WEBVTT - Looking Back at 2018 with Al Gore and Michael Barbaro (Part Two)

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is sponsored by a d T. A d

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>T can design and install a smart home just for

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you back by seven protection, like Doorman Service, which is

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>an a d T automation that actually unlocks the door

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>for packages, friends or your kids, or Turned Down Service

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that's an a d T automation that arms your system,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>locks your doors, and turns down your lights and thermostat

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very eco friendly. They're all controlled from the a d

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>T app or the sound of your voice, and they're

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>back by seven protection. Just visit a DT dot com

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>slash smart to learn more about how a d T

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>can design and install a secure smart home just for you.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>A huge thank you to Prudential, along with financial wellness

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>expert Alexandra Draine, who's traveling across America to learn more

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about the changing financial landscape and a brand new project

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>called the State of Us. Fewer than half of us

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>believe we're on track to meet our financial goals. Listen

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as Prudential talks with real people to uncover the challenges

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that are getting in the way of financial wellness. To

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>learn more about the financial challenges facing America, visit prudential

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash State of US. Hey Brian Hi Katie

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and High to all of our listeners. Before we begin

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>today's show, we wanted to share a little news. After

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years of making this podcast, Brian

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and I have decided that today will be our last episode,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at least for a while. Think of it as we'll

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>see you later and not necessarily goodbye, more of a

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of an au revoir, if you will. We're taking a

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>break because we have not bigger fish to fry, but

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>other fish to fry. Right Brian, this is true. Um.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Katie's production company is taking the world by storm, producing

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>tons of shows both online and in other platforms. I

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>am trying to figure out my plan for but we

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fear not, dear listeners, fear not, You will hear from

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>us again in the not so distant future in some way,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. And I, for one, have loved doing this.

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm such a huge fan of my colleague Brian Goldsmiths,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I've loved spending this time together with him, and

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, our incredible group here at Stitcher has been

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a real joy to work with and so we're gonna

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>miss being together every week. But again, we've got a

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of things up our sleeves. So two words, stay

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tuned and working with Katie has been a joy and

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a privilege every single day, and I will I will

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>miss that, although I am very confident we will stay

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in touch quite frequently in the weeks and months ahead. Um.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But we're not done quite yet. We still have a

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>very special show today. This is part two of our

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>look back at the year eighteen. This week we're talking

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>about the year in climate change with former Vice President

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Al Gore, someone I admire enormously, and then we'll talk

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>about the year in news and politics with someone else

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like, Michael Barbarrow, who hosts The Daily from

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times. We're big fans of The Daily. Meanwhile,

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we're starting with the Vice President. And of course I

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>have known Al Gore for a long time. I think

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I first covered him back in nineteen ninety two. Jesus,

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm old, aren't I. During his terms as a representative

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and then Senator from Tennessee, he was already passionate about

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the environment and very interested in climate change. In fact,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he published his first book on the environment back into

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the same year he and Bill Clinton were elected to

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the White House. Of course, after eight years as Vice President,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Gore ran for president in the infamous or famous two

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand election against George W. Bush. Gore won the popular

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>vote but lost in the electoral college. Some say he

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>lost in the Supreme Court, but we're not going to

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>go there. Um. After that debacle, Gore left politics for

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>good and really focused on his passionate advocacy on the

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>climate issue. And that's why in two thousand and six

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he released a book and documentary, both titled An Inconvenient Truth,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that detailed the impending climate disaster, and in two thousand

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>seven he won the Nobel Peace Prize for his environmental work.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>In the years since two thousand, al Gore has also

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>been very involved in Silicon Valley tech has been a

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>huge passion of his. He's on the board of Apple,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>among other things, and he's also founded the Climate Reality Project,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a big nonprofit devoted to solving what he

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>calls the climate crisis. So he's been very busy, and

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking him primarily about the environment. First.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know, given the devastating California wildfires and

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes on the Eastern seaboard that we saw this year,

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>what role has climate changed played in two thousand team. Well,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of the climate crisis are growing much more severe,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>uh and much more frequent. And the latest report by

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change got the attention of

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>millions of people around the world, and it was followed

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>by the devastating hurricanes you mentioned, and these incredible fires

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this year that have been so devastating in California and

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of western North America and around the world.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, these are global events. Every night on

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the TV news is like a nature hike through the

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Book of Revelation now, and I think that people are

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are are responding to Mother Nature's advocacy far more than

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to the advocacy of those of us who are activists

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. But we're trying to do our part

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think that the entrenched opposition to really

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>solving this crisis h still comes from a dark money

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>provided by large carbon polluters, the American Petroleum Institute, the

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Koke Brothers, some of the large oil companies, even some

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>who publicly proclaim they've changed their minds and are not

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fighting action anymore. Whenever there's a serious proposal, they pour

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the money. But overall, we are seeing tremendous momentum

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for the solutions to the climate crisis. Some of it's

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>uh due to technological advances, the stunning reductions in the

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of electricity from the sun and the wind, and

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>stunning reductions in the cost of batteries and electric vehicles

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of efficiency improvements. This is a really

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>changing the global picture. Sometimes I get confused out when

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I see these fires, and I watched these hurricanes, and

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I get confused about the direct link between climate change

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and these catastrophic events. What is the link? I mean,

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can you say that these wildfires are because of climate change?

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Here is the connection, Katie. The accumulated amount of man

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>made global warming pollution in the thin shell of atmosphere

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>surrounding our planet. You know, it stays. We're putting a

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ten million tons every day into the atmosphere as if

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an open sewer, and it stays there for more

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>than a thousand years. The majority of it, and the

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>accumulated amount of man made global warming pollution is now

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:07.119
<v Speaker 1>trapping as much extra heat energy every day as would

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be released by five hundred thousand herosia mclass atomic bombs

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>exploding every twenty four hours. Day in and day out.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That extra heat energy evaporates a lot more water vapor

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>off the oceans into the sky, and the so called

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric rivers carry it over the land, and so we

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>get these massive downpours uh, four times more common than

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in even And the same extra heat pulls the moisture

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the soil and the vegetation, so you get

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>both the droughts and drying trees and dead trees that

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>are kindling for these fires. Uh. And you get much

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>more powerful hurricanes and much larger town pours. So Mr

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Vice President, I have a hard time calling you out.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to step back and talk about why we're

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the position that we're in at this moment. You

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the Koch Brothers and some of the kind of

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>carbon polluting interests. Do you basically hold them responsible for

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason it's been so hard to convince the public

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of the magnitude of this Well, I think they're one

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of the major reasons. Yes. Um, the large carbon polluters

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>have spent a couple of billion dollars in sewing confusion

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and false s doubt. They took the playbook of the

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>tobacco companies and use some of the same pr firms

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and lobbyists. The tobacco companies hired actors and dress them

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up as doctors and put them in front of cameras

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and teleprompters to falsely reassure people that there was no

0:09:54.120 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>medical reason to avoid smoking cigarettes. Well decades later, they've

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>documented how the large carbon polluters spend enormous amounts of

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>money to intentionally confuse Americans and paralyze legislative bodies to

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>prevent to action. They're losing this battle, but they are

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>delaying actions still. The grassroots opinion, more than two thirds

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the American people know this UH is real. College

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>young Republicans, by the way, are now UH saying their

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>party has to change as well. A lot of businesses

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>are providing leadership. But you know UH. In Tennessee, the

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>farmers have an old saying that if you see a

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>turtle on top of a fence post, you can be

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure it didn't get there by itself. And and

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if if you see persistent levels of climate denial in

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the US, unlike in any other country, you can be

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that didn't happen by itself either. It's very

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to find an established, much less respected scientific voice

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that disagrees with the consensus. The level of certainty exceeds

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that linking smoking to lung cancer, and it almost approaches

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the certainty about the existence of gravity. But on the

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>other hand, there was a gallipole earlier this year that

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>showed that only eighteen percent of Republicans believe that global

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>warming will pose a serious threat in their lifetime. And

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and this country elected a climate change denier as president.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like the experts haven't really made the

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>sale here. Well, let me unpack that that that question.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, of course, as you know, there's the

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fabled tribalism in our politics now, and there is, of course, uh,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>something else at work. And when there is a general

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>uneasiness about the state of the world and a general

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>feeling of doubt, then that that creates conditions for a

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>demagogue to come in with with falsehoods and uh and

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>false expansive promises. And I think we've certainly seen that,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen a wave of populist authoritarianism in other

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>countries as well. Part of it is the global financial

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>crisis in two thousand and eight, uh uh, and I

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think that was a real trigger for the real disaffection

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and hostility against elites and experts of any stripe. I mean,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can go deeper into this, but I

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>think that's a fair summation. And add to that, this

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>issue of the climate crisis is inherently complicated, and it's

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>global in scope, and we're not used to thinking in

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>those terms, and it plays out over longer time periods

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>than our political system is used to dealing with, and

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so and and and the final element would be just

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of garden variety denial. It's hard to think about

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult threats that are scary and solutions that are now

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>readily available but seem to require overcoming the inertia in

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in our devotion to patterns that have existed for a

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>long time. It also seems to me out that people

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time dealing with problems that are not

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily immediate, and that's one of the problems I think

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>with climate change. Similarly, the causality. Sometimes people don't understand

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that events like wildfires and flooding and hurricane is seriously

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>exacerbated by climate change. Yeah. Well, I think that part

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of human nature is that we are more prepared to

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>respond immediately to the kinds of threats that are and

