1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:23,799 Speaker 1: To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Steve Shumaron is 6 00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 1: taking notes. Had a Multi Assis Solutions Federated MS right now, Steve, 7 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:36,160 Speaker 1: what have you changed here? I mean the dynamics now, 8 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:39,320 Speaker 1: the new genus we have this panel today, but really 9 00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: the economic data tomorrow, how is Federated tweaked the sixty 10 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:50,240 Speaker 1: allocation significantly. Um. You know, we've been sellers really since 11 00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 1: last September UM, and we took the opportunity with last 12 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,400 Speaker 1: week's rally, you know, growth and popped about ten percent 13 00:00:57,800 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 1: and we reduced. We reduced so we're one percent overweight equities, 14 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,040 Speaker 1: which is you know equities right now, which is the 15 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,400 Speaker 1: lowest overweight time that we've had really since two thousand 16 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:10,280 Speaker 1: and eight, two thousand nine. As you know, along with 17 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: Steve Off in phil Orlando, we've been one of the 18 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:15,880 Speaker 1: most bullish shops on the street really for the last 19 00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:19,520 Speaker 1: decade plus UM. But we're as as low in our 20 00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: allocation equities as we've been, and we mirror that on 21 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: the fixed income side. We are underweight almost every major 22 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:29,280 Speaker 1: category of credit, in fact, not almost every major category 23 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:31,000 Speaker 1: of credit, and that's really only the third time in 24 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 1: the last fifteen years. Help our radio and TV audiences 25 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 1: that are saying, okay, underweight, translate that does that mean 26 00:01:38,319 --> 00:01:43,399 Speaker 1: go to cash? It does um to a certain extent. 27 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:46,399 Speaker 1: So we've been you know, our neutral allocation to cash 28 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 1: and at sixty is roughly three. You know, we're sitting 29 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 1: at eight, which is you know, darnier. Three times are 30 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:55,400 Speaker 1: a normal cash weight, so almost a triple levered cash 31 00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: on the full. But I think, you know, there's gonna 32 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 1: be a time to buy longer dated treasuries as as 33 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 1: the recession, which we think is more and more likely, 34 00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: comes into view. The problem is, I think the rally 35 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 1: of the last couple of weeks and treasuries is still premature. 36 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 1: I still think you're gonna have upside surprises to inflation 37 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,119 Speaker 1: of FED that's hawkish in a ten year that ultimately 38 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 1: moves back to that three and a half percent rate. 39 00:02:19,919 --> 00:02:22,760 Speaker 1: So we would look to add on treasuries as we move, 40 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:25,360 Speaker 1: as we saw a more because I think you're gonna 41 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 1: want those longer dated treasuries when you get into kind 42 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 1: of worse growth periods. But right now we think cash 43 00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 1: is king. Steve, let's take a step back and understand 44 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: the framing of your parishness and put on your federal 45 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:41,560 Speaker 1: reserve suggish hat in terms of commentating, So if you 46 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 1: said before you came on that you think that they're 47 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 1: in the midst of the biggest policy air going back 48 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 1: to the nineteen thirties, what exactly is their policy are? Yeah? 49 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 1: I mean, and to Tom's point, I think it's very 50 00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:56,400 Speaker 1: understandable how they got there, But I don't think this 51 00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 1: is malfeasance. But when when you woke up in March 52 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: and interest rates for zero inflation was eight percent and 53 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: the you know hood was still buying bonds, I don't 54 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 1: care how you got there. That's policy here, um, and 55 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 1: that has now forced them into a position right now 56 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: where you know, they're hiking aggressively and they need to 57 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 1: into a slowing economy. And I think what they missed, 58 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,560 Speaker 1: and Tom you might find this interesting, what they missed 59 00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 1: is a longer term structural change in the economy. We 60 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 1: were in this kind of new normal, sub two percent growth, 61 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:31,160 Speaker 1: sub two percent inflation, sub two percent rate environment for 62 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:34,679 Speaker 1: a decade, new normal, if you will. And just in time, 63 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 1: inventories are no longer just good enough, so companies are 64 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 1: reorienting their uh their supply chains. Chinese working age population 65 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: is set to decline over the next twenty years, and 66 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 1: the US population growth is set to go from two 67 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 1: percent growth to eight percent growth over that same period. 