Speaker 1: Up next The Truth with Lisa Booth part of the
Speaker 1: game Welcome back to the Truth with Lisa Booth. So
Speaker 1: the Biden administration is learning the hard way that you
Speaker 1: don't mess with Texas. On this episode of the Truth
Speaker 1: with Lisa Booth, I sit down with Texas Attorney General
Speaker 1: Kent Paxston to discuss the Lone Star States legal fight
Speaker 1: against this administration's authoritarian assault on our freedoms. From vaccine
Speaker 1: mandates to the border crisis. The Biden administration is showing
Speaker 1: it doesn't care about your liberty or the rule of law.
Speaker 1: It only cares about power, plain and simple. This is
Speaker 1: a crucial moment for our country and we can't afford bystanders.
Speaker 1: Attorney General Paxton is well aware of what's at stake,
Speaker 1: and that's why the gloves are off in the Lone
Speaker 1: Star State. Don't miss this episode and this interview with
Speaker 1: the Attorney General of Texas, Kent Paxton. YEA, So, it's
Speaker 1: such an honor to have of the Texas Attorney General
Speaker 1: Ken Paxton on this episode. Probably the second greatest state
Speaker 1: in the nation. I am biased as a New Floridian
Speaker 1: and sir, but I really appreciate you joining the show
Speaker 1: at least thanks fornd the on and Florida is not bad.
Speaker 1: We love Florida. In sects, We're still going to claim
Speaker 1: number one, but we like Florida too. A matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I think it's critical that Florida and Texas are sticking together.
Speaker 1: We take on the federal government and so many other
Speaker 1: important issues together. I agree, sir. We were lucky to
Speaker 1: be into the greatest states in the nation, you know, sir,
Speaker 1: I was looking at some of the images coming out
Speaker 1: near the border near Del Rio, Texas over the weekend,
Speaker 1: and they're absolutely unreal. I mean, we're seeing a migrant
Speaker 1: camp with over fourteen thousand people. Many of these individuals
Speaker 1: came from Haiti. I mean, it's just complete and utter lawlessness.
Speaker 1: How did it get this bad? I always say a
Speaker 1: pictures worth a thousand works. This is this is started
Speaker 1: the day that Joe Biden became president, when he told
Speaker 1: the world, Hey, we're had an forcing immigration laws. You
Speaker 1: can come and we won't deport you. That was the message.
Speaker 1: It was clear, it was simple. It was in complete
Speaker 1: violation of federal law. It was in complete violation of
Speaker 1: this constitutional role. And and this is what it's been
Speaker 1: like it's just this finally we get a visual for
Speaker 1: the rest of America to see what Texas and Arizona
Speaker 1: and other states have been dealing with since the very beginning.
Speaker 1: But this is what is happening over This is a
Speaker 1: small segment of those coming. It just so happens that
Speaker 1: they they've all congregated in one area. But that's that's
Speaker 1: like almost a daily amount of people coming across. Because
Speaker 1: there's over two hundred thousand people a month that are
Speaker 1: coming across that we know of, versus just a year
Speaker 1: ago it was like, you know, one fourth of that.
Speaker 1: You look at a city like del Rio, for for example,
Speaker 1: I think it's a city of thirty five thousand people.
Speaker 1: I read and there are over fourteen thousand at their doorsteps.
Speaker 1: So I mean, what impact does this have on a
Speaker 1: city like Del Rio and in a state like Texas
Speaker 1: in general, Who's you know right there in the fight
Speaker 1: obviously is a border state. Yeah, so I've been to
Speaker 1: Del Rio, I've been to Laredo, I've been down to
Speaker 1: McAllen and other cities are all alone the border. It's
Speaker 1: all the same. They're overwhelmed. It puts tremendous pressure on
Speaker 1: them both from a cost standpoint, but also just like
Speaker 1: risk standpoint, um with higher instance of COVID coming in,
Speaker 1: higher instance of human trafficking, bet in all other type
Speaker 1: of crime activity, crimes to the their property. People are
Speaker 1: afraid and it and it definitely affects the lives of
Speaker 1: those right on the border more than probably anybody else
Speaker 1: the United States. You know, the irony of all of
Speaker 1: this is we've got a president who on September nine
Speaker 1: announced the sweeping vaccine mandates for Americans. However, you know,
Speaker 1: he's letting illegal immigrants flow across the border with COVID,
Speaker 1: not vaccinate all these different things. So he's obviously a
Speaker 1: complete hypocrite. But you know, as we look at some
Speaker 1: of these mandates impacting companies with over huttered employees, federal
Speaker 1: workers and contractors as well as healthcare workers, are these
Speaker 1: actions legal? Well, first of all, you bring up a
Speaker 1: really good point that the fact that they are lecturing
Speaker 1: us and trying to force Americans take a vaccine he's
Speaker 1: been lecturing, the president been lecturing is about maths. And
Speaker 1: then he's letting people, not just letting people, but inviting
Speaker 1: people to come into the United States who are unvaccinated,
Speaker 1: who have COVID and then spreads them around the country.