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>sesters survived, you know, a snake, other humans with weapons. Uh.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>These are the things that we're hardwired to respond to immediately.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And when we face a much greater danger that has

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to be UH perceived with the assistance of our analytical capabilities.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Were capable of that too. We've demonstrated that throughout history,

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but it takes more effort. And in fact, al I

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was going to mention, I recently read that the ozone

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>layer was closing up because of actions that were taken

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to do just that. And that is an example that

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>shows when we take action, things can change, right. Yes, absolutely,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And back in the mid eighties, the scientific community UH

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>made this alarming discovery that a certain kinds of chemicals

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that had only been used for about fifty years were

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>destroying that stratosphere go zone layer that filters out the

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>UV radiation and keeps it so that it only gives

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a sunburn instead of killing us. That that it was

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>deteriorating rapidly, and within one year, Margaret Thatcher in the

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom, who had a chemistry a degree, enlisted the

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>cooperation of her dear friend of President Ronald Reagan. They

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>took action and now we are on the way to

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>solving that crisis. Now here's the difference, Katie. Those chemicals

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that were causing that catastrophe were a very tiny part

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the global economy. The company's making it fought against it,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but they but they were defeated. Now, the problem is

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>c O two and methane and other gases, But the main,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the heart of it is CEO two, and that comes

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>from the fuels that still provide of all the inner

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>g in the global economy. And there are alternatives for

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>them as well. But there are vested interests and established

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>patterns of behavior that are more difficult to change and

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>overcome than it was when we successfully solve the stratospheric

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>zone layering problem. Clearly, President Trump is not on the

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>same page as you are. To put it mildly, here's

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what he said not too long ago on sixty minutes

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about global warming. Do you still think the climate change

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is a hoax? Look, I think something's happening, something's changing,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and it will change back again. I don't think it's

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. I think there's probably a difference, but I

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it's man made. I will say this, Um,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give trillions and trillions of dollars.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to lose millions and millions of jobs.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be put a disadvantage. I'm not

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>denying climate change, but it could very well go back.

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking to about all that's the nine

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of views. They say that we had hurricanes that were

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>far worse than what we just had with Michael who

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>says that, they say people say that India. But what

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>about the scientists who say it's worse than ever. You

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>have to show me the scientists because they have a

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>very big political agenda, lest like I can't bring the

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>managers also have a political agenda. What has your reaction

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>been to the President's position on this? Well? Uh, you know,

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go into the Trump cul de sac,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>we may not escape from it. I don't know. I

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>mean whenever, every time a new outrage comes along, I

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to download some existing outrage to make room for

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the new outrage. Uh. And just to take a couple

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>of points from his comment, uh that it will change back. No,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it won't change back. Uh No, because we're putting a

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>million extra tons every day, uh and into the sky

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and adding it to this blanket of heat trapping gases

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that is causing the problem. Uh, it can go back

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>if we change our behavior. Now. The the idea that

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the scientists have some political agenda, it's an insult to

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>these uh scientists. They do it on volunteer time. Uh.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They won the Nobel Prize. They continue their work. They're

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>they're they're among the most respected women and men uh

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in their fields in countries all around the world. And

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as I said before, they've been proven right.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>What they predicted decades ago is playing out on our

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>television screens and in the lives of people living in

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cities that are being hit hard right now. So, UM,

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this is wilful denial. This is is a global crisis.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the President set up this prototypical battle between

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>industry and jobs on the one hand and the environment

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other. Is that really the choice that we're

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>facing here? No, the choice actually switching to renewable energy

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that saves us money and and by the way, it

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>creates jobs. The fastest growing job in the United States

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of America today, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is solar installer. Those jobs are growing nine times faster

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>than average job growth. The second fastest growing job is

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>wind turbine technician. We're in the early stages of a

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>sustainability revolution all around the world that has the magnitude

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>of the industrial revolution, but the speed of the digital revolution.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Electricity from solar and wind is now cheaper in the

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of locations around the world than electricity from burning

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. End. The fossil fuel electricity keeps getting more

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive and also produces local air pollution, which kills almost

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>ten million people a year. Air pollutions the new smoking,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>whereas the renewable electricity is pollution free, creates jobs, makes

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>our economy more efficient, and it keeps coming down in

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>price year after year after year. This is the future. Uh.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we don't have a shortage of fossil fuels.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But as the oil minister of Saudi Arabia said, and

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>his warning to the King of Saudi Arabia decades ago,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>remember the Stone Age didn't end because of a shortage

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of stones. It ended because something better came along. And

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the point we're at now in our energy and

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>transportation uh and and and built environment. So per your

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>point earlier, I don't want to move into the Trump

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>cul de sac. But we we have to stay there

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for a little while, just because obviously he's the president

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. You met with him when he

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>was president elect. During the transition. It was reported that

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Jared and Ivanka helped set that up. Do you think

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Jared and Ivanka, who seemed to be more sympathetic to

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your views, have exercised any influence in the administration. Yes,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>obviously they have had a good deal of influence. I

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that where his buddies in the in the

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon pollution community are concerned, I think they take a

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>priority over everyone else when it comes to this issue.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's abundantly obvious. I mean, look at the

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people he's appointed. I you know, I think there must

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be a grifter's tender out there where these people find

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one another. Uh, I mean you you look, I mean,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>just look at this acting Attorney general. For God's sake,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could not. I mean the classic cliche

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is if you wrote this in a novel, your editor

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, no, it's just not believable. On you, sasquatched,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm travel I mean, please, as we're airing this out,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll be at the annual meeting of the group that

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>produced the Paris Climate Agreement, and it's been more than

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a year since the president pulled out of that agreement.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Some people minimize this by saying it's a non binding deal.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>What if the real consequence has been of America's withdrawal

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>from the accord. Well, first of all, under US law

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and international law, the first day on which the US

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can actually withdraw from the agreement happens to be the

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>day after the next presidential election, in the middle of November. Uh,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And so he can make a speech and declare his intention.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But the US is still legally bound. And while part

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of it is voluntary, there are also binding provisions in

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the agreement, and a new president, by the way, could

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>simply give third day's notice and we're back in the agreement.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps more importantly, the US, in spite of Donald Trump,

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is on track to exceed the commitments so that we're

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>made by our country in the Paris Agreement. That's partly

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because big states like California and New York and fifteen

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>others and hundreds of cities and uh, many of the

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>large businesses, particularly consumer facing businesses, they're still in the

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Paris Agreement, and they've stepped up their efforts to exceed

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>their commitments. Uh. California just passed a binding law that

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go a hundred percent carbon free. Uh. Colorado

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>is now going to join them by so many cities

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are going a renewable I was just in Atlanta and

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they've made that commitment of Atlantic can do it, any

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>city can do it, and that gives us real hope. Yeah,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>it does. So now I don't I don't want to

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>to risk a sounding up Polly Anish, because the truth

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is the problem is getting worse faster than we are

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>responding to it. But the new Congress that comes in

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>uh to office in in January is gonna make a

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. Uh. The new Democrats picked up seven governors

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>offices and many hundreds of state legislative seats. Uh. We're

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing commitments on climate action from many of these new officeholders.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's ample room for legitimate optimism. But we

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have to retain our sense of urgency because the danger

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is very high, it's very real, it's growing, and in

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>order to solve this crisis in time, we have to

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>step up the changes in laws and policies. You know,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>one person who's not quite as optimistic as you are

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bill mckibbon, who recently wrote a long piece for

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The New Yorker that's very powerful in a affecting about

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change, and he basically argues that even if Paris

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>were followed, it's wildly inadequate to the challenge, and that

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a future of negative and even catastrophic consequences is virtually inevitable.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So has your optimism been tempered at all by the

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>events we've seen over the last several years. Well, you know,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Bill does a great job. I'm a big fan of

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>his work. But but if you look at that piece

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the New Yorker, you'll see that he carved out

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a section for hope himself and articulated it. And where

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the inadequacy of the Paris Agreement is concerned, I have

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>said that many times, but again here is a really

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>important provision in the Paris Agreement that ought to change

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the way pessimists think about it. One of the binding

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>provisions is that every five years, all of the nations

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that have signed it have an obligation to review their

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.959
<v Speaker 1>progress and upgrade their ambitions. And in light of the

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>continuing cost reductions in carbon free energy and efficiency improvements

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and electric transportation and so forth. UH. The first five

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>year review period, which will begin next year and culminate

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Conference of the Parties, is likely to see

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>significant increases in ambition, with much steeper cuts in greenhouse

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>gas pollution pledged by the major emitters. So it's certainly

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>true that the Paris Agreement taken as a whole is inadequate,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of course, but it it was designed to build a

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>foundation from which stronger commitments can come UH in the

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>year's five allowing the implementation of the agreement, and that

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>process has already started. Some nations have already upgraded their commitments,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and in I think you're likely to see a major

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>global increase in the pledged actions by countries around the world.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill McKibbin sort of bemoaned the fact that world leaders

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and presidents in our country didn't intervene enough and said

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that what was that the theoretical threat has become a

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fierce daily reality. I know that in two thousand thirteen

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you said President Obama failed to use the bully pulpit

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to make the case for bold action on climate change.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>That was a direct quote. Do you think he could

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>have and should have done more well. I think you

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have to differentiate to Katie between President Obama's record in

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>his first four years and in his second four years.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>He deserves credit, as I've written, in his first four

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>years for dramatically increasing the mileage standard requirements for cars

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and trucks, and for the green stimulus elements of his

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>economic stimulus plan, which which made a difference. The White

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>House might well have done more to secure passage of