68 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 1: And so and at the same time, you've you've undermined 69 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 1: the three pillars at least for the short run of globalization. 70 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:01,760 Speaker 1: The free movement of goods really kind of peaked with 71 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:05,000 Speaker 1: the trade war, the free movement of people peaked with COVID, 72 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 1: and the free movement of finance may have peaked with 73 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: this with this kind of economic war with Russian So 74 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 1: I think you're headed to a scenario at the other 75 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 1: side of a recession where you have hired US growth, 76 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 1: but it's less efficient. You're gonna get more inflation per 77 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,039 Speaker 1: unit of growth. That's a different world. Steve. This a 78 00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:24,360 Speaker 1: lot of people would agree on, at least in the 79 00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: short term, but in terms of what happens next is 80 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,360 Speaker 1: the question and there was a belief in the market 81 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: perhaps last week that the Fed would ease off on 82 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,000 Speaker 1: rate heikes when they saw dampening in some of the 83 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,240 Speaker 1: growth expectations and frankly, uh the underlying economy. We just 84 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:43,279 Speaker 1: heard from Laurid Domester of the Cleveland Federal Reserve. She 85 00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: doesn't see that happening, and she still sees a FED 86 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 1: funds rate well over four percent when it comes to 87 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 1: next year. Do you think the market is miss pricing that? 88 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 1: Do you think that the turmoil that will ensue from 89 00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: that will confirm your parishness and the reason why you're 90 00:04:56,000 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 1: not ready to go full throttle into longer duration yet. Yeah, 91 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: I think the market has kind of contorted itself and 92 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 1: had complacency multiple times over the course of the last 93 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 1: next months where it's looking for peak inflation and peak hawkishness, 94 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: which you know, and I know you guys were talking 95 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:17,040 Speaker 1: about this yesterday, But if infletion goes from eight to seven, 96 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 1: that's not a victory lap. You really need to get 97 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,040 Speaker 1: that number, you know, down, even if it's not quite 98 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:25,279 Speaker 1: to two, certainly you know, pretty darn close to it. 99 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: And so I think defense still has a lot of 100 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:29,719 Speaker 1: work to do in order to do that, because you've 101 00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:33,599 Speaker 1: got service price inflation that's operating around eight nine on 102 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,320 Speaker 1: a three month basis and wages are high. For that 103 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:39,280 Speaker 1: to come down, unemployment needs to rise, and I think 104 00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:42,760 Speaker 1: they're gonna have to go for some time. UM. And 105 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:46,040 Speaker 1: if they do slow, Tom, I think they're slowing because 106 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,440 Speaker 1: it's abundantly clear that we've got, you know, a significant 107 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: decline in growth, if not an outright procession. How fast 108 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: does the employment dynamic changed? Your own pulse said we 109 00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:58,000 Speaker 1: have a strong economy in this testimony two cups of 110 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:01,159 Speaker 1: coffee ago. We've done a lot of work on this 111 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:03,960 Speaker 1: as part of our recession dashboard, and you can go 112 00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:08,240 Speaker 1: effective on average. It's a series of indicators that we 113 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 1: look at that I mean, there's no perfect formula to 114 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 1: understand when a recession is coming, but there's guide trades 115 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:16,159 Speaker 1: that you can look at. You try to understand UM 116 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 1: on average, you can go from the cycle low and 117 00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:22,080 Speaker 1: claims to a recession within twelve months. We hit a 118 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 1: cycle lowan claims three months ago. So there's no historic 119 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,839 Speaker 1: relationship between how strong the labor market is coming in 120 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:32,600 Speaker 1: in terms of how fast they can deteriorate. UM and 121 00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 1: so it's a fickle It's a fickle friend to rely 122 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 1: solely on a strong labor, of course, and we may 123 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 1: find that the excess inventory that we have this cycle 124 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:46,479 Speaker 1: was employment in certain sectors. And I think we've seen 125 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:49,200 Speaker 1: some of the tech guys already say we over hired, 126 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:52,960 Speaker 1: whether that's Amazon or or or Meta or some of 127 00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 1: the other folks that have said that. So I think, look, 128 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 1: this idea that you're going to get through this by 129 00:06:57,880 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 1: only making job openings this appear that's a comforting thought, 130 00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:04,040 Speaker 1: but I think it's ultimately going to prove to be 131 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:06,720 Speaker 1: really optimistic. Steve. I just want to wake out something 132 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,520 Speaker 1: you said earlier in the interview. If people aren't familiar 133 00:07:09,560 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: with your work, to hear this from you from Steve 134 00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: Orth from Phil Orlando, it's quite something. You know, forgive 135 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 1: the snark, but it's like Marko Klanovitch a JP Morgan 136 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 1: coming out this morning and going Max Bearish, you used 137 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 1: to make fun of me for my snark around that. Stay, 138 00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 1: thank you. Stay Chevaron Federate. By way into the General 139 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,560 Speaker 1: Mills piece there the nine year piece. Back then it 140 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:37,040 Speaker 1: was a ten year piece at a one oh two. 141 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:41,480 Speaker 1: I'm enjoying it this morning at one and studied you'll 142 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:44,800 Speaker 1: got it right greatly. Jones here, so I can yell 143 00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 1: at her because she told me to get spawns there. 144 00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: She fixed income strategist at Charles Schwab, Cathy, that's the reality, 145 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 1: not a bunch of bonds strategists talking about spreads and 146 00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: credit quality. People listening and watching bought a piece at 147 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 1: par and they're enjoying it a one or eighty two 148 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,040 Speaker 1: like the General Mills two and a quarter of thirty one. 149 00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 1: What do you do if you own that bond, Well, 150 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 1: you have two choices. Tom One is you hold it 151 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 1: to maturity and it goes back to part because that's 152 00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:22,960 Speaker 1: what bonds do unless there's a default, or you sell it. Now, 153 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 1: take your tax loss and replace it with a higher 154 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 1: yielding box, Kathy, When does the concern start to creep 155 00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,800 Speaker 1: in that we're not seeing issueans really pick up? And 156 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: then a lot of companies can choose not to now, 157 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 1: but maybe in six months and certainly in twelve months, 158 00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:43,360 Speaker 1: it'll be less of an option. Yeah, you know, I 159 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:46,959 Speaker 1: think right now, corporate balance sheets are still among the 160 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 1: investment grade community is still pretty strong, and they don't 161 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: they did load up on debt at lower yields UM. 162 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 1: So they're in pretty good shape, but we'll probably see 163 00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 1: issuance pick up. There's always going to be a window 164 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 1: uh oh been um. You know later on in the year, 165 00:09:02,679 --> 00:09:04,440 Speaker 1: as we get into next year, that will have to 166 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 1: be some refinancing that takes place. I think a lot 167 00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:11,080 Speaker 1: of the issuance now is just waiting for yields to 168 00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:13,320 Speaker 1: come back down. Do you think that they will? I mean, 169 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:15,360 Speaker 1: that's the issue. If they don't come back down, they're 170 00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:17,760 Speaker 1: looking at financing costs that are double what they were 171 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: potentially just a couple of years ago. How much does 172 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 1: the need for it to come down really determine the 173 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:27,880 Speaker 1: next to fault cycle? Well, I think when you're talking 174 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,680 Speaker 1: about high yield are certainly bank loans UM. Then you 175 00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:33,120 Speaker 1: have a problem with short rates moving up, particularly in 176 00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:36,160 Speaker 1: the bank loan sector, because they adjust the durations very short, 177 00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:39,559 Speaker 1: they adjust very rapidly, and for those companies which are 178 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:43,280 Speaker 1: basically junk companies UM, their cost of financing is going 179 00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:47,680 Speaker 1: to jump, and that there's one reason we're not big 180 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 1: fans of bank loans right now. I think it will 181 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: also hit the low end of the high yield market, 182 00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 1: because you know, spreads have moved up a bit here, 183 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:57,439 Speaker 1: but they're probably gonna move up some more. We think 184 00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:00,480 Speaker 1: there's a high risk of recession, particularly of the goes 185 00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:03,640 Speaker 1: really hard and fast the way they're talking about, and 186 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:05,600 Speaker 1: that's not going to be good for the hyold market. 187 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:10,080 Speaker 1: What is the unexpected if the Fed moves seeps in 188 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 1: July or onward. Well, I think it does translate into 189 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:20,079 Speaker 1: the FX market. Obviously, if the Fed goes, that's built 190 00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 1: into the market, and I think a fair amount of 191 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:26,079 Speaker 1: tightening is built into the market. If the Loretto Master 192 00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:29,560 Speaker 1: gets her four percent next year, then I think that 193 00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 1: we're seeing an inverted yield curve. All else being equal, 194 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 1: would be very difficult with the economic indicators rolling over 195 00:10:37,080 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 1: to see yields move up from there, I think you've 196 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 1: seen inverted curve, and that translates when we look at 197 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 1: say the Japanese bond market and where the yen is 198 00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 1: and what's happening in Europe. That's going to translate into 199 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:55,920 Speaker 1: a pretty stiff global tightening cycle and that's when things break. Kathy, 200 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,439 Speaker 1: thank you, you wanted the best. I love hearing from you. 201 00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 1: Kathy Jones there to us. Thank you joint to get 202 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:12,560 Speaker 1: snabas founder and CEOM of ex Sante Data. You're let's 203 00:11:12,559 --> 00:11:15,800 Speaker 1: start here, President a Guard, Chairman Pal, Governor Baudi. What's 204 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: your number one question? Going into that a little bit 205 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: later this morning, I would say what matters more growth 206 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:26,719 Speaker 1: or inflation? Right? We had a totally different cycle than 207 00:11:26,720 --> 00:11:29,560 Speaker 1: we've seen for the last forty years, right, that even 208 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:34,440 Speaker 1: if we have recession fears, the central banks are a 209 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:37,240 Speaker 1: very very tricky spot, right because inflation is way above 210 00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:40,000 Speaker 1: target and they can really focus on growth as much 211 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:42,079 Speaker 1: as they've done in the past. And I think if 212 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:43,840 Speaker 1: you look at what's going on in the market, right, 213 00:11:44,520 --> 00:11:46,959 Speaker 1: we've we've clearly had the recession focused over the last 214 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:52,240 Speaker 1: couple of weeks, right. And nevertheless, BONDI bond deals are 215 00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:54,200 Speaker 1: close to the highs. Right. It used to be the 216 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:56,240 Speaker 1: case the lesson for the last four years was as 217 00:11:56,240 --> 00:11:58,720 Speaker 1: soon as there was any weakening in growth, you just 218 00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 1: had to close your eyes and by bonds. And this 219 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:04,840 Speaker 1: cycle is totally different, right, because it is an inflation 220 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 1: cycle as opposed to just still growth cycle. I look 221 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:10,920 Speaker 1: yand it's the path of inflation. And this will be 222 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 1: my question today to these bankers and it's a really 223 00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:17,079 Speaker 1: a steam panel to say at least folks, so I 224 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,880 Speaker 1: really pay attention to that. YenS to me, inflation is 225 00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:24,560 Speaker 1: by part and then there's an easy path down. Core 226 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: comes down, and then it gets way way more difficult. 227 00:12:29,040 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: Where do you perceive the level of inflation where it 228 00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:37,400 Speaker 1: really becomes heavy lifting for these central bankers. Yes, I 229 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 1: think we probably have a period where goods prices and 230 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:46,520 Speaker 1: commodity prices are gonna come down over the next year, 231 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:50,920 Speaker 1: and that really hasn't not much to do with central 232 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 1: bank policy, right. And then the question is if the 233 00:12:54,480 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 1: wages and the services prices stay elevated so that a 234 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,560 Speaker 1: drop in in those other prices don't really get the 235 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:07,600 Speaker 1: overall inflation numbers down that much, then the central banks 236 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:11,480 Speaker 1: are gonna do the heavy heavy lifting and really get tight. 237 00:13:12,040 --> 00:13:16,560 Speaker 1: Don't forget we're talking about the FED having overdone it. 238 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:21,880 Speaker 1: How many months have they actually been hiking? A couple 239 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:24,560 Speaker 1: of months? We're a couple of months in here, right 240 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,920 Speaker 1: and uh and and that's the discussion already, right. So 241 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 1: the real tricky bit will be if they have to 242 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:34,120 Speaker 1: go to free and then considering going to five, that's 243 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:37,320 Speaker 1: when then the pain on the economy will be well, 244 00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:40,320 Speaker 1: be severe right. Right now, we're really discussing about getting 245 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:43,760 Speaker 1: to neutralish a little bit above but not really tight. 