WEBVTT - We Need A Law About This? 

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we need a law about this? It's one more thing.

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm strong and getty, one more thing. So we got

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure this out as a society, either morally and

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>culturally or actually legally, where we are on the whole.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Somebody whipping out their cell phone and recording you and

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>then what they can do with it and all that.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe who almost went to law school is going to

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>at some point say, there's no expectation of privaty privacy.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>But you know, public place, You've saved me the trouble.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But that was that was that meant different, That meant

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>something different when only if you were wanting to spend

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars on a on a moving video camera

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and carry it around, were you capable of videoing anybody?

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody can video everybody all the time. There was

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 1>no reason to care about that particular rule.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that has more to do with the government,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, surveilling you than anything. You cannot use someone's

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>image and likeness for profit without their signing a release

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of some sort.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that? I think there are thirty states

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that are one party consent states for recording someone. Most

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>states are not that not like California, where like, if

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we we can't call somebody up on the

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>phone like you could in the old days on radio,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>which was a lot of fun, call somebody up and

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>put them on the air without them knowing it, or

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>record them without them knowing it.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>That's actually a different law. Those are two different questions. Yeah,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>airing somebody's a different question. How about just recording them?

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Just recording? Uh yeah, yeah, what about it?

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think you should be able to

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>record me without me knowing it. I don't care who

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you are.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh No. Although the counter argument is like if somebody's

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>threatening you or defrauding you, or committing any other than

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>there are dozens of examples, you're not allowed to get

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the proof of it that you need, Katie.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I So I have a question back to what you said, Joe,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>where you can't make a profit off of a video

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>of somebody.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Else mm hmm. Theoretically, I mean, like, if you're in

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a documentary, they got to have everybody's got to sign

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a release right of some sort, although I don't know

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the fine print on that, so you know, don't start

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>doing a documentary on my say.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just thinking about like those videos that go

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>viral somebody puts on they're about to talk about.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's do this and then we can get

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>into the specifics, because we're going to talk about this

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>story which went viral a week or so ago. Maybe

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you've heard the outlines of it of a woman who

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't give up her seat on a plane to a child,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and then some other woman took out her phone and

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>recorded it, and the woman who wouldn't give up a

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>seat became the bad person. Here's the here's a news

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>report version of this.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Plane passenger is being publicly berated by a furious mom

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>for refusing to swap seats with her toddler. Jennifer Castro

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 4>was filmed calmly ignoring the angry mother's request after she

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 4>boarded the Gol Airlines domestic flight in Brazil in December.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>When she boarded the plane, Jennifer found a toddler sitting

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 4>in her window seat and asked him to move, which

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>caused the tod to start crying. When she refused to move,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 4>the mother pulled out her phone and started filming Jennifer

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 4>and said, I'm recording your face.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>This is disgusting.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 4>It's the twenty first century and people have no empathy

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 4>for children.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So what happens from here is the mom posts the

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>video of this awful human being who, in her words,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't give up her seat to the three year

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>old one to sit at the window seat. Got to

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>admit I probably would have given up my seat, but

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to posts it. It ends up with

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>two point one million views as of this. The woman

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't give up her seat gets, you know, out

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way that these people do and says she

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>had to quit her job and was getting threats and

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't walk down the street and emotional this and that,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and is suing the airline for allowing this to happen.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the airline comes in. Yeah, okay,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And then, but just in general, if I have the

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>worst day of my life, and what would be a

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>good example, Okay, yell at a waiter at a restaurant,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not cool, shouldn't do it? But I do it, and

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody gets it on video and posts it, and I

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it material effects effects my life? Is that just

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a world we're going to live in forever?

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Number one, throw your meal on them. If you're gonna

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>go that far, just throw that meal right into their chest, okay,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>like Gordon Ramsay, like we were talking about the other day,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Just push it right into their chest. They're wearing a

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 2>white shirt to leave the mark. Uh wow, yeah, I don't,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Are you talking ethics law?

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, it needs to be dealt with either ethnically, morally

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or legally. All right, But if we're just gonna live

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in a world where your worst moment is up for

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>grabs for anybody who has their phone out and they

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>can just make you look like an ass clown to

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole world, affect your reputation, maybe your kids at

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>school or your job. Everything is up for grabs all

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. Are we gonna put some sort of limits

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on this? Can we do we turn against this Somehow

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.119
<v Speaker 1>do we turn against people who whip out their phones

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and record this stuff? I doubt we can ever get there.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, you yourself have said as if I we

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>need more shaming for avererant behavior in the modern world, not.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Less right, But uh yeah, let me try to think

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about well, yeah, this is this is the problem.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>People with bad judgment get to do it too.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Whatever it is, right, So I I do believe that

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we need more shaming, not less. For like, you know,

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you should be ashamed of begging for money.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you should be ashamed. You should really want

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to not have to beg for money.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, shame. But you should have your hair cut from

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>your head and be paraded naked through town with a

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>lady shaking a bell at you and shouting shame.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree completely, But shaming people for really just human nature,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which is everybody loses their temper sometimes or whatever.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>You have it in public like that?

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna are you gonna? Are you gonna hope

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to like never lose your temper in public ever in

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>your life? Have you never lost the control? Yeah to

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be ashamed?

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly quick videotaping Katie on it.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't think I actually haven't. I

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think I have an instance of ever losing my

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>temper in public that I would be like horrified to

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have on video. I don't think that's ever happened. So

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm using a I'm using a hypothetical that doesn't even

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>apply to me.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So that this takes me back to my question, is

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>if it racked up that many views. Whoever posted that

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>video got some monetary blowback.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Right they are they are an influencer, or at least

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>now they're an influencer.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>So they they.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Weren't, They weren't an influencer before, but they become an

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>influencer because they got, you know, millions of followers.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 3>And if millions of people go to their page and

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>start clicking on their other content, now it's a cash

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 3>cow based off of this chick's situation on this plane.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>So the question before me then is if something not

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>for commercial purposes inadvertently makes money in Brazil and it

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>happened in public, what are the laws on this emerging field.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a fucking idea.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But we gotta, we gotta figure this out. I think

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we can't. We can't just operate this way. So this woman,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so she gets on the plane. This is a sort

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of plane that's got assigned seats, and there's a little

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>kid in your seat and you say, hey, that's my seat.

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Can I sit there? You have a window seat, you

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>paid extra for a window seat, and.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The kid get a little slumber in huh.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The three year old starts crying because the three year

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>old really wanted that seat. Mom should have paid for it.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Mom asks would it be okay if my three year

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>old sat in that seat? Like I said, I being

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a dad and have had, you know, kids on planes

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest thing in the world. I probably would

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have given up the seat, but you're not obligated to.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it should be a you know, ruin

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>your life for a while moment. If I say no, no,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna stay in this seat, and then

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they whip out their phone say you're really not going

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to give up your seat to this kid.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>No, they're the dick, They're the a hole, as the

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Internet says. Now, was this a so we can sit

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>together situation or was it just the kid prefers the

0:08:58.600 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>window seat?

0:08:59.280 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, there's a there's a seat number

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>on the kid's ticket put their ass in it.

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Well that's the mark said. Really gone viral.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You'd be hounded all across the country.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Be kind of worked up to that.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>The Internet decided that the woman that wouldn't give it

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>up her seat is the bad person.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what the Internet decided. By far up the Internet.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 2>It's evil, Michael, you're saying something my mom or dad

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>would have said, no, you got to get in that seat.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>This nice person, that's their seat. You can sit over here. Yeah. Yeah, gosh.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish my parents would have videoed their last flight.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>They were taking first class from San Francisco back to Boise,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and apparently the couple in front of them had a

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 3>three year old that they were soft parenting. This kid

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 3>was this kid was slapping her dad and one didn't

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>want the cheerios but wanted the Nutter butters and all,

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and and she's screaming at the top.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Like two or three.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 3>And the reason the age is totally relevant because the

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>mom grabs the daughter and puts her in her lap

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and goes, how do you feel right now? Let's let's

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>get talk about your feelings. And my dad's my dad

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 3>is texting me she's fucking two.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was sharier feelings.

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know, angsty, conflicted on we on on

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 5>we exactly. I just Dad, There are times Mom, I

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 5>just I don't know why I bother.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's a tough one because I mean, kids

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>when they're little, and if you got a special needs kid,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they can act all kinds of different ways and you're

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just trying to get to your destination. So I don't

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. But I did see one one time

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with some teenagers who were back talking their dad, and

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I could not believe the shit that dad took from

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>these two teenagers. I would have drugged them off the plane.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what our plans are, Ye, we ain't

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>going we're waiting for the next plane back home, or

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if this is our homework staying home. I can't believe

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he put up with that, and he threatened several times,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I want to take away your car, Go ahead, dad,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. And then kids would laugh, just laughing

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at him. I just it was, it was, it was.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I was embarrassed for this dude.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 2>He was trying to end the trip as quickly as possible.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have gone to that great length and expense

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to drag their ascides off that plane. No, I don't

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>care how to do.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 2>What ends?

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Huh to what end? If you're not getting what you want,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be my end. And what they wanted was

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to go wherever they were going.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I'm just thinking if they were going home,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 2>what are you going to prolong the trip?

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Put him in jail, put him in an orphanage.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I had to hit the emergency slide and pushed him off,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>put him in the overhead compartment one of those boot camps.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>But exactly exactly. But anyway to my original point, you

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are making the argument for me. You think the

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>woman who didn't give up her seat didn't do anything wrong.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>She edited her life turned upside down. We have to

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>come up with a mechanism keep this rappening, don't we

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the modern world where everybody's carrying around a video recorder.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Again, my understanding of Brazilian law is cursory at best.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 2>But if you do it and distribute it for the

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 2>purpose of damaging a person's reputation and or financial well being,

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>then you got a tort right there.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, so that's that's a good one, and you would

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>almost always be posting it to damage the person's reputation.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah correct, Oh yeah, that's practically assumed. I mean, what

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 2>else are you going to do? I'm hoping this gets

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>posted and in the next five minutes she becomes aware

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of the reaction and lets my kid look out the way. No, no,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>it's purely to hurt them.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>See there, are accounts out there that's this one guy.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even going to say his name because I

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>hate his existence. But he's dedicated to figuring out who

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>people are in viral videos and doxing the hell out

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 3>of them, putting them on display their workplace, tagging their

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>profiles and everything. And I think that type of shit

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>should be illegal because you are reminding somebody's life.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>My kid's going to law school right now. I'm going

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to tell her. Look, I will finance your law office.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>What we're going to do is when people seek to

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>damage people's reputation unjustifiedly because you know, you got to

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>win the jury. Generally, that's what we'll prosecute.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, uh oh, bird flu.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Basically, that guy's using a cell phone as a weapon. Yeah,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 2>it's you.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Know, well, yeah, as a weapon, because she whipped that

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out with the idea that okay, you're going to be

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>intimidated now that I'm videotaping you and give up the seat.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's absolutely a weapon.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 3>And did you say she had she had a platform

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>before she filmed this or she don't think so.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I think she became an influencer after she got the

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>two million, and she's attractive, so.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Great that always the hot ones sounds like a beachh

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to me, Jack, Have you ever lost your temper in

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>public and said do you know who I am? I'm

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Internet famous? Or I guess she said, I'm Instagram famous. One.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember that. If I ever had the words do you

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know who I am? Come out of my mouth, I

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>would be embarrassed. To my core, I'd hang myself. What

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was I gonna say about that? Do you know who

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I am? Instagram famous? I had a point. Have you

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ever sent call law having a platform? Por having a

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>platform prior?

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, so the whole influencer thing. So I'm

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like a shoe company and I'm going to pay her

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to wear my shoes, thinking I'll sell more shoes now.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, unfortunately, because she's one millions of dollars of business

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>done on that in that way. Yeah.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember the most famous woman on a plane that lost

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>her mind a year or so ago is the one

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pointing at the guy in the back of the plane.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't exist, he's not real or whatever the hell happens. Yes,

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and she, uh, she She's got tons of followers. Fun,

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you follow?

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I follow her on Twitter and the other day, she

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>posted a screenshot of it. Oh yeah, she got banned

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 3>from American Airlines for that whole situation, and she got

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>an email from American Airlines saying that you have twenty

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 3>five thousand points that you haven't used, and she she

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>captioned it, who's gonna tell them?

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty funny, that's amusing.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can't believe you follow her, Katie, I do,

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>you're not real?

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess that's it.