Speaker 1: I mean, the president is the greatest super spreader of
Speaker 1: COVID at any probably buddy in America maybe ever, and
Speaker 1: and so it doesn't make sense to me that he
Speaker 1: cares about COVID. He says he does, but he can't
Speaker 1: care about COVID and let people come in our back
Speaker 1: door with COVID and not do anything about it. So, yes,
Speaker 1: I do think we can do something about it. If
Speaker 1: it's when OSHA brings out their rules, when they promulgate
Speaker 1: their rules, we're gonna look at them, and very likely
Speaker 1: you'll see not only Texas, but most of the Republican
Speaker 1: states will fight back for because it is unconstitutional for
Speaker 1: a president to order anybody to get a vaccine. You know,
Speaker 1: why do you think Democrats so embrace open borders? What's
Speaker 1: behind that? They may all have some differing reasons, but
Speaker 1: I mean, from looking at what the president has done,
Speaker 1: there's clear clearly two things that going on. And the
Speaker 1: only thing I can come up with is one he
Speaker 1: wants to hurt Republican state more crime, more COVID. Then
Speaker 1: he can blame, you know, say things are going bad
Speaker 1: in our states, put more costs on us. So it's
Speaker 1: it's a very insidious reason, but I think it's true.
Speaker 1: And he also wants to have these people here voting
Speaker 1: because he knows if he can overwhelm our states with
Speaker 1: with voters eventually, you know, what they would like to
Speaker 1: see is something like California. It's a one party state
Speaker 1: where there's accountability, corruption can reign. And I'm not a
Speaker 1: believer in a one party system anywhere because without a
Speaker 1: two party system, whether you're a Democrat or Republican, you
Speaker 1: end up with very little accountability for your elected officials.
Speaker 1: And I don't think it would be a very good
Speaker 1: thing to be down the road that that the president wants,
Speaker 1: which is he wants a one party system where they
Speaker 1: run everything as if there is no real election. How
Speaker 1: much correlation is there between you know, Texas COVID numbers
Speaker 1: and hospital zation and all that with these you know,
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants pouring across the border with COVID what what
Speaker 1: you know? How how much of do you think the
Speaker 1: state's problems fighting COVID are are because of open borders?
Speaker 1: You know what, I would say very likely significant because
Speaker 1: there's so many people coming across the border and it's
Speaker 1: uncontrollable for us because we don't know where the president
Speaker 1: is going to send these people. I was talking to
Speaker 1: some police officers in Dallas and they said they were,
Speaker 1: you know, out in their patrols and they could see
Speaker 1: these buses coming in at night. They let people out.
Speaker 1: They're not detained, they just disappear. And that's happening, you know,
Speaker 1: all of our state. I'm sure it's happening to Florida. UM.
Speaker 1: So we can't even know. That's how bad it is
Speaker 1: for us. The President doesn't help us, know, doesn't seem
Speaker 1: to really care, and so we're stuck with the consequences.
Speaker 1: I don't think we'll ever know exactly what percentage, but
Speaker 1: it certainly isn't helping well. And what's so different about
Speaker 1: what we've seen under the Biden administration is that it's
Speaker 1: it's a global immigration crisis. I we people coming from
Speaker 1: all over the world. It's no longer just Central America.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's essentially an open vision, the invitation to
Speaker 1: to anyone anywhere. That's exactly right. And the problem with
Speaker 1: that is not just the fact the things that I mentioned,
Speaker 1: but you have to now add in potential terrorisms. People
Speaker 1: coming in to established terrorist little networks around our country.
Speaker 1: We wouldn't know it. Uh, they're not vetted, they're just released,
Speaker 1: and they're coming from I think a hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: countries are more, and so we're very likely if you
Speaker 1: want to be a terrorist, you want to come here,
Speaker 1: you can get in pretty easily and you can set
Speaker 1: yourself up. All of these guys can set themselves up
Speaker 1: all of the country. And that's obviously not just going
Speaker 1: to affect border states, but it will affect the entire
Speaker 1: country well. And of course this all comes as we're importing,
Speaker 1: you know, untold numbers of Afghans as well to the
Speaker 1: United States, likely unvetted as well. So we not only
Speaker 1: have a wide open, poorest border, but we're also importing
Speaker 1: potential terrorists also some good people, but potential terrorists as well, uh,
Speaker 1: into the country, all unvetted, which you know, to your
Speaker 1: point is a is a huge, huge national security issue
Speaker 1: for our country, you know, sir, I want to get
Speaker 1: into you know, the new abortion law in this state.
Speaker 1: There was a doctor named Dr Allen Brain who has
Speaker 1: an O B G y N for San Antonio. He
Speaker 1: wrote an op ed in The Washington Post recently bragging
Speaker 1: about violating the law and performing an abortion. He says
Speaker 1: a woman has a fundamental right to receive this care.
Speaker 1: What's your response to this doctor and his violation of
Speaker 1: the state's law. Look, he's certainly opened himself up because
Speaker 1: it is an abolition state law, and now the enforcement
Speaker 1: isn't from the state. Any any individual can can sue,
Speaker 1: and so he can he can be sued civilly. And
Speaker 1: if if he's bragging about it, he's basically providing the
Speaker 1: evidence that someone would need to show at least that
Speaker 1: a harmless done and then open himself for for potential
Speaker 1: major damages. So no, I mean he's flaunting it, and
Speaker 1: maybe he's inviting the laws that he wants to be
Speaker 1: the first one suit. But that's certainly he certainly is
Speaker 1: in volation state law. Well, and what makes this law
Speaker 1: different than some of the other states is what you
Speaker 1: just mentioned, is it relies on civil not criminal enforcement.
Speaker 1: Talk about the significance of that and why that's the
Speaker 1: case and why it's different in some other states. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean this was uh put forth by our legislature
Speaker 1: in the last session, which was last spring. Um, I
Speaker 1: think they were trying to take it out of the
Speaker 1: states and and put it, you know, open the course
Speaker 1: up to to for lawsuits, just like they do with
Speaker 1: all other all different kinds of causes of action. So
Speaker 1: the courts can be open for any type of cause
Speaker 1: of that cause of actions of the legislature teams um
Speaker 1: worthy of allowing people to seek redress for a harm
Speaker 1: and so it just for some reason that that particular
Speaker 1: route had never really been opened up to individuals. I
Speaker 1: think it was a pretty creative way to handle it.
Speaker 1: And it takes the state out of having to having
Speaker 1: to deal with prosecutions because in some in our states
Speaker 1: the das wouldn't prosecute it anyway. So it is pretty
Speaker 1: smart move. It took it out of the the hands of
Speaker 1: the district attorneys and put it into the hands of
Speaker 1: individual citizens to bring their their own claim. Quick commercial
Speaker 1: break and then I have more questions for the Attorney
Speaker 1: General of Texas, Kent Paxxton. So you have taken on
Speaker 1: big tech, and there's also a law coming through the
Speaker 1: pipe in Texas that requires social media companies to disclose
Speaker 1: how and why they moderate content. It also give Texans
Speaker 1: the ability to sue it they're wrongfully censored. And you,
Speaker 1: as the attorney general the power to sue companies tech
Speaker 1: companies on behalf of groups of users. How would a
Speaker 1: law like this impact or fight against social media and
Speaker 1: some of the censorship we've seen. And how much impact
Speaker 1: can individual states have on this issue? You know what,
Speaker 1: I think big states really all states eventually can start
Speaker 1: having impact on this. I think big states in particular,
Speaker 1: especially the other states, see what we're doing. States like
Speaker 1: Florida have I think some good legislatures state passed relating
Speaker 1: to these social media tech companies. In addition, we have
Speaker 1: UH in Texas. We have a pretty major lawsuit against
Speaker 1: Google as a as a monopolistic UH company. We think
Speaker 1: we've got a very good chance of affecting how they operate. Um,
Speaker 1: it's just gonna take longer. And so I like the
Speaker 1: fact that the legislature is giving individuals an opportunity to
Speaker 1: protect themselves because these these companies have so much power
Speaker 1: and so much money. Um. And again, it gives individuals
Speaker 1: the opportunity to open the door UH to addressing their
Speaker 1: harm which before these tech companies were protected from. Well,
Speaker 1: and I think that's the broader concern, you know, as
Speaker 1: conservatives here as we see you know, companies have kind
Speaker 1: of shown their colors with going after uh. I mean,
Speaker 1: Texas has been a recipient of it, the ire of
Speaker 1: some of these woke corporations. So is Georgia with their
Speaker 1: election law as well. We've got you know, big tech companies.
Speaker 1: I mean, it seems like, how do we sit in
Speaker 1: you know, we're broadly protect ourselves from some of these
Speaker 1: companies that are essentially doing the Democrat Party's bidding. Well,
Speaker 1: for one, you can stop using their products, um and
Speaker 1: I think that that will slowly but surely send a
Speaker 1: message there as their stock price goes down. Part of
Speaker 1: the problem of these tech companies, though, is that there's
Speaker 1: no other choice their monopolies, and they've they've enforced their
Speaker 1: monopoly with anti competitive behavior and predatory you know, purchases
Speaker 1: of other companies. And so those are the ones that
Speaker 1: we're trying to focus on the ones that we can't
Speaker 1: just go to another choice like coke. You can pick
Speaker 1: another product that there's certainly a probably the largest, and
Speaker 1: but there's still other choices, um that you can make
Speaker 1: it a consumer. You can drink water if you want to.
Speaker 1: So I would I would encourage people if if you
Speaker 1: see companies acting that way to stop purchasing their products.
Speaker 1: But should the fight be bigger than that? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, our corporations and the enemy of conservatives these days. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's a great question. I mean, I think individual companies,
Speaker 1: I mean, they it's it's harder to to say what
Speaker 1: what they should do, what they should do. It's one
Speaker 1: thing when the government is limiting our speech and imposing
Speaker 1: restrictions on people's speech and their ability to communicate. When
Speaker 1: it's an individual company, if they're not ballistic, Uh, there's competition.
Speaker 1: I think the best choice really is for consumers to
Speaker 1: organize and say, look, we're not going to use you.
Speaker 1: It's when they're monopolistic and we don't have a choice
Speaker 1: that I think governments have to step in and give
Speaker 1: people that option. You know. S it seems like, you know,
Speaker 1: as we look around the country, particularly over you know,
Speaker 1: throughout COVID, there's just seems to be such a loss
Speaker 1: of liberty in the country. You know, all of our
Speaker 1: freedoms are under attack. We look at you know, censorship
Speaker 1: is rampant. Uh, the Second Amendment is under attack. People
Speaker 1: were not allowed to worship in certain parts of the country.
Speaker 1: We've seen a great centralization of power in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: Are we still a constitutional republic? So you know, rama
Speaker 1: Manuel One said, and I think it was him that said,
Speaker 1: don't ever let a crisis go to waste. They made
Speaker 1: a crisis that is this, and they they certainly not
Speaker 1: let it go to waste. The left is certainly pushed
Speaker 1: towards less freedom, less constitutional government, and I would say, yes,
Speaker 1: we are risk if we're on the verge right now
Speaker 1: of losing our representative constitutional government with the checks and
Speaker 1: balances on power that our founders put in place. And
Speaker 1: the founders didn't trust government, That's why they put these
Speaker 1: checks and balances in place. And what the Biden administration
Speaker 1: is doing is trying to silence those differences. They're trying
Speaker 1: to uh place power, centralized power with the president in Washington,
Speaker 1: away from the states, trying to limit our abilities of
Speaker 1: states to operate, even suing us of our own. It's
Speaker 1: one thing for the federal government to follow federal law,
Speaker 1: which is what Biden does every day. It's another thing
Speaker 1: for him to create new law, which is trying to
Speaker 1: do with these vaccine thing and even another thing where
Speaker 1: you go to to Georgia and Florida and Texas and
Speaker 1: says you can't pass those the law. This is the
Speaker 1: type of administration we have. And yet we the American
Speaker 1: people need to wake up. We are on the verge
Speaker 1: of losing our constitutional government. Well, and I mean we
Speaker 1: also we saw this recently with General Mark Millie, the
Speaker 1: chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I mean, bragging
Speaker 1: about attempted a coup against President Trump, and the left
Speaker 1: and the media celebrated these actions. I mean, this may
Speaker 1: sound outrages, but I don't really know how far away
Speaker 1: we are from a Democrat president saying I need a
Speaker 1: third term and then because Republicans are evil and the
Speaker 1: media cheering it along. It just seems like there's no
Speaker 1: regard for the constitution anymore. Yeah, or a third term,
Speaker 1: or just making sure that the elections are not that
Speaker 1: are they're not fair and that people can't trust them.
Speaker 1: And that's certainly what happens in other countries. You know,
Speaker 1: you look at Benzezuela. They moved away from a constitutional
Speaker 1: government or of democracy to dictatorship, and they did it
Speaker 1: through the voting process. And so that's why I think
Speaker 1: you're seeing such great attempts at the federal level to
Speaker 1: federalize election because they know that in California they've got
Speaker 1: it's one party system, no accountability, no real competitive elections.
Speaker 1: We saw that with the recall, and that's the way
Speaker 1: they want it. They want complete control where there really
Speaker 1: isn't a reason to go vote because there's no hope
Speaker 1: and that if we get to that point, we have
Speaker 1: lost our representative government. We have no We're no difference
Speaker 1: than Venzehuela or Cuba, or Russia or China. Will be
Speaker 1: controlled by a few people. Quick break back on the
Speaker 1: other side, stay with us. You look at the election,
Speaker 1: it was extremely close in Texas, but it was also
Speaker 1: this really unique election because we saw an unprecedented use
Speaker 1: of absentee ballots across the country in a way that
Speaker 1: we have never seen before in this country. Without that
Speaker 1: easy access to absentee ballots, do you think Joe Biden
Speaker 1: would have won? You know, like I can only tell
Speaker 1: you what happened in Texas, and we fought thought that
Speaker 1: we just like other states, there was a massive attempt
Speaker 1: by some of these democratic account needs to change the
Speaker 1: rules the legislature put in place and start mailing out
Speaker 1: absentee ballots. They were gonna mail out over two and
Speaker 1: a half million in Harris County, Atlone. Same in Travis County,
Speaker 1: which is where Austin is. Same in Bear County, which
Speaker 1: we're San Antonio is. Had we allowed that to happen,
Speaker 1: we fought off twelve lawsuits. Had we lost any one
Speaker 1: of those lawsuits, we would have been doing the same thing.
Speaker 1: We would have been counting mail in ballots for a
Speaker 1: couple of days. Very likely they would have had enough
Speaker 1: to overcome the Trump election. Trumpet A lost Texas, we
Speaker 1: would have lost the Texas House. And once those rules
Speaker 1: get put in place, you can see from California, Once
Speaker 1: those type of mail in ballots where you can commit
Speaker 1: fraud or in place, it's hard to ever undo it.
Speaker 1: So yes, I think that that had a significant impact.
Speaker 1: You could look at all the states that changed their
Speaker 1: rules for COVID locally instead of falling with the legislature
Speaker 1: put in place, and you know, Joe Biden one of
Speaker 1: those states. And I think it was no accident the
Speaker 1: way this happened. And knowing what I know that we
Speaker 1: had to fend off twelve lawsuits and went all of them,
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised that this is what happened nationwide. Well,
Speaker 1: and that's you know, to your point earlier, that's why
Speaker 1: the Democrats are fighting so hard to federalize elections and
Speaker 1: also to keep some of these things in in the
Speaker 1: process of absentee ballots, no excuse, absentee ballots, and then
Speaker 1: also you know, counting ballots way past election day. Yep,
Speaker 1: that's exactly what happened. It was no coincidence that had happened.
Speaker 1: And I mean, we've never seen it happen before that
Speaker 1: I know of. And then it happens in you know,
Speaker 1: six states, and what happened in our state had we
Speaker 1: not had we not taken the huge effort to fight
Speaker 1: this off, and I think one of the broader problems
Speaker 1: we're facing. I mean, look, I think skepticism is healthy.
Speaker 1: I'm a firm believer in not trusting you know anything.
Speaker 1: It's hence the premise of this show. But we've really
Speaker 1: had almost every institution of this country has you know,
Speaker 1: given Americans good reason not to trust them, whether it's
Speaker 1: the the FBI, the UH, you know, even with the
Speaker 1: the c d C, the n i H. With Anthony
Speaker 1: Fauci in charge that the media, what does this mean
Speaker 1: for the country moving forward. You know what, you know
Speaker 1: the Declaration of Independence that our rights for granted is
Speaker 1: by God, not by the government, and it gave us
Speaker 1: a right to reform government that wasn't answering to the people,
Speaker 1: wasn't honoring our inalienable rights. And we've got massive amount
Speaker 1: of government. Now. You mentioned some of the agencies that
Speaker 1: no one can people can't trust anymore, and I think
Speaker 1: we have to figure out a way to win a
Speaker 1: few more elections that we have to reform this government.
Speaker 1: We have to, you know, restart some of these agencies
Speaker 1: from from scratch, because they don't answer to the people anymore.
Speaker 1: They are there somewhat corrupt, if not totally corrupt, and
Speaker 1: they don't they don't take care of the American people.
Speaker 1: They've got their they've got their own agenda. And that's
Speaker 1: that's an agency that shouldn't exist, whether it's law enforcement
Speaker 1: or whether it's you know, the E p A. Or
Speaker 1: whatever it is. You know, insert your You're facing a
Speaker 1: pretty crowded primary right now. You've got a step state
Speaker 1: rab Matt Cross, I think of pronouncing his last name,
Speaker 1: just entered Land Commissioner George P. W. Bush. Some of
Speaker 1: them are are citing some of the legal challenges that
Speaker 1: you're you're facing. How vulnerable do you think you are
Speaker 1: right now? Well, look, I just continue to do the
Speaker 1: right things. I can tell you this if if you're
Speaker 1: there fighting the way I'm fighting, this is the kind
Speaker 1: of stuff that they do to you, it's inevitable. Um.
Speaker 1: And the people that are trying to take my job
Speaker 1: are part of the problem. They're not people that are
Speaker 1: going to step out and take these risks, are gonna
Speaker 1: put themselves in the front of the line of the
Speaker 1: people that kind of shoot you in the back and
Speaker 1: and hope that they can step into your spot, But
Speaker 1: they don't really want to step into the same spot.
Speaker 1: They don't want to be at the front line of
Speaker 1: the fight. And there are very few people that actually
Speaker 1: want that that role. I didn't ask for it, but
Speaker 1: because of the situation that our country is in uh
Speaker 1: Texas and I have in my office has stepped into
Speaker 1: it and will continue to step into it. And I
Speaker 1: know they're always consequences for that, and and some of
Speaker 1: them are pretty tough to deal with, but I won't quit. UM.
Speaker 1: I think my my polling is very good, our fundraising
Speaker 1: is good, so we'll just continue to fight the fight
Speaker 1: no matter what those people say. Well, you know, we've
Speaker 1: seen the targeting of President Trump as well. You know.
Speaker 1: And last question, you know, looking at the state, so
Speaker 1: you know you're going to face Democrat challenges statewide? Uh
Speaker 1: so is Governor Abbott? You know election was extremely close
Speaker 1: in the state of Texas. What are you guys looking
Speaker 1: at in terms of statewide? Are you concerned that Republicans
Speaker 1: could lose their their control of the state, Like, I'm
Speaker 1: always concerned because we we always have to we have
Speaker 1: to communicate our message and make people aware that without
Speaker 1: the leadership that we have from the Republican Party, this
Speaker 1: whole country could be lost. And so you know, it's
Speaker 1: a pretty important fight. It's one we have to win.
Speaker 1: We can't afford to lose Texas. Um So, all I
Speaker 1: can tell you is we're going to do our best
Speaker 1: communicate that message, and the people of Texas have to
Speaker 1: either stay in the fight or realize we're gonna we're
Speaker 1: gonna lose the fight. Attorney General Ken packs into the
Speaker 1: great state of Texas almost as great as Florida. Sir,
Speaker 1: they thank you so much for your time. I truly
Speaker 1: appreciate it, absolutely have a great day. Thanks for having
Speaker 1: me on m Yeah. I want to thank Texas Attorney
Speaker 1: General Ken Paxton for making time for the show, and
Speaker 1: I want to thank you guys at home for listening.
Speaker 1: If you enjoy our show, please leave us a review
Speaker 1: and rate us five stars on Apple Podcasts. I love
Speaker 1: reading those that means so much when we take the
Speaker 1: time to leave feedback into reviews. Please do that. You
Speaker 1: can also follow me personally on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook
Speaker 1: at least some rebooth. I also want to anchor team
Speaker 1: producer John Cassio, writer and researcher Aaron Kleigman, and our
Speaker 1: executive producers Debbie Myers and speaker New Gingrich, all part
Speaker 1: of the Gingridge three sixty network and team