WEBVTT - Trump Reshapes Global Order With Maduro Capture

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>The first name on the list was Edward Morse. Absolutely

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>definitive within the global zeitgeis, if you will, the Washington

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Consensus on Petroleum. All sorts of efforts here, including his

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>work with the Council on Foreign at Relations, and we're

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>honored that doctor Morris would join us in our studio today.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg, doctor Morse. When I look at this,

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the arch question is a cup of coffee

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>this morning with the President of the United States, how

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>would you brief him on the timeline to get Venezuela

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to a new Caracas, a new Venezuela.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>The timeline is very, very long. The timeline includes not

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>just what must be done on the oils patch, but

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>also includes how do you get this government to cooperate

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>with the United States? And yes, starting out on a

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>good foot, but this can't be done without a change

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>in the entire view of the government of how they

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>do what they do. They're there to make money, they're

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>there to control things, and they can't do that and

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 3>have the oil patch resume what it was like twenty

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>five years ago.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>This is a transactional president. You have lived, with your

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>iconic work at City Group, a transactional big American banks

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>enjoying losing big money in Latin America and other places.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you perceive as a relationship of President Trump

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>with mister Diamond, with mister moynihan and with other financiers

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of America.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's got a good relationship with the financial sect

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for all kinds of good reasons that we can get into.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a separate subject. But here the capital has to

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>come from oil companies, and oil companies look at risk.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>They look at the risk in the marketplace, what is

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>a supply demand balance, They look at the risks of

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>an investment, and in the case of Venezuela, they need

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of capital going into infrastructure, and that infrastructure

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 3>has to be in place before the oil comes out

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of the ground. So we're talking here about billions of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>dollars to start to restore the infrastructure that will get

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>things going to allow oil on a sustainable basis to

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 3>rise by a mere four or five hundred thousand barrels

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>a day. That's twenty billion dollars. Twenty billion dollars is

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>not nothing when oil companies have opportunities in Guyana, opportunities

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 3>in Argentina, opportunities in Brazil, and opportunities in Africa. So

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the question is what will attract companies to spend the

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 3>capital that Trump needs for the transaction toward Paul.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Chevron debt eleven point seven percent, that's where they are

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Just as an example, what do you think the US

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 4>government or what do you think those energy companies would

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 4>need from the US government in terms of assurances or

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 4>whatever to commit that capital.

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, well, they need the reassurance from the

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Venezuelan side as well as from the US government, because

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 3>the US government said that it's not taking over Venezuela

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>have good point, so it needs it needs to have

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the confidence, which will be step by step, and I

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>suspect that the first step will be with Chevron to

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>see whether they can make good in short term of

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>capital with short term return. So I think it's going

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>to be a slow process, but it will be trust,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>building on trust, and we'll see how smooth that transition goes.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Takos to just describe the energy when we talk about Venezuela,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 4>what do they have, what do they need?

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>How big are they is?

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 4>How important is this because I understand there's a lot underground,

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 4>it's quite important.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So the world is known for a long time that

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Venezuela has the largest known oil reserves in the world.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>The problem is it's not the kind of oil that

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the world needs or wants. And the

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 3>problem is it's in Venezuela, and it's complicated oil to

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>get out of the ground. But they've done it before,

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and they've managed to go from under two million barrels

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a day to three and a half million barrels a

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>day in a relatively short period of time a couple

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>of decades ago. So if the will is there and

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the government is there to provide the guarantees, but to

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>do that you need the government institutions to be rewarned.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Those government institutions have themselves deteriorate it dramatically. They don't

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 3>have the human resources, they don't have the personnel to

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 3>be able to guide it. So part of the process

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>will be a return of that human resource base.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Edard wars with this for a lengthy conversation this morning

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>with heart Tree and of course Definitive It's City Group,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>among other services to the United States over his long

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>decades on petroleum on Hydrocarbon's I believe I've shared the

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>stage with you and Shannon O'Neil at the Council on

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Relations. Doctor O'Neil was on with us recently exceptionally

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 2>gloomy about Venezuela's ability to reorganize given an event like

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen. I assume you've been to Caracas more

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 2>than forty times. You remember a Caracas from another time

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in place. Do you have any optimism that they can

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>move from a Cuba like society to something that could

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>get capitalism done.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, you have to be a little bit optimistic given

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the change that has already taken place. So changing getting

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Maduro out of that position is a major step. And

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>now the government is in a crisis of survival. That

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>survival will require them to collaborate with the US. So

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the options that they have are quite limited. Who is

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>going to replace the US at this moment in time?

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Given the US military position, the naval position surrounding Venezuela,

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the control that the US has over Venezuelan exports, it's

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>not easy to imagine a replacement for that. So the

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 3>good news really is that they are cooperating to start

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>and we'll see how that goes, but it will be

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>a long road with difficulty.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Is it your understanding, just based upon the limited reporting

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that we have in the last forty eight hours, that

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 4>the government of Venzezezuela was in contact with the Trump

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 4>administration if to facilitate that mister Maduro being taken.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Look, it could not have been done without there being

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>some contact within the government. We know from reporting that

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the intelligence operations preceded this. They were on the ground,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>they had to have help to be on the ground,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and undoubtedly they were not taken by surprise because of

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the smooth way events went on over the weekend.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I do think China is viewing what's going on these days.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 3>China's in a big difficult position they have. They are

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>massive creditor to Venezuela. Venezuela has been part of central

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to the Belton Road initiative enlarging China's influence in Latin America.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me and it's been, frankly a failure. They have

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>between fifty and one hundred billion of debt. Their operations

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>right now are to export oil to pay for that debt.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>The US controls they are exports out of Venezuela. So

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>they had, Yes, they came down and condemned the US government.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>They had to do that. But they have to take

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 3>a quiet approach because there's so much at stake between

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>them and the US on a global basis, so much

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 3>at stake on a bilateral basis, including their tariffs, that

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>they want to see.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Some resolution on.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think we'll see quiet diplomacy with China and

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the US rather than stamping on the foot or saying

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>anything about military force.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>In my reading, I've heard that. But what does Edward Morris,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to butcher the pronunciation, doctor Morris. Do we

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>need to show the flag this morning and Kaushing Port

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>in Taiwan? Does the US Navy need to get over there,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, like Perry centuries ago, show the flag, tim.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the US showed the flag before Madua was

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>taken out. They showed the flag with a massive military

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 3>seal to Taiwan, right, and the military has been there

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the navy has been there. China is not in a

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 3>position to fool around with the US, even with much

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 3>of the US naval fleet now around Venezuela. So I

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be stepping you know, very lightly

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>on what would happen Van.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Morris with his folks a special edition of Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>We really held back the commercial interruptions to give you

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>this conversation for America. Around the world. You have such

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 2>a relationship with Faisal and on in Saudi Arabia. How

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 2>does the Middle East in general, and particularly read and Jetta,

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>how do they respond to these actions?

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>There is my quite quietly, Riata is looking at the

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>global setting. They know that Venezuela could be a threat

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 3>to the production agreement within OPEK plus, but not in

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 3>the short run. And the short run they're looking at

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the year ahead. The year ahead is quite uncertain and

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>quite messy, and it was that way before the taking

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>of Maduro. So we have Russia, Ukraine, we have uncertainty

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>on the distortion and disruption side around the world, and

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the Saudis have also a military tide of the US

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that they don't want to lose, so they have to

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and they look at their budget. The budget requires a

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of borrowing. That borrowing may include in their own minds.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 3>How low can prices go for US six Where.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Folks I failed the fall, I've failed. Ed Morris nailed

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the decline in oil. Do we have a lower oil

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>target from her for heartreat?

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>So we don't know how low the price will go.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 3>It's lifted a little bit by the geopolitical risk. I'd

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>say the supply demand balance, which is higher supply than

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 3>the race demand now and going forward, is for oil

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 3>testing branded forty okay, And I think testing branded forty

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>is something the Saudia's can swallow. How much lower than

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 3>that they can swallow? It is not known.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to say, because Paul's got any questions.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to go visit Trump. President Trump is

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>going to bean Edward Morris coffee with the President. You're

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about a transactional American president. And I

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>know you're going to get a phone call from Ottawa

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>where Mark Kearney is going to go Edmonton's playing Ottawa,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Edmore's come join me at an Ottawa senator's hockey game.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the way it's going to work.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you say to Mark Kearney of Canada.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, so with Trump, because I haven't answered your question

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>if I say that Trump, and what I said to

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump is your policy on energy dominance is a wonderful strategy.

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>But mister President, I think you're ignoring some things about

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>energy dominance. And there are two things about it. One

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>is that you can't get to where you want without

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>having a significant growth because this is a world transitioning

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to electricity intensity, and you can't do the electricity intensity

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you need for AI and cloud computing and energy dominance

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>without renewables. You can't do it even without hydrogen. So

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>you've got to enlarge what you think about energy dominance.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And then, mister President, you've got to think about the US.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 3>The US is not one country when it comes to energy.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>At six, we have two exporting segments in the US.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>They are the Gulf Coast of the US and I'm

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>not talking about the Gulf of America or the Gulf

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of Mexico, but the Gulf Coast. And we have Alaska,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>both exporters of fossil fuels. And then we have two

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>massive importers of fossil fuel with no tie and mister President,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 3>here is a lesson. The reason that we have two

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 3>importers on the West Coast and the East Coast that

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 3>are massive in scale, global in scale, is because another

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>period of dominance around World War One, we thought we

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>were the best shipbuilding company country in the world and

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 3>we wanted to retain that dominance. So the Jones Act

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 3>was enacted, and the Jones Act has meant that when

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 3>it comes to energy we are importer. Is because we

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 3>can't afford American chips to take oil from the Gulf

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Coast to the West Coast or the East Coast. We

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>need foreign vessels and they carry farm So this is.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>The moment to do away with the Jones Act.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>This is the moment to do it, I mean, and

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>also to tell the President energy dominance a good idea

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 3>needs a little bit of massaging at the edge.

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean. The photograph of Theodore Roosevelt with a map

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of Venezuela behind him from I believe Paul nineteen oh

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>nine was just stunning. I mean, this history going back here,

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney with Edward Morris.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 4>So when you go down to Houston, you talk to

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 4>these big energy companies today, are they happy with what's

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 4>going on in the last twenty four or forty eight hours,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>or are they apprehensive that they see a big opportunity here.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>They see a better opportunity that than they've seen in years,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 3>but they are apprehensive. The risk of putting capital, their capital,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 3>their shareholders capital at risk looms extremely large in their minds.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 3>So there's not going to be a rush to put

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>money into Venezuela until we see what the structure of

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 3>the investment might look like.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised I don't see a move in WTI and

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Brent Crewe today. Now, I couldn't have told you is

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 4>it going to be a five percent or down five percent?

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>But I kind of got nothing going on here today.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, in my prepared remarks, I thought that was the

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>first question.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>You know that we're going to have prices go down

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a load.

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Its surveillance. You know, we make it up as we're

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>winging it.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not surprised. Okay, there is no change in

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the energy market period.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 4>There you go, all right, So, but I think at

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 4>some point it just feels like almost Opeck and Opeck

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 4>plus become less and less relevant every day.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Opeck and OUTPECK plus have become less relevant every day

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>since the beginning of this decade. And when we look

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 3>at the positions that have put this in, it's not

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 3>just the rise of Guyana and Brazil and Argentina again,

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>but it really is the US, the US, you know,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I have this battle with my colleagues at work almost

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 3>every day. The US is not just a crude oil producer.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 3>It is a massive liquids producer. We are a producer

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 3>of twenty three to twenty four million barrels a day,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and our growth has been in natural gas liquids. Natural

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>gas liquids compete with oil out of a refinery. They

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 3>compete with gasoline, they compete with dissolate, they compete with

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>fuel oil. They're there for transportation, they're there for home

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>heating and power generation and industrial use. So we are

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the disruptor of the global market, and we're the ones

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>who put OPEC plus in a position of defense.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I would be out. We're going to have to wrap

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>it up here with Mark Champion coming up, folks from Europe,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>with all of his decades of experience, Doctor Morris. Some

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of the the highlights of my career here than with

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>you in with Daniel Jurgen. If I was to get

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Jurgen in morse together and look at his the prize,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>just the romance that I, as a kid in college

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>read cover to cover. We got to find the romance

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>for Venezuela, to save a society, to save a region,

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe to support the don Road doctrine. I don't know

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>how do we get the romance back that you knew

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 2>working there, that I knew as a student. I don't

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>know how we do that.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I know that I'm not going to bring the romance back,

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and Dan Jurgen certainly has the ability.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>To do it.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I was an early reader of the Prize.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 3>He and I knew each other in graduate school. We

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 3>were in different graduate schools. And when he wrote The Price,

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>the original version that I read was actually twice as

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 3>long as a version in print, So he had to

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 3>cut out a lot of wonderful text in order to

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>put out that brilliant book.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 2>The book was it, Paul? It was You had to

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>walk around even if you didn't read it. You walked

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a walk it. Yeah, to be cool. You're gonna talk

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 2>about this unique American relationship with various and sundry banana

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>republics Reagan and Granada and the rest. Can we develop

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a new process with central in Latin America or will

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 2>this be the same old, same world through the rest

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Trump term.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, I think I think there is a process going on.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>If we look at elections that have taken place in

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Latin America, there's a rebellion in those countries against corruption.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 3>There's a move from the corrupt left to the right.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 3>We've had a corrupt right in the past, but it's

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>been a very constructive set of moves from reelections. So

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I think Latin America is in a very

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>good position now, better position than it's been in a

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>long time. And part of it is the lessons learned

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>from China, overspending and having a view that all credit

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 3>has to be repaid.

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Paul, we got to mark Champion, but doctor Morris,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I got to bring this up, Paul said, you got

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to ask the question time, what's it mean for land Man?

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much for inviting me.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>This had a pleasure to be more. Thank you so much.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>We're the hard Tree And of course doctor Morris was

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>City Group for many years. Edward Warrice there stay with us.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Apple,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Keith Leernert, he's the CIO and chief market strategist at

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Truest Keith, So we think about twenty twenty six year,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 4>we got geopolitics front and center here today to start

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 4>kind of the year off, right, let's step back to

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 4>just a little bit there. What are your outlook for

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>markets in twenty twenty six after just outstanding results and

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 4>equities and bonds and commodities in twenty twenty five.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, first, great to kind of bring in the

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 6>new year with you guys.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Great to be on.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 6>So our look that we published in December was called

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 6>the seventh Inning Stretch, and the way we thought about

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 6>it is, you know, we've come a long way in

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 6>the economic cycle and the markets. It was a good

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 6>time to kind of access where we are and our

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 6>bottom line is, you know, our way the evidence approach

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 6>suggests it is still upside in both the economy and

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 6>the stock market. So let me just share a couple

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 6>of stats with you.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 5>The first one is, you.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 6>Know, we just had our third year anniversary of the

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 6>bullmarket late last year. When we look historically, there's been

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 6>seven bull markets that has had a third year anniversary,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 6>all them sore gains over the next year. It's only

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 6>a sample size of seven, but as a starting point,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 6>that's a positive. If I lay on top of that

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 6>that the Fed once again in December cut rates when

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 6>when the SMP was close to all time highs.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 5>When you test that out about a year.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 6>Later, the market has been up more than ninety percent

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 6>of the time, so that's also a positive. And then

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned the earning side. You know, the pe for

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 6>the overall market last year was flat. For the technology

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 6>sector it was actually down. And all the games really

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 6>last year were earnings. As we move forward, we expect

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 6>low double digit earnings again that should support the overall market.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 6>I will say it is a mid timber election year.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 6>Those tend to be somewhere more vatile. We have our

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 6>first turn ball that we saw here with the Venezuela

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 6>over yesday.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>What I got most wrong last year was, as in

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the triple leverage, all cash run for the entire year.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Paul cratered great. I mean that Cratered you learned. What'd

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 2>you get most wrong? Last year?

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 6>When I get most most wrong, I would say, I thought,

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, when think about the April trade side, we

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 6>downgraded equities in February.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 5>We told a lot of investors do not sell at

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 5>the lowest.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 6>But then after we had the initial pop, we took a.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 5>Little bit off the table.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 6>So I think that's probably if you say what you

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 6>got most wrong. What I'm proud of is that we

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 6>didn't stay there too long. We then upgraded stocks are

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 6>shortly thereafter. But it was you know, we follow this

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 6>way of the evidence approach, and you know it overall

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 6>led us directly in the right way.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 4>So fixed income here high single did your returns in

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five in twenty six? Is it just a

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 4>function of clipping the coupon?

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 6>I think so for the most part, I mean our

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 6>house views is the ten year drifts towards three seventy five,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 6>So maybe you get a little bit of price appreciation,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 6>and you know, relative to the last ten fifteen years,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 6>you know, yields are still somewhat attractive.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, we think, you know, we we basically clipped

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 5>the coupon.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 6>That's why I with an overall assd allocation, we still

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 6>have a modest equity tilt, and we still all year along.

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 6>Last year we had our position in gold, which we

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 6>call the MVP, and we still like gold as we

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 6>move into this year, at least from a portfolio diversification standpoint, Say.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 2>To people, Keith, like they participated, but maybe they were

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, sixty forty they were more fixed income or Paul,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>how I mean, how many people are in cash? The

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>money mark fronts three point x percent. Yeah, Kathy Jones

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>is not agen. She's the only one that hasn't. Hey,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Keith Lerner, you're talking to Kathy Jones and Charles Schwab

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 2>or anybody else. When did you make the shift to equities?

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, you know, I don't think it's like

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 6>on off switch. In our review, we actually have, you know,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 6>just kind of targeted levels of cash. We've been telling

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 6>folks if you have excess cash to work that in

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 6>the market. It could be inequities, it could be in

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 6>fixed income. And you know you just mentioned yeah, bond's

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 6>underperformed stocks. But you know, you really what you're paying

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 6>for or what you're looking for for fixed income is

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 6>to clip that coupone for income and some stability.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 5>So I would still be working that money in.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 6>And we still think there's upside in the equity market,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 6>in the fixed income market, and we do think that

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 6>will likely see one to two rate cuts this year,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 6>which means those short term money market rates are likely

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 6>to come down.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 5>Or is our fixed income.

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 6>Had says the error of you know, buying the T

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 6>bills and just chilling is likely over.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 5>So I think there's still opportunity.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Kathy Jones is at peace sitting in her studio because

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Keith saying, take the coupe part and say think one

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>more for Keith Learner.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Keith, as good as the equity returns in the

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 4>US in twenty twenty five, they were better outside of

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 4>the US. How do you think about US versus the

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world in terms of the equity markets

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>in twenty.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 6>Six Yeah, big picture, we have a modest over to

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 5>We have over the last fifteen.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 6>Months increased our international We have a global bull market

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 6>on the way. I would just say, though a lot

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 6>of focus on how much in the US underperformed last

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 6>year zoom out. The year before, the US had outperformed

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 6>international developed by the most in the nineties, and it's

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 6>still more than about double the performance of international.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Over the last five years. So listen. I think there's

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 5>opportunities globally.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 6>I want to have more allocation there, but we still

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 6>have a bias for the US because their earning trends

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 6>still remain strongest domestically.

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Keith, Thank you so much. Keith lerner with us with

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Truis to get us started in the equity markets. Stay

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now for Too Sure a visit. Henrietta Treys

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 2>joins us from Data Partners. Henriette an open question, what

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 2>will you study and listen for on Capitol Hill this morning?

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's the question of the hour.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 8>I would say that the White House likes to tell

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 8>Capitol Hill that they are incredibly transparent, and I think

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 8>what they mean by that is that they talk a lot,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 8>and they tell voters, they tell lawmakers what they're thinking

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 8>in real time. So one of the things that's most

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 8>important to me is what comes after Venezuela. Obviously we're

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 8>hearing about Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico. And i'd point out

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 8>one thing that I think is really important for investors

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 8>right now, which is that Ambassador Greer, the USTR has

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 8>stopped putting into writing the way that the United States

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 8>is planning to treat the USMCA, the US Mexico Canada

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Trade Agreement. They're saying, we're going to basically adapt to

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 8>this on the fly. We are going to be updating

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 8>things as Mexico responds to our incursions in Venezuela, what

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 8>might be coming in Cuba or Colombia. They're telegraphing that

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 8>there's more to come. So I think when members on

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 8>Capitol Hook get their briefings, they're not going to be

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 8>concerned about the who, what, where, when, why, what happened

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 8>over the weekend. They're looking to what comes next and

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 8>getting out in front of it. And I think the

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 8>White House is telegraphing that there is much more to come.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Henrietta, what are you with twenty four hours of hindsight here?

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 4>What do you think the political calculus was for President

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Trump and his advisors as it relates to going into

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 4>another perhaps open ended commitment to another country versus kind

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 4>of what he said on the campaign trail about that

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 4>that's not what we're going to do here. We're going

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 4>to get ourselves away from that type of foreign policy.

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 4>How do you think that worked out?

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 8>I think so far what's happened is that no one

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 8>can say anything negative about what actually went down. There's

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 8>no military desk on the United States side. It was fast.

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Maduro and his wife are in the United States already

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 8>awaiting trial right now. So it's going to be the

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 8>fallout and sort of wrangling members going forward that they're

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 8>going to need to do with every single piece in

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 8>their arsenal. So the briefings on the Senate side today

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 8>between the House Republicans and the President tomorrow, it's going

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 8>to be imperative that they keep descent to a bare minimum.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's going to be successful.

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 8>I imagine they lose two votes on the Senate side

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 8>and maybe two votes on the House side, but they

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 8>can keep descent at bay, keep the war powers resolutions

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 8>at bay, and that's going to be their number one priority.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Keep the Republican rank and file in line.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you think President Trump or in the midterm elections

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party will pay any price here for this type

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 4>of farm policy, That's the question.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 8>I would say no, mostly because American voters do not

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 8>care about foreign policy. So unless they're our military desks,

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 8>this can go downward. But there's not an upside for

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 8>the president here. Gas prices are already low. It's going

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 8>to take years to bring Venezuelan and oil onto the market.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 8>You've got to put it out previously. The maybe Europe

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 8>benefits here, but this is not going to bring gas

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 8>prices down in the United States, is the expectation of

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 8>all the investors I spoke with and energy sector experts

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 8>I spoke with this weekend. So I think we're really

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 8>still on affordability, inflation, jobs, prices, and it is by

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 8>far and away the number one issue of voters, and

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 8>they don't like the President's handling of it. And that's

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 8>that's the reality that the White House and the Republican

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 8>Conference have to face.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Any of the trades with this Vada partner as we continue.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Where they're into this closing hour of Bloomberg surveillance is

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 2>seven o'clock. Are here in New York Internet our Michael mcgloan,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Damien Sasa, Edward Morris, Mark Champion, I think from London,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 2>as well as Lisa Matteo Henrietta. Unspoken in the X

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 2>number of briefings I've read in the last forty hours

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty hours, is the United States military and particularly our Navy.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Is the feeling in your context that our military is stretched?

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't get that impression, mostly because as you've seen

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 8>federal spending on the Navy, on the Coastguard, on the Marines,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 8>everything has gone up. This year, federal spending is up

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 8>six percent and that's going to continue. So one of

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 8>the things that we don't have is a defense appropriations

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 8>bill beyond January thirtieth, And that's really important because the

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 8>White House is now in a position to come and

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 8>request more money for the Department of Defense, for the Pentagon,

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 8>for any of the agencies associated with the military, and

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 8>you can bet.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 7>Your bottom Dalla that request is coming.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 8>In one of the things you might like to do

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 8>is delay that request so it doesn't look like this

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 8>incursion is costing money. They can push it out into

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 8>February and March. I suspect there will be a short

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 8>term cr that punts on long term solutions to the

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 8>Department of Defense and spending there. But there's going to

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 8>be more money flowing to defense.

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>It's Washington fighting the last war where what we need

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>is another aircraft carrier or is the answer six million drones?

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Oh man, are you bringing in shipbuilding? I will talk

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 7>about that all day. I mean, I know your agent shipbuilding.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Your agent called me at three am and said, Tom, shipbuilding, Henrietta.

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, if you're going to bring up trade

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 8>and you know what we're doing on tariffs and all that,

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 8>it's very much associated with shipbuilding.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 7>You can see it.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 8>And the President's you know, not finished but endeavored trade

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 8>deals with Japan, with South Korea, with China, bringing shipbuilding

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 8>back to the United States. So that is definitely a

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 8>part of what President Trump wants. Actual physical you know,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 8>almost like battleship the game.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 7>Make sure you have them ships here in the United States.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 8>They're actively working to build that out, Henrietta.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 4>We are obviously folcusing today and probably for the days

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 4>to come on geopolitics. But don't we have to keep

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 4>this government open? What's the status there?

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>We sure knew.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 8>The government is prepared to shut down on February first

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 8>if they don't reach a deal. The reality on that

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 8>is that, as I mentioned, Defense is not even funded,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 8>the Labor Department is not funded. So we're at the

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 8>same sort of negative for the market situation going into

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 8>February as we were back in October, where we lapps

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 8>labor data and BLS data, et cetera.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 7>So there's a lot of work to be done in.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 8>The House and the Senator on two totally different pages,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 8>which is why I suggest that maybe we'll get one

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 8>to even three long term bills funding various sectors of

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 8>the federal government. But for the most part, we're going

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 8>to be operating on a short term basis. Probably into March.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 8>I could see another cr My odds was shutdown are

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 8>low twenty five percent or lower, but it's going to

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 8>be a major topic of discussion to the end of

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 8>this month.

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 4>What else is on the agenda for Congress? You're going

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 4>forward here, because again I'm assuming geopolitics is going to

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 4>supersede a lot of this at least in the coming back.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes, yeah, for sure. And so anything that you thought

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 7>was going to happen is not going to happen.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 8>So a second reconciliation bill is highly unlikely. The one

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 8>caveat I'd put on that is to say that there

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 8>is an effort from Lindsay Graham, the chairman of the

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 8>Senate Budget Committee, to deployed military spending into a second

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 8>reconciliation bill, which would be pretty novel in terms of

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 8>what you can do under that authority. But that's something

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 8>to be mindful of if the President really does come

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 8>in with a massive request for the Pedagon in the

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 8>wake of the Venezuela incursion and what's to come in Cuba,

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 8>in Colombia and elsewhere, So that's worth being mindful of.

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 8>But I'm low lot to twenty percent or below. We're

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 8>not going to get that tire freebate dividend check. The

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:44.959
<v Speaker 8>biggest thing that's actually going to happen is the Supreme

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 8>Court ruling on tariffs. Everything else that Congress wants to do,

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 8>whether it's on crypto or permitting or housing whatever, and

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 8>none of that's going to happen.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly here a NERD question unered Greg Giroux or

0:30:55.640 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Greg Polling Acts. Has mister Trump lost the Latino vote

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and did he get back the Latino vote this weekend?

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 8>That is definitely a great demographic question. The Venezuela vote

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 8>is heavily concentrated in Florida. I would suggest it's maybe

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 8>worth two or three percentage points from the Latino vote

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 8>in the state of Florida, but it's not widespread throughout

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 8>the nation, and the Latino voter from Jersey, Virginia, Tennessee,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 8>even across the country, certainly California. You've seen absolute hemorrhage

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 8>support for President Trump in the week of his immigration

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 8>and basically his economic handling. When you see Democrats outperforming

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 8>Republicans on the handling of the economy, that goes to

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 8>every voter, Latino or no. So I don't think that

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 8>the Venezuela piece is big enough to move the entire

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 8>Latino vote, and that's going to be a misnomer heading

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 8>into the mitchem Henrietta, thank you so much.

0:31:49.160 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty right now.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>As you mentioned, Kathy Jones joins if she's fixed income

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 2>strategists at Charles Schwubb, can't you got eight ways to

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>go here? Let me pick up on what mister Lerner

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 2>said is that even if you own in Vidia, there's

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 2>a place for bonds, notes and bills. Explain to the

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>tech bro why they should be looking at your world.

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean one of the basics of asset allocation

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 9>is to have some risk assets and some less risky assets,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 9>so you get diversification, and they're not correlated with each other,

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 9>so that gives you that efficient You want to be

0:32:56.480 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 9>on that efficient frontier right where your return is is high,

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 9>but your risk is mitigated. And that's the combination, the

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 9>magic combination when you do asset allocation that you're aiming for.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 4>We've got it feels like a steepening yield curve here.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about that? What does it mean

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 4>for the marketplace?

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, We've been riding the steepening Eiel curve trade for

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 9>about a year now, and I think one of the

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 9>questions I have is whether that continues in light of

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 9>the expectations of lower inflation due to lower oil prices.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 9>I think it's premature to make that decision right now,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 9>but as things are playing out, perhaps there will be

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 9>the expectation of more supply lower oil prices in the future,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 9>therefore less inflation. But for now, you know, we still

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 9>have the feti using, so that means short end probably

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 9>still come down a bit. When you get to intermediate

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 9>to long term, you still have problems that could keep

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 9>yield sort of where they are, and that would be

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 9>you know, sticky inflation so far, and the deficit and

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 9>the need to deal with supply.

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I was channeling Paul this morning. First chart I looked

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 2>at on the Bloomberg terminal was the difference in yield

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 2>between a five year and a thirty year Paul. The

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 2>only reason I did that was Steve Major. Yep, it wasn't.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't an original thought from Tom Kane. Explain to

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>our audience. They know that vanilla is the two ten spread.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 2>You can go three months to thirty year, like the

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 2>whole curve. Explain the efficacy of pistachio the five year

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to thirty years spread.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think when you're looking at five year to

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 9>thirty year, what you're really trying to do is scope

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 9>out the really long term, what really long duration can

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 9>do for you. When you go into the thirty year,

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be more volatile and it's going to

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 9>really reflect the long duration view. Right, you take a

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 9>fair amount of duration risk in that. I take a

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 9>lot of duration risk in that. So you have to

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 9>be really convinced that the long term trend is towards

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 9>disinflation for that to really make sense or to get

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, so much yield that it compensates you for

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 9>the risk of volatility along the way and surprises along

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 9>the way. And you know, if you're a trader, you

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 9>may look at that. Most everyday investors don't go out

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 9>to thirty years.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty five, you got paid for taking some

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 4>credit risk. How about in twenty six are you gonna

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 4>get paid for credit risk? Or do I just stay

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 4>a little bit closer in on my credit.

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the credit spreads are still tight. We're seeing some

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 9>deterioration in the underlying market. Again, we'd be cautious. It's

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 9>not that you can't take some credit risk, it's that

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 9>you don't want to take too much credit risk. And

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 9>this is a highly unstable environment right now to try

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 9>to predict, you know, where corporate profits are going to go.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 9>They look good, but you know it's priced in a

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 9>lot of priced in, so we'd be kind of cautious.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 2>That don't mean to interrupt, but that sounds exactly like

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 2>ninety days ago, one hundred and eighty days ago, two

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy days ago. Remember before the earning season. Yeah, OMG,

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 2>we're not sure. And then what is it January fourteenth, fifteenth.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Whammo, some solid earnings across the board. Here in twenty

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty six. Here are there sectors that screenwall for you.

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 4>How are you thinking about finding opportunity this year?

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we like tips. We think they're well priced for

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 9>real return, so you get a positive real return. And

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 9>I think the investors really haven't latched onto this because

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 9>I've had some difficulty kind of reading the tips market.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 9>But we think tips look pretty good. We think munis

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 9>are undervalued there right now, and that's because supply has

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 9>been really large. But if you're in a higher tax

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 9>bracket and a high tax even if you're not in

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 9>a high tax bracket, they can make sense for tax equivalent.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't ask you this question in March or August,

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 2>but it's January, and my jargon police are out in force.

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 2>What in God's name is a tip?

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 9>Oh, treasury inflation protective securities.

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>So you're betting on inflation there.

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, what you're doing is you're buying a treasury that's

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 9>index to the CPI, and it's the overall CPI, so

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 9>not excluding food and energy. So right now, the way

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 9>their price, you're going to get one or two percent

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 9>above inflation whatever that right turns out to be. So

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 9>that gives you a real positive, real return kind of

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 9>no matter what happens.

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 2>You and lizz Anne look look tanned and rested. Did

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Gordon get any time out? Did he work every day?

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 9>Kevin had a good vacation in there, He had some

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 9>time on. He had like twelve hours like you give

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 9>a much chance every once in a while.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Jathy, thank you so much again, thank you for helping

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 2>us with the FED decides as well. That would be

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 2>January twenty ninth, Miss Jones is with Charles Schwad.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal