WEBVTT - Do Animals Laugh?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain stuff from how stuff works. Have you

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ever tried to tell a joke to an animal? I've

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>done it before, I talked to my dogs, whatever. But

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this this is brain stuff and I'm Christian Seger. So

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>here's the question. Can animals laugh? In some cases this

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>might sound ridiculous. There are many different types of laughter,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and generally speaking, these types fall into two broad categories,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>complex social laughter, where you have to know the context

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>or have a sense of humor to you know, get it,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and laughter in response to stimulation like tickling. Some animals,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>such as primates, seem to have a sense of humor,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning they can respond to situations with a pant that

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds eerily similar to laughter. You can read numerous stories

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about Coco the gorilla allegedly making jokes in sign language

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Additionally, when adult animals like dolphins or

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ravens play pranks, they're indicating an understanding of humor. But

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.839
<v Speaker 1>laughter itself seems more common than humans had originally thought.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Rats have been laughing their furry little keysters off since

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the dawn of recorded history, but we only figured this

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>out a few years back. It turns out rats like

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>being tickled and when they're tickled, they chirp at a

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>range too high for human ears to pick up. It's

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>around fifty kila herds. We know this thanks to the

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>work of Jacques Panskep and Jeffrey Bergdorff beginning in the

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>late nineties at Bowling Green State University. And if we're

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about that second category of laughter, a positive vocalization

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>associated with touch, then the comedy floodgates may have just

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>swung open. Dr de Villa Ross has been gathering as

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>much data as possible about the reactions various animals have

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to being tickled. The list of animals that make a

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>vocal reaction when tickled include mere cats, camels, dolphins, dogs, owls, penguins,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and more So. What's the explanation, Well, according to Michael O. Wren,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>an associate professor of psychology and neuroscience from Georgia State

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>University that's my alma mater, the case may be simple,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at least when applied to mammals. It's just a pleasant

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling evoked by touching. Laughter it seems may well be

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>millions of years old and existed before human beings. If

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, we're sort of late to the joke,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, most scientists aren't calling this straight

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>out laughter. Instead, they're suggesting that these positive vocalizations, or

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as Dr de Villa Ross writes, expressions of joy. And

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>when we ask whether laughter is a sign of intelligence,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr pank Stp notes that intelligence isn't a requirement for laughter. Instead,

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>he suggests maybe we should look at it from another direction.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps play in any species can increase social intelligence. As

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>research continues, we're learning more and more about animals, laughter,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and pep. Check out the brainstuff channel on YouTube, and

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com