to sort of reshape their roster. I know they're 544 00:27:15,720 --> 00:27:17,560 Speaker 3: their outfield is one of the best in baseball with 545 00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:21,760 Speaker 3: all three guys, but you know, if they need someone 546 00:27:21,800 --> 00:27:23,840 Speaker 3: to fill in, he's definitely someone who could who could 547 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:24,040 Speaker 3: do that. 548 00:27:24,680 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: And the Marlins outfield could be completely gone after this offseason, 549 00:27:29,280 --> 00:27:31,640 Speaker 1: or or they could end up holding on to Azuna 550 00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:35,919 Speaker 1: or Yelich. Obviously, Stanton seems a Stanton trade seems pretty imminent. 551 00:27:36,200 --> 00:27:39,080 Speaker 1: So from going back to that Giants offer, like you said, 552 00:27:39,119 --> 00:27:41,800 Speaker 1: it's pretty easy to top it. What would be the 553 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:45,399 Speaker 1: Dodgers version of that offer, I guess in your eyes 554 00:27:45,880 --> 00:27:47,399 Speaker 1: in terms of what they would give up. 555 00:27:48,320 --> 00:27:53,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, so I guess Tyler Beattie. I don't know how 556 00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:55,720 Speaker 3: far he's fallen as a prospect, but I would wonder. 557 00:27:56,840 --> 00:28:00,800 Speaker 3: I think like someone like a brock Stewart is probably 558 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:03,600 Speaker 3: the closest, has a little bit of a major league experience, 559 00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:05,760 Speaker 3: might be a starter, might be a reliever going forward. 560 00:28:05,760 --> 00:28:07,919 Speaker 3: It's hard to say. I don't know if he's as 561 00:28:07,960 --> 00:28:10,600 Speaker 3: good as Beatie as a prospect, but he's sort of 562 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:15,159 Speaker 3: the guy there, the major league ready guy like the 563 00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:18,200 Speaker 3: Joe Panic, if you will, would probably be Jack Peterson. 564 00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:19,680 Speaker 3: I know it's not a one to one thing because 565 00:28:19,680 --> 00:28:23,240 Speaker 3: it's you know, second basement and outfielder, and then I 566 00:28:23,280 --> 00:28:28,720 Speaker 3: would say probably I honestly just Alex, you know, Alex Verduo, 567 00:28:29,119 --> 00:28:31,399 Speaker 3: even though it would just be given up to outfielders. 568 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:36,639 Speaker 3: I think something like that like Peterson, Verdugo, brock Stewart, 569 00:28:36,720 --> 00:28:39,000 Speaker 3: or then you could, I guess, mix and match depending 570 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:41,160 Speaker 3: on how they do the like if they change it 571 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 3: up a little bit, like maybe Yati or Alvarez one 572 00:28:45,160 --> 00:28:47,600 Speaker 3: of their higher pitching prospects instead of brock Stewart, so 573 00:28:47,720 --> 00:28:50,680 Speaker 3: then you you might switch up the rest of the deal. 574 00:28:50,800 --> 00:28:55,040 Speaker 3: But something like that Peterson, Verdugo, Alvarez, and then I 575 00:28:55,040 --> 00:28:57,480 Speaker 3: would imagine that that would get the Marlins to eat 576 00:28:57,800 --> 00:29:01,800 Speaker 3: a pretty decent amount of the salary. But yeah, that's 577 00:29:01,840 --> 00:29:04,240 Speaker 3: sort of the deal I would imagine, And that. 578 00:29:04,520 --> 00:29:08,240 Speaker 1: Deal seems more appealing to the Marlins than the Giants deal. 579 00:29:08,400 --> 00:29:10,200 Speaker 1: I think the prospects you named to have a much 580 00:29:10,280 --> 00:29:14,320 Speaker 1: higher ceiling. But in terms of Stanton's contract from an 581 00:29:14,360 --> 00:29:18,120 Speaker 1: outsider's perspective that you know covers another organization, do you 582 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:20,400 Speaker 1: really think that deal? I know it's backloaded, but is 583 00:29:20,480 --> 00:29:23,760 Speaker 1: it really that out of the market value in terms 584 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:26,320 Speaker 1: of what you think players of Stanton's caliber will be 585 00:29:26,360 --> 00:29:27,520 Speaker 1: getting in the next couple of years. 586 00:29:27,960 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's It's probably the thing for me 587 00:29:31,560 --> 00:29:35,600 Speaker 3: is that the tenure guarantee is is pretty hard to 588 00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:40,000 Speaker 3: sort of fathom or like to you know, take on, 589 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:43,720 Speaker 3: especially when you're giving up prospects and the main names 590 00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:45,960 Speaker 3: I mentioned. I don't know if the Dodgers are willing 591 00:29:46,040 --> 00:29:50,080 Speaker 3: to even do those guys in the trade, but I'm 592 00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:52,640 Speaker 3: just just trying to spitball there. But I think, you know, 593 00:29:53,240 --> 00:29:56,480 Speaker 3: I think sans contract, you know, the twenty nine and 594 00:29:56,520 --> 00:29:59,960 Speaker 3: a half million a year, that's like pretty reasonable, especially 595 00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:03,920 Speaker 3: coming off the year he had. You know, obviously MVP one, 596 00:30:04,080 --> 00:30:06,360 Speaker 3: he's like the best, probably the best power hitter in 597 00:30:06,440 --> 00:30:08,520 Speaker 3: the game going back, you know, as long as he's 598 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:12,400 Speaker 3: been in the game. The issue with him obviously played 599 00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:15,200 Speaker 3: one hundred and fifty nine games this