246 00:13:44,559 --> 00:13:47,320 Speaker 1: It's not a volcal cycle yet, right, but that would 247 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:49,840 Speaker 1: come into play if the weights keep going, if the 248 00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:53,079 Speaker 1: services prices keep going, even beyond the point where the 249 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 1: supply issues has been fixed. Yeah, it's just real quickly 250 00:13:56,559 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: here to your point. Lauramester this morning in CenTra said, 251 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:03,600 Speaker 1: the FED is just at the beginning of raising rates, 252 00:14:03,840 --> 00:14:05,720 Speaker 1: and these rates going to three and a half percent 253 00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 1: by the end of this year and a little above 254 00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:13,640 Speaker 1: four percent next year. Has the market adequately priced at it, No, So, 255 00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:17,199 Speaker 1: so we were at the moment especially Yeah, last week 256 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: we got to an extreme point where the market is 257 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 1: actually pricing significant cuts in two thousand and twenty three, right, 258 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: so essentially priced that we're gonna have a nine month 259 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:30,880 Speaker 1: tightening cycle and then we're gonna start cutting, right. So 260 00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: obviously the hikes are up prices bigger than its normal 261 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:36,760 Speaker 1: for a cycle, right because we're talking about fifty and 262 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:40,960 Speaker 1: seventy based upon steps. But nevertheless, we were pricing hiking 263 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:43,600 Speaker 1: cycle that was going to be essentially a year and 264 00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:46,080 Speaker 1: then the cuts were going to start that I think 265 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:49,960 Speaker 1: is what's very questionable. Um, I think we're gonna have 266 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:52,440 Speaker 1: a situation where the services prices are going to be 267 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:55,400 Speaker 1: sticky and it's going to be very very hard for 268 00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 1: the FED to to switch to cutting mode. It might 269 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:00,400 Speaker 1: be the case that we're not gonna be talk about 270 00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 1: seventy five basis points forever. Maybe we're gonna go to 271 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:05,680 Speaker 1: a more slow pace of up tightening. Maybe we're gonna 272 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,200 Speaker 1: plateau at a high level of rights. But this notion 273 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:11,560 Speaker 1: that the FED is gonna flip from super hawkers to 274 00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:14,520 Speaker 1: getting ready to cut within a year, that I think 275 00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:17,720 Speaker 1: is too early. And I think we're gonna push that 276 00:15:17,760 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 1: out and and that's not priced yet, Ian Tilson, to 277 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 1: get your view on things, and so why it's a 278 00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 1: bit of reality check from human Extant tainst norfic that 279 00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 1: Greg Villier with us on the elections on what we learned, 280 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:35,200 Speaker 1: and I guess it was, no, it's not the first 281 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 1: Tuesday of June. We're late in June, and he was, 282 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 1: we had an election with some results, Greg, I want 283 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:43,720 Speaker 1: to go to what the Democrats need to do to 284 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:48,920 Speaker 1: not focus inside the Beltway and have a Democratic Party 285 00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:53,680 Speaker 1: strategy across this nation. Kate Zernk in The New York 286 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:58,400 Speaker 1: Times destroyed the Democrats this weekend, saying they've simply failed 287 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:03,320 Speaker 1: to go across the nation an organization. Yeah, you would 288 00:16:03,320 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 1: think they'd be doing a lot better time on so 289 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:08,160 Speaker 1: many issues. I think that there is a need for 290 00:16:08,240 --> 00:16:12,200 Speaker 1: something more unified. Maybe the abortion issue will finally get 291 00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 1: the party together. It's given them a catalyst. But you 292 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:20,120 Speaker 1: and she and her piece are right. It's there's a 293 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:23,800 Speaker 1: lack of unity and strategy. A single sentence in your 294 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:27,760 Speaker 1: note this morning on the governor of California. What does 295 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: good Mr Newsom need to do well? I think he's running. 296 00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:34,120 Speaker 1: He's starting to run some ads. I think he's making 297 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:37,760 Speaker 1: noise like he may run. You know, everybody's frozen in 298 00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 1: place right now because of Joe Biden. If if Biden 299 00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: announces he's going to seek a second term, which I doubt, 300 00:16:44,920 --> 00:16:47,480 Speaker 1: but if he does, that changes everything. If he doesn't, 301 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 1: I think Newsome runs, and believe it or not, don't 302 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:53,280 Speaker 1: shoot the messenger here. I think Hillary Clinton may give 303 00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:56,400 Speaker 1: thought to one last run. Wait what say that one 304 00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:01,040 Speaker 1: more time? Greg? Yes, I can't let that. Yeah, I 305 00:17:01,080 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 1: mean I do. There's been a lot of speculation in 306 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:06,800 Speaker 1: the last few days that if Biden doesn't run and 307 00:17:06,880 --> 00:17:10,080 Speaker 1: the Democrats don't have any clear favorite, that she might 308 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,080 Speaker 1: hop into the RACI seventy four that makes her, you know, 309 00:17:13,160 --> 00:17:16,800 Speaker 1: fairly young by today's standards, But I do I don't 310 00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:21,320 Speaker 1: rule out one last run by her if Biden doesn't run. Well, 311 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:23,919 Speaker 1: there's a lot to go on that particular line of 312 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,320 Speaker 1: questioning Greg But I do want to go back to 313 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:29,920 Speaker 1: the task at hand for all legislators right now, which 314 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 1: is trying to deal with inflation, which is the primary 315 00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 1: concern for a lot of investors, and social issues creeping 316 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 1: up in terms of priorities for some voters. But is 317 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:43,200 Speaker 1: there any chance that this Congress could really take action 318 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:46,120 Speaker 1: in a material way from a legislative stance in terms 319 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 1: of financing different kinds of programs or offsetting some of 320 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 1: the inflationary pressures given the lack of unity, and given 321 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:56,640 Speaker 1: the polarization that you're just talking about, Logically, you would 322 00:17:56,680 --> 00:17:59,600 Speaker 1: think the answer would be yes, they will. But logic 323 00:17:59,640 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 1: does not dominate Washington. And I think that while there's 324 00:18:02,840 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: a lot of talk about terrorists, a lot of talk 325 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,600 Speaker 1: about other programs that might help a little at the 326 00:18:09,640 --> 00:18:13,400 Speaker 1: margin on inflation. I don't see it. I think I frankly, 327 00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:16,119 Speaker 1: I think Ukraine is more important. And as long as 328 00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:20,440 Speaker 1: this war continues, that we're gonna have high energy prices 329 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,439 Speaker 1: at high food prices. I think that's the bigger factor. 330 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:26,000 Speaker 1: So Greg, if that does spur some sort of recession, 331 00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:31,800 Speaker 1: where is the fiscal impulse to respond, typically doing the 332 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:35,199 Speaker 1: exact wrong thing at the exact wrong time, You're going 333 00:18:35,240 --> 00:18:38,200 Speaker 1: to see Congress now get very frugal, not a lot 334 00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:42,000 Speaker 1: of spending Republicans will take the house. They're not. They 335 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 1: don't want to spend a lot of money. So just 336 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 1: when you have monetary policy tightening, you're going to see 337 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:51,000 Speaker 1: fiscal policy tightening as well. Gregg frame it for me. 338 00:18:51,160 --> 00:18:56,360 Speaker 1: A Sunday evening the end of March, Lyndon Baines Johnson, 339 00:18:56,600 --> 00:19:01,240 Speaker 1: overwhelmed by Vietnam, among others, said I not gonna run again. 340 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 1: I was sitting on the couch, remember clear as a 341 00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 1: belle a nation stunt. What is Biden waiting for or 342 00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:11,960 Speaker 1: does he have to wait for March of two thousand 343 00:19:12,080 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 1: twenty four. Well, the March that you refer to with 344 00:19:16,520 --> 00:19:19,920 Speaker 1: LBJ occurs on November eight here in the US. That's 345 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:22,760 Speaker 1: the election, and if the House flips, which I still 346 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 1: think is likely. Said it is a tougher call now 347 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:28,880 Speaker 1: because of abortion, but you know that could slip as well. 348 00:19:29,320 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: I think that would be the catalyst to push Biden out. 349 00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:36,480 Speaker 1: It's not just his age, it's his polling numbers and 350 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:39,239 Speaker 1: the elections on November eight, Greg, we've got to talk 351 00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:42,720 Speaker 1: about the other ticket, just briefly. That testament yesterday. I 352 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:45,960 Speaker 1: wouldn't you a view on this. Does that change the 353 00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:48,440 Speaker 1: support that the former president gets and does that open 354 00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:51,080 Speaker 1: the door a little bit wider for the governor from Florida. 355 00:19:52,080 --> 00:19:56,240 Speaker 1: John June of the year two will be remembered as 356 00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:59,800 Speaker 1: the month that pretty much finished off Donald Trump. It's 357 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:02,600 Speaker 1: it's not just that he may get indicted. It's not 358 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:05,520 Speaker 1: just that he has lost some altitude in the party. 359 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:07,760 Speaker 1: It's the near fact that more and more of his 360 00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:12,400 Speaker 1: own supporters are telling poll takers that one terms enough, 361 00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:15,800 Speaker 1: we really are not excited about him running again. And 362 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 1: that's his own supporters who are now starting to say 363 00:20:18,560 --> 00:20:20,680 Speaker 1: that that's the one to watch for show. Greg. Thank you, 364 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:26,480 Speaker 1: Jeff Investments. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. 365 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:30,160 Speaker 1: Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern 366 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:34,440 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from 367 00:20:34,480 --> 00:20:39,760 Speaker 1: six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 368 00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:44,919 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on 369 00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:48,840 Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on 370 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:53,040 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg