WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 14 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Down. Then Thursday Morning, December five,

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>nine teams, up Dating, up Book podcast and megapod Skill

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Alexander And of course it's week fourteen in the National

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Football the quarter pole in horse racing parlance. The regulars

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on the show here as always from Circus Sports, Derek

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Stephen's conciliary, the vice president of operations at Circa. It's

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>our buddy, Mike Palm. What's happening to Mike? Are you?

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing very well. You're eating in the office. We're

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>all on camera here, everybody but our guest today. You

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to be eating well. Everyone else is at lunch,

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>but due to John Murray's schedule, we had to do

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this later, so I'm not able to go to lunch.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>There we go already welcoming the guests. Pretty sure, Mike,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you missing launch wouldn't be the end of the world. Oho,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And so it begins and finished fourth in the non

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>casino employed We go Here we go using Twitter polls

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>against each other. Mike is very serious about these Twitter polls.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Not He's very seriously. First of all, you can just anything.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I make jokes about your weight, you could say same

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to you, fat so because I'm a fat so too. Yeah,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I know you are, but I would never stoop to

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that level because there's a lot of pastors where it

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>may not be your fault and you're trying to get

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>more healthy. Wow. Wow, now that's that beautiful Catholicism coming together.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it, John, John, aren't you glad you agreed

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to do this? This is all we do for an

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>entire forty five minutes every everyone. I'm very excited to

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>come on and try to talk about the NFL with

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I apologize, Mike, I do. I overextended myself

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two days. I agreed to way too many

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>interviews the last two days. I'm pretty sure the people

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that work here think I'm not doing anything and my

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>office door is closed all day, just doing interview after interview.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>They probably think I'm just sitting back here watching TV.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He's very popular, John Murray, that's what But that's what

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you do, John, I mean, they can't be made what

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you do. Know. I know it's a big part of

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the job now, you know that, Mike, and make part

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the job now is promoting the different books and

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>different media and it's a lot of fun. It's a

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more fun than going to another meeting, I'll tell

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you that much. For those who don't know, that's the

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>voice of John Murray. He is the executive director of

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Racing Sports at the Westgate the Super Book here in

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas under Jake Cornegey's stewardship. John Murray, executive director

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of Racing Sports. So we're thrilled to have you John,

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>first time ever on the megapod. And so here's how

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this works. Usually before we get into games, we get

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a contest update from Mike, but since you're here, we

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>get to get a contest update, perhaps if you know

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it off hand from you first at the West Gate.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what the leading record is in the

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Super Contest Classic or Gold right now? By any chance, John,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I wish you would ask me that I could have

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>had the guys pull the numbers for me, and I

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. I can look it up,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and I can look it up very quickly, all right,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>if you want to look it up, you can. Otherwise

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, we'll get an update from Mike Palm

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the Circus Sport Million. It was the first day of

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>our final quarterly or your final quarterly there at circa.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I didn't start well. I started two

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and three. Todd had you dark and three? Two and three? Also, Mike,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>how many five? Oh? Is the first week of the quarterly?

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Only fifty only fifty one? Wow? That's still pretty damn good. Geez.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And who is in the lead now for the whole deal?

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The booty Blockers maintains the lead. He's got forty six

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. He's got a two point lead

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>over two other entries, and then a three point lead

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>over an additional two entries. So there's five five entries

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>within two points of the lead. Right now, booty blockers,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what booty Blocker's means? What does that even mean?

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>The name is Isaac. His first name is Isaac, so

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's part of your group God. But he's coming

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in today actually to collect, to collect from quarter three,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to meet him from California. So he won

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter three as well, that's right, Yeah, he split quarter

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>three and he's leading for the million. His Hebrew name

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is First of all, I'm not part of any group

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as part of a religion. I've renounced studios many times.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I will renounce on air right now again. I am

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>part of no group except the human race, and that

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is John will never do this show again. John, do

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an update for us with the Westgate Super Contest?

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Do I do? Gil lead? The leader is still that

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Tuco now Tucos alias is based off Tuco Salamanca. If

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you remember the bad guy from the season of Breaking Bad,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he checked in a forty four twenty and one one.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>There's two people behind him at forty three one and

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>one Crisper and Chicago Jeff right behind Tuco. So and

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>then there's a whole group at forty three forty two

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half. You guys know, there's a long way

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to go here down the stretch in the NFL, so

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>very still still very much up for grounds, no doubt

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about that. That's a super contest classic. I can get

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you the gold as well here, John, I got a

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I got a tech from Randy McKay said he was

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>tied for the lead and the goal. Oh wow, Okay,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know his alias offhand? Mike? No, I don't. Okay,

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>let me see if I can get you the gold standings.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Right here, there's two people at thirty nine twenty five

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and one Mike and one guy's contestant Workman w W

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>two and the other guy is Walter Payton. So I'm

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure which one of those are, Mr McKay. But

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there's two guys at thirty nine five and one, and

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>then there's two more people at thirty eight five and two,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so they're about to have They're a half point behind

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>those two. So the Gold obviously a bottleneck as well.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Sweetness tied for the lead, but the Classic is one

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>point four two million. I got to look up a

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gold bought on Okay, all right, we don't need to

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>know that one point four two million for Classic circle

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>million is for a million obviously, the quarter prize of

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty three thousand in that as well, and gold

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is whatever. Gold is also low six figures on that,

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, before we get into any best bets, and

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is one of your best bets, I don't know,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But any thoughts on the Thursday night game at all

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas favored by three at Chicago tonight, John, any thoughts

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on this game tonight? We're just overloaded here with nothing

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but Cowboys money. I don't have an opinion on this

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>game myself. I thought the Bears were very lucky to

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>escape the Lions last last week on Thanksgiving, but you know,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas looked awful night game against Buffalo. I guess, if anything,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be a good time to buy in on

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas after such a bad performance last week. We're gonna

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>need the Bears here, Mike. I would imagine most books

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in town are going to be in that same predicament, Mike,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what about years well? Uh, gil Um. I think to

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>John's last point that if you if you'd have had

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to look aheadline like they do at Westgate, Um, this

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>game probably would have been four and a half or

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>five before Dallas looks so awful on Thanksgiving. I think

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty cheap price on the Cowboys. I personally

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>laid three with the Cowboys, but it's not one of

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>my three best bets here. The strange things with the

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>cow Boys is that you know they can lose tonight,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 1>they can lose next Sunday to the Rams, and then

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>still win the division by beating Philadelphia and walking in

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the close of the year. It's just in that seast.

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, John, you and gilbeat Redskins fans can speak

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.559
<v Speaker 1>out and that that division is this year. Three games

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>back to speak to your point, Mike, we were at

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>minus three and a half on the look ahead line,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the early line, so maybe there is a little bit

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of value here at minus three. Yeah, the Redskins are

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>still in the thick of the playoff RaSE. We just

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>did a Bears win tonight, gil and a Giants win

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. Green Bay is a thirteen point dog that

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we might be right back in this thing, hey man.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Double digit dog last week took care of the Panthers,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not only took care of her, dominated him. Um. By

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, Dallas six and six before we get your

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughts tied, Dallas is six and six. The opponents they've beaten,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they're six wins. The opponents they've beaten a combined sixteen

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty and one. The opponents they've lost to forty nine

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen. That is splits make Splitsville right there. For Dallas,

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they are a bully and then they get crushed by

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>good teams. Where the Chicago fall we shall see, Todd

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts tonight. First of all, I want to ask

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you if you can Usually I write down all the picks,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have a pen here in the car,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so I was wondering if you could write down the

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>picks for us today so we can track of them.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Anything else you need me to do? Man, Yeah, well

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not wasn't something I volunteered to do in the

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>first place. Well, this is a change. Jusie Todd asked

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the listeners to do his work. This time he's asking

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the call host. I'll do it, Todd. I'll write him

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>down there you go, thank you. I will take the

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>arrows from Mike Palm with pride and no prejudice. Okay, Um,

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>As far as tonight's game, how the hell can you

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>make a call? You've got true bisky, it's a joke.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Cowboys coaching as a joke. You just

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have to watch Michael probably play the under in the

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>first half. And it probably is not a bad idea.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's Cowboys. Listen. If they have this talent,

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't they beat a team like Chicago with Mr Biscuite quarterback?

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Because and the Bears defense is not anything vaunted. They

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>let David Blow go up and down the field on them.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So like, if the Cowboys can't get it done, remember

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins got Ron Rivera fired. I'm talking to you,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Pat Shermer week sixteen. Jason Garrett Week seventeen, you better

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>watch out, Skins are coming. Let's begin with the best bets.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>John Murray from the West Gate. We start with you.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>What's your first best bet, sir? I think this week

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the one the one player I really do like actually

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is the Indianapolis Colts. You know, I think this is

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>an overreaction line here. You can get the Colts plus

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>three on the road in Tampa. The Buccaneers have really

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>struggled at home this year. Colts are coming off of

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>what looks like a bad loss to the Titans, but

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they're really in control of that game until the end there.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think much of the Bucks, although I do

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>find watching Jamis Winston to be a lot of fun.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lean to the cold tier. I'm gonna assume

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston is gonna make some egregious mistakes and give

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this game away. You're with Chris Andrews. Chris Andrews said

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a by low situation on the Indianapolis Colts.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You are echoing that as well. Tampa Bay three point favorites.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks, who are five and seven, Colts are six

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and six. They're two out in the uh A f

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>C South two behind the Texans, one behind the Titans.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike best bet number one. I really like Baltimore lane

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>five and a half at Buffalo is that the lion

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>cod Are you look? Are you able to look at

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lines now that you're in a car? I actually actually

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I got six. I got six six and and and

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and for tradition, we should really always, you know, bump

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike half a point because he always tries to. Here's

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the irony. Mike hates it when people give the wrong lines,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but meanwhile every week he tries to get a half

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a point on us. It's I only hate it when

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Hoops Peterson gives the line that's dead points off exactly

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the West Gate and circuit of both and half five

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I can't be able to get five

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We got five and a a half right

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>here at the West kid. Yeah, Gil is always the

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>final r. I'm just looking at consensus off shore and

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at six off shore. So sorry, sorry Las Vegas, but

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go with the six just to be consistent. Yeah, John,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and I hold a gaming license. We can't be held

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at at off Sorry, I don't know what you're talking

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about when you're talking about off shore books, guys, I'm

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>only looking at the prominent Vegas sports book. That's all

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>I look at. All Right, Well, we give him the

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>five and a half of the six, Gil, you're the

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>final harbiter. Six damn it six. Sorry, here's the thing,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>off shore, do they have Jesus or the other guy

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>making the lines? Because I know it's circle they do,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I believe I thought I saw a picture of

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that there Jesus hugging o J. Simpson on Twitter? Was

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that for real? Are you talking about Lindiman and Metcalf? Oh? Wow,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Lindiman won't return my d M. What's the deal with that?

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Dale hug o J. Come on? That was a set

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>up about they couldn't believe he didn't have any plays

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and then they said, yeah he couldn't take a stab

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>at it. That was just a whole set up. I

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>was very reference market. Yeah, there are people too young

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to understand that reference listening to this podcast right now. Alright,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So six six I don't like. I don't like six

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>as much as I like five and a half. But

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>here here's the thing. I think this is a bad

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Buffalo. I just don't see how they're gonna

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>stop the power running game of the Ravens. Now we

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>saw and I've been critical of Alan the ability. I

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>always say he could beat them more with his legs

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and his arms. He had a very good game in Dallas,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but that was playing in the Dome and perfect circumstances.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we have to go back to Buffalo, where they're

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>always winding, no matter what season of the year. And

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that the Baltimore Ravens are more built

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to play in bolts to play in Buffalo than Buffalo is.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought that game with the forty nine was just terrific,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they did not play a great

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>game and still want it right, they were still able

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to grindnd out enough first down and use Tucker and

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>win a game against a very good team and a

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very meaningful game. Buffalo high off. This probably the biggest

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>win they've had one sixteen years, but maybe longer for

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this branch. I like I like, I like Baltimore to

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>keep it rolling and the win this game by a touchdown.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore with their win over San Francisco, a game that

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they perhaps could have lost, if not should have, but

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the best starting franchise history. Now at ten and two.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Justin Tucker with his thirty eight straight field goal made

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, that is just absolutely sick. What

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a weapon he is for them and they want it

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>with two three totally yards. By the way, I talked

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Dallas splits, Buffalo is nine and three opponents.

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They've beaten a combined twenty seven and sixty six though

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at least give them credit that they probably not probably,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but they did have something to do with the fact

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that Tennessee seven and five, that one of those losses

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is from Buffalo, and Dallas six and six one of

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>those is from Buffalo as well, So at least they

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have a couple good wins on their resume. Todd your first,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>well with my first, I'm gonna go back with my

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>tried and true. Everybody's heard me on a Numbers game

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and on this podcast, and granted I get tons of

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>things wrong, but I have not been wrong this year

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>when targeting a certain team for the over, and that's

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Week after week, I've been pounding

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the table. Tampa Bay Buccaneers over is the greatest bets

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>since sliced bread. They play absolutely zero defense, they're very

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>explosive on offense, and there's always the chance that Jamis

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>might throw some picks that go the other direction. So

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just the the the overlover's dream. Last week, if

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you if you remember, I decided not to take the

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>over with them, and it was the first time they

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>did not go over because they were playing the Jaguars

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was scared that the Jaguars might not score,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what happened. So I've really had a

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>good beat on Tampa Bay all year. I don't understand

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>why people are betting it under give me over, Gil,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the consensus? Seven over forty seven in the Indianapolis

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Colts Tampa Bay Buccaneers game, and we will cash again. Yeah,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Jamis last week, no touchdowns, no picks like that was

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a unjamed like game and that's why it stayed under

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>right eleven. Or it was because Jacksonville wasn't going to

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>score to help them. Did their usual but Jacksonville, I

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>thought might not help them, and that's why I laid

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>off Tampa Bay Colts over for Todd over forty seven.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>My first best bet. I'm gonna do like Todd does.

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I pretty much go to him every week. Todd's had

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more success than I have, though, But I'm

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>going with the Miami Dolphins. Todd saying it. Miami Dolphins,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins, Miami Dolphins no longer number thirty one. John

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is never doing the show again. I just repeated one

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>more time. Uh, Miami is now plus five and a half. Consensus.

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It was six, it's now plus five and a half.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>This is more of just to play against the Jets.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Why are the Jets five and a half point favorites

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in this game when I was guessing it on Monday.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>When I do Dolphins games now on guessing lines, every

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>time I have to give, it's the one team that

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to give what I think it should be

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and what I think it will be. And with the Dolphins,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it should be four. I would imagine it

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was five and a half. It was six at the time,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it is five and a half. Dolphins are ten

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and two in one possession game since the started last season.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They won three of five outright since going oh and seven.

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>They outscored the Eagles twenty three to three after trailing

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>by fourteen and the third quarter. Last week, they scored

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on six of their final seven drives. The fact is

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Fitzpatrick makes them a decent, you know, slightly

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>below average football team, but they're not horrific. They're not

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a joke with Ryan Fitzpatrick at quarterback, and he seems

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to have this chemistry with DeVante Parker and the Jets

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>returned to be in the Jets last week. You're giving

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>me five and a half points, I'll take the Dolphins.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>That's my best bet. Number one, John pick number two.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you guys the same pick we gave

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to Mr Brenton Musbrewer yesterday on My Guys in the Desert.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Brent asks us to give him a pick each week

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Super Contest, and we gave him New England

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>minus three at home against the Kansas City Chiefs. I

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good by low spot on New England.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They looked awful on and then I had Actually that

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>two final against Houston was misleading. They really got beat

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>worse than that. But I think they'll bounce back at

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>home here against Andy Reid and the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So we gave Brent New England minus three. It's my

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite play this week. How's that going with you and Brent,

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>is he upset with you for bad picks or he's

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>happy with you with good picks. Well, you know, he

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>he was upset with us because we gave him a

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>loser going against New England. This is several weeks ago.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And then we gave him Baltimore against New England. I'm

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys remember that Sunday night game or Baltimore

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just trucked the Patriots and Brent actually ignored the pick,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but he apologized to me on air for that one.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure our records pretty good. There was a

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a scandal a few weeks ago where

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we tried to give him the Jets against the Raiders.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't thinking, I you know, it was my fault.

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't. That was our favorite play that week, was

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Jets plus three at home against the Raiders, but I

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't thinking. Of course, Mr Mustger can't use the Raiders game,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so he kind of laughed at me on that one.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But we gave him. We gave him San Francisco plus

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>six last Sunday, which I thought was a good one,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're giving him New England minus three this week.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>The Jets did win that game against the Raiders thirty

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>four to three. He does realize that in retrospect, right,

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he does. But it was really my fault, Gill.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I he I know, I know he can't play the

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Raider games. I just wasn't thinking clearly that afternoon, and

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we ended up giving him. We ended up

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>giving him another play that lost in in uh In

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in place of the Jets. So disappointing week, but I

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think overall we've given him some more winners than losers.

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that John, who I am told while doing

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>market Watch, actually drinks Bookmaker blonde while on the set.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that true as well? Oh? Absolutely, that's a fact. Yeah, No,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a Bookmaker blonde on set with Jeff Paul's

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was that last Monday, Mike. We were all down there

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the camera kept catching me going to commercial

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>drinking a beer. I'm like, you, guys, put a beer

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. I'm gonna drink a beer. What

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>do you? What do you people want from me? Why

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was it catching you? We drank on my guys, We

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>openly drank and toasted seas He's after after I wanted

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the guys man, Well, you knew

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it was. You knew that, and there it was wasn't

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna last along with humans at ten o'clock. So actually

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Mai at the time, so it was it was kind

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of a free for all on set. Oh that's right, Mikey.

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>What's pick number two? Uh? What is the total guil

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings Lions? Gig? I like how you asked

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>me and that you refuse asked hod Now it's forty

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>three flat. I asked you because I don't need a speech.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over three. You know. The only thing,

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that uh, the only thing that I

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>think we learned about either of these teams uh in

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>their last games on Thanksgiving and then on Monday night,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is that Patricia is just never gonna bring any pressure.

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>He's just gonna let the quarterback sit there. He could

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>defend in that second if you let Cousins sit there

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>back at home, look at Cousins numbers at home. I mean,

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the guy is lethal in that dome at home, and

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in laying almost two touchdowns. But I

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think this game will we'll we'll go back and gave

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>blow actually played better than if he's if it's Blow

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>actually played better than that Travisky on Sunco on Thursday.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Vikings can put up points at home.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at their splits, they scored thirty two

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a game at home. So I think this number came

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>back a little low over forty over forty three. By

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, Matt Stafford still wanted to play this year.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>They haven't ruled him out completely, and I don't see

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>any reason why they would play him. But David Blow

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is the starting quarterback for the Detroit Lions this weekend.

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh in their game against the Minnesota Vikings. Totals forty three.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the spread on that is twelve and

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a half thirteen somewhere in that pocket. But Mike, he's

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going over forty three. Dad, what's number two? Well, Dad,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get the good number. It's all about getting

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a good number anyways. Uh. Now that's the guy in

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the sports book Love who always tells me about certain

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ethnicities will always write number and other ethnicities just want

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to bet right before the game. They're not as smart

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>as the other ethnicities will get the right number. Well,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>since since you've already said that, why don't you just

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>tell everybody what that what he said exactly well, because

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get any ethnicities mad at me,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not going to I'm not at you. I'm

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to say which ethnicities he said are the

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>smart ones and get the right number. But anyways, I

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>will take the New Orleans Saints over the San Francisco

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. What's the line there, Gil, are we looking

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>at two two and a half? What are we looking at?

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty even split between two and two and

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'll go ahead and help myself to a

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>two a little more two and a half. Let's say

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Dome fine, I'll take the two

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half New Orleans minus two and a half

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>against the San Francisco forty Niners. Here's why Jimmy g

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>scared the Bejesus out of me. Obviously, the Niners are

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>very good. They're obviously arguably in the top three to

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>five teams in the league. Um they're you know, well coached,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>although Shannon and sometimes makes some questionable decisions, like late

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in the yes Seattle game with he could have taken

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and could cost him major playoff seating. But that being said, Obviously,

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Niners are very good team. The thing is they

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>scare me with too many turnovers. Jimmy g fumbles the

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>balls too much, throws a couple too many picks, throws

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple too many tip balls because his receivers are

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not that great. And in a big game. I think

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna come back to haunt them in a

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very tough place to play. That dome will go absolutely crazy.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh for this game. This is a gigantic game. Obviously,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I only have to win by three. Give me Drew

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Brees and the Boys to beat the Niners by three,

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>which covers the two and a half. Give me the

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints. Balls of you going against the Niners.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna go with the Tennessee Titans as my

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>second pick. Tennessee. Now, is it was one and halfen

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>now it's two and a half? Is it three reduced

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>use or two and a half? Consensus? Do you st

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Tennessee? Yeah? I think it's two and a half

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Tennessee minus two and a half from me?

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh consensus? Uh? Look, I was dead wrong about the Raiders,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as so many people were early in the season. I

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that schedule was gonna murder them. I thought they'd

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be one in six after seven games, and said they were.

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>They had a winning record after seven games. Um. But

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>now it's kind of coming home to roost for them.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think as much as they overachieved early, I

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're about to see an underachieving Oakland Raiders team

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch. Derek Carr not good again last week

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Chiefs. UM in Tennessee. Here someone said something

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Raiders, and I can't remember who said this,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so forgive me that I'm not attributing it to the

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>right person. Um, but someone said something interesting about the

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and all the rookies playing well, which is in

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the NBA we always talk about these college players who

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>come and play NBA ball and the schedule so long,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we're like, oh, they're hitting the rookie wall. Raiders have

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rookie contributors, maybe hitting the rookie wall

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, I don't know. I mean, looks like

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Crosby and Josh Jacobs and Waller are still playing well,

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. Maybe that could be part of

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it too. I just think Tennessee is real good football team.

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>No one is ever going to talk about Marcus Mariota again.

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember that dude, Ryan Tannehill. Eight touchdowns, no picks, six

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way through the air, two on the ground

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of touchdowns no picks during the Titans three

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>game winning streak. He's efficient, he makes good decisions. He's

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>five and one as the starting quarterback for the Titans

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this season. Derrick Henry is getting it done. Twenty six

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>carries a hundred forty nine yards last week in victory

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts. Uh, you're giving me less than a

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You're you're making me lay less than a field goal.

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee in a big game for both teams. Tennessee one

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the a f C South. They're tied with

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh right now for the sixth and final playoff spot

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C, and Oakland right now is

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>in a proverbial must win situation. And when people say

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they're in a must win situation, as my friend Bob

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Stole says, they must not be very good. Then I'll

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>take Tennessee. I'll give two and a half. That's pick

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>number two. John Murray third and final pick, well, you

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just you just t me up because my third and

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>final play is the Oakland race. There you go. Both

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are we saw our most respected NFL group. They came

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in here, they hit us. They took Oakland plus three.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying. It looks like the Raiders

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have kind of hit the wall here, But I think

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a good spot to get behind them. After

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two straight blow our losses to the Jets, to the Chiefs,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Raiders find a way to win this game.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Tennessee last week it was a little misleading,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. I don't know why the Colts kept trotting

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out Adam Vinetarry to miss those field goals and then

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously that blocked field goal return for a touchdown really

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>cost Indianapolis that game. But I'm gonna go with the

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Raiders here at home. I think they're gonna get this

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>win over the Titans and get back into the fringe

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of the playoff race, so to speak. Alright, Raiders plus

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Officially for John Mikey final pick,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Gil I don't want to give a contradictory pick here. Yeah,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to both of both of my

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>last for the two games I was gonna use, I'd

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>be going against somebody here and I don't want to

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm gonna take a my good show prep. Alright, Todd,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you're in a car and you're not writing down the

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>don't tell don't tell me, Okay, don't tell me. I

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>only said that, folks, because Mike busts my balls mercilessly

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and says that I don't do enough show prep. Meanwhile,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I volunteer to do all that stuff. So just let's set.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>You gotta always be prepared for these shows. Man, you

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>have a legitimate point that you're not getting paid on

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game, Todd. But how about self pride and

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just representing yourself better? Okay? I do. I do what's

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>called charity work to try to help the others in

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think gil is doing a lot of

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that too, all right. Think it never misses a shot,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>never misses enough. You can't you can't miss your shot,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>all right. I'm gonna take a stand on a game

0:26:54.800 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that's it's it's an all time philosophical argument, gil M.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>What happens when a team that has quit meets Anthony

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Lynn And I'm gonna hold my nose and late three

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>points with the Los Angeles Chargers. Okay, now, Here's why

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>any team that could not term Jameis Winston over is

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>totally done that for many, many reasons, for many If

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you watched that game, Tampa Bay moved up and down

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the field for the first two and a half quarters

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at will, as did Tennessee in the second half of

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that game the previous week. Every time you look up

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>its second and thirteen. With this Jaguars, they're not even

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>competitive within sets of downs, within possessions. Anthony Lynn, yes,

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 1>he finds ways to lose. Accept if he's up two scores.

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he can do that. I'm gonna I'm

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go against what we believe about Anthony Lennon lay

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>three points on the road last week. Let's say the

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Charger season. First of all, the Charger season, as we

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>said on Guessing Lines earlier this week on the podcast

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and on the Numbers game. Fourth loss this season. Chargers

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>loss to the Broncos last week, fourth loss this season

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>by three points or fewer. That's the most in the NFL,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and every one of their eight losses is by seven

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>points or fewer. And then lost in that Jacksonville anemic

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>performance against the Bucks in which Nick Foles was benched

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for Gardener Minshew sixteen penalties for a hundred and twenty

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>five yards. So to your point about second and thirteen,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>every time you looked up, that's why, because they're going

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the other way. You know, my dad, my dad, when

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he used to watch football with me. He's not from

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this country, but whenever the Skins would have two consecutive

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 1>plays where they would have negative yardage, my dad, as

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>if he'd never said it before, would go, Jesus Christ,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going the wrong way. So that's what the Jaguars

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are at this point. But basically my dad shouting at

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the TV. Oh, Todd, I'm sorry, Todd, I forgot you're there, Todd.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You're in a car. What you got, Todd? My final

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>pick is going to be the Oakland Raiders. I'm owing

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with the same pick as John Murray is going with.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. In the SFL we have these games

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going on, Dr Alexander. But the NFL, every week

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we have these games where nothing makes sense. If you

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the Steeler Colt game earlier in the year, everybody

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>loved the Colts, and of course, somehow, some way and

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>found a way for the Steelers to cover the game. Uh,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there's always a couple every week that look ridiculous. There's

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be anybody betting the Raiders this week. After

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>two absolute atrocious performances, getting handled easily by the Jets

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and easily by the Chiefs. No one's gonna want to

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>burn their hard earned money on the Oakland Raiders. And

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why I want them. They're gonna circle the wagons.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Knock on wood if you're with me, folks, knock on wood,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>men with the Raiders. The Oakland Raiders to lose this

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>ball game twenty to nineteen and stay inside two and

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a half points. Give me the Raiders plus two and

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. The right guessing lines I liked, uh five

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>different games. One of them has remained neutral on the line,

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>one has has gone maybe a half point against me.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But the first three that I had, the market has

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>all come my way. Miami, I had it was plus six,

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's now five and a half. Tennessee, it was one

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half, it's now two and a half. And

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the third one for me is the San Francisco forty niners.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm appo you. I match your oppo me Todd with

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>an appo you How about that. We're double. We have

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>two opos double apo um. I like the night you're

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>writing down. I hope you're writing these picks down. You're

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in charge of that this week. Mike is not me.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember we went through this already. Mike is writing him down. Okay, alright, uh,

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Even in defeat last week against the Ravens,

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a very solid performance from them,

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And in clement weather against Lamar Jackson, they could have

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just as easily won that football game. I do think

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in a very top heavy NFC, they're still the best

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>football team. Saints are already in the playoffs. Saints are

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>playing for seating right now. And I don't think Drew

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Brees is very good right now. I really don't, you know,

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with that whole Rams Saints know horrific refereeing decision last

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>year in the playoffs, we kind of forgot that Drew

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Brees wasn't really great anymore the second half of last season.

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's that good this year either. And

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Garoppolo is the one, perhaps the

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one flaw of this Niners team. They found something with

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Raheem Mostert nineteen carries a hundred forty six yards against

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. I think the Niners are the most balanced

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>team in the NFC. I think you're giving me three

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>points on the road against the Saints. I will happily

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>take the Niners in this spot. I don't think much

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Saints. I think they're They're a paper tiger

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that a lot of these NFC

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>teams are with the big records, like the Packers, for instance.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Give me the three, I'll take the Niners. That's my

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>final pick of the week. So those are the best bets.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Support for today's Beating the Book podcast comes as always

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from our friends at Bookmaker dot eu. I have been

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>saying it all season long. I will continue to say it.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The Bookmaker dot eu as an industry later for close

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to thirty years. You should know that by now pro

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>players consider them a must because their first to post dots,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They take the highest limits and most importantly, pride themselves

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on never having kicked out a winning player. That is

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>huge in this day and age. Bookmakers a high volume

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sports book best suited for not only the sophisticated player

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>who understand sports betting, but also the large recreational players

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. And their motto is where the lines originate,

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because chances are the sports book at which you've been

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>betting all along follows their lines. And right now, if

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you visit bookmaker dot eu slash gill that's Bookmaker dot

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>U slash g I l L, you can claim an

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars. Once again,

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's Bookmaker dot eu slash gill g I l L.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>To join and claim you're welcome bonus of up to

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars right now, don't miss out before we

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the final two questions. Teaser of the week

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to team six point Teaser of the week, John, what

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>do you like my teaser of the week. I'm gonna

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>piggyback off your last play there, Gil. I'm gonna go

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>with the forty Niners. I'll tease them up to plus

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. I'm gonna pair that with the

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals. I think it's a good week to get

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>behind the Cardinals. They looked awful last week. Get the

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams Pittsburgh down to their third string quarterback. They gotta

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>go out on the road, Arizona. I know, Mike Tomlin

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is doing a great job this year, but I like

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Arizona in that spot, so I'll go San Francisco plus

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half to Arizona plus eight and a

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>half six point teaser, al Right, eight and a half,

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half San Francisco Arizona, Mike, Yeah, I

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>want to clarify. So you're getting plus two and a

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>half with the forty niners, not three. That's correct. In

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, I guess three on It was three on Monday,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and the market came to me, Yes, two and a half, okay,

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>forty niners for John eight and a half Cardinals, Okay,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very good. I'm gonna take uh and tease the Texans down.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>What's number you see there, Todd or gil on the

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Texas against the bron Uncles nine, even more nine than nine,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and al, I'm gonna tease him down to three. Against

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, I thought they I know they could be

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a JACKO and high team, but I thought they looked

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>awfully good against New England on Sunday night. Um, this

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Broncos team still has their own issues offensively, and after

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>they got up fourteen to three, the Chargers controlled that

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>game for the most part. Through the last three quarters. UM.

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually took four and a half with the Broncos

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and then was in a spot where I needed the

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Chargers to win that game by a field goal because

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I bet the Chargers in game money line when they

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were down fourteen and three. But uh Dom Domblin couldn't

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>tackle the receivers with nine seconds to go in the game,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>so we got a bad call and we couldn't get

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I just think the Texans I cannot foresee

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>them losing this game at home. They're playing themselves into

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a position to have a shot at a buy in

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the a f C and win this division. And then

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the other game is that I'm going to agree with

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>John and with Gil here. I like the forty Niners

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>getting more than a touchdown up to eight and a half, alright, Niners,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Texans From Mikey Todd, I am gonna go with the

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals up to eight and a half. UM if Pittsburgh.

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh obviously has won seven games this year with smoking mirrors.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin, who I consider a good coach, not a

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.479
<v Speaker 1>great coach. This is the one thing he's great at doing,

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is smoking mirroring his way with defense and

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody on deck somehow pull out games that they shouldn't

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>really be winning. I don't see them blowing out Arizona

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road. I don't see them blowing out anyone.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, all their wins have been tight wins, except

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for that Cincinnati travesty earlier in the year on Monday Night.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Even the Dolphins games should have been close had that

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>idiot not blitzed on third and twenty too late in

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the first half. So I don't see the Steelers winning

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>by more than eight and a half. So give me

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona plus eight and a half, and then for the

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>second part of it, give me the Oakland Arraidas plus

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half as well. I will go Stanford

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>wonging this week with two eight and a half the

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and the Zonas. You know me, Stanford wonging me

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>into oblivion. I'm going San Francisco in Kansas City. I'll

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>take got nine against the Patriots, thank you very much.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>In that one. Uh, Patriots have had trouble with multidimensional quarterbacks.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Patrick Mahomes will give the Patriots defense problems

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with all their weapons, and I don't think it's any

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>stretch to think that New England's offense is still gonna

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have difficulty. I know Kansas City's defense is terrible, but

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you're giving me nine points to work with here. I

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprised if Kansas City wins this game,

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>out right, I really would not be. I think they're

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in the weeds in the a f C. Everybody's kind

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of forgotten about them, and there's really no pressure on them.

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I like Kansas City getting nine in a tease with

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Final two questions, gentlemen, which of the big favorites,

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion is the most likely to lose? Outright?

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Will define them by six points or more? Green Bay

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half or thirteen points favorites against the

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Redskins Viking, same exact thing somewhere in that twelve and

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a half or thirteen point pocket at home against the Lions.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland seven and a half point favorites at home against Cincinnata,

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Houston nine point favorites at home against Denver Um. We'll

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>skip that one because I'll make it too easy. And

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>then Philadelphia nine and a half point favorites. What about

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>BALTI what about Baltimore? Six. That's the one I skipped

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because it would be too easy. Philadelphia nine and a

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites at home against the Giants, uh so,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, Minnesota, Cleveland, Houston, and the Eagles. Which of

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>those is the most likely in your opinion, John to

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>lose outright? Well, it's kind of a cop out answer

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're the shortest favorite. But I actually like the

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Bengals anyway, so I have to say Cleveland here. Bengals

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is the last team I left out of my three

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>best bets because that line has come down from nine

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half down to seven and a half.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati actually looks like a professional football team with Andy

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Dalton playing quarterback. And anytime you can say that Freddie

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Kitchens has a chance to lose, you're probably right. Freddie

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Kitchens is a buffoon. He's done a terrible job with

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>an extremely talented roster in Cleveland, totally dysfunctional team. It

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>really wouldn't surprise me at all if the Bengals won

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this game one and done for Kitchens, you think, I

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>think it has to be. I think if you're the

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Brown, you're wasting a roster that has jam packed

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>with talent on a guy who has no business being

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>an NFL head coach. Yeah, I can't disagree, and I

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a cop out. By the way, I

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 1>still think that's a pretty bold upset if it happens. Mike,

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>same question. I agree with John and I think what

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>we're because of the buffoonery of Kitchens, were overlooking the

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that Baker Mayfield is just not this good either.

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>They get they go out, and they get back up,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and that they have no explosive that the only times

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they moved the ball against the Steelers in that game

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 1>were drives where they diked and they dunked and they ran.

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They cannot stretch the field at all. Dalton very motivated

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, closing in on two touchdown passes for his career,

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's a better quarterback right now than

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. Cincinnati Bagels, I'm gonna go with your Philadelphia Eagles.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>This football team has been atrocious. I mean, losing a

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown lead at Miami the week before. They had

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>no business even being in the game against Seattle there.

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously they're better than the Giants, but I

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>mean the Giants are horrible too. Maybe Eli Manning, who

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was one hundred and sixteen and one hundred and sixteen

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as a starting quarterback for his career, could go out

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on a winning record to beat the Birds in Philadelphia. Look,

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>it's probably unlikely, but nothing would shock me with how

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>how bad the Eagles have been the last couple of weeks.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And I can't add much to that because I think Cincinnati,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Cleveland is probably the right answer, but Philadelphia

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is a close second. I would not be surprised to

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>see that. If the Giants won that game out right,

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it would not shock me. The Cowboys are trying to

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>give the division to the Eagles, and the Eagles refused

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to take it from the Eagles five and seven, getting

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>some of their players back, but uh clearly not helping

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>yet as they squandered fourteen point lead against the Dolphins

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>last week. Final question, then, John, we live in a

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>bizarro world. You're forced to bet aside on each and

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>every one of the sixteen NFL games this week starting tonight,

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're allowed one free pass. What's the game you

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>want no part of whatsoever? On the side bet over

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the the Miami game, Miami against the New York Jets.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why Miami keeps winning. They're better off losing.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the hell the New York Jets think.

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>They ripped off three runs in the world. They scored

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty or four points a game, then they lose to

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals last Sunday. I think Adam Gaze talk

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>about one and done the Browns thing to move on

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>from Kitchens. The Jets need to move on from Adam

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Gays before he ruins Sam Donald, their young quarterback. I

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>can't pick a side in that game because I think

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Miami is probably the right side, but they're better off losing,

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have no idea what the Jets are gonna

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do any given week. I'm staying the hell away from

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that game. Yeah, this may be the biggest. I mean,

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if we'll have more one and done this

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 1>year than any other year in the history of the NFL.

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Mike same question, what's the one you want? No part

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. I don't want any part of the Panthers

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and Falcons. I'm not sure that. I don't know how

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to react to Rivera being let go. I'm

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>not sure he was not u popular with that team

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Falcons played two games like Super Bowl champions,

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>then reverted to their form in the first eight games.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So I have no opinion on game, don't want to

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>touch it. I will go with the Rams in Seattle.

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Who the hell are the Rams? Are they a good team?

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they a bad team? Are they an average team?

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Is their quarterback serviceable? Is he not serviceable? Is he

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>worth million? What the hell is going on with the Rams?

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. I don't want any part of it,

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm off Seattle Rams. And for me, it's Carolina

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta to Mike uh, if you told me Carolina won

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that game by seventeen at the end, or Atlanta did

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>win by seventeen, I wouldn't be surprised either way. And

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, it's got to be that game. I

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.919
<v Speaker 1>have no clue what happens there. Atlanta favored by three.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the sort of default line of we

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what it's gonna be there, Atlanta Carolina.

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>That would be the play for me. John Murray, executive

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>director of Racing Sports at the Westgate super Book, Thank you, John,

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope it wasn't too painful for you, sir, oh

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a great time, guys. I appreciate you guys

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>working around my schedule and hopefully we can all talk

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>against Let's do it all right, John Murray, appreciate it.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>UM for Mike Palm at Circle, Thank you, Mikey Todd,

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you pre ship it as always Todd. I think

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we're toasting the quarterly starting at two and three unless

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we go five and oh, and then we'll be really

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>giddy about it and we'll think we're in it. All

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to do is go twenty and oh from

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>here and we're in. That's that's all we have to do.

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Get utter. Thank you to both of you. Thank you

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to everybody for listening. Good luck with all your picks.

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen in the National Boatball League