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>major legislation that passed the House in the in the

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>early summer of two thousand nine, which failed in the Senate.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But in his second term, uh, he built on his

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>beginnings in the first term and really did use the

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>bully pulpit quite significantly. And and he played a major

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>role in securing the success of the Paris Agreement. And

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>one year before the Paris Agreement, he achieved an historic

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>binational commitment between the US and China which laid the

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>foundation for the success in Paris. So I think you

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the balance of his eight years in the

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>White House, I think that he made major, major contributions.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>A number of top retired Republicans have signed onto a

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax as the right way to deal with climate change.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you quickly explain what that means and tell us

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what you think of that approach. Well, I've proposed a

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a carbon tax UH for thirty years now, so yes,

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much in favor of it for the simple

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>reason that our economy now counts pollution UH to have

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>a value of zero. We we ignore it. And you

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>know the term of art you've heard as externalities, which

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>basically means, uh, just forget about it and pretend it

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. But but that's obviously insane, particularly when when

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we're putting a hundred ten million tons of it every

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>day into the sky. Uh. And and one of the

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to remedy uh, the economy's blindness to this pollution

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is to put a price on it. Now, having said that, Katie, UH,

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the political difficulty in enacting any kind of taxation increase

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is well known and impressive, and partly as a result,

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>many people took a different approach with the so called

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>cap and trade mechanism UH that's now being used in

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the European Union, It's being used by China. They implemented

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it this year. It is an indirect price on carbon

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and can achieve the same goals if it's skillfully UH

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and strongly enforced, and I think the world is probably

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>moving in that direction. I actually support both a carbon

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>tax and a carbon trading or cap and trade regime,

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but we also need um regulatory chain, just requirements, such

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as telling utilities they have to have growing percentages of

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>their electricity from renewable sources by a date certain UH.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Many countries around the world have now enacted laws requiring

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the the illegal cessation of any sales of internal combustion engines,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>mandating a shift to electric vehicles. Sweden, India has announced

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that by no new internal combustion cars and trucks can

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be sold. And that's the an example of a of

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a law and a regulation approach that can accomplish more

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. But yes, I support a carbon tax and

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a cap and trade program. Mr Vice President Alexandra Ocasio Cortes,

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the new Democratic Socialist congresswoman from New York, led a

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>protest in Nancy Pelosi's office to create a Select Committee

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on Climate change, which is a position that Pelosi has

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>said that she shares. What was your reaction to the

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>decision to protest her, of all people, and do you

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think she ought to be the next Speaker of the House.

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I really welcome the energy and activism

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of this new incoming group of Democrats in the Congress.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I like that Select Committee. I don't think

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposition to it, by the way, was anything more

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>than the committee chairs, with the substance of jurisdiction, want

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to sink their teeth into it. But I'll let them

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sort that out. As far as the race for Speaker

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the House is concerned, I'm a longtime friend and

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>admirer of Nancy Pelosi, and in my experience, she's been

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the great speakers of the last century. She

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>knows how to knit her caucus together and count votes. Well.

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that race is going to turn out,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but if I had a vote, I would vote for her.

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to leave people some hope as we enter

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen, and I think some people feel powerless.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>They see these problems, they see the government not acting enough,

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and they wonder what can we do. So, what one

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of advice would you give the average American if

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he or she wants to uh contribute to finding a

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>solution for global warming? Well as important as it is

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to to change light bulbs and take those other actions

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that each individual can take. It's more important to change

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the laws and the policies. So my number one recommendation

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is to not only register to vote and vote, but

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>reclaim your voice as a citizen of this country and

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>become politically active. There is hope in action, and I

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get a tremendous amount of hope from the millions of

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>people who are now really engaged in grassroots active them.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I train climate activists all over this country and all

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>over the world, and what I'm seeing is an up

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>surge of enthusiasm and energy and demands for progress and

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>change that is ultimately not going to be denied. So

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>be be a part of those who are taking action

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as citizens of this country. Well that's good advice, and Brian,

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you and I will meet you at the next protest. Actually,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I would like to get out there and be more

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>vocal about some of these issues. You know, as journalists,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we always shy away a bit, But you know,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in my old agel, I'm like, to hell with it.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to speak my mind a little bit more.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>In the middle of March, we're having a three day

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>mass training in Atlanta, UM and there there. These trainings

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>really motivate people. You'll learn everything you need to know

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>about the causes of the climate crisis and the solutions

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for the climate crisis, and communications and advocate advocacy skills,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and one or both of you ought to consider coming

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.479
<v Speaker 1>down and covering that going through it. That would be fun.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And when people say what are you doing these days?

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I can say I'm a climate change activists. What are

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you doing? There? You go, yeah, that's a good question. Absolutely. Anyway,

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Al Gore, you're you're such uh, you're such a mench

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Al let me do us from Nashville. Thank you, Brian,

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and thank you Katie, and thank you for the overly

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>generous and kind words. Katie and I hope to see

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you both in person again soon. I hope so too.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year coming up, We're gonna look back this

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>year in news and politics with the one and only

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barbarrow of the New York Times Daily podcast that's

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>right after this. Support for today's show comes from Thrive

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>market and online marketplace that's on a mission to make

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>healthy living easy and affordable for everyone. You get access

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to thousands of the best selling organic foods and natural

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>products at twenty five to fifty percent below traditional retail prices,

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from organic almond butter to lavender essential oil, both products

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy. By the way, Thrive Market carries everything you need.

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They have pantry staples, cleaning products, sweet treats, the best

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>snacks and much more at such affordable prices. I got

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a big box from Thrive Market the other day and

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>included gluten free bread and almond butter and all sorts

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>of grade crackers and stack foods, and I'm loving it

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all and as they say, at very reasonable prices. So

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>with our special length, Thrive Market is giving you an

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>extra off your first purchase plus a free thirty day

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>trial that's off the already low prices that Thrive Market offers.

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Just go to thrive market dot com slash Katie Currik

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to access this terrific discount. So here's a new concept

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in eyewear. Contemporary eyeglasses that are extremely affordable and fashion

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>forward glasses that can be viewed kind of as a

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>fashion accessory but should not cost as much as a

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>plane ticket or a new iPhone. With Warby Parker, glasses

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>start at just nine including prescription lenses for every pair

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you buy A pair is distributed to someone in need

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>their home. Try on program allows you to order five

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>pairs of glasses ship directly to your door, where you

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>can try them on in the comfort of your own home,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>get feedback from friends, family, your cat, the mailman, whoever.

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You can try the frames for five days before sending

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>them back using a free prepaid return shipping label with

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>no obligation to purchase. It's free. It's so easy. Even

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I can do it, and I had a wonderful experience

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>getting a new pair of glasses through Warby Parker. So

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>had to warby Parker dot com slash Katie to order

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 1>your free home tryons to choose the five frames you'd

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like to try on, mail the frames back, choose your

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite pair to have your prescription added to, and order.

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really simple. Visit warby Parker dot com slash Katie

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to begin your free home try on experience today, and

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have an iPhone, tin make sure to download

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>warby Parker's app, where you can use their brand new

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>feature Find your Fit. Find Your Fit recommends approximately twelve

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Warby Parker frames that likely fit your face. The process

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is seamless, very cool, and only takes a few seconds. Now,

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the show. Our next guest is

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barbaro, who many of you know as the host

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of The Daily podcast from the New York Times and

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>not to be missed podcast for Brian and me. That's true.

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Michael and his team take the biggest news stories and

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>turn them into a short narrative podcast that comes out

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>every weekday. And because he's always covering the biggest headlines,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought he'd be the perfect person to walk us

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>through what happened this year in the wacky world of

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>news and politics. I started by asking Michael a very

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>important question, if he's having fun doing the Daily most

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of the time. I'm having a really good time most

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the time, having a wonderful time. You know, making

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a daily show from scratch, it's all consuming. It's a vortex,

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and no one tells you that when you start to

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 1>make a show. And even it's almost been two years

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>since we started the Daily, and it turns out that

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a really powerful way of transforming the written word

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into in some ways, a more resonant, emotional kind of storytelling.

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And now, and the most flattering thing that's happened since

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>The Daily started, there are a lot of copycats. Is

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot more. There are a lot more

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of daily news shows. And that's really flattering. And

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I I wish them well and I mean that, but

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I wish them sleep because I just don't think they

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>know how hard it will be. Okay, Michael, we we've

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>got to get to the topic or the topics at

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>hand here, which is the year and news and politics.

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the biggest names. One name we

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily expect to be big this year, President George H. W. Bush.

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>He recently died, of course, age ninety four. Here's a

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>clip of his son, President George W. Bush, eulogizing his father.

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna miss you. Your decency, sincerity, and kind

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>soul will stay with us forever. So through our tears,

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>let us know the blessings of knowing and loving you,

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a great and nobleman. Were you surprised at how George

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Walker Bush was practically deified in the media, And

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's because by comparison, he's such a

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>different public figure than our current president. Yes and no.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>And I want to dispute the characterization a little bit

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of deification because by the second day of National Mourning

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 1>around George Herbert Walker Bush. There there were a slew

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of sobering articles that we're pointing out all the ways

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in which he was this or not quite that. You know,

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened with AIDS under his watch, what was his

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship with race, What does it mean to be a

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>wasp and to be really entitled? And are we in

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a better place now as a meritocracy than we were

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>during the era when the Bushes came up and were

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed pretty much a spotty yale and seemingly a spot

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>of a governorship or a job in the house. I

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>was so struck by the number of people who came

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>out to greet his train, the train that brought him

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to College Station, Texas for his burial, and that instinct

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to just be patriotic in that moment, I think overrides partisanship,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and that is rare. And I think so many elements

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of his death, the funeral, the President's all sitting in

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a row. It was like nostalgic, even in the moment,

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>because our day to day with President Trump is so

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>partisan and combative. Just the simple spectacle of unification around

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>mourning feels of a different era, and I think that's

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>why everybody felt something there. What do you think? I

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think his presidency also looks a lot different now than

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it did when he was defeated. Somehow at the time,

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>with the sour economy, we probably didn't appreciate enough the

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>masterful role he played in managing the end of the

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Cold War and the role he played in building a

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of bipartisan accomplishments at home. Plus his signal sort

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of failure as president, breaking his no new taxes pledge

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect looks like an accomplishment because it took great

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>political courage to do what was right, even though he

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>knew it would hurt him in the next election. You

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>know one other figure like that who died this year,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>of course, was Senator John McCain. Do you think these

0:42:55.840 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>two deaths signaled the death of the Republican established shman

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>itself a certain kind of Republican establishment for sure. Yeah.

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And both of them existed in eras when what would

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>become the future Republican Party was bubbling up beneath their feet.

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, John McCain got a lot of grief for

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>his enthusiasm for immigration reform. Uh. George Herbert walker Bush

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was experiencing the beginning of the kind of anti tax revolt,

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the gingrich revolution that would come in ninety four, and

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of tamping it down, and he left

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>office as it rose. It's so interesting you point out

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the tax pledge, because after George Walker Bush left office,

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>almost every Republican would be asked to literally sign a

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>pledge that Grovern Orcas would present to them. And it

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>felt like a pledge. You know, if you didn't sign it,

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you were a real Republican that you would never agree

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to raise taxes. And so yeah, this was an error

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>where it was conceivable that you could stand for compromise

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and you would be respected within your party. In addition

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to changing our view of the Republican establishment, I do

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>think it hearkened to a bygone era when presidents did

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not tweet things about former secretaries of state and say

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they're dumb as a rock. I mean, I think the

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>contrast was so intense when you looked at this patrician

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>family that had certain more Ray's a lot of humility,

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>hated to talk about himself. So I think that's one

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that people were just craving that kind

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of civility, and that was what I believe was being

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>celebrated as much as George Bush's presidency itself. Completely agree,

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and yet it was also an occasion to be sober

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and honest about the ways in which that was a

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>crafted image, right, Because the reason why we were all

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Willie Horton ad that George Herb Walker

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Bush put out in his winning campaign against Michael Cocacus

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was because it was it was a really ugly ad

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and it felt racist and definitely racially tinged, and you know,

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was a very very messy moment

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in our kind of national political dialogue to have that

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>ad running, and I think it's important that people did

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about it because I think, beneath the veneer of

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>civility and grace and sort of good manners, a lot

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of people said that when push came to shove, George

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Walker Bush did what he had to do politically,

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and some of it was not very pretty. Let's talk

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>about what we learned this year about the state of

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Muller's investigation, you know, especially with all of the people

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's ensnared, like Michael Cohen and Paul Maniford and Michael Flynn,

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Am I the only one who has a really hard

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>time keeping up with all of this? Yes? No, no,

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not that A yes that meant no that everybody

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has a hard time keeping up that we constantly at

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the daily We constantly debate like do we need to

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do another episode? And the the answer is often yes,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>because no one can keep track of everything. It is

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so hard, So help us. As the year draws to enclose,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where we are in terms of the investigation, there's a

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lot about Michael Cohen. Maybe start with him. Sure, So,

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as we speak, Michael Cohen is about to be sentenced

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for his role in these payoffs, to these attempts to

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>silence the women who claim they had sexual encounters with

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 1>candidate Donald Trump. And the bigger narrative of the moment

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the Special Counsel went out seeking information about

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially two things, Russian interference in the election and communication

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>between the those around the Trump campaign and Russia. I

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's been during the process of this investigation that

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>all these many investigations have spun off, and those are

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are hard to keep track of. In

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the mix of this as well, is whether the president

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sought to obstruct justice after these investigations all began. And

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the reason why people like Michael Cohen get caught up

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in this is because of the kind of ancillary investigations

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that have spun off of this. I mean, one of

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the most astonishing things about the Muller investigation is how

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>often he seems to prove that people around the president

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>lie and lie with with real kind of ease, as

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's you know, kind of like essential to their nature.

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's Paul Manaford or Michael Flynn, the president's former

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>national security advisor and the president's campaign chairman and then

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>his personal lawyer. I mean, these were people that the

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 1>president has entrusted huge responsibilities to and it turns out

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that that they lie. But Michael Flynn, it seems to me,

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys, has been very cooperative. That's the message coming

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>from Mueller's office. What in store for him? And why

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>is he behaved differently than Cohen and Manafort? I would say,

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 1>assuming he's being honest, he's looking out for his own

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 1>self interest. You know, Mueller is very effective, along with

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some people around him who have had great experience doing this,

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Weissman At basically saying to people, unless you

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>are on cooperative, we're going to prosecute you and put

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you away for many, many years. And the people who

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are apparently cooperating for real, like Flynn, are going to

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 1>get treated a hell of a lot better than the

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>people who tried to shade the truth a little bit

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and kind of play both sides, like Paul Manifort, who

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is now staring in the face of being in jail

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of his life. And why does the

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>President tweet things like thank you you know, no collusion,

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I you know, basically claiming he's been exonerating. I mean,

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.919
<v Speaker 1>he may genuinely feel relieved each time there's a chord

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>filing that he's not directly implicated in a in a

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>way that exposes him to any kind of criminal charges.

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. There's also just the kind of incessant,

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>impulsive need to kind of put his stamp on something.

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he also recognizes that if he says something

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>about the country will believe it, and so he can

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>create this alternative universe, this alternative reality where up is down. Yeah,

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's partially he wants to shape the narrative, as

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he's very effective in doing, but things are getting We're

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>entering a very interesting and perilous phase of this, all

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for the president. Because Michael Cohen is pleading guilty to

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>conduct that the president was personally involved in. Suddenly the

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>stakes are getting higher, and it's starting to look like

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very much in Watergate, when Richard Nixon was an unindicted

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>co conspirator, and you're here that I'm a crook, when

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when he wasn't charged, but every everyone understood that he

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.479
<v Speaker 1>had been involved in criminal conduct or potentially criminal conic

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>We're now entering a phase. We're according to all of

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues and to the documents that were filed just

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago, the president was involved in

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>something that those who were also involved in are pleading

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty to a crime for that suggests that a crime

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>has been committed and he was involved. You can play

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of word games, but at the end of

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, if he were not president, would he be

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>charged with that same crime? And I think some people

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>believe yes. So then it becomes an interesting question of well,

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>what do we do with that? Can I ask you

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about Russian collusion though, because we're dealing with obviously stormy

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Daniels and the other woman and paying them money when

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 1>he was a candidate. But where are we on in

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the collusion uh phase of the investigation. I think there's

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary amount of evidence that there was, to quote

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the most recent filing, a political synergy between the Russians

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Trump campaign. And what we've learned over the

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>last several days and in the most recent filings is

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a potential motive, which is that Donald Trump wanted to

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>build a Trump Tower in Moscow. He apparently was prepared

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to offer the penthouse to Vladimir Putin to get it done.

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is a project that would have made him tends,

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.880
<v Speaker 1>if not hundreds of millions of dollars. And so when

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the actions that his campaign took

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to cozy up to Russia, it turns out Donald Trump

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 1>had an ongoing financial motive to try to do that.

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 1>The complicated question of collusion and there really isn't there's

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of debate about what that word means. Is

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it requires motivation on both sides, I believe, And what

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:52.839
<v Speaker 1>was the motivation of those around the president? Did they

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>intend to solicit the political cooperation of Russia with the

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sole intent of affecting the out of the election, or

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>or at various moments where they just kind of following

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>their instinct to get dirt on an opponent or to

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do a business. What is it all add up to?

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Robert Mueller very much wanted to sit

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>down with President Trump, because there's only one way to

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get to someone's motives at any moment, and that's to

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ask them, what were your motives? And maybe in this

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>case that it's the cover up, like in Watergate, more

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>than the crime itself that nails the president in that

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>lying about this, obstructing justice about this may ultimately be

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>seen as the greater infractions here. Needless to say, you'll

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be doing a lot of dailies in two thousand nineteens

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:40.280
<v Speaker 1>about the Mueller investment. By the way, no one thoughtless

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 1>investigation would last through the end of the year. Let's

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>move on to some of the other big names and

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 1>big stories that really dominated the daily and headlines writ

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>large over the last year. Mohammed been Salmon and Saudi

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Arabia MBS. I remember seeing sort of a big pr campaign.

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 1>He was kind of doing a dog and phony show.

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a new kind of ruler look at this guy,

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly he is, you know, public enemy number one

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. Why did it take so long for

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States and for the citizens of this country

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to really take a close look at Saudi Arabia and

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>our relationship with it. It's a great question. This all

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:28.439
<v Speaker 1>goes back to Jared Kushner, as a young, pretty inexperienced

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>adviser to the president, striking up a relationship with Mohammed

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>been Salmon, because, as we're now learning through leaked documents

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and investigations, the Saudi Arabian leaders, especially MBS, they understood

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that he was vulnerable, that they could cozy up with him.

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a whole lot of baggage or deep

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.759
<v Speaker 1>history in the region, and they formed an alliance that

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:54.760
<v Speaker 1>ended up influencing the course of events in Saudi Arabia

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because once Jared Kushner decided to elevate Mohammed been Salmon,

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular with a one on one meal with President Trump,

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>suddenly people back in Saudi Arabia undershoid, Oh this guy,

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he demand he is. He's in a really good position here,

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and so that affected his trajectory. Back at home. We

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>understand he is elevated to Crown Prince, which is effectively

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the day to day leader of Saudi Arabia, and he

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>has the approval the perimeter of the White House, so

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting kind of pretty. And then a series of

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:31.360
<v Speaker 1>events happen that make us question why why did we

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>do that? And that, of course was the assassination of

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamaka Shoji, this journalist who resided in the US, and

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's had the secondary effective focusing our attention on the

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>US role in the war in Yellen, which is a

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Saudi led campaign that President Obama signed off on. President

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump continued, it's one of those things. Yes, we weren't

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to any of this until this assassination, and

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>then we will look back and tried to understand what

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Jared Kushner had done and where he had taken us,

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and why we have had such a cozy relationship with

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia for many, many years. It's a remarkable kind

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of moment in live history when an event like this,

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this assassination, forces everyone to reevaluate everything, including whether we

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>should be involved in the war in Yemen, whether we

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>should be selling arms to Saudi Arabia for that war,

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the role it has Visa vi Iran, right. I mean,

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's it opened up a huge geopolitical

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of worms, right. And Yemen is the worst humanitarian

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe in the world right now. There are literally thousands

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of children who are dying needlessly of starvation.

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And you, yourself, Michael, admitted that you hadn't really been

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to it. I don't. I think most people had. No,

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't. I think all of us understood

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that there was a war in Yemen. We understood it

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was about Iran and Saudi Arabia, and there it was bad.

0:55:55.200 --> 0:55:59.959
<v Speaker 1>And now I think the world's attention is is fick

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>xed on it anyway, that this that that that again

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>is just like a very unexpected outcome of one man's assassination.

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons I think Yemen has gotten so

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:13.920
<v Speaker 1>little attention is because news organizations are too afraid to

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>turn attention away from Donald Trump. I'm not quite sure

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. It's very hard to get journalists

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in Yemen. It's a very hard place to report from.

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And yes, there's a domestic story that is pretty consuming.

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I believe to the degree that our news diets

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>are shaped by cable news and front pages. Those are

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.439
<v Speaker 1>dominated by the president, and it was after the death

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of Jamal ka Shoji, the assassination of him by the

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Saudi government, that many front pages, including The York Times,

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>started to focus more on Yemen. We have a clip

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump talking about the Kasho murder. Abia has

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>been a great ally, but what happened is unacceptable. He

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:56.399
<v Speaker 1>later would deny what the entire intelligence community said, which

0:56:56.440 --> 0:57:00.919
<v Speaker 1>is that MBS either directed or at least was very

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:05.280
<v Speaker 1>aware of the assassination of Kashogi, and he is signaled

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the world that, you know, business

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>as usual goes on, which is a little bit interesting

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because unlike in previous decades, the US is no longer

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>dependent on oil from Saudi Arabia, so it costs a

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lot less for US to be more independent and stand

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>up to Saudi Arabia than it than it used to.

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of my colleagues have this phrase for what President

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump does and some of these moments. They call it

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>reading the stage directions out loud. You know, traditionally politicians

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>would never say the thing that really undergirds a decision.

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>President Trump will often just say it out loud. And

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing he has said repeatedly about the U S

0:57:44.640 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Saudi Arabia is it it's financially motivated. He

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>makes no bones about it. He doesn't she that in

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>diplomacy and niceties. He makes very clear that in his

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mind there's a Faustian bargain. Saudi Arabia buys billions of

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars of American military are and we have a productive

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>economic partnership, and that overrides the moral questions about their behavior.

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a kind of virtue in that honesty, I suppose,

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's very startling to hear Michael speaking of moral questions.

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Another huge story involving some big names who want to

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about is Facebook, and those names are Mark Zuckerberg

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and Cheryl Sandberg. How did we get to where we are?

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Where Facebook has become probably the most controversial technology company

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in America, if not the world. In some ways, it

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>goes back to right after the election. Doesn't seem like

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>everything goes back to the election, and when Mark Zuckerberg,

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the founder and CEO of Facebook, said the idea that

0:58:46.320 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook somehow influenced the outcome of the election, that someone

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 1>could hijack it or misuse it, and it could influence

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 1>who won. That's crazy. And it turns out inside Facebook,

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his own employees, his own security official heard him say

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that and said, oh no, he may not understand the

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>depth of what has just happened. And what had just happened,

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, was that Russians who were maliciously intended that

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the word. Um, they we just made it one.

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We made it one. They had found ways to use

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to influence American voters, or to seek to influence

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>American voters in a pret systematic way, and that either

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in their minds, their boss didn't know about it, or

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was deliberately misleading people. And what was going on inside

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was a kind of reckoning with what had really

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 1>happened on this giant social media platform at the hands

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of people who wanted to exploit it. And over time,

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we've now learned from the reporting of of my colleagues

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>at the times, the company sought to tamp down that information.

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want the world to know in real time

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>as they were learning it just how much influenced Russians

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had actually had with this platform. And it got to

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the point where those criticizing Facebook became targets of Facebook.

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And we now know that Cheryl Sandberg, the CE who

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is who's beloved by many for her public profile for

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the book she wrote about encouraging women to lean in,

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Who's written after her husband, very very movingly, about losing

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a spouse, and about being thoughtful when it comes to grief,

1:00:23.680 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>yours others. What we learned is that people underneath Cheryl

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Sandberg and Its, seemingly with her permission, had authorized opposition

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>research into those who criticized the company, including George Sorrows,

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who is a billionaire investor known for his left leaning positions.

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And so now there are all sorts of questions. Why

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>would Facebook go after its critics like this? Why would

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it hire a company to do opposite of research. Why

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't its instinct to share with the world immediately what

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Russia did on its platform? I think the bigger question

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like, is this a company that started

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>off and has even through its development, is ultimately interested

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in bringing people together or is this really a company

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that's interested in kind of like hoovering up all our

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>private information, using it for profit, keeping things secret, going

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>after critics. I mean that's not the Facebook that you

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think about when we post baby photos. Soros,

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>or at least going after Soros is such a fraud

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>thing because he has become unfairly, in my view, a

1:01:27.480 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>boogeyman on the right and used to explain all sorts

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theories, liberal victories, et cetera in a way

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that crosses the line into anti Semitism. And so it

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>may have been legitimate, given Soros his history of short selling,

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to look into whether Soros had a financial stake in

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying about Facebook. The reason it it

1:01:54.600 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>set off so many alarm bells is this is exactly

1:01:57.480 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what sort of the most extreme elements on the right

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do you is George Soros as an excuse for everything.

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brett Havanaugh is another huge name, along with Dr Christine

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Blassie Ford. They dominated the conversation for a certain period

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eighteen. You all approached it in

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting way at the daily We did, I

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>mean we everyone instantly understood that this was going to

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>divide the country kind of down the middle in the

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>way that so many of these kind of national episodes do.

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And there were so many big questions brought up by

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this case. One was simply what happened, and did Brett

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh do the things that he denied doing, and that

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr plus Ford said that he did do? And who

1:02:43.920 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>do you believe? And who do you believe? And I

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think there was no satisfying resolution in the kind of

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>national public conscious conscious when it came to that, because

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't really an investigation done by the Senate Judiciary Committee,

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and and that was such a messy, complicated partisan process,

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and so everybody was left to kind of come to

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>their own conclusions about this. And we went to Brooklyn

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Daily to talk to a bunch of young high

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>school girls about what had happened, and in some ways,

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, these girls were more thoughtful about it than

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>members of the U. S. Senate because they understood what

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it meant to be in that phase of life. Like obviously,

1:03:30.960 --> 1:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>high schools like a write of passage, and you've got

1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to make mistakes and learn your way through it. But

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things that it's just like like saying

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:43.959
<v Speaker 1>hateful things to certain minority groups and things like sexual misconduct.

1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That kind of stuff follows the victims forever. And if

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it follows the victims forever. Well, then you've got to

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>do with it too, since it's your fault, you know

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. I think when we look back at

1:03:55.400 --> 1:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this year, the dueling testimony of Christine blasi Ford and

1:04:01.960 --> 1:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Brett Kavanaugh, her tone, her vulnerability, his rage, his defensiveness,

1:04:10.240 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately some of the inconsistencies that we're surfaced about

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>how he described his behaviors, how other people versus his

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>classmates who described him as as drinking much more heavily

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>than he acknowledged. We're gonna be remembering that testimony and

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how it contrasted with her testimony for decades. Well, I

1:04:29.840 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's not just the testimony, it's also the aftermath.

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The result of this hearing was Kavanaugh achieving his lifelong

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>dream of sitting and serving on the Supreme Court, and

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Christine blasi Ford, when last I checked, still couldn't go

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>back to her home, still required seven security for all

1:04:50.960 --> 1:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the threats that she's gotten. And so the trope that

1:04:55.240 --> 1:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know she's doing this for any reason other than

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth rings a little bit hollow to me personally,

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>given the costs that this is imposed on her life.

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think this was the moment where the me

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Too movement did lose a bit of steam in the

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>eyes of some people who are more traditional in terms

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:24.959
<v Speaker 1>of gender and societal roles, and they saw this as

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>going too far, and people having very very little sympathy

1:05:30.840 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for the perpetrators of these crimes or incidents suddenly said,

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, we're not sure we can wholeheartedly embrace

1:05:41.200 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this moment or this movement as much as we thought.

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with that? I do agree with that,

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because this was the moment when the me too movement

1:05:52.400 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of crashed into American politics, which is sort of

1:05:57.040 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>split right down the middle, and for the half of

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a country that supports the Republican Party and Donald Trump,

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Brett Kavanaugh seemed more like the victim here than Dr Ford,

1:06:09.960 --> 1:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that there weren't a lot of other

1:06:13.160 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>people who either were willing to come forward or were

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>called to come forward to support her side of the

1:06:19.360 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>story was used by Kavanaugh supporters to say, how can

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you destroy this man's life based on the word of

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>one person? And I think that went even beyond you guys,

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump supporters. I think it was also the feeling

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>amongst some older women who just thought it was a

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>bridge too far even if they weren't firmly in Donald

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump's camp. Let's transition to some other big moments. On

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>election Day, Democrats took the House of Representatives. We now

1:06:50.800 --> 1:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>know they gained forty seats. Nancy Pelosi is likely to

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>become Speaker of the House. What are the consequences for

1:06:58.960 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>politics and twenty nineteen. It means so many things to

1:07:02.000 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have divided government. Is the difference between a giant tax

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>bill passing or not passing, between the possibility of investigations

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:14.919
<v Speaker 1>with the president happening or not happening, between healthcare being

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally changed on the country or not changing. And and

1:07:19.160 --> 1:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete game changer for the second half of

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a presidency. Everybody remembers what the first two years of

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>President Obama's government looked like when the House, the Senate,

1:07:29.880 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and the White House we're controlled by Democrats. That's when

1:07:31.640 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Affordable Care Act passed. And then the lights went

1:07:34.400 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>off and the Republicans took back control of Congress, and

1:07:38.280 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that and and and and basically we had paralysis. And

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're looking at a similar situation potentially with President Trump.

1:07:45.520 --> 1:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We now know that it was the biggest House popular

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>vote victory from one party since the aftermath of Watergate,

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that there was an enormous swing and a huge national

1:07:56.960 --> 1:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>rebuke in the House to President Trump. So, Michael, one

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>trend we may see playing out over the course of

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is an economic slowdown. We've had a very long economic expansion.

1:08:09.080 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We're due for a recession, if not a slowdown. What

1:08:13.080 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think the consequences would be if unemployment goes up,

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if growth slows down, if wages don't keep increasing, etcetera.

1:08:22.280 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think no one wants to see a slowdown. But

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if there is an economic slowdown, and it feels like

1:08:26.040 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see science that there could be one,

1:08:28.760 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're not sure that that would be very problematic

1:08:33.200 --> 1:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump. I mean, we talked about President George

1:08:36.920 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Walker Bush. The thing that happened to him that

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:41.919
<v Speaker 1>no one expected was that the second half of his presidency,

1:08:41.920 --> 1:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>which felt so triumphant, was defined by a recession. And

1:08:45.600 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be really interesting to see how

1:08:47.920 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a president who defines his success by the stock market

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and by the economic indicators of the country, how he

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>will deal with a suddenly souring economy. I don't I

1:08:57.200 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think he would deal with it very well. We've

1:08:59.080 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 1>started to see him scream at the Federal Reserve chairman

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for doing something that the President didn't like on interest rates.

1:09:06.320 --> 1:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's of course unorthodox to respond to a changing

1:09:09.280 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>economy by yelling at the people around you because you

1:09:12.840 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like it. But if that's his response, that that

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>could be very politically problematic. Because he is seen as

1:09:18.800 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a very firm figure when it comes to the economy.

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an area of of kind of, in

1:09:24.120 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense, almost unmitigated success for this president. So if

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it begins to change, I don't know how he will respond,

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think he will be very flustered. What about

1:09:32.880 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>gun violence, you know that dominated the headlines in two

1:09:36.240 --> 1:09:39.799
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen. Do you think anything is going to change?

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at a national level, a huge percentage I

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:49.639
<v Speaker 1>think want want universal background checks, for example, and yet

1:09:49.680 --> 1:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think people are very frustrated that nothing seems to change.

1:09:53.120 --> 1:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So you see that any movement in this area at all,

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would just to bump stocks. Remember those

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>were the devices that everybody seized on and seemed to

1:10:05.479 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>agree shouldn't be on the market because they make it

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>possible for a semi automatic weapon to become essentially automatic.

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>They were used in that horrible Las Vegas mass shooting,

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>and nothing changed, nothing happened. And this was the year

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen where it felt like an entire generation of millennials

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was activated and animated about guns and gun violence and

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>gun controlled by by the Parkland school shooting. And I

1:10:35.680 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's been really sobering for those kids to see

1:10:39.160 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>how hard it is to make things change, and yet

1:10:40.960 --> 1:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see them being dissuaded from it. And it

1:10:42.760 --> 1:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>feels like they're going to spend the rest of their

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lives on this. And the question is when will their

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>time come, if it comes at all, or will they

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be stymied by the kind of the wall of of

1:10:55.120 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>opposition that's so nestled into our political system. Early this year,

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Katie and I spoke to Ali, she from Parkland, Florida,

1:11:04.600 --> 1:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and she said very clearly that they're in this for

1:11:06.640 --> 1:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the long haul and that progress may come slowly. They

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>understand that. I mean, what we may see in is

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the House passing some legislation that then dies in the Senate. Katie,

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you've pointed out that states may take greater action to

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>combat the scourge of gun violence, and I think one

1:11:24.040 --> 1:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>thing we saw in the election is that support for

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gun control could be a political plus in a way

1:11:29.920 --> 1:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it hadn't been previous cycles. People are becoming

1:11:33.760 --> 1:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>single issue voters on that issue, as we saw with

1:11:37.920 --> 1:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Lucy Macbeth victory in Georgia, which was a surprise

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>too many people. And of course at all starts at

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the top. With new leadership potentially in and someone who

1:11:50.400 --> 1:11:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is not beholden to the n r A as President

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump is, that could be clearly a game changer which

1:11:57.200 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>brings us to elections. Commonly, Harris has said she's going

1:12:01.280 --> 1:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about it over the holidays. Mike Bloomberg visited Iowa. Uh,

1:12:06.200 --> 1:12:10.519
<v Speaker 1>there's what a cast of thousands who are considering running

1:12:10.760 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic nomination? How do you see that all

1:12:14.400 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>playing out? And um, you know, are the ideological uh

1:12:21.000 --> 1:12:25.599
<v Speaker 1>differences within the party itself going to work against whoever

1:12:25.760 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it is who runs against Donald Trump. Either it will

1:12:29.120 --> 1:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for that person, or it will be

1:12:31.080 --> 1:12:34.639
<v Speaker 1>really clarifying and it will crown that person, whoever he

1:12:34.880 --> 1:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>or she is. Because there are twenty debates going inside

1:12:37.600 --> 1:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party and we can't keep up with all

1:12:39.479 --> 1:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. But I mean among them are generational. Is

1:12:44.760 --> 1:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden too old to be the nominee or is

1:12:47.560 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he just right? Is Elizabeth Warren too progressive or is

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>she just right? Um? Is this party or too green?

1:12:56.640 --> 1:13:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Too inexperienced exactly or is he exactly level of excitement

1:13:00.800 --> 1:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that people wanted to do? You have to be an officeholder?

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you be an outsider? Donald Trump was an outsider?

1:13:05.640 --> 1:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Can the Democrats wrap their head around the idea of

1:13:07.560 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity candidate the rock? Yeah? I think that the

1:13:14.439 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>president broke so many of the rules that you have

1:13:18.240 --> 1:13:20.599
<v Speaker 1>to reevaluate the rules to a certain degree. And then

1:13:21.200 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to answer the questions that the Democrats have

1:13:24.000 --> 1:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of failed to answer for many election cycles. Now,

1:13:26.560 --> 1:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>which is is it a party about identity and progressive politics?

1:13:32.720 --> 1:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it a party that's going to rival the Republicans

1:13:36.479 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump around questions of economic populism? Is it

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>going to speak to the coal workers? Can it be

1:13:43.240 --> 1:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a party that stands for environmentalism and sustainability while being

1:13:47.840 --> 1:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to to the to were traditional forms exactly to

1:13:54.400 --> 1:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the coal miner um or those two things incompatible? And

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>does it need to bet on an on a new

1:14:00.439 --> 1:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>exciting outsider or can it be a familiar face who

1:14:03.760 --> 1:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>stands for kind of the middle. And I mean the

1:14:05.720 --> 1:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>reality is that it keeps putting off these debates. The

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>House strategy that seemed to win this year was a

1:14:13.600 --> 1:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>message of health care and the economy, and it the

1:14:18.920 --> 1:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>party forestalled these essential debates about who they are. And

1:14:22.680 --> 1:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>now it can't do that anymore. It has to figure

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:28.439
<v Speaker 1>out who it is. And I think, as you say, Michael,

1:14:28.640 --> 1:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the debate is going to be as much about the

1:14:32.400 --> 1:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>past versus the future as it is about the left

1:14:35.400 --> 1:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the center. You look at the last three Democratic

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 1>presidents Obama, Clinton, Carter, they were all to some extent

1:14:44.560 --> 1:14:49.639
<v Speaker 1>outsiders to the political establishment. They were young, they didn't

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of traditional Washington experience. Um Nominating and

1:14:55.000 --> 1:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>electing Joe Biden would be a real break from that.

1:14:57.880 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>But Donald Trump is a break from a law of things.

1:15:00.520 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. I guess the big question is do

1:15:03.040 --> 1:15:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you go with someone who is new, exciting, charismatic, has

1:15:07.720 --> 1:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a great message and signals the dawn of a new era.

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But if you do that to risk going with someone

1:15:17.760 --> 1:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>who's not guaranteed to be President Trump, I think that's

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>no one is guaranteed anybody, right, But that's I think

1:15:24.120 --> 1:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the question or who has you know? Do you go

1:15:27.280 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with someone solely because they have enough popular appeal that

1:15:32.960 --> 1:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to beat the president? Or do you

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>usher in this new generation not really knowing if they're

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to get the job done. My

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 1>advice is always the same, one of these things. Having

1:15:46.600 --> 1:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>covered so many presidential campaigns, now is there is a process,

1:15:50.760 --> 1:15:54.519
<v Speaker 1>it plays out, it works, there's primaries. I don't know

1:15:54.600 --> 1:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>why people get so agitated so early. I don't know

1:15:57.400 --> 1:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>why polls get done before beple are even close to voting,

1:16:01.360 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but they do. I don't know why people throw things

1:16:04.160 --> 1:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>across the table, you know, at family dinners when people

1:16:07.080 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't even announced candidacies. Um, but we have one full

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>year before this primary, and I plan on not using

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it to think too much about the presidential election. All

1:16:19.760 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of us will have plenty to talk about in two

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen, and the dailies will keep you as busy

1:16:27.080 --> 1:16:31.639
<v Speaker 1>as ever and us as informed as ever. Congratulations for

1:16:31.720 --> 1:16:35.759
<v Speaker 1>such great work for not only during two thousand eighteen,

1:16:35.800 --> 1:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but two thousand seventeen as well. Thank you, Thank you,

1:16:38.240 --> 1:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>kat I really appreciate. Thank you. We're big fans of

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the show, big fans, as they say, Michael, thanks for

1:16:43.439 --> 1:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks for doing our show. My pleasure. So Katie, before

1:16:49.439 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>we wrap our final episode of this show, are wonderful

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>producers and I have put together another look back, not

1:16:56.439 --> 1:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just at this year, but at the whole run of

1:16:59.000 --> 1:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Let's have a listen. It all started with

1:17:04.280 --> 1:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a trip down to d C in July. It feels

1:17:08.160 --> 1:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a little like old Home week for me because here

1:17:10.200 --> 1:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we are in the heart Senate office building. When I

1:17:12.439 --> 1:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>lived in Washington, I covered a lot of stories here

1:17:15.200 --> 1:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say it's a beautiful building. For

1:17:18.040 --> 1:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>our first episode, we talked with then Senator Al Franken,

1:17:22.800 --> 1:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>give us your prediction for the fall. I am not

1:17:27.000 --> 1:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a prognosticator. That's not what I do. So what I do?

1:17:31.200 --> 1:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Hillary Clinton is going to win? The

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Senator was wrong about that, of course, and little did

1:17:36.720 --> 1:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we know that just over a year later, his own

1:17:39.400 --> 1:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>political career would end. We continued obsessing about the presidential

1:17:44.040 --> 1:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>election throughout that year with people like Samantha b. Bryan

1:17:49.160 --> 1:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and I started this by saying I can't wait till

1:17:52.479 --> 1:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's over. Ryan said, he's going to be sad when

1:17:55.439 --> 1:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so. You're Nate Silver made a pretty safe prediction

1:18:04.240 --> 1:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>right before the election, there are going to be consequences

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:10.599
<v Speaker 1>of this election, win or lose, are going to persist

1:18:10.680 --> 1:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for for many years. And then we got together the

1:18:15.240 --> 1:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>morning after and tried to make sense of what happened

1:18:18.200 --> 1:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with Doris Kern's goodwin. You know, I predicted, obviously wrongly,

1:18:22.479 --> 1:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that the morning after people would realize what a big

1:18:26.000 --> 1:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thing this was that two forty years after our founding,

1:18:29.400 --> 1:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when so many other nations have had their first female leader,

1:18:32.200 --> 1:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we finally had a female president. We went back down

1:18:37.000 --> 1:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to Washington to catch the last of the Obama administration

1:18:40.240 --> 1:18:43.599
<v Speaker 1>with Valerie Jarrett. Welcome to the White House, Katie, delighted

1:18:43.640 --> 1:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to have you, thank you. And just as President Trump

1:18:46.400 --> 1:18:49.759
<v Speaker 1>was taking office, we talked with the impersonator in chief

1:18:50.439 --> 1:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>NBC Great organization. Yes, sure, Katie schooled the pod Save

1:18:56.080 --> 1:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>America guys, Jason Candersy, the one that did the great

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>where he put together the automatic weapon blindfolded. Yeah, he's

1:19:03.920 --> 1:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a card carrying badass. We also, obviously Elizabeth Warren is like,

1:19:06.880 --> 1:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a card carrying badass. I think

1:19:09.520 --> 1:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you just had to apply. We heard from New Orleans

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Mitch Landrew Listen, I think that race is really

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>hard for us. It's hard for everybody to talk about.

1:19:22.840 --> 1:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've said many times on this issue. We have

1:19:25.840 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of progress, but we're not finished. And

1:19:30.120 --> 1:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>we talked with New Jersey Senator Corey Booker. So, I'm

1:19:34.439 --> 1:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a former mayor and um, I had a fixed stuff,

1:19:38.400 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>um that I couldn't use philosophy, as Fiel Little Guardias said,

1:19:41.720 --> 1:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no Republican or Democratic way to fix a pothole.

1:19:43.960 --> 1:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You just gotta fix it. But it hasn't been all

1:19:46.760 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>politics for us. We've sat down with everyone from Tony Robbins,

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna feed a billion people and then an

1:19:52.720 --> 1:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>i'mgoing hundred million new meals per year. Can I just

1:19:55.360 --> 1:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>say I give up? I feel so lazy and useless

1:19:58.800 --> 1:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>after just hearing the this is really impressive to Ena Garden,

1:20:06.040 --> 1:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>who's in charge of cracking eggs, so I need eight eggs,

1:20:09.920 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>eight eggs of excellent. We were also inspired by the

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:16.559
<v Speaker 1>strength and talent of so many women we talked to,

1:20:16.680 --> 1:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>like Ava du Verney working for thirteen years and film

1:20:20.479 --> 1:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that closely gave me a set of tools that really

1:20:23.080 --> 1:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>made up for not going to film school and Martha

1:20:25.920 --> 1:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Stewart and then you had this moment in your life

1:20:29.640 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>when you were in prison. What was that like for you? Mean?

1:20:32.479 --> 1:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Was that sort of like it was horrifying. It was

1:20:35.640 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>horrifying and no one, no one should have to go

1:20:39.560 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>through that kind of indignity. We even got to take

1:20:43.040 --> 1:20:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a peek or listen inside Katie's closet with Marie Condo,

1:20:47.080 --> 1:20:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the Queen of tidying up. So when I was in nineteen,

1:20:50.640 --> 1:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I went to university and my hobby then was to

1:20:53.080 --> 1:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>clean my friends places and then ounds fun. But it's

1:20:58.240 --> 1:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>no surprise that in these turbulent time so many of

1:21:01.000 --> 1:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>our conversations turned back to politics and Donald Trump. Like

1:21:04.960 --> 1:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with Morning Joe and Morning Mika, He's not interested in policy,

1:21:10.240 --> 1:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He's interested in getting the reaction from the tweet. Somebody

1:21:12.960 --> 1:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>who's loved very close to me just said he loves

1:21:15.880 --> 1:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>setting the bomb off and just watching him loves float.

1:21:18.920 --> 1:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We even went across the pond with the BBC and

1:21:22.200 --> 1:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>got to bask in the britishness with Doubt Nappy creator

1:21:25.479 --> 1:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Lord Julian Fellows. I like the servants more than that

1:21:31.240 --> 1:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>people's favorite characters. We dealt with big issues and challenging

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>subjects on this show, like the Me Too movement. We

1:21:37.880 --> 1:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about it with Amy Schumer. I identify with with

1:21:41.040 --> 1:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>all the women in these situations. I kind of my

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>mind doesn't go right. Even if it's my friend, I

1:21:45.400 --> 1:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>don't go oh, but he's a good guy. I think,

1:21:48.320 --> 1:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>what would it feel like to have been her? You know?

1:21:50.320 --> 1:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And Laverne Cox. I noticed when some trans women have

1:21:53.400 --> 1:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>come forward and said that they have been exactly assaulted,

1:21:56.160 --> 1:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's been a different tenor in terms of the ways

1:21:59.280 --> 1:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in which they've and believed we reckon with the scourge

1:22:02.439 --> 1:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of gun violence. When we talked to Ali, she student

1:22:05.479 --> 1:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>from Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, I'm

1:22:09.280 --> 1:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>going to ask the question that reporters are told not

1:22:12.600 --> 1:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask, but somehow I feel is appropriate given the situation.

1:22:16.960 --> 1:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing? Um? I think right now all

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of us are kind of doing the best that we can.

1:22:23.200 --> 1:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>It's getting used to our new normal that we have

1:22:26.560 --> 1:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at our school, in our community. Right now, we've asked

1:22:30.080 --> 1:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the tough questions of people like Jim Comey, a friend

1:22:33.760 --> 1:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of mine who's a very respected former federal prosecutor, says,

1:22:36.840 --> 1:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the only reason not to fully inform the Attorney general

1:22:40.520 --> 1:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was that you knew you were doing something wrong and

1:22:42.960 --> 1:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't want to be stopped. I'm curious to hear

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>your reaction to that, and we've been able to get

1:22:47.360 --> 1:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>an inside a look at what happened behind the news.

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Like with former U s. Attorney pre Perra, we had

1:22:53.840 --> 1:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a discussion about whether or not we should tape the

1:22:56.640 --> 1:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. We decided against that because we,

1:23:01.000 --> 1:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>unlike Michael Cohen, his own lawyer, I thought it was

1:23:04.120 --> 1:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of uncool to take the president of the United States.

1:23:07.720 --> 1:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of an inside look, we took a deep

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>dive into this political moment with our series on Katie's

1:23:13.479 --> 1:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Palin Interviews ten years later. She was the canary

1:23:17.520 --> 1:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in the mind that the party had changed and it

1:23:19.960 --> 1:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>had become more animated by xenophobia, by nativism, by grievances

1:23:25.120 --> 1:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>than by any single animating idea. We laughed a lot,

1:23:29.920 --> 1:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the trampoline based workerut I mean, and then

1:23:35.680 --> 1:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot was just there learned a lot. I said,

1:23:39.800 --> 1:23:43.559
<v Speaker 1>such an underrated beauty to all it really is. She's

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so anti inflammatory and she's so affordable, which is great.

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And listened to Katie sing a lot. There's no business

1:23:52.479 --> 1:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>like shoe business. Okay, you got the idea. So you're

1:23:55.760 --> 1:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ. Were the great Jesus Christ? Prove to me

1:23:59.320 --> 1:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're summer loving had me a last summer loving

1:24:05.320 --> 1:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>happened so fast, and I know that if you love

1:24:09.439 --> 1:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>me to want a wonderful world, this would be through

1:24:15.920 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it all. My admiration and affection for Katie pretty big

1:24:19.120 --> 1:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, only got bigger. What a wonderful privilege

1:24:23.160 --> 1:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it was to be on this journey with Katie and

1:24:25.479 --> 1:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with all of you for the last two and a

1:24:27.640 --> 1:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>half years. Uh, that was so nice. Thank you all

1:24:43.840 --> 1:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for putting that together. And wow, this was

1:24:47.120 --> 1:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a really good show. It actually was. That's it, everybody,

1:24:52.520 --> 1:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>at least for now. It's our last show. I'd like

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to start off by thanking Stitcher Media, the company that

1:24:57.880 --> 1:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian and I partnered with to douce this podcasts. And

1:25:02.160 --> 1:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge thank you to Gianna Palmer, who's no longer

1:25:05.160 --> 1:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with us. Well she's with us, she's working, but she

1:25:08.840 --> 1:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was our fearless leader throughout much of our podcast times.

1:25:13.200 --> 1:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Here and Chris Bannon who was such a big supporter,

1:25:16.520 --> 1:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and John Delore who was our audio engineer at the

1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>very beginning and who helped out tremendously during our two parts,

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Palin episodes, and Greta Cone who was our very

1:25:27.880 --> 1:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>first producer. Um We also want to thank our our

1:25:30.840 --> 1:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>current production staff, producer Emma morgen Stern, associate producer Noura Richie,

1:25:36.720 --> 1:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>audio engineer Jared O'Connell who never gets the credit he deserves.

1:25:40.520 --> 1:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>And a shout out to Brendan Burns at ere Wolf

1:25:42.760 --> 1:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and Julian Nicholson and Invisible Studios for recording the l

1:25:46.840 --> 1:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>A side of today's podcast, And of course the team

1:25:49.880 --> 1:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>over at Katie Couric Media, my assistant Beth de Mos,

1:25:53.320 --> 1:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>my social media Maven Julia Lewis, she obviously took Alison

1:25:58.160 --> 1:26:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Bresnick's place. We mentioned Allison a lot, as you know,

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Brown, who helped out a lot with the booking.

1:26:04.840 --> 1:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You all have helped the production run so smoothly and

1:26:08.280 --> 1:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't thank you enough. Jared Arnold composed our theme music.

1:26:12.360 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>You can continue to find me on at Goldsmith b

1:26:15.320 --> 1:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, and even though the podcast is ending, Katie

1:26:19.320 --> 1:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>has no plans to retire from social media anytime soon.

1:26:22.479 --> 1:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Quite the contrary. You can find her on Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat,

1:26:26.840 --> 1:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and especially Instagram at Katie Current and Brian and I

1:26:30.880 --> 1:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>will have important exciting news to report, so pay attention

1:26:35.400 --> 1:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to our social media channels. Will share with you what

1:26:39.479 --> 1:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we're doing on those platforms. And I'd just like to

1:26:43.760 --> 1:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>say personally, thank you all so much for listening to

1:26:47.439 --> 1:26:50.519
<v Speaker 1>our podcast. I have to say, you know, I've done

1:26:50.560 --> 1:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different things throughout my career, but people

1:26:53.680 --> 1:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>who were enthusiastic about the podcast, possibly because we're coming

1:26:58.240 --> 1:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>through your little earbok uds directly to your brain, have

1:27:02.400 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 1>been so supportive and enthusiastic about the work we've done here.

1:27:06.880 --> 1:27:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And we can't thank you enough for really caring about

1:27:10.960 --> 1:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that we care about and wanting to listen

1:27:14.160 --> 1:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to the guests that we've been interested in. Yeah, people

1:27:17.000 --> 1:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me all the time about how much they've learned

1:27:18.960 --> 1:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on this show, while I've learned at least as much

1:27:22.200 --> 1:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as they have working with Katie, working with our terrific team,

1:27:25.760 --> 1:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>interacting with our listeners. Uh, it's just been a fabulous

1:27:29.400 --> 1:27:32.559
<v Speaker 1>experience start to finish, So thank you all. For being

1:27:32.640 --> 1:27:35.479
<v Speaker 1>part of this with us, and remember you know you

1:27:35.520 --> 1:27:38.599
<v Speaker 1>can still listen to a lot of the episodes if

1:27:38.600 --> 1:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you're interested. If this is peaked your interest in the podcast,

1:27:42.600 --> 1:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>or you're just feeling nostalgic to hear some of your

1:27:45.280 --> 1:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite episodes over again, feel free to listen and to

1:27:49.760 --> 1:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us on social media because we'd love

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to continue to hear what you have to say and

1:27:55.800 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>understand the issues you're you're interested in, uh learning more about,

1:28:00.960 --> 1:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and the people you'd like to hear from. Because we're

1:28:03.840 --> 1:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not going away, we're just taking a little break. So

1:28:07.080 --> 1:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks again everyone so much for your support and Brian Um,

1:28:11.479 --> 1:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know I'll be calling you at all hours per usual.

1:28:16.040 --> 1:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Why should anything change? Okay? This show is sponsored by

1:28:34.720 --> 1:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a d T. A d T can design and install

1:28:36.920 --> 1:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a smart home just for you back protection like Turndown Service,

1:28:41.479 --> 1:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>which is an a d T automation that arms your system,

1:28:44.640 --> 1:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>locks your doors, and turns down your lights and thermostat.

1:28:48.200 --> 1:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's all controlled from the a d T app or

1:28:50.280 --> 1:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the sound of your voice, and it's back protection. Just

1:28:54.120 --> 1:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>visit a DT dot com slash smart to learn more

1:28:56.960 --> 1:28:59.439
<v Speaker 1>about how a d T can design and install a

1:28:59.520 --> 1:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>secure smart home just for you it Stitcher. I always

1:29:08.960 --> 1:29:11.479
<v Speaker 1>told you you ought to go into politics, Katie. I

1:29:11.520 --> 1:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>think I said that to her too. Yeah yeah, Well

1:29:16.439 --> 1:29:18.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe between the two of us we can talk

1:29:18.680 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>her into it. I doubt it. Hello, Dead Beats, It's Gabby.

1:29:24.400 --> 1:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Gabby Done, host of Bad with Money. I had the

1:29:26.920 --> 1:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Bad with Money book come out in January. I'm super

1:29:29.280 --> 1:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>stoked for season four. This season, we're going back to

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:35.479
<v Speaker 1>our roots and I'm having long conversations with amazing people

1:29:35.600 --> 1:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and getting the big picture about money and the economy.

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you like intersectional queer, social justice based money podcasts?

1:29:44.320 --> 1:29:46.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the only one, so get into it. Did

1:29:46.720 --> 1:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you earn it? You deserve to be like a billionaire

1:29:49.840 --> 1:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>when somebody who's working as a janitor or working in Walmart,

1:29:53.560 --> 1:29:56.839
<v Speaker 1>or teacher or a teacher, yeah certainly, or a teacher

1:29:57.120 --> 1:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>who may be working just as many hours as you,

1:29:59.200 --> 1:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe just as smart it as you like? Does that

1:30:01.920 --> 1:30:04.639
<v Speaker 1>make it okay that you have so much? I get

1:30:04.640 --> 1:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>paid once a month, so my my check accounts huge.

1:30:07.040 --> 1:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like a tidal wave comes in and then on

1:30:09.120 --> 1:30:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the second it's empty again. Oh my god, speaking my language.

1:30:13.160 --> 1:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Bad with Money is back now for season four, Listen

1:30:15.960 --> 1:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and stitch your Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.