WEBVTT - Bloomberg Tech Screentime Special

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:04.210
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios.

0:00:04.690 --> 0:00:06.210
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts. Radio.

0:00:06.650 --> 0:00:07.050
<v Speaker 3>News.

0:00:13.330 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon Valley

0:00:17.420 --> 0:00:19.700
<v Speaker 1>with Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.940
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to a special edition of Bloomberg Tech, live from

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:34.290
<v Speaker 4>Skunk Works, Lockheed Martin's advanced aircraft development facility in Southern California.

0:00:34.350 --> 0:00:37.030
<v Speaker 2>Today, we go all in on defense tech and.

0:00:36.970 --> 0:00:39.430
<v Speaker 4>Discuss with some of the biggest names in this booming industry,

0:00:39.630 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 4>from the conflict in Iran and competition with China to

0:00:42.940 --> 0:00:46.659
<v Speaker 4>working with the U.S. government, AI's role. in the future

0:00:47.140 --> 0:00:49.180
<v Speaker 4>of warfare. We start with one of the most profound

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:53.139
<v Speaker 4>changes for the defense tech industry, how it's doing business

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.970
<v Speaker 4>with the Pentagon. It used to be that defense companies

0:00:56.010 --> 0:01:00.990
<v Speaker 4>competed for contracts based on requirements set by the government. Now,

0:01:01.110 --> 0:01:05.110
<v Speaker 4>Lockheed Martin's CEO, Jim Tyclair, wants to pitch that technology

0:01:05.370 --> 0:01:07.990
<v Speaker 4>before the U.S. government comes asking. I sat down with

0:01:08.030 --> 0:01:09.289
<v Speaker 4>him to discuss.

0:01:08.990 --> 0:01:12.740
<v Speaker 2>That and much more. Typically, the U.S.

0:01:12.780 --> 0:01:15.660
<v Speaker 5>Government would set requirements or the armed services would set

0:01:15.700 --> 0:01:19.030
<v Speaker 5>requirements and say, well, I want a new plane that

0:01:19.050 --> 0:01:21.970
<v Speaker 5>goes this speed at this altitude, can carry this much

0:01:22.010 --> 0:01:26.810
<v Speaker 5>equipment and weapons, whatever. And here's a 500-page set of

0:01:27.190 --> 0:01:28.010
<v Speaker 5>requirements that.

0:01:27.970 --> 0:01:30.789
<v Speaker 1>We've identified that we want you to design to.

0:01:31.470 --> 0:01:34.110
<v Speaker 5>Two or three of us would get, companies would get

0:01:34.450 --> 0:01:35.500
<v Speaker 5>requests for information.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.190
<v Speaker 1>Can you do this? What are these requirements going to

0:01:39.209 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>take to create? What's it going to cost?

0:01:42.709 --> 0:01:45.050
<v Speaker 5>And then there'd be a bunch of input back from industry,

0:01:45.069 --> 0:01:46.780
<v Speaker 5>and then there'd be a request for a proposal. Okay,

0:01:46.810 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 5>who really wants to step up and try to do this?

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Very well-defined, extremely well-defined requirement set. And then there'd be

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 5>two or three bidders. It'd be down selected to one,

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.419
<v Speaker 5>usually the lowest-cost provider who was technically qualified would get

0:02:00.460 --> 0:02:00.940
<v Speaker 5>the job.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.110
<v Speaker 1>And then it would take years to actually create that capability.

0:02:05.970 --> 0:02:07.390
<v Speaker 1>What is different now.

0:02:07.670 --> 0:02:12.660
<v Speaker 5>Is that the current– leadership in the Pentagon has decided

0:02:12.750 --> 0:02:15.570
<v Speaker 5>to take the straitjacket off the companies, which allows us

0:02:15.590 --> 0:02:18.170
<v Speaker 5>to take the straitjackets off of our engineers and scientists,

0:02:18.669 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 5>to allow us to be flexible, to propose solutions, to

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.460
<v Speaker 5>do prototypes, to go out, we go out in the field,

0:02:24.820 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 5>and the field could be the Pacific Ocean, of course,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 5>for us, And we test prototypes on actual ships with

0:02:30.980 --> 0:02:34.109
<v Speaker 5>sailors that are stationed on the ships running the prototype

0:02:34.130 --> 0:02:36.130
<v Speaker 5>to see if it works. And so then we'll come

0:02:36.190 --> 0:02:38.750
<v Speaker 5>back with that or an Army test range like Yuma

0:02:38.810 --> 0:02:42.550
<v Speaker 5>Proving Ground. We actually shot some of our JAGA missiles

0:02:42.730 --> 0:02:46.590
<v Speaker 5>out of our Grizzly launcher and showed the Army and

0:02:46.770 --> 0:02:48.250
<v Speaker 5>had their people operate it.

0:02:48.490 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It worked. So we have this integration capability now.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.169
<v Speaker 5>The straitjacket's off the companies and the industry, and we

0:02:56.230 --> 0:02:58.490
<v Speaker 5>welcome the new entrants. We welcome the startups because we

0:02:58.530 --> 0:03:01.740
<v Speaker 5>want that creativity so we can learn from it. And

0:03:01.780 --> 0:03:03.660
<v Speaker 5>so if we see somebody can do like Fordham, a

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.510
<v Speaker 5>better capability at a certain size and shape and cost

0:03:07.530 --> 0:03:09.950
<v Speaker 5>than we can, we want to bring that in really quickly.

0:03:10.350 --> 0:03:13.730
<v Speaker 1>So we welcome those investors. We welcome that talent.

0:03:14.050 --> 0:03:16.390
<v Speaker 5>We welcome that technology because we want to integrate it

0:03:16.450 --> 0:03:17.450
<v Speaker 5>into our mission sets.

0:03:18.070 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And again, we can be the subcontractor too.

0:03:20.460 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 5>If someone else has got a better mission profile solution

0:03:24.500 --> 0:03:27.420
<v Speaker 5>than we do, we would love to put the F-35

0:03:27.460 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 5>into that profile.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.130
<v Speaker 1>So this can go both ways, actually, Ed.

0:03:31.650 --> 0:03:35.750
<v Speaker 4>Jim, what is Lockheed Martin's AI strategy? How core is

0:03:35.900 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>AI to that technology roadmap?

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 5>It's very fundamental to the company and everything that we're doing.

0:03:44.030 --> 0:03:47.030
<v Speaker 5>Our chief engineer, when I started the company in management

0:03:47.450 --> 0:03:50.430
<v Speaker 5>six years ago, said AI is really critical. And, of course,

0:03:50.450 --> 0:03:53.150
<v Speaker 5>to ask for budget to invest in our own AI

0:03:54.310 --> 0:03:59.610
<v Speaker 5>containerized instance where we would not be going using data

0:03:59.630 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 5>sets off the Internet. We would not be using models

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.740
<v Speaker 5>and then feeding our information back into the system where

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 5>we would have a basically a controlled environment for our

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.780
<v Speaker 5>AI workloads. And one of our partners, again, in the

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.140
<v Speaker 5>technology space has been Jensen Wong. Back in 2000, 2001,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>where hardly anyone maybe had heard of NVIDIA, if you

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 5>weren't a gamer, we were teamed with NVIDIA to get GPUs.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:31.099
<v Speaker 5>And that relationship continues today. So we have our own GPUs.

0:04:31.180 --> 0:04:32.550
<v Speaker 5>We have our own platforms.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:33.550
<v Speaker 1>We host.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.370
<v Speaker 5>AI models on our own platforms and on our own GPUs.

0:04:39.770 --> 0:04:42.210
<v Speaker 5>We use only data that we've generated or we get

0:04:42.230 --> 0:04:45.590
<v Speaker 5>from the U.S. government, and then we can create AI-driven

0:04:45.630 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 5>solutions to those many of those mission sets that we

0:04:48.580 --> 0:04:49.679
<v Speaker 5>just talked about a little bit earlier.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 4>That was my exclusive conversation with Lockheed Martin's CEO, Jim Ticlac.

0:04:53.940 --> 0:04:57.849
<v Speaker 4>You can find the full video online, Bloomberg.com and on YouTube.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.210
<v Speaker 4>For more than 80 years, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works has

0:05:01.250 --> 0:05:04.710
<v Speaker 4>helped define the cutting edge of American air power. We

0:05:04.770 --> 0:05:08.750
<v Speaker 4>are live from that storied operation with actually its former leader,

0:05:08.850 --> 0:05:12.900
<v Speaker 4>OJ Sanchez, who now runs Lockheed Martin's $ 30 billion plus

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 4>aeronautics business. And I think we should start Skunk Works.

0:05:17.460 --> 0:05:21.540
<v Speaker 4>You led this team, this culture, this place for some time,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.380
<v Speaker 4>and you still work so closely with them.

0:05:23.779 --> 0:05:26.300
<v Speaker 2>Where are we? What goes on here?

0:05:26.580 --> 0:05:28.340
<v Speaker 1>Well, first, welcome to Skunk Works.

0:05:28.500 --> 0:05:30.700
<v Speaker 6>So I hope your team is enjoying the mystery and

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 6>the magic that is here. And Skunk Works, as you mentioned,

0:05:33.700 --> 0:05:37.820
<v Speaker 6>for 80 years, has existed for the purpose of delivering

0:05:37.900 --> 0:05:40.770
<v Speaker 6>on urgent national security objectives. And so where we are

0:05:40.850 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 6>is continuing that mission, which matters to all of us.

0:05:43.290 --> 0:05:46.740
<v Speaker 6>And in this moment, Like we've heard, nations need us

0:05:46.779 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 6>to go faster. They need us to be able to

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.650
<v Speaker 6>bring capabilities to the fight and to deterrence with speed

0:05:51.810 --> 0:05:54.849
<v Speaker 6>and with an interoperability purpose that only Skunk Works has

0:05:54.890 --> 0:05:57.110
<v Speaker 6>really delivered on in the past. And so we're excited

0:05:57.150 --> 0:05:58.550
<v Speaker 6>about what Skunk Works contributes.

0:05:58.610 --> 0:06:01.570
<v Speaker 4>There's so much familiarity with F-35, right? From the American public,

0:06:01.610 --> 0:06:07.510
<v Speaker 4>the world, a manned fighter. But Vectis is the autonomous craft,

0:06:07.850 --> 0:06:11.230
<v Speaker 4>the basic idea born out of Skunk Works. How does

0:06:11.270 --> 0:06:15.910
<v Speaker 4>that work? Being, you know, an idea... to capability deployment?

0:06:16.450 --> 0:06:19.930
<v Speaker 6>So core to delivering on those security objectives are knowing

0:06:20.190 --> 0:06:24.310
<v Speaker 6>what our customers need well ahead of time. What we've done, F-35,

0:06:24.350 --> 0:06:26.419
<v Speaker 6>as you know, was actually invented here in Skunkworth. It

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.900
<v Speaker 6>was delivered and now it's being produced in the bigger aeronautics. Vectis,

0:06:29.940 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 6>very similar, comes from a long DNA of drone technology

0:06:33.350 --> 0:06:36.050
<v Speaker 6>development that we did starting in the 60s all the

0:06:36.089 --> 0:06:37.969
<v Speaker 6>way till now and what it's going to do on that.

0:06:37.910 --> 0:06:40.210
<v Speaker 4>Point sorry to interrupt of course in the 60s there

0:06:40.250 --> 0:06:42.130
<v Speaker 4>was work on drones what we.

0:06:42.029 --> 0:06:44.010
<v Speaker 6>Yes it's a great skunk work story if you go

0:06:44.029 --> 0:06:45.850
<v Speaker 6>back and look in the past like many skunk work

0:06:45.870 --> 0:06:49.500
<v Speaker 6>stories the u.s and the soviet union signed a treaty

0:06:49.540 --> 0:06:51.580
<v Speaker 6>that said we won't fly manned flights over one another

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.650
<v Speaker 6>country Immediately the CIA came to Skunk Works and said,

0:06:54.870 --> 0:06:57.450
<v Speaker 6>we need to fly over that country. And out of

0:06:57.490 --> 0:06:59.350
<v Speaker 6>that was born, out of that in the 60s was

0:06:59.390 --> 0:07:02.130
<v Speaker 6>born the D-21, flew 2,000 miles an hour as a

0:07:02.190 --> 0:07:05.900
<v Speaker 6>drone in the 60s, and now that heritage we find

0:07:05.940 --> 0:07:06.980
<v Speaker 6>behind us in.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:07.900
<v Speaker 1>The Lockheed Martin Vectus.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 6>And so Vectus is bringing together both the ability to

0:07:11.380 --> 0:07:15.420
<v Speaker 6>design and develop advanced hardware with advanced capabilities in the

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.900
<v Speaker 6>software and open architecture that's going to come alongside the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 6>F-35 and create the future of air dominance.

0:07:20.940 --> 0:07:24.900
<v Speaker 4>You know, This is being internally funded, Vectis. But is

0:07:24.990 --> 0:07:28.530
<v Speaker 4>Vectis the next big franchise, the next big aeronautic franchise

0:07:28.570 --> 0:07:32.030
<v Speaker 4>for the company, irrespective of whether there's a human... in

0:07:32.050 --> 0:07:32.940
<v Speaker 4>that platform or not.

0:07:33.100 --> 0:07:33.500
<v Speaker 2>There isn't.

0:07:34.060 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.580
<v Speaker 6>So what Vectis represents is us understanding our customers' problems

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.060
<v Speaker 6>and the challenges that we're going to see in our

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.860
<v Speaker 6>dominance and getting ahead of that. We like to say

0:07:42.900 --> 0:07:46.060
<v Speaker 6>here at Skunk Works, only one miracle per program. And

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.340
<v Speaker 6>the reality is that we have to burn down those

0:07:48.420 --> 0:07:50.820
<v Speaker 6>miracles in order to land at a program like Vectis.

0:07:50.860 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 6>So while it appears new to the public, we've been

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.150
<v Speaker 6>working on the pieces of that. So as far as

0:07:55.170 --> 0:07:58.430
<v Speaker 6>the franchise goes... We've invested in the technologies that will

0:07:58.450 --> 0:08:02.370
<v Speaker 6>build this incredible CCA for a long time, and now

0:08:02.430 --> 0:08:05.490
<v Speaker 6>we're getting out ahead of requirements, listening to the global

0:08:05.510 --> 0:08:09.570
<v Speaker 6>demand for these, and we see that capability in this lethal, survivable,

0:08:09.740 --> 0:08:15.060
<v Speaker 6>adaptable airplane that we're building to come alongside the incredible

0:08:15.100 --> 0:08:18.260
<v Speaker 6>work that the fifth-generation platforms, both the F-22 and the F-35,

0:08:18.300 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 6>have proven valuable.

0:08:20.650 --> 0:08:22.950
<v Speaker 2>How much does a program like that cost? What does

0:08:23.010 --> 0:08:24.430
<v Speaker 2>it take in dollar terms?

0:08:24.450 --> 0:08:26.890
<v Speaker 6>Well, I will tell you it takes incredible commitment. And

0:08:26.930 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 6>so at Lockheed Martin, we're committed to invest ahead in

0:08:30.820 --> 0:08:33.180
<v Speaker 6>order to be able to deliver on these solutions. And

0:08:33.220 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 6>so while the exact numbers are less important than the commitment,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.910
<v Speaker 6>every day we are focused on those things that we

0:08:41.950 --> 0:08:45.110
<v Speaker 6>think will matter the most. And listening to the global

0:08:45.190 --> 0:08:48.209
<v Speaker 6>need for this capability is We're investing to make sure

0:08:48.250 --> 0:08:48.630
<v Speaker 6>it's ready.

0:08:49.030 --> 0:08:52.390
<v Speaker 4>The reason I ask you about the next truly major

0:08:52.610 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>aeronautics franchise, if you think about the next generation US

0:08:55.550 --> 0:08:58.380
<v Speaker 4>aircraft programs, several of them have gone to some of

0:08:58.420 --> 0:09:03.100
<v Speaker 4>your rivals. Is Vectis the response to that? Or is

0:09:03.300 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>it in isolation? It is something different to the F-35

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 4>program entirely.

0:09:09.090 --> 0:09:11.590
<v Speaker 6>So what I see for the future of air dominance

0:09:12.070 --> 0:09:15.929
<v Speaker 6>is actually not a singular platform. It's about the family

0:09:16.010 --> 0:09:18.170
<v Speaker 6>of systems and platforms that are going to be able

0:09:18.220 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 6>to connect across domains, from space, through the air, down

0:09:22.179 --> 0:09:25.100
<v Speaker 6>to the sea, to all the shooters. And so Vectis

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 6>is not in response to any particular competition. What it is,

0:09:28.940 --> 0:09:31.830
<v Speaker 6>is it's the realization of what's going to be required

0:09:31.950 --> 0:09:34.370
<v Speaker 6>to deter fight and win in the future. And so

0:09:34.910 --> 0:09:37.650
<v Speaker 6>I believe that what you're seeing behind you is where

0:09:37.740 --> 0:09:40.620
<v Speaker 6>we're going to start adding capability to that family of systems.

0:09:41.059 --> 0:09:44.140
<v Speaker 6>And programs like the F-35, a lot of people don't realize,

0:09:44.220 --> 0:09:47.620
<v Speaker 6>there's 1,350 F-35s out in the world already today.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.300
<v Speaker 1>They're in combat. That fleet is growing at about 160.

0:09:50.300 --> 0:09:50.500
<v Speaker 5>U.S.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:51.140
<v Speaker 2>And allies.

0:09:51.500 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 7>U.S.

0:09:51.850 --> 0:09:52.430
<v Speaker 1>And allies.

0:09:52.870 --> 0:09:55.870
<v Speaker 6>That fleet is growing at about 160 a year. When

0:09:55.929 --> 0:09:59.470
<v Speaker 6>we add the capabilities like Vectis, we've shown that Vectis

0:09:59.530 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 6>can be controlled by a single F-35, as many as eight.

0:10:04.380 --> 0:10:06.660
<v Speaker 6>As many as eight Vectis by a single one. Imagine

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 6>the mass and scale of a program like that. So yes,

0:10:09.540 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 6>we do see this future family of systems underpinned by

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.540
<v Speaker 6>the fifth generation airplanes we have and augmented by capabilities

0:10:16.580 --> 0:10:17.099
<v Speaker 6>like Vectis.

0:10:18.020 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Project Meridian is the big news item for your industry.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 4>In simple terms, Secretary Hegseth is signing a 120-day effort

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 4>to do the same thing you've kind of pitched, get

0:10:29.780 --> 0:10:34.380
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the threat, come with proposals. Elon Musk is involved.

0:10:34.730 --> 0:10:38.630
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Osborne-Malucky is involved. Your response to it, your interpretation

0:10:38.650 --> 0:10:41.770
<v Speaker 4>of it, it seems similar to what you say you're doing.

0:10:42.850 --> 0:10:43.209
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:10:43.429 --> 0:10:46.730
<v Speaker 6>I appreciate the leadership that Secretary Hegseth has at looking

0:10:46.809 --> 0:10:50.490
<v Speaker 6>through Project Meridian at the changing nature of warfare, what

0:10:50.530 --> 0:10:53.450
<v Speaker 6>we should see and learn from conflicts we have and

0:10:53.510 --> 0:10:55.870
<v Speaker 6>how we best prepare for the future. So here at

0:10:55.910 --> 0:10:58.990
<v Speaker 6>Lockheed Martin, we are always in that posture, looking ahead.

0:10:59.070 --> 0:11:01.819
<v Speaker 6>And what Project Meridian will do, we talk about that

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 6>big tent. We, of course, I'm in and out of

0:11:04.260 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 6>the Pentagon every week sometimes. And so we work directly

0:11:07.740 --> 0:11:10.540
<v Speaker 6>with the Department of War as well as the agencies

0:11:10.620 --> 0:11:13.300
<v Speaker 6>to help envision this. Meridian's going to help open up

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 6>that tent to enable others. And here at Skunk Works

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.180
<v Speaker 6>and across all our Lockheed Martin organizations, if we find

0:11:19.260 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 6>something in that, we'll pull that into that bigger tent

0:11:21.620 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 6>and then help deliver capabilities for the future.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>This is a question I got for you from the

0:11:24.660 --> 0:11:27.420
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg tech audience, the big tent. Let's say there's a

0:11:27.470 --> 0:11:31.150
<v Speaker 4>close air support mission. Vectis is involved. Again, there isn't

0:11:31.190 --> 0:11:34.110
<v Speaker 4>a set customer production contract yet. But how does that

0:11:34.190 --> 0:11:36.229
<v Speaker 4>work in real time? For the everyday person, what are

0:11:36.250 --> 0:11:36.989
<v Speaker 4>you talking about there?

0:11:37.210 --> 0:11:38.130
<v Speaker 2>So that's a great question.

0:11:38.309 --> 0:11:41.590
<v Speaker 6>So I used to get to fly these airplanes, so

0:11:41.610 --> 0:11:45.059
<v Speaker 6>I flew the F-22 in the past. And fifth-generation airplanes

0:11:45.179 --> 0:11:48.819
<v Speaker 6>like the F-22 and the F-35 have what's called sensor fusion,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.479
<v Speaker 6>where you can see the entirety of the battle space

0:11:51.580 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 6>right in front of you. And what you're usually limited

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.260
<v Speaker 6>by is the ability to get others to see it

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 6>or to be able to have enough weapons or ability

0:11:59.740 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 6>to get to every place. What Vectis is going to

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.610
<v Speaker 6>do in a situation like that is it's going to

0:12:04.710 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 6>extend that capability, that incredible capability, fusion and decision advantage

0:12:09.500 --> 0:12:13.390
<v Speaker 6>into actionable capabilities, whether that be an air-to-air mission, an

0:12:13.429 --> 0:12:18.070
<v Speaker 6>air-to-ground mission, or a sensing mission, the vectus accoutrement to

0:12:18.110 --> 0:12:21.150
<v Speaker 6>the F-35, F-22, or others is going to make everybody

0:12:21.190 --> 0:12:24.910
<v Speaker 6>better and enable that force of action to happen in

0:12:24.929 --> 0:12:28.020
<v Speaker 6>a much wider area of responsibility, which is going to

0:12:28.050 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 6>be a tremendous help to the warfighter.

0:12:30.340 --> 0:12:34.370
<v Speaker 4>Another curious news story, is NASA bringing back the SR-71?

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:36.940
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to help them with that?

0:12:37.179 --> 0:12:39.740
<v Speaker 6>So the SR-71, for those who don't know, was also

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.020
<v Speaker 6>invented in the Skunk Works.

0:12:41.059 --> 0:12:41.420
<v Speaker 7>It was.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.900
<v Speaker 6>And if you haven't seen it in a while, I'd

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 6>encourage you to go look. Incredible airplane, flew at unbelievable speeds.

0:12:48.260 --> 0:12:52.829
<v Speaker 6>And here at Skunk Works, 97% of the portfolio is classified.

0:12:52.890 --> 0:12:55.830
<v Speaker 6>And so I would love to see the SR-71 fly again.

0:12:55.870 --> 0:12:57.370
<v Speaker 6>We'll just have to wait and see what NASA.

0:12:57.230 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Chooses to do.

0:12:57.610 --> 0:13:00.050
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, Bloomberg Tech did a pretty good job being

0:13:00.070 --> 0:13:02.270
<v Speaker 4>able to get it into the building. But I appreciate

0:13:02.330 --> 0:13:04.230
<v Speaker 4>the classified nature of it. of a lot of what

0:13:04.250 --> 0:13:06.910
<v Speaker 4>goes on here. It's been fascinating to speak with you,

0:13:07.429 --> 0:13:10.770
<v Speaker 4>OJ Sanchez of Lockheed Martin. Thank you very much. And

0:13:10.860 --> 0:13:13.340
<v Speaker 4>thank you to the team for having us here. There's

0:13:13.380 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot more to come. We're going to speak to

0:13:14.700 --> 0:13:18.140
<v Speaker 4>John Gruen, CEO of Fortin. That's a startup Lockheed has

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:19.140
<v Speaker 4>backed twice.

0:13:19.820 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>They also work together. This is the big tent idea.

0:13:22.860 --> 0:13:24.220
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:13:36.470 --> 0:13:39.850
<v Speaker 4>Despite the growth of venture-backed defense tech firms, defense primes

0:13:40.010 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 4>still receive a third of U.S.

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:43.220
<v Speaker 2>Military contracts.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 4>These figures are from 2025, but it's held around that

0:13:47.020 --> 0:13:50.660
<v Speaker 4>rate for about 10 years. The primes, though, aren't ignoring

0:13:50.700 --> 0:13:54.660
<v Speaker 4>what these startups can offer and are increasingly partnering with them,

0:13:55.070 --> 0:13:57.670
<v Speaker 4>like when Lockheed needed a new radar system for a

0:13:57.730 --> 0:13:59.310
<v Speaker 4>new containerized launcher.

0:14:00.790 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 5>We also said, well, we need a mobile, relatively inexpensive

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.380
<v Speaker 5>radar to go along with this amazing system. And one

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 5>of our venture investments called Fordham builds those kinds of radars.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.729
<v Speaker 5>And we put another $ 25 million into the company and said,

0:14:15.130 --> 0:14:18.490
<v Speaker 5>here's the mission. We need a radar with this weight,

0:14:18.530 --> 0:14:19.430
<v Speaker 5>this form factor.

0:14:19.770 --> 0:14:21.350
<v Speaker 1>This mobility, this battery life.

0:14:21.510 --> 0:14:25.239
<v Speaker 5>So again, if you think differently, like a technology company

0:14:25.250 --> 0:14:29.100
<v Speaker 5>would think, and constantly improve what you have, add the

0:14:29.140 --> 0:14:33.100
<v Speaker 5>new hardware when it's ready, you can continuously improve the

0:14:33.140 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 5>mission capability.

0:14:34.740 --> 0:14:37.260
<v Speaker 4>Fordham CEO John Gruen joins us now. And actually, the

0:14:37.300 --> 0:14:40.780
<v Speaker 4>breaking news of the last 24 hours is $ 50 million

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:46.250
<v Speaker 4>Series B. Lockheed participated in that. That's a sizable round.

0:14:46.530 --> 0:14:48.850
<v Speaker 4>What do you need that capital for?

0:14:49.610 --> 0:14:51.050
<v Speaker 2>And congratulations. Thank you very much.

0:14:51.070 --> 0:14:55.340
<v Speaker 8>Really appreciate it. And we absolutely need it to continue

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.980
<v Speaker 8>to scale. So we are doubling manufacturing this year. We

0:15:00.020 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 8>are doubling our bookings. We're adding 250% of floor space.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.700
<v Speaker 8>And all of that requires capital to do.

0:15:09.900 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so let's go to the case study that Lockheed's CEO,

0:15:12.820 --> 0:15:16.170
<v Speaker 4>Jim Teichert, just outlined to me, right? They approach you.

0:15:16.590 --> 0:15:20.610
<v Speaker 4>They like your technology. How does that then work? The mission,

0:15:20.870 --> 0:15:21.210
<v Speaker 4>the plan.

0:15:22.070 --> 0:15:24.470
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's been a great partnership with Lockheed Martin. It

0:15:24.510 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 8>started on the venture side. So we were earlier in

0:15:28.220 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 8>our stage and engaged with the venture team. They really

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 8>validated our core technologies and then enabled, once they had

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 8>done that and put a little venture money into us,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.660
<v Speaker 8>then we had exposure to the rest of the corporation

0:15:43.060 --> 0:15:45.630
<v Speaker 8>and were able to go find the right projects. projects

0:15:46.030 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 8>for our technology to be applicable to. And so over time,

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 8>that has grown and we've done a number of projects

0:15:53.620 --> 0:15:56.740
<v Speaker 8>and products that have real traction in the market. So

0:15:56.820 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 8>this current investment is really a reflection of that, of

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 8>the market traction of the capabilities of our integrated products.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.250
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're here in Skunk Works in the United States, California.

0:16:09.270 --> 0:16:10.050
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that.

0:16:10.550 --> 0:16:13.970
<v Speaker 4>What's happening in Europe and Ukraine in the war in

0:16:14.010 --> 0:16:17.970
<v Speaker 4>Iran is you know, drones.

0:16:17.610 --> 0:16:21.070
<v Speaker 2>In warfare, that's the learning, I think.

0:16:21.230 --> 0:16:24.630
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's what I'm hearing from this Pentagon and

0:16:24.750 --> 0:16:26.450
<v Speaker 4>from Jim himself.

0:16:27.090 --> 0:16:30.500
<v Speaker 2>Where does Fortin fit in in that? Yeah, we're instrumental

0:16:30.510 --> 0:16:30.750
<v Speaker 2>in that.

0:16:31.300 --> 0:16:34.380
<v Speaker 8>So we've been in all of those war zones for

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:35.420
<v Speaker 8>four to five years.

0:16:36.180 --> 0:16:37.860
<v Speaker 1>We have learned all those hard lessons.

0:16:38.500 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 8>And so we are very out in front and rapidly

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:45.100
<v Speaker 8>developing the technologies and the products that are going to

0:16:45.140 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 8>be the forefront of warfare in the future.

0:16:48.020 --> 0:16:50.900
<v Speaker 4>Right, because that data that I shared, right, Bloomberg's Zoe

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.860
<v Speaker 4>Thomas put that together, that's like the drone spending. Is

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.940
<v Speaker 4>that different from counter drone spending? Like there's a distinction

0:16:56.980 --> 0:16:58.500
<v Speaker 4>in those roadmaps, right?

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.380
<v Speaker 8>Yes, today drone and counter drone are different budget line

0:17:02.420 --> 0:17:06.830
<v Speaker 8>items typically and bought by different, customer sets. And so

0:17:07.470 --> 0:17:11.790
<v Speaker 8>it is a dynamic of the market and having to,

0:17:11.910 --> 0:17:14.369
<v Speaker 8>but it is a cat and mouse game in some sense.

0:17:14.550 --> 0:17:19.610
<v Speaker 8>So rapid development on the drone, threat, offensive side, you

0:17:19.650 --> 0:17:21.909
<v Speaker 8>have to be out in front on the defensive side.

0:17:22.530 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 8>And defensive typically means layers to be effective.

0:17:26.140 --> 0:17:27.780
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a one for one.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.899
<v Speaker 8>It's more, I need a layered solution of sensors and

0:17:31.940 --> 0:17:34.859
<v Speaker 8>effectors to to really be ready for any of those

0:17:35.100 --> 0:17:35.940
<v Speaker 8>dynamic threats.

0:17:36.140 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>You're an American company.

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.659
<v Speaker 4>How are you able to do business with our Western allies,

0:17:40.700 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 4>with our NATO allies?

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:43.100
<v Speaker 1>Partnerships.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 8>So whether it's Lockheed Martin internationally.

0:17:45.740 --> 0:17:47.300
<v Speaker 2>That's the sales channel, basically.

0:17:47.380 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Or some other partnerships.

0:17:49.330 --> 0:17:53.170
<v Speaker 8>Basically, any customer today, if you have a best of

0:17:53.530 --> 0:17:56.630
<v Speaker 8>breed product, if you have the right product, they will

0:17:56.710 --> 0:18:00.050
<v Speaker 8>buy it from you. And so we are definitely looking

0:18:00.330 --> 0:18:02.929
<v Speaker 8>to make sure that we have enduring partnerships around the

0:18:02.970 --> 0:18:05.980
<v Speaker 8>world that allow us to continue what we've built there.

0:18:06.380 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 8>But it really ends up being you've got to be

0:18:09.619 --> 0:18:10.020
<v Speaker 8>the best.

0:18:10.500 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 4>What happens next for you, John? What's your priority for

0:18:13.220 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 4>growing this company?

0:18:14.820 --> 0:18:17.220
<v Speaker 8>I think exactly that, staying out ahead. So staying out

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.139
<v Speaker 8>ahead of the demand on the products. We have to

0:18:21.180 --> 0:18:24.429
<v Speaker 8>deliver scale that we've never done before. But then at

0:18:24.450 --> 0:18:28.370
<v Speaker 8>the same time, staying ahead of that offensive threat curve,

0:18:28.730 --> 0:18:31.889
<v Speaker 8>we've got to make sure we're taking the data, applying

0:18:31.930 --> 0:18:34.899
<v Speaker 8>it into our new products, and then having the partnerships

0:18:34.940 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 8>to deploy it out there at scale.

0:18:36.810 --> 0:18:40.770
<v Speaker 4>John Gruen, CEO of Fordham, just closed $ 50 million Series B.

0:18:41.050 --> 0:18:44.570
<v Speaker 4>Lockheed participate, but they also now extend that to technology,

0:18:44.950 --> 0:18:45.910
<v Speaker 4>working together on the mission.

0:18:45.930 --> 0:18:46.930
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much indeed.

0:18:47.580 --> 0:18:51.659
<v Speaker 4>Coming up here at the Skunk Works, Lockheed Martin, California,

0:18:51.740 --> 0:18:55.020
<v Speaker 4>tech billionaires Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey may get a

0:18:55.100 --> 0:18:56.420
<v Speaker 4>say in the future of warfare.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.380
<v Speaker 2>We're going to explain that one next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:19:06.580 --> 0:19:08.270
<v Speaker 9>Thank you.

0:19:17.930 --> 0:19:20.669
<v Speaker 4>The Defense Department has tasked two of its biggest contractors

0:19:20.750 --> 0:19:23.830
<v Speaker 4>to lead an effort to study the future of warfare

0:19:24.030 --> 0:19:27.750
<v Speaker 4>and design weapons that American service members will need in

0:19:27.790 --> 0:19:28.270
<v Speaker 4>the years ahead.

0:19:28.290 --> 0:19:30.830
<v Speaker 2>The initiative is called Project Meridian, and.

0:19:30.810 --> 0:19:34.389
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be co-led by lucky Elon Musk and

0:19:34.410 --> 0:19:38.290
<v Speaker 4>former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Bloomberg's Wendy Benjaminson is with me.

0:19:38.850 --> 0:19:41.970
<v Speaker 4>It was so interesting when this announcement was made. Can

0:19:41.990 --> 0:19:44.180
<v Speaker 4>you just explain the basic concept, Wendy?

0:19:45.609 --> 0:19:49.050
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I'll do my best. I mean, Defense Secretary Pete

0:19:49.130 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 7>Hegseth announced this as one of six initiatives he announced

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.780
<v Speaker 7>in his State of the Force speech that he gave

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.820
<v Speaker 7>on Wednesday to an audience of handpicked troops and then

0:20:00.859 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 7>was broadcast on the Pentagon's website. But it was... What

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 7>this is, supposedly, is a group of people led by

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:16.940
<v Speaker 7>those three that you mentioned that will study over 120

0:20:16.940 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 7>days only, that's all they have for this, will study

0:20:21.730 --> 0:20:25.369
<v Speaker 7>what warfare will look like in the future, what tools

0:20:25.430 --> 0:20:28.650
<v Speaker 7>they need, what weapons they need, what vehicles they need.

0:20:29.530 --> 0:20:32.810
<v Speaker 7>What makes this particularly interesting is that Elon Musk and

0:20:32.830 --> 0:20:36.070
<v Speaker 7>Palmer Luckey are two of the biggest defense contractors in

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.290
<v Speaker 7>They make a tremendous amount of money from the U.S.

0:20:40.310 --> 0:20:43.970
<v Speaker 7>taxpayer via the Pentagon, and now they are in charge

0:20:44.390 --> 0:20:48.689
<v Speaker 7>of deciding what tools the military will have. And I

0:20:49.310 --> 0:20:53.020
<v Speaker 7>can't imagine a world in which they don't profit from this.

0:20:56.590 --> 0:20:59.630
<v Speaker 4>Wendy, you and I have discussed, you know, the president's

0:20:59.690 --> 0:21:04.740
<v Speaker 4>proximity to CEOs, private industry. You noted that the 128

0:21:04.740 --> 0:21:07.470
<v Speaker 4>20 day limit. I mean, what kind of access and

0:21:07.530 --> 0:21:10.629
<v Speaker 4>authority are Musk and Lucky going to actually have?

0:21:11.790 --> 0:21:16.730
<v Speaker 7>Well, they tweeted out photos today of the of those

0:21:16.810 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 7>three with Hegseth and the entire board meeting in the Pentagon.

0:21:20.619 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 7>These are not open to the public. I don't know

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.150
<v Speaker 7>that we'll be able to get transcripts. We don't know

0:21:27.250 --> 0:21:28.109
<v Speaker 7>what they're going to.

0:21:28.090 --> 0:21:28.670
<v Speaker 10>Come up with.

0:21:28.810 --> 0:21:33.330
<v Speaker 7>They are clearly there working with civilian military officials. We

0:21:33.350 --> 0:21:35.689
<v Speaker 7>didn't see any, I don't think, military officials in the

0:21:35.710 --> 0:21:39.290
<v Speaker 7>room where there were some members of Congress. But the

0:21:39.290 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 7>120 days is a limit because That's when the special

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.230
<v Speaker 7>government employee status ends and they would actually have to

0:21:46.270 --> 0:21:49.449
<v Speaker 7>pay these guys, you know, a salary to be in it.

0:21:49.510 --> 0:21:52.389
<v Speaker 7>So they have just, you know, a few months to

0:21:52.930 --> 0:21:55.260
<v Speaker 7>come up with these new tools.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.300
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Wendy Benjaminson out of Washington, D.C. Thank you very much. Okay,

0:22:02.340 --> 0:22:06.649
<v Speaker 4>Skunk Works. Coming up, we're going to discuss Lockheed's technology strategy,

0:22:06.990 --> 0:22:09.990
<v Speaker 4>also some of the investments that Lockheed has been making,

0:22:10.330 --> 0:22:11.909
<v Speaker 4>a conversation also about AI.

0:22:11.950 --> 0:22:12.190
<v Speaker 2>Dr.

0:22:12.210 --> 0:22:16.570
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Heiser, Senior Vice President of Technology and Strategic Innovation,

0:22:16.850 --> 0:22:18.330
<v Speaker 4>is the conversation we're having next.

0:22:18.410 --> 0:22:20.929
<v Speaker 2>It's so interesting. Lockheed's been talking to.

0:22:20.910 --> 0:22:23.830
<v Speaker 4>Jensen Wong at NVIDIA and using GPUs a long time.

0:22:24.170 --> 0:22:27.149
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk a little bit about that, too. This is

0:22:27.190 --> 0:22:28.190
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:29.190 --> 0:22:30.869
<v Speaker 9>We need to match.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.660
<v Speaker 5>The cost of the solution to the cost of the threat.

0:22:53.180 --> 0:22:56.500
<v Speaker 5>And it's well known, of course, that there were $ 4

0:22:56.460 --> 0:23:01.090
<v Speaker 5>million Patriot missiles used to shoot down maybe a $ 50, 000 drone.

0:23:01.940 --> 0:23:04.390
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's a bad exchange ratio.

0:23:04.490 --> 0:23:07.930
<v Speaker 5>But the other exchange ratio we have to consider here

0:23:08.510 --> 0:23:14.139
<v Speaker 5>is with what we have today in the stockpiles, What

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:19.609
<v Speaker 5>is the tradeoff between letting that Shahed drone hit a

0:23:19.650 --> 0:23:25.409
<v Speaker 5>marine barracks in Qatar or to hit a factory or

0:23:25.450 --> 0:23:30.109
<v Speaker 5>an oil processing station in Saudi Arabia? So the tradeoff

0:23:30.350 --> 0:23:33.210
<v Speaker 5>is not just the cost of the items. It's the

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 5>cost of the damage done.

0:23:37.740 --> 0:23:40.300
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to a special edition of Bloomberg Tech. That

0:23:40.340 --> 0:23:43.459
<v Speaker 4>was Lockheed CEO Jim Ticlett discussing one of the lessons

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 4>learned from the U.S.

0:23:44.700 --> 0:23:45.460
<v Speaker 2>War with Iran.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:51.490
<v Speaker 4>And he acknowledged that the industry is seeking cheaper, autonomous solutions.

0:23:51.570 --> 0:23:55.450
<v Speaker 4>That is not historically an area Lockheed has dominated, according

0:23:55.490 --> 0:23:57.650
<v Speaker 4>to data compiled by Bloomberg.

0:23:58.270 --> 0:24:00.050
<v Speaker 2>These are where.

0:23:59.910 --> 0:24:02.740
<v Speaker 4>The contracts are going, specifically in the drone segment in

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.619
<v Speaker 4>the last two years. But Lockheed is pushing hard on innovation,

0:24:07.060 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 4>cost efficiency in terms of military options. This is about

0:24:10.580 --> 0:24:14.010
<v Speaker 4>the nexus of AI, autonomy, aerospace. The person reshaping that

0:24:14.050 --> 0:24:17.649
<v Speaker 4>roadmap is Dr. Sarah Heiser, Lockheed Senior Vice President of

0:24:17.670 --> 0:24:22.350
<v Speaker 4>Technology and Strategic Innovation. Thank you, Dr. Heiser, for being

0:24:22.390 --> 0:24:24.929
<v Speaker 4>with us and for having us here at Skunk Works.

0:24:25.130 --> 0:24:27.580
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely. Welcome, Ed. And it's an honor to be here.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.340
<v Speaker 10>There's no better place to talk about innovation and technology

0:24:30.460 --> 0:24:33.020
<v Speaker 10>than Skunk Works based on our legacy. And it's A

0:24:33.060 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 10>representation of the center of excellence and center of innovations

0:24:36.580 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 10>that we have across Lockheed.

0:24:37.700 --> 0:24:38.900
<v Speaker 2>And that's the work you're doing now.

0:24:39.109 --> 0:24:39.609
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely.

0:24:40.390 --> 0:24:42.810
<v Speaker 2>I want to get straight to the idea of AI, right?

0:24:42.950 --> 0:24:46.740
<v Speaker 4>What AI actually looks like within Lockheed and in terms

0:24:46.780 --> 0:24:49.180
<v Speaker 4>of the programs for next generation platforms as well.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely.

0:24:50.420 --> 0:24:54.060
<v Speaker 10>So we have chosen to be agnostic when it comes

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.010
<v Speaker 10>to Frontier Labs. That's an intentional part of our strategy.

0:24:57.380 --> 0:24:58.970
<v Speaker 10>We see it a little bit like a horse race.

0:24:59.050 --> 0:25:02.070
<v Speaker 10>So we're unclear which model will play out in the

0:25:02.109 --> 0:25:04.410
<v Speaker 10>long term. And there are pros and cons to each.

0:25:04.510 --> 0:25:08.310
<v Speaker 10>Fun fact, we have 55 different large language models that

0:25:08.330 --> 0:25:12.340
<v Speaker 10>we're using to run Lockheed Martin. And to your point,

0:25:12.820 --> 0:25:15.859
<v Speaker 10>we use it for both internal business operations to achieve

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 10>efficiencies and and so forth, whether that's human resources, financial analysis.

0:25:22.710 --> 0:25:25.379
<v Speaker 10>but we also apply it for mission application. So we

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 10>have a bunch of fielded systems today, aircraft, missile systems,

0:25:28.859 --> 0:25:32.700
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. By using AI, we can extend them, make

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.340
<v Speaker 10>them more reliable, and expand their efficacy.

0:25:36.100 --> 0:25:38.700
<v Speaker 4>You know, in the news cycle, the concern that's been

0:25:38.770 --> 0:25:42.850
<v Speaker 4>raised is about an agent misbehaving, and that's been largely

0:25:42.950 --> 0:25:47.250
<v Speaker 4>flagged in the cybersecurity context. But again, the American public

0:25:47.290 --> 0:25:49.710
<v Speaker 4>and the world, their fear would be, what if an

0:25:49.750 --> 0:25:53.649
<v Speaker 4>AI agent does something that does relate to weapon systems.

0:25:54.090 --> 0:25:55.790
<v Speaker 4>How do you keep that under control?

0:25:56.869 --> 0:25:59.090
<v Speaker 9>Well, we do take it seriously, first of all.

0:25:59.630 --> 0:26:02.370
<v Speaker 10>We've actually been working with AI and machine learning for

0:26:02.450 --> 0:26:05.340
<v Speaker 10>two decades. And that may raise a question of like, well,

0:26:05.430 --> 0:26:10.260
<v Speaker 10>why isn't it more ubiquitous? The logjam was around compute capability.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:11.580
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that amazing? It is.

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:13.820
<v Speaker 10>And so we've overcome that in the last three to

0:26:13.859 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 10>five years with GPUs, TPUs coming online. But to your point,

0:26:17.660 --> 0:26:20.410
<v Speaker 10>because we've been working with it for so long, we

0:26:20.490 --> 0:26:24.070
<v Speaker 10>understand harnessing. But really critical to the way we go

0:26:24.109 --> 0:26:26.430
<v Speaker 10>about AI is the same way we go about, say,

0:26:26.450 --> 0:26:28.859
<v Speaker 10>a missile system or an aircraft. We put it through

0:26:28.950 --> 0:26:32.219
<v Speaker 10>rigorous testing, including corners of the box, so that we

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:37.220
<v Speaker 10>understand its capability and to ensure the harnessing is sufficient.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 9>So in the same way we would go through.

0:26:40.290 --> 0:26:42.989
<v Speaker 10>many hours of flight testing for an aircraft, we do

0:26:43.050 --> 0:26:45.869
<v Speaker 10>the same thing with AI before we deploy it and

0:26:45.910 --> 0:26:46.669
<v Speaker 10>then apply it.

0:26:47.510 --> 0:26:50.770
<v Speaker 4>How is AI changing the future of warfare? Where do

0:26:50.810 --> 0:26:52.290
<v Speaker 4>you think this will manifest most?

0:26:53.369 --> 0:26:54.550
<v Speaker 9>I think certainly in autonomy.

0:26:54.570 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 10>We're going to see a lot of advancement, specifically initially

0:26:58.740 --> 0:27:01.300
<v Speaker 10>with crewed, uncrewed teaming, and that gives us a lot

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 10>of advantage there.

0:27:02.020 --> 0:27:03.780
<v Speaker 2>And this is kind of what we're talking about with Vectis, right?

0:27:03.820 --> 0:27:04.139
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.219
<v Speaker 4>The idea that Vectis is part of a mission that

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 4>could have different types of aircraft.

0:27:09.260 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:27:09.660 --> 0:27:13.350
<v Speaker 10>So you could have a piloted F-35 and it is

0:27:13.380 --> 0:27:17.310
<v Speaker 10>working in collaboration with the Vectus in that case. And

0:27:17.330 --> 0:27:20.330
<v Speaker 10>in another way, it is around interoperability. So right now

0:27:20.390 --> 0:27:23.609
<v Speaker 10>we have a lot of individual systems, whether that's Lockheed

0:27:23.650 --> 0:27:28.010
<v Speaker 10>Martin or our competitive mates within the defense industrial base,

0:27:28.590 --> 0:27:30.650
<v Speaker 10>and they all don't really talk to each other. So

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.140
<v Speaker 10>having the right data layer to have interoperability between all

0:27:34.180 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 10>of those systems will be enabled by AI.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.020
<v Speaker 9>Take me back.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Deep into Skunk Works. Behind the wall behind you is

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:45.430
<v Speaker 4>somewhere I can't go. It's all classified. But your teams,

0:27:45.830 --> 0:27:49.389
<v Speaker 4>the AI work that's actually happening here, what kind of

0:27:49.450 --> 0:27:51.649
<v Speaker 4>people are those? Where have they come from? Are they

0:27:51.710 --> 0:27:54.030
<v Speaker 4>from the world of research? Are they from the world

0:27:54.070 --> 0:27:57.449
<v Speaker 4>of defense? How have you built up the competence?

0:27:57.990 --> 0:27:59.730
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so I mentioned we've worked on this for a

0:27:59.790 --> 0:28:03.719
<v Speaker 10>couple decades, but you have everything from, say, software engineers

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.889
<v Speaker 10>to mechanical engineers to And they gain an expertise and

0:28:06.910 --> 0:28:11.220
<v Speaker 10>we expose them through testing and training. And so, you know,

0:28:11.300 --> 0:28:13.740
<v Speaker 10>I would say certainly almost all of them have technical

0:28:13.900 --> 0:28:15.700
<v Speaker 10>and science or engineering backgrounds.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.570
<v Speaker 9>But you don't necessarily have to be.

0:28:17.530 --> 0:28:21.270
<v Speaker 10>A software expert to have found yourself in the middle

0:28:21.290 --> 0:28:24.550
<v Speaker 10>of AI and applying it in, say, an autonomous systems.

0:28:25.450 --> 0:28:27.500
<v Speaker 2>Sarah, we've talked about how.

0:28:28.330 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>These sort of storied and fabled aircraft were born out

0:28:32.020 --> 0:28:33.820
<v Speaker 4>of Skunk Works since 1943.

0:28:33.820 --> 0:28:34.300
<v Speaker 2>Why is.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Skunk Works the best place for these leading talents in

0:28:39.740 --> 0:28:42.850
<v Speaker 4>AI to be working? Why not a different part of

0:28:42.890 --> 0:28:46.310
<v Speaker 4>Lockheed or like you do with Fortum, for example, just

0:28:46.370 --> 0:28:50.150
<v Speaker 4>work with an outside partner to do more of the

0:28:50.210 --> 0:28:50.690
<v Speaker 4>work there?

0:28:51.420 --> 0:28:53.390
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that a lot of the folks who

0:28:53.410 --> 0:28:55.610
<v Speaker 10>work at Lockheed Martin and here at Skunk Works, we

0:28:55.650 --> 0:29:00.540
<v Speaker 10>like to see our innovative results integrated but ultimately scaled

0:29:00.620 --> 0:29:02.700
<v Speaker 10>and scaled at relevance so that we make an impact

0:29:02.740 --> 0:29:05.250
<v Speaker 10>to the nation and in some cases to the world.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.530
<v Speaker 10>And so when you work here, you're able to work

0:29:07.570 --> 0:29:10.310
<v Speaker 10>on those kind of things that scale of relevance. And

0:29:10.330 --> 0:29:13.090
<v Speaker 10>you mentioned like Fordham. We work with all kinds of

0:29:13.130 --> 0:29:15.970
<v Speaker 10>different companies. I think that's another really cool part of

0:29:16.010 --> 0:29:19.030
<v Speaker 10>working at Lockheed Martin is that we work beyond the

0:29:19.070 --> 0:29:21.690
<v Speaker 10>walls of Skunk Works and beyond the walls of Lockheed Martin.

0:29:21.710 --> 0:29:23.770
<v Speaker 10>So we work with venture companies. We work with large

0:29:23.830 --> 0:29:26.190
<v Speaker 10>commercial tech companies. And so it gives us lots of

0:29:26.260 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 10>opportunities to see different technologies as well as different types

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:31.420
<v Speaker 10>of businesses.

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.890
<v Speaker 4>There are other nascent technologies. Nascent, maybe you challenge me

0:29:35.930 --> 0:29:37.830
<v Speaker 4>on that, but let's take quantum, for example.

0:29:38.390 --> 0:29:38.890
<v Speaker 2>You know, in the world.

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.810
<v Speaker 4>everyone sort of says, when is this moving beyond the

0:29:42.850 --> 0:29:44.190
<v Speaker 4>lab and research?

0:29:44.930 --> 0:29:47.370
<v Speaker 2>Think about what's at stake. with Lockheed.

0:29:47.470 --> 0:29:51.070
<v Speaker 4>Is quantum actually a useful technology to you to get

0:29:51.110 --> 0:29:51.990
<v Speaker 4>platforms deployed?

0:29:52.450 --> 0:29:57.390
<v Speaker 10>This past week, actually, we announced the Quantum Innovation Center.

0:29:57.890 --> 0:30:00.850
<v Speaker 10>And that is because we think we're on the cusp

0:30:01.050 --> 0:30:04.730
<v Speaker 10>of a next breakthrough around quantum. We're now seeing it

0:30:04.810 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 10>moving outside of the lab. And so for us, yes,

0:30:07.930 --> 0:30:10.300
<v Speaker 10>we are interested in quantum compute, and we'll leverage that

0:30:10.340 --> 0:30:12.420
<v Speaker 10>in the same way, like, say, we do with GPUs

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 10>and TPUs.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:14.740
<v Speaker 9>But specifically for.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.780
<v Speaker 10>National security, we're looking to use quantum for sensing, remote sensing,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.500
<v Speaker 10>secure comms, and position navigation and timing. And those are

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.780
<v Speaker 10>all really kind of niche to national security. But what's

0:30:25.820 --> 0:30:29.450
<v Speaker 10>exciting is, to answer your question around the lab, next

0:30:29.490 --> 0:30:32.190
<v Speaker 10>year we plan to do demos, including some from space,

0:30:32.370 --> 0:30:33.510
<v Speaker 10>using quantum technologies.

0:30:33.890 --> 0:30:38.209
<v Speaker 4>Where is, which piece of emerging technology, where is Skunkworks

0:30:39.090 --> 0:30:42.410
<v Speaker 4>just ahead? The world underappreciates, but you're already on it.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 9>I certainly think an autonomy is one of those. Autonomy

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:47.420
<v Speaker 9>is not new to us.

0:30:47.900 --> 0:30:50.590
<v Speaker 10>And then the application of AI, both of those we've

0:30:50.610 --> 0:30:53.030
<v Speaker 10>been working on a long time. And because of that,

0:30:53.070 --> 0:30:56.350
<v Speaker 10>we have the foundation and the expertise, and we understand

0:30:56.370 --> 0:30:59.970
<v Speaker 10>the mission so that we can deliver a holistic solution.

0:31:00.230 --> 0:31:03.910
<v Speaker 2>Does the customer believe in that technology and in that expertise?

0:31:03.930 --> 0:31:05.410
<v Speaker 9>I think they do, and they rely on it every day.

0:31:05.930 --> 0:31:08.910
<v Speaker 4>You spend a lot of time, I guess, explaining to

0:31:08.950 --> 0:31:11.020
<v Speaker 4>them the benefit of AI.

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:11.210
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:11.830 --> 0:31:13.530
<v Speaker 9>I don't think we have to explain the benefit.

0:31:13.650 --> 0:31:15.989
<v Speaker 10>I think they know the benefit of AI, and they

0:31:16.030 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 10>have seen it employed in systems like Aegis, where we

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.300
<v Speaker 10>have demonstrated that. And actually, I'll share right now that

0:31:22.340 --> 0:31:26.220
<v Speaker 10>we're working a project. As we advance the F-35, we're

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.090
<v Speaker 10>bringing on even more advanced sensor capability. And we've discovered

0:31:30.130 --> 0:31:32.670
<v Speaker 10>some math and physics challenges, and we've actually reached out

0:31:32.690 --> 0:31:35.870
<v Speaker 10>to OpenAI. We all saw the headline that they were

0:31:35.910 --> 0:31:40.410
<v Speaker 10>able to overcome the math problem that researchers had.

0:31:40.340 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 9>Worked on for years. And we have some.

0:31:42.780 --> 0:31:45.220
<v Speaker 10>Math and physics challenges as we employ this next generation.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 10>sensor capability on the F-35, and OpenAI is working next

0:31:48.380 --> 0:31:50.980
<v Speaker 10>to us to uncover some of those math and physics challenges.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 4>And is that just that they're teams, or it's their

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.930
<v Speaker 4>specific underlying model is the best solution there?

0:31:56.950 --> 0:32:00.330
<v Speaker 10>Their team is working right beside us. We are absolutely

0:32:00.350 --> 0:32:01.230
<v Speaker 10>working right beside each other.

0:32:01.250 --> 0:32:02.830
<v Speaker 2>Like embed with Skunk Works?

0:32:02.890 --> 0:32:05.990
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, OpenAI is working with F-35 team on this math

0:32:06.010 --> 0:32:09.469
<v Speaker 10>and physics challenge to see if we can uncover, overcome

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 10>that challenge that we've encountered as we advance our sensors.

0:32:12.260 --> 0:32:12.540
<v Speaker 2>Dr.

0:32:12.580 --> 0:32:16.780
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Heiser, Senior Vice President of Technology and Strategic Innovation

0:32:16.820 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 4>here at Lockheed Martin. And again, we are live inside

0:32:19.620 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Skunk Works. Thank you very much indeed. We are live

0:32:24.090 --> 0:32:31.050
<v Speaker 4>in Skunk Works, the storied lab origin of so many

0:32:31.430 --> 0:32:33.750
<v Speaker 4>fabled aircraft. But there's a lot more to come up

0:32:33.790 --> 0:32:36.180
<v Speaker 4>in this show. The next conversation is with Divergent CEO,

0:32:36.570 --> 0:32:38.210
<v Speaker 4>Luca Singer, and he joins us next.

0:32:38.690 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:33:01.780 --> 0:33:05.580
<v Speaker 4>The Pentagon wants weapons built faster, cheaper, and at far

0:33:05.620 --> 0:33:09.860
<v Speaker 4>greater scale. Divergence bedding, advanced manufacturing can help. And it's

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.980
<v Speaker 4>already working on it with Lockheed Martin, Skunk Works. New

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 4>ways to design and build aircrafts is the case study.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:20.180
<v Speaker 4>Divergent's CEO, Lucas Singer, is with us. This has been

0:33:20.220 --> 0:33:25.110
<v Speaker 4>a story for some time. Re-industrializing the defense industrial base,

0:33:25.140 --> 0:33:27.870
<v Speaker 4>bringing more things back to America, including the supply chain.

0:33:28.570 --> 0:33:32.130
<v Speaker 4>But you are doing the building bit, advanced manufacturing. Just

0:33:32.190 --> 0:33:33.930
<v Speaker 4>explain in practice how that works.

0:33:34.930 --> 0:33:40.660
<v Speaker 11>At Divergent, we're building the infrastructure layer. So we're thinking... Primes,

0:33:40.980 --> 0:33:44.209
<v Speaker 11>product companies, below that, there's a layer that has to

0:33:44.250 --> 0:33:49.010
<v Speaker 11>have the actual capability and capacity to manufacture. So full stop,

0:33:49.050 --> 0:33:52.850
<v Speaker 11>what we're building is that layer, that manufacturing layer. You

0:33:52.870 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 11>talk about reshoring, you talk about manufacturing capacity. We care

0:33:56.980 --> 0:33:59.510
<v Speaker 11>deeply about that. We agree we need more of it.

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:04.060
<v Speaker 11>But not only more, but also new capabilities. So at Divergent,

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.540
<v Speaker 11>what we're doing is building that next generation industrial base,

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.970
<v Speaker 11>not only capacity, but also capability and advanced capability.

0:34:12.219 --> 0:34:13.250
<v Speaker 2>This is tricky, right?

0:34:13.270 --> 0:34:15.290
<v Speaker 4>You know, we keep saying a lot of what's around

0:34:15.330 --> 0:34:17.989
<v Speaker 4>us here is classified, but you also don't just work

0:34:18.010 --> 0:34:21.710
<v Speaker 4>with Lockheed. You work with many of their peers and competitors.

0:34:22.010 --> 0:34:22.930
<v Speaker 2>How do you manage that?

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.180
<v Speaker 11>We see ourselves as a force multiplier. We never compete

0:34:27.219 --> 0:34:28.930
<v Speaker 11>as a prime. So in that sense.

0:34:28.989 --> 0:34:29.180
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:34:29.219 --> 0:34:31.209
<v Speaker 2>You just manufacture. We manufacture.

0:34:31.410 --> 0:34:34.270
<v Speaker 11>And we partner with these businesses, though, because we end

0:34:34.410 --> 0:34:36.930
<v Speaker 11>up being their manufacturing partner, right?

0:34:36.969 --> 0:34:37.590
<v Speaker 2>A supplier.

0:34:37.670 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 11>But yes, we are doing a critical part. or an assembly,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.739
<v Speaker 11>say an airframe, in the case of Lockheed Martin. Now,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.580
<v Speaker 11>we want to see all of these programs succeed because

0:34:46.620 --> 0:34:48.540
<v Speaker 11>our warfighters, they need this hardware.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.469
<v Speaker 4>From a national security perspective as well, you have to

0:34:51.510 --> 0:34:53.250
<v Speaker 4>be very, very in control.

0:34:53.469 --> 0:34:54.229
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes.

0:34:54.330 --> 0:34:57.270
<v Speaker 11>So we never lock up any of our customers' IP.

0:34:57.570 --> 0:35:00.069
<v Speaker 11>That stays with Lockheed. That stays with Raytheon.

0:35:00.310 --> 0:35:01.049
<v Speaker 2>But what we do.

0:35:01.570 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 11>is engineer that airframe and make sure that we're supplying

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.020
<v Speaker 11>it on time, at the right quality level, and importantly,

0:35:07.060 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 11>at scale. And that last one is really part of

0:35:09.820 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 11>the missing factor, right? How many of these units can

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.089
<v Speaker 11>you make per year for your customer? And that's where

0:35:15.130 --> 0:35:18.310
<v Speaker 11>Divergent shines. How much of this is about speed? You know,

0:35:18.330 --> 0:35:23.540
<v Speaker 11>if you think about the conclusions of Iran There were

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 11>everything ranging from munition supply to the types of technology,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.430
<v Speaker 11>but the net result is, as I said, the Pentagon

0:35:30.450 --> 0:35:33.610
<v Speaker 11>wants things faster and cheaper. I think speed is the

0:35:33.650 --> 0:35:36.089
<v Speaker 11>most important and speed with scale. So what is your

0:35:36.150 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 11>time to market? You get a new set of requirements,

0:35:38.430 --> 0:35:40.899
<v Speaker 11>new program. How quickly can you get in the air?

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 11>Then when can you field it? But also when you

0:35:43.780 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 11>learn a lesson, how can you adapt to it, right?

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.660
<v Speaker 11>How can you change that requirement or mission set and

0:35:48.700 --> 0:35:49.700
<v Speaker 11>make a new piece of hardware?

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.460
<v Speaker 2>How quickly does Divergent react to things like that? Incredibly quickly.

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.950
<v Speaker 11>We can go from engineering inputs to flight ready vehicle

0:35:57.180 --> 0:36:00.250
<v Speaker 11>in under three months. We can have a critical design

0:36:00.430 --> 0:36:02.390
<v Speaker 11>in less than that, say two or three weeks. Wow.

0:36:02.650 --> 0:36:04.850
<v Speaker 11>And we've shown now with primes in the loop that

0:36:04.870 --> 0:36:08.370
<v Speaker 11>we can go from start to full rate production in

0:36:08.489 --> 0:36:11.549
<v Speaker 11>under a year. That's much, much faster than programs that

0:36:11.570 --> 0:36:13.730
<v Speaker 11>were taking five plus years to get to market.

0:36:13.950 --> 0:36:18.380
<v Speaker 4>Has this administration taken any action that has actually allowed

0:36:18.420 --> 0:36:22.380
<v Speaker 4>you to do that, to move faster, to scale what.

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 2>They want, right? This is something that they have shared

0:36:24.860 --> 0:36:26.220
<v Speaker 2>as a goal too.

0:36:26.460 --> 0:36:27.219
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.299
<v Speaker 11>They are completely mission aligned. And more than that, I'd

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 11>say they've been a driving force top down. And where

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 11>we really see it is we do advanced manufacturing, 3D

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.090
<v Speaker 11>printing of metals. This is a better way, in our opinion,

0:36:39.110 --> 0:36:41.530
<v Speaker 11>to make a metal structure for most of these systems.

0:36:41.910 --> 0:36:44.950
<v Speaker 11>How can we qualify these at a high pace? That's

0:36:44.989 --> 0:36:47.669
<v Speaker 11>where the admin has said we need to have the

0:36:47.750 --> 0:36:50.770
<v Speaker 11>right process to bring in new technology, and we can't

0:36:50.830 --> 0:36:54.259
<v Speaker 11>get burdened. by too cautious of a wrist posture. So

0:36:54.300 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 11>we've seen the admins drive reports.

0:36:55.180 --> 0:36:55.739
<v Speaker 2>That seems like a.

0:36:55.700 --> 0:36:59.859
<v Speaker 4>Procurement issue, though, really, rather than, I mean, for example,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 4>what about sort of cutting red tape?

0:37:04.580 --> 0:37:07.469
<v Speaker 11>I'd say part of that red tape is in accepting

0:37:07.489 --> 0:37:11.089
<v Speaker 11>new technologies because it is all about that demand signal, right?

0:37:11.150 --> 0:37:13.750
<v Speaker 11>If we get acceptance from the Air Force, the Navy,

0:37:14.050 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 11>the Army, other services... Then we will get demand signal

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.020
<v Speaker 11>in on programs. That demand signal will drive investment into

0:37:21.060 --> 0:37:23.810
<v Speaker 11>new factories, and then we'll be producing at scale. So

0:37:23.830 --> 0:37:26.290
<v Speaker 11>for us, that's probably the biggest area where the admin

0:37:26.330 --> 0:37:26.850
<v Speaker 11>can help us.

0:37:27.090 --> 0:37:31.870
<v Speaker 4>We've been showing some of what Diversion does, right? Take

0:37:31.930 --> 0:37:33.390
<v Speaker 4>us inside your company.

0:37:34.090 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 2>How have you grown? What are your capital needs right now?

0:37:37.140 --> 0:37:39.860
<v Speaker 11>Yes, we've been around for over a decade now, and

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.980
<v Speaker 11>we started with a simple thesis, which was product agnostic

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:47.060
<v Speaker 11>manufacturing at low unit cost. So unpacking that, imagine a

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 11>factory that's flexible, can go from making a car part

0:37:50.340 --> 0:37:53.090
<v Speaker 11>to a defense part back to back, is digitally driven,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.890
<v Speaker 11>but it also has a low unit cost on both

0:37:55.930 --> 0:37:58.489
<v Speaker 11>of those items, right? That's never happened before. That was

0:37:58.530 --> 0:38:01.830
<v Speaker 11>our thesis. We spent six years building that platform. We

0:38:01.870 --> 0:38:04.910
<v Speaker 11>raised over a billion dollars into the business, have great

0:38:05.690 --> 0:38:09.230
<v Speaker 11>American investors that are defense focused, like Rochefort Management, have

0:38:09.270 --> 0:38:12.310
<v Speaker 11>some blue chip PE investors like Hedda Sophia, have great

0:38:12.330 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 11>strategic investors as well. And now for us, it's all

0:38:15.380 --> 0:38:18.470
<v Speaker 11>about building more factories. Long Beach is our second factory

0:38:18.510 --> 0:38:22.450
<v Speaker 11>that's coming online. There'll be 30,000 airframes of capacity per year.

0:38:22.469 --> 0:38:23.370
<v Speaker 1>Long Beach? Yes.

0:38:23.770 --> 0:38:23.989
<v Speaker 7>Long Beach.

0:38:24.010 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 4>Hard decision to grow in California versus somewhere else in

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:27.340
<v Speaker 4>this country?

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.020
<v Speaker 11>Well, for us, we're going to grow in multiple states.

0:38:30.340 --> 0:38:32.219
<v Speaker 11>So luckily, that's not just a decision we need to

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 11>make once. But for Long Beach, that was customer locations.

0:38:36.620 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 11>That was engineering talent, and then actually the facility itself,

0:38:39.940 --> 0:38:43.750
<v Speaker 11>when we're doing these advanced processes, 400,000 square feet, we

0:38:43.790 --> 0:38:46.310
<v Speaker 11>can make 30,000 airframes per year, so it worked very

0:38:46.350 --> 0:38:46.850
<v Speaker 11>well for us.

0:38:47.510 --> 0:38:49.210
<v Speaker 2>Lucas, what's the permanence of this shift?

0:38:49.630 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Instead of the primes reacting to times of war, is

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.300
<v Speaker 4>it just fundamentally a change of how the business works?

0:38:57.780 --> 0:38:57.940
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:38:58.410 --> 0:39:01.690
<v Speaker 11>I think this is a long-lasting defense cycle. I think

0:39:01.730 --> 0:39:05.300
<v Speaker 11>we've seen what modern warfare needs in terms of new systems.

0:39:05.660 --> 0:39:08.100
<v Speaker 11>We've seen the price points that the department is asking

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 11>for for those new systems. We've seen competition come in

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.540
<v Speaker 11>in terms of new players. So I think this is

0:39:14.140 --> 0:39:16.069
<v Speaker 11>a cycle that's here to stay. I think you're going

0:39:16.090 --> 0:39:18.509
<v Speaker 11>to see more innovation. You're going to see volumes go up,

0:39:18.590 --> 0:39:22.350
<v Speaker 11>prices go down. And for us, we view resilience as flexibility.

0:39:22.350 --> 0:39:26.450
<v Speaker 11>So being cross-industry allows us to take a choppy demand signal,

0:39:26.450 --> 0:39:30.410
<v Speaker 11>which at times defense is, especially in sustainment. and maintenance,

0:39:30.750 --> 0:39:33.890
<v Speaker 11>and make really good economics of it, which allows us

0:39:33.930 --> 0:39:36.129
<v Speaker 11>to deliver at a steady volume.

0:39:35.810 --> 0:39:39.109
<v Speaker 2>And at a good cost. Lucas Singer, Divergent CEO, thank

0:39:39.130 --> 0:39:39.669
<v Speaker 2>you very much.

0:39:39.870 --> 0:39:40.260
<v Speaker 11>Thank you.

0:39:40.300 --> 0:39:42.140
<v Speaker 2>Being with us here in Palmdale.

0:39:42.469 --> 0:39:46.620
<v Speaker 4>Okay, coming up in the program, Boeing beats out Northrop

0:39:46.739 --> 0:39:51.390
<v Speaker 4>to produce the Navy's Next, Top Gunfighter. We're going to

0:39:51.430 --> 0:39:54.110
<v Speaker 4>talk about what that means for this industry, the landscape,

0:39:54.170 --> 0:39:57.190
<v Speaker 4>and their businesses next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:39:58.410 --> 0:40:04.489
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:14.070 --> 0:40:17.410
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this week, the Pentagon announced Boeing beat Northrop to

0:40:17.450 --> 0:40:21.250
<v Speaker 4>produce the Navy's next top gunfighter jet, an award valued

0:40:21.969 --> 0:40:34.950
<v Speaker 4>more than $ 20 billion. Bloomberg Intelligence writing that, quote, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:40:35.390 --> 0:40:37.870
<v Speaker 4>global head of aerospace and defense research.

0:40:38.110 --> 0:40:41.900
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson is with us. Hey, I'm here in the skunk.

0:40:41.660 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Works of Lockheed, but there's a lot happened this week.

0:40:45.460 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Go to your thesis on this particular contract that Boeing's

0:40:49.420 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 4>come out on top on.

0:40:51.150 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so the thesis is that Boeing's fighter program, its franchise,

0:40:56.860 --> 0:41:00.259
<v Speaker 12>was traditionally pretty strong, but it had gone through some

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 12>rough years. It wasn't on the F-35. It was on

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.180
<v Speaker 12>the F-22, but that was very limited production. But the

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.730
<v Speaker 12>F-18 is the primary Navy strike fighter now, twin engine.

0:41:11.190 --> 0:41:14.790
<v Speaker 12>There's like 800 or 1,000 of those around. F-15 are

0:41:14.810 --> 0:41:19.210
<v Speaker 12>a very strong part of the franchise, too. Non-stealth, twin-engine fighter,

0:41:19.610 --> 0:41:22.290
<v Speaker 12>Mach 2.5. We see it used in the Middle East.

0:41:22.469 --> 0:41:25.589
<v Speaker 12>Very capable fighter. They're really lacking in sort of this

0:41:26.210 --> 0:41:29.910
<v Speaker 12>stealth technology because they weren't on a modern stealth fighter anymore.

0:41:30.969 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 12>And now the Pentagon has given them the two next

0:41:34.390 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 12>generation stealth fighters, the Air Superior Fighter, the F-47 for

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 12>the Air Force, and then handed.

0:41:40.620 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Them as well the Navy fighters.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:47.300
<v Speaker 12>So, you know, really, it's I feel like their franchise

0:41:47.340 --> 0:41:49.990
<v Speaker 12>has gone from, you know, a lot of concern around

0:41:50.010 --> 0:41:54.050
<v Speaker 12>it to really in great position if they execute on

0:41:54.090 --> 0:41:54.690
<v Speaker 12>these programs.

0:41:57.860 --> 0:42:00.100
<v Speaker 4>You and I have talked about your research on Lockheed.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm here at Skunk Works. You're bullish on

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.450
<v Speaker 4>a growth story that's more about missiles than aircraft.

0:42:06.489 --> 0:42:07.650
<v Speaker 2>Just talk a little bit about that.

0:42:08.870 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, I think missiles are super important right now, right?

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.180
<v Speaker 12>We're seeing some of these really sophisticated munitions be.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>In short order.

0:42:17.820 --> 0:42:22.660
<v Speaker 12>Actually, we just watched a drumbeat of orders go through Raytheon.

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:27.410
<v Speaker 3>There's about $ 70- some billion of orders that flowed in the

0:42:27.450 --> 0:42:31.290
<v Speaker 3>last kind of month and a half. Lockheed as well

0:42:31.310 --> 0:42:33.310
<v Speaker 3>has gotten a number of those. These are the two

0:42:33.810 --> 0:42:39.569
<v Speaker 3>primary manufacturers of things like Patriot, things like THAAD, which

0:42:39.610 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 3>are super important to air defense in the modern age.

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 3>But honestly, the big programs are usually these fighter programs

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 3>and bomber programs.

0:42:48.260 --> 0:42:50.540
<v Speaker 12>They're worth a lot more money over the long run.

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.860
<v Speaker 12>And so, look, I think Boeing did pretty well here recently.

0:42:54.180 --> 0:42:54.339
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:42:56.790 --> 0:43:00.630
<v Speaker 4>George Ferguson from Bloomberg Intelligence. Thank you very much indeed.

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 4>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. We

0:43:04.460 --> 0:43:09.819
<v Speaker 4>are at the Skunk Works, Lockheed Martin's advanced facility. And

0:43:10.020 --> 0:43:12.500
<v Speaker 4>it's a story about a company that wants to transition

0:43:12.980 --> 0:43:15.779
<v Speaker 4>from being the world's biggest defense contractor to being the

0:43:15.820 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 4>biggest defense technology company in the world. And a part

0:43:18.620 --> 0:43:20.620
<v Speaker 4>of that has been how they're willing to work with others,

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:23.819
<v Speaker 4>including rivals. We talked a lot about how they are

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 4>using AI. We talked a lot about autonomy. Recap all

0:43:27.620 --> 0:43:30.529
<v Speaker 4>of those conversations on the podcast. You guys know where

0:43:30.550 --> 0:43:33.790
<v Speaker 4>to find it on Bloomberg, also on iHeart, Apple, and

0:43:33.850 --> 0:43:36.509
<v Speaker 4>on Spotify. And out there as well is the big

0:43:36.550 --> 0:43:40.830
<v Speaker 4>conversation that we have with Lockheed Martin's CEO, Jim Ticlette,

0:43:40.870 --> 0:43:44.290
<v Speaker 4>which you can find again on Bloomberg.com and on YouTube.

0:43:45.370 --> 0:43:48.570
<v Speaker 4>Classified access, declassified, live from Skunk Works.

0:43:49.130 --> 0:43:50.709
<v Speaker 2>This was Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:56.580 --> 0:43:57.150
<v Speaker 11>Thank you.