year, but he's 600 00:30:15,240 --> 00:30:18,720 Speaker 3: been injury prone. You know, different different maladies you know, 601 00:30:19,120 --> 00:30:21,320 Speaker 3: seem to sort of come up every single year. I 602 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:23,240 Speaker 3: know it's some of them are flukes, like he's you know, 603 00:30:23,280 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 3: you got hit in the face when you're it's not 604 00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 3: like you're you're prone to get hit in the face 605 00:30:28,560 --> 00:30:31,760 Speaker 3: or whatever. But but it's just it seems like that's 606 00:30:31,800 --> 00:30:36,280 Speaker 3: an issue, like and he's like, you know, still relatively young, 607 00:30:36,480 --> 00:30:38,520 Speaker 3: Like he's not pooh holes, it's not he's not already 608 00:30:38,520 --> 00:30:41,560 Speaker 3: in his thirties, so it's not going to be like 609 00:30:41,680 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 3: something where he's immediately a cripple in two years basically. 610 00:30:45,280 --> 00:30:49,280 Speaker 3: So I just think that's sort of the issue, is 611 00:30:49,320 --> 00:30:51,760 Speaker 3: that long term risk. I know Robinson canos sign a 612 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 3: ten year deal a few years ago, but like, that's 613 00:30:55,480 --> 00:30:58,560 Speaker 3: that's what's hard to stomach, I think for teams. So 614 00:30:58,720 --> 00:31:02,840 Speaker 3: that's probably what the issue is than anything. But then 615 00:31:03,160 --> 00:31:06,280 Speaker 3: then I think also what complicates things further is that 616 00:31:06,360 --> 00:31:10,280 Speaker 3: he has that opt out after three years, So that said, 617 00:31:10,320 --> 00:31:12,040 Speaker 3: he'd be walking away from I think, what is it 618 00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:15,400 Speaker 3: to eighteen over seven? Uh so that's you know, a 619 00:31:15,400 --> 00:31:18,440 Speaker 3: little bit over thirty one million a year. That's a 620 00:31:18,480 --> 00:31:20,360 Speaker 3: tough thing to walk away from. At the same time, 621 00:31:20,480 --> 00:31:22,440 Speaker 3: but who knows, Like if he has what if he 622 00:31:22,560 --> 00:31:25,000 Speaker 3: just does three more years like this last year, he'd 623 00:31:25,040 --> 00:31:26,480 Speaker 3: be a fool not to walk away from that, you know, 624 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:31,520 Speaker 3: because he'd he'd really cash in. So yeah, so are 625 00:31:31,560 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 3: you getting are you ten years of Stanton or do 626 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:36,880 Speaker 3: you think you're getting three years of Stanton? It's really 627 00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:40,240 Speaker 3: hard to say, so that there's so many like little 628 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:42,120 Speaker 3: variables like that that makes this one of the more 629 00:31:42,200 --> 00:31:45,000 Speaker 3: like complicated, you know, potential deals. 630 00:31:45,160 --> 00:31:47,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, obviously it's going to be really complicated. But he 631 00:31:47,520 --> 00:31:50,760 Speaker 1: has to go somewhere. And I asked Grant Brisbee, uh, 632 00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:53,840 Speaker 1: when I was talking about the Giants with him, he 633 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:57,840 Speaker 1: works with McCovey Chronicles, what he thought about the percent 634 00:31:58,040 --> 00:32:01,160 Speaker 1: chance of the Giants landing And he said, twenty percent. 635 00:32:01,520 --> 00:32:03,880 Speaker 1: What would you give ballpark for the Dodgers. I know 636 00:32:03,960 --> 00:32:06,760 Speaker 1: it's a tough question for the Dodgers to land John 637 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:08,640 Speaker 1: Carlos Stanton's offseason. 638 00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 3: Is that okay? So that's funny, Like I would say 639 00:32:11,840 --> 00:32:15,960 Speaker 3: around around twenty percent for the Dodgers right now, because 640 00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:18,200 Speaker 3: I like, honestly like the fact the fact that they 641 00:32:18,240 --> 00:32:21,640 Speaker 3: are already, like the Giants met with Stanton. I know, 642 00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:24,400 Speaker 3: it doesn't mean a deal has been agreed to, but 643 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:26,480 Speaker 3: the fact that they're far enough along in the process 644 00:32:26,640 --> 00:32:31,680 Speaker 3: to get to approve that meeting, like that's that's relatively rare. 645 00:32:31,760 --> 00:32:33,600 Speaker 3: I mean, I guess that happens in some cases, but 646 00:32:34,280 --> 00:32:38,280 Speaker 3: that to me suggests that they're pretty far along. And 647 00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:41,040 Speaker 3: I think if they're that far along. I think the 648 00:32:41,640 --> 00:32:44,400 Speaker 3: sort of the wheels have been greased a little bit, 649 00:32:44,480 --> 00:32:48,760 Speaker 3: and I think deals more likely to happen with them. So, 650 00:32:49,040 --> 00:32:50,840 Speaker 3: like I said, I think the Dodgers' best opportunity is 651 00:32:50,920 --> 00:32:55,400 Speaker 3: sort of waiting around. And if the meeting with Stanton, 652 00:32:55,720 --> 00:32:58,320 Speaker 3: maybe with the Giants said then he said, look, I 653 00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:00,760 Speaker 3: don't really want to go there. Ultimately does approve a deal. 654 00:33:01,160 --> 00:33:04,520 Speaker 3: That's when the Dodgers sort of swoop in and you know, 655 00:33:04,920 --> 00:33:07,400 Speaker 3: let him get to the place where he really wants 656 00:33:07,440 --> 00:33:09,040 Speaker 3: to go. If that's the case, I don't know that's 657 00:33:09,080 --> 00:33:11,680 Speaker 3: the case. But so that's I put it twenty percent 658 00:33:11,800 --> 00:33:12,400 Speaker 3: for the Dodgers. 659 00:33:13,320 --> 00:33:16,680 Speaker 1: And in fairness to Grant, asked him that question before 660 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 1: that report actually came out. The report came out right 661 00:33:19,560 --> 00:33:22,920 Speaker 1: after I spoke to him, so I'm sure I'm sure 662 00:33:22,960 --> 00:33:25,720 Speaker 1: that percent chance went up a little bit. Anyway, thank 663 00:33:25,800 --> 00:33:28,960 Speaker 1: you so much for coming on, Eric's even of true 664 00:33:29,040 --> 00:33:31,760 Speaker 1: Blue La place to go for all things. Dodgers. Can't 665 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:32,280 Speaker 1: thank you enough. 666 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:34,800 Speaker 3: Eric, Yeah, no problem. And now that I know that 667 00:33:34,960 --> 00:33:37,760 Speaker 3: the meeting happened after you're talking with Grant, maybe maybe 668 00:33:37,800 --> 00:33:39,560 Speaker 3: the Dodgers will meet with Stanton tonight. Who knows. 669 00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:42,160 Speaker 1: Oh, oh, that might be. That's the way things are 670 00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:42,840 Speaker 1: going right now. 671 00:33:43,840 --> 00:33:45,640 Speaker 3: Thanks, no problem. 672 00:33:46,560 --> 00:33:49,280 Speaker 1: So, last, and certainly not least, we have the Saint 673 00:33:49,360 --> 00:33:52,920 Speaker 1: Louis Cardinals. A lot has been said about the prospects 674 00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:56,120 Speaker 1: the Cardinals could potentially offer the Marlins, but it's also 675 00:33:56,200 --> 00:33:57,680 Speaker 1: been said that they may not be willing to give 676 00:33:57,760 --> 00:34:00,800 Speaker 1: up as much money in the Stanton contract as the 677 00:34:00,920 --> 00:34:03,480 Speaker 1: Dodgers and the Giants. To tell us more about this, 678 00:34:03,600 --> 00:34:07,200 Speaker 1: I brought on Tyler Kinsey from Viva Albertos, the Saint 679 00:34:07,280 --> 00:34:09,920 Speaker 1: Louis Cardinals espionation blog. Tyler, thanks for being. 680 00:34:09,840 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 4: On, Thanks for having me so. 681 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:16,120 Speaker 1: Tyler actually recently interviewed me for an article on his 682 00:34:16,360 --> 00:34:18,560 Speaker 1: blog on the Saint Louis Cardinals blog, and we kind 683 00:34:18,600 --> 00:34:23,600 Speaker 1: of spitballed a trade involving Stanton. I can't completely remember 684 00:34:23,640 --> 00:34:25,200 Speaker 1: what we agreed to, but I know what led him 685 00:34:25,200 --> 00:34:27,080 Speaker 1: as Dias was part of the deal. So we're gonna 686 00:34:27,080 --> 00:34:29,960 Speaker 1: have to restructure on that end. But what can you 687 00:34:30,000 --> 00:34:31,759 Speaker 1: tell me about the Saint Louis Cardinals before we get 688 00:34:31,800 --> 00:34:34,759 Speaker 1: into trade talks? And what I've asked every single person 689 00:34:34,840 --> 00:34:36,759 Speaker 1: that's been on so far, what can you tell us 690 00:34:36,760 --> 00:34:38,360 Speaker 1: about the fan base, what do they think about a 691 00:34:38,400 --> 00:34:39,399 Speaker 1: potential standon trade. 692 00:34:39,920 --> 00:34:42,520 Speaker 5: Well, I think, right now, for the Cardinals fan base, 693 00:34:42,560 --> 00:34:44,880 Speaker 5: but also the front office, this is the top priority 694 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:48,520 Speaker 5: just because right field is probably the weakest position at 695 00:34:48,560 --> 00:34:51,480 Speaker 5: twenty seventeen, it rejects to be the weakest position going forward. 696 00:34:51,560 --> 00:34:53,840 Speaker 5: So naturally these two teams line up a bit. The 697 00:34:53,920 --> 00:34:57,520 Speaker 5: Cardinals have this abundance of pitching depth and especially in 698 00:34:57,560 --> 00:35:00,040 Speaker 5: their prospects this and the Marlins need that, so I 699 00:35:00,120 --> 00:35:01,919 Speaker 5: could see you working out. The big thing at this point, 700 00:35:01,960 --> 00:35:04,600 Speaker 5: I think is going to be Stan's no trade clause 701 00:35:04,680 --> 00:35:06,560 Speaker 5: and does he want to come to a Midwest city. 702 00:35:07,120 --> 00:35:10,000 Speaker 1: Well, Stanton made it publicly clear that he wants to 703 00:35:10,040 --> 00:35:12,239 Speaker 1: play for a winner, but he also wants to play 704 00:35:12,600 --> 00:35:14,480 Speaker 1: on the coast, and that's where it kind of makes 705 00:35:14,520 --> 00:35:17,520 Speaker 1: it interesting between the Cardinals and the Giants, as they're 706 00:35:17,520 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: two of the favorites to land Stanton. But as I 707 00:35:21,160 --> 00:35:25,000 Speaker 1: said earlier in the podcast, the Giants are not quite 708 00:35:25,040 --> 00:35:27,480 Speaker 1: winners right now, but they are on the coast. The 709 00:35:27,560 --> 00:35:29,800 Speaker 1: Cardinals are in position to win, but they're not on 710 00:35:29,880 --> 00:35:32,319 Speaker 1: the coast. So it's going to be interesting to see 711 00:35:32,360 --> 00:35:36,239 Speaker 1: which one of those ideals Stanton compromises in terms of 712 00:35:36,680 --> 00:35:38,719 Speaker 1: you know, where he wants to land or unless he 713 00:35:39,120 --> 00:35:42,000 Speaker 1: can almost veto his way over to la If the 714 00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:45,239 Speaker 1: Dodgers is interested as people think they are, but what 715 00:35:45,360 --> 00:35:47,960 Speaker 1: can you tell us about how much money the Cardinals 716 00:35:48,040 --> 00:35:50,400 Speaker 1: might be willing to take on? And you know, the Giants' 717 00:35:50,480 --> 00:35:53,239 Speaker 1: big strength in terms of trade talks is that they 718 00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:56,280 Speaker 1: want to take on the most money, and the Marlins 719 00:35:56,320 --> 00:35:59,640 Speaker 1: have been said to have been more focused on unloading 720 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:03,360 Speaker 1: the money rather than a prospect return, which the Cardinal's 721 00:36:03,360 --> 00:36:05,640 Speaker 1: strength is probably the prospects they have to offer. 722 00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:10,840 Speaker 5: Well, it's frustrating because this team prints cash. They and 723 00:36:10,960 --> 00:36:13,799 Speaker 5: a down year, they get over three million people going 724 00:36:13,840 --> 00:36:16,560 Speaker 5: to the games. They had a revenue I think this 725 00:36:16,719 --> 00:36:18,959 Speaker 5: year of over three hundred million. They have the money 726 00:36:19,080 --> 00:36:21,600 Speaker 5: to get stand on their payroll and they wouldn't be 727 00:36:21,640 --> 00:36:24,040 Speaker 5: a problem. Wayne Wright's making about twenty million. He'll be 728 00:36:24,080 --> 00:36:26,720 Speaker 5: off the books next year, so the money isn't a concern. 729 00:36:26,760 --> 00:36:28,799 Speaker 5: As far as the Cardinals are nearing the luxury tax 730 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:30,600 Speaker 5: or anything, they can't do it. But the real question 731 00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:32,719 Speaker 5: is will they be willing to And I guess one 732 00:36:32,760 --> 00:36:35,080 Speaker 5: option too is save the money, maybe wait for the 733 00:36:35,160 --> 00:36:37,000 Speaker 5: Cubs to try to make one last hurrah with their 734 00:36:37,080 --> 00:36:39,080 Speaker 5: core and go spend it next offseason or the off 735 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:41,920 Speaker 5: season after. But I think the Cardinals they can definitely 736 00:36:42,040 --> 00:36:44,480 Speaker 5: match whatever the Giants are willing to offer payroll wise, 737 00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:47,160 Speaker 5: and at that point, the tiebreaker becomes who has more 738 00:36:47,239 --> 00:36:49,320 Speaker 5: prospect debts, and obviously that is Saint Louis. 739 00:36:50,200 --> 00:36:52,400 Speaker 1: If Saint Louis is really willing to give up the 740 00:36:52,480 --> 00:36:54,880 Speaker 1: money like you say they are, then it definitely seems 741 00:36:54,920 --> 00:36:57,840 Speaker 1: like Satan should be the favorite to land Stanton. Like 742 00:36:57,960 --> 00:37:01,120 Speaker 1: you said, they could wait till next year to you know, 743 00:37:01,320 --> 00:37:03,799 Speaker 1: spend that money, but you really only get one shot 744 00:37:03,880 --> 00:37:06,879 Speaker 1: at a generational talent like John Carlo Stanton, reigning MVP, 745 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:09,200 Speaker 1: a guy that hit fifty nine home runs and has 746 00:37:09,239 --> 00:37:12,040 Speaker 1: showed that he could probably hit more. So it's interesting 747 00:37:12,080 --> 00:37:13,640 Speaker 1: to see if the Dodgers really want to go all 748 00:37:13,680 --> 00:37:16,440 Speaker 1: in at the Dodgers the Cardinals rather really want to 749 00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:18,839 Speaker 1: go all in now, or if they want to kind 750 00:37:18,840 --> 00:37:20,960 Speaker 1: of wait like you said and wait for free agency. 751 00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:23,080 Speaker 1: You know, guys like Manny Machado will be free agenty 752 00:37:23,280 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 1: Bryce Harper among others, and it'll be interesting to see 753 00:37:26,160 --> 00:37:27,719 Speaker 1: what they do. But Wayne Wright coming off the books 754 00:37:27,719 --> 00:37:30,000 Speaker 1: would definitely be huge. What do you think it'll take 755 00:37:30,080 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 1: prospect wise for the Cardinals to bring in stand. 756 00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:36,800 Speaker 5: Well, it is going to be that sliding scale obviously, 757 00:37:36,920 --> 00:37:39,040 Speaker 5: where the less money you take on, the more you're 758 00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:40,879 Speaker 5: gonna have to give up in terms of prospects. Since 759 00:37:41,760 --> 00:37:44,719 Speaker 5: I think the Giants, what was it, two forty two 760 00:37:44,800 --> 00:37:46,560 Speaker 5: fifty is a number those floatered about. We don't know 761 00:37:46,600 --> 00:37:49,200 Speaker 5: what Saint Lewis is willing to offer, and I'm guessing 762 00:37:49,239 --> 00:37:52,040 Speaker 5: it's probably not going to be that much, So that 763 00:37:52,200 --> 00:37:55,880 Speaker 5: probably puts them in a tougher situation because Reyes, I 764 00:37:55,960 --> 00:37:59,319 Speaker 5: don't think we'll get traded, but you look further down 765 00:37:59,360 --> 00:38:01,520 Speaker 5: the system back Flaherty, he was the guy we talked 766 00:38:01,520 --> 00:38:04,239 Speaker 5: about in our kind of mock trates. I could see him. 767 00:38:04,280 --> 00:38:06,920 Speaker 5: The Marlins were interested in Dakota Hudson this fast summer. 768 00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:10,440 Speaker 5: They had scouts going to his games, and then Sandy Alcontra, 769 00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:13,120 Speaker 5: that flame throwing one hundred and plus smile now at righty, 770 00:38:13,160 --> 00:38:14,440 Speaker 5: the Marlins have been interested in him. 771 00:38:15,920 --> 00:38:17,880 Speaker 1: The Marlins have always kind of had an affinity for 772 00:38:18,280 --> 00:38:21,680 Speaker 1: hard throwing right handers, even when they don't work out, 773 00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:25,879 Speaker 1: like Tyler Kohach, who they selected second overall four years ago. 774 00:38:26,160 --> 00:38:28,279 Speaker 1: It seems like it was two years ago because he's 775 00:38:28,280 --> 00:38:31,120 Speaker 1: only pitched about one season. If that. He's still work 776 00:38:31,239 --> 00:38:33,480 Speaker 1: on the mend from Tommy John. But the Marlins have 777 00:38:33,520 --> 00:38:36,520 Speaker 1: always kind of had this interest in hard throwing, right 778 00:38:36,560 --> 00:38:39,000 Speaker 1: handed arms, and that's why it'll be interesting to see 779 00:38:39,040 --> 00:38:41,080 Speaker 1: if they go after all contra. I know a lot 780 00:38:41,120 --> 00:38:43,560 Speaker 1: of people have been saying, Ray, it seems untouchable, and 781 00:38:43,600 --> 00:38:46,160 Speaker 1: I've been surprised to see that Luke Weaver has not 782 00:38:46,280 --> 00:38:48,160 Speaker 1: come up much in talks. I don't know if it's 783 00:38:48,239 --> 00:38:51,560 Speaker 1: because he's more of a higher floor, lower ceiling type 784 00:38:51,560 --> 00:38:53,279 Speaker 1: of guy, where you know what you're gonna get with him. 785 00:38:53,320 --> 00:38:55,479 Speaker 1: He just pitched almost a full season in the major leagues. 786 00:38:55,520 --> 00:38:58,200 Speaker 1: He was very solid. But I'm curious what you think 787 00:38:58,320 --> 00:39:00,480 Speaker 1: do you think Luke Weaver could be in the talks 788 00:39:00,520 --> 00:39:03,040 Speaker 1: of a potential trader. Is he kind of showed you 789 00:39:03,160 --> 00:39:05,719 Speaker 1: what he's going to be in terms of his potential. 790 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:08,320 Speaker 5: I like the way you put that high floor, low ceiling. 791 00:39:08,400 --> 00:39:11,839 Speaker 5: That's kind of been a debate him on Cardinals chance. Hypothetically, 792 00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:14,000 Speaker 5: if let's say you have a stand trade in place, 793 00:39:14,080 --> 00:39:16,200 Speaker 5: but you have to give up one of Flarity or Weaver. 794 00:39:16,320 --> 00:39:18,680 Speaker 5: Which one would you give up? And there's kind of 795 00:39:18,719 --> 00:39:21,560 Speaker 5: this divide that Flerty has the chance to be this 796 00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:25,040 Speaker 5: ace or frontline starting pitcher, and not to say that 797 00:39:25,080 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 5: Weaver can't be a reliable number two, but he's not 798 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:29,799 Speaker 5: going to win any ccyons probably or be that ace 799 00:39:29,880 --> 00:39:31,240 Speaker 5: that can lead you to a World Series. 800 00:39:31,880 --> 00:39:34,279 Speaker 1: Also in the Marlins end of things, too, it's a 801 00:39:34,360 --> 00:39:37,600 Speaker 1: similar discussion, because do you want to take the chance 802 00:39:37,680 --> 00:39:40,840 Speaker 1: on a guy like Flaherty when you really have no 803 00:39:41,680 --> 00:39:44,120 Speaker 1: help in the rotation right now, or a guy like 804 00:39:44,200 --> 00:39:46,400 Speaker 1: Weaver that can you can plug right into the rotation 805 00:39:46,880 --> 00:39:49,240 Speaker 1: and you know he's going to give you quality innings, 806 00:39:49,320 --> 00:39:54,399 Speaker 1: quality starts right away. When Flarerity struggled in the minor 807 00:39:54,480 --> 00:39:58,560 Speaker 1: leagues last season, curious what you think of the struggles, 808 00:39:58,640 --> 00:40:00,120 Speaker 1: what you think they stem from, If they were can 809 00:40:00,160 --> 00:40:02,280 Speaker 1: control issues or if he was he just not missing 810 00:40:02,360 --> 00:40:06,600 Speaker 1: bats or what it was. But in terms of his ceiling, 811 00:40:06,680 --> 00:40:11,640 Speaker 1: that's that's indisputable. He has ace type stuff. But what 812 00:40:11,880 --> 00:40:14,759 Speaker 1: was Flerdy's problem in the minor leagues? Because I know 813 00:40:15,160 --> 00:40:16,959 Speaker 1: he seems to be one of the most likely guys 814 00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:18,840 Speaker 1: that would come in a potential stance and trade. 815 00:40:19,560 --> 00:40:22,239 Speaker 5: Well, he was actually descent in the minor leagues this year. 816 00:40:22,360 --> 00:40:24,440 Speaker 5: Is that twenty one innings in the major leagues and 817 00:40:24,480 --> 00:40:27,839 Speaker 5: again it's twenty one inningternal guy, who's what twenty two, 818 00:40:28,080 --> 00:40:30,759 Speaker 5: So make of it what you will. But the walk 819 00:40:30,880 --> 00:40:32,560 Speaker 5: rates with him, I think it is going to be key. 820 00:40:32,600 --> 00:40:35,040 Speaker 5: It was up to four point two to two per 821 00:40:35,120 --> 00:40:37,359 Speaker 5: nine innings in the major leagues this year and it's 822 00:40:37,440 --> 00:40:40,160 Speaker 5: been consistently lower in the minor leagues. 823 00:40:40,200 --> 00:40:41,359 Speaker 4: And then the strikeout rates. 824 00:40:41,400 --> 00:40:44,120 Speaker 5: He doesn't have the overpowering one hundred mile an hour 825 00:40:44,200 --> 00:40:45,880 Speaker 5: stuff like al Contre does, but I think he has 826 00:40:45,920 --> 00:40:47,920 Speaker 5: this interesting mix with his breaking ball where you can 827 00:40:48,160 --> 00:40:50,719 Speaker 5: get hitters out that way. So I think the question 828 00:40:50,840 --> 00:40:53,360 Speaker 5: really is going to be what type of prospects are 829 00:40:53,440 --> 00:40:55,520 Speaker 5: the Marlins looking for. They looking for more of those 830 00:40:55,560 --> 00:40:57,520 Speaker 5: home run picks or the safer bets to kind of 831 00:40:58,080 --> 00:40:59,920 Speaker 5: give their younger talented stability. 832 00:41:00,800 --> 00:41:03,400 Speaker 1: And normally I could go off of what the Marlins 833 00:41:03,440 --> 00:41:05,480 Speaker 1: have done in the past with trades and what kind 834 00:41:05,480 --> 00:41:08,800 Speaker 1: of guys that they target, but with Jeter kind of 835 00:41:08,920 --> 00:41:12,080 Speaker 1: overhauling from the inside out and bringing guys in like 836 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:14,920 Speaker 1: Gary Dembo, who's one of the leaders in the overhaul 837 00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:17,640 Speaker 1: of the Yankees and did a great job over there. 838 00:41:17,880 --> 00:41:21,000 Speaker 1: I mean, as you saw in a rebuilding year how 839 00:41:21,080 --> 00:41:24,120 Speaker 1: well they did. He's definitely gonna have much more of 840 00:41:24,160 --> 00:41:27,279 Speaker 1: an impact in terms of player development and who the 841 00:41:27,880 --> 00:41:30,960 Speaker 1: Marlins may go after, even though they did still keep 842 00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:34,800 Speaker 1: Michael Hill the GM around, which actually surprised me. But 843 00:41:35,320 --> 00:41:37,600 Speaker 1: what do you think, package wise, what would it take 844 00:41:38,239 --> 00:41:42,440 Speaker 1: for the Marlins or for the Cardinals rather to get 845 00:41:42,560 --> 00:41:44,840 Speaker 1: John Carloston. What kind of package would they have to 846 00:41:44,880 --> 00:41:47,480 Speaker 1: give the Marlins. I know it's a slipper slope with 847 00:41:47,560 --> 00:41:49,840 Speaker 1: the money, and it depends, like you said, with the 848 00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:52,960 Speaker 1: sliding scale, but what do you think it would take 849 00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:56,520 Speaker 1: in terms of just kind of a median type of offer. 850 00:41:57,560 --> 00:41:59,399 Speaker 5: Well, what if imagined right now is what I'm thinking 851 00:41:59,480 --> 00:42:02,560 Speaker 5: is happening. Is I think the Cardinals and Giants both 852 00:42:02,680 --> 00:42:05,080 Speaker 5: have agreed to deals with Miami at this point. We're 853 00:42:05,080 --> 00:42:07,719 Speaker 5: waiting to see, because Stan is still holding out at 854 00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:09,840 Speaker 5: this point that the Dodgers are going to jump in 855 00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:12,360 Speaker 5: and make an offer for him that's he'll get to 856 00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:13,960 Speaker 5: go to the team he's always wanted to go to. 857 00:42:14,080 --> 00:42:16,759 Speaker 5: But assuming the Dodgers don't jump in and that this 858 00:42:16,880 --> 00:42:19,800 Speaker 5: does become a two horse race between the Giants and Cardinals. 859 00:42:20,280 --> 00:42:23,200 Speaker 5: The Cardinals have the upper hand, obviously, what are the 860 00:42:23,239 --> 00:42:27,440 Speaker 5: Giants talking about? What did Grant say? Beatty probably and Arroyo. 861 00:42:27,880 --> 00:42:30,960 Speaker 1: So Arroyo is not even being discussed, which surprised me 862 00:42:31,000 --> 00:42:34,320 Speaker 1: because the Marlins could really use an infielder. Grant Brisbee 863 00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:37,879 Speaker 1: earlier on the show told me that he was thinking 864 00:42:37,920 --> 00:42:40,480 Speaker 1: it's going to be more along the lines of Chris Shaw, 865 00:42:40,960 --> 00:42:44,960 Speaker 1: Beatty and maybe Joe Panic was discussed, but that's also 866 00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:46,680 Speaker 1: been said that he might not be a part of 867 00:42:46,719 --> 00:42:50,600 Speaker 1: the deal, and it could be someone like like Ramos, 868 00:42:50,800 --> 00:42:55,000 Speaker 1: who is a young seventeen, as Grant put it, but 869 00:42:55,400 --> 00:42:59,080 Speaker 1: his ceiling is sky high. So it's really interesting in 870 00:42:59,200 --> 00:43:01,839 Speaker 1: that side of things because they really can't put together 871 00:43:01,880 --> 00:43:04,680 Speaker 1: a great package. Shaw is you know, you know what 872 00:43:04,719 --> 00:43:07,920 Speaker 1: you're gonna get with Shaw, power hitter, high volume strikeouts. 873 00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:11,719 Speaker 1: His ceiling is not that high. Beaty struggled in the 874 00:43:11,800 --> 00:43:15,360 Speaker 1: minor leagues. He's projecting to a back of the rotation 875 00:43:15,520 --> 00:43:19,000 Speaker 1: type guy, and you know, you get Joe Panic, you 876 00:43:19,080 --> 00:43:21,680 Speaker 1: know what you're getting with him as well. The Ramos 877 00:43:21,760 --> 00:43:23,759 Speaker 1: would be you know, the high ceiling type, home run 878 00:43:23,840 --> 00:43:25,279 Speaker 1: type of guy that you can try and take a 879 00:43:25,400 --> 00:43:27,880 Speaker 1: chance on. But it seems like the Giants package is 880 00:43:27,960 --> 00:43:29,880 Speaker 1: more centered around the money they're willing to take on. 881 00:43:31,160 --> 00:43:32,960 Speaker 5: Absolutely, and I think that's one of those things where 882 00:43:33,680 --> 00:43:37,000 Speaker 5: if money is Miami's top concern, and that was one 883 00:43:37,040 --> 00:43:39,840 Speaker 5: thing I was joking on Twitter yesterday, that's obviously you 884 00:43:39,920 --> 00:43:42,160 Speaker 5: were upset about. I can't remember who said at the 885 00:43:42,200 --> 00:43:44,320 Speaker 5: fish Stripes account that they were upset that the Marlins 886 00:43:44,360 --> 00:43:46,680 Speaker 5: are making the money the top priority and not the prospects. 887 00:43:47,400 --> 00:43:49,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, that was that kind of infuriated me because I 888 00:43:49,800 --> 00:43:51,840 Speaker 1: understand that you when you buy a team, you have 889 00:43:52,000 --> 00:43:53,680 Speaker 1: to start over, you have to make money, and you 890 00:43:53,760 --> 00:43:57,399 Speaker 1: have to cut payroll. But when you're trading away your 891 00:43:57,520 --> 00:44:01,160 Speaker 1: best player, you know, a generational talent, and you have 892 00:44:01,280 --> 00:44:03,399 Speaker 1: nothing to come back with, the show fans like, hey, 893 00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:06,040 Speaker 1: this is what we got and this is what we're 894 00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:07,959 Speaker 1: going to bring back to you, and there's a reason 895 00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:10,400 Speaker 1: to be excited for the future. I don't think you 896 00:44:10,440 --> 00:44:14,160 Speaker 1: can sell fans on hey, we cut some money. You 897 00:44:14,239 --> 00:44:17,359 Speaker 1: know we're gonna we increase our profit margins and our 898 00:44:17,480 --> 00:44:19,040 Speaker 1: payroll is going to be lower this year. And we'll 899 00:44:19,040 --> 00:44:20,800 Speaker 1: probably be in the the bottom five in the MLB 900 00:44:20,880 --> 00:44:22,920 Speaker 1: in terms of payroll. I don't think that's something that's 901 00:44:22,920 --> 00:44:25,360 Speaker 1: going to get fans very excited, and especially fans that 902 00:44:25,440 --> 00:44:30,520 Speaker 1: have endured so many terrible years of fire sales and 903 00:44:30,600 --> 00:44:33,840 Speaker 1: trading their best players and of course the tragic gloss 904 00:44:33,840 --> 00:44:37,279 Speaker 1: of Jose Fernandez. It just doesn't seem like a very 905 00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:41,720 Speaker 1: exciting thing for fans to rally around with a new ownership, 906 00:44:41,840 --> 00:44:45,160 Speaker 1: especially one that's led by a figure like Derek Jeter, 907 00:44:45,239 --> 00:44:49,200 Speaker 1: who has definitely not gotten off on the right foot exactly. 908 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:51,480 Speaker 5: And I think the Cardinals, when you look at their 909 00:44:51,480 --> 00:44:54,200 Speaker 5: payroll situation, like I said, they're fine money wise taking 910 00:44:54,239 --> 00:44:56,560 Speaker 5: on stands contract or the majority of the question is 911 00:44:56,600 --> 00:44:59,239 Speaker 5: will they and is ownership polling to do that? And 912 00:44:59,239 --> 00:45:02,840 Speaker 5: I think a Boyles onto any contract or sorry not 913 00:45:02,880 --> 00:45:06,520 Speaker 5: any contract, any offer that the Giants proposed, at the 914 00:45:06,680 --> 00:45:09,240 Speaker 5: very least, the Cardinals can match it, if not surpassed 915 00:45:09,239 --> 00:45:13,359 Speaker 5: it anyway. So the only way this shouldn't happen from 916 00:45:13,400 --> 00:45:17,400 Speaker 5: a Cardinals fan perspective is that Stan absolutely refuses to 917 00:45:17,440 --> 00:45:19,279 Speaker 5: come play in Saint Louis. And at this point, you 918 00:45:19,360 --> 00:45:21,680 Speaker 5: can't get two men at the front office because they 919 00:45:21,719 --> 00:45:22,479 Speaker 5: can try to be as. 920 00:45:22,400 --> 00:45:24,320 Speaker 4: Persuasive as possible, but there's only so much of that 921 00:45:24,400 --> 00:45:25,120 Speaker 4: they could control. 922 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:30,520 Speaker 1: That's the thing. And you know, you like fans have 923 00:45:30,680 --> 00:45:32,680 Speaker 1: accepted at the fact that I think Stanton's going to 924 00:45:32,880 --> 00:45:35,960 Speaker 1: be gone, but at the same time, like I said, 925 00:45:36,000 --> 00:45:38,319 Speaker 1: you really need to get that return back. What are 926 00:45:38,400 --> 00:45:41,120 Speaker 1: Cardinals fan saying? Are Cardinals fans really hoping to land 927 00:45:41,160 --> 00:45:43,840 Speaker 1: Stanton or is the money something that the fans are 928 00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:45,080 Speaker 1: kind of skeptical about. 929 00:45:45,640 --> 00:45:48,879 Speaker 5: This is a team that blocked at Max Scherzer, who 930 00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:50,520 Speaker 5: a ton of us were calling for the team to 931 00:45:50,600 --> 00:45:52,800 Speaker 5: sign hometown guy. He openly said, hey, I take a 932 00:45:52,880 --> 00:45:55,080 Speaker 5: discount to come back home. You went to high school here. 933 00:45:56,120 --> 00:45:57,960 Speaker 5: Didn't sign him then. I think it was the following 934 00:45:58,040 --> 00:46:00,800 Speaker 5: offseason they finished in second place on and Hayward. 935 00:46:00,960 --> 00:46:02,680 Speaker 4: So there are a lot of fans. 936 00:46:02,480 --> 00:46:05,279 Speaker 5: Who are very frustrated with this front office as far 937 00:46:05,320 --> 00:46:08,440 Speaker 5: as their inability to land that star long term. Ever 938 00:46:08,520 --> 00:46:10,680 Speaker 5: since the trade for Matt Holliday and signing him. So, 939 00:46:11,400 --> 00:46:14,839 Speaker 5: if the Cardinals don't get Stanton, and I'm not sure 940 00:46:14,920 --> 00:46:17,000 Speaker 5: who the favorite is at this point, I think it's 941 00:46:17,120 --> 00:46:20,200 Speaker 5: the Giants just because Stan Holds some of the cards 942 00:46:20,239 --> 00:46:23,439 Speaker 5: in his hand with the no trade clause. But people 943 00:46:23,480 --> 00:46:25,239 Speaker 5: are going to be infuriated here if they don't get 944 00:46:25,280 --> 00:46:27,960 Speaker 5: stan He's been the top priority for a while here, 945 00:46:28,040 --> 00:46:30,640 Speaker 5: and it's just tough to say how people are going 946 00:46:30,719 --> 00:46:31,759 Speaker 5: to react if they don't get him. 947 00:46:31,760 --> 00:46:33,359 Speaker 4: It's not going to be pretty, I'll say that much. 948 00:46:33,880 --> 00:46:36,799 Speaker 1: If the Cardinals do land Stanton, do you think they're 949 00:46:36,880 --> 00:46:40,120 Speaker 1: instantly World Series contenders or where do you think that 950 00:46:40,280 --> 00:46:41,880 Speaker 1: places them in terms of contention? 951 00:46:42,200 --> 00:46:45,080 Speaker 5: The tough part is is that the Cubs right now, 952 00:46:45,200 --> 00:46:48,839 Speaker 5: I mean, who's their fifth starter, Eddie Butler or Luke 953 00:46:48,920 --> 00:46:51,440 Speaker 5: Faeryrell or something. The Cubs are going to get at 954 00:46:51,520 --> 00:46:54,920 Speaker 5: least one starter this offseason. So the problem there is, yes, 955 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:56,839 Speaker 5: you gain a ton of ground on the Cubs by 956 00:46:56,880 --> 00:46:59,359 Speaker 5: getting Stanton, but not only do you have to match 957 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:01,360 Speaker 5: whatever up grades the Cubs make, but then you have 958 00:47:01,440 --> 00:47:04,000 Speaker 5: to surpass that if you want to talk about potentially 959 00:47:04,040 --> 00:47:05,279 Speaker 5: winning the Division against them. 960 00:47:06,040 --> 00:47:08,360 Speaker 1: That's gonna be the interesting thing. And I guess a 961 00:47:08,440 --> 00:47:10,640 Speaker 1: lot of it is kind of leans on the Cardinal's 962 00:47:10,680 --> 00:47:14,120 Speaker 1: potential rotation because one of these young guys that we've 963 00:47:14,239 --> 00:47:16,279 Speaker 1: named that doesn't end up coming to Miami in a 964 00:47:16,320 --> 00:47:19,319 Speaker 1: potential trade is gonna have to step up and at 965 00:47:19,360 --> 00:47:22,239 Speaker 1: some point probably pitch some dings for the Cardinals and 966 00:47:22,280 --> 00:47:25,319 Speaker 1: the Majors if I'm not wrong, and it's probably gonna 967 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:25,720 Speaker 1: be Rayes. 968 00:47:26,719 --> 00:47:26,799 Speaker 2: Right. 969 00:47:26,960 --> 00:47:29,720 Speaker 5: The thing with Rays since he's coming off Tommy John surgery, 970 00:47:30,400 --> 00:47:34,080 Speaker 5: the plan so far with him is they're gonna try 971 00:47:34,120 --> 00:47:34,880 Speaker 5: to ease him back in. 972 00:47:35,000 --> 00:47:36,600 Speaker 4: He'll be on some sort of Indians limit. 973 00:47:36,640 --> 00:47:38,320 Speaker 5: We don't have a set number at this point, but 974 00:47:39,280 --> 00:47:42,799 Speaker 5: in all likelihood when he does come back, which they 975 00:47:42,840 --> 00:47:45,759 Speaker 5: haven't ruled out opening Day yet, he was on a 976 00:47:45,800 --> 00:47:47,880 Speaker 5: pretty good throwing schedule towards the end of the season, 977 00:47:47,880 --> 00:47:49,759 Speaker 5: the last we'd heard of him. But I think when 978 00:47:49,840 --> 00:47:52,160 Speaker 5: he does come back at some points in twenty eighteen, 979 00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:53,640 Speaker 5: it's going to be out of the bullpen at first, 980 00:47:53,719 --> 00:47:55,520 Speaker 5: and maybe later in the season they ease him into 981 00:47:55,520 --> 00:47:57,560 Speaker 5: the rotation, but they're going to have to try to 982 00:47:57,600 --> 00:47:58,839 Speaker 5: get those innings somewhere else. 983 00:47:59,680 --> 00:48:02,640 Speaker 1: It'll be interesting to see how the Cardinals get those innings. 984 00:48:02,760 --> 00:48:04,920 Speaker 1: And so this is the last question I've wrapped up 985 00:48:05,000 --> 00:48:08,720 Speaker 1: with everyone so far. What would you put the percent 986 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:12,560 Speaker 1: chance of the Cardinals landing John Carlos stan I. 987 00:48:12,600 --> 00:48:15,239 Speaker 5: Mean, the eternal optimist to me says, yes, they have 988 00:48:15,360 --> 00:48:18,480 Speaker 5: the prospects, they have the money ability to take them on. 989 00:48:18,680 --> 00:48:21,200 Speaker 5: But at this point, here's what I think will happen. 990 00:48:22,080 --> 00:48:24,200 Speaker 5: I think the Dodgers won't go in at stand because 991 00:48:24,200 --> 00:48:26,279 Speaker 5: they're worried about the luxury tax and I don't think 992 00:48:26,320 --> 00:48:27,640 Speaker 5: it's just a good fit for them. 993 00:48:27,760 --> 00:48:30,920 Speaker 4: So eventually, at some point soon, I think Stan will 994 00:48:31,000 --> 00:48:31,520 Speaker 4: kind of let. 995 00:48:31,480 --> 00:48:34,560 Speaker 5: That ship sail at which points the Red Sox just 996 00:48:34,560 --> 00:48:37,200 Speaker 5: said earlier today, and we're recording this on Sunday out know, 997 00:48:37,280 --> 00:48:39,799 Speaker 5: and this will go up. That's they're officially out on Stan. 998 00:48:39,960 --> 00:48:42,680 Speaker 5: So it's essentially the Cardinals at Giants now, and the 999 00:48:42,800 --> 00:48:45,319 Speaker 5: question becomes, I think, where does Stan want to play 1000 00:48:45,400 --> 00:48:49,920 Speaker 5: more unless Miami. If Miami is convinced that Saint Louis 1001 00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:53,440 Speaker 5: has the better offer, then maybe they try to leverage 1002 00:48:53,440 --> 00:48:56,160 Speaker 5: Stan into forcing them to Saint Lois, saying hey, it's 1003 00:48:56,160 --> 00:48:58,239 Speaker 5: Saint Louis, or you get stuck on this rebuild all 1004 00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:00,799 Speaker 5: alone when we trade a Zuna and and everyone else 1005 00:49:00,920 --> 00:49:04,359 Speaker 5: f's I just think that, as much as I hate 1006 00:49:04,400 --> 00:49:06,120 Speaker 5: to say it, I think Stan is going to find 1007 00:49:06,160 --> 00:49:08,839 Speaker 5: a way to get himself out to the West coast 1008 00:49:08,920 --> 00:49:11,160 Speaker 5: whatever way possible, and that would be San Francisco. So 1009 00:49:12,080 --> 00:49:17,160 Speaker 5: as far as a percentage, probably one in three maybe, so. 1010 00:49:17,400 --> 00:49:21,560 Speaker 1: Thirty three percent we have. That's the highest percent chance 1011 00:49:21,600 --> 00:49:23,279 Speaker 1: that I've been given so far. Believe it or not. 1012 00:49:23,640 --> 00:49:25,759 Speaker 1: It seems like every team is a little skeptical that 1013 00:49:26,040 --> 00:49:28,840 Speaker 1: they think that they're going to land him. You know, 1014 00:49:29,000 --> 00:49:33,080 Speaker 1: Grant gave me twenty percent, and that seemed to be 1015 00:49:33,200 --> 00:49:36,040 Speaker 1: the trend so far too until you gave me thirty 1016 00:49:36,120 --> 00:49:40,280 Speaker 1: three percent. Eric Stevens of Troupula also gave me twenty percent. 1017 00:49:40,800 --> 00:49:44,040 Speaker 1: Thank you so much Tyler Kinsey for coming on Absolute 1018 00:49:44,120 --> 00:49:47,680 Speaker 1: Baseball Guru. If you check out his work at Viva Alberto's, 1019 00:49:47,719 --> 00:49:50,920 Speaker 1: he did an awesome piece in a mock trade discussion 1020 00:49:51,000 --> 00:49:54,320 Speaker 1: with me and puts together these amazing charts that I 1021 00:49:54,400 --> 00:49:58,160 Speaker 1: can't even understand, but you guys probably can and they 1022 00:49:58,200 --> 00:50:01,480 Speaker 1: are really really good project into what you can see 1023 00:50:01,560 --> 00:54:24,799 Speaker 1: for this following years. Definitely check out what he's got 1024 00:54:24,920 --> 00:54:27,200 Speaker 1: going on over there. And now I'll wrap it up 1025 00:54:27,239 --> 00:54:30,080 Speaker 1: for this week's podcast. I hope you guys liked it. 1026 00:54:30,120 --> 00:54:32,440 Speaker 1: I know it was a little different than the usual episode, 1027 00:54:32,520 --> 00:54:35,759 Speaker 1: and I'll probably see you guys when Stanton's Traded. Thanks 1028 00:54:35,800 --> 00:54:36,600 Speaker 1: so much